Electronic Reporting Under the Toxic Substances Control Act, 72818-72830 [2013-28510]
Download as PDF
72818
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Notice of deviation from
drawbridge regulation.
ACTION:
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
that governs the U.S. Highway 90 bridge
across Chef Menteur Pass, mile 2.8, at
New Orleans, Orleans Parish, Louisiana.
The deviation is necessary to affect
repairs and maintenance that is required
for safe operation of the bridge. This
deviation allows the bridge to remain
closed to navigation for 18 consecutive
days, except that the bridge will open
twice daily during the middle 14 days
of the repair period.
DATES: This deviation is effective
without actual notice from December 4,
2013 until December 21, 2013. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from the date the deviation
was signed, November 18, 2013, until
December 21, 2013.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
deviation, [USCG–2013–0968] is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Type the docket number in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation. You may
also visit the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email James
Wetherington, Bridge Administration
Branch, Coast Guard, telephone 504–
671–2128, email
james.r.wetherington@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Louisiana Department of Transportation
and Development requested a temporary
deviation from the normal operation of
the U.S. Highway 90 drawbridge in
order to remove, repair, and replace
machinery required to operate the
drawbridge. This maintenance is
essential for the continued safe
operation of the drawbridge. This
temporary deviation allows the
drawbridge to remain closed from 7 a.m.
on Tuesday, December 3, 2013 through
7 a.m. on Saturday, December 21, 2013.
During the repair period, the bridge will
be able to open for the passage of vessels
twice daily, at 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
beginning on Thursday, December 5,
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:12 Dec 03, 2013
Jkt 232001
2013 through Wednesday, December 18,
2013.
The bridge has a vertical clearance of
10 feet above mean high water,
elevation 3 feet (NGVD 29) in the
closed-to-navigation position and
unlimited in the open-to-navigation
position.
In accordance with to 33 CFR
117.436, the draw of the U.S. Highway
90 Bridge, mile 2.8, shall open on
signal; except that, from 5:30 a.m. to
7:30 a.m. Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays, the draw need
open only for the passage of vessels. The
draw shall open at any time for a vessel
in distress.
This deviation is effective from 7 a.m.
on Tuesday, December 3, 2013 through
7 a.m. on Saturday December 21, 2013.
This closure allows for the maintenance
and repairs to be done safely and
efficiently. Navigation on the waterway
consists mainly of commercial
fishermen and sportsman fishermen. As
a result of coordination between the
Coast Guard and the waterway users, it
has been determined that this closure
will not have a significant effect on
these vessels.
Vessels able to pass through the
bridge in the closed positions may do so
at anytime. The bridge will not be able
to open for emergencies. Rigolets Pass
can be used as an alternate route for
vessels unable to pass through the
bridge in closed positions. The Coast
Guard will also inform the users of the
waterways through our Local and
Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the
change in operating schedule for the
bridge so that vessels can arrange their
transits to minimize any impact caused
by the temporary deviation.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the effective period of this
temporary deviation. This deviation
from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: November 18, 2013.
David M. Frank,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–29011 Filed 12–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 712, 716, 720, 721, 723,
725, 766, 790, and 799
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2011–0519; FRL–9394–6]
RIN 2070–AJ75
Electronic Reporting Under the Toxic
Substances Control Act
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is amending certain
reporting requirements that were
promulgated under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) to
require the use electronic reporting.
EPA is requiring the use of electronic
reporting in order to minimize the
paperwork burden associated with the
underlying regulatory requirements and
to minimize the cost to the Federal
Government of the creation, collection,
maintenance, use, dissemination, and
disposition of information. This action
will also improve the quality and use of
information to strengthen
decisionmaking, accountability, and
openness in government and society, as
well as provide for the timely
dissemination of public information and
in a manner that promotes the utility of
the information to the public and makes
effective use of information technology.
DATES: This final rule is effective March
4, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2011–0519 is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT) Docket,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West
Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number of the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
566–0280. Please review the visitor
instructions and additional information
about the docket available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information contact:
Katherine Sleasman, Chemical Control
Division (7405M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001;
telephone number: (202) 564–7716;
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
email address: sleasman.katherine@
epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture
(including import), process, or
distribute in commerce chemical
substances and mixtures. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Chemicals and Allied Products
Manufacturers (NAICS code 32411).
• Petroleum Refining (NAICS codes
325 and 32411).
If you have any questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the technical
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
II. Background
A. What action is the agency taking?
EPA is promulgating amendments to
reporting requirements under TSCA
section 4 (including test rules and
Enforceable Consent Agreements
(ECAs)), TSCA section 5, TSCA section
8(a) Preliminary Analysis Information
Rule (PAIR) at 40 CFR part 712, and
TSCA section 8(d) Health and Safety
Data Reporting Rules at 40 CFR part
716. EPA developed this action in
accordance with its final plan for
periodic retrospective reviews of
existing regulations under Executive
Order 13563, entitled ‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review.’’
This final rule was proposed in the
Federal Register issue of April 17, 2012
(Ref. 1). The purpose of the amendments
is to manage and leverage EPA’s
information resources to reduce
information collection burdens on the
public; increase EPA program efficiency
and effectiveness; and improve the
integrity, quality, and utility of
information to all users within and
outside the Agency, including
capabilities for ensuring dissemination
of public information, public access to
Federal Government information, and
protections for privacy and security.
This final rule is part of broader
government efforts to move to modern,
electronic methods of information
gathering. EPA’s Chemical Information
Submission System (CISS) Web-based
reporting tool and e-PMN software
enable more efficient data transmittal
via the Central Data Exchange (CDX)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:12 Dec 03, 2013
Jkt 232001
and reduces errors with the built-in
validation procedures. EPA believes the
adoption of electronic reporting reduces
the reporting burden for submitters by
reducing the cost and time required to
review, edit, and transmit data to the
Agency. The resource and time
requirements to review and process data
by the Agency will also be reduced and
document storage and retrieval will
require fewer resources. In addition, the
final rule ensures the legal
dependability of electronically
submitted documents so that they meet
the needs of the compliance and
enforcement programs. The legal
dependability of electronically
submitted documents is ensured by
valid electronic signatures that can be
submitted into evidence, assurance that
electronic documents can be
authenticated to provide evidence of
what an individual submitted and/or
attested to, and assurance that electronic
signatures resist repudiation by the
signatory.
The Agency is extending the TSCA
section 5 electronic reporting
requirements to Notice of
Commencements (NOCs) and support
documents (e.g., correspondence,
amendments, and test data) relating to
TSCA section 5 notices submitted to
EPA prior to April 6, 2010, the effective
date of the TSCA Section 5
Premanufacture and Significant New
Use Notification Electronic Reporting;
Revisions to Notification Regulations
(Ref. 2). Previously, follow-up
submissions for TSCA section 5 notices
submitted before this date were not
subject to electronic reporting
requirements.
Effective March 4, 2014, EPA will
only accept data, reports, and other
information subject to these rules when
submitted through CDX and the CISS
tool for the submission of forms, reports,
and other documents. TSCA section 5
submissions, however, must be
submitted through CDX using e-PMN
software downloaded from EPA’s CDX
Web site. Data, reports, and other
information not submitted in the
manner required will not be considered
by EPA to have met the filing
requirements of those rules. The CISS
tool is also available for use in making
voluntary submissions, such as those
under Memoranda of Understanding
(MOUs), electronically, following the
same procedures described in this final
rule. Submitters should register through
CDX and submit data, reports, and other
documents through the CISS tool. The
final rule amends the following
regulations:
1. TSCA section 4 test rules and ECAs.
Documents required under TSCA
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72819
section 4 include letters of intent to
conduct testing (40 CFR 790.45),
extension requests (40 CFR 790.50),
modification requests (40 CFR 790.55),
exemption requests (40 CFR 790.80 and
40 CFR 790.82), hearing requests (40
CFR 790.90), data required to be
developed under rules at 40 CFR part
799, and documents and
correspondence related to ECAs
negotiated pursuant to 40 CFR part 790.
Affected sections include those relating
to submission or modification of a study
plan (40 CFR 790.62), and requests to
modify the test schedule for any test
required under an ECA (40 CFR 790.68).
Electronic reporting requirements for
TSCA section 4 rules and ECAs are
added to 40 CFR 790.5 and 799.50. In
addition, anyone who manufactures,
imports, or processes a chemical
substance under 40 CFR part 766, must
test that chemical substance
immediately upon manufacture, import,
or processing for the presence of
halogenated dibenzodioxins/
halogenated dibenzofurans (HDDs/
HDFs), and submit all test data to EPA.
A requirement for electronic reporting is
added to 40 CFR 766.35.
2. TSCA section 5. EPA is amending
certain TSCA section 5 reporting
requirements that extend electronic
reporting requirements to NOCs and
support documents (e.g.,
correspondence, amendments, and test
data) relating to TSCA section 5 notices
submitted to EPA before April 6, 2010.
The e-PMN final rule (Ref. 2) required
submitters of NOCs and support
documents whose original notices were
submitted to EPA prior to April 6, 2010
(legacy notices) to submit those NOCs
and support documents to EPA in hard
copy. At the time the final e-PMN rule
was published, EPA believed the hard
copy submission of these documents
was necessary because the Agency
intended to operate two different
databases; one for storing electronic
TSCA section 5 notices submitted to
EPA after April 6, 2010, and another for
storing legacy notices. EPA originally
intended to enter legacy notices only
into EPA’s ‘‘legacy database,’’ i.e., the
database used prior to April 6, 2010,
and so would not have been able to link
up a subsequent NOC or support
document with its original or ‘‘parent’’
legacy notice if the subsequent
document was entered into EPA’s new
database.
However, since publication of the ePMN final rule, EPA’s electronic
reporting program has evolved and EPA
now has the ability to house both legacy
notices and notices submitted after
April 6, 2010, in the same database. EPA
is therefore amending 40 CFR parts 720,
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
72820
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
721, 723, and 725 to require NOCs and
support documents submitted after
March 4, 2014 for TSCA section 5
notices originally submitted prior to
April 6, 2010, to be submitted
electronically allowing them to be
stored with their legacy TSCA section 5
notices in the new database.
In the e-PMN final rule, EPA phasedin electronic reporting of TSCA section
5 notices and their related NOCs and
support documents over a 2-year period
that ended April 6, 2012. In this final
rule, EPA is removing the phase-in
because the phase-in period is over and
all TSCA section 5 notices, NOCs, and
support documents are required to be
submitted to EPA via CDX.
3. TSCA section 8(a). Electronic
reporting requirements for Form 7710–
35, Manufacturer’s Report—Preliminary
Assessment Information (Manufacturer’s
Report), are added to 40 CFR 712.28 and
712.30. In addition, electronic reporting
requirements for Form 7710–51,
Dioxins/Furans Report Form, are added
to 40 CFR 766.35.
4. TSCA section 8(d). Electronic
submission of data, reports, and other
documents are now required under the
TSCA section 8(d) Health and Safety
Data Reporting Rule at 40 CFR part 716
and the Dibenzo-Para-Dioxins/
Dibenzofurans Rule at 40 CFR part 766
(specifically 40 CFR 716.30, 716.35,
716.60, and 766.35). Additional affected
sections of 40 CFR part 716 include the
submission of underlying data,
preliminary reports of ongoing studies,
additional copies of studies (40 CFR
716.40), requests for extension of time
(40 CFR 716.60), and requests for
withdrawal of a chemical substance
from a rule (40 CFR 716.105).
EPA also requires submission of
allegations of significant adverse
reactions to dibenzo-para-dioxins/
dibenzofurans, pursuant to 40 CFR part
717. EPA has not received a large
number of allegations of significant
adverse reactions, and therefore is not
implementing a mechanism for the
electronic submission of these
allegations of significant adverse
reactions using the CISS tool at this
time. Anyone subject to the applicable
requirements of 40 CFR part 766 must
continue to submit to EPA paper copies
of allegations of significant adverse
reactions.
B. What is the agency’s authority for
taking this action?
TSCA gives EPA broad authority to
regulate the manufacture (including
import) and processing of chemical
substances. The underlying
requirements promulgated under this
broad authority and amended by this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:12 Dec 03, 2013
Jkt 232001
final rule require manufacturers
(including importers) and processors of
chemical substances and mixtures to:
• Perform testing to generate data
relevant to a determination whether the
manufacture, distribution in commerce,
processing, use, or disposal of such
chemicals or mixtures presents an
unreasonable risk of injury to health or
the environment (TSCA section 4).
• Report such data as EPA may
reasonably require, including
information that is necessary to
facilitate the evaluation of the potential
adverse human health and
environmental effects from exposure to
identified chemical substances,
mixtures, or categories (TSCA section
8(a)).
• Submit lists and/or copies of
ongoing and completed unpublished
health and safety studies concerning
identified chemical substances,
mixtures, or categories (TSCA section
8(d)).
• Notify EPA at least 90 days before
commencing the manufacture of a new
chemical substance for commercial
purposes (TSCA section 5(a)(1)(A)).
• Notify EPA at least 90 days before
manufacturing or processing the
chemical substance for any use of a
chemical substance that EPA has
determined, by rule, to be a ‘‘significant
new use’’ (TSCA section 5(a)(2)).
In addition, the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) requires Federal agencies to
manage information resources to reduce
information collection burdens on the
public; increase program efficiency and
effectiveness; and improve the integrity,
quality, and utility of information to all
users within and outside an agency,
including capabilities for ensuring
dissemination of public information,
public access to Federal Government
information, and protections for privacy
and security (44 U.S.C. 3506). Section 2
of TSCA expresses the intent of
Congress that EPA carry out TSCA in a
reasonable and prudent manner, and in
consideration of the impacts that any
action taken under TSCA may have on
the environment, the economy, and
society (15 U.S.C. 2601). Electronic
reporting was not available when TSCA
was enacted nor when several
underlying reporting requirements were
subsequently promulgated by EPA. EPA
believes that it is now reasonable and
prudent to manage and leverage its
information resources, including
information technology (IT), to require
the use of electronic reporting in the
implementation of certain TSCA
provisions. Electronic reporting can
reduce burden and costs for the
regulated entities by eliminating the
costs associated with printing and
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
mailing this information to EPA, while
at the same time improving EPA’s
efficiency in reviewing submitted
information, making decisions and
disseminating information to the public.
III. Description of Changes to Reporting
Procedures
This unit provides an overview of
EPA’s CDX, the Chemical Safety and
Pesticide Program (CSPP), the CISS tool,
and the e-PMN software for NOCs and
support documents associated with
legacy TSCA section 5 notices.
A. What is CDX?
CDX is EPA’s centralized electronic
submission receiving system. CDX also
provides the capability for submitters to
access their data through the use of web
services. CDX enables EPA to work with
stakeholders, including governments,
regulated industries, and the public, to
enable streamlined, electronic
submission of data via the Internet. For
more information about CDX, go to
https://epa.gov/cdx.
B. What is CISS?
EPA developed the CISS tool for use
in submitting data, reports, and other
information under TSCA electronically
to the Agency. In the proposed rule
CISS was referred to as e-TSCAweb. In
this document only the term CISS is
used. The CISS tool is available for use
with Windows, Macs, Linux, and UNIX
based computers, using ‘‘Extensible
Markup Language’’ (XML) specifications
for efficient data transmission across the
Internet. The CISS tool provides userfriendly navigation, works with CDX to
secure online communication, creates a
completed Portable Document Format
(PDF) for review prior to submission,
and enables data, reports, and other
information to be submitted easily as
PDF attachments, or by other electronic
standards, such as XML, and protects
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
as appropriate. Over time, there will be
updates to CISS tool. The most recent
version of CISS is available online at
https://epa.gov/cdx.
C. What is the e-PMN software for TSCA
section 5?
EPA has developed e-PMN software
for use in preparing and submitting
Premanufacture Notices (PMNs) and
other TSCA section 5 notices and
support documents electronically to the
Agency. For further information on the
software capabilities, visit the TSCA
New Chemicals Program Web site
available online at https://www.epa.gov/
oppt/newchems. Also, see the e-PMN
final rule (Ref. 2) for further guidance.
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
D. What are the benefits of CDX
reporting and use of the CISS tool and
the e-PMN software?
