Almonds Grown in California; Continuance Referendum, 77367-77368 [2013-30391]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
impact on the rights, roles and
responsibilities of State, local, or tribal
governments.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 894
Administrative practice and
procedure, Employee benefit plans,
Government employees, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Retirement.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Katherine Archuleta,
Director.
Accordingly, OPM proposes to amend
5 CFR part 894 as follows:
experienced a QLE. QLEs for dental and
vision coverage are described in this
part 894 and 5 CFR part 892 allowing
enrollment in FEHB for those making
pre-tax payment of FEHB premiums.
■ 5. Section 894.508 is amended by
revising paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 894.508 When may I increase my type of
enrollment?
*
*
*
*
*
(e) QLEs for dental and vision
coverage are described in this part 894
and 5 CFR part 892 allowing enrollment
in FEHB for those making pre-tax
payment of FEHB premiums.
[FR Doc. 2013–30413 Filed 12–20–13; 8:45 am]
PART 894—FEDERAL EMPLOYEE
DENTAL AND VISION PROGRAM
BILLING CODE 6325–63–P
■
1. The authority citation for part 894
continues to read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8962; 5 U.S.C. 8992;
subpart C also issued under sec. 1 of Pub. L.
110–279, 122 Stat. 2604.
Agricultural Marketing Service
Subpart A—Administration and
General Provisions
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–13–0082; FV14–981–1
CR]
2. Section 894.101 is amended by
removing the definition of QLE and
adding in its place a definition of QLE
qualifying life event to read as follows:
Almonds Grown in California;
Continuance Referendum
■
§ 894.101
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
QLE qualifying life event means an
event in this part 894 that permits an
enrollment change and also includes all
applicable QLEs defined in 5 CFR part
892 allowing enrollment in FEHB for
those making pre-tax payment of FEHB
premiums.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart E—Enrolling and Changing
Enrollment
3. Section 894.502 is amended as
follows:
■
§ 894.502 What are the Qualifying Life
Events (QLEs) that allow me to enroll?
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
QLEs allowing enrollment in FEDVIP
include the QLEs described in this part
894 and include applicable QLEs in 5
CFR part 892 allowing enrollment in
FEHB for those making pre-tax payment
of FEHB premiums.
■ 4. Section 894.507 is amended by
adding new paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
§ 894.507 After I’m enrolled, may I change
from one dental or vision plan or plan
option to another?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Outside of open season, you may
change from one dental and/or vision
plan to another plan or one plan option
to another option if you have
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Dec 20, 2013
Jkt 232001
7 CFR Part 981
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Referendum order.
AGENCY:
This document directs that a
referendum be conducted among
eligible growers of almonds in
California to determine whether they
favor continuance of the marketing
order that regulates the handling of
almonds grown in California.
DATES: The referendum will be
conducted from February 18 through
March 7, 2014. To vote in this
referendum, growers must have
produced almonds in California during
the period of August 1, 2012, through
July 31, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the marketing
order may be obtained from the
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
2202 Monterey Street, Suite 102B,
Fresno, California, 93721–3129, or the
Office of the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division, Fruit
and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237, or
internet: regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria Stobbe, Marketing Specialist, or
Martin Engeler, Regional Director,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77367
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Maria.Stobbe@ams.usda.gov or
Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov,
respectively.
Pursuant
to Marketing Order No. 981 (7 CFR part
981), hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order,’’ and the applicable provisions
of the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act,’’ it is hereby directed that
a referendum be conducted to ascertain
whether continuance of the order is
favored by growers. The referendum
shall be conducted from February 18
through March 7, 2014, among eligible
California almond growers. Only current
growers that were also engaged in the
production of almonds in California
during the period of August 1, 2012,
through July 31, 2013, may participate
in the continuance referendum.
