Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Photovoltaic Devices (DFARS Case 2014-D006), 76993-76995 [2013-30496]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 252
RIN 0750–AI18
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Photovoltaic
Devices (DFARS Case 2014–D006)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing an interim rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to clarify rules of origin under
trade agreements for photovoltaic
devices to be utilized under covered
DoD contracts, as required by a section
of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2011.
DATES: Effective December 20, 2013.
Comment date: Comments on the
interim rule should be submitted in
writing to the address shown below on
or before February 18, 2014, to be
considered in the formation of a final
rule.’’
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by DFARS Case 2014–D006,
using any of the following methods:
Æ Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
entering ‘‘DFARS Case 2014–D006’’
under the heading ‘‘Enter keyword or
ID’’ and selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the
link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that
corresponds with ‘‘DFARS Case 2014–
D006.’’ Follow the instructions provided
at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘DFARS Case 2014–
D006’’ on your attached document.
Æ Email: dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2014–D006 in the subject
line of the message.
Æ Fax: 571–372–6094.
Æ Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy G.
Williams, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS,
Room 3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
Ms.
Amy G. Williams, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System,
OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS, Room
3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Telephone 571–372–6106; facsimile
571–372–6101.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
I. Background
Section 846 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(Pub. L. 111–383) addresses the origin of
photovoltaic devices purchased by a
contractor under an energy savings
performance contract, a utility service
contract, or a private housing contract,
if such contract will result in DoD
ownership of photovoltaic devices, by
means other than DoD purchase as end
products. DoD is deemed to own a
photovoltaic device if the device is—
(1) Installed on DoD property or in a
facility owned by DoD; and
(2) Reserved for the exclusive use of
DoD for the full economic life of the
device.
The statute requires that photovoltaic
devices provided under covered
contracts shall comply with the Buy
American statute (41 U.S.C. chapter 83),
subject to the exceptions to that statute
provided in the Trade Agreements Act,
or otherwise provided by law.
• Under the Buy American statute,
there is an exception for other foreign
photovoltaic devices, if covered by the
Buy American statute and the cost of a
domestic photovoltaic device would be
unreasonable (i.e., 50 percent more than
the cost of the foreign photovoltaic
device).
• For DoD, qualifying country
photovoltaic devices may be utilized in
any covered contract, because DFARS
225.103(a)(i)(A) provides an exception
to the Buy American statute for
products of qualifying countries, as
defined in 225.003.
• Depending on the value of the
photovoltaic devices to be utilized,
various trade agreements may apply to
photovoltaic devices that are the
product of a designated country. These
photovoltaic devices may be broadly
identified as World Trade Organization
Government Procurement Agreement
photovoltaic devices, Free Trade
Agreement photovoltaic devices, or by
the specific country of origin.
DoD initially implemented this statute
through an interim rule (DFARS Case
2011–D046), published in the Federal
Register on December 20, 2011 (76 FR
78858). The interim rule added a new
DFARS section 225.7017, Utilization of
domestic photovoltaic devices; a clause
at 252.225–7017, Photovoltaic Devices;
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76993
and a provision at 252.225–7018,
Photovoltaic Devices—Certificate. DoD
finalized the interim rule, with changes
on May 22, 2012 (77 FR 30368).
The final rule explains that for
purposes of determining that a
photovoltaic device is eligible for an
exception to the Buy American statute
due to applicability of a trade
agreement, the origin of a photovoltaic
device is the country in which the
photovoltaic device was wholly
manufactured (including all
components), or the country in which
the photovoltaic device was
‘‘substantially transformed’’ into a new
and different article with a name,
character, or use distinct from that of
the article or articles from which it was
transformed.
Since implementation in the DFARS,
some questions have arisen as to where
the substantial transformation of some
solar panels occurs, when different
phases of the production process occur
in different countries. DOD has
determined, after consultation with the
United States Trade Representative, that
clarification is needed to avoid
confusion by offerors on how to
determine the country of origin of a
photovoltaic device, when trade
agreements provide an exception to the
Buy American statute.
II. Discussion and Analysis
This rule makes two clarifications to
provide greater certainty and avoid
confusion by offerors responding to
solicitations that are governed by
section 846 and the associated DFARS
implementing provisions. Both
clarifications are consistent with
existing DoD practices.