The effort to eliminate paper-based
submissions in favor of CDX reporting,
including use of the CISS tool, is part of
broader Federal Government efforts to
move to modern, electronic methods of
information gathering. The CISS tool
and e-PMN software enable more
efficient data transmittal and reduces
errors with the built-in validation
procedures. EPA believes the adoption
of electronic reporting reduces the
reporting burden for submitters by
reducing the cost and time required to
review, edit, and transmit data to the
Agency. It also allows submitters to
share a draft submission within their
organization, and more easily save a
copy for their records or future use. The
resource and time requirements to
review and process data by the Agency
will also be reduced and document
storage and retrieval will require fewer
resources. EPA expects to benefit from
receiving electronic submissions and
communicating back electronically with
submitters. In addition, the use of CDX
and the CISS tool ensures the legal
dependability of electronic reports so
that they meet the needs of the
compliance and enforcement programs.
The legal dependability of electronically
submitted documents is ensured by
valid electronic signatures that can be
submitted into evidence, assurance that
electronic documents can be
authenticated to provide evidence of
what an individual submitted and/or
attested to, and assurance that electronic
signatures resist repudiation by the
signatory (Ref. 3).
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
E. How do I submit data, reports, and
other documents required under TSCA
sections 4, 8(a), and 8(d) using CDX?
This final rule requires submitters to
register with EPA’s CDX, request access
to CSPP, and use the CISS tool to
prepare a file for submission.
1. Registering with CDX. Registration
enables CDX to authenticate each user’s
identity, and to verify each user’s
authorization to file official submissions
to EPA on behalf of a company.
To submit electronically to EPA via
CDX, individuals must first register in
CDX through EPA’s Web page at https://
cdx.epa.gov/epa_home.asp.
To register in CDX, the CDX registrant
(also referred to as ‘‘Electronic Signature
Holder’’ or ‘‘Public/Private Key
Holder’’) agrees to the terms and
conditions, provides information about
the submitter and organization, selects a
user name and password, selects a
program and role, and follows the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:12 Dec 03, 2013
Jkt 232001
procedures outlined in the CDX user
guide available on EPA’s Web page at
https://www.epa.gov/cdr/tools/CDX_
Registration_Guide_v0_02.pdf.
Users, who have previously registered
with CDX for TSCA section 5
submissions, or the Toxics Release
Inventory TRI–ME web reporting, are
able to add CSPP to their current
registration, and use the CISS tool.
2. Communication through CDX.
Currently communication through CDX
between the submitter and EPA is
focused on transactional activities,
meaning the submission of information
to EPA and notification from EPA that
the submission was received. EPA is
mandating that all submissions of
required materials be done through CDX
but acknowledges that use of certified
mail and email for correspondence
related to the submissions is still
necessary since the ability to do so
within CDX is not yet available. EPA is
in the process of enhancing the CDX
correspondence functionality so the
two-way emailing between submitters
and EPA is offered in a secure
environment.
3. Preparing the submission. All
submitters are required to use the CISS
tool to prepare their submissions. The
CISS tool guides users through a
‘‘hands-on’’ process of creating an
electronic submission. Once a user
completes the relevant data fields,
attaches appropriate PDF or other file
types, such as XML files, and completes
metadata information, the CISS tool
validates the submission by performing
a basic error check and makes sure all
the required fields and attachments are
provided and complete. Further
instructions on submitting voluntary
submissions, such as under MOUs and
instructions for uploading PDF
attachments or other file types, such as
XML, and completing metadata
information are available through the
CISS tool user guide.
4. Completing the submission to EPA.
The CISS tool also allows the user to
choose ‘‘Print,’’ ‘‘Save,’’ or ‘‘Transmit
through CDX.’’ When ‘‘Transmission
through CDX’’ is selected, the user is
asked to provide the user name and
password that was created during the
CDX registration process. The CISS tool
then encrypts the file and submits it via
CDX.
F. How must TSCA section 5 NOCs and
support documents relating to legacy
TSCA section 5 notices be submitted to
EPA?
EPA is requiring that NOCs and
support documents relating to legacy
TSCA section 5 notices be submitted to
EPA using the same process as
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72821
described in 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2), see
Unit II.A.3. All NOCs and support
documents are required to be generated
using e-PMN software and be completed
through the finalization step of the
software. See the e-PMN final rule (Ref.
2) for more detailed information on the
process for submitting NOCs and
support documents.
G. How must CBI be submitted using
CISS?
All information sent by the submitter
via CDX is transmitted securely to
protect CBI. The CISS tool enables the
user to submit CBI in an electronic
format. The CISS tool also guides the
user through the process of submitting
CBI by prompting the submitter to check
a CBI box if using an electronic form or
by submitting a sanitized document
containing CBI by bracketing,
underlining, or otherwise marking the
confidential information on the
document to be submitted prior to
scanning. The submitter must provide a
sanitized non-CBI document and CBI
document. Documents containing
information claimed as CBI must be
submitted in an electronic format, in
accordance with the recordkeeping
requirements (Ref. 3) and the following
regulations:
1. TSCA section 4 test rules and ECAs.
Documents required under TSCA
section 4 that may contain information
claimed as CBI include study plans
submitted in accordance with test rules
(40 CFR 790.50) and study plans
submitted in accordance with an ECA
(40 CFR 790.62). The CISS tool allows
the submitter to indicate whether a
study plan contains information
claimed as CBI by checking the
appropriate box. The submitter then is
prompted to submit the study plan
document in an electronic format. The
submitter must indicate which
information in the study plan contains
information claimed as CBI by marking
the specific information claimed as
confidential and designating it with the
words ‘‘confidential business
information,’’ ‘‘trade secret,’’ or another
appropriate phrase in the document
prior to scanning. Subsequently, if CBI
is claimed in either a study plan for test
rules or an ECA, the submitter is
prompted by the CISS tool to
substantiate those claims by answering
the substantiating questions pursuant to
40 CFR 790.7 in a document submitted
in an electronic format.
2. TSCA section 8(a). The CISS tool
includes areas for indicating CBI on
Form 7710–35, Manufacturer’s Report,
(40 CFR 712.28 and 712.30). If CBI is
indicated on Form 7710–35,
Manufacturer’s Report, the CISS tool
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
72822
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
requires the submitter to certify that the
confidentially statements are true by
prompting the submitter to select the
‘‘Confidentiality Certification
Statement.’’ The Dioxins/Furans Report
Form (Form 7710–51) and instructions
for downloading the form required
under 40 CFR part 766 are available
online at https://www.epa.gov/oppt/
chemtest/ereporting/.
3. TSCA section 8(d). Documents
submitted under TSCA section 8(d) that
contain information claimed as CBI
must be indicated as such by using the
CISS tool. The CISS tool allows the
submitter to indicate if the document
contains CBI by checking the
appropriate box. Then, the submitter is
prompted to submit the document in an
electronic format. In submitting a
document that contains CBI, the CISS
tool prompts the submitter to submit
two copies of the document in an
electronic format. The copy containing
CBI must identify the confidential
information by bracketing or
underlining the information and
labeling the copy ‘‘confidential,’’
‘‘proprietary,’’ or ‘‘trade secret.’’ The
non-CBI second copy needs to have all
confidential information deleted. Once
CBI is claimed, the CISS tool prompts
the submitter to substantiate their
claims (40 CFR 716.55).
The CISS tool user guide also
instructs users on how to submit and
substantiate CBI information.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
H. How will the agency provide
opportunities for potential users to
become familiar with the reporting tool?
The Agency will offer a webinar open
to the public for potential users to
become familiar with the CISS tool
before its release following publication
of this final rule. The webinar will be
recorded and available at https://
www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/
index.html. There will also be beta
testing to allow submitters to become
familiar with the CISS tool on their own
and to provide comments to the Agency
on its functionality and performance.
IV. Economic Analysis
The Agency’s estimated economic
impact of this final rule is presented in
a document entitled ‘‘Economic
Analysis for the Electronic Reporting
under Toxic Substance Control Act
(TSCA) Final Rule’’ (Economic
Analysis) (Ref. 4) a copy of which is
available in the docket and is briefly
summarized in this unit.
EPA estimates that this final rule will
result in cost savings to the affected
companies because the time required to
enter, review, edit, and submit their
reports using CDX will be reduced
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:12 Dec 03, 2013
Jkt 232001
compared to the existing paper-based
process.
EPA estimates that this final rule will
result in total cost to the industry of
approximately $14,061 in year 1 and a
cost savings of $66,834 in each
subsequent year. The cost savings in
subsequent years are greater than those
in year 1 because of the one-time CDX
registration costs incurred at the initial
submission. EPA assumes that industry
will continue to realize cost savings
each additional year.
EPA estimates that the Agency also
will experience a reduction in the cost
to administer submissions of data under
TSCA in the long-run. Due to the onetime development cost of $200,000 for
CDX in year 1 and an annual CDX
Operations and Maintenance (O&M)
cost of $57,353, EPA will incur a cost
of $197,918 in year 1, after accounting
for $59,435 in savings resulting from the
burden reductions associated with
electronic processing of submissions
within the Agency. In subsequent years,
EPA will incur the $57,353 annually in
operations and maintenance costs,
resulting in Agency savings of $2,082 a
year in subsequent years.
EPA received 9,280 TSCA section 5
supporting documents between April 1,
2005 and June 22, 2011, with an average
of 1,510 supporting documents each
year. EPA assumed that the impact of
this final rule relating to the submission
of TSCA section 5 supporting
documents would be very minimal
given that industry has already
undertaken electronic submission of
such supplemental materials.
V. Response to Comments
The Agency received comments from
two persons on the proposed rule for
electronic reporting for TSCA
submissions. One was an anonymous
comment expressing support for
electronic reporting and the other
comment was from an industry trade
association. Copies of all comments
received are available in the docket for
this action. The comments received on
the proposed rule did not result in EPA
making significant changes to the final
rule. A discussion of the comments
germane to the rulemaking and the
Agency’s responses follow:
Comment 1: Phased-in the electronic
reporting requirements. One commenter
stated that EPA must phase-in the
electronic reporting requirements. The
commenter stated that EPA should
conduct adequate beta testing, and then
should accept paper submissions as
well as electronic ones for at least a 2year phase-in period. They said that it
is essential to avoid excessive burden on
submitters, as well as to avoid placing
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the regulated community in the position
of potential late submission or
noncompliance related to reporting
system obstacles. In addition, the
commenter asserted that EPA’s logs of
calls to its hotline for the Chemical Data
Reporting Rule (CDR) reporting will
demonstrate objectively the nature and
level of problems that users have
encountered in this electronic reporting
system, which was mandatory and was
not phased-in. They asserted that their
member companies have spent time
working through the new CDR
electronic reporting system, consulting
with EPA’s help desk and other staff,
and otherwise addressing the various
issues presented by the mandatory
electronic reporting under CDR.
The commenter stated that phasing-in
is necessary to allow EPA to work with
users to ensure that the system is
practical, user-friendly, and free of
errors. Based on the commenter’s
experience with developing CDR
submissions, they noted that it is
important that persons other than an
Authorized Official (AO) are able to
make submissions as appropriate in any
electronic system, as they also do with
paper submissions.
The commenter strongly urged EPA to
continue to allow submissions through
alternative means for at least a phase-in
period. The phase-in period should
follow a thorough beta-testing period.
Furthermore, they noted that EPA
should consider allowing alternative
means of submission on a case-by-case
basis. It is possible that future rules
under TSCA sections 4 and 8 will affect
entities that have not done prior TSCA
submissions or even used CDX. They
noted that such entities should not be
forced to use any electronic submission
system (particularly in a short time
frame) unless and until the system is
proved to be foolproof, efficient, and
user-friendly.
EPA Response: EPA is mandating
certain electronic reporting under TSCA
in this final rule because EPA believes
that the benefits of filing submissions
electronically are substantial, in terms
of data quality and timeliness of
processing and public data availability
and for records management. The
Agency also notes that paper
submissions contain errors that can be
caught with forms associated with
electronic submissions thus increasing
data reliability. Although EPA
acknowledges the initial burdens
incurred with registering submitters in
CDX and in learning how to use the
CISS tool, EPA has received very
positive feedback from industry
submitters for the CDR Rule. Submitters
have conveyed that the electronic
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
reporting tool for that program,
eCDRweb, while experiencing some
initial performance issues, is far
superior to previous electronic reporting
applications used by EPA. EPA believes
that, as more TSCA submitters register
with CDX and gain experience with the
CISS tool, concerns with using the
electronic reporting tool will diminish.
With regard to IT-related issues that
arose during the CDR reporting, EPA
acknowledges that there were some
issues in the registration process early
in the reporting period, and that CDX
registrants were unfamiliar with the
registration process and how the
reporting tool worked. EPA responded
to issues reported through the CDX help
desk, the CDR help desk and the TSCA
hotline in a timely manner with patches
to the system. Most of the issues
involved delays in CDX registration,
with the need to reset passwords in the
system, and in some cases with issues
related to using the XML schema
provided by EPA.
The CDX system has been in
operation for over 10 years and during
that time, EPA has continued to
improve the registration process so that
it is more efficient for users. For
example, EPA found that accepting the
Electronic Signature Agreements of CDX
registered submitters under Toxic
Release Inventory for those registering
in CDX as TSCA submitters significantly
reduced the burden associated with the
CDX registration process. EPA expects
eventually to achieve a one-time
registration process for all Agency
submitters, not just for those under
TSCA, in CDX and is exploring other
ways to streamline the CDX registration
process.
EPA strongly encourages TSCA
submitters to register with CDX in
advance so that they are in a position to
report when the need arises. EPA also
encourages that multiple submitters in
each company register as AO with CDX
so that an alternate AO will be able to
make the submission in a timely manner
in the event that one of the registered
AO CDX users is unavailable. It is
critical that AO be individuals who can
make submissions on behalf of their
company in order to comply with CrossMedia Electronic Reporting Regulation
(Ref. 5).
EPA understands the commenter’s
interest in beta testing and agrees that
providing the regulated community
with opportunities to learn how to use
the CISS tool and provide feedback is
beneficial. Through these opportunities,
submitters will gain experience with its
functionalities and operation, and EPA
can make refinements as necessary. In
response to this comment, EPA has
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:12 Dec 03, 2013
Jkt 232001
established a 90-day time frame between
the publication date and effective date
of this final rule rather than a 30- or 60day time frame, in order to facilitate
compliance with the final rule’s
effective date. During the 90 days, EPA
will offer webinars and training
opportunities for submitters to gain
experience with the reporting tool and
CDX. EPA also conducted webinars for
TSCA section 8(a) on September 18,
2012, and for TSCA section 8(d) on May
22, 2012, and September 20, 2012.
During these webinars, industry
representatives had the opportunity to
familiarize themselves with both CDX
and CISS and ask questions regarding
their functionality. EPA is
implementing best practices and
procedures and adding technologies to
closely monitor the performance of the
CISS tool and accelerate resolution of
any problems that may arise with the
tool. Performance status and scheduled
updates to the CDX registration process
and the CISS tool will be made available
on the EPA electronic reporting Web
site available online at https://
www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/
index.html. Use of a web-based
reporting tool provides assurance that
upgrades to the system are seamless to
the user, minimizing downtime and
disruptions to the reporting process.
EPA is committed to ensuring that the
gap between incident and response is
minimal.
In light of the substantial
disadvantages associated with paper
submissions, and with the reporting tool
improvements and training
opportunities, EPA does not believe it is
necessary to phase-in electronic
reporting for TSCA sections 4 and 8. As
a practical matter, electronic reporting
requirements covered under this final
rule are invoked by individual rules that
are not promulgated under a set
schedule and may not have ongoing
reporting requirements (e.g., annual
reporting), so it would be difficult to
phase-in electronic reporting
requirements. Further, the phase-in
period in place for TSCA section 5
notices is completed therefore the
regulated community is familiar with
the ePMN software and an additional
phase-in period is not needed. In
addition, EPA and many regulated
entities have gained experience with
electronic reporting under TSCA and
EPA believes that phasing would
accommodate only a small number of
new reporters, while potentially
confusing those submitters already
filing electronically under other TSCA
requirements. It would also impose
burden on EPA to manage both paper
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72823
and electronic systems. EPA believes
that by providing additional time to
register in CDX before this final rule
becomes effective, continuing to
improve registration and help desk
functions, and by offering training
opportunities to industry, both new and
experienced submitters will be able to
successfully report electronically to EPA
and be aware of the status of submitted
data, reports, and other documents.
