Special Conditions: Airbus, Model A350-900 Series Airplane; Flight Envelope Protection: Normal Load Factor (g) Limiting, 76249-76251 [2013-29941]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules
part 36 and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under
§ 611 of Public Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise
Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, under § 11.38,
and they become part of the typecertification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Airbus Model A350–900 series
airplane will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design feature: a side
stick controller for only one-hand
operation by wrist and not by arms.
Pitch
Roll
Nose down 200 lbf ....
Nose right 100 lbf.
(2) For all other components of the
side stick control assembly, but
excluding the internal components of
the electrical sensor assemblies, to avoid
damage as a result of an in-flight jam.
Pitch
Roll
Nose up 125 lbf ........
Nose down 125 lbf ....
Nose left 50 lbf.
Nose right 50 lbf.
Discussion
Special conditions for Airbus side
stick controllers have been developed
and applied during previous Airbus
certification programs. These proposed
special conditions are also appropriate
for the Model A350–900 series side stick
controller.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
22, 2013.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
Applicability
As discussed above, these proposed
special conditions apply to Airbus
Model A350–900 series airplanes.
Should Airbus apply later for a change
to the type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, the proposed
special conditions would apply to that
model as well.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on the Airbus
Model A350–900 series airplanes. It is
not a rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
proposed special conditions is as
follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions in lieu of
§ 25.397(c), which are identical to A320,
A340, and A380 special conditions on
the same subject:
For the Airbus Model A350–900
series airplane equipped with stick
controls designed for forces to be
applied by one wrist and not arms, the
limit pilot forces are as follows:
(1) For all components between and
including the handle and its control
stops.
Roll
Nose up 200 lbf ........
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Nose left 100 lbf.
14:27 Dec 16, 2013
Jkt 232001
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0905; Notice No.
25–13–28–SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus, Model
A350–900 Series Airplane; Flight
Envelope Protection: Normal Load
Factor (g) Limiting
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
AGENCY:
This action proposes special
conditions for Airbus Model A350–900
series airplanes. These airplanes will
have a novel or unusual design
feature(s) associated with a flight
control system that prevents the pilot
from inadvertently or intentionally
exceeding the positive or negative
airplane limit load factor. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for this design feature.
These proposed special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send your comments on or
before January 31, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2013–0905
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
SUMMARY:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
Pitch
[FR Doc. 2013–29939 Filed 12–16–13; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76249
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington,
DC, 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at
https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Jacobsen, FAA, Airplane and Flightcrew
Interface Branch, ANM–111, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–2011; facsimile
(425) 227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change these proposed special
conditions based on the comments we
receive.
E:\FR\FM\17DEP1.SGM
17DEP1
76250
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied
for a type certificate for their new Model
A350–900 series airplane. Later, Airbus
requested and the FAA approved an
extension to the application for FAA
type certification to June 28, 2009. The
Model A350–900 series has a
conventional layout with twin wingmounted Rolls-Royce Trent XWB
engines. It features a twin aisle 9-abreast
economy class layout, and
accommodates side-by-side placement
of LD–3 containers in the cargo
compartment. The basic Airbus Model
A350–900 series configuration will
accommodate 315 passengers in a
standard two-class arrangement. The
design cruise speed is Mach 0.85 with
a Maximum Take-Off Weight of 602,000
lbs. Airbus proposes the Model A350–
900 series to be certified for extended
operations (ETOPS) beyond 180 minutes
at entry into service for up to a 420minute maximum diversion time.
The normal load factor limit on
Airbus Model A350–900 series airplanes
is unique in that traditional airplanes
with conventional flight control systems
(mechanical linkages) are limited in the
pitch axis only by the elevator surface
area and deflection limit. The elevator
control power is normally derived for
adequate controllability and
maneuverability at the most critical
longitudinal pitching moment. The
result is that traditional airplanes have
a significant portion of the flight
envelope wherein maneuverability in
excess of limit structural design values
is possible.
Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) part 25 sections do not specify
requirements or policy for
demonstrating maneuver control that
impose any handling qualities
requirements beyond the design limit
structural loads. Nevertheless, some
pilots have become accustomed to the
availability of this excess maneuver
capacity in case of extreme emergency
such as upset recoveries or collision
avoidance.
