Compassionate Release, 73083-73084 [2013-29076]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 234 / Thursday, December 5, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(4) Effective/applicability date.
Paragraph (a)(2) of this section and
Example 6 apply on or after January 23,
2012.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Effective/applicability date. Except
as otherwise provided in paragraphs
(a)(4) and (f)(3) of this section, this
section applies to payments made after
December 31, 2000.
§ 1.1441–7T
[Removed].
Par. 19. Section 1.1441–7T is
removed.
■ Par. 20. Section 1.1461–1 is amended
by:
■ 1. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(i)(L).
■ 2. Adding paragraph (c)(2)(iii).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
■
§ 1.1461–1
withheld.
Payment and returns of tax
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(L) Dividend equivalents as described
in section 871(m) and the regulations
thereunder;
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) Effective/applicability date.
Paragraph (c)(2)(i)(L) of this section
applies on or after January 23, 2012.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1.1461–1T
[Removed].
Par. 21. Section 1.1461–1T is
removed.
■
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: November 26, 2013.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2013–28933 Filed 12–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Prisons
28 CFR Part 571
[BOP–1168–P]
RIN 1120–AB68
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Compassionate Release
Bureau of Prisons, Justice.
Interim rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Bureau of Prisons
(Bureau) changes its regulations on
compassionate release, to provide that
when considering an inmate for
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:56 Dec 04, 2013
Jkt 232001
reduction in sentence, the General
Counsel will solicit the opinion of the
United States Attorney in the district in
which the inmate was sentenced; and
the final decision is subject to the
general supervision and direction of the
Attorney General and Deputy Attorney
General.
DATES: This rule will be effective
December 5, 2013. Written comments
must be postmarked and electronic
comments must be submitted on or
before February 3, 2014. Comments
received by mail will be considered
timely if they are postmarked on or
before that date. The electronic Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS)
will accept comments until Midnight
Eastern Time at the end of that day.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling
of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket
No. BOP 1168’’ on all electronic and
written correspondence. The
Department encourages all comments be
submitted electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov using the
electronic comment form provided on
that site. An electronic copy of this
document is also available at the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site for easy
reference. Paper comments that
duplicate the electronic submission are
not necessary as all comments
submitted to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted for public review and are
part of the official docket record. Should
you, however, wish to submit written
comments via regular or express mail,
they should be sent to Rules Unit, Office
of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons,
320 First Street NW., Washington, DC
20534.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Qureshi, Office of General
Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202)
307–2105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments
Please note that all comments
received are considered part of the
public record and made available for
public inspection online at
www.regulations.gov. Such information
includes personal identifying
information (such as your name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter.
If you want to submit personal
identifying information (such as your
name, address, etc.) as part of your
comment, but do not want it to be
posted online, you must include the
phrase ‘‘PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also locate
all the personal identifying information
you do not want posted online in the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
73083
first paragraph of your comment and
identify what information you want
redacted.
If you want to submit confidential
business information as part of your
comment but do not want it to be posted
online, you must include the phrase
‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also
prominently identify confidential
business information to be redacted
within the comment. If a comment
contains so much confidential business
information that it cannot be effectively
redacted, all or part of that comment
may not be posted on
www.regulations.gov.
Personal identifying information
identified and located as set forth above
will be placed in the agency’s public
docket file, but not posted online.
Confidential business information
identified and located as set forth above
will not be placed in the public docket
file. If you wish to inspect the agency’s
public docket file in person by
appointment, please see the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph.
The
Bureau published a proposed rule
revising all of the regulations in 28 CFR
part 571, subpart G, on December 21,
2006 (71 FR 76619). We also published
an interim rule making a technical
change to the regulations on February
28, 2013 (78 FR 13478).
We now withdraw the proposed rule
published in 2006. The Bureau is
continuing to consider issues relating to
compassionate release and the public
comments submitted in response to the
2006 notice of proposed rulemaking.
At this time, we are promulgating this
interim rule which makes the following
changes to the regulations on
compassionate release: (1) Providing
that, when considering an inmate for
reduction in sentence, the General
Counsel will solicit the opinion of the
United States Attorney in the district in
which the inmate was sentenced; and
(2) clarifying that the final decision is
subject to the general supervision and
direction of the Attorney General and
Deputy Attorney General.