Comment 2: Information about EPA’s
plans for offering electronic reporting
for TSCA sections 8(e) and 12(b). One
commenter requested that EPA explain
its plans for electronic reporting under
TSCA section 8(e) and 12(b),
particularly since EPA has been
demonstrating its software for electronic
reporting of TSCA section 8(e)
submissions.
The commenter suggested that EPA
establish voluntary electronic reporting
options for submissions under TSCA
section 8(e) and for export notifications
under TSCA section 12(b). The
commenter noted that electronic
reporting should be voluntary, not
mandatory, due to the short timeframes
for reporting and the ongoing potential
for submissions to be made by first-time
reporters. Also, the commenter noted
that voluntary electronic reporting
would allow companies to use any
internal systems they may have already
developed to accomplish export
notification, at least until they are able
to revise the systems to accommodate
electronic reporting to EPA.
EPA Response: EPA will announce
the availability of an electronic
reporting option for use both by those
who are required to submit a
notification of substantial risk under
TSCA section 8(e) and by those who
wish to voluntarily submit related FYI
notifications. EPA is also considering
extending electronic reporting for TSCA
section 12(b) export notifications but is
not announcing the availability of such
a reporting method at this time.
Comment 3: Correspondence through
CDX. The commenter noted to EPA that
such correspondence could be useful,
depending on its format and method of
delivery. However, the commenter
noted that EPA should not rely solely on
CDX as the sole means of
communication, and requested that any
material correspondence relating to
submissions under TSCA sections 4 and
8(d) rules should be transmitted by
traditional means (e.g., letter and/or
email as appropriate) as well as through
CDX. Finally, it was noted that it is very
important that any reporting system
include a clear mechanism for
documented acknowledgement from
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
72824
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
EPA that a submission has been
received.
EPA Response: EPA acknowledges
that CDX correspondence with TSCA
submitters is limited. EPA is
considering options to enhance CDX
correspondence functionalities,
including offering the ability to conduct
two-way emailing between submitters
and EPA in a secure environment. EPA
will continue to allow TSCA submitters
to correspond with EPA about their
electronically reported TSCA
submissions through email and certified
mail after the submission and all related
materials are electronically reported
through CDX. CDX does create and store
a Copy of Record of the original
submission and any amendments made
by the submitter. This functionality
provides records management benefits
for EPA as well as the regulated
community and other stakeholders who
make TSCA submissions.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
VI. References
As indicated under ADDRESSES, a
docket has been established for this
final rule under docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OPPT–2011–0519. The following is
a listing of the documents that are
specifically referenced in this action.
The docket includes these documents
and other information considered by
EPA, including documents that are
referenced within the documents that
are included in the docket, even if the
referenced document is not physically
located in the docket. For assistance in
locating these other documents, please
consult the technical contact listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
1. EPA. Electronic Reporting Under the
Toxic Substances Control Act; Proposed
Rule. Federal Register (77 FR 22707, April
17, 2012) (FRL–9337–5).
2. EPA. TSCA Section 5 Premanufacture
and Significant New Use Notification
Electronic Reporting; Revisions to
Notification Regulations; Final Rule. Federal
Register (75 FR 773, January 6, 2010) (FRL–
8794–5).
3. Transfer of Records to the National
Archives of the United States. 36 CFR part
1235.
4. EPA. Economic Analysis for the
Electronic Reporting under Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) Final Rule. June 17,
2013.
5. EPA. Cross-Media Electronic Reporting;
Final Rule. Federal Register (70 FR 59855,
October 13, 2005) (FRL–7977–1).
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
This action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order 12866, entitled
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:12 Dec 03, 2013
Jkt 232001
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993), and is
therefore not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Orders 12866
and 13563, entitled ‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review’’ (76
FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
EPA has prepared an Economic
Analysis for this action, which is
contained in a document entitled
‘‘Economic Analysis for the Electronic
Reporting under Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) Final Rule’’ (Ref. 4).
A copy of the Economic Analysis is
available in the docket for this final rule
and is summarized in Unit IV.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements (ICR) contained in this
final rule have been submitted for OMB
approval under PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq. The ICR document prepared by
EPA, identified under EPA ICR No.
2412.02 and OMB Control No. 2070–
0183, is available in the docket for this
final rule. The ICR addresses the
incremental changes to the four
currently approved ICR documents that
cover the existing reporting and
recordkeeping programs that are
approved under OMB control numbers
2070–0004, 2070–0012, 2070–0033, and
2070–0054. An agency may not conduct
or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The amended
information collection activities
contained in this final rule are designed
to assist the Agency in meeting its
responsibility under TSCA to receive,
process, and review reports, data, and
other information. Thus, submissions in
response to the collection of information
covered by these ICRs are mandatory
and respondents are required to use the
CISS tool, except for TSCA section 5
submissions, which require the use of
the existing electronic e-PMN software.
Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
The ICR document for this final rule
provides a detailed presentation of the
estimated burden and costs for the first
year of the program. The rule-related
burden and cost to chemical
manufacturers, importers, and
processors who would submit notices to
the Agency for review is summarized
here. The projected total burden to
industry is 1,228 hours per year for the
first year of the final rule. This includes
an estimated average burden per
response of 0.9 hours for CDX
registration, 1.8 hours for requesting a
CDX electronic signature, and 0.8 hours
for final rule familiarization.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq., the Agency hereby
certifies that this final rule will not have
a significant adverse economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
Small entities include small
businesses, small organizations, and
small governmental jurisdictions. For
purposes of assessing the impacts of this
final rule on small entities, small entity
is defined as:
1. A small business as defined by the
Small Business Administration’s (SBA)
regulations at 13 CFR 121.201.
2. A small governmental jurisdiction
that is a government of a city, county,
town, school district, or special district
with a population of less than 50,000.
3. A small organization that is any
not-for-profit enterprise, which is
independently owned and operated and
is not dominant in its field.
In determining whether a rule has a
significant adverse economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities,
an agency may certify that a rule will
not have a significant adverse economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities if the rule relieves regulatory
burden, or otherwise has a positive
economic effect on all of the small
entities subject to the rule.
This final rule is expected to reduce
the existing regulatory burden. The
factual basis for the Agency’s
certification is presented in the small
entity impact analysis prepared as part
of the Economic Analysis for this final
rule, and is briefly summarized in Unit
IV. EPA analyzed reporting data that
identified individual companies
submitting information under TSCA
sections 4, 5, 8(a), or 8(d) and identified
those companies potentially affected by
this final rule that qualify for the small
business status. EPA estimated the cost
impact ratios for small parent entities
potentially affected by this final rule
and has determined that the estimated
regulatory costs represent a small
impact of less than 1% of their annual
revenue. The estimated ratios range
from less than 0.0001% to 0.014%,
depending on the NAICS sector and
employment size category, with an
average of 0.001%. No small parent
entities are expected to have a cost
impact of greater than 1% of annual
revenue. Since the estimated regulatory
costs represent a small fraction of a
typical parent entity’s revenue (i.e., less
than 1%), the impacts of this final rule
are likely to be minimal.
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C.
1531–1538, requires Federal agencies,
unless otherwise prohibited by law, to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This final rule does not contain a
Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures of $100 million or more
for State, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or the private sector in
any 1 year. EPA estimates that this final
rule will result in total private sector
cost of approximately $14,061 in year 1
and a cost savings of $66,834 in each
subsequent year (Ref. 4). State, local,
and tribal governments have not been
affected by the TSCA sections 4, 5, 8(a),
and 8(d) reporting requirements, and are
not expected to be affected by this final
rule. Thus, this final rule is not subject
to the requirements of UMRA sections
202 or 205. This final rule is also not
subject to the requirements of UMRA
section 203 because it contains no
regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
E. Executive Order 13132
This action does not have a
substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This final rule does not have tribal
implications because it is not expected
to have substantial direct effects on
Indian Tribes. This final rule does not
significantly nor uniquely affect the
communities of Indian Tribal
governments nor does it involve or
impose any requirements that affect
Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to his final rule.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
G. Executive Order 13045
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because this action is
not an economically significant
regulatory action as defined by E.O.
12866, and this action does not address
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:12 Dec 03, 2013
Jkt 232001
environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children.
This final rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, entitled
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because this action is not
expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use and because this
action is not a significant regulatory
action under E.O. 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Since this action does not involve any
technical standards, section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), 15
U.S.C. 272 note, does not apply to this
action.
This final rule does not entail special
consideration of environmental justice
related issues as delineated by
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA is
submitting a report containing this rule
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 712,
716, 720, 721, 723, 725, 766, 790, and
799
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Business and industry, Chemicals,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: November 19, 2013.
James Jones,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical
Safety and Pollution Prevention.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1. The authority citation for part 712
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2607(a).
2. In § 712.3, add new paragraphs (q)
and (r) to read as follows:
■
§ 712.3
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(q) Central Data Exchange or CDX
means EPA’s centralized electronic
submission receiving system.
(r) Chemical Information Submission
System or CISS means EPA’s electronic,
web-based reporting tool for the
completion and submission of data,
reports, and other information, or its
successors.
■ 3. In § 712.28, revise paragraphs (c)
and (d) and add new paragraph (e) to
read as follows:
§ 712.28
Form and instructions.
*
J. Executive Order 12898
Frm 00035
PART 712—[AMENDED]
■
H. Executive Order 13211
PO 00000
72825
*
*
*
*
(c) Persons authorized to report
information under this subpart must
include the following information on
Form 7710–35, Manufacturer’s Report—
Preliminary Assessment Information
(Manufacturer’s Report):
(1) A certification as to the truth and
accuracy of the information reported
signed and dated by an authorized
person located at the plant site or
corporate headquarters of the
respondent company.
(2) A confidentiality statement signed
and dated by an authorized person
located at the plant site or corporate
headquarters of the respondent
company.
(3) The specific chemical name and
Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)
Registry Number listed in 40 CFR
712.30.
(4) The name, company, address, city,
State, ZIP code, and telephone number
of a person who is submitting the form,
which may be a person located at a
plant site or corporate headquarters that
will serve as the respondent, and will be
able to answer questions about the
information submitted by the company
to EPA. A respondent to this subpart
must include the appropriate Dun and
Bradstreet Number for each plant site
reported.
(5) The plant site activities, such as
the manufacturing of a chemical
substance, including the total quantity
of the chemical substance (in kilograms)
imported in bulk during the reporting
period.
(6) The total number of workers and
total worker-hours in each process
category, which includes enclosed
process, controlled release process, and
open process.
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
72826
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(7) The information related to
chemical substance processing by
customers, including customers’ use in
industrial and consumer products, the
market names under which the
chemical substance is manufactured or
imported, and the customer’s process
categories that are sold to customers for
further processing.
(d) Persons must use the CISS tool to
complete and submit Form 7710–35,
Manufacturer’s Report, and
accompanying letters, via CDX.
Submission requires registration with
CDX, and must be made only as set forth
in this section.
(e) To access the CISS tool go to
https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/
PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx
and follow the appropriate links, and for
further instructions to go https://
www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/
index.html.
■ 4. In § 712.30, revise paragraphs
(a)(3)(i), (a)(3)(ii), and (c)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 712.30 Chemical lists and reporting
periods.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i)(A) The respondent has previously
and voluntarily provided EPA with a
Manufacturer’s Report on a chemical
substance or mixture subject to subpart
B of this part, which contains data for
a 1-year period ending no more than 3
years prior to the effective date
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section. Respondents meeting this
condition must notify EPA by letter of
their desire to have the voluntary
submission used in lieu of a current
data submission and must verify the
completeness and current accuracy of
the voluntarily submitted data. Such
letters, sent in accordance with the
method specified in § 712.28(d) to EPA,
must contain the following language:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, all information entered
on this form is complete and accurate. I agree
to permit access to, and the copying of
records by, a duly authorized representative
of the EPA Administrator, in accordance with
the Toxic Substances Control Act, to
document any information reported on the
form.
(B) Notification letters must be
submitted in accordance with the
method specified in § 712.28(d) prior to
the reporting deadline.
(ii)(A) The respondent has previously
submitted a Manufacturer’s Report on a
chemical substance or mixture subject
to subpart B of this part to the
Interagency Testing Committee, but not
to EPA, and that Manufacturer’s Report
contained data for a 1-year period
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:12 Dec 03, 2013
Jkt 232001
ending less than 3 years prior to the
effective date described in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section. Respondents
meeting this condition must submit a
copy of the Manufacture’s Report, in
accordance with the method specified
in § 712.28(d) to EPA, and must submit
an accompanying letter, also in
accordance with the methods specified
in § 712.28(d), notifying EPA of the
respondent’s intent that the submission
be used in lieu of a current
Manufacturer’s Report. The notification
letter must verify the completeness and
current accuracy of the voluntarily
submitted data. Such a letter must
contain the following language:
I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, all information entered
on this form is complete and accurate. I agree
to permit access to, and the copying of
records by, a duly authorized representative
of the EPA Administrator, in accordance with
the Toxic Substances Control Act, to
document any information reported on the
form.
(B) The submission must be made
prior to the reporting deadline.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) You must submit the information
using the method specified in
§ 712.28(d).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 716—[AMENDED]
5. The authority citation for part 716
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2607(d).
6. In § 716.3, add the following
definitions in alphabetical order to read
as follows:
■
§ 716.3
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Central Data Exchange or CDX means
EPA’s centralized electronic submission
receiving system.
Chemical Information Submission
System or CISS means EPA’s electronic,
web-based tool for the completion and
submission of data, reports, and other
information, or its successors.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. In § 716.30, revise paragraph (c) and
add new paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
§ 716.30
Submission of copies of studies.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Persons must use the CISS tool to
complete and submit all data, reports,
and other information required by 40
CFR part 716, via CDX. Submission
requires registration with CDX, and
must be made only as set forth in this
section.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(d) To access the CISS tool go to
https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/
PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx
and follow the appropriate links and for
further instructions to go https://
www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/
index.html.
■ 8. In § 716.35, revise paragraph (c) and
add new paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
§ 716.35
Submission of lists of studies.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Persons must use the CISS tool to
complete and submit all data, reports,
and other information required by 40
CFR part 716, via CDX. Submission
requires registration with CDX, and
must be made only as set forth in this
section.
(d) To access the CISS tool go to
https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/
PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx
and follow the appropriate links and for
further instructions to go https://
www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/
index.html.
■ 9. In § 716.55, revise paragraph (b)(3)
to read as follows:
§ 716.55
Confidentiality claims.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Failure to furnish a second copy
when information is claimed as
confidential in the first copy will be
considered a presumptive waiver of the
claim of confidentiality. EPA will notify
the respondent by certified mail that a
finding of a presumptive waiver of the
claim of confidentiality has been made.
The respondent will be given 30 days
from the date of his or her receipt of this
notification to submit the required
second copy in accordance with the
method specified in § 716.30(d). If the
respondent fails to submit the second
copy within the 30 days, EPA will place
the first copy in the docket.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. In § 716.60, revise paragraphs (a),
(b)(2), (c), and (d), and add new
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 716.60
Reporting schedule.
(a) General requirements. Except as
provided in § 716.5 and paragraphs (b)
and (c) of this section, submissions
under §§ 716.30 and 716.35 must be
submitted using the electronic method
specified in §§ 716.30(c) and 716.35(c),
on or before 60 days after the effective
date of the listing of a substance or
mixture in § 716.120 or within 60 days
of proposing to manufacture (including
import) or process a listed substance or
listed mixture (including as a known
byproduct) if first done after the
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
effective date of the substance or
mixture being listed in § 716.120.
(b) * * *
(2) Submission of copies of completed
studies. Persons must submit studies
listed as ongoing or initiated under
§ 716.35(a)(1) and (2) within 30 days of
completing the study, using the method
specified in §§ 716.30(c) and 716.35(c).
(c) Requests for extensions of time.
Respondents who cannot meet a
deadline under this section may apply
for a reasonable extension of time.
