Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section 128(a); Notice of Grant Funding Guidance for State and Tribal Response Programs for FY2014, 73525-73534 [2013-28983]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2013 / Notices
Dredged Material Management Plan,
Port of Morehead City, Comment
Period Ends: 02/03/2014, Contact:
Hugh Heine 910–251–4070.
Revision to the FR Notice Published
11/01/2013; Extending Comment Period
from 12/16/2013 to 02/03/2014.
EIS No. 20130325, Draft EIS, NPS, MO,
Ozark National Scenic Riverways
Draft General Management Plan,
Wilderness Study, Comment Period
Ends: 01/08/2014, Contact: William
Black 573–323–4236.
Revision to the FR Notice Published
11/08/2013; Extending Comment Period
from 12/30/2013 to 01/08/2014.
Dated: December 3, 2013.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2013–29193 Filed 12–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9903–71–OSWER]
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section
128(a); Notice of Grant Funding
Guidance for State and Tribal
Response Programs for FY2014
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) will begin to accept
requests, from December 9, 2013
through January 31, 2014, for grants to
supplement State and Tribal Response
Programs. This notice provides
guidance on eligibility for funding, use
of funding, grant mechanisms and
process for awarding funding, the
allocation system for distribution of
funding, and terms and reporting under
these grants. EPA has consulted with
state and tribal officials in developing
this guidance.
The primary goal of this funding is to
ensure that state and tribal response
programs include, or are taking
reasonable steps to include, certain
elements and a public record. Another
goal is to provide funding for other
activities that increase the number of
response actions conducted or overseen
by a state or tribal response program.
This funding is not intended to supplant
current state or tribal funding for their
response programs. Instead, it is to
supplement their funding to increase
their response capacity.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Dec 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
For fiscal year 2014, EPA will
consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.0 million per state or
tribe. Subject to the availability of
funds, EPA regional personnel will be
available to provide technical assistance
to states and tribes as they apply for and
carry out these grants.
DATES: This action is effective as of
December 9, 2013. EPA expects to make
non-competitive grant awards to states
and tribes which apply during fiscal
year 2014.
ADDRESSES: Mailing addresses for EPA
Regional Offices and EPA Headquarters
can be located at www.epa.gov/
brownfields and at the end of this
Notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
EPA’s Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Office of
Brownfields and Land Revitalization,
(202) 566–2745 or the applicable EPA
Regional Office listed at the end this
Notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
Section 128(a) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA), as amended, authorizes a
noncompetitive $50 million grant
program to establish and enhance state 1
and tribal 2 response programs. CERCLA
128(a) response program grants are
funded with categorical 3 State and
Tribal Assistance Grant (STAG)
appropriations. Section 128(a)
cooperative agreements are awarded and
administered by the EPA regional
offices. Generally, these response
programs address the assessment,
cleanup, and redevelopment of
brownfields sites and other sites with
actual or perceived contamination. This
document provides guidance that will
enable states and tribes to apply for and
use fiscal year 2014 section 128(a)
funds.4
The Catalogue of Federal Domestic
Assistance entry for the section 128(a)
State and Tribal Response Program
cooperative agreements is 66.817. This
grant program is eligible to be included
1 The term ‘‘state’’ is defined in this document as
defined in CERCLA section 101(27).
2 The term ‘‘Indian tribe’’ is defined in this
document as it is defined in CERCLA section
101(36). Intertribal consortia, as defined in the
Federal Register Notice at 67 FR 67181, Nov. 4,
2002, are also eligible for funding under CERCLA
section 128(a).
3 Categorical grants are issued by the U.S.
Congress to fund state and local governments for
narrowly defined purposes.
4 The Agency may waive any provision of this
guidance that is not required by statute, regulation,
Executive Order or overriding Agency policies.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73525
in state and tribal Performance
Partnership Grants under 40 CFR part
35 Subparts A and B, with the exception
of funds used to capitalize a revolving
loan fund for brownfield remediation
under section 104(k)(3); or purchase
insurance or develop a risk sharing
pool, an indemnity pool, or insurance
mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a State or Tribal
response program.
Requests for funding will be accepted
from December 9, 2013 through January
31, 2014. Requests EPA receives after
January 31, 2014 will not be considered
for FY2014 funding. Information that
must be submitted with the funding
request is listed in Section VIII of this
guidance. States or tribes that do not
submit the request in the appropriate
manner may forfeit their ability to
receive funds. First time requestors are
strongly encouraged to contact their
Regional EPA Brownfields contacts,
listed at the end of this guidance, prior
to submitting their funding request.
EPA will consider funding requests
up to a maximum of $1.0 million per
state or tribe for FY2014.
Requests submitted by the January 31,
2014 request deadline are preliminary;
final cooperative agreement work plans
and budgets will be negotiated with the
regional offices once final funding
allocation determinations are made. As
in previous years, EPA will place
special emphasis on reviewing a
cooperative agreement recipient’s use of
prior section 128(a) funding in making
allocation decisions and unexpended
balances are subject to 40 CFR 35.118
and 40 CFR 35.518 to the extent
consistent with this guidance.
States and tribes requesting funds are
required to provide a Dun and
Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number with their
cooperative agreement’s final package.
For more information, please go to
www.grants.gov.
II. Background
State and tribal response programs
oversee assessment and cleanup
activities at brownfields sites across the
country. The depth and breadth of state
and tribal response programs vary.
Some focus on CERCLA related
activities, while others are multifaceted, addressing sites regulated by
both CERCLA and the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
Many state programs also offer
accompanying financial incentive
programs to spur cleanup and
redevelopment. In enacting CERCLA
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
73526
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2013 / Notices
section 128(a),5 Congress recognized the
accomplishments of state and tribal
response programs in cleaning up and
redeveloping brownfields sites. Section
128(a) provides EPA with an
opportunity to strengthen its
partnership with states and tribes, and
recognizes the response programs’
critical role in overseeing cleanups
enrolled in their response programs.
This funding is intended for those
states and tribes that have the
management and administrative
capacity within their government
required to administer a federal grant.
The primary goal of this funding is to
ensure that state and tribal response
programs include, or are taking
reasonable steps to include, certain
elements of an environmental response
program and that the response program
establishes and maintains a public
record of sites addressed.
Subject to the availability of funds,
EPA regional personnel will be available
to provide technical assistance to states
and tribes as they apply for and carry
out section 128(a) cooperative
agreements.
III. Eligibility for Funding
To be eligible for funding under
CERCLA section 128(a), a state or tribe
must:
1. demonstrate that its response
program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four
elements of a response program
described in Section V of this guidance;
or be a party to a voluntary response
program Memorandum of Agreement
(VRP MOA) 6 with EPA; and
2. maintain and make available to the
public a record of sites at which
response actions have been completed
in the previous year and are planned to
be addressed in the upcoming year, see
CERCLA section 128(b)(1)(C).
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Matching Funds/Cost-Share
States and tribes are not required to
provide matching funds for cooperative
agreements awarded under section
128(a), with the exception of section
128(a) funds a state or tribe uses to
capitalize a Brownfields Revolving Loan
Fund (RLF) under CERCLA section
104(k)(3). There is a 20% cost share
requirement for 128(a) funds used to
capitalize a RLF.
5 Section 128(a) was added to CERCLA in 2002 by
the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields
Revitalization Act (Brownfield Amendments).
6 States or tribes that are parties to VRP MOAs
and that maintain and make available a public
record are automatically eligible for section 128(a)
funding.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Dec 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
V. The Four Elements—Section 128(a)
Section 128(a) recipients that do not
have a VRP MOA with EPA must
demonstrate that their response program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to
include, the four elements.
Achievement of the four elements
should be viewed as a priority. Section
128(a) authorizes funding for activities
necessary to establish and enhance the
four elements, and to establish and
maintain the public record requirement.
The four elements of a response
program are described below:
1. Timely survey and inventory of
brownfields sites in state or tribal land.
EPA’s goal in funding activities under
this element is to enable the state or
tribe to establish or enhance a system or
process that will provide a reasonable
estimate of the number, likely locations,
and the general characteristics of
brownfields sites in their state or tribal
lands. EPA recognizes the varied scope
of state and tribal response programs
and will not require states and tribes to
develop a ‘‘list’’ of brownfields sites.
However, at a minimum, the state or
tribe should develop and/or maintain a
system or process that can provide a
reasonable estimate of the number,
likely location, and general
characteristics of brownfields sites
within their state or tribal lands.
Inventories should evolve to a
prioritization of sites based on
community needs, planning priorities,
and protection of human health and the
environment. Inventories should be
developed in direct coordination with
communities, and particular attention
should focus on those communities
with limited capacity to compete for,
and manage a competitive brownfield
assessment, revolving loan, or cleanup
cooperative agreement.
Given funding limitations, EPA will
negotiate work plans with states and
tribes to achieve this goal efficiently and
effectively, and within a realistic time
frame. For example, many of EPA’s
Brownfields Assessment cooperative
agreement recipients conduct
inventories of brownfields sites in their
communities or jurisdictions. EPA
encourages states and tribes to work
with these cooperative agreement
recipients to obtain the information that
they have gathered and include it in
their survey and inventory.
2. Oversight and enforcement
authorities or other mechanisms and
resources. EPA’s goal in funding
activities under this element is to have
state and tribal response programs that
include oversight and enforcement
authorities or other mechanisms, and
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
resources that are adequate to ensure
that:
a. A response action will protect
human health and the environment, and
be conducted in accordance with
applicable laws; and
b. The state or tribe will complete the
necessary response activities if the
person conducting the response fails to
complete the necessary response (this
includes operation and maintenance
and/or long-term monitoring activities).
3. Mechanisms and resources to
provide meaningful opportunities for
public participation.7 EPA’s goal in
funding activities under this element is
to have states and tribes include in their
response program mechanisms and
resources for meaningful public
participation, at the local level,
including, at a minimum:
a. Public access to documents and
related materials that a state, tribe, or
party conducting the cleanup is relying
on or developing to make cleanup
decisions or conduct site activities;
b. Prior notice and opportunity for
meaningful public comment on cleanup
plans and site activities, including the
input into the prioritization of sites; and
c. A mechanism by which a person
who is, or may be, affected by a release
or threatened release of a hazardous
substance, pollutant, or contaminant at
a brownfields site—located in the
community in which the person works
or resides—may request that a site
assessment be conducted. The
appropriate state or tribal official must
consider this request and appropriately
respond.
4. Mechanisms for approval of a
cleanup plan, and verification and
certification that cleanup is complete.
EPA’s goal in funding activities under
this element is to have states and tribes
include in their response program
mechanisms to approve cleanup plans
and to verify that response actions are
complete, including a requirement for
certification or similar documentation
from the state, the tribe, or a licensed
site professional that the response
action is complete. Written approval by
a state or tribal response program
official of a proposed cleanup plan is an
example of an approval mechanism.
VI. Public Record Requirement
In order to be eligible for section
128(a) funding, states and tribes
(including those with MOAs) must
establish and maintain a public record
system, as described below, in order to
7 States and tribes establishing this element may
find useful information on public participation on
EPA’s community involvement Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/superfund/community/policies.htm.
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2013 / Notices
receive funds. The public record should
be made available to provide a
mechanism for meaningful public
participation (refer to Section V.3
above). Specifically, under section
128(b)(1)(C), states and tribes must:
1. Maintain and update, at least
annually or more often as appropriate,
a record that includes the name and
location of sites at which response
actions have been completed during the
previous year;
2. Maintain and update, at least
annually or more often as appropriate,
a record that includes the name and
location of sites at which response
actions are planned in the next year;
and
3. Identify in the public record
whether or not the site, upon
completion of the response action, will
be suitable for unrestricted use. If not,
the public record must identify the
institutional controls relied on in the
remedy and include relevant
information concerning the entity that
will be responsible for oversight,
monitoring, and/or maintenance of the
institutional and engineering controls;
and how the responsible entity is
implementing those activities (see
Section VI.C).
Section 128(a) funds may be used to
maintain and make available a public
record system that meets the
requirements discussed above.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Distinguishing the ‘‘Survey and
Inventory’’ Element From the ‘‘Public
Record’’
It is important to note that the public
record requirement differs from the
‘‘timely survey and inventory’’ element
described in the ‘‘Four Elements’’
section above. The public record
addresses sites at which response
actions have been completed in the
previous year or are planned in the
upcoming year. In contrast, the ‘‘timely
survey and inventory’’ element,
described above, refers to identifying
brownfields sites regardless of planned
or completed actions at the site.
