Section 306D Water Systems for Rural and Native Villages in Alaska, 77009-77019 [2013-30189]
Download as PDF
77009
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 245
Friday, December 20, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
Room 5159, Washington, DC 20250–
1522.
Additional information about the
Agency and its programs is available on
the Internet at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/UWEP_
HomePage.html.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rural Utilities Service
7 CFR Part 1784
RIN 0572–AC28
Section 306D Water Systems for Rural
and Native Villages in Alaska
Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Rural Utilities Service
(RUS), an Agency of the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA),
proposes to modify its existing
regulations and establish a separate
regulation for making grants to rural or
Native Alaskan Villages under the Rural
Alaska Village Grant (RAVG) Program.
The existing RAVG regulation (7 CFR
1780.49) will be relocated to its own
section and modified to conform with
streamlined processes established
through a Memorandum of
Understanding among USDA, RUS; The
United States Department of Health and
Human Services, Indian Health Service
(IHS); The State of Alaska, Department
of Environmental Conservation (DEC);
and the Alaska Native Tribal Health
Consortium (ANTHC). The grants will
be provided directly to a rural or Native
Alaskan Village or jointly with either
DEC or ANTHC for the development
and construction of water and
wastewater systems to improve the
health and sanitation conditions in
those Villages through removal of dire
sanitation conditions.
DATES: Comments must be submitted by
February 18, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments by either
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
instructions for submitting comments.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send your comment addressed to
Michele Brooks, Director, Program
Development and Regulatory Analysis,
USDA Rural Development, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 1522,
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
Jacqueline M. Ponti-Lazaruk, Assistant
Administrator, Water and
Environmental Programs, Rural Utilities
Service, Rural Development, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 1548,
Room 5147, Washington, DC 20250–
1590. Telephone number: (202) 690–
2670, Facsimile: (202) 720–0718.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. RUS has determined
that this rule meets the applicable
standards provided in section 3 of that
Executive Order. In addition, all State
and local laws and regulations that are
in conflict with this rule will be
preempted. No retroactive effect will be
given to the rule and, in accordance
with section 212(e) of the Department of
Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994
(7 U.S.C. 6912(e)), administrative appeal
procedures must be exhausted before an
action against the Department or its
agencies may be initiated.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), this
proposed rule related to grants is
exempt from the rulemaking
requirements of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.),
including the requirement to provide
prior notice and an opportunity for
public comment. Because this rule is
not subject to a requirement to provide
prior notice and an opportunity for
public comment pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553, or any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are
inapplicable.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Information Collection and
Recordkeeping Requirements
The information collection and
recordkeeping requirements contained
in this rule will not be effective until
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), subject to the
submission of a paperwork package for
which the Agency intends to request
approval from OMB pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35). RUS invites
comments, on any aspect of this
collection of information including
suggestions for reducing the burden.
Send questions or comments regarding
this information collection to Michele
Brooks, Director, Program Development
and Regulatory Analysis, Rural Utilities
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
STOP 1522, Washington, DC 20250–
152, FAX: (202) 720–8435.
Organizations applying for the RAVG
program must submit an application
which includes an application form,
various other forms, certifications, and
supplemental information. RUS will use
the information collected from
applicants, borrowers, and consultants
to determine applicant eligibility,
project feasibility, and the applicant’s
ability to meet the grant and regulatory
requirements. Failure to collect proper
information could result in improper
determinations of eligibility, improper
use of funds, or hindrances in making
grants authorized by the RAVG program.
The applicant will submit the
following information:
SF–424, ‘‘Application for Federal
Assistance’’
Applicants use this form as a required
cover sheet for applications submitted
for RAVG grants. The application is an
official form required for all Federal
grants and requests basic information
about the applicant and the proposed
project.
Form—RD Instruction 1940–Q, Exhibit
A–1, ‘‘Certification for Contracts,
Grants, and Loans’’
Applicants read and sign this
certification. Submission of this
certification is a prerequisite for making
or entering into this transaction
imposed by 31 U.S.C. 1352.
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
77010
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
RD 400–1, ‘‘Equal Opportunity
Agreement’’
Applicants read and sign these forms
to assure RUS that they agree to and will
comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, and the Equal Opportunity
Clause under Executive Order 11246 of
September 24, 1965.
RD 442–7, ‘‘Operating Budget’’
All applicants use the form to project
income and expense items and a
complete cash flow through the first full
year of operations after they use the loan
proceeds. These projections are
necessary in determining the source and
reliability of the projected income and
the adequacy of resources to repay the
loan in a timely manner, operate and
maintain the facility, and maintain
adequate reserves.
Written—Certification Regarding
Prohibited Tying Arrangements
Applicants that provide electric
service must provide the Agency a
certification that they will not require
users of a water or waste facility
financed under this part to accept
electric service as a condition of
receiving assistance.
Form AD–1047, ‘‘Certification Regarding
Debarment, Suspension, and Other
Responsibility Matters—Primary
Covered Transactions’’
USDA regulations published at 2 CFR
Parts 180 and 417 implement the
government-wide debarment and
suspension system for USDA’s nonprocurement transactions. Applicants
for RAVG grants are required to provide
certification under these regulations.
Form AD–1047 may also be used to
obtain the required certification.
Form AD–1048, ‘‘Certification Regarding
Debarment, Suspension, and Other
Responsibility Matters—Lower Tier
Covered Transactions.’’
Form AD–1048 will be signed by the
applicant’s suppliers, auditors,
contractors, etc., and retained by the
applicant in their files.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Form AD–1049, ‘‘Certification Regarding
Drug-Free Workplace Requirements
(Grants) Alternative I—for Grantees
Other Than Individuals’’
USDA regulations published at 2 CFR
Parts 180 and 417 implement the DrugFree Workplace Act of 1988, which
requires that grant recipients agree that
they will maintain a drug-free
workplace. Applicants are required to
provide certification under these
regulations. Form AD–1049 may also be
used to obtain the required certification.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
Written—Land Surveyors Certification
and Opinion of Right of Way
The document will include legal
descriptions of lands created for parcels
and shown in referenced documents are
true and correct.
Written—Civil Rights Compliance
Assurance Self Certification
Applicant certifies that it will comply
with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964. The certification can be a written
self-certification statement.
Written—Approved Business Plan
The business plan will include the
resolution adopting the plan and outline
the proposed O&M costs, rate structures,
short-lived asset rate schedule and
associated materials.
Written—Preliminary Engineering
Report
Applicants must submit a preliminary
engineering report (PER) prepared by a
qualified engineer. The PER indicates
areas to be served, scope and need of the
project, cost estimate, annual operating
expenses, etc. This report is necessary
for RUS to determine project feasibility.
Written—Supporting Documentation
Applicants must provide
documentation of legal organization and
authority to borrow funds, construct,
operate, manage the facility, etc. The
documentation may include articles of
incorporation, certificate of
incorporation and good standing,
bylaws, rules, and organizational
minutes. Applicants also must provide
financial information such as financial
statements, audits, or existing debt
instruments. This information is
necessary for RUS to determine an
organization’s legal existence, authority
to perform certain functions, and
financial capacity to borrow funds.
requirements for submitting an audit
report under OMB Circular A–133 are
based on the total amount of Federal
financial assistance expended during a
grantee’s fiscal year from all Federal
sources. Grantees that expend $500,000
or more in a year in Federal awards
must have a single audit conducted for
that year under OMB Circular A–133.
Those that expend less than $500,000 in
Federal awards and have an outstanding
RUS loan balance equal to or greater
than $1,000,000 must submit an audit in
accordance with Water and Waste
Disposal audit requirements. Grantees
expending less than $500,000 in Federal
assistance and having a RUS loan
balance less than $1,000,000 may
submit a management report instead of
an audit report. RUS will designate the
type of audit grantees must submit.
Written—Management Reports
All grantees must furnish
management reports that will provide
management a means of evaluating prior
decisions and serve as a basis for
planning future operations and financial
strategies. This requirement is necessary
to help assure that the facility will be
properly managed and to protect the
financial interest of the Government.
The following information/forms are
collected and accounted for under other
collection packages:
SF–424C, ‘‘Budget Information—
Construction Programs’’
Applicants estimate costs and
expenses for the grant project. The form
also provides information on matching
funds. This form is submitted as part of
the pre-application and if the project is
selected, as part of the formal
application.
SF–424D, ‘‘Assurances—Construction
Programs’’
Written—Grant Agreement
The Grant Agreement sets forth the
terms and conditions under which the
applicant receives a RUS grant.
Applicants and RUS must execute the
document before RUS disburses grant
funds.
Applicants will read and sign this
form to indicate the organization’s
intent to comply with the laws,
regulations, and policies to which a
grant is subject.
Written—Audits Based on Federal
Assistance
Grantees must submit audited
financial statements annually in
accordance with Generally Accepted
Government Auditing Standards
(GAGAS). The audit must comply with
the requirements of OMB Circular A–
133, ‘‘Audits of State, Local
Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations’’ or Water and Waste
Disposal audit requirements. The
Applicant will complete all items on
the form that apply for both the initial
filing and material change report.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SF–LLL, ‘‘Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities’’
RD 442–3, ‘‘Balance Sheet’’
All applicants and borrowers use this
form to present their assets, liabilities,
and net worth. Borrowers whose gross
annual income is less than $100,000
may use it at year-end. This form is
necessary for all applicants, who
prepare it once to present a comparative
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
balance sheet for the most current and
prior years.
RD 442–2, ‘‘Statement of Budget,
Income and Equity’’
This form serves a dual purpose as a
budget and an income and expense
statement. RUS generally requires new
borrowers to submit it each quarter for
the first 3 years so RUS can monitor
financial progress in the early years of
operation. The report is then
discontinued for those borrowers that
are progressing satisfactorily. As a
budget report, borrowers must submit
their budget estimates before the
beginning of each fiscal year. In these
cases only, column three is to be
completed. Borrowers, at their option,
may also use this form as a year-end
income and expense statement when
audited financial statements are not
prepared.
RD 442–22, ‘‘Opinion of Counsel
Regarding Right of Way’’
Applicants and their attorneys may
use this form in obtaining continuous
and adequate rights-of-way and interest
in land needed for the construction,
operation, and maintenance of a facility.
This form is.
RD 1942–19, ‘‘Agreement for
Engineering Services’’
Applicants must contract for the
professional services rendered from an
engineer, attorney, bond counsel,
accountant, auditor, appraiser, or
financial advisor. Contracts or other
forms of agreement for services
necessary for project planning and
development are subject to RUS
concurrence. Applicants must submit
them to RUS for review and
concurrence to ensure the needed
services will be available at a reasonable
cost.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
RD 400–4, ‘‘Assurance Agreement’’
Applicants read and sign these forms
to assure RUS that they agree to and will
comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, and the Equal Opportunity
Clause under Executive Order 11246 of
September 24, 1965.
RD 1942–6, ‘‘Letter of Intent To Meet
Conditions’’
Applicants complete this form to
indicate the intent to meet the
conditions of the loan established
previously by RUS. This information is
necessary to determine whether the
Agency should continue further
processing of the loan application.
Comments on this information
collection must be received by February
18, 2014.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
Comments are invited on (a) whether
the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumption used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques on
other forms and information technology.
Title: Rural Alaska Village Grant
Program (RAVG).
OMB Control Number: 0572–NEW.
Type of Request: New.
Abstract: The Rural Alaska Village
Grant (RAVG) Program is authorized
under Section 306D of the Consolidated
Farm and Rural Development Act
(CONACT), (7 U.S.C. 1926(d)), as
amended. Governing regulations are
currently codified in 7 CFR 1780.49.
Under this program, the Secretary may
make grants to the State of Alaska for
the benefit of rural or Native Villages in
Alaska to provide for the development
and construction of water and
wastewater systems to improve the
health and sanitation conditions in
those Villages.
This is new collection associated with
a proposed rule. RUS proposes to
modify its existing regulations and
establish a separate regulation for
making grants to rural or Native Alaskan
Villages under the Rural Alaska Village
Grant (RAVG) Program. The existing
RAVG regulation, 7 CFR 1780.49 will be
relocated to its own section and
modified to conform with the
established streamlined processes. The
collection of information from the
public is necessary in order for RUS to
identify projects eligible for RAVG
grants.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
for this collection of information is
estimated to average 2.05 hours per
responses.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
25.
Estimated Number of Total Annual
Responses per Respondents: 415.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 851.
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from MaryPat Daskal,
Program Development and Regulatory
Analysis at (202) 720–7853.
All responses to this information
collection and recordkeeping notice will
be summarized and included in the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77011
request for OMB approval. All
comments will also become a matter of
public record.
E-Government Act Compliance
RUS is committed to the EGovernment Act, which requires
Government agencies in general to
provide the public the option of
submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The program described by this
proposed rule is listed in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance Programs
under number 10.760. This catalog is
available electronically through the free
CFDA Web site on the Internet at
https://www.cfda.gov. The print edition
may be purchased by calling the
Superintendent of Documents at 202–
512–1800 or toll free at 866–512–1800,
or ordering it online at https://
bookstore.gpo.gov.
Executive Order 12372
All projects funded under this part are
subject to Executive Order 12372 (3
CFR, 1983 Comp., p. 197), which
requires intergovernmental consultation
with State and local officials. These
requirements are set forth in U.S.
Department of Agriculture regulations 7
CFR Part 3015, Subpart V, and RD
Instruction 1940 J. In the case of grants
made to DEC and ANTHC, DEC and
ANTHC will certify that the
requirements listed in paragraphs a–e
are included in their agreements with
the rural or Native Villages.
Unfunded Mandates
This proposed rule contains no
Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provision of Title II of the Unfunded
Mandate Reform Act of 1995) for State,
local, and tribal governments or the
private sector. Thus, this proposed rule
is not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded
Mandate Reform Act of 1995.
