Peanut Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Amendment to Primary Peanut-Producing States and Adjustment of Membership, 77368-77370 [2013-30416]

Download as PDF 77368 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules the Conduct of Referenda in Connection With Marketing Orders for Fruits, Vegetables, and Nuts Pursuant to the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as Amended’’ (7 CFR 900.400– 900.407). Ballots will be mailed to all growers of record and may also be obtained from the referendum agents or from their appointees. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981 Almonds, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. Dated: December 17, 2013. Rex A. Barnes, Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2013–30391 Filed 12–20–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 1216 [Document Number AMS–FV–13–0042] Peanut Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Amendment to Primary Peanut-Producing States and Adjustment of Membership Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: This proposal invites comments on adding the State of Arkansas as a primary peanut-producing State under the Peanut Promotion, Research, and Information Order (Order). The Order is administered by the National Peanut Board (Board) with oversight by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Under the Order, primary peanut-producing States must maintain a 3-year average production of at least 10,000 tons of peanuts. Arkansas’s peanut production meets this requirement. Primary peanutproducing States also have a seat on the Board, and this proposal would also add a seat on the Board for the State of Arkansas. The Board recommended this action to ensure that the Board’s representation reflects changes in the geographical distribution of the production of peanuts. DATES: Comments must be received by January 22, 2014. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this proposal. Comments may be submitted on the Internet at: tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:16 Dec 20, 2013 Jkt 232001 http://www.regulations.gov or to the Promotion and Economics Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room 1406–S, Stop 0244, Washington, DC 20250–0244; facsimile: (202) 205–2800. All comments should reference the document number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be made available for public inspection, including name and address, if provided, in the above office during regular business hours or it can be viewed at http://www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanette Palmer, Marketing Specialist, Promotion and Economics Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, Stop 0244, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room 1406–S, Washington, DC 20250–0244; telephone: (202) 720–9915; facsimile: (202) 205– 2800; or electronic mail: Jeanette.Palmer@ams.usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule is issued under the Order (7 CFR part 1216). The Order is authorized under the Commodity Promotion, Research, and Information Act of 1996 (1996 Act)(7 U.S.C. 7411– 7425). Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563 Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules and promoting flexibility. This action has been designated as a ‘‘non-significant regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has waived the review process. Executive Order 13175 This action has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments. The review reveals that this regulation would not have substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and would not have significant Tribal implications. Executive Order 12988 This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. Section 524 of the 1996 Act provides that it shall not affect or preempt any other Federal or State law authorizing promotion or research relating to an agricultural commodity. Under section 519 of the 1996 Act, a person subject to an order may file a written petition with USDA stating that an order, any provision of an order, or any obligation imposed in connection with an order, is not established in accordance with the law, and request a modification of an order or an exemption from an order. Any petition filed challenging an order, any provision of an order, or any obligation imposed in connection with an order, shall be filed within two years after the effective date of an order, provision, or obligation subject to challenge in the petition. The petitioner will have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. Thereafter, USDA will issue a ruling on the petition. The 1996 Act provides that the district court of the United States for any district in which the petitioner resides or conducts business shall have the jurisdiction to review a final ruling on the petition, if the petitioner files a complaint for that purpose not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of USDA’s final ruling. Background This proposed rule invites comments on adding the State of Arkansas as a primary peanut-producing State under the Order. The Order is administered by the Board with oversight by USDA. This proposal would also add a seat on the Board for the State of Arkansas. Under the Order, primary peanut-producing States must maintain a 3-year average production of at least 10,000 tons of peanuts. Arkansas’s peanut production meets this requirement. Primary peanutproducing States also have a seat on the Board. This action would ensure that the Board’s representation reflects changes in the geographical distribution of the production of peanuts covered under the Order. The Order became effective on July 30, 1999. Under the Order, the Board administers a nationally-coordinated program of promotion, research, and information designed to strengthen the position of peanuts in the market place and to develop, maintain, and expand the demand for peanuts in the United States. Under the program, all peanut producers pay an assessment of one percent of the total value of all farmers’ stock peanuts. The assessments are remitted to the Board by handlers and, for peanuts under loan, by the Commodity Credit Corporation. E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM 23DEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS The Order distinguishes between the terms ‘‘minor peanut-producing states’’ and ‘‘major peanut-producing states’’ for purposes of Board representation and voting at meetings. Section 1216.21 defines primary peanut-producing States as Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia. These