B. Making the Public Record Easily
Accessible
EPA’s goal is to enable states and
tribes to make the public record and
other information, such as information
from the ‘‘survey and inventory’’
element, easily accessible. For this
reason, EPA will allow states and tribes
to use section 128(a) funding to make
the public record, as well as other
information, such as information from
the ‘‘survey and inventory’’ element,
available to the public via the internet
or other means. For example, the
Agency would support funding state
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Dec 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
and tribal efforts to include detailed
location information in the public
record such as the street address, and
latitude and longitude information for
each site.8 States and tribes should
ensure that all affected communities
have appropriate access to the public
record by making it available on-line, in
print at libraries, or at other community
gathering places.
In an effort to reduce cooperative
agreement reporting requirements and
increase public access to the public
record, EPA encourages states and tribes
to place their public record on the
internet. If a state or tribe places the
public record on the internet, maintains
the substantive requirements of the
public record, and provides EPA with
the link to that site, EPA will, for
purposes of cooperative agreement
funding only, deem the public record
reporting requirement met.
C. Long-Term Maintenance of the Public
Record
EPA encourages states and tribes to
maintain public record information,
including data on institutional controls,
on a long term basis (more than one
year) for sites at which a response action
has been completed. Subject to EPA
regional office approval, states or tribes
may include development and operation
of systems that ensure long term
maintenance of the public record,
including information on institutional
controls (such as ensuring the entity
responsible for oversight, monitoring,
and/or maintenance of the institutional
and engineering controls is
implementing those activities) in their
work plans.9
VII. Use of Funding
A. Overview
Section 128(a)(1)(B) describes the
eligible uses of cooperative agreement
funds by states and tribes. In general, a
state or tribe may use funding to
‘‘establish or enhance’’ its response
program. Specifically, a state or tribe
may use cooperative agreement funds to
build response programs that includes
the four elements outline in section
128(a)(2). Eligible activities include, but
are not limited to, the following:
• Developing legislation, regulations,
procedures, ordinances, guidance, etc.
8 For further information on data quality
requirements for latitude and longitude
information, please see EPA’s data standards Web
site available at https://iaspub.epa.gov/sor_internet/
registry/datastds/findadatastandard/epaapproved/
latitudelongitude.
9 States and tribes may find useful information on
institutional controls on the EPA’s institutional
controls Web site at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/
policy/ic/index.htm
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73527
that establish or enhance the
administrative and legal structure of a
response program;
• Establishing and maintaining the
required public record described in
Section VI of this guidance;
• Operation, maintenance and longterm monitoring of institutional controls
and engineering controls;
• Conducting site-specific activities,
such as assessment or cleanup, provided
such activities establish and/or enhance
the response program and are tied to the
four elements. In addition to the
requirement under CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to provide for public
comment on cleanup plans and site
activities, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input
regarding the priority of sites to be
addressed and solicit input from local
communities, especially potential
environmental justice communities,
communities with a health risk related
to exposure to hazardous waste or other
public health concerns, economically
disadvantaged or remote areas, and
communities with limited experience
working with government agencies. EPA
will not provide section 128(a) funds
solely for assessment or cleanup of
specific brownfields sites; site-specific
activities must be part of an overall
section 128(a) work plan that includes
funding for other activities that establish
or enhance the four elements;
• Capitalizing a revolving loan fund
(RLF) for brownfields cleanup under
CERCLA section 104(k)(3). These RLFs
are subject to the same statutory
requirements and cooperative agreement
terms and conditions applicable to RLFs
awarded under section 104(k)(3).
Requirements include a 20 percent
match (can be in the form of a
contribution of money, labor, material,
or services from a non-federal source)
on the amount of section 128(a) funds
used for the RLF, a prohibition on using
EPA cooperative agreement funds for
administrative costs relating to the RLF,
and a prohibition on using RLF loans or
subgrants for response costs at a site for
which the recipient may be potentially
liable under section 107 of CERCLA.
Other prohibitions contained in
CERCLA section 104(k)(4) also apply;
and
• Purchasing environmental
insurance or developing a risk-sharing
pool, indemnity pool, or insurance
mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a state or tribal
response program.
B. Uses Related to ‘‘Establishing’’ A
State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a),
‘‘establish’’ includes activities necessary
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
73528
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2013 / Notices
to build the foundation for the four
elements of a state or tribal response
program and the public record
requirement. For example, a state or
tribal response program may use section
128(a) funds to develop regulations,
ordinances, procedures, guidance, and a
public record.
C. Uses Related to ‘‘Enhancing’’ A State
or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a),
‘‘enhance’’ is related to activities that
add to or improve a state or tribal
response program or increase the
number of sites at which response
actions are conducted under a state or
tribal response program.
The exact ‘‘enhancement’’ uses that
may be allowable depend upon the
work plan negotiated between the EPA
regional office and the state or tribe. For
example, regional offices and states or
tribes may agree that section 128(a)
funds may be used for outreach and
training directly related to increasing
awareness of its response program, and
improving the skills of program staff. It
may also include developing better
coordination and understanding of other
state response programs, e.g., RCRA or
Underground Storage Tanks (USTs). As
another example, states and tribal
response programs enhancement
activities can include outreach to local
communities to increase their awareness
and knowledge regarding the
importance of monitoring engineering
and institutional controls. Other
‘‘enhancement’’ uses may be allowable
as well.
D. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Activities
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Eligible Uses of Funds for SiteSpecific Activities
Site-specific assessment and cleanup
activities should establish and/or
enhance the response program and be
tied to the four elements. Site-specific
assessments and cleanups can be both
eligible and allowable if the activities is
included in the work plan negotiated
between the EPA regional office and the
state or tribe, but activities must comply
with all applicable laws and are subject
to the following restrictions:
a. Section 128(a) funds can only be
used for assessments or cleanups at sites
that meet the definition of a brownfields
site at CERCLA section 101(39). EPA
encourages states and tribes to use sitespecific funding to perform assessment
(e.g., phase II, supplemental
assessments and cleanup planning) and
cleanup activities that will lead more
quickly to the reuse and redevelopment
of sites, particularly sites located in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Dec 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
distressed, environmental justice, rural
or tribal communities. Furthermore,
states and tribes that perform sitespecific activities should plan to
directly engage with and involve the
targeted community in the project. For
example, a Community Relations Plan
(CRP) could be developed to provide
reasonable notice to the public about a
planned cleanup, as well as
opportunities for the public to comment
on the cleanup. States and tribes should
work towards securing additional
funding for site-specific activities by
leveraging resources from other sources
such as businesses, non-profit
organizations, education and training
providers, and/or federal, state, tribal,
and local governments;
b. Absent EPA approval, no more than
$200,000 per site assessment can be
funded with section 128(a) funds, and
no more than $200,000 per site cleanup
can be funded with section 128(a)
funds;
c. Absent EPA approval, the state/
tribe may not use funds awarded under
this agreement to assess and/or clean up
sites owned or operated by the recipient
or held in trust by the United States
Government for the recipient; and
d. Assessments and cleanups cannot
be conducted at sites where the state/
tribe is a potentially responsible party
pursuant to CERCLA section 107,
except:
• At brownfields sites contaminated
by a controlled substance as defined in
CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
• When the recipient would satisfy
all of the elements set forth in CERCLA
section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide
prospective purchaser except that the
date of acquisition of the property was
on or before January 11, 2002.
Subgrants cannot be provided to
entities that may be potentially
responsible parties (pursuant to
CERCLA section 107) at the site for
which the assessment or cleanup
activities are proposed to be conducted,
except:
1. At brownfields sites contaminated
by a controlled substance as defined in
CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
2. When the recipient would satisfy
all of the elements set forth in CERCLA
section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide
prospective purchaser except that the
date of acquisition of the property was
on or before January 11, 2002.
2. Limitations on the Amount of Funds
Used for Site-Specific Activities and
Waiver Process
States and tribes may use section
128(a) funds for site-specific activities
that improve state or tribal capacity but
the amount recipients may request for
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
site-specific assessments and cleanups
may not generally exceed 50% of the
total amount of funding.10 In order for
EPA to consider a waiver, the total
amount of the site-specific request may
not exceed the recipient’s total funding
level for the previous year. The funding
request must include a brief justification
describing the reason(s) for spending
more than 50% of an annual allocation
on site-specific activities. An applicant,
when requesting a waiver, must include
the following information in the written
justification:
• Total amount requested for sitespecific activities;
• Percentage of the site-specific
activities (assuming waiver is approved)
in the total budget;
• Site specific activities that will be
covered by this funding. If known,
provide site specific information and
describe how work on each site
contributes to the development or
enhancement of your state/tribal site
response program. EPA recognizes the
role of response programs to develop
and provide capacity in distressed,
environmental justice, rural or tribal
communities, and encourages
prioritization for site-specific activities
in those communities. Further explain
how the community will be (or has
been) involved in prioritization of site
work and especially those sites where
there is a potential or known significant
environmental impact to the
community;
• An explanation of how this shift in
funding will not negatively impact the
core programmatic capacity (i.e., the
ability to establish/enhance four
elements of a response program) and
how related activities will be
maintained in spite of an increase in
site-specific work. Recipients must
demonstrate that they have adequate
funding from other sources to effectively
carry out work on the four elements for
EPA to grant a waiver of the 50% limit
on using 128(a) funds for site-specific
activities;
• As explanation as to whether the
sites to be addressed are those for which
the affected community(ies) has
requested work be conducted (refer to
Section VII.A Overview of Funding for
more information). EPA Headquarters
will base approval of waivers on the
information that is included in the
justification along with the request for
funding, as well as other information
available to the Agency. The EPA will
then inform recipients of the Agency’s
final decision(s).
10 Oversight of assessment and cleanup activities
performed by responsible parties (other than the
state or tribe) does not count toward the 50% limit.
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2013 / Notices
3. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Activities at Petroleum Brownfields
Sites
States and tribes may use section
128(a) funds for activities that establish
and enhance response programs
addressing petroleum brownfield sites.
Subject to the restrictions listed above
(see Section VII.D.1) for all site-specific
activities, the costs of site-specific
assessments and cleanup activities at
petroleum contaminated brownfields
sites, defined at CERCLA section
101(39)(D)(ii)(II), are both eligible and
allowable if the activity is included in
the work plan negotiated between the
EPA regional office and the state or
tribe. Section 128(a) funds used to
capitalize a Brownfields RLF may be
used at brownfields sites contaminated
by petroleum to the extent allowed
under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
4. Additional Examples of Eligible SiteSpecific Activities
Other eligible uses of funds for sitespecific related include, but are not
limited to, the following activities:
• Technical assistance to federal
brownfields cooperative agreement
recipients;
• Development and/or review of
quality assurance project plans (QAPPs);
and
• Entering data into the ACRES
database
E. Uses Related to Activities At ‘‘NonBrownfields’’ Sites
Costs incurred for activities at nonbrownfields sites, e.g., oversight, may be
eligible and allowable if such activities
are included in the state’s or tribe’s
work plan. Other uses not specifically
referenced in this guidance may also be
eligible and allowable. Recipients
should consult with their regional state
or tribal contact for additional guidance.
Direct assessment and cleanup activities
may only be conducted on eligible
brownfields sites, as defined in CERCLA
section 101(39).
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VIII. General Programmatic Guidelines
For 128(a) Grant Funding Requests
Funding authorized under CERCLA
section 128(a) is awarded through a
cooperative agreement 11 between EPA
and a state or a tribe. The program is
administered under the general EPA
grant and cooperative agreement
regulations for states, tribes, and local
governments found in the Code of
11 A cooperative agreement is an agreement to a
state/tribe that includes substantial involvement by
EPA on activities described in the work plan which
may include technical assistance, collaboration on
program priorities, etc.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Dec 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
Federal Regulations at 40 CFR part 31 as
well as applicable provisions of 40 CFR
Part 35 Subparts A and B. Under these
regulations, the cooperative agreement
recipient for section 128(a) grant
program is the government to which a
cooperative agreement is awarded and
which is accountable for the use of the
funds provided. The cooperative
agreement recipient is the entire legal
entity even if only a particular
component of the entity is designated in
the cooperative agreement award
document. Further, unexpended
balances of cooperative agreement funds
are subject to 40 CFR 35.118 and 40 CFR
35.518 to the extent consistent with this
guidance. EPA allocates funds to state
and tribal response programs under 40
CFR 35.420 and 40 CFR 35.737.
A. One Application Per State or Tribe
Subject to the availability of funds,
EPA regional offices will negotiate and
enter into section 128(a) cooperative
agreements with eligible and interested
states or tribes. EPA will accept only one
application from each eligible state or
tribe.