National Environmental Policy Act
Certification
RUS has determined that this
proposed rule will not significantly
affect the quality of the human
environment as defined by the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Therefore, this
action does not require an
environmental impact statement or
assessment.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The policies contained in this
proposed rule do not have any
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
77012
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
substantial direct effect on states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor does this
proposed rule impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments. Therefore, consultation
with the states is not required.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 13175
Executive Order 13175 imposes
requirements on RUS in the
development of regulatory policies that
have tribal implications or preempt
tribal laws. RUS has determined that
this proposed rule has a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribe(s) or on either the relationship or
the distribution of powers and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Therefore, in anticipation of the
publication of this proposed rule, RUS
focused its quarterly Tribal Consultation
webinar and teleconference process
during the summer of 2013 on the Rural
Alaska Village Grant program. A preconsultation briefing was held on June
20, 2013 to provide a thorough briefing
of the Rural Alaska Village Grant
program and the regulatory changes
under consideration. This was followed
by a Tribal Consultation webinar and
teleconference on July 17, 2013. Input
received by RUS through the Tribal
Consultation process will be considered
alongside comments to the proposed
rule and utilized in drafting the next
iteration of this rule. If a Tribe has
questions about the Tribal Consultation
process please contact Rural
Development’s Native American
Coordinator at (720) 544–2911 or
AIAN@wdc.usda.gov.
Background
The Rural Utilities Service, a Rural
Development agency of the United
States Department of Agriculture (RUS),
works to improve the quality of life in
rural America by providing investment
capital, in the form of loans, loan
guarantees, grants and technical
assistance for the deployment of rural
telecommunications, broadband,
electric, water and environmental
infrastructure. RUS loans, loan
guarantee and grant programs act as a
catalyst for economic and community
development. By financing
improvements to rural electric, water
and waste, and telecommunications and
broadband infrastructure, RUS plays a
significant role in improving other
measures of quality of life in rural
America, including public health and
safety, environmental protection,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
conservation, and cultural and historic
preservation.
Statutory Authorization
The Rural Alaska Village Grant
(RAVG) Program is authorized under
Section 306D of the Consolidated Farm
and Rural Development Act (CONACT),
(7 U.S.C. 1926(d)), as amended.
Governing regulations are currently
codified in 7 CFR 1780. Under this
program, the Secretary may make grants
to the State of Alaska for the benefit of
rural or Native Villages in Alaska to
provide for the development and
construction of water and wastewater
systems to improve the health and
sanitation conditions in those Villages.
To be eligible to receive a grant under
the RAVG program, the project must
provide 25 percent in matching funds
from the State of Alaska. The matching
funds must come from non-Federal
sources. The Secretary shall consult
with the State of Alaska on a method of
prioritizing the allocation of grants
according to the needs of, and relative
health and sanitation conditions in,
each village. Not more than 2 percent of
the amount made available for a fiscal
year may be used by the State of Alaska
for training and technical assistance
programs relating to the operation and
management of water and waste
disposal services in rural and Native
Villages. Appropriated funds shall be
available until expended.
The U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Indian Health Service
(IHS) is authorized to construct
sanitation and water supply facilities for
native villages, and to enter into
agreements and arrangements with
public agencies, non-profit
organizations and the native villages to
be served in furtherance of such
projects, pursuant to Public Law 86–
121, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2004a.
ANTHC is authorized to provide
statewide health services, including the
construction of sanitation and water
supply facilities, to Native beneficiaries
in Alaska pursuant to Public Law 105–
83, Sec. 325(a).
The Village Safe Water program is
authorized under the Village Safe Water
Act, Alaska Statute Title 46, Chapter 7
(AS 46.07), as amended.
RAVG History
The State of Alaska recognized the
need for adequate water and sewer
systems through the passage of the
Village Safe Water Act in 1970. The
purpose of the Village Safe Water (VSW)
program was to ‘‘establish a program
designed to provide safe water and
hygienic disposal facilities in the State
of Alaska.’’ There are several sources of
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
grant funding that support water and
waste projects in rural Alaska
communities. The VSW program
receives funding support from four
primary sources: The USDA, the
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), the Department of Health and
Human Services’ Indian Health Services
(IHS), and the State of Alaska. The
RAVG program is administered by the
Rural Development State Office. In
recent years, Congressional set-asides
have been provided to assist three
groups of rural Americans who have
great needs in improving their access to
clean water. Alaska Natives through the
RAVG program is one of those three
groups. Through the RAVG set-aside, up
to $25 million a year has been provided
since fiscal year (FY) 2006 to help the
Alaska VSW program fund projects
designed to improve public health and
provide clean, safe drinking water in
rural areas. The RAVG program is
currently administered under 7 CFR
1780.49 and is designed to provide up
to 75 percent grant funding to rural
Alaskan Villages that are trying to
address a dire sanitation problem.
Applicants must: (1) Be a rural Alaska
community that meets the definition of
a village under Alaska law and whose
population is 10,000 inhabitants or less;
(2) have a median household income
not exceeding 110 percent of the State
nonmetropolitan median household
income; and (3) obtain 25 percent of the
project costs from State of Alaska or
local contributions. When the State
provides the 25 percent matching funds,
it must come from nonfederal sources.
If the State contributes to the project
development costs, the project does not
have to meet the construction
requirements contained in 7 CFR part
1780.
The RAVG program is coordinated
with the Alaska Department of
Environmental Conservation (DEC) that
administers the VSW program, IHS,
EPA, and Rural Utilities Service. Grants
are awarded according to the needs of
and relative health and sanitation
conditions in each village.
On June 15, 2011, Rural Development
signed a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with federal and
state partners in Alaska that streamlines
policies and procedures for the RAVG
Program. The MOU is the result of an
initiative launched by USDA in April of
2010 to improve program delivery and
ensure that critical water and waste
services are provided to rural Alaskan
Villages. The inter-agency collaboration
has produced results throughout the
streamlining initiative. Between Fiscal
Year (FY) 2009 and FY 2012, 53
construction grants have been funded
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
providing service to 17,425 residents; 72
percent of the construction grants are
complete or nearly complete and the
remainders are underway. Also,
between FY 2009 and FY 2012, 68
planning grants have been funded; 76
percent of the planning grants are
complete or nearly complete and the
remainders are underway. In FY 2013,
an additional 8 construction grants and
2 planning grants were awarded and
will begin in the latter part of FY 2014.
The total amount of cost overruns
incurred since FY 2009 is $4,132,391.
The goals of the MOU are to
streamline the grant process, better align
the regulations to the statute, and
improve accountability within the
program; all of which would ultimately
address the dire sanitary conditions in
Rural Alaskan Villages more effectively.
Major changes to the existing process
included:
(a) Revised application review. RAVG
applications were processed pursuant to
7 CFR part 1780 which also covers the
process for the direct loan and grant
program. According to 7 U.S.C. 1926d,
it is clear that this program is intended
to be a grant program. Under the MOU,
the twenty-five (25) percent match
funding from the state of Alaska serves
as applicant contribution and the
Sanitary Deficiency System (SDS)
categorization of the projects serves as
the indicator of need for the project.
Also, because this is a grant program,
the credit elsewhere requirements in 7
CFR part 1780 and in Section 333(1)(A)
of the Consolidated Farm and Rural
Development Act (CONACT) do not
apply.
(b) An updated two-stage funding
process. A two-stage funding process
was implemented where applications
for planning grants are submitted in the
first stage to allow for development of
preliminary engineering reports (PER)
and environmental reports (ER) related
to proposed construction projects. Once
the planning activities are completed,
construction applications are
entertained for those projects. Due to the
dire conditions and unique economic
conditions in rural Alaskan Villages,
there are limited, or no, funds available
from the applicant to complete the
application process. Under the MOU,
applications for construction are filed
after the planning grant is completed.
As a result, the projects are well
planned and RUS is able to fund
projects with a high level of confidence.
The result is the elimination of future
cost overruns and incomplete projects
that were experienced prior to the MOU.
(c) Bundled applications. Under the
MOU, DEC and ANTHC are permitted to
bundle applications and seek funding
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
for multiple construction projects in
multiple villages within a single
application. The single application is
called the master application. DEC and
ANTHC are responsible for managing
the projects and accounting for funds
associated with every project under the
master application. Although RUS
obligates funds for multiple projects in
a single obligation, measures are
included in the MOU process to avoid
issues previously experienced with the
RAVG program and to account for
funding as identified in the 2010 Office
of the Inspector General (OIG) report. To
address concerns raised by OIG in their
audit, the following measures were
implemented:
(a) Standardized construction
information. A PER is required for each
construction project proposed within a
single application.
(b) Funds are designated within the
master obligation for specific projects.
Funds cannot be transferred from one
project to another.
(c) Excess funds on projects are
required to be returned to RUS. These
funds are then returned to the RAVG
funding account and used for other
projects. This allows the RUS to extend
the reach of the program and ensure that
funds are used only for the purposes
specified.
(d) Specific reporting requirements for
DEC and ANTHC were also established
in the MOU. These allow RUS to
effectively account for funds and track
the progress on projects funded.
(e) Streamlined environmental
process. IHS has been designated as the
lead agency for the environmental
process because they have specialized
expertise in this area and a local
presence. For projects administered by
ANTHC, IHS will be the lead agency for
the environmental review process and
required determinations applicable to
various environmental laws and
regulations. The ANTHC shall notify the
funding agencies and the IHS if a
change in the project or project’s scope
occurs which could change
environmental determinations or could
adversely impact the environment. The
IHS shall bear no mitigation costs as it
is not a funding agency for projects
under the MOU. The environmental
review process established in the MOU
will result in a more streamlined review
process minimizing duplication of
efforts and provide clarity to roles and
responsibilities of all concerned parties.
(f) Appointment of a dedicated
program coordinator. Finally, to ensure
success of the new process, RUS
appointed a RAVG Program Coordinator
who is solely dedicated to RAVG
program delivery.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77013
Ultimately the MOU has achieved the
goal of streamlining the RAVG process.
The program is working well under the
MOU. Applications are being filed by
ANTHC and DEC on behalf of villages.
Those applications are being processed
in a timely manner by RUS, and the
State of Alaska continues to provide a
25 percent match of funds to projects.
Most importantly, the construction of
projects is occurring as proposed and
the quality of life is improving in rural
Alaskan Villages. The following are two
examples of how the process adopted
under the MOU is achieving program
results:
(1) Lower Kalskag, Alaska (Funding
amount: $6,879,155). The thought of
having to haul a honey bucket, in winter
temperatures that drop to ¥55 °F, is an
unpleasant scenario. For some residents
in the community of Lower Kalskag, and
other rural Alaskan communities, this is
a reality. The community of Lower
Kalskag, Alaska is remotely located 350
miles west of Anchorage in a persistent
poverty area. This small community has
a population of around 280, and roughly
50 percent of its homes still lack
adequate sanitation systems. The lack of
adequate sanitation services is a dire
health and safety issue faced daily by
residents of this small, remote
community. In those households, the
individual residents must haul their
waste from their homes in honey
buckets (five gallon buckets), regardless
of the temperature outside. The
community of Lower Kalskag provides a
glimpse of the progress and success of
the MOU that was executed by RUS and
its partners on June 15, 2011. Those
partners, including the ANTHC, State of
Alaska’s Village Safe Water Program,
and IHS, are essential in helping to
provide rural Alaskan communities
with safe and healthy sanitation
systems. Under the MOU, a phased
approach is being utilized to
successfully get projects moving
through to the construction phase. It is
through that phased approach the
community of Lower Kalskag has
received service from the RAVG
program. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2010, the
community of Lower Kalskag received a
grant from the RAVG program in the
amount of $869,193 to design proposed
utility improvements. The design was
finalized in early 2012 and allowed the
ANTHC, on behalf of Lower Kalskag, to
apply for a construction grant. In FY
2012, RUS awarded a construction grant
in the amount of $6,879,155 to construct
wastewater improvements that will
serve 34 homes. Due to the phased
approach, construction is anticipated to
be underway by the spring of 2014. The
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
77014
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
effort to retire the use of honey buckets
in this community, and other rural
Alaskan communities, is no small feat.
The result of those efforts and the grants
provided by the RUS’s RAVG program
will help improve the health and safety
of community members for generations
to come.
(2) Pitkas Point, Alaska (Funded as
both a design planning grant and two
construction grants). Most Americans
take their supply of sanitary water and
effective wastewater disposal for
granted. Water as close as the nearest
faucet and easy access to restrooms is
often taken for granted. Residents of
Pitkas Point had to deal with unhealthy
water and wastewater conditions that
were staggering. They were in dire need
of a water supply, water treatment
facilities and wastewater treatment and
collection facilities. Drinking water was
hauled from local watering points,
which did not meet safe drinking water
standards. Wastewater was hauled in
honey buckets along the same route
children played on and where they
traveled to and from school. RAVG
assistance included a preplanning and
development grant in FY 2009 in the
amount of $378,966 to design water
distribution mains and sewer collection
mains; and two construction grants were
awarded in FY 2010 in the amount of
$6,891,750 and $2,214,769 to construct
core sanitation facilities and a piped
water and wastewater system. The
project became fully operational on
September 8, 2011. Funding for this
critical infrastructure project made it
possible for the Pitkas Point community
to construct a variety of basic water and
waste needs for this rural community.
(d) Establishing a single lead
responsible for facilitating each
applicable agencies’ environmental and
historic preservation review
requirements for all projects.
Purpose of This Proposed Rule
The purpose of this proposed rule is
to solicit comments on proposed
modifications to the current RAVG
regulation. Specifically, the
modifications include:
(1) Move regulation requirements
from inclusion in 7 CFR part 1780, to
new part 7 CFR part 1784;
(2) Elimination of the RAVG
regulatory language currently located in
7 CFR part 1780; and
(3) Key streamlining measures which
include:
(a) Revised application review so the
evaluation process is based on need for
grant only;
(b) A new application process that
allows the state of Alaska to bundle
applications from multiple villages into
a single master application;
(c) Improved reporting and tracking
measures to ensure accountability of
funds and completion of projects in a
timely fashion; and
Subpart A—General Provisions
Sec.
1784.1 Purpose.
1784.2 Definitions.
1784.3 Objective.
1784.4–1784.7 [Reserved]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
Request for Comments
RUS invites interested parties
including, but not limited to, Tribes,
Rural or Native Villages in Alaska,
Alaska Native Regional and Village
Corporations, financial and lending
institutions, trade associations,
consumer groups and individuals to
provide any information or analyses
they believe to be relevant to the issues
discussed in this proposed rule and to
the implementation of the grant
program. RUS is proposing to codify the
process developed under the MOU and
establish rules for the RAVG program
under the new part 7 CFR part 1784.
The proposed regulation includes all of
the streamlined approaches and
accountability measures from the MOU.
RUS seeks comment on these changes.
