Request for Information for the 2014; Trafficking in Persons Report, 76183-76186 [2013-29860]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2013 / Notices programs for Board members and recommend changes, where appropriate. In addition to the foregoing, the GC may undertake other and different activities, as appropriate, or as may be delegated to it by the Board. In discharging its role, the GC shall confer with management and other employees of OCC to the extent the GC deems it necessary to so to fulfill its duties.3 OCC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 4 because the GC Charter helps ensure that OCC’s governance structure is designed to protect investors and the public interest. By creating a GC Charter that clarifies the duties and operations of the GC, OCC will have, as required under Rule 17Ad–22(d)(8), a clear and transparent governance structure that will fulfill the public interests requirements in Section 17A of the Act, support the objectives of OCC’s owners and participants and promote the effectiveness of OCC’s risk management procedures.5 (B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on Burden on Competition OCC does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.6 This proposed rule change will help ensure that OCC meets regulatory requirements that it has a clear and transparent governance structure, as well as clarify the organization, duties and operation of the GC through the adoption of the GC Charter. To the extent OCC’s clearing members are affected by proposed rule change, OCC believes that, by publishing the terms of the GC Charter in the public domain, all of its participants will have greater certainty concerning OCC’s governance arrangements. Accordingly, OCC does not believe that the proposed rule will it impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES (C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others Written comments on the proposed rule change were not and are not intended to be solicited with respect to 3 The GC, subject to the approval of the Board, is permitted to hire specialists or rely on outside advisors or specialists to assist it in carrying out the GC’s activities. The GC has the authority to approve the fees and retention terms of such advisors and specialists. 4 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F). 5 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(8). 6 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(I). VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:51 Dec 13, 2013 Jkt 232001 the proposed rule change and none have been received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml), or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–OCC–2013–18 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–OCC–2013–18. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method of submission. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090 on PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 76183 official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of OCC and on OCC’s Web site at http://www.theocc.com/about/ publications/bylaws.jsp. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–OCC–2013–18 and should be submitted on or before January 6, 2014. For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.7 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013–29780 Filed 12–13–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 8548] Request for Information for the 2014; Trafficking in Persons Report The Department of State (‘‘the Department’’) requests written information to assist in reporting on the degree to which the United States and foreign governments comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons (‘‘minimum standards’’) that are prescribed by the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, (Div. A, Pub. L. 106–386) as amended (‘‘TVPA’’). This information will assist in the preparation of the Trafficking in Persons Report (‘‘TIP Report’’) that the Department submits annually to appropriate committees in the U.S. Congress on governments’ level of compliance with the minimum standards. Foreign governments that do not comply with the minimum standards and are not making significant efforts to do so may be subject to restrictions on nonhumanitarian, nontrade-related foreign assistance from the United States, as defined by the TVPA. Submissions must be made in writing to the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons at the Department of State by January 30, 2014. Please refer to the Addresses, Scope of Interest, and Information Sought sections of this Notice for additional instructions on submission requirements. SUMMARY: 7 17 E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 16DEN1 76184 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2013 / Notices Submissions must be received by the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons by 5 p.m. on January 30, 2014. Addresses: Written submissions and supporting documentation may be submitted to the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons by the following methods: • Facsimile (fax): 202–312–9637. • Mail, Express Delivery, Hand Delivery and Messenger Service: U.S. Department of State, Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons (J/TIP), 1800 G Street NW., Suite 2148, Washington, DC 20520. Please note that materials submitted by mail may be delayed due to security screenings and processing. • Email (preferred): tipreport@ state.gov for submissions related to foreign governments and tipreportUS@ state.gov for submissions related to the United States. Scope of Interest: The Department requests information relevant to assessing the United States’ and foreign governments’ compliance with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons in the year 2013. The minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons are listed in the Background section. Submissions must include information relevant and probative of the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons and should include, but need not be limited to, answering the questions in the Information Sought section. These questions are designed to elicit information relevant to the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons. Only those questions for which the submitter has direct professional experience should be answered and that experience should be noted. For any critique or deficiency described, please provide a recommendation to remedy it. Note the country or countries that are the focus of the submission. Submissions may include written narratives that answer the questions presented in this Notice, research, studies, statistics, fieldwork, training materials, evaluations, assessments, and other relevant evidence of local, state, and federal government efforts. To the extent possible, precise dates should be included. Where applicable, written narratives providing factual information