First, the rule clarifies that the
country of origin is the country in
which the final substantial
transformation occurred. Each of the
definitions for specific types of
designated photovoltaic devices has
been amended to specify that the
photovoltaic device is not subsequently
substantially transformed outside of the
specified country.
For example:
‘‘Bahrainian photovoltaic device’’
means an article that—
(i) Is wholly manufactured in Bahrain;
or
(ii) In the case of an article that
consists in whole or in part of materials
from another country, has been
substantially transformed in Bahrain
into a new and different article of
commerce with a name, character, or
use distinct from that of the article or
articles from which it was transformed,
provided that the photovoltaic device is
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
76994
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
not subsequently substantially
transformed outside of Bahrain.
Second, a new paragraph (c) has been
added to the provision at 252.225–7018,
which directs offerors to certify the
origin of a designated country
photovoltaic device consistent with
country of origin determinations by U.S.
Customs and Border Protection for the
same or similar items. If the offeror is
uncertain, the provision directs the
offeror to request a determination from
U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
This guidance applies only to the origin
of designated country photovoltaic
devices (as defined in 252.225–7017(a)).
The origin of domestic photovoltaic
devices and qualifying country
photovoltaic devices is not based on
substantial transformation, but on place
of manufacture (regardless of the origin
of the components). FAR 52.225–18
defines ‘‘place of manufacture’’ as the
place where an end product is
assembled out of components, or
otherwise made or processed from raw
materials into the finished product to be
provided to the Government (in this
case the photovoltaic device to be
utilized under the contract).
U.S.-made photovoltaic devices are
not designated country photovoltaic
devices, but their utilization is allowed,
consistent with FAR 25.403(c), when
the value of the photovoltaic devices
utilized exceeds $202,000, so that U.S.made photovoltaic devices that do not
qualify as domestic photovoltaic devices
are not disadvantaged in favor of
designated country photovoltaic
devices. U.S.-made photovoltaic devices
may be manufactured or substantially
transformed in the United States.
Therefore, a U.S.-made photovoltaic
device may qualify on the basis of
manufacture in the U.S., even if it does
not meet the more stringent
requirements of substantial
transformation in the United States.
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule contains information
collection requirements that require the
approval of the Office of Management
and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35;
however, these changes to the DFARS
do not impose additional information
collection requirements to the
paperwork burden previously approved
under OMB Control Number 0704–0229,
entitled Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS); Part
225, Foreign Acquisition.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this rule to have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because this rule only impacts the
determination of whether photovoltaic
devices are substantially transformed in
a designated country. No domestic
entities will be impacted because the
United States is not a designated
country. For the definition of ‘‘small
business,’’ the Regulatory Flexibility Act
refers to the Small Business Act, which
in turn allows the U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) Administrator to
specify detailed definitions or standards
(5 U.S.C. 601(3) and 15 U.S.C. 632(a)).
The SBA regulations at 13 CFR 121.105
discuss who is a small business: ‘‘(a)(1)
Except for small agricultural
cooperatives, a business concern eligible
for assistance from SBA as a small
business is a business entity organized
for profit, with a place of business
located in the United States, and which
operates primarily within the United
States or which makes a significant
contribution to the U.S. economy
through payment of taxes or use of
American products, materials or labor.
Therefore, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis has not been
performed. DoD invites comments from
small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected
impact of this rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2014–D006), in
correspondence.
VI. Determination To Issue an Interim
Rule
A determination has been made under
the authority of the Secretary of Defense
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that urgent and compelling reasons exist
to promulgate this interim rule without
prior opportunity for public comment.
This action is necessary to ensure that
section 846 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
is being appropriately implemented in
accordance with DoD practices for
achieving consistent adherence with
international trade rules. Section 846
addresses the origin of photovoltaic
devices acquired by DoD. The statute
requires that photovoltaic devices
comply with the Buy American statute,
subject to the exceptions to that statute
provided in the Trade Agreements Act
(TAA), or otherwise provided by law.
When an acquisition is subject to the
TAA, the substantial transformation test
is used to establish the origin of
products. Questions have arisen
regarding interpretation of the
substantial transformation test for
photovoltaic devices, in light of varying
interpretations that have been issued by
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) and the Department of Commerce
in carrying out their respective
missions. These opinions were issued
after DOD published its final rule
implementing section 846 in May 2012.