List of Subjects
Agriculture, Community
development, Community facilities,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rural areas, Sewage
disposal, Waste treatment and disposal,
Water pollution control, Water supply,
Watersheds.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, RUS proposes to amend 7
CFR chapter XVII of Title 7 of the Code
of Federal Regulations by adding a new
part 1784 to read as follows:
PART 1784—RURAL ALASKAN
VILLAGE GRANTS
Subpart B—Grant Requirements
1784.8 Eligibility.
1784.9 Grant Amount.
1784.10 Eligible Grant Purposes.
1784.11 Restrictions.
1784.12–1784.15 [Reserved]
Subpart C—Application Processing
1784.16 Application for Master Plan grant.
1784.17 Application for Pre-development
grants.
1784.18 Application for Construction
grants.
1784.19 Applications accepted from DEC or
ANTHC.
1784.20 Other forms and certifications.
1784.21 Other requirements.
1784.22 Lead Agency Environmental
Review.
1784.23–1784.25 [Reserved]
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Subpart D—Grant Processing
1784.26 Planning, Development and
Procurement.
1784.27 Grant closing and Disbursement of
funds.
1784.28 Grantee Accounting Methods,
Management Reporting and Audits.
1784.29 Grant Servicing and
Accountability.
1784.30 Subsequent grants.
1784.31 Exception Authority.
1784.32–1784.34 [Reserved]
Subpart E—Design, Bidding, Contracting,
Constructing, and Inspections
1784.35 General.
1784.36 Procurement by Applicants Eligible
Under 1784.8(a)(2) and (3).
1784.37 Procurement by Applicants Eligible
Under 1784.8(a)(1).
1784.38–1784.99 [Reserved]
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1926d.
Subpart A.—General Provisions
§ 1784.1
Purpose.
This part sets forth the policies and
procedures that will apply when the
Rural Utilities Service (RUS) makes
grants under the Rural Alaska Village
Grant (RAVG) program to rural or Native
Villages in Alaska. The grants will be
provided directly to a rural or native
village or jointly with either The State
of Alaska, Department of Environmental
Conservation (DEC) or The Alaska
Native Tribal Health Consortium
(ANTHC) for the benefit of rural or
native villages in Alaska.
§ 1784.2
Definitions.
The following definitions apply to
subparts A through E of this part.
ANTHC means the Alaska Native
Tribal Health Consortium.
CONACT means the Consolidated
Farm and Rural Development Act.
DEC means the State of Alaska,
Department of Environmental
Conservation.
Dire sanitation conditions means:
(1) Recurring instances of a
waterborne communicable disease have
been documented; or
(2) No community-wide water and
sewer system exists and individual
residents must haul water to or human
waste from their homes and/or use pit
privies; or (3) An appropriate regulatory
Agency of the State of Alaska
determines that an imminent threat of a
waterborne communicable disease is
present.
Grant recipient means an applicant
that has been awarded a Rural Alaskan
Village Grant under this part.
IHS means the United States
Department of Health and Human
Services, Indian Health Service.
RAVG means Rural Alaskan Village
Grant, a grant awarded by RUS, DEC,
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
and/or ANTHC to a grant recipient
under this part.
Rural or Native Villages in Alaska
means a rural community or Native
village in Alaska which meets the
definition of a village under State
statutes and does not have a population
in excess of 10,000 inhabitants,
according to the U.S. Census American
Community Survey.
RD means Rural Development, a
federal agency mission area delivering
the United States Department of
Agriculture’s programs to rural
communities.
Recipient community means a
community that has been awarded a
grant under this part.
RUS means the Rural Utilities
Service, a federal agency delivering the
United States Department of
Agriculture’s rural utilities programs.
Short-lived assets means repair and
replacement items expended each year
that are not included in the annual
Operational and Maintenance expenses
as annual repair and maintenance.
Statewide nonmetropolitan median
household income (SNMHI) means the
median household income of the State’s
nonmetropolitan counties and portions
of metropolitan counties outside of
cities, towns or places of 50,000 or more
population.
USDA means the United States
Department of Agriculture.
VSW means Village Safe Water
Program authorized under the Village
Safe Water Act, Alaska Statute Title 46,
Chapter 7 (AS 46.07).
§ 1784.3
Objective.
The objective of the RAVG Program is
to assist the residents of rural or Native
Villages in Alaska to provide for the
development and construction of water
and wastewater systems to improve the
health and sanitation conditions in
those Villages through removal of dire
sanitation conditions.
§ 1784.4–1784.7
[Reserved]
Subpart B—Grant Requirements
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1784.8
Eligibility.
(a) Grants may be made to the
following eligible applicants:
(1) A rural or native village in Alaska;
and/or
(2) DEC on behalf of one or more rural
or native villages in Alaska; or
(3) ANTHC on behalf of one or more
rural or native villages in Alaska.
(b) Grants made to DEC or ANTHC
may be obligated through a master letter
of conditions for more than one rural or
native village in Alaska; however, DEC
or ANTHC together with each
individual rural or native village
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
beneficiary shall execute a grant
agreement on a project by project basis.
Expenditures for projects will be based
on specific scope and be requested on
a project by project basis.
(c) For grants proposed to be
administered directly by a community,
the responsibility to meet the
requirements outlined in this part will
be met by the community. RUS will be
the lead agency on direct administration
projects.
(d) The median household income of
the rural or native village cannot exceed
110 percent of the statewide
nonmetropolitan household income,
according to US Census American
Community Survey. Alaska census
communities considered to be high cost
isolated areas or ‘‘off the road systems’’
(i.e. communities that cannot be
accessed by roads) may utilize up to 150
percent of SNMHI.
(e) A dire sanitation condition as
defined in § 1784.2 must exist in the
village served by the proposed project.
For those projects identified under (1)
and (3) of the dire sanitation definition,
a notice of violation, consent order or
other enforcement action from the
appropriate regulatory agency must be
provided to document the dire
sanitation condition.
(f) In order for an eligible applicant to
receive a grant under the Rural Alaska
Village Grant program, the State of
Alaska shall provide 25 percent in
matching funds from non-Federal
sources.
(g) In processing grants through DEC
and ANTHC, a public meeting must be
held to inform the general public
regarding the development of any
proposed project. Documentation of the
public meeting must be received with
construction applications.
(1) A notice of intent must be
published in a newspaper of general
circulation in the proposed area to be
served.
(2) For projects where there are no
newspapers of general circulation, a
posting of the notice in a community
building (post office, washeteria, clinic,
etc.) frequented by village residents may
be used to meet the requirement. This
alternative form of notice has been
authorized by the RUS Administrator.
§ 1784.9
Grant Amount.
Grants will be made for up to 75
percent of the project development and/
or construction costs. Pursuant to
Section 306 D of the CONACT, the State
of Alaska shall provide 25 percent in
matching funds from non-Federal
sources.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 1784.10
77015
Eligible Grant Purposes.
Grant funds may be used for the
following purposes:
(a) To pay reasonable costs associated
with providing potable water or waste
disposal services to residents of rural or
native villages in Alaska.
(b) To pay reasonable costs associated
with the use of a recipient community’s
equipment during construction. (i.e.
maintenance, minor repairs, and
operational costs). A cost accounting
system that is accurate to track expenses
must be in place. Use of ANTHC or
State of Alaska equipment fleet rental
costs will also be eligible. RUS
concurrence in the allocation method is
required.
(1) Reasonable costs include
construction, master planning,
predevelopment costs (including
engineering, design, and rights-of-way
establishment), and technical assistance
as further defined below:
(i) Master planning. Grants can be
made specifically for Master planning
costs associated with the prioritization
process.
(ii) Pre-Development. Grants can be
made for pre-development costs such as
preliminary engineering, environmental,
application development, review and
establishment of rights-of-way and
easement, and full construction design
for up to $1,000,000 for each eligible
village. Prior to approving additional
pre-development costs, a preliminary
engineering report (PER) and/or
approved PER like document, such as
the Cooperative Project Agreement and
supplemental documents from ANTHC
and an environmental report shall be
reviewed and concurred by RUS, DEC,
ANTHC, and IHS.
(iii) Training and Technical
Assistance. Not more than 2 percent of
the funding made available each fiscal
year may be used by the State of Alaska
for training and technical assistance
programs relating to the operation and
management of water and waste
disposal services in rural and native
villages. Grants for this purpose will be
processed in accordance with 7 CFR
Part 1775.
(c) Individual Installations:
(1) Individual service installation
relates to residential homes only and
does not include public facilities and/or
commercial facilities. The only
exception to serving a public facility is
when the facility is necessary for the
successful operation and maintenance
of the water or sanitation system (i.e. the
facility utilized for accepting utility
payments and/or holding public
meetings on the utility system).
(2) Individual home installations,
including wells, septic system, flush
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
77016
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
tank & haul, in-house plumbing, etc.,
may be provided. The following
guidelines must be followed for
individual installations. A certification
will be required with the application
that provides documentation of the
following:
(i) The residents are unable to afford
to make the improvements on their own.
(ii) An agreement outlining the
installation, operation, and maintenance
of facilities must be in place.
(iii) An adequate method for denying
service in the event of non-payment of
user fees.
(iv) All residents of the community
are treated equally.
(v) The improvements provided are
reasonable and modest.
(vi) Legal authority (i.e. easements) is
obtained to construct these
improvements.
(vii) Documentation must be provided
to RUS indicating the quantity and
quality of the individual installations
that may be developed; cost
effectiveness of the individual facility
compared with initial and long term
user costs on a central system; health
and pollution problems attributable to
individual facilities; operational or
management problems peculiar to
individual installations; and permit of
regulatory agency requirements.
§ 1784.11
Restrictions.
Grant funds may not be used to:
(a) Pay any annual recurring costs that
are considered to be operational
expenses of a facility.
(b) Pay basic/rental fee or
depreciation for the use of the recipient
community’s equipment.
(c) Purchase existing systems.
(d) Pay for items not associated with
Rural Utilities Service’s approved scope
of work. This includes projects
developed from other funding sources.
§ 1784.12–1784.15
[Reserved]
applications under the Village Safe
Water Program.
(b) In order to be considered for
funding, projects must be included in a
sanitation facility Master Plan for the
community which has been approved
by DEC or ANTHC and RUS.
(c) Entities identified in § 1784.8 of
this part may submit a completed
Standard Form 424 to apply for funding
to establish a Master Plan for a rural or
Native village.
§ 1784.17
grants.
Application for pre-development
(a) A prioritized list of projects will be
developed each year by RUS, DEC, and
ANTHC applying prioritization criteria
to the sanitation needs database.
Prioritization criteria established by the
RUS, DEC, ANTHC, and IHS will be
based, at a minimum, on relative health
impacts, drinking water and wastewater
regulatory requirements, the sanitation
conditions in each community and
project readiness. The Village Safe
Water Program process and associated
prioritization criteria will be used to
prioritize projects and place them on a
priority list. The process will be
reviewed and approved by RUS, DEC,
ANTHC, and IHS. Projects will be
funded from the priority list as they
meet established planning, design, and
construction requirements, subject to
available funding.
(b) Funding for pre-development
grants will be allocated by USDA, DEC,
and ANTHC according to the prioritized
list.
(c) Entities identified in § 1784.8 of
this part may submit a completed
Standard Form 424 to apply for funding
for pre-development costs. Predevelopment costs are described in
§ 1784.10 (b)(2)(ii) of this part.
(d) Projects submitted for design only
under the pre-development grants, must
have RUS approval of the master plan
prior to consideration for funding.
§ 1784.18
grants.
§ 1784.16
grant.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Subpart C—Application Processing
(a) Funding for construction grants
will be allocated annually by USDA,
DEC, and ANTHC according to the
prioritization list described in
§ 1784.17(a) of this part.
(b) An application for a construction
grant shall include:
(1) Completed Standard Form 424,
Standard Form 424C and Standard Form
424D. Current versions of these forms
may be found at Grants.gov.
(2) Preliminary Engineering Report,
Environmental Report, or approved PER
like document, including ANTHC’s
Cooperative Project Agreement and
associated supplemental attachments;
Application for master plan
(a) DEC and ANTHC utilize the
National Indian Health Service,
Sanitation Deficiency System (SDS)
database as a comprehensive source of
rural sanitation needs in Alaska. The
database provides an inventory of the
sanitation deficiencies including water,
sewer, and solid waste facilities for
existing homes. The sanitation
deficiencies data is updated annually by
DEC and ANTHC in consultation with
the respective rural or native villages.
The SDS database is utilized under the
RAVG program to help prioritize
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Application for construction
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(3) Population and median household
income of the area to be served;
(4) Description of the project; and
(5) Approved business plan, including
resolution adopting the plan, for the
recipient community. The business plan
will outline the proposed operation and
management costs, rate structures,
short-lived asset schedule and
associated materials.
§ 1784.19
ANTHC.
Applications from DEC or
(a) In cases where applications are
accepted from DEC or ANTHC, one
master application may be submitted
covering all rural or native villages to be
funded, however, each individual
project will be broken out and (for
construction grants) each will require its
own PER, or PER like document and
Environmental Report.
(b) They will be processed as separate
projects with individual grant
agreements, as appropriate.
(c) Expenditures for projects will be
based on specific scope and be
requested on a project by project basis.
(d) Funding amounts, as indicated in
each grant agreement and letter of
conditions, will be for the approved
scope of work.
§ 1784.20
Other forms and certifications.
(a) Referenced bulletins, instructions
and forms are for use in administering
grants made under this part and are
available from any USDA/Rural
Development office or the Rural Utilities
Service, United States Department of
Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250–
1500.
(b) Applicants will be required to
submit the following items to the
processing office, upon notification
from the processing office to proceed
with further development of the full
application:
(1) Form RD 400–1, Equal
Opportunity Agreement;
(2) Form RD 400–4, Assurance
Agreement;
(3) Form AD 1047, Certification
Regarding Debarment, Suspension and
other Responsibility Matters;
(4) Form AD 1048, Certification
Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—
Lower Tier Covered Transactions;
(5) Form AD 1049, Certification
regarding Drug-Free Workplace
Requirements (Grants) Alternative I for
Grantees Other Than Individuals;
(6) RUS Form 266, Compliance
Assurance form—Civil Rights
Compliance;
(7) Standard Form LLL, Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities;
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(8) RD Instruction 1940–Q, Exhibit A–
1, Certifications for Contracts, Grants,
and Loans (Regarding Lobbying); and
(9) Certification regarding prohibited
tying arrangements. Applicants that
provide electric service must provide
the Agency a certification that they will
not require users of a water or waste
facility financed under this part to
accept electric service as a condition of
receiving assistance.
