Provision of Early Intervention and Special Education Services to Eligible DoD Dependents, 75997-76027 [2013-29433]
Download as PDF
Vol. 78
Friday,
No. 240
December 13, 2013
Part III
Department of Defense
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 57
Provision of Early Intervention and Special Education Services to Eligible
DoD Dependents; Proposed Rule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
75998
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 57
[Docket ID: DOD–2011–OS–0095]
RIN 0790–AI77
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Provision of Early Intervention and
Special Education Services to Eligible
DoD Dependents
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule reissues
the current regulations and establishes
policy, assigns responsibilities, and
implements the non-funding and nonreporting provisions of chapter 33 of 20
U.S.C., ‘‘The Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA),’’ in
DoD for: provision of early intervention
services (EIS) to infants and toddlers
with disabilities and their families, as
well as special education and related
services to children with disabilities
entitled under this part to receive
education services from the DoD;
implementation of a comprehensive,
multidisciplinary program of EIS for
infants and toddlers with disabilities
and their families who, but for age, are
eligible to be enrolled in DoD schools;
provision of a free appropriate public
education (FAPE), including special
education and related services, for
children with disabilities, as specified
in their individualized education
programs (IEP), who are eligible to
enroll in DoD schools; and monitoring
of DoD programs providing EIS, and
special education and related services
for compliance with this part; and
establishes a DoD Coordinating
Committee to recommend policies and
provide compliance oversight for early
intervention and special education.
DATES: Comments must be received by
February 11, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and/or RIN
number and title, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
2nd Floor, East Tower, Suite 02G09,
Alexandria, VA 22350–3100.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
Lorie A. Sebestyen, 703–588–0254.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Purpose of the Regulatory Action
a. This proposed rule would revise
the current regulations in 32 CFR part
57 to incorporate the 2004 amendments
to the IDEA and would establish other
policy and assign responsibilities to
implement the non-funding and nonreporting provisions of Parts B and C of
the IDEA. Under 10 U.S.C. 2164(f) and
20 U.S.C. 927(c), DoD implements,
within the DoD school system, the
Department of Defense Education
Activity (DoDEA), the applicable
statutory provisions of Parts B and C of
the IDEA, other than the funding and
reporting provisions. This proposed rule
brings the DoD into compliance with the
requirements of the non-funding and
non-reporting provisions of IDEA by
updating and amending the DoD
implementation of the IDEA within the
DoD school system. The revisions will
ensure that eligible children with
disabilities are afforded the services and
safeguards as required by applicable
statutory provisions of IDEA. The IDEA
regulations in 34 CFR parts 300 and 303,
which apply to States that receive funds
from the U.S. Department of Education
under IDEA Parts B and C, do not apply
to the DoD school systems as DoD does
not receive funds under the IDEA.
Nothing in the proposed regulations in
32 CFR part 57 would affect the
applicability of the U.S. Department of
Education’s regulations implementing
IDEA in 34 CFR parts 300 and 303.
b. The authority for the proposed
regulatory changes to 32 CFR part 57 is
10 U.S.C. 2164, 20 U.S.C. 921–932 and
chapter 33, which is codified at 20
U.S.C. 1400 et seq.
II. Summary of the Major Provisions of
the Regulatory Action in Question
This proposed rule identifies the
services and procedural safeguards
afforded to DoD dependent infants and
toddlers and their families who are
eligible for early intervention services
under the IDEA and this part; identifies
the services and procedural safeguards
afforded to DoD dependent children
with disabilities age 3–21 (inclusive)
who are eligible for a free and
appropriate public education under the
IDEA and this part; outlines procedures
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
and timelines for the transition of young
children from early intervention
services to school-based preschool
services; identifies the procedures
available for resolution of disputes
regarding the provision of early
intervention services, or special
education and related services;
establishes early intervention and
special education monitoring and
reporting requirements; and establishes
procedures within the DoD for
implementing the applicable statutory
provisions of the IDEA and this part.
III. Costs and Benefits
The provision of early intervention
and special education, and related
services is funded through
Congressional appropriations to the
DoD. The Department of Defense
Education Activity (DoDEA) and the
medical elements of the Military
Departments, which are responsible for
providing services to children with
special needs, receive their funding
from DoD. DoDEA funding is in
Defense-wide, Operation and
Maintenance funds. The cost of the
special education program is included
in the combined DoDEA/Military
Departments cost that is used to operate
all parts of the educational program.
The approximate cost for the special
education program for FY2011 was
$107,851,606.94. Total includes cost for
personnel (salaries/benefits), contracts,
travel, and equipment/supplies.
The approximate cost for the
provision of early intervention and
related services by the Military
Departments is $32,000,000 annually.
Total includes cost for personnel, travel,
professional development, and
materials/supplies.
This rule updates DoD guidance to
reflect the current version of the
requirements resulting from the nonfunding and non-reporting provisions of
the IDEA, thereby ensuring that eligible
infants and toddlers and children with
disabilities, including those of military
families, are aware of and provided the
services and safeguards required by
federal statute. The non-funding and
non-reporting provisions of the IDEA
are the substantive rights, protections,
and procedural safeguards that apply to
DoD. These are applicable as opposed to
the ‘‘funding’’ and ‘reporting’ provisions
because DoD schools and child
development centers do not receive
funding from the US Department of
Education and therefore, the IDEA
statutory reporting and related funding
provisions do not apply to DoD.
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
57 does not:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a section of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another Agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in these Executive Orders.
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
57 does not contain a Federal mandate
that may result in expenditure by State,
local and tribal governments, in
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
57 is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it
would not, if promulgated, have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
57 does impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
These reporting requirements have been
approved by OMB and assigned OMB
Control Number 0704–0411.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
57 does not have federalism
implications, as set forth in Executive
Order 13132. This rule does not have
substantial direct effects on:
(1) The States;
(2) The relationship between the
National Government and the States; or
(3) The distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of Government.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 57
Education of individuals with
disabilities, Elementary and secondary
education, Government employees,
Military personnel.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 57 is
proposed to be revised to read as
follows:
PART 57—PROVISION OF EARLY
INTERVENTION AND SPECIAL
EDUCATION SERVICES TO ELIGIBLE
DOD DEPENDENTS
Sec.
57.1
57.2
57.3
57.4
57.5
57.6
Purpose.
Applicability.
Definitions.
Policy.
Responsibilities.
Procedures.
Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2164, 20 U.S.C. 921–
932 and chapter 33.
§ 57.1
Purpose.
(a) This part:
(1) Establishes policy and assigns
responsibilities to implement, other
than the funding and reporting
provisions, chapter 33 of 20 U.S.C. (also
known and hereinafter referred to in
this Part as ‘‘Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)’’) in
DoD, including DoD schools, pursuant
to 20 U.S.C. 927(c) and 10 U.S.C. 2164
(f):
(i) Provision of early intervention
services (EIS) to infants and toddlers
with disabilities and their families, as
well as special education and related
services to children with disabilities
entitled under this part to receive
education services from the DoD in
accordance with 20 U.S.C. 921–932, 10
U.S.C. 2164, and DoD Directive 1342.20
(see https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/
corres/pdf/134220p.pdf), and the IDEA.
(ii) Implementation of a
comprehensive, multidisciplinary
program of EIS for infants and toddlers
with disabilities and their DoD civilianemployed and military families.
(iii) Provision of a free appropriate
public education (FAPE), including
special education and related services
for children with disabilities who are
eligible to enroll in DoDEA schools, as
specified in their respective
individualized education programs
(IEP).
(iv) Monitoring of DoD programs
providing EIS, or special education and
related services for compliance with this
part.
(2) Establishes a DoD Coordinating
Committee to recommend policies and
provide compliance oversight for early
intervention and special education.
(3) Authorizes the issuance of other
guidance as necessary.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
75999
(b) Reserved.
§ 57.2
Applicability.
This part applies to:
(a) Office of the Secretary of Defense
(OSD), the Military Departments, the
Office of the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the
Combatant Commands, the Office of the
Inspector General of the Department of
Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD
Field Activities, and all other
organizational entities in the DoD
(hereinafter referred to collectively as
the ‘‘DoD Components’’).
(b) Eligible infants, toddlers, and
children receiving or entitled to receive
early intervention services (EIS) or
special education and related services
from the DoD, whose parents have not
elected voluntary enrollment in a nonDepartment of Defense Education
Activity (DoDEA) school.
(c) All schools operated under the
oversight of the DoDEA, including:
(1) Domestic Dependent Elementary
and Secondary Schools (DDESS)
operated by the DoD pursuant to 10
U.S.C. 2164.
(2) Department of Defense Dependents
Schools (DoDDS) operated by the DoD
pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 921–932
(hereinafter referred to as ‘‘overseas’’
schools).
(d) Does not create any substantive
rights or remedies not otherwise
authorized by the IDEA or other relevant
law; and may not be relied upon by any
person, organization, or other entity to
allege a denial of substantive rights or
remedies not otherwise authorized by
the IDEA or other relevant law.
§ 57.3
Definitions.
Unless otherwise noted, these terms
and their definitions are for the purpose
of this part.
Age of majority. The age when a
person acquires the rights and
responsibilities of being an adult. For
purposes of this part, a child attains
majority at age 18, unless the child has
been determined by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be
incompetent, or if the child has not been
determined to be incompetent, he or she
is incapable of providing informed
consent with respect to his or her
educational program.
Alternate assessment. A process that
measures the performance of students
with disabilities unable to participate,
even with appropriate accommodations
provided as necessary and as
determined by their respective CSC, in
a system-wide assessment.
Alternative educational setting (AES).
A temporary setting in or out of the
school, other than the setting normally
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
76000
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
attended by the student (e.g., alternative
classroom, home setting, installation
library) determined by school
authorities as the appropriate learning
environment for a student because of
learning or behavioral issues.
Assessment for early intervention. The
ongoing procedures used by
appropriately qualified personnel
throughout the period of a child’s
eligibility determination to identify the
child’s unique needs; the family’s
strengths and needs related to
development of the child; and the
nature and extent of early intervention
services (EIS) that are needed by the
child and the child’s family to meet
their unique needs. Also may include
reviewing pertinent records and
conducting observations.
Assistive technology device. Any item,
piece of equipment, or product system,
whether acquired commercially or off
the shelf, modified, or customized, that
is used to increase, maintain, or
improve functional capabilities of
children with disabilities. This term
does not include a medical device that
is surgically implanted or the
replacement of that device.
Assistive technology service. Any
service that directly assists an
individual with a disability in the
selection, acquisition, or use of an
assistive technology device. The term
includes: evaluating the needs of an
individual with a disability, including a
functional evaluation in the individual’s
customary environment; purchasing,
leasing, or otherwise providing for the
acquisition of assistive technology
devices by individuals with disabilities;
selecting, designing, fitting,
customizing, adapting, applying,
maintaining, repairing, or replacing
assistive technology devices;
coordinating and using other therapies,
interventions, or services with assistive
technology devices, such as those
associated with existing educational and
rehabilitative plans and programs;
training or technical assistance for an
individual with disabilities or the
family of an individual with disabilities;
and training or technical assistance for
professionals (including individuals
providing educational rehabilitative
services), employers, or other
individuals who provide services to,
employ, or are otherwise substantially
involved in the major life functions of
an individual with a disability.
Case study committee (CSC). A
school-level multidisciplinary team,
including the child’s parents,
responsible for making educational
decisions concerning a child with a
disability.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
Child-find. An outreach program used
by DoDEA, the Military Departments,
and the other DoD Components to
locate, identify, and evaluate children
from birth to age 21, inclusive, who may
require EIS or special education and
related services. All children who are
eligible to attend a DoD school under 20
U.S.C. 921–932 or 10 U.S.C. 2164 fall
within the scope of the DoD child-find
responsibilities. Child-find activities
include the dissemination of
information to Service members, DoD
employees, and parents of students
eligible to enroll in DoDEA schools; the
identification and screening of children;
and the use of referral procedures.
Children with disabilities. Children,
ages 3 through 21, inclusive, who are
entitled to enroll, or are enrolled, in a
DoD school in accordance with 20
U.S.C. 921–932 and 10 U.S.C. 2164,
have not graduated from high school or
completed the General Education
Degree, have one or more disabilities in
accordance with section 1401(3) of the
IDEA, and need and qualify for special
education and related services.
Complainant. Person making an
administrative complaint.
Comprehensive system of personnel
development (CSPD). A system of
personnel development that is
developed in coordination with the
Military Departments and the Director,
DoDEA. CSPD is the training of
professionals, paraprofessionals, and
primary referral source personnel with
respect to the basic components of early
intervention, special education, and
related services. CSPD may also include
implementing innovative strategies and
activities for the recruitment and
retention of personnel providing special
education and related services, ensuring
that personnel requirements are
established and maintaining
qualifications to ensure that personnel
necessary to carry out the purposes of
this part are appropriately and
adequately prepared to provide special
education and related services. Training
of personnel may include working
within the military and with military
families, the emotional and social
development of children, and transition
services from early intervention to
preschool and transitions within
educational settings and to postsecondary environments.
Consent. The permission obtained
from the parent ensuring they are fully
informed of all information about the
activity for which consent is sought, in
his or her native language or in another
mode of communication if necessary,
and that the parent understands and
agrees in writing to the implementation
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
of the activity for which permission is
sought.
Continuum of alternative placements.
Instruction in general education classes,
special classes, special schools, home
instruction, and instruction in hospitals
and institutions; includes provision for
supplementary services (such as
resource room or itinerant instruction)
to be provided in conjunction with
regular class placement.
Controlled substance. As defined in
Sections 801–971 of title 21, United
States Code (also known as the
‘‘Controlled Substances Act, as
amended’’).
Day. A calendar day, unless otherwise
indicated as a business day or a school
day.
(1) Business day. Monday through
Friday except for Federal and State
holidays.
(2) School day. Any day, including a
partial day, that children are in
attendance at school for instructional
purposes. School day has the same
meaning for all children in school,
including children with and without
disabilities.
Department of Defense Education
Activity (DoDEA). The Department of
Defense Education Activity is a DoD
Field Activity under the direction,
operation, and control of the Under
Secretary of Defense for Personnel &
Readiness (USD)(P&R) and Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Readiness &
Force Management (ASD)(R&FM). The
mission of DoDEA is to provide an
exemplary education by effectively and
efficiently planning, directing, and
overseeing the management, operation,
and administration of the DoD Domestic
Dependent Elementary and Secondary
Schools (DDESS) and the DoD
Dependents Schools (DoDDS), which
provide instruction from kindergarten
through grade 12 to eligible dependents.
Department of Defense Dependents
Schools (DoDDS). The overseas schools
(kindergarten through grade 12)
established in accordance with 20
U.S.C. 921–932.
Department of Defense Education
Activity School. A DDESS or DoDDS
school operated under the oversight of
DoDEA.
Developmental delay. A significant
discrepancy, as defined and measured
by implementing guidance authorized
by this part and confirmed by clinical
observation and judgment, in the actual
functioning of an infant, toddler, or
child, birth through age 7, when
compared with the functioning of a nondisabled infant, toddler, or child of the
same chronological age in any of the
following developmental areas:
Physical, cognitive, communication,
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
social or emotional, or adaptive. A child
determined to have a developmental
delay before the age of 7 may maintain
that eligibility through age 9.
DoD school systems. The school
systems established under the
authorities of 20 U.S.C. 921–932 and 10
U.S.C. 2164.
Domestic Dependent Elementary and
Secondary Schools (DDESS). The
schools (pre-kindergarten through grade
12) established in accordance with 10
U.S.C. 2164.
Early intervention service provider.
An individual that provides early
intervention services in accordance with
this part.
Educational and Developmental
Intervention Services (EDIS). Programs
operated by the Military Departments to
provide EIS to eligible infants and
toddlers with disabilities, and related
services to eligible children with
disabilities in accordance with this part.
EIS. Developmental services for
infants and toddlers with disabilities, as
defined in this part, that are provided
under the supervision of a Military
Department, including evaluation,
individualized family service plan
(IFSP) development and revision, and
service coordination, provided at no
cost to the child’s parents (except for
incidental fees also charged to children
without disabilities).
Extended school year (ESY) services.
Special education and related services
that are provided to a child with a
disability beyond the normal DoDEA
school year, in accordance with the
child’s IEP, are at no cost to the parents,
and meet the standards of the DoDEA
school system.
Evaluation: The method used by a
multidisciplinary team to conduct and
review the assessments of the child and
other relevant input to determine
whether a child has a disability and a
child’s initial and continuing need to
receive EIS or special education and
related services.
FAPE. Special education and related
services that are provided under the
general supervision and direction of
DoDEA at no cost to parents of a child
with a disability, in conformity with an
IEP in accordance with the requirements
of the IDEA and DoD guidance.
Functional behavioral assessment. A
process for identifying the events that
predict and maintain patterns of
problem behavior.
General education curriculum. The
curriculum adopted by the DoDEA
school systems for all children from
preschool through secondary school. To
the extent applicable to an individual
child with a disability, the general
education curriculum can be used in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
any educational environment along a
continuum of alternative placements.
IDEA. The Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C.
1400 et seq., is the federal law that
governs the provision of early
intervention and special education and
related services to eligible children with
disabilities.
IEP. A written document that is
developed, reviewed, and revised at a
meeting of the CSC, identifying the
required components of the
individualized education program for a
child with a disability.
Individualized Family Service Plan
(IFSP). A written document identifying
the specially designed services for an
infant or toddler with a disability and
the family of such infant or toddler.
Independent educational evaluation
(IEE). An evaluation conducted by a
qualified examiner who is not an EDIS
examiner or an examiner funded by the
DoDEA school who conducted the
evaluation with which the parent is in
disagreement.
Infants and toddlers with disabilities.
Children from birth up to 3 years of age,
inclusive, who need EIS because
(1) They are experiencing
developmental delays as measured by
appropriate diagnostic instruments and
procedures, in one or more of the
following areas: cognitive development,
physical development including vision
and hearing, communication
development, social or emotional
development, adaptive development; or
(2) They have a diagnosed physical or
mental condition that has a high
probability of resulting in
developmental delay.
Inter-component. Cooperation among
DoD organizations and programs,
ensuring coordination and integration of
services to infants, toddlers, children
with disabilities, and their families.
Manifestation determination. The
process in which the CSC reviews all
relevant information and the
relationship between the child’s
disability and the child’s behavior to
determine whether the behavior is a
manifestation of the child’s disability
and to identify what disciplinary
proceedings will be permissible under
IDEA and this part.’’ Mediation. A
confidential, voluntary, informal
dispute resolution process that is
provided at no charge to the parents,
whether or not a due process petition
has been filed, in which the disagreeing
parties engage in a discussion of issues
related to the provision of the child’s
EIS or special education and related
services in accordance with the
requirements of IDEA and this part, in
the presence of, or through, a qualified
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
76001
and impartial mediator who is trained
in effective mediation techniques.
Medical services. Those evaluative,
diagnostic, and therapeutic, services
provided by a licensed and credentialed
medical provider to assist providers of
EIS, regular and special education
teachers, and providers of related
services to develop and implement
IFSPs and IEPs.
Multidisciplinary. The involvement of
two or more disciplines or professions
in the integration and coordination of
services, including evaluation and
assessment activities and development
of an IFSP or an IEP.
Native language. When used with
reference to an individual of limited
English proficiency, the home language
normally used by such individuals, or
in the case of a child, the language
normally used by the parents of the
child.
Natural environment. A setting,
including home and community, in
which children without disabilities
participate.
Non-academic and extracurricular
services and activities. Services and
activities including counseling services;
athletics, transportation, health services;
recreational activities; special interest
groups or clubs sponsored by the
DoDEA school system; and referrals to
agencies that provide assistance to
individuals with disabilities and
employment of students, including
employment by a public agency and
assistance in making outside
employment available.
Non-DoD placement. An assignment
by the DoDEA school system of a child
with a disability to a non-DoDEA school
or facility.
Non-DoD school or facility. A public
or private school or other educational
program not operated by DoD.
Parent. The natural, adoptive, or
foster parent of a child, a guardian, an
individual acting in the place of a
natural or adoptive parent with whom
the child lives, or an individual who is
legally responsible for the child’s
welfare if that person contributes at
least one-half of the child’s support.
Personally identifiable information.
Information that would make it possible
to identify the infant, toddler, or child
with reasonable certainty. Information
includes: the name of the child, the
child’s parent or other family member;
the address of the child; a personal
identifier, such as the child’s social
security number or student number; or
a list of personal characteristics or other
information that would make it possible
to identify the child with reasonable
certainty.
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
76002
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Primary referral source. Parents and
the DoD Components, including child
development centers, pediatric clinics,
and newborn nurseries, that suspect an
infant or toddler has a disability and
bring the child to the attention of the
EDIS.
Psychological services. Psychological
services include: Administering
psychological and educational tests and
other assessment procedures;
interpreting assessment results;
obtaining, integrating and interpreting
information about child behavior and
conditions relating to learning;
consulting with other staff members in
planning school programs to meet the
special educational needs of children as
indicated by psychological tests,
interviews, direct observations, and
behavioral evaluations; planning and
managing a program of psychological
services, including psychological
counseling for children and parents; and
assisting in developing positive
behavioral intervention strategies.
Public awareness program. Activities
or print materials focusing on early
identification of infants and toddlers
with disabilities. Materials may include
information prepared and disseminated
by a military medical department to all
primary referral sources and
information for parents on the
availability of EIS. Procedures to
determine the availability of
information on EIS to parents are also
included in that program.
Qualified. A person who meets the
DoD-approved or recognized
certification, licensing, or registration
requirements or other comparable
requirements in the area in which the
person provides evaluation or
assessment, EIS, special education or
related services to an infant, toddler, or
child with a disability.
Rehabilitation counseling. Services
provided by qualified personnel in
individual or group sessions that focus
specifically on career development,
employment preparation, achieving
independence, and integration in the
workplace and community of the
student with a disability. The term also
includes vocational rehabilitation
services provided to a student with
disabilities by vocational rehabilitation
programs funded in accordance with the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.
chapter 16.
Related services. Transportation and
such developmental, corrective, and
other supportive services, as required, to
assist a child with a disability to benefit
from special education under the child’s
IEP. The term includes speech-language
pathology and audiology; interpreting
services; psychological services;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
physical and occupational therapy;
recreation including therapeutic
recreation; social work services; and
school nurse services designed to enable
a child with a disability to receive a
FAPE as described in the child’s IEP;
early identification and assessment of
disabilities in children; counseling
services including rehabilitation
counseling; orientation and mobility
services; and psychological and medical
services for diagnostic, evaluative, and
consultative purposes. The term does
not include a medical device that is
surgically implanted or the replacement
of such.
Related services assigned to the
Military Departments. Medical and
psychological services, audiology, and
optometry for diagnostic or evaluative
purposes to determine whether a
particular child has a disability, the type
and extent of the disability, and the
child’s eligibility to receive special
services. In the overseas and domestic
areas, transportation is provided as a
related service by the Military
Department when transportation is
prescribed in an IFSP for an infant or
toddler, under 3 years of age, with
disabilities.
Resolution meeting. The meeting
between parents and relevant school
personnel, which must be convened
within a specified number of days after
receiving notice of a due process
complaint and prior to the initiation of
a due process hearing, in accordance
with the IDEA and this part. The
purpose of the meeting is for the parent
to discuss the due process complaint
and the facts giving rise to the
complaint so that the school has the
opportunity to resolve the complaint.
Resolution period. That period of time
following a resolution meeting, the
length of which is defined in this part,
during which the school is afforded an
opportunity to resolve the parent’s
concerns before the dispute can proceed
to a due process hearing.
Separate facility. A school or a
portion of a school, regardless of
whether it is operated by DoD, attended
exclusively by children with
disabilities.
Serious bodily injury. A cut, abrasion,
bruise, burn, illness, or any other injury
to the body, which involves a
substantial risk of death; extreme
physical pain; protracted and obvious
disfigurement; or protracted loss or
impairment of the function of a bodily
member, organ, or mental faculty.
Service coordination. Activities of a
service coordinator to assist and enable
an infant or toddler and the family to
receive the rights, procedural
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
safeguards, and services that are
authorized to be provided.
Special education. Specially designed
instruction, which is provided at no cost
to the parents, to meet the unique needs
of a child with a disability, including
instruction conducted in the classroom,
in the home, in hospitals and
institutions, and in other settings; and
instruction in physical education.
Specially designed instruction. An
instruction whose content,
methodology, or delivery has been
adapted to address the unique needs of
an eligible child in accordance with this
part; and that ensures access of the child
to the general curriculum, so that she or
he can meet the educational standards
within the DoDEA school systems.
Supplementary aids and services.
Include aids, services, and other
supports that are provided in regular
education classes, other educationalrelated settings, and in extracurricular
and nonacademic settings to enable
children with disabilities to be educated
with non-disabled children to the
maximum extent appropriate.
Transition services. A coordinated set
of activities for a child with a disability
that is designed to be within a resultsoriented process, that is focused on
improving the academic and functional
achievement of the child with a
disability to facilitate the child’s
movement from school to post-school
activities, including post-secondary
education, vocational education,
integrated employment (including
supported employment), continuing and
adult education, adult services,
independent living, or community
participation, and is based on the
individual child’s needs, taking into
account the child’s strengths,
preferences, and interests.
Transportation. A service that
includes transportation and related
costs, including the cost of mileage or
travel by taxi, common carrier, tolls, and
parking expenses, that are necessary to:
enable an eligible child with a disability
and the family to receive EIS, when
prescribed in a child’s IFSP; enable an
eligible child with a disability to receive
special education and related services,
when prescribed as a related service by
the child’s IEP; and enable a child to
obtain an evaluation to determine
eligibility for special education and
related services, if necessary. It also
includes specialized equipment,
including special or adapted buses, lifts,
and ramps needed to transport children
with disabilities.
Weapon. Defined in Department of
Defense Education Activity Regulation
2051.1 (see https://www.dodea.edu/foia/
iod/pdf/2051_1a.pdf).
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
§ 57.4
Policy.
It is DoD policy that:
(a) Infants and toddlers with
disabilities and their families who (but
for the children’s age) would be entitled
to enroll in a DoDEA school in
accordance with 20 U.S.C. 921–932 or
10 U.S.C. 2164 shall be provided EIS.
(b) The DoD shall engage in child-find
activities for all children age birth to 21,
inclusive, who are entitled by 20 U.S.C.
921–932 or 10 U.S.C. 2164 to enroll or
are enrolled in a DoDEA school.
(c) Children with disabilities who
meet the enrollment eligibility criteria
of 20 U.S.C. 921–932 or 10 U.S.C. 2164
shall be provided a FAPE in the least
restrictive environment, including if
appropriate to the needs of the
individual child, placement in a
residential program for children with
disabilities in accordance with the
child’s IEP and at no cost to the parents.
(d) The Military Departments and
DoDEA shall cooperate in the delivery
of related services prescribed by section
1401(26) of the IDEA and this part as
may be required to assist eligible
children with disabilities to benefit from
special education.
(e) Children with disabilities who are
eligible to enroll in a DoDEA school in
accordance with 20 U.S.C. 921–932 or
10 U.S.C. 2164 shall not be entitled to
provision of a FAPE by DoDEA, or to the
procedural safeguards prescribed by this
part in accordance with the IDEA, if:
(1) The sponsor is assigned to an
overseas area where a DoDEA school is
available within the commuting area of
the sponsor’s overseas assignment, but
the sponsor does not elect to enroll the
child in a DoDEA school for reasons
other than DoDEA’s alleged failure to
provide a FAPE; or
(2) The sponsor is assigned in the
United States or in a U.S. territory,
commonwealth, or possession and the
sponsor’s child meets the eligibility
requirements for enrollment in a DoDEA
school, but the sponsor does not elect to
enroll the child in a DoDEA school for
reasons other than DoDEA’s alleged
failure to provide a FAPE.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 57.5
Responsibilities.
(a) The Assistant Secretary of Defense
for Readiness and Force Management
(ASD(R&FM)) under the authority,
direction, and control of the (USD(P&R))
shall:
(1) Establish, in accordance with DoD
Instruction 5105.18 (see https://
www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/
510518p.pdf), a DoD Coordinating
Committee to recommend policies
regarding the provision of early
intervention and special education
services.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
(2) Ensure the development,
implementation and administration of a
system of services for infants and
toddlers with disabilities and their
families and children with disabilities;
and provide compliance oversight for
early intervention and special education
in accordance with DoD Directive
5124.02 (see https://www.dtic.mil/whs/
directives/corres/pdf/512402p.pdf); 20
U.S.C. 921–932; the applicable statutory
provision of the IDEA; 10 U.S.C. 2164;
DoD Directive 1342.20 and
implementing guidance authorized by
this part.
(3) Oversee DoD Component
collaboration on the provision of
services and transition support to
infants, toddlers, and school-aged
children.
(4) Develop a DoD-wide
comprehensive child-find system to
identify eligible infants, toddlers, and
children ages birth through 21 years,
inclusive, who may require early
intervention or special education
services, in accordance with the IDEA.
(5) Develop and provide guidance as
necessary for the delivery of services for
children with disabilities and for the
protection of procedural rights
consistent with the IDEA and
implementing guidance authorized by
this part.
(6) Coordinate with the Secretaries of
the Military Departments to ensure that
their responsibilities, as detailed in
paragraph (f) of this section, are
completed.
(7) Direct the development and
implementation of a comprehensive
system of personnel development
(CSPD) for personnel serving infants
and toddlers with disabilities and their
families, and children with disabilities.
(8) Develop requirements and
procedures for compiling and reporting
data on the number of eligible infants
and toddlers with disabilities and their
families in need of EIS and children in
need of special education and related
services.
(9) Require DoDEA schools provide
educational information for assignment
coordination and enrollment in the
Services’ Exceptional Family Member
Program or Special Needs Program
consistent with DoD Instruction 1315.19
(see https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/
corres/pdf/131519p.pdf).
(10) Identify representatives to serve
on the Department of Defense
Coordinating Committee on Early
Intervention, Special Education, and
Related Services (DoD–CC).
(11) Ensure delivery of appropriate
early intervention and educational
services to eligible infants, toddlers, and
children, and their families as
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
76003
appropriate pursuant to the IDEA and
this part through onsite monitoring of
special needs programs and submission
of an annual compliance report.
(b) The Assistant Secretary of Defense
for Health Affairs (ASD(HA)), under the
authority, direction, and control of the
USD(P&R), shall:
(1) Advise the USD(P&R) and consult
with the General Counsel of the
Department of Defense (GC, DoD)
regarding the provision of EIS and
related services.
(2) Oversee development of provider
workload standards and performance
levels to determine staffing
requirements for EIS and related
services. The standards shall take into
account the provider training needs, the
requirements of this part, and the
additional time required to provide EIS
and related services in schools and the
natural environments, and for the
coordination with other DoD
Components.
(3) Establish and maintain an
automated data system to support the
operation and oversight of the Military
Departments’ delivery of EIS and related
services.
(4) Assign geographical areas of
responsibility for providing EIS and
related services under the purview of
healthcare providers to the Military
Departments. Periodically review the
alignment of geographic areas to ensure
that resource issues (e.g., base closures)
are considered in the cost-effective
delivery of services.
(5) Establish a system for measuring
EIS program outcomes for children and
their families.
(6) Resolve disputes among the DoD
Components providing EIS.
(c) The Director, Tricare Management
Activity, under the authority, direction,
and control of the ASD(HA), shall
identify representatives to serve on the
DoD–CC.
(d) The Director, DoD Education
Activity (DoDEA), under the authority,
direction, and control of the USD(P&R),
and through the ASD(R&FM), in
accordance with DoD Directive 5124.02,
shall ensure that:
(1) Children who meet the enrollment
eligibility criteria of 20 U.S.C. 921–932
or 10 U.S.C. 2164 are identified and
referred for evaluation if they are
suspected of having disabilities, and are
afforded appropriate procedural
safeguards in accordance with the IDEA
and implementing guidance authorized
by this part.
(2) Children who meet the enrollment
eligibility criteria of 20 U.S.C. 921–932
or 10 U.S.C. 2164 shall be evaluated in
accordance with the IDEA and
implementing guidance authorized by
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
76004
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
this part, as needed. If found eligible for
special education and related services,
they shall be provided a FAPE in
accordance with an IEP, with services
delivered in the least restrictive
environment and procedural safeguards
in accordance with the requirements of
the IDEA and implementing guidance
authorized by this part.
(3) Records are maintained on the
special education and related services
provided to children in accordance with
this part, pursuant to 32 CFR part 310.
(4) Related services as prescribed in
an IEP for a child with disabilities
enrolled in a DoDEA school in the
United States, its territories,
commonwealths, or possessions are
provided by DoDEA.
(5) Transportation is provided by
DoDEA in overseas and domestic areas
as a related service to children with
disabilities when transportation is
prescribed in a child’s IEP. The related
service of transportation includes
necessary accommodations to access
and leave the bus and to ride safely on
the bus and transportation between the
child’s home, the DoDEA school, or
another location, as specified in the
child’s IEP.
(6) Appropriate personnel participate
in the development and implementation
of a CSPD.
(7) Appropriate written guidance is
issued to implement the requirements
pertaining to special education and
related services under 20 U.S.C. 921–
932, 10 U.S.C. 2164, and the IDEA.
(8) Activities to identify and train
personnel to monitor the provision of
services to eligible children with
disabilities are funded.
(9) DoDEA schools that operate
pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 921–932 and 10
U.S.C. 2164 conduct child find activities
for all eligible children;
(10) A free appropriate public
education (FAPE) is made available to
children who are entitled to enroll in
DoDEA schools under the enrollment
eligibility criteria of 10 U.S.C. 2164 or
20 U.S.C. 921–932. However, a FAPE, or
the procedural safeguards prescribed by
the IDEA and this part, shall NOT be
available to such children, if:
(i) The sponsor who is assigned to an
overseas area elects not to enroll his or
her child in a DoDEA school overseas
where a DoDEA school is available
within the commuting area of the
sponsor’s overseas assignment; or
(ii) The sponsor is assigned in the
United States or in a U.S. territory,
commonwealth, or possession and the
sponsor’s child meets the eligibility
requirements for enrollment in a DoDEA
school, but the sponsor does not elect to
enroll the child in a DoDEA school for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
reasons other than DoDEA’s alleged
failure to provide a FAPE.
(11) The educational needs of
children with and without disabilities
are met comparably, in accordance with
§ 57.6 (b) of this part.
(12) Educational facilities and
services (including the start of the
school day and the length of the school
year) operated by DoDEA for children
with and without disabilities are
comparable.
(13) All programs providing special
education and related services are
monitored for compliance with this part
and with the substantive rights,
protections, and procedural safeguards
of the IDEA and this part at least once
every 3 years.
(14) A report to the USD(P&R) is
submitted not later than September 30
of each year certifying whether all
schools are in compliance with the
IDEA and this part, and are affording
children with disabilities the
substantive rights, protections, and
procedural safeguards of the IDEA and
this part.
(15) Transition assistance is provided
in accordance with IDEA and this part
to promote movement from early
intervention or preschool into the
school setting.
(16) Transition services are provided
in accordance with IDEA and this part
to facilitate the child’s movement into
different educational settings and postsecondary environments.
(e) The GC, DoD shall identify
representatives to serve on the DoD–CC.
(f) The Secretaries of the Military
Departments shall:
(1) Establish educational and
developmental intervention services
(EDIS) to ensure infants and toddlers
with disabilities are identified and
provided EIS where appropriate, and are
afforded appropriate procedural
safeguards in accordance with the
requirements of the IDEA and
implementing guidance authorized by
this part.
(2) Staff EDIS with appropriate
professional staff, based on the services
required to serve children with
disabilities.
(3) Provide related services required
to be provided by a Military Department
in accordance with the mandates of this
part for children with disabilities. In the
overseas areas served by DoDEA
schools, the related services required to
be provided by a Military Department
under an IEP necessary for the student
to benefit from special education
include medical services for diagnostic
or evaluative purposes; social work;
community health nursing; dietary,
audiological, optometric, and
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
psychological testing and therapy;
occupational therapy; and physical
therapy. Transportation is provided as a
related service by the Military
Department when it is prescribed in a
child’s IFSP for an infant or toddler
birth up to 3 years of age, inclusive,
with disabilities. Related services shall
be administered in accordance with
guidance issued pursuant to this part,
including guidance from the ASD(HA)
on staffing and personnel standards.
(4) Issue implementing guidance and
forms necessary for the operation of
EDIS in accordance with this part.
(5) Provide EIS to infants and toddlers
with disabilities and their families, and
related services to children with
disabilities as required by this part at
the same priority that medical care is
provided to active duty military
members.
(6) Provide counsel from the Military
Department concerned or request
counsel from the Defense Office of
Hearings and Appeals (DOHA) to
represent the Military Department in
impartial due process hearings and
administrative appeals conducted in
accordance with this part for infants and
toddlers birth up to 3 years of age
(inclusive) with disabilities who are
eligible for EIS.
(7) Execute Departmental
responsibilities under the Exceptional
Family Member program (EFMP)
prescribed by DoD Instruction 1315.19.
(8) Train command personnel to fully
understand their legal obligations to
ensure compliance with and provide the
services required by this part.
(9) Fund activities to identify and
train personnel to monitor the provision
of services to eligible children with
disabilities.
(10) Require the development of
policies and procedures for providing,
documenting, and evaluating EDIS,
including EIS and related services
provided to children receiving special
education in a DoDEA school.
(11) Maintain EDIS to provide
necessary EIS to eligible infants and
toddlers with disabilities and related
services to eligible children with
disabilities in accordance with this part
and the substantive rights, protections,
and procedural safeguards of the IDEA,
§ 57.6(a) and § 57.6(c) of this part.
(12) Implement a comprehensive,
coordinated, inter-component,
community-based system of EIS for
eligible infants and toddlers with
disabilities and their families using the
procedures established in § 57.6 (a) of
this part and guidelines from the
ASD(HA) on staffing and personnel
standards.
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(13) Provide transportation for EIS
pursuant to the IDEA and this part.
(14) Provide transportation for
children with disabilities pursuant to
the IDEA and this part. The Military
Departments are to provide
transportation for a child to receive
medical or psychological evaluations at
a medical facility in the event that the
local servicing military treatment
facility (MTF) is unable to provide such
services and must transport the child to
another facility.
(15) Require that EDIS programs
maintain the components of an EIS as
required by the IDEA and this part, to
include:
(i) A comprehensive child-find
system, including a system for making
referrals for services that includes
timelines and provides for participation
by primary referral sources, and that
establishes rigorous standards for
appropriately identifying infants and
toddlers with disabilities for services.
(ii) A public awareness program
focusing on early identification of
infants and toddlers with disabilities to
include:
(A) Preparation of information
materials for parents regarding the
availability of EIS, especially to inform
parents with premature infants or
infants with other physical risk factors
associated with learning or
developmental complications.
(B) Dissemination of those materials
to all primary referral sources,
especially hospitals and physicians, for
distribution to parents.
(C) A definition of developmental
delay, consistent with § 57.6(g) of this
part, to be used in the identification of
infants and toddlers with disabilities
who are in need of services.
(D) Availability of appropriate EIS.
(iii) A timely, comprehensive,
multidisciplinary evaluation of the
functioning of each infant or toddler
and identification of the needs of the
child’s family to assist appropriately in
the development of the infant or
toddler.
(iv) Procedures for development of an
Individualized Family Service Plan
(IFSP) and coordination of EIS for
families of eligible infants and toddlers
with disabilities.
(v) A system of EIS designed to
support infants and toddlers and their
families in the acquisition of skills
needed to become functionally
independent and to reduce the need for
additional support services as toddlers
enter school.
(vi) A central directory of information
on EIS resources and experts available
to military families.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
(16) Implement a comprehensive
system of personnel development
consistent with the requirements of the
IDEA and this part.
(17) Require that EDIS participate in
the existing MTF quality assurance
program, which monitors and evaluates
the medical services for children
receiving such services as described by
this part. Generally accepted standards
of practice for the relevant medical
services shall be followed, to the extent
consistent with the requirements of the
IDEA and this part including provision
of EIS in a natural environment, to
ensure accessibility, acceptability, and
adequacy of the medical portion of the
program provided by EDIS.
(18) Require transition services to
promote movement from early
intervention, preschool, and other
educational programs into different
educational settings and post-secondary
environments.
(19) Direct that each program
providing EIS is monitored for
compliance with this part, and with the
substantive rights, protections, and
procedural safeguards of the IDEA, at
least once every 3 years.