States must maintain a 3-year average production of at least 10,000 tons of peanuts. All other peanut-producing States are defined as minor peanut-producing States, pursuant to section 1217.15. As specified in section 1216.40(a), the Board is composed of 11 producer members and their alternates: One member and alternate from each primary peanut-producing State, and one at-large member and alternate collectively from the minor peanutproducing States. The members and alternates are nominated by producers or producer groups. Pursuant to section 1216.40(b) of the Order, at least once in each five-year period, the Board must review the geographical distribution of peanuts in the United States and make a recommendation to the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) to continue without change or whether changes should be made in the number of representatives on the Board to reflect changes in the geographical distribution of the production of peanuts. Board Recommendation As required by the Order, the Board met on April 9–10, 2013, and reviewed the geographical distribution of peanuts. According to data from the USDA’s Federal State Inspection Service, for the years 2010, 2011, and 2012, 1,357, 6,092, and 38,866 tons of peanuts were inspected in Arkansas, respectively. Based on this data, the 3-year average annual peanut production for Arkansas totals 15,438 tons per year (46,315 divided by 3) which exceeds the requirement set in the Order of maintaining a 3-year rolling average of 10,000 tons per year to become a major peanut-producing State. (Data from USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) was not available at the time of the Board’s review because Arkansas had not produced enough peanuts annually to be recorded. NASS plans to record peanut production for Arkansas in the near future.) Based on Federal State Inspection Service data, the Board voted, with one member opposed, to add Arkansas as a primary peanut-producing State under the Order. The member opposed expressed concern that Arkansas did not produce 10,000 tons per year for three VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:16 Dec 20, 2013 Jkt 232001 consecutive years, similar to when the Order was amended to add Mississippi as a primary peanut-producing State (73 FR 39214; July 9, 2008). However, the Order does not require that a State produce 10,000 tons per year for three consecutive years to be a primary peanut-producing State. In addition, USDA’s Federal State Inspection Service summary for 2013 tonnage reports Arkansas peanut production to date at 11,121 tons. This shows that Arkansas peanut production has maintained its production levels above 10,000 tons. This action would also add a producer member and alternate on the Board from the State of Arkansas. These changes would help ensure that the Board’s representation reflect changes in the geographical distribution of the production of peanuts. Accordingly, this proposed rule would amend sections 1216.15 and 1216.21 of the Order to classify the State of Arkansas as a primary peanut-producing State. This proposal would also revise sections 1216.40(a) and 1216.40 (a)(1) of the Order to specify that the Board would be composed of 12 peanut producer members and their alternates rather than 11. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601– 612), AMS is required to examine the impact of the proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be disproportionately burdened. The Small Business Administration (SBA) defines, in 13 CFR Part 121, small agricultural producers as those having annual receipts of no more than $750,000 and small agricultural service firms (handlers) as those having annual receipts of no more than $7.0 million. According to the Board, there were approximately 9,208 producers and 29 handlers of peanuts who were subject to the program in 2012. Most producers would be classified as small businesses under the criteria established by the SBA. USDA’s NASS reports that the farm value of the peanuts produced in the top 10 States in the years 2010, 2011, and 2012 was $939 million, $1.169 billion, and $2.309 billion, respectively; the 3-year average crop value was $1.472 billion. With a 2012 crop value of $2.309 billion, average peanut sales per producer were approximately $251,000. With a 2010– PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 77369 2012 average crop value of $1.472 billion, average peanut sales per producer was approximately $160,000. The average peanut crop value per handler for 2010–2012 ranged from about $32 million to $80 million. This is many times larger than the $7 million SBA threshold and is thus an indication that most of the handlers would not be classified as small businesses. The quantity of U.S. peanut production from the 10 major peanutproducing States for 2010, 2011, and 2012 was 4.157 billion pounds, 3.659 billion pounds, and 6.741 billion pounds, respectively; the 3-year average crop quantity was 4.852 billion pounds. NASS reports that Georgia was the largest producer (48 percent of the 3year average quantity), followed by Alabama (13 percent), Florida (12 percent), Texas (9 percent), North Carolina (7 percent), South Carolina (6 percent), Mississippi (2 percent), Virginia (1 percent), Oklahoma (1 percent) and New Mexico (less than 1 percent). According to the 2007 Census of Agriculture, small amounts of peanuts were also grown in six other States. If the number of peanut producers (9,208) is divided into the total U.S. production for 2012 (6.741 billion), the resulting average peanut production per producer is approximately 732,000 pounds. If divided by the 3-year average production for 2010–2012 (4.852 billion), the resulting average is approximately 527,000 pounds per producer. This proposal would amend sections 1216.15 and 1216.21 of the Order to classify the State of Arkansas as a primary peanut-producing State. The Order is administered by the Board with oversight by USDA. This proposal would also amend section 1216.40(a)(1) to add a seat on the Board for the State of Arkansas. Under the Order, primary peanut-producing States must maintain a 3-year average production of at least 10,000 tons of peanuts. Arkansas’s peanut production meets this requirement. Primary peanut-producing States also have a seat on the Board. This action would ensure that the Board’s representation reflects changes in the geographical distribution of the production of peanuts covered under the Order. This action is authorized under section 1216.40(b) of the Order and Section 515(b)(3) of the 1996 Act. Regarding the economic impact of this proposed rule on affected entities, this action would impose no costs on producers and handlers. The changes would define the State of Arkansas as a primary peanut-producing State based on recent production data and add a E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM 23DEP1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 77370 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules seat on the Board for the State of Arkansas. With regard to alternatives, the Board reviewed the peanut distribution for all the minor peanut-producing States, and determined that Arkansas was the only current minor State that met the Order’s requirement for a 3-year average peanut production of at least 10,000 tons. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the background form, which represents the information collection and recordkeeping requirements that may be imposed by this proposed rule, was previously approved under OMB control number 0505–0001. Adding a producer member and alternate member representing the State of Arkansas for the Board means that four additional producers would be required to submit background forms to USDA in order to be considered for appointment to the Board. Four producers would be affected because two names must be submitted to the Secretary for consideration for each position on the Board (two members and two alternates). The public reporting burden is estimated to increase by an average 0.5 hours per response for each of the four producers. This additional burden would be included in the existing information collections approved for use under OMB control number 0505–0001. The estimated annual cost of providing the information by the four producers would be $66.00 or $16.50 per producer. However, serving on the Board is optional, and the burden of submitting the background form would be offset by the benefits of serving on the Board. As with all Federal promotion programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. Finally, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule. AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. In regards to outreach efforts, the Board discussed Arkansas peanut production level at its November 27–30, 2012, meeting. The Board notified the major peanut-producing States (Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, Virginia, Oklahoma, and New Mexico) of Arkansas production numbers by VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:04 Dec 20, 2013 Jkt 232001 disseminating information through the Board’s weekly newsletter which is titled News in a Nutshell. The Board also sent out notification about Arkansas’ increased production numbers to the peanut industry through its Peanut Quarterly newsletter. In addition, Arkansas’s increased production numbers in the year 2012 to present date were widely published in trade publications. The Board met in April 2013 and recommended adding the State of Arkansas as a primary peanut-producing State. All of the Board’s meetings are open to the public and interested persons are invited to participate and express their views. We have performed this initial RFA regarding the impact of this proposed action on small entities and we invite comments concerning potential effects of this action on small businesses. While this proposed rule set forth below has not yet received the approval of USDA, it has been determined that it is consistent with and would effectuate the purposes of the 1996 Act. A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposal. Thirty days is deemed appropriate so that the proposed amendments, if adopted, may be implemented for the next nomination process which begins early in spring 2014. If this process is not in effect by spring 2014, then Arkansas would not have representation on the Board until the year 2015. All written comments received in response to this proposed rule will be considered prior to finalizing this action. Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia. ■ 3. Section 1216.21 is revised to read as follows: § 1216.21 states. Primary peanut-producing Primary peanut-producing states means Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia, Provided, these states maintain a 3-year average production of at least 10,000 tons of peanuts. ■ 4. Section 1216.40, paragraph (a) introductory text and (a)(1) are revised to read as follows: § 1216.40 Establishment and membership. (a) Establishment of a National Peanut Board. There is hereby established a National Peanut Board, hereinafter called the Board, composed of no more than 12 peanut producers and alternates, appointed by the Secretary from nominations as follows: (1) Eleven members and alternates. One member and one alternate shall be appointed from each primary peanutproducing state, who are producers and whose nominations have been submitted by certified peanut producer organizations within a primary peanutproducing state. * * * * * Dated: December 17, 2013. Rex A. Barnes, Associate Administrator. [FR Doc. 2013–30416 Filed 12–20–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1216 Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Consumer information, Marketing agreements, Peanut promotion, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 1216 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 1216—PEANUT PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION ORDER 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1216 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425; 7 U.S.C. 7401. 2. Section 1216.15 is revised to read as follows: ■ § 1216.15 Minor peanut-producing states. Minor peanut-producing states means all peanut-producing states with the exception of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, New PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 9 CFR Part 94 [Docket No. APHIS–2009–0017] RIN 0579–AD41 Importation of Beef From a Region in Brazil Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: We are proposing to amend the regulations governing the importation of certain animals, meat, and other animal products by allowing, under certain conditions, the importation of fresh (chilled or frozen) beef from a region in Brazil (the States of Bahia, Distrito Federal, Espirito Santo, Goias, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM 23DEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 246 (Monday, December 23, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77368-77370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30416]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 1216