should provide citations to sources and copies of the source material should be provided. If possible, send electronic copies of the entire submission, including source material. If primary sources are utilized, such as research pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES DATES: VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:51 Dec 13, 2013 Jkt 232001 studies, interviews, direct observations, or other sources of quantitative or qualitative data, details on the research or data-gathering methodology should be provided. The Department does not include in the Report, and is therefore not seeking, information on prostitution, human smuggling, visa fraud, or child abuse, unless such conduct occurs in the context of human trafficking. Confidentiality: Please provide the name, phone number, and email address of a single point of contact for any submission. It is Department practice not to identify in the TIP Report information concerning sources in order to safeguard those sources. Please note, however, that any information submitted to the Department may be releasable pursuant to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act or other applicable law. When applicable, portions of submissions relevant to efforts by other U.S. government agencies may be shared with those agencies. Response: This is a request for information only; there will be no response to submissions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The TIP Report: The TIP Report is the most comprehensive worldwide report on governments’ efforts to combat trafficking in persons. It represents an updated, global look at the nature and scope of trafficking in persons and the broad range of government actions to confront and eliminate it. The U.S. Government uses the TIP Report to engage in diplomacy, to encourage partnership in creating and implementing laws and policies, to combat trafficking, and to target resources on prevention, protection, and prosecution programs. Worldwide, the Report is used by international organizations, foreign governments, and nongovernmental organizations alike as a tool to examine where resources are most needed. Freeing victims, preventing trafficking, and bringing traffickers to justice are the ultimate goals of the Report and of the U.S Government’s anti-trafficking policy. The Department prepares the TIP Report using information from across the U.S. Government, U.S. embassies, foreign government officials, nongovernmental and international organizations, published reports, and research trips to every region. The TIP Report focuses on concrete actions that governments take to fight trafficking in persons, including prosecutions, convictions, and prison sentences for traffickers, as well as victim protection measures and prevention efforts. Each PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 TIP Report narrative also includes a section on recommendations. These recommendations are then used to assist in measuring progress from one year to the next and determining whether governments comply with the minimum standards to eliminate trafficking in persons or are making significant efforts to do so. The TVPA creates a four tier ranking system. Tier placement is based more on the extent of government action to combat trafficking than on the size of the problem, although that is a consideration. The Department first evaluates whether the government fully complies with the TVPA’s minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking. Governments that fully comply are placed on Tier 1. For other governments, the Department considers the extent of efforts to reach compliance. Governments that are making significant efforts to meet the minimum standards are placed on Tier 2. Governments that do not fully comply with the minimum standards and are not making significant efforts to do so are placed on Tier 3. Finally, the Department considers Special Watch List criteria and, when applicable, moves Tier 2 countries to Tier 2 Watch List. For more information, the 2013 TIP Report can be found at http:// www.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/2013/ index.htm. Since the inception of the TIP Report in 2001, the number of countries included and ranked has more than doubled to include 188 countries in the 2013 TIP Report. Around the world, the TIP Report and the best practices reflected therein have inspired legislation, national action plans, policy implementation, program funding, protection mechanisms that complement prosecution efforts, and a stronger global understanding of this crime. Since 2003, the primary reporting on the United States’ anti-trafficking activities has been through the annual Attorney General’s Report to Congress and Assessment of U.S. Government Activities to Combat Human Trafficking (‘‘AG Report’’) mandated by section 105 of the TVPA (22 U.S.C. 7103(d)(7)). In addition, the United States, through a collaborative interagency process, includes in the TIP Report an analysis of U.S. Government anti-trafficking efforts in light of the minimum standards to eliminate trafficking in persons set forth by the TVPA. E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM 16DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2013 / Notices pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES II. Minimum Standards for the Elimination of Trafficking in Persons The TVPA sets forth the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons as follows: (1) The government of the country should prohibit severe forms of trafficking in persons and punish acts of such trafficking. (2) For the knowing commission of any act of sex trafficking involving force, fraud, coercion, or in which the victim of sex trafficking is a child incapable of giving meaningful consent, or of trafficking which includes rape or kidnapping or which causes a death, the government of the country should prescribe punishment commensurate with that for grave crimes, such as forcible sexual assault. (3) For the knowing commission of any act of a severe form of trafficking in persons, the government of the country should prescribe punishment that is sufficiently stringent to deter and that adequately reflects the heinous nature of the offense. (4) The government of the country should make serious and sustained efforts to eliminate severe forms of trafficking in persons. The following factors should be considered as indicia of serious and sustained efforts to eliminate severe forms of trafficking in persons: (1) Whether the government of the country vigorously investigates and prosecutes acts of severe forms of trafficking in persons, and convicts and sentences persons responsible for such acts, that take place wholly or partly within the territory of the country, including, as appropriate, requiring incarceration of individuals convicted of such acts. For purposes of the preceding sentence, suspended or significantly reduced sentences