(20) Submit a report to the USD(P&R)
not later than September 30 of each year
stating whether all EDIS programs are in
compliance with this part and are
affording infants and toddlers the
substantive rights, protections, and
procedural safeguards of the IDEA, as
stated in § 57.6(f) of this part.
(21) Compile and report EDIS
workload and compliance data using the
system established by the ASD(HA) as
stated in § 57.6(f).
(g) The Director, DOHA, under the
authority, direction, and control of the
GC, DoD/Director, Defense Legal
Services Agency, shall:
(1) Ensure impartial due process
hearings are provided in accordance
with the IDEA and implementing
guidance authorized by this part with
respect to complaints related to special
education and related services arising
under the IDEA.
(2) Ensure DOHA Department Counsel
represents DoDEA in all due process
proceedings arising under the IDEA for
children age 3 through 21 who are
eligible for special education and
related services.
(3) Ensure DOHA Department
Counsel, upon request by a Military
Department, represents the Military
Department in due process proceedings
arising under the IDEA for infants and
toddlers birth up to 3 years of age with
disabilities who are eligible for EIS.
(4) Ensure the DOHA Center for
Alternative Dispute Resolution (CADR)
maintains a roster of mediators qualified
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
76005
in special education disputes and, when
requested, provides a mediator for
complaints related to special education
and related services arising under the
IDEA.
§ 57.6
Procedures.
(a) Procedures for the Provision of EIS
for Infants and Toddlers with
Disabilities.
(1) General. (i) There is an urgent and
substantial need to:
(A) Enhance the development of
infants and toddlers with disabilities to
minimize their potential for
developmental delay and to recognize
the significant brain development that
occurs during a child’s first 3 years of
life.
(B) Reduce educational costs by
minimizing the need for special
education and related services after
infants and toddlers with disabilities
reach school age.
(C) Maximize the potential for
individuals with disabilities to live
independently.
(D) Enhance the capacity of families
to meet the special needs of their infants
and toddlers with disabilities.
(ii) All procedures and services
within EIS must be in accordance with
the IDEA and the provisions of this part.
(2) Identification and Screening. (i)
Each Military Department shall develop
and implement in its assigned
geographic area a comprehensive childfind and public awareness program,
pursuant to the IDEA and this part, that
focuses on the early identification of
infants and toddlers who are eligible to
receive EIS pursuant to this part.
(ii) The military treatment facility
(MTF) and Family Advocacy Program
must be informed that EDIS will accept
direct referrals for infants and toddlers
from birth up to 3 years of age who are:
(A) Involved in a substantiated case of
child abuse or neglect; or
(B) Identified as affected by illegal
substance abuse or withdrawal
symptoms resulting from prenatal drug
exposure.
(iii) All other DoD Components will
refer infants and toddlers with
suspected disabilities to EDIS in
collaboration with the parents.
(iv) Upon receipt of a referral, EDIS
shall appoint a service coordinator.
(v) All infants and toddlers referred to
the EDIS for EIS shall be screened to
determine the appropriateness of the
referral and to guide the assessment
process.
(A) Screening does not constitute a
full evaluation. At a minimum,
screening shall include a review of the
medical and developmental history of
the referred infant or toddler through a
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
76006
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
parent interview and a review of
medical records.
(B) If screening is conducted prior to
the referral, or if there is a substantial
or obvious biological risk, a screening
following the referral may not be
necessary.
(C) If EDIS determines that an
evaluation is not necessary based on
screening results, EDIS will provide
written notice to the parents in
accordance with paragraph (a)(9) of this
section.
(3) Assessment and Evaluation.
(i) Assessments and Evaluations. The
assessment and evaluation of each
infant and toddler must:
(A) Be conducted by a
multidisciplinary team.
(B) Include:
(1) A review of records related to the
infant’s or toddler’s current health
status and medical history.
(2) An assessment of the infant’s or
toddler’s needs for EIS based on
personal observation of the child by
qualified personnel.
(3) An evaluation of the infant’s or
toddler’s level of functioning in each of
the following developmental areas,
including a multidisciplinary
assessment of the unique strengths and
needs of the child and the identification
of services appropriate to meet those
needs.
(i) Cognitive development.
(ii) Physical development, including
functional vision and hearing.
(iii) Communication development.
(iv) Social or emotional development.
(v) Adaptive development.
(4) Informed clinical opinion of
qualified personnel if the infant or
toddler does not qualify based on
standardized testing and there is
probable need for services.
(ii) Family Assessments
(A) Family assessments must include
consultation with the family members.
(B) If EDIS conducts an assessment of
the family, the assessment must:
(1) Be voluntary on the part of the
family.
(2) Be conducted by personnel trained
to utilize appropriate methods and
procedures.
(3) Be based on information provided
by the family through a personal
interview.
(4) Incorporate the family’s
description of its resources, priorities,
and concerns related to enhancing the
infant’s or toddler’s development.
(iii) Standards for Assessment
Selection and Procedures. EDIS shall
ensure, at a minimum, that:
(A) Evaluators administer tests and
other evaluations in the native language
of the infant or toddler, or the family’s
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
native language, or other mode of
communication, unless it is clearly not
feasible to do so.
(B) Assessment, evaluation
procedures, and materials are selected
and administered so as not to be racially
or culturally discriminatory.
(C) No single procedure is used as the
sole criterion for determining an infant’s
or toddler’s eligibility under this part.
(D) Qualified personnel conduct
evaluations and assessments.
(iv) Delivery of Intervention Services.
With parental consent, the delivery of
intervention services may begin before
the completion of the assessment and
evaluation when it has been determined
by a multidisciplinary team that the
infant or toddler or the infant’s or
toddler’s family needs the service
immediately. Although EDIS has not
completed all assessments, EDIS must
develop an IFSP before the start of
services and complete the remaining
assessments in a timely manner.
(4) Eligibility. (i) The EIS team shall
meet with the parents and determine
eligibility. The EIS team shall document
the basis for eligibility in an eligibility
report and provide a copy to the
parents.
(ii) Infants and toddlers from birth up
to 3 years of age with disabilities are
eligible for EIS if they meet one of the
following criteria:
(A) The infant or toddler is
experiencing a developmental delay.
(B) The infant or toddler has a
diagnosed physical or mental condition
that has a high probability of resulting
in developmental delay.
(5) Timelines. (i) EIS shall complete
the initial evaluation and assessment of
each infant and toddler (including the
family assessment) in a timely manner
ensuring that the timeline in paragraph
(a)(6)(ii) of this section is met.
(ii) The Military Department
responsible for providing EIS shall
develop procedures requiring that, if
circumstances make it impossible to
complete the evaluation and assessment
within a timely manner (e.g., if an infant
or toddler is ill), EDIS shall:
(A) Document those circumstances.
(B) Develop and implement an
appropriate interim IFSP in accordance
with this part.
(6) IFSP. (i) The EDIS shall develop
and implement an IFSP for each infant
and toddler with a disability, from birth
up to 3 years of age, who meets the
eligibility criteria for EIS.
(ii) EDIS shall convene a meeting to
develop the IFSP of an infant or toddler
with a disability. The meeting shall be
scheduled as soon as possible following
its determination that the infant or
toddler is eligible for EIS, but not later
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
than 45 days from the date of the
referral for services.
(iii) Meetings to develop and review
the IFSP must include:
(A) The parent or parents of the infant
or toddler.
(B) Other family members, as
requested by the parent, if feasible.
(C) An advocate or person outside of
the family if the parent requests that
person’s participation.
(D) The service coordinator who has
worked with the family since the initial
referral of the infant or toddler or who
is responsible for the implementation of
the IFSP.
(E) The persons directly involved in
conducting the evaluations and
assessments.
(F) As appropriate, persons who shall
provide services to the infant or toddler
or the family.
(iv) If a participant listed in paragraph
(a)(6)(iii) of this part is unable to attend
a meeting, arrangements must be made
for the person’s involvement through
other means, which may include:
(A) A telephone conference call or
other electronic means of
communication.
(B) Providing knowledgeable,
authorized representation.
(C) Providing pertinent records for use
at the meeting.
(v) The IFSP shall contain:
(A) A statement of the infant’s or
toddler’s current developmental levels
including physical, cognitive,
communication, social or emotional,
and adaptive behaviors based on the
information from the evaluation and
assessments.
(B) A statement of the family’s
resources, priorities, and concerns about
enhancing the infant’s or toddler’s
development.
(C) A statement of the measurable
results or measurable outcomes
expected to be achieved for the infant or
toddler and the family. The statement
shall contain pre-literacy and language
skills, as developmentally appropriate
for the infant or toddler, and the criteria,
procedures, and timelines used to
determine the degree to which progress
toward achieving the outcomes is being
made and whether modification or
revision of the results and services are
necessary.
(D) A statement of the specific EIS
based on peer-reviewed research, to the
extent practicable, necessary to meet the
unique needs of the infant or toddler
and the family, including the frequency,
intensity, and method of delivering
services.
(E) A statement of the natural
environments in which EIS will be
provided including a justification of the
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
extent, if any, to which the services
shall not be provided in a natural
environment because the intervention
cannot be achieved satisfactorily for the
infant or toddler. The IFSP must include
a justification for not providing a
particular early intervention service in
the natural environment.
(F) The projected dates for initiation
of services and the anticipated length,
duration, and frequency of those
services.
(G) The name of the service
coordinator who shall be responsible for
the implementation of the IFSP and for
coordination with other agencies and
persons. In meeting these requirements,
EDIS may:
(1) Assign the same service
coordinator appointed at the infant or
toddler’s initial referral for evaluation to
implement the IFSP;
(2) Appoint a new service
coordinator; or
(3) Appoint a service coordinator
requested by the parents.
(H) A description of the appropriate
transition services supporting the
movement of the toddler with a
disability to preschool or other services.
(vi) EDIS shall explain the contents of
the IFSP to the parents and shall obtain
an informed, written consent from the
parents before providing EIS described
in the IFSP.
(vii) The IFSP shall be implemented
within ten business days of completing
the document, unless the IFSP team,
including the parents, documents the
need for a delay.
(viii) If a parent does not provide
consent for participation in all EIS, EDIS
shall still provide those interventions to
which a parent does give consent.
(ix) EDIS shall evaluate the IFSP at
least once a year and the family shall be
provided an opportunity to review the
plan at 6-month intervals (or more
frequently, based on the needs of the
child and family). The purpose of the
periodic review is to determine:
(A) The degree to which progress
toward achieving the outcomes is being
made.
(B) Whether modification or revision
of the outcomes or services is necessary.
(x) The review may be carried out by
a meeting or by another means that is
acceptable to the parents and other
participants.
(7) Transition.
(i) EDIS shall provide a written
transition plan for toddlers receiving
EIS to facilitate their transition to
preschool, if appropriate. A transition
plan must be recorded on the IFSP
between the toddler’s second and third
birthday and not later than 90 days
before the toddler’s third birthday.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
(ii) Families shall be included in the
transition planning. EDIS shall inform
the toddler’s parents regarding future
preschool, the child find requirements
of the school, and the procedures for
transitioning the toddler from EIS to
preschool.
(iii) Not later than 6 months before the
toddler’s third birthday, the EDIS
service coordinator shall obtain parental
consent prior to release of identified
records of a toddler receiving EIS to the
DoD local school in order to allow the
DoDEA school to meet child-find
requirements.
(iv) The EDIS service coordinator
shall initiate a pre-transition meeting
with the CSC, and shall provide the
toddler’s early intervention assessment
reports, IFSP, and relevant supporting
documentation. The parent shall receive
reasonable notice of the pre-transition
meeting, shall receive copies of any
documents provided to the CSC, and
shall have the right to participate in and
provide input to the pre-transition
meeting.
(v) As soon as reasonably possible
following receipt of notice of a toddler
potentially transitioning to preschool,
the local DoDEA school shall convene a
CSC. The CSC and EDIS shall cooperate
to obtain parental consent, in
accordance with IDEA and this part, to
conduct additional evaluations if
necessary.
(vi) Based on the information received
from EDIS, the CSC, coordinating with
EDIS, will determine at the pretransition meeting whether:
(A) No additional testing or
observation is necessary to determine
that the toddler is eligible for special
education and related services, in which
case the CSC shall develop an eligibility
report based on the EDIS early
intervention assessment reports, IFSP,
supporting documentation and other
information obtained at the pretransition meeting, in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section; or
(B) Additional testing or observation
is necessary to determine whether the
toddler is eligible for special education
and related services, in which case the
CSC shall develop an assessment plan to
collect all required information
necessary to determine eligibility for
special education and obtain parental
consent, in accordance with IDEA and
this part, for evaluation in accordance
with paragraph (b) of this section.
(vii) In the event that the toddler is
first referred to EDIS fewer than 90 days
before the toddler’s third birthday, EDIS
and the DoDEA school shall work
cooperatively in the evaluation process
and shall develop a joint assessment
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
76007
plan to determine whether the toddler is
eligible for EIS or special education.
(A) EDIS shall complete its eligibility
determination process and the
development of an IFSP, if applicable.
(B) The CSC shall determine
eligibility for special education.
(viii) Eligibility assessments shall be
multidisciplinary and family-centered
and shall incorporate the resources of
the EDIS as necessary and appropriate.
(ix) Upon completion of the
evaluations, the CSC shall schedule an
eligibility determination meeting at the
local school, no later than 90 days prior
to the toddler’s third birthday.
(A) The parents shall receive
reasonable notice of the eligibility
determination meeting, shall receive
copies of any documents provided to
the CSC, and shall have the right to
participate in and provide input to the
meeting.
(B) EDIS and the CSC shall cooperate
to develop an eligibility determination
report based upon all available data,
including that provided by EDIS and the
parents, in accordance with paragraph
(b) of this section.
(x) If the toddler is found eligible for
special education and related services,
the CSC shall develop an individualized
education program (IEP) in accordance
with paragraph (b) of this section, and
must implement the IEP on or before the
toddler’s third birthday.
(xi) If the toddler’s third birthday
occurs during the period June through
August (the traditional summer vacation
period for school systems), the CSC
shall complete the eligibility
determination process and the
development of an IEP before the end of
the school year preceding the toddler’s
third birthday. An IEP must be prepared
to ensure that the toddler enters
preschool services with an instructional
program at the start of the new school
year.
(xii) The full transition of a toddler
shall occur on the toddler’s third
birthday unless the IFSP team and the
CSC determine that an extended
transition is in the best interest of the
toddler and family.
(A) An extended transition may occur
when:
(1) The toddler’s third birthday falls
within the last 6 weeks of the school
year;
(2) The family is scheduled to have a
permanent change of station (PCS)
within 6 weeks after a toddler’s third
birthday; or
(3) The toddler’s third birthday occurs
after the end of the school year and
before October 1.
(B) An extended transition may occur
if the IFSP team and the CSC determine
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
76008
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
that extended EIS beyond the toddler’s
third birthday are necessary and
appropriate, and if so, how long
extended services will be provided.
(1) The IFSP team, including the
parents, may decide to continue services
in accordance with the IFSP until the
end of the school year, PCS date, or
until the beginning of the next school
year.
(2) Extended services must be
delivered in accordance with the
toddler’s IFSP, which shall be updated
if the toddler’s or family’s needs change
on or before the toddler’s third birthday.
(3) The CSC shall maintain in its
records meeting minutes that reflect the
decision for EDIS to provide an
extended transition for the specified
period.
(4) Prior to the end of the extended
transition period, the CSC shall meet to
develop an IEP that shall identify all
special education and related services
that will begin at the end of the
transition period and meet all
requirements of the IDEA and this part,
in accordance with paragraph (b) of this
section.
(C) The IFSP team and the CSC may
jointly determine that the toddler
should receive services in the special
education preschool prior to the
toddler’s third birthday.
(1) If only a portion of the child’s
services will be provided by the DoDEA
school, the information shall be
identified in the IFSP, which shall also
specify responsibilities for service
coordination and transition planning.
The CSC shall develop an IEP that shall
identify all services to be delivered at
the school, in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) If all the toddler’s services will be
provided by the DoDEA school, the
services will be delivered pursuant to an
IEP developed in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section. Transition
activities and other services under the
IFSP will terminate with the toddler’s
entry into the special education
preschool.
(3) Early entry into preschool services
should occur only in exceptional
circumstances (e.g., to facilitate natural
transitions).
(xiii) In the case of a child who may
not be eligible for DoDEA preschool
special education services, with the
approval of the parents, EDIS shall make
reasonable efforts to convene a
conference among EDIS, the family, and
providers of other services for children
who are not eligible for special
education preschool services (e.g.,
community preschools) in order to
explain the basis for this conclusion to
the parents and obtain parental input.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
(8) Maintenance of Records.
(i) EDIS officials shall maintain all EIS
records, in accordance with 32 CFR part
310.
(ii) EIS records, including the IFSP
and the documentation of services
delivered in accordance with the IFSP,
are educational records consistent with
32 CFR part 285 and shall not be placed
in the child’s medical record.
(9) Procedural Safeguards.
(i) Parents of an infant or toddler who
is eligible for EIS shall be afforded
specific procedural safeguards that must
include:
(A) The right to confidentiality of
personally identifiable information in
accordance with 32 CFR part 310,
including the right of a parent to receive
written notice and give written consent
to the exchange of information between
the Department of Defense and outside
agencies in accordance with Federal law
and 32 CFR part 310 and 32 CFR part
285.
(B) The opportunity to inspect and
review records relating to screening,
evaluations and assessments, eligibility
determinations, development and
implementation of IFSPs.
(C) The right to determine whether
they or other family members will
accept or decline any EIS, and to
decline such a service after first
accepting it, without jeopardizing the
provision of other EIS.
(D) The right to written parental
consent.
(1) Consent must be obtained before
evaluation of the infant or toddler in
accordance with this section.
(2) Consent must be obtained before
initiation of EIS in accordance with this
section.
(3) If consent is not given, EDIS shall
make reasonable efforts to ensure that
the parent:
(i) Is fully aware of the nature of the
evaluation and assessment or the
services that would be available.
(ii) Understands that the infant or
toddler will not be able to receive the
evaluation and assessment or services
unless consent is given.
(E) The right to prior written notice.
(1) Prior written notice must be given
to the parents of an infant or toddler
entitled to EIS a reasonable time before
EDIS proposes to initiate or change, or
refuses to initiate or change the
identification, evaluation, or placement
of the infant or toddler, or the provision
of appropriate EIS to the infant or
toddler and any family member.
(2) The notice must be in sufficient
detail to inform the parents about:
(i) The action that is being proposed
or refused.
(ii) The reasons for taking the action.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(iii) Each of the procedural safeguards
that are available in accordance with
this section, including availability of
mediation, administrative complaint
procedures, and due process complaint
procedures that are available for dispute
resolution as described in this section,
including descriptions of how to file a
complaint and the applicable timelines.
(3) The notice must be provided in
language written for a general lay
audience and in the native language of
the parent or other mode of
communication used by the parent,
unless it is clearly not feasible to do so.
(F) The right to timely administrative
resolution of complaints.
(G) The availability of dispute
resolution with respect to any matter
relating to the provision of EIS to an
infant or toddler, through the
administrative complaint, mediation
and due process procedures described
in paragraph (d) of this section, except
the requirement to conduct a resolution
meeting, in the event of a dispute
between the Military Department
concerned and the parents regarding
EIS.
(H) Any party aggrieved by the
decision regarding a due process
complaint filed in accordance with
paragraph (d) of this section shall have
the right to bring a civil action in a
district court of the United States of
competent jurisdiction without regard to
the amount in controversy.
(ii) During the pendency of any
proceeding or action involving a
complaint by the parent of an infant or
toddler with a disability relating to the
provision of EIS, unless the parent and
EDIS otherwise agree, the infant or
toddler shall continue to receive the
appropriate EIS currently being
provided under the most recent signed
IFSP or, if applying for initial EIS
services, shall receive the services not in
dispute.
(10) Mediation and Due Process
Procedures. Mediation and due process
procedures, described in paragraph (d)
of this section, except the requirement
to conduct a resolution meeting, are
applicable to early intervention when
the Military Department concerned and
the parents will be the parties in the
dispute.
(b) Procedures for the Provision of
Educational Programs and Services for
Children With Disabilities, Ages 3
Through 21 Years, Inclusive
(1) Parent Involvement and General
Provisions.
(i) The CSC shall take reasonable
steps to provide for the participation of
the parent(s) in the special education
program of his/her child. School
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
officials shall use devices or hire
interpreters or other intermediaries who
might be necessary to foster effective
communications between the school
and the parent about the child. Special
education parental rights and
responsibilities will be provided in the
parent’s native language, unless it is
clearly not feasible to do so, e.g., low
incidence language or not a written
language.
(ii) The CSC shall afford the child’s
parents the opportunity to participate in
CSC meetings to determine their child’s
initial or continuing eligibility for
special education and related services,
to prepare or change the child’s IEP, or
to determine or change the child’s
placement.
(iii) No child shall be required to
obtain a prescription for a substance
covered by the Controlled Substances
Act, as amended, 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.
as a condition of attending school,
receiving an evaluation, or receiving
services.
(iv) For meetings described in this
section, the parent of a child with a
disability and the DoDEA school
officials may agree to use alternative
means of meeting participation, such as
video conferences and conference calls.
(2) Identification and Referral.
(i) DoDEA shall:
(A) Engage in child-find activities to
locate, identify, and screen all children
who are entitled to enroll in DDESS in
accordance with DoD Instruction
1342.26 (see https://www.dtic.mil/whs/
directives/corres/pdf/134226p.pdf) or in
DoDDS in accordance with DoDEA
Regulation 1342.13 (see https://
www.dodea.edu/foia/iod/pdf/1342_
13.pdf) who may require special
education and related services.
(B) Cooperate with the Military
Departments to conduct ongoing childfind activities and periodically publish
any information, guidelines, and
directions on child-find activities for
eligible children with disabilities, ages 3
through 21 years, inclusive.
(C) Conduct the following activities to
determine if children may need special
education and related services:
(1) Review school records for
information about student performance
on system-wide testing and other basic
skills tests in the areas of reading and
language arts and mathematics.
(2) Review school health data such as
reports of hearing, vision, speech, or
language tests and reports from
healthcare personnel about the health
status of a child. For children with
disabilities, any health records or other
information that tends to identify a
child as a person with a disability must
be maintained in confidential files that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
are not co-mingled with other records
and that are available only to essential
staff for the purpose of providing
effective education and services to the
child.
(3) Review school discipline records
and maintain the confidentiality of such
records and any information that tends
to identify a child as a person with a
disability.
(4) Participate in transition activities
of children receiving EIS who may
require special education preschool
services.
(ii) DoDEA school system officials,
related service providers, or others who
suspect that a child has a possible
disabling condition shall submit a childfind referral to the CSC containing, at a
minimum, the name and contact
information for the child and the reason
for the referral.
(iii) The screening of a student by a
teacher or specialist to determine
appropriate instructional strategies for
curriculum implementation shall not be
considered to be an evaluation for
eligibility for special education and
related services and does not require
informed consent.
(3) Incoming Students. The DoDEA
school will take the following actions,
in consultation with the parent, when a
child transfers to a DoDEA school with
an active IEP:
(i) If the current IEP is from a nonDoDEA school:
(A) Promptly obtain the child’s
educational records including
information regarding assessment,
eligibility, and provision of special
education and related services from the
previous school.
(B) Provide FAPE, including services
comparable (i.e., similar or equivalent)
to those described in the incoming IEP,
in consultation with the parents, until
the CSC:
(1) Conducts an evaluation, if
determined necessary by such agency.
(2) Develops, adopts, and implements
a new IEP, if appropriate, in accordance
with the requirements of the IDEA and
this part within 30 school days of
receipt of the IEP.
(ii) If the current IEP is from a DoDEA
school, the new school must provide the
child a FAPE, including services
comparable to those described in the
incoming IEP, until the new school
either:
(A) Adopts the child’s IEP from the
previous DoDEA school; or
(B) Develops, adopts, and implements
a new IEP that meets the requirements
of the IDEA and this part within 30
school days of receipt of the incoming
IEP.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
76009
(iii) Coordinate assessments of
children with disabilities who transfer
with the child’s previous school as
quickly as possible to facilitate prompt
completion of full evaluations.
(4) Referral by a Parent. Should a
parent submit a written request for an
evaluation because they suspect the
child has a disability the CSC shall,
within 15 school days, review the
request, confer with the child’s teachers,
and gather information related to the
educational concerns. Following a
review of the information, the CSC
shall:
(i) Convene a conference among the
parents, teachers, and one or more other
members of the CSC to discuss the
educational concerns and document
their agreements. Following the
discussion, the parents may agree that:
(A) The child’s needs are not
indicative of a suspected disability and
other supports and accommodations
will be pursued;
(B) Additional information is
necessary and a pre-referral process will
be initiated; or
(C) Information from the conference
will be forwarded to the CSC for action
on the parent’s request for an
evaluation.
(ii) Within 10 school days of receipt
of information from the conference
regarding the parents’ request for
evaluation, agree to initiate the
preparation of an assessment plan for a
full and comprehensive educational
evaluation or provide written notice to
the parent denying the formal
evaluation.
(5) Referral by a Teacher.
(i) Prior to referring a child to the
CSC, the teacher shall identify the
child’s areas of specific instructional
need and target instructional
interventions to those needs as soon as
the areas of need become apparent.
(ii) If the area of specific instructional
need is not resolved, the teacher shall
initiate the pre-referral process
involving other members of the school
staff.
(iii) If interventions conducted during
pre-referral fail to resolve the area of
specific instructional need, the teacher
shall submit a formal referral to the
CSC.
(6) Assessment and Evaluation.
(i) A full and comprehensive
evaluation of educational needs shall be
conducted prior to eligibility
determination and before an IEP is
developed or placement is made in a
special education program, subject to
the provisions for incoming students
transferring to a DoDEA school as set
forth in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
When the school determines that a child
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
76010
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
should be evaluated for a suspected
disability, the school will:
(A) Issue a prior written notice to the
parents of the school’s intention to
evaluate and a description of the
evaluation in accordance with
paragraph (b)(19) of this section.
(B) Provide parents notice of
procedural safeguards.
(C) Request that the parent execute a
written consent for the evaluation in
accordance with paragraph (b)(18) of
this section.
(ii) The CSC shall ensure that the
following elements are included in a
full and comprehensive assessment and
evaluation of a child:
(A) Screening of visual and auditory
acuity.
(B) Review of existing school
educational and health records.
(C) Observation in an educational
environment.
(D) A plan to assess the type and
extent of the disability. A child shall be
assessed in all areas related to the
suspected disability. The assessment
plan shall include, as appropriate:
(1) An assessment of the level of
functioning academically, intellectually,
emotionally, socially, and in the family.
(2) An assessment of physical status
including perceptual and motor
abilities.
(3) An assessment of the need for
transition services for students 16 years
and older.
(iii) The CSC shall involve the parents
in the assessment process in order to
obtain information about the child’s
strengths and needs and family
concerns.
(iv) The CSC, as necessary, shall use
all locally available community,
medical, and school resources to
accomplish the assessment and
evaluation. At least one specialist with
knowledge in the area of the suspected
disability shall be a member of the
multidisciplinary assessment team.
(v) The CSC must obtain parental
consent, in accordance with IDEA and
this part, before conducting an
evaluation. The parent shall not be
required to give consent for an
evaluation without first being informed
of the specific evaluation procedures
that the school proposes to conduct.
(vi) The evaluation must be
completed by the school within 45
school days following the receipt of the
parent’s written consent to evaluate in
accordance with the school’s assessment
plan.
(vii) The eligibility determination
meeting must be conducted within 10
school days after completion of the
school’s formal evaluation.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
(viii) All DoD elements including the
CSC and related services providers
shall:
(A) Use a variety of assessment tools
and strategies to gather relevant
functional, developmental, and
academic information, including
information provided by the parent,
which may assist in determining:
(1) Whether the child has a disability.
(2) The content of the child’s IEP,
including information related to
enabling the child to be involved and
progress in the general education
curriculum or, for preschool children, to
participate in appropriate activities.
(B) Not use any single measure or
assessment as the sole criterion for
determining whether a child has a
disability or determining an appropriate
educational program for the child.
(C) Use technically sound instruments
that may assess the relative contribution
of cognitive and behavioral factors, in
addition to physical or developmental
factors.
(ix) The CSC and DoD related services
providers shall ensure that assessment
materials and evaluation procedures are:
(A) Selected and administered so as
not to be racially or culturally
discriminatory.
(B) Provided in the child’s native
language or other mode of
communication and in the form most
likely to yield accurate information on
what the child knows and can do
academically, developmentally, and
functionally, unless it is clearly not
feasible to so provide and administer.
(C) Selected and administered to
assess the extent to which the child
with limited English proficiency has a
disability and needs special education,
rather than measuring the child’s
English language skills.
(D) Validated for the specific purpose
for which they are used or intended to
be used.
(E) Administered by trained and
knowledgeable personnel in compliance
with the instructions of the testing
instrument.
(F) Selected to assess specific areas of
educational needs and strengths and not
merely to provide a single general
intelligence quotient.
(G) Administered to a child with
impaired sensory, motor, or
communication skills so that the results
accurately reflect a child’s aptitude or
achievement level or other factors the
test purports to measure, rather than
reflecting the child’s impaired sensory,
manual, or speaking skills.
(x) As part of an initial evaluation and
as part of any reevaluation, the CSC
shall review existing evaluation data on
the child, including:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(A) The child’s educational records.
(B) Evaluations and information
provided by the parents of the child.
(C) Current classroom-based, local, or
system-wide assessments and classroom
observations.
(D) Observations by teachers and
related services providers.
(xi) On the basis of that review and
input from the child‘s parents, identify
what additional data, if any, are needed
to determine:
(A) Whether the child has a particular
category of disability or, in the case of
a reevaluation of a child, whether the
child continues to have such a
disability.
(B) The present levels of academic
achievement and related developmental
needs of the child.
(C) Whether the child needs special
education and related services or, in the
case of a reevaluation of a child,
whether the child continues to need
special education and related services.
(D) Whether any additions or
modifications to the special education
and related services are needed to
enable the child to meet the measurable
annual goals set out in the IEP and to
participate, as appropriate, in the
general education curriculum.
(xii) The CSC may conduct its review
of existing evaluation data without a
meeting.
(xiii) The CSC shall administer tests
and other evaluation materials as
needed to produce the data identified in
paragraph (b)(6)(ii) and (xi) of this
section.
(7) Eligibility.
(i) The CSC shall:
(A) Require that the full
comprehensive evaluation of a child is
accomplished by a multidisciplinary
team, including specialists with
knowledge in the area of the suspected
disability and shall receive input from
the child’s parent(s).
(B) Convene a meeting to determine
eligibility of a child for special
education and related services not later
than 10 school days after the child has
been assessed by the school.
(C) Afford the child’s parents the
opportunity to participate in the CSC
eligibility meeting.
(D) Determine whether the child is a
child with a disability as defined by the
IDEA and this part, and the educational
needs of the child.
(E) Issue a written eligibility
determination report, including a
synthesis of evaluation findings, that
documents a child’s primary eligibility
in one of the disability categories
described in paragraph (g) of this
section, providing a copy of the
eligibility determination report to the
parent.
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(F) Determine that a child does NOT
have a disability if the determinant
factor is:
(1) Lack of appropriate instruction in
essential components of reading;
(2) Lack of instruction in
mathematics; or
(3) Limited English proficiency.
(ii) The CSC shall reevaluate the
eligibility of a child with a disability
every 3 years, or more frequently, if the
child’s educational or related services
needs, including improved academic
achievement and functional
performance, warrant a reevaluation.
School officials shall not reevaluate
more often than once a year, unless the
parents and the school officials agree
otherwise.
(A) The scope and type of the
reevaluation shall be determined
individually based on a child’s
performance, behavior, and needs
during the reevaluation and the review
of existing data.
(B) If the CSC determines that no
additional data are needed to determine
whether the child continues to be a
child with a disability, the CSC shall, in
accordance with paragraph (b)(19) of
this section, provide prior written notice
to the child’s parents of:
(1) The determination that no
additional assessment data are needed
and the reasons for their determination.
(2) The right of the parents to request
an assessment to determine whether the
child continues to have a disability and
to determine the child’s educational
needs.
(C) The CSC is not required to
conduct assessments for the purposes
described in paragraph (b)(7)(i)(B)(2) of
this section, unless requested to do so
by the child’s parents.
(iii) The CSC shall evaluate a child in
accordance with paragraph (b)(7)(ii) of
this section before determining that the
child no longer has a disability.
(iv) The CSC is not required to
evaluate a child before the termination
of the child’s eligibility due to
graduation from secondary school with
a regular diploma, or due to exceeding
the age of eligibility for FAPE.
(v) When a child’s eligibility has
terminated due to graduation or
exceeding the age of eligibility, the
DoDEA school must provide the child,
or the parent if the child has not yet
reached the age of majority or is
otherwise incapable of providing
informed consent, with a summary of
the child’s academic achievement and
functional performance.
(A) The summary of performance
must be completed during the final year
of a child’s high school education.
(B) The summary must include:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
(1) Child’s demographics.
(2) Child’s postsecondary goal.
(3) Summary of performance in the
areas of academic, cognitive, and
functional levels of performance to
include the child’s present level of
performance, and the accommodations,
modifications, and assistive technology
that were essential in high school to
assist the student in achieving
maximum progress.
(4) Recommendations on how to assist
the child in meeting the child’s postsecondary goals.
(8) IEP.
(i) IEP Development.
(A) DoDEA shall ensure that the CSC
develops and implements an IEP to
provide FAPE for each child with a
disability who requires special
education and related services as
determined by the CSC. An IEP shall be
in effect at the beginning of each school
year for each child with a disability
eligible for special education and
related services under the IDEA and this
part.
(B) In developing the child’s IEP, the
CSC shall consider:
(1) The strengths of the child.
(2) The concerns of the parents for
enhancing the education of their child.
(3) The results of the initial evaluation
or most recent evaluation of the child.
(4) The academic, developmental, and
functional needs of the child.
(ii) IEP Development Meeting. The
CSC shall convene a meeting to develop
the IEP of a child with a disability. The
meeting shall:
(A) Be scheduled within 10 school
days from the eligibility meeting
following a determination by the CSC
that the child is eligible for special
education and related services.
(B) Include as participants:
(1) An administrator or school
representative other than the child’s
teacher who is qualified to provide or
supervise the provision of special
education and is knowledgeable about
the general education curriculum and
available resources.
(2) Not less than one general
education teacher of the child (if the
child is, or may be, participating in the
general education environment).
(3) A special education teacher or
provider.
(4) One or both of the child’s parents.
(5) An EIS coordinator or other
representative of EIS, if the child is
transitioning from EIS.
(6) The child, if appropriate.
(7) A representative of the evaluation
team who is knowledgeable about the
evaluation procedures used and can
interpret the instructional implications
of the results of the evaluation.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
76011
(8) Other individuals invited at the
discretion of the parents or school who
have knowledge or special expertise
regarding the child, including related
services personnel, as appropriate.
(iii) IEP Content. The CSC shall
include in the IEP:
(A) A statement of the child’s present
levels of academic achievement and
functional performance including:
(1) How the child’s disability affects
involvement and progress in the general
education curriculum, or
(2) For preschoolers, how the
disability affects participation in
appropriate activities.
(B) A statement of measurable annual
goals including academic and functional
goals designed to meet:
(1) The child’s needs that result from
the disability to enable the child to be
involved in and make progress in the
general education curriculum.
(2) Each of the child’s other
educational needs resulting from his or
her disability.
(C) A description of how the child’s
progress toward meeting the annual
goals shall be measured, and when
periodic progress reports will be
provided to the parents.
(D) A statement of the special
education and related services,
supplementary aids and services (which
are based on peer-reviewed research to
the extent practicable and shall be
provided to the child or on behalf of the
child), and a statement of the program
modifications or supports for school
personnel that shall be provided for the
child to:
(1) Advance appropriately toward
attaining the annual goals.
(2) Be involved in and make progress
in the general education curriculum and
participate in extracurricular and other
non-academic activities.
(3) Be educated and participate with
other children who may or may not
have disabilities.
(E) An explanation of the extent, if
any, to which the child will not
participate with non-disabled children
in the regular class and in non-academic
activities.
(F) A statement of any individualized
appropriate accommodations necessary
to measure the child’s academic
achievement and functional
performance on system-wide or districtwide assessments. If the CSC determines
that the child shall take an alternate
assessment of a particular system-wide
or district-wide assessment of student
achievement (or part of an assessment),
a statement of why:
(1) The child cannot participate in the
regular assessment.
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
76012
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(2) The particular alternate
assessment selected is appropriate for
the child.
(G) Consideration of the following
special factors:
(1) Assistive technology devices and
services for all children.
(2) Language needs for the child with
limited English proficiency.
(3) Instruction in Braille and the use
of Braille for a child who is blind or
visually impaired, unless the CSC
determines, after an evaluation of the
child’s reading and writing skills, needs,
and appropriate reading and writing
media (including an evaluation of the
child’s future needs for instruction in
Braille or the use of Braille) that
instruction in Braille or the use of
Braille is not appropriate for the child.
(4) Interventions, strategies, and
supports including positive behavioral
interventions and supports to address
behavior for a child whose behavior
impedes his or her learning or that of
others.
(5) Language and communication
needs, and in the case of a child who
is deaf or hard of hearing, opportunities
for direct communications with peers
and professional personnel in the
child’s language and communication
mode, academic level, and full range of
needs, including opportunities for direct
instruction in the child’s
communication mode.
(H) A statement of the amount of time
that each service shall be provided to
the child, including the date for
beginning of services and the
anticipated frequency, number of
required related services sessions to be
provided by EDIS, location and duration
of those services (including adjusted
school day or an extended school year),
and modifications.
(I) A statement of special
transportation requirements, if any.
(J) Physical education services,
specially designed if necessary, shall be
made available to every child with a
disability receiving a FAPE. Each child
with a disability must be afforded the
opportunity to participate in the regular
physical education program available to
non-disabled children unless the child
is enrolled full-time in a separate
facility or needs specially designed
physical education, as prescribed in the
child’s IEP.
(iv) Transition Services.
(A) Beginning not later than the first
IEP to be in effect when the child turns
16, or younger if determined
appropriate by the CSC, and updated
annually, thereafter, the IEP must
include:
(1) Appropriate measurable
postsecondary goals based on age-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
appropriate transition assessments
related to training, education,
employment and, where appropriate,
independent living skills.
(2) The transition services, including
courses of study, needed to assist the
child in reaching postsecondary goals.
(B) Beginning at least 1 year before the
child reaches the age of majority (18
years of age), except for a child with a
disability who has been determined to
be incompetent in accordance with
Federal or State law, a statement that
the child has been informed of those
rights that transfer to him or her in
accordance with this part.
(9) Implementation of the IEP.
(i) The CSC shall ensure that all IEP
provisions developed for any child
entitled to an education by the DoDEA
school system are fully implemented.
(ii) The CSC shall:
(A) Seek to obtain parental agreement
and signature on the IEP before delivery
of special education and related services
in accordance with that IEP is begun.
(B) Provide a copy of the child’s IEP
to the parents.
(C) Ensure that the IEP is
implemented as soon as possible
following the IEP development meeting.
(D) Ensure the provision of special
education and related services, in
accordance with the IEP.
(E) Ensure that the child’s IEP is
accessible to each general education
teacher, special education teacher,
related service provider, and any other
service provider who is responsible for
its implementation, and that each
teacher and provider is informed of:
(1) His or her specific responsibilities
related to implementing the child’s IEP.
(2) The specific accommodations,
modifications, and supports that must
be provided for the child in accordance
with the IEP.
(F) Review the IEP for each child
periodically and at least annually in a
CSC meeting to determine whether the
child has been progressing toward the
annual goals.
(G) Revise the IEP, as appropriate, and
address:
(1) Any lack of progress toward the
annual goals and in the general
education curriculum, where
appropriate.
(2) The results of any reevaluation.
(3) Information about the child
provided by the parents, teachers, or
related service providers.
(4) The child’s needs.
(10) Placement and Least Restrictive
Environment (LRE).
(i) The CSC shall determine the
educational placement of a child with a
disability.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(ii) The educational placement
decision for a child with a disability
shall be:
(A) Determined at least annually.
(B) Made in conformity with the
child’s IEP.
(C) Made in conformity with the
requirements of IDEA and this part for
LRE.
