Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery; 2014-2016 Fishing Quotas, 77005-77008 [2013-30313]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: December 12, 2013.
Rachel Jacobsen,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish
and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2013–30164 Filed 12–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–C
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 121009528–2729–02]
RIN 0648–XD021
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Summer Flounder Fishery;
Quota Transfer
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; quota transfer.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces that the
Commonwealth of Virginia and the
State of North Carolina are both
transferring a portion of their 2013
commercial summer flounder quotas to
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
NMFS is adjusting the quotas and
announcing the revised commercial
quota for each state involved.
DATES: Effective December 17, 2013,
through December 31, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carly Bari, Fishery Management
Specialist, 978–281–9224.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations governing the summer
flounder fishery are in 50 CFR part 648,
and require annual specification of a
commercial quota that is apportioned
among the coastal states from North
Carolina through Maine. The process to
set the annual commercial quota and the
percent allocated to each state are
described in § 648.100.
The final rule implementing
Amendment 5 to the Summer Flounder,
Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery
Management Plan, which was published
on December 17, 1993 (58 FR 65936),
provided a mechanism for summer
flounder quota to be transferred from
one state to another. Two or more states,
under mutual agreement and with the
concurrence of the Administrator,
Northeast Region, NMFS (Regional
Administrator), can transfer or combine
summer flounder commercial quota
under § 648.102(c)(2). The Regional
Administrator is required to consider
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:57 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
the criteria in § 648.102(c)(2)(i) to
evaluate requests for quota transfers or
combinations.
Virginia has agreed to transfer 19,858
lb (9,007 kg) of its 2013 commercial
quota to Massachusetts. North Carolina
has agreed to transfer 19,857 lb (9,007
kg) of its 2013 commercial quota to
Massachusetts. These transfers were
prompted by summer flounder landings
of two vessels intending to land in
North Carolina and Virginia, which
were granted safe harbor in
Massachusetts due to mechanical failure
on December 2, 2013, thereby requiring
quota transfers to account for an
increase in Massachusetts’ landings that
would have otherwise accrued against
the North Carolina and Virginia quotas.
The Regional Administrator has
determined that the criteria set forth in
§ 648.102(c)(2)(i) have been met. The
revised summer flounder commercial
quotas for calendar year 2013 are:
Virginia, 5,020,643 lb (2,277,325 kg);
North Carolina, 402,773 lb (182,695 kg);
and Massachusetts, 830,951 lb (376,913
kg).
Classification
This action is taken under 50 CFR
part 648 and is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: December 16, 2013.
Sean F. Corson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–30218 Filed 12–17–13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 130904778–3999–02]
RIN 0648–XC855
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the
Northeastern United States; Atlantic
Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery;
2014–2016 Fishing Quotas
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule implements
the commercial quotas for the Atlantic
surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries for
2014, 2015, and 2016. The quotas are
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77005
unchanged from the quotas for the 2011,
2012, and 2013 fishing years. This
action sets allowable harvest levels of
Atlantic surfclams and ocean quahogs,
prevents overfishing, and allows
harvesting of optimum yield. This
action also continues to suspend the
minimum shell size for Atlantic
surfclams for the 2014 fishing year.
DATES: This rule is effective December
20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the
Environmental Assessment prepared for
this action is available upon request
from the Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management (Council), 800 North State
Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 09901.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason Berthiaume, Fishery Management
Specialist, 978–281–9177.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog
Fishery Management Plan (FMP)
requires that NMFS, in consultation
with the Council, specify quotas for
surfclam and ocean quahog for a 3-yr
period, with an annual review, from a
range that represents the optimum yield
(OY) for each fishery. It is the policy of
the Council that the levels selected
allow sustainable fishing to continue at
that level for at least 10 yrs for
surfclams, and 30 yrs for ocean quahogs.
The Council policy also considers the
economic impacts of the quotas.
Regulations implementing Amendment
10 to the FMP (63 FR 27481, May 19,
1998) added Maine ocean quahogs
(locally known as Maine mahogany
quahogs) to the management unit, and
provided for a small artisanal fishery for
ocean quahogs in the waters north of
43°50′ N. lat., with an annual quota
within a range of 17,000 to 100,000
Maine bushels (bu) (0.6 to 3.524 million
L). As specified in Amendment 10, the
Maine mahogany ocean quahog quota is
allocated separately from the quota
specified for the ocean quahog fishery.