Extension requests must be submitted
on or before 40 days after the effective
date of the listing of a substance or
mixture in § 716.120, using the
electronic method specified in
§§ 716.30(c) and 716.35(c). The Director
of EPA’s Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics will grant or deny extension
requests.
(d) Submission methods. Persons
must use the CISS tool to complete and
submit all data, reports, and other
information required by 40 CFR part
716, via CDX. Submission requires
registration with CDX, and must be
made only as set forth in this section.
(e) To access the CISS tool go to
https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/
PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx
and follow the appropriate links and for
further instructions to go https://
www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/
index.html.
■ 11. In § 716.105, revise paragraph (d)
and add new paragraph (e) to read as
follows:
§ 716.105 Additions of substances and
mixtures to which this subpart applies.
*
*
*
*
(d) Persons who wish to submit
information that shows why a substance
should be withdrawn must submit their
comments by using the CISS tool to
complete and submit all data, reports,
and other information required by 40
CFR part 716, via CDX. Submission
requires registration with CDX, and
must be made only as set forth in this
section.
(e) To access the CISS tool go to
https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/
PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx
and follow the appropriate links and for
further instructions to go https://
www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/
index.html.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
PART 720—[AMENDED]
12. The authority citation for part 720
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and 2613.
13. In § 720.40:
a. Remove paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and
(a)(2)(ii).
■
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:12 Dec 03, 2013
Jkt 232001
b. Redesignate paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)
and (a)(2)(iv) as paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and
(a)(2)(ii).
■ c. Revise newly redesignated
paragraph (a)(2)(i).
■ d. Revise paragraph (c).
The amendments read as follows:
■
§ 720.40
General.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Submission via CDX. TSCA section
5 notices and any related support
documents must be submitted
electronically to EPA via CDX. Prior to
submission to EPA via CDX, such
notices must be generated and
completed on EPA Form 7710–25 using
e-PMN software. To obtain a version of
e-PMN software that contains an
encryption module you must register
with CDX. A version without encryption
may be downloaded without registering
with CDX.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Where to submit a notice or
support documents. For submitting
notices or support documents via CDX,
use the e-PMN software.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 14. In § 720.75, revise paragraphs
(b)(2) and (e)(1) to read as follows:
§ 720.75
Notice review period.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) A request for suspension may only
be submitted in a manner set forth in
this paragraph. The request for
suspension also may be made orally,
including by telephone, to the
submitter’s EPA contact for that notice,
subject to paragraph (b)(3) of this
section. Requests for suspension may be
submitted electronically to EPA via
CDX. Such requests must be generated
and completed using e-PMN software.
See § 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on
how to obtain e-PMN software.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Withdrawal of a notice by the
submitter. (1)(i) A submitter may
withdraw a notice during the notice
review period by submitting a statement
of withdrawal in a manner set forth in
this paragraph. The withdrawal is
effective upon receipt by EPA of the
CDX submission.
(ii) Submission of withdrawal notices.
EPA will accept statements of
withdrawal only if submitted in
accordance with this paragraph.
Statements of withdrawal must be
generated, completed, and submitted to
EPA (via CDX) using e-PMN software.
See § 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on
how to obtain e-PMN software.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72827
15. In § 720.102:
a. Remove paragraph (d)(1).
b. Designate the introductory text of
paragraph (d) as paragraph (d)(1).
■ c. Revise paragraph (d)(2).
The amendments read as follows:
■
■
■
§ 720.102 Notice of commencement of
manufacture or import.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) Submission of notice of
commencement. EPA will accept
notices of commencement only if
submitted in accordance with this
paragraph. All notices of
commencement must be submitted
electronically to EPA via CDX. Prior to
submission to EPA via CDX, such
notices of commencement must be
generated and completed using e-PMN
software. See § 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for
information on how to obtain e-PMN
software.
PART 721—[AMENDED]
16. The authority citation for part 721
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and
2625(c).
17. In § 721.30, revise the introductory
text of paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 721.30 EPA approval of alternative
control measures.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Persons submitting a request for a
determination of equivalency to EPA
under this part must submit the request
to EPA via CDX using e-PMN software
in the manner set forth in 40 CFR
720.40(a)(2)(i). See 40 CFR
720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on how
to obtain e-PMN software. Support
documents related to these requests
must be submitted in the manner set
forth in 40 CFR 720.40(c). A request for
a determination of equivalency must
contain:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 18. In § 721.185, revise paragraph
(b)(1) to read as follows:
§ 721.185 Limitation or revocation of
certain notification requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Any affected person may request
modification or revocation of significant
new use notification requirements for a
chemical substance that has been added
to subpart E of this part using the
procedures described in §§ 721.160 or
721.170 by submitting a request that is
accompanied by information sufficient
to support the request. Persons
submitting a request to EPA under this
part must submit the request to EPA
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
72828
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
using e-PMN software in the manner set
forth in 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(i). See 40
CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on
how to obtain the e-PMN software.
Support documents related to these
requests must also be submitted to EPA
in the manner set forth in 40 CFR
720.40(c).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 723—[AMENDED]
19. The authority citation for part 723
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604.
20. In § 723.50, revise paragraph (e)(1)
to read as follows:
■
§ 723.50 Chemical substances
manufactured in quantities of 10,000
kilograms or less per year, and chemical
substances with low environmental
releases and human exposures.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) A manufacturer applying for an
exemption under either paragraph (c)(1)
or (c)(2) of this section must submit an
exemption notice to EPA at least 30
days before manufacture of the new
chemical substance begins. Exemption
notices and modifications must be
submitted to EPA on EPA Form No.
7710–25 via CDX using e-PMN software
in the manner set forth in this
paragraph. See 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii)
for information on how to obtain e-PMN
software. Notices and any related
support documents, must be generated
and completed (via CDX) using e-PMN
software. See 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for
information on how to obtain e-PMN
software.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 725—[AMENDED]
21. The authority citation for part 725
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, 2613, and
2625.
22. In § 725.25, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
■
§ 725.25 General administrative
requirements.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Where to submit information
under this part. MCANs and exemption
requests, and any support documents
related to these submissions, may only
be submitted in a manner set forth in
this paragraph. MCANs and exemption
requests, and any related support
documents, must be generated,
completed, and submitted to EPA (via
CDX) using e-PMN software. See 40 CFR
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:12 Dec 03, 2013
Jkt 232001
720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on how
to obtain e-PMN software.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 23. In § 725.54, revise paragraphs (b)
and (d) to read as follows:
§ 725.54
Suspension of the review period.
*
*
*
*
*
(b)(1) Request for suspension. A
request for suspension may only be
submitted in a manner set forth in this
paragraph. The request for suspension
also may be made orally, including by
telephone, to the submitter’s EPA
contact for that notice, subject to
paragraph (c) of this section.
(2) Submission of suspension notices.
EPA will accept requests for suspension
only if submitted in accordance with
this paragraph. Requests for suspension,
must be generated, completed, and
submitted to EPA (via CDX) using ePMN software. See 40 CFR
720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on how
to obtain e-PMN software.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) If the submitter has not made a
previous oral request, the running of the
notice review period is suspended as of
the date of receipt of the CDX
submission by EPA.
■ 24. In § 725.60, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 725.60 Withdrawal of submission by the
submitter.
(a)(1) Withdrawal of notice by the
submitter. A submitter may withdraw a
notice during the notice review period
by submitting a statement of withdrawal
in a manner set forth in this paragraph.
The withdrawal is effective upon receipt
of the CDX submission by EPA.
(2) Submission of withdrawal notices.
EPA will accept statements of
withdrawal only if submitted in
accordance with this paragraph.
Statements of withdrawal must be
generated, completed, and submitted to
EPA (via CDX) using e-PMN software.
See 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for
information on how to obtain e-PMN
software.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 25. In § 725.190, revise paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
§ 725.190 Notice of commencement of
manufacture or import.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) How to submit. All notices of
commencement must be generated,
completed, and submitted to EPA (via
CDX) using e-PMN software. See 40 CFR
720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on how
to obtain e-PMN software.
■ 26. In § 725.975, revise the
introductory text of paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 725.975 EPA approval of alternative
control measures.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Persons submitting a request for a
determination of equivalency to EPA
under this part must submit the request
to EPA (via CDX) using e-PMN software.
See 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for
information on how to obtain e-PMN
software. Support documents related to
these requests must also be submitted to
EPA via CDX using e-PMN software. A
request for a determination of
equivalency must contain:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 27. In § 725.984, revise paragraph
(b)(1) to read as follows:
§ 725.984 Modification or revocation of
certain notification requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Any affected person may request
modification or revocation of significant
new use notification requirements for a
microorganism that has been added to
subpart M of this part using the
procedures described in § 725.980. The
request must be accompanied by
information sufficient to support the
request. Persons submitting a request to
EPA under this part must submit the
request to EPA (via CDX) using e-PMN
software. See 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for
information on how to obtain e-PMN
software. Support documents related to
these requests must also be submitted to
EPA via CDX using e-PMN software.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 766—[AMENDED]
28. The authority citation for part 766
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2603 and 2607.
29. In § 766.3, add the following
definitions in alphabetical order to read
as follows:
■
§ 766.3
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Central Data Exchange or CDX means
EPA’s centralized electronic submission
receiving system.
Chemical Information Submission
System or CISS means EPA’s electronic,
web-based reporting tool for the
completion and submission of data,
reports, and other information, or its
successors.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 30. Revise § 766.7 to read as follows:
§ 766.7
Submission of information.
(a) All information (including letters
of intent, protocols, data, forms, studies,
and allegations) submitted to EPA under
this part must bear the applicable Code
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
of Federal Regulations (CFR) section
number (e.g., § 766.20).
(b) You must use the CISS tool to
complete and submit all data, reports,
and other information required under
this part except for records and reports
of allegations of significant adverse
reactions, which must be submitted in
accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section.
(1) Submissions must be submitted to
EPA via CDX.
(2) To access the CISS tool go to
https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/
PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx
and follow the appropriate links and for
further instructions to go https://
www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/
index.html.
(c) You must submit records and
reports of allegations of significant
adverse reactions and the accompanying
cover letters by one of the following
methods:
(1) Mail, preferably certified, to the
Document Control Office (DCO)
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001,
ATTN: Dioxin/Furan report part 766,
Allegations of significant adverse
reactions.
(2) Hand delivery to OPPT Document
Control Office (DCO), EPA East, Rm.
6428, 1201 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC, ATTN: Dioxin/Furan
report part 766, Allegations of
significant adverse reactions. The DCO
is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
DCO is (202) 564–8930. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the DCO’s
normal hours of operation.
■ 31. In § 766.35, revise paragraph
(c)(1)(i) to read as follows:
§ 766.35
Reporting requirements.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) A completed form (EPA 7710–51)
for that chemical substance. The form
and instructions are available online at
https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/
ereporting/. One form must
be submitted for each chemical
substance for which a positive test
result has been submitted.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 790—[AMENDED]
32. The authority citation for part 790
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2603.
33. In § 790.3, add the following
definitions in alphabetical order to read
as follows:
■
13:12 Dec 03, 2013
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Central Data Exchange or CDX means
EPA’s centralized electronic submission
receiving system.
*
*
*
*
*
Chemical Information Submission
System or CISS means EPA’s electronic,
web-based tool for the completion and
submission of data, reports, and other
information, or its successors.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 34. Revise § 790.5 to read as follows:
§ 790.5
Submission of information.
(a) All submissions and
correspondence to EPA under this part
must bear the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) section number of the
subject chemical test rule consent
agreements.
(b) You must use the CISS tool to
complete and submit via CDX all data,
reports, other information, and
correspondence required by rules
promulgated under TSCA section 4, and
for correspondence pertaining to
consent agreements as required under
this part. The submissions must be
made only as set forth in this section.
(c) To access the CISS tool go to
https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/
PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx
and follow the appropriate links and for
further instructions to go https://
www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/
index.html.
■ 35. In § 790.45, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 790.45 Submission of letter of intent to
conduct testing or exemption application.
(a) No later than 30 days after the
effective date of a test rule described in
§ 790.40, each person subject to that test
rule and required to comply with the
requirements of that test rule as
provided in § 790.42(a) must, for each
test required, send his or her notice of
intent to conduct testing, or submit to
EPA an application for exemption from
testing by the method specified in
§ 790.5(b).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 36. In § 790.48, revise paragraphs
(b)(3), (b)(5), (c)(2), and (c)(3) to read as
follows:
§ 790.48 Procedure if no one submits a
letter of intent to conduct testing.
*
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
§ 790.3
Jkt 232001
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) No later than 30 days after the date
of publication of the Federal Register
notice described in paragraph (b)(2) of
this section, each person described in
§ 790.40(a)(4) and (a)(5) and each person
processing the subject chemical as of the
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72829
effective date of the test rule described
in § 790.40 or by 30 days after the date
of publication of the Federal Register
notice described in paragraph (b)(2) of
this section must, for each test specified
in the Federal Register notice, either
notify EPA of his or her intent to
conduct testing, or submit to EPA an
application for an exemption from
testing requirements for the test. Each
such notification to conduct testing or
application for exemption from testing
must be submitted to EPA by the
method specified in § 790.5(b).
*
*
*
*
*
(5) If no manufacturer or processor
submits a letter of intent to EPA through
CDX within 30 days after either receipt
of the certified letter or publication in
the Federal Register notice described in
(b)(4) of this section, all manufacturers
and processors subject to the test rule
will be in violation of the test rule from
the 31st day after receipt of the certified
letter or publication in the Federal
Register.
(c) * * *
(2) If no processor subject to the test
rule has notified EPA through CDX of its
intent to conduct one or more of the
required tests within 30 days after the
effective date of the test rule described
in § 790.40, EPA will notify all the
processors by certified mail or publish
a notice in the Federal Register of this
fact, specifying the tests for which no
letter of intent has been submitted and
to give the processors an opportunity to
take corrective action.
(3) If no processor submits a letter of
intent through CDX to conduct one or
more of the required tests within 30
days after receipt of the certified letter
or publication of the Federal Register
notice described in paragraph (c)(2) of
this section, all processors subject to the
test rule will be in violation of the test
rule from the 31st day after receipt of
the certified letter or publication of the
Federal Register notice described in
paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
■ 37. In § 790.50, revise paragraphs
(b)(1) and (e) to read as follows:
§ 790.50
Submission of study plans.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) EPA may grant requests for
additional time for the development of
study plans on a case-by-case basis.
Requests for additional time for study
plan development must be submitted to
EPA by the method specified in
§ 790.5(b). Any extension request must
state why EPA should grant the
extension.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
72830
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(e) Amendments to study plans. Test
sponsors must submit all amendments
by the method specified in § 790.5(b).
■ 38. In § 790.55, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 790.55 Modification of test standards or
schedules during conduct of test.
(a) Application. Any test sponsor who
wishes to modify the test schedule for
the mandatory testing conditions or
requirements (i.e., ‘‘shall statements’’) in
the test standard for any test required by
a test rule must submit an application
in accordance with this paragraph.
Application for modification must be
made by the method specified in
§ 790.5(b). Applications must include an
appropriate explanation and rationale
for the modification. Where a test
sponsor requests EPA to provide
guidance or to clarify a non-mandatory
testing requirement (i.e., ‘‘should
statements’’) in a test standard, the test
sponsor must submit these requests to
EPA by the method format specified in
§ 790.5(b).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 39. In § 790.62, revise paragraph (c)(4)
to read as follows:
§ 790.62 Submission of study plans and
conduct of testing.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) The test sponsor shall submit any
amendments to study plans to EPA
using the method specified in § 790.5(b).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 40. In § 790.68, revise paragraph (b)(1)
to read as follows:
§ 790.68 Modification of consent
agreements.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Any test sponsor who wishes to
modify the test schedule for any test
required under a consent agreement
must submit an application in
accordance with this paragraph.
Application for modification must be
made using the method specified in
§ 790.5(b). Applications must include an
appropriate explanation and rationale
for the modification. EPA will consider
only those applications that request
modifications to mandatory testing
conditions or requirements (‘‘shall
statements’’ in the consent agreement).