USDA has determined that
continuance referenda are an effective
means for determining whether growers
favor the continuation of marketing
order programs. USDA would consider
termination of the order if fewer than
two-thirds of the growers voting in the
referendum and growers of less than
two-thirds of the volume of California
almonds represented in the referendum
favor continuance. In evaluating the
merits of continuance versus
termination, USDA will consider the
results of the continuance referendum
and other relevant information
regarding operation of the order. USDA
will evaluate the order’s relative
benefits and disadvantages to growers,
handlers, and consumers to determine
whether continuing the order would
tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the ballot materials used in
the referendum herein ordered have
been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), under
OMB No. 0581–0178, Almonds Grown
in California. It has been estimated that
it will take an average of 10 minutes for
each of the approximately 6,400 growers
of California almonds to cast a ballot.
Participation is voluntary. Ballots
postmarked after March 7, 2014, will
not be included in the vote tabulation.
Martin Engeler and Maria Stobbe of
the California Marketing Field Office,
Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS,
USDA, are hereby designated as the
referendum agents of the Secretary of
Agriculture to conduct this referendum.
The procedure applicable to the
referendum shall be the ‘‘Procedure for
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
77368
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules
the Conduct of Referenda in Connection
With Marketing Orders for Fruits,
Vegetables, and Nuts Pursuant to the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as Amended’’ (7 CFR 900.400–
900.407).
Ballots will be mailed to all growers
of record and may also be obtained from
the referendum agents or from their
appointees.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements,
Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
Dated: December 17, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–30391 Filed 12–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1216
[Document Number AMS–FV–13–0042]
Peanut Promotion, Research, and
Information Order; Amendment to
Primary Peanut-Producing States and
Adjustment of Membership
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposal invites
comments on adding the State of
Arkansas as a primary peanut-producing
State under the Peanut Promotion,
Research, and Information Order
(Order). The Order is administered by
the National Peanut Board (Board) with
oversight by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA). Under the Order,
primary peanut-producing States must
maintain a 3-year average production of
at least 10,000 tons of peanuts.
Arkansas’s peanut production meets
this requirement. Primary peanutproducing States also have a seat on the
Board, and this proposal would also add
a seat on the Board for the State of
Arkansas. The Board recommended this
action to ensure that the Board’s
representation reflects changes in the
geographical distribution of the
production of peanuts.
DATES: Comments must be received by
January 22, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
may be submitted on the Internet at:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Dec 20, 2013
Jkt 232001
https://www.regulations.gov or to the
Promotion and Economics Division,
Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS,
USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Room 1406–S, Stop 0244,
Washington, DC 20250–0244; facsimile:
(202) 205–2800. All comments should
reference the document number and the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register and will be made
available for public inspection,
including name and address, if
provided, in the above office during
regular business hours or it can be
viewed at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeanette Palmer, Marketing Specialist,
Promotion and Economics Division,
Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS,
USDA, Stop 0244, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Room 1406–S,
Washington, DC 20250–0244; telephone:
(202) 720–9915; facsimile: (202) 205–
2800; or electronic mail:
Jeanette.Palmer@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed rule is issued under the Order
(7 CFR part 1216). The Order is
authorized under the Commodity
Promotion, Research, and Information
Act of 1996 (1996 Act)(7 U.S.C. 7411–
7425).
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, reducing costs,
harmonizing rules and promoting
flexibility. This action has been
designated as a ‘‘non-significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has waived the review process.
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation would not have
substantial and direct effects on Tribal
governments and would not have
significant Tribal implications.
Executive Order 12988
This proposal has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Justice Reform. It is not intended to
have retroactive effect. Section 524 of
the 1996 Act provides that it shall not
affect or preempt any other Federal or
State law authorizing promotion or
research relating to an agricultural
commodity.
Under section 519 of the 1996 Act, a
person subject to an order may file a
written petition with USDA stating that
an order, any provision of an order, or
any obligation imposed in connection
with an order, is not established in
accordance with the law, and request a
modification of an order or an
exemption from an order. Any petition
filed challenging an order, any
provision of an order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with an order,
shall be filed within two years after the
effective date of an order, provision, or
obligation subject to challenge in the
petition. The petitioner will have the
opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. Thereafter, USDA will issue a
ruling on the petition. The 1996 Act
provides that the district court of the
United States for any district in which
the petitioner resides or conducts
business shall have the jurisdiction to
review a final ruling on the petition, if
the petitioner files a complaint for that
purpose not later than 20 days after the
date of the entry of USDA’s final ruling.