These proposed special conditions are
needed to ensure adequate
maneuverability and controllability for
the Model A350–900 series using the
Airbus flight control system.
Under Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, Airbus must
show that the Model A350–900 series
meets the applicable provisions of 14
CFR part 25, as amended by
Amendments 25–1 through 25–128.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:27 Dec 16, 2013
Jkt 232001
for the Model A350–900 series because
of a novel or unusual design feature,
special conditions are prescribed under
§ 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same or similar novel
or unusual design feature, the proposed
special conditions would also apply to
the other model under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and proposed
special conditions, the Airbus Model
A350–900 series must comply with the
fuel vent and exhaust emission
requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the
noise certification requirements of 14
CFR part 36 and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under
§ 611 of Public Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise
Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, under § 11.38,
and they become part of the typecertification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Airbus Model A350–900 series
will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: a flight control
system that prevents the pilot from
inadvertently or intentionally exceeding
the positive or negative airplane limit
load factor.
Discussion
Flight envelope protection that limits
normal load factor (g) limiting is
considered novel and unusual because
the current regulations do not provide
standards for maneuverability and
controllability evaluations for such
systems. Special conditions are needed
to ensure adequate maneuverability and
controllability when using this design
feature.
As with the previous fly-by-wire
airplanes, the FAA has no regulatory or
safety reason to inhibit the design
concept of the Airbus A350 flight
control system with load factor limiting.
Pilots accustomed to this control feature
may feel more freedom in commanding
full stick displacement maneuvers
because of the following:
(1) Knowledge that the limit system
will protect the structure,
(2) Low stick force/displacement
gradients, and
(3) Smooth transition from pilot
elevator control to limit control.
Applicability
As discussed above, these proposed
special conditions apply to Airbus
Model A350–900 series airplanes.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Should Airbus apply later for a change
to the type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, the proposed
special conditions would apply to that
model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on the Airbus
Model A350–900 series airplanes. It is
not a rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of
the type certification basis for Airbus
Model A350–900 series airplanes.
To meet the intent of adequate
maneuverability and controllability
required by § 25.143(a), and in the
absence of other limiting factors, the
following special condition is proposed:
1. The positive limiting load factor
must not be less than:
(a) 2.5g for the EFCS normal state
with the high lift devices retracted up to
VMO/MMO. The positive limiting load
factor may be gradually reduced down
to 2.25g above VMO/MMO.
(b) 2.0g for the EFCS normal state
with the high lift devices extended.
2. The negative limiting load factor
must be equal to or more negative than:
(a) Minus 1.0g for the EFCS normal
state with the high lift devices retracted.
(b) 0.0g for the EFCS normal state
with high lift devices extended.
3. Maximum reachable positive load
factor wings level may be limited by
flight control system characteristics or
flight envelope protections (other than
load factor protection) provided:
(a) That the required values are
readily achievable in turns and
(b) that wings level pitch up
responsiveness is satisfactory.
4. Maximum achievable negative load
factor may be limited by flight control
system characteristics or flight envelope
protections (other than load factor
protection) provided:
(a) pitch down responsiveness is
satisfactory
(b) from level flight, 0g is readily
achievable or alternatively, a
satisfactory* trajectory change is readily
achievable at operational speeds (from
VLS to max speed ¥10kts). VLS is the
lowest speed that the crew may fly with
E:\FR\FM\17DEP1.SGM
17DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules
auto thrust or auto pilot engaged. It is
displayed on primary flight displays as
the top of the low speed amber band,
and is the lower end of the normal flight
envelope. Max speed ¥ 10kts is
proposed to cover typical margin from
VMO/MMO to cruise speeds and typical
margin from VFE to standard speed in
high lift configurations.
* For the FAA to consider a trajectory
change as satisfactory, the applicant
should propose and justify a pitch rate
that provides sufficient maneuvering
capability in the most critical scenarios.
Compliance demonstration with the
above requirements may be performed
without ice accretion on the airframe.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
22, 2013.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–29941 Filed 12–16–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0909; Notice No.