for convictions of principal actors in cases of severe forms of trafficking in persons shall be considered, on a case-by-case basis, whether to be considered as an indicator of serious and sustained efforts to eliminate severe forms of trafficking in persons. After reasonable requests from the Department of State for data regarding investigations, prosecutions, convictions, and sentences, a government which does not provide such data, consistent with the capacity of such government to obtain such data, shall be presumed not to have vigorously investigated, prosecuted, convicted, or sentenced such acts. The Secretary of State may disregard the presumption contained in the preceding sentence if the government has provided some data to the Department of State regarding such VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:51 Dec 13, 2013 Jkt 232001 acts and the Secretary has determined that the government is making a good faith effort to collect such data. (2) Whether the government of the country protects victims of severe forms of trafficking in persons and encourages their assistance in the investigation and prosecution of such trafficking, including provisions for legal alternatives to their removal to countries in which they would face retribution or hardship, and ensures that victims are not inappropriately incarcerated, fined, or otherwise penalized solely for unlawful acts as a direct result of being trafficked, including by providing training to law enforcement and immigration officials regarding the identification and treatment of trafficking victims using approaches that focus on the needs of the victims. (3) Whether the government of the country has adopted measures to prevent severe forms of trafficking in persons, such as measures to inform and educate the public, including potential victims, about the causes and consequences of severe forms of trafficking in persons; measures to establish the identity of local populations, including birth registration, citizenship, and nationality; measures to ensure that its nationals who are deployed abroad as part of a diplomatic, peacekeeping, or other similar mission do not engage in or facilitate severe forms of trafficking in persons or exploit victims of such trafficking; a transparent system for remediating or punishing such public officials as a deterrent; measures to prevent the use of forced labor or child labor in violation of international standards; effective bilateral, multilateral, or regional informationsharing and cooperation arrangements with other countries; and effective policies or laws regulating foreign labor recruiters and holding them civilly and criminally liable for fraudulent recruiting. (4) Whether the government of the country cooperates with other governments in the investigation and prosecution of severe forms of trafficking in persons and has entered into bilateral, multilateral, or regional law enforcement cooperation and coordination arrangements with other countries. (5) Whether the government of the country extradites persons charged with acts of severe forms of trafficking in persons on substantially the same terms and to substantially the same extent as persons charged with other serious crimes (or, to the extent such extradition would be inconsistent with the laws of such country or with international PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 76185 agreements to which the country is a party, whether the government is taking all appropriate measures to modify or replace such laws and treaties so as to permit such extradition). (6) Whether the government of the country monitors immigration and emigration patterns for evidence of severe forms of trafficking in persons and whether law enforcement agencies of the country respond to any such evidence in a manner that is consistent with the vigorous investigation and prosecution of acts of such trafficking, as well as with the protection of human rights of victims and the internationally recognized human right to leave any country, including one’s own, and to return to one’s own country. (7) Whether the government of the country vigorously investigates, prosecutes, convicts, and sentences public officials, including diplomats and soldiers, who participate in or facilitate severe forms of trafficking in persons, including nationals of the country who are deployed abroad as part of a diplomatic, peacekeeping, or other similar mission who engage in or facilitate severe forms of trafficking in persons or exploit victims of such trafficking, and takes all appropriate measures against officials who condone such trafficking. A government’s failure to appropriately address public allegations against such public officials, especially once such officials have returned to their home countries, shall be considered inaction under these criteria. After reasonable requests from the Department of State for data regarding such investigations, prosecutions, convictions, and sentences, a government which does not provide such data consistent with its resources shall be presumed not to have vigorously investigated, prosecuted, convicted, or sentenced such acts. The Secretary of State may disregard the presumption contained in the preceding sentence if the government has provided some data to the Department of State regarding such acts and the Secretary has determined that the government is making a good faith effort to collect such data. (8) Whether the percentage of victims of severe forms of trafficking in the country that are non-citizens of such countries is insignificant. (9) Whether the government has entered into effective, transparent partnerships, cooperative agreements, or agreements that have resulted in concrete and measureable outcomes with— (A) domestic civil society organizations, private sector entities, or international non-governmental E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM 16DEN1 76186 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2013 / Notices pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES organizations, or into multilateral or regional arrangements or agreements, to assist the government’s efforts to prevent trafficking, protect victims, and punish traffickers or (B) the United States toward agreed goals and objectives in the collective fight against trafficking. (10) Whether the government of the country, consistent with the capacity of such government, systematically monitors its efforts to satisfy the criteria described in paragraphs (1) through (8) and makes available publicly a periodic assessment of such efforts. (11) Whether the government of the country achieves appreciable progress in eliminating severe forms of trafficking when compared to the assessment in the previous year. (12) Whether the government of the country has made serious and sustained efforts to reduce the demand for (A) commercial sex acts; and (B) participation in international sex tourism by nationals of the country. III. Information Sought Relevant to the Minimum Standards Submissions should include, but need not be limited to, answers to relevant questions below for which the submitter has direct professional experience and that experience should be noted. Citations to source material should also be provided. Note the country or countries that are the focus of the submission. Please see the Scope of Interest section for detailed information regarding submission requirements. 