Regulations implementing Amendment
13 to the FMP (68 FR 69970, December
16, 2003) established the ability to set
multi-year quotas. The Council annually
reviews the quota to determine whether
the multi-year quota specifications
remain appropriate. The fishing quotas
must be in compliance with overfishing
definitions for each species. In
recommending these quotas, the
Council considered the most recent
stock assessments and other relevant
scientific information.
In June 2013, the Council voted to
recommend maintaining the 2013 quota
levels of 5.333 million bu (284 million
L) for the ocean quahog fishery, 3.400
million bu (181 million L) for the
Atlantic surfclam fishery, and 100,000
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
77006
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Maine bu (3.524 million L) for the
Maine ocean quahog fishery for 2014–
2016. The quotas for the 2014–2016
Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog
fishery are shown in the table below.
FINAL 2014–2016 ATLANTIC SURFCLAM AND OCEAN QUAHOG QUOTAS
Ocean Quahog
Year
ABC
ACL
ACT
Commercial quota
2014–2016
5.7 million bu (306 million L) ...
5.7 million bu (306 million L) ...
Maine ACT: 105,010 Maine bu
(3.7 million L).
Non-Maine ACT: 5.56 million
bu (298 million L).
Maine Quota: 100,000 Maine
bu (3.524 million L).
Non-Maine Quota: 5.3 million
bu (284 million L).
Atlantic Surfclam
Year
Allowable Biological Catch
(ABC)
Annual Catch Limit
(ACL)
Annual Catch Target
(ACT)
2014 .........
2015 .........
2016 .........
7.8 million bu (415 million L) ...
6.7 million bu (202 million L) ...
6.2 million bu (188 million L) ...
7.8 million bu (415 million L) ...
6.7 million bu (202 million L) ...
6.2 million bu (188 million L) ...
3.8 million bu (202 million L) ...
3.8 million bu (202 million L) ...
3.8 million bu (115 million L) ...
The Atlantic surfclam and ocean
quahog quotas are specified in
‘‘industry’’ bushels of 53.24 L per
bushel, while the Maine ocean quahog
quota is specified in Maine bushels of
35.24 L per bushel. Because Maine
ocean quahogs are the same species as
ocean quahogs, both fisheries are
assessed under the same ocean quahog
overfishing definition. When the two
quota amounts (ocean quahog and
Maine ocean quahog) are added, the
total allowable harvest is still lower
than the level that would result in
overfishing for the entire stock.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Surfclams
In 1999, the Council expressed its
intention to increase the surfclam quota
to OY over a period of 5 yrs (OY = 3.4
million bu (181 million L)). The
proposed 2014–2016 status quo
surfclam quota was developed after
reviewing the results of the Northeast
Regional Stock Assessment Workshop
(SAW) 56 for Atlantic surfclam, released
to the public in 2013. The surfclam
quota recommendation is consistent
with the SAW 56 finding that the
Atlantic surfclam stock is not
overfished, nor is overfishing occurring.
Based on this information, the Council
recommended, and NMFS maintains,
the status quo surfclam quota of 3.4
million bu (181 million L) for 2014–
2016. This quota represents the
maximum allowable quota under the
FMP.
Ocean Quahogs
In April 2013, the ocean quahog stock
assessment was updated and found that
the ocean quahog stock is not
overfished, nor is overfishing occurring.
Ocean quahog is a low productivity
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
stock that is being fished down from its
pre-fishery level; however, after several
decades of relatively low fishing
mortality, the stock is still above the
biomass target reference points. This
action maintains the status quo quota of
5.333 million bu (284 million L) for
2014–2016.
The 2014–2016 quota for Maine ocean
quahogs is the status quo level of
100,000 Maine bu (3.524 million L). In
2008, the State of Maine completed a
stock assessment of the resource within
the Maine Mahogany Quahog Zone. The
findings of the Maine quahog survey did
not change the status of the entire ocean
quahog resource. The quotas represent
the maximum allowable quota under the
FMP.
Comments
We received six comments on the
proposed rule; five from members of the
Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog
industry and one from the general
public. All comments supported the
quotas in the proposed rule.
Changes From Proposed Rule to Final
Rule
There are no changes from the
proposed to final rule.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA, has
determined that this final rule is
consistent with the Atlantic Surfclam
and Ocean Quahog FMP, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law.
NMFS finds good cause to waive the
30-day delay in effectiveness period for
this action. A delay in the effective date
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Commercial
quota
3.4 million bu (181 million L).