B. Maximum Funding Request
For Fiscal Year 2014, EPA will
consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.0 million per state or
tribe. Please note the CERCLA 128(a)
program’s annual budget has remained
relatively the same since 2003 while
demand has increased over time. Due to
the increasing number of entities
requesting funding, it is likely that the
FY14 states and tribal individual
funding amounts will be less than the
FY13 individual funding amounts.
C. Define the State or Tribal Response
Program
States and tribes must define in their
work plan the ‘‘section 128(a) response
program(s)’’ to which the funds will be
applied, and may designate a
component of the state or tribe that will
be EPA’s primary point of contact for
negotiations on their proposed work
plan. When EPA funds the section
128(a) cooperative agreement, states and
tribes may distribute these funds among
the appropriate state and tribal agencies
that are part of the section 128(a)
response program. This distribution
must be clearly outlined in their annual
work plan.
D. Separate Cooperative Agreements for
the Capitalization of RLFs Using Section
128(a) Funds
If a portion of the section 128(a) grant
funds requested will be used to
capitalize a revolving loan fund for
cleanup, pursuant to section 104(k)(3),
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73529
two separate cooperative agreements
must be awarded, i.e., one for the RLF
and one for non-RLF uses. States and
tribes may, however, submit one initial
request for funding, delineating the RLF
as a proposed use. Section 128(a) funds
used to capitalize an RLF are not
eligible for inclusion into a Performance
Partnership Grant (PPG).
E. Authority To Manage a Revolving
Loan Fund Program
If a state or tribe chooses to use its
section 128(a) funds to capitalize a
revolving loan fund program, the state
or tribe must have the lead authority to
manage the program, e.g., hold loans,
make loans, enter into loan agreements,
collect repayment, access and secure the
site in event of an emergency or loan
default. If the agency/department listed
as the point of contact for the section
128(a) cooperative agreement does not
have this authority, it must be able to
demonstrate that another state or tribal
agency does have the authority to
manage the RLF and is willing to do so.
F. Section 128(a) Cooperative
Agreements Can Be Part of a
Performance Partnership Grant (PPG)
States and tribes may include section
128(a) cooperative agreements in their
PPG 69 FR 51,756 (2004). Section 128(a)
funds used to capitalize an RLF or
purchase insurance or develop a risk
sharing pool, an indemnity pool, or
insurance mechanism to provide
financing for response actions under a
state or tribal response program are not
eligible for inclusion in the PPG.
G. Project Period
EPA regional offices will determine
the project period for each cooperative
agreement. These may be for multiple
years depending on the regional office’s
cooperative agreement policies. Each
cooperative agreement must have an
annual budget period tied to an annual
work plan. While not prohibited, preaward costs are subject to 40 CFR 35.113
and 40 CFR 35.513.
H. Demonstrating the Four Elements
As part of the annual work plan
negotiation process, states or tribes that
do not have VRP MOAs must
demonstrate that their program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to
include, the four elements described in
Section V. EPA will not fund, in future
years, state or tribal response program
annual work plans if EPA determines
that these elements are not met or
reasonable progress is not being made.
EPA may base this determination on the
information the state or tribe provides to
support its work plan, on progress
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2013 / Notices
reports, or on EPA’s review of the state
or tribal response program.
I. Establishing and Maintaining the
Public Record
Prior to funding a state’s or tribe’s
annual work plan, EPA regional offices
will verify and document that a public
record, as described in Section VI and
below, exists and is being maintained.12
Specifically for:
• States or tribes that received initial
funding prior to FY13: Requests for
FY14 funds will not be accepted from
states or tribes that fail to demonstrate,
by the January 31, 2014 request
deadline, that they established and are
maintaining a public record. (Note, this
would potentially impact any state or
tribe that had a term and condition
placed on their FY13 cooperative
agreement that prohibited drawdown of
FY13 funds prior to meeting public
record requirement). States or tribes in
this situation will not be prevented from
drawing down their prior year funds
once the public record requirement is
met; and
• States or tribes that received initial
funding in FY13: By the time of the
actual FY14 award, the state or tribe
must demonstrate that they established
and maintained the public record (those
states and tribes that do not meet this
requirement will have a term and
condition placed on their FY14
cooperative agreement that prohibits the
drawdown of FY14 funds until the
public record requirement is met).
J. Demonstration of Significant
Utilization of Prior Years’ Funding
States and tribes should be aware that
EPA and its Congressional
appropriations committees place
significant emphasis on the utilization
of prior years’ funding. Unused funds
from prior years will be considered in
the allocation process. Existing balances
of cooperative agreement funds as
reflected in EPA’s Financial Data
Warehouse could support an allocation
amount below a recipient’s request for
funding or, if appropriate deobligation
and reallocation by EPA Regions as
provided for in 40 CFR 35.118 and 40
CFR 35.518.
EPA Regional staff will review EPA’s
Financial Database Warehouse to
identify the amount of remaining prior
year(s) funds. The requestor should
work, as early as possible, with both
their own finance department, and with
their Regional Project Officer to
reconcile any discrepancy between the
amount of unspent funds showing in
EPA’s system, and the amount reflected
in the recipient’s records. The recipient
should obtain concurrence from the
Region on the amount of unspent funds
requiring justification by the deadline
for this request for funding.
IX. Information To Be Submitted With
the Funding Request
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Summary of Planned Use of FY14
Funding
All states and tribes requesting FY14
funds must submit (to their regional
brownfields contact) a summary of the
planned use of the funds with
associated dollar amounts. Please
provide the request in the chart below.
The amount of funding requested
should be an amount that can be
reasonably spent in one year. It is likely
that the FY14 state and tribal individual
12 For purposes of 128(a) funding, the state’s or
tribe’s public record applies to that state’s or tribe’s
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Dec 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
funding amounts will be less than the
FY13 individual funding amounts. The
requestor should work, as early as
possible, with their EPA Regional
Program contact to ensure that the
funding amount requested and related
activities are reasonable.
B. Demonstration of Significant
Utilization of Prior Years’ Funding
States and tribes that received section
128(a) funds in prior years must provide
the amount of prior years’ funding
including funds that recipients have not
received in payments (i.e., funds EPA
K. Allocation System and Process for
Distribution of Funds
After the January 31, 2014, request
deadline, EPA’s Regional Offices will
submit summaries of state and tribal
requests to EPA Headquarters. Before
submitting requests to EPA
Headquarters, regional offices may take
into account additional factors when
determining recommended allocation
amounts. Such factors include, but are
not limited to, the depth and breadth of
the state or tribal program; scope of the
perceived need for the funding, e.g., size
of state or tribal jurisdiction or the
proposed work plan balanced against
capacity of the program, amount of
current year funding, funds remaining
from prior years, etc.
After receipt of the regional
recommendations, EPA Headquarters
will consolidate requests and make
decisions on the final funding
allocations.
EPA regional offices will work with
interested states and tribes to develop
their preliminary work plans and
funding requests. Final cooperative
agreement work plans and budgets will
be negotiated with the regional office
once final allocation determinations are
made. Please refer to process flow chart
below (dates are estimates and subject to
change):
has obligated for grants that remain in
EPA’s Financial Data Warehouse). EPA
will take into account these funds in the
allocation process when determining
the recipient’s programmatic needs
under 40 CFR 35.420 and 40 CFR
35.737. The recipient should include a
detailed explanation and justification of
prior year funds that remain in EPA’s
Financial Data Warehouse as unspent
balances. The recipient should obtain
concurrence from the Region on the
amount of unspent funds requiring
explanation by the January 31, 2014
response program(s) that utilized the section 128(a)
funding.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
EN06DE13.000
73530
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2013 / Notices
deadlines for submitting funding
requests.
activities of your response program.
Specifically, at what amount (e.g.,
percentage of your current funding
level) would your response program
experience core programmatic impacts
such as a reduction in staff, a decrease
in oversight activities, or other impacts
to the environment and health of the
communities the program serves, etc.?
C. Optional: Explanation of Overall
Program Impacts of Any Funding
Reductions
Please explain the programmatic
effects of a reduction (to your current
funding amount) on significant
73531
An EPA Region may require that this
information be submitted as part of the
request for funding in order to fully
understand the individual program
impacts associated with decreased
funding. These impacts will be
considered as part of the decision for
the final allocation.
Funding use
FY13 Awarded
FY14
Requested
Establish or enhance the four elements:
1. Timely survey and inventory of
brownfields sites;.
$XX,XXX ...............
...............................
$XX,XXX.
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
• develop/enhance ordinances, regulations, procedures
for response programs.
3. Examples:
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
•
•
•
•
...............................
...............................
develop a community involvement process.
community outreach.
issue public notices of site activities.
develop a process to seek public input from local communities, especially potential environmental justice communities, communities with a health risk related to exposure to hazardous waste or other public health concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote areas,
and communities with limited experience working with
government agencies to prioritize sites to be addressed.
4. Examples:
Establish and maintain the public record
...............................
...............................
$XX,XXX ...............
...............................
...............................
...............................
...............................
$XX,XXX ...............
...............................
...............................
•
•
•
•
•
Enhance the response program .............
$XX,XXX ...............
...............................
$XX,XXX ...............
...............................
•
•
...............................
...............................
...............................
$XX,XXX ...............
...............................
...............................
...............................
$XX,XXX ...............
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
$XX,XXX ...............
...............................
$XX,XXX ...............
$XXX,XXX .............
$XX,XXX ...............
...............................
$XX,XXX ...............
$XXX,XXX .............
• review potential uses of environmental insurance.
• manage an insurance risk pool.
• create a cleanup revolving loan fund.
Performance Partnership Grant? Yes b No b.
2. Oversight and enforcement authorities or other mechanisms;.
3. Mechanisms and resources to
provide meaningful opportunities
for public participation;.
4. Mechanisms or approval of a
cleanup plan and verification and
certification that cleanup is complete.
Site-specific activities (amount requested should be incidental to the
workplan, see Section VI.D for more
information on what activities should
be considered when calculating site
specific activities).
Environmental insurance ........................
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Revolving loan fund ................................
Total funding ...........................................
X. Terms and Reporting
Cooperative agreements for state and
tribal response programs will include
programmatic and administrative terms
and conditions. These terms and
conditions will describe EPA’s
substantial involvement including
technical assistance and collaboration
on program development and site-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Dec 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
Summary of intended use
(Example Uses)
1. Examples:
• inventory and prioritize brownfields sites.
• institutional control (IC)/engineering control (EC) tracking.
2. Examples:
Develop/update cleanup standards.
review cleanup plans and verify completed actions.
maintain public record.
create web site for public record.
disseminate public information on how to access the
public record.
provide oversight of site assessments and cleanups.
attend training and conferences on brownfields cleanup
technologies & other brownfields topics.
update and enhance program management activities.
negotiate/oversee contracts for response programs.
enhance program management & tracking systems.
perform site assessments and cleanups.
develop QAPPs.
establish eligibility of target sites.
prepare Property Profile Forms/input data into ACRES
database for these sites.
specific activities. Each of the
subsections below summarizes the basic
terms and conditions, and related
reporting that will be required if a
cooperative agreement with EPA is
awarded.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Progress Reports
In accordance with 40 CFR 31.40,
state and tribes must provide progress
reports as provided in the terms and
conditions of the cooperative agreement
negotiated with EPA regional offices.
State and tribal costs for complying with
reporting requirements are an eligible
expense under the section 128(a)
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
73532
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2013 / Notices
cooperative agreement. As a minimum,
state or tribal progress reports must
include both a narrative discussion and
performance data relating to the state’s
or tribe’s accomplishments and
environmental outputs associated with
the approved budget and workplan.
Reports should also provide an
accounting of section 128(a) funding. If
applicable, the state or tribe must
include information on activities related
to establishing or enhancing the four
elements of the state’s or tribe’s
response program. All recipients must
provide information related to
establishing or, if already established,
maintaining the public record.
Depending upon the activities included
in the state’s or tribe’s work plan, an
EPA regional office may request that a
progress report include:
1. Reporting interim and final
progress reports. Reports must
prominently display the following three
relevant Essential Elements as reflected
in the current EPA strategic plan:
Strategic Plan Goal 3: Cleaning Up
Communities and Advancing
Sustainable Development, Strategic Plan
Objective 3.1: Promote Sustainable and
Livable Communities, and Work plan
Commitments and Timeframes. EPA’s
strategic plan can be found on the
Internet at https://www.epa.gov/
planandbudget/strategicplan.html.