1. How have trafficking methods changed in the past 12 months? For example, are there victims from new countries of origin? Is internal trafficking or child trafficking increasing? Has sex trafficking changed from brothels to private apartments? Is labor trafficking now occurring in additional types of industries or agricultural operations? Is forced begging a problem? 2. In what ways has the government’s efforts to combat trafficking in persons changed in the past year? What new laws, regulations, policies, and implementation strategies exist (e.g., substantive criminal laws and procedures, mechanisms for civil remedies, and victim-witness security, generally, and in relation to court proceedings)? 3. Please provide observations regarding the implementation of existing laws and procedures. 4. Is the government equally vigorous in pursuing labor trafficking and sex trafficking? 5. Are the anti-trafficking laws and sentences strict enough to reflect the VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:51 Dec 13, 2013 Jkt 232001 nature of the crime? Are sex trafficking sentences commensurate with rape sentences? 6. Do government officials understand the nature of trafficking? If not, please provide examples of misconceptions or misunderstandings. 7. Do judges appear appropriately knowledgeable and sensitized to trafficking cases? What sentences have courts imposed upon traffickers? How common are suspended sentences and prison time of less than one year for convicted traffickers? 8. Please provide observations regarding the efforts of police and prosecutors to pursue trafficking cases. 9. Are government officials (including law enforcement, diplomats, and soldiers/peacekeepers) complicit in human trafficking by, for example, profiting from, taking bribes, or receiving sexual services for allowing it to continue? Are government officials operating trafficking rings or activities? If so, have these government officials been subject to an investigation and/or prosecution? What punishments have been imposed? 10. Has the government vigorously investigated, prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced nationals of the country deployed abroad as part of a diplomatic, peacekeeping, or other similar mission who engage in or facilitate trafficking? 11. Has the government investigated, prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced organized crime groups that are involved in trafficking? 12. Is the country a source of sex tourists and, if so, what are their destination countries? Is the country a destination for sex tourists and, if so, what are their source countries? 13. Please provide observations regarding government efforts to address the issue of unlawful child soldiering. 14. Does the government make a coordinated, proactive effort to identify victims? Is there any screening conducted before deportation to determine whether individuals were trafficked? 15. What victim services are provided (legal, medical, food, shelter, interpretation, mental health care, health care, employment, training, etc.)? Who provides these services? If nongovernment organizations provide the services, does the government support their work either financially or otherwise? 16. How could victim services be improved? 17. Are services provided equally and adequately to victims of labor and sex trafficking? Men, women, and children? Citizen and noncitizen? Members of the LGBT community? PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 18. Do service providers and law enforcement work together cooperatively, for instance, to share information about trafficking trends or to plan for services after a raid? What is the level of cooperation, communication, and trust between service providers and law enforcement? 19. May victims file civil suits or seek legal action against their trafficker? Do victims avail themselves of those remedies? 20. Does the government repatriate victims who wish to return home? Does the government assist with third country resettlement? Does the government engage in any analysis of whether victims may face retribution or hardship upon repatriation to their country of origin? Are victims awaiting repatriation or third country resettlement offered services? Are victims indeed repatriated or are they deported? 21. Does the government inappropriately detain or imprison identified trafficking victims? 22. Does the government punish trafficking victims for forgery of documents, illegal immigration, unauthorized employment, or participation in illegal activities directed by the trafficker? 23. What efforts has the government made to prevent human trafficking? 24. Has the government entered into effective bilateral, multilateral, or regional information-sharing and cooperation arrangements that have resulted in concrete and measureable outcomes? 25. Does the country have effective policies or laws regulating foreign labor recruiters? 26. Does the government undertake activities that could prevent or reduce vulnerability to trafficking, such as registering births of indigenous populations? 27. Does the government provide financial support to NGOs working to promote public awareness or does the government implement such campaigns itself? Have public awareness campaigns proven to be effective? 28. Please provide additional recommendations to improve the government’s anti-trafficking efforts. 29. Please highlight effective strategies and practices that other governments could consider adopting. Dated: December 3, 2013. Luis CdeBaca, Ambassador-at-Large, Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, U.S. Department of State. [FR Doc. 2013–29860 Filed 12–13–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–00–P E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM 16DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 241 (Monday, December 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76183-76186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29860]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8548]


Request for Information for the 2014; Trafficking in Persons 
Report

SUMMARY: The Department of State (``the Department'') requests written 
information to assist in reporting on the degree to which the United 
States and foreign governments comply with the minimum standards for 
the elimination of trafficking in persons (``minimum standards'') that 
are prescribed by the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, (Div. 
