Approval of Application Submitted by Eastern Shoshone Tribe and Northern Arapaho Tribe for Treatment in a Similar Manner as a State Under the Clean Air Act, 76829-76830 [2013-30248]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 244 / Thursday, December 19, 2013 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings #1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
November 29, 2013.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
Docket Numbers: EG14–14–000.
Applicants: New AERG, LLC.
Description: Notice of SelfCertification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status.
Filed Date: 11/29/13.
Accession Number: 20131129–5025.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/20/13.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric rate
filings:
Docket Numbers: ER13–255–001.
Applicants: NV Energy, Inc.
Description: Transmission Rate
Case—NPC Settlement to be effective 1/
1/2013.
Filed Date: 11/27/13.
Accession Number: 20131127–5174.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/18/13.
Docket Numbers: ER14–489–000.
Applicants: Northern States Power
Company, a Minnesota Corporation.
Description: 2013–11–27–SMMPA
Byron TR9 Repl Meter—565–0.0.0 to be
effective 11/28/2013.
Filed Date: 11/27/13.
Accession Number: 20131127–5146.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/18/13.
Docket Numbers: ER14–490–000.
Applicants: Hatchet Ridge Wind, LLC.
Description: Hatchet Ridge Category 2
to be effective 11/28/2013.
Filed Date: 11/27/13.
Accession Number: 20131127–5160.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/18/13.
Docket Numbers: ER14–491–000.
Applicants: Spring Valley Wind LLC.
Description: Spring Valley Category 2
to be effective 11/28/2013.
Filed Date: 11/27/13.
Accession Number: 20131127–5164.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/18/13.
Docket Numbers: ER14–492–000.
Applicants: Ocotillo Express LLC.
Description: Ocotillo MBR Revisions
to be effective 11/28/2013.
Filed Date: 11/27/13.
Accession Number: 20131127–5167.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/18/13.
Docket Numbers: ER14–493–000.
Applicants: SU FERC, L.L.C.
Description: Cancellation to be
effective 1/1/2014.
Filed Date: 11/27/13.
Accession Number: 20131127–5175.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/18/13.
Docket Numbers: ER14–494–000.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Dec 18, 2013
Jkt 232001
Applicants: South Bay Energy Corp.
Description: South Bay Energy Corp.
Market Based Rate Tariff to be effective
1/15/2014.
Filed Date: 11/27/13.
Accession Number: 20131127–5190.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/18/13.
Docket Numbers: ER14–495–000.
Applicants: California Independent
System Operator Corporation.
Description: OATT Order No. 764
Compliance Filing to be effective 4/1/
2014.
Filed Date: 11/27/13.
Accession Number: 20131127–5193.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/18/13.
Docket Numbers: ER14–496–000.
Applicants: NV Energy, Inc.
Description: OATT Order No. 784—
Regulation and Frequency Response
Service to be effective 12/27/2013.
Filed Date: 11/27/13.
Accession Number: 20131127–5212.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/18/13.
Docket Numbers: ER14–497–000.
Applicants: New England Power Pool
Participants Committee.
Description: December 2013
Membership Filing to be effective 11/1/
2013.
Filed Date: 11/27/13.
Accession Number: 20131127–5224.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/18/13.
Docket Numbers: ER14–498–000.
Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.
Description: Western WDT November
2013 Biannual Filing to be effective 2/
1/2014.
Filed Date: 11/27/13.
Accession Number: 20131127–5232.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/18/13.
Docket Numbers: ER14–499–000.
Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.
Description: Western IA November
2013 Biannual Filing to be effective 2/
1/2014.
Filed Date: 11/27/13.
Accession Number: 20131127–5235.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/18/13.
Docket Numbers: ER14–500–000.
Applicants: New York Independent
System Operator, Inc.
Description: NYISO tariff revision re:
ICAP Demand Curve Reset to be
effective 1/28/2014.
Filed Date: 11/29/13.
Accession Number: 20131129–5000.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/20/13.
Docket Numbers: ER14–501–000.
Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.
Description: Notice of Termination for
Pristine Sun Fund 10 Fresno PGE, LLC,
Service Agreement No. 191, Tariff
Volume No. 4 of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76829
Filed Date: 11/27/13.
Accession Number: 20131127–5242.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/18/13.
Docket Numbers: ER14–502–000.
Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.
Description: Notice of Termination for
Yuba City Solar Millennium Fund,
Service Agreement Nos. 212 and 213,
Tariff Volume No. 4 of Pacific Gas and
Electric Company.
Filed Date: 11/27/13.
Accession Number: 20131127–5243.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/18/13.
The filings are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the
docket number.