(1) A child with a disability shall be
educated, to the maximum extent
appropriate, with children who are not
disabled, and that special classes,
separate schooling, or other removal of
children with disabilities from the
regular educational environment shall
occur only if the nature or severity of
the child’s disability that education in
regular classes with the use of
supplementary aids and services cannot
be achieved satisfactorily.
(2) A child with a disability shall not
be removed from education in ageappropriate general education
classrooms solely because of needed
modifications in the general education
classroom.
(3) As appropriate, the CSC shall
make provisions for supplementary
services to be provided in conjunction
with general education placement.
(4) Special classes, separate schooling,
or other removal of a child with a
disability from the general education
environment shall occur only when the
nature or severity of the disability is
such that education in general
education classes with the use of
supplementary aids and services cannot
be achieved satisfactorily.
(5) In providing or arranging for the
provision of non-academic and
extracurricular services and activities,
including meals, recess periods,
assemblies, and study trips, the CSC
shall ensure that a child with a
disability participates with non-disabled
children in those services and activities
to the maximum extent appropriate to
the needs of that child.
(iv) In determining the LRE for an
individual student, the CSC shall
consider:
(A) The needs of the individual child
as well as any potential harmful effect
on the child or the quality of services
that he or she needs.
(B) A continuum of placement options
must be made available to meet the
needs of children with disabilities for
special education and related services.
The options on this continuum include
the general education classroom, special
classes (a self-contained classroom in
the school), home bound instruction, or
instruction in hospitals or institutions.
(v) When special schools and
institutions may be appropriate, the CSC
shall consider such placement options
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
in coordination with the Area Special
Education Office.
(vi) In the case of a disciplinary
placement, school officials shall follow
the procedures set forth in paragraph
(b)(13) of this section.
(12) Extended School Year (ESY)
Services. ESY services must be provided
only if a child’s IEP team determines
that the services are necessary for the
provision of FAPE to the child. DoDEA
may not:
(i) Limit ESY services to particular
categories of disability; or
(ii) Unilaterally limit the type,
amount, or duration of ESY services.
(13) Discipline. (i) School Discipline.
All regular disciplinary rules and
procedures applicable to children
attending a DoDEA school shall apply to
children with disabilities who violate
school rules and regulations or disrupt
regular classroom activities, except that:
(A) A manifestation determination
must be conducted for discipline
proposed for children with disabilities
in accordance with DoDEA disciplinary
rules and regulations and paragraph
(b)(13)(v) of this section, and
(B) The child subject to disciplinary
removal shall continue to receive
educational services in accordance with
paragraph (b)(13)(iv) of this section.
(ii) Change of Placement. (A) It is a
change of placement if a child is
removed from his or her current
placement for more than 10 consecutive
school days or for a series of removals
that cumulates to more than 10 school
days during the school year that meets
the criteria of paragraph (b)(13)(ii)(C) of
this section.
(B) It is not a change of placement if
a child is removed from his or her
current academic placement for less
than 10 consecutive or cumulative days
in a school year for one incident of
misconduct. A child can be removed
from the current educational placement
for separate incidents of misconduct in
the same school year (as long as those
removals do not constitute a change of
placement under IDEA to the extent
such a disciplinary alternative is
applied to children without disabilities).
(C) If a child has been removed from
his or her current placement for more
than 10 days in a school year, but not
more than 10 consecutive school days,
the CSC shall determine whether the
child has been subject to a series of
removals that constitute a pattern. The
determination is made on a case-by-case
basis and is subject to review by a
hearing officer in accordance with the
provisions of paragraph (d)(5) of this
section. The CSC will base its
determination on whether the child has
been subjected to a series of removals
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
that constitute a pattern by examining
whether:
(1) The child’s behavior is
substantially similar to his or her
behavior in previous incidents that
resulted in the series of removals, and,
(2) Additional factors such as the
length of each removal, the total amount
of time the child has been removed, and
the proximity of the removals to one
another.
(D) On the date the decision is made
to remove a child with a disability
because of misconduct, when the
removal would change the child’s
placement, the school must notify the
parents of that decision and provide the
parents the procedural safeguards notice
described in paragraph (b)(19) of this
section.
(iii) Period of Removal. School
personnel may remove a child with a
disability for misconduct from his or her
current placement to an appropriate
interim alternative educational setting
(AES), another setting, or suspension:
(A) For not more than 10 consecutive
school days to the extent those
alternatives are applied to children
without disabilities (for example,
removing the child from the classroom
to the school library, to a different
classroom, or to the child’s home), and
for additional removals of not more than
10 consecutive school days in that same
school year for separate incidents of
misconduct (as long as those removals
do not constitute a pattern); or
(B) For not more than 45 school days,
without regard to whether the behavior
is determined to be a manifestation of
the child’s disability, if the child, at
school, on school-provided
transportation, on school premises, or at
a school-sponsored event:
(1) Carries a weapon or possesses a
weapon;
(2) Knowingly possesses or uses
illegal drugs or sells or solicits the sale
of a controlled substance; or
(3) Has inflicted serious bodily injury
upon another person.
(C) After an expedited hearing if
school personnel believe that returning
the child to his or her current
educational placement is substantially
likely to cause injury to the child or to
others.
(iv) Required Services During
Removal. (A) If a child with a disability
is removed from his or her placement
for 10 cumulative school days or less in
a school year, the school is required
only to provide services comparable to
the services it provides to a child
without disabilities who is similarly
removed.
(B) If a child with a disability is
removed from his or her placement for
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
76013
more than 10 school days, where the
behavior that gave rise to the violation
of the school code is determined in
accordance with paragraph (b)(13)(v) of
this section not to be a manifestation of
the child’s disability, or who is removed
under paragraph (b)(13)(iii)(B) of this
section 9irrespective of whether the
behavior is determined to be a
manifestation of the child’s disability,
the school must:
(1) Continue to provide the child with
the educational services as identified by
the child’s IEP as a FAPE so as to enable
the child to continue participating in
the general education curriculum,
although in another setting, and to
progress toward meeting the goals set
out in the child’s IEP.
(2) Provide, as appropriate, a
functional behavioral assessment and
behavioral intervention services and
modifications designed to address the
behavior violation so that it does not
recur.
(C) If a child with a disability has
been removed for more than 10
cumulative school days and the current
removal is for 10 consecutive school
days or less, then the CSC must
determine whether the pattern of
removals constitutes a change of
placement in accordance with
paragraph (b)(13)(ii) of this section.
(1) If the CSC determines the pattern
of removals is NOT a change of
placement, then the CSC must
determine the extent to which services
are needed to enable the child to
continue participating in the general
education curriculum, although in
another setting, and to progress toward
meeting the goals set out in the child’s
IEP.
(2) If the CSC determines that the
pattern of removals IS a change of
placement, then the CSC must conduct
a manifestation determination.
(v) Manifestation Determination (A) A
principal must give the notice required
and convene a manifestation
determination meeting with the CSC
within 10 school days of
recommending, in accordance with
DoDEA Regulation 2051.1, a
disciplinary action that would remove a
child with disabilities for:
(1) More than 10 consecutive school
days, or
(2) A period in excess of 10
cumulative school days when the child
has been subjected to a series of
removals that constitute a pattern.
(B) The manifestation CSC will review
all relevant information in the child’s
file (including the IEP, any teacher
observations, and any information
provided by the sponsor or parent) and
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
76014
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
determine whether the misconduct was
a manifestation of the child’s disability.
(1) The misconduct must be
determined to be a manifestation of the
child’s disability if it is determined the
misconduct:
(i) Was caused by the child’s
disability or had a direct and substantial
relationship to the child’s disability; or
(ii) Was the direct result of the
school’s failure to implement the IEP.
(2) If the determination is made that
the misconduct was a manifestation of
the child’s disability, the CSC must:
(i) Conduct a functional behavioral
assessment, unless the school
conducted a functional behavioral
assessment before the behavior that
resulted in the change of placement
occurred, and implement a behavioral
intervention plan for the child; or
(ii) Review any existing behavioral
intervention or disciplinary plan and
modify it, as necessary, to address the
behavior; and
(iii) Revise the student’s IEP or
placement and delivery system to
ensure that the student receives services
in accordance with the IEP.
(3) Unless the parent and school agree
to a change of placement as part of the
modification of the behavioral
intervention plan, the CSC must return
the child to the placement from which
the child was removed:
(i) Not later than the end of 10 days
of removal; or
(ii) Not later than the end of 45
consecutive school days, if the student
committed a weapon or drug offense or
caused serious bodily injury for which
the student was removed to an AES.
(4) If the determination is made that
the misconduct in question was the
direct result of the school’s failure to
implement the IEP, the school must take
immediate steps to remedy those
deficiencies.
(5) If the determination is made that
the behavior is NOT a manifestation of
the child’s disability, school personnel
may apply the relevant disciplinary
procedures in the same manner and for
the same duration as the procedures that
would be applied to children without
disabilities, and must:
(i) Forward the case and a
recommended course of action to the
school principal, who may then refer
the case to a disciplinary committee for
processing.
(ii) Reconvene the CSC following a
disciplinary decision that would change
the student’s placement to revise the
child’s IEP and/or identify an
appropriate educational setting and
delivery system to ensure the child
receives services in accordance with the
IEP.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
(vi) Appeals of School Decision
Regarding Placement or Manifestation
Determination. (A) The parent of a child
with a disability who disagrees with any
decision regarding placement or
manifestation determination, or a school
that believes maintaining the current
placement of the child is substantially
likely to result in injury to the child or
others, may appeal the decision by
requesting an expedited due process
hearing before a hearing officer by filing
a petition in accordance with paragraph
(d)(5) of this section.
(B) A hearing officer, appointed in
accordance with paragraph (d) of this
section, hears and makes a
determination regarding an appeal. In
making the determination the hearing
officer may:
(1) Return the child with a disability
to the placement from which the child
was removed if the hearing officer
determines that the removal was a
violation of the authority of school
personnel in accordance with this part
or that the child’s behavior was a
manifestation of the child’s disability; or
(2) Order a change of placement of the
child with a disability to an appropriate
interim AES for not more than 45 school
days if the hearing officer determines
that maintaining the child’s current
placement is substantially likely to
result in injury to the child or to others.
(C) At the end of the placement in the
appropriate AES, the procedures for
placement in an AES may be repeated,
with the consent of the Area Director, if
the school believes that returning the
child to the original placement is
substantially likely to result in injury to
the child or to others.
(D) When an appeal has been made by
either the parent or the school, the child
must remain in the interim AES
pending the decision of the hearing
officer or until the expiration of the
specified time period, whichever occurs
first, unless the parent and the DoDEA
school system agree otherwise.
(14) Children Not Yet Determined
Eligible for Special Education. (i) A
child who has not been determined to
be eligible for special education and
related services and who is subject to
discipline may assert any of the
protections provided for in paragraph
(b)(19) of this section if the school had
knowledge that the child was a child
with a disability before the behavior that
precipitated the disciplinary action
occurred.
(ii) DoDEA shall be deemed to have
knowledge that a child is a child with
a disability if, before the behavior that
precipitated the disciplinary action
occurred:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(A) The parent of the child expressed
concern in writing to a teacher of the
child, the school principal or assistant
principal, or the school special
education coordinator that the child was
in need of special education and related
services;
(B) The child presented an active IEP
from another school;
(C) The parent of the child requested
an evaluation of the child; or
(D) The teacher of the child or other
school personnel expressed specific
concerns about a pattern of behavior
demonstrated by the child directly to
the principal or assistant principal, the
special education coordinator, or to
another teacher of the child.
(iii) A school is deemed NOT to have
knowledge that a child is a child with
a disability if:
(A) The parent of the child has not
allowed an evaluation of the child or the
parent has revoked consent, in writing,
to the delivery of the child’s special
education and related services, in
accordance with this part; or
(B) The child has been evaluated and
determined not to be a child with a
disability.
(iv) Conditions that apply if there is
no basis of knowledge that the child is
a child with a disability.
(A) If a school has no basis of
knowledge that a child is a child with
a disability prior to taking disciplinary
measures against the child, the child
may be subjected to the disciplinary
measures applied to non-disabled
children who engage in comparable
behaviors in accordance with paragraph
(b)(13)(i) of this section.
(B) If a request is made for an
evaluation of a child during the time
period when the child is subjected to
disciplinary measures:
(1) The evaluation must be expedited.
(2) Until the evaluation is completed,
the child remains in his or her then
current educational placement, which
can include suspension or expulsion
without educational services.
(v) If the child is determined to be a
child with a disability, taking into
consideration information from the
evaluation conducted by the agency and
information provided by the parents, the
school must provide special education
and related services in accordance with
an IEP.
(15) Referral to and Action by Law
Enforcement and Judicial Authorities.
(i) Rule of Construction. Nothing
prohibits a school from reporting a
crime threatened or committed by a
child with a disability to appropriate
authorities, or prevents military, hostnation, or State law enforcement and
judicial authorities from exercising their
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
responsibilities with regard to the
application of Federal, host-nation, and
State law to crimes committed or
threatened by a child with a disability.
(ii) Transmittal of Records. An agency
reporting a crime in accordance with
this paragraph may transmit copies of
the child’s special education and
disciplinary records only to the extent
that the transmission is in accordance
with 32 CFR part 285.
(16) Children With Disabilities Who
are Placed in a Non-DoDEA School or
Facility Pursuant to an IEP. (i) Children
with disabilities who are eligible to
receive a DoDEA school education, but
are placed in a non-DoD school or
facility by DoDEA because a FAPE
cannot be provided by DoD, shall have
all the rights of children with
disabilities who are enrolled in a
DoDEA school.
(ii) A child with a disability may be
placed at DoD expense in a non-DoD
school or facility only if required by the
IEP.
(iii) DoDEA school officials shall
initiate and conduct a meeting to
develop an IEP for the child before
placement. A representative of the nonDoD school or facility should attend the
meeting. If the representative cannot
attend, the DoDEA school officials shall
communicate in other ways to facilitate
participation including individual or
conference telephone calls. A valid IEP
must document the necessity of the
placement in a non-DoD school or
facility. The IEP must:
(A) Be signed by an authorized
DoDEA official before it becomes valid.
(B) Include a determination that the
DoDEA school system does not
currently have and cannot reasonably
create an educational program
appropriate to meet the needs of the
child with a disability.
(C) Include a determination that the
non-DoD school or facility and its
educational program and related
services conform to the requirements of
this part.
(iv) The DoD shall not be required to
reimburse the costs of special education
and related services if DoDEA made
FAPE available in accordance with the
requirements of the IDEA and a parent
unilaterally places the child in a nonDoD school without the approval of
DoDEA.
(A) Reimbursement may be ordered
by a hearing officer if he or she
determines that DoDEA had not made
FAPE available in a timely manner prior
to enrollment in the non-DoDEA school
and that the private placement is
appropriate.
(B) Reimbursement may be reduced or
denied:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
(1) If, at the most recent CSC meeting
that the parents attended prior to
removal of the child from the DoDEA
school, the parents did not inform the
CSC that they were rejecting the
placement proposed by the DoDEA
school to provide FAPE to their child,
including stating their concerns and
their intent to enroll their child in nonDoD school at DoD expense.
(2) If, at least 10 business days
(including for this purpose any holidays
that occur on a Monday through Friday)
prior to the removal of the child from
the DoDEA school, the parents did not
give written notice to the school
principal or CSC chairperson of the
information described in paragraph
(b)(16)(iv)(B)(1) of this section.
(3) If, the CSC informed the parents of
its intent to evaluate the child, using the
notice requirement described in
paragraph (b)(6)(i) and paragraph (b)(19)
of this section, but the parents did not
make the child available; or
(4) Upon a hearing officer finding of
unreasonableness with respect to
actions taken by the parents.
(C) Reimbursement may not be
reduced or denied for failure to provide
the required notice if:
(1) The DoDEA school prevented the
parent from providing notice;
(2) The parents had not received
notification of the requirement that the
school provide prior written notice
required by paragraph (b)(19) of this
section;
(3) Compliance would result in
physical or emotional harm to the child;
or
(4) The parents cannot read and write
in English.
(17) Confidentiality of the Records.
The DoDEA school and EDIS officials
shall maintain all student records in
accordance with 32 CFR part 310.
(18) Parental Consent. (i) Consent
Requirements. The consent of a parent
of a child with a disability or suspected
of having a disability shall be obtained
before:
(A) Initiation of formal evaluation
procedures to determine whether the
child qualifies as a child with a
disability and prior to conducting a
reevaluation;
(B) Initial provision of special
education and related services; or
(ii) Consent for Initial Evaluation. If
the parent of a child does not provide
consent for an initial evaluation or fails
to respond to a request for consent for
an initial evaluation, then DoDEA may
use the procedures described in
paragraph (d) of this section to pursue
an evaluation of a child suspected of
having a disability.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
76015
(A) Consent to evaluate shall not
constitute consent for placement or
receipt of special education and related
services.
(B) If a parent declines to give consent
for evaluation, DoDEA shall not be in
violation of the requirement to conduct
child-find, the initial evaluation, or the
duties to follow evaluation procedures
or make an eligibility determination and
write an IEP as prescribed in this
section.
(iii) Consent for Reevaluation. The
school must seek to obtain parental
consent to conduct a reevaluation. If the
parent does not provide consent or fails
to respond to a request for consent for
a reevaluation, then the school may
conduct the reevaluation without
parental consent if the school can
demonstrate that it has made reasonable
efforts to obtain parental consent and
documented its efforts. The
documentation must include a record of
the school’s attempts in areas such as:
(A) Detailed records of telephone calls
made or attempted and the results of
those calls.
(B) Copies of correspondence sent to
the parents and any responses received.
(C) Detailed records of visits made to
the parents’ home, place of employment
or duty station, and the results of those
visits.
(iv) Consent for the Initial Provision of
Special Education and Related Services.
The school that is responsible for
making a FAPE available to a child with
a disability under this part must seek to
obtain informed consent from the parent
of such child before providing special
education and related services to the
child. If the parent refuses initial
consent for services, the DoDEA school:
(A) May not use the procedures
described in paragraph (d) of this
section (mediation and due process) to
obtain agreement or a ruling that the
special education and related services
recommended by the child’s CSC may
be provided to the child without
parental consent.
(B) Shall not be considered to be in
violation of the requirement to make a
FAPE available to the child for its
failure to provide those services to the
child for which parental consent was
requested.
(C) Shall not be required to convene
an IEP meeting or develop an IEP for the
child.
(19) Parent Revocation of Consent for
Continued Special Education and
Related Services.
(i) Parents may unilaterally withdraw
their children from further receipt of all
special education and related services
by revoking their consent for the
continued provision of special
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
76016
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
education and related services to their
children.
(ii) Parental revocation of consent
must be in writing.
(iii) Upon receiving a written
revocation of consent, the DoDEA
school must cease the provision of
special education and related services
and must provide the parents prior
written notice before ceasing the
provision of services. The notice shall
comply with the requirements of
paragraph (b)(19) of this section and
shall advise the parent:
(A) Changes in educational placement
and services that will result from the
revocation of consent.
(B) That the school will terminate
special education and related services to
the child on a specified date, which
shall be within a reasonable time
following the delivery of the written
notice.
(C) That DoDEA will not be
considered to be in violation of the
requirement to make FAPE available to
the child because of the failure to
provide the child with further special
education and related services.
(D) That the DoDEA school will not be
deemed to have knowledge that the
child is a child with a disability and the
child may be disciplined as a general
education student and will not be
entitled to the IDEA discipline
protections.
(E) That the parents maintain the right
to subsequently request an initial
evaluation to determine if the child is a
child with a disability who needs
special education and related services
and that their child will not receive
special education and related services
until eligibility has been determined.
(F) That the DoDEA school will not
challenge, through mediation or a due
process hearing, the revocation of
consent to the provision of special
education or related services.
(G) That while the school is not
required to convene a CSC meeting or to
develop an IEP for further provision of
special education and related services, it
is willing to convene a CSC meeting
upon request of the parent prior to the
date that service delivery ceases.
(iv) Revocation of consent for a
particular service:
(A) Upon receiving a revocation of
consent for a particular special
education or related service, the DoDEA
school must provide the parent prior
written notice in accordance with the
requirements of paragraph (b)(19) of this
section.
(B) If parents disagree with the
provision of a particular special
education or related service and the
school members of the CSC and the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
parents agree that the child would be
provided a FAPE if the child did not
receive that service, the child’s IEP may
be modified to remove the service.
(C) If the parent and the school
members of the CSC disagree as to
whether the child would be provided a
FAPE if the child did not receive a
particular service, the parent may use
the mediation or due process
procedures under this part to obtain a
determination as to whether the service
with which the parent disagrees is or is
not appropriate to his or her child and
necessary to FAPE, but the school may
not cease the provision of a particular
service that has been included in the
child’s active IEP until the dispute is
resolved.
(20) Procedural Safeguards. (i)
Parental Rights. Parents of children,
ages 3 through 21 inclusive, with
disabilities must be afforded procedural
safeguards with respect to the provision
of FAPE which shall include:
(A) The right to confidentiality of
personally identifiable information in
accordance with Federal law and DoD
regulations.
(B) The right to examine records and
to participate in meetings with respect
to assessment, screening, eligibility
determinations, and the development
and implementation of the IEP.
(C) The right to furnish or decline
consent in accordance with this section.
(D) The right to prior written notice
when the school proposes to initiate or
change, or refuses to initiate or change
the identification, evaluation,
educational placement, or provision of
FAPE to a child with a disability.
(1) The notice must be in sufficient
detail to inform parents about:
(i) The action that is being proposed
or refused.
(ii) An explanation of why the agency
proposes or refuses to take the action.
(iii) A description of any other options
considered by the CSC and the reasons
why those options were rejected.
(iv) A description of the factors that
were relevant to the agency’s proposal
or refusal.
(v) Each of the procedural safeguards
that is available in accordance with the
IDEA and this part.
(vi) Sources for parents to contact to
obtain assistance in understanding the
provisions of this part.
(vii) Dispute resolution procedures,
including a description of mediation,
how to file a complaint, due process
hearing procedures, and applicable
timelines.
(2) The notice must be provided in
language understandable to a lay person
and in the native language of the parent
or other mode of communication used
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
by the parent, unless it is clearly not
feasible to do so.
(E) The right to obtain an independent
educational evaluation (IEE) of the
child.
(F) The right to timely administrative
resolution of complaints.
(G) The availability of dispute
resolution through the administrative
complaint, mediation, and due process
procedures described in paragraph (d) of
this section with respect to any matter
relating to the identification, evaluation,
or educational placement of the child,
or a FAPE for the child, age 3 through
21 years, inclusive.
(H) The right of any party aggrieved
by the decision regarding a due process
complaint to bring a civil action in a
district court of the United States of
competent jurisdiction in accordance
with paragraph (d)(21) of this section.
(ii) Procedural Safeguards Notice. A
DoDEA school shall not be required to
give parents a copy of the procedural
safeguards notice more than once a
school year, except that a copy must be
given to parents upon a request from the
parents; upon initial referral for
evaluation or parental request for
evaluation; and upon receipt of the first
due process complaint.
(A) The procedural safeguards notice
must include a full explanation of all of
the procedural safeguards available,
including:
(1) Independent evaluation for
children (3 through 21 years, inclusive).
(2) Prior written notice.
(3) Parental consent.
(4) Access to educational records.
(5) Dispute resolution procedures
together with applicable timelines
including:
(i) The availability of mediation.
(ii) Procedures for filing a due process
complaint and the required time period
within which a due process complaint
must be filed.
(iii) The opportunity for the DoDEA
school system to resolve a due process
complaint filed by a parent through the
resolution process.
(iv) Procedures for filing an
administrative complaint and for
administrative resolution of the issues.
(6) The child’s placement during
pendency of due process proceedings in
accordance with paragraph (d)(18) of
this section.
(7) Procedures for children (3 through
21 years, inclusive) who are subject to
placement in an interim AES.
(8) Requirements for unilateral
placement by parents of children in
private schools at public expense.
(9) Due process hearings, including
requirements for disclosure of
evaluation results and
recommendations.
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(10) The right to bring a civil action
in a district court of the United States
in accordance with paragraph (d)(21) of
this section, including the time period
in which to file such action.
(11) The possibility of an award of
attorney’s fees to the prevailing party in
certain circumstances.
(B) The procedural safeguards notice
must be:
(1) Written in language
understandable to the general public.
(2) Provided in the native language of
the parent or other mode of
communication used by the parent,
unless it is clearly not feasible to do so.
If the procedural safeguards notice is
not translated into the native language
of the parent, then the DoDEA school
system shall ensure that:
(i) The notice is translated orally or by
other means for the parent in his or her
native language or other mode of
communication.
(ii) The parent understands the
content of the notice.
(iii) There is written evidence that the
requirements above have been met.
(iii) Independent Educational
Evaluation (IEE).
(A) Obtaining an IEE. The DoDEA
school system shall provide to the
parents, upon request for an IEE,
information about where an IEE that
meets DoDEA school system criteria, as
set forth in paragraph (b)(19)(iii)(F) of
this section, may be obtained.
(B) Right to IEE. The parents of a child
with a disability have a right to an IEE
at the DoDEA school system expense if
the parent disagrees with an evaluation
obtained by the DoDEA school system,
subject to paragraph (b)(19)(iii)(C) to (H)
of this section.
(C) Written Request for IEE. If a parent
provides the DoDEA school system with
a written request for an IEE funded by
the school system, then the school
system shall either:
(1) Agree to fund an appropriate IEE
that meets the DoDEA school system
criteria, or
(2) Initiate a due process hearing in
accordance with paragraph (d) of this
section, without unnecessary delay, and
demonstrate that its evaluation was
appropriate under this part.
(i) If the DoDEA school system
initiates a due process hearing and the
final decision is that the school system’s
evaluation is appropriate, the parent
still has the right to an IEE, but not at
public expense.
(ii) If a parent requests an IEE, the
DoDEA school system may ask for the
parent’s reason why he or she objects to
the school system’s evaluation.
However, the parent may not be
compelled to provide an explanation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
and the DoDEA school system may not
unreasonably delay either agreeing to
fund an IEE that meets DoDEA school
system criteria or initiating a due
process hearing to defend its evaluation.
(D) Parent-Initiated Evaluations. If the
parent obtains an IEE funded by the
school system or shares with the DoDEA
school system an evaluation obtained at
private expense:
(1) The results of the evaluation shall
be considered by the DoDEA school if
it meets the school system’s criteria in
any decision made with respect to the
provision of FAPE to the child.
(2) The results may be presented by
any party as evidence at a due process
hearing under this section regarding that
child.
(3) The DoDEA school system may not
be required to fund an IEE that has been
obtained by a parent if at a due process
hearing initiated by either party and
conducted under this section, the
DoDEA school system demonstrates
either that:
(i) The parentally obtained evaluation
was not educationally appropriate or
failed to meet agency criteria; or
(ii) The DoDEA school system’s
evaluation was appropriate.
(E) Hearing Officer Order for
Evaluation. A hearing officer may only
order an IEE at the DoDEA school
system’s expense as part of a due
process hearing under this section if:
(1) The school system has failed to
demonstrate its assessment was
appropriate; or
(2) The school system has not already
funded an IEE in response to a given
school evaluation.
(F) DoDEA School System Criteria. An
IEE provided at the DoDEA school
system’s expense must:
(1) Conform to the requirements of
paragraph (b)(6)(viii) and (ix) of this
section.
(2) Be conducted, when possible, in
the geographic area where the child
resides utilizing available qualified
resources, including qualified
examiners employed by the Military
Department, unless the parent can
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
DoDEA school system or in a due
process hearing filed in accordance with
paragraph (d) of this section, that the
geographic limitation renders the IEE
impossible.
(3) Meet DoD standards governing
persons qualified to conduct an IEE,
including an evaluation for related
services.
(G) Conditions. Except for the criteria
in paragraph (b)(6)(viii) and(b)(6)(ix) of
this section, the DoDEA school system
shall not impose conditions or timelines
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
76017
related to obtaining an IEE at the DoDEA
school system expense.
(H) Limitations. A parent is entitled to
only one IEE at DoDEA school system
expense in response to a given DoDEA
school system evaluation with which
the parent disagrees.
(iv) Placement During Due Process,
Appeal, or Civil Procedures. While an
impartial due process proceeding,
appeal proceeding, or civil proceeding
is pending, unless the DoDEA school
system and the parent of the child agree
otherwise in writing, the child shall
remain in his or her current placement,
subject to the disciplinary procedures
prescribed in paragraph (b)(13) of this
section.
(v) Transfer of Parental Rights at Age
of Majority.
(A) In the DoDEA school system, a
child reaches the age of majority at age
18.
(B) When a child with a disability
reaches the age of majority (except for
a child with a disability who has been
determined to be incompetent in
accordance with Federal or State law)
the rights afforded to the parents in
accordance with the IDEA and this part
transfer to the child.
(C) When a child reaches the age of
majority, the DoDEA school shall notify
the child and the parents of the transfer
of rights.
(D) When a child with a disability
who has not been determined to be
incompetent, but who does not have the
ability to provide informed consent with
respect to his or her educational
program, reaches the age of majority, the
DoD shall appoint a parent or the
parents of the child to represent the
educational interests of the child
throughout the period of eligibility for
special education services.
(c) Procedures for Provision of Related
Services by the Military Departments to
Students With Disabilities in a DoDDS
(1) Evaluation Procedures.
(i) Upon request by a CSC, the
responsible EDIS shall ensure that a
qualified medical authority conducts or
verifies a medical evaluation for use by
the CSC in determining the medically
related disability that results in a child’s
need for special education and related
services, and shall oversee an EDIS
evaluation used in determining a child’s
need for related services.
(ii) The medical or related services
evaluation, including necessary
consultation with other medical
personnel, shall be supervised by a
physician or other qualified healthcare
provider.
(iii) The medical or related services
evaluation shall be specific to the
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
76018
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
concerns addressed in the request from
the CSC.
(iv) The EDIS shall provide to the CSC
an evaluation report that responds to the
questions posed in the original request
for an evaluation. The written report
shall include:
(A) Demographic information about
the child, such as the child’s name, date
of birth, and grade level
(B) Behavioral observation of the
child during testing.
(C) Instruments and techniques used.
(D) Evaluation results.
(E) Descriptions of the child’s
strengths and limitations.
(F) Instructional implications of the
findings.
(G) The impact of the child’s medical
condition(s), if applicable, on his or her
educational performance.
(v) If the EDIS that supports the
DoDDS school requires assistance to
conduct or complete an evaluation, the
EDIS shall contact the MTF designated
by the Military Department with
geographic responsibility for the area
where the EDIS is located.
(vi) If EDIS determines that in order
to respond to the CSC referral the scope
of its assessment and evaluation must be
expanded beyond the areas specified in
the initial parental permission, EDIS
must:
(A) Obtain parental permission for the
additional activities.
(B) Complete its initial evaluation by
the original due date.
(C) Notify the CSC of the additional
evaluation activities.
(vii) When additional evaluation
information is submitted by EDIS, the
CSC shall review all data and determine
the need for program changes and the
reconsideration of eligibility.
(viii) An EDIS provider shall serve on
the CSC when eligibility, placement, or
requirements for related services that
EDIS provides are to be determined.
(2) IEP
(i) EDIS shall be provided the
opportunity to participate in the IEP
meeting.
(ii) EDIS shall provide related services
assigned to EDIS that are listed on the
IEP.
(3) Liaison With DoDDS. Each EDIS
shall designate a special education
liaison officer to:
(i) Provide liaison between the EDIS
and DoDDS on requests for evaluations
and other matters within their purview.
(ii) Offer, on a consultative basis,
training for school personnel on medical
aspects of specific disabilities.
(iii) Offer consultation and advice as
needed regarding the medical services
provided at school (for example,
tracheotomy care, tube feeding,
occupational therapy).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
(iv) Participate with school personnel
in developing and delivering in-service
training programs that include
familiarization with various conditions
that impair a child’s educational
endeavors, the relationship of medical
findings to educational functioning,
related services, and the requirements of
the IDEA and this part.
(d) Dispute Resolution and Due Process
Procedures
(1) General. This section establishes
requirements for resolving disputes
regarding the provision of EIS to an
infant or toddler up to 3 years of age, or
the identification, evaluation, or
educational placement of a child (ages
3 through 21, inclusive), or the
provision of a FAPE to such child in
accordance with the IDEA and this part.
(2) Conferences. Whenever possible,
parties are encouraged to resolve
disputes through the use of conferences
at the lowest level possible between the
parents and EDIS or the DoDEA school.
(i) Within a DoDEA school, problems
should be brought first to the teacher,
then the school administrator, and then
the district office.
(ii) At EDIS, problems should be
brought first to the EDIS provider, then
the EDIS program manager, and then the
local MTF commander.
(3) Administrative Complaints. (i) A
complaint filed with the responsible
agency, relating to the provision of
services under the IDEA and this part,
other than due process complaints filed
in accordance with paragraph (d)(5) of
this section, is known as an
administrative complaint.
(ii) An individual or organization may
file an administrative complaint alleging
issues relating to services required to be
delivered under the IDEA and this part
with:
(A) The Office of the Inspector
General of a Military Department when
the issue involves services or programs
for infants and toddlers with
disabilities, or related services provided
by the Military Departments to children
with disabilities.
(B) The DoDEA Director, Office of
Investigations and Internal Review
(OI&IR) when the issue involves the
services or programs for children ages 3
to 21, inclusive that are under the
direction or control of the DoDEA
school system.
(iii) An administrative complaint
alleging issues relating to services
required to be delivered under the IDEA
or this part must include:
(A) A statement that the Military
Service or the DoDEA school system has
violated a requirement of the IDEA or
this part.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(B) The facts on which the statement
is based.
(C) The signature and contact
information for the complainant.
(D) If alleging violations with respect
to specific children:
(1) The name of the school the child
is attending.
(2) The name and address of the
residence of the child.
(3) A description of the nature of the
problem of the child, including facts
relating to the problem.
(4) A proposed resolution of the
problem to the extent known and
available to the complainant at the time
the complaint is filed.
(iv) An administrative complaint may
not allege a violation that occurred more
than 1 year prior to the date that the
complaint is received.
(v) The complainant filing an
administrative complaint alleging issues
related to services required to be
delivered under the IDEA or this part
must forward a copy of the complaint to
the DoDEA school or EDIS clinic serving
the child at the same time the
complainant files the complaint with
the appropriate authority in paragraph
(d)(3)(i) of this section.
(A) Upon receipt of the complaint, the
Inspector General of the Military
Department concerned will notify the
Secretary of the Military Department
concerned, and the OCA will notify the
Director, DoDEA, of the complaint.
(B) Upon receipt of a complaint, the
responsible Military Department
Inspector General or the OCA shall, if
warranted, promptly open an
investigation consistent with its
established procedures for investigating
complaints.
(1) The investigation shall afford the
complainant an opportunity to submit
additional information about the
allegations.
(2) The investigation shall afford the
DoDEA school system or the Military
Department an opportunity to:
(i) Respond to the complaint;
(ii) Propose a resolution to the
complaint; or
(iii) If the parties are willing,
voluntarily engage in mediation of the
complaint.
(3) The investigation shall produce a
report consistent with those the
investigating agency routinely provides,
shall determine whether its findings
support the complaint, and shall state
whether the DoDEA school system or
the Military Department is violating a
requirement of the IDEA or this part.
(vi) The findings and conclusions of
the report of investigation related to the
administrative complaint shall be made
available to the complainant and
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
members of the public in accordance
with the standard operating procedures
of the investigating activity and 32 CFR
part 310 and 32 CFR part 285.
(A) The investigating activity shall
provide a copy of the report to the
Director, DoDEA and the Secretary of a
Military Department concerned or in
accordance with the investigating
activity’s protocols.
(B) The report shall be provided, to
the extent practicable, within 60 days of
initiating the investigation, unless
extended by the complainant and the
DoDEA school system or the Military
Department.
(vii) The Secretary of the Military
Department concerned or the Director,
DoDEA shall resolve complaints within
their respective area of responsibility
when the Military Service or the DoDEA
school system is found to have failed to
provide appropriate services consistent
with the requirements of the IDEA or
this part. Remediation may include
corrective action appropriate to address
the needs of the child such as
compensatory services, or monetary
reimbursement where otherwise
authorized by law.
(viii) When a complaint received
under this section is also the subject of
a due process complaint regarding
alleged violations of rights afforded
under the IDEA and this part, or
contains multiple issues of which one or
more are part of that due process
complaint, the investigation activity
shall set aside any issues alleged in the
due process complaint until a hearing is
concluded in accordance with the IDEA
and this part. Any issue that is not part
of the due process hearing must be
resolved using the procedures of this
section.
(ix) If an issue raised in a complaint
filed under this section has been
previously decided in a due process
hearing involving the same parties:
(A) The due process hearing decision
is binding on that issue.
(B) The Director, DoDEA or the
Secretary of the Military Department
concerned shall so inform the
complainant.
(4) Mediation.
(i) A parent, the Military Department
concerned, or DoDEA may request
mediation at any time, whether or not
a due process petition has been filed, to
informally resolve a disagreement on
any matter relating to the provision of
EIS to an infant or toddler (birth up to
3 years of age), or the identification,
evaluation, or educational placement of
a child (ages 3 through 21, inclusive), or
the provision of a FAPE to such child.
(ii) Mediation must be voluntary on
the part of the parties and shall not be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
used to deny or delay a parent’s right to
a due process hearing or to deny other
substantive or procedural rights
afforded under the IDEA.
(A) DoDEA school officials participate
in mediation involving special
education and related services; the
cognizant Military Department
participates in mediation involving EIS.
(B) The initiating party’s request must
be written, include a description of the
dispute, bear the signature of the
requesting party, and be provided:
(1) In the case of a parent initiating
mediation, to:
(i) The local EDIS program manager in
disputes involving EDIS; or
(ii) The school principal in disputes
involving a DoDEA school.
(2) In the case of the school or EDIS
initiating mediation, to the parent.
(C) Acknowledgment of the request
for mediation shall occur in a timely
manner.
(D) Agreement to mediate shall be
provided in writing to the other party in
a timely manner.
(ii) Upon agreement of the parties to
mediate a dispute, the local EDIS or
DoDEA school shall forward a request
for a mediator to the Military
Department or to DoDEA’s Center for
Early Dispute Resolution (CEDR),
respectively.
(iii) The mediator shall be obtained
from the Defense Office of Hearings and
Appeals (DOHA) unless another
qualified and impartial mediator is
obtained by the Military Department or
CEDR.
(A) Where DOHA is used, the DOHA
Center for Alternate Dispute Resolution
(CADR) shall provide the mediator from
its roster of mediators qualified in
special education disputes.
(B) Where the Military Department or
DoDEA elects to secure a mediator
through its own DoD Component
resources, the mediator shall be selected
from the Component’s roster of
mediators qualified in special education
disputes, or by contract with an outside
mediator duly qualified in special
education disputes and who is trained
in effective mediation techniques.
(iv) The Military Department or
DoDEA through CEDR shall obtain a
mediator within 15 business days of
receipt of a request for mediation, or
immediately request a mediator through
the Director, DOHA, through the DOHA
CADR.
(v) When requested, the Director,
DOHA, through the CADR, shall appoint
a mediator within 15 business days of
receiving the request, unless a party
provides written notice to the Director,
DOHA that the party refuses to
participate in mediation.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
76019
(vi) Unless both parties agree
otherwise, mediation shall commence in
a timely manner after both parties agree
to mediation.
(vii) The parents of the infant, toddler,
or child, and EDIS or the school shall be
parties in the mediation. With the
consent of both parties, other persons
may attend the mediation.
(viii) Mediation shall be conducted
using the following rules:
(A) The Military Department
concerned shall bear the cost of the
mediation process in mediations
concerning EIS.
(B) DoDEA shall bear the cost of the
mediation process in mediations
concerning special education and
related services.
(C) The mediator may require the
parties to sign a confidentiality pledge
before the commencement of mediation.
(D) Unless the parties and the
mediator agree, no person may record a
mediation session, nor shall any written
notes be taken from the room by either
party.
(E) Either party may request a recess
of a mediation session to consult
advisors, whether or not present, or to
consult privately with the mediator.
(F) The mediator shall ensure and the
contract for mediation services shall
require that any partial or complete
resolution or agreement of any issue in
mediation is reduced to writing, and
that the written agreement is signed and
dated by the parties, with a copy given
to each party.