DoD has determined, after
consultation with the United States
Trade Representative, that clarification
is necessary to avoid unintended
confusion in the marketplace and
potential non-compliance with section
846 and to ensure the proper and
appropriate application of international
trade rules. This rule makes explicit
DOD’s practice of generally following
determinations made by CBP regarding
when an end product is considered to
have been substantially transformed.
Because this rule addresses
‘‘photovoltaic devices’’ rather than ‘‘end
products,’’ it also clarifies that the
country of origin is the country in
which the final substantial
transformation occurred. These
immediate clarifications will ensure that
offerors are properly certifying their
compliance with existing law and
regulation addressing the acquisition of
photovoltaic devices and provide
greater certainty to the marketplace
when offering these products to DoD at
a time when the U.S. Government is
working aggressively to take greater
advantage of green energy industries as
part of its comprehensive energy and
environmental policies. The rule
provides guidance to offerors that will
facilitate offeror certifications that are
consistent with existing DoD policy and
practice when DoD directly acquires
end products. Failure to implement this
requirement promptly can also have
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
adverse effects on the U.S. photovoltaic
industry, which this statute was
designed to protect.
DOD will consider, pursuant to 41
U.S.C. 1707 and FAR 1.501–3(b), public
comments received in response to this
interim rule in the formation of the final
rule.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252
Government procurement.
Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore 48 CFR part 252 is amended
as follows:
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 252 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
2. Section 252.225–7017 is amended
by—
■ a. Removing the clause date ‘‘(OCT
2013)’’ and adding ‘‘(DEC 2013)’’ in its
place; and
■ b. In paragraph (a)—
■ i. In the definition of ‘‘Bahrainian
photovoltaic device’’ in paragraph (ii),
removing ‘‘transformed.’’ and adding
‘‘transformed, provided that the
photovoltaic device is not subsequently
substantially transformed outside of
Bahrain.’’ in its place.
■ ii. In the definition of ‘‘Canadian
photovoltaic device’’, removing
‘‘transformed.’’ and adding
‘‘transformed, provided that the
photovoltaic device is not subsequently
substantially transformed outside of
Canada.’’ in its place.
■ iii. In the definition of ‘‘Caribbean
Basin country photovoltaic device’’ in
paragraph (ii), removing ‘‘transformed.’’
and adding ‘‘transformed, provided that
the photovoltaic device is not
subsequently substantially transformed
outside of a Caribbean Basin country.’’
in its place.
■ iv. In the definition of ‘‘Free Trade
Agreement country photovoltaic device’’
in paragraph (ii), removing
‘‘transformed.’’ and adding
‘‘transformed, provided that the
photovoltaic device is not subsequently
substantially transformed outside of a
Free Trade Agreement country.’’ in its
place.
■ v. In the definition of ‘‘Korean
photovoltaic device’’ in paragraph (i),
removing ‘‘Korea’’ and adding ‘‘Korea
(Republic of)’’ in its place, and in
paragraph (ii) removing ‘‘transformed.’’
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
and adding ‘‘transformed, provided that
the photovoltaic device is not
subsequently substantially transformed
outside of Korea (Republic of).’’ in its
place.
■ vi. In the definition of ‘‘Least
developed country photovoltaic device’’
in paragraph (ii), removing
‘‘transformed.’’ and adding
‘‘transformed, provided that the
photovoltaic device is not subsequently
substantially transformed outside of a
least developed country.’’ in its place.
■ vii. In the definition of ‘‘Moroccan
photovoltaic device’’ in paragraph (ii),
removing ‘‘transformed.’’ and adding
‘‘transformed, provided that the
photovoltaic device is not subsequently
substantially transformed outside of
Morocco.’’ in its place.
■ viii. In the definition of ‘‘Panamanian
photovoltaic device’’ in paragraph (ii),
removing ‘‘transformed.’’ and adding
‘‘transformed, provided that the
photovoltaic device is not subsequently
substantially transformed outside of
Panama.’’ in its place.