A, Pub. L. 106-386) as amended (``TVPA''). This information will assist 
in the preparation of the Trafficking in Persons Report (``TIP 
Report'') that the Department submits annually to appropriate 
committees in the U.S. Congress on governments' level of compliance 
with the minimum standards. Foreign governments that do not comply with 
the minimum standards and are not making significant efforts to do so 
may be subject to restrictions on nonhumanitarian, nontrade-related 
foreign assistance from the United States, as defined by the TVPA. 
Submissions must be made in writing to the Office to Monitor and Combat 
Trafficking in Persons at the Department of State by January 30, 2014. 
Please refer to the Addresses, Scope of Interest, and Information 
Sought sections of this Notice for additional instructions on 
submission requirements.

[[Page 76184]]


DATES: Submissions must be received by the Office to Monitor and Combat 
Trafficking in Persons by 5 p.m. on January 30, 2014.
    Addresses: Written submissions and supporting documentation may be 
submitted to the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons by 
the following methods:
     Facsimile (fax): 202-312-9637.
     Mail, Express Delivery, Hand Delivery and Messenger 
Service: U.S. Department of State, Office to Monitor and Combat 
Trafficking in Persons (J/TIP), 1800 G Street NW., Suite 2148, 
Washington, DC 20520. Please note that materials submitted by mail may 
be delayed due to security screenings and processing.
     Email (preferred): tipreport@state.gov for submissions 
related to foreign governments and tipreportUS@state.gov for 
submissions related to the United States.
    Scope of Interest: The Department requests information relevant to 
assessing the United States' and foreign governments' compliance with 
the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons in 
the year 2013. The minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking 
in persons are listed in the Background section. Submissions must 
include information relevant and probative of the minimum standards for 
the elimination of trafficking in persons and should include, but need 
not be limited to, answering the questions in the Information Sought 
section. These questions are designed to elicit information relevant to 
the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons. 
Only those questions for which the submitter has direct professional 
experience should be answered and that experience should be noted. For 
any critique or deficiency described, please provide a recommendation 
to remedy it. Note the country or countries that are the focus of the 
submission.
    Submissions may include written narratives that answer the 
questions presented in this Notice, research, studies, statistics, 
fieldwork, training materials, evaluations, assessments, and other 
relevant evidence of local, state, and federal government efforts. To 
the extent possible, precise dates should be included.
    Where applicable, written narratives providing factual information 
should provide citations to sources and copies of the source material 
should be provided. If possible, send electronic copies of the entire 
submission, including source material. If primary sources are utilized, 
such as research studies, interviews, direct observations, or other 
sources of quantitative or qualitative data, details on the research or 
data-gathering methodology should be provided. The Department does not 
include in the Report, and is therefore not seeking, information on 
prostitution, human smuggling, visa fraud, or child abuse, unless such 
conduct occurs in the context of human trafficking.
    Confidentiality: Please provide the name, phone number, and email 
address of a single point of contact for any submission. It is 
Department practice not to identify in the TIP Report information 
concerning sources in order to safeguard those sources. Please note, 
however, that any information submitted to the Department may be 
releasable pursuant to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 
or other applicable law. When applicable, portions of submissions 
relevant to efforts by other U.S. government agencies may be shared 
with those agencies.
    Response: This is a request for information only; there will be no 
response to submissions.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    The TIP Report: The TIP Report is the most comprehensive worldwide 
report on governments' efforts to combat trafficking in persons. It 
represents an updated, global look at the nature and scope of 
trafficking in persons and the broad range of government actions to 
confront and eliminate it. The U.S. Government uses the TIP Report to 
engage in diplomacy, to encourage partnership in creating and 
implementing laws and policies, to combat trafficking, and to target 
resources on prevention, protection, and prosecution programs. 
Worldwide, the Report is used by international organizations, foreign 
governments, and nongovernmental organizations alike as a tool to 
examine where resources are most needed. Freeing victims, preventing 
trafficking, and bringing traffickers to justice are the ultimate goals 
of the Report and of the U.S Government's anti-trafficking policy.