Where a test sponsor requests EPA to
provide guidance or to clarify a nonmandatory testing requirement (i.e.,
‘‘should statements’’), the test sponsor
shall submit these requests to EPA using
the method specified in § 790.5(b).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 41. In § 790.87, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:12 Dec 03, 2013
Jkt 232001
§ 790.87 Approval of exemption
applications.
§ 790.97
*
*
*
*
*
(c)(1) EPA will give exemption
applicants final notice that they have
received a conditional exemption
through one of the following ways:
(i) A final Phase II test rule that
adopts the study plans in a two-phase
rulemaking.
(ii) A separate Federal Register notice
in a single-phase rulemaking.
(iii) A letter by certified mail will give
exemption applicants final notice that
they have received a conditional
exemption.
(2) All conditional exemptions thus
granted are contingent upon the test
sponsors’ successful completion of
testing according to the specifications of
the test rule.
■ 42. In § 790.90, revise paragraph (c)(2)
to read as follows:
§ 790.90 Appeal of denial of exemption
application.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Hearing requests must be
submitted using the method specified in
§ 790.5(b) and be received by EPA
within 30 days of receipt of the
Agency’s notification under § 790.88(b).
Hearing requests must provide reasons
why a hearing is necessary.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 43. In § 790.93, revise paragraphs (c)
and (d)(2) to read as follows:
§ 790.93 Termination of conditional
exemption.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Within 30 days after receipt of a
letter notification or publication of a
notice in the Federal Register that EPA
intends to terminate a conditional
exemption, the exemption holder may
submit information using the method
specified in § 790.5(b) either to rebut
EPA’s preliminary decision or notify
EPA of its intent to conduct the required
test pursuant to the test standard
established in the test rule. Such a letter
of intent shall contain all of the
information required by § 790.45(c).
(d) * * *
(2) Hearing requests must be
submitted using the method specified in
§ 790.5(b) and must be received by EPA
within 30 days after receipt of the letter
or publication in the Federal Register
notice described in paragraph (b) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 44. In § 790.97, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Hearing procedures.
(a) Hearing requests must be
submitted using the method specified in
§ 790.5(b). Such requests must include
the applicant’s basis for appealing EPA’s
decision.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 799—[AMENDED]
45. The authority citation for part 799
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2603, 2611, and 2625.
■
46. Revise § 799.5 to read as follows:
§ 799.5
Submission of information.
(a) Information (e.g., letters, study
plans, or reports) submitted to EPA
must be submitted using the method
specified in paragraph (b) of this
section. All information submitted
under this part must bear the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) section
number of the subject chemical test rule
(e.g., § 799.1053 for trichlorobenzenes).
(b) You must use CISS to complete
and submit all data, reports, and other
information required under this part.
Submissions must be submitted to EPA
via the Central Data Exchange (CDX).
(c) To access CISS go to https://
cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/
PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx
and follow the appropriate links and for
further instructions to go https://
www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/
index.html.
[FR Doc. 2013–28510 Filed 12–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 21
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–MB–2013–0110;
FF09M21200–134–FXMB1231099BPP0]
RIN 1018–BA01
Migratory Bird Permits; Delegating
Falconry Permitting Authority to 17
States
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The States of Alabama,
California, Connecticut, Delaware,
Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana,
Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New
York, Rhode Island, South Carolina,
Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin
have requested that we delegate
permitting for falconry to the State, as
provided under our regulations. We
have reviewed regulations and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 4, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72818-72830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28510]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 712, 716, 720, 721, 723, 725, 766, 790, and 799
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0519; FRL-9394-6]
RIN 2070-AJ75
Electronic Reporting Under the Toxic Substances Control Act
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is amending certain reporting requirements that were
promulgated under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to require
the use electronic reporting. EPA is requiring the use of electronic
reporting in order to minimize the paperwork burden associated with the
underlying regulatory requirements and to minimize the cost to the
Federal Government of the creation, collection, maintenance, use,
dissemination, and disposition of information. This action will also
improve the quality and use of information to strengthen
decisionmaking, accountability, and openness in government and society,
as well as provide for the timely dissemination of public information
and in a manner that promotes the utility of the information to the
public and makes effective use of information technology.
DATES: This final rule is effective March 4, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0519 is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics (OPPT) Docket, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Docket
Center (EPA/DC), EPA West Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number of the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone
number for the OPPT Docket is (202) 566-0280. Please review the visitor
instructions and additional information about the docket available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact:
Katherine Sleasman, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-7716;
[[Page 72819]]
email address: sleasman.katherine@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture
(including import), process, or distribute in commerce chemical
substances and mixtures. Potentially affected entities may include, but
are not limited to:
Chemicals and Allied Products Manufacturers (NAICS code
32411).
Petroleum Refining (NAICS codes 325 and 32411).
If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this
action to a particular entity, consult the technical person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
II. Background
A. What action is the agency taking?
EPA is promulgating amendments to reporting requirements under TSCA
section 4 (including test rules and Enforceable Consent Agreements
(ECAs)), TSCA section 5, TSCA section 8(a) Preliminary Analysis
Information Rule (PAIR) at 40 CFR part 712, and TSCA section 8(d)
Health and Safety Data Reporting Rules at 40 CFR part 716. EPA
developed this action in accordance with its final plan for periodic
retrospective reviews of existing regulations under Executive Order
13563, entitled ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review.'' This
final rule was proposed in the Federal Register issue of April 17, 2012
(Ref. 1). The purpose of the amendments is to manage and leverage EPA's
information resources to reduce information collection burdens on the
public; increase EPA program efficiency and effectiveness; and improve
the integrity, quality, and utility of information to all users within
and outside the Agency, including capabilities for ensuring
dissemination of public information, public access to Federal
Government information, and protections for privacy and security.
This final rule is part of broader government efforts to move to
modern, electronic methods of information gathering. EPA's Chemical
Information Submission System (CISS) Web-based reporting tool and e-PMN
software enable more efficient data transmittal via the Central Data
Exchange (CDX) and reduces errors with the built-in validation
procedures. EPA believes the adoption of electronic reporting reduces
the reporting burden for submitters by reducing the cost and time
required to review, edit, and transmit data to the Agency. The resource
and time requirements to review and process data by the Agency will
also be reduced and document storage and retrieval will require fewer
resources. In addition, the final rule ensures the legal dependability
of electronically submitted documents so that they meet the needs of
the compliance and enforcement programs. The legal dependability of
electronically submitted documents is ensured by valid electronic
signatures that can be submitted into evidence, assurance that
electronic documents can be authenticated to provide evidence of what
an individual submitted and/or attested to, and assurance that
electronic signatures resist repudiation by the signatory.
The Agency is extending the TSCA section 5 electronic reporting
requirements to Notice of Commencements (NOCs) and support documents
(e.g., correspondence, amendments, and test data) relating to TSCA
section 5 notices submitted to EPA prior to April 6, 2010, the
effective date of the TSCA Section 5 Premanufacture and Significant New
Use Notification Electronic Reporting; Revisions to Notification
Regulations (Ref. 2). Previously, follow-up submissions for TSCA
section 5 notices submitted before this date were not subject to
electronic reporting requirements.
Effective March 4, 2014, EPA will only accept data, reports, and
other information subject to these rules when submitted through CDX and
the CISS tool for the submission of forms, reports, and other
documents. TSCA section 5 submissions, however, must be submitted
through CDX using e-PMN software downloaded from EPA's CDX Web site.
Data, reports, and other information not submitted in the manner
required will not be considered by EPA to have met the filing
requirements of those rules. The CISS tool is also available for use in
making voluntary submissions, such as those under Memoranda of
Understanding (MOUs), electronically, following the same procedures
described in this final rule. Submitters should register through CDX
and submit data, reports, and other documents through the CISS tool.
The final rule amends the following regulations:
1. TSCA section 4 test rules and ECAs. Documents required under
TSCA section 4 include letters of intent to conduct testing (40 CFR
790.45), extension requests (40 CFR 790.50), modification requests (40
CFR 790.55), exemption requests (40 CFR 790.80 and 40 CFR 790.82),
hearing requests (40 CFR 790.90), data required to be developed under
rules at 40 CFR part 799, and documents and correspondence related to
ECAs negotiated pursuant to 40 CFR part 790. Affected sections include
those relating to submission or modification of a study plan (40 CFR
790.62), and requests to modify the test schedule for any test required
under an ECA (40 CFR 790.68). Electronic reporting requirements for
TSCA section 4 rules and ECAs are added to 40 CFR 790.5 and 799.50. In
addition, anyone who manufactures, imports, or processes a chemical
substance under 40 CFR part 766, must test that chemical substance
immediately upon manufacture, import, or processing for the presence of
halogenated dibenzodioxins/halogenated dibenzofurans (HDDs/HDFs), and
submit all test data to EPA. A requirement for electronic reporting is
added to 40 CFR 766.35.
2. TSCA section 5. EPA is amending certain TSCA section 5 reporting
requirements that extend electronic reporting requirements to NOCs and
support documents (e.g., correspondence, amendments, and test data)
relating to TSCA section 5 notices submitted to EPA before April 6,
2010. The e-PMN final rule (Ref. 2) required submitters of NOCs and
support documents whose original notices were submitted to EPA prior to
April 6, 2010 (legacy notices) to submit those NOCs and support
documents to EPA in hard copy. At the time the final e-PMN rule was
published, EPA believed the hard copy submission of these documents was
necessary because the Agency intended to operate two different
databases; one for storing electronic TSCA section 5 notices submitted
to EPA after April 6, 2010, and another for storing legacy notices. EPA
originally intended to enter legacy notices only into EPA's ``legacy
database,'' i.e., the database used prior to April 6, 2010, and so
would not have been able to link up a subsequent NOC or support
document with its original or ``parent'' legacy notice if the
subsequent document was entered into EPA's new database.
However, since publication of the e-PMN final rule, EPA's
electronic reporting program has evolved and EPA now has the ability to
house both legacy notices and notices submitted after April 6, 2010, in
the same database. EPA is therefore amending 40 CFR parts 720,
[[Page 72820]]
721, 723, and 725 to require NOCs and support documents submitted after
March 4, 2014 for TSCA section 5 notices originally submitted prior to
April 6, 2010, to be submitted electronically allowing them to be
stored with their legacy TSCA section 5 notices in the new database.
In the e-PMN final rule, EPA phased-in electronic reporting of TSCA
section 5 notices and their related NOCs and support documents over a
2-year period that ended April 6, 2012. In this final rule, EPA is
removing the phase-in because the phase-in period is over and all TSCA
section 5 notices, NOCs, and support documents are required to be
submitted to EPA via CDX.
3. TSCA section 8(a). Electronic reporting requirements for Form
7710-35, Manufacturer's Report--Preliminary Assessment Information
(Manufacturer's Report), are added to 40 CFR 712.28 and 712.30. In
addition, electronic reporting requirements for Form 7710-51, Dioxins/
Furans Report Form, are added to 40 CFR 766.35.
4. TSCA section 8(d). Electronic submission of data, reports, and
other documents are now required under the TSCA section 8(d) Health and
Safety Data Reporting Rule at 40 CFR part 716 and the Dibenzo-Para-
Dioxins/Dibenzofurans Rule at 40 CFR part 766 (specifically 40 CFR
716.30, 716.35, 716.60, and 766.35). Additional affected sections of 40
CFR part 716 include the submission of underlying data, preliminary
reports of ongoing studies, additional copies of studies (40 CFR
716.40), requests for extension of time (40 CFR 716.60), and requests
for withdrawal of a chemical substance from a rule (40 CFR 716.105).
EPA also requires submission of allegations of significant adverse
reactions to dibenzo-para-dioxins/dibenzofurans, pursuant to 40 CFR
part 717. EPA has not received a large number of allegations of
significant adverse reactions, and therefore is not implementing a
mechanism for the electronic submission of these allegations of
significant adverse reactions using the CISS tool at this time. Anyone
subject to the applicable requirements of 40 CFR part 766 must continue
to submit to EPA paper copies of allegations of significant adverse
reactions.
B. What is the agency's authority for taking this action?
TSCA gives EPA broad authority to regulate the manufacture
(including import) and processing of chemical substances. The
underlying requirements promulgated under this broad authority and
amended by this final rule require manufacturers (including importers)
and processors of chemical substances and mixtures to:
Perform testing to generate data relevant to a
determination whether the manufacture, distribution in commerce,
processing, use, or disposal of such chemicals or mixtures presents an
unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment (TSCA section
4).
Report such data as EPA may reasonably require, including
information that is necessary to facilitate the evaluation of the
potential adverse human health and environmental effects from exposure
to identified chemical substances, mixtures, or categories (TSCA
section 8(a)).
Submit lists and/or copies of ongoing and completed
unpublished health and safety studies concerning identified chemical
substances, mixtures, or categories (TSCA section 8(d)).
Notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing the
manufacture of a new chemical substance for commercial purposes (TSCA
section 5(a)(1)(A)).
Notify EPA at least 90 days before manufacturing or
processing the chemical substance for any use of a chemical substance
that EPA has determined, by rule, to be a ``significant new use'' (TSCA
section 5(a)(2)).
In addition, the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) requires Federal
agencies to manage information resources to reduce information
collection burdens on the public; increase program efficiency and
effectiveness; and improve the integrity, quality, and utility of
information to all users within and outside an agency, including
capabilities for ensuring dissemination of public information, public
access to Federal Government information, and protections for privacy
and security (44 U.S.C. 3506). Section 2 of TSCA expresses the intent
of Congress that EPA carry out TSCA in a reasonable and prudent manner,
and in consideration of the impacts that any action taken under TSCA
may have on the environment, the economy, and society (15 U.S.C. 2601).
Electronic reporting was not available when TSCA was enacted nor when
several underlying reporting requirements were subsequently promulgated
by EPA. EPA believes that it is now reasonable and prudent to manage
and leverage its information resources, including information
technology (IT), to require the use of electronic reporting in the
implementation of certain TSCA provisions. Electronic reporting can
reduce burden and costs for the regulated entities by eliminating the
costs associated with printing and mailing this information to EPA,
while at the same time improving EPA's efficiency in reviewing
submitted information, making decisions and disseminating information
to the public.
III. Description of Changes to Reporting Procedures
This unit provides an overview of EPA's CDX, the Chemical Safety
and Pesticide Program (CSPP), the CISS tool, and the e-PMN software for
NOCs and support documents associated with legacy TSCA section 5
notices.
A. What is CDX?
CDX is EPA's centralized electronic submission receiving system.
CDX also provides the capability for submitters to access their data
through the use of web services. CDX enables EPA to work with
stakeholders, including governments, regulated industries, and the
public, to enable streamlined, electronic submission of data via the
Internet. For more information about CDX, go to https://epa.gov/cdx.
B. What is CISS?
EPA developed the CISS tool for use in submitting data, reports,
and other information under TSCA electronically to the Agency. In the
proposed rule CISS was referred to as e-TSCAweb. In this document only
the term CISS is used. The CISS tool is available for use with Windows,
Macs, Linux, and UNIX based computers, using ``Extensible Markup
Language'' (XML) specifications for efficient data transmission across
the Internet. The CISS tool provides user-friendly navigation, works
with CDX to secure online communication, creates a completed Portable
Document Format (PDF) for review prior to submission, and enables data,
reports, and other information to be submitted easily as PDF
attachments, or by other electronic standards, such as XML, and
protects Confidential Business Information (CBI) as appropriate. Over
time, there will be updates to CISS tool. The most recent version of
CISS is available online at https://epa.gov/cdx.
C. What is the e-PMN software for TSCA section 5?
EPA has developed e-PMN software for use in preparing and
submitting Premanufacture Notices (PMNs) and other TSCA section 5
notices and support documents electronically to the Agency. For further
information on the software capabilities, visit the TSCA New Chemicals
Program Web site available online at https://www.epa.gov/oppt/newchems.
Also, see the e-PMN final rule (Ref. 2) for further guidance.
[[Page 72821]]
D. What are the benefits of CDX reporting and use of the CISS tool and
the e-PMN software?
The effort to eliminate paper-based submissions in favor of CDX
reporting, including use of the CISS tool, is part of broader Federal
Government efforts to move to modern, electronic methods of information
gathering. The CISS tool and e-PMN software enable more efficient data
transmittal and reduces errors with the built-in validation procedures.
