Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in Alaska; Harvest Regulations for Migratory Birds in Alaska During the 2014 Season, 75321-75327 [2013-29300]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
References Cited
A complete list of references cited in
this finding is available on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2013–0116 or
upon request from the Deputy Field
Supervisor, Ventura Fish and Wildlife
Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
Authors
The primary authors of this finding
are the staff members of the Pacific
Southwest Regional Office and the
Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Authority
The authority for this section is
section 4 of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Dated: November 27, 2013.
Rowan W. Gould,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–29410 Filed 12–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 92
[Docket No. FWS–R7–MB–2013–0109;
FF09M21200–123–FXMB1231099BPP0L2]
RIN 1018–BA02
Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in
Alaska; Harvest Regulations for
Migratory Birds in Alaska During the
2014 Season
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service or we) proposes
migratory bird subsistence harvest
regulations in Alaska for the 2014
season. These regulations would enable
the continuation of customary and
traditional subsistence uses of migratory
birds in Alaska and prescribe regional
information on when and where the
harvesting of birds may occur. These
regulations were developed under a comanagement process involving the
Service, the Alaska Department of Fish
and Game, and Alaska Native
representatives. The rulemaking is
necessary because the regulations
governing the subsistence harvest of
migratory birds in Alaska are subject to
annual review. This rulemaking
proposes region-specific regulations that
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:58 Dec 10, 2013
Jkt 232001
would go into effect on April 2, 2014,
and expire on August 31, 2014.
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
February 10, 2014. We must receive
requests for public hearings, in writing,
at the address shown in FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT by January 27,
2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments to
Docket No. FWS–R7–MB–2013–0109.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: FWS–R7–
MB–2013–0109; Division of Policy and
Directives Management; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive,
MS 2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203.
We will not accept email or faxes. We
will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see the
Public Comment Procedures section
below for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donna Dewhurst, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 1011 E. Tudor Road, Mail Stop
201, Anchorage, AK 99503; (907) 786–
3499.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comment Procedures
To ensure that any action resulting
from this proposed rule will be as
accurate and as effective as possible, we
request that you send relevant
information for our consideration. The
comments that will be most useful and
likely to influence our decisions are
those that you support by quantitative
information or studies and those that
include citations to, and analyses of, the
applicable laws and regulations. Please
make your comments as specific as
possible and explain the basis for them.
In addition, please include sufficient
information with your comments to
allow us to authenticate any scientific or
commercial data you include.
You must submit your comments and
materials concerning this proposed rule
by one of the methods listed above in
the ADDRESSES section. We will not
accept comments sent by email or fax or
to an address not listed in ADDRESSES.
If you submit a comment via https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment—including any personal
identifying information, such as your
address, telephone number, or email
address—will be posted on the Web site.
When you submit a comment, the
system receives it immediately.
However, the comment will not be
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
75321
publicly viewable until we post it,
which might not occur until several
days after submission.
If you mail or hand-carry a hardcopy
comment directly to us that includes
personal information, you may request
at the top of your document that we
withhold this information from public
review. However, we cannot guarantee
that we will be able to do so. To ensure
that the electronic docket for this
rulemaking is complete and all
comments we receive are publicly
available, we will post all hardcopy
comments on https://
www.regulations.gov.
In addition, comments and materials
we receive, as well as supporting
documentation used in preparing this
proposed rule, will be available for
public inspection in two ways:
(1) You can view them on https://
www.regulations.gov. Search for FWS–
R7–MB–2013–0109, which is the docket
number for this rulemaking.
(2) You can make an appointment,
during normal business hours, to view
the comments and materials in person at
the Division of Migratory Bird
Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; 4501 N. Fairfax Drive, Room
4107, Arlington, VA 22203–1610.
Public Availability of Comments
As stated above in more detail, before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Why is this rulemaking necessary?
This rulemaking is necessary because,
by law, the migratory bird harvest
season is closed unless opened by the
Secretary of the Interior, and the
regulations governing subsistence
harvest of migratory birds in Alaska are
subject to public review and annual
approval. This rule proposes regulations
for the taking of migratory birds for
subsistence uses in Alaska during the
spring and summer of 2014. This rule
proposes a list of migratory bird season
openings and closures in Alaska by
region.
How do I find the history of these
regulations?
Background information, including
past events leading to this rulemaking,
accomplishments since the Migratory
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
75322
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Bird Treaties with Canada and Mexico
were amended, and a history, was
originally addressed in the Federal
Register on August 16, 2002 (67 FR
53511) and most recently on February
21, 2013 (78 FR 11988).
Recent Federal Register documents,
which are all proposed rules setting
forth the annual harvest regulations, are
available at https://alaska.fws.gov/
ambcc/regulations.htm or by contacting
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
What is the process for issuing
regulations for the subsistence harvest
of migratory birds in Alaska?
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service or we) is proposing migratory
bird subsistence harvest regulations in
Alaska for the 2014 season. These
regulations would enable the
continuation of customary and
traditional subsistence uses of migratory
birds in Alaska and prescribe regional
information on when and where the
harvesting of birds may occur. These
proposed regulations were developed
under a co-management process
involving the Service, the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game, and
Alaska Native representatives.
We opened the process to establish
regulations for the 2014 spring and
summer subsistence harvest of
migratory birds in Alaska in a proposed
rule published in the Federal Register
on April 9, 2013 (78 FR 21200), to
amend 50 CFR part 20. While that
proposed rule dealt primarily with the
regulatory process for hunting migratory
birds for all purposes throughout the
United States, we also discussed the
background and history of Alaska
subsistence regulations, explained the
annual process for their establishment,
and requested proposals for the 2014
season. The rulemaking processes for
both types of migratory bird harvest are
related, and the April 9, 2013, proposed
rule explained the connection between
the two.
The Alaska Migratory Bird Comanagement Council (Co-management
Council) held meetings on April 3–4,
2013, to develop recommendations for
changes that would take effect during
the 2014 harvest season. These
recommendations were presented first
to the Flyway Councils and then to the
Service Regulations Committee (SRC) at
the committee’s meeting on July 23–25,
2013.
Who is eligible to hunt under these
regulations?
Eligibility to harvest under the
regulations established in 2003 was
limited to permanent residents,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:58 Dec 10, 2013
Jkt 232001
regardless of race, in villages located
within the Alaska Peninsula, Kodiak
Archipelago, the Aleutian Islands, and
in areas north and west of the Alaska
Range (50 CFR 92.5). These geographical
restrictions opened the initial migratory
bird subsistence harvest to about 13
percent of Alaska residents. Highpopulated, roaded areas such as
Anchorage, the Matanuska-Susitna and
Fairbanks North Star boroughs, the
Kenai Peninsula roaded area, the Gulf of
Alaska roaded area, and Southeast
Alaska were excluded from eligible
subsistence harvest areas.
Based on petitions requesting
inclusion in the harvest, in 2004, we
added 13 additional communities based
on criteria set forth in 50 CFR 92.5(c).
These communities were Gulkana,
Gakona, Tazlina, Copper Center,
Mentasta Lake, Chitina, Chistochina,
Tatitlek, Chenega, Port Graham,
Nanwalek, Tyonek, and Hoonah, with a
combined population of 2,766. In 2005,
we added three additional communities
for glaucous-winged gull egg gathering
only, based on petitions requesting
inclusion. These southeastern
communities were Craig, Hydaburg, and
Yakutat, with a combined population of
2,459, based on the latest census
information at that time.
In 2007, we enacted the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game’s request
to expand the Fairbanks North Star
Borough excluded area to include the
Central Interior area. This action
excluded the following communities
from participation in this harvest: Big
Delta/Fort Greely, Healy, McKinley
Park/Village, and Ferry, with a
combined population of 2,812.
In 2012, we received a request from
the Native Village of Eyak to include
Cordova, Alaska, for a limited season
that would legalize the traditional
gathering of gull eggs and early season
waterfowl.
What is different in the region-specific
regulations for 2014?
In 2011, we received a request by the
Fairbanks Native Association asking
that regulations be developed that
would allow residents who live in
excluded areas be able to participate in
the spring/summer subsistence
migratory bird harvest. This would
permit tribal members currently living
in excluded areas to openly and
traditionally continue their Native
traditional hunting practices and
provide for the cultural and traditional
needs for spring/summer waterfowl.
This proposal request was tabled by the
Co-management Council until exact
wording could be worked out by the
Invitation Subcommittee of the Council.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Language was proposed to amend 50
CFR 92.5, Subpart D, and recommended
for passage by the Co-management
Council at their April 2013 meeting.
Upon legal review by individuals in
the Department of the Interior’s Office of
the Solicitor and the Service’s Law
Enforcement Division, the language was
amended by the Service working with
the Invitation Subcommittee. The
primary legal concerns were deviations
from the language in the Letter of
Submittal de-emphasizing that the
purpose of allowing residents who live
in excluded areas to be able to
participate in the spring/summer
subsistence migratory bird harvest is to
assist immediate family members still
residing in a village in an included area.