3.4 million bu (181 million L).
3.4 million bu (115 million L).
of this final rule would disrupt the
surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries
and would also likely cause substantial
confusion and raise administrative
issues. There is no rollover provision in
the surfclam and ocean quahog
fisheries; therefore, if the specifications
are not in place by the start of the
fishing year on January 1, 2014, the
following would result: (1) No 2014–
2016 proposed specifications for these
fisheries would be published; (2) the
indefinite management measures for
each of these species would remain
unchanged; (3) there would be no
specific cap on the allowable annual
catch (i.e., annual catch limits) and
landings in each of these fisheries (i.e.,
no commercial quotas), and (4)
individual transferable quota (ITQ) tags
would be issued to owners in 2014–
2016 (however, these tags would
technically have no meaning as the
specifications would not be set).
Further, because there is no rollover
provision, the only regulatory controls
on fishing effort and harvests would be
the indefinite measures. These include
§ 648.14(j), which states that ‘‘It is
unlawful for any person to do any of the
following: Land or possess any
surfclams or ocean quahogs harvested in
or from the EEZ without having been
issued, or in excess of, an individual
allocation.’’ Because it prohibits landing
or possessing surflcams or ocean
quahogs, § 648.14(j), could effectively
prohibit the fishery from operating, if
quotas were not in place for January 1,
2014. Note that this provision is at odds
with § 648.75(b), which requires NMFS
to issue tags to ITQ allocation holders
prior to the fishing year. Therefore, if
NMFS does not waive the delay in
effectiveness, NMFS will have already
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
provided ITQ allocation holders with
their allocation information and tags
that would otherwise allow them to fish,
but without quotas being allocated.
ITQ shareholders each receive a
portion of the overall annual quotas for
the two species. An allocation holder
receives an amount of cage tags
equivalent to his/her share of the overall
quota each year. As discussed above,
fishing for surfclams and ocean quahogs
can potentially begin on January 1, each
year, regardless of the publication of the
annual quota, as the tags are issued each
year prior to January 1, pursuant to
§ 648.75(b). As such, waiving the 30-day
delay in effectiveness would ensure that
the quota for surfclams and ocean
quahogs is in place for January 1, 2014,
thus preventing any conflicts between
these regulations. On the contrary, not
waiving the 30-day delay in
effectiveness would result in tags being
issued, with no associated value, as the
quotas would not be in place.
Lastly, ITQ allocations are often
transferred, either permanently or
temporarily, immediately upon the
commencement of the fishing year to
meet adjust to any new circumstances in
the fishery. Without a quota in effect,
the industry does not have the ability to
transfer allocation either permanently or
temporarily. The inability of the
industry to make such transfers effective
would preclude the intended recipients
of such transfers from fishing.
Accordingly, a delay in the effectiveness
of this rule would be contrary to the
rule’s intent to maintain current quota
levels that have the full support of the
fishing industry and that facilitate the
transfer of quotas requested by the
industry.
The inability to transfer quota would
be contrary to the public interest
because it would preclude the intended
recipients of such transfers from fishing,
thereby resulting in a negative economic
impact on the industry. Also, not having
quotas in effect would cause substantial
confusion and could raise legal and
enforcement issues, since fishery
participants would already have their
ITQ allocation tags, but the tags would
technically not have any meaning as the
specifications would not have been set.
Therefore, it is necessary to waive the
30-day delay in effectiveness, as a delay
in effectiveness would compromise the
start of the fishing year and thereby
undermine the intent of this rule,
contrary to the public’s interest.
This final rule is exempt from the
requirements of E.O. 12866.
The Council prepared an EA for this
action that analyzes the impacts of this
rule. A copy of the EA is available from
the Federal e-Rulemaking portal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
www.regulations.gov. Type ‘‘NOAA–
NMFS–2013–0139’’ in the ID field and
click search. A copy of the EA is also
available upon request from the Council
(see ADDRESSES).
A final regulatory flexibility analysis
(FRFA) was prepared, as required by
section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RSA). The FRFA describes the
economic impacts this final rule would
have on small entities. The FRFA
incorporates the IRFA, the RIR, a
summary of the significant issues raised
by the public comments in response to
the IRFA, NMFS’ responses to those
comments, and a summary of the
analyses completed to support the
action. A copy of the IRFA and EA are
available upon request (see ADDRESSES).
