Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 76572-76574 [2013-30030]
Download as PDF
76572
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 243
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–1028; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–068–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A318–111 and –112
airplanes, Model A319–111, –112, –113,
–114, and –115 airplanes, Model A320–
111, –211, –212, and –214 airplanes,
and Model A321–111, –112, –211, –212,
and –213 airplanes. This proposed AD
was prompted by reports of broken aft
engine mount retainers. This proposed
AD would require inspecting the aft
engine mount retainers for surface
finish, and for cracks and failure, and
replacement if necessary. We are
proposing this AD to prevent failure of
retainer brackets of the aft engine mount
and consequent loss of the locking
feature of the nuts of the inner and outer
pins. Loss of the pins will result in the
aft mount engine link no longer being
secured to the aft engine mount.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by February 3, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Dec 17, 2013
Jkt 232001
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For Airbus service information
identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5
61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com.
For Goodrich Corporation service
information identified in this proposed
AD, contact Goodrich Corporation,
Aerostructures, 850 Lagoon Drive, Chula
Vista, CA 91910–2098; phone: 619–691–
2719; email: jan.lewis@goodrich.com;
Internet: https://www.goodrich.com/
TechPubs.
You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1405;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2013–1028; Directorate Identifier
2013–NM–068–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013–0050,
dated March 5, 2013 (referred to after
this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
During in-service inspections, several aft
engine mount retainers, fitted on aeroplanes
equipped with CFM56–5/5B engines, have
been found broken.
The results of the investigations highlight
that two different types of surface finish have
been applied (respectively bright and dull
material finishes), and that dull finish
adversely affects the strength of the retainer
with regard to fatigue properties of the part.
The pins which attach the engine link to
the aft mount are secured by two nuts, which
do not have a self-locking feature; this
function is provided by the retainer brackets.
In case of failure of the retainer bracket, the
locking feature of the nuts of the inner and
outer pins is lost; as a result, these nuts could
subsequently become loose.
In case of full loss of the nuts, there is the
potential to also lose the pins, in which case
the aft mount link will no longer be secured
to the aft engine mount. The same locking
feature is used for the three link assemblies
of the aft mount.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD requires a one-time detailed
visual inspection (DVI) of the aft engine
mount to identify the affected dull finish
retainers [and for cracks and failure] and
replace these [retainers] with serviceable
retainers. This [EASA] AD also prohibits
installation of any dull finish aft engine
mount retainers.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating it in Docket No. FAA–
2013–1028.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP1.SGM
18DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Airbus Alert
Operators Transmission (AOT)
A71N001–12, Rev. 2, dated February 27,
2013.
Goodrich Corporation has issued
Goodrich Service Bulletin RA32071–
146, Rev. 2, dated July 26, 2012.
The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the
MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
76573
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 851 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per product
Cost on U.S.
operators
Inspection ...............................
3 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $255 per inspection cycle
for two engines.
$0
$255 per inspection cycle for
two engines.
$217,005 per inspection cycle
for two engines.
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary replacements that would
be required based on the results of the
proposed inspection. We have no way of
determining the number of aircraft that
might need these replacements:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Bracket replacement ................................
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 per
engine.
$10,000
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This proposed
regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Dec 17, 2013
Jkt 232001
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cost per product
$10,085 per engine.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2013–1028;
Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–068–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by February 3,
2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes
identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4)
of this AD, certificated in any category, all
manufacturer serial numbers.
(1) Airbus Model A318–111 and –112
airplanes.
(2) Airbus Model A319–111, –112, –113,
–114, and –115 airplanes.
(3) Airbus Model A320–111, –211, –212,
and –214 airplanes.
(4) Airbus Model A321–111, –112, –211,
–212, and –213 airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 71, Powerplant.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of
broken aft engine mount retainers. We are
issuing this AD to prevent failure of retainer
brackets of the aft engine mount and
consequent loss of the locking feature of the
nuts of the inner and outer pins. Loss of the
E:\FR\FM\18DEP1.SGM
18DEP1
76574
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2013 / Proposed Rules
pins will result in the aft mount engine link
no longer being secured to the aft engine
mount.
the effective date of this AD using Airbus
AOT A71N001–12, Rev. 1, dated August 9,
2012.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(m) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1405; fax (425) 227–
1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer, use these actions if they are
FAA-approved. Corrective actions are
considered FAA-approved if they were
approved by the State of Design Authority (or
its delegated agent, or by the Design
Approval Holder with a State of Design
Authority’s design organization approval).
For a repair method to be approved, the
repair approval must specifically refer to this
AD. You are required to ensure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(g) Inspection
Within 3 months after the effective date of
this AD: Do a detailed inspection of the aft
engine mount retainers for surface finish
(dull or bright), and for cracks and failure, in
accordance with Section 4.2.2, ‘‘Inspection
Requirements,’’ of Airbus Alert Operators
Transmission (AOT) A71N001–12, Rev. 2,
dated February 27, 2013, except as specified
in paragraph (h) of this AD.