(ix) Any written agreement resulting
from the mediation shall state that all
discussions that occurred during the
mediation process and all records of the
mediation other than a final executed
agreement shall be confidential and may
not be discoverable or admissible as
evidence in any subsequent due process
proceeding, appeal proceeding, or civil
proceeding under this part, and shall be
legally binding upon the parties and
enforceable in a district court of the
United States.
(x) All mediation sessions shall be
held in a location that is convenient to
both parties.
(xi) No hearing officer or adjudicative
body shall draw any inference from the
fact that a mediator or a party withdrew
from mediation or from the fact that
mediation did not result in settlement of
a dispute.
(xii) Discussions and statements made
during the mediation process, and any
minutes, statements or other records of
a mediation session other than a final
executed mediation agreement, shall be
considered confidential between the
parties to that mediation and are not
discoverable or admissible in a due
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
76020
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
process proceeding, appeal proceeding,
or civil proceeding under this part.
(5) Due Process Complaint
Procedures.
(i) Parents of infants, toddlers, and
children who are covered by this part
and the cognizant Military Department
or DoDEA, are afforded impartial
hearings and administrative appeals
after the parties have waived or
participated in and failed to resolve a
dispute through:
(A) Mediation, in the case of an infant
or toddler; or
(B) A resolution process, or mediation
in lieu of the resolution process prior to
proceeding to a due process hearing, in
the case of a child (ages 3 through 21
years, inclusive).
(ii) An impartial due process hearing
is available to resolve any dispute
concerning the provision of EIS to
infants and toddlers with disabilities or
with respect to any matter relating to the
identification, evaluation, educational
placement of, and the FAPE provided by
the Department of Defense to children
(ages 3 through 21, inclusive) who are
covered by this part, in accordance with
the IDEA and this part.
(A) Whenever the parents or the
cognizant Military Department present a
due process complaint (petition) in
accordance with this part, an impartial
due process hearing is available to
resolve any dispute concerning the
provision of EIS.
(B) When the parents of children ages
3 through 21 years, inclusive, or the
cognizant Military Department or
DoDEA, present a due process
complaint (petition) in accordance with
this part relating to any matter regarding
the identification, evaluation,
placement, or the provision of FAPE,
the parties shall first proceed in
accordance with the requirements for a
statutory resolution process in
accordance with this part, after which
time an impartial due process hearing is
available to resolve the dispute set forth
by the complaint.
(iii) An expedited impartial due
process hearing may be requested:
(A) By a parent when the parent
disagrees with the manifestation
determination or any decision regarding
the child’s disciplinary placement.
(B) By the school when it believes that
maintaining a student in his or her
current educational placement is
substantially likely to result in injury to
the student or others and.
(iv) Any party to a special education
dispute may initiate a due process
hearing by filing a petition stating the
specific issues that are in dispute. The
initiating party is the ‘‘petitioner’’ and
the responding party is the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
‘‘respondent.’’ The petition itself will
remain confidential, in accordance with
applicable law, not be released to those
not a party to the litigation and its
Personally Identifiable Information shall
be protected in accordance with the
DoD Privacy Act.
(v) Petitioner and respondent are each
entitled to representation by counsel at
their own expense. The parent and child
may choose to be assisted by a personal
representative with special knowledge
or training with respect to the problems
of disabilities rather than by legal
counsel.
(vi) To file a petition that affords
sufficient notice of the issues and
commences the running of relevant
timelines, petitioners shall specifically
include in the petition:
(A) The name and residential address
of the child and the name of the school
the child is attending or the location of
the EDIS serving the child.
(B) A description of the dispute(s)
between the parents and the school or
EDIS describing the facts (who, what,
when, where, how, why) pertinent to
each dispute and relating those facts to:
(1) A proposal, or the refusal of a
proposal, to initiate or change the
identification, evaluation, or
educational placement of the child; or
(2) Any allegation of the failure to
provide a FAPE to the child.
(C) A proposed resolution of the
problem to the extent known and
available to the petitioner at the time.
(D) The signature of the parent, or if
the petitioner is DoDEA or a Military
Department, an authorized
representative of that petitioner, or of
the counsel or personal representative
for the petitioner, and his or her
telephone number and mailing address.
(vii) When the cognizant Military
Department or DoDEA petitions for a
hearing, it shall additionally:
(A) Inform the parent of the 10
business-day deadline (or 5 school days
in the case of an expedited hearing) for
filing a response that specifically
addresses the issues raised in the
petition.
(B) Provide the parent with a copy of
this part.
(viii) A special rule applies for
expedited hearing requests. The
petitioner must state, as applicable to
his or her petition:
(A) The disciplinary basis for the
child’s change in placement to an
interim AES or other removal from the
child’s current placement.
(B) The reasons for the change in
placement.
(C) The reasoning of the manifestation
determination committee in concluding
that a particular act of misconduct was
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
not a manifestation of the child’s
disability.
(D) How the child’s current
educational placement is or is not
substantially likely to result in injury to
the child or others.
(ix) The petition or request for an
expedited due process hearing must be
delivered to:
(A) The Director, DOHA, by mail to
P.O. Box 3656, Arlington, Virginia
22203, by fax to 703–696–1831, or email
to specialedcomplaint@osdgc.osd.mil.
Filing may also be made by hand
delivery to the office of the Director,
DOHA if approval from the Director,
DOHA is obtained in advance of
delivery.
(B) The respondent by mail, fax,
email, or hand delivery.
(1) If the petitioner is a parent of a
child (ages of 3–21, inclusive), or a child
(in the event that rights have been
transferred in accordance with
paragraph (b)(19) of this section, the
respondent is DoDEA and the petition
must be delivered to and received by the
principal of the school in which the
child is enrolled, or if the child is
enrolled in the Non-DoD School
Program (NDSP) to the DoDEA General
Counsel (generalcounsel@
hq.dodea.edu).
(2) If the petitioner is the parent of an
infant or toddler (birth to age 3), the
respondent is the responsible Military
Department and the petition must be
delivered to and received by the EDIS
manager.
(3) If the petitioner is the responsible
Military Department or DoDEA, the
petition must be delivered to and
received by the parent of the child.
(C) Filing of the due process petition
with DOHA is considered complete
when received by DOHA.
(x) The timelines for requesting and
conducting a due process hearing are:
(A) Timelines for Requesting a
Hearing. A petitioner may not allege a
violation that occurred more than 2
years before the date the petitioner
knew, or should have known, about the
alleged action that forms the basis of the
complaint, unless the parent was
prevented from requesting the hearing
due to:
(1) Specific misrepresentation by
DoDEA or EDIS that it had resolved the
problem forming the basis of the
complaint.
(2) The withholding of information by
DoDEA or EDIS from the petitioning
parent that was required to be provided
to the parent in accordance with the
IDEA and this part.
(B) Timeline for Conducting a Due
Process Hearing. Except as provided in
paragraph (d)(5)(x)(D) and (d)(8)(ii) of
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
this section, a hearing officer shall issue
findings of fact and conclusions of law
not later than 50 business days:
(1) In a case involving EDIS, following
the filing and service of a legally
sufficient petition or amended petition
in accordance with this section.
(2) In disputes involving a school and
a child age 3–21, inclusive, following
the filing and service of a legally
sufficient petition or amended petition
in accordance with this section and the
hearing officer’s receipt of notice that
the 30-day resolution period concluded
without agreement, the parties waived
the resolution meeting, or the parties
have concluded mediation in lieu of the
resolution process without reaching
agreement.
(C) Exceptions to the Timelines for
Conduct of a Hearing
(1) When the hearing officer grants a
request for discovery made by either
party, as provided for in paragraph
(d)(10) of this section, in which case the
time required for such discovery does
not count toward the 50 business days.
(2) When the hearing officer grants a
specific extension of time for good cause
in accordance with paragraph (d)(8) of
this section.
(D) Timeline for Conducting an
Expedited Hearing. (i) In the event of a
petition for expedited hearing is
requested, a DOHA hearing officer shall
arrange for the hearing to be held not
later than 20 school days (when school
is in session) of the date the request is
filed with DOHA, subject to the timeline
for scheduling a resolution meeting and
the 15 day resolution period
requirements of this section.
(ii) The hearing officer must make a
determination within 10 school days
after the hearing.
(6) Responses and Actions Required
Following Receipt of a Petition or
Request for Expedited Hearing. (i)
Immediately upon receipt of the
petition, the Director, DOHA, shall
appoint a hearing officer to take charge
of the case.
(A) The hearing officer shall
immediately notify the parties of his or
her appointment.
(B) Upon receipt of notice that a
hearing officer is appointed, the parties
shall communicate all motions,
pleadings, or amendments in writing to
the hearing officer, with a copy to the
opposing party, unless the hearing
officer directs otherwise.
(ii) Within 10 business days of receipt
of the petition (5 school days when
school is in session in the case of a
petition for an expedited hearing), the
respondent shall deliver a copy of the
written response to the petitioner and
file the original written response with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
the hearing officer. Filing may be made
by mail to P.O. Box 3656, Arlington,
Virginia 22203, by fax to 703–696–1831,
by hand delivery if approved in advance
by the hearing officer, or by email to
specialedcomplaint@osdgc.osd.mil. If a
hearing officer has not yet been
appointed, the respondent will deliver
the original written response to the
Director, DOHA in accordance with
paragraph (d)(5)(ix) of this section.
(iii) The respondent shall specifically
address the issues raised in the due
process hearing petition.
(iv) If the respondent is the cognizant
Military Department or DoDEA, the
response shall include:
(A) An explanation of why the
respondent proposed or refused to take
the action at issue in the due process
complaint.
(B) A description of each evaluation
procedure, assessment, record, or report
the DoD Component used as the basis
for the proposed or refused action.
(C) A description of the options that
the respondent considered and the
reasons why those options were
rejected.
(D) A description of the other factors
that are relevant to the respondent’s
proposed or refused action.
(v) The respondent may file a notice
of insufficient petition within 15
business days of receiving a petition if
the respondent wishes to challenge the
sufficiency of the petition for failure to
state the elements required by the IDEA.
Within 5 business days of receiving a
notice of insufficient petition, the
hearing officer will issue a decision and
will notify the parties in writing of that
determination.
(vi) A response to the petitioner shall
not be construed to preclude the
respondent from asserting that the
parents’ due process complaint was
insufficient.
(vii) Parties may amend a petition
only if:
(A) The other party consents in
writing to such amendment and is given
the opportunity to resolve the complaint
through the resolution process; or
(B) The hearing officer grants
permission, except that the hearing
officer may not grant such permission at
any time later than 5 days before a due
process hearing is scheduled to begin.
(viii) The filing of an amended
petition resets the timelines for:
(A) The conduct of a resolution
meeting and the resolution period
relating to the amended petition, and
(B) All deadlines for responses and
action required following the receipt of
the amended petition, and for
conducting a due process hearing on the
amended petition.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
76021
(7) Statutory Resolution Process. A
resolution meeting shall be convened by
DoDEA and a resolution period
afforded, in accordance with this
section, for any dispute in which a due
process petition has been filed regarding
the the identification, evaluation, or
educational placement, or the provision
of FAPE for children ages 3 to 21,
inclusive.
(i) Within 15 calendar days of
receiving the parent’s petition for due
process (7 calendar days in the case of
an expedited hearing), DoDEA, through
the pertinent school principal or
superintendent, shall convene a dispute
resolution meeting, which must be
attended by:
(A) The parents.
(B) A legal representative of the
parents if desired by the parents.
(C) A DoDEA official designated and
authorized by the District
Superintendent or Area Director to
exercise decision-making authority on
behalf of DoDEA.
(D) A DoDEA legal representative,
only if the parent is represented by
counsel at the resolution meeting.
(E) The relevant members of the
child’s CSC who have specific
knowledge of the facts identified in the
petition.
(ii) The parties may agree to mediate
in lieu of conducting a resolution
meeting or in lieu of completing the
resolution period. The resolution
meeting need not be held if the parties
agree in writing to waive the meeting or
agree to use the mediation process.
(iii) Failure to convene or participate
in resolution meeting.
(A) If DoDEA has offered to convene
a resolution meeting and has been
unable to obtain parental participation
in the resolution meeting after making
and documenting its reasonable efforts,
DoDEA may, at the conclusion of the
resolution period (30 days or 15 days in
the case of an expedited hearing)
request that a hearing officer dismiss the
parent’s due process complaint or
request for an expedited due process
hearing.
(B) If DoDEA fails to convene a
resolution meeting within 15 days of
receipt of a due process complaint or if
it fails to participate in the resolution
meeting, the parent may request the
hearing officer to immediately convene
the due process hearing without waiting
for the 30-day resolution period to
expire.
(iv) DoDEA shall have a 30-day
resolution period, counted from the
receipt of the complaint by the school
principal, (15 days in the case of an
expedited hearing request) within
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
76022
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
which to resolve the complaint to the
satisfaction of the parents.
(v) The resolution period may be
adjusted because of one of the following
events:
(A) Both parties agree in writing to
waive the resolution meeting.
(B) After the resolution meeting starts,
but before the end of the applicable
resolution period, the parties agree in
writing that no agreement is possible
and agree to waive the balance of the
resolution period.
(C) Both parties agree in writing to
continue the resolution meeting at the
end of the applicable resolution period,
but later the parent or the school
withdraws from the resolution process.
(vi) If a partial or complete resolution
to the dispute is reached at the
resolution meeting, the parties must
execute a written agreement that is:
(A) Signed by both the parents and a
representative of the school with
authority to bind the school to the terms
of the agreement.
(B) Legally enforceable in a U.S.
District Court of competent jurisdiction,
unless the parties have voided the
agreement within an agreement review
period of 3 business days following the
execution of the agreement.
(vii) Discussions held, minutes,
statements, and other records of a
resolution meeting, and any final
executed resolution agreement are not
presumed confidential and therefore are
discoverable and admissible in a due
process proceeding, appeal proceeding,
or civil proceeding, except when the
parties have agreed to confidentiality.
(viii) If DoDEA has not resolved the
complaint to the satisfaction of the
parents at the expiration of the
resolution period or the adjusted
resolution period, if applicable:
(A) DoDEA shall provide written
notice to the hearing officer, copy to the
parents, within 3 business days (1
business day in the case of an expedited
hearing) of the expiration of the
resolution period or adjusted resolution
period that the parties failed to reach
agreement.
(B) Upon receipt of that notification
by the hearing officer, all of the
applicable timelines for proceeding to a
due process hearing under this section
shall commence.
(ix) If the parties execute a binding
written agreement at the conclusion of
the resolution period, and do not
subsequently declare it void during the
3-business day agreement review
period, then:
(A) DoDEA shall provide written
notice to the hearing officer, copy to the
parents, at the conclusion of the
agreement review period that the parties
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
have reached an agreement for
resolution of complaints set forth in the
due process petition.
(B) Upon receipt of that notification
by the presiding hearing officer, no due
process hearing shall proceed on the
issues resolved.
(8) The Due Process Hearing. (i)
Purpose. The purpose of the due process
hearing is to establish the relevant facts
necessary for the hearing officer to reach
a fair and impartial determination of the
case.
(ii) Hearing Officer Duties. The
hearing officer shall be the presiding
officer, with judicial powers to manage
the proceeding and conduct the hearing.
Those powers shall include, but are not
limited to, the authority to:
(A) Determine the adequacy of
pleadings.
(B) Decide whether to allow
amendment of pleadings, provided
permission is granted to authorize the
amendment not later than 5 days before
a due process hearing occurs.
(C) Rule on questions of timeliness
and grant specific extension of time for
good cause either on his or her own
motion or at the request of either party.
(1) Good cause includes the time
required for mediation in accordance
with paragraph (d)(4) of this section
where the parties have jointly requested
an extension of time in order to
complete mediation.
(2) If the hearing officer grants an
extension of time, he or she shall
identify the length of the extension and
the reason for the extension in the
record of the proceeding. Any such
extension shall be excluded from the
time required to convene a hearing or
issue a final decision, and at the
discretion of the hearing officer may
delay other filing dates specified by this
section.
(D) Rule on requests for discovery and
discovery disputes.
(E) Order an evaluation of the child at
the expense of the DoDEA school
system or the Military Department
concerned.
(F) Rule on evidentiary issues.
(G) Ensure a full and complete record
of the case is developed.
(H) Decide when the record in a case
is closed.
(I) Issue findings of fact and
conclusions of law.
(J) Issue a decision on substantive
grounds based on a determination of
whether the child received a FAPE.
When the petition alleges a procedural
violation, a hearing officer may find that
a child did not receive a FAPE only if
the procedural inadequacies:
(1) Impeded the child’s right to a
FAPE;
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(2) Significantly impeded the parent’s
opportunity to participate in the
decision-making process regarding the
provision of FAPE to the child; or
(3) Caused a deprivation of
educational benefits.
(K) Order such relief as is necessary
for the child to receive a FAPE or
appropriate EIS, including ordering the
DoDEA school system or the responsible
Military Department to:
(1) Correct a procedural deficiency
that caused a denial of a FAPE or
appropriate EIS;
(2) Conduct evaluations or
assessments and report to the hearing
officer;
(3) Change the school-aged child’s
placement or order the child to an AES
for up to 45 days;
(4) Provide EIS or specific school-age
educational or related services to a child
to remedy a denial of FAPE, including
compensatory services when
appropriate and in accordance with the
current early intervention or
educational program; or
(5) Placement of a school-aged child
in an appropriate residential program
for children with disabilities at DoD
expense, when appropriate under the
law and upon a determination that
DoDEA has failed to provide and cannot
provide an otherwise eligible child with
a FAPE at the appropriate DoD facility.
(i) A residential program must be one
that can address the specific needs of
the child as determined by the DoDEA
school.
(ii) The program should, whenever
possible, be located near members of the
child’s family.
(9) Attendees at the Hearing.
Attendance at the hearing is limited to:
(i) The parents and the counsel or
personal representative of the parents.
(ii) A representative of DoDEA or the
EDIS concerned and the counsel
representing DoDEA or the EDIS.
(iii) Witnesses for the parties,
including but not limited to the
professional employees of DoDEA or the
EDIS concerned and any expert
witnesses.
(iv) A person qualified to transcribe or
record the proceedings.
(v) Other persons with the agreement
of the parties or the order of the hearing
officer, in accordance with the privacy
interests of the parents and the
individual with disabilities.
(10) Discovery. (i) Full discovery shall
be available, with the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, Rules 26–37, 28 U.S.C.
appendix, serving as a guide to parties
to a due process hearing or conducted
in accordance with this part.
(ii) If voluntary discovery cannot be
accomplished, a party seeking discovery
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
may file a motion with the hearing
officer to accomplish discovery. The
hearing officer shall grant an order to
accomplish discovery upon a showing
that the document or information sought
is relevant or reasonably calculated to
lead to the discovery of admissible
evidence. An order granting discovery,
or compelling testimony or the
production of evidence shall be
enforceable by all reasonable means
within the authority of the hearing
officer, to include the exclusion of
testimony or witnesses, adverse
inferences, and dismissal or summary
judgment.
(iii) Records compiled or created in
the regular course of business, which
have been provided to the opposing
party at least 5 business days prior to
the hearing, may be received and
considered by the hearing officer
without authenticating witnesses.
(iv) A copy of the written or electronic
transcription of a deposition taken by a
Military Department or DoDEA shall be
made available by the Military
Department or DoDEA without charge to
the opposing party.
(11) Right to an Open Hearing. The
parents, or child who has reached the
age of majority, have the right to an
open hearing upon waiving, in writing,
their privacy rights and those of the
individual with disabilities who is the
subject of the hearing.
(12) Location of Hearing. Subject to
modification by the hearing officer for
good cause shown or upon the
agreement of the parties, the hearing
shall be held:
(i) In the DoDEA school district
attended by the child (ages 3 through
21, inclusive):
(ii) On the military installation of the
EDIS serving infants and toddlers with
disabilities; or
(iii) At a suitable video
teleconferencing facility convenient for
the parents of the child involved in the
hearing and available for the duration of
a hearing.
(13) Witnesses and Documentary
Evidence. (i) At least 5 business days
prior to a hearing, the parties shall
exchange lists of all documents and
materials that each party intends to use
at the hearing, including all evaluations
and reports. Each party also shall
disclose the names of all witnesses it
intends to call at a hearing along with
a proffer of the anticipated testimony of
each witness.
(ii) At least 10 business days prior to
a hearing, each party must provide the
name, title, description of professional
qualifications, and summary of
proposed testimony of any expert
witness it intends to call at the hearing.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
(iii) Failure to disclose documents,
materials, or witnesses may result in the
hearing officer barring their
introduction at the hearing.
(iv) Parties must limit evidence to the
issues specifically pleaded, except by
order of the hearing officer or with the
consent of the parties.
(v) The rules of evidence shall be
relaxed to permit the development of a
full evidentiary record with the Federal
Rules of Evidence, 28 U.S.C. appendix,
serving as guide.
(vi) All witnesses testifying at the
hearing shall be advised by the hearing
officer that under 18 U.S.C. 1001, it is
a criminal offense to knowingly and
willfully make a materially false,
fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
representation to a department or
agency of the U.S. Government as to any
matter within the jurisdiction of that
department or agency, and may result in
a fine or imprisonment.
(vii) A party calling a witness shall
bear the witness’ travel and incidental
expenses associated with testifying at
the hearing. The DoDEA school system
or the Military Department concerned
shall pay such expenses if a witness is
called by the hearing officer.
(viii) The parties shall have the right
to cross-examine witnesses testifying at
the hearing.
(ix) The hearing officer may issue an
order compelling a party to make a
specific witness employed by or under
control of the party available for
testimony at the party’s expense or to
submit specific documentary or
physical evidence for inspection by the
hearing officer or for submission into
the record on motion of either party or
on the hearing officer’s own motion.
(x) When the hearing officer
determines that a party has failed to
obey an order to make a specific witness
available for testimony or to submit
specific documentary or physical
evidence in accordance with the hearing
officer’s order, and that such failure is
in knowing and willful disregard of the
order, the hearing officer shall so certify
as a part of the written record in the case
and may order appropriate sanctions.
(14) Transcripts. (i) A verbatim
written transcription of any deposition
taken by a party shall be provided to the
opposing party in hardcopy written
format or as attached to an electronic
email with prior permission of the
recipient. If a Military Department or
DoDEA takes a desposition, the
verbatim written transcript of that
deposition shall be provided to the
parent(s) without charge.
(ii) A verbatim written transcription
of the due process hearing shall be
arranged by the hearing officer and shall
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
76023
be made available to the parties in
hardcopy written format, or as an
attachment to an electronic email, with
prior permission of the recipient, on
request and without cost to the
parent(s), and a copy of the verbatim
written transcript of the hearing shall
become a permanent part of the record
(15) Hearing Officer’s Written
Decision. (i) The hearing officer shall
make written findings of fact and
conclusions of law and shall set forth
both in a written decision addressing
the issues raised in the due process
complaint, the resolution of those
issues, and the rationale for the
resolution.
(ii) The hearing officer’s decision of
the case shall be based on the record,
which shall include the petition, the
answer, the transcript of the hearing,
exhibits admitted into evidence,
pleadings or correspondence properly
filed and served on all parties, and such
other matters as the hearing officer may
include in the record, if such matter is
made available to all parties before the
record is closed.
(iii) The hearing officer shall file the
written decision with the Director,
DOHA, and additionally provide the
Director, DOHA with a copy of that
decision from which all personally
identifiable information has been
redacted.
(iv) The Director, DOHA, shall
forward to parents and to the DoDEA or
the EDIS concerned, copies, unredacted
and with all personally identifiable
information redacted, of the hearing
officer’s decision.
(v) The decision of the hearing officer
shall become final unless a timely
notice of appeal is filed in accordance
with paragraph (d)(17) of this section.
(vi) The DoDEA or the EDIS
concerned shall implement the decision
as soon as practicable after it becomes
final.
(16) Determination Without Hearing.
(i) At the request of a parent of an infant
or toddler, birth to 3 years of age, when
EIS are at issue, or of a parent of a child
age 3 through 21, inclusive, or child
who has reached the age of majority,
when special education (including
related services) are at issue, the
requirement for a hearing may be
waived, and the case may be submitted
to the hearing officer on written
documents filed by the parties. The
hearing officer shall make findings of
fact and conclusions of law and issue a
written decision within the period fixed
by paragraph (d)(5)(x) of this section.
(ii) DoDEA or the EDIS concerned
may oppose a request to waive a
hearing. In that event, the hearing
officer shall rule on the request.
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
76024
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(iii) Documentary evidence submitted
to the hearing officer in a case
determined without a hearing shall
comply with the requirements of
paragraph (d)(13) of this section. A party
submitting such documents shall
provide copies to all other parties.
(17) Appeal of Hearing Officer
Decision. (i) A party may appeal the
hearing officer’s findings of fact and
decision by filing a written notice of
appeal within 15 business days of
receipt of the hearing officer’s decision
with the Chairperson, DOHA Appeal
Board by mail to P.O. Box 3656,
Arlington, Virginia 22203, by fax to
703–696–1831, by email to
specialedcomplaint@osdgc.osd.mil, or
by hand delivery to the office of the
Chairperson, DOHA Appeal Board if
approval from the Chairperson, DOHA
Appeal Board is obtained in advance of
delivery. The notice of appeal must
contain the appealing party’s
certification that a copy of the notice of
appeal has been provided to the other
party by mail.
(ii) Within 30 business days of filing
the notice of appeal, the appealing party
shall file a written statement of issues
and arguments on appeal with the
Chairperson, DOHA Appeal Board by
mail to P.O. Box 3656, Arlington,
Virginia 22203, by fax to 703–696–1831,
by email to specialedcomplaint@
osdgc.osd.mil, or by hand delivery to
the office of the Chairperson, DOHA
Appeal Board if approval from the
Chairperson, DOHA Appeal Board is
obtained in advance of filing. The
appealing party shall deliver a copy to
the other party by mail.
(iii) The non-appealing party shall file
any reply within 20 business days of
receiving the appealing party’s
statement of issues and arguments on
appeal with the Chairperson, DOHA
Appeal Board by mail to P.O. Box 3656,
Arlington, Virginia 22203, by fax to
703–696–1831, by email to
specialedcomplaint@osdgc.osd.mil, or
by hand delivery to the office of the
Chairperson, DOHA Appeal Board if
approval from the Chairperson, DOHA
Appeal Board is obtained in advance of
filing. The non-appealing party shall
deliver a copy of the reply to the
appealing party by mail.
(iv) Appeal filings with DOHA are
complete upon transmittal. It is the
burden of the appealing party to provide
timely transmittal to and receipt to
DOHA.
(v) The DOHA Appeal Board, shall
issue a decision on all parties’ appeals
within 45 business days of receipt of the
matter.
(vi) The determination of the DOHA
Appeal Board shall be a final
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
administrative decision and shall be in
written form. It shall address the issues
presented and set forth a rationale for
the decision reached. A determination
denying the appeal of a parent in whole
or in part shall state that the parent has
the right, in accordance with the IDEA,
to bring a civil action on the matters in
dispute in a district court of the United
States of competent jurisdiction without
regard to the amount in controversy.
(vii) No provision of this part or other
DoD guidance may be construed as
conferring a further right of
administrative review. A party must
exhaust all administrative remedies
afforded by this section before seeking
judicial review of a determination.
(18) Maintenance of Current
Educational Placement. (i) Except when
a child is in an interim AES for
disciplinary reasons, during the
pendency of any proceeding conducted
pursuant to this section, unless the
school and the parents otherwise agree,
the child will remain in the then current
educational placement.
(ii) When the parent has appealed a
decision to place a child in an interim
AES, the child shall remain in the
interim setting until the expiration of
the prescribed period or the hearing
officer makes a decision on placement,
whichever occurs first, unless the parent
and the school agree otherwise.
(19) General Hearing Administration.
The Director, DOHA, shall:
(i) Exercise administrative
responsibility for ensuring the
timeliness, fairness, and impartiality of
the hearing and appeal procedures to be
conducted in accordance with this
section.
(ii) Appoint hearing officers from the
DOHA Administrative judges who shall:
(A) Be attorneys who are active
members of the bar of the highest court
of a State, U.S. Commonwealth, U.S.
Territory, or the District of Columbia
and permitted to engage in the active
practice of law, who are qualified in
accordance with DoD Instruction
1442.02 (see https://www.dtic.mil/whs/
directives/corres/pdf/144202p.pdf).
(B) Possess the knowledge of and
ability to:
(1) Understand the provisions of the
IDEA and this part, and related Federal
regulations and legal interpretations of
those regulations by Federal courts.
(2) Conduct hearings in accordance
with appropriate, standard legal
practice.
(3) Render and write decisions in
accordance with the requirements of
this part.
(C) Be disqualified from presiding in
any individual case if the hearing
officer:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(1) Has a personal or professional
interest that conflicts with the hearing
officer’s objectivity in the hearing.
(2) Is a current employee of, or
military member assigned to, DoDEA or
the Military Medical Department
providing services in accordance with
the IDEA and this part.
(20) Publication and Reporting of
Final Decisions. The Director, DOHA,
shall ensure that hearing officer and
appeal board decisions in cases arising
in accordance with this section are
published and indexed with all
personally identifiable information
redacted to protect the privacy rights of
the parents who are parties in the due
process hearing and the children of such
parents, in accordance with 32 CFR part
310.
(21) Civil Actions. Any party
aggrieved by the final administrative
decision of a due process complaint
shall have the right to file a civil action
in a district court of the United States
of competent jurisdiction, without
regard to the amount in controversy.
The party bringing the civil action shall
have 90 days from the date of the
decision of the hearing officer or, if
applicable, the date of the decision of
the DOHA Appeal Board, to file a civil
action.
(e) DoD–CC on Early Intervention,
Special Education, and Related Services
(1) Committee Membership. The DoD–
CC shall meet at least annually to
facilitate collaboration in early
intervention, special education, and
related services in the Department of
Defense. The Secretary of Defense shall
appoint representatives to serve on the
DoD–CC who shall be full-time or
permanent part-time government
employees or military members from:
(i) USD(P&R), who shall serve as the
Chair.
(ii) Secretaries of the Military
Departments.
(ii) TRICARE Management Activity.
(iv) DoDEA.
(v) GC, DoD.
(2) Responsibilities. The
responsibilities of the DoD–CC include:
(i) Implementation of a
comprehensive, multidisciplinary
program of EIS for infants and toddlers
with disabilities and their families.
(ii) Provision of a FAPE, including
special education and related services,
for children with disabilities who are
enrolled full-time in the DoDEA school
system, as specified in their IEP.
(iii) Designation of a subcommittee on
compliance to:
(A) Advise and assist the USD(P&R) in
the performance of his or her
responsibilities.
(B) At the direction of the USD(P&R),
advise and assist the Military
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Departments and DoDEA in the
coordination of services among
providers of early intervention, special
education, and related services.
(C) Monitor compliance in the
provision of EIS for infants and toddlers
and special education and related
services for children ages 3 to 21,
inclusive.
(D) Identify common concerns,
facilitate coordination of effort, and
forward issues requiring resolution to
the USD(P&R).
(E) Assist in the coordination of
assignments of sponsors who have
children with disabilities who are or
who may be eligible for special
education and related services through
DoDEA or EIS through the Military
Departments.
(F) Perform other duties as assigned
by the USD(P&R), including oversight
for monitoring the delivery of services
consistent with the IDEA and this part.
(f) Monitoring.
(1) Program Monitoring and
Oversight.
(i) The USD(P&R) shall monitor the
implementation of the provisions of the
IDEA and this part in the programs
operated by the Department of Defense.
The USD(P&R) will carry out his or her
responsibilities under this section
primarily through the DoD–CC.
(ii) The primary focus of monitoring
shall be on:
(A) Improving educational results and
functional outcomes for all children
with disabilities.
(B) Ensuring the DoD programs meet
the requirements of the IDEA and this
part.
(iii) Monitoring shall include the
following priority areas and any
additional priority areas identified by
the USD(P&R):
(A) Provision of a FAPE in the LRE
and the delivery of early intervention
services.
(B) Child-find.
(C) Program management.
(D) The use of dispute resolution
including administrative complaints,
due process and the mandatory
resolution process, and voluntary
mediation.
(E) A system of transition services.
(iv) The USD(P&R) shall develop
quantifiable indicators in each of the
priority areas and such qualitative
indicators necessary to adequately
measure performance.
(v) DoDEA and the Military
Departments shall establish procedures
for monitoring special services and
reviewing program compliance in
accordance with the requirements of
this section.
(vi) By January 1 of each calendar
year, the DoD–CC shall identify any
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
additional information required to
support compliance activities that will
be included in the next annual
compliance report to be submitted no
later than September 30 of that year.
The results of monitoring program areas
described in paragraph (f)(1)(iii) of this
section shall be reported in a manner
that does not result in the disclosure of
data identifiable to individual children.
(2) Compliance Reporting. The
Director, DoDEA, and the Military
Departments shall submit reports to the
DoD–CC not later than September 30
each year that summarize the status of
compliance. The reports shall:
(i) Identify procedures conducted at
headquarters and at each subordinate
level, including on-site visits, to
evaluate compliance with the IDEA and
this part.
(ii) Summarize the findings and
indicate the status of program
compliance.
(iii) Describe corrective actions
required of the programs that did not
meet the requirements of the IDEA and
this part and identify the technical
assistance that was or shall be provided
to ensure compliance.
(iv) Include applicable data on the
operation of special education and early
intervention in the Department of
Defense. Data must be submitted in the
format required by the DoD–CC to
enable the aggregation of data across
components. March 31 shall be the
census date for counting children for the
reporting period that begins on July 1
and ends on June 30 of the following
year.
(3) School Level Reporting. (i) The
reporting requirements for school aged
children (3 through 21, inclusive) with
disabilities shall also include:
(A) Data to determine if significant
disproportionality based on race and
ethnicity is occurring with respect to:
(1) The identification of school-aged
children as children with disabilities
including the identification of children
as children with disabilities affected by
a particular impairment described in
paragraph (g) of this section.
(2) The placement of these children in
particular educational settings.
(3) The incidence, duration, and type
of disciplinary suspensions and
expulsions.
(4) Removal to an interim AES, the
acts or items precipitating those
removals, and the number of children
with disabilities who are subject to longterm suspensions or expulsions.
(5) The number and percentage of
school-aged children with disabilities,
by race, ethnicity, limited English
proficiency status, gender, and
disability category, who are:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
76025
(i) Receiving special education and
related services.
(ii) Participating in regular education.
(iii) In separate classes, separate
schools or facilities, or public or private
residential facilities.
(B) The number of due process
complaints requested, the number of
hearings conducted, and the number of
changes in placement ordered as a result
of those hearings.
(C) The number of mediations held
and the number of settlement
agreements reached through such
mediations.
(ii) For each year of age from age 16
through 21, children who stopped
receiving special education and related
services because of program completion
(including graduation with a regular
secondary school diploma) or other
reasons, and the reasons why those
children stopped receiving special
education and related services.
(4) Early Intervention Reporting. The
reporting requirements for infants and
toddlers with disabilities shall also
include:
(i) Data to determine if significant
disproportionality based on race,
gender, and ethnicity is occurring with
respect to infants and toddlers with
disabilities who:
(A) Received EIS by criteria of
developmental delay or a high
probability of developing a delay.
(B) Stopped receiving EIS because of
program completion or for other
reasons.
(C) Received EIS in natural
environments.
(D) Received EIS in a timely manner
as defined in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(ii) The number of due process
complaints requested and the number of
hearings conducted.
(iii) The number of mediations held
and the number of settlement
agreements reached through such
mediations.
(5) USD(P&R) Oversight. (i) On behalf
of the USD(P&R), the DoD–CC shall
make or arrange for periodic visits, not
less than annually, to selected programs
to ensure the monitoring process is in
place; validate the compliance data and
reporting; and address select focus areas
identified by the DoD–CC and priority
areas identified in paragraph (f)(1) of
this section. The DoD–CC may use other
means in addition to periodic visits to
ensure compliance with the
requirements established in this part.
(ii) The DoD–CC shall identify
monitoring team members to conduct
monitoring activities.
(iii) For DoD–CC monitoring visits,
the Secretaries of the Military
Departments shall:
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
76026
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(A) Provide necessary technical
assistance and logistical support to
monitoring teams during monitoring
visits to facilities for which they are
responsible.
(B) Provide necessary travel funding
and support for their respective team
members.
(C) Cooperate with monitoring teams,
including making all pertinent records
available to the teams.
(D) Promptly implement monitoring
teams’ recommendations concerning
early intervention and related services
for which the Secretary concerned has
responsibility, including those to be
furnished through an inter-Service
agreement.
(iv) For DoD–CC monitoring visits, the
Director, DoDEA, shall:
(A) Provide necessary technical
assistance and logistical support to
monitoring teams during monitoring
visits to facilities for which he or she is
responsible.
(B) Cooperate with monitoring teams,
including making all pertinent records
available to the teams.
(C) Promptly implement monitoring
teams’ recommendations concerning
special education and related services
for which the DoDEA school system
concerned has responsibility.
(v) The ASD(HA) shall provide
technical assistance to the DoD
monitoring teams when requested.
(vi) The GC, DoD shall:
(A) Provide legal counsel to the
USD(P&R), and, where appropriate, to
DoDEA, monitored agencies, and
monitoring teams regarding monitoring
activities conducted pursuant to this
part.
(B) Provide advice about the legal
requirements of this part and Federal
law to the DoDEA school systems,
military medical commanders, military
installation commanders, and to other
DoD personnel as appropriate, in
connection with monitoring activities
conducted pursuant to this part.
(g) Types of Disabilities (1) Autism
Spectrum Disorder. A developmental
disability significantly affecting verbal
and nonverbal communication and
social interaction that adversely affects
a child’s educational performance.
Other characteristics often associated
with autism are engagement in
repetitive activities and stereotyped
movements, resistance to environmental
change or change in daily routines, and
unusual responses to sensory
experiences. Essential features are
typically but not necessarily manifested
before age 3. Autism may include
autism spectrum disorders such as but
not limited to autistic disorder,
pervasive developmental disorder not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
otherwise specified, and Asperger’s
syndrome. The term does not apply if a
child’s educational performance is
adversely affected primarily because the
child has an emotional disturbance.
(2) Deafness. A hearing loss or deficit
so severe that it impairs a child’s ability
to process linguistic information
through hearing, with or without
amplification, and affects the child’s
educational performance adversely.
(3) Deaf-Blindness. A combination of
hearing and visual impairments causing
such severe communication,
developmental, and educational
problems that the child cannot be
accommodated in a program specifically
for the deaf or a program specifically for
the blind.
(4) Developmental Delay. A
significant discrepancy, as defined and
measured in accordance with this part
and confirmed by clinical observation
and judgment, in the actual functioning
of an infant, toddler, or child, birth
through age 7, when compared with the
functioning of a non-disabled infant,
toddler, or child of the same
chronological age in any of the
following developmental areas:
physical, cognitive, communication,
social or emotional. A child determined
to have a developmental delay before
the age of 7 may maintain that eligibility
through age 9.
(i) Significant Discrepancy. The child
is experiencing a developmental delay
of two standard deviations below the
mean as measured by diagnostic
instruments and procedures in at least
one area; a 25 percent delay in at least
one developmental area on assessment
instruments that yield scores in months;
a developmental delay of 1.5 standard
deviations below the mean as measured
by diagnostic instruments and
procedures in two or more areas; or a 20
percent delay in two or more
developmental areas on assessment
instruments that yield scores in months.
(ii) High Probability for
Developmental Delay. An infant or
toddler, birth up to age 3, with a
diagnosed physical or mental condition
that places the infant or toddler at
substantial risk of evidencing a
developmental delay without the benefit
of EIS. Includes conditions such as
chromosomal abnormalities; genetic or
congenital disorders; severe sensory
impairments; inborn errors of
metabolism; disorders reflecting
disturbance of the development of the
nervous system; congenital infections;
and disorders secondary to exposure to
toxic substances, including fetal alcohol
syndrome.
(5) Emotional Disturbance. A
condition confirmed by clinical
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
evaluation and diagnosis and that, over
a long period of time and to a marked
degree, adversely affects educational
performance and exhibits one or more of
the following characteristics:
(i) Inability to learn that cannot be
explained by intellectual, sensory, or
health factors.
(ii) Inability to build or maintain
satisfactory interpersonal relationships
with peers and teachers.
(iii) Inappropriate types of behavior or
feelings under normal circumstances.