A summary of the IRFA was published
in the proposed rule for this action and
is not repeated here. A description of
why this action was considered, the
objectives of, and the legal basis for, this
rule is contained in the preamble to the
proposed rule and this final rule and is
not repeated here.
A Summary of the Significant Issues
Raised by the Public Comments in
Response to the IRFA, a Summary of the
Assessment of the Agency of Such
Issues, and a Statement of Any Changes
Made in the Proposed Rule as a Result
of Such Comments
NMFS received no comments relative
to the IRFA or economic impacts of the
proposed 2014–2016 specifications for
the Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog
fisheries. No changes were made from
the proposed to final rule.
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities to Which This Final
Rule Would Apply
The final measures would only affect
vessels holding an active Federal open
access surfclam and/or ocean quahog
permit. The SBA defines a small
commercial shellfish fishing entity as a
firm with gross annual receipts not
exceeding $5 million. In 2012, 42
vessels reported harvesting surfclams
and/or ocean quahogs from Federal
waters under the IFQ system. In
addition, 12 vessels participated in the
limited access Maine ocean quahog
fishery, for a total of 54 participants in
2012. Average 2012 gross income was
$950,000 per vessel. Each vessel in this
analysis is treated as a single entity for
purposes of size determination and
impact assessment. All 54 commercial
fishing entities fall below the SBA size
threshold for small commercial shellfish
fishing entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77007
Reporting and Recordkeeping
Requirements
This action does not introduce any
new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
compliance requirements. This final
rule does not duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with other Federal rules.
Description of the Steps Taken To
Minimize Economic Impact on Small
Entities
Specifications
The final quotas for 2014–2016 reflect
the same quota levels set for 2011–2013.
Therefore, it is not expected that there
will be any different economic impacts
beyond status quo resulting from the
quotas. Leaving the ocean quahog quota
at the harvest level of 5.333 million bu
(284 million L) is not expected to
constrain the fishery. The surfclam
quota is set to the maximum allowed
under the FMP of 3.4 million bu (181
million L).
The Maine ocean quahog quota is set
at the maximum allowed under the FMP
of 100,000 Maine bu (3.524 million L).
It is anticipated that by maintaining the
status quo quota level for the next 3
years, the fishing industry will benefit
from the stability of product demand
from the seafood processors and being
able to predict future fishery
performance based on past performance
from the last 3 yrs.
Alternatives to these status quo quotas
were considered, but were not adopted.
The alternatives would have resulted in
more restrictive quotas and would not
have been in the best interest of the
fishery. In addition, the Council and the
industry both support the status quo
quotas being adopted in this action. As
a result, since the non-selected
alternatives would have resulted in a
negative impacts to fisheries and would
have been contrary to achieving
optimum yield, while preventing
overfishing, the alternatives were not
adopted.
Minimum Size Suspension for Atlantic
Surfclams
The minimum size limit for surfclams
has been suspended since 2005.
Therefore, because this action would
not impose a minimum size limit, and
because no net change in fishing effort,
participation in the fishery, or fishery
expenses are expected, it is anticipated
that this action would not impose any
additional costs on the industry. In fact,
continuing to suspend the minimum
size limit would likely have positive
economic affects in contrast to not
suspending the minimum size limit, as
not suspending the minimum size limit
would likely reduce vessel efficiency
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
77008
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
through time spent measuring and
culling small surfclams.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule, or group
of related rules, for which an agency is
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
compliance guides.’’ The agency shall
explain the actions a small entity is
required to make to comply with a rule
or group of rules. As part of this
rulemaking process, a small entity
compliance guide will be sent to all
holders of permits issued either a
surfclam or ocean quahog permit, as
well as surfclam and ocean quahog
dealers. In addition, copies of this final
rule and guide (i.e., bulletin) are
available from the Regional
Administrator (see ADDRESSES) and may
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
be found at the following Web site:
www.nero.noaa.gov.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: December 16, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
performing the functions and duties of the
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–30313 Filed 12–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 245 (Friday, December 20, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77005-77008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30313]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 130904778-3999-02]
RIN 0648-XC855
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic
Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery; 2014-2016 Fishing Quotas
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule implements the commercial quotas for the
Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries for 2014, 2015, and 2016.
The quotas are unchanged from the quotas for the 2011, 2012, and 2013
fishing years. This action sets allowable harvest levels of Atlantic
surfclams and ocean quahogs, prevents overfishing, and allows
harvesting of optimum yield. This action also continues to suspend the
minimum shell size for Atlantic surfclams for the 2014 fishing year.