(c) In the case of grants made to DEC
and ANTHC, DEC and ANTHC will
certify that the above requirements are
included in their agreements with the
Villages. The certification and forms
listed above must be provided from DEC
and ANTHC on an annual basis for
utilization in proposed applications.
(d) When favorable action is not taken
on an application, the applicant will be
notified in writing by the Rural
Development State Program Official of
the reasons why the request was not
favorably considered. Notification to the
applicant will state that a review of this
decision by the Agency may be
requested by the applicant in
accordance with 7 CFR Part 11.
(e) When favorable action is taken on
an application, the applicant will be
notified by a letter which establishes
conditions that must be understood and
agreed to before further consideration
may be given to the application. In cases
where a master application is submitted
by DEC or ANTHC, the letter of
conditions will include all projects, and
their funding amounts, included in the
master application on which favorable
action will be taken. The letter of
conditions does not constitute loan and/
or grant approval, nor does it ensure
that funds are or will be available for the
project. The grant will be considered
approved on the date a signed copy of
Form RD 1940–1, Request for Obligation
of Funds, is mailed to the applicant.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1784.21
Other requirements.
Other Federal statutes and regulations
are applicable to grants awarded under
this part. These include but are not
limited to:
(a) 7 CFR part 1, subpart A—USDA
implementation of Freedom of
Information Act.
(b) 7 CFR part 3—USDA
implementation of OMB Circular No. A–
129 regarding debt collection.
(c) 7 CFR part 15, subpart A—USDA
implementation of Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended.
(d) 7 CFR part 1794, RUS
Implementation of the National
Environmental Policy Act.
(e) 7 CFR part 1901, subpart E—Civil
Rights Compliance Requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
(f) 7 CFR part 3015—Uniform Federal
Assistance Regulations.
(g) 7 CFR part 3016—USDA
Implementation of OMB Circular Nos.
A–102 and A–97, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Cooperative Agreements to State
and Local Governments.
(h) 7 CFR part 3018—Restrictions on
Lobbying, prohibiting the use of
appropriated funds to influence
Congress or a Federal agency in
connection with the making of any
Federal grant and other Federal
contracting and financial transactions.
(i) 7 CFR part 3019—USDA
implementation of OMB Circular A–
110, Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements With Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and Other
Nonprofit Organizations.
(j) 7 CFR part 3021, as amended—
Government-wide Debarment and
Suspension (Non-procurement);
Government-wide Requirements for
Drug-Free Workplace (Grants),
implementing Executive Order 12549 on
debarment and suspension and the
Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41
U.S.C. 701).
(k) 7 CFR part 3052—USDA
implementation of OMB Circular No. A–
133 regarding audits of institutions of
higher education and other nonprofit
institutions.
(l) 29 U.S.C. 794, section 504—
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and 7 CFR
part 15B (USDA implementation of
statute), prohibiting discrimination
based upon physical or mental handicap
in federally assisted programs.
(m) Floodplains. The agencies follow
the eight-step decision-making process
referenced in Section 2(a) of Executive
Order 11988, Floodplain Management,
when undertaking actions located in
floodplains. Pursuant to E.O. 11988, the
IHS uses a Class Review process to
exclude certain actions from further
review under the eight-step process. For
all actions that do not qualify for IHS
Class Review, the eight-step process
shall be completed. All practicable
measures to minimize development in
floodplains and reduce the risk of
human safety, health, and welfare shall
be followed, including elevating a new
water or wastewater facility at least one
foot above the base flood elevation as
determined by the Army Corp of
Engineers or other qualified survey. If
an area has been designated by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency
mapping, flood insurance shall be
required for facilities located in flood
plains. If a community is not
participating in the National Flood
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77017
Insurance Program, this requirement
does not apply.
(n) Project planning, including
engineering and environmental reports,
to the maximum extent feasible, must
address all water and/or waste disposal
needs for a community in a coordinated
manner with other community
development projects and take into
consideration information presented in
available community strategic and
comprehensive plans. Any reports or
designs completed with funds must be
completed in accordance with sound
engineering practices and USDA
regulations, including environmental
instruction 7 CFR Part 1794.
§ 1784.22
Review.
Lead Agency Environmental
(a) The Agency designated as the lead
agency for the purposes of this grant
program, will fulfill and agree to be
responsible for complying with lead
agency requirements for:
(1) National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) as outlined in 40 CFR 1501.5,
Lead agencies;
(2) Section 106 review process as
outlined in 36 CFR Part 800.2(a)(2) Lead
Federal agency; and
(3) Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act as outlined in 50 CFR
402.07, Designation of lead agency.
(b) All environmental findings and
determinations made by the lead agency
represent those of the cooperating
agencies and will be completed in
accordance with the procedures
outlined in this section.
(c) RUS will, to the extent possible
and in accordance with 40 CFR 1506.2
and 7 CFR 1794.14, actively participate
with DEC, IHS, and ANTHC to
cooperatively or jointly prepare
environmental documents so that one
document will comply with all
applicable laws.
(d) For projects administered by DEC
and ANTHC, RUS agrees to participate
as a cooperating agency in accordance
with 40 CFR 1501.6 and 7 CFR 1794.14
and relies upon those agencies’
procedures for implementing NEPA
procedures as further described below.
(e) The lead agency will indicate that
RUS is a cooperating agency in all
NEPA-related notices published for the
proposed action.
(f) A construction grant may not be
approved until all environmental
findings and determinations have been
made according to the following:
(1) Rural Development Lead Agency.
If RUS is the lead agency the
environmental review process,
including all findings and
determinations, will be completed in
accordance with 7 CFR 1794.
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
77018
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(2) DEC Lead Agency. In the event
DEC is the lead agency, the
environmental review process,
including all findings and
determinations will be completed in
accordance with the procedures
outlined in the RAVG Environmental
Review Process in this section 1784.22.
(3) IHS Lead Agency. For projects
administered by ANTHC, IHS will be
the lead agency for the environmental
review process, including all findings
and determinations. The environmental
review process, including all findings
and determinations will be completed
in accordance with the Department of
Health and Human Services policies
and procedures in General
Administration Manual, Part 30, the
Council on Environmental Quality
regulations at 40 CFR 1500–1508 and
with procedures published by IHS in
the Federal Register on March 22, 1993
at 58 FR15284. The ANTHC shall notify
the funding agencies and the IHS if a
change in the project or project scope
occurs which could change any
previously prepared environmental
findings or determinations or could
adversely impact the environment. In
the event of an unanticipated discovery
of a historic property or other
environmental resource, the ANTHC
shall stop construction activity in the
area of the discovery and notify the
appropriate authority and the IHS.
Mitigation options resulting from
unanticipated discoveries, including but
not limited to changes in project scope
or cancellation of the project will be
evaluated by the funding agencies in
collaboration with the ANTHC and IHS.
If appropriate and necessary, mitigation
plans will be negotiated and approved
by all parties. When the funding
agencies have approved a mitigation
plan and IHS has reaffirmed its
environmental review process,
including all findings review and
determinations, the ANTHC will be
authorized to initiate the agreed to
mitigation plan. The IHS shall bear no
mitigation costs as it is not a funding
agency for projects under 7 CFR part
1784.
(g) RUS will have an opportunity to
review the IHS or DEC environmental
review documents, including all
findings and determinations to ensure
consistency with this part and agency
procedures. Where an Environmental
Assessment (EA) or Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) is required by
the lead agency’s environmental
policies and procedures, the lead agency
will ensure that the scope and content
of the EA or EIS satisfies the statutory
and regulatory requirements applicable
to RUS. Where an EA and EIS is not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
required under the applicable lead
agencies’ procedures for implementing
NEPA, the review by RUS will be
limited to ensure that the applicable
lead agencies’ procedures were
followed.
(h) The Section 106, National Historic
Preservation Act review requirements
completed for ANTHC administered
projects will be carried out in
accordance with RAVG Section 106
Process.
§ 1784.23–25
[Reserved]
Subpart D—Grant Processing
§ 1784.26 Planning Development and
Procurement.
(a) If RUS is the lead agency and will
provide oversight for the project, a
certification should be obtained from
the State agency, or the Environmental
Protection Agency if the State does not
have primacy, stating that the proposed
improvements will be in compliance
with requirements of the Safe Drinking
Water Act and/or Clean Water Act and
the applicable requirements of 7 CFR
parts 3015, 3016 and 3019.
(b) Applicants that will bid and
construct a project in phases, must
provide assurance that the full scope of
each specific phase of the project will be
functional. In the event that the actual
cost is anticipated to exceed the funding
originally allocated for the project, all
potential options will be reviewed and
considered, including but not limited to
acquiring additional funds or a
reduction in project scope. RUS,
ANTHC, and VSW will ensure that
funded scope items are functional when
all funds have been disbursed.
§ 1784.27 Grant Closing and Disbursement
of Funds.
(a) The Water and Waste Grant
Agreements for rural and native villages
in Alaska, or other approved form(s)
will be executed by all applicants. To
view all forms and agreements, refer to
the USDA RUS Water and
Environmental Programs Web site.
(b) Grant funds will be distributed
from the Treasury at the time they are
actually needed by the applicant using
multiple advances. Instructions
regarding disbursement of funds can be
found in the Letter of Conditions.
(c) If there is a significant reduction
in project costs, the applicant’s funding
needs will be reassessed. Decreases in
RUS funds will be based on revised
project costs and current number of
users, however, other factors including
RUS regulations used at the time of
grant approval will remain the same.
Obligated grant funds not needed to
complete the proposed project will be
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
deobligated. In such cases applicable
forms, the letter of conditions, and other
items will be revised.
§ 1784.28 Grantee Accounting Methods,
Management Reporting and Audits.
(a) All Agency grantees will follow
the reporting requirements as outlined
in 7 CFR 1780.47.
(b) Other reporting requirements are
as follows:
(1) During the construction period, for
the reporting of expenses incurred for
projects under this part, the party
responsible for the administration of the
project (DEC, ANTHC, or community)
will provide an audit report in
accordance with § 1784.28 (which
includes GAGAS and OMB Circular A–
133 requirements).
(2) For DEC and ANTHC projects, a
supplemental report will be provided to
the external independent CPA auditing
the organization. The report will
support the official figure indicated for
CFDA 10.760 in the Schedule of
Expenditure of Federal Awards. The
report must provide details on the
amount of expenses and specific
communities for which expenses were
incurred. This report must also be
provided to RUS.
(3) After the construction period and
for the life of the facility, the recipient
community will be responsible to meet
the requirements outlined in 7 CFR
parts 3015, 3016, and 3019 and 7 CFR
1784.28, paragraphs a through d, herein.
These requirements include
administration and record keeping
requirements along with CPA audit
report and report requirements. These
requirements must be outlined in
funding documents from RUS, ANTHC,
and VSW and in agreements with the
recipient communities.
(4) The requirements found in 7 CFR
parts 3015, 3016 and 3019 shall apply
to all grants made under the RAVG
program and shall be set forth in the
respective grant agreement where
required.
§ 1784.29 Grant servicing and
accountability.
a. Grants will be serviced in
accordance with 7 CFR Part 1782.
b. RUS reserves the right to request
and review project files from grantees at
any time.
§ 1784.30
Subsequent grants.
Subsequent grants will be processed
in accordance with the requirements set
forth in this part. The initial and
subsequent grants made to complete a
previously approved project must
comply with the maximum grant
requirements set forth in Subpart B of
this section.
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
§ 1784.31
Exception authority.
The Administrator may, in individual
cases, make an exception to any
requirement or provision of this part
which is not inconsistent with the
authorizing statute or other applicable
law and is determined to be in the
Government’s best interest.
Additionally, in individual cases where
a proposed project does not meet the
definition of ‘‘Dire sanitation condition’’
in Section 1784.2, but an applicant is
able to satisfactorily demonstrate to the
Administrator of RUS that a water or
sewer system is deficient and negatively
impacts the health or safety of the
community, the Administrator of RUS
may consider funding under this Rule.
§ 1784.32–34
[Reserved]
Subpart E—Design Bidding,
Contracting, Constructing, and
Inspections
§ 1784.35
(1) To include in all contracts for
construction or repair a provision for
compliance with the Copeland ‘‘AntiKick Back’’ Act (18 U.S.C. 874) as
supplemented in Department of Labor
regulations (29 CFR, Part 3).
(2) To include in all contracts in
excess of $100,000 a provision that the
contractor agrees to comply with all the
requirements of the Clean Air Act (42
U.S.C. 7414) and Section 308 of the
Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C.
1318) relating to inspection, monitoring,
entry, reports, and information, as well
as all other requirements specified in
Section 114 of the Clean Air Act and
Section 308 of the Water Pollution
Control Act and all regulations and
guidelines issued there under after the
award of the contract.
§ 1784.37 Procurement by Applicants
Eligible Under 1784.8(a)(1).
General.
This subpart is specifically designed
for use by owners including the
professional or technical consultants or
agents who provide assistance and
services such as engineering,
environmental, inspection, financial,
legal or other services related to
planning, designing, bidding,
contracting, and constructing water and
waste disposal facilities. These
procedures do not relieve the owner of
the contractual obligations that arise
from the procurement of these services.
For this subpart, an owner is defined as
an applicant, or grantee. For projects
administered by eligible applicants
identified in 1784.8(a)(2) or (3), 1784.36
of this subpart will be followed. For
eligible applicants identified in
1784.8(a)(1), the requirements outlined
in 1784.37 will be followed.
For grants proposed to be
administered directly by applicants
eligible under 1784.8(a)(1), the
requirements outlined in § 1780 subpart
C will be met by those eligible
applicants with the exception of the
following requirements:
(a) Preliminary engineering reports
and Environmental Reports (§ 1780.55).
Refer to the requirements of this subpart
and subpart C 1784.21(e)).
(b) Metering devices in § 1780.57(m).
(c) Utility Purchase Contracts in
§ 1780.62.
(d) Sewage treatment and bulk water
sales contracts in § 1780.63.
§ 1784.3 1784.99
[Reserved].
Dated: November 8, 2013.
John Charles Padalino,
Administrator,
Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–30189 Filed 12–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1784.36 Procurement by Applicants
Eligible Under 1784.8(a)(2) and (3).