This revision was approved via phone
poll by the Co-management Council in
July 2013. The revised language was
approved by the SRC on July 25, 2013.
In 2012, the Native Village of Eyak
requested to add residents of Cordova,
Alaska, onto the list of included
subsistence communities based on
criteria set forth in 50 CFR 92.5(c). They
stated that this would allow for the legal
traditional gathering of gull eggs and
early season hunting of migratory
waterfowl (and cranes) to subsistence
residents. The Copper River barrier
islands afford traditional location for
gull egg gathering and early spring
migratory waterfowl hunting. The
harvest season requested would be in
Prince William Sound Game
Management Units 6C and 6D (barrier
islands only), to open a waterfowl
hunting season, April 2–30, and a gull
egg gathering season, May 1–31,
primarily for the residents of Cordova.
Special registration permits would be
required and hunting would be done
from boats or ATVs. The Native Village
of Eyak worked closely with the
Service’s Migratory Bird Management
Office to restrict harvest to protect and
conserve dusky Canada geese, trumpeter
swans, and shorebirds. This subsistence
harvest would require the possession of
special registration permits to help
ensure harvesting is conducted only by
residents of included areas. The SRC
approved inclusion of Cordova at their
meeting on July 25, 2013.
How will the service ensure that the
subsistence harvest will not raise
overall migratory bird harvest or
threaten the conservation of
endangered and threatened species?
We have monitored subsistence
harvest for the past 25 years through the
use of annual household surveys in the
most heavily used subsistence harvest
areas, such as the Yukon–Kuskokwim
Delta. In recent years, more intensive
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
surveys combined with outreach efforts
focused on species identification have
been added to improve the accuracy of
information gathered from regions still
reporting some subsistence harvest of
listed or candidate species.
Spectacled and Steller’s Eiders
Spectacled eiders (Somateria fischeri)
and the Alaska-breeding population of
Steller’s eiders (Polysticta stelleri) are
listed as threatened species. Their
migration and breeding distribution
overlap with areas where the spring and
summer subsistence migratory bird hunt
is open in Alaska. Both species are
closed to hunting, although harvest
surveys and Service documentation
indicate both species have been taken in
several regions of Alaska.
The Service has dual objectives and
responsibilities for authorizing a
subsistence harvest while protecting
migratory birds and threatened species.
Although these objectives continue to be
challenging, they are not irreconcilable,
providing the proposed regulations
continue to protect threatened species,
measures to remedy documented threats
are implemented, and the subsistence
community and other conservation
partners commit to working together.
With these dual objectives in mind, the
Service, working with North Slope
partners, developed measures in 2009,
to further reduce the potential for
shooting mortality or injury of closed
species. These conservation measures
included: (1) Increased waterfowl
hunter outreach and community
awareness through partnering with the
North Slope Migratory Bird Task Force;
(2) continued enforcement of the
migratory bird regulations that are
protective of listed eiders; and (3) inseason Service verification of the
harvest to detect taking of any
threatened eider species.
This proposed rule continues to focus
on the North Slope from Barrow to Point
Hope because Steller’s eiders from the
listed Alaska breeding population are
known to breed and migrate there.
These proposed regulations are
designed to address several ongoing
eider management needs by clarifying
for subsistence users that (1) Service law
enforcement personnel have authority to
verify species of birds possessed by
hunters, and (2) it is illegal to possess
any species of bird closed to harvest.
This rule also describes how the
Service’s existing authority of
emergency closure would be
implemented, if necessary, to protect
Steller’s eiders. We are always willing to
discuss regulations with our partners on
the North Slope to ensure protection of
closed species as well as provide
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:58 Dec 10, 2013
Jkt 232001
subsistence hunters an opportunity to
harvest migratory birds in a way that
maintains the culture and traditional
harvest of the community. The
regulations pertaining to bag checks and
possession of illegal birds are deemed
necessary to verify that no closed eider
species are taken during the legal
subsistence hunt.
The Service is aware of and
appreciates the considerable efforts by
North Slope partners to raise awareness
and educate hunters on Steller’s eider
conservation via the bird fair, meetings,
radio shows, signs, school visits, and
one-on-one contacts. We also recognize
that no listed eiders have been
documented shot from 2009 through
2012, even though Steller’s eiders
nested in the Barrow area from 2010
through 2013. One Steller’s eider and
one spectacled eider were found shot
during the summer of 2013, and are
under investigation. The Service
acknowledges progress made with the
other eider conservation measures
including partnering with the North
Slope Migratory Bird Task Force for
increased waterfowl hunter awareness,
continued enforcement of the
regulations, and in-season verification
of the harvest. Our primary strategy to
reduce the threat of shooting mortality
of threatened eiders is to continue
working with North Slope partners to
conduct education, outreach, and
harvest monitoring. In addition, the
emergency closure authority provides
another level of assurance if an
unexpected amount of Steller’s eider
shooting mortality occurs (50 CFR 92.21
and 50 CFR 92.32).
In-season harvest monitoring
information would be used to evaluate
the efficacy of regulations, conservation
measures, and outreach efforts.
Conservation measures are being
continued by the Service and the North
Slope Borough, with the amount of
effort and emphasis being based on
regulatory adherence. Specifically, local
communities have continued to develop
greater responsibility for taking actions
to ensure Steller’s and spectacled eider
conservation and recovery, and based
on last year’s observations, local hunters
have demonstrated greater compliance
with hunting regulations.
The longstanding general emergency
closure provision at 50 CFR 92.21
specifies that the harvest may be closed
or temporarily suspended upon finding
that a continuation of the regulation
allowing the harvest would pose an
imminent threat to the conservation of
any migratory bird population. With
regard to Steller’s eiders, the regulation
at 50 CFR 92.32, carried over from the
past 3 years, would clarify that we
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
75323
would take action under 50 CFR 92.21
as is necessary to prevent further take of
Steller’s eiders, and that action could
include temporary or long-term closures
of the harvest in all or a portion of the
geographic area open to harvest. If
mortality of threatened eiders occurs,
we would evaluate each mortality event
by criteria such as cause, quantity, sex,
age, location, and date. We would
consult with the Co-management
Council when we are considering an
emergency closure. If we determine that
an emergency closure is necessary, we
would design it to minimize its impact
on the subsistence harvest.
Yellow-Billed Loon
Yellow-billed loons (Gavia adamsii)
are a candidate species for listing under
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Their
migration and breeding distribution
overlaps with where the spring and
summer migratory bird hunt is open in
Alaska. Yellow-billed loons are closed
to hunting, but harvest surveys have
indicated that on the North Slope and
St. Lawrence Island some take does
occur. Most of the yellow-billed loons
reported harvested on the North Slope
were found to be entangled loons
salvaged from subsistence fishing nets
as described below. The Service would
continue outreach efforts in both areas
in 2014, engaging partners to decrease
the take of yellow-billed loons.
Consistent with the request of the
North Slope Borough Fish and Game
Management Committee and the
recommendation of the Co-management
Council, this rule proposes to continue
the provisions originally established in
2005, to allow subsistence use of
yellow-billed loons inadvertently
entangled in subsistence fishing (gill)
nets on the North Slope. Yellow-billed
loons are culturally important to the
Inupiat Eskimo of the North Slope for
use in traditional dance regalia. A
maximum of 20 yellow-billed loons
would be allowed to be kept if found
entangled in fishing nets in 2014, under
this provision. This proposed provision
does not authorize intentional harvest of
yellow-billed loons, but allows use of
those loons inadvertently entangled
during normal subsistence fishing
activities.
Endangered Species Act Consideration
Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act (16 U.S.C. 1536) requires the
Secretary of the Interior to ‘‘review other
programs administered by her and
utilize such programs in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act’’ and to ‘‘insure
that any action authorized, funded, or
carried out . . . is not likely to
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
75324
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
jeopardize the continued existence of
any endangered species or threatened
species or result in the destruction or
adverse modification of [critical]
habitat. . . .’’ Prior to issuance of
annual spring and summer subsistence
regulations, we would consult under
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (Act), to ensure
that the 2014 subsistence harvest is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of any species designated as
endangered or threatened, or modify or
destroy its critical habitats, and that the
regulations are consistent with
conservation programs for those species.
Consultation under section 7 of the Act
for the annual subsistence take
regulations may cause us to change
these regulations. Our biological
opinion resulting from the section 7
consultation is a public document
available from the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Statutory Authority
We derive our authority to issue these
regulations from the Migratory Bird
Treaty Act of 1918, at 16 U.S.C. 712(1),
which authorizes the Secretary of the
Interior, in accordance with the treaties
with Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia,
to ‘‘issue such regulations as may be
necessary to assure that the taking of
migratory birds and the collection of
their eggs, by the indigenous inhabitants
of the State of Alaska, shall be permitted
for their own nutritional and other
essential needs, as determined by the
Secretary of the Interior, during seasons
established so as to provide for the
preservation and maintenance of stocks
of migratory birds.’’