DATES: This rule is effective December 20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the Environmental Assessment prepared for this
action is available upon request from the Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management (Council), 800 North State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE
09901.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Berthiaume, Fishery Management
Specialist, 978-281-9177.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog
Fishery Management Plan (FMP) requires that NMFS, in consultation with
the Council, specify quotas for surfclam and ocean quahog for a 3-yr
period, with an annual review, from a range that represents the optimum
yield (OY) for each fishery. It is the policy of the Council that the
levels selected allow sustainable fishing to continue at that level for
at least 10 yrs for surfclams, and 30 yrs for ocean quahogs. The
Council policy also considers the economic impacts of the quotas.
Regulations implementing Amendment 10 to the FMP (63 FR 27481, May 19,
1998) added Maine ocean quahogs (locally known as Maine mahogany
quahogs) to the management unit, and provided for a small artisanal
fishery for ocean quahogs in the waters north of 43[deg]50[min] N.
lat., with an annual quota within a range of 17,000 to 100,000 Maine
bushels (bu) (0.6 to 3.524 million L). As specified in Amendment 10,
the Maine mahogany ocean quahog quota is allocated separately from the
quota specified for the ocean quahog fishery. Regulations implementing
Amendment 13 to the FMP (68 FR 69970, December 16, 2003) established
the ability to set multi-year quotas. The Council annually reviews the
quota to determine whether the multi-year quota specifications remain
appropriate. The fishing quotas must be in compliance with overfishing
definitions for each species. In recommending these quotas, the Council
considered the most recent stock assessments and other relevant
scientific information.
In June 2013, the Council voted to recommend maintaining the 2013
quota levels of 5.333 million bu (284 million L) for the ocean quahog
fishery, 3.400 million bu (181 million L) for the Atlantic surfclam
fishery, and 100,000
[[Page 77006]]
Maine bu (3.524 million L) for the Maine ocean quahog fishery for 2014-
2016. The quotas for the 2014-2016 Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog
fishery are shown in the table below.
Final 2014-2016 Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Quotas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ocean Quahog
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year ABC ACL ACT Commercial quota
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014-2016........... 5.7 million bu (306 5.7 million bu (306 Maine ACT: 105,010 Maine Quota: 100,000
million L). million L). Maine bu (3.7 Maine bu (3.524
million L). million L).
Non-Maine ACT: 5.56 Non-Maine Quota: 5.3
million bu (298 million bu (284
million L). million L).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlantic Surfclam
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allowable Biological Annual Catch Limit Annual Catch Target
Year Catch (ABC) (ACL) (ACT) Commercial quota
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014................ 7.8 million bu (415 7.8 million bu (415 3.8 million bu (202 3.4 million bu (181
million L). million L). million L). million L).
2015................ 6.7 million bu (202 6.7 million bu (202 3.8 million bu (202 3.4 million bu (181
million L). million L). million L). million L).
2016................ 6.2 million bu (188 6.2 million bu (188 3.8 million bu (115 3.4 million bu (115
million L). million L). million L). million L).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog quotas are specified in
``industry'' bushels of 53.24 L per bushel, while the Maine ocean
quahog quota is specified in Maine bushels of 35.24 L per bushel.
Because Maine ocean quahogs are the same species as ocean quahogs, both
fisheries are assessed under the same ocean quahog overfishing
definition. When the two quota amounts (ocean quahog and Maine ocean
quahog) are added, the total allowable harvest is still lower than the
level that would result in overfishing for the entire stock.
Surfclams
In 1999, the Council expressed its intention to increase the
surfclam quota to OY over a period of 5 yrs (OY = 3.4 million bu (181
million L)). The proposed 2014-2016 status quo surfclam quota was
developed after reviewing the results of the Northeast Regional Stock
Assessment Workshop (SAW) 56 for Atlantic surfclam, released to the
public in 2013. The surfclam quota recommendation is consistent with
the SAW 56 finding that the Atlantic surfclam stock is not overfished,
nor is overfishing occurring. Based on this information, the Council
recommended, and NMFS maintains, the status quo surfclam quota of 3.4
million bu (181 million L) for 2014-2016. This quota represents the
maximum allowable quota under the FMP.