2. Reporting for Non-MOA states and
tribes. All recipients without a VRP
MOA must report activities related to
establishing or enhancing the four
elements of the state’s or tribe’s
response program. For each element
state/tribes must report how they are
maintaining the element or how they are
taking reasonable steps to establish or
enhance the element as negotiated in
individual state/tribal work plans. For
example, pursuant to CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(B), reports on the oversight
and enforcement authorities/
mechanisms element may include:
• A narrative description and copies
of applicable documents developed or
under development to enable the
response program to conduct
enforcement and oversight at sites. For
example:
Æ Legal authorities and mechanisms
(e.g., statutes, regulations, orders,
agreements); and
Æ Policies and procedures to
implement legal authorities; and other
mechanisms;
• A description of the resources and
staff allocated/to be allocated to the
response program to conduct oversight
and enforcement at sites as a result of
the cooperative agreement;
• A narrative description of how
these authorities or other mechanisms,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Dec 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
and resources, are adequate to ensure
that:
Æ A response action will protect
human health and the environment; and
be conducted in accordance with
applicable federal and state law; and if
the person conducting the response
action fails to complete the necessary
response activities, including operation
and maintenance or long-term
monitoring activities, the necessary
response activities are completed; and
• A narrative description and copy of
appropriate documents demonstrating
the exercise of oversight and
enforcement authorities by the response
program at a brownfields site.
3. Reporting for site-specific
assessment or cleanup activities.
Recipients with work plans that include
funding for brownfields site assessment
or cleanup must input information
required by the OMB-approved Property
Profile Form into the Assessment
Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange
System (ACRES) database for each site
assessment and cleanup. In addition,
recipients must report how they provide
the affected community with prior
notice and opportunity for meaningful
participation as per CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(C)(ii), on proposed cleanup
plans and site activities. For example,
EPA strongly encourages states and
tribes to seek public input regarding the
priority of sites to be addressed and to
solicit input from local communities,
especially potential environmental
justice communities, communities with
a health risk related to exposure to
hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged
or remote communities, and
communities with limited experience
working with government agencies.
4. Reporting for other site-specific
activities. Recipients with work plans
that include funding for other sitespecific related activities must include a
description of the site-specific activities
and the number of sites at which the
activity was conducted. For example:
• Number and frequency of oversight
audits of licensed site professional
certified cleanups;
• Number and frequency of state/
tribal oversight audits conducted;
• Number of sites where staff
conducted audits, provided technical
assistance, or conducted other oversight
activities; and
• Number of staff conducting
oversight audits, providing technical
assistance, or conducting other
oversight activities.
5. Reporting required when using
funding for an RLF. Recipients with
work plans that include funding for
revolving loan fund (RLF) must include
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the information required by the terms
and conditions for progress reporting
under CERCLA section 104(k)(3) RLF
cooperative agreements.
6. Reporting environmental insurance.
Recipients with work plans that include
funding for environmental insurance
must report:
• Number and description of
insurance policies purchased (e.g., type
of coverage provided; dollar limits of
coverage; any buffers or deductibles;
category and identity of insured
persons; premium; first dollar or
umbrella; site specific or blanket;
occurrence or claims made, etc.);
• The number of sites covered by the
insurance;
• The amount of funds spent on
environmental insurance (e.g., amount
dedicated to insurance program, or to
insurance premiums); and
• The amount of claims paid by
insurers to policy holders.
The regional offices may also request
that information be added to the
progress reports, as appropriate, to
properly document activities described
by the cooperative agreement work plan.
EPA regions may allow states or tribes
to provide performance data in
appropriate electronic format.
The regional offices will forward
progress reports to EPA Headquarters, if
requested. This information may be
used to develop national reports on the
outcomes of CERCLA section 128(a)
funding to states and tribes.
B. Reporting of Program Activity Levels
States and tribes must report, by
January 31, 2014, a summary of the
previous federal fiscal year’s work
(October 1, 2012 through September 30,
2013). The following information must
be submitted to your regional project
officer:
• Environmental programs where
CERCLA 128(a) funds are used to
support capacity building (general
program support, non-site-specific
work). Indicate as appropriate from the
following:
—Brownfields
—Underground Storage Tanks/Leaking
Underground Storage Tanks
—Federal Facilities
—Solid Waste
—Superfund
—Hazardous Waste Facilities
—VCP (Voluntary Cleanup Program,
Independent Cleanup Program, etc.)
—Other________;
• Number of properties (or sites)
enrolled in a response program during
FY13;
• Number of properties (or sites)
where documentation indicates that
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2013 / Notices
cleanup work is complete and all
required institutional controls (IC’s) are
in place, or not required;
• Total number of acres associated
with properties (or sites) in the previous
bullet; and
• Number of properties where
assistance was provided, but the
property was not enrolled in the
response program (OPTIONAL).
EPA may require states/tribes to
report specific performance measures
related to the four elements that can be
aggregated for national reporting to
Congress.
For example:
1. Timely survey and inventory—
estimated number of brownfields sites
in the state or on tribal land;
2. oversight and enforcement
authorities/mechanisms—number of
active cleanups and percentage that
received oversight; percentage of active
cleanups not in compliance with the
cleanup workplan and that received
communications from recipient
regarding non-compliance;
3. public participation—percentage of
sites in the response program where
public meetings/notices were conducted
regarding the cleanup plan and/or other
site activities; number of site
assessments requests, and responses to
such requests; and
4. cleanup approval/certification
mechanisms—total number of ‘‘no
further action’’ letters or total number of
certificates of completions.
[NOTE: This reporting requirement
may include activities not funded with
CERCLA Section 128(a) funding,
because such information may be
helpful to EPA when evaluating
whether recipients have met or are
taking reasonable steps to meet the four
elements of a response program
pursuant to CERCLA Section 128(a)(2).]
C. Reporting of Public Record
All recipients must report, as
specified in the terms and conditions of
their cooperative agreement, and in
Section VIII.I of this guidance,
information related to establishing, or if
already established, maintaining the
public record, described above. States
and tribes can refer to an already
existing public record, e.g., Web site or
other public database to meet the public
record requirement. Recipients
reporting may only be required to
demonstrate that the public record (a)
exists and is up-to-date, and (b) is
adequate. A public record may include
the following information:
A list of sites at which response
actions have been completed in the past
year including:
• Date the response action was
completed;
• Site name;
• Name of owner at time of cleanup,
if known;
• Location of the site (street address,
and latitude and longitude);
• Whether an institutional control is
in place;
• Type of institutional control in
place (e.g., deed restriction, zoning
restriction, local ordinance, state
registries of contaminated property,
deed notices, advisories, etc.);
• Nature of the contamination at the
site (e.g., hazardous substances,
contaminants or pollutants, petroleum
contamination, etc.); and
• Size of the site in acres.
A list of sites planned to be addressed
by the state or tribal response program
in the coming year including:
• Site name and the name of owner
at time of cleanup, if known;
• Location of the site (street address,
and latitude and longitude);
• To the extent known, whether an
institutional control is in place;
• Type of the institutional control in
place (e.g., deed restriction, zoning
restriction, local ordinance, state
registries of contaminated property,
deed notices, advisories, etc.);
• To the extent known, the nature of
the contamination at the site (e.g.,
hazardous substances, contaminants, or
pollutants, petroleum contamination,
etc.); and
• Size of the site in acres
D. Award Administration Information
1. Subaward and Executive
Compensation Reporting
Applicants must ensure that they
have the necessary processes and
73533
systems in place to comply with the
subaward and executive total
compensation reporting requirements
established under OMB guidance at 2
CFR part 170, unless they qualify for an
exception from the requirements,
should they be selected for funding.
2. System for Award Management
(SAM) and Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) Requirements
Unless exempt from these
requirements under OMB guidance at 2
CFR Part 25(e.g., individuals),
applicants must:
1. Be registered in SAM prior to
submitting an application or proposal
under this announcement. SAM
information can be found at
https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/
SAM/.
2. Maintain an active SAM
registration with current information at
all times during which it has an active
Federal award or an application or
proposal under consideration by an
agency, and
3. Provide its DUNS number in each
application or proposal it submits to the
agency. Applicants can receive a DUNS
number, at no cost, by calling the
dedicated toll-free DUNS Number
request line at 1–866–705–5711, or
visiting the D&B Web site at: https://
www.dnb.com.
If an applicant fails to comply with
these requirements, it will, should it be
selected for award, affect their ability to
receive the award.
Please note that the CCR has been
replaced by the System for Award
Management (SAM). To learn more
about SAM, go to SAM.gov or https://
www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/.
3. Use of Funds
An applicant that receives an award
under this announcement is expected to
manage assistance agreement funds
efficiently and effectively, and make
sufficient progress towards completing
the project activities described in the
work-plan in a timely manner. The
assistance agreement will include terms
and conditions related to implementing
this requirement.
REGIONAL STATE AND TRIBAL BROWNFIELDS CONTACTS
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Region
State
1—CT, ME, MA,
NH, RI, VT.
2—NJ, NY, PR, VI ..
3—DE, DC, MD, PA,
VA, WV.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Tribal
James Byrne, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, (OSRR07–
2), Boston, MA 02109–3912, Phone (617) 918–1389 Fax
(617) 918–1291.
Alison Devine, 290 Broadway, 18th Floor, New York, NY
10007–1866, Phone (212) 637–4158 Fax (212) 637–
3083.
Janice Bartel, 1650 Arch Street (3HS51), Philadelphia, PA
19103, Phone (215) 814–5394 Fax (215) 814–3015.
Amy Jean McKeown, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100
(OSRR07–2), Boston, MA 02109–3912, Phone (617)
918–1248 Fax (617) 918–1291.
Phillip Clappin, 290 Broadway, 18th Floor, New York, NY
10007–1866, Phone (212) 637–4431 Fax (212) 637–
3083.
17:28 Dec 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
73534
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2013 / Notices
REGIONAL STATE AND TRIBAL BROWNFIELDS CONTACTS—Continued
Region
State
Tribal
4—AL, FL, GA, KY,
MS, NC, SC, TN.
Nicole Comick-Bates, 61 Forsyth Street, S.W, 10TH FL
(9T25), Atlanta, GA 30303–8909, Phone (404) 562–9966
Fax (404) 562–8788.
Jan Pels, 77 West Jackson Boulevard (SE–7J), Chicago, IL
60604–3507, Phone (312) 886–3009 Fax (312) 692–
2161.
Amber Perry, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 (6SF), Dallas,
TX 75202–2733, Phone (214) 665–3172 Fax (214) 665–
6660.
Susan Klein, 11201 Renner Boulevard (SUPRSTAR),
Lenexa, KS 66219, Phone (913) 551–7786 Fax (913)
551–9786.
Christina Wilson, 1595 Wynkoop Street (EPR–B), Denver,
CO 80202–1129, Phone (303) 312–6706 Fax (303) 312–
6065.
Eugenia Chow, 75 Hawthorne St. (SFD–6–1), San Francisco, CA 94105, Phone (415) 972–3160 Fax (415) 947–
3520.
Mary K. Goolie, 222 West 7th Avenue #19 (AOO), Anchorage, AK 99513, Phone ((907) 271–3414 Fax ( 907) 271–
3424.
Cindy J. Nolan, 61 Forsyth Street, S.W, 10TH FL (9T25),
Atlanta, GA 30303–8909, Phone (404) 562–8425 Fax
(404) 562–8788.
Jane Neumann, 77 West Jackson Boulevard (SE–7J), Chicago, IL 60604–3507, Phone (312) 353–0123 Fax (312)
697–2649.
Amber Perry, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 (6SF), Dallas,
TX 75202–2733, Phone (214) 665–3172 Fax (214) 665–
6660.
Jennifer Morris, 11201 Renner Boulevard (SUPRSTAR),
Lenexa, KS 66219, Phone (913) 551–7341Fax (913)
551–9798.
Barbara Benoy, 1595 Wynkoop Street (8EPR–SA), Denver,
CO 80202–1129, Phone (303) 312–6760 Fax (303) 312–
6962.
Glenn Kistner, 75 Hawthorne St. (SFD–6–1), San Francisco, CA 94105, Phone (415) 972–3004 Fax (415) 947–
3520.
Mary K. Goolie, 222 West 7th Avenue #19 (AOO), Anchorage, AK 99513, Phone ((907) 271–3414 Fax (907) 271–
3424.
5—IL, IN, MI, MN,
OH, WI.
6—AR, LA, NM, OK,
TX.