    The Department prepares the TIP Report using information from 
across the U.S. Government, U.S. embassies, foreign government 
officials, nongovernmental and international organizations, published 
reports, and research trips to every region. The TIP Report focuses on 
concrete actions that governments take to fight trafficking in persons, 
including prosecutions, convictions, and prison sentences for 
traffickers, as well as victim protection measures and prevention 
efforts. Each TIP Report narrative also includes a section on 
recommendations. These recommendations are then used to assist in 
measuring progress from one year to the next and determining whether 
governments comply with the minimum standards to eliminate trafficking 
in persons or are making significant efforts to do so.
    The TVPA creates a four tier ranking system. Tier placement is 
based more on the extent of government action to combat trafficking 
than on the size of the problem, although that is a consideration. The 
Department first evaluates whether the government fully complies with 
the TVPA's minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking. 
Governments that fully comply are placed on Tier 1. For other 
governments, the Department considers the extent of efforts to reach 
compliance. Governments that are making significant efforts to meet the 
minimum standards are placed on Tier 2. Governments that do not fully 
comply with the minimum standards and are not making significant 
efforts to do so are placed on Tier 3. Finally, the Department 
considers Special Watch List criteria and, when applicable, moves Tier 
2 countries to Tier 2 Watch List. For more information, the 2013 TIP 
Report can be found at http://www.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/2013/index.htm.
    Since the inception of the TIP Report in 2001, the number of 
countries included and ranked has more than doubled to include 188 
countries in the 2013 TIP Report. Around the world, the TIP Report and 
the best practices reflected therein have inspired legislation, 
national action plans, policy implementation, program funding, 
protection mechanisms that complement prosecution efforts, and a 
stronger global understanding of this crime.
    Since 2003, the primary reporting on the United States' anti-
trafficking activities has been through the annual Attorney General's 
Report to Congress and Assessment of U.S. Government Activities to 
Combat Human Trafficking (``AG Report'') mandated by section 105 of the 
TVPA (22 U.S.C. 7103(d)(7)). In addition, the United States, through a 
collaborative interagency process, includes in the TIP Report an 
analysis of U.S. Government anti-trafficking efforts in light of the 
minimum standards to eliminate trafficking in persons set forth by the 
TVPA.

[[Page 76185]]

II. Minimum Standards for the Elimination of Trafficking in Persons

    The TVPA sets forth the minimum standards for the elimination of 
trafficking in persons as follows:
    (1) The government of the country should prohibit severe forms of 
trafficking in persons and punish acts of such trafficking.
    (2) For the knowing commission of any act of sex trafficking 
involving force, fraud, coercion, or in which the victim of sex 
trafficking is a child incapable of giving meaningful consent, or of 
trafficking which includes rape or kidnapping or which causes a death, 
the government of the country should prescribe punishment commensurate 
with that for grave crimes, such as forcible sexual assault.
    (3) For the knowing commission of any act of a severe form of 
trafficking in persons, the government of the country should prescribe 
punishment that is sufficiently stringent to deter and that adequately 
reflects the heinous nature of the offense.
    (4) The government of the country should make serious and sustained 
efforts to eliminate severe forms of trafficking in persons.
    The following factors should be considered as indicia of serious 
and sustained efforts to eliminate severe forms of trafficking in 
persons:
    (1) Whether the government of the country vigorously investigates 
and prosecutes acts of severe forms of trafficking in persons, and 
convicts and sentences persons responsible for such acts, that take 
place wholly or partly within the territory of the country, including, 
as appropriate, requiring incarceration of individuals convicted of 
such acts. For purposes of the preceding sentence, suspended or 
significantly reduced sentences for convictions of principal actors in 
cases of severe forms of trafficking in persons shall be considered, on 
a case-by-case basis, whether to be considered as an indicator of 
serious and sustained efforts to eliminate severe forms of trafficking 
in persons. After reasonable requests from the Department of State for 
data regarding investigations, prosecutions, convictions, and 
sentences, a government which does not provide such data, consistent 
with the capacity of such government to obtain such data, shall be 
presumed not to have vigorously investigated, prosecuted, convicted, or 
sentenced such acts. The Secretary of State may disregard the 
presumption contained in the preceding sentence if the government has 
provided some data to the Department of State regarding such acts and 
the Secretary has determined that the government is making a good faith 
effort to collect such data.