Required Determinations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant
rules. The Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of E.O. 12866 while calling
for improvements in the nation’s
regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:58 Dec 10, 2013
Jkt 232001
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
defined under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). An initial
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. Accordingly, a Small Entity
Compliance Guide is not required. This
proposed rule would legalize a preexisting subsistence activity, and the
resources harvested would be consumed
by the harvesters or persons within their
local community.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
(a) Would not have an annual effect
on the economy of $100 million or
more. It proposes to legalize and
regulate a traditional subsistence
activity. It would not result in a
substantial increase in subsistence
harvest or a significant change in
harvesting patterns. The commodities
that would be regulated under this
proposed rule are migratory birds. This
rule deals with legalizing the
subsistence harvest of migratory birds
and, as such, does not involve
commodities traded in the marketplace.
A small economic benefit from this
proposed rule would derive from the
sale of equipment and ammunition to
carry out subsistence hunting. Most, if
not all, businesses that sell hunting
equipment in rural Alaska qualify as
small businesses. We have no reason to
believe that this proposed rule would
lead to a disproportionate distribution
of benefits.
(b) Would not cause a major increase
in costs or prices for consumers;
individual industries; Federal, State, or
local government agencies; or
geographic regions. This proposed rule
does not deal with traded commodities
and, therefore, does not have an impact
on prices for consumers.
(c) Would not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This proposed rule deals with the
harvesting of wildlife for personal
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
consumption. It does not regulate the
marketplace in any way to generate
effects on the economy or the ability of
businesses to compete.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We have determined and certified
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) that this
proposed rule would not impose a cost
of $100 million or more in any given
year on local, State, or tribal
governments or private entities. The
proposed rule does not have a
significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the
private sector. A statement containing
the information required by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act is not
required. Participation on regional
management bodies and the Comanagement Council would require
travel expenses for some Alaska Native
organizations and local governments. In
addition, they would assume some
expenses related to coordinating
involvement of village councils in the
regulatory process. Total coordination
and travel expenses for all Alaska
Native organizations are estimated to be
less than $300,000 per year. In a Notice
of Decision (65 FR 16405; March 28,
2000), we identified 7 to 12 partner
organizations (Alaska Native nonprofits
and local governments) to administer
the regional programs. The Alaska
Department of Fish and Game would
also incur expenses for travel to Comanagement Council and regional
management body meetings. In
addition, the State of Alaska would be
required to provide technical staff
support to each of the regional
management bodies and to the Comanagement Council. Expenses for the
State’s involvement may exceed
$100,000 per year, but should not
exceed $150,000 per year. When
funding permits, we make annual grant
agreements available to the partner
organizations and the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game to help
offset their expenses.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
12630, this proposed rule would not
have significant takings implications.
This proposed rule is not specific to
particular land ownership, but applies
to the harvesting of migratory bird
resources throughout Alaska. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
13132, this proposed rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
summary impact statement. We discuss
effects of this proposed rule on the State
of Alaska in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act section above. We worked
with the State of Alaska to develop
these proposed regulations. Therefore, a
federalism summary impact statement is
not required.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
The Department, in promulgating this
proposed rule, has determined that it
would not unduly burden the judicial
system and that it meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988.
Government-to-Government Relations
With Native American Tribal
Governments
Consistent with Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249; November 6, 2000),
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’, and
Department of Interior policy on
Consultation with Indian Tribes
(December 1, 2011), we will send letters
to all 229 Alaska Federally recognized
Indian tribes. Consistent with
Congressional direction (Pub. L. 108–
199, div. H, Sec. 161, Jan. 23, 2004, 118
Stat. 452, as amended by Pub. L. 108–
447, div. H, title V, Sec. 518, Dec. 8,
2004, 118 Stat. 3267), we will be
sending letters to approximately 200
Alaska Native corporations and other
tribal entities in Alaska soliciting their
input as to whether or not they would
like the Service to consult with them on
the 2014 migratory bird subsistence
harvest regulations.
We implemented the amended treaty
with Canada with a focus on local
involvement. The treaty calls for the
creation of management bodies to
ensure an effective and meaningful role
for Alaska’s indigenous inhabitants in
the conservation of migratory birds.
According to the Letter of Submittal,
management bodies are to include
Alaska Native, Federal, and State of
Alaska representatives as equals. They
would develop recommendations for
among other things: seasons and bag
limits, methods and means of take, law
enforcement policies, population and
harvest monitoring, education programs,
research and use of traditional
knowledge, and habitat protection. The
management bodies would involve
village councils to the maximum extent
possible in all aspects of management.
To ensure maximum input at the village
level, we required each of the 11
participating regions to create regional
management bodies consisting of at
least one representative from the
participating villages. The regional
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:58 Dec 10, 2013
Jkt 232001
75325
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703–712.
management bodies meet twice
annually to review and/or submit
proposals to the Statewide body.
Subpart A—General Provisions
Paperwork Reduction Act
■
This proposed rule has been
examined under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) and does not contain any new
collections of information that require
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approval. OMB has renewed our
collection of information associated
with the voluntary annual household
surveys used to determine levels of
subsistence take. The OMB control
number is 1018–0124, which now
expires June 30, 2016. An agency may
not conduct or sponsor and a person is
not required to respond to a collection
of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) Consideration
The annual regulations and options
are considered in the environmental
assessment, ‘‘Managing Migratory Bird
Subsistence Hunting in Alaska: Hunting
Regulations for the 2014 Spring/
Summer Harvest,’’ September 20, 2013.
Copies are available from the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT or at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
(Executive Order 13211)
Executive Order 13211 requires
agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain
actions. This is not a significant
regulatory action under this Executive
Order; it would allow only for
traditional subsistence harvest and
would improve conservation of
migratory birds by allowing effective
regulation of this harvest. Further, this
proposed rule is not expected to
significantly affect energy supplies,
distribution, or use. Therefore, this
action is not a significant energy action
under Executive Order 13211, and no
Statement of Energy Effects is required.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 92
Hunting, Treaties, Wildlife.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, we propose to amend title 50,
chapter I, subchapter G, of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 92—MIGRATORY BIRD
SUBSISTENCE HARVEST IN ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 92
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Amend § 92.5 by revising paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
§ 92.5
Who is eligible to participate?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Participation by permanent
residents of excluded areas. Immediate
family members who are residents of
excluded areas may participate in the
customary spring and summer
subsistence harvest in a village’s
subsistence area with permission of the
village council, to assist indigenous
inhabitants in meeting their nutritional
and other essential needs or for the
teaching of cultural knowledge. A letter
of invitation will be sent by the village
council to the hunter with a copy to the
Executive Director of the Comanagement Council, who will inform
law enforcement.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart D—Annual Regulations
Governing Subsistence Harvest
3. Amend subpart D by adding § 92.31
to read as follows:
■
§ 92.31
Region-specific regulations.
The 2014 season dates for the eligible
subsistence harvest areas are as follows:
(a) Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Region.
(1) Northern Unit (Pribilof Islands):
(i) Season: April 2–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
(2) Central Unit (Aleut Region’s
eastern boundary on the Alaska
Peninsula westward to and including
Unalaska Island):
(i) Season: April 2–June 15 and July
16–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 16–July 15.
(iii) Special Black Brant Season
Closure: August 16–August 31, only in
Izembek and Moffet lagoons.
(iv) Special Tundra Swan Closure: All
hunting and egg gathering closed in
units 9(D) and 10.
(3) Western Unit (Umnak Island west
to and including Attu Island):
(i) Season: April 2–July 15 and August
16–August 31.
(ii) Closure: July 16–August 15.
(b) Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta Region.
(1) Season: April 2–August 31.
(2) Closure: 30-day closure dates to be
announced by the Service’s Alaska
Regional Director or his designee, after
consultation with field biologists and
the Association of Village Council
President’s Waterfowl Conservation
Committee. This 30-day period would
occur between June 1 and August 15 of
each year. A press release announcing
the actual closure dates would be
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
75326
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
forwarded to regional newspapers and
radio and television stations.
(3) Special Black Brant and Cackling
Goose Season Hunting Closure: From
the period when egg laying begins until
young birds are fledged. Closure dates to
be announced by the Service’s Alaska
Regional Director or his designee, after
consultation with field biologists and
the Association of Village Council
President’s Waterfowl Conservation
Committee. A press release announcing
the actual closure dates would be
forwarded to regional newspapers and
radio and television stations.
(c) Bristol Bay Region.
(1) Season: April 2–June 14 and July
16–August 31 (general season); April 2–
July 15 for seabird egg gathering only.