[Document Number AMS-FV-13-0042]


Peanut Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Amendment to 
Primary Peanut-Producing States and Adjustment of Membership

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This proposal invites comments on adding the State of Arkansas 
as a primary peanut-producing State under the Peanut Promotion, 
Research, and Information Order (Order). The Order is administered by 
the National Peanut Board (Board) with oversight by the U.S. Department 
of Agriculture (USDA). Under the Order, primary peanut-producing States 
must maintain a 3-year average production of at least 10,000 tons of 
peanuts. Arkansas's peanut production meets this requirement. Primary 
peanut-producing States also have a seat on the Board, and this 
proposal would also add a seat on the Board for the State of Arkansas. 
The Board recommended this action to ensure that the Board's 
representation reflects changes in the geographical distribution of the 
production of peanuts.

DATES: Comments must be received by January 22, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
concerning this proposal. Comments may be submitted on the Internet at: 
http://www.regulations.gov or to the Promotion and Economics Division, 
Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., 
Room 1406-S, Stop 0244, Washington, DC 20250-0244; facsimile: (202) 
205-2800. All comments should reference the document number and the 
date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be 
made available for public inspection, including name and address, if 
provided, in the above office during regular business hours or it can 
be viewed at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanette Palmer, Marketing Specialist, 
Promotion and Economics Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, 
USDA, Stop 0244, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room 1406-S, Washington, 
DC 20250-0244; telephone: (202) 720-9915; facsimile: (202) 205-2800; or 
electronic mail: Jeanette.Palmer@ams.usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule is issued under the Order 
(7 CFR part 1216). The Order is authorized under the Commodity 
Promotion, Research, and Information Act of 1996 (1996 Act)(7 U.S.C. 
7411-7425).

Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, distributive impacts and equity). Executive 
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules and promoting flexibility. 
This action has been designated as a ``non-significant regulatory 
action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has waived the review process.

Executive Order 13175

    This action has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements 
of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian 
Tribal Governments. The review reveals that this regulation would not 
have substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and would not 
have significant Tribal implications.