7—IA, KS, MO, NE
8—CO, MT, ND,
SD, UT, WY.
9—AZ, CA, HI, NV,
AS, GU.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
10—AK, ID, OR, WA
XI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
is therefore not subject to review under
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76
FR 3821, January 21, 2011). Because this
action is not subject to notice and
comment requirements under the
Administrative Procedures Act or any
other statute, it is not subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.) or Sections 202 and 205 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1999
(UMRA) (Pub.L. 104–4). In addition,
this action does not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. This
action does not create new binding legal
requirements that substantially and
directly affect Tribes under Executive
Order 13175 (63 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This action does not have
significant Federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132 (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999). Because this
final rule has been exempted from
review under Executive Order 12866,
this final rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Dec 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994). This action does not involve
technical standards; thus, the
requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801
et seq., generally provides that before
certain actions may take effect, the
agency promulgating the action must
submit a report, which includes a copy
of the action, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Because this final
action does not contain legally binding
requirements, it is not subject to the
Congressional Review Act.
Dated: November 25, 2013.
David R. Lloyd,
Director, Office of Brownfields and Land
Revitalization, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. 2013–28983 Filed 12–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
Farm Credit Administration Board;
Sunshine Act Meeting
AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to the Government in the
Sunshine Act, of the regular meeting of
the Farm Credit Administration Board
(Board).
DATE AND TIME: The regular meeting of
the Board will be held at the offices of
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Farm Credit Administration in
McLean, Virginia, on December 12,
2013, from 9:00 a.m. until such time as
the Board concludes its business.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale
L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883–
4009, TTY (703) 883–4056.
ADDRESSES: Farm Credit
Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive,
McLean, Virginia 22102–5090. Submit
attendance requests via email to
VisitorRequest@FCA.gov. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for further
information about attendance requests.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of
this meeting of the Board will be open
to the public (limited space available),
and parts will be closed to the public.
Please send an email to VisitorRequest@
FCA.gov at least 24 hours before the
meeting. In your email include: Name,
postal address, entity you are
representing (if applicable), and
telephone number. You will receive an
email confirmation from us. Please be
prepared to show a photo identification
when you arrive. If you need assistance
for accessibility reasons, or if you have
any questions, contact Dale L. Aultman,
Secretary to the Farm Credit
Administration Board, at (703) 883–
4009. The matters to be considered at
the meeting are:
Open Session
A. Approval of Minutes
• November 14, 2013.
B. New Business
• Reports of Accounts and
Exposures—Final Rule.
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 235 (Friday, December 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73525-73534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28983]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9903-71-OSWER]
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section 128(a); Notice of Grant Funding
Guidance for State and Tribal Response Programs for FY2014
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will begin to accept
requests, from December 9, 2013 through January 31, 2014, for grants to
supplement State and Tribal Response Programs. This notice provides
guidance on eligibility for funding, use of funding, grant mechanisms
and process for awarding funding, the allocation system for
distribution of funding, and terms and reporting under these grants.
EPA has consulted with state and tribal officials in developing this
guidance.
The primary goal of this funding is to ensure that state and tribal
response programs include, or are taking reasonable steps to include,
certain elements and a public record. Another goal is to provide
funding for other activities that increase the number of response
actions conducted or overseen by a state or tribal response program.
This funding is not intended to supplant current state or tribal
funding for their response programs. Instead, it is to supplement their
funding to increase their response capacity.
For fiscal year 2014, EPA will consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.0 million per state or tribe. Subject to the availability
of funds, EPA regional personnel will be available to provide technical
assistance to states and tribes as they apply for and carry out these
grants.
DATES: This action is effective as of December 9, 2013. EPA expects to
make non-competitive grant awards to states and tribes which apply
during fiscal year 2014.
ADDRESSES: Mailing addresses for EPA Regional Offices and EPA
Headquarters can be located at www.epa.gov/brownfields and at the end
of this Notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: EPA's Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization,
(202) 566-2745 or the applicable EPA Regional Office listed at the end
this Notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
Section 128(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, authorizes a
noncompetitive $50 million grant program to establish and enhance state
\1\ and tribal \2\ response programs. CERCLA 128(a) response program
grants are funded with categorical \3\ State and Tribal Assistance
Grant (STAG) appropriations. Section 128(a) cooperative agreements are
awarded and administered by the EPA regional offices. Generally, these
response programs address the assessment, cleanup, and redevelopment of
brownfields sites and other sites with actual or perceived
contamination. This document provides guidance that will enable states
and tribes to apply for and use fiscal year 2014 section 128(a)
funds.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The term ``state'' is defined in this document as defined in
CERCLA section 101(27).
\2\ The term ``Indian tribe'' is defined in this document as it
is defined in CERCLA section 101(36). Intertribal consortia, as
defined in the Federal Register Notice at 67 FR 67181, Nov. 4, 2002,
are also eligible for funding under CERCLA section 128(a).
\3\ Categorical grants are issued by the U.S. Congress to fund
state and local governments for narrowly defined purposes.
\4\ The Agency may waive any provision of this guidance that is
not required by statute, regulation, Executive Order or overriding
Agency policies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance entry for the section
128(a) State and Tribal Response Program cooperative agreements is
66.817. This grant program is eligible to be included in state and
tribal Performance Partnership Grants under 40 CFR part 35 Subparts A
and B, with the exception of funds used to capitalize a revolving loan
fund for brownfield remediation under section 104(k)(3); or purchase
insurance or develop a risk sharing pool, an indemnity pool, or
insurance mechanism to provide financing for response actions under a
State or Tribal response program.
Requests for funding will be accepted from December 9, 2013 through
January 31, 2014. Requests EPA receives after January 31, 2014 will not
be considered for FY2014 funding. Information that must be submitted
with the funding request is listed in Section VIII of this guidance.
States or tribes that do not submit the request in the appropriate
manner may forfeit their ability to receive funds. First time
requestors are strongly encouraged to contact their Regional EPA
Brownfields contacts, listed at the end of this guidance, prior to
submitting their funding request.
EPA will consider funding requests up to a maximum of $1.0 million
per state or tribe for FY2014.
Requests submitted by the January 31, 2014 request deadline are
preliminary; final cooperative agreement work plans and budgets will be
negotiated with the regional offices once final funding allocation
determinations are made. As in previous years, EPA will place special
emphasis on reviewing a cooperative agreement recipient's use of prior
section 128(a) funding in making allocation decisions and unexpended
balances are subject to 40 CFR 35.118 and 40 CFR 35.518 to the extent
consistent with this guidance.
States and tribes requesting funds are required to provide a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number with their
cooperative agreement's final package. For more information, please go
to www.grants.gov.
II. Background
State and tribal response programs oversee assessment and cleanup
activities at brownfields sites across the country. The depth and
breadth of state and tribal response programs vary. Some focus on
CERCLA related activities, while others are multi-faceted, addressing
sites regulated by both CERCLA and the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA). Many state programs also offer accompanying
financial incentive programs to spur cleanup and redevelopment. In
enacting CERCLA
[[Page 73526]]
section 128(a),\5\ Congress recognized the accomplishments of state and
tribal response programs in cleaning up and redeveloping brownfields
sites. Section 128(a) provides EPA with an opportunity to strengthen
its partnership with states and tribes, and recognizes the response
programs' critical role in overseeing cleanups enrolled in their
response programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Section 128(a) was added to CERCLA in 2002 by the Small
Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act
(Brownfield Amendments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This funding is intended for those states and tribes that have the
management and administrative capacity within their government required
to administer a federal grant. The primary goal of this funding is to
ensure that state and tribal response programs include, or are taking
reasonable steps to include, certain elements of an environmental
response program and that the response program establishes and
maintains a public record of sites addressed.
Subject to the availability of funds, EPA regional personnel will
be available to provide technical assistance to states and tribes as
they apply for and carry out section 128(a) cooperative agreements.
III. Eligibility for Funding
To be eligible for funding under CERCLA section 128(a), a state or
tribe must:
1. demonstrate that its response program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four elements of a response program
described in Section V of this guidance; or be a party to a voluntary
response program Memorandum of Agreement (VRP MOA) \6\ with EPA; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ States or tribes that are parties to VRP MOAs and that
maintain and make available a public record are automatically
eligible for section 128(a) funding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. maintain and make available to the public a record of sites at
which response actions have been completed in the previous year and are
planned to be addressed in the upcoming year, see CERCLA section
128(b)(1)(C).
IV. Matching Funds/Cost-Share
States and tribes are not required to provide matching funds for
cooperative agreements awarded under section 128(a), with the exception
of section 128(a) funds a state or tribe uses to capitalize a
Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
There is a 20% cost share requirement for 128(a) funds used to
capitalize a RLF.
V. The Four Elements--Section 128(a)
Section 128(a) recipients that do not have a VRP MOA with EPA must
demonstrate that their response program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four elements. Achievement of the four
elements should be viewed as a priority. Section 128(a) authorizes
funding for activities necessary to establish and enhance the four
elements, and to establish and maintain the public record requirement.
The four elements of a response program are described below:
1. Timely survey and inventory of brownfields sites in state or
tribal land. EPA's goal in funding activities under this element is to
enable the state or tribe to establish or enhance a system or process
that will provide a reasonable estimate of the number, likely
locations, and the general characteristics of brownfields sites in
their state or tribal lands. EPA recognizes the varied scope of state
and tribal response programs and will not require states and tribes to
develop a ``list'' of brownfields sites. However, at a minimum, the
state or tribe should develop and/or maintain a system or process that
can provide a reasonable estimate of the number, likely location, and
general characteristics of brownfields sites within their state or
tribal lands. Inventories should evolve to a prioritization of sites
based on community needs, planning priorities, and protection of human
health and the environment. Inventories should be developed in direct
coordination with communities, and particular attention should focus on
those communities with limited capacity to compete for, and manage a
competitive brownfield assessment, revolving loan, or cleanup
cooperative agreement.
Given funding limitations, EPA will negotiate work plans with
states and tribes to achieve this goal efficiently and effectively, and
within a realistic time frame. For example, many of EPA's Brownfields
Assessment cooperative agreement recipients conduct inventories of
brownfields sites in their communities or jurisdictions. EPA encourages
states and tribes to work with these cooperative agreement recipients
to obtain the information that they have gathered and include it in
their survey and inventory.
2. Oversight and enforcement authorities or other mechanisms and
resources. EPA's goal in funding activities under this element is to
have state and tribal response programs that include oversight and
enforcement authorities or other mechanisms, and resources that are
adequate to ensure that:
a. A response action will protect human health and the environment,
and be conducted in accordance with applicable laws; and
b. The state or tribe will complete the necessary response
activities if the person conducting the response fails to complete the
necessary response (this includes operation and maintenance and/or
long-term monitoring activities).
3. Mechanisms and resources to provide meaningful opportunities for
public participation.\7\ EPA's goal in funding activities under this
element is to have states and tribes include in their response program
mechanisms and resources for meaningful public participation, at the
local level, including, at a minimum:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ States and tribes establishing this element may find useful
information on public participation on EPA's community involvement
Web site at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/community/policies.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Public access to documents and related materials that a state,
tribe, or party conducting the cleanup is relying on or developing to
make cleanup decisions or conduct site activities;
b. Prior notice and opportunity for meaningful public comment on
cleanup plans and site activities, including the input into the
prioritization of sites; and
c. A mechanism by which a person who is, or may be, affected by a
release or threatened release of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or
contaminant at a brownfields site--located in the community in which
the person works or resides--may request that a site assessment be
conducted. The appropriate state or tribal official must consider this
request and appropriately respond.
4. Mechanisms for approval of a cleanup plan, and verification and
certification that cleanup is complete. EPA's goal in funding
activities under this element is to have states and tribes include in
their response program mechanisms to approve cleanup plans and to
verify that response actions are complete, including a requirement for
certification or similar documentation from the state, the tribe, or a
licensed site professional that the response action is complete.
Written approval by a state or tribal response program official of a
proposed cleanup plan is an example of an approval mechanism.
VI. Public Record Requirement
In order to be eligible for section 128(a) funding, states and
tribes (including those with MOAs) must establish and maintain a public
record system, as described below, in order to
[[Page 73527]]
receive funds. The public record should be made available to provide a
mechanism for meaningful public participation (refer to Section V.3
above). Specifically, under section 128(b)(1)(C), states and tribes
must:
1. Maintain and update, at least annually or more often as
appropriate, a record that includes the name and location of sites at
which response actions have been completed during the previous year;
2. Maintain and update, at least annually or more often as
appropriate, a record that includes the name and location of sites at
which response actions are planned in the next year; and
3. Identify in the public record whether or not the site, upon
completion of the response action, will be suitable for unrestricted
use. If not, the public record must identify the institutional controls
relied on in the remedy and include relevant information concerning the
entity that will be responsible for oversight, monitoring, and/or
maintenance of the institutional and engineering controls; and how the
responsible entity is implementing those activities (see Section VI.C).