EPA believes the adoption of electronic reporting reduces the reporting
burden for submitters by reducing the cost and time required to review,
edit, and transmit data to the Agency. It also allows submitters to
share a draft submission within their organization, and more easily
save a copy for their records or future use. The resource and time
requirements to review and process data by the Agency will also be
reduced and document storage and retrieval will require fewer
resources. EPA expects to benefit from receiving electronic submissions
and communicating back electronically with submitters. In addition, the
use of CDX and the CISS tool ensures the legal dependability of
electronic reports so that they meet the needs of the compliance and
enforcement programs. The legal dependability of electronically
submitted documents is ensured by valid electronic signatures that can
be submitted into evidence, assurance that electronic documents can be
authenticated to provide evidence of what an individual submitted and/
or attested to, and assurance that electronic signatures resist
repudiation by the signatory (Ref. 3).
E. How do I submit data, reports, and other documents required under
TSCA sections 4, 8(a), and 8(d) using CDX?
This final rule requires submitters to register with EPA's CDX,
request access to CSPP, and use the CISS tool to prepare a file for
submission.
1. Registering with CDX. Registration enables CDX to authenticate
each user's identity, and to verify each user's authorization to file
official submissions to EPA on behalf of a company.
To submit electronically to EPA via CDX, individuals must first
register in CDX through EPA's Web page at https://cdx.epa.gov/epa_home.asp.
To register in CDX, the CDX registrant (also referred to as
``Electronic Signature Holder'' or ``Public/Private Key Holder'')
agrees to the terms and conditions, provides information about the
submitter and organization, selects a user name and password, selects a
program and role, and follows the procedures outlined in the CDX user
guide available on EPA's Web page at https://www.epa.gov/cdr/tools/CDX_Registration_Guide_v0_02.pdf.
Users, who have previously registered with CDX for TSCA section 5
submissions, or the Toxics Release Inventory TRI-ME web reporting, are
able to add CSPP to their current registration, and use the CISS tool.
2. Communication through CDX. Currently communication through CDX
between the submitter and EPA is focused on transactional activities,
meaning the submission of information to EPA and notification from EPA
that the submission was received. EPA is mandating that all submissions
of required materials be done through CDX but acknowledges that use of
certified mail and email for correspondence related to the submissions
is still necessary since the ability to do so within CDX is not yet
available. EPA is in the process of enhancing the CDX correspondence
functionality so the two-way emailing between submitters and EPA is
offered in a secure environment.
3. Preparing the submission. All submitters are required to use the
CISS tool to prepare their submissions. The CISS tool guides users
through a ``hands-on'' process of creating an electronic submission.
Once a user completes the relevant data fields, attaches appropriate
PDF or other file types, such as XML files, and completes metadata
information, the CISS tool validates the submission by performing a
basic error check and makes sure all the required fields and
attachments are provided and complete. Further instructions on
submitting voluntary submissions, such as under MOUs and instructions
for uploading PDF attachments or other file types, such as XML, and
completing metadata information are available through the CISS tool
user guide.
4. Completing the submission to EPA. The CISS tool also allows the
user to choose ``Print,'' ``Save,'' or ``Transmit through CDX.'' When
``Transmission through CDX'' is selected, the user is asked to provide
the user name and password that was created during the CDX registration
process. The CISS tool then encrypts the file and submits it via CDX.
F. How must TSCA section 5 NOCs and support documents relating to
legacy TSCA section 5 notices be submitted to EPA?
EPA is requiring that NOCs and support documents relating to legacy
TSCA section 5 notices be submitted to EPA using the same process as
described in 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2), see Unit II.A.3. All NOCs and support
documents are required to be generated using e-PMN software and be
completed through the finalization step of the software. See the e-PMN
final rule (Ref. 2) for more detailed information on the process for
submitting NOCs and support documents.
G. How must CBI be submitted using CISS?
All information sent by the submitter via CDX is transmitted
securely to protect CBI. The CISS tool enables the user to submit CBI
in an electronic format. The CISS tool also guides the user through the
process of submitting CBI by prompting the submitter to check a CBI box
if using an electronic form or by submitting a sanitized document
containing CBI by bracketing, underlining, or otherwise marking the
confidential information on the document to be submitted prior to
scanning. The submitter must provide a sanitized non-CBI document and
CBI document. Documents containing information claimed as CBI must be
submitted in an electronic format, in accordance with the recordkeeping
requirements (Ref. 3) and the following regulations:
1. TSCA section 4 test rules and ECAs. Documents required under
TSCA section 4 that may contain information claimed as CBI include
study plans submitted in accordance with test rules (40 CFR 790.50) and
study plans submitted in accordance with an ECA (40 CFR 790.62). The
CISS tool allows the submitter to indicate whether a study plan
contains information claimed as CBI by checking the appropriate box.
The submitter then is prompted to submit the study plan document in an
electronic format. The submitter must indicate which information in the
study plan contains information claimed as CBI by marking the specific
information claimed as confidential and designating it with the words
``confidential business information,'' ``trade secret,'' or another
appropriate phrase in the document prior to scanning. Subsequently, if
CBI is claimed in either a study plan for test rules or an ECA, the
submitter is prompted by the CISS tool to substantiate those claims by
answering the substantiating questions pursuant to 40 CFR 790.7 in a
document submitted in an electronic format.
2. TSCA section 8(a). The CISS tool includes areas for indicating
CBI on Form 7710-35, Manufacturer's Report, (40 CFR 712.28 and 712.30).
If CBI is indicated on Form 7710-35, Manufacturer's Report, the CISS
tool
[[Page 72822]]
requires the submitter to certify that the confidentially statements
are true by prompting the submitter to select the ``Confidentiality
Certification Statement.'' The Dioxins/Furans Report Form (Form 7710-
51) and instructions for downloading the form required under 40 CFR
part 766 are available online at https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/.
3. TSCA section 8(d). Documents submitted under TSCA section 8(d)
that contain information claimed as CBI must be indicated as such by
using the CISS tool. The CISS tool allows the submitter to indicate if
the document contains CBI by checking the appropriate box. Then, the
submitter is prompted to submit the document in an electronic format.
In submitting a document that contains CBI, the CISS tool prompts the
submitter to submit two copies of the document in an electronic format.
The copy containing CBI must identify the confidential information by
bracketing or underlining the information and labeling the copy
``confidential,'' ``proprietary,'' or ``trade secret.'' The non-CBI
second copy needs to have all confidential information deleted. Once
CBI is claimed, the CISS tool prompts the submitter to substantiate
their claims (40 CFR 716.55).
The CISS tool user guide also instructs users on how to submit and
substantiate CBI information.
H. How will the agency provide opportunities for potential users to
become familiar with the reporting tool?
The Agency will offer a webinar open to the public for potential
users to become familiar with the CISS tool before its release
following publication of this final rule. The webinar will be recorded
and available at https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/. There will also be beta testing to allow submitters to
become familiar with the CISS tool on their own and to provide comments
to the Agency on its functionality and performance.
IV. Economic Analysis
The Agency's estimated economic impact of this final rule is
presented in a document entitled ``Economic Analysis for the Electronic
Reporting under Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) Final Rule''
(Economic Analysis) (Ref. 4) a copy of which is available in the docket
and is briefly summarized in this unit.
EPA estimates that this final rule will result in cost savings to
the affected companies because the time required to enter, review,
edit, and submit their reports using CDX will be reduced compared to
the existing paper-based process.
EPA estimates that this final rule will result in total cost to the
industry of approximately $14,061 in year 1 and a cost savings of
$66,834 in each subsequent year. The cost savings in subsequent years
are greater than those in year 1 because of the one-time CDX
registration costs incurred at the initial submission. EPA assumes that
industry will continue to realize cost savings each additional year.
EPA estimates that the Agency also will experience a reduction in
the cost to administer submissions of data under TSCA in the long-run.
Due to the one-time development cost of $200,000 for CDX in year 1 and
an annual CDX Operations and Maintenance (O&M) cost of $57,353, EPA
will incur a cost of $197,918 in year 1, after accounting for $59,435
in savings resulting from the burden reductions associated with
electronic processing of submissions within the Agency. In subsequent
years, EPA will incur the $57,353 annually in operations and
maintenance costs, resulting in Agency savings of $2,082 a year in
subsequent years.
EPA received 9,280 TSCA section 5 supporting documents between
April 1, 2005 and June 22, 2011, with an average of 1,510 supporting
documents each year. EPA assumed that the impact of this final rule
relating to the submission of TSCA section 5 supporting documents would
be very minimal given that industry has already undertaken electronic
submission of such supplemental materials.
V. Response to Comments
The Agency received comments from two persons on the proposed rule
for electronic reporting for TSCA submissions. One was an anonymous
comment expressing support for electronic reporting and the other
comment was from an industry trade association. Copies of all comments
received are available in the docket for this action. The comments
received on the proposed rule did not result in EPA making significant
changes to the final rule. A discussion of the comments germane to the
rulemaking and the Agency's responses follow:
Comment 1: Phased-in the electronic reporting requirements. One
commenter stated that EPA must phase-in the electronic reporting
requirements. The commenter stated that EPA should conduct adequate
beta testing, and then should accept paper submissions as well as
electronic ones for at least a 2-year phase-in period. They said that
it is essential to avoid excessive burden on submitters, as well as to
avoid placing the regulated community in the position of potential late
submission or noncompliance related to reporting system obstacles. In
addition, the commenter asserted that EPA's logs of calls to its
hotline for the Chemical Data Reporting Rule (CDR) reporting will
demonstrate objectively the nature and level of problems that users
have encountered in this electronic reporting system, which was
mandatory and was not phased-in. They asserted that their member
companies have spent time working through the new CDR electronic
reporting system, consulting with EPA's help desk and other staff, and
otherwise addressing the various issues presented by the mandatory
electronic reporting under CDR.
The commenter stated that phasing-in is necessary to allow EPA to
work with users to ensure that the system is practical, user-friendly,
and free of errors. Based on the commenter's experience with developing
CDR submissions, they noted that it is important that persons other
than an Authorized Official (AO) are able to make submissions as
appropriate in any electronic system, as they also do with paper
submissions.
The commenter strongly urged EPA to continue to allow submissions
through alternative means for at least a phase-in period. The phase-in
period should follow a thorough beta-testing period. Furthermore, they
noted that EPA should consider allowing alternative means of submission
on a case-by-case basis. It is possible that future rules under TSCA
sections 4 and 8 will affect entities that have not done prior TSCA
submissions or even used CDX. They noted that such entities should not
be forced to use any electronic submission system (particularly in a
short time frame) unless and until the system is proved to be
foolproof, efficient, and user-friendly.
EPA Response: EPA is mandating certain electronic reporting under
TSCA in this final rule because EPA believes that the benefits of
filing submissions electronically are substantial, in terms of data
quality and timeliness of processing and public data availability and
for records management. The Agency also notes that paper submissions
contain errors that can be caught with forms associated with electronic
submissions thus increasing data reliability. Although EPA acknowledges
the initial burdens incurred with registering submitters in CDX and in
learning how to use the CISS tool, EPA has received very positive
feedback from industry submitters for the CDR Rule. Submitters have
conveyed that the electronic
[[Page 72823]]
reporting tool for that program, eCDRweb, while experiencing some
initial performance issues, is far superior to previous electronic
reporting applications used by EPA. EPA believes that, as more TSCA
submitters register with CDX and gain experience with the CISS tool,
concerns with using the electronic reporting tool will diminish.
With regard to IT-related issues that arose during the CDR
reporting, EPA acknowledges that there were some issues in the
registration process early in the reporting period, and that CDX
registrants were unfamiliar with the registration process and how the
reporting tool worked. EPA responded to issues reported through the CDX
help desk, the CDR help desk and the TSCA hotline in a timely manner
with patches to the system. Most of the issues involved delays in CDX
registration, with the need to reset passwords in the system, and in
some cases with issues related to using the XML schema provided by EPA.
The CDX system has been in operation for over 10 years and during
that time, EPA has continued to improve the registration process so
that it is more efficient for users. For example, EPA found that
accepting the Electronic Signature Agreements of CDX registered
submitters under Toxic Release Inventory for those registering in CDX
as TSCA submitters significantly reduced the burden associated with the
CDX registration process. EPA expects eventually to achieve a one-time
registration process for all Agency submitters, not just for those
under TSCA, in CDX and is exploring other ways to streamline the CDX
registration process.
EPA strongly encourages TSCA submitters to register with CDX in
advance so that they are in a position to report when the need arises.
EPA also encourages that multiple submitters in each company register
as AO with CDX so that an alternate AO will be able to make the
submission in a timely manner in the event that one of the registered
AO CDX users is unavailable. It is critical that AO be individuals who
can make submissions on behalf of their company in order to comply with
Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Regulation (Ref. 5).
EPA understands the commenter's interest in beta testing and agrees
that providing the regulated community with opportunities to learn how
to use the CISS tool and provide feedback is beneficial. Through these
opportunities, submitters will gain experience with its functionalities
and operation, and EPA can make refinements as necessary. In response
to this comment, EPA has established a 90-day time frame between the
publication date and effective date of this final rule rather than a
30- or 60-day time frame, in order to facilitate compliance with the
final rule's effective date. During the 90 days, EPA will offer
webinars and training opportunities for submitters to gain experience
with the reporting tool and CDX. EPA also conducted webinars for TSCA
section 8(a) on September 18, 2012, and for TSCA section 8(d) on May
22, 2012, and September 20, 2012. During these webinars, industry
representatives had the opportunity to familiarize themselves with both
CDX and CISS and ask questions regarding their functionality. EPA is
implementing best practices and procedures and adding technologies to
closely monitor the performance of the CISS tool and accelerate
resolution of any problems that may arise with the tool. Performance
status and scheduled updates to the CDX registration process and the
CISS tool will be made available on the EPA electronic reporting Web
site available online at https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/. Use of a web-based reporting tool provides assurance that
upgrades to the system are seamless to the user, minimizing downtime
and disruptions to the reporting process. EPA is committed to ensuring
that the gap between incident and response is minimal.
In light of the substantial disadvantages associated with paper
submissions, and with the reporting tool improvements and training
opportunities, EPA does not believe it is necessary to phase-in
electronic reporting for TSCA sections 4 and 8. As a practical matter,
electronic reporting requirements covered under this final rule are
invoked by individual rules that are not promulgated under a set
schedule and may not have ongoing reporting requirements (e.g., annual
reporting), so it would be difficult to phase-in electronic reporting
requirements. Further, the phase-in period in place for TSCA section 5
notices is completed therefore the regulated community is familiar with
the ePMN software and an additional phase-in period is not needed. In
addition, EPA and many regulated entities have gained experience with
electronic reporting under TSCA and EPA believes that phasing would
accommodate only a small number of new reporters, while potentially
confusing those submitters already filing electronically under other
TSCA requirements. It would also impose burden on EPA to manage both
paper and electronic systems. EPA believes that by providing additional
time to register in CDX before this final rule becomes effective,
continuing to improve registration and help desk functions, and by
offering training opportunities to industry, both new and experienced
submitters will be able to successfully report electronically to EPA
and be aware of the status of submitted data, reports, and other
documents.
Comment 2: Information about EPA's plans for offering electronic
reporting for TSCA sections 8(e) and 12(b). One commenter requested
that EPA explain its plans for electronic reporting under TSCA section
8(e) and 12(b), particularly since EPA has been demonstrating its
software for electronic reporting of TSCA section 8(e) submissions.
The commenter suggested that EPA establish voluntary electronic
reporting options for submissions under TSCA section 8(e) and for
export notifications under TSCA section 12(b). The commenter noted that
electronic reporting should be voluntary, not mandatory, due to the
short timeframes for reporting and the ongoing potential for
submissions to be made by first-time reporters. Also, the commenter
noted that voluntary electronic reporting would allow companies to use
any internal systems they may have already developed to accomplish
export notification, at least until they are able to revise the systems
to accommodate electronic reporting to EPA.
EPA Response: EPA will announce the availability of an electronic
reporting option for use both by those who are required to submit a
notification of substantial risk under TSCA section 8(e) and by those
who wish to voluntarily submit related FYI notifications. EPA is also
considering extending electronic reporting for TSCA section 12(b)
export notifications but is not announcing the availability of such a
reporting method at this time.