Executive Order 12988

    This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. Section 
524 of the 1996 Act provides that it shall not affect or preempt any 
other Federal or State law authorizing promotion or research relating 
to an agricultural commodity.
    Under section 519 of the 1996 Act, a person subject to an order may 
file a written petition with USDA stating that an order, any provision 
of an order, or any obligation imposed in connection with an order, is 
not established in accordance with the law, and request a modification 
of an order or an exemption from an order. Any petition filed 
challenging an order, any provision of an order, or any obligation 
imposed in connection with an order, shall be filed within two years 
after the effective date of an order, provision, or obligation subject 
to challenge in the petition. The petitioner will have the opportunity 
for a hearing on the petition. Thereafter, USDA will issue a ruling on 
the petition. The 1996 Act provides that the district court of the 
United States for any district in which the petitioner resides or 
conducts business shall have the jurisdiction to review a final ruling 
on the petition, if the petitioner files a complaint for that purpose 
not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of USDA's final 
ruling.

Background

    This proposed rule invites comments on adding the State of Arkansas 
as a primary peanut-producing State under the Order. The Order is 
administered by the Board with oversight by USDA. This proposal would 
also add a seat on the Board for the State of Arkansas. Under the 
Order, primary peanut-producing States must maintain a 3-year average 
production of at least 10,000 tons of peanuts. Arkansas's peanut 
production meets this requirement. Primary peanut-producing States also 
have a seat on the Board. This action would ensure that the Board's 
representation reflects changes in the geographical distribution of the 
production of peanuts covered under the Order.
    The Order became effective on July 30, 1999. Under the Order, the 
Board administers a nationally-coordinated program of promotion, 
research, and information designed to strengthen the position of 
peanuts in the market place and to develop, maintain, and expand the 
demand for peanuts in the United States. Under the program, all peanut 
producers pay an assessment of one percent of the total value of all 
farmers' stock peanuts. The assessments are remitted to the Board by 
handlers and, for peanuts under loan, by the Commodity Credit 
Corporation.

[[Page 77369]]

    The Order distinguishes between the terms ``minor peanut-producing 
states'' and ``major peanut-producing states'' for purposes of Board 
representation and voting at meetings. Section 1216.21 defines primary 
peanut-producing States as Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, New 
Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia. 
These States must maintain a 3-year average production of at least 
10,000 tons of peanuts. All other peanut-producing States are defined 
as minor peanut-producing States, pursuant to section 1217.15.
    As specified in section 1216.40(a), the Board is composed of 11 
producer members and their alternates: One member and alternate from 
each primary peanut-producing State, and one at-large member and 
alternate collectively from the minor peanut-producing States. The 
members and alternates are nominated by producers or producer groups.
    Pursuant to section 1216.40(b) of the Order, at least once in each 
five-year period, the Board must review the geographical distribution 
of peanuts in the United States and make a recommendation to the 
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) to continue without change or 
whether changes should be made in the number of representatives on the 
Board to reflect changes in the geographical distribution of the 
production of peanuts.

Board Recommendation

    As required by the Order, the Board met on April 9-10, 2013, and 
reviewed the geographical distribution of peanuts. According to data 
from the USDA's Federal State Inspection Service, for the years 2010, 
2011, and 2012, 1,357, 6,092, and 38,866 tons of peanuts were inspected 
in Arkansas, respectively. Based on this data, the 3-year average 
annual peanut production for Arkansas totals 15,438 tons per year 
(46,315 divided by 3) which exceeds the requirement set in the Order of 
maintaining a 3-year rolling average of 10,000 tons per year to become 
a major peanut-producing State. (Data from USDA's National Agricultural 
Statistics Service (NASS) was not available at the time of the Board's 
review because Arkansas had not produced enough peanuts annually to be 
recorded. NASS plans to record peanut production for Arkansas in the 
near future.)
    Based on Federal State Inspection Service data, the Board voted, 
with one member opposed, to add Arkansas as a primary peanut-producing 
State under the Order. The member opposed expressed concern that 
Arkansas did not produce 10,000 tons per year for three consecutive 
years, similar to when the Order was amended to add Mississippi as a 
primary peanut-producing State (73 FR 39214; July 9, 2008). However, 
the Order does not require that a State produce 10,000 tons per year 
for three consecutive years to be a primary peanut-producing State. In 
addition, USDA's Federal State Inspection Service summary for 2013 
tonnage reports Arkansas peanut production to date at 11,121 tons. This 
shows that Arkansas peanut production has maintained its production 
levels above 10,000 tons. This action would also add a producer member 
and alternate on the Board from the State of Arkansas.
    These changes would help ensure that the Board's representation 
reflect changes in the geographical distribution of the production of 
peanuts. Accordingly, this proposed rule would amend sections 1216.15 
and 1216.21 of the Order to classify the State of Arkansas as a primary 
peanut-producing State. This proposal would also revise sections 
1216.40(a) and 1216.40 (a)(1) of the Order to specify that the Board 
would be composed of 12 peanut producer members and their alternates 
rather than 11.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis

    In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 
601-612), AMS is required to examine the impact of the proposed rule on 
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has considered the economic impact of 
this action on small entities.
    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be 
disproportionately burdened. The Small Business Administration (SBA) 
defines, in 13 CFR Part 121, small agricultural producers as those 
having annual receipts of no more than $750,000 and small agricultural 
service firms (handlers) as those having annual receipts of no more 
than $7.0 million.
    According to the Board, there were approximately 9,208 producers 
and 29 handlers of peanuts who were subject to the program in 2012.
    Most producers would be classified as small businesses under the 
criteria established by the SBA. USDA's NASS reports that the farm 
value of the peanuts produced in the top 10 States in the years 2010, 
2011, and 2012 was $939 million, $1.169 billion, and $2.309 billion, 
respectively; the 3-year average crop value was $1.472 billion. With a 
2012 crop value of $2.309 billion, average peanut sales per producer 
were approximately $251,000. With a 2010-2012 average crop value of 
$1.472 billion, average peanut sales per producer was approximately 
$160,000.
    The average peanut crop value per handler for 2010-2012 ranged from 
about $32 million to $80 million. This is many times larger than the $7 
million SBA threshold and is thus an indication that most of the 
handlers would not be classified as small businesses.
    The quantity of U.S. peanut production from the 10 major peanut-
producing States for 2010, 2011, and 2012 was 4.157 billion pounds, 
3.659 billion pounds, and 6.741 billion pounds, respectively; the 3-
year average crop quantity was 4.852 billion pounds. NASS reports that 
Georgia was the largest producer (48 percent of the 3-year average 
quantity), followed by Alabama (13 percent), Florida (12 percent), 
Texas (9 percent), North Carolina (7 percent), South Carolina (6 
percent), Mississippi (2 percent), Virginia (1 percent), Oklahoma (1 
percent) and New Mexico (less than 1 percent). According to the 2007 
Census of Agriculture, small amounts of peanuts were also grown in six 
other States.
    If the number of peanut producers (9,208) is divided into the total 
U.S. production for 2012 (6.741 billion), the resulting average peanut 
production per producer is approximately 732,000 pounds. If divided by 
the 3-year average production for 2010-2012 (4.852 billion), the 
resulting average is approximately 527,000 pounds per producer.
    This proposal would amend sections 1216.15 and 1216.21 of the Order 
to classify the State of Arkansas as a primary peanut-producing State. 
The Order is administered by the Board with oversight by USDA. This 
proposal would also amend section 1216.40(a)(1) to add a seat on the 
Board for the State of Arkansas. Under the Order, primary peanut-
producing States must maintain a 3-year average production of at least 
10,000 tons of peanuts. Arkansas's peanut production meets this 
requirement. Primary peanut-producing States also have a seat on the 
Board. This action would ensure that the Board's representation 
reflects changes in the geographical distribution of the production of 
peanuts covered under the Order. This action is authorized under 
section 1216.40(b) of the Order and Section 515(b)(3) of the 1996 Act.
    Regarding the economic impact of this proposed rule on affected 
entities, this action would impose no costs on producers and handlers. 
The changes would define the State of Arkansas as a primary peanut-
producing State based on recent production data and add a