(a) For applicants eligible under
1784.8(a)(2) and (3), contracting and
procurement activities will follow DEC
or ANTHC policies, procedures and
methods. DEC and ANTHC’s practices
will be based on Uniform
Administrative Requirements for federal
grants and OMB requirements as
defined by applicable OMB Circulars.
Procurement procedures shall not
restrict or eliminate open and free
competition. In specifying materials,
DEC and ANTHC will consider all
materials normally suitable for the
project based on sound engineering
practices and project requirements.
(b) Contracts for construction or
repairs must contain the following
provisions:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Dec 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket No. EERE–2013–BT–NOA–0047]
RIN 1904–AD08
Energy Conservation Program: Energy
Conservation Standards for Certain
Consumer Products
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE or the ‘‘Department’’)
proposes to adopt into the Code of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77019
Federal Regulations the definitions for
‘‘through-the-wall central air
conditioner’’ and ‘‘through-the-wall
central air conditioning heat pump’’ that
were established in section 5 of the
American Energy Manufacturing
Technical Corrections Act. This notice
also proposes to remove the standards
for air conditioners that were
superseded effective in 2006, and the
now defunct references to the ‘‘throughthe-wall air conditioner and heat pump’’
product class, including the definition
and standards.
DATES: DOE will accept comments, data,
and information regarding this notice of
proposed rulemaking (NOPR) received
no later than January 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Any comments submitted
must identify the NOPR for the
AEMTCA amendments and provide
docket number EERE–2013–BT–NOA–
0047 and/or Regulation Identification
Number (RIN) 1904–AD08, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email:
AEMTCATechAmend2013NOA0047@
ee.doe.gov. Include the docket number
EERE–2013–BT–NOA–0047 and/or RIN
1904–AD08 in the subject line of the
message.
• Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. If
possible, please submit all items on a
compact disc (CD), in which case it is
not necessary to include printed copies.
[Please note that comments and CDs
sent by mail are often delayed and may
be damaged by mail screening
processes.]
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, 950
L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone (202)
586–2945. If possible, please submit all
items on CD, in which case it is not
necessary to include printed copies.
Docket: The docket is available for
review at regulations.gov, including
Federal Register notices, framework
documents, public meeting attendee
lists and transcripts, comments, and
other supporting documents/materials.
All documents in the docket are listed
in the regulations.gov index. However,
not all documents listed in the index
may be publicly available, such as
information that is exempt from public
disclosure.
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Lucas Adin, U.S. Department of Energy,
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 245 (Friday, December 20, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77009-77019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30189]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2013 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 77009]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
7 CFR Part 1784
RIN 0572-AC28
Section 306D Water Systems for Rural and Native Villages in
Alaska
AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service (RUS), an Agency of the United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA), proposes to modify its
existing regulations and establish a separate regulation for making
grants to rural or Native Alaskan Villages under the Rural Alaska
Village Grant (RAVG) Program. The existing RAVG regulation (7 CFR
1780.49) will be relocated to its own section and modified to conform
with streamlined processes established through a Memorandum of
Understanding among USDA, RUS; The United States Department of Health
and Human Services, Indian Health Service (IHS); The State of Alaska,
Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC); and the Alaska Native
Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC). The grants will be provided directly
to a rural or Native Alaskan Village or jointly with either DEC or
ANTHC for the development and construction of water and wastewater
systems to improve the health and sanitation conditions in those
Villages through removal of dire sanitation conditions.
DATES: Comments must be submitted by February 18, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow instructions for submitting comments.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send your comment
addressed to Michele Brooks, Director, Program Development and
Regulatory Analysis, USDA Rural Development, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., STOP 1522, Room 5159, Washington, DC 20250-1522.
Additional information about the Agency and its programs is
available on the Internet at https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/UWEP_HomePage.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline M. Ponti-Lazaruk, Assistant
Administrator, Water and Environmental Programs, Rural Utilities
Service, Rural Development, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 1548, Room 5147, Washington, DC 20250-
1590. Telephone number: (202) 690-2670, Facsimile: (202) 720-0718.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. RUS has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards provided in section 3 of that Executive Order. In
addition, all State and local laws and regulations that are in conflict
with this rule will be preempted. No retroactive effect will be given
to the rule and, in accordance with section 212(e) of the Department of
Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 (7 U.S.C. 6912(e)),
administrative appeal procedures must be exhausted before an action
against the Department or its agencies may be initiated.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), this proposed rule related to
grants is exempt from the rulemaking requirements of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.), including the requirement to
provide prior notice and an opportunity for public comment. Because
this rule is not subject to a requirement to provide prior notice and
an opportunity for public comment pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, or any
other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are inapplicable.
Information Collection and Recordkeeping Requirements
The information collection and recordkeeping requirements contained
in this rule will not be effective until approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), subject to the submission of a paperwork
package for which the Agency intends to request approval from OMB
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
RUS invites comments, on any aspect of this collection of information
including suggestions for reducing the burden. Send questions or
comments regarding this information collection to Michele Brooks,
Director, Program Development and Regulatory Analysis, Rural Utilities
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, STOP 1522, Washington, DC
20250-152, FAX: (202) 720-8435.
Organizations applying for the RAVG program must submit an
application which includes an application form, various other forms,
certifications, and supplemental information. RUS will use the
information collected from applicants, borrowers, and consultants to
determine applicant eligibility, project feasibility, and the
applicant's ability to meet the grant and regulatory requirements.
Failure to collect proper information could result in improper
determinations of eligibility, improper use of funds, or hindrances in
making grants authorized by the RAVG program.
The applicant will submit the following information:
SF-424, ``Application for Federal Assistance''
Applicants use this form as a required cover sheet for applications
submitted for RAVG grants. The application is an official form required
for all Federal grants and requests basic information about the
applicant and the proposed project.
Form--RD Instruction 1940-Q, Exhibit A-1, ``Certification for
Contracts, Grants, and Loans''
Applicants read and sign this certification. Submission of this
certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this
transaction imposed by 31 U.S.C. 1352.
[[Page 77010]]
RD 400-1, ``Equal Opportunity Agreement''
Applicants read and sign these forms to assure RUS that they agree
to and will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and
the Equal Opportunity Clause under Executive Order 11246 of September
24, 1965.
RD 442-7, ``Operating Budget''
All applicants use the form to project income and expense items and
a complete cash flow through the first full year of operations after
they use the loan proceeds. These projections are necessary in
determining the source and reliability of the projected income and the
adequacy of resources to repay the loan in a timely manner, operate and
maintain the facility, and maintain adequate reserves.
Written--Certification Regarding Prohibited Tying Arrangements
Applicants that provide electric service must provide the Agency a
certification that they will not require users of a water or waste
facility financed under this part to accept electric service as a
condition of receiving assistance.
Form AD-1047, ``Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and
Other Responsibility Matters--Primary Covered Transactions''
USDA regulations published at 2 CFR Parts 180 and 417 implement the
government-wide debarment and suspension system for USDA's non-
procurement transactions. Applicants for RAVG grants are required to
provide certification under these regulations. Form AD-1047 may also be
used to obtain the required certification.
Form AD-1048, ``Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and
Other Responsibility Matters--Lower Tier Covered Transactions.''
Form AD-1048 will be signed by the applicant's suppliers, auditors,
contractors, etc., and retained by the applicant in their files.
Form AD-1049, ``Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace
Requirements (Grants) Alternative I--for Grantees Other Than
Individuals''
USDA regulations published at 2 CFR Parts 180 and 417 implement the
Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, which requires that grant recipients
agree that they will maintain a drug-free workplace. Applicants are
required to provide certification under these regulations. Form AD-1049
may also be used to obtain the required certification.
Written--Land Surveyors Certification and Opinion of Right of Way
The document will include legal descriptions of lands created for
parcels and shown in referenced documents are true and correct.
Written--Civil Rights Compliance Assurance Self Certification
Applicant certifies that it will comply with Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964. The certification can be a written self-
certification statement.
Written--Approved Business Plan
The business plan will include the resolution adopting the plan and
outline the proposed O&M costs, rate structures, short-lived asset rate
schedule and associated materials.
Written--Preliminary Engineering Report
Applicants must submit a preliminary engineering report (PER)
prepared by a qualified engineer. The PER indicates areas to be served,
scope and need of the project, cost estimate, annual operating
expenses, etc. This report is necessary for RUS to determine project
feasibility.
Written--Supporting Documentation
Applicants must provide documentation of legal organization and
authority to borrow funds, construct, operate, manage the facility,
etc. The documentation may include articles of incorporation,
certificate of incorporation and good standing, bylaws, rules, and
organizational minutes. Applicants also must provide financial
information such as financial statements, audits, or existing debt
instruments. This information is necessary for RUS to determine an
organization's legal existence, authority to perform certain functions,
and financial capacity to borrow funds.
Written--Grant Agreement
The Grant Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions under which
the applicant receives a RUS grant. Applicants and RUS must execute the
document before RUS disburses grant funds.
Written--Audits Based on Federal Assistance
Grantees must submit audited financial statements annually in
accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards
(GAGAS). The audit must comply with the requirements of OMB Circular A-
133, ``Audits of State, Local Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations'' or Water and Waste Disposal audit requirements. The
requirements for submitting an audit report under OMB Circular A-133
are based on the total amount of Federal financial assistance expended
during a grantee's fiscal year from all Federal sources. Grantees that
expend $500,000 or more in a year in Federal awards must have a single
audit conducted for that year under OMB Circular A-133. Those that
expend less than $500,000 in Federal awards and have an outstanding RUS
loan balance equal to or greater than $1,000,000 must submit an audit
in accordance with Water and Waste Disposal audit requirements.
Grantees expending less than $500,000 in Federal assistance and having
a RUS loan balance less than $1,000,000 may submit a management report
instead of an audit report. RUS will designate the type of audit
grantees must submit.
Written--Management Reports
All grantees must furnish management reports that will provide
management a means of evaluating prior decisions and serve as a basis
for planning future operations and financial strategies. This
requirement is necessary to help assure that the facility will be
properly managed and to protect the financial interest of the
Government.
The following information/forms are collected and accounted for
under other collection packages:
SF-424C, ``Budget Information--Construction Programs''
Applicants estimate costs and expenses for the grant project. The
form also provides information on matching funds. This form is
submitted as part of the pre-application and if the project is
selected, as part of the formal application.
SF-424D, ``Assurances--Construction Programs''
Applicants will read and sign this form to indicate the
organization's intent to comply with the laws, regulations, and
policies to which a grant is subject.
SF-LLL, ``Disclosure of Lobbying Activities''
Applicant will complete all items on the form that apply for both
the initial filing and material change report.
RD 442-3, ``Balance Sheet''
All applicants and borrowers use this form to present their assets,
liabilities, and net worth. Borrowers whose gross annual income is less
than $100,000 may use it at year-end. This form is necessary for all
applicants, who prepare it once to present a comparative
[[Page 77011]]
balance sheet for the most current and prior years.
RD 442-2, ``Statement of Budget, Income and Equity''
This form serves a dual purpose as a budget and an income and
expense statement. RUS generally requires new borrowers to submit it
each quarter for the first 3 years so RUS can monitor financial
progress in the early years of operation. The report is then
discontinued for those borrowers that are progressing satisfactorily.
As a budget report, borrowers must submit their budget estimates before
the beginning of each fiscal year. In these cases only, column three is
to be completed. Borrowers, at their option, may also use this form as
a year-end income and expense statement when audited financial
statements are not prepared.
RD 442-22, ``Opinion of Counsel Regarding Right of Way''
Applicants and their attorneys may use this form in obtaining
continuous and adequate rights-of-way and interest in land needed for
the construction, operation, and maintenance of a facility. This form
is.
RD 1942-19, ``Agreement for Engineering Services''
Applicants must contract for the professional services rendered
from an engineer, attorney, bond counsel, accountant, auditor,
appraiser, or financial advisor. Contracts or other forms of agreement
for services necessary for project planning and development are subject
to RUS concurrence. Applicants must submit them to RUS for review and
concurrence to ensure the needed services will be available at a
reasonable cost.
RD 400-4, ``Assurance Agreement''
Applicants read and sign these forms to assure RUS that they agree
to and will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and
the Equal Opportunity Clause under Executive Order 11246 of September
24, 1965.
RD 1942-6, ``Letter of Intent To Meet Conditions''
Applicants complete this form to indicate the intent to meet the
conditions of the loan established previously by RUS. This information
is necessary to determine whether the Agency should continue further
processing of the loan application.
Comments on this information collection must be received by
February 18, 2014.
Comments are invited on (a) whether the collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the
accuracy of the agency's estimate of burden including the validity of
the methodology and assumption used; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques on
other forms and information technology.
Title: Rural Alaska Village Grant Program (RAVG).
OMB Control Number: 0572-NEW.
Type of Request: New.
Abstract: The Rural Alaska Village Grant (RAVG) Program is
authorized under Section 306D of the Consolidated Farm and Rural
Development Act (CONACT), (7 U.S.C. 1926(d)), as amended. Governing
regulations are currently codified in 7 CFR 1780.49. Under this
program, the Secretary may make grants to the State of Alaska for the
benefit of rural or Native Villages in Alaska to provide for the
development and construction of water and wastewater systems to improve
the health and sanitation conditions in those Villages.
This is new collection associated with a proposed rule. RUS
proposes to modify its existing regulations and establish a separate
regulation for making grants to rural or Native Alaskan Villages under
the Rural Alaska Village Grant (RAVG) Program. The existing RAVG
regulation, 7 CFR 1780.49 will be relocated to its own section and
modified to conform with the established streamlined processes. The
collection of information from the public is necessary in order for RUS
to identify projects eligible for RAVG grants.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting for this collection of
information is estimated to average 2.05 hours per responses.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 25.
Estimated Number of Total Annual Responses per Respondents: 415.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 851.
Copies of this information collection can be obtained from MaryPat
Daskal, Program Development and Regulatory Analysis at (202) 720-7853.
All responses to this information collection and recordkeeping
notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval.
All comments will also become a matter of public record.
E-Government Act Compliance
RUS is committed to the E-Government Act, which requires Government
agencies in general to provide the public the option of submitting
information or transacting business electronically to the maximum
extent possible.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The program described by this proposed rule is listed in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs under number 10.760.