Section 571.62 describes procedures
the Bureau follows to review a request
for reduction in sentence. The request
must be reviewed by the Warden,
General Counsel, Medical Director (for
medical referrals), the Assistant Director
(for non-medical referrals), and the
Director. During the course of this
review, the United States Attorney’s
Office is consulted and made aware of
a request being considered for approval.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
73084
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 234 / Thursday, December 5, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
This is current practice for requests for
reduction in sentence.
We now codify this practice to make
it clear to inmates and the public that
the United States Attorney’s Office will
be consulted in the course of the review
of the Office of General Counsel. We
will therefore insert a provision stating
that the General Counsel will solicit the
opinion of the U.S. Attorney in the
district in which the inmate was
sentenced.
Also, in § 571.62(a)(2), which
describes the Bureau’s approval of a
request to make a motion for
compassionate release, we add a
statement clarifying that final decision
authority is subject to the general
supervision and direction of the
Attorney General and Deputy Attorney
General.
‘‘rule’’ that is subject to review under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly
this regulation has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget.
Administrative Procedure Act 5 U.S.C.
553
The two changes made in this interim
rule are ‘‘matter[s] relating to agency
management’’ as described in 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(1), and are ‘‘rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice’’ as
described in section 553(b)(A), and,
accordingly, they are not subject to the
requirement for prior notice and
comment under section 553(b). These
changes impose no new restrictions on
inmates or the public. Because this rule
relates to agency management as
described in section 553(a)(1), and is not
a ‘‘substantive rule’’ as described in
section 553(d), this rule is not subject to
a requirement for a delayed effective
date. This rule is made effective upon
issuance.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Congressional Review Act
The Bureau of Prisons has determined
that this action pertains to agency
management and, accordingly, is not a
‘‘rule’’ as that term is used by the
Congressional Review Act (CRA),
(Subtitle E of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act,
(SBREFA)). Therefore, the reports to
Congress and the General Accounting
Office specified by section 801 of
SBREFA are not required.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
This regulation has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review’’, section 1(b), Principles of
Regulation, and Executive Order 13563,
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review’’. Because this interim rule is
‘‘limited to agency organization,
management, or personnel matters,’’
within the meaning of Executive Order
12866, section 3(d)(3), it does not fall
within the scope of a ‘‘regulation’’ or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:56 Dec 04, 2013
Jkt 232001
Executive Order 13132
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 571
Prisoners.
Thomas R. Kane
Deputy Director, Bureau of Prisons.
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, under
Executive Order 13132, we determine
that this regulation does not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
Under rulemaking authority vested in
the Attorney General in 5 U.S.C 301; 28
U.S.C. 509, 510 and delegated to the
Director, Bureau of Prisons in 28 CFR
0.96, we amend 28 CFR chapter V,
subchapter D, part 571, as follows.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
■
The Director of the Bureau of Prisons,
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)), reviewed this regulation
and certifies that it will not have a
significant economic impact upon a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This regulation
pertains to the correctional management
of inmates committed to the custody of
the Attorney General or the Director of
the Bureau of Prisons. Its economic
impact is limited to the Bureau’s
appropriated funds.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 18 U.S.C. 3565;
3568 and 3569 (Repealed in part as to
offenses committed on or after November 1,
1987), 3582, 3621, 3622, 3624, 4001, 4042,
4081, 4082 (Repealed in part as to offenses
committed on or after November 1, 1987),
4161–4166 and 4201–4218 (Repealed as to
offenses committed on or after November 1,
1987), 5006–5024 (Repealed October 12,
1984, as to offenses committed after that
date), 5031–5042; 28 U.S.C. 509 and 510;
U.S. Const., Art. II, Sec. 2; 28 CFR 1.1–1.10;
D.C. Official Code sections 24–101, 24–461,
24–465, 24–467, and 24–468.