(iv) A tendency to develop physical
symptoms or fears associated with
personal or school problems.
(v) A general pervasive mood of
unhappiness or depression. Includes
children who are schizophrenic, but
does not include children who are
socially maladjusted unless it is
determined they are emotionally
disturbed.
(6) Hearing Impairment. An
impairment in hearing, whether
permanent or fluctuating, that adversely
affects a child’s educational
performance but is not included under
the definition of deafness.
(7) Intellectual Disability.
Significantly below-average general
intellectual functioning, existing
concurrently with deficits in adaptive
behavior. This disability is manifested
during the developmental period and
adversely affects a child’s educational
performance.
(8) Orthopedic Impairment. A severe
orthopedic impairment that adversely
affects a child’s educational
performance. That term includes
congenital impairments such as club
foot or absence of some member;
impairments caused by disease, such as
poliomyelitis and bone tuberculosis;
and impairments from other causes such
as cerebral palsy, amputations, and
fractures or burns causing contractures.
(9) Other Health Impairment. Limited
strength, vitality, or alertness including
a heightened alertness to environmental
stimuli, that results in limited alertness
with respect to the educational
environment, that due to chronic or
acute health problems that adversely
affect a child’s educational performance.
Such impairments may include, but are
not necessarily limited to, attention
deficit disorder, attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder, heart condition,
tuberculosis, rheumatic fever, nephritis,
asthma, sickle cell anemia, hemophilia,
seizure disorder, lead poisoning,
leukemia, or diabetes.
(10) Specific Learning Disability. A
disorder in one or more of the basic
psychological processes involved in
understanding or in using spoken or
written language that may manifest
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
itself as an imperfect ability to listen,
think, speak, read, write, spell,
remember, or do mathematical
calculations. That term includes such
conditions as perceptual disabilities,
brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction,
dyslexia, and developmental aphasia.
This term does not include learning
problems that are primarily the result of
visual, hearing, or motor disabilities;
mental retardation; emotional
disturbance; or environmental, cultural,
or economic differences.
(11) Speech or Language
Impairments. (i) Communication
disorder is characterized by stuttering,
impaired articulation, voice
impairment, or a disorder in the
receptive or expressive areas of language
that adversely affects a child’s
educational performance.
(ii) Articulation disorder is
characterized by substitutions,
distortions, and/or omissions of
phonemes that are not commensurate
with expected developmental age
norms, that are not the result of limited
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:33 Dec 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
English proficiency or dialect
difference, and that may cause
unintelligible conversational speech.
(iii) Fluency disorder is characterized
by atypical rate, rhythm, repetitions,
and/or secondary behaviors that
interfere with communication or is
inconsistent with age or development.
(iv) Language and phonological
disorders are characterized by an
impairment or delay in receptive or
expressive language including
semantics, morphology and syntax,
phonology, or pragmatics. This
impairment does not include students
whose language problems are due to
English being their second language or
dialect differences.
(v) Voice disorder is characterized by
abnormal pitch, intensity, resonance,
duration, or quality that are
inappropriate for chronological age or
gender.
(12) Traumatic Brain Injury. An
acquired injury to the brain caused by
an external physical force resulting in
total or partial functional disability or
psychosocial impairment (or both) that
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
76027
adversely affects educational
performance. Includes open or closed
head injuries resulting in impairments
in one or more areas including
cognition, language, memory, attention,
reasoning, abstract thinking, judgment,
problem solving, sensory, perceptual
and motor abilities, psychosocial
behavior, physical function, information
processing, and speech. The term does
not include brain injuries that are
congenital or degenerative or brain
injuries that are induced by birth
trauma.
(13) Visual Impairment, Including
Blindness. An impairment of vision
that, even with correction, adversely
affects a child’s educational
performance. That term includes both
partial sight and blindness.
Dated: December 5, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013–29433 Filed 12–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
E:\FR\FM\13DEP2.SGM
13DEP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 240 (Friday, December 13, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 75997-76027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29433]
[[Page 75997]]
Vol. 78
Friday,
No. 240
December 13, 2013
Part III
Department of Defense
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office of the Secretary
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
32 CFR Part 57
Provision of Early Intervention and Special Education Services to
Eligible DoD Dependents; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 78 , No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 75998]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 57
[Docket ID: DOD-2011-OS-0095]
RIN 0790-AI77
Provision of Early Intervention and Special Education Services to
Eligible DoD Dependents
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule reissues the current regulations and
establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and implements the non-
funding and non-reporting provisions of chapter 33 of 20 U.S.C., ``The
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA),'' in DoD for:
provision of early intervention services (EIS) to infants and toddlers
with disabilities and their families, as well as special education and
related services to children with disabilities entitled under this part
to receive education services from the DoD; implementation of a
comprehensive, multidisciplinary program of EIS for infants and
toddlers with disabilities and their families who, but for age, are
eligible to be enrolled in DoD schools; provision of a free appropriate
public education (FAPE), including special education and related
services, for children with disabilities, as specified in their
individualized education programs (IEP), who are eligible to enroll in
DoD schools; and monitoring of DoD programs providing EIS, and special
education and related services for compliance with this part; and
establishes a DoD Coordinating Committee to recommend policies and
provide compliance oversight for early intervention and special
education.
DATES: Comments must be received by February 11, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or
RIN number and title, by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark
Center Drive, 2nd Floor, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-
3100.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lorie A. Sebestyen, 703-588-0254.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Purpose of the Regulatory Action
a. This proposed rule would revise the current regulations in 32
CFR part 57 to incorporate the 2004 amendments to the IDEA and would
establish other policy and assign responsibilities to implement the
non-funding and non-reporting provisions of Parts B and C of the IDEA.
Under 10 U.S.C. 2164(f) and 20 U.S.C. 927(c), DoD implements, within
the DoD school system, the Department of Defense Education Activity
(DoDEA), the applicable statutory provisions of Parts B and C of the
IDEA, other than the funding and reporting provisions. This proposed
rule brings the DoD into compliance with the requirements of the non-
funding and non-reporting provisions of IDEA by updating and amending
the DoD implementation of the IDEA within the DoD school system. The
revisions will ensure that eligible children with disabilities are
afforded the services and safeguards as required by applicable
statutory provisions of IDEA. The IDEA regulations in 34 CFR parts 300
and 303, which apply to States that receive funds from the U.S.
Department of Education under IDEA Parts B and C, do not apply to the
DoD school systems as DoD does not receive funds under the IDEA.
Nothing in the proposed regulations in 32 CFR part 57 would affect the
applicability of the U.S. Department of Education's regulations
implementing IDEA in 34 CFR parts 300 and 303.
b. The authority for the proposed regulatory changes to 32 CFR part
57 is 10 U.S.C. 2164, 20 U.S.C. 921-932 and chapter 33, which is
codified at 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.
II. Summary of the Major Provisions of the Regulatory Action in
Question
This proposed rule identifies the services and procedural
safeguards afforded to DoD dependent infants and toddlers and their
families who are eligible for early intervention services under the
IDEA and this part; identifies the services and procedural safeguards
afforded to DoD dependent children with disabilities age 3-21
(inclusive) who are eligible for a free and appropriate public
education under the IDEA and this part; outlines procedures and
timelines for the transition of young children from early intervention
services to school-based preschool services; identifies the procedures
available for resolution of disputes regarding the provision of early
intervention services, or special education and related services;
establishes early intervention and special education monitoring and
reporting requirements; and establishes procedures within the DoD for
implementing the applicable statutory provisions of the IDEA and this
part.
III. Costs and Benefits
The provision of early intervention and special education, and
related services is funded through Congressional appropriations to the
DoD. The Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) and the
medical elements of the Military Departments, which are responsible for
providing services to children with special needs, receive their
funding from DoD. DoDEA funding is in Defense-wide, Operation and
Maintenance funds. The cost of the special education program is
included in the combined DoDEA/Military Departments cost that is used
to operate all parts of the educational program. The approximate cost
for the special education program for FY2011 was $107,851,606.94. Total
includes cost for personnel (salaries/benefits), contracts, travel, and
equipment/supplies.
The approximate cost for the provision of early intervention and
related services by the Military Departments is $32,000,000 annually.
Total includes cost for personnel, travel, professional development,
and materials/supplies.
This rule updates DoD guidance to reflect the current version of
the requirements resulting from the non-funding and non-reporting
provisions of the IDEA, thereby ensuring that eligible infants and
toddlers and children with disabilities, including those of military
families, are aware of and provided the services and safeguards
required by federal statute. The non-funding and non-reporting
provisions of the IDEA are the substantive rights, protections, and
procedural safeguards that apply to DoD. These are applicable as
opposed to the ``funding'' and `reporting' provisions because DoD
schools and child development centers do not receive funding from the
US Department of Education and therefore, the IDEA statutory reporting
and related funding provisions do not apply to DoD.
[[Page 75999]]
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 57 does not:
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy; a section of the
economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public
health or safety; or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another Agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
these Executive Orders.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 57 does not contain a
Federal mandate that may result in expenditure by State, local and
tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. 601)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 57 is not subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it would not, if
promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 57 does impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
These reporting requirements have been approved by OMB and assigned OMB
Control Number 0704-0411.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 57 does not have federalism
implications, as set forth in Executive Order 13132. This rule does not
have substantial direct effects on:
(1) The States;
(2) The relationship between the National Government and the
States; or
(3) The distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of Government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 57
Education of individuals with disabilities, Elementary and
secondary education, Government employees, Military personnel.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 57 is proposed to be revised to read as
follows:
PART 57--PROVISION OF EARLY INTERVENTION AND SPECIAL EDUCATION
SERVICES TO ELIGIBLE DOD DEPENDENTS
Sec.
57.1 Purpose.
57.2 Applicability.
57.3 Definitions.
57.4 Policy.
57.5 Responsibilities.
57.6 Procedures.
Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2164, 20 U.S.C. 921-932 and chapter 33.
Sec. 57.1 Purpose.
(a) This part:
(1) Establishes policy and assigns responsibilities to implement,
other than the funding and reporting provisions, chapter 33 of 20
U.S.C. (also known and hereinafter referred to in this Part as
``Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)'') in DoD,
including DoD schools, pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 927(c) and 10 U.S.C. 2164
(f):
(i) Provision of early intervention services (EIS) to infants and
toddlers with disabilities and their families, as well as special
education and related services to children with disabilities entitled
under this part to receive education services from the DoD in
accordance with 20 U.S.C. 921-932, 10 U.S.C. 2164, and DoD Directive
1342.20 (see https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/134220p.pdf), and the IDEA.
(ii) Implementation of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary program
of EIS for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their DoD
civilian-employed and military families.
(iii) Provision of a free appropriate public education (FAPE),
including special education and related services for children with
disabilities who are eligible to enroll in DoDEA schools, as specified
in their respective individualized education programs (IEP).
(iv) Monitoring of DoD programs providing EIS, or special education
and related services for compliance with this part.
(2) Establishes a DoD Coordinating Committee to recommend policies
and provide compliance oversight for early intervention and special
education.
(3) Authorizes the issuance of other guidance as necessary.
(b) Reserved.
Sec. 57.2 Applicability.
This part applies to:
(a) Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), the Military
Departments, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the
Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies,
the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities in the
DoD (hereinafter referred to collectively as the ``DoD Components'').
(b) Eligible infants, toddlers, and children receiving or entitled
to receive early intervention services (EIS) or special education and
related services from the DoD, whose parents have not elected voluntary
enrollment in a non-Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA)
school.
(c) All schools operated under the oversight of the DoDEA,
including:
(1) Domestic Dependent Elementary and Secondary Schools (DDESS)
operated by the DoD pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 2164.
(2) Department of Defense Dependents Schools (DoDDS) operated by
the DoD pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 921-932 (hereinafter referred to as
``overseas'' schools).
(d) Does not create any substantive rights or remedies not
otherwise authorized by the IDEA or other relevant law; and may not be
relied upon by any person, organization, or other entity to allege a
denial of substantive rights or remedies not otherwise authorized by
the IDEA or other relevant law.
Sec. 57.3 Definitions.
Unless otherwise noted, these terms and their definitions are for
the purpose of this part.
Age of majority. The age when a person acquires the rights and
responsibilities of being an adult. For purposes of this part, a child
attains majority at age 18, unless the child has been determined by a
court of competent jurisdiction to be incompetent, or if the child has
not been determined to be incompetent, he or she is incapable of
providing informed consent with respect to his or her educational
program.
Alternate assessment. A process that measures the performance of
students with disabilities unable to participate, even with appropriate
accommodations provided as necessary and as determined by their
respective CSC, in a system-wide assessment.
Alternative educational setting (AES). A temporary setting in or
out of the school, other than the setting normally
[[Page 76000]]
attended by the student (e.g., alternative classroom, home setting,
installation library) determined by school authorities as the
appropriate learning environment for a student because of learning or
behavioral issues.
Assessment for early intervention. The ongoing procedures used by
appropriately qualified personnel throughout the period of a child's
eligibility determination to identify the child's unique needs; the
family's strengths and needs related to development of the child; and
the nature and extent of early intervention services (EIS) that are
needed by the child and the child's family to meet their unique needs.
Also may include reviewing pertinent records and conducting
observations.
Assistive technology device. Any item, piece of equipment, or
product system, whether acquired commercially or off the shelf,
modified, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve
functional capabilities of children with disabilities. This term does
not include a medical device that is surgically implanted or the
replacement of that device.
Assistive technology service. Any service that directly assists an
individual with a disability in the selection, acquisition, or use of
an assistive technology device. The term includes: evaluating the needs
of an individual with a disability, including a functional evaluation
in the individual's customary environment; purchasing, leasing, or
otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices
by individuals with disabilities; selecting, designing, fitting,
customizing, adapting, applying, maintaining, repairing, or replacing
assistive technology devices; coordinating and using other therapies,
interventions, or services with assistive technology devices, such as
those associated with existing educational and rehabilitative plans and
programs; training or technical assistance for an individual with
disabilities or the family of an individual with disabilities; and
training or technical assistance for professionals (including
individuals providing educational rehabilitative services), employers,
or other individuals who provide services to, employ, or are otherwise
substantially involved in the major life functions of an individual
with a disability.
Case study committee (CSC). A school-level multidisciplinary team,
including the child's parents, responsible for making educational
decisions concerning a child with a disability.
Child-find. An outreach program used by DoDEA, the Military
Departments, and the other DoD Components to locate, identify, and
evaluate children from birth to age 21, inclusive, who may require EIS
or special education and related services. All children who are
eligible to attend a DoD school under 20 U.S.C. 921-932 or 10 U.S.C.
2164 fall within the scope of the DoD child-find responsibilities.
Child-find activities include the dissemination of information to
Service members, DoD employees, and parents of students eligible to
enroll in DoDEA schools; the identification and screening of children;
and the use of referral procedures.
Children with disabilities. Children, ages 3 through 21, inclusive,
who are entitled to enroll, or are enrolled, in a DoD school in
accordance with 20 U.S.C. 921-932 and 10 U.S.C. 2164, have not
graduated from high school or completed the General Education Degree,
have one or more disabilities in accordance with section 1401(3) of the
IDEA, and need and qualify for special education and related services.
Complainant. Person making an administrative complaint.
Comprehensive system of personnel development (CSPD). A system of
personnel development that is developed in coordination with the
Military Departments and the Director, DoDEA. CSPD is the training of
professionals, paraprofessionals, and primary referral source personnel
with respect to the basic components of early intervention, special
education, and related services. CSPD may also include implementing
innovative strategies and activities for the recruitment and retention
of personnel providing special education and related services, ensuring
that personnel requirements are established and maintaining
qualifications to ensure that personnel necessary to carry out the
purposes of this part are appropriately and adequately prepared to
provide special education and related services. Training of personnel
may include working within the military and with military families, the
emotional and social development of children, and transition services
from early intervention to preschool and transitions within educational
settings and to post-secondary environments.
Consent. The permission obtained from the parent ensuring they are
fully informed of all information about the activity for which consent
is sought, in his or her native language or in another mode of
communication if necessary, and that the parent understands and agrees
in writing to the implementation of the activity for which permission
is sought.
Continuum of alternative placements. Instruction in general
education classes, special classes, special schools, home instruction,
and instruction in hospitals and institutions; includes provision for
supplementary services (such as resource room or itinerant instruction)
to be provided in conjunction with regular class placement.
Controlled substance. As defined in Sections 801-971 of title 21,
United States Code (also known as the ``Controlled Substances Act, as
amended'').
Day. A calendar day, unless otherwise indicated as a business day
or a school day.
(1) Business day. Monday through Friday except for Federal and
State holidays.
(2) School day. Any day, including a partial day, that children are
in attendance at school for instructional purposes. School day has the
same meaning for all children in school, including children with and
without disabilities.
Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA). The Department of
Defense Education Activity is a DoD Field Activity under the direction,
operation, and control of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel
& Readiness (USD)(P&R) and Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness
& Force Management (ASD)(R&FM). The mission of DoDEA is to provide an
exemplary education by effectively and efficiently planning, directing,
and overseeing the management, operation, and administration of the DoD
Domestic Dependent Elementary and Secondary Schools (DDESS) and the DoD
Dependents Schools (DoDDS), which provide instruction from kindergarten
through grade 12 to eligible dependents.
Department of Defense Dependents Schools (DoDDS). The overseas
schools (kindergarten through grade 12) established in accordance with
20 U.S.C. 921-932.
Department of Defense Education Activity School. A DDESS or DoDDS
school operated under the oversight of DoDEA.
Developmental delay. A significant discrepancy, as defined and
measured by implementing guidance authorized by this part and confirmed
by clinical observation and judgment, in the actual functioning of an
infant, toddler, or child, birth through age 7, when compared with the
functioning of a non-disabled infant, toddler, or child of the same
chronological age in any of the following developmental areas:
Physical, cognitive, communication,
[[Page 76001]]
social or emotional, or adaptive. A child determined to have a
developmental delay before the age of 7 may maintain that eligibility
through age 9.
DoD school systems. The school systems established under the
authorities of 20 U.S.C. 921-932 and 10 U.S.C. 2164.
Domestic Dependent Elementary and Secondary Schools (DDESS). The
schools (pre-kindergarten through grade 12) established in accordance
with 10 U.S.C. 2164.
Early intervention service provider. An individual that provides
early intervention services in accordance with this part.
Educational and Developmental Intervention Services (EDIS).
Programs operated by the Military Departments to provide EIS to
eligible infants and toddlers with disabilities, and related services
to eligible children with disabilities in accordance with this part.
EIS. Developmental services for infants and toddlers with
disabilities, as defined in this part, that are provided under the
supervision of a Military Department, including evaluation,
individualized family service plan (IFSP) development and revision, and
service coordination, provided at no cost to the child's parents
(except for incidental fees also charged to children without
disabilities).
Extended school year (ESY) services. Special education and related
services that are provided to a child with a disability beyond the
normal DoDEA school year, in accordance with the child's IEP, are at no
cost to the parents, and meet the standards of the DoDEA school system.
Evaluation: The method used by a multidisciplinary team to conduct
and review the assessments of the child and other relevant input to
determine whether a child has a disability and a child's initial and
continuing need to receive EIS or special education and related
services.
FAPE. Special education and related services that are provided
under the general supervision and direction of DoDEA at no cost to
parents of a child with a disability, in conformity with an IEP in
accordance with the requirements of the IDEA and DoD guidance.
Functional behavioral assessment. A process for identifying the
events that predict and maintain patterns of problem behavior.
General education curriculum. The curriculum adopted by the DoDEA
school systems for all children from preschool through secondary
school. To the extent applicable to an individual child with a
disability, the general education curriculum can be used in any
educational environment along a continuum of alternative placements.
IDEA. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C.
1400 et seq., is the federal law that governs the provision of early
intervention and special education and related services to eligible
children with disabilities.
IEP. A written document that is developed, reviewed, and revised at
a meeting of the CSC, identifying the required components of the
individualized education program for a child with a disability.
Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP). A written document
identifying the specially designed services for an infant or toddler
with a disability and the family of such infant or toddler.
Independent educational evaluation (IEE). An evaluation conducted
by a qualified examiner who is not an EDIS examiner or an examiner
funded by the DoDEA school who conducted the evaluation with which the
parent is in disagreement.
Infants and toddlers with disabilities. Children from birth up to 3
years of age, inclusive, who need EIS because
(1) They are experiencing developmental delays as measured by
appropriate diagnostic instruments and procedures, in one or more of
the following areas: cognitive development, physical development
including vision and hearing, communication development, social or
emotional development, adaptive development; or
(2) They have a diagnosed physical or mental condition that has a
high probability of resulting in developmental delay.
Inter-component. Cooperation among DoD organizations and programs,
ensuring coordination and integration of services to infants, toddlers,
children with disabilities, and their families.
Manifestation determination. The process in which the CSC reviews
all relevant information and the relationship between the child's
disability and the child's behavior to determine whether the behavior
is a manifestation of the child's disability and to identify what
disciplinary proceedings will be permissible under IDEA and this
part.'' Mediation. A confidential, voluntary, informal dispute
resolution process that is provided at no charge to the parents,
whether or not a due process petition has been filed, in which the
disagreeing parties engage in a discussion of issues related to the
provision of the child's EIS or special education and related services
in accordance with the requirements of IDEA and this part, in the
presence of, or through, a qualified and impartial mediator who is
trained in effective mediation techniques.
Medical services. Those evaluative, diagnostic, and therapeutic,
services provided by a licensed and credentialed medical provider to
assist providers of EIS, regular and special education teachers, and
providers of related services to develop and implement IFSPs and IEPs.
Multidisciplinary. The involvement of two or more disciplines or
professions in the integration and coordination of services, including
evaluation and assessment activities and development of an IFSP or an
IEP.
Native language. When used with reference to an individual of
limited English proficiency, the home language normally used by such
individuals, or in the case of a child, the language normally used by
the parents of the child.
Natural environment. A setting, including home and community, in
which children without disabilities participate.
Non-academic and extracurricular services and activities. Services
and activities including counseling services; athletics,
transportation, health services; recreational activities; special
interest groups or clubs sponsored by the DoDEA school system; and
referrals to agencies that provide assistance to individuals with
disabilities and employment of students, including employment by a
public agency and assistance in making outside employment available.
Non-DoD placement. An assignment by the DoDEA school system of a
child with a disability to a non-DoDEA school or facility.
Non-DoD school or facility. A public or private school or other
educational program not operated by DoD.
Parent. The natural, adoptive, or foster parent of a child, a
guardian, an individual acting in the place of a natural or adoptive
parent with whom the child lives, or an individual who is legally
responsible for the child's welfare if that person contributes at least
one-half of the child's support.
Personally identifiable information. Information that would make it
possible to identify the infant, toddler, or child with reasonable
certainty. Information includes: the name of the child, the child's
parent or other family member; the address of the child; a personal
identifier, such as the child's social security number or student
number; or a list of personal characteristics or other information that
would make it possible to identify the child with reasonable certainty.
[[Page 76002]]
Primary referral source. Parents and the DoD Components, including
child development centers, pediatric clinics, and newborn nurseries,
that suspect an infant or toddler has a disability and bring the child
to the attention of the EDIS.
Psychological services. Psychological services include:
Administering psychological and educational tests and other assessment
procedures; interpreting assessment results; obtaining, integrating and
interpreting information about child behavior and conditions relating
to learning; consulting with other staff members in planning school
programs to meet the special educational needs of children as indicated
by psychological tests, interviews, direct observations, and behavioral
evaluations; planning and managing a program of psychological services,
including psychological counseling for children and parents; and
assisting in developing positive behavioral intervention strategies.
Public awareness program. Activities or print materials focusing on
early identification of infants and toddlers with disabilities.
Materials may include information prepared and disseminated by a
military medical department to all primary referral sources and
information for parents on the availability of EIS. Procedures to
determine the availability of information on EIS to parents are also
included in that program.
Qualified. A person who meets the DoD-approved or recognized
certification, licensing, or registration requirements or other
comparable requirements in the area in which the person provides
evaluation or assessment, EIS, special education or related services to
an infant, toddler, or child with a disability.
Rehabilitation counseling. Services provided by qualified personnel
in individual or group sessions that focus specifically on career
development, employment preparation, achieving independence, and
integration in the workplace and community of the student with a
disability. The term also includes vocational rehabilitation services
provided to a student with disabilities by vocational rehabilitation
programs funded in accordance with the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29
U.S.C. chapter 16.
Related services. Transportation and such developmental,
corrective, and other supportive services, as required, to assist a
child with a disability to benefit from special education under the
child's IEP. The term includes speech-language pathology and audiology;
interpreting services; psychological services; physical and
occupational therapy; recreation including therapeutic recreation;
social work services; and school nurse services designed to enable a
child with a disability to receive a FAPE as described in the child's
IEP; early identification and assessment of disabilities in children;
counseling services including rehabilitation counseling; orientation
and mobility services; and psychological and medical services for
diagnostic, evaluative, and consultative purposes. The term does not
include a medical device that is surgically implanted or the
replacement of such.
Related services assigned to the Military Departments. Medical and
psychological services, audiology, and optometry for diagnostic or
evaluative purposes to determine whether a particular child has a
disability, the type and extent of the disability, and the child's
eligibility to receive special services. In the overseas and domestic
areas, transportation is provided as a related service by the Military
Department when transportation is prescribed in an IFSP for an infant
or toddler, under 3 years of age, with disabilities.
Resolution meeting. The meeting between parents and relevant school
personnel, which must be convened within a specified number of days
after receiving notice of a due process complaint and prior to the
initiation of a due process hearing, in accordance with the IDEA and
this part. The purpose of the meeting is for the parent to discuss the
due process complaint and the facts giving rise to the complaint so
that the school has the opportunity to resolve the complaint.
Resolution period. That period of time following a resolution
meeting, the length of which is defined in this part, during which the
school is afforded an opportunity to resolve the parent's concerns
before the dispute can proceed to a due process hearing.
Separate facility. A school or a portion of a school, regardless of
whether it is operated by DoD, attended exclusively by children with
disabilities.
Serious bodily injury. A cut, abrasion, bruise, burn, illness, or
any other injury to the body, which involves a substantial risk of
death; extreme physical pain; protracted and obvious disfigurement; or
protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member,
organ, or mental faculty.
Service coordination. Activities of a service coordinator to assist
and enable an infant or toddler and the family to receive the rights,
procedural safeguards, and services that are authorized to be provided.
Special education. Specially designed instruction, which is
provided at no cost to the parents, to meet the unique needs of a child
with a disability, including instruction conducted in the classroom, in
the home, in hospitals and institutions, and in other settings; and
instruction in physical education.
Specially designed instruction. An instruction whose content,
methodology, or delivery has been adapted to address the unique needs
of an eligible child in accordance with this part; and that ensures
access of the child to the general curriculum, so that she or he can
meet the educational standards within the DoDEA school systems.
Supplementary aids and services. Include aids, services, and other
supports that are provided in regular education classes, other
educational-related settings, and in extracurricular and nonacademic
settings to enable children with disabilities to be educated with non-
disabled children to the maximum extent appropriate.
Transition services. A coordinated set of activities for a child
with a disability that is designed to be within a results-oriented
process, that is focused on improving the academic and functional
achievement of the child with a disability to facilitate the child's
movement from school to post-school activities, including post-
secondary education, vocational education, integrated employment
(including supported employment), continuing and adult education, adult
services, independent living, or community participation, and is based
on the individual child's needs, taking into account the child's
strengths, preferences, and interests.
Transportation. A service that includes transportation and related
costs, including the cost of mileage or travel by taxi, common carrier,
tolls, and parking expenses, that are necessary to: enable an eligible
child with a disability and the family to receive EIS, when prescribed
in a child's IFSP; enable an eligible child with a disability to
receive special education and related services, when prescribed as a
related service by the child's IEP; and enable a child to obtain an
evaluation to determine eligibility for special education and related
services, if necessary. It also includes specialized equipment,
including special or adapted buses, lifts, and ramps needed to
transport children with disabilities.
Weapon. Defined in Department of Defense Education Activity
Regulation 2051.1 (see https://www.dodea.edu/foia/iod/pdf/2051_1a.pdf).
[[Page 76003]]
Sec. 57.4 Policy.
It is DoD policy that:
(a) Infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families who
(but for the children's age) would be entitled to enroll in a DoDEA
school in accordance with 20 U.S.C. 921-932 or 10 U.S.C. 2164 shall be
provided EIS.
(b) The DoD shall engage in child-find activities for all children
age birth to 21, inclusive, who are entitled by 20 U.S.C. 921-932 or 10
U.S.C. 2164 to enroll or are enrolled in a DoDEA school.
(c) Children with disabilities who meet the enrollment eligibility
criteria of 20 U.S.C. 921-932 or 10 U.S.C. 2164 shall be provided a
FAPE in the least restrictive environment, including if appropriate to
the needs of the individual child, placement in a residential program
for children with disabilities in accordance with the child's IEP and
at no cost to the parents.
(d) The Military Departments and DoDEA shall cooperate in the
delivery of related services prescribed by section 1401(26) of the IDEA
and this part as may be required to assist eligible children with
disabilities to benefit from special education.
(e) Children with disabilities who are eligible to enroll in a
DoDEA school in accordance with 20 U.S.C. 921-932 or 10 U.S.C. 2164
shall not be entitled to provision of a FAPE by DoDEA, or to the
procedural safeguards prescribed by this part in accordance with the
IDEA, if:
(1) The sponsor is assigned to an overseas area where a DoDEA
school is available within the commuting area of the sponsor's overseas
assignment, but the sponsor does not elect to enroll the child in a
DoDEA school for reasons other than DoDEA's alleged failure to provide
a FAPE; or
(2) The sponsor is assigned in the United States or in a U.S.
territory, commonwealth, or possession and the sponsor's child meets
the eligibility requirements for enrollment in a DoDEA school, but the
sponsor does not elect to enroll the child in a DoDEA school for
reasons other than DoDEA's alleged failure to provide a FAPE.
Sec. 57.5 Responsibilities.
(a) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness and Force
Management (ASD(R&FM)) under the authority, direction, and control of
the (USD(P&R)) shall:
(1) Establish, in accordance with DoD Instruction 5105.18 (see
https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/510518p.pdf), a DoD
Coordinating Committee to recommend policies regarding the provision of
early intervention and special education services.
(2) Ensure the development, implementation and administration of a
system of services for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their
families and children with disabilities; and provide compliance
oversight for early intervention and special education in accordance
with DoD Directive 5124.02 (see https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/512402p.pdf); 20 U.S.C. 921-932; the applicable statutory
provision of the IDEA; 10 U.S.C. 2164; DoD Directive 1342.20 and
implementing guidance authorized by this part.
(3) Oversee DoD Component collaboration on the provision of
services and transition support to infants, toddlers, and school-aged
children.
(4) Develop a DoD-wide comprehensive child-find system to identify
eligible infants, toddlers, and children ages birth through 21 years,
inclusive, who may require early intervention or special education
services, in accordance with the IDEA.
(5) Develop and provide guidance as necessary for the delivery of
services for children with disabilities and for the protection of
procedural rights consistent with the IDEA and implementing guidance
authorized by this part.
(6) Coordinate with the Secretaries of the Military Departments to
ensure that their responsibilities, as detailed in paragraph (f) of
this section, are completed.
(7) Direct the development and implementation of a comprehensive
system of personnel development (CSPD) for personnel serving infants
and toddlers with disabilities and their families, and children with
disabilities.
(8) Develop requirements and procedures for compiling and reporting
data on the number of eligible infants and toddlers with disabilities
and their families in need of EIS and children in need of special
education and related services.
(9) Require DoDEA schools provide educational information for
assignment coordination and enrollment in the Services' Exceptional
Family Member Program or Special Needs Program consistent with DoD
Instruction 1315.19 (see https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/131519p.pdf).
(10) Identify representatives to serve on the Department of Defense
Coordinating Committee on Early Intervention, Special Education, and
Related Services (DoD-CC).
(11) Ensure delivery of appropriate early intervention and
educational services to eligible infants, toddlers, and children, and
their families as appropriate pursuant to the IDEA and this part
through onsite monitoring of special needs programs and submission of
an annual compliance report.
(b) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs
(ASD(HA)), under the authority, direction, and control of the USD(P&R),
shall:
(1) Advise the USD(P&R) and consult with the General Counsel of the
Department of Defense (GC, DoD) regarding the provision of EIS and
related services.
(2) Oversee development of provider workload standards and
performance levels to determine staffing requirements for EIS and
related services. The standards shall take into account the provider
training needs, the requirements of this part, and the additional time
required to provide EIS and related services in schools and the natural
environments, and for the coordination with other DoD Components.
(3) Establish and maintain an automated data system to support the
operation and oversight of the Military Departments' delivery of EIS
and related services.
(4) Assign geographical areas of responsibility for providing EIS
and related services under the purview of healthcare providers to the
Military Departments. Periodically review the alignment of geographic
areas to ensure that resource issues (e.g., base closures) are
considered in the cost-effective delivery of services.
(5) Establish a system for measuring EIS program outcomes for
children and their families.
(6) Resolve disputes among the DoD Components providing EIS.
(c) The Director, Tricare Management Activity, under the authority,
direction, and control of the ASD(HA), shall identify representatives
to serve on the DoD-CC.
(d) The Director, DoD Education Activity (DoDEA), under the
authority, direction, and control of the USD(P&R), and through the
ASD(R&FM), in accordance with DoD Directive 5124.02, shall ensure that:
(1) Children who meet the enrollment eligibility criteria of 20
U.S.C. 921-932 or 10 U.S.C. 2164 are identified and referred for
evaluation if they are suspected of having disabilities, and are
afforded appropriate procedural safeguards in accordance with the IDEA
and implementing guidance authorized by this part.
(2) Children who meet the enrollment eligibility criteria of 20
U.S.C. 921-932 or 10 U.S.C. 2164 shall be evaluated in accordance with
the IDEA and implementing guidance authorized by
[[Page 76004]]
this part, as needed. If found eligible for special education and
related services, they shall be provided a FAPE in accordance with an
IEP, with services delivered in the least restrictive environment and
procedural safeguards in accordance with the requirements of the IDEA
and implementing guidance authorized by this part.
(3) Records are maintained on the special education and related
services provided to children in accordance with this part, pursuant to
32 CFR part 310.
(4) Related services as prescribed in an IEP for a child with
disabilities enrolled in a DoDEA school in the United States, its
territories, commonwealths, or possessions are provided by DoDEA.
(5) Transportation is provided by DoDEA in overseas and domestic
areas as a related service to children with disabilities when
transportation is prescribed in a child's IEP. The related service of
transportation includes necessary accommodations to access and leave
the bus and to ride safely on the bus and transportation between the
child's home, the DoDEA school, or another location, as specified in
the child's IEP.
(6) Appropriate personnel participate in the development and
implementation of a CSPD.
(7) Appropriate written guidance is issued to implement the
requirements pertaining to special education and related services under
20 U.S.C. 921-932, 10 U.S.C. 2164, and the IDEA.
(8) Activities to identify and train personnel to monitor the
provision of services to eligible children with disabilities are
funded.
(9) DoDEA schools that operate pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 921-932 and 10
U.S.C. 2164 conduct child find activities for all eligible children;
(10) A free appropriate public education (FAPE) is made available
to children who are entitled to enroll in DoDEA schools under the
enrollment eligibility criteria of 10 U.S.C. 2164 or 20 U.S.C. 921-932.
However, a FAPE, or the procedural safeguards prescribed by the IDEA
and this part, shall NOT be available to such children, if:
(i) The sponsor who is assigned to an overseas area elects not to
enroll his or her child in a DoDEA school overseas where a DoDEA school
is available within the commuting area of the sponsor's overseas
assignment; or
(ii) The sponsor is assigned in the United States or in a U.S.
territory, commonwealth, or possession and the sponsor's child meets
the eligibility requirements for enrollment in a DoDEA school, but the
sponsor does not elect to enroll the child in a DoDEA school for
reasons other than DoDEA's alleged failure to provide a FAPE.
(11) The educational needs of children with and without
disabilities are met comparably, in accordance with Sec. 57.6 (b) of
this part.
(12) Educational facilities and services (including the start of
the school day and the length of the school year) operated by DoDEA for
children with and without disabilities are comparable.
(13) All programs providing special education and related services
are monitored for compliance with this part and with the substantive
rights, protections, and procedural safeguards of the IDEA and this
part at least once every 3 years.
(14) A report to the USD(P&R) is submitted not later than September
30 of each year certifying whether all schools are in compliance with
the IDEA and this part, and are affording children with disabilities
the substantive rights, protections, and procedural safeguards of the
IDEA and this part.
(15) Transition assistance is provided in accordance with IDEA and
this part to promote movement from early intervention or preschool into
the school setting.
(16) Transition services are provided in accordance with IDEA and
this part to facilitate the child's movement into different educational
settings and post-secondary environments.
(e) The GC, DoD shall identify representatives to serve on the DoD-
CC.
(f) The Secretaries of the Military Departments shall:
(1) Establish educational and developmental intervention services
(EDIS) to ensure infants and toddlers with disabilities are identified
and provided EIS where appropriate, and are afforded appropriate
procedural safeguards in accordance with the requirements of the IDEA
and implementing guidance authorized by this part.
(2) Staff EDIS with appropriate professional staff, based on the
services required to serve children with disabilities.
(3) Provide related services required to be provided by a Military
Department in accordance with the mandates of this part for children
with disabilities. In the overseas areas served by DoDEA schools, the
related services required to be provided by a Military Department under
an IEP necessary for the student to benefit from special education
include medical services for diagnostic or evaluative purposes; social
work; community health nursing; dietary, audiological, optometric, and
psychological testing and therapy; occupational therapy; and physical
therapy. Transportation is provided as a related service by the
Military Department when it is prescribed in a child's IFSP for an
infant or toddler birth up to 3 years of age, inclusive, with
disabilities. Related services shall be administered in accordance with
guidance issued pursuant to this part, including guidance from the
ASD(HA) on staffing and personnel standards.
(4) Issue implementing guidance and forms necessary for the
operation of EDIS in accordance with this part.
(5) Provide EIS to infants and toddlers with disabilities and their
families, and related services to children with disabilities as
required by this part at the same priority that medical care is
provided to active duty military members.
(6) Provide counsel from the Military Department concerned or
request counsel from the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA)
to represent the Military Department in impartial due process hearings
and administrative appeals conducted in accordance with this part for
infants and toddlers birth up to 3 years of age (inclusive) with
disabilities who are eligible for EIS.
(7) Execute Departmental responsibilities under the Exceptional
Family Member program (EFMP) prescribed by DoD Instruction 1315.19.
(8) Train command personnel to fully understand their legal
obligations to ensure compliance with and provide the services required
by this part.
(9) Fund activities to identify and train personnel to monitor the
provision of services to eligible children with disabilities.
(10) Require the development of policies and procedures for
providing, documenting, and evaluating EDIS, including EIS and related
services provided to children receiving special education in a DoDEA
school.
(11) Maintain EDIS to provide necessary EIS to eligible infants and
toddlers with disabilities and related services to eligible children
with disabilities in accordance with this part and the substantive
rights, protections, and procedural safeguards of the IDEA, Sec.
57.6(a) and Sec. 57.6(c) of this part.
(12) Implement a comprehensive, coordinated, inter-component,
community-based system of EIS for eligible infants and toddlers with
disabilities and their families using the procedures established in
Sec. 57.6 (a) of this part and guidelines from the ASD(HA) on staffing
and personnel standards.
[[Page 76005]]
(13) Provide transportation for EIS pursuant to the IDEA and this
part.
(14) Provide transportation for children with disabilities pursuant
to the IDEA and this part. The Military Departments are to provide
transportation for a child to receive medical or psychological
evaluations at a medical facility in the event that the local servicing
military treatment facility (MTF) is unable to provide such services
and must transport the child to another facility.
(15) Require that EDIS programs maintain the components of an EIS
as required by the IDEA and this part, to include:
(i) A comprehensive child-find system, including a system for
making referrals for services that includes timelines and provides for
participation by primary referral sources, and that establishes
rigorous standards for appropriately identifying infants and toddlers
with disabilities for services.
(ii) A public awareness program focusing on early identification of
infants and toddlers with disabilities to include:
(A) Preparation of information materials for parents regarding the
availability of EIS, especially to inform parents with premature
infants or infants with other physical risk factors associated with
learning or developmental complications.