This catalog is available electronically through the free CFDA Web site
on the Internet at https://www.cfda.gov. The print edition may be
purchased by calling the Superintendent of Documents at 202-512-1800 or
toll free at 866-512-1800, or ordering it online at https://bookstore.gpo.gov.
Executive Order 12372
All projects funded under this part are subject to Executive Order
12372 (3 CFR, 1983 Comp., p. 197), which requires intergovernmental
consultation with State and local officials. These requirements are set
forth in U.S. Department of Agriculture regulations 7 CFR Part 3015,
Subpart V, and RD Instruction 1940 J. In the case of grants made to DEC
and ANTHC, DEC and ANTHC will certify that the requirements listed in
paragraphs a-e are included in their agreements with the rural or
Native Villages.
Unfunded Mandates
This proposed rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provision of Title II of the Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of
1995) for State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector.
Thus, this proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of sections
202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995.
National Environmental Policy Act Certification
RUS has determined that this proposed rule will not significantly
affect the quality of the human environment as defined by the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Therefore,
this action does not require an environmental impact statement or
assessment.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The policies contained in this proposed rule do not have any
[[Page 77012]]
substantial direct effect on states, on the relationship between the
national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Nor does this
proposed rule impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and
local governments. Therefore, consultation with the states is not
required.
Executive Order 13175
Executive Order 13175 imposes requirements on RUS in the
development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications or
preempt tribal laws. RUS has determined that this proposed rule has a
substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribe(s) or on either
the relationship or the distribution of powers and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Therefore, in
anticipation of the publication of this proposed rule, RUS focused its
quarterly Tribal Consultation webinar and teleconference process during
the summer of 2013 on the Rural Alaska Village Grant program. A pre-
consultation briefing was held on June 20, 2013 to provide a thorough
briefing of the Rural Alaska Village Grant program and the regulatory
changes under consideration. This was followed by a Tribal Consultation
webinar and teleconference on July 17, 2013. Input received by RUS
through the Tribal Consultation process will be considered alongside
comments to the proposed rule and utilized in drafting the next
iteration of this rule. If a Tribe has questions about the Tribal
Consultation process please contact Rural Development's Native American
Coordinator at (720) 544-2911 or AIAN@wdc.usda.gov.
Background
The Rural Utilities Service, a Rural Development agency of the
United States Department of Agriculture (RUS), works to improve the
quality of life in rural America by providing investment capital, in
the form of loans, loan guarantees, grants and technical assistance for
the deployment of rural telecommunications, broadband, electric, water
and environmental infrastructure. RUS loans, loan guarantee and grant
programs act as a catalyst for economic and community development. By
financing improvements to rural electric, water and waste, and
telecommunications and broadband infrastructure, RUS plays a
significant role in improving other measures of quality of life in
rural America, including public health and safety, environmental
protection, conservation, and cultural and historic preservation.
Statutory Authorization
The Rural Alaska Village Grant (RAVG) Program is authorized under
Section 306D of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act
(CONACT), (7 U.S.C. 1926(d)), as amended. Governing regulations are
currently codified in 7 CFR 1780. Under this program, the Secretary may
make grants to the State of Alaska for the benefit of rural or Native
Villages in Alaska to provide for the development and construction of
water and wastewater systems to improve the health and sanitation
conditions in those Villages. To be eligible to receive a grant under
the RAVG program, the project must provide 25 percent in matching funds
from the State of Alaska. The matching funds must come from non-Federal
sources. The Secretary shall consult with the State of Alaska on a
method of prioritizing the allocation of grants according to the needs
of, and relative health and sanitation conditions in, each village. Not
more than 2 percent of the amount made available for a fiscal year may
be used by the State of Alaska for training and technical assistance
programs relating to the operation and management of water and waste
disposal services in rural and Native Villages. Appropriated funds
shall be available until expended.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Indian Health
Service (IHS) is authorized to construct sanitation and water supply
facilities for native villages, and to enter into agreements and
arrangements with public agencies, non-profit organizations and the
native villages to be served in furtherance of such projects, pursuant
to Public Law 86-121, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2004a.
ANTHC is authorized to provide statewide health services, including
the construction of sanitation and water supply facilities, to Native
beneficiaries in Alaska pursuant to Public Law 105-83, Sec. 325(a).
The Village Safe Water program is authorized under the Village Safe
Water Act, Alaska Statute Title 46, Chapter 7 (AS 46.07), as amended.
RAVG History
The State of Alaska recognized the need for adequate water and
sewer systems through the passage of the Village Safe Water Act in
1970. The purpose of the Village Safe Water (VSW) program was to
``establish a program designed to provide safe water and hygienic
disposal facilities in the State of Alaska.'' There are several sources
of grant funding that support water and waste projects in rural Alaska
communities. The VSW program receives funding support from four primary
sources: The USDA, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the
Department of Health and Human Services' Indian Health Services (IHS),
and the State of Alaska. The RAVG program is administered by the Rural
Development State Office. In recent years, Congressional set-asides
have been provided to assist three groups of rural Americans who have
great needs in improving their access to clean water. Alaska Natives
through the RAVG program is one of those three groups. Through the RAVG
set-aside, up to $25 million a year has been provided since fiscal year
(FY) 2006 to help the Alaska VSW program fund projects designed to
improve public health and provide clean, safe drinking water in rural
areas. The RAVG program is currently administered under 7 CFR 1780.49
and is designed to provide up to 75 percent grant funding to rural
Alaskan Villages that are trying to address a dire sanitation problem.
Applicants must: (1) Be a rural Alaska community that meets the
definition of a village under Alaska law and whose population is 10,000
inhabitants or less; (2) have a median household income not exceeding
110 percent of the State nonmetropolitan median household income; and
(3) obtain 25 percent of the project costs from State of Alaska or
local contributions. When the State provides the 25 percent matching
funds, it must come from nonfederal sources. If the State contributes
to the project development costs, the project does not have to meet the
construction requirements contained in 7 CFR part 1780.
The RAVG program is coordinated with the Alaska Department of
Environmental Conservation (DEC) that administers the VSW program, IHS,
EPA, and Rural Utilities Service. Grants are awarded according to the
needs of and relative health and sanitation conditions in each village.
On June 15, 2011, Rural Development signed a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with federal and state partners in Alaska that
streamlines policies and procedures for the RAVG Program. The MOU is
the result of an initiative launched by USDA in April of 2010 to
improve program delivery and ensure that critical water and waste
services are provided to rural Alaskan Villages. The inter-agency
collaboration has produced results throughout the streamlining
initiative. Between Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 and FY 2012, 53 construction
grants have been funded
[[Page 77013]]
providing service to 17,425 residents; 72 percent of the construction
grants are complete or nearly complete and the remainders are underway.
Also, between FY 2009 and FY 2012, 68 planning grants have been funded;
76 percent of the planning grants are complete or nearly complete and
the remainders are underway. In FY 2013, an additional 8 construction
grants and 2 planning grants were awarded and will begin in the latter
part of FY 2014. The total amount of cost overruns incurred since FY
2009 is $4,132,391.
The goals of the MOU are to streamline the grant process, better
align the regulations to the statute, and improve accountability within
the program; all of which would ultimately address the dire sanitary
conditions in Rural Alaskan Villages more effectively. Major changes to
the existing process included:
(a) Revised application review. RAVG applications were processed
pursuant to 7 CFR part 1780 which also covers the process for the
direct loan and grant program. According to 7 U.S.C. 1926d, it is clear
that this program is intended to be a grant program. Under the MOU, the
twenty-five (25) percent match funding from the state of Alaska serves
as applicant contribution and the Sanitary Deficiency System (SDS)
categorization of the projects serves as the indicator of need for the
project. Also, because this is a grant program, the credit elsewhere
requirements in 7 CFR part 1780 and in Section 333(1)(A) of the
Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (CONACT) do not apply.
(b) An updated two-stage funding process. A two-stage funding
process was implemented where applications for planning grants are
submitted in the first stage to allow for development of preliminary
engineering reports (PER) and environmental reports (ER) related to
proposed construction projects. Once the planning activities are
completed, construction applications are entertained for those
projects. Due to the dire conditions and unique economic conditions in
rural Alaskan Villages, there are limited, or no, funds available from
the applicant to complete the application process. Under the MOU,
applications for construction are filed after the planning grant is
completed. As a result, the projects are well planned and RUS is able
to fund projects with a high level of confidence. The result is the
elimination of future cost overruns and incomplete projects that were
experienced prior to the MOU.
(c) Bundled applications. Under the MOU, DEC and ANTHC are
permitted to bundle applications and seek funding for multiple
construction projects in multiple villages within a single application.
The single application is called the master application. DEC and ANTHC
are responsible for managing the projects and accounting for funds
associated with every project under the master application. Although
RUS obligates funds for multiple projects in a single obligation,
measures are included in the MOU process to avoid issues previously
experienced with the RAVG program and to account for funding as
identified in the 2010 Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report. To
address concerns raised by OIG in their audit, the following measures
were implemented:
(a) Standardized construction information. A PER is required for
each construction project proposed within a single application.
(b) Funds are designated within the master obligation for specific
projects. Funds cannot be transferred from one project to another.
(c) Excess funds on projects are required to be returned to RUS.
These funds are then returned to the RAVG funding account and used for
other projects. This allows the RUS to extend the reach of the program
and ensure that funds are used only for the purposes specified.
(d) Specific reporting requirements for DEC and ANTHC were also
established in the MOU. These allow RUS to effectively account for
funds and track the progress on projects funded.
(e) Streamlined environmental process. IHS has been designated as
the lead agency for the environmental process because they have
specialized expertise in this area and a local presence. For projects
administered by ANTHC, IHS will be the lead agency for the
environmental review process and required determinations applicable to
various environmental laws and regulations. The ANTHC shall notify the
funding agencies and the IHS if a change in the project or project's
scope occurs which could change environmental determinations or could
adversely impact the environment. The IHS shall bear no mitigation
costs as it is not a funding agency for projects under the MOU. The
environmental review process established in the MOU will result in a
more streamlined review process minimizing duplication of efforts and
provide clarity to roles and responsibilities of all concerned parties.
(f) Appointment of a dedicated program coordinator. Finally, to
ensure success of the new process, RUS appointed a RAVG Program
Coordinator who is solely dedicated to RAVG program delivery.
Ultimately the MOU has achieved the goal of streamlining the RAVG
process. The program is working well under the MOU. Applications are
being filed by ANTHC and DEC on behalf of villages. Those applications
are being processed in a timely manner by RUS, and the State of Alaska
continues to provide a 25 percent match of funds to projects. Most
importantly, the construction of projects is occurring as proposed and
the quality of life is improving in rural Alaskan Villages. The
following are two examples of how the process adopted under the MOU is
achieving program results:
(1) Lower Kalskag, Alaska (Funding amount: $6,879,155). The thought
of having to haul a honey bucket, in winter temperatures that drop to -
55 [deg]F, is an unpleasant scenario. For some residents in the
community of Lower Kalskag, and other rural Alaskan communities, this
is a reality. The community of Lower Kalskag, Alaska is remotely
located 350 miles west of Anchorage in a persistent poverty area. This
small community has a population of around 280, and roughly 50 percent
of its homes still lack adequate sanitation systems. The lack of
adequate sanitation services is a dire health and safety issue faced
daily by residents of this small, remote community. In those
households, the individual residents must haul their waste from their
homes in honey buckets (five gallon buckets), regardless of the
temperature outside. The community of Lower Kalskag provides a glimpse
of the progress and success of the MOU that was executed by RUS and its
partners on June 15, 2011. Those partners, including the ANTHC, State
of Alaska's Village Safe Water Program, and IHS, are essential in
helping to provide rural Alaskan communities with safe and healthy
sanitation systems. Under the MOU, a phased approach is being utilized
to successfully get projects moving through to the construction phase.
It is through that phased approach the community of Lower Kalskag has
received service from the RAVG program. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2010, the
community of Lower Kalskag received a grant from the RAVG program in
the amount of $869,193 to design proposed utility improvements. The
design was finalized in early 2012 and allowed the ANTHC, on behalf of
Lower Kalskag, to apply for a construction grant. In FY 2012, RUS
awarded a construction grant in the amount of $6,879,155 to construct
wastewater improvements that will serve 34 homes. Due to the phased
approach, construction is anticipated to be underway by the spring of
2014. The
[[Page 77014]]
effort to retire the use of honey buckets in this community, and other
rural Alaskan communities, is no small feat. The result of those
efforts and the grants provided by the RUS's RAVG program will help
improve the health and safety of community members for generations to
come.
(2) Pitkas Point, Alaska (Funded as both a design planning grant
and two construction grants). Most Americans take their supply of
sanitary water and effective wastewater disposal for granted. Water as
close as the nearest faucet and easy access to restrooms is often taken
for granted. Residents of Pitkas Point had to deal with unhealthy water
and wastewater conditions that were staggering. They were in dire need
of a water supply, water treatment facilities and wastewater treatment
and collection facilities. Drinking water was hauled from local
watering points, which did not meet safe drinking water standards.
Wastewater was hauled in honey buckets along the same route children
played on and where they traveled to and from school. RAVG assistance
included a preplanning and development grant in FY 2009 in the amount
of $378,966 to design water distribution mains and sewer collection
mains; and two construction grants were awarded in FY 2010 in the
amount of $6,891,750 and $2,214,769 to construct core sanitation
facilities and a piped water and wastewater system. The project became
fully operational on September 8, 2011. Funding for this critical
infrastructure project made it possible for the Pitkas Point community
to construct a variety of basic water and waste needs for this rural
community.
Purpose of This Proposed Rule
The purpose of this proposed rule is to solicit comments on
proposed modifications to the current RAVG regulation. Specifically,
the modifications include:
(1) Move regulation requirements from inclusion in 7 CFR part 1780,
to new part 7 CFR part 1784;
(2) Elimination of the RAVG regulatory language currently located
in 7 CFR part 1780; and
(3) Key streamlining measures which include:
(a) Revised application review so the evaluation process is based
on need for grant only;
(b) A new application process that allows the state of Alaska to
bundle applications from multiple villages into a single master
application;
(c) Improved reporting and tracking measures to ensure
accountability of funds and completion of projects in a timely fashion;
and
(d) Establishing a single lead responsible for facilitating each
applicable agencies' environmental and historic preservation review
requirements for all projects.