■ ix. In the definition of ‘‘Peruvian
photovoltaic device’’ in paragraph (ii),
removing ‘‘transformed.’’ and adding
‘‘transformed, provided that the
photovoltaic device is not subsequently
substantially transformed outside of
Peru.’’ in its place.
■ x. In the definition of ‘‘U.S.-made
photovoltaic device’’ in paragraph (ii),
removing ‘‘transformed.’’ and adding
‘‘transformed, provided that the
photovoltaic device is not subsequently
substantially transformed outside of the
United States.’’ in its place.
■ xi. In the definition of ‘‘WTO GPA
country photovoltaic device’’ in
paragraph (ii), removing ‘‘transformed.’’
and adding ‘‘transformed, provided that
the photovoltaic device is not
subsequently substantially transformed
outside of a WTO GPA country.’’ in its
place.
■ 3. Amend section 252.225–7018 by—
■ a. Removing the clause date ‘‘(NOV
2012)’’ and adding ‘‘(DEC 2013)’’ in its
place; and
■ b. Adding to paragraph (a) the phrase
‘‘designated country photovoltaic
device’’ after the phrase ‘‘designated
country’’;
■ c. Removing, in paragraph (b)(1),
‘‘(c)(2)(ii), (c)(3)(ii) or (c)(4)(ii)’’ and
adding ‘‘(d)(2)(ii), (d)(3)(ii) or (d)(4)(ii)’’
in its place; and
■ d. Redesignating paragraph (c) as
paragraph (d) and adding a new
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
252.225–7018
Certificate.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00023
Photovoltaic Devices—
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
76995
(c) Country in which a designated
country photovoltaic device was wholly
manufactured or was substantially
transformed. If the estimated value of
the photovoltaic devices to be utilized
under a resultant contract exceeds
$25,000, the Offeror’s certification that
such photovoltaic device (e.g., solar
panel) is a designated country
photovoltaic device shall be consistent
with country of origin determinations
by the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection with regard to importation of
the same or similar photovoltaic devices
into the United States. If the Offeror is
uncertain as to what the country of
origin would be determined to be by the
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the
Offeror shall request a determination
from U.S. Customs and Border
Protection. (See https://www.cbp.gov/xp/
cgov/trade/legal/rulings/.)
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–30496 Filed 12–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket Nos. FWS–R1–ES–2012–0017;
FWS–R1–ES–2013–0012; 4500030113]
RIN 1018–AX72; 1018–AZ54
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Threatened Status for
Eriogonum codium (Umtanum Desert
Buckwheat) and Physaria douglasii
subsp. tuplashensis (White Bluffs
Bladderpod) and Designation of
Critical Habitat
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; revision.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, affirm our
determination to list Eriogonum codium
(Umtanum desert buckwheat) and
Physaria douglasii subsp. tuplashensis
(White Bluffs bladderpod) as threatened
under the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (Act). This
affirmation of a previously published
final rule implements the Federal
protections provided by the Act for
these species. We also affirm our
designation of critical habitat for
Umtanum desert buckwheat and revise
our designation of critical habitat for
White Bluffs bladderpod under the Act.
In total, approximately 344 acres (139
hectares) are designated as critical
habitat for Umtanum desert buckwheat
in Benton County, Washington, and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 245 (Friday, December 20, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76993-76995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30496]
[[Page 76993]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Part 252
RIN 0750-AI18
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Photovoltaic
Devices (DFARS Case 2014-D006)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is issuing an interim rule amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to clarify rules of origin
under trade agreements for photovoltaic devices to be utilized under
covered DoD contracts, as required by a section of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011.
DATES: Effective December 20, 2013.
Comment date: Comments on the interim rule should be submitted in
writing to the address shown below on or before February 18, 2014, to
be considered in the formation of a final rule.''
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2014-D006, using
any of the following methods:
[cir] Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by entering ``DFARS Case 2014-D006''
under the heading ``Enter keyword or ID'' and selecting ``Search.''
Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with ``DFARS Case
2014-D006.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit a
Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and
``DFARS Case 2014-D006'' on your attached document.
[cir] Email: dfars@mail.mil. Include DFARS Case 2014-D006 in the
subject line of the message.
[cir] Fax: 571-372-6094.