Any person desiring to intervene or
protest in any of the above proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission’s
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date.
Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a
party to the proceeding.
eFiling is encouraged. More detailed
information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests,
service, and qualifying facilities filings
can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
other information, call (866) 208–3676
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–30111 Filed 12–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[R08–WR–2013–0007; FRL–9904–28–
Region–8]
Approval of Application Submitted by
Eastern Shoshone Tribe and Northern
Arapaho Tribe for Treatment in a
Similar Manner as a State Under the
Clean Air Act
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final action.
AGENCY:
This notice announces that
the EPA Regional Administrator for
Region 8 has approved the December
2008 application submitted by the
Northern Arapaho Tribe and Eastern
Shoshone Tribe (Tribes) of the Wind
River Indian Reservation for treatment
in a similar manner as a state (TAS)
pursuant to the Clean Air Act and the
EPA’s implementing regulations for
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
76830
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 244 / Thursday, December 19, 2013 / Notices
purposes of certain Clean Air Act
provisions. None of the provisions for
which the Tribes requested eligibility
entails the exercise of Tribal regulatory
authority under the Clean Air Act.
DATES: EPA’s decision approving the
Tribes’ TAS application was issued and
took effect on December 6, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may review copies of
the Wind River TAS Decision
Document, Attachment 1 (Legal
Analysis of the Wind River Indian
Reservation Boundary), Attachment 2
(Capability Statement), and other
supporting information at the EPA
Region 8 Office, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. If you
wish to review the documents in hard
copy, EPA requests that you contact the
individual listed below to view these
documents. You may view the hard
copies of these documents Monday
through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays. If you wish
to examine these documents, you
should make an appointment at least 24
hours before the day of your visit.
Additionally, these documents are
available electronically at: https://
www2.epa.gov/region8/tribal-assistanceprogram.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
Daly, Air Program, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 8, Mailcode
8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129, (303) 312–6416,
daly.carl@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 17, 2008, as supplemented on
December 23, 2008, the Tribes
submitted their TAS application as
authorized by Clean Air Act section
301(d) (42 U.S.C. 7601(d)) and EPA’s
regulations at 40 CFR part 49. In their
application, the Tribes requested TAS
eligibility for purposes of Clean Air Act
provisions that generally relate to grant
funding (e.g., for air quality planning
purposes) (section 105 (42 U.S.C. 7405));
involvement in EPA national ambient
air quality redesignations for the
Reservation (section 107(d)(3) (42 U.S.C.
7407(d)(3)); receiving notices of,
reviewing, and/or commenting on
certain nearby permitting and sources
(sections 505(a)(2) (42 U.S.C.
7661d(a)(2)) and 126 (42 U.S.C. 7426);
receiving risk management plans of
certain stationary sources (section
§ 112(r)(7)(B)(iii) (42 U.S.C.
7412(r)(7)(B)(iii)); and participation in
certain interstate and regional air
quality bodies (sections 169B (42 U.S.C.
7492), 176A (42 U.S.C. 7506a) and 184
(42 U.S.C. 7511c). None of the
provisions for which the Tribes
requested eligibility entails the exercise
of Tribal regulatory authority under the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Dec 18, 2013
Jkt 232001
Clean Air Act. The Tribes’ TAS
application thus does not request, and
EPA’s decision to approve the
application does not approve, Tribal
authority to implement any Clean Air
Act regulatory programs or to otherwise
implement Tribal regulatory authority
under the Clean Air Act.
In accordance with EPA’s regulations,
as part of its review process, EPA
notified all appropriate governmental
entities and the public of the Tribes’
TAS application and in that notice
specified the geographic boundaries of
the Wind River Indian Reservation as
identified in the Tribes’ application.
EPA afforded the appropriate
governmental entities and the public a
period totaling 60 days to provide
written comments regarding any dispute
concerning the boundary of the
Reservation. Several commenters
disagreed with the Tribes’ Reservation
boundary description, asserting that a
1905 Congressional Act, 33 Stat. 1016
(1905) (1905 Act), altered and
diminished the Reservation boundary.
Consistent with established TAS
procedures, EPA afforded the Tribes an
opportunity to respond to comments
received by EPA on the Tribes’
application and has previously made all
comments received and the Tribes’
responses thereto available to the
public. In addition, because EPA was
aware of existing disagreements
regarding the Reservation boundary,
EPA exercised its discretion to consult
with the U.S. Department of the Interior
(DOI), which has expertise on Indian
country issues. On October 26, 2011,
EPA received an opinion from the DOI
Solicitor addressing the Reservation
boundary.