[[Page 77370]]

seat on the Board for the State of Arkansas.
    With regard to alternatives, the Board reviewed the peanut 
distribution for all the minor peanut-producing States, and determined 
that Arkansas was the only current minor State that met the Order's 
requirement for a 3-year average peanut production of at least 10,000 
tons.
    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), the background form, which represents the information 
collection and recordkeeping requirements that may be imposed by this 
proposed rule, was previously approved under OMB control number 0505-
0001.
    Adding a producer member and alternate member representing the 
State of Arkansas for the Board means that four additional producers 
would be required to submit background forms to USDA in order to be 
considered for appointment to the Board. Four producers would be 
affected because two names must be submitted to the Secretary for 
consideration for each position on the Board (two members and two 
alternates). The public reporting burden is estimated to increase by an 
average 0.5 hours per response for each of the four producers. This 
additional burden would be included in the existing information 
collections approved for use under OMB control number 0505-0001. The 
estimated annual cost of providing the information by the four 
producers would be $66.00 or $16.50 per producer. However, serving on 
the Board is optional, and the burden of submitting the background form 
would be offset by the benefits of serving on the Board.
    As with all Federal promotion programs, reports and forms are 
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and 
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. Finally, USDA has 
not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or 
conflict with this proposed rule.
    AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote 
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide 
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information 
and services, and for other purposes.
    In regards to outreach efforts, the Board discussed Arkansas peanut 
production level at its November 27-30, 2012, meeting. The Board 
notified the major peanut-producing States (Georgia, Alabama, Florida, 
Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, Virginia, Oklahoma, 
and New Mexico) of Arkansas production numbers by disseminating 
information through the Board's weekly newsletter which is titled News 
in a Nutshell. The Board also sent out notification about Arkansas' 
increased production numbers to the peanut industry through its Peanut 
Quarterly newsletter. In addition, Arkansas's increased production 
numbers in the year 2012 to present date were widely published in trade 
publications. The Board met in April 2013 and recommended adding the 
State of Arkansas as a primary peanut-producing State. All of the 
Board's meetings are open to the public and interested persons are 
invited to participate and express their views.
    We have performed this initial RFA regarding the impact of this 
proposed action on small entities and we invite comments concerning 
potential effects of this action on small businesses.
    While this proposed rule set forth below has not yet received the 
approval of USDA, it has been determined that it is consistent with and 
would effectuate the purposes of the 1996 Act.
    A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to 
respond to this proposal. Thirty days is deemed appropriate so that the 
proposed amendments, if adopted, may be implemented for the next 
nomination process which begins early in spring 2014. If this process 
is not in effect by spring 2014, then Arkansas would not have 
representation on the Board until the year 2015. All written comments 
received in response to this proposed rule will be considered prior to 
finalizing this action.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1216

    Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Consumer 
information, Marketing agreements, Peanut promotion, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 1216 is 
proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 1216--PEANUT PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION ORDER

0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1216 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411-7425; 7 U.S.C. 7401.

0
2. Section 1216.15 is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  1216.15  Minor peanut-producing states.

    Minor peanut-producing states means all peanut-producing states 
with the exception of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, 
New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, and 
Virginia.
0
3. Section 1216.21 is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  1216.21  Primary peanut-producing states.

    Primary peanut-producing states means Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, 
Georgia, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South 
Carolina, Texas, and Virginia, Provided, these states maintain a 3-year 
average production of at least 10,000 tons of peanuts.
0
4. Section 1216.40, paragraph (a) introductory text and (a)(1) are 
revised to read as follows:


Sec.  1216.40  Establishment and membership.

    (a) Establishment of a National Peanut Board. There is hereby 
established a National Peanut Board, hereinafter called the Board, 
composed of no more than 12 peanut producers and alternates, appointed 
by the Secretary from nominations as follows:
    (1) Eleven members and alternates. One member and one alternate 
shall be appointed from each primary peanut-producing state, who are 
producers and whose nominations have been submitted by certified peanut 
producer organizations within a primary peanut-producing state.
* * * * *

    Dated: December 17, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-30416 Filed 12-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P