(2) Closure: June 15–July 15 (general
season); July 16–August 31 (seabird egg
gathering).
(d) Bering Strait/Norton Sound
Region.
(1) Stebbins/St. Michael Area (Point
Romanof to Canal Point):
(i) Season: April 15–June 14 and July
16–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 15–July 15.
(2) Remainder of the region:
(i) Season: April 2–June 14 and July
16–August 31 for waterfowl; April 2–
July 19 and August 21–August 31 for all
other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 15–July 15 for
waterfowl; July 20–August 20 for all
other birds.
(e) Kodiak Archipelago Region, except
for the Kodiak Island roaded area,
which is closed to the harvesting of
migratory birds and their eggs. The
closed area consists of all lands and
waters (including exposed tidelands)
east of a line extending from Crag Point
in the north to the west end of Saltery
Cove in the south and all lands and
water south of a line extending from
Termination Point along the north side
of Cascade Lake extending to Anton
Larsen Bay. Waters adjacent to the
closed area are closed to harvest within
500 feet from the water’s edge. The
offshore islands are open to harvest.
(1) Season: April 2–June 30 and July
31–August 31 for seabirds; April 2–June
20 and July 22–August 31 for all other
birds.
(2) Closure: July 1–July 30 for
seabirds; June 21–July 21 for all other
birds.
(f) Northwest Arctic Region.
(1) Season: April 2–June 9 and August
15–August 31 (hunting in general);
waterfowl egg gathering May 20–June 9
only; seabird egg gathering May 20–July
12 only; hunting molting/non-nesting
waterfowl July 1–July 31 only.
(2) Closure: June 10–August 14,
except for the taking of seabird eggs and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:58 Dec 10, 2013
Jkt 232001
molting/non-nesting waterfowl as
provided in paragraph (f)(1) of this
section.
(g) North Slope Region.
(1) Southern Unit (Southwestern
North Slope regional boundary east to
Peard Bay, everything west of the
longitude line 158°30′ W and south of
the latitude line 70°45′ N to the west
bank of the Ikpikpuk River, and
everything south of the latitude line
69°45′ N between the west bank of the
Ikpikpuk River to the east bank of
Sagavinirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2–June 29 and July
30–August 31 for seabirds; April 2–June
19 and July 20–August 31 for all other
birds.
(ii) Closure: June 30–July 29 for
seabirds; June 20–July 19 for all other
birds.
(iii) Special Black Brant Hunting
Opening: From June 20–July 5. The
open area would consist of the
coastline, from mean high water line
outward to include open water, from
Nokotlek Point east to longitude line
158°30′ W. This includes Peard Bay,
Kugrua Bay, and Wainwright Inlet, but
not the Kuk and Kugrua river drainages.
(2) Northern Unit (At Peard Bay,
everything east of the longitude line
158°30′ W and north of the latitude line
70°45′ N to west bank of the Ikpikpuk
River, and everything north of the
latitude line 69°45′ N between the west
bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east
bank of Sagavinirktok River):
(i) Season: April 6–June 6 and July 7–
August 31 for king and common eiders;
April 2–June 15 and July 16–August 31
for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 7–July 6 for king and
common eiders; June 16–July 15 for all
other birds.
(3) Eastern Unit (East of eastern bank
of the Sagavanirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2–June 19 and July
20–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 20–July 19.
(4) All Units: yellow-billed loons.
Annually, up to 20 yellow-billed loons
total for the region may be inadvertently
entangled in subsistence fishing nets in
the North Slope Region and kept for
subsistence use.
(5) North Coastal Zone (Cape
Thompson north to Point Hope and east
along the Arctic Ocean coastline around
Point Barrow to Ross Point, including
Iko Bay, and 5 miles inland).
(i) No person may at any time, by any
means, or in any manner, possess or
have in custody any migratory bird or
part thereof, taken in violation of
subpart C and D of this part.
(ii) Upon request from a Service law
enforcement officer, hunters taking,
attempting to take, or transporting
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
migratory birds taken during the
subsistence harvest season must present
them to the officer for species
identification.
(h) Interior Region.
(1) Season: April 2–June 14 and July
16–August 31; egg gathering May 1–June
14 only.
(2) Closure: June 15–July 15.
(i) Upper Copper River Region
(Harvest Area: Units 11 and 13) (Eligible
communities: Gulkana, Chitina, Tazlina,
Copper Center, Gakona, Mentasta Lake,
Chistochina and Cantwell).
(1) Season: April 15–May 26 and June
27–August 31.
(2) Closure: May 27–June 26.
(3) The Copper River Basin
communities listed above also
documented traditional use harvesting
birds in Unit 12, making them eligible
to hunt in this unit using the seasons
specified in paragraph (h) of this
section.
(j) Gulf of Alaska Region.
(1) Prince William Sound Area West
(Harvest area: Unit 6[D]), (Eligible
Chugach communities: Chenega Bay,
Tatitlek):
(i) Season: April 2–May 31 and July
1–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1–30.
(2) Prince William Sound Area East
(Harvest area: Units 6[C]and [B]—
Barrier Islands between Strawberry
Channel and Softtuk Bar), (Eligible
Chugach communities: Cordova):
(i) Season: April 2–April 30 (hunting);
May 1–May 31 (gull egg gathering).
(ii) Closure: May 1–August 31
(hunting); April 2–30 and June 1–
August 31 (gull egg gathering).
(iii) Species Open for Hunting: greater
white-fronted goose; snow goose;
gadwall; Eurasian and American
wigeon; blue-winged and green-winged
teal; mallard; northern shoveler;
northern pintail; canvasback; redhead;
ring-necked duck; greater and lesser
scaup; king and common eider;
harlequin duck; surf, white-winged, and
black scoter; long-tailed duck;
bufflehead; common and Barrow’s
goldeneye; hooded, common, and redbreasted merganser; and sandhill crane.
Species open for egg gathering:
glaucous-winged, herring, and mew
gulls.
(iv) Use of Boats/All-Terrain Vehicles:
No hunting from motorized vehicles or
any form of watercraft.
(v) Special Registration: All hunters or
egg gathers must possess an annual
permit; available from the Cordova
offices of the Native Village of Eyak and
the U.S. Forest Service.
(3) Kachemak Bay Area (Harvest area:
Unit 15[C] South of a line connecting
the tip of Homer Spit to the mouth of
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Fox River) (Eligible Chugach
Communities: Port Graham, Nanwalek):
(i) Season: April 2–May 31 and July
1–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1–30.
(k) Cook Inlet (Harvest area: portions
of Unit 16[B] as specified below)
(Eligible communities: Tyonek only):
(1) Season: April 2–May 31—That
portion of Unit 16(B) south of the
Skwentna River and west of the Yentna
River, and August 1–31—That portion
of Unit 16(B) south of the Beluga River,
Beluga Lake, and the Triumvirate
Glacier.
(2) Closure: June 1–July 31.
(l) Southeast Alaska.
(1) Community of Hoonah (Harvest
area: National Forest lands in Icy Strait
and Cross Sound, including Middle Pass
Rock near the Inian Islands, Table Rock
in Cross Sound, and other traditional
locations on the coast of Yakobi Island.
The land and waters of Glacier Bay
National Park remain closed to all
subsistence harvesting (50 CFR Part
100.3(a)):
(i) Season: glaucous-winged gull egg
gathering only: May 15–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
(2) Communities of Craig and
Hydaburg (Harvest area: small islands
and adjacent shoreline of western Prince
of Wales Island from Point Baker to
Cape Chacon, but also including
Coronation and Warren islands):
(i) Season: glaucous-winged gull egg
gathering only: May 15–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
(3) Community of Yakutat (Harvest
area: Icy Bay (Icy Cape to Point Riou),
and coastal lands and islands bordering
the Gulf of Alaska from Point Manby
southeast to Dry Bay):
(i) Season: glaucous-winged gull egg
gathering: May 15–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
■ 4. Amend subpart D by adding § 92.32
to read as follows:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 92.32 Emergency regulations to protect
Steller’s eiders.
Upon finding that continuation of
these subsistence regulations would
pose an imminent threat to the
conservation of threatened Steller’s
eiders (Polysticta stelleri), the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service Alaska Regional
Director, in consultation with the Comanagement Council, will immediately
under § 92.21 take action as is necessary
to prevent further take. Regulation
changes implemented could range from
a temporary closure of duck hunting in
a small geographic area to large-scale
regional or Statewide long-term closures
of all subsistence migratory bird
hunting. These closures or temporary
suspensions will remain in effect until
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:58 Dec 10, 2013
Jkt 232001
the Regional Director, in consultation
with the Co-management Council,
determines that the potential for
additional Steller’s eiders to be taken no
longer exists.
Dated: November 22, 2013.
Michael J. Bean,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2013–29300 Filed 12–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 120328229–3656–01]
RIN 0648–BC09
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
2006 Consolidated Highly Migratory
Species Fishery Management Plan;
Amendment 7; Reopening of Comment
Period
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; Reopening of
comment period.