    (2) Whether the government of the country protects victims of 
severe forms of trafficking in persons and encourages their assistance 
in the investigation and prosecution of such trafficking, including 
provisions for legal alternatives to their removal to countries in 
which they would face retribution or hardship, and ensures that victims 
are not inappropriately incarcerated, fined, or otherwise penalized 
solely for unlawful acts as a direct result of being trafficked, 
including by providing training to law enforcement and immigration 
officials regarding the identification and treatment of trafficking 
victims using approaches that focus on the needs of the victims.
    (3) Whether the government of the country has adopted measures to 
prevent severe forms of trafficking in persons, such as measures to 
inform and educate the public, including potential victims, about the 
causes and consequences of severe forms of trafficking in persons; 
measures to establish the identity of local populations, including 
birth registration, citizenship, and nationality; measures to ensure 
that its nationals who are deployed abroad as part of a diplomatic, 
peacekeeping, or other similar mission do not engage in or facilitate 
severe forms of trafficking in persons or exploit victims of such 
trafficking; a transparent system for remediating or punishing such 
public officials as a deterrent; measures to prevent the use of forced 
labor or child labor in violation of international standards; effective 
bilateral, multilateral, or regional information-sharing and 
cooperation arrangements with other countries; and effective policies 
or laws regulating foreign labor recruiters and holding them civilly 
and criminally liable for fraudulent recruiting.
    (4) Whether the government of the country cooperates with other 
governments in the investigation and prosecution of severe forms of 
trafficking in persons and has entered into bilateral, multilateral, or 
regional law enforcement cooperation and coordination arrangements with 
other countries.
    (5) Whether the government of the country extradites persons 
charged with acts of severe forms of trafficking in persons on 
substantially the same terms and to substantially the same extent as 
persons charged with other serious crimes (or, to the extent such 
extradition would be inconsistent with the laws of such country or with 
international agreements to which the country is a party, whether the 
government is taking all appropriate measures to modify or replace such 
laws and treaties so as to permit such extradition).
    (6) Whether the government of the country monitors immigration and 
emigration patterns for evidence of severe forms of trafficking in 
persons and whether law enforcement agencies of the country respond to 
any such evidence in a manner that is consistent with the vigorous 
investigation and prosecution of acts of such trafficking, as well as 
with the protection of human rights of victims and the internationally 
recognized human right to leave any country, including one's own, and 
to return to one's own country.
    (7) Whether the government of the country vigorously investigates, 
prosecutes, convicts, and sentences public officials, including 
diplomats and soldiers, who participate in or facilitate severe forms 
of trafficking in persons, including nationals of the country who are 
deployed abroad as part of a diplomatic, peacekeeping, or other similar 
mission who engage in or facilitate severe forms of trafficking in 
persons or exploit victims of such trafficking, and takes all 
appropriate measures against officials who condone such trafficking. A 
government's failure to appropriately address public allegations 
against such public officials, especially once such officials have 
returned to their home countries, shall be considered inaction under 
these criteria. After reasonable requests from the Department of State 
for data regarding such investigations, prosecutions, convictions, and 
sentences, a government which does not provide such data consistent 
with its resources shall be presumed not to have vigorously 
investigated, prosecuted, convicted, or sentenced such acts. The 
Secretary of State may disregard the presumption contained in the 
preceding sentence if the government has provided some data to the 
Department of State regarding such acts and the Secretary has 
determined that the government is making a good faith effort to collect 
such data.
    (8) Whether the percentage of victims of severe forms of 
trafficking in the country that are non-citizens of such countries is 
insignificant.
    (9) Whether the government has entered into effective, transparent 
partnerships, cooperative agreements, or agreements that have resulted 
in concrete and measureable outcomes with--
    (A) domestic civil society organizations, private sector entities, 
or international non-governmental

[[Page 76186]]

organizations, or into multilateral or regional arrangements or 
agreements, to assist the government's efforts to prevent trafficking, 
protect victims, and punish traffickers or
    (B) the United States toward agreed goals and objectives in the 
collective fight against trafficking.
    (10) Whether the government of the country, consistent with the 
capacity of such government, systematically monitors its efforts to 
satisfy the criteria described in paragraphs (1) through (8) and makes 
available publicly a periodic assessment of such efforts.
    (11) Whether the government of the country achieves appreciable 
progress in eliminating severe forms of trafficking when compared to 
the assessment in the previous year.
    (12) Whether the government of the country has made serious and 
sustained efforts to reduce the demand for (A) commercial sex acts; and 
(B) participation in international sex tourism by nationals of the 
country.

III. Information Sought Relevant to the Minimum Standards

    Submissions should include, but need not be limited to, answers to 
relevant questions below for which the submitter has direct 
professional experience and that experience should be noted. Citations 
to source material should also be provided. Note the country or 
countries that are the focus of the submission. Please see the Scope of 
Interest section for detailed information regarding submission 
requirements.