(h) Exception to Paragraph (g) of This AD
The actions required by paragraph (g) of
this AD are not required to be done on
airplanes with manufacturer serial numbers
4942 and higher, provided a review of
maintenance records verifies that no aft
engine mount retainers have been replaced
since first flight of the airplane.
(i) Repetitive Inspection and Retainer
Replacement for Dull Finish Retainers
If, during the detailed inspection required
by paragraph (g) of this AD, any installed
dull finish aft engine mount retainer is found
without cracks and not failed: Do the actions
specified in paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this
AD.
(1) Within 25 flight cycles after doing the
actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD,
repeat the detailed inspection specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD.
(2) Within 50 flight cycles after doing the
first detailed inspection specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD: Replace all dull
finish retainers with a new or serviceable
retainer, in accordance with Section 4.2.3.1,
‘‘Replacement Procedure,’’ of Airbus AOT
A71N001–12, Rev. 2, dated February 27,
2013.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
(j) Replacement of Cracked or Failed
Retainers
If, during any detailed inspection specified
in paragraph (g) of this AD, any installed aft
engine mount retainer is found cracked or
failed: Before further flight, replace all
affected aft engine mount retainers with a
new or serviceable retainer, in accordance
with Section 4.2.3, ‘‘Replacement
Procedure,’’ of Airbus AOT A71N001–12,
Rev. 2, dated February 27, 2013.
(k) Parts Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install any aft engine mount
retainer with a dull finish on any airplane.
The instructions of Airbus AOT A71N001–
12, Revision 2, dated February 27, 2013; or
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Goodrich Service Bulletin RA32071–146,
Rev. 2, dated July 26, 2012; can be used to
verify the correct finish of the part.
(l) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraphs (g), (i), and (j) of this
AD, if those actions were performed before
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Dec 17, 2013
Jkt 232001
(n) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits may be issued in
accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199
of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to
a location where the airplane can be
modified (if the operator elects to do so),
provided no dull finish aft engine mount
retainers that are cracked or have failed are
installed.
(o) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) European
Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2013–0050, dated March 5, 2013,
for related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating it in Docket No. FAA–2013–
1028.
(2) For Airbus service information
identified in this AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33
5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(3) For Goodrich Corporation service
information identified in this AD, contact
Goodrich Corporation, Aerostructures, 850
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Lagoon Drive, Chula Vista, CA 91910–2098;
phone: 619–691–2719; email: jan.lewis@
goodrich.com; Internet: https://
www.goodrich.com/TechPubs.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 9, 2013.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–30030 Filed 12–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900–A082
Burial Benefits
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to clarify,
reorganize, and rewrite in plain
language its regulations that govern
entitlement to monetary burial benefits,
which include burial allowances for
service-connected and non-serviceconnected deaths, a plot or interment
allowance, and reimbursement of
transportation expenses. The
amendments would also establish rules
to support VA’s automated payment of
burial allowances to surviving spouses,
conversion to flat-rate burial and plot or
interment allowances that are equal to
the maximum benefit authorized by law,
and priority of payment to non-spouse
survivors.
DATES: VA must receive comments on or
before January 17, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to Director, Regulations
Management (02REG), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
A082, Burial Benefits.’’ Copies of
comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Office of
Regulation Policy and Management,
Room 1063B, between the hours of 8:00
a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through
Friday (except holidays). Please call
(202) 461–4902 for an appointment.
This is not a toll-free number. In
addition, during the comment period,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18DEP1.SGM
18DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76572-76574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30030]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2013 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 76572]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-1028; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-068-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A318-111 and -112 airplanes, Model A319-111, -112, -113, -
114, and -115 airplanes, Model A320-111, -211, -212, and -214
airplanes, and Model A321-111, -112, -211, -212, and -213 airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by reports of broken aft engine mount
retainers. This proposed AD would require inspecting the aft engine
mount retainers for surface finish, and for cracks and failure, and
replacement if necessary. We are proposing this AD to prevent failure
of retainer brackets of the aft engine mount and consequent loss of the
locking feature of the nuts of the inner and outer pins. Loss of the
pins will result in the aft mount engine link no longer being secured
to the aft engine mount.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 3,
2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For Airbus service information identified in this proposed AD,
contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax
+33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet
https://www.airbus.com.
For Goodrich Corporation service information identified in this
proposed AD, contact Goodrich Corporation, Aerostructures, 850 Lagoon
Drive, Chula Vista, CA 91910-2098; phone: 619-691-2719; email:
jan.lewis@goodrich.com; Internet: https://www.goodrich.com/TechPubs.
You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1405;
fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-1028;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-068-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013-0050, dated March 5, 2013 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
During in-service inspections, several aft engine mount
retainers, fitted on aeroplanes equipped with CFM56-5/5B engines,
have been found broken.
The results of the investigations highlight that two different
types of surface finish have been applied (respectively bright and
dull material finishes), and that dull finish adversely affects the
strength of the retainer with regard to fatigue properties of the
part.
The pins which attach the engine link to the aft mount are
secured by two nuts, which do not have a self-locking feature; this
function is provided by the retainer brackets. In case of failure of
the retainer bracket, the locking feature of the nuts of the inner
and outer pins is lost; as a result, these nuts could subsequently
become loose.