Section 128(a) funds may be used to maintain and make available a
public record system that meets the requirements discussed above.
A. Distinguishing the ``Survey and Inventory'' Element From the
``Public Record''
It is important to note that the public record requirement differs
from the ``timely survey and inventory'' element described in the
``Four Elements'' section above. The public record addresses sites at
which response actions have been completed in the previous year or are
planned in the upcoming year. In contrast, the ``timely survey and
inventory'' element, described above, refers to identifying brownfields
sites regardless of planned or completed actions at the site.
B. Making the Public Record Easily Accessible
EPA's goal is to enable states and tribes to make the public record
and other information, such as information from the ``survey and
inventory'' element, easily accessible. For this reason, EPA will allow
states and tribes to use section 128(a) funding to make the public
record, as well as other information, such as information from the
``survey and inventory'' element, available to the public via the
internet or other means. For example, the Agency would support funding
state and tribal efforts to include detailed location information in
the public record such as the street address, and latitude and
longitude information for each site.\8\ States and tribes should ensure
that all affected communities have appropriate access to the public
record by making it available on-line, in print at libraries, or at
other community gathering places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For further information on data quality requirements for
latitude and longitude information, please see EPA's data standards
Web site available at https://iaspub.epa.gov/sor_internet/registry/datastds/findadatastandard/epaapproved/latitudelongitude.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In an effort to reduce cooperative agreement reporting requirements
and increase public access to the public record, EPA encourages states
and tribes to place their public record on the internet. If a state or
tribe places the public record on the internet, maintains the
substantive requirements of the public record, and provides EPA with
the link to that site, EPA will, for purposes of cooperative agreement
funding only, deem the public record reporting requirement met.
C. Long-Term Maintenance of the Public Record
EPA encourages states and tribes to maintain public record
information, including data on institutional controls, on a long term
basis (more than one year) for sites at which a response action has
been completed. Subject to EPA regional office approval, states or
tribes may include development and operation of systems that ensure
long term maintenance of the public record, including information on
institutional controls (such as ensuring the entity responsible for
oversight, monitoring, and/or maintenance of the institutional and
engineering controls is implementing those activities) in their work
plans.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ States and tribes may find useful information on
institutional controls on the EPA's institutional controls Web site
at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/ic/index.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VII. Use of Funding
A. Overview
Section 128(a)(1)(B) describes the eligible uses of cooperative
agreement funds by states and tribes. In general, a state or tribe may
use funding to ``establish or enhance'' its response program.
Specifically, a state or tribe may use cooperative agreement funds to
build response programs that includes the four elements outline in
section 128(a)(2). Eligible activities include, but are not limited to,
the following:
Developing legislation, regulations, procedures,
ordinances, guidance, etc. that establish or enhance the administrative
and legal structure of a response program;
Establishing and maintaining the required public record
described in Section VI of this guidance;
Operation, maintenance and long-term monitoring of
institutional controls and engineering controls;
Conducting site-specific activities, such as assessment or
cleanup, provided such activities establish and/or enhance the response
program and are tied to the four elements. In addition to the
requirement under CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to provide for public
comment on cleanup plans and site activities, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input regarding the priority of sites
to be addressed and solicit input from local communities, especially
potential environmental justice communities, communities with a health
risk related to exposure to hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote areas, and communities
with limited experience working with government agencies. EPA will not
provide section 128(a) funds solely for assessment or cleanup of
specific brownfields sites; site-specific activities must be part of an
overall section 128(a) work plan that includes funding for other
activities that establish or enhance the four elements;
Capitalizing a revolving loan fund (RLF) for brownfields
cleanup under CERCLA section 104(k)(3). These RLFs are subject to the
same statutory requirements and cooperative agreement terms and
conditions applicable to RLFs awarded under section 104(k)(3).
Requirements include a 20 percent match (can be in the form of a
contribution of money, labor, material, or services from a non-federal
source) on the amount of section 128(a) funds used for the RLF, a
prohibition on using EPA cooperative agreement funds for administrative
costs relating to the RLF, and a prohibition on using RLF loans or
subgrants for response costs at a site for which the recipient may be
potentially liable under section 107 of CERCLA. Other prohibitions
contained in CERCLA section 104(k)(4) also apply; and
Purchasing environmental insurance or developing a risk-
sharing pool, indemnity pool, or insurance mechanism to provide
financing for response actions under a state or tribal response
program.
B. Uses Related to ``Establishing'' A State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a), ``establish'' includes activities
necessary
[[Page 73528]]
to build the foundation for the four elements of a state or tribal
response program and the public record requirement. For example, a
state or tribal response program may use section 128(a) funds to
develop regulations, ordinances, procedures, guidance, and a public
record.
C. Uses Related to ``Enhancing'' A State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a), ``enhance'' is related to activities
that add to or improve a state or tribal response program or increase
the number of sites at which response actions are conducted under a
state or tribal response program.
The exact ``enhancement'' uses that may be allowable depend upon
the work plan negotiated between the EPA regional office and the state
or tribe. For example, regional offices and states or tribes may agree
that section 128(a) funds may be used for outreach and training
directly related to increasing awareness of its response program, and
improving the skills of program staff. It may also include developing
better coordination and understanding of other state response programs,
e.g., RCRA or Underground Storage Tanks (USTs). As another example,
states and tribal response programs enhancement activities can include
outreach to local communities to increase their awareness and knowledge
regarding the importance of monitoring engineering and institutional
controls. Other ``enhancement'' uses may be allowable as well.
D. Uses Related to Site-Specific Activities
1. Eligible Uses of Funds for Site-Specific Activities
Site-specific assessment and cleanup activities should establish
and/or enhance the response program and be tied to the four elements.
Site-specific assessments and cleanups can be both eligible and
allowable if the activities is included in the work plan negotiated
between the EPA regional office and the state or tribe, but activities
must comply with all applicable laws and are subject to the following
restrictions:
a. Section 128(a) funds can only be used for assessments or
cleanups at sites that meet the definition of a brownfields site at
CERCLA section 101(39). EPA encourages states and tribes to use site-
specific funding to perform assessment (e.g., phase II, supplemental
assessments and cleanup planning) and cleanup activities that will lead
more quickly to the reuse and redevelopment of sites, particularly
sites located in distressed, environmental justice, rural or tribal
communities. Furthermore, states and tribes that perform site-specific
activities should plan to directly engage with and involve the targeted
community in the project. For example, a Community Relations Plan (CRP)
could be developed to provide reasonable notice to the public about a
planned cleanup, as well as opportunities for the public to comment on
the cleanup. States and tribes should work towards securing additional
funding for site-specific activities by leveraging resources from other
sources such as businesses, non-profit organizations, education and
training providers, and/or federal, state, tribal, and local
governments;
b. Absent EPA approval, no more than $200,000 per site assessment
can be funded with section 128(a) funds, and no more than $200,000 per
site cleanup can be funded with section 128(a) funds;
c. Absent EPA approval, the state/tribe may not use funds awarded
under this agreement to assess and/or clean up sites owned or operated
by the recipient or held in trust by the United States Government for
the recipient; and
d. Assessments and cleanups cannot be conducted at sites where the
state/tribe is a potentially responsible party pursuant to CERCLA
section 107, except:
At brownfields sites contaminated by a controlled
substance as defined in CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
When the recipient would satisfy all of the elements set
forth in CERCLA section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide prospective
purchaser except that the date of acquisition of the property was on or
before January 11, 2002.
Subgrants cannot be provided to entities that may be potentially
responsible parties (pursuant to CERCLA section 107) at the site for
which the assessment or cleanup activities are proposed to be
conducted, except:
1. At brownfields sites contaminated by a controlled substance as
defined in CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
2. When the recipient would satisfy all of the elements set forth
in CERCLA section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide prospective
purchaser except that the date of acquisition of the property was on or
before January 11, 2002.
2. Limitations on the Amount of Funds Used for Site-Specific Activities
and Waiver Process
States and tribes may use section 128(a) funds for site-specific
activities that improve state or tribal capacity but the amount
recipients may request for site-specific assessments and cleanups may
not generally exceed 50% of the total amount of funding.\10\ In order
for EPA to consider a waiver, the total amount of the site-specific
request may not exceed the recipient's total funding level for the
previous year. The funding request must include a brief justification
describing the reason(s) for spending more than 50% of an annual
allocation on site-specific activities. An applicant, when requesting a
waiver, must include the following information in the written
justification:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Oversight of assessment and cleanup activities performed by
responsible parties (other than the state or tribe) does not count
toward the 50% limit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total amount requested for site-specific activities;
Percentage of the site-specific activities (assuming
waiver is approved) in the total budget;
Site specific activities that will be covered by this
funding. If known, provide site specific information and describe how
work on each site contributes to the development or enhancement of your
state/tribal site response program. EPA recognizes the role of response
programs to develop and provide capacity in distressed, environmental
justice, rural or tribal communities, and encourages prioritization for
site-specific activities in those communities. Further explain how the
community will be (or has been) involved in prioritization of site work
and especially those sites where there is a potential or known
significant environmental impact to the community;
An explanation of how this shift in funding will not
negatively impact the core programmatic capacity (i.e., the ability to
establish/enhance four elements of a response program) and how related
activities will be maintained in spite of an increase in site-specific
work. Recipients must demonstrate that they have adequate funding from
other sources to effectively carry out work on the four elements for
EPA to grant a waiver of the 50% limit on using 128(a) funds for site-
specific activities;
As explanation as to whether the sites to be addressed are
those for which the affected community(ies) has requested work be
conducted (refer to Section VII.A Overview of Funding for more
information). EPA Headquarters will base approval of waivers on the
information that is included in the justification along with the
request for funding, as well as other information available to the
Agency. The EPA will then inform recipients of the Agency's final
decision(s).
[[Page 73529]]
3. Uses Related to Site-Specific Activities at Petroleum Brownfields
Sites
States and tribes may use section 128(a) funds for activities that
establish and enhance response programs addressing petroleum brownfield
sites. Subject to the restrictions listed above (see Section VII.D.1)
for all site-specific activities, the costs of site-specific
assessments and cleanup activities at petroleum contaminated
brownfields sites, defined at CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(II), are
both eligible and allowable if the activity is included in the work
plan negotiated between the EPA regional office and the state or tribe.
Section 128(a) funds used to capitalize a Brownfields RLF may be used
at brownfields sites contaminated by petroleum to the extent allowed
under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
4. Additional Examples of Eligible Site-Specific Activities
Other eligible uses of funds for site-specific related include, but
are not limited to, the following activities:
Technical assistance to federal brownfields cooperative
agreement recipients;
Development and/or review of quality assurance project
plans (QAPPs); and
Entering data into the ACRES database
E. Uses Related to Activities At ``Non-Brownfields'' Sites
Costs incurred for activities at non-brownfields sites, e.g.,
oversight, may be eligible and allowable if such activities are
included in the state's or tribe's work plan. Other uses not
specifically referenced in this guidance may also be eligible and
allowable. Recipients should consult with their regional state or
tribal contact for additional guidance. Direct assessment and cleanup
activities may only be conducted on eligible brownfields sites, as
defined in CERCLA section 101(39).
VIII. General Programmatic Guidelines For 128(a) Grant Funding Requests
Funding authorized under CERCLA section 128(a) is awarded through a
cooperative agreement \11\ between EPA and a state or a tribe. The
program is administered under the general EPA grant and cooperative
agreement regulations for states, tribes, and local governments found
in the Code of Federal Regulations at 40 CFR part 31 as well as
applicable provisions of 40 CFR Part 35 Subparts A and B. Under these
regulations, the cooperative agreement recipient for section 128(a)
grant program is the government to which a cooperative agreement is
awarded and which is accountable for the use of the funds provided. The
cooperative agreement recipient is the entire legal entity even if only
a particular component of the entity is designated in the cooperative
agreement award document. Further, unexpended balances of cooperative
agreement funds are subject to 40 CFR 35.118 and 40 CFR 35.518 to the
extent consistent with this guidance. EPA allocates funds to state and
tribal response programs under 40 CFR 35.420 and 40 CFR 35.737.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ A cooperative agreement is an agreement to a state/tribe
that includes substantial involvement by EPA on activities described
in the work plan which may include technical assistance,
collaboration on program priorities, etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. One Application Per State or Tribe
Subject to the availability of funds, EPA regional offices will
negotiate and enter into section 128(a) cooperative agreements with
eligible and interested states or tribes. EPA will accept only one
application from each eligible state or tribe.