[cir] Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy
G. Williams, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS, Room 3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301-3060.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting
(except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy G. Williams, Defense
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS, Room 3B855, 3060
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 571-372-6106;
facsimile 571-372-6101.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 846 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2011 (Pub. L. 111-383) addresses the origin of photovoltaic
devices purchased by a contractor under an energy savings performance
contract, a utility service contract, or a private housing contract, if
such contract will result in DoD ownership of photovoltaic devices, by
means other than DoD purchase as end products. DoD is deemed to own a
photovoltaic device if the device is--
(1) Installed on DoD property or in a facility owned by DoD; and
(2) Reserved for the exclusive use of DoD for the full economic
life of the device.
The statute requires that photovoltaic devices provided under
covered contracts shall comply with the Buy American statute (41 U.S.C.
chapter 83), subject to the exceptions to that statute provided in the
Trade Agreements Act, or otherwise provided by law.
Under the Buy American statute, there is an exception for
other foreign photovoltaic devices, if covered by the Buy American
statute and the cost of a domestic photovoltaic device would be
unreasonable (i.e., 50 percent more than the cost of the foreign
photovoltaic device).
For DoD, qualifying country photovoltaic devices may be
utilized in any covered contract, because DFARS 225.103(a)(i)(A)
provides an exception to the Buy American statute for products of
qualifying countries, as defined in 225.003.
Depending on the value of the photovoltaic devices to be
utilized, various trade agreements may apply to photovoltaic devices
that are the product of a designated country. These photovoltaic
devices may be broadly identified as World Trade Organization
Government Procurement Agreement photovoltaic devices, Free Trade
Agreement photovoltaic devices, or by the specific country of origin.
DoD initially implemented this statute through an interim rule
(DFARS Case 2011-D046), published in the Federal Register on December
20, 2011 (76 FR 78858). The interim rule added a new DFARS section
225.7017, Utilization of domestic photovoltaic devices; a clause at
252.225-7017, Photovoltaic Devices; and a provision at 252.225-7018,
Photovoltaic Devices--Certificate. DoD finalized the interim rule, with
changes on May 22, 2012 (77 FR 30368).
The final rule explains that for purposes of determining that a
photovoltaic device is eligible for an exception to the Buy American
statute due to applicability of a trade agreement, the origin of a
photovoltaic device is the country in which the photovoltaic device was
wholly manufactured (including all components), or the country in which
the photovoltaic device was ``substantially transformed'' into a new
and different article with a name, character, or use distinct from that
of the article or articles from which it was transformed.
Since implementation in the DFARS, some questions have arisen as to
where the substantial transformation of some solar panels occurs, when
different phases of the production process occur in different
countries. DOD has determined, after consultation with the United
States Trade Representative, that clarification is needed to avoid
confusion by offerors on how to determine the country of origin of a
photovoltaic device, when trade agreements provide an exception to the
Buy American statute.
II. Discussion and Analysis
This rule makes two clarifications to provide greater certainty and
avoid confusion by offerors responding to solicitations that are
governed by section 846 and the associated DFARS implementing
provisions. Both clarifications are consistent with existing DoD
practices.
First, the rule clarifies that the country of origin is the country
in which the final substantial transformation occurred. Each of the
definitions for specific types of designated photovoltaic devices has
been amended to specify that the photovoltaic device is not
subsequently substantially transformed outside of the specified
country.
For example:
``Bahrainian photovoltaic device'' means an article that--
(i) Is wholly manufactured in Bahrain; or
(ii) In the case of an article that consists in whole or in part of
materials from another country, has been substantially transformed in
Bahrain into a new and different article of commerce with a name,
character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from
which it was transformed, provided that the photovoltaic device is
[[Page 76994]]
not subsequently substantially transformed outside of Bahrain.
Second, a new paragraph (c) has been added to the provision at
252.225-7018, which directs offerors to certify the origin of a
designated country photovoltaic device consistent with country of
origin determinations by U.S. Customs and Border Protection for the
same or similar items. If the offeror is uncertain, the provision
directs the offeror to request a determination from U.S. Customs and
Border Protection. This guidance applies only to the origin of
designated country photovoltaic devices (as defined in 252.225-
7017(a)).