AGENCY:
On August 21, 2013, NMFS
published the proposed rule for Draft
Amendment 7 to the 2006 Consolidated
Highly Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) to control
bluefin incidental catch (landings and
dead discards) in the pelagic longline
fishery, enhance reporting in all
categories, and ensure U.S. compliance
with the ICCAT-recommended quota.
As described in the proposed rule, the
proposed measures include Allocation
measures, Area-Based measures, Bluefin
Quota Controls, Enhanced Reporting
measures, and other measures that
modify rules with respect to how the
various quota categories utilize quota. In
the proposed rule, NMFS announced
the end of the comment period as
October 23, 2013, which would allow an
approximately 60-day comment period.
On September 18, 2013, NMFS
extended the comment period through
December 10, 2013, in order to provide
additional opportunities for the public
and other interested parties to comment
on the proposed rule, and to provide
adequate time for constituents to
consider potential changes to the
regulatory environment resulting from
any new recommendations by the
International Commission for the
Conservation of Atlantic Tunas at its
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
75327
November 2013 meeting. However, due
to the government shutdown and
NMFS’ inability to respond to
constituents on this complex rule
during that time frame and based on the
comments received to date requesting
an extension due to the complexity and
interplay of the measures covered in the
DEIS, NMFS is reopening the comment
period for this action until January 10,
2014, to provide additional opportunity
for informed public comment.
DATES: The deadline for comments on
the proposed rule published at 78 FR
52032 has been reopened from
December 10, 2013 to January 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule, as published on
August 21, 2013 (78 FR 52032),
identified by ‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2013–
0101,’’ by any of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20130101, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments. Do not submit
electronic comments to individual
NMFS staff.
• Mail: Submit written comments to:
Thomas Warren, Highly Migratory
Species Management Division, NMFS,
55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester,
MA 01930. Please mark the outside of
the envelope ‘‘Comments on
Amendment 7 to the HMS FMP.’’
• Fax: 978–281–9347, Attn: Thomas
Warren.
Instructions: Comments must be
submitted by one of the above methods
to ensure that the comments are
received, documented, and considered
by NMFS. Comments sent by any other
method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are
a part of the public record and generally
will be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. Do not submit
Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields, if you wish to
remain anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word or Excel, WordPerfect,
or Adobe PDF file formats only.
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 11, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 75321-75327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29300]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 92
[Docket No. FWS-R7-MB-2013-0109; FF09M21200-123-FXMB1231099BPP0L2]
RIN 1018-BA02
Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in Alaska; Harvest Regulations
for Migratory Birds in Alaska During the 2014 Season
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or we) proposes
migratory bird subsistence harvest regulations in Alaska for the 2014
season. These regulations would enable the continuation of customary
and traditional subsistence uses of migratory birds in Alaska and
prescribe regional information on when and where the harvesting of
birds may occur. These regulations were developed under a co-management
process involving the Service, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game,
and Alaska Native representatives. The rulemaking is necessary because
the regulations governing the subsistence harvest of migratory birds in
Alaska are subject to annual review. This rulemaking proposes region-
specific regulations that would go into effect on April 2, 2014, and
expire on August 31, 2014.
DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before
February 10, 2014. We must receive requests for public hearings, in
writing, at the address shown in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by
January 27, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments to Docket No. FWS-R7-
MB-2013-0109.
U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public Comments Processing,
Attn: FWS-R7-MB-2013-0109; Division of Policy and Directives
Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS
2042-PDM; Arlington, VA 22203.
We will not accept email or faxes. We will post all comments on
https://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us (see the Public Comment Procedures
section below for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Dewhurst, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 1011 E. Tudor Road, Mail Stop 201, Anchorage, AK 99503; (907)
786-3499.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comment Procedures
To ensure that any action resulting from this proposed rule will be
as accurate and as effective as possible, we request that you send
relevant information for our consideration. The comments that will be
most useful and likely to influence our decisions are those that you
support by quantitative information or studies and those that include
citations to, and analyses of, the applicable laws and regulations.
Please make your comments as specific as possible and explain the basis
for them. In addition, please include sufficient information with your
comments to allow us to authenticate any scientific or commercial data
you include.
You must submit your comments and materials concerning this
proposed rule by one of the methods listed above in the ADDRESSES
section. We will not accept comments sent by email or fax or to an
address not listed in ADDRESSES. If you submit a comment via https://www.regulations.gov, your entire comment--including any personal
identifying information, such as your address, telephone number, or
email address--will be posted on the Web site. When you submit a
comment, the system receives it immediately. However, the comment will
not be publicly viewable until we post it, which might not occur until
several days after submission.
If you mail or hand-carry a hardcopy comment directly to us that
includes personal information, you may request at the top of your
document that we withhold this information from public review. However,
we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. To ensure that the
electronic docket for this rulemaking is complete and all comments we
receive are publicly available, we will post all hardcopy comments on
https://www.regulations.gov.
In addition, comments and materials we receive, as well as
supporting documentation used in preparing this proposed rule, will be
available for public inspection in two ways:
(1) You can view them on https://www.regulations.gov. Search for
FWS-R7-MB-2013-0109, which is the docket number for this rulemaking.
(2) You can make an appointment, during normal business hours, to
view the comments and materials in person at the Division of Migratory
Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4501 N. Fairfax Drive,
Room 4107, Arlington, VA 22203-1610.
Public Availability of Comments
As stated above in more detail, before including your address,
phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information
in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--
including your personal identifying information--may be made publicly
available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold
your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Why is this rulemaking necessary?
This rulemaking is necessary because, by law, the migratory bird
harvest season is closed unless opened by the Secretary of the
Interior, and the regulations governing subsistence harvest of
migratory birds in Alaska are subject to public review and annual
approval. This rule proposes regulations for the taking of migratory
birds for subsistence uses in Alaska during the spring and summer of
2014. This rule proposes a list of migratory bird season openings and
closures in Alaska by region.
How do I find the history of these regulations?
Background information, including past events leading to this
rulemaking, accomplishments since the Migratory
[[Page 75322]]
Bird Treaties with Canada and Mexico were amended, and a history, was
originally addressed in the Federal Register on August 16, 2002 (67 FR
53511) and most recently on February 21, 2013 (78 FR 11988).
Recent Federal Register documents, which are all proposed rules
setting forth the annual harvest regulations, are available at https://alaska.fws.gov/ambcc/regulations.htm or by contacting the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
What is the process for issuing regulations for the subsistence harvest
of migratory birds in Alaska?
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or we) is proposing
migratory bird subsistence harvest regulations in Alaska for the 2014
season. These regulations would enable the continuation of customary
and traditional subsistence uses of migratory birds in Alaska and
prescribe regional information on when and where the harvesting of
birds may occur. These proposed regulations were developed under a co-
management process involving the Service, the Alaska Department of Fish
and Game, and Alaska Native representatives.
We opened the process to establish regulations for the 2014 spring
and summer subsistence harvest of migratory birds in Alaska in a
proposed rule published in the Federal Register on April 9, 2013 (78 FR
21200), to amend 50 CFR part 20. While that proposed rule dealt
primarily with the regulatory process for hunting migratory birds for
all purposes throughout the United States, we also discussed the
background and history of Alaska subsistence regulations, explained the
annual process for their establishment, and requested proposals for the
2014 season. The rulemaking processes for both types of migratory bird
harvest are related, and the April 9, 2013, proposed rule explained the
connection between the two.
The Alaska Migratory Bird Co-management Council (Co-management
Council) held meetings on April 3-4, 2013, to develop recommendations
for changes that would take effect during the 2014 harvest season.
These recommendations were presented first to the Flyway Councils and
then to the Service Regulations Committee (SRC) at the committee's
meeting on July 23-25, 2013.
Who is eligible to hunt under these regulations?
Eligibility to harvest under the regulations established in 2003
was limited to permanent residents, regardless of race, in villages
located within the Alaska Peninsula, Kodiak Archipelago, the Aleutian
Islands, and in areas north and west of the Alaska Range (50 CFR 92.5).
These geographical restrictions opened the initial migratory bird
subsistence harvest to about 13 percent of Alaska residents. High-
populated, roaded areas such as Anchorage, the Matanuska-Susitna and
Fairbanks North Star boroughs, the Kenai Peninsula roaded area, the
Gulf of Alaska roaded area, and Southeast Alaska were excluded from
eligible subsistence harvest areas.
Based on petitions requesting inclusion in the harvest, in 2004, we
added 13 additional communities based on criteria set forth in 50 CFR
92.5(c). These communities were Gulkana, Gakona, Tazlina, Copper
Center, Mentasta Lake, Chitina, Chistochina, Tatitlek, Chenega, Port
Graham, Nanwalek, Tyonek, and Hoonah, with a combined population of
2,766. In 2005, we added three additional communities for glaucous-
winged gull egg gathering only, based on petitions requesting
inclusion. These southeastern communities were Craig, Hydaburg, and
Yakutat, with a combined population of 2,459, based on the latest
census information at that time.