25–13–17–SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus, Model
A350–900 Series Airplane; Electronic
System Security Protection From
Unauthorized External Access
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
AGENCY:
This action proposes special
conditions for Airbus Model A350–900
series airplanes. These airplanes will
have a novel or unusual design feature
associated with electronic system
security protection from unauthorized
external access. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These proposed
special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send your comments on or
before January 31, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2013–0909
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:27 Dec 16, 2013
Jkt 232001
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington,
DC, 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at
https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Varun Khanna, FAA, Airplane and
Flightcrew Interface Branch, ANM–111,
Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1298; facsimile
(425) 227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We may change these
proposed special conditions based on
the comments we receive.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76251
Background
On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied
for a type certificate for their new Model
A350–900 series airplane. Later, Airbus
requested and the FAA approved an
extension to the application for FAA
type certification to June 28, 2009. The
Model A350–900 series has a
conventional layout with twin wingmounted Rolls-Royce Trent XWB
engines. It features a twin aisle 9-abreast
economy class layout, and
accommodates side-by-side placement
of LD–3 containers in the cargo
compartment. The basic Model A350–
900 series configuration will
accommodate 315 passengers in a
standard two-class arrangement. The
design cruise speed is Mach 0.85 with
a Maximum Take-Off Weight of 602,000
lbs. Airbus proposes the Model A350–
900 series to be certified for extended
operations (ETOPS) beyond 180 minutes
at entry into service for up to a 420minute maximum diversion time.
Contemporary transport category
airplanes have both safety-related and
non-safety-related electronic system
networks for many operational
functions. However, electronic system
network security considerations and
functions have played a relatively minor
role in the certification of such systems
because of the isolation, protection
mechanisms, and limited connectivity
between the different networks.
Type Certification Basis
Under Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, Airbus must
show that the Model A350–900 series
meets the applicable provisions of 14
CFR part 25, as amended by
Amendments 25–1 through 25–129.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Model A350–900 series because
of a novel or unusual design feature,
special conditions are prescribed under
§ 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, the proposed special
conditions would also apply to the other
model under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and proposed
special conditions, the Model A350–900
series must comply with the fuel vent
and exhaust emission requirements of
14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR
E:\FR\FM\17DEP1.SGM
17DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76249-76251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29941]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0905; Notice No. 25-13-28-SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus, Model A350-900 Series Airplane;
Flight Envelope Protection: Normal Load Factor (g) Limiting
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for Airbus Model A350-
900 series airplanes. These airplanes will have a novel or unusual
design feature(s) associated with a flight control system that prevents
the pilot from inadvertently or intentionally exceeding the positive or
negative airplane limit load factor. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for
this design feature. These proposed special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary
to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send your comments on or before January 31, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2013-0905
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC, 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Jacobsen, FAA, Airplane and
Flightcrew Interface Branch, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2011; facsimile (425) 227-
1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is
possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change
these proposed special conditions based on the comments we receive.
[[Page 76250]]
Background
On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied for a type certificate for their
new Model A350-900 series airplane. Later, Airbus requested and the FAA
approved an extension to the application for FAA type certification to
June 28, 2009. The Model A350-900 series has a conventional layout with
twin wing-mounted Rolls-Royce Trent XWB engines. It features a twin
aisle 9-abreast economy class layout, and accommodates side-by-side
placement of LD-3 containers in the cargo compartment. The basic Airbus
Model A350-900 series configuration will accommodate 315 passengers in
a standard two-class arrangement. The design cruise speed is Mach 0.85
with a Maximum Take-Off Weight of 602,000 lbs. Airbus proposes the
Model A350-900 series to be certified for extended operations (ETOPS)
beyond 180 minutes at entry into service for up to a 420-minute maximum
diversion time.
The normal load factor limit on Airbus Model A350-900 series
airplanes is unique in that traditional airplanes with conventional
flight control systems (mechanical linkages) are limited in the pitch
axis only by the elevator surface area and deflection limit. The
elevator control power is normally derived for adequate controllability
and maneuverability at the most critical longitudinal pitching moment.