Background
This proposed rule invites comments
on adding the State of Arkansas as a
primary peanut-producing State under
the Order. The Order is administered by
the Board with oversight by USDA. This
proposal would also add a seat on the
Board for the State of Arkansas. Under
the Order, primary peanut-producing
States must maintain a 3-year average
production of at least 10,000 tons of
peanuts. Arkansas’s peanut production
meets this requirement. Primary peanutproducing States also have a seat on the
Board. This action would ensure that
the Board’s representation reflects
changes in the geographical distribution
of the production of peanuts covered
under the Order.
The Order became effective on July
30, 1999. Under the Order, the Board
administers a nationally-coordinated
program of promotion, research, and
information designed to strengthen the
position of peanuts in the market place
and to develop, maintain, and expand
the demand for peanuts in the United
States. Under the program, all peanut
producers pay an assessment of one
percent of the total value of all farmers’
stock peanuts. The assessments are
remitted to the Board by handlers and,
for peanuts under loan, by the
Commodity Credit Corporation.
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 246 (Monday, December 23, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77367-77368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30391]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-13-0082; FV14-981-1 CR]
Almonds Grown in California; Continuance Referendum
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Referendum order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document directs that a referendum be conducted among
eligible growers of almonds in California to determine whether they
favor continuance of the marketing order that regulates the handling of
almonds grown in California.
DATES: The referendum will be conducted from February 18 through March
7, 2014. To vote in this referendum, growers must have produced almonds
in California during the period of August 1, 2012, through July 31,
2013.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the marketing order may be obtained from the
California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 2202 Monterey Street, Suite 102B, Fresno, California,
93721-3129, or the Office of the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237, or
internet: regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Stobbe, Marketing Specialist, or
Martin Engeler, Regional Director, California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or Email:
Maria.Stobbe@ams.usda.gov or Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Marketing Order No. 981 (7 CFR
part 981), hereinafter referred to as the ``order,'' and the applicable
provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act,'' it
is hereby directed that a referendum be conducted to ascertain whether
continuance of the order is favored by growers. The referendum shall be
conducted from February 18 through March 7, 2014, among eligible
California almond growers. Only current growers that were also engaged
in the production of almonds in California during the period of August
1, 2012, through July 31, 2013, may participate in the continuance
referendum.
USDA has determined that continuance referenda are an effective
means for determining whether growers favor the continuation of
marketing order programs. USDA would consider termination of the order
if fewer than two-thirds of the growers voting in the referendum and
growers of less than two-thirds of the volume of California almonds
represented in the referendum favor continuance. In evaluating the
merits of continuance versus termination, USDA will consider the
results of the continuance referendum and other relevant information
regarding operation of the order. USDA will evaluate the order's
relative benefits and disadvantages to growers, handlers, and consumers
to determine whether continuing the order would tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the ballot materials used in the referendum herein ordered
have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), under
OMB No. 0581-0178, Almonds Grown in California. It has been estimated
that it will take an average of 10 minutes for each of the
approximately 6,400 growers of California almonds to cast a ballot.
Participation is voluntary. Ballots postmarked after March 7, 2014,
will not be included in the vote tabulation.
Martin Engeler and Maria Stobbe of the California Marketing Field
Office, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, are hereby designated
as the referendum agents of the Secretary of Agriculture to conduct
this referendum. The procedure applicable to the referendum shall be
the ``Procedure for
[[Page 77368]]
the Conduct of Referenda in Connection With Marketing Orders for
Fruits, Vegetables, and Nuts Pursuant to the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as Amended'' (7 CFR 900.400-900.407).
Ballots will be mailed to all growers of record and may also be
obtained from the referendum agents or from their appointees.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
Dated: December 17, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-30391 Filed 12-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P