The origin of domestic photovoltaic devices and qualifying country
photovoltaic devices is not based on substantial transformation, but on
place of manufacture (regardless of the origin of the components). FAR
52.225-18 defines ``place of manufacture'' as the place where an end
product is assembled out of components, or otherwise made or processed
from raw materials into the finished product to be provided to the
Government (in this case the photovoltaic device to be utilized under
the contract).
U.S.-made photovoltaic devices are not designated country
photovoltaic devices, but their utilization is allowed, consistent with
FAR 25.403(c), when the value of the photovoltaic devices utilized
exceeds $202,000, so that U.S.-made photovoltaic devices that do not
qualify as domestic photovoltaic devices are not disadvantaged in favor
of designated country photovoltaic devices. U.S.-made photovoltaic
devices may be manufactured or substantially transformed in the United
States. Therefore, a U.S.-made photovoltaic device may qualify on the
basis of manufacture in the U.S., even if it does not meet the more
stringent requirements of substantial transformation in the United
States.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this rule to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because this rule
only impacts the determination of whether photovoltaic devices are
substantially transformed in a designated country. No domestic entities
will be impacted because the United States is not a designated country.
For the definition of ``small business,'' the Regulatory Flexibility
Act refers to the Small Business Act, which in turn allows the U.S.
Small Business Administration (SBA) Administrator to specify detailed
definitions or standards (5 U.S.C. 601(3) and 15 U.S.C. 632(a)). The
SBA regulations at 13 CFR 121.105 discuss who is a small business:
``(a)(1) Except for small agricultural cooperatives, a business concern
eligible for assistance from SBA as a small business is a business
entity organized for profit, with a place of business located in the
United States, and which operates primarily within the United States or
which makes a significant contribution to the U.S. economy through
payment of taxes or use of American products, materials or labor.
Therefore, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis has not been
performed. DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2014-D006), in
correspondence.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule contains information collection requirements that require
the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35; however, these changes to the
DFARS do not impose additional information collection requirements to
the paperwork burden previously approved under OMB Control Number 0704-
0229, entitled Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS); Part 225, Foreign Acquisition.
VI. Determination To Issue an Interim Rule
A determination has been made under the authority of the Secretary
of Defense that urgent and compelling reasons exist to promulgate this
interim rule without prior opportunity for public comment. This action
is necessary to ensure that section 846 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 is being appropriately
implemented in accordance with DoD practices for achieving consistent
adherence with international trade rules. Section 846 addresses the
origin of photovoltaic devices acquired by DoD. The statute requires
that photovoltaic devices comply with the Buy American statute, subject
to the exceptions to that statute provided in the Trade Agreements Act
(TAA), or otherwise provided by law. When an acquisition is subject to
the TAA, the substantial transformation test is used to establish the
origin of products. Questions have arisen regarding interpretation of
the substantial transformation test for photovoltaic devices, in light
of varying interpretations that have been issued by U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) and the Department of Commerce in carrying out
their respective missions. These opinions were issued after DOD
published its final rule implementing section 846 in May 2012.
DoD has determined, after consultation with the United States Trade
Representative, that clarification is necessary to avoid unintended
confusion in the marketplace and potential non-compliance with section
846 and to ensure the proper and appropriate application of
international trade rules. This rule makes explicit DOD's practice of
generally following determinations made by CBP regarding when an end
product is considered to have been substantially transformed. Because
this rule addresses ``photovoltaic devices'' rather than ``end
products,'' it also clarifies that the country of origin is the country
in which the final substantial transformation occurred. These immediate
clarifications will ensure that offerors are properly certifying their
compliance with existing law and regulation addressing the acquisition
of photovoltaic devices and provide greater certainty to the
marketplace when offering these products to DoD at a time when the U.S.
Government is working aggressively to take greater advantage of green
energy industries as part of its comprehensive energy and environmental
policies. The rule provides guidance to offerors that will facilitate
offeror certifications that are consistent with existing DoD policy and
practice when DoD directly acquires end products. Failure to implement
this requirement promptly can also have
[[Page 76995]]
adverse effects on the U.S. photovoltaic industry, which this statute
was designed to protect.
DOD will consider, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 1707 and FAR 1.501-3(b),
public comments received in response to this interim rule in the
formation of the final rule.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252
Government procurement.
Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore 48 CFR part 252 is amended as follows:
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 252 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
0
2. Section 252.225-7017 is amended by--
0
a. Removing the clause date ``(OCT 2013)'' and adding ``(DEC 2013)'' in
its place; and
0
b. In paragraph (a)--
0
i. In the definition of ``Bahrainian photovoltaic device'' in paragraph
(ii), removing ``transformed.'' and adding ``transformed, provided that
the photovoltaic device is not subsequently substantially transformed
outside of Bahrain.'' in its place.
0
ii. In the definition of ``Canadian photovoltaic device'', removing
``transformed.'' and adding ``transformed, provided that the
photovoltaic device is not subsequently substantially transformed
outside of Canada.'' in its place.
0
iii. In the definition of ``Caribbean Basin country photovoltaic
device'' in paragraph (ii), removing ``transformed.'' and adding
``transformed, provided that the photovoltaic device is not
subsequently substantially transformed outside of a Caribbean Basin
country.'' in its place.
0
iv. In the definition of ``Free Trade Agreement country photovoltaic
device'' in paragraph (ii), removing ``transformed.'' and adding
``transformed, provided that the photovoltaic device is not
subsequently substantially transformed outside of a Free Trade
Agreement country.'' in its place.
0
v. In the definition of ``Korean photovoltaic device'' in paragraph
(i), removing ``Korea'' and adding ``Korea (Republic of)'' in its
place, and in paragraph (ii) removing ``transformed.'' and adding
``transformed, provided that the photovoltaic device is not
subsequently substantially transformed outside of Korea (Republic
of).'' in its place.
0
vi. In the definition of ``Least developed country photovoltaic
device'' in paragraph (ii), removing ``transformed.'' and adding
``transformed, provided that the photovoltaic device is not
subsequently substantially transformed outside of a least developed
country.'' in its place.
0
vii. In the definition of ``Moroccan photovoltaic device'' in paragraph
(ii), removing ``transformed.'' and adding ``transformed, provided that
the photovoltaic device is not subsequently substantially transformed
outside of Morocco.'' in its place.
0
viii. In the definition of ``Panamanian photovoltaic device'' in
paragraph (ii), removing ``transformed.'' and adding ``transformed,
provided that the photovoltaic device is not subsequently substantially
transformed outside of Panama.'' in its place.
0
ix. In the definition of ``Peruvian photovoltaic device'' in paragraph
(ii), removing ``transformed.'' and adding ``transformed, provided that
the photovoltaic device is not subsequently substantially transformed
outside of Peru.'' in its place.
0
x. In the definition of ``U.S.-made photovoltaic device'' in paragraph
(ii), removing ``transformed.'' and adding ``transformed, provided that
the photovoltaic device is not subsequently substantially transformed
outside of the United States.'' in its place.
0
xi. In the definition of ``WTO GPA country photovoltaic device'' in
paragraph (ii), removing ``transformed.'' and adding ``transformed,
provided that the photovoltaic device is not subsequently substantially
transformed outside of a WTO GPA country.'' in its place.
0
3. Amend section 252.225-7018 by--
0
a. Removing the clause date ``(NOV 2012)'' and adding ``(DEC 2013)'' in
its place; and
0
b. Adding to paragraph (a) the phrase ``designated country photovoltaic
device'' after the phrase ``designated country'';
0
c. Removing, in paragraph (b)(1), ``(c)(2)(ii), (c)(3)(ii) or
(c)(4)(ii)'' and adding ``(d)(2)(ii), (d)(3)(ii) or (d)(4)(ii)'' in its
place; and
0
d. Redesignating paragraph (c) as paragraph (d) and adding a new
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
252.225-7018 Photovoltaic Devices--Certificate.
* * * * *
(c) Country in which a designated country photovoltaic device was
wholly manufactured or was substantially transformed. If the estimated
value of the photovoltaic devices to be utilized under a resultant
contract exceeds $25,000, the Offeror's certification that such
photovoltaic device (e.g., solar panel) is a designated country
photovoltaic device shall be consistent with country of origin
determinations by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection with regard to
importation of the same or similar photovoltaic devices into the United
States. If the Offeror is uncertain as to what the country of origin
would be determined to be by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
the Offeror shall request a determination from U.S. Customs and Border
Protection. (See https://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/trade/legal/rulings/.)
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-30496 Filed 12-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P