On December 4, 2013, the Tribes sent
EPA a letter requesting that EPA not
address at this time the lands subject to
Section 1 of the 1953 Act, 67 Stat. 592
(1953), and stating that the Tribes would
notify EPA in writing if and when they
decide to request an EPA decision with
respect to those lands.
EPA has carefully considered the
application materials, the comments
received from appropriate governmental
entities and the public and the Tribes’
responses to those comments, the
opinion of the DOI Solicitor, as well as
other materials, relevant case law,
applicable statutory and regulatory
provisions, and relevant EPA guidance.
EPA has determined that the Northern
Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone Tribes
have met the requirements of CAA
§ 301(d)(2) and 40 CFR 49.6 and are
therefore approved to be treated in a
similar manner as a state for purposes
of CAA §§ 105, 505(a)(2), 107(d)(3),
112(r)(7)(B)(iii), 126, 169B, 176A, and
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
184. EPA’s decision also concludes that
the boundaries of the Reservation
encompass and include, subject to the
proviso below concerning the 1953 Act,
the area set forth in the 1868 Treaty of
Fort Bridger, 15 Stat. 673 (1868), less
those areas conveyed by the Tribes
under the 1874 Lander Purchase Act, 18
Stat. 291 (1874), and the 1897
Thermopolis Purchase Act, 30 Stat. 93
(1897), and including certain lands
located outside the original boundaries
that were added to the Reservation
under subsequent legislation in 1940, 54
Stat. 628 (1940). With regard to the
lands subject to Section 1 of the 1953
Act, 67 Stat. 592 (1953), consistent with
the Tribes’ request that EPA’s TAS
decision not address the lands described
in the 1953 Act at this time, the lands
are not included in the geographic scope
of approval for this decision. EPA’s TAS
decision therefore does not address the
1953 Act area. Thus, EPA approved the
Tribes’ Application for Treatment in a
Manner Similar to a State Under the
Clean Air Act for Purposes of Section
105 Grant Program, Affected State
Status and Other Provisions for Which
No Separate Tribal Program is Required.
A detailed explanation of EPA’s
approval of the Tribes’ TAS application
is contained within the Decision
Document and accompanying
attachments referred to in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice and at
https://www2.epa.gov/region8/tribalassistance-program.
Judicial Review: Pursuant to section
307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.
7607(b)(1)), Petitioners may seek
judicial review of this approval in the
United States Court of Appeals for the
Tenth Circuit. Any petition for judicial
review shall be filed within 60 days
from the date this notice appears in the
Federal Register, i.e., not later than
February 18, 2014.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 11, 2013.
Howard M. Cantor,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2013–30248 Filed 12–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
EXPORT-IMPORT BANK
[Public Notice: 2013–3006]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
Export-Import Bank of the
United States.
ACTION: Submission for OMB review and
comments request.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76829-76830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30248]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[R08-WR-2013-0007; FRL-9904-28-Region-8]
Approval of Application Submitted by Eastern Shoshone Tribe and
Northern Arapaho Tribe for Treatment in a Similar Manner as a State
Under the Clean Air Act
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final action.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces that the EPA Regional Administrator for
Region 8 has approved the December 2008 application submitted by the
Northern Arapaho Tribe and Eastern Shoshone Tribe (Tribes) of the Wind
River Indian Reservation for treatment in a similar manner as a state
(TAS) pursuant to the Clean Air Act and the EPA's implementing
regulations for
[[Page 76830]]
purposes of certain Clean Air Act provisions. None of the provisions
for which the Tribes requested eligibility entails the exercise of
Tribal regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act.
DATES: EPA's decision approving the Tribes' TAS application was issued
and took effect on December 6, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may review copies of the Wind River TAS Decision
Document, Attachment 1 (Legal Analysis of the Wind River Indian
Reservation Boundary), Attachment 2 (Capability Statement), and other
supporting information at the EPA Region 8 Office, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. If you wish to review the documents in
hard copy, EPA requests that you contact the individual listed below to
view these documents. You may view the hard copies of these documents
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays. If you wish to examine these documents, you should make an
appointment at least 24 hours before the day of your visit.
Additionally, these documents are available electronically at: https://www2.epa.gov/region8/tribal-assistance-program.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Daly, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6416, daly.carl@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 17, 2008, as supplemented on
December 23, 2008, the Tribes submitted their TAS application as
authorized by Clean Air Act section 301(d) (42 U.S.C. 7601(d)) and
EPA's regulations at 40 CFR part 49. In their application, the Tribes
requested TAS eligibility for purposes of Clean Air Act provisions that
generally relate to grant funding (e.g., for air quality planning
purposes) (section 105 (42 U.S.C. 7405)); involvement in EPA national
ambient air quality redesignations for the Reservation (section
107(d)(3) (42 U.S.C. 7407(d)(3)); receiving notices of, reviewing, and/
or commenting on certain nearby permitting and sources (sections
505(a)(2) (42 U.S.C. 7661d(a)(2)) and 126 (42 U.S.C. 7426); receiving
risk management plans of certain stationary sources (section Sec.