(B) Dissemination of those materials to all primary referral
sources, especially hospitals and physicians, for distribution to
parents.
(C) A definition of developmental delay, consistent with Sec.
57.6(g) of this part, to be used in the identification of infants and
toddlers with disabilities who are in need of services.
(D) Availability of appropriate EIS.
(iii) A timely, comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation of the
functioning of each infant or toddler and identification of the needs
of the child's family to assist appropriately in the development of the
infant or toddler.
(iv) Procedures for development of an Individualized Family Service
Plan (IFSP) and coordination of EIS for families of eligible infants
and toddlers with disabilities.
(v) A system of EIS designed to support infants and toddlers and
their families in the acquisition of skills needed to become
functionally independent and to reduce the need for additional support
services as toddlers enter school.
(vi) A central directory of information on EIS resources and
experts available to military families.
(16) Implement a comprehensive system of personnel development
consistent with the requirements of the IDEA and this part.
(17) Require that EDIS participate in the existing MTF quality
assurance program, which monitors and evaluates the medical services
for children receiving such services as described by this part.
Generally accepted standards of practice for the relevant medical
services shall be followed, to the extent consistent with the
requirements of the IDEA and this part including provision of EIS in a
natural environment, to ensure accessibility, acceptability, and
adequacy of the medical portion of the program provided by EDIS.
(18) Require transition services to promote movement from early
intervention, preschool, and other educational programs into different
educational settings and post-secondary environments.
(19) Direct that each program providing EIS is monitored for
compliance with this part, and with the substantive rights,
protections, and procedural safeguards of the IDEA, at least once every
3 years.
(20) Submit a report to the USD(P&R) not later than September 30 of
each year stating whether all EDIS programs are in compliance with this
part and are affording infants and toddlers the substantive rights,
protections, and procedural safeguards of the IDEA, as stated in Sec.
57.6(f) of this part.
(21) Compile and report EDIS workload and compliance data using the
system established by the ASD(HA) as stated in Sec. 57.6(f).
(g) The Director, DOHA, under the authority, direction, and control
of the GC, DoD/Director, Defense Legal Services Agency, shall:
(1) Ensure impartial due process hearings are provided in
accordance with the IDEA and implementing guidance authorized by this
part with respect to complaints related to special education and
related services arising under the IDEA.
(2) Ensure DOHA Department Counsel represents DoDEA in all due
process proceedings arising under the IDEA for children age 3 through
21 who are eligible for special education and related services.
(3) Ensure DOHA Department Counsel, upon request by a Military
Department, represents the Military Department in due process
proceedings arising under the IDEA for infants and toddlers birth up to
3 years of age with disabilities who are eligible for EIS.
(4) Ensure the DOHA Center for Alternative Dispute Resolution
(CADR) maintains a roster of mediators qualified in special education
disputes and, when requested, provides a mediator for complaints
related to special education and related services arising under the
IDEA.
Sec. 57.6 Procedures.
(a) Procedures for the Provision of EIS for Infants and Toddlers
with Disabilities.
(1) General. (i) There is an urgent and substantial need to:
(A) Enhance the development of infants and toddlers with
disabilities to minimize their potential for developmental delay and to
recognize the significant brain development that occurs during a
child's first 3 years of life.
(B) Reduce educational costs by minimizing the need for special
education and related services after infants and toddlers with
disabilities reach school age.
(C) Maximize the potential for individuals with disabilities to
live independently.
(D) Enhance the capacity of families to meet the special needs of
their infants and toddlers with disabilities.
(ii) All procedures and services within EIS must be in accordance
with the IDEA and the provisions of this part.
(2) Identification and Screening. (i) Each Military Department
shall develop and implement in its assigned geographic area a
comprehensive child-find and public awareness program, pursuant to the
IDEA and this part, that focuses on the early identification of infants
and toddlers who are eligible to receive EIS pursuant to this part.
(ii) The military treatment facility (MTF) and Family Advocacy
Program must be informed that EDIS will accept direct referrals for
infants and toddlers from birth up to 3 years of age who are:
(A) Involved in a substantiated case of child abuse or neglect; or
(B) Identified as affected by illegal substance abuse or withdrawal
symptoms resulting from prenatal drug exposure.
(iii) All other DoD Components will refer infants and toddlers with
suspected disabilities to EDIS in collaboration with the parents.
(iv) Upon receipt of a referral, EDIS shall appoint a service
coordinator.
(v) All infants and toddlers referred to the EDIS for EIS shall be
screened to determine the appropriateness of the referral and to guide
the assessment process.
(A) Screening does not constitute a full evaluation. At a minimum,
screening shall include a review of the medical and developmental
history of the referred infant or toddler through a
[[Page 76006]]
parent interview and a review of medical records.
(B) If screening is conducted prior to the referral, or if there is
a substantial or obvious biological risk, a screening following the
referral may not be necessary.
(C) If EDIS determines that an evaluation is not necessary based on
screening results, EDIS will provide written notice to the parents in
accordance with paragraph (a)(9) of this section.
(3) Assessment and Evaluation.
(i) Assessments and Evaluations. The assessment and evaluation of
each infant and toddler must:
(A) Be conducted by a multidisciplinary team.
(B) Include:
(1) A review of records related to the infant's or toddler's
current health status and medical history.
(2) An assessment of the infant's or toddler's needs for EIS based
on personal observation of the child by qualified personnel.
(3) An evaluation of the infant's or toddler's level of functioning
in each of the following developmental areas, including a
multidisciplinary assessment of the unique strengths and needs of the
child and the identification of services appropriate to meet those
needs.
(i) Cognitive development.
(ii) Physical development, including functional vision and hearing.
(iii) Communication development.
(iv) Social or emotional development.
(v) Adaptive development.
(4) Informed clinical opinion of qualified personnel if the infant
or toddler does not qualify based on standardized testing and there is
probable need for services.
(ii) Family Assessments
(A) Family assessments must include consultation with the family
members.
(B) If EDIS conducts an assessment of the family, the assessment
must:
(1) Be voluntary on the part of the family.
(2) Be conducted by personnel trained to utilize appropriate
methods and procedures.
(3) Be based on information provided by the family through a
personal interview.
(4) Incorporate the family's description of its resources,
priorities, and concerns related to enhancing the infant's or toddler's
development.
(iii) Standards for Assessment Selection and Procedures. EDIS shall
ensure, at a minimum, that:
(A) Evaluators administer tests and other evaluations in the native
language of the infant or toddler, or the family's native language, or
other mode of communication, unless it is clearly not feasible to do
so.
(B) Assessment, evaluation procedures, and materials are selected
and administered so as not to be racially or culturally discriminatory.
(C) No single procedure is used as the sole criterion for
determining an infant's or toddler's eligibility under this part.
(D) Qualified personnel conduct evaluations and assessments.
(iv) Delivery of Intervention Services. With parental consent, the
delivery of intervention services may begin before the completion of
the assessment and evaluation when it has been determined by a
multidisciplinary team that the infant or toddler or the infant's or
toddler's family needs the service immediately. Although EDIS has not
completed all assessments, EDIS must develop an IFSP before the start
of services and complete the remaining assessments in a timely manner.
(4) Eligibility. (i) The EIS team shall meet with the parents and
determine eligibility. The EIS team shall document the basis for
eligibility in an eligibility report and provide a copy to the parents.
(ii) Infants and toddlers from birth up to 3 years of age with
disabilities are eligible for EIS if they meet one of the following
criteria:
(A) The infant or toddler is experiencing a developmental delay.
(B) The infant or toddler has a diagnosed physical or mental
condition that has a high probability of resulting in developmental
delay.
(5) Timelines. (i) EIS shall complete the initial evaluation and
assessment of each infant and toddler (including the family assessment)
in a timely manner ensuring that the timeline in paragraph (a)(6)(ii)
of this section is met.
(ii) The Military Department responsible for providing EIS shall
develop procedures requiring that, if circumstances make it impossible
to complete the evaluation and assessment within a timely manner (e.g.,
if an infant or toddler is ill), EDIS shall:
(A) Document those circumstances.
(B) Develop and implement an appropriate interim IFSP in accordance
with this part.
(6) IFSP. (i) The EDIS shall develop and implement an IFSP for each
infant and toddler with a disability, from birth up to 3 years of age,
who meets the eligibility criteria for EIS.
(ii) EDIS shall convene a meeting to develop the IFSP of an infant
or toddler with a disability. The meeting shall be scheduled as soon as
possible following its determination that the infant or toddler is
eligible for EIS, but not later than 45 days from the date of the
referral for services.
(iii) Meetings to develop and review the IFSP must include:
(A) The parent or parents of the infant or toddler.
(B) Other family members, as requested by the parent, if feasible.
(C) An advocate or person outside of the family if the parent
requests that person's participation.
(D) The service coordinator who has worked with the family since
the initial referral of the infant or toddler or who is responsible for
the implementation of the IFSP.
(E) The persons directly involved in conducting the evaluations and
assessments.
(F) As appropriate, persons who shall provide services to the
infant or toddler or the family.
(iv) If a participant listed in paragraph (a)(6)(iii) of this part
is unable to attend a meeting, arrangements must be made for the
person's involvement through other means, which may include:
(A) A telephone conference call or other electronic means of
communication.
(B) Providing knowledgeable, authorized representation.
(C) Providing pertinent records for use at the meeting.
(v) The IFSP shall contain:
(A) A statement of the infant's or toddler's current developmental
levels including physical, cognitive, communication, social or
emotional, and adaptive behaviors based on the information from the
evaluation and assessments.
(B) A statement of the family's resources, priorities, and concerns
about enhancing the infant's or toddler's development.
(C) A statement of the measurable results or measurable outcomes
expected to be achieved for the infant or toddler and the family. The
statement shall contain pre-literacy and language skills, as
developmentally appropriate for the infant or toddler, and the
criteria, procedures, and timelines used to determine the degree to
which progress toward achieving the outcomes is being made and whether
modification or revision of the results and services are necessary.
(D) A statement of the specific EIS based on peer-reviewed
research, to the extent practicable, necessary to meet the unique needs
of the infant or toddler and the family, including the frequency,
intensity, and method of delivering services.
(E) A statement of the natural environments in which EIS will be
provided including a justification of the
[[Page 76007]]
extent, if any, to which the services shall not be provided in a
natural environment because the intervention cannot be achieved
satisfactorily for the infant or toddler. The IFSP must include a
justification for not providing a particular early intervention service
in the natural environment.
(F) The projected dates for initiation of services and the
anticipated length, duration, and frequency of those services.
(G) The name of the service coordinator who shall be responsible
for the implementation of the IFSP and for coordination with other
agencies and persons. In meeting these requirements, EDIS may:
(1) Assign the same service coordinator appointed at the infant or
toddler's initial referral for evaluation to implement the IFSP;
(2) Appoint a new service coordinator; or
(3) Appoint a service coordinator requested by the parents.
(H) A description of the appropriate transition services supporting
the movement of the toddler with a disability to preschool or other
services.
(vi) EDIS shall explain the contents of the IFSP to the parents and
shall obtain an informed, written consent from the parents before
providing EIS described in the IFSP.
(vii) The IFSP shall be implemented within ten business days of
completing the document, unless the IFSP team, including the parents,
documents the need for a delay.
(viii) If a parent does not provide consent for participation in
all EIS, EDIS shall still provide those interventions to which a parent
does give consent.
(ix) EDIS shall evaluate the IFSP at least once a year and the
family shall be provided an opportunity to review the plan at 6-month
intervals (or more frequently, based on the needs of the child and
family). The purpose of the periodic review is to determine:
(A) The degree to which progress toward achieving the outcomes is
being made.
(B) Whether modification or revision of the outcomes or services is
necessary.
(x) The review may be carried out by a meeting or by another means
that is acceptable to the parents and other participants.
(7) Transition.
(i) EDIS shall provide a written transition plan for toddlers
receiving EIS to facilitate their transition to preschool, if
appropriate. A transition plan must be recorded on the IFSP between the
toddler's second and third birthday and not later than 90 days before
the toddler's third birthday.
(ii) Families shall be included in the transition planning. EDIS
shall inform the toddler's parents regarding future preschool, the
child find requirements of the school, and the procedures for
transitioning the toddler from EIS to preschool.
(iii) Not later than 6 months before the toddler's third birthday,
the EDIS service coordinator shall obtain parental consent prior to
release of identified records of a toddler receiving EIS to the DoD
local school in order to allow the DoDEA school to meet child-find
requirements.
(iv) The EDIS service coordinator shall initiate a pre-transition
meeting with the CSC, and shall provide the toddler's early
intervention assessment reports, IFSP, and relevant supporting
documentation. The parent shall receive reasonable notice of the pre-
transition meeting, shall receive copies of any documents provided to
the CSC, and shall have the right to participate in and provide input
to the pre-transition meeting.
(v) As soon as reasonably possible following receipt of notice of a
toddler potentially transitioning to preschool, the local DoDEA school
shall convene a CSC. The CSC and EDIS shall cooperate to obtain
parental consent, in accordance with IDEA and this part, to conduct
additional evaluations if necessary.
(vi) Based on the information received from EDIS, the CSC,
coordinating with EDIS, will determine at the pre-transition meeting
whether:
(A) No additional testing or observation is necessary to determine
that the toddler is eligible for special education and related
services, in which case the CSC shall develop an eligibility report
based on the EDIS early intervention assessment reports, IFSP,
supporting documentation and other information obtained at the pre-
transition meeting, in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section;
or
(B) Additional testing or observation is necessary to determine
whether the toddler is eligible for special education and related
services, in which case the CSC shall develop an assessment plan to
collect all required information necessary to determine eligibility for
special education and obtain parental consent, in accordance with IDEA
and this part, for evaluation in accordance with paragraph (b) of this
section.
(vii) In the event that the toddler is first referred to EDIS fewer
than 90 days before the toddler's third birthday, EDIS and the DoDEA
school shall work cooperatively in the evaluation process and shall
develop a joint assessment plan to determine whether the toddler is
eligible for EIS or special education.
(A) EDIS shall complete its eligibility determination process and
the development of an IFSP, if applicable.
(B) The CSC shall determine eligibility for special education.
(viii) Eligibility assessments shall be multidisciplinary and
family-centered and shall incorporate the resources of the EDIS as
necessary and appropriate.
(ix) Upon completion of the evaluations, the CSC shall schedule an
eligibility determination meeting at the local school, no later than 90
days prior to the toddler's third birthday.
(A) The parents shall receive reasonable notice of the eligibility
determination meeting, shall receive copies of any documents provided
to the CSC, and shall have the right to participate in and provide
input to the meeting.
(B) EDIS and the CSC shall cooperate to develop an eligibility
determination report based upon all available data, including that
provided by EDIS and the parents, in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this section.
(x) If the toddler is found eligible for special education and
related services, the CSC shall develop an individualized education
program (IEP) in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, and
must implement the IEP on or before the toddler's third birthday.
(xi) If the toddler's third birthday occurs during the period June
through August (the traditional summer vacation period for school
systems), the CSC shall complete the eligibility determination process
and the development of an IEP before the end of the school year
preceding the toddler's third birthday. An IEP must be prepared to
ensure that the toddler enters preschool services with an instructional
program at the start of the new school year.
(xii) The full transition of a toddler shall occur on the toddler's
third birthday unless the IFSP team and the CSC determine that an
extended transition is in the best interest of the toddler and family.
(A) An extended transition may occur when:
(1) The toddler's third birthday falls within the last 6 weeks of
the school year;
(2) The family is scheduled to have a permanent change of station
(PCS) within 6 weeks after a toddler's third birthday; or
(3) The toddler's third birthday occurs after the end of the school
year and before October 1.
(B) An extended transition may occur if the IFSP team and the CSC
determine
[[Page 76008]]
that extended EIS beyond the toddler's third birthday are necessary and
appropriate, and if so, how long extended services will be provided.
(1) The IFSP team, including the parents, may decide to continue
services in accordance with the IFSP until the end of the school year,
PCS date, or until the beginning of the next school year.
(2) Extended services must be delivered in accordance with the
toddler's IFSP, which shall be updated if the toddler's or family's
needs change on or before the toddler's third birthday.
(3) The CSC shall maintain in its records meeting minutes that
reflect the decision for EDIS to provide an extended transition for the
specified period.
(4) Prior to the end of the extended transition period, the CSC
shall meet to develop an IEP that shall identify all special education
and related services that will begin at the end of the transition
period and meet all requirements of the IDEA and this part, in
accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
(C) The IFSP team and the CSC may jointly determine that the
toddler should receive services in the special education preschool
prior to the toddler's third birthday.
(1) If only a portion of the child's services will be provided by
the DoDEA school, the information shall be identified in the IFSP,
which shall also specify responsibilities for service coordination and
transition planning. The CSC shall develop an IEP that shall identify
all services to be delivered at the school, in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) If all the toddler's services will be provided by the DoDEA
school, the services will be delivered pursuant to an IEP developed in
accordance with paragraph (b) of this section. Transition activities
and other services under the IFSP will terminate with the toddler's
entry into the special education preschool.
(3) Early entry into preschool services should occur only in
exceptional circumstances (e.g., to facilitate natural transitions).
(xiii) In the case of a child who may not be eligible for DoDEA
preschool special education services, with the approval of the parents,
EDIS shall make reasonable efforts to convene a conference among EDIS,
the family, and providers of other services for children who are not
eligible for special education preschool services (e.g., community
preschools) in order to explain the basis for this conclusion to the
parents and obtain parental input.
(8) Maintenance of Records.
(i) EDIS officials shall maintain all EIS records, in accordance
with 32 CFR part 310.
(ii) EIS records, including the IFSP and the documentation of
services delivered in accordance with the IFSP, are educational records
consistent with 32 CFR part 285 and shall not be placed in the child's
medical record.
(9) Procedural Safeguards.
(i) Parents of an infant or toddler who is eligible for EIS shall
be afforded specific procedural safeguards that must include:
(A) The right to confidentiality of personally identifiable
information in accordance with 32 CFR part 310, including the right of
a parent to receive written notice and give written consent to the
exchange of information between the Department of Defense and outside
agencies in accordance with Federal law and 32 CFR part 310 and 32 CFR
part 285.
(B) The opportunity to inspect and review records relating to
screening, evaluations and assessments, eligibility determinations,
development and implementation of IFSPs.
(C) The right to determine whether they or other family members
will accept or decline any EIS, and to decline such a service after
first accepting it, without jeopardizing the provision of other EIS.
(D) The right to written parental consent.
(1) Consent must be obtained before evaluation of the infant or
toddler in accordance with this section.
(2) Consent must be obtained before initiation of EIS in accordance
with this section.
(3) If consent is not given, EDIS shall make reasonable efforts to
ensure that the parent:
(i) Is fully aware of the nature of the evaluation and assessment
or the services that would be available.
(ii) Understands that the infant or toddler will not be able to
receive the evaluation and assessment or services unless consent is
given.
(E) The right to prior written notice.
(1) Prior written notice must be given to the parents of an infant
or toddler entitled to EIS a reasonable time before EDIS proposes to
initiate or change, or refuses to initiate or change the
identification, evaluation, or placement of the infant or toddler, or
the provision of appropriate EIS to the infant or toddler and any
family member.
(2) The notice must be in sufficient detail to inform the parents
about:
(i) The action that is being proposed or refused.
(ii) The reasons for taking the action.
(iii) Each of the procedural safeguards that are available in
accordance with this section, including availability of mediation,
administrative complaint procedures, and due process complaint
procedures that are available for dispute resolution as described in
this section, including descriptions of how to file a complaint and the
applicable timelines.
(3) The notice must be provided in language written for a general
lay audience and in the native language of the parent or other mode of
communication used by the parent, unless it is clearly not feasible to
do so.
(F) The right to timely administrative resolution of complaints.
(G) The availability of dispute resolution with respect to any
matter relating to the provision of EIS to an infant or toddler,
through the administrative complaint, mediation and due process
procedures described in paragraph (d) of this section, except the
requirement to conduct a resolution meeting, in the event of a dispute
between the Military Department concerned and the parents regarding
EIS.
(H) Any party aggrieved by the decision regarding a due process
complaint filed in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section shall
have the right to bring a civil action in a district court of the
United States of competent jurisdiction without regard to the amount in
controversy.
(ii) During the pendency of any proceeding or action involving a
complaint by the parent of an infant or toddler with a disability
relating to the provision of EIS, unless the parent and EDIS otherwise
agree, the infant or toddler shall continue to receive the appropriate
EIS currently being provided under the most recent signed IFSP or, if
applying for initial EIS services, shall receive the services not in
dispute.
(10) Mediation and Due Process Procedures. Mediation and due
process procedures, described in paragraph (d) of this section, except
the requirement to conduct a resolution meeting, are applicable to
early intervention when the Military Department concerned and the
parents will be the parties in the dispute.
(b) Procedures for the Provision of Educational Programs and Services
for Children With Disabilities, Ages 3 Through 21 Years, Inclusive
(1) Parent Involvement and General Provisions.
(i) The CSC shall take reasonable steps to provide for the
participation of the parent(s) in the special education program of his/
her child. School
[[Page 76009]]
officials shall use devices or hire interpreters or other
intermediaries who might be necessary to foster effective
communications between the school and the parent about the child.
Special education parental rights and responsibilities will be provided
in the parent's native language, unless it is clearly not feasible to
do so, e.g., low incidence language or not a written language.
(ii) The CSC shall afford the child's parents the opportunity to
participate in CSC meetings to determine their child's initial or
continuing eligibility for special education and related services, to
prepare or change the child's IEP, or to determine or change the
child's placement.
(iii) No child shall be required to obtain a prescription for a
substance covered by the Controlled Substances Act, as amended, 21
U.S.C. 801 et seq. as a condition of attending school, receiving an
evaluation, or receiving services.
(iv) For meetings described in this section, the parent of a child
with a disability and the DoDEA school officials may agree to use
alternative means of meeting participation, such as video conferences
and conference calls.
(2) Identification and Referral.
(i) DoDEA shall:
(A) Engage in child-find activities to locate, identify, and screen
all children who are entitled to enroll in DDESS in accordance with DoD
Instruction 1342.26 (see https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/134226p.pdf) or in DoDDS in accordance with DoDEA Regulation 1342.13
(see https://www.dodea.edu/foia/iod/pdf/1342_13.pdf) who may require
special education and related services.
(B) Cooperate with the Military Departments to conduct ongoing
child-find activities and periodically publish any information,
guidelines, and directions on child-find activities for eligible
children with disabilities, ages 3 through 21 years, inclusive.
(C) Conduct the following activities to determine if children may
need special education and related services:
(1) Review school records for information about student performance
on system-wide testing and other basic skills tests in the areas of
reading and language arts and mathematics.
(2) Review school health data such as reports of hearing, vision,
speech, or language tests and reports from healthcare personnel about
the health status of a child. For children with disabilities, any
health records or other information that tends to identify a child as a
person with a disability must be maintained in confidential files that
are not co-mingled with other records and that are available only to
essential staff for the purpose of providing effective education and
services to the child.
(3) Review school discipline records and maintain the
confidentiality of such records and any information that tends to
identify a child as a person with a disability.
(4) Participate in transition activities of children receiving EIS
who may require special education preschool services.
(ii) DoDEA school system officials, related service providers, or
others who suspect that a child has a possible disabling condition
shall submit a child-find referral to the CSC containing, at a minimum,
the name and contact information for the child and the reason for the
referral.
(iii) The screening of a student by a teacher or specialist to
determine appropriate instructional strategies for curriculum
implementation shall not be considered to be an evaluation for
eligibility for special education and related services and does not
require informed consent.
(3) Incoming Students. The DoDEA school will take the following
actions, in consultation with the parent, when a child transfers to a
DoDEA school with an active IEP:
(i) If the current IEP is from a non-DoDEA school:
(A) Promptly obtain the child's educational records including
information regarding assessment, eligibility, and provision of special
education and related services from the previous school.
(B) Provide FAPE, including services comparable (i.e., similar or
equivalent) to those described in the incoming IEP, in consultation
with the parents, until the CSC:
(1) Conducts an evaluation, if determined necessary by such agency.
(2) Develops, adopts, and implements a new IEP, if appropriate, in
accordance with the requirements of the IDEA and this part within 30
school days of receipt of the IEP.
(ii) If the current IEP is from a DoDEA school, the new school must
provide the child a FAPE, including services comparable to those
described in the incoming IEP, until the new school either:
(A) Adopts the child's IEP from the previous DoDEA school; or
(B) Develops, adopts, and implements a new IEP that meets the
requirements of the IDEA and this part within 30 school days of receipt
of the incoming IEP.
(iii) Coordinate assessments of children with disabilities who
transfer with the child's previous school as quickly as possible to
facilitate prompt completion of full evaluations.
(4) Referral by a Parent. Should a parent submit a written request
for an evaluation because they suspect the child has a disability the
CSC shall, within 15 school days, review the request, confer with the
child's teachers, and gather information related to the educational
concerns. Following a review of the information, the CSC shall:
(i) Convene a conference among the parents, teachers, and one or
more other members of the CSC to discuss the educational concerns and
document their agreements. Following the discussion, the parents may
agree that:
(A) The child's needs are not indicative of a suspected disability
and other supports and accommodations will be pursued;
(B) Additional information is necessary and a pre-referral process
will be initiated; or
(C) Information from the conference will be forwarded to the CSC
for action on the parent's request for an evaluation.
(ii) Within 10 school days of receipt of information from the
conference regarding the parents' request for evaluation, agree to
initiate the preparation of an assessment plan for a full and
comprehensive educational evaluation or provide written notice to the
parent denying the formal evaluation.
(5) Referral by a Teacher.
(i) Prior to referring a child to the CSC, the teacher shall
identify the child's areas of specific instructional need and target
instructional interventions to those needs as soon as the areas of need
become apparent.
(ii) If the area of specific instructional need is not resolved,
the teacher shall initiate the pre-referral process involving other
members of the school staff.
(iii) If interventions conducted during pre-referral fail to
resolve the area of specific instructional need, the teacher shall
submit a formal referral to the CSC.
(6) Assessment and Evaluation.
(i) A full and comprehensive evaluation of educational needs shall
be conducted prior to eligibility determination and before an IEP is
developed or placement is made in a special education program, subject
to the provisions for incoming students transferring to a DoDEA school
as set forth in paragraph (b)(3) of this section. When the school
determines that a child
[[Page 76010]]
should be evaluated for a suspected disability, the school will:
(A) Issue a prior written notice to the parents of the school's
intention to evaluate and a description of the evaluation in accordance
with paragraph (b)(19) of this section.
(B) Provide parents notice of procedural safeguards.
(C) Request that the parent execute a written consent for the
evaluation in accordance with paragraph (b)(18) of this section.
(ii) The CSC shall ensure that the following elements are included
in a full and comprehensive assessment and evaluation of a child:
(A) Screening of visual and auditory acuity.
(B) Review of existing school educational and health records.
(C) Observation in an educational environment.
(D) A plan to assess the type and extent of the disability. A child
shall be assessed in all areas related to the suspected disability. The
assessment plan shall include, as appropriate:
(1) An assessment of the level of functioning academically,
intellectually, emotionally, socially, and in the family.
(2) An assessment of physical status including perceptual and motor
abilities.
(3) An assessment of the need for transition services for students
16 years and older.
(iii) The CSC shall involve the parents in the assessment process
in order to obtain information about the child's strengths and needs
and family concerns.
(iv) The CSC, as necessary, shall use all locally available
community, medical, and school resources to accomplish the assessment
and evaluation. At least one specialist with knowledge in the area of
the suspected disability shall be a member of the multidisciplinary
assessment team.
(v) The CSC must obtain parental consent, in accordance with IDEA
and this part, before conducting an evaluation. The parent shall not be
required to give consent for an evaluation without first being informed
of the specific evaluation procedures that the school proposes to
conduct.
(vi) The evaluation must be completed by the school within 45
school days following the receipt of the parent's written consent to
evaluate in accordance with the school's assessment plan.
(vii) The eligibility determination meeting must be conducted
within 10 school days after completion of the school's formal
evaluation.
(viii) All DoD elements including the CSC and related services
providers shall:
(A) Use a variety of assessment tools and strategies to gather
relevant functional, developmental, and academic information, including
information provided by the parent, which may assist in determining:
(1) Whether the child has a disability.
(2) The content of the child's IEP, including information related
to enabling the child to be involved and progress in the general
education curriculum or, for preschool children, to participate in
appropriate activities.
(B) Not use any single measure or assessment as the sole criterion
for determining whether a child has a disability or determining an
appropriate educational program for the child.
(C) Use technically sound instruments that may assess the relative
contribution of cognitive and behavioral factors, in addition to
physical or developmental factors.
(ix) The CSC and DoD related services providers shall ensure that
assessment materials and evaluation procedures are:
(A) Selected and administered so as not to be racially or
culturally discriminatory.
(B) Provided in the child's native language or other mode of
communication and in the form most likely to yield accurate information
on what the child knows and can do academically, developmentally, and
functionally, unless it is clearly not feasible to so provide and
administer.
(C) Selected and administered to assess the extent to which the
child with limited English proficiency has a disability and needs
special education, rather than measuring the child's English language
skills.
(D) Validated for the specific purpose for which they are used or
intended to be used.
(E) Administered by trained and knowledgeable personnel in
compliance with the instructions of the testing instrument.
(F) Selected to assess specific areas of educational needs and
strengths and not merely to provide a single general intelligence
quotient.
(G) Administered to a child with impaired sensory, motor, or
communication skills so that the results accurately reflect a child's
aptitude or achievement level or other factors the test purports to
measure, rather than reflecting the child's impaired sensory, manual,
or speaking skills.
(x) As part of an initial evaluation and as part of any
reevaluation, the CSC shall review existing evaluation data on the
child, including:
(A) The child's educational records.
(B) Evaluations and information provided by the parents of the
child.
(C) Current classroom-based, local, or system-wide assessments and
classroom observations.
(D) Observations by teachers and related services providers.
(xi) On the basis of that review and input from the child`s
parents, identify what additional data, if any, are needed to
determine:
(A) Whether the child has a particular category of disability or,
in the case of a reevaluation of a child, whether the child continues
to have such a disability.
(B) The present levels of academic achievement and related
developmental needs of the child.
(C) Whether the child needs special education and related services
or, in the case of a reevaluation of a child, whether the child
continues to need special education and related services.
(D) Whether any additions or modifications to the special education
and related services are needed to enable the child to meet the
measurable annual goals set out in the IEP and to participate, as
appropriate, in the general education curriculum.
(xii) The CSC may conduct its review of existing evaluation data
without a meeting.
(xiii) The CSC shall administer tests and other evaluation
materials as needed to produce the data identified in paragraph
(b)(6)(ii) and (xi) of this section.
(7) Eligibility.
(i) The CSC shall:
(A) Require that the full comprehensive evaluation of a child is
accomplished by a multidisciplinary team, including specialists with
knowledge in the area of the suspected disability and shall receive
input from the child's parent(s).
(B) Convene a meeting to determine eligibility of a child for
special education and related services not later than 10 school days
after the child has been assessed by the school.
(C) Afford the child's parents the opportunity to participate in
the CSC eligibility meeting.
(D) Determine whether the child is a child with a disability as
defined by the IDEA and this part, and the educational needs of the
child.
(E) Issue a written eligibility determination report, including a
synthesis of evaluation findings, that documents a child's primary
eligibility in one of the disability categories described in paragraph
(g) of this section, providing a copy of the eligibility determination
report to the parent.
[[Page 76011]]
(F) Determine that a child does NOT have a disability if the
determinant factor is:
(1) Lack of appropriate instruction in essential components of
reading;
(2) Lack of instruction in mathematics; or
(3) Limited English proficiency.
(ii) The CSC shall reevaluate the eligibility of a child with a
disability every 3 years, or more frequently, if the child's
educational or related services needs, including improved academic
achievement and functional performance, warrant a reevaluation. School
officials shall not reevaluate more often than once a year, unless the
parents and the school officials agree otherwise.
(A) The scope and type of the reevaluation shall be determined
individually based on a child's performance, behavior, and needs during
the reevaluation and the review of existing data.
(B) If the CSC determines that no additional data are needed to
determine whether the child continues to be a child with a disability,
the CSC shall, in accordance with paragraph (b)(19) of this section,
provide prior written notice to the child's parents of:
(1) The determination that no additional assessment data are needed
and the reasons for their determination.
(2) The right of the parents to request an assessment to determine
whether the child continues to have a disability and to determine the
child's educational needs.
(C) The CSC is not required to conduct assessments for the purposes
described in paragraph (b)(7)(i)(B)(2) of this section, unless
requested to do so by the child's parents.
(iii) The CSC shall evaluate a child in accordance with paragraph
(b)(7)(ii) of this section before determining that the child no longer
has a disability.
(iv) The CSC is not required to evaluate a child before the
termination of the child's eligibility due to graduation from secondary
school with a regular diploma, or due to exceeding the age of
eligibility for FAPE.
(v) When a child's eligibility has terminated due to graduation or
exceeding the age of eligibility, the DoDEA school must provide the
child, or the parent if the child has not yet reached the age of
majority or is otherwise incapable of providing informed consent, with
a summary of the child's academic achievement and functional
performance.
(A) The summary of performance must be completed during the final
year of a child's high school education.
(B) The summary must include:
(1) Child's demographics.
(2) Child's postsecondary goal.
(3) Summary of performance in the areas of academic, cognitive, and
functional levels of performance to include the child's present level
of performance, and the accommodations, modifications, and assistive
technology that were essential in high school to assist the student in
achieving maximum progress.
(4) Recommendations on how to assist the child in meeting the
child's post-secondary goals.
(8) IEP.
(i) IEP Development.
(A) DoDEA shall ensure that the CSC develops and implements an IEP
to provide FAPE for each child with a disability who requires special
education and related services as determined by the CSC. An IEP shall
be in effect at the beginning of each school year for each child with a
disability eligible for special education and related services under
the IDEA and this part.
(B) In developing the child's IEP, the CSC shall consider:
(1) The strengths of the child.
(2) The concerns of the parents for enhancing the education of
their child.
(3) The results of the initial evaluation or most recent evaluation
of the child.
(4) The academic, developmental, and functional needs of the child.
(ii) IEP Development Meeting. The CSC shall convene a meeting to
develop the IEP of a child with a disability. The meeting shall:
(A) Be scheduled within 10 school days from the eligibility meeting
following a determination by the CSC that the child is eligible for
special education and related services.
(B) Include as participants:
(1) An administrator or school representative other than the
child's teacher who is qualified to provide or supervise the provision
of special education and is knowledgeable about the general education
curriculum and available resources.
(2) Not less than one general education teacher of the child (if
the child is, or may be, participating in the general education
environment).
(3) A special education teacher or provider.
(4) One or both of the child's parents.
(5) An EIS coordinator or other representative of EIS, if the child
is transitioning from EIS.
(6) The child, if appropriate.
(7) A representative of the evaluation team who is knowledgeable
about the evaluation procedures used and can interpret the
instructional implications of the results of the evaluation.
(8) Other individuals invited at the discretion of the parents or
school who have knowledge or special expertise regarding the child,
including related services personnel, as appropriate.
(iii) IEP Content. The CSC shall include in the IEP:
(A) A statement of the child's present levels of academic
achievement and functional performance including:
(1) How the child's disability affects involvement and progress in
the general education curriculum, or
(2) For preschoolers, how the disability affects participation in
appropriate activities.
(B) A statement of measurable annual goals including academic and
functional goals designed to meet:
(1) The child's needs that result from the disability to enable the
child to be involved in and make progress in the general education
curriculum.
(2) Each of the child's other educational needs resulting from his
or her disability.
(C) A description of how the child's progress toward meeting the
annual goals shall be measured, and when periodic progress reports will
be provided to the parents.
(D) A statement of the special education and related services,
supplementary aids and services (which are based on peer-reviewed
research to the extent practicable and shall be provided to the child
or on behalf of the child), and a statement of the program
modifications or supports for school personnel that shall be provided
for the child to:
(1) Advance appropriately toward attaining the annual goals.
(2) Be involved in and make progress in the general education
curriculum and participate in extracurricular and other non-academic
activities.
(3) Be educated and participate with other children who may or may
not have disabilities.
(E) An explanation of the extent, if any, to which the child will
not participate with non-disabled children in the regular class and in
non-academic activities.
(F) A statement of any individualized appropriate accommodations
necessary to measure the child's academic achievement and functional
performance on system-wide or district-wide assessments. If the CSC
determines that the child shall take an alternate assessment of a
particular system-wide or district-wide assessment of student
achievement (or part of an assessment), a statement of why:
(1) The child cannot participate in the regular assessment.
[[Page 76012]]
(2) The particular alternate assessment selected is appropriate for
the child.
(G) Consideration of the following special factors:
(1) Assistive technology devices and services for all children.
(2) Language needs for the child with limited English proficiency.
(3) Instruction in Braille and the use of Braille for a child who
is blind or visually impaired, unless the CSC determines, after an
evaluation of the child's reading and writing skills, needs, and
appropriate reading and writing media (including an evaluation of the
child's future needs for instruction in Braille or the use of Braille)
that instruction in Braille or the use of Braille is not appropriate
for the child.
(4) Interventions, strategies, and supports including positive
behavioral interventions and supports to address behavior for a child
whose behavior impedes his or her learning or that of others.
(5) Language and communication needs, and in the case of a child
who is deaf or hard of hearing, opportunities for direct communications
with peers and professional personnel in the child's language and
communication mode, academic level, and full range of needs, including
opportunities for direct instruction in the child's communication mode.
(H) A statement of the amount of time that each service shall be
provided to the child, including the date for beginning of services and
the anticipated frequency, number of required related services sessions
to be provided by EDIS, location and duration of those services
(including adjusted school day or an extended school year), and
modifications.
(I) A statement of special transportation requirements, if any.
(J) Physical education services, specially designed if necessary,
shall be made available to every child with a disability receiving a
FAPE. Each child with a disability must be afforded the opportunity to
participate in the regular physical education program available to non-
disabled children unless the child is enrolled full-time in a separate
facility or needs specially designed physical education, as prescribed
in the child's IEP.
(iv) Transition Services.
(A) Beginning not later than the first IEP to be in effect when the
child turns 16, or younger if determined appropriate by the CSC, and
updated annually, thereafter, the IEP must include:
(1) Appropriate measurable postsecondary goals based on age-
appropriate transition assessments related to training, education,
employment and, where appropriate, independent living skills.
(2) The transition services, including courses of study, needed to
assist the child in reaching postsecondary goals.
(B) Beginning at least 1 year before the child reaches the age of
majority (18 years of age), except for a child with a disability who
has been determined to be incompetent in accordance with Federal or
State law, a statement that the child has been informed of those rights
that transfer to him or her in accordance with this part.
(9) Implementation of the IEP.
(i) The CSC shall ensure that all IEP provisions developed for any
child entitled to an education by the DoDEA school system are fully
implemented.
(ii) The CSC shall:
(A) Seek to obtain parental agreement and signature on the IEP
before delivery of special education and related services in accordance
with that IEP is begun.
(B) Provide a copy of the child's IEP to the parents.
(C) Ensure that the IEP is implemented as soon as possible
following the IEP development meeting.
(D) Ensure the provision of special education and related services,
in accordance with the IEP.
(E) Ensure that the child's IEP is accessible to each general
education teacher, special education teacher, related service provider,
and any other service provider who is responsible for its
implementation, and that each teacher and provider is informed of:
(1) His or her specific responsibilities related to implementing
the child's IEP.
(2) The specific accommodations, modifications, and supports that
must be provided for the child in accordance with the IEP.
(F) Review the IEP for each child periodically and at least
annually in a CSC meeting to determine whether the child has been
progressing toward the annual goals.
(G) Revise the IEP, as appropriate, and address:
(1) Any lack of progress toward the annual goals and in the general
education curriculum, where appropriate.
(2) The results of any reevaluation.
(3) Information about the child provided by the parents, teachers,
or related service providers.
(4) The child's needs.
(10) Placement and Least Restrictive Environment (LRE).
(i) The CSC shall determine the educational placement of a child
with a disability.
(ii) The educational placement decision for a child with a
disability shall be:
(A) Determined at least annually.
(B) Made in conformity with the child's IEP.
(C) Made in conformity with the requirements of IDEA and this part
for LRE.
(1) A child with a disability shall be educated, to the maximum
extent appropriate, with children who are not disabled, and that
special classes, separate schooling, or other removal of children with
disabilities from the regular educational environment shall occur only
if the nature or severity of the child's disability that education in
regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot
be achieved satisfactorily.