In 2007, we enacted the Alaska Department of Fish and Game's
request to expand the Fairbanks North Star Borough excluded area to
include the Central Interior area. This action excluded the following
communities from participation in this harvest: Big Delta/Fort Greely,
Healy, McKinley Park/Village, and Ferry, with a combined population of
2,812.
In 2012, we received a request from the Native Village of Eyak to
include Cordova, Alaska, for a limited season that would legalize the
traditional gathering of gull eggs and early season waterfowl.
What is different in the region-specific regulations for 2014?
In 2011, we received a request by the Fairbanks Native Association
asking that regulations be developed that would allow residents who
live in excluded areas be able to participate in the spring/summer
subsistence migratory bird harvest. This would permit tribal members
currently living in excluded areas to openly and traditionally continue
their Native traditional hunting practices and provide for the cultural
and traditional needs for spring/summer waterfowl. This proposal
request was tabled by the Co-management Council until exact wording
could be worked out by the Invitation Subcommittee of the Council.
Language was proposed to amend 50 CFR 92.5, Subpart D, and recommended
for passage by the Co-management Council at their April 2013 meeting.
Upon legal review by individuals in the Department of the
Interior's Office of the Solicitor and the Service's Law Enforcement
Division, the language was amended by the Service working with the
Invitation Subcommittee. The primary legal concerns were deviations
from the language in the Letter of Submittal de-emphasizing that the
purpose of allowing residents who live in excluded areas to be able to
participate in the spring/summer subsistence migratory bird harvest is
to assist immediate family members still residing in a village in an
included area. This revision was approved via phone poll by the Co-
management Council in July 2013. The revised language was approved by
the SRC on July 25, 2013.
In 2012, the Native Village of Eyak requested to add residents of
Cordova, Alaska, onto the list of included subsistence communities
based on criteria set forth in 50 CFR 92.5(c). They stated that this
would allow for the legal traditional gathering of gull eggs and early
season hunting of migratory waterfowl (and cranes) to subsistence
residents. The Copper River barrier islands afford traditional location
for gull egg gathering and early spring migratory waterfowl hunting.
The harvest season requested would be in Prince William Sound Game
Management Units 6C and 6D (barrier islands only), to open a waterfowl
hunting season, April 2-30, and a gull egg gathering season, May 1-31,
primarily for the residents of Cordova. Special registration permits
would be required and hunting would be done from boats or ATVs. The
Native Village of Eyak worked closely with the Service's Migratory Bird
Management Office to restrict harvest to protect and conserve dusky
Canada geese, trumpeter swans, and shorebirds. This subsistence harvest
would require the possession of special registration permits to help
ensure harvesting is conducted only by residents of included areas. The
SRC approved inclusion of Cordova at their meeting on July 25, 2013.
How will the service ensure that the subsistence harvest will not raise
overall migratory bird harvest or threaten the conservation of
endangered and threatened species?
We have monitored subsistence harvest for the past 25 years through
the use of annual household surveys in the most heavily used
subsistence harvest areas, such as the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta. In recent
years, more intensive
[[Page 75323]]
surveys combined with outreach efforts focused on species
identification have been added to improve the accuracy of information
gathered from regions still reporting some subsistence harvest of
listed or candidate species.
Spectacled and Steller's Eiders
Spectacled eiders (Somateria fischeri) and the Alaska-breeding
population of Steller's eiders (Polysticta stelleri) are listed as
threatened species. Their migration and breeding distribution overlap
with areas where the spring and summer subsistence migratory bird hunt
is open in Alaska. Both species are closed to hunting, although harvest
surveys and Service documentation indicate both species have been taken
in several regions of Alaska.
The Service has dual objectives and responsibilities for
authorizing a subsistence harvest while protecting migratory birds and
threatened species. Although these objectives continue to be
challenging, they are not irreconcilable, providing the proposed
regulations continue to protect threatened species, measures to remedy
documented threats are implemented, and the subsistence community and
other conservation partners commit to working together. With these dual
objectives in mind, the Service, working with North Slope partners,
developed measures in 2009, to further reduce the potential for
shooting mortality or injury of closed species. These conservation
measures included: (1) Increased waterfowl hunter outreach and
community awareness through partnering with the North Slope Migratory
Bird Task Force; (2) continued enforcement of the migratory bird
regulations that are protective of listed eiders; and (3) in-season
Service verification of the harvest to detect taking of any threatened
eider species.
This proposed rule continues to focus on the North Slope from
Barrow to Point Hope because Steller's eiders from the listed Alaska
breeding population are known to breed and migrate there. These
proposed regulations are designed to address several ongoing eider
management needs by clarifying for subsistence users that (1) Service
law enforcement personnel have authority to verify species of birds
possessed by hunters, and (2) it is illegal to possess any species of
bird closed to harvest. This rule also describes how the Service's
existing authority of emergency closure would be implemented, if
necessary, to protect Steller's eiders. We are always willing to
discuss regulations with our partners on the North Slope to ensure
protection of closed species as well as provide subsistence hunters an
opportunity to harvest migratory birds in a way that maintains the
culture and traditional harvest of the community. The regulations
pertaining to bag checks and possession of illegal birds are deemed
necessary to verify that no closed eider species are taken during the
legal subsistence hunt.
The Service is aware of and appreciates the considerable efforts by
North Slope partners to raise awareness and educate hunters on
Steller's eider conservation via the bird fair, meetings, radio shows,
signs, school visits, and one-on-one contacts. We also recognize that
no listed eiders have been documented shot from 2009 through 2012, even
though Steller's eiders nested in the Barrow area from 2010 through
2013. One Steller's eider and one spectacled eider were found shot
during the summer of 2013, and are under investigation. The Service
acknowledges progress made with the other eider conservation measures
including partnering with the North Slope Migratory Bird Task Force for
increased waterfowl hunter awareness, continued enforcement of the
regulations, and in-season verification of the harvest. Our primary
strategy to reduce the threat of shooting mortality of threatened
eiders is to continue working with North Slope partners to conduct
education, outreach, and harvest monitoring. In addition, the emergency
closure authority provides another level of assurance if an unexpected
amount of Steller's eider shooting mortality occurs (50 CFR 92.21 and
50 CFR 92.32).
In-season harvest monitoring information would be used to evaluate
the efficacy of regulations, conservation measures, and outreach
efforts. Conservation measures are being continued by the Service and
the North Slope Borough, with the amount of effort and emphasis being
based on regulatory adherence. Specifically, local communities have
continued to develop greater responsibility for taking actions to
ensure Steller's and spectacled eider conservation and recovery, and
based on last year's observations, local hunters have demonstrated
greater compliance with hunting regulations.
The longstanding general emergency closure provision at 50 CFR
92.21 specifies that the harvest may be closed or temporarily suspended
upon finding that a continuation of the regulation allowing the harvest
would pose an imminent threat to the conservation of any migratory bird
population. With regard to Steller's eiders, the regulation at 50 CFR
92.32, carried over from the past 3 years, would clarify that we would
take action under 50 CFR 92.21 as is necessary to prevent further take
of Steller's eiders, and that action could include temporary or long-
term closures of the harvest in all or a portion of the geographic area
open to harvest. If mortality of threatened eiders occurs, we would
evaluate each mortality event by criteria such as cause, quantity, sex,
age, location, and date. We would consult with the Co-management
Council when we are considering an emergency closure. If we determine
that an emergency closure is necessary, we would design it to minimize
its impact on the subsistence harvest.
Yellow-Billed Loon
Yellow-billed loons (Gavia adamsii) are a candidate species for
listing under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.). Their migration and breeding distribution overlaps with
where the spring and summer migratory bird hunt is open in Alaska.
Yellow-billed loons are closed to hunting, but harvest surveys have
indicated that on the North Slope and St. Lawrence Island some take
does occur. Most of the yellow-billed loons reported harvested on the
North Slope were found to be entangled loons salvaged from subsistence
fishing nets as described below. The Service would continue outreach
efforts in both areas in 2014, engaging partners to decrease the take
of yellow-billed loons.
Consistent with the request of the North Slope Borough Fish and
Game Management Committee and the recommendation of the Co-management
Council, this rule proposes to continue the provisions originally
established in 2005, to allow subsistence use of yellow-billed loons
inadvertently entangled in subsistence fishing (gill) nets on the North
Slope. Yellow-billed loons are culturally important to the Inupiat
Eskimo of the North Slope for use in traditional dance regalia. A
maximum of 20 yellow-billed loons would be allowed to be kept if found
entangled in fishing nets in 2014, under this provision. This proposed
provision does not authorize intentional harvest of yellow-billed
loons, but allows use of those loons inadvertently entangled during
normal subsistence fishing activities.