The result is that traditional airplanes have a significant portion of
the flight envelope wherein maneuverability in excess of limit
structural design values is possible.
Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 25 sections do
not specify requirements or policy for demonstrating maneuver control
that impose any handling qualities requirements beyond the design limit
structural loads. Nevertheless, some pilots have become accustomed to
the availability of this excess maneuver capacity in case of extreme
emergency such as upset recoveries or collision avoidance.
These proposed special conditions are needed to ensure adequate
maneuverability and controllability for the Model A350-900 series using
the Airbus flight control system.
Under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, Airbus
must show that the Model A350-900 series meets the applicable
provisions of 14 CFR part 25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-
128.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Model A350-900 series because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar
novel or unusual design feature, the proposed special conditions would
also apply to the other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and
proposed special conditions, the Airbus Model A350-900 series must
comply with the fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR
part 34 and the noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36 and
the FAA must issue a finding of regulatory adequacy under Sec. 611 of
Public Law 92-574, the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19,
under Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type-certification basis
under Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Airbus Model A350-900 series will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design features: a flight control system that prevents
the pilot from inadvertently or intentionally exceeding the positive or
negative airplane limit load factor.
Discussion
Flight envelope protection that limits normal load factor (g)
limiting is considered novel and unusual because the current
regulations do not provide standards for maneuverability and
controllability evaluations for such systems. Special conditions are
needed to ensure adequate maneuverability and controllability when
using this design feature.
As with the previous fly-by-wire airplanes, the FAA has no
regulatory or safety reason to inhibit the design concept of the Airbus
A350 flight control system with load factor limiting. Pilots accustomed
to this control feature may feel more freedom in commanding full stick
displacement maneuvers because of the following:
(1) Knowledge that the limit system will protect the structure,
(2) Low stick force/displacement gradients, and
(3) Smooth transition from pilot elevator control to limit control.
Applicability
As discussed above, these proposed special conditions apply to
Airbus Model A350-900 series airplanes. Should Airbus apply later for a
change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design feature, the proposed special
conditions would apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on the Airbus Model A350-900 series airplanes. It is not a rule of
general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis
for Airbus Model A350-900 series airplanes.
To meet the intent of adequate maneuverability and controllability
required by Sec. 25.143(a), and in the absence of other limiting
factors, the following special condition is proposed:
1. The positive limiting load factor must not be less than:
(a) 2.5g for the EFCS normal state with the high lift devices
retracted up to VMO/MMO. The positive limiting
load factor may be gradually reduced down to 2.25g above
VMO/MMO.
(b) 2.0g for the EFCS normal state with the high lift devices
extended.
2. The negative limiting load factor must be equal to or more
negative than:
(a) Minus 1.0g for the EFCS normal state with the high lift devices
retracted.
(b) 0.0g for the EFCS normal state with high lift devices extended.
3. Maximum reachable positive load factor wings level may be
limited by flight control system characteristics or flight envelope
protections (other than load factor protection) provided:
(a) That the required values are readily achievable in turns and
(b) that wings level pitch up responsiveness is satisfactory.
4. Maximum achievable negative load factor may be limited by flight
control system characteristics or flight envelope protections (other
than load factor protection) provided:
(a) pitch down responsiveness is satisfactory
(b) from level flight, 0g is readily achievable or alternatively, a
satisfactory* trajectory change is readily achievable at operational
speeds (from VLS to max speed -10kts). VLS is the
lowest speed that the crew may fly with
[[Page 76251]]
auto thrust or auto pilot engaged. It is displayed on primary flight
displays as the top of the low speed amber band, and is the lower end
of the normal flight envelope. Max speed - 10kts is proposed to cover
typical margin from VMO/MMO to cruise speeds and
typical margin from VFE to standard speed in high lift
configurations.
* For the FAA to consider a trajectory change as satisfactory, the
applicant should propose and justify a pitch rate that provides
sufficient maneuvering capability in the most critical scenarios.
Compliance demonstration with the above requirements may be performed
without ice accretion on the airframe.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 22, 2013.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-29941 Filed 12-16-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P