(2) A child with a disability shall not be removed from education
in age-appropriate general education classrooms solely because of
needed modifications in the general education classroom.
(3) As appropriate, the CSC shall make provisions for supplementary
services to be provided in conjunction with general education
placement.
(4) Special classes, separate schooling, or other removal of a
child with a disability from the general education environment shall
occur only when the nature or severity of the disability is such that
education in general education classes with the use of supplementary
aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily.
(5) In providing or arranging for the provision of non-academic and
extracurricular services and activities, including meals, recess
periods, assemblies, and study trips, the CSC shall ensure that a child
with a disability participates with non-disabled children in those
services and activities to the maximum extent appropriate to the needs
of that child.
(iv) In determining the LRE for an individual student, the CSC
shall consider:
(A) The needs of the individual child as well as any potential
harmful effect on the child or the quality of services that he or she
needs.
(B) A continuum of placement options must be made available to meet
the needs of children with disabilities for special education and
related services. The options on this continuum include the general
education classroom, special classes (a self-contained classroom in the
school), home bound instruction, or instruction in hospitals or
institutions.
(v) When special schools and institutions may be appropriate, the
CSC shall consider such placement options
[[Page 76013]]
in coordination with the Area Special Education Office.
(vi) In the case of a disciplinary placement, school officials
shall follow the procedures set forth in paragraph (b)(13) of this
section.
(12) Extended School Year (ESY) Services. ESY services must be
provided only if a child's IEP team determines that the services are
necessary for the provision of FAPE to the child. DoDEA may not:
(i) Limit ESY services to particular categories of disability; or
(ii) Unilaterally limit the type, amount, or duration of ESY
services.
(13) Discipline. (i) School Discipline. All regular disciplinary
rules and procedures applicable to children attending a DoDEA school
shall apply to children with disabilities who violate school rules and
regulations or disrupt regular classroom activities, except that:
(A) A manifestation determination must be conducted for discipline
proposed for children with disabilities in accordance with DoDEA
disciplinary rules and regulations and paragraph (b)(13)(v) of this
section, and
(B) The child subject to disciplinary removal shall continue to
receive educational services in accordance with paragraph (b)(13)(iv)
of this section.
(ii) Change of Placement. (A) It is a change of placement if a
child is removed from his or her current placement for more than 10
consecutive school days or for a series of removals that cumulates to
more than 10 school days during the school year that meets the criteria
of paragraph (b)(13)(ii)(C) of this section.
(B) It is not a change of placement if a child is removed from his
or her current academic placement for less than 10 consecutive or
cumulative days in a school year for one incident of misconduct. A
child can be removed from the current educational placement for
separate incidents of misconduct in the same school year (as long as
those removals do not constitute a change of placement under IDEA to
the extent such a disciplinary alternative is applied to children
without disabilities).
(C) If a child has been removed from his or her current placement
for more than 10 days in a school year, but not more than 10
consecutive school days, the CSC shall determine whether the child has
been subject to a series of removals that constitute a pattern. The
determination is made on a case-by-case basis and is subject to review
by a hearing officer in accordance with the provisions of paragraph
(d)(5) of this section. The CSC will base its determination on whether
the child has been subjected to a series of removals that constitute a
pattern by examining whether:
(1) The child's behavior is substantially similar to his or her
behavior in previous incidents that resulted in the series of removals,
and,
(2) Additional factors such as the length of each removal, the
total amount of time the child has been removed, and the proximity of
the removals to one another.
(D) On the date the decision is made to remove a child with a
disability because of misconduct, when the removal would change the
child's placement, the school must notify the parents of that decision
and provide the parents the procedural safeguards notice described in
paragraph (b)(19) of this section.
(iii) Period of Removal. School personnel may remove a child with a
disability for misconduct from his or her current placement to an
appropriate interim alternative educational setting (AES), another
setting, or suspension:
(A) For not more than 10 consecutive school days to the extent
those alternatives are applied to children without disabilities (for
example, removing the child from the classroom to the school library,
to a different classroom, or to the child's home), and for additional
removals of not more than 10 consecutive school days in that same
school year for separate incidents of misconduct (as long as those
removals do not constitute a pattern); or
(B) For not more than 45 school days, without regard to whether the
behavior is determined to be a manifestation of the child's disability,
if the child, at school, on school-provided transportation, on school
premises, or at a school-sponsored event:
(1) Carries a weapon or possesses a weapon;
(2) Knowingly possesses or uses illegal drugs or sells or solicits
the sale of a controlled substance; or
(3) Has inflicted serious bodily injury upon another person.
(C) After an expedited hearing if school personnel believe that
returning the child to his or her current educational placement is
substantially likely to cause injury to the child or to others.
(iv) Required Services During Removal. (A) If a child with a
disability is removed from his or her placement for 10 cumulative
school days or less in a school year, the school is required only to
provide services comparable to the services it provides to a child
without disabilities who is similarly removed.
(B) If a child with a disability is removed from his or her
placement for more than 10 school days, where the behavior that gave
rise to the violation of the school code is determined in accordance
with paragraph (b)(13)(v) of this section not to be a manifestation of
the child's disability, or who is removed under paragraph
(b)(13)(iii)(B) of this section 9irrespective of whether the behavior
is determined to be a manifestation of the child's disability, the
school must:
(1) Continue to provide the child with the educational services as
identified by the child's IEP as a FAPE so as to enable the child to
continue participating in the general education curriculum, although in
another setting, and to progress toward meeting the goals set out in
the child's IEP.
(2) Provide, as appropriate, a functional behavioral assessment and
behavioral intervention services and modifications designed to address
the behavior violation so that it does not recur.
(C) If a child with a disability has been removed for more than 10
cumulative school days and the current removal is for 10 consecutive
school days or less, then the CSC must determine whether the pattern of
removals constitutes a change of placement in accordance with paragraph
(b)(13)(ii) of this section.
(1) If the CSC determines the pattern of removals is NOT a change
of placement, then the CSC must determine the extent to which services
are needed to enable the child to continue participating in the general
education curriculum, although in another setting, and to progress
toward meeting the goals set out in the child's IEP.
(2) If the CSC determines that the pattern of removals IS a change
of placement, then the CSC must conduct a manifestation determination.
(v) Manifestation Determination (A) A principal must give the
notice required and convene a manifestation determination meeting with
the CSC within 10 school days of recommending, in accordance with DoDEA
Regulation 2051.1, a disciplinary action that would remove a child with
disabilities for:
(1) More than 10 consecutive school days, or
(2) A period in excess of 10 cumulative school days when the child
has been subjected to a series of removals that constitute a pattern.
(B) The manifestation CSC will review all relevant information in
the child's file (including the IEP, any teacher observations, and any
information provided by the sponsor or parent) and
[[Page 76014]]
determine whether the misconduct was a manifestation of the child's
disability.
(1) The misconduct must be determined to be a manifestation of the
child's disability if it is determined the misconduct:
(i) Was caused by the child's disability or had a direct and
substantial relationship to the child's disability; or
(ii) Was the direct result of the school's failure to implement the
IEP.
(2) If the determination is made that the misconduct was a
manifestation of the child's disability, the CSC must:
(i) Conduct a functional behavioral assessment, unless the school
conducted a functional behavioral assessment before the behavior that
resulted in the change of placement occurred, and implement a
behavioral intervention plan for the child; or
(ii) Review any existing behavioral intervention or disciplinary
plan and modify it, as necessary, to address the behavior; and
(iii) Revise the student's IEP or placement and delivery system to
ensure that the student receives services in accordance with the IEP.
(3) Unless the parent and school agree to a change of placement as
part of the modification of the behavioral intervention plan, the CSC
must return the child to the placement from which the child was
removed:
(i) Not later than the end of 10 days of removal; or
(ii) Not later than the end of 45 consecutive school days, if the
student committed a weapon or drug offense or caused serious bodily
injury for which the student was removed to an AES.
(4) If the determination is made that the misconduct in question
was the direct result of the school's failure to implement the IEP, the
school must take immediate steps to remedy those deficiencies.
(5) If the determination is made that the behavior is NOT a
manifestation of the child's disability, school personnel may apply the
relevant disciplinary procedures in the same manner and for the same
duration as the procedures that would be applied to children without
disabilities, and must:
(i) Forward the case and a recommended course of action to the
school principal, who may then refer the case to a disciplinary
committee for processing.
(ii) Reconvene the CSC following a disciplinary decision that would
change the student's placement to revise the child's IEP and/or
identify an appropriate educational setting and delivery system to
ensure the child receives services in accordance with the IEP.
(vi) Appeals of School Decision Regarding Placement or
Manifestation Determination. (A) The parent of a child with a
disability who disagrees with any decision regarding placement or
manifestation determination, or a school that believes maintaining the
current placement of the child is substantially likely to result in
injury to the child or others, may appeal the decision by requesting an
expedited due process hearing before a hearing officer by filing a
petition in accordance with paragraph (d)(5) of this section.
(B) A hearing officer, appointed in accordance with paragraph (d)
of this section, hears and makes a determination regarding an appeal.
In making the determination the hearing officer may:
(1) Return the child with a disability to the placement from which
the child was removed if the hearing officer determines that the
removal was a violation of the authority of school personnel in
accordance with this part or that the child's behavior was a
manifestation of the child's disability; or
(2) Order a change of placement of the child with a disability to
an appropriate interim AES for not more than 45 school days if the
hearing officer determines that maintaining the child's current
placement is substantially likely to result in injury to the child or
to others.
(C) At the end of the placement in the appropriate AES, the
procedures for placement in an AES may be repeated, with the consent of
the Area Director, if the school believes that returning the child to
the original placement is substantially likely to result in injury to
the child or to others.
(D) When an appeal has been made by either the parent or the
school, the child must remain in the interim AES pending the decision
of the hearing officer or until the expiration of the specified time
period, whichever occurs first, unless the parent and the DoDEA school
system agree otherwise.
(14) Children Not Yet Determined Eligible for Special Education.
(i) A child who has not been determined to be eligible for special
education and related services and who is subject to discipline may
assert any of the protections provided for in paragraph (b)(19) of this
section if the school had knowledge that the child was a child with a
disability before the behavior that precipitated the disciplinary
action occurred.
(ii) DoDEA shall be deemed to have knowledge that a child is a
child with a disability if, before the behavior that precipitated the
disciplinary action occurred:
(A) The parent of the child expressed concern in writing to a
teacher of the child, the school principal or assistant principal, or
the school special education coordinator that the child was in need of
special education and related services;
(B) The child presented an active IEP from another school;
(C) The parent of the child requested an evaluation of the child;
or
(D) The teacher of the child or other school personnel expressed
specific concerns about a pattern of behavior demonstrated by the child
directly to the principal or assistant principal, the special education
coordinator, or to another teacher of the child.
(iii) A school is deemed NOT to have knowledge that a child is a
child with a disability if:
(A) The parent of the child has not allowed an evaluation of the
child or the parent has revoked consent, in writing, to the delivery of
the child's special education and related services, in accordance with
this part; or
(B) The child has been evaluated and determined not to be a child
with a disability.
(iv) Conditions that apply if there is no basis of knowledge that
the child is a child with a disability.
(A) If a school has no basis of knowledge that a child is a child
with a disability prior to taking disciplinary measures against the
child, the child may be subjected to the disciplinary measures applied
to non-disabled children who engage in comparable behaviors in
accordance with paragraph (b)(13)(i) of this section.
(B) If a request is made for an evaluation of a child during the
time period when the child is subjected to disciplinary measures:
(1) The evaluation must be expedited.
(2) Until the evaluation is completed, the child remains in his or
her then current educational placement, which can include suspension or
expulsion without educational services.
(v) If the child is determined to be a child with a disability,
taking into consideration information from the evaluation conducted by
the agency and information provided by the parents, the school must
provide special education and related services in accordance with an
IEP.
(15) Referral to and Action by Law Enforcement and Judicial
Authorities. (i) Rule of Construction. Nothing prohibits a school from
reporting a crime threatened or committed by a child with a disability
to appropriate authorities, or prevents military, host-nation, or State
law enforcement and judicial authorities from exercising their
[[Page 76015]]
responsibilities with regard to the application of Federal, host-
nation, and State law to crimes committed or threatened by a child with
a disability.
(ii) Transmittal of Records. An agency reporting a crime in
accordance with this paragraph may transmit copies of the child's
special education and disciplinary records only to the extent that the
transmission is in accordance with 32 CFR part 285.
(16) Children With Disabilities Who are Placed in a Non-DoDEA
School or Facility Pursuant to an IEP. (i) Children with disabilities
who are eligible to receive a DoDEA school education, but are placed in
a non-DoD school or facility by DoDEA because a FAPE cannot be provided
by DoD, shall have all the rights of children with disabilities who are
enrolled in a DoDEA school.
(ii) A child with a disability may be placed at DoD expense in a
non-DoD school or facility only if required by the IEP.
(iii) DoDEA school officials shall initiate and conduct a meeting
to develop an IEP for the child before placement. A representative of
the non-DoD school or facility should attend the meeting. If the
representative cannot attend, the DoDEA school officials shall
communicate in other ways to facilitate participation including
individual or conference telephone calls. A valid IEP must document the
necessity of the placement in a non-DoD school or facility. The IEP
must:
(A) Be signed by an authorized DoDEA official before it becomes
valid.
(B) Include a determination that the DoDEA school system does not
currently have and cannot reasonably create an educational program
appropriate to meet the needs of the child with a disability.
(C) Include a determination that the non-DoD school or facility and
its educational program and related services conform to the
requirements of this part.
(iv) The DoD shall not be required to reimburse the costs of
special education and related services if DoDEA made FAPE available in
accordance with the requirements of the IDEA and a parent unilaterally
places the child in a non-DoD school without the approval of DoDEA.
(A) Reimbursement may be ordered by a hearing officer if he or she
determines that DoDEA had not made FAPE available in a timely manner
prior to enrollment in the non-DoDEA school and that the private
placement is appropriate.
(B) Reimbursement may be reduced or denied:
(1) If, at the most recent CSC meeting that the parents attended
prior to removal of the child from the DoDEA school, the parents did
not inform the CSC that they were rejecting the placement proposed by
the DoDEA school to provide FAPE to their child, including stating
their concerns and their intent to enroll their child in non-DoD school
at DoD expense.
(2) If, at least 10 business days (including for this purpose any
holidays that occur on a Monday through Friday) prior to the removal of
the child from the DoDEA school, the parents did not give written
notice to the school principal or CSC chairperson of the information
described in paragraph (b)(16)(iv)(B)(1) of this section.
(3) If, the CSC informed the parents of its intent to evaluate the
child, using the notice requirement described in paragraph (b)(6)(i)
and paragraph (b)(19) of this section, but the parents did not make the
child available; or
(4) Upon a hearing officer finding of unreasonableness with respect
to actions taken by the parents.
(C) Reimbursement may not be reduced or denied for failure to
provide the required notice if:
(1) The DoDEA school prevented the parent from providing notice;
(2) The parents had not received notification of the requirement
that the school provide prior written notice required by paragraph
(b)(19) of this section;
(3) Compliance would result in physical or emotional harm to the
child; or
(4) The parents cannot read and write in English.
(17) Confidentiality of the Records. The DoDEA school and EDIS
officials shall maintain all student records in accordance with 32 CFR
part 310.
(18) Parental Consent. (i) Consent Requirements. The consent of a
parent of a child with a disability or suspected of having a disability
shall be obtained before:
(A) Initiation of formal evaluation procedures to determine whether
the child qualifies as a child with a disability and prior to
conducting a reevaluation;
(B) Initial provision of special education and related services; or
(ii) Consent for Initial Evaluation. If the parent of a child does
not provide consent for an initial evaluation or fails to respond to a
request for consent for an initial evaluation, then DoDEA may use the
procedures described in paragraph (d) of this section to pursue an
evaluation of a child suspected of having a disability.
(A) Consent to evaluate shall not constitute consent for placement
or receipt of special education and related services.
(B) If a parent declines to give consent for evaluation, DoDEA
shall not be in violation of the requirement to conduct child-find, the
initial evaluation, or the duties to follow evaluation procedures or
make an eligibility determination and write an IEP as prescribed in
this section.
(iii) Consent for Reevaluation. The school must seek to obtain
parental consent to conduct a reevaluation. If the parent does not
provide consent or fails to respond to a request for consent for a
reevaluation, then the school may conduct the reevaluation without
parental consent if the school can demonstrate that it has made
reasonable efforts to obtain parental consent and documented its
efforts. The documentation must include a record of the school's
attempts in areas such as:
(A) Detailed records of telephone calls made or attempted and the
results of those calls.
(B) Copies of correspondence sent to the parents and any responses
received.
(C) Detailed records of visits made to the parents' home, place of
employment or duty station, and the results of those visits.
(iv) Consent for the Initial Provision of Special Education and
Related Services. The school that is responsible for making a FAPE
available to a child with a disability under this part must seek to
obtain informed consent from the parent of such child before providing
special education and related services to the child. If the parent
refuses initial consent for services, the DoDEA school:
(A) May not use the procedures described in paragraph (d) of this
section (mediation and due process) to obtain agreement or a ruling
that the special education and related services recommended by the
child's CSC may be provided to the child without parental consent.
(B) Shall not be considered to be in violation of the requirement
to make a FAPE available to the child for its failure to provide those
services to the child for which parental consent was requested.
(C) Shall not be required to convene an IEP meeting or develop an
IEP for the child.
(19) Parent Revocation of Consent for Continued Special Education
and Related Services.
(i) Parents may unilaterally withdraw their children from further
receipt of all special education and related services by revoking their
consent for the continued provision of special
[[Page 76016]]
education and related services to their children.
(ii) Parental revocation of consent must be in writing.
(iii) Upon receiving a written revocation of consent, the DoDEA
school must cease the provision of special education and related
services and must provide the parents prior written notice before
ceasing the provision of services. The notice shall comply with the
requirements of paragraph (b)(19) of this section and shall advise the
parent:
(A) Changes in educational placement and services that will result
from the revocation of consent.
(B) That the school will terminate special education and related
services to the child on a specified date, which shall be within a
reasonable time following the delivery of the written notice.
(C) That DoDEA will not be considered to be in violation of the
requirement to make FAPE available to the child because of the failure
to provide the child with further special education and related
services.
(D) That the DoDEA school will not be deemed to have knowledge that
the child is a child with a disability and the child may be disciplined
as a general education student and will not be entitled to the IDEA
discipline protections.
(E) That the parents maintain the right to subsequently request an
initial evaluation to determine if the child is a child with a
disability who needs special education and related services and that
their child will not receive special education and related services
until eligibility has been determined.
(F) That the DoDEA school will not challenge, through mediation or
a due process hearing, the revocation of consent to the provision of
special education or related services.
(G) That while the school is not required to convene a CSC meeting
or to develop an IEP for further provision of special education and
related services, it is willing to convene a CSC meeting upon request
of the parent prior to the date that service delivery ceases.
(iv) Revocation of consent for a particular service:
(A) Upon receiving a revocation of consent for a particular special
education or related service, the DoDEA school must provide the parent
prior written notice in accordance with the requirements of paragraph
(b)(19) of this section.
(B) If parents disagree with the provision of a particular special
education or related service and the school members of the CSC and the
parents agree that the child would be provided a FAPE if the child did
not receive that service, the child's IEP may be modified to remove the
service.
(C) If the parent and the school members of the CSC disagree as to
whether the child would be provided a FAPE if the child did not receive
a particular service, the parent may use the mediation or due process
procedures under this part to obtain a determination as to whether the
service with which the parent disagrees is or is not appropriate to his
or her child and necessary to FAPE, but the school may not cease the
provision of a particular service that has been included in the child's
active IEP until the dispute is resolved.
(20) Procedural Safeguards. (i) Parental Rights. Parents of
children, ages 3 through 21 inclusive, with disabilities must be
afforded procedural safeguards with respect to the provision of FAPE
which shall include:
(A) The right to confidentiality of personally identifiable
information in accordance with Federal law and DoD regulations.
(B) The right to examine records and to participate in meetings
with respect to assessment, screening, eligibility determinations, and
the development and implementation of the IEP.
(C) The right to furnish or decline consent in accordance with this
section.
(D) The right to prior written notice when the school proposes to
initiate or change, or refuses to initiate or change the
identification, evaluation, educational placement, or provision of FAPE
to a child with a disability.
(1) The notice must be in sufficient detail to inform parents
about:
(i) The action that is being proposed or refused.
(ii) An explanation of why the agency proposes or refuses to take
the action.
(iii) A description of any other options considered by the CSC and
the reasons why those options were rejected.
(iv) A description of the factors that were relevant to the
agency's proposal or refusal.
(v) Each of the procedural safeguards that is available in
accordance with the IDEA and this part.
(vi) Sources for parents to contact to obtain assistance in
understanding the provisions of this part.
(vii) Dispute resolution procedures, including a description of
mediation, how to file a complaint, due process hearing procedures, and
applicable timelines.
(2) The notice must be provided in language understandable to a lay
person and in the native language of the parent or other mode of
communication used by the parent, unless it is clearly not feasible to
do so.
(E) The right to obtain an independent educational evaluation (IEE)
of the child.
(F) The right to timely administrative resolution of complaints.
(G) The availability of dispute resolution through the
administrative complaint, mediation, and due process procedures
described in paragraph (d) of this section with respect to any matter
relating to the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of
the child, or a FAPE for the child, age 3 through 21 years, inclusive.
(H) The right of any party aggrieved by the decision regarding a
due process complaint to bring a civil action in a district court of
the United States of competent jurisdiction in accordance with
paragraph (d)(21) of this section.
(ii) Procedural Safeguards Notice. A DoDEA school shall not be
required to give parents a copy of the procedural safeguards notice
more than once a school year, except that a copy must be given to
parents upon a request from the parents; upon initial referral for
evaluation or parental request for evaluation; and upon receipt of the
first due process complaint.
(A) The procedural safeguards notice must include a full
explanation of all of the procedural safeguards available, including:
(1) Independent evaluation for children (3 through 21 years,
inclusive).
(2) Prior written notice.
(3) Parental consent.
(4) Access to educational records.
(5) Dispute resolution procedures together with applicable
timelines including:
(i) The availability of mediation.
(ii) Procedures for filing a due process complaint and the required
time period within which a due process complaint must be filed.
(iii) The opportunity for the DoDEA school system to resolve a due
process complaint filed by a parent through the resolution process.
(iv) Procedures for filing an administrative complaint and for
administrative resolution of the issues.
(6) The child's placement during pendency of due process
proceedings in accordance with paragraph (d)(18) of this section.
(7) Procedures for children (3 through 21 years, inclusive) who are
subject to placement in an interim AES.
(8) Requirements for unilateral placement by parents of children in
private schools at public expense.
(9) Due process hearings, including requirements for disclosure of
evaluation results and recommendations.
[[Page 76017]]
(10) The right to bring a civil action in a district court of the
United States in accordance with paragraph (d)(21) of this section,
including the time period in which to file such action.
(11) The possibility of an award of attorney's fees to the
prevailing party in certain circumstances.
(B) The procedural safeguards notice must be:
(1) Written in language understandable to the general public.
(2) Provided in the native language of the parent or other mode of
communication used by the parent, unless it is clearly not feasible to
do so. If the procedural safeguards notice is not translated into the
native language of the parent, then the DoDEA school system shall
ensure that:
(i) The notice is translated orally or by other means for the
parent in his or her native language or other mode of communication.
(ii) The parent understands the content of the notice.
(iii) There is written evidence that the requirements above have
been met.
(iii) Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE).
(A) Obtaining an IEE. The DoDEA school system shall provide to the
parents, upon request for an IEE, information about where an IEE that
meets DoDEA school system criteria, as set forth in paragraph
(b)(19)(iii)(F) of this section, may be obtained.
(B) Right to IEE. The parents of a child with a disability have a
right to an IEE at the DoDEA school system expense if the parent
disagrees with an evaluation obtained by the DoDEA school system,
subject to paragraph (b)(19)(iii)(C) to (H) of this section.
(C) Written Request for IEE. If a parent provides the DoDEA school
system with a written request for an IEE funded by the school system,
then the school system shall either:
(1) Agree to fund an appropriate IEE that meets the DoDEA school
system criteria, or
(2) Initiate a due process hearing in accordance with paragraph (d)
of this section, without unnecessary delay, and demonstrate that its
evaluation was appropriate under this part.
(i) If the DoDEA school system initiates a due process hearing and
the final decision is that the school system's evaluation is
appropriate, the parent still has the right to an IEE, but not at
public expense.
(ii) If a parent requests an IEE, the DoDEA school system may ask
for the parent's reason why he or she objects to the school system's
evaluation. However, the parent may not be compelled to provide an
explanation and the DoDEA school system may not unreasonably delay
either agreeing to fund an IEE that meets DoDEA school system criteria
or initiating a due process hearing to defend its evaluation.
(D) Parent-Initiated Evaluations. If the parent obtains an IEE
funded by the school system or shares with the DoDEA school system an
evaluation obtained at private expense:
(1) The results of the evaluation shall be considered by the DoDEA
school if it meets the school system's criteria in any decision made
with respect to the provision of FAPE to the child.
(2) The results may be presented by any party as evidence at a due
process hearing under this section regarding that child.
(3) The DoDEA school system may not be required to fund an IEE that
has been obtained by a parent if at a due process hearing initiated by
either party and conducted under this section, the DoDEA school system
demonstrates either that:
(i) The parentally obtained evaluation was not educationally
appropriate or failed to meet agency criteria; or
(ii) The DoDEA school system's evaluation was appropriate.
(E) Hearing Officer Order for Evaluation. A hearing officer may
only order an IEE at the DoDEA school system's expense as part of a due
process hearing under this section if:
(1) The school system has failed to demonstrate its assessment was
appropriate; or
(2) The school system has not already funded an IEE in response to
a given school evaluation.
(F) DoDEA School System Criteria. An IEE provided at the DoDEA
school system's expense must:
(1) Conform to the requirements of paragraph (b)(6)(viii) and (ix)
of this section.
(2) Be conducted, when possible, in the geographic area where the
child resides utilizing available qualified resources, including
qualified examiners employed by the Military Department, unless the
parent can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the DoDEA school system
or in a due process hearing filed in accordance with paragraph (d) of
this section, that the geographic limitation renders the IEE
impossible.
(3) Meet DoD standards governing persons qualified to conduct an
IEE, including an evaluation for related services.
(G) Conditions. Except for the criteria in paragraph (b)(6)(viii)
and(b)(6)(ix) of this section, the DoDEA school system shall not impose
conditions or timelines related to obtaining an IEE at the DoDEA school
system expense.
(H) Limitations. A parent is entitled to only one IEE at DoDEA
school system expense in response to a given DoDEA school system
evaluation with which the parent disagrees.
(iv) Placement During Due Process, Appeal, or Civil Procedures.
While an impartial due process proceeding, appeal proceeding, or civil
proceeding is pending, unless the DoDEA school system and the parent of
the child agree otherwise in writing, the child shall remain in his or
her current placement, subject to the disciplinary procedures
prescribed in paragraph (b)(13) of this section.
(v) Transfer of Parental Rights at Age of Majority.
(A) In the DoDEA school system, a child reaches the age of majority
at age 18.
(B) When a child with a disability reaches the age of majority
(except for a child with a disability who has been determined to be
incompetent in accordance with Federal or State law) the rights
afforded to the parents in accordance with the IDEA and this part
transfer to the child.
(C) When a child reaches the age of majority, the DoDEA school
shall notify the child and the parents of the transfer of rights.
(D) When a child with a disability who has not been determined to
be incompetent, but who does not have the ability to provide informed
consent with respect to his or her educational program, reaches the age
of majority, the DoD shall appoint a parent or the parents of the child
to represent the educational interests of the child throughout the
period of eligibility for special education services.
(c) Procedures for Provision of Related Services by the Military
Departments to Students With Disabilities in a DoDDS
(1) Evaluation Procedures.
(i) Upon request by a CSC, the responsible EDIS shall ensure that a
qualified medical authority conducts or verifies a medical evaluation
for use by the CSC in determining the medically related disability that
results in a child's need for special education and related services,
and shall oversee an EDIS evaluation used in determining a child's need
for related services.
(ii) The medical or related services evaluation, including
necessary consultation with other medical personnel, shall be
supervised by a physician or other qualified healthcare provider.
(iii) The medical or related services evaluation shall be specific
to the
[[Page 76018]]
concerns addressed in the request from the CSC.
(iv) The EDIS shall provide to the CSC an evaluation report that
responds to the questions posed in the original request for an
evaluation. The written report shall include:
(A) Demographic information about the child, such as the child's
name, date of birth, and grade level
(B) Behavioral observation of the child during testing.
(C) Instruments and techniques used.
(D) Evaluation results.
(E) Descriptions of the child's strengths and limitations.
(F) Instructional implications of the findings.
(G) The impact of the child's medical condition(s), if applicable,
on his or her educational performance.
(v) If the EDIS that supports the DoDDS school requires assistance
to conduct or complete an evaluation, the EDIS shall contact the MTF
designated by the Military Department with geographic responsibility
for the area where the EDIS is located.
(vi) If EDIS determines that in order to respond to the CSC
referral the scope of its assessment and evaluation must be expanded
beyond the areas specified in the initial parental permission, EDIS
must:
(A) Obtain parental permission for the additional activities.
(B) Complete its initial evaluation by the original due date.
(C) Notify the CSC of the additional evaluation activities.
(vii) When additional evaluation information is submitted by EDIS,
the CSC shall review all data and determine the need for program
changes and the reconsideration of eligibility.
(viii) An EDIS provider shall serve on the CSC when eligibility,
placement, or requirements for related services that EDIS provides are
to be determined.
(2) IEP
(i) EDIS shall be provided the opportunity to participate in the
IEP meeting.
(ii) EDIS shall provide related services assigned to EDIS that are
listed on the IEP.
(3) Liaison With DoDDS. Each EDIS shall designate a special
education liaison officer to:
(i) Provide liaison between the EDIS and DoDDS on requests for
evaluations and other matters within their purview.
(ii) Offer, on a consultative basis, training for school personnel
on medical aspects of specific disabilities.
(iii) Offer consultation and advice as needed regarding the medical
services provided at school (for example, tracheotomy care, tube
feeding, occupational therapy).
(iv) Participate with school personnel in developing and delivering
in-service training programs that include familiarization with various
conditions that impair a child's educational endeavors, the
relationship of medical findings to educational functioning, related
services, and the requirements of the IDEA and this part.
(d) Dispute Resolution and Due Process Procedures
(1) General. This section establishes requirements for resolving
disputes regarding the provision of EIS to an infant or toddler up to 3
years of age, or the identification, evaluation, or educational
placement of a child (ages 3 through 21, inclusive), or the provision
of a FAPE to such child in accordance with the IDEA and this part.
(2) Conferences. Whenever possible, parties are encouraged to
resolve disputes through the use of conferences at the lowest level
possible between the parents and EDIS or the DoDEA school.
(i) Within a DoDEA school, problems should be brought first to the
teacher, then the school administrator, and then the district office.
(ii) At EDIS, problems should be brought first to the EDIS
provider, then the EDIS program manager, and then the local MTF
commander.
(3) Administrative Complaints. (i) A complaint filed with the
responsible agency, relating to the provision of services under the
IDEA and this part, other than due process complaints filed in
accordance with paragraph (d)(5) of this section, is known as an
administrative complaint.
(ii) An individual or organization may file an administrative
complaint alleging issues relating to services required to be delivered
under the IDEA and this part with:
(A) The Office of the Inspector General of a Military Department
when the issue involves services or programs for infants and toddlers
with disabilities, or related services provided by the Military
Departments to children with disabilities.
(B) The DoDEA Director, Office of Investigations and Internal
Review (OI&IR) when the issue involves the services or programs for
children ages 3 to 21, inclusive that are under the direction or
control of the DoDEA school system.
(iii) An administrative complaint alleging issues relating to
services required to be delivered under the IDEA or this part must
include:
(A) A statement that the Military Service or the DoDEA school
system has violated a requirement of the IDEA or this part.
(B) The facts on which the statement is based.
(C) The signature and contact information for the complainant.
(D) If alleging violations with respect to specific children:
(1) The name of the school the child is attending.
(2) The name and address of the residence of the child.
(3) A description of the nature of the problem of the child,
including facts relating to the problem.
(4) A proposed resolution of the problem to the extent known and
available to the complainant at the time the complaint is filed.
(iv) An administrative complaint may not allege a violation that
occurred more than 1 year prior to the date that the complaint is
received.
(v) The complainant filing an administrative complaint alleging
issues related to services required to be delivered under the IDEA or
this part must forward a copy of the complaint to the DoDEA school or
EDIS clinic serving the child at the same time the complainant files
the complaint with the appropriate authority in paragraph (d)(3)(i) of
this section.
(A) Upon receipt of the complaint, the Inspector General of the
Military Department concerned will notify the Secretary of the Military
Department concerned, and the OCA will notify the Director, DoDEA, of
the complaint.
(B) Upon receipt of a complaint, the responsible Military
Department Inspector General or the OCA shall, if warranted, promptly
open an investigation consistent with its established procedures for
investigating complaints.
(1) The investigation shall afford the complainant an opportunity
to submit additional information about the allegations.
(2) The investigation shall afford the DoDEA school system or the
Military Department an opportunity to:
(i) Respond to the complaint;
(ii) Propose a resolution to the complaint; or
(iii) If the parties are willing, voluntarily engage in mediation
of the complaint.
(3) The investigation shall produce a report consistent with those
the investigating agency routinely provides, shall determine whether
its findings support the complaint, and shall state whether the DoDEA
school system or the Military Department is violating a requirement of
the IDEA or this part.
(vi) The findings and conclusions of the report of investigation
related to the administrative complaint shall be made available to the
complainant and
[[Page 76019]]
members of the public in accordance with the standard operating
procedures of the investigating activity and 32 CFR part 310 and 32 CFR
part 285.
(A) The investigating activity shall provide a copy of the report
to the Director, DoDEA and the Secretary of a Military Department
concerned or in accordance with the investigating activity's protocols.
(B) The report shall be provided, to the extent practicable, within
60 days of initiating the investigation, unless extended by the
complainant and the DoDEA school system or the Military Department.
(vii) The Secretary of the Military Department concerned or the
Director, DoDEA shall resolve complaints within their respective area
of responsibility when the Military Service or the DoDEA school system
is found to have failed to provide appropriate services consistent with
the requirements of the IDEA or this part. Remediation may include
corrective action appropriate to address the needs of the child such as
compensatory services, or monetary reimbursement where otherwise
authorized by law.
(viii) When a complaint received under this section is also the
subject of a due process complaint regarding alleged violations of
rights afforded under the IDEA and this part, or contains multiple
issues of which one or more are part of that due process complaint, the
investigation activity shall set aside any issues alleged in the due
process complaint until a hearing is concluded in accordance with the
IDEA and this part. Any issue that is not part of the due process
hearing must be resolved using the procedures of this section.
(ix) If an issue raised in a complaint filed under this section has
been previously decided in a due process hearing involving the same
parties:
(A) The due process hearing decision is binding on that issue.
(B) The Director, DoDEA or the Secretary of the Military Department
concerned shall so inform the complainant.
(4) Mediation.
(i) A parent, the Military Department concerned, or DoDEA may
request mediation at any time, whether or not a due process petition
has been filed, to informally resolve a disagreement on any matter
relating to the provision of EIS to an infant or toddler (birth up to 3
years of age), or the identification, evaluation, or educational
placement of a child (ages 3 through 21, inclusive), or the provision
of a FAPE to such child.
(ii) Mediation must be voluntary on the part of the parties and
shall not be used to deny or delay a parent's right to a due process
hearing or to deny other substantive or procedural rights afforded
under the IDEA.
(A) DoDEA school officials participate in mediation involving
special education and related services; the cognizant Military
Department participates in mediation involving EIS.
(B) The initiating party's request must be written, include a
description of the dispute, bear the signature of the requesting party,
and be provided:
(1) In the case of a parent initiating mediation, to:
(i) The local EDIS program manager in disputes involving EDIS; or
(ii) The school principal in disputes involving a DoDEA school.
(2) In the case of the school or EDIS initiating mediation, to the
parent.
(C) Acknowledgment of the request for mediation shall occur in a
timely manner.
(D) Agreement to mediate shall be provided in writing to the other
party in a timely manner.
(ii) Upon agreement of the parties to mediate a dispute, the local
EDIS or DoDEA school shall forward a request for a mediator to the
Military Department or to DoDEA's Center for Early Dispute Resolution
(CEDR), respectively.
(iii) The mediator shall be obtained from the Defense Office of
Hearings and Appeals (DOHA) unless another qualified and impartial
mediator is obtained by the Military Department or CEDR.
(A) Where DOHA is used, the DOHA Center for Alternate Dispute
Resolution (CADR) shall provide the mediator from its roster of
mediators qualified in special education disputes.
(B) Where the Military Department or DoDEA elects to secure a
mediator through its own DoD Component resources, the mediator shall be
selected from the Component's roster of mediators qualified in special
education disputes, or by contract with an outside mediator duly
qualified in special education disputes and who is trained in effective
mediation techniques.
(iv) The Military Department or DoDEA through CEDR shall obtain a
mediator within 15 business days of receipt of a request for mediation,
or immediately request a mediator through the Director, DOHA, through
the DOHA CADR.
(v) When requested, the Director, DOHA, through the CADR, shall
appoint a mediator within 15 business days of receiving the request,
unless a party provides written notice to the Director, DOHA that the
party refuses to participate in mediation.
(vi) Unless both parties agree otherwise, mediation shall commence
in a timely manner after both parties agree to mediation.
(vii) The parents of the infant, toddler, or child, and EDIS or the
school shall be parties in the mediation. With the consent of both
parties, other persons may attend the mediation.
(viii) Mediation shall be conducted using the following rules:
(A) The Military Department concerned shall bear the cost of the
mediation process in mediations concerning EIS.
(B) DoDEA shall bear the cost of the mediation process in
mediations concerning special education and related services.
(C) The mediator may require the parties to sign a confidentiality
pledge before the commencement of mediation.
(D) Unless the parties and the mediator agree, no person may record
a mediation session, nor shall any written notes be taken from the room
by either party.
(E) Either party may request a recess of a mediation session to
consult advisors, whether or not present, or to consult privately with
the mediator.
(F) The mediator shall ensure and the contract for mediation
services shall require that any partial or complete resolution or
agreement of any issue in mediation is reduced to writing, and that the
written agreement is signed and dated by the parties, with a copy given
to each party.
(ix) Any written agreement resulting from the mediation shall state
that all discussions that occurred during the mediation process and all
records of the mediation other than a final executed agreement shall be
confidential and may not be discoverable or admissible as evidence in
any subsequent due process proceeding, appeal proceeding, or civil
proceeding under this part, and shall be legally binding upon the
parties and enforceable in a district court of the United States.
(x) All mediation sessions shall be held in a location that is
convenient to both parties.
(xi) No hearing officer or adjudicative body shall draw any
inference from the fact that a mediator or a party withdrew from
mediation or from the fact that mediation did not result in settlement
of a dispute.
(xii) Discussions and statements made during the mediation process,
and any minutes, statements or other records of a mediation session
other than a final executed mediation agreement, shall be considered
confidential between the parties to that mediation and are not
discoverable or admissible in a due
[[Page 76020]]
process proceeding, appeal proceeding, or civil proceeding under this
part.
(5) Due Process Complaint Procedures.
(i) Parents of infants, toddlers, and children who are covered by
this part and the cognizant Military Department or DoDEA, are afforded
impartial hearings and administrative appeals after the parties have
waived or participated in and failed to resolve a dispute through:
(A) Mediation, in the case of an infant or toddler; or
(B) A resolution process, or mediation in lieu of the resolution
process prior to proceeding to a due process hearing, in the case of a
child (ages 3 through 21 years, inclusive).
(ii) An impartial due process hearing is available to resolve any
dispute concerning the provision of EIS to infants and toddlers with
disabilities or with respect to any matter relating to the
identification, evaluation, educational placement of, and the FAPE
provided by the Department of Defense to children (ages 3 through 21,
inclusive) who are covered by this part, in accordance with the IDEA
and this part.
(A) Whenever the parents or the cognizant Military Department
present a due process complaint (petition) in accordance with this
part, an impartial due process hearing is available to resolve any
dispute concerning the provision of EIS.