Request for Comments
RUS invites interested parties including, but not limited to,
Tribes, Rural or Native Villages in Alaska, Alaska Native Regional and
Village Corporations, financial and lending institutions, trade
associations, consumer groups and individuals to provide any
information or analyses they believe to be relevant to the issues
discussed in this proposed rule and to the implementation of the grant
program. RUS is proposing to codify the process developed under the MOU
and establish rules for the RAVG program under the new part 7 CFR part
1784. The proposed regulation includes all of the streamlined
approaches and accountability measures from the MOU. RUS seeks comment
on these changes.
List of Subjects
Agriculture, Community development, Community facilities, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Rural areas, Sewage disposal, Waste
treatment and disposal, Water pollution control, Water supply,
Watersheds.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, RUS proposes to amend 7
CFR chapter XVII of Title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations by
adding a new part 1784 to read as follows:
PART 1784--RURAL ALASKAN VILLAGE GRANTS
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec.
1784.1 Purpose.
1784.2 Definitions.
1784.3 Objective.
1784.4-1784.7 [Reserved]
Subpart B--Grant Requirements
1784.8 Eligibility.
1784.9 Grant Amount.
1784.10 Eligible Grant Purposes.
1784.11 Restrictions.
1784.12-1784.15 [Reserved]
Subpart C--Application Processing
1784.16 Application for Master Plan grant.
1784.17 Application for Pre-development grants.
1784.18 Application for Construction grants.
1784.19 Applications accepted from DEC or ANTHC.
1784.20 Other forms and certifications.
1784.21 Other requirements.
1784.22 Lead Agency Environmental Review.
1784.23-1784.25 [Reserved]
Subpart D--Grant Processing
1784.26 Planning, Development and Procurement.
1784.27 Grant closing and Disbursement of funds.
1784.28 Grantee Accounting Methods, Management Reporting and Audits.
1784.29 Grant Servicing and Accountability.
1784.30 Subsequent grants.
1784.31 Exception Authority.
1784.32-1784.34 [Reserved]
Subpart E--Design, Bidding, Contracting, Constructing, and Inspections
1784.35 General.
1784.36 Procurement by Applicants Eligible Under 1784.8(a)(2) and
(3).
1784.37 Procurement by Applicants Eligible Under 1784.8(a)(1).
1784.38-1784.99 [Reserved]
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1926d.
Subpart A.--General Provisions
Sec. 1784.1 Purpose.
This part sets forth the policies and procedures that will apply
when the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) makes grants under the Rural
Alaska Village Grant (RAVG) program to rural or Native Villages in
Alaska. The grants will be provided directly to a rural or native
village or jointly with either The State of Alaska, Department of
Environmental Conservation (DEC) or The Alaska Native Tribal Health
Consortium (ANTHC) for the benefit of rural or native villages in
Alaska.
Sec. 1784.2 Definitions.
The following definitions apply to subparts A through E of this
part.
ANTHC means the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium.
CONACT means the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act.
DEC means the State of Alaska, Department of Environmental
Conservation.
Dire sanitation conditions means:
(1) Recurring instances of a waterborne communicable disease have
been documented; or
(2) No community-wide water and sewer system exists and individual
residents must haul water to or human waste from their homes and/or use
pit privies; or (3) An appropriate regulatory Agency of the State of
Alaska determines that an imminent threat of a waterborne communicable
disease is present.
Grant recipient means an applicant that has been awarded a Rural
Alaskan Village Grant under this part.
IHS means the United States Department of Health and Human
Services, Indian Health Service.
RAVG means Rural Alaskan Village Grant, a grant awarded by RUS,
DEC,
[[Page 77015]]
and/or ANTHC to a grant recipient under this part.
Rural or Native Villages in Alaska means a rural community or
Native village in Alaska which meets the definition of a village under
State statutes and does not have a population in excess of 10,000
inhabitants, according to the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
RD means Rural Development, a federal agency mission area
delivering the United States Department of Agriculture's programs to
rural communities.
Recipient community means a community that has been awarded a grant
under this part.
RUS means the Rural Utilities Service, a federal agency delivering
the United States Department of Agriculture's rural utilities programs.
Short-lived assets means repair and replacement items expended each
year that are not included in the annual Operational and Maintenance
expenses as annual repair and maintenance.
Statewide nonmetropolitan median household income (SNMHI) means the
median household income of the State's nonmetropolitan counties and
portions of metropolitan counties outside of cities, towns or places of
50,000 or more population.
USDA means the United States Department of Agriculture.
VSW means Village Safe Water Program authorized under the Village
Safe Water Act, Alaska Statute Title 46, Chapter 7 (AS 46.07).
Sec. 1784.3 Objective.
The objective of the RAVG Program is to assist the residents of
rural or Native Villages in Alaska to provide for the development and
construction of water and wastewater systems to improve the health and
sanitation conditions in those Villages through removal of dire
sanitation conditions.
Sec. 1784.4-1784.7 [Reserved]
Subpart B--Grant Requirements
Sec. 1784.8 Eligibility.
(a) Grants may be made to the following eligible applicants:
(1) A rural or native village in Alaska; and/or
(2) DEC on behalf of one or more rural or native villages in
Alaska; or
(3) ANTHC on behalf of one or more rural or native villages in
Alaska.
(b) Grants made to DEC or ANTHC may be obligated through a master
letter of conditions for more than one rural or native village in
Alaska; however, DEC or ANTHC together with each individual rural or
native village beneficiary shall execute a grant agreement on a project
by project basis. Expenditures for projects will be based on specific
scope and be requested on a project by project basis.
(c) For grants proposed to be administered directly by a community,
the responsibility to meet the requirements outlined in this part will
be met by the community. RUS will be the lead agency on direct
administration projects.
(d) The median household income of the rural or native village
cannot exceed 110 percent of the statewide nonmetropolitan household
income, according to US Census American Community Survey. Alaska census
communities considered to be high cost isolated areas or ``off the road
systems'' (i.e. communities that cannot be accessed by roads) may
utilize up to 150 percent of SNMHI.
(e) A dire sanitation condition as defined in Sec. 1784.2 must
exist in the village served by the proposed project. For those projects
identified under (1) and (3) of the dire sanitation definition, a
notice of violation, consent order or other enforcement action from the
appropriate regulatory agency must be provided to document the dire
sanitation condition.
(f) In order for an eligible applicant to receive a grant under the
Rural Alaska Village Grant program, the State of Alaska shall provide
25 percent in matching funds from non-Federal sources.
(g) In processing grants through DEC and ANTHC, a public meeting
must be held to inform the general public regarding the development of
any proposed project. Documentation of the public meeting must be
received with construction applications.
(1) A notice of intent must be published in a newspaper of general
circulation in the proposed area to be served.
(2) For projects where there are no newspapers of general
circulation, a posting of the notice in a community building (post
office, washeteria, clinic, etc.) frequented by village residents may
be used to meet the requirement. This alternative form of notice has
been authorized by the RUS Administrator.
Sec. 1784.9 Grant Amount.
Grants will be made for up to 75 percent of the project development
and/or construction costs. Pursuant to Section 306 D of the CONACT, the
State of Alaska shall provide 25 percent in matching funds from non-
Federal sources.
Sec. 1784.10 Eligible Grant Purposes.
Grant funds may be used for the following purposes:
(a) To pay reasonable costs associated with providing potable water
or waste disposal services to residents of rural or native villages in
Alaska.
(b) To pay reasonable costs associated with the use of a recipient
community's equipment during construction. (i.e. maintenance, minor
repairs, and operational costs). A cost accounting system that is
accurate to track expenses must be in place. Use of ANTHC or State of
Alaska equipment fleet rental costs will also be eligible. RUS
concurrence in the allocation method is required.
(1) Reasonable costs include construction, master planning,
predevelopment costs (including engineering, design, and rights-of-way
establishment), and technical assistance as further defined below:
(i) Master planning. Grants can be made specifically for Master
planning costs associated with the prioritization process.
(ii) Pre-Development. Grants can be made for pre-development costs
such as preliminary engineering, environmental, application
development, review and establishment of rights-of-way and easement,
and full construction design for up to $1,000,000 for each eligible
village. Prior to approving additional pre-development costs, a
preliminary engineering report (PER) and/or approved PER like document,
such as the Cooperative Project Agreement and supplemental documents
from ANTHC and an environmental report shall be reviewed and concurred
by RUS, DEC, ANTHC, and IHS.
(iii) Training and Technical Assistance. Not more than 2 percent of
the funding made available each fiscal year may be used by the State of
Alaska for training and technical assistance programs relating to the
operation and management of water and waste disposal services in rural
and native villages. Grants for this purpose will be processed in
accordance with 7 CFR Part 1775.
(c) Individual Installations:
(1) Individual service installation relates to residential homes
only and does not include public facilities and/or commercial
facilities. The only exception to serving a public facility is when the
facility is necessary for the successful operation and maintenance of
the water or sanitation system (i.e. the facility utilized for
accepting utility payments and/or holding public meetings on the
utility system).
(2) Individual home installations, including wells, septic system,
flush
[[Page 77016]]
tank & haul, in-house plumbing, etc., may be provided. The following
guidelines must be followed for individual installations. A
certification will be required with the application that provides
documentation of the following:
(i) The residents are unable to afford to make the improvements on
their own.
(ii) An agreement outlining the installation, operation, and
maintenance of facilities must be in place.
(iii) An adequate method for denying service in the event of non-
payment of user fees.
(iv) All residents of the community are treated equally.
(v) The improvements provided are reasonable and modest.
(vi) Legal authority (i.e. easements) is obtained to construct
these improvements.
(vii) Documentation must be provided to RUS indicating the quantity
and quality of the individual installations that may be developed; cost
effectiveness of the individual facility compared with initial and long
term user costs on a central system; health and pollution problems
attributable to individual facilities; operational or management
problems peculiar to individual installations; and permit of regulatory
agency requirements.
Sec. 1784.11 Restrictions.
Grant funds may not be used to:
(a) Pay any annual recurring costs that are considered to be
operational expenses of a facility.
(b) Pay basic/rental fee or depreciation for the use of the
recipient community's equipment.
(c) Purchase existing systems.
(d) Pay for items not associated with Rural Utilities Service's
approved scope of work. This includes projects developed from other
funding sources.
Sec. 1784.12-1784.15 [Reserved]
Subpart C--Application Processing
Sec. 1784.16 Application for master plan grant.
(a) DEC and ANTHC utilize the National Indian Health Service,
Sanitation Deficiency System (SDS) database as a comprehensive source
of rural sanitation needs in Alaska. The database provides an inventory
of the sanitation deficiencies including water, sewer, and solid waste
facilities for existing homes. The sanitation deficiencies data is
updated annually by DEC and ANTHC in consultation with the respective
rural or native villages. The SDS database is utilized under the RAVG
program to help prioritize applications under the Village Safe Water
Program.
(b) In order to be considered for funding, projects must be
included in a sanitation facility Master Plan for the community which
has been approved by DEC or ANTHC and RUS.
(c) Entities identified in Sec. 1784.8 of this part may submit a
completed Standard Form 424 to apply for funding to establish a Master
Plan for a rural or Native village.
Sec. 1784.17 Application for pre-development grants.
(a) A prioritized list of projects will be developed each year by
RUS, DEC, and ANTHC applying prioritization criteria to the sanitation
needs database. Prioritization criteria established by the RUS, DEC,
ANTHC, and IHS will be based, at a minimum, on relative health impacts,
drinking water and wastewater regulatory requirements, the sanitation
conditions in each community and project readiness. The Village Safe
Water Program process and associated prioritization criteria will be
used to prioritize projects and place them on a priority list. The
process will be reviewed and approved by RUS, DEC, ANTHC, and IHS.
Projects will be funded from the priority list as they meet established
planning, design, and construction requirements, subject to available
funding.
(b) Funding for pre-development grants will be allocated by USDA,
DEC, and ANTHC according to the prioritized list.
(c) Entities identified in Sec. 1784.8 of this part may submit a
completed Standard Form 424 to apply for funding for pre-development
costs. Pre-development costs are described in Sec. 1784.10 (b)(2)(ii)
of this part.
(d) Projects submitted for design only under the pre-development
grants, must have RUS approval of the master plan prior to
consideration for funding.
Sec. 1784.18 Application for construction grants.
(a) Funding for construction grants will be allocated annually by
USDA, DEC, and ANTHC according to the prioritization list described in
Sec. 1784.17(a) of this part.
(b) An application for a construction grant shall include:
(1) Completed Standard Form 424, Standard Form 424C and Standard
Form 424D. Current versions of these forms may be found at Grants.gov.
(2) Preliminary Engineering Report, Environmental Report, or
approved PER like document, including ANTHC's Cooperative Project
Agreement and associated supplemental attachments;
(3) Population and median household income of the area to be
served;
(4) Description of the project; and
(5) Approved business plan, including resolution adopting the plan,
for the recipient community. The business plan will outline the
proposed operation and management costs, rate structures, short-lived
asset schedule and associated materials.
Sec. 1784.19 Applications from DEC or ANTHC.
(a) In cases where applications are accepted from DEC or ANTHC, one
master application may be submitted covering all rural or native
villages to be funded, however, each individual project will be broken
out and (for construction grants) each will require its own PER, or PER
like document and Environmental Report.
(b) They will be processed as separate projects with individual
grant agreements, as appropriate.
(c) Expenditures for projects will be based on specific scope and
be requested on a project by project basis.
(d) Funding amounts, as indicated in each grant agreement and
letter of conditions, will be for the approved scope of work.
Sec. 1784.20 Other forms and certifications.
(a) Referenced bulletins, instructions and forms are for use in
administering grants made under this part and are available from any
USDA/Rural Development office or the Rural Utilities Service, United
States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250-1500.
(b) Applicants will be required to submit the following items to
the processing office, upon notification from the processing office to
proceed with further development of the full application:
(1) Form RD 400-1, Equal Opportunity Agreement;
(2) Form RD 400-4, Assurance Agreement;
(3) Form AD 1047, Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and
other Responsibility Matters;
(4) Form AD 1048, Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion--Lower Tier Covered Transactions;
(5) Form AD 1049, Certification regarding Drug-Free Workplace
Requirements (Grants) Alternative I for Grantees Other Than
Individuals;
(6) RUS Form 266, Compliance Assurance form--Civil Rights
Compliance;
(7) Standard Form LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities;
[[Page 77017]]
(8) RD Instruction 1940-Q, Exhibit A-1, Certifications for
Contracts, Grants, and Loans (Regarding Lobbying); and
(9) Certification regarding prohibited tying arrangements.