112(r)(7)(B)(iii) (42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(7)(B)(iii)); and participation in
certain interstate and regional air quality bodies (sections 169B (42
U.S.C. 7492), 176A (42 U.S.C. 7506a) and 184 (42 U.S.C. 7511c). None of
the provisions for which the Tribes requested eligibility entails the
exercise of Tribal regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act. The
Tribes' TAS application thus does not request, and EPA's decision to
approve the application does not approve, Tribal authority to implement
any Clean Air Act regulatory programs or to otherwise implement Tribal
regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act.
In accordance with EPA's regulations, as part of its review
process, EPA notified all appropriate governmental entities and the
public of the Tribes' TAS application and in that notice specified the
geographic boundaries of the Wind River Indian Reservation as
identified in the Tribes' application. EPA afforded the appropriate
governmental entities and the public a period totaling 60 days to
provide written comments regarding any dispute concerning the boundary
of the Reservation. Several commenters disagreed with the Tribes'
Reservation boundary description, asserting that a 1905 Congressional
Act, 33 Stat. 1016 (1905) (1905 Act), altered and diminished the
Reservation boundary. Consistent with established TAS procedures, EPA
afforded the Tribes an opportunity to respond to comments received by
EPA on the Tribes' application and has previously made all comments
received and the Tribes' responses thereto available to the public. In
addition, because EPA was aware of existing disagreements regarding the
Reservation boundary, EPA exercised its discretion to consult with the
U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), which has expertise on Indian
country issues. On October 26, 2011, EPA received an opinion from the
DOI Solicitor addressing the Reservation boundary.
On December 4, 2013, the Tribes sent EPA a letter requesting that
EPA not address at this time the lands subject to Section 1 of the 1953
Act, 67 Stat. 592 (1953), and stating that the Tribes would notify EPA
in writing if and when they decide to request an EPA decision with
respect to those lands.
EPA has carefully considered the application materials, the
comments received from appropriate governmental entities and the public
and the Tribes' responses to those comments, the opinion of the DOI
Solicitor, as well as other materials, relevant case law, applicable
statutory and regulatory provisions, and relevant EPA guidance.
EPA has determined that the Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone
Tribes have met the requirements of CAA Sec. 301(d)(2) and 40 CFR 49.6
and are therefore approved to be treated in a similar manner as a state
for purposes of CAA Sec. Sec. 105, 505(a)(2), 107(d)(3),
112(r)(7)(B)(iii), 126, 169B, 176A, and 184. EPA's decision also
concludes that the boundaries of the Reservation encompass and include,
subject to the proviso below concerning the 1953 Act, the area set
forth in the 1868 Treaty of Fort Bridger, 15 Stat. 673 (1868), less
those areas conveyed by the Tribes under the 1874 Lander Purchase Act,
18 Stat. 291 (1874), and the 1897 Thermopolis Purchase Act, 30 Stat. 93
(1897), and including certain lands located outside the original
boundaries that were added to the Reservation under subsequent
legislation in 1940, 54 Stat. 628 (1940). With regard to the lands
subject to Section 1 of the 1953 Act, 67 Stat. 592 (1953), consistent
with the Tribes' request that EPA's TAS decision not address the lands
described in the 1953 Act at this time, the lands are not included in
the geographic scope of approval for this decision. EPA's TAS decision
therefore does not address the 1953 Act area. Thus, EPA approved the
Tribes' Application for Treatment in a Manner Similar to a State Under
the Clean Air Act for Purposes of Section 105 Grant Program, Affected
State Status and Other Provisions for Which No Separate Tribal Program
is Required.
A detailed explanation of EPA's approval of the Tribes' TAS
application is contained within the Decision Document and accompanying
attachments referred to in the ADDRESSES section of this notice and at
https://www2.epa.gov/region8/tribal-assistance-program.
Judicial Review: Pursuant to section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act
(42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1)), Petitioners may seek judicial review of this
approval in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Any petition for judicial review shall be filed within 60 days from the
date this notice appears in the Federal Register, i.e., not later than
February 18, 2014.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 11, 2013.
Howard M. Cantor,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2013-30248 Filed 12-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P