B. Maximum Funding Request
For Fiscal Year 2014, EPA will consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.0 million per state or tribe. Please note the CERCLA
128(a) program's annual budget has remained relatively the same since
2003 while demand has increased over time. Due to the increasing number
of entities requesting funding, it is likely that the FY14 states and
tribal individual funding amounts will be less than the FY13 individual
funding amounts.
C. Define the State or Tribal Response Program
States and tribes must define in their work plan the ``section
128(a) response program(s)'' to which the funds will be applied, and
may designate a component of the state or tribe that will be EPA's
primary point of contact for negotiations on their proposed work plan.
When EPA funds the section 128(a) cooperative agreement, states and
tribes may distribute these funds among the appropriate state and
tribal agencies that are part of the section 128(a) response program.
This distribution must be clearly outlined in their annual work plan.
D. Separate Cooperative Agreements for the Capitalization of RLFs Using
Section 128(a) Funds
If a portion of the section 128(a) grant funds requested will be
used to capitalize a revolving loan fund for cleanup, pursuant to
section 104(k)(3), two separate cooperative agreements must be awarded,
i.e., one for the RLF and one for non-RLF uses. States and tribes may,
however, submit one initial request for funding, delineating the RLF as
a proposed use. Section 128(a) funds used to capitalize an RLF are not
eligible for inclusion into a Performance Partnership Grant (PPG).
E. Authority To Manage a Revolving Loan Fund Program
If a state or tribe chooses to use its section 128(a) funds to
capitalize a revolving loan fund program, the state or tribe must have
the lead authority to manage the program, e.g., hold loans, make loans,
enter into loan agreements, collect repayment, access and secure the
site in event of an emergency or loan default. If the agency/department
listed as the point of contact for the section 128(a) cooperative
agreement does not have this authority, it must be able to demonstrate
that another state or tribal agency does have the authority to manage
the RLF and is willing to do so.
F. Section 128(a) Cooperative Agreements Can Be Part of a Performance
Partnership Grant (PPG)
States and tribes may include section 128(a) cooperative agreements
in their PPG 69 FR 51,756 (2004). Section 128(a) funds used to
capitalize an RLF or purchase insurance or develop a risk sharing pool,
an indemnity pool, or insurance mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a state or tribal response program are not
eligible for inclusion in the PPG.
G. Project Period
EPA regional offices will determine the project period for each
cooperative agreement. These may be for multiple years depending on the
regional office's cooperative agreement policies. Each cooperative
agreement must have an annual budget period tied to an annual work
plan. While not prohibited, pre-award costs are subject to 40 CFR
35.113 and 40 CFR 35.513.
H. Demonstrating the Four Elements
As part of the annual work plan negotiation process, states or
tribes that do not have VRP MOAs must demonstrate that their program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to include, the four elements
described in Section V. EPA will not fund, in future years, state or
tribal response program annual work plans if EPA determines that these
elements are not met or reasonable progress is not being made. EPA may
base this determination on the information the state or tribe provides
to support its work plan, on progress
[[Page 73530]]
reports, or on EPA's review of the state or tribal response program.
I. Establishing and Maintaining the Public Record
Prior to funding a state's or tribe's annual work plan, EPA
regional offices will verify and document that a public record, as
described in Section VI and below, exists and is being maintained.\12\
Specifically for:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ For purposes of 128(a) funding, the state's or tribe's
public record applies to that state's or tribe's response program(s)
that utilized the section 128(a) funding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
States or tribes that received initial funding prior to
FY13: Requests for FY14 funds will not be accepted from states or
tribes that fail to demonstrate, by the January 31, 2014 request
deadline, that they established and are maintaining a public record.
(Note, this would potentially impact any state or tribe that had a term
and condition placed on their FY13 cooperative agreement that
prohibited drawdown of FY13 funds prior to meeting public record
requirement). States or tribes in this situation will not be prevented
from drawing down their prior year funds once the public record
requirement is met; and
States or tribes that received initial funding in FY13: By
the time of the actual FY14 award, the state or tribe must demonstrate
that they established and maintained the public record (those states
and tribes that do not meet this requirement will have a term and
condition placed on their FY14 cooperative agreement that prohibits the
drawdown of FY14 funds until the public record requirement is met).
J. Demonstration of Significant Utilization of Prior Years' Funding
States and tribes should be aware that EPA and its Congressional
appropriations committees place significant emphasis on the utilization
of prior years' funding. Unused funds from prior years will be
considered in the allocation process. Existing balances of cooperative
agreement funds as reflected in EPA's Financial Data Warehouse could
support an allocation amount below a recipient's request for funding
or, if appropriate deobligation and reallocation by EPA Regions as
provided for in 40 CFR 35.118 and 40 CFR 35.518.
EPA Regional staff will review EPA's Financial Database Warehouse
to identify the amount of remaining prior year(s) funds. The requestor
should work, as early as possible, with both their own finance
department, and with their Regional Project Officer to reconcile any
discrepancy between the amount of unspent funds showing in EPA's
system, and the amount reflected in the recipient's records. The
recipient should obtain concurrence from the Region on the amount of
unspent funds requiring justification by the deadline for this request
for funding.
K. Allocation System and Process for Distribution of Funds
After the January 31, 2014, request deadline, EPA's Regional
Offices will submit summaries of state and tribal requests to EPA
Headquarters. Before submitting requests to EPA Headquarters, regional
offices may take into account additional factors when determining
recommended allocation amounts. Such factors include, but are not
limited to, the depth and breadth of the state or tribal program; scope
of the perceived need for the funding, e.g., size of state or tribal
jurisdiction or the proposed work plan balanced against capacity of the
program, amount of current year funding, funds remaining from prior
years, etc.
After receipt of the regional recommendations, EPA Headquarters
will consolidate requests and make decisions on the final funding
allocations.
EPA regional offices will work with interested states and tribes to
develop their preliminary work plans and funding requests. Final
cooperative agreement work plans and budgets will be negotiated with
the regional office once final allocation determinations are made.
Please refer to process flow chart below (dates are estimates and
subject to change):
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06DE13.000
IX. Information To Be Submitted With the Funding Request
A. Summary of Planned Use of FY14 Funding
All states and tribes requesting FY14 funds must submit (to their
regional brownfields contact) a summary of the planned use of the funds
with associated dollar amounts. Please provide the request in the chart
below. The amount of funding requested should be an amount that can be
reasonably spent in one year. It is likely that the FY14 state and
tribal individual funding amounts will be less than the FY13 individual
funding amounts. The requestor should work, as early as possible, with
their EPA Regional Program contact to ensure that the funding amount
requested and related activities are reasonable.
B. Demonstration of Significant Utilization of Prior Years' Funding
States and tribes that received section 128(a) funds in prior years
must provide the amount of prior years' funding including funds that
recipients have not received in payments (i.e., funds EPA has obligated
for grants that remain in EPA's Financial Data Warehouse). EPA will
take into account these funds in the allocation process when
determining the recipient's programmatic needs under 40 CFR 35.420 and
40 CFR 35.737. The recipient should include a detailed explanation and
justification of prior year funds that remain in EPA's Financial Data
Warehouse as unspent balances. The recipient should obtain concurrence
from the Region on the amount of unspent funds requiring explanation by
the January 31, 2014
[[Page 73531]]
deadlines for submitting funding requests.
C. Optional: Explanation of Overall Program Impacts of Any Funding
Reductions
Please explain the programmatic effects of a reduction (to your
current funding amount) on significant activities of your response
program. Specifically, at what amount (e.g., percentage of your current
funding level) would your response program experience core programmatic
impacts such as a reduction in staff, a decrease in oversight
activities, or other impacts to the environment and health of the
communities the program serves, etc.? An EPA Region may require that
this information be submitted as part of the request for funding in
order to fully understand the individual program impacts associated
with decreased funding. These impacts will be considered as part of the
decision for the final allocation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of intended use (Example
Funding use FY13 Awarded FY14 Requested Uses)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Establish or enhance the four $XX,XXX............. $XX,XXX............
elements:.
1. Timely survey and .................... ................... 1. Examples:
inventory of brownfields
sites;.
.................... ................... inventory and prioritize
brownfields sites.
.................... ................... institutional control
(IC)/engineering control (EC)
tracking.
2. Oversight and enforcement .................... ................... 2. Examples:
authorities or other
mechanisms;.
.................... ................... develop/enhance
ordinances, regulations,
procedures for response programs.
3. Mechanisms and resources .................... ................... 3. Examples:
to provide meaningful
opportunities for public
participation;.
.................... ................... develop a community
involvement process.
.................... ................... community outreach.
.................... ................... issue public notices of
site activities.
.................... ................... develop a process to seek
public input from local
communities, especially potential
environmental justice
communities, communities with a
health risk related to exposure
to hazardous waste or other
public health concerns,
economically disadvantaged or
remote areas, and communities
with limited experience working
with government agencies to
prioritize sites to be addressed.
4. Mechanisms or approval of .................... ................... 4. Examples:
a cleanup plan and
verification and
certification that cleanup
is complete.
.................... ................... Develop/update cleanup
standards.
.................... ................... review cleanup plans and
verify completed actions.
Establish and maintain the public $XX,XXX............. $XX,XXX............ maintain public record.
record.
.................... ................... create web site for
public record.
.................... ................... disseminate public
information on how to access the
public record.
Enhance the response program..... $XX,XXX............. $XX,XXX............ provide oversight of site
assessments and cleanups.
.................... ................... attend training and
conferences on brownfields
cleanup technologies & other
brownfields topics.
.................... ................... update and enhance
program management activities.
.................... ................... negotiate/oversee
contracts for response programs.
.................... ................... enhance program
management & tracking systems.
Site-specific activities (amount $XX,XXX............. $XX,XXX............ perform site assessments
requested should be incidental and cleanups.
to the workplan, see Section develop QAPPs.
VI.D for more information on establish eligibility of
what activities should be target sites.
considered when calculating site prepare Property Profile
specific activities). Forms/input data into ACRES
database for these sites.
Environmental insurance.......... $XX,XXX............. $XX,XXX............ review potential uses of
environmental insurance.
.................... ................... manage an insurance risk
pool.
Revolving loan fund.............. $XX,XXX............. $XX,XXX............ create a cleanup
revolving loan fund.
Total funding.................... $XXX,XXX............ $XXX,XXX........... Performance Partnership Grant? Yes
[ballot] No [ballot].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
X. Terms and Reporting
Cooperative agreements for state and tribal response programs will
include programmatic and administrative terms and conditions. These
terms and conditions will describe EPA's substantial involvement
including technical assistance and collaboration on program development
and site-specific activities. Each of the subsections below summarizes
the basic terms and conditions, and related reporting that will be
required if a cooperative agreement with EPA is awarded.
A. Progress Reports
In accordance with 40 CFR 31.40, state and tribes must provide
progress reports as provided in the terms and conditions of the
cooperative agreement negotiated with EPA regional offices. State and
tribal costs for complying with reporting requirements are an eligible
expense under the section 128(a)
[[Page 73532]]
cooperative agreement. As a minimum, state or tribal progress reports
must include both a narrative discussion and performance data relating
to the state's or tribe's accomplishments and environmental outputs
associated with the approved budget and workplan. Reports should also
provide an accounting of section 128(a) funding. If applicable, the
state or tribe must include information on activities related to
establishing or enhancing the four elements of the state's or tribe's
response program. All recipients must provide information related to
establishing or, if already established, maintaining the public record.
Depending upon the activities included in the state's or tribe's work
plan, an EPA regional office may request that a progress report
include:
1. Reporting interim and final progress reports. Reports must
prominently display the following three relevant Essential Elements as
reflected in the current EPA strategic plan: Strategic Plan Goal 3:
Cleaning Up Communities and Advancing Sustainable Development,
Strategic Plan Objective 3.1: Promote Sustainable and Livable
Communities, and Work plan Commitments and Timeframes. EPA's strategic
plan can be found on the Internet at https://www.epa.gov/planandbudget/strategicplan.html.