Comment 3: Correspondence through CDX. The commenter noted to EPA
that such correspondence could be useful, depending on its format and
method of delivery. However, the commenter noted that EPA should not
rely solely on CDX as the sole means of communication, and requested
that any material correspondence relating to submissions under TSCA
sections 4 and 8(d) rules should be transmitted by traditional means
(e.g., letter and/or email as appropriate) as well as through CDX.
Finally, it was noted that it is very important that any reporting
system include a clear mechanism for documented acknowledgement from
[[Page 72824]]
EPA that a submission has been received.
EPA Response: EPA acknowledges that CDX correspondence with TSCA
submitters is limited. EPA is considering options to enhance CDX
correspondence functionalities, including offering the ability to
conduct two-way emailing between submitters and EPA in a secure
environment. EPA will continue to allow TSCA submitters to correspond
with EPA about their electronically reported TSCA submissions through
email and certified mail after the submission and all related materials
are electronically reported through CDX. CDX does create and store a
Copy of Record of the original submission and any amendments made by
the submitter. This functionality provides records management benefits
for EPA as well as the regulated community and other stakeholders who
make TSCA submissions.
VI. References
As indicated under ADDRESSES, a docket has been established for
this final rule under docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0519. The
following is a listing of the documents that are specifically
referenced in this action. The docket includes these documents and
other information considered by EPA, including documents that are
referenced within the documents that are included in the docket, even
if the referenced document is not physically located in the docket. For
assistance in locating these other documents, please consult the
technical contact listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
1. EPA. Electronic Reporting Under the Toxic Substances Control
Act; Proposed Rule. Federal Register (77 FR 22707, April 17, 2012)
(FRL-9337-5).
2. EPA. TSCA Section 5 Premanufacture and Significant New Use
Notification Electronic Reporting; Revisions to Notification
Regulations; Final Rule. Federal Register (75 FR 773, January 6,
2010) (FRL-8794-5).
3. Transfer of Records to the National Archives of the United
States. 36 CFR part 1235.
4. EPA. Economic Analysis for the Electronic Reporting under
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Final Rule. June 17, 2013.
5. EPA. Cross-Media Electronic Reporting; Final Rule. Federal
Register (70 FR 59855, October 13, 2005) (FRL-7977-1).
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), and is therefore not subject
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563, entitled ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review'' (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
EPA has prepared an Economic Analysis for this action, which is
contained in a document entitled ``Economic Analysis for the Electronic
Reporting under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Final Rule'' (Ref.
4). A copy of the Economic Analysis is available in the docket for this
final rule and is summarized in Unit IV.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements (ICR) contained in this
final rule have been submitted for OMB approval under PRA, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq. The ICR document prepared by EPA, identified under EPA ICR
No. 2412.02 and OMB Control No. 2070-0183, is available in the docket
for this final rule. The ICR addresses the incremental changes to the
four currently approved ICR documents that cover the existing reporting
and recordkeeping programs that are approved under OMB control numbers
2070-0004, 2070-0012, 2070-0033, and 2070-0054. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The amended information collection activities contained
in this final rule are designed to assist the Agency in meeting its
responsibility under TSCA to receive, process, and review reports,
data, and other information. Thus, submissions in response to the
collection of information covered by these ICRs are mandatory and
respondents are required to use the CISS tool, except for TSCA section
5 submissions, which require the use of the existing electronic e-PMN
software.
Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). The ICR document for this
final rule provides a detailed presentation of the estimated burden and
costs for the first year of the program. The rule-related burden and
cost to chemical manufacturers, importers, and processors who would
submit notices to the Agency for review is summarized here. The
projected total burden to industry is 1,228 hours per year for the
first year of the final rule. This includes an estimated average burden
per response of 0.9 hours for CDX registration, 1.8 hours for
requesting a CDX electronic signature, and 0.8 hours for final rule
familiarization.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., the Agency hereby certifies that this final rule
will not have a significant adverse economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and
small governmental jurisdictions. For purposes of assessing the impacts
of this final rule on small entities, small entity is defined as:
1. A small business as defined by the Small Business
Administration's (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR 121.201.
2. A small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a
city, county, town, school district, or special district with a
population of less than 50,000.
3. A small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise,
which is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its
field.
In determining whether a rule has a significant adverse economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities, an agency may certify
that a rule will not have a significant adverse economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory
burden, or otherwise has a positive economic effect on all of the small
entities subject to the rule.
This final rule is expected to reduce the existing regulatory
burden. The factual basis for the Agency's certification is presented
in the small entity impact analysis prepared as part of the Economic
Analysis for this final rule, and is briefly summarized in Unit IV. EPA
analyzed reporting data that identified individual companies submitting
information under TSCA sections 4, 5, 8(a), or 8(d) and identified
those companies potentially affected by this final rule that qualify
for the small business status. EPA estimated the cost impact ratios for
small parent entities potentially affected by this final rule and has
determined that the estimated regulatory costs represent a small impact
of less than 1% of their annual revenue. The estimated ratios range
from less than 0.0001% to 0.014%, depending on the NAICS sector and
employment size category, with an average of 0.001%. No small parent
entities are expected to have a cost impact of greater than 1% of
annual revenue. Since the estimated regulatory costs represent a small
fraction of a typical parent entity's revenue (i.e., less than 1%), the
impacts of this final rule are likely to be minimal.
[[Page 72825]]
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2
U.S.C. 1531-1538, requires Federal agencies, unless otherwise
prohibited by law, to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on
State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. This final
rule does not contain a Federal mandate that may result in expenditures
of $100 million or more for State, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or the private sector in any 1 year. EPA estimates that
this final rule will result in total private sector cost of
approximately $14,061 in year 1 and a cost savings of $66,834 in each
subsequent year (Ref. 4). State, local, and tribal governments have not
been affected by the TSCA sections 4, 5, 8(a), and 8(d) reporting
requirements, and are not expected to be affected by this final rule.
Thus, this final rule is not subject to the requirements of UMRA
sections 202 or 205. This final rule is also not subject to the
requirements of UMRA section 203 because it contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
E. Executive Order 13132
This action does not have a substantial direct effect on States, on
the relationship between national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled
``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This final rule does not have tribal implications because it is not
expected to have substantial direct effects on Indian Tribes. This
final rule does not significantly nor uniquely affect the communities
of Indian Tribal governments nor does it involve or impose any
requirements that affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the requirements
of Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), do not
apply to his final rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because this action is not an
economically significant regulatory action as defined by E.O. 12866,
and this action does not address environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled
``Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because
this action is not expected to affect energy supply, distribution, or
use and because this action is not a significant regulatory action
under E.O. 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Since this action does not involve any technical standards, section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), 15 U.S.C. 272 note, does not apply to this action.
J. Executive Order 12898
This final rule does not entail special consideration of
environmental justice related issues as delineated by Executive Order
12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February
16, 1994).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA is submitting a
report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General
of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 712, 716, 720, 721, 723, 725, 766,
790, and 799
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Business and industry, Chemicals, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: November 19, 2013.
James Jones,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 712--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 712 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2607(a).
0
2. In Sec. 712.3, add new paragraphs (q) and (r) to read as follows:
Sec. 712.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
(q) Central Data Exchange or CDX means EPA's centralized electronic
submission receiving system.
(r) Chemical Information Submission System or CISS means EPA's
electronic, web-based reporting tool for the completion and submission
of data, reports, and other information, or its successors.
0
3. In Sec. 712.28, revise paragraphs (c) and (d) and add new paragraph
(e) to read as follows:
Sec. 712.28 Form and instructions.
* * * * *
(c) Persons authorized to report information under this subpart
must include the following information on Form 7710-35, Manufacturer's
Report--Preliminary Assessment Information (Manufacturer's Report):
(1) A certification as to the truth and accuracy of the information
reported signed and dated by an authorized person located at the plant
site or corporate headquarters of the respondent company.
(2) A confidentiality statement signed and dated by an authorized
person located at the plant site or corporate headquarters of the
respondent company.
(3) The specific chemical name and Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)
Registry Number listed in 40 CFR 712.30.
(4) The name, company, address, city, State, ZIP code, and
telephone number of a person who is submitting the form, which may be a
person located at a plant site or corporate headquarters that will
serve as the respondent, and will be able to answer questions about the
information submitted by the company to EPA. A respondent to this
subpart must include the appropriate Dun and Bradstreet Number for each
plant site reported.
(5) The plant site activities, such as the manufacturing of a
chemical substance, including the total quantity of the chemical
substance (in kilograms) imported in bulk during the reporting period.
(6) The total number of workers and total worker-hours in each
process category, which includes enclosed process, controlled release
process, and open process.
[[Page 72826]]
(7) The information related to chemical substance processing by
customers, including customers' use in industrial and consumer
products, the market names under which the chemical substance is
manufactured or imported, and the customer's process categories that
are sold to customers for further processing.
(d) Persons must use the CISS tool to complete and submit Form
7710-35, Manufacturer's Report, and accompanying letters, via CDX.
Submission requires registration with CDX, and must be made only as set
forth in this section.
(e) To access the CISS tool go to https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx and follow the appropriate links,
and for further instructions to go https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/.
0
4. In Sec. 712.30, revise paragraphs (a)(3)(i), (a)(3)(ii), and (c)(2)
to read as follows:
Sec. 712.30 Chemical lists and reporting periods.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i)(A) The respondent has previously and voluntarily provided EPA
with a Manufacturer's Report on a chemical substance or mixture subject
to subpart B of this part, which contains data for a 1-year period
ending no more than 3 years prior to the effective date described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section. Respondents meeting this condition
must notify EPA by letter of their desire to have the voluntary
submission used in lieu of a current data submission and must verify
the completeness and current accuracy of the voluntarily submitted
data. Such letters, sent in accordance with the method specified in
Sec. 712.28(d) to EPA, must contain the following language:
I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
all information entered on this form is complete and accurate. I
agree to permit access to, and the copying of records by, a duly
authorized representative of the EPA Administrator, in accordance
with the Toxic Substances Control Act, to document any information
reported on the form.
(B) Notification letters must be submitted in accordance with the
method specified in Sec. 712.28(d) prior to the reporting deadline.
(ii)(A) The respondent has previously submitted a Manufacturer's
Report on a chemical substance or mixture subject to subpart B of this
part to the Interagency Testing Committee, but not to EPA, and that
Manufacturer's Report contained data for a 1-year period ending less
than 3 years prior to the effective date described in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section. Respondents meeting this condition must submit a copy
of the Manufacture's Report, in accordance with the method specified in
Sec. 712.28(d) to EPA, and must submit an accompanying letter, also in
accordance with the methods specified in Sec. 712.28(d), notifying EPA
of the respondent's intent that the submission be used in lieu of a
current Manufacturer's Report. The notification letter must verify the
completeness and current accuracy of the voluntarily submitted data.
Such a letter must contain the following language:
I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
all information entered on this form is complete and accurate. I
agree to permit access to, and the copying of records by, a duly
authorized representative of the EPA Administrator, in accordance
with the Toxic Substances Control Act, to document any information
reported on the form.
(B) The submission must be made prior to the reporting deadline.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) You must submit the information using the method specified in
Sec. 712.28(d).
* * * * *
PART 716--[AMENDED]
0
5. The authority citation for part 716 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2607(d).
0
6. In Sec. 716.3, add the following definitions in alphabetical order
to read as follows:
Sec. 716.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
Central Data Exchange or CDX means EPA's centralized electronic
submission receiving system.
Chemical Information Submission System or CISS means EPA's
electronic, web-based tool for the completion and submission of data,
reports, and other information, or its successors.
* * * * *
0
7. In Sec. 716.30, revise paragraph (c) and add new paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
Sec. 716.30 Submission of copies of studies.
* * * * *
(c) Persons must use the CISS tool to complete and submit all data,
reports, and other information required by 40 CFR part 716, via CDX.
Submission requires registration with CDX, and must be made only as set
forth in this section.
(d) To access the CISS tool go to https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx and follow the appropriate links
and for further instructions to go https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/.
0
8. In Sec. 716.35, revise paragraph (c) and add new paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
Sec. 716.35 Submission of lists of studies.
* * * * *
(c) Persons must use the CISS tool to complete and submit all data,
reports, and other information required by 40 CFR part 716, via CDX.
Submission requires registration with CDX, and must be made only as set
forth in this section.
(d) To access the CISS tool go to https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx and follow the appropriate links
and for further instructions to go https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/.
0
9. In Sec. 716.55, revise paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 716.55 Confidentiality claims.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Failure to furnish a second copy when information is claimed as
confidential in the first copy will be considered a presumptive waiver
of the claim of confidentiality. EPA will notify the respondent by
certified mail that a finding of a presumptive waiver of the claim of
confidentiality has been made. The respondent will be given 30 days
from the date of his or her receipt of this notification to submit the
required second copy in accordance with the method specified in Sec.
716.30(d). If the respondent fails to submit the second copy within the
30 days, EPA will place the first copy in the docket.
* * * * *
0
10. In Sec. 716.60, revise paragraphs (a), (b)(2), (c), and (d), and
add new paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 716.60 Reporting schedule.
(a) General requirements. Except as provided in Sec. 716.5 and
paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, submissions under Sec. Sec.
716.30 and 716.35 must be submitted using the electronic method
specified in Sec. Sec. 716.30(c) and 716.35(c), on or before 60 days
after the effective date of the listing of a substance or mixture in
Sec. 716.120 or within 60 days of proposing to manufacture (including
import) or process a listed substance or listed mixture (including as a
known byproduct) if first done after the
[[Page 72827]]
effective date of the substance or mixture being listed in Sec.
716.120.
(b) * * *
(2) Submission of copies of completed studies. Persons must submit
studies listed as ongoing or initiated under Sec. 716.35(a)(1) and (2)
within 30 days of completing the study, using the method specified in
Sec. Sec. 716.30(c) and 716.35(c).
(c) Requests for extensions of time. Respondents who cannot meet a
deadline under this section may apply for a reasonable extension of
time. Extension requests must be submitted on or before 40 days after
the effective date of the listing of a substance or mixture in Sec.
716.120, using the electronic method specified in Sec. Sec. 716.30(c)
and 716.35(c). The Director of EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics will grant or deny extension requests.
(d) Submission methods. Persons must use the CISS tool to complete
and submit all data, reports, and other information required by 40 CFR
part 716, via CDX. Submission requires registration with CDX, and must
be made only as set forth in this section.
(e) To access the CISS tool go to https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx and follow the appropriate links
and for further instructions to go https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/.
0
11. In Sec. 716.105, revise paragraph (d) and add new paragraph (e) to
read as follows:
Sec. 716.105 Additions of substances and mixtures to which this
subpart applies.
* * * * *
(d) Persons who wish to submit information that shows why a
substance should be withdrawn must submit their comments by using the
CISS tool to complete and submit all data, reports, and other
information required by 40 CFR part 716, via CDX. Submission requires
registration with CDX, and must be made only as set forth in this
section.
(e) To access the CISS tool go to https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx and follow the appropriate links
and for further instructions to go https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/.
PART 720--[AMENDED]
0
12. The authority citation for part 720 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and 2613.
0
13. In Sec. 720.40:
0
a. Remove paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii).
0
b. Redesignate paragraphs (a)(2)(iii) and (a)(2)(iv) as paragraphs
(a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii).
0
c. Revise newly redesignated paragraph (a)(2)(i).
0
d. Revise paragraph (c).
The amendments read as follows:
Sec. 720.40 General.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Submission via CDX. TSCA section 5 notices and any related
support documents must be submitted electronically to EPA via CDX.
Prior to submission to EPA via CDX, such notices must be generated and
completed on EPA Form 7710-25 using e-PMN software. To obtain a version
of e-PMN software that contains an encryption module you must register
with CDX. A version without encryption may be downloaded without
registering with CDX.
* * * * *
(c) Where to submit a notice or support documents. For submitting
notices or support documents via CDX, use the e-PMN software.
* * * * *
0
14. In Sec. 720.75, revise paragraphs (b)(2) and (e)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 720.75 Notice review period.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) A request for suspension may only be submitted in a manner set
forth in this paragraph. The request for suspension also may be made
orally, including by telephone, to the submitter's EPA contact for that
notice, subject to paragraph (b)(3) of this section. Requests for
suspension may be submitted electronically to EPA via CDX. Such
requests must be generated and completed using e-PMN software. See
Sec. 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on how to obtain e-PMN software.