Endangered Species Act Consideration
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1536) requires
the Secretary of the Interior to ``review other programs administered
by her and utilize such programs in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act'' and to ``insure that any action authorized, funded, or carried
out . . . is not likely to
[[Page 75324]]
jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or
threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification
of [critical] habitat. . . .'' Prior to issuance of annual spring and
summer subsistence regulations, we would consult under section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), to ensure that the
2014 subsistence harvest is not likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of any species designated as endangered or threatened, or
modify or destroy its critical habitats, and that the regulations are
consistent with conservation programs for those species. Consultation
under section 7 of the Act for the annual subsistence take regulations
may cause us to change these regulations. Our biological opinion
resulting from the section 7 consultation is a public document
available from the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Statutory Authority
We derive our authority to issue these regulations from the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, at 16 U.S.C. 712(1), which
authorizes the Secretary of the Interior, in accordance with the
treaties with Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia, to ``issue such
regulations as may be necessary to assure that the taking of migratory
birds and the collection of their eggs, by the indigenous inhabitants
of the State of Alaska, shall be permitted for their own nutritional
and other essential needs, as determined by the Secretary of the
Interior, during seasons established so as to provide for the
preservation and maintenance of stocks of migratory birds.''
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant rules. The Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this rule is
not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while
calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches
that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for
the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and
consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further
that regulations must be based on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent
with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). An initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
Accordingly, a Small Entity Compliance Guide is not required. This
proposed rule would legalize a pre-existing subsistence activity, and
the resources harvested would be consumed by the harvesters or persons
within their local community.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
(a) Would not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more. It proposes to legalize and regulate a traditional subsistence
activity. It would not result in a substantial increase in subsistence
harvest or a significant change in harvesting patterns. The commodities
that would be regulated under this proposed rule are migratory birds.
This rule deals with legalizing the subsistence harvest of migratory
birds and, as such, does not involve commodities traded in the
marketplace. A small economic benefit from this proposed rule would
derive from the sale of equipment and ammunition to carry out
subsistence hunting. Most, if not all, businesses that sell hunting
equipment in rural Alaska qualify as small businesses. We have no
reason to believe that this proposed rule would lead to a
disproportionate distribution of benefits.
(b) Would not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local government
agencies; or geographic regions. This proposed rule does not deal with
traded commodities and, therefore, does not have an impact on prices
for consumers.
(c) Would not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This
proposed rule deals with the harvesting of wildlife for personal
consumption. It does not regulate the marketplace in any way to
generate effects on the economy or the ability of businesses to
compete.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We have determined and certified under the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) that this proposed rule would not impose a
cost of $100 million or more in any given year on local, State, or
tribal governments or private entities. The proposed rule does not have
a significant or unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments
or the private sector. A statement containing the information required
by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act is not required. Participation on
regional management bodies and the Co-management Council would require
travel expenses for some Alaska Native organizations and local
governments. In addition, they would assume some expenses related to
coordinating involvement of village councils in the regulatory process.
Total coordination and travel expenses for all Alaska Native
organizations are estimated to be less than $300,000 per year. In a
Notice of Decision (65 FR 16405; March 28, 2000), we identified 7 to 12
partner organizations (Alaska Native nonprofits and local governments)
to administer the regional programs. The Alaska Department of Fish and
Game would also incur expenses for travel to Co-management Council and
regional management body meetings. In addition, the State of Alaska
would be required to provide technical staff support to each of the
regional management bodies and to the Co-management Council. Expenses
for the State's involvement may exceed $100,000 per year, but should
not exceed $150,000 per year. When funding permits, we make annual
grant agreements available to the partner organizations and the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game to help offset their expenses.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 12630, this proposed rule
would not have significant takings implications. This proposed rule is
not specific to particular land ownership, but applies to the
harvesting of migratory bird resources throughout Alaska. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 13132, this proposed rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism
[[Page 75325]]
summary impact statement. We discuss effects of this proposed rule on
the State of Alaska in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act section above.
We worked with the State of Alaska to develop these proposed
regulations. Therefore, a federalism summary impact statement is not
required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
The Department, in promulgating this proposed rule, has determined
that it would not unduly burden the judicial system and that it meets
the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Government-to-Government Relations With Native American Tribal
Governments
Consistent with Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249; November 6,
2000), ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments'', and Department of Interior policy on Consultation with
Indian Tribes (December 1, 2011), we will send letters to all 229
Alaska Federally recognized Indian tribes. Consistent with
Congressional direction (Pub. L. 108-199, div. H, Sec. 161, Jan. 23,
2004, 118 Stat. 452, as amended by Pub. L. 108-447, div. H, title V,
Sec. 518, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3267), we will be sending letters to
approximately 200 Alaska Native corporations and other tribal entities
in Alaska soliciting their input as to whether or not they would like
the Service to consult with them on the 2014 migratory bird subsistence
harvest regulations.
We implemented the amended treaty with Canada with a focus on local
involvement. The treaty calls for the creation of management bodies to
ensure an effective and meaningful role for Alaska's indigenous
inhabitants in the conservation of migratory birds. According to the
Letter of Submittal, management bodies are to include Alaska Native,
Federal, and State of Alaska representatives as equals. They would
develop recommendations for among other things: seasons and bag limits,
methods and means of take, law enforcement policies, population and
harvest monitoring, education programs, research and use of traditional
knowledge, and habitat protection. The management bodies would involve
village councils to the maximum extent possible in all aspects of
management. To ensure maximum input at the village level, we required
each of the 11 participating regions to create regional management
bodies consisting of at least one representative from the participating
villages. The regional management bodies meet twice annually to review
and/or submit proposals to the Statewide body.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule has been examined under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and does not contain any new
collections of information that require Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approval. OMB has renewed our collection of information
associated with the voluntary annual household surveys used to
determine levels of subsistence take. The OMB control number is 1018-
0124, which now expires June 30, 2016. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
Consideration
The annual regulations and options are considered in the
environmental assessment, ``Managing Migratory Bird Subsistence Hunting
in Alaska: Hunting Regulations for the 2014 Spring/Summer Harvest,''
September 20, 2013. Copies are available from the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or at https://www.regulations.gov.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (Executive Order 13211)
Executive Order 13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. This is not a
significant regulatory action under this Executive Order; it would
allow only for traditional subsistence harvest and would improve
conservation of migratory birds by allowing effective regulation of
this harvest. Further, this proposed rule is not expected to
significantly affect energy supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore,
this action is not a significant energy action under Executive Order
13211, and no Statement of Energy Effects is required.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 92
Hunting, Treaties, Wildlife.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons set out in the preamble, we propose to amend title
50, chapter I, subchapter G, of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 92--MIGRATORY BIRD SUBSISTENCE HARVEST IN ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for part 92 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703-712.
Subpart A--General Provisions
0
2. Amend Sec. 92.5 by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 92.5 Who is eligible to participate?
* * * * *
(d) Participation by permanent residents of excluded areas.
Immediate family members who are residents of excluded areas may
participate in the customary spring and summer subsistence harvest in a
village's subsistence area with permission of the village council, to
assist indigenous inhabitants in meeting their nutritional and other
essential needs or for the teaching of cultural knowledge. A letter of
invitation will be sent by the village council to the hunter with a
copy to the Executive Director of the Co-management Council, who will
inform law enforcement.
* * * * *
Subpart D--Annual Regulations Governing Subsistence Harvest
0
3. Amend subpart D by adding Sec. 92.31 to read as follows:
Sec. 92.31 Region-specific regulations.
The 2014 season dates for the eligible subsistence harvest areas
are as follows:
(a) Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Region.
(1) Northern Unit (Pribilof Islands):
(i) Season: April 2-June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
(2) Central Unit (Aleut Region's eastern boundary on the Alaska
Peninsula westward to and including Unalaska Island):
(i) Season: April 2-June 15 and July 16-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 16-July 15.
(iii) Special Black Brant Season Closure: August 16-August 31, only
in Izembek and Moffet lagoons.
(iv) Special Tundra Swan Closure: All hunting and egg gathering
closed in units 9(D) and 10.
(3) Western Unit (Umnak Island west to and including Attu Island):
(i) Season: April 2-July 15 and August 16-August 31.
(ii) Closure: July 16-August 15.
(b) Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta Region.
(1) Season: April 2-August 31.
(2) Closure: 30-day closure dates to be announced by the Service's
Alaska Regional Director or his designee, after consultation with field
biologists and the Association of Village Council President's Waterfowl
Conservation Committee. This 30-day period would occur between June 1
and August 15 of each year. A press release announcing the actual
closure dates would be
[[Page 75326]]
forwarded to regional newspapers and radio and television stations.