In case of full loss of the nuts, there is the potential to also
lose the pins, in which case the aft mount link will no longer be
secured to the aft engine mount. The same locking feature is used
for the three link assemblies of the aft mount.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires a one-
time detailed visual inspection (DVI) of the aft engine mount to
identify the affected dull finish retainers [and for cracks and
failure] and replace these [retainers] with serviceable retainers.
This [EASA] AD also prohibits installation of any dull finish aft
engine mount retainers.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-
2013-1028.
[[Page 76573]]
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Airbus Alert Operators Transmission (AOT)
A71N001-12, Rev. 2, dated February 27, 2013.
Goodrich Corporation has issued Goodrich Service Bulletin RA32071-
146, Rev. 2, dated July 26, 2012.
The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 851 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection...................... 3 work-hours x $85 $0 $255 per inspection $217,005 per
per hour = $255 cycle for two inspection cycle
per inspection engines. for two engines.
cycle for two
engines.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection.
We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need
these replacements:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bracket replacement.................... 1 work-hour x $85 per hour $10,000 $10,085 per engine.
= $85 per engine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This proposed regulation is
within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in
this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2013-1028; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-
068-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by February 3, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1) through (c)(4) of this AD, certificated in any category, all
manufacturer serial numbers.
(1) Airbus Model A318-111 and -112 airplanes.
(2) Airbus Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, and -115 airplanes.
(3) Airbus Model A320-111, -211, -212, and -214 airplanes.
(4) Airbus Model A321-111, -112, -211, -212, and -213 airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 71, Powerplant.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of broken aft engine mount
retainers. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of retainer
brackets of the aft engine mount and consequent loss of the locking
feature of the nuts of the inner and outer pins. Loss of the
[[Page 76574]]
pins will result in the aft mount engine link no longer being
secured to the aft engine mount.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspection
Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD: Do a
detailed inspection of the aft engine mount retainers for surface
finish (dull or bright), and for cracks and failure, in accordance
with Section 4.2.2, ``Inspection Requirements,'' of Airbus Alert
Operators Transmission (AOT) A71N001-12, Rev. 2, dated February 27,
2013, except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
(h) Exception to Paragraph (g) of This AD
The actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD are not
required to be done on airplanes with manufacturer serial numbers
4942 and higher, provided a review of maintenance records verifies
that no aft engine mount retainers have been replaced since first
flight of the airplane.
(i) Repetitive Inspection and Retainer Replacement for Dull Finish
Retainers
If, during the detailed inspection required by paragraph (g) of
this AD, any installed dull finish aft engine mount retainer is
found without cracks and not failed: Do the actions specified in
paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD.
(1) Within 25 flight cycles after doing the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, repeat the detailed inspection specified
in paragraph (g) of this AD.
(2) Within 50 flight cycles after doing the first detailed
inspection specified in paragraph (g) of this AD: Replace all dull
finish retainers with a new or serviceable retainer, in accordance
with Section 4.2.3.1, ``Replacement Procedure,'' of Airbus AOT
A71N001-12, Rev. 2, dated February 27, 2013.
(j) Replacement of Cracked or Failed Retainers
If, during any detailed inspection specified in paragraph (g) of
this AD, any installed aft engine mount retainer is found cracked or
failed: Before further flight, replace all affected aft engine mount
retainers with a new or serviceable retainer, in accordance with
Section 4.2.3, ``Replacement Procedure,'' of Airbus AOT A71N001-12,
Rev. 2, dated February 27, 2013.
(k) Parts Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install any
aft engine mount retainer with a dull finish on any airplane. The
instructions of Airbus AOT A71N001-12, Revision 2, dated February
27, 2013; or the Accomplishment Instructions of Goodrich Service
Bulletin RA32071-146, Rev. 2, dated July 26, 2012; can be used to
verify the correct finish of the part.
(l) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g), (i), and (j) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD using Airbus AOT
A71N001-12, Rev. 1, dated August 9, 2012.
(m) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone (425) 227-1405; fax (425) 227-1149. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer, use these actions if they
are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if
they were approved by the State of Design Authority (or its
delegated agent, or by the Design Approval Holder with a State of
Design Authority's design organization approval). For a repair
method to be approved, the repair approval must specifically refer
to this AD. You are required to ensure the product is airworthy
before it is returned to service.
(n) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections
21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the airplane
can be modified (if the operator elects to do so), provided no dull
finish aft engine mount retainers that are cracked or have failed
are installed.
(o) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2013-
0050, dated March 5, 2013, for related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-2013-1028.
(2) For Airbus service information identified in this AD,
contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(3) For Goodrich Corporation service information identified in
this AD, contact Goodrich Corporation, Aerostructures, 850 Lagoon
Drive, Chula Vista, CA 91910-2098; phone: 619-691-2719; email:
jan.lewis@goodrich.com; Internet: https://www.goodrich.com/TechPubs.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 9, 2013.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-30030 Filed 12-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P