2. Reporting for Non-MOA states and tribes. All recipients without
a VRP MOA must report activities related to establishing or enhancing
the four elements of the state's or tribe's response program. For each
element state/tribes must report how they are maintaining the element
or how they are taking reasonable steps to establish or enhance the
element as negotiated in individual state/tribal work plans. For
example, pursuant to CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(B), reports on the
oversight and enforcement authorities/mechanisms element may include:
A narrative description and copies of applicable documents
developed or under development to enable the response program to
conduct enforcement and oversight at sites. For example:
[cir] Legal authorities and mechanisms (e.g., statutes,
regulations, orders, agreements); and
[cir] Policies and procedures to implement legal authorities; and
other mechanisms;
A description of the resources and staff allocated/to be
allocated to the response program to conduct oversight and enforcement
at sites as a result of the cooperative agreement;
A narrative description of how these authorities or other
mechanisms, and resources, are adequate to ensure that:
[cir] A response action will protect human health and the
environment; and be conducted in accordance with applicable federal and
state law; and if the person conducting the response action fails to
complete the necessary response activities, including operation and
maintenance or long-term monitoring activities, the necessary response
activities are completed; and
A narrative description and copy of appropriate documents
demonstrating the exercise of oversight and enforcement authorities by
the response program at a brownfields site.
3. Reporting for site-specific assessment or cleanup activities.
Recipients with work plans that include funding for brownfields site
assessment or cleanup must input information required by the OMB-
approved Property Profile Form into the Assessment Cleanup and
Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) database for each site assessment
and cleanup. In addition, recipients must report how they provide the
affected community with prior notice and opportunity for meaningful
participation as per CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(C)(ii), on proposed
cleanup plans and site activities. For example, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input regarding the priority of sites
to be addressed and to solicit input from local communities, especially
potential environmental justice communities, communities with a health
risk related to exposure to hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote communities, and
communities with limited experience working with government agencies.
4. Reporting for other site-specific activities. Recipients with
work plans that include funding for other site-specific related
activities must include a description of the site-specific activities
and the number of sites at which the activity was conducted. For
example:
Number and frequency of oversight audits of licensed site
professional certified cleanups;
Number and frequency of state/tribal oversight audits
conducted;
Number of sites where staff conducted audits, provided
technical assistance, or conducted other oversight activities; and
Number of staff conducting oversight audits, providing
technical assistance, or conducting other oversight activities.
5. Reporting required when using funding for an RLF. Recipients
with work plans that include funding for revolving loan fund (RLF) must
include the information required by the terms and conditions for
progress reporting under CERCLA section 104(k)(3) RLF cooperative
agreements.
6. Reporting environmental insurance. Recipients with work plans
that include funding for environmental insurance must report:
Number and description of insurance policies purchased
(e.g., type of coverage provided; dollar limits of coverage; any
buffers or deductibles; category and identity of insured persons;
premium; first dollar or umbrella; site specific or blanket; occurrence
or claims made, etc.);
The number of sites covered by the insurance;
The amount of funds spent on environmental insurance
(e.g., amount dedicated to insurance program, or to insurance
premiums); and
The amount of claims paid by insurers to policy holders.
The regional offices may also request that information be added to
the progress reports, as appropriate, to properly document activities
described by the cooperative agreement work plan.
EPA regions may allow states or tribes to provide performance data
in appropriate electronic format.
The regional offices will forward progress reports to EPA
Headquarters, if requested. This information may be used to develop
national reports on the outcomes of CERCLA section 128(a) funding to
states and tribes.
B. Reporting of Program Activity Levels
States and tribes must report, by January 31, 2014, a summary of
the previous federal fiscal year's work (October 1, 2012 through
September 30, 2013). The following information must be submitted to
your regional project officer:
Environmental programs where CERCLA 128(a) funds are used
to support capacity building (general program support, non-site-
specific work). Indicate as appropriate from the following:
--Brownfields
--Underground Storage Tanks/Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
--Federal Facilities
--Solid Waste
--Superfund
--Hazardous Waste Facilities
--VCP (Voluntary Cleanup Program, Independent Cleanup Program, etc.)
--Other----------------;
Number of properties (or sites) enrolled in a response
program during FY13;
Number of properties (or sites) where documentation
indicates that
[[Page 73533]]
cleanup work is complete and all required institutional controls (IC's)
are in place, or not required;
Total number of acres associated with properties (or
sites) in the previous bullet; and
Number of properties where assistance was provided, but
the property was not enrolled in the response program (OPTIONAL).
EPA may require states/tribes to report specific performance
measures related to the four elements that can be aggregated for
national reporting to Congress.
For example:
1. Timely survey and inventory--estimated number of brownfields
sites in the state or on tribal land;
2. oversight and enforcement authorities/mechanisms--number of
active cleanups and percentage that received oversight; percentage of
active cleanups not in compliance with the cleanup workplan and that
received communications from recipient regarding non-compliance;
3. public participation--percentage of sites in the response
program where public meetings/notices were conducted regarding the
cleanup plan and/or other site activities; number of site assessments
requests, and responses to such requests; and
4. cleanup approval/certification mechanisms--total number of ``no
further action'' letters or total number of certificates of
completions.
[NOTE: This reporting requirement may include activities not funded
with CERCLA Section 128(a) funding, because such information may be
helpful to EPA when evaluating whether recipients have met or are
taking reasonable steps to meet the four elements of a response program
pursuant to CERCLA Section 128(a)(2).]
C. Reporting of Public Record
All recipients must report, as specified in the terms and
conditions of their cooperative agreement, and in Section VIII.I of
this guidance, information related to establishing, or if already
established, maintaining the public record, described above. States and
tribes can refer to an already existing public record, e.g., Web site
or other public database to meet the public record requirement.
Recipients reporting may only be required to demonstrate that the
public record (a) exists and is up-to-date, and (b) is adequate. A
public record may include the following information:
A list of sites at which response actions have been completed in
the past year including:
Date the response action was completed;
Site name;
Name of owner at time of cleanup, if known;
Location of the site (street address, and latitude and
longitude);
Whether an institutional control is in place;
Type of institutional control in place (e.g., deed
restriction, zoning restriction, local ordinance, state registries of
contaminated property, deed notices, advisories, etc.);
Nature of the contamination at the site (e.g., hazardous
substances, contaminants or pollutants, petroleum contamination, etc.);
and
Size of the site in acres.
A list of sites planned to be addressed by the state or tribal
response program in the coming year including:
Site name and the name of owner at time of cleanup, if
known;
Location of the site (street address, and latitude and
longitude);
To the extent known, whether an institutional control is
in place;
Type of the institutional control in place (e.g., deed
restriction, zoning restriction, local ordinance, state registries of
contaminated property, deed notices, advisories, etc.);
To the extent known, the nature of the contamination at
the site (e.g., hazardous substances, contaminants, or pollutants,
petroleum contamination, etc.); and
Size of the site in acres
D. Award Administration Information
1. Subaward and Executive Compensation Reporting
Applicants must ensure that they have the necessary processes and
systems in place to comply with the subaward and executive total
compensation reporting requirements established under OMB guidance at 2
CFR part 170, unless they qualify for an exception from the
requirements, should they be selected for funding.
2. System for Award Management (SAM) and Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) Requirements
Unless exempt from these requirements under OMB guidance at 2 CFR
Part 25(e.g., individuals), applicants must:
1. Be registered in SAM prior to submitting an application or
proposal under this announcement. SAM information can be found at
https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/.
2. Maintain an active SAM registration with current information at
all times during which it has an active Federal award or an application
or proposal under consideration by an agency, and
3. Provide its DUNS number in each application or proposal it
submits to the agency. Applicants can receive a DUNS number, at no
cost, by calling the dedicated toll-free DUNS Number request line at 1-
866-705-5711, or visiting the D&B Web site at: https://www.dnb.com.
If an applicant fails to comply with these requirements, it will,
should it be selected for award, affect their ability to receive the
award.
Please note that the CCR has been replaced by the System for Award
Management (SAM). To learn more about SAM, go to SAM.gov or https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/.
3. Use of Funds
An applicant that receives an award under this announcement is
expected to manage assistance agreement funds efficiently and
effectively, and make sufficient progress towards completing the
project activities described in the work-plan in a timely manner. The
assistance agreement will include terms and conditions related to
implementing this requirement.
Regional State and Tribal Brownfields Contacts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Region State Tribal
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1--CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT....... James Byrne, 5 Amy Jean McKeown,
Post Office 5 Post Office
Square, Suite Square, Suite 100
100, (OSRR07-2), (OSRR07-2),
Boston, MA 02109- Boston, MA 02109-
3912, Phone (617) 3912, Phone (617)
918-1389 Fax 918-1248 Fax
(617) 918-1291. (617) 918-1291.
2--NJ, NY, PR, VI............... Alison Devine, 290 Phillip Clappin,
Broadway, 18th 290 Broadway,
Floor, New York, 18th Floor, New
NY 10007-1866, York, NY 10007-
Phone (212) 637- 1866, Phone (212)
4158 Fax (212) 637-4431 Fax
637-3083. (212) 637-3083.
3--DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV....... Janice Bartel,
1650 Arch Street
(3HS51),
Philadelphia, PA
19103, Phone
(215) 814-5394
Fax (215) 814-
3015.
[[Page 73534]]
4--AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, Nicole Comick- Cindy J. Nolan, 61
TN. Bates, 61 Forsyth Forsyth Street,
Street, S.W, 10TH S.W, 10TH FL
FL (9T25), (9T25), Atlanta,
Atlanta, GA 30303- GA 30303-8909,
8909, Phone (404) Phone (404) 562-
562-9966 Fax 8425 Fax (404)
(404) 562-8788. 562-8788.
5--IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI....... Jan Pels, 77 West Jane Neumann, 77
Jackson Boulevard West Jackson
(SE-7J), Chicago, Boulevard (SE-
IL 60604-3507, 7J), Chicago, IL
Phone (312) 886- 60604-3507, Phone
3009 Fax (312) (312) 353-0123
692-2161. Fax (312) 697-
2649.
6--AR, LA, NM, OK, TX........... Amber Perry, 1445 Amber Perry, 1445
Ross Avenue, Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200 (6SF), Suite 1200 (6SF),
Dallas, TX 75202- Dallas, TX 75202-
2733, Phone (214) 2733, Phone (214)
665-3172 Fax 665-3172 Fax
(214) 665-6660. (214) 665-6660.
7--IA, KS, MO, NE............... Susan Klein, 11201 Jennifer Morris,
Renner Boulevard 11201 Renner
(SUPRSTAR), Boulevard
Lenexa, KS 66219, (SUPRSTAR),
Phone (913) 551- Lenexa, KS 66219,
7786 Fax (913) Phone (913) 551-
551-9786. 7341Fax (913) 551-
9798.
8--CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY....... Christina Wilson, Barbara Benoy,
1595 Wynkoop 1595 Wynkoop
Street (EPR-B), Street (8EPR-SA),
Denver, CO 80202- Denver, CO 80202-
1129, Phone (303) 1129, Phone (303)
312-6706 Fax 312-6760 Fax
(303) 312-6065. (303) 312-6962.
9--AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS, GU....... Eugenia Chow, 75 Glenn Kistner, 75
Hawthorne St. Hawthorne St.
(SFD-6-1), San (SFD-6-1), San
Francisco, CA Francisco, CA
94105, Phone 94105, Phone
(415) 972-3160 (415) 972-3004
Fax (415) 947- Fax (415) 947-
3520. 3520.
10--AK, ID, OR, WA.............. Mary K. Goolie, Mary K. Goolie,
222 West 7th 222 West 7th
Avenue 19 (AOO), i>19 (AOO),
Anchorage, AK Anchorage, AK
99513, Phone 99513, Phone
((907) 271-3414 ((907) 271-3414
Fax ( 907) 271- Fax (907) 271-
3424. 3424.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
XI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore not
subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011). Because this action is not subject to notice and
comment requirements under the Administrative Procedures Act or any
other statute, it is not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) or Sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1999 (UMRA) (Pub.L. 104-4). In addition, this action does
not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This action
does not create new binding legal requirements that substantially and
directly affect Tribes under Executive Order 13175 (63 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000). This action does not have significant Federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). Because this final rule has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this final rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly
Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001)
or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997). This final rule does not contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). This action does not
involve technical standards; thus, the requirements of Section 12(d) of
the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et
seq., generally provides that before certain actions may take effect,
the agency promulgating the action must submit a report, which includes
a copy of the action, to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. Because this final action
does not contain legally binding requirements, it is not subject to the
Congressional Review Act.
Dated: November 25, 2013.
David R. Lloyd,
Director, Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. 2013-28983 Filed 12-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P