    1. How have trafficking methods changed in the past 12 months? For 
example, are there victims from new countries of origin? Is internal 
trafficking or child trafficking increasing? Has sex trafficking 
changed from brothels to private apartments? Is labor trafficking now 
occurring in additional types of industries or agricultural operations? 
Is forced begging a problem?
    2. In what ways has the government's efforts to combat trafficking 
in persons changed in the past year? What new laws, regulations, 
policies, and implementation strategies exist (e.g., substantive 
criminal laws and procedures, mechanisms for civil remedies, and 
victim-witness security, generally, and in relation to court 
proceedings)?
    3. Please provide observations regarding the implementation of 
existing laws and procedures.
    4. Is the government equally vigorous in pursuing labor trafficking 
and sex trafficking?
    5. Are the anti-trafficking laws and sentences strict enough to 
reflect the nature of the crime? Are sex trafficking sentences 
commensurate with rape sentences?
    6. Do government officials understand the nature of trafficking? If 
not, please provide examples of misconceptions or misunderstandings.
    7. Do judges appear appropriately knowledgeable and sensitized to 
trafficking cases? What sentences have courts imposed upon traffickers? 
How common are suspended sentences and prison time of less than one 
year for convicted traffickers?
    8. Please provide observations regarding the efforts of police and 
prosecutors to pursue trafficking cases.
    9. Are government officials (including law enforcement, diplomats, 
and soldiers/peacekeepers) complicit in human trafficking by, for 
example, profiting from, taking bribes, or receiving sexual services 
for allowing it to continue? Are government officials operating 
trafficking rings or activities? If so, have these government officials 
been subject to an investigation and/or prosecution? What punishments 
have been imposed?
    10. Has the government vigorously investigated, prosecuted, 
convicted, and sentenced nationals of the country deployed abroad as 
part of a diplomatic, peacekeeping, or other similar mission who engage 
in or facilitate trafficking?
    11. Has the government investigated, prosecuted, convicted, and 
sentenced organized crime groups that are involved in trafficking?
    12. Is the country a source of sex tourists and, if so, what are 
their destination countries? Is the country a destination for sex 
tourists and, if so, what are their source countries?
    13. Please provide observations regarding government efforts to 
address the issue of unlawful child soldiering.
    14. Does the government make a coordinated, proactive effort to 
identify victims? Is there any screening conducted before deportation 
to determine whether individuals were trafficked?
    15. What victim services are provided (legal, medical, food, 
shelter, interpretation, mental health care, health care, employment, 
training, etc.)? Who provides these services? If nongovernment 
organizations provide the services, does the government support their 
work either financially or otherwise?
    16. How could victim services be improved?
    17. Are services provided equally and adequately to victims of 
labor and sex trafficking? Men, women, and children? Citizen and 
noncitizen? Members of the LGBT community?
    18. Do service providers and law enforcement work together 
cooperatively, for instance, to share information about trafficking 
trends or to plan for services after a raid? What is the level of 
cooperation, communication, and trust between service providers and law 
enforcement?
    19. May victims file civil suits or seek legal action against their 
trafficker? Do victims avail themselves of those remedies?
    20. Does the government repatriate victims who wish to return home? 
Does the government assist with third country resettlement? Does the 
government engage in any analysis of whether victims may face 
retribution or hardship upon repatriation to their country of origin? 
Are victims awaiting repatriation or third country resettlement offered 
services? Are victims indeed repatriated or are they deported?
    21. Does the government inappropriately detain or imprison 
identified trafficking victims?
    22. Does the government punish trafficking victims for forgery of 
documents, illegal immigration, unauthorized employment, or 
participation in illegal activities directed by the trafficker?
    23. What efforts has the government made to prevent human 
trafficking?
    24. Has the government entered into effective bilateral, 
multilateral, or regional information-sharing and cooperation 
arrangements that have resulted in concrete and measureable outcomes?
    25. Does the country have effective policies or laws regulating 
foreign labor recruiters?
    26. Does the government undertake activities that could prevent or 
reduce vulnerability to trafficking, such as registering births of 
indigenous populations?
    27. Does the government provide financial support to NGOs working 
to promote public awareness or does the government implement such 
campaigns itself? Have public awareness campaigns proven to be 
effective?
    28. Please provide additional recommendations to improve the 
government's anti-trafficking efforts.
    29. Please highlight effective strategies and practices that other 
governments could consider adopting.

    Dated: December 3, 2013.
Luis CdeBaca,
Ambassador-at-Large, Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in 
Persons, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-29860 Filed 12-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-00-P