(3) Special Black Brant and Cackling Goose Season Hunting Closure:
From the period when egg laying begins until young birds are fledged.
Closure dates to be announced by the Service's Alaska Regional Director
or his designee, after consultation with field biologists and the
Association of Village Council President's Waterfowl Conservation
Committee. A press release announcing the actual closure dates would be
forwarded to regional newspapers and radio and television stations.
(c) Bristol Bay Region.
(1) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31 (general season);
April 2-July 15 for seabird egg gathering only.
(2) Closure: June 15-July 15 (general season); July 16-August 31
(seabird egg gathering).
(d) Bering Strait/Norton Sound Region.
(1) Stebbins/St. Michael Area (Point Romanof to Canal Point):
(i) Season: April 15-June 14 and July 16-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 15-July 15.
(2) Remainder of the region:
(i) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31 for waterfowl;
April 2-July 19 and August 21-August 31 for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 15-July 15 for waterfowl; July 20-August 20 for
all other birds.
(e) Kodiak Archipelago Region, except for the Kodiak Island roaded
area, which is closed to the harvesting of migratory birds and their
eggs. The closed area consists of all lands and waters (including
exposed tidelands) east of a line extending from Crag Point in the
north to the west end of Saltery Cove in the south and all lands and
water south of a line extending from Termination Point along the north
side of Cascade Lake extending to Anton Larsen Bay. Waters adjacent to
the closed area are closed to harvest within 500 feet from the water's
edge. The offshore islands are open to harvest.
(1) Season: April 2-June 30 and July 31-August 31 for seabirds;
April 2-June 20 and July 22-August 31 for all other birds.
(2) Closure: July 1-July 30 for seabirds; June 21-July 21 for all
other birds.
(f) Northwest Arctic Region.
(1) Season: April 2-June 9 and August 15-August 31 (hunting in
general); waterfowl egg gathering May 20-June 9 only; seabird egg
gathering May 20-July 12 only; hunting molting/non-nesting waterfowl
July 1-July 31 only.
(2) Closure: June 10-August 14, except for the taking of seabird
eggs and molting/non-nesting waterfowl as provided in paragraph (f)(1)
of this section.
(g) North Slope Region.
(1) Southern Unit (Southwestern North Slope regional boundary east
to Peard Bay, everything west of the longitude line 158[deg]30' W and
south of the latitude line 70[deg]45' N to the west bank of the
Ikpikpuk River, and everything south of the latitude line 69[deg]45' N
between the west bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east bank of
Sagavinirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2-June 29 and July 30-August 31 for seabirds;
April 2-June 19 and July 20-August 31 for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 30-July 29 for seabirds; June 20-July 19 for all
other birds.
(iii) Special Black Brant Hunting Opening: From June 20-July 5. The
open area would consist of the coastline, from mean high water line
outward to include open water, from Nokotlek Point east to longitude
line 158[deg]30' W. This includes Peard Bay, Kugrua Bay, and Wainwright
Inlet, but not the Kuk and Kugrua river drainages.
(2) Northern Unit (At Peard Bay, everything east of the longitude
line 158[deg]30' W and north of the latitude line 70[deg]45' N to west
bank of the Ikpikpuk River, and everything north of the latitude line
69[deg]45' N between the west bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east
bank of Sagavinirktok River):
(i) Season: April 6-June 6 and July 7-August 31 for king and common
eiders; April 2-June 15 and July 16-August 31 for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 7-July 6 for king and common eiders; June 16-
July 15 for all other birds.
(3) Eastern Unit (East of eastern bank of the Sagavanirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2-June 19 and July 20-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 20-July 19.
(4) All Units: yellow-billed loons. Annually, up to 20 yellow-
billed loons total for the region may be inadvertently entangled in
subsistence fishing nets in the North Slope Region and kept for
subsistence use.
(5) North Coastal Zone (Cape Thompson north to Point Hope and east
along the Arctic Ocean coastline around Point Barrow to Ross Point,
including Iko Bay, and 5 miles inland).
(i) No person may at any time, by any means, or in any manner,
possess or have in custody any migratory bird or part thereof, taken in
violation of subpart C and D of this part.
(ii) Upon request from a Service law enforcement officer, hunters
taking, attempting to take, or transporting migratory birds taken
during the subsistence harvest season must present them to the officer
for species identification.
(h) Interior Region.
(1) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31; egg gathering
May 1-June 14 only.
(2) Closure: June 15-July 15.
(i) Upper Copper River Region (Harvest Area: Units 11 and 13)
(Eligible communities: Gulkana, Chitina, Tazlina, Copper Center,
Gakona, Mentasta Lake, Chistochina and Cantwell).
(1) Season: April 15-May 26 and June 27-August 31.
(2) Closure: May 27-June 26.
(3) The Copper River Basin communities listed above also documented
traditional use harvesting birds in Unit 12, making them eligible to
hunt in this unit using the seasons specified in paragraph (h) of this
section.
(j) Gulf of Alaska Region.
(1) Prince William Sound Area West (Harvest area: Unit 6[D]),
(Eligible Chugach communities: Chenega Bay, Tatitlek):
(i) Season: April 2-May 31 and July 1-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1-30.
(2) Prince William Sound Area East (Harvest area: Units 6[C]and
[B]--Barrier Islands between Strawberry Channel and Softtuk Bar),
(Eligible Chugach communities: Cordova):
(i) Season: April 2-April 30 (hunting); May 1-May 31 (gull egg
gathering).
(ii) Closure: May 1-August 31 (hunting); April 2-30 and June 1-
August 31 (gull egg gathering).
(iii) Species Open for Hunting: greater white-fronted goose; snow
goose; gadwall; Eurasian and American wigeon; blue-winged and green-
winged teal; mallard; northern shoveler; northern pintail; canvasback;
redhead; ring-necked duck; greater and lesser scaup; king and common
eider; harlequin duck; surf, white-winged, and black scoter; long-
tailed duck; bufflehead; common and Barrow's goldeneye; hooded, common,
and red-breasted merganser; and sandhill crane. Species open for egg
gathering: glaucous-winged, herring, and mew gulls.
(iv) Use of Boats/All-Terrain Vehicles: No hunting from motorized
vehicles or any form of watercraft.
(v) Special Registration: All hunters or egg gathers must possess
an annual permit; available from the Cordova offices of the Native
Village of Eyak and the U.S. Forest Service.
(3) Kachemak Bay Area (Harvest area: Unit 15[C] South of a line
connecting the tip of Homer Spit to the mouth of
[[Page 75327]]
Fox River) (Eligible Chugach Communities: Port Graham, Nanwalek):
(i) Season: April 2-May 31 and July 1-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1-30.
(k) Cook Inlet (Harvest area: portions of Unit 16[B] as specified
below) (Eligible communities: Tyonek only):
(1) Season: April 2-May 31--That portion of Unit 16(B) south of the
Skwentna River and west of the Yentna River, and August 1-31--That
portion of Unit 16(B) south of the Beluga River, Beluga Lake, and the
Triumvirate Glacier.
(2) Closure: June 1-July 31.
(l) Southeast Alaska.
(1) Community of Hoonah (Harvest area: National Forest lands in Icy
Strait and Cross Sound, including Middle Pass Rock near the Inian
Islands, Table Rock in Cross Sound, and other traditional locations on
the coast of Yakobi Island. The land and waters of Glacier Bay National
Park remain closed to all subsistence harvesting (50 CFR Part
100.3(a)):
(i) Season: glaucous-winged gull egg gathering only: May 15-June
30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
(2) Communities of Craig and Hydaburg (Harvest area: small islands
and adjacent shoreline of western Prince of Wales Island from Point
Baker to Cape Chacon, but also including Coronation and Warren
islands):
(i) Season: glaucous-winged gull egg gathering only: May 15-June
30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
(3) Community of Yakutat (Harvest area: Icy Bay (Icy Cape to Point
Riou), and coastal lands and islands bordering the Gulf of Alaska from
Point Manby southeast to Dry Bay):
(i) Season: glaucous-winged gull egg gathering: May 15-June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
0
4. Amend subpart D by adding Sec. 92.32 to read as follows:
Sec. 92.32 Emergency regulations to protect Steller's eiders.
Upon finding that continuation of these subsistence regulations
would pose an imminent threat to the conservation of threatened
Steller's eiders (Polysticta stelleri), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Alaska Regional Director, in consultation with the Co-
management Council, will immediately under Sec. 92.21 take action as
is necessary to prevent further take. Regulation changes implemented
could range from a temporary closure of duck hunting in a small
geographic area to large-scale regional or Statewide long-term closures
of all subsistence migratory bird hunting. These closures or temporary
suspensions will remain in effect until the Regional Director, in
consultation with the Co-management Council, determines that the
potential for additional Steller's eiders to be taken no longer exists.
Dated: November 22, 2013.
Michael J. Bean,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. 2013-29300 Filed 12-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P