Applicants that provide electric service must provide the Agency a
certification that they will not require users of a water or waste
facility financed under this part to accept electric service as a
condition of receiving assistance.
(c) In the case of grants made to DEC and ANTHC, DEC and ANTHC will
certify that the above requirements are included in their agreements
with the Villages. The certification and forms listed above must be
provided from DEC and ANTHC on an annual basis for utilization in
proposed applications.
(d) When favorable action is not taken on an application, the
applicant will be notified in writing by the Rural Development State
Program Official of the reasons why the request was not favorably
considered. Notification to the applicant will state that a review of
this decision by the Agency may be requested by the applicant in
accordance with 7 CFR Part 11.
(e) When favorable action is taken on an application, the applicant
will be notified by a letter which establishes conditions that must be
understood and agreed to before further consideration may be given to
the application. In cases where a master application is submitted by
DEC or ANTHC, the letter of conditions will include all projects, and
their funding amounts, included in the master application on which
favorable action will be taken. The letter of conditions does not
constitute loan and/or grant approval, nor does it ensure that funds
are or will be available for the project. The grant will be considered
approved on the date a signed copy of Form RD 1940-1, Request for
Obligation of Funds, is mailed to the applicant.
Sec. 1784.21 Other requirements.
Other Federal statutes and regulations are applicable to grants
awarded under this part. These include but are not limited to:
(a) 7 CFR part 1, subpart A--USDA implementation of Freedom of
Information Act.
(b) 7 CFR part 3--USDA implementation of OMB Circular No. A-129
regarding debt collection.
(c) 7 CFR part 15, subpart A--USDA implementation of Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.
(d) 7 CFR part 1794, RUS Implementation of the National
Environmental Policy Act.
(e) 7 CFR part 1901, subpart E--Civil Rights Compliance
Requirements.
(f) 7 CFR part 3015--Uniform Federal Assistance Regulations.
(g) 7 CFR part 3016--USDA Implementation of OMB Circular Nos. A-102
and A-97, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments.
(h) 7 CFR part 3018--Restrictions on Lobbying, prohibiting the use
of appropriated funds to influence Congress or a Federal agency in
connection with the making of any Federal grant and other Federal
contracting and financial transactions.
(i) 7 CFR part 3019--USDA implementation of OMB Circular A-110,
Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements With
Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit
Organizations.
(j) 7 CFR part 3021, as amended--Government-wide Debarment and
Suspension (Non-procurement); Government-wide Requirements for Drug-
Free Workplace (Grants), implementing Executive Order 12549 on
debarment and suspension and the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41
U.S.C. 701).
(k) 7 CFR part 3052--USDA implementation of OMB Circular No. A-133
regarding audits of institutions of higher education and other
nonprofit institutions.
(l) 29 U.S.C. 794, section 504--Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and 7
CFR part 15B (USDA implementation of statute), prohibiting
discrimination based upon physical or mental handicap in federally
assisted programs.
(m) Floodplains. The agencies follow the eight-step decision-making
process referenced in Section 2(a) of Executive Order 11988, Floodplain
Management, when undertaking actions located in floodplains. Pursuant
to E.O. 11988, the IHS uses a Class Review process to exclude certain
actions from further review under the eight-step process. For all
actions that do not qualify for IHS Class Review, the eight-step
process shall be completed. All practicable measures to minimize
development in floodplains and reduce the risk of human safety, health,
and welfare shall be followed, including elevating a new water or
wastewater facility at least one foot above the base flood elevation as
determined by the Army Corp of Engineers or other qualified survey. If
an area has been designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
mapping, flood insurance shall be required for facilities located in
flood plains. If a community is not participating in the National Flood
Insurance Program, this requirement does not apply.
(n) Project planning, including engineering and environmental
reports, to the maximum extent feasible, must address all water and/or
waste disposal needs for a community in a coordinated manner with other
community development projects and take into consideration information
presented in available community strategic and comprehensive plans. Any
reports or designs completed with funds must be completed in accordance
with sound engineering practices and USDA regulations, including
environmental instruction 7 CFR Part 1794.
Sec. 1784.22 Lead Agency Environmental Review.
(a) The Agency designated as the lead agency for the purposes of
this grant program, will fulfill and agree to be responsible for
complying with lead agency requirements for:
(1) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as outlined in 40 CFR
1501.5, Lead agencies;
(2) Section 106 review process as outlined in 36 CFR Part
800.2(a)(2) Lead Federal agency; and
(3) Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act as outlined in 50 CFR
402.07, Designation of lead agency.
(b) All environmental findings and determinations made by the lead
agency represent those of the cooperating agencies and will be
completed in accordance with the procedures outlined in this section.
(c) RUS will, to the extent possible and in accordance with 40 CFR
1506.2 and 7 CFR 1794.14, actively participate with DEC, IHS, and ANTHC
to cooperatively or jointly prepare environmental documents so that one
document will comply with all applicable laws.
(d) For projects administered by DEC and ANTHC, RUS agrees to
participate as a cooperating agency in accordance with 40 CFR 1501.6
and 7 CFR 1794.14 and relies upon those agencies' procedures for
implementing NEPA procedures as further described below.
(e) The lead agency will indicate that RUS is a cooperating agency
in all NEPA-related notices published for the proposed action.
(f) A construction grant may not be approved until all
environmental findings and determinations have been made according to
the following:
(1) Rural Development Lead Agency. If RUS is the lead agency the
environmental review process, including all findings and
determinations, will be completed in accordance with 7 CFR 1794.
[[Page 77018]]
(2) DEC Lead Agency. In the event DEC is the lead agency, the
environmental review process, including all findings and determinations
will be completed in accordance with the procedures outlined in the
RAVG Environmental Review Process in this section 1784.22.
(3) IHS Lead Agency. For projects administered by ANTHC, IHS will
be the lead agency for the environmental review process, including all
findings and determinations. The environmental review process,
including all findings and determinations will be completed in
accordance with the Department of Health and Human Services policies
and procedures in General Administration Manual, Part 30, the Council
on Environmental Quality regulations at 40 CFR 1500-1508 and with
procedures published by IHS in the Federal Register on March 22, 1993
at 58 FR15284. The ANTHC shall notify the funding agencies and the IHS
if a change in the project or project scope occurs which could change
any previously prepared environmental findings or determinations or
could adversely impact the environment. In the event of an
unanticipated discovery of a historic property or other environmental
resource, the ANTHC shall stop construction activity in the area of the
discovery and notify the appropriate authority and the IHS. Mitigation
options resulting from unanticipated discoveries, including but not
limited to changes in project scope or cancellation of the project will
be evaluated by the funding agencies in collaboration with the ANTHC
and IHS. If appropriate and necessary, mitigation plans will be
negotiated and approved by all parties. When the funding agencies have
approved a mitigation plan and IHS has reaffirmed its environmental
review process, including all findings review and determinations, the
ANTHC will be authorized to initiate the agreed to mitigation plan. The
IHS shall bear no mitigation costs as it is not a funding agency for
projects under 7 CFR part 1784.
(g) RUS will have an opportunity to review the IHS or DEC
environmental review documents, including all findings and
determinations to ensure consistency with this part and agency
procedures. Where an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) is required by the lead agency's environmental
policies and procedures, the lead agency will ensure that the scope and
content of the EA or EIS satisfies the statutory and regulatory
requirements applicable to RUS. Where an EA and EIS is not required
under the applicable lead agencies' procedures for implementing NEPA,
the review by RUS will be limited to ensure that the applicable lead
agencies' procedures were followed.
(h) The Section 106, National Historic Preservation Act review
requirements completed for ANTHC administered projects will be carried
out in accordance with RAVG Section 106 Process.
Sec. 1784.23-25 [Reserved]
Subpart D--Grant Processing
Sec. 1784.26 Planning Development and Procurement.
(a) If RUS is the lead agency and will provide oversight for the
project, a certification should be obtained from the State agency, or
the Environmental Protection Agency if the State does not have primacy,
stating that the proposed improvements will be in compliance with
requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act and/or Clean Water Act and
the applicable requirements of 7 CFR parts 3015, 3016 and 3019.
(b) Applicants that will bid and construct a project in phases,
must provide assurance that the full scope of each specific phase of
the project will be functional. In the event that the actual cost is
anticipated to exceed the funding originally allocated for the project,
all potential options will be reviewed and considered, including but
not limited to acquiring additional funds or a reduction in project
scope. RUS, ANTHC, and VSW will ensure that funded scope items are
functional when all funds have been disbursed.
Sec. 1784.27 Grant Closing and Disbursement of Funds.
(a) The Water and Waste Grant Agreements for rural and native
villages in Alaska, or other approved form(s) will be executed by all
applicants. To view all forms and agreements, refer to the USDA RUS
Water and Environmental Programs Web site.
(b) Grant funds will be distributed from the Treasury at the time
they are actually needed by the applicant using multiple advances.
Instructions regarding disbursement of funds can be found in the Letter
of Conditions.
(c) If there is a significant reduction in project costs, the
applicant's funding needs will be reassessed. Decreases in RUS funds
will be based on revised project costs and current number of users,
however, other factors including RUS regulations used at the time of
grant approval will remain the same. Obligated grant funds not needed
to complete the proposed project will be deobligated. In such cases
applicable forms, the letter of conditions, and other items will be
revised.
Sec. 1784.28 Grantee Accounting Methods, Management Reporting and
Audits.
(a) All Agency grantees will follow the reporting requirements as
outlined in 7 CFR 1780.47.
(b) Other reporting requirements are as follows:
(1) During the construction period, for the reporting of expenses
incurred for projects under this part, the party responsible for the
administration of the project (DEC, ANTHC, or community) will provide
an audit report in accordance with Sec. 1784.28 (which includes GAGAS
and OMB Circular A-133 requirements).
(2) For DEC and ANTHC projects, a supplemental report will be
provided to the external independent CPA auditing the organization. The
report will support the official figure indicated for CFDA 10.760 in
the Schedule of Expenditure of Federal Awards. The report must provide
details on the amount of expenses and specific communities for which
expenses were incurred. This report must also be provided to RUS.
(3) After the construction period and for the life of the facility,
the recipient community will be responsible to meet the requirements
outlined in 7 CFR parts 3015, 3016, and 3019 and 7 CFR 1784.28,
paragraphs a through d, herein. These requirements include
administration and record keeping requirements along with CPA audit
report and report requirements. These requirements must be outlined in
funding documents from RUS, ANTHC, and VSW and in agreements with the
recipient communities.
(4) The requirements found in 7 CFR parts 3015, 3016 and 3019 shall
apply to all grants made under the RAVG program and shall be set forth
in the respective grant agreement where required.
Sec. 1784.29 Grant servicing and accountability.
a. Grants will be serviced in accordance with 7 CFR Part 1782.
b. RUS reserves the right to request and review project files from
grantees at any time.
Sec. 1784.30 Subsequent grants.
Subsequent grants will be processed in accordance with the
requirements set forth in this part. The initial and subsequent grants
made to complete a previously approved project must comply with the
maximum grant requirements set forth in Subpart B of this section.
[[Page 77019]]
Sec. 1784.31 Exception authority.
The Administrator may, in individual cases, make an exception to
any requirement or provision of this part which is not inconsistent
with the authorizing statute or other applicable law and is determined
to be in the Government's best interest. Additionally, in individual
cases where a proposed project does not meet the definition of ``Dire
sanitation condition'' in Section 1784.2, but an applicant is able to
satisfactorily demonstrate to the Administrator of RUS that a water or
sewer system is deficient and negatively impacts the health or safety
of the community, the Administrator of RUS may consider funding under
this Rule.
Sec. 1784.32-34 [Reserved]
Subpart E--Design Bidding, Contracting, Constructing, and
Inspections
Sec. 1784.35 General.
This subpart is specifically designed for use by owners including
the professional or technical consultants or agents who provide
assistance and services such as engineering, environmental, inspection,
financial, legal or other services related to planning, designing,
bidding, contracting, and constructing water and waste disposal
facilities. These procedures do not relieve the owner of the
contractual obligations that arise from the procurement of these
services. For this subpart, an owner is defined as an applicant, or
grantee. For projects administered by eligible applicants identified in
1784.8(a)(2) or (3), 1784.36 of this subpart will be followed. For
eligible applicants identified in 1784.8(a)(1), the requirements
outlined in 1784.37 will be followed.
Sec. 1784.36 Procurement by Applicants Eligible Under 1784.8(a)(2)
and (3).
(a) For applicants eligible under 1784.8(a)(2) and (3), contracting
and procurement activities will follow DEC or ANTHC policies,
procedures and methods. DEC and ANTHC's practices will be based on
Uniform Administrative Requirements for federal grants and OMB
requirements as defined by applicable OMB Circulars. Procurement
procedures shall not restrict or eliminate open and free competition.
In specifying materials, DEC and ANTHC will consider all materials
normally suitable for the project based on sound engineering practices
and project requirements.
(b) Contracts for construction or repairs must contain the
following provisions:
(1) To include in all contracts for construction or repair a
provision for compliance with the Copeland ``Anti-Kick Back'' Act (18
U.S.C. 874) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR,
Part 3).
(2) To include in all contracts in excess of $100,000 a provision
that the contractor agrees to comply with all the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7414) and Section 308 of the Water Pollution
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1318) relating to inspection, monitoring, entry,
reports, and information, as well as all other requirements specified
in Section 114 of the Clean Air Act and Section 308 of the Water
Pollution Control Act and all regulations and guidelines issued there
under after the award of the contract.
Sec. 1784.37 Procurement by Applicants Eligible Under 1784.8(a)(1).
For grants proposed to be administered directly by applicants
eligible under 1784.8(a)(1), the requirements outlined in Sec. 1780
subpart C will be met by those eligible applicants with the exception
of the following requirements:
(a) Preliminary engineering reports and Environmental Reports
(Sec. 1780.55). Refer to the requirements of this subpart and subpart
C 1784.21(e)).
(b) Metering devices in Sec. 1780.57(m).
(c) Utility Purchase Contracts in Sec. 1780.62.
(d) Sewage treatment and bulk water sales contracts in Sec.
1780.63.
Sec. 1784.3 1784.99 [Reserved].
Dated: November 8, 2013.
John Charles Padalino,
Administrator,
Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-30189 Filed 12-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P