* * * * *
(e) Withdrawal of a notice by the submitter. (1)(i) A submitter may
withdraw a notice during the notice review period by submitting a
statement of withdrawal in a manner set forth in this paragraph. The
withdrawal is effective upon receipt by EPA of the CDX submission.
(ii) Submission of withdrawal notices. EPA will accept statements
of withdrawal only if submitted in accordance with this paragraph.
Statements of withdrawal must be generated, completed, and submitted to
EPA (via CDX) using e-PMN software. See Sec. 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for
information on how to obtain e-PMN software.
* * * * *
0
15. In Sec. 720.102:
0
a. Remove paragraph (d)(1).
0
b. Designate the introductory text of paragraph (d) as paragraph
(d)(1).
0
c. Revise paragraph (d)(2).
The amendments read as follows:
Sec. 720.102 Notice of commencement of manufacture or import.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) Submission of notice of commencement. EPA will accept notices
of commencement only if submitted in accordance with this paragraph.
All notices of commencement must be submitted electronically to EPA via
CDX. Prior to submission to EPA via CDX, such notices of commencement
must be generated and completed using e-PMN software. See Sec.
720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on how to obtain e-PMN software.
PART 721--[AMENDED]
0
16. The authority citation for part 721 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and 2625(c).
0
17. In Sec. 721.30, revise the introductory text of paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
Sec. 721.30 EPA approval of alternative control measures.
* * * * *
(b) Persons submitting a request for a determination of equivalency
to EPA under this part must submit the request to EPA via CDX using e-
PMN software in the manner set forth in 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(i). See 40
CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on how to obtain e-PMN software.
Support documents related to these requests must be submitted in the
manner set forth in 40 CFR 720.40(c). A request for a determination of
equivalency must contain:
* * * * *
0
18. In Sec. 721.185, revise paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 721.185 Limitation or revocation of certain notification
requirements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Any affected person may request modification or revocation of
significant new use notification requirements for a chemical substance
that has been added to subpart E of this part using the procedures
described in Sec. Sec. 721.160 or 721.170 by submitting a request that
is accompanied by information sufficient to support the request.
Persons submitting a request to EPA under this part must submit the
request to EPA
[[Page 72828]]
using e-PMN software in the manner set forth in 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(i).
See 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on how to obtain the e-PMN
software. Support documents related to these requests must also be
submitted to EPA in the manner set forth in 40 CFR 720.40(c).
* * * * *
PART 723--[AMENDED]
0
19. The authority citation for part 723 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604.
0
20. In Sec. 723.50, revise paragraph (e)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 723.50 Chemical substances manufactured in quantities of 10,000
kilograms or less per year, and chemical substances with low
environmental releases and human exposures.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) A manufacturer applying for an exemption under either paragraph
(c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section must submit an exemption notice to EPA
at least 30 days before manufacture of the new chemical substance
begins. Exemption notices and modifications must be submitted to EPA on
EPA Form No. 7710-25 via CDX using e-PMN software in the manner set
forth in this paragraph. See 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on
how to obtain e-PMN software. Notices and any related support
documents, must be generated and completed (via CDX) using e-PMN
software. See 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on how to obtain
e-PMN software.
* * * * *
PART 725--[AMENDED]
0
21. The authority citation for part 725 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, 2613, and 2625.
0
22. In Sec. 725.25, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 725.25 General administrative requirements.
* * * * *
(c) Where to submit information under this part. MCANs and
exemption requests, and any support documents related to these
submissions, may only be submitted in a manner set forth in this
paragraph. MCANs and exemption requests, and any related support
documents, must be generated, completed, and submitted to EPA (via CDX)
using e-PMN software. See 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on
how to obtain e-PMN software.
* * * * *
0
23. In Sec. 725.54, revise paragraphs (b) and (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 725.54 Suspension of the review period.
* * * * *
(b)(1) Request for suspension. A request for suspension may only be
submitted in a manner set forth in this paragraph. The request for
suspension also may be made orally, including by telephone, to the
submitter's EPA contact for that notice, subject to paragraph (c) of
this section.
(2) Submission of suspension notices. EPA will accept requests for
suspension only if submitted in accordance with this paragraph.
Requests for suspension, must be generated, completed, and submitted to
EPA (via CDX) using e-PMN software. See 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for
information on how to obtain e-PMN software.
* * * * *
(d) If the submitter has not made a previous oral request, the
running of the notice review period is suspended as of the date of
receipt of the CDX submission by EPA.
0
24. In Sec. 725.60, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 725.60 Withdrawal of submission by the submitter.
(a)(1) Withdrawal of notice by the submitter. A submitter may
withdraw a notice during the notice review period by submitting a
statement of withdrawal in a manner set forth in this paragraph. The
withdrawal is effective upon receipt of the CDX submission by EPA.
(2) Submission of withdrawal notices. EPA will accept statements of
withdrawal only if submitted in accordance with this paragraph.
Statements of withdrawal must be generated, completed, and submitted to
EPA (via CDX) using e-PMN software. See 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for
information on how to obtain e-PMN software.
* * * * *
0
25. In Sec. 725.190, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 725.190 Notice of commencement of manufacture or import.
* * * * *
(d) How to submit. All notices of commencement must be generated,
completed, and submitted to EPA (via CDX) using e-PMN software. See 40
CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on how to obtain e-PMN software.
0
26. In Sec. 725.975, revise the introductory text of paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
Sec. 725.975 EPA approval of alternative control measures.
* * * * *
(b) Persons submitting a request for a determination of equivalency
to EPA under this part must submit the request to EPA (via CDX) using
e-PMN software. See 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on how to
obtain e-PMN software. Support documents related to these requests must
also be submitted to EPA via CDX using e-PMN software. A request for a
determination of equivalency must contain:
* * * * *
0
27. In Sec. 725.984, revise paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 725.984 Modification or revocation of certain notification
requirements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Any affected person may request modification or revocation of
significant new use notification requirements for a microorganism that
has been added to subpart M of this part using the procedures described
in Sec. 725.980. The request must be accompanied by information
sufficient to support the request. Persons submitting a request to EPA
under this part must submit the request to EPA (via CDX) using e-PMN
software. See 40 CFR 720.40(a)(2)(ii) for information on how to obtain
e-PMN software. Support documents related to these requests must also
be submitted to EPA via CDX using e-PMN software.
* * * * *
PART 766--[AMENDED]
0
28. The authority citation for part 766 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2603 and 2607.
0
29. In Sec. 766.3, add the following definitions in alphabetical order
to read as follows:
Sec. 766.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
Central Data Exchange or CDX means EPA's centralized electronic
submission receiving system.
Chemical Information Submission System or CISS means EPA's
electronic, web-based reporting tool for the completion and submission
of data, reports, and other information, or its successors.
* * * * *
0
30. Revise Sec. 766.7 to read as follows:
Sec. 766.7 Submission of information.
(a) All information (including letters of intent, protocols, data,
forms, studies, and allegations) submitted to EPA under this part must
bear the applicable Code
[[Page 72829]]
of Federal Regulations (CFR) section number (e.g., Sec. 766.20).
(b) You must use the CISS tool to complete and submit all data,
reports, and other information required under this part except for
records and reports of allegations of significant adverse reactions,
which must be submitted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section.
(1) Submissions must be submitted to EPA via CDX.
(2) To access the CISS tool go to https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx and follow the appropriate links
and for further instructions to go https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/.
(c) You must submit records and reports of allegations of
significant adverse reactions and the accompanying cover letters by one
of the following methods:
(1) Mail, preferably certified, to the Document Control Office
(DCO) (7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001, ATTN: Dioxin/Furan report part 766,
Allegations of significant adverse reactions.
(2) Hand delivery to OPPT Document Control Office (DCO), EPA East,
Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC, ATTN: Dioxin/
Furan report part 766, Allegations of significant adverse reactions.
The DCO is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number for the DCO is (202) 564-8930.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the DCO's normal hours of
operation.
0
31. In Sec. 766.35, revise paragraph (c)(1)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 766.35 Reporting requirements.
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) A completed form (EPA 7710-51) for that chemical substance. The
form and instructions are available online at https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/. One form must be submitted for each
chemical substance for which a positive test result has been submitted.
* * * * *
PART 790--[AMENDED]
0
32. The authority citation for part 790 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2603.
0
33. In Sec. 790.3, add the following definitions in alphabetical order
to read as follows:
Sec. 790.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
Central Data Exchange or CDX means EPA's centralized electronic
submission receiving system.
* * * * *
Chemical Information Submission System or CISS means EPA's
electronic, web-based tool for the completion and submission of data,
reports, and other information, or its successors.
* * * * *
0
34. Revise Sec. 790.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 790.5 Submission of information.
(a) All submissions and correspondence to EPA under this part must
bear the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section number of the
subject chemical test rule consent agreements.
(b) You must use the CISS tool to complete and submit via CDX all
data, reports, other information, and correspondence required by rules
promulgated under TSCA section 4, and for correspondence pertaining to
consent agreements as required under this part. The submissions must be
made only as set forth in this section.
(c) To access the CISS tool go to https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx and follow the appropriate links
and for further instructions to go https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/.
0
35. In Sec. 790.45, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 790.45 Submission of letter of intent to conduct testing or
exemption application.
(a) No later than 30 days after the effective date of a test rule
described in Sec. 790.40, each person subject to that test rule and
required to comply with the requirements of that test rule as provided
in Sec. 790.42(a) must, for each test required, send his or her notice
of intent to conduct testing, or submit to EPA an application for
exemption from testing by the method specified in Sec. 790.5(b).
* * * * *
0
36. In Sec. 790.48, revise paragraphs (b)(3), (b)(5), (c)(2), and
(c)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 790.48 Procedure if no one submits a letter of intent to conduct
testing.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) No later than 30 days after the date of publication of the
Federal Register notice described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section,
each person described in Sec. 790.40(a)(4) and (a)(5) and each person
processing the subject chemical as of the effective date of the test
rule described in Sec. 790.40 or by 30 days after the date of
publication of the Federal Register notice described in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section must, for each test specified in the Federal
Register notice, either notify EPA of his or her intent to conduct
testing, or submit to EPA an application for an exemption from testing
requirements for the test. Each such notification to conduct testing or
application for exemption from testing must be submitted to EPA by the
method specified in Sec. 790.5(b).
* * * * *
(5) If no manufacturer or processor submits a letter of intent to
EPA through CDX within 30 days after either receipt of the certified
letter or publication in the Federal Register notice described in
(b)(4) of this section, all manufacturers and processors subject to the
test rule will be in violation of the test rule from the 31st day after
receipt of the certified letter or publication in the Federal Register.
(c) * * *
(2) If no processor subject to the test rule has notified EPA
through CDX of its intent to conduct one or more of the required tests
within 30 days after the effective date of the test rule described in
Sec. 790.40, EPA will notify all the processors by certified mail or
publish a notice in the Federal Register of this fact, specifying the
tests for which no letter of intent has been submitted and to give the
processors an opportunity to take corrective action.
(3) If no processor submits a letter of intent through CDX to
conduct one or more of the required tests within 30 days after receipt
of the certified letter or publication of the Federal Register notice
described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, all processors subject
to the test rule will be in violation of the test rule from the 31st
day after receipt of the certified letter or publication of the Federal
Register notice described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
0
37. In Sec. 790.50, revise paragraphs (b)(1) and (e) to read as
follows:
Sec. 790.50 Submission of study plans.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) EPA may grant requests for additional time for the development
of study plans on a case-by-case basis. Requests for additional time
for study plan development must be submitted to EPA by the method
specified in Sec. 790.5(b). Any extension request must state why EPA
should grant the extension.
* * * * *
[[Page 72830]]
(e) Amendments to study plans. Test sponsors must submit all
amendments by the method specified in Sec. 790.5(b).
0
38. In Sec. 790.55, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 790.55 Modification of test standards or schedules during
conduct of test.
(a) Application. Any test sponsor who wishes to modify the test
schedule for the mandatory testing conditions or requirements (i.e.,
``shall statements'') in the test standard for any test required by a
test rule must submit an application in accordance with this paragraph.
Application for modification must be made by the method specified in
Sec. 790.5(b). Applications must include an appropriate explanation
and rationale for the modification. Where a test sponsor requests EPA
to provide guidance or to clarify a non-mandatory testing requirement
(i.e., ``should statements'') in a test standard, the test sponsor must
submit these requests to EPA by the method format specified in Sec.
790.5(b).
* * * * *
0
39. In Sec. 790.62, revise paragraph (c)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 790.62 Submission of study plans and conduct of testing.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) The test sponsor shall submit any amendments to study plans to
EPA using the method specified in Sec. 790.5(b).
* * * * *
0
40. In Sec. 790.68, revise paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 790.68 Modification of consent agreements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Any test sponsor who wishes to modify the test schedule for any
test required under a consent agreement must submit an application in
accordance with this paragraph. Application for modification must be
made using the method specified in Sec. 790.5(b). Applications must
include an appropriate explanation and rationale for the modification.
EPA will consider only those applications that request modifications to
mandatory testing conditions or requirements (``shall statements'' in
the consent agreement). Where a test sponsor requests EPA to provide
guidance or to clarify a non-mandatory testing requirement (i.e.,
``should statements''), the test sponsor shall submit these requests to
EPA using the method specified in Sec. 790.5(b).
* * * * *
0
41. In Sec. 790.87, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 790.87 Approval of exemption applications.
* * * * *
(c)(1) EPA will give exemption applicants final notice that they
have received a conditional exemption through one of the following
ways:
(i) A final Phase II test rule that adopts the study plans in a
two-phase rulemaking.
(ii) A separate Federal Register notice in a single-phase
rulemaking.
(iii) A letter by certified mail will give exemption applicants
final notice that they have received a conditional exemption.
(2) All conditional exemptions thus granted are contingent upon the
test sponsors' successful completion of testing according to the
specifications of the test rule.
0
42. In Sec. 790.90, revise paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 790.90 Appeal of denial of exemption application.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Hearing requests must be submitted using the method specified
in Sec. 790.5(b) and be received by EPA within 30 days of receipt of
the Agency's notification under Sec. 790.88(b). Hearing requests must
provide reasons why a hearing is necessary.
* * * * *
0
43. In Sec. 790.93, revise paragraphs (c) and (d)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 790.93 Termination of conditional exemption.
* * * * *
(c) Within 30 days after receipt of a letter notification or
publication of a notice in the Federal Register that EPA intends to
terminate a conditional exemption, the exemption holder may submit
information using the method specified in Sec. 790.5(b) either to
rebut EPA's preliminary decision or notify EPA of its intent to conduct
the required test pursuant to the test standard established in the test
rule. Such a letter of intent shall contain all of the information
required by Sec. 790.45(c).
(d) * * *
(2) Hearing requests must be submitted using the method specified
in Sec. 790.5(b) and must be received by EPA within 30 days after
receipt of the letter or publication in the Federal Register notice
described in paragraph (b) of this section.
* * * * *
0
44. In Sec. 790.97, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 790.97 Hearing procedures.
(a) Hearing requests must be submitted using the method specified
in Sec. 790.5(b). Such requests must include the applicant's basis for
appealing EPA's decision.
* * * * *
PART 799--[AMENDED]
0
45. The authority citation for part 799 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2603, 2611, and 2625.
0
46. Revise Sec. 799.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 799.5 Submission of information.
(a) Information (e.g., letters, study plans, or reports) submitted
to EPA must be submitted using the method specified in paragraph (b) of
this section. All information submitted under this part must bear the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section number of the subject
chemical test rule (e.g., Sec. 799.1053 for trichlorobenzenes).
(b) You must use CISS to complete and submit all data, reports, and
other information required under this part. Submissions must be
submitted to EPA via the Central Data Exchange (CDX).
(c) To access CISS go to https://cdx.epa.gov/ssl/CSPP/PrimaryAuthorizedOfficial/Home.aspx and follow the appropriate links
and for further instructions to go https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/.
[FR Doc. 2013-28510 Filed 12-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P