This regulation will not result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This regulation is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This regulation
will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
PART 571—RELEASE FROM
CUSTODY
1. Revise the authority citation for 28
CFR part 571 to read as follows:
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
PO 00000
SUBCHAPTER D—COMMUNITY
PROGRAMS AND RELEASE
Subpart G—Compassionate Release
(Procedures for the Implementation of
18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A) and 4205(g))
2. In 571.62, the second sentence of
paragraph (a)(2) is removed and two
sentences are added in its place to read
as follows:
■
§ 571.62
Approval of request.
(a) * * *
(2) * * * The General Counsel will
solicit the opinion of the United States
Attorney in the district in which the
inmate was sentenced. With these
opinions, the General Counsel shall
forward the entire matter to the Director,
Bureau of Prisons, for final decision,
subject to the general supervision and
direction of the Attorney General and
Deputy Attorney General.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–29076 Filed 12–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–05–P
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 234 (Thursday, December 5, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73083-73084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29076]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Prisons
28 CFR Part 571
[BOP-1168-P]
RIN 1120-AB68
Compassionate Release
AGENCY: Bureau of Prisons, Justice.
ACTION: Interim rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) changes its regulations on
compassionate release, to provide that when considering an inmate for
reduction in sentence, the General Counsel will solicit the opinion of
the United States Attorney in the district in which the inmate was
sentenced; and the final decision is subject to the general supervision
and direction of the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General.
DATES: This rule will be effective December 5, 2013. Written comments
must be postmarked and electronic comments must be submitted on or
before February 3, 2014. Comments received by mail will be considered
timely if they are postmarked on or before that date. The electronic
Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) will accept comments until
Midnight Eastern Time at the end of that day.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling of comments, please reference
``Docket No. BOP 1168'' on all electronic and written correspondence.
The Department encourages all comments be submitted electronically
through https://www.regulations.gov using the electronic comment form
provided on that site. An electronic copy of this document is also
available at the https://www.regulations.gov Web site for easy
reference. Paper comments that duplicate the electronic submission are
not necessary as all comments submitted to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted for public review and are part of the official docket
record. Should you, however, wish to submit written comments via
regular or express mail, they should be sent to Rules Unit, Office of
General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street NW., Washington,
DC 20534.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Qureshi, Office of General
Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202) 307-2105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments
Please note that all comments received are considered part of the
public record and made available for public inspection online at
www.regulations.gov. Such information includes personal identifying
information (such as your name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter.
If you want to submit personal identifying information (such as
your name, address, etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want it
to be posted online, you must include the phrase ``PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also
locate all the personal identifying information you do not want posted
online in the first paragraph of your comment and identify what
information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential business information as part of
your comment but do not want it to be posted online, you must include
the phrase ``CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also prominently identify confidential
business information to be redacted within the comment. If a comment
contains so much confidential business information that it cannot be
effectively redacted, all or part of that comment may not be posted on
www.regulations.gov.
Personal identifying information identified and located as set
forth above will be placed in the agency's public docket file, but not
posted online. Confidential business information identified and located
as set forth above will not be placed in the public docket file. If you
wish to inspect the agency's public docket file in person by
appointment, please see the For Further Information Contact paragraph.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Bureau published a proposed rule
revising all of the regulations in 28 CFR part 571, subpart G, on
December 21, 2006 (71 FR 76619). We also published an interim rule
making a technical change to the regulations on February 28, 2013 (78
FR 13478).
We now withdraw the proposed rule published in 2006. The Bureau is
continuing to consider issues relating to compassionate release and the
public comments submitted in response to the 2006 notice of proposed
rulemaking.
At this time, we are promulgating this interim rule which makes the
following changes to the regulations on compassionate release: (1)
Providing that, when considering an inmate for reduction in sentence,
the General Counsel will solicit the opinion of the United States
Attorney in the district in which the inmate was sentenced; and (2)
clarifying that the final decision is subject to the general
supervision and direction of the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney
General.
Section 571.62 describes procedures the Bureau follows to review a
request for reduction in sentence. The request must be reviewed by the
Warden, General Counsel, Medical Director (for medical referrals), the
Assistant Director (for non-medical referrals), and the Director.