Ocean Quahogs
In April 2013, the ocean quahog stock assessment was updated and
found that the ocean quahog stock is not overfished, nor is overfishing
occurring. Ocean quahog is a low productivity stock that is being
fished down from its pre-fishery level; however, after several decades
of relatively low fishing mortality, the stock is still above the
biomass target reference points. This action maintains the status quo
quota of 5.333 million bu (284 million L) for 2014-2016.
The 2014-2016 quota for Maine ocean quahogs is the status quo level
of 100,000 Maine bu (3.524 million L). In 2008, the State of Maine
completed a stock assessment of the resource within the Maine Mahogany
Quahog Zone. The findings of the Maine quahog survey did not change the
status of the entire ocean quahog resource. The quotas represent the
maximum allowable quota under the FMP.
Comments
We received six comments on the proposed rule; five from members of
the Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog industry and one from the
general public. All comments supported the quotas in the proposed rule.
Changes From Proposed Rule to Final Rule
There are no changes from the proposed to final rule.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA, has determined that this
final rule is consistent with the Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog
FMP, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable
law.
NMFS finds good cause to waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness
period for this action. A delay in the effective date of this final
rule would disrupt the surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries and would
also likely cause substantial confusion and raise administrative
issues. There is no rollover provision in the surfclam and ocean quahog
fisheries; therefore, if the specifications are not in place by the
start of the fishing year on January 1, 2014, the following would
result: (1) No 2014-2016 proposed specifications for these fisheries
would be published; (2) the indefinite management measures for each of
these species would remain unchanged; (3) there would be no specific
cap on the allowable annual catch (i.e., annual catch limits) and
landings in each of these fisheries (i.e., no commercial quotas), and
(4) individual transferable quota (ITQ) tags would be issued to owners
in 2014-2016 (however, these tags would technically have no meaning as
the specifications would not be set).
Further, because there is no rollover provision, the only
regulatory controls on fishing effort and harvests would be the
indefinite measures. These include Sec. 648.14(j), which states that
``It is unlawful for any person to do any of the following: Land or
possess any surfclams or ocean quahogs harvested in or from the EEZ
without having been issued, or in excess of, an individual
allocation.'' Because it prohibits landing or possessing surflcams or
ocean quahogs, Sec. 648.14(j), could effectively prohibit the fishery
from operating, if quotas were not in place for January 1, 2014. Note
that this provision is at odds with Sec. 648.75(b), which requires
NMFS to issue tags to ITQ allocation holders prior to the fishing year.
Therefore, if NMFS does not waive the delay in effectiveness, NMFS will
have already
[[Page 77007]]
provided ITQ allocation holders with their allocation information and
tags that would otherwise allow them to fish, but without quotas being
allocated.
ITQ shareholders each receive a portion of the overall annual
quotas for the two species. An allocation holder receives an amount of
cage tags equivalent to his/her share of the overall quota each year.
As discussed above, fishing for surfclams and ocean quahogs can
potentially begin on January 1, each year, regardless of the
publication of the annual quota, as the tags are issued each year prior
to January 1, pursuant to Sec. 648.75(b). As such, waiving the 30-day
delay in effectiveness would ensure that the quota for surfclams and
ocean quahogs is in place for January 1, 2014, thus preventing any
conflicts between these regulations. On the contrary, not waiving the
30-day delay in effectiveness would result in tags being issued, with
no associated value, as the quotas would not be in place.
Lastly, ITQ allocations are often transferred, either permanently
or temporarily, immediately upon the commencement of the fishing year
to meet adjust to any new circumstances in the fishery. Without a quota
in effect, the industry does not have the ability to transfer
allocation either permanently or temporarily. The inability of the
industry to make such transfers effective would preclude the intended
recipients of such transfers from fishing. Accordingly, a delay in the
effectiveness of this rule would be contrary to the rule's intent to
maintain current quota levels that have the full support of the fishing
industry and that facilitate the transfer of quotas requested by the
industry.
The inability to transfer quota would be contrary to the public
interest because it would preclude the intended recipients of such
transfers from fishing, thereby resulting in a negative economic impact
on the industry. Also, not having quotas in effect would cause
substantial confusion and could raise legal and enforcement issues,
since fishery participants would already have their ITQ allocation
tags, but the tags would technically not have any meaning as the
specifications would not have been set. Therefore, it is necessary to
waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness, as a delay in effectiveness
would compromise the start of the fishing year and thereby undermine
the intent of this rule, contrary to the public's interest.
This final rule is exempt from the requirements of E.O. 12866.