(B) When the parents of children ages 3 through 21 years,
inclusive, or the cognizant Military Department or DoDEA, present a due
process complaint (petition) in accordance with this part relating to
any matter regarding the identification, evaluation, placement, or the
provision of FAPE, the parties shall first proceed in accordance with
the requirements for a statutory resolution process in accordance with
this part, after which time an impartial due process hearing is
available to resolve the dispute set forth by the complaint.
(iii) An expedited impartial due process hearing may be requested:
(A) By a parent when the parent disagrees with the manifestation
determination or any decision regarding the child's disciplinary
placement.
(B) By the school when it believes that maintaining a student in
his or her current educational placement is substantially likely to
result in injury to the student or others and.
(iv) Any party to a special education dispute may initiate a due
process hearing by filing a petition stating the specific issues that
are in dispute. The initiating party is the ``petitioner'' and the
responding party is the ``respondent.'' The petition itself will remain
confidential, in accordance with applicable law, not be released to
those not a party to the litigation and its Personally Identifiable
Information shall be protected in accordance with the DoD Privacy Act.
(v) Petitioner and respondent are each entitled to representation
by counsel at their own expense. The parent and child may choose to be
assisted by a personal representative with special knowledge or
training with respect to the problems of disabilities rather than by
legal counsel.
(vi) To file a petition that affords sufficient notice of the
issues and commences the running of relevant timelines, petitioners
shall specifically include in the petition:
(A) The name and residential address of the child and the name of
the school the child is attending or the location of the EDIS serving
the child.
(B) A description of the dispute(s) between the parents and the
school or EDIS describing the facts (who, what, when, where, how, why)
pertinent to each dispute and relating those facts to:
(1) A proposal, or the refusal of a proposal, to initiate or change
the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of the child;
or
(2) Any allegation of the failure to provide a FAPE to the child.
(C) A proposed resolution of the problem to the extent known and
available to the petitioner at the time.
(D) The signature of the parent, or if the petitioner is DoDEA or a
Military Department, an authorized representative of that petitioner,
or of the counsel or personal representative for the petitioner, and
his or her telephone number and mailing address.
(vii) When the cognizant Military Department or DoDEA petitions for
a hearing, it shall additionally:
(A) Inform the parent of the 10 business-day deadline (or 5 school
days in the case of an expedited hearing) for filing a response that
specifically addresses the issues raised in the petition.
(B) Provide the parent with a copy of this part.
(viii) A special rule applies for expedited hearing requests. The
petitioner must state, as applicable to his or her petition:
(A) The disciplinary basis for the child's change in placement to
an interim AES or other removal from the child's current placement.
(B) The reasons for the change in placement.
(C) The reasoning of the manifestation determination committee in
concluding that a particular act of misconduct was not a manifestation
of the child's disability.
(D) How the child's current educational placement is or is not
substantially likely to result in injury to the child or others.
(ix) The petition or request for an expedited due process hearing
must be delivered to:
(A) The Director, DOHA, by mail to P.O. Box 3656, Arlington,
Virginia 22203, by fax to 703-696-1831, or email to
specialedcomplaint@osdgc.osd.mil. Filing may also be made by hand
delivery to the office of the Director, DOHA if approval from the
Director, DOHA is obtained in advance of delivery.
(B) The respondent by mail, fax, email, or hand delivery.
(1) If the petitioner is a parent of a child (ages of 3-21,
inclusive), or a child (in the event that rights have been transferred
in accordance with paragraph (b)(19) of this section, the respondent is
DoDEA and the petition must be delivered to and received by the
principal of the school in which the child is enrolled, or if the child
is enrolled in the Non-DoD School Program (NDSP) to the DoDEA General
Counsel (generalcounsel@hq.dodea.edu).
(2) If the petitioner is the parent of an infant or toddler (birth
to age 3), the respondent is the responsible Military Department and
the petition must be delivered to and received by the EDIS manager.
(3) If the petitioner is the responsible Military Department or
DoDEA, the petition must be delivered to and received by the parent of
the child.
(C) Filing of the due process petition with DOHA is considered
complete when received by DOHA.
(x) The timelines for requesting and conducting a due process
hearing are:
(A) Timelines for Requesting a Hearing. A petitioner may not allege
a violation that occurred more than 2 years before the date the
petitioner knew, or should have known, about the alleged action that
forms the basis of the complaint, unless the parent was prevented from
requesting the hearing due to:
(1) Specific misrepresentation by DoDEA or EDIS that it had
resolved the problem forming the basis of the complaint.
(2) The withholding of information by DoDEA or EDIS from the
petitioning parent that was required to be provided to the parent in
accordance with the IDEA and this part.
(B) Timeline for Conducting a Due Process Hearing. Except as
provided in paragraph (d)(5)(x)(D) and (d)(8)(ii) of
[[Page 76021]]
this section, a hearing officer shall issue findings of fact and
conclusions of law not later than 50 business days:
(1) In a case involving EDIS, following the filing and service of a
legally sufficient petition or amended petition in accordance with this
section.
(2) In disputes involving a school and a child age 3-21, inclusive,
following the filing and service of a legally sufficient petition or
amended petition in accordance with this section and the hearing
officer's receipt of notice that the 30-day resolution period concluded
without agreement, the parties waived the resolution meeting, or the
parties have concluded mediation in lieu of the resolution process
without reaching agreement.
(C) Exceptions to the Timelines for Conduct of a Hearing
(1) When the hearing officer grants a request for discovery made by
either party, as provided for in paragraph (d)(10) of this section, in
which case the time required for such discovery does not count toward
the 50 business days.
(2) When the hearing officer grants a specific extension of time
for good cause in accordance with paragraph (d)(8) of this section.
(D) Timeline for Conducting an Expedited Hearing. (i) In the event
of a petition for expedited hearing is requested, a DOHA hearing
officer shall arrange for the hearing to be held not later than 20
school days (when school is in session) of the date the request is
filed with DOHA, subject to the timeline for scheduling a resolution
meeting and the 15 day resolution period requirements of this section.
(ii) The hearing officer must make a determination within 10 school
days after the hearing.
(6) Responses and Actions Required Following Receipt of a Petition
or Request for Expedited Hearing. (i) Immediately upon receipt of the
petition, the Director, DOHA, shall appoint a hearing officer to take
charge of the case.
(A) The hearing officer shall immediately notify the parties of his
or her appointment.
(B) Upon receipt of notice that a hearing officer is appointed, the
parties shall communicate all motions, pleadings, or amendments in
writing to the hearing officer, with a copy to the opposing party,
unless the hearing officer directs otherwise.
(ii) Within 10 business days of receipt of the petition (5 school
days when school is in session in the case of a petition for an
expedited hearing), the respondent shall deliver a copy of the written
response to the petitioner and file the original written response with
the hearing officer. Filing may be made by mail to P.O. Box 3656,
Arlington, Virginia 22203, by fax to 703-696-1831, by hand delivery if
approved in advance by the hearing officer, or by email to
specialedcomplaint@osdgc.osd.mil. If a hearing officer has not yet been
appointed, the respondent will deliver the original written response to
the Director, DOHA in accordance with paragraph (d)(5)(ix) of this
section.
(iii) The respondent shall specifically address the issues raised
in the due process hearing petition.
(iv) If the respondent is the cognizant Military Department or
DoDEA, the response shall include:
(A) An explanation of why the respondent proposed or refused to
take the action at issue in the due process complaint.
(B) A description of each evaluation procedure, assessment, record,
or report the DoD Component used as the basis for the proposed or
refused action.
(C) A description of the options that the respondent considered and
the reasons why those options were rejected.
(D) A description of the other factors that are relevant to the
respondent's proposed or refused action.
(v) The respondent may file a notice of insufficient petition
within 15 business days of receiving a petition if the respondent
wishes to challenge the sufficiency of the petition for failure to
state the elements required by the IDEA. Within 5 business days of
receiving a notice of insufficient petition, the hearing officer will
issue a decision and will notify the parties in writing of that
determination.
(vi) A response to the petitioner shall not be construed to
preclude the respondent from asserting that the parents' due process
complaint was insufficient.
(vii) Parties may amend a petition only if:
(A) The other party consents in writing to such amendment and is
given the opportunity to resolve the complaint through the resolution
process; or
(B) The hearing officer grants permission, except that the hearing
officer may not grant such permission at any time later than 5 days
before a due process hearing is scheduled to begin.
(viii) The filing of an amended petition resets the timelines for:
(A) The conduct of a resolution meeting and the resolution period
relating to the amended petition, and
(B) All deadlines for responses and action required following the
receipt of the amended petition, and for conducting a due process
hearing on the amended petition.
(7) Statutory Resolution Process. A resolution meeting shall be
convened by DoDEA and a resolution period afforded, in accordance with
this section, for any dispute in which a due process petition has been
filed regarding the the identification, evaluation, or educational
placement, or the provision of FAPE for children ages 3 to 21,
inclusive.
(i) Within 15 calendar days of receiving the parent's petition for
due process (7 calendar days in the case of an expedited hearing),
DoDEA, through the pertinent school principal or superintendent, shall
convene a dispute resolution meeting, which must be attended by:
(A) The parents.
(B) A legal representative of the parents if desired by the
parents.
(C) A DoDEA official designated and authorized by the District
Superintendent or Area Director to exercise decision-making authority
on behalf of DoDEA.
(D) A DoDEA legal representative, only if the parent is represented
by counsel at the resolution meeting.
(E) The relevant members of the child's CSC who have specific
knowledge of the facts identified in the petition.
(ii) The parties may agree to mediate in lieu of conducting a
resolution meeting or in lieu of completing the resolution period. The
resolution meeting need not be held if the parties agree in writing to
waive the meeting or agree to use the mediation process.
(iii) Failure to convene or participate in resolution meeting.
(A) If DoDEA has offered to convene a resolution meeting and has
been unable to obtain parental participation in the resolution meeting
after making and documenting its reasonable efforts, DoDEA may, at the
conclusion of the resolution period (30 days or 15 days in the case of
an expedited hearing) request that a hearing officer dismiss the
parent's due process complaint or request for an expedited due process
hearing.
(B) If DoDEA fails to convene a resolution meeting within 15 days
of receipt of a due process complaint or if it fails to participate in
the resolution meeting, the parent may request the hearing officer to
immediately convene the due process hearing without waiting for the 30-
day resolution period to expire.
(iv) DoDEA shall have a 30-day resolution period, counted from the
receipt of the complaint by the school principal, (15 days in the case
of an expedited hearing request) within
[[Page 76022]]
which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of the parents.
(v) The resolution period may be adjusted because of one of the
following events:
(A) Both parties agree in writing to waive the resolution meeting.
(B) After the resolution meeting starts, but before the end of the
applicable resolution period, the parties agree in writing that no
agreement is possible and agree to waive the balance of the resolution
period.
(C) Both parties agree in writing to continue the resolution
meeting at the end of the applicable resolution period, but later the
parent or the school withdraws from the resolution process.
(vi) If a partial or complete resolution to the dispute is reached
at the resolution meeting, the parties must execute a written agreement
that is:
(A) Signed by both the parents and a representative of the school
with authority to bind the school to the terms of the agreement.
(B) Legally enforceable in a U.S. District Court of competent
jurisdiction, unless the parties have voided the agreement within an
agreement review period of 3 business days following the execution of
the agreement.
(vii) Discussions held, minutes, statements, and other records of a
resolution meeting, and any final executed resolution agreement are not
presumed confidential and therefore are discoverable and admissible in
a due process proceeding, appeal proceeding, or civil proceeding,
except when the parties have agreed to confidentiality.
(viii) If DoDEA has not resolved the complaint to the satisfaction
of the parents at the expiration of the resolution period or the
adjusted resolution period, if applicable:
(A) DoDEA shall provide written notice to the hearing officer, copy
to the parents, within 3 business days (1 business day in the case of
an expedited hearing) of the expiration of the resolution period or
adjusted resolution period that the parties failed to reach agreement.
(B) Upon receipt of that notification by the hearing officer, all
of the applicable timelines for proceeding to a due process hearing
under this section shall commence.
(ix) If the parties execute a binding written agreement at the
conclusion of the resolution period, and do not subsequently declare it
void during the 3-business day agreement review period, then:
(A) DoDEA shall provide written notice to the hearing officer, copy
to the parents, at the conclusion of the agreement review period that
the parties have reached an agreement for resolution of complaints set
forth in the due process petition.
(B) Upon receipt of that notification by the presiding hearing
officer, no due process hearing shall proceed on the issues resolved.
(8) The Due Process Hearing. (i) Purpose. The purpose of the due
process hearing is to establish the relevant facts necessary for the
hearing officer to reach a fair and impartial determination of the
case.
(ii) Hearing Officer Duties. The hearing officer shall be the
presiding officer, with judicial powers to manage the proceeding and
conduct the hearing. Those powers shall include, but are not limited
to, the authority to:
(A) Determine the adequacy of pleadings.
(B) Decide whether to allow amendment of pleadings, provided
permission is granted to authorize the amendment not later than 5 days
before a due process hearing occurs.
(C) Rule on questions of timeliness and grant specific extension of
time for good cause either on his or her own motion or at the request
of either party.
(1) Good cause includes the time required for mediation in
accordance with paragraph (d)(4) of this section where the parties have
jointly requested an extension of time in order to complete mediation.
(2) If the hearing officer grants an extension of time, he or she
shall identify the length of the extension and the reason for the
extension in the record of the proceeding. Any such extension shall be
excluded from the time required to convene a hearing or issue a final
decision, and at the discretion of the hearing officer may delay other
filing dates specified by this section.
(D) Rule on requests for discovery and discovery disputes.
(E) Order an evaluation of the child at the expense of the DoDEA
school system or the Military Department concerned.
(F) Rule on evidentiary issues.
(G) Ensure a full and complete record of the case is developed.
(H) Decide when the record in a case is closed.
(I) Issue findings of fact and conclusions of law.
(J) Issue a decision on substantive grounds based on a
determination of whether the child received a FAPE. When the petition
alleges a procedural violation, a hearing officer may find that a child
did not receive a FAPE only if the procedural inadequacies:
(1) Impeded the child's right to a FAPE;
(2) Significantly impeded the parent's opportunity to participate
in the decision-making process regarding the provision of FAPE to the
child; or
(3) Caused a deprivation of educational benefits.
(K) Order such relief as is necessary for the child to receive a
FAPE or appropriate EIS, including ordering the DoDEA school system or
the responsible Military Department to:
(1) Correct a procedural deficiency that caused a denial of a FAPE
or appropriate EIS;
(2) Conduct evaluations or assessments and report to the hearing
officer;
(3) Change the school-aged child's placement or order the child to
an AES for up to 45 days;
(4) Provide EIS or specific school-age educational or related
services to a child to remedy a denial of FAPE, including compensatory
services when appropriate and in accordance with the current early
intervention or educational program; or
(5) Placement of a school-aged child in an appropriate residential
program for children with disabilities at DoD expense, when appropriate
under the law and upon a determination that DoDEA has failed to provide
and cannot provide an otherwise eligible child with a FAPE at the
appropriate DoD facility.
(i) A residential program must be one that can address the specific
needs of the child as determined by the DoDEA school.
(ii) The program should, whenever possible, be located near members
of the child's family.
(9) Attendees at the Hearing. Attendance at the hearing is limited
to:
(i) The parents and the counsel or personal representative of the
parents.
(ii) A representative of DoDEA or the EDIS concerned and the
counsel representing DoDEA or the EDIS.
(iii) Witnesses for the parties, including but not limited to the
professional employees of DoDEA or the EDIS concerned and any expert
witnesses.
(iv) A person qualified to transcribe or record the proceedings.
(v) Other persons with the agreement of the parties or the order of
the hearing officer, in accordance with the privacy interests of the
parents and the individual with disabilities.
(10) Discovery. (i) Full discovery shall be available, with the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 26-37, 28 U.S.C. appendix,
serving as a guide to parties to a due process hearing or conducted in
accordance with this part.
(ii) If voluntary discovery cannot be accomplished, a party seeking
discovery
[[Page 76023]]
may file a motion with the hearing officer to accomplish discovery. The
hearing officer shall grant an order to accomplish discovery upon a
showing that the document or information sought is relevant or
reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
An order granting discovery, or compelling testimony or the production
of evidence shall be enforceable by all reasonable means within the
authority of the hearing officer, to include the exclusion of testimony
or witnesses, adverse inferences, and dismissal or summary judgment.
(iii) Records compiled or created in the regular course of
business, which have been provided to the opposing party at least 5
business days prior to the hearing, may be received and considered by
the hearing officer without authenticating witnesses.
(iv) A copy of the written or electronic transcription of a
deposition taken by a Military Department or DoDEA shall be made
available by the Military Department or DoDEA without charge to the
opposing party.
(11) Right to an Open Hearing. The parents, or child who has
reached the age of majority, have the right to an open hearing upon
waiving, in writing, their privacy rights and those of the individual
with disabilities who is the subject of the hearing.
(12) Location of Hearing. Subject to modification by the hearing
officer for good cause shown or upon the agreement of the parties, the
hearing shall be held:
(i) In the DoDEA school district attended by the child (ages 3
through 21, inclusive):
(ii) On the military installation of the EDIS serving infants and
toddlers with disabilities; or
(iii) At a suitable video teleconferencing facility convenient for
the parents of the child involved in the hearing and available for the
duration of a hearing.
(13) Witnesses and Documentary Evidence. (i) At least 5 business
days prior to a hearing, the parties shall exchange lists of all
documents and materials that each party intends to use at the hearing,
including all evaluations and reports. Each party also shall disclose
the names of all witnesses it intends to call at a hearing along with a
proffer of the anticipated testimony of each witness.
(ii) At least 10 business days prior to a hearing, each party must
provide the name, title, description of professional qualifications,
and summary of proposed testimony of any expert witness it intends to
call at the hearing.
(iii) Failure to disclose documents, materials, or witnesses may
result in the hearing officer barring their introduction at the
hearing.
(iv) Parties must limit evidence to the issues specifically
pleaded, except by order of the hearing officer or with the consent of
the parties.
(v) The rules of evidence shall be relaxed to permit the
development of a full evidentiary record with the Federal Rules of
Evidence, 28 U.S.C. appendix, serving as guide.
(vi) All witnesses testifying at the hearing shall be advised by
the hearing officer that under 18 U.S.C. 1001, it is a criminal offense
to knowingly and willfully make a materially false, fictitious, or
fraudulent statement or representation to a department or agency of the
U.S. Government as to any matter within the jurisdiction of that
department or agency, and may result in a fine or imprisonment.
(vii) A party calling a witness shall bear the witness' travel and
incidental expenses associated with testifying at the hearing. The
DoDEA school system or the Military Department concerned shall pay such
expenses if a witness is called by the hearing officer.
(viii) The parties shall have the right to cross-examine witnesses
testifying at the hearing.
(ix) The hearing officer may issue an order compelling a party to
make a specific witness employed by or under control of the party
available for testimony at the party's expense or to submit specific
documentary or physical evidence for inspection by the hearing officer
or for submission into the record on motion of either party or on the
hearing officer's own motion.
(x) When the hearing officer determines that a party has failed to
obey an order to make a specific witness available for testimony or to
submit specific documentary or physical evidence in accordance with the
hearing officer's order, and that such failure is in knowing and
willful disregard of the order, the hearing officer shall so certify as
a part of the written record in the case and may order appropriate
sanctions.
(14) Transcripts. (i) A verbatim written transcription of any
deposition taken by a party shall be provided to the opposing party in
hardcopy written format or as attached to an electronic email with
prior permission of the recipient. If a Military Department or DoDEA
takes a desposition, the verbatim written transcript of that deposition
shall be provided to the parent(s) without charge.
(ii) A verbatim written transcription of the due process hearing
shall be arranged by the hearing officer and shall be made available to
the parties in hardcopy written format, or as an attachment to an
electronic email, with prior permission of the recipient, on request
and without cost to the parent(s), and a copy of the verbatim written
transcript of the hearing shall become a permanent part of the record
(15) Hearing Officer's Written Decision. (i) The hearing officer
shall make written findings of fact and conclusions of law and shall
set forth both in a written decision addressing the issues raised in
the due process complaint, the resolution of those issues, and the
rationale for the resolution.
(ii) The hearing officer's decision of the case shall be based on
the record, which shall include the petition, the answer, the
transcript of the hearing, exhibits admitted into evidence, pleadings
or correspondence properly filed and served on all parties, and such
other matters as the hearing officer may include in the record, if such
matter is made available to all parties before the record is closed.
(iii) The hearing officer shall file the written decision with the
Director, DOHA, and additionally provide the Director, DOHA with a copy
of that decision from which all personally identifiable information has
been redacted.
(iv) The Director, DOHA, shall forward to parents and to the DoDEA
or the EDIS concerned, copies, unredacted and with all personally
identifiable information redacted, of the hearing officer's decision.
(v) The decision of the hearing officer shall become final unless a
timely notice of appeal is filed in accordance with paragraph (d)(17)
of this section.
(vi) The DoDEA or the EDIS concerned shall implement the decision
as soon as practicable after it becomes final.
(16) Determination Without Hearing. (i) At the request of a parent
of an infant or toddler, birth to 3 years of age, when EIS are at
issue, or of a parent of a child age 3 through 21, inclusive, or child
who has reached the age of majority, when special education (including
related services) are at issue, the requirement for a hearing may be
waived, and the case may be submitted to the hearing officer on written
documents filed by the parties. The hearing officer shall make findings
of fact and conclusions of law and issue a written decision within the
period fixed by paragraph (d)(5)(x) of this section.
(ii) DoDEA or the EDIS concerned may oppose a request to waive a
hearing. In that event, the hearing officer shall rule on the request.
[[Page 76024]]
(iii) Documentary evidence submitted to the hearing officer in a
case determined without a hearing shall comply with the requirements of
paragraph (d)(13) of this section. A party submitting such documents
shall provide copies to all other parties.
(17) Appeal of Hearing Officer Decision. (i) A party may appeal the
hearing officer's findings of fact and decision by filing a written
notice of appeal within 15 business days of receipt of the hearing
officer's decision with the Chairperson, DOHA Appeal Board by mail to
P.O. Box 3656, Arlington, Virginia 22203, by fax to 703-696-1831, by
email to specialedcomplaint@osdgc.osd.mil, or by hand delivery to the
office of the Chairperson, DOHA Appeal Board if approval from the
Chairperson, DOHA Appeal Board is obtained in advance of delivery. The
notice of appeal must contain the appealing party's certification that
a copy of the notice of appeal has been provided to the other party by
mail.
(ii) Within 30 business days of filing the notice of appeal, the
appealing party shall file a written statement of issues and arguments
on appeal with the Chairperson, DOHA Appeal Board by mail to P.O. Box
3656, Arlington, Virginia 22203, by fax to 703-696-1831, by email to
specialedcomplaint@osdgc.osd.mil, or by hand delivery to the office of
the Chairperson, DOHA Appeal Board if approval from the Chairperson,
DOHA Appeal Board is obtained in advance of filing. The appealing party
shall deliver a copy to the other party by mail.
(iii) The non-appealing party shall file any reply within 20
business days of receiving the appealing party's statement of issues
and arguments on appeal with the Chairperson, DOHA Appeal Board by mail
to P.O. Box 3656, Arlington, Virginia 22203, by fax to 703-696-1831, by
email to specialedcomplaint@osdgc.osd.mil, or by hand delivery to the
office of the Chairperson, DOHA Appeal Board if approval from the
Chairperson, DOHA Appeal Board is obtained in advance of filing. The
non-appealing party shall deliver a copy of the reply to the appealing
party by mail.
(iv) Appeal filings with DOHA are complete upon transmittal. It is
the burden of the appealing party to provide timely transmittal to and
receipt to DOHA.
(v) The DOHA Appeal Board, shall issue a decision on all parties'
appeals within 45 business days of receipt of the matter.
(vi) The determination of the DOHA Appeal Board shall be a final
administrative decision and shall be in written form. It shall address
the issues presented and set forth a rationale for the decision
reached. A determination denying the appeal of a parent in whole or in
part shall state that the parent has the right, in accordance with the
IDEA, to bring a civil action on the matters in dispute in a district
court of the United States of competent jurisdiction without regard to
the amount in controversy.
(vii) No provision of this part or other DoD guidance may be
construed as conferring a further right of administrative review. A
party must exhaust all administrative remedies afforded by this section
before seeking judicial review of a determination.
(18) Maintenance of Current Educational Placement. (i) Except when
a child is in an interim AES for disciplinary reasons, during the
pendency of any proceeding conducted pursuant to this section, unless
the school and the parents otherwise agree, the child will remain in
the then current educational placement.
(ii) When the parent has appealed a decision to place a child in an
interim AES, the child shall remain in the interim setting until the
expiration of the prescribed period or the hearing officer makes a
decision on placement, whichever occurs first, unless the parent and
the school agree otherwise.
(19) General Hearing Administration. The Director, DOHA, shall:
(i) Exercise administrative responsibility for ensuring the
timeliness, fairness, and impartiality of the hearing and appeal
procedures to be conducted in accordance with this section.
(ii) Appoint hearing officers from the DOHA Administrative judges
who shall:
(A) Be attorneys who are active members of the bar of the highest
court of a State, U.S. Commonwealth, U.S. Territory, or the District of
Columbia and permitted to engage in the active practice of law, who are
qualified in accordance with DoD Instruction 1442.02 (see https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/144202p.pdf).
(B) Possess the knowledge of and ability to:
(1) Understand the provisions of the IDEA and this part, and
related Federal regulations and legal interpretations of those
regulations by Federal courts.
(2) Conduct hearings in accordance with appropriate, standard legal
practice.
(3) Render and write decisions in accordance with the requirements
of this part.
(C) Be disqualified from presiding in any individual case if the
hearing officer:
(1) Has a personal or professional interest that conflicts with the
hearing officer's objectivity in the hearing.
(2) Is a current employee of, or military member assigned to, DoDEA
or the Military Medical Department providing services in accordance
with the IDEA and this part.
(20) Publication and Reporting of Final Decisions. The Director,
DOHA, shall ensure that hearing officer and appeal board decisions in
cases arising in accordance with this section are published and indexed
with all personally identifiable information redacted to protect the
privacy rights of the parents who are parties in the due process
hearing and the children of such parents, in accordance with 32 CFR
part 310.
(21) Civil Actions. Any party aggrieved by the final administrative
decision of a due process complaint shall have the right to file a
civil action in a district court of the United States of competent
jurisdiction, without regard to the amount in controversy. The party
bringing the civil action shall have 90 days from the date of the
decision of the hearing officer or, if applicable, the date of the
decision of the DOHA Appeal Board, to file a civil action.
(e) DoD-CC on Early Intervention, Special Education, and Related
Services
(1) Committee Membership. The DoD-CC shall meet at least annually
to facilitate collaboration in early intervention, special education,
and related services in the Department of Defense. The Secretary of
Defense shall appoint representatives to serve on the DoD-CC who shall
be full-time or permanent part-time government employees or military
members from:
(i) USD(P&R), who shall serve as the Chair.
(ii) Secretaries of the Military Departments.
(ii) TRICARE Management Activity.
(iv) DoDEA.
(v) GC, DoD.
(2) Responsibilities. The responsibilities of the DoD-CC include:
(i) Implementation of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary program of
EIS for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families.
(ii) Provision of a FAPE, including special education and related
services, for children with disabilities who are enrolled full-time in
the DoDEA school system, as specified in their IEP.
(iii) Designation of a subcommittee on compliance to:
(A) Advise and assist the USD(P&R) in the performance of his or her
responsibilities.
(B) At the direction of the USD(P&R), advise and assist the
Military
[[Page 76025]]
Departments and DoDEA in the coordination of services among providers
of early intervention, special education, and related services.
(C) Monitor compliance in the provision of EIS for infants and
toddlers and special education and related services for children ages 3
to 21, inclusive.
(D) Identify common concerns, facilitate coordination of effort,
and forward issues requiring resolution to the USD(P&R).
(E) Assist in the coordination of assignments of sponsors who have
children with disabilities who are or who may be eligible for special
education and related services through DoDEA or EIS through the
Military Departments.
(F) Perform other duties as assigned by the USD(P&R), including
oversight for monitoring the delivery of services consistent with the
IDEA and this part.
(f) Monitoring.
(1) Program Monitoring and Oversight.
(i) The USD(P&R) shall monitor the implementation of the provisions
of the IDEA and this part in the programs operated by the Department of
Defense. The USD(P&R) will carry out his or her responsibilities under
this section primarily through the DoD-CC.
(ii) The primary focus of monitoring shall be on:
(A) Improving educational results and functional outcomes for all
children with disabilities.
(B) Ensuring the DoD programs meet the requirements of the IDEA and
this part.
(iii) Monitoring shall include the following priority areas and any
additional priority areas identified by the USD(P&R):
(A) Provision of a FAPE in the LRE and the delivery of early
intervention services.
(B) Child-find.
(C) Program management.
(D) The use of dispute resolution including administrative
complaints, due process and the mandatory resolution process, and
voluntary mediation.
(E) A system of transition services.
(iv) The USD(P&R) shall develop quantifiable indicators in each of
the priority areas and such qualitative indicators necessary to
adequately measure performance.
(v) DoDEA and the Military Departments shall establish procedures
for monitoring special services and reviewing program compliance in
accordance with the requirements of this section.
(vi) By January 1 of each calendar year, the DoD-CC shall identify
any additional information required to support compliance activities
that will be included in the next annual compliance report to be
submitted no later than September 30 of that year. The results of
monitoring program areas described in paragraph (f)(1)(iii) of this
section shall be reported in a manner that does not result in the
disclosure of data identifiable to individual children.
(2) Compliance Reporting. The Director, DoDEA, and the Military
Departments shall submit reports to the DoD-CC not later than September
30 each year that summarize the status of compliance. The reports
shall:
(i) Identify procedures conducted at headquarters and at each
subordinate level, including on-site visits, to evaluate compliance
with the IDEA and this part.
(ii) Summarize the findings and indicate the status of program
compliance.
(iii) Describe corrective actions required of the programs that did
not meet the requirements of the IDEA and this part and identify the
technical assistance that was or shall be provided to ensure
compliance.
(iv) Include applicable data on the operation of special education
and early intervention in the Department of Defense. Data must be
submitted in the format required by the DoD-CC to enable the
aggregation of data across components. March 31 shall be the census
date for counting children for the reporting period that begins on July
1 and ends on June 30 of the following year.
(3) School Level Reporting. (i) The reporting requirements for
school aged children (3 through 21, inclusive) with disabilities shall
also include:
(A) Data to determine if significant disproportionality based on
race and ethnicity is occurring with respect to:
(1) The identification of school-aged children as children with
disabilities including the identification of children as children with
disabilities affected by a particular impairment described in paragraph
(g) of this section.
(2) The placement of these children in particular educational
settings.
(3) The incidence, duration, and type of disciplinary suspensions
and expulsions.
(4) Removal to an interim AES, the acts or items precipitating
those removals, and the number of children with disabilities who are
subject to long-term suspensions or expulsions.
(5) The number and percentage of school-aged children with
disabilities, by race, ethnicity, limited English proficiency status,
gender, and disability category, who are:
(i) Receiving special education and related services.
(ii) Participating in regular education.
(iii) In separate classes, separate schools or facilities, or
public or private residential facilities.
(B) The number of due process complaints requested, the number of
hearings conducted, and the number of changes in placement ordered as a
result of those hearings.
(C) The number of mediations held and the number of settlement
agreements reached through such mediations.
(ii) For each year of age from age 16 through 21, children who
stopped receiving special education and related services because of
program completion (including graduation with a regular secondary
school diploma) or other reasons, and the reasons why those children
stopped receiving special education and related services.
(4) Early Intervention Reporting. The reporting requirements for
infants and toddlers with disabilities shall also include:
(i) Data to determine if significant disproportionality based on
race, gender, and ethnicity is occurring with respect to infants and
toddlers with disabilities who:
(A) Received EIS by criteria of developmental delay or a high
probability of developing a delay.
(B) Stopped receiving EIS because of program completion or for
other reasons.
(C) Received EIS in natural environments.
(D) Received EIS in a timely manner as defined in paragraph (a) of
this section.
(ii) The number of due process complaints requested and the number
of hearings conducted.
(iii) The number of mediations held and the number of settlement
agreements reached through such mediations.
(5) USD(P&R) Oversight. (i) On behalf of the USD(P&R), the DoD-CC
shall make or arrange for periodic visits, not less than annually, to
selected programs to ensure the monitoring process is in place;
validate the compliance data and reporting; and address select focus
areas identified by the DoD-CC and priority areas identified in
paragraph (f)(1) of this section. The DoD-CC may use other means in
addition to periodic visits to ensure compliance with the requirements
established in this part.
(ii) The DoD-CC shall identify monitoring team members to conduct
monitoring activities.
(iii) For DoD-CC monitoring visits, the Secretaries of the Military
Departments shall:
[[Page 76026]]
(A) Provide necessary technical assistance and logistical support
to monitoring teams during monitoring visits to facilities for which
they are responsible.
(B) Provide necessary travel funding and support for their
respective team members.
(C) Cooperate with monitoring teams, including making all pertinent
records available to the teams.
(D) Promptly implement monitoring teams' recommendations concerning
early intervention and related services for which the Secretary
concerned has responsibility, including those to be furnished through
an inter-Service agreement.
(iv) For DoD-CC monitoring visits, the Director, DoDEA, shall:
(A) Provide necessary technical assistance and logistical support
to monitoring teams during monitoring visits to facilities for which he
or she is responsible.
(B) Cooperate with monitoring teams, including making all pertinent
records available to the teams.
(C) Promptly implement monitoring teams' recommendations concerning
special education and related services for which the DoDEA school
system concerned has responsibility.
(v) The ASD(HA) shall provide technical assistance to the DoD
monitoring teams when requested.
(vi) The GC, DoD shall:
(A) Provide legal counsel to the USD(P&R), and, where appropriate,
to DoDEA, monitored agencies, and monitoring teams regarding monitoring
activities conducted pursuant to this part.
(B) Provide advice about the legal requirements of this part and
Federal law to the DoDEA school systems, military medical commanders,
military installation commanders, and to other DoD personnel as
appropriate, in connection with monitoring activities conducted
pursuant to this part.
(g) Types of Disabilities (1) Autism Spectrum Disorder. A
developmental disability significantly affecting verbal and nonverbal
communication and social interaction that adversely affects a child's
educational performance. Other characteristics often associated with
autism are engagement in repetitive activities and stereotyped
movements, resistance to environmental change or change in daily
routines, and unusual responses to sensory experiences. Essential
features are typically but not necessarily manifested before age 3.
Autism may include autism spectrum disorders such as but not limited to
autistic disorder, pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise
specified, and Asperger's syndrome. The term does not apply if a
child's educational performance is adversely affected primarily because
the child has an emotional disturbance.
(2) Deafness. A hearing loss or deficit so severe that it impairs a
child's ability to process linguistic information through hearing, with
or without amplification, and affects the child's educational
performance adversely.
(3) Deaf-Blindness. A combination of hearing and visual impairments
causing such severe communication, developmental, and educational
problems that the child cannot be accommodated in a program
specifically for the deaf or a program specifically for the blind.
(4) Developmental Delay. A significant discrepancy, as defined and
measured in accordance with this part and confirmed by clinical
observation and judgment, in the actual functioning of an infant,
toddler, or child, birth through age 7, when compared with the
functioning of a non-disabled infant, toddler, or child of the same
chronological age in any of the following developmental areas:
physical, cognitive, communication, social or emotional. A child
determined to have a developmental delay before the age of 7 may
maintain that eligibility through age 9.
(i) Significant Discrepancy. The child is experiencing a
developmental delay of two standard deviations below the mean as
measured by diagnostic instruments and procedures in at least one area;
a 25 percent delay in at least one developmental area on assessment
instruments that yield scores in months; a developmental delay of 1.5
standard deviations below the mean as measured by diagnostic
instruments and procedures in two or more areas; or a 20 percent delay
in two or more developmental areas on assessment instruments that yield
scores in months.
(ii) High Probability for Developmental Delay. An infant or
toddler, birth up to age 3, with a diagnosed physical or mental
condition that places the infant or toddler at substantial risk of
evidencing a developmental delay without the benefit of EIS. Includes
conditions such as chromosomal abnormalities; genetic or congenital
disorders; severe sensory impairments; inborn errors of metabolism;
disorders reflecting disturbance of the development of the nervous
system; congenital infections; and disorders secondary to exposure to
toxic substances, including fetal alcohol syndrome.
(5) Emotional Disturbance. A condition confirmed by clinical
evaluation and diagnosis and that, over a long period of time and to a
marked degree, adversely affects educational performance and exhibits
one or more of the following characteristics:
(i) Inability to learn that cannot be explained by intellectual,
sensory, or health factors.
(ii) Inability to build or maintain satisfactory interpersonal
relationships with peers and teachers.
(iii) Inappropriate types of behavior or feelings under normal
circumstances.
(iv) A tendency to develop physical symptoms or fears associated
with personal or school problems.
(v) A general pervasive mood of unhappiness or depression. Includes
children who are schizophrenic, but does not include children who are
socially maladjusted unless it is determined they are emotionally
disturbed.
(6) Hearing Impairment. An impairment in hearing, whether permanent
or fluctuating, that adversely affects a child's educational
performance but is not included under the definition of deafness.
(7) Intellectual Disability. Significantly below-average general
intellectual functioning, existing concurrently with deficits in
adaptive behavior. This disability is manifested during the
developmental period and adversely affects a child's educational
performance.
(8) Orthopedic Impairment. A severe orthopedic impairment that
adversely affects a child's educational performance. That term includes
congenital impairments such as club foot or absence of some member;
impairments caused by disease, such as poliomyelitis and bone
tuberculosis; and impairments from other causes such as cerebral palsy,
amputations, and fractures or burns causing contractures.
(9) Other Health Impairment. Limited strength, vitality, or
alertness including a heightened alertness to environmental stimuli,
that results in limited alertness with respect to the educational
environment, that due to chronic or acute health problems that
adversely affect a child's educational performance. Such impairments
may include, but are not necessarily limited to, attention deficit
disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, heart condition,
tuberculosis, rheumatic fever, nephritis, asthma, sickle cell anemia,
hemophilia, seizure disorder, lead poisoning, leukemia, or diabetes.
(10) Specific Learning Disability. A disorder in one or more of the
basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using
spoken or written language that may manifest
[[Page 76027]]
itself as an imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write,
spell, remember, or do mathematical calculations. That term includes
such conditions as perceptual disabilities, brain injury, minimal brain
dysfunction, dyslexia, and developmental aphasia. This term does not
include learning problems that are primarily the result of visual,
hearing, or motor disabilities; mental retardation; emotional
disturbance; or environmental, cultural, or economic differences.
(11) Speech or Language Impairments. (i) Communication disorder is
characterized by stuttering, impaired articulation, voice impairment,
or a disorder in the receptive or expressive areas of language that
adversely affects a child's educational performance.
(ii) Articulation disorder is characterized by substitutions,
distortions, and/or omissions of phonemes that are not commensurate
with expected developmental age norms, that are not the result of
limited English proficiency or dialect difference, and that may cause
unintelligible conversational speech.
(iii) Fluency disorder is characterized by atypical rate, rhythm,
repetitions, and/or secondary behaviors that interfere with
communication or is inconsistent with age or development.
(iv) Language and phonological disorders are characterized by an
impairment or delay in receptive or expressive language including
semantics, morphology and syntax, phonology, or pragmatics. This
impairment does not include students whose language problems are due to
English being their second language or dialect differences.
(v) Voice disorder is characterized by abnormal pitch, intensity,
resonance, duration, or quality that are inappropriate for
chronological age or gender.
(12) Traumatic Brain Injury. An acquired injury to the brain caused
by an external physical force resulting in total or partial functional
disability or psychosocial impairment (or both) that adversely affects
educational performance. Includes open or closed head injuries
resulting in impairments in one or more areas including cognition,
language, memory, attention, reasoning, abstract thinking, judgment,
problem solving, sensory, perceptual and motor abilities, psychosocial
behavior, physical function, information processing, and speech. The
term does not include brain injuries that are congenital or
degenerative or brain injuries that are induced by birth trauma.
(13) Visual Impairment, Including Blindness. An impairment of
vision that, even with correction, adversely affects a child's
educational performance. That term includes both partial sight and
blindness.
Dated: December 5, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013-29433 Filed 12-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P