During the course of this review, the United States Attorney's Office
is consulted and made aware of a request being considered for approval.
[[Page 73084]]
This is current practice for requests for reduction in sentence.
We now codify this practice to make it clear to inmates and the
public that the United States Attorney's Office will be consulted in
the course of the review of the Office of General Counsel. We will
therefore insert a provision stating that the General Counsel will
solicit the opinion of the U.S. Attorney in the district in which the
inmate was sentenced.
Also, in Sec. 571.62(a)(2), which describes the Bureau's approval
of a request to make a motion for compassionate release, we add a
statement clarifying that final decision authority is subject to the
general supervision and direction of the Attorney General and Deputy
Attorney General.
Administrative Procedure Act 5 U.S.C. 553
The two changes made in this interim rule are ``matter[s] relating
to agency management'' as described in 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1), and are
``rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice'' as described
in section 553(b)(A), and, accordingly, they are not subject to the
requirement for prior notice and comment under section 553(b). These
changes impose no new restrictions on inmates or the public. Because
this rule relates to agency management as described in section
553(a)(1), and is not a ``substantive rule'' as described in section
553(d), this rule is not subject to a requirement for a delayed
effective date. This rule is made effective upon issuance.
Congressional Review Act
The Bureau of Prisons has determined that this action pertains to
agency management and, accordingly, is not a ``rule'' as that term is
used by the Congressional Review Act (CRA), (Subtitle E of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, (SBREFA)). Therefore, the
reports to Congress and the General Accounting Office specified by
section 801 of SBREFA are not required.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'', section
1(b), Principles of Regulation, and Executive Order 13563, ``Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review''. Because this interim rule is
``limited to agency organization, management, or personnel matters,''
within the meaning of Executive Order 12866, section 3(d)(3), it does
not fall within the scope of a ``regulation'' or ``rule'' that is
subject to review under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly this
regulation has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget.
Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, under Executive Order 13132,
we determine that this regulation does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Director of the Bureau of Prisons, under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), reviewed this regulation and
certifies that it will not have a significant economic impact upon a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
regulation pertains to the correctional management of inmates committed
to the custody of the Attorney General or the Director of the Bureau of
Prisons. Its economic impact is limited to the Bureau's appropriated
funds.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This regulation will not result in the expenditure by State, local
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This regulation is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This
regulation will not result in an annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 571
Prisoners.
Thomas R. Kane
Deputy Director, Bureau of Prisons.
Under rulemaking authority vested in the Attorney General in 5
U.S.C 301; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510 and delegated to the Director, Bureau of
Prisons in 28 CFR 0.96, we amend 28 CFR chapter V, subchapter D, part
571, as follows.
SUBCHAPTER D--COMMUNITY PROGRAMS AND RELEASE
PART 571--RELEASE FROM CUSTODY
0
1. Revise the authority citation for 28 CFR part 571 to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 18 U.S.C. 3565; 3568 and 3569
(Repealed in part as to offenses committed on or after November 1,
1987), 3582, 3621, 3622, 3624, 4001, 4042, 4081, 4082 (Repealed in
part as to offenses committed on or after November 1, 1987), 4161-
4166 and 4201-4218 (Repealed as to offenses committed on or after
November 1, 1987), 5006-5024 (Repealed October 12, 1984, as to
offenses committed after that date), 5031-5042; 28 U.S.C. 509 and
510; U.S. Const., Art. II, Sec. 2; 28 CFR 1.1-1.10; D.C. Official
Code sections 24-101, 24-461, 24-465, 24-467, and 24-468.
Subpart G--Compassionate Release (Procedures for the Implementation
of 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A) and 4205(g))
0
2. In 571.62, the second sentence of paragraph (a)(2) is removed and
two sentences are added in its place to read as follows:
Sec. 571.62 Approval of request.
(a) * * *
(2) * * * The General Counsel will solicit the opinion of the
United States Attorney in the district in which the inmate was
sentenced. With these opinions, the General Counsel shall forward the
entire matter to the Director, Bureau of Prisons, for final decision,
subject to the general supervision and direction of the Attorney
General and Deputy Attorney General.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-29076 Filed 12-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-05-P