The Council prepared an EA for this action that analyzes the
impacts of this rule. A copy of the EA is available from the Federal e-
Rulemaking portal www.regulations.gov. Type ``NOAA-NMFS-2013-0139'' in
the ID field and click search. A copy of the EA is also available upon
request from the Council (see ADDRESSES).
A final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RSA). The
FRFA describes the economic impacts this final rule would have on small
entities. The FRFA incorporates the IRFA, the RIR, a summary of the
significant issues raised by the public comments in response to the
IRFA, NMFS' responses to those comments, and a summary of the analyses
completed to support the action. A copy of the IRFA and EA are
available upon request (see ADDRESSES). A summary of the IRFA was
published in the proposed rule for this action and is not repeated
here. A description of why this action was considered, the objectives
of, and the legal basis for, this rule is contained in the preamble to
the proposed rule and this final rule and is not repeated here.
A Summary of the Significant Issues Raised by the Public Comments in
Response to the IRFA, a Summary of the Assessment of the Agency of Such
Issues, and a Statement of Any Changes Made in the Proposed Rule as a
Result of Such Comments
NMFS received no comments relative to the IRFA or economic impacts
of the proposed 2014-2016 specifications for the Atlantic surfclam and
ocean quahog fisheries. No changes were made from the proposed to final
rule.
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which This
Final Rule Would Apply
The final measures would only affect vessels holding an active
Federal open access surfclam and/or ocean quahog permit. The SBA
defines a small commercial shellfish fishing entity as a firm with
gross annual receipts not exceeding $5 million. In 2012, 42 vessels
reported harvesting surfclams and/or ocean quahogs from Federal waters
under the IFQ system. In addition, 12 vessels participated in the
limited access Maine ocean quahog fishery, for a total of 54
participants in 2012. Average 2012 gross income was $950,000 per
vessel. Each vessel in this analysis is treated as a single entity for
purposes of size determination and impact assessment. All 54 commercial
fishing entities fall below the SBA size threshold for small commercial
shellfish fishing entities.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements
This action does not introduce any new reporting, recordkeeping, or
other compliance requirements. This final rule does not duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with other Federal rules.
Description of the Steps Taken To Minimize Economic Impact on Small
Entities
Specifications
The final quotas for 2014-2016 reflect the same quota levels set
for 2011-2013. Therefore, it is not expected that there will be any
different economic impacts beyond status quo resulting from the quotas.
Leaving the ocean quahog quota at the harvest level of 5.333 million bu
(284 million L) is not expected to constrain the fishery. The surfclam
quota is set to the maximum allowed under the FMP of 3.4 million bu
(181 million L).
The Maine ocean quahog quota is set at the maximum allowed under
the FMP of 100,000 Maine bu (3.524 million L). It is anticipated that
by maintaining the status quo quota level for the next 3 years, the
fishing industry will benefit from the stability of product demand from
the seafood processors and being able to predict future fishery
performance based on past performance from the last 3 yrs.
Alternatives to these status quo quotas were considered, but were
not adopted. The alternatives would have resulted in more restrictive
quotas and would not have been in the best interest of the fishery. In
addition, the Council and the industry both support the status quo
quotas being adopted in this action. As a result, since the non-
selected alternatives would have resulted in a negative impacts to
fisheries and would have been contrary to achieving optimum yield,
while preventing overfishing, the alternatives were not adopted.
Minimum Size Suspension for Atlantic Surfclams
The minimum size limit for surfclams has been suspended since 2005.
Therefore, because this action would not impose a minimum size limit,
and because no net change in fishing effort, participation in the
fishery, or fishery expenses are expected, it is anticipated that this
action would not impose any additional costs on the industry. In fact,
continuing to suspend the minimum size limit would likely have positive
economic affects in contrast to not suspending the minimum size limit,
as not suspending the minimum size limit would likely reduce vessel
efficiency
[[Page 77008]]
through time spent measuring and culling small surfclams.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule, or group of related rules, for
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance
guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is
required to make to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of
this rulemaking process, a small entity compliance guide will be sent
to all holders of permits issued either a surfclam or ocean quahog
permit, as well as surfclam and ocean quahog dealers. In addition,
copies of this final rule and guide (i.e., bulletin) are available from
the Regional Administrator (see ADDRESSES) and may be found at the
following Web site: www.nero.noaa.gov.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: December 16, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, performing the functions and
duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-30313 Filed 12-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P