Proposal for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator Negative Declaration for Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Michigan and Wisconsin, 72611-72612 [2013-28964]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
imposed by Federal law,’’ any person
making a voluntary disclosure of
information to a state agency regarding
a violation of an environmental statute,
regulation, permit, or administrative
order is granted immunity from
administrative or civil penalty. The
Attorney General’s January 12, 1998
opinion states that the quoted language
renders this statute inapplicable to
enforcement of any Federally authorized
programs, since ‘‘no immunity could be
afforded from administrative, civil, or
criminal penalties because granting
such immunity would not be consistent
with Federal law, which is one of the
criteria for immunity.’’
Therefore, EPA has determined that
Virginia’s Privilege and Immunity
statutes will not preclude the
Commonwealth from enforcing its
program consistent with the Federal
requirements. In any event, because
EPA has also determined that a state
audit privilege and immunity law can
affect only state enforcement and cannot
have any impact on Federal
enforcement authorities, EPA may at
any time invoke its authority under the
CAA, including, for example, sections
113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce the
requirements or prohibitions of the
section 111(d)/129 plan, independently
of any state enforcement effort. In
addition, citizen enforcement under
section 304 of the CAA is likewise
unaffected by this, or any, state audit
privilege or immunity law.
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
Virginia section 111(d)/129 plan for SSI
units submitted pursuant to 40 CFR part
60, subpart MMMM. Therefore, EPA is
proposing to amend 40 CFR part 62,
subpart VV to reflect this action. This
approval is based on the rationale
previously discussed and in further
detail in the TSD associated with this
action. The scope of the proposed
approval of the section 111(d)/129 plan
is limited to the provisions of 40 CFR
parts 60 and 62 for existing SSI units,
as referenced in the emission
guidelines, subpart MMMM.
The EPA Administrator continues to
retain authority for several tasks, as
stipulated in 40 CFR § 60.5050 as well
as the ‘‘Plan Provisions’’ section of
Virginia’s section 111(d)/129 plan
submittal. This retention of federal
authority includes the granting of
waivers for performance tests.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this proposed
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
action’’ and therefore is not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)). This action merely proposes
to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). Because this rule proposes to
approve pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Public Law 104–4). This proposed rule
also does not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will
it have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
proposes to approve a state rule
implementing a Federal requirement,
and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the CAA.
This proposed rule also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it approves a
state rule implementing a Federal
standard.
In reviewing VADEQ’s submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. In this context, in the absence
of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a VADEQ submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a VADEQ
submission, to use VCS in place of a
VADEQ submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72611
Thus, the requirements of section 12(d)
of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this proposed rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct. EPA
has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the Attorney
General’s ‘‘Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under
the executive order. This proposed rule
for the approval of VADEQ’s section
111(d)/129 plan for SSI units does not
impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Aluminum,
Fertilizers, Fluoride, Intergovernmental
relations, Paper and paper products
industry, Phosphate, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Sulfur acid plants, Waste
treatment and disposal.
Dated: November 15, 2013.
W.C. Early,
Acting, Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2013–28958 Filed 12–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0678; FRL–9903–34–
Region 5]
Proposal for Hospital/Medical/
Infectious Waste Incinerator Negative
Declaration for Designated Facilities
and Pollutants: Michigan and
Wisconsin
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is notifying the public
that we have received from Michigan
and Wisconsin negative declarations for
Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste
Incinerators (HMIWI). The Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality
submitted on August 9, 2013 a negative
declaration certifying that there are no
HMIWI units currently operating in the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03DEP1.SGM
03DEP1
72612
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules
state of Michigan. The Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources
submitted on July 15, 2013 a negative
declaration certifying that there are no
HMIWI units currently operating in the
state of Wisconsin.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 2, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2013–0678, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: nash.carlton@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2543.
4. Mail: Carlton T. Nash, Chief, Toxics
and Global Atmosphere Section, Air
Toxics and Assessment Branch (AT–
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Carlton T. Nash,
Chief, Toxics and Global Atmosphere
Section, Air Toxics and Assessment
Branch (AT–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office normal hours
of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding
Federal holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which is
located in the Rules section of this
Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Margaret Sieffert, Environmental
Engineer, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard (AT–18J), Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 353–1151,
sieffert.margaret@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Rules section of this Federal Register,
EPA is amending 40 CFR part 62 to
reflect the States’ submittals of the
negative declarations as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
action and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
action is set forth in the direct final rule.
If no adverse comments are received in
response to this rule, no further activity
is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse
comments, we will withdraw the direct
final rule and will address all public
comments in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on any part of this rule, and
if that provision may be severed from
the remainder of the rule, EPA may
adopt as final those provisions of the
rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment. For additional
information, see the direct final rule
which is located in the Rules section of
this Federal Register.
Dated: November 8, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2013–28964 Filed 12–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 194
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0684; FRL–9903–38–
OAR]
Criteria for the Certification and
Recertification of the Waste Isolation
Pilot Plant’s Compliance With the
Disposal Regulations; Panel Closure
Redesign
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
With this notice, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA,
or the Agency) proposes to approve the
U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE, or
the Department) planned change request
to implement the Run-of-Mine Panel
Closure System (ROMPCS) at the Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) and to
amend the WIPP Compliance Criteria to
allow an EPA-approved panel closure
other than the currently-required Option
D design. Technical analyses
demonstrate that, with the modified
panel closure design, WIPP remains in
compliance with the release limits set
by the ‘‘Environmental Standards for the
Management and Disposal of Spent
Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and
Transuranic (TRU) Radioactive Waste.’’
The proposed changes do not lessen the
requirements for complying with the
Compliance Criteria, nor do these
changes impact the technical approach
that the EPA will employ when
considering any future planned changes
to the panel closure system. Compliance
with environmental or public health
regulations other than the EPA’s
disposal regulations and WIPP
Compliance Criteria is not addressed by
today’s action. Today’s notice marks the
beginning of a 60-day public comment
period on this proposed action.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Comments must be received on
or before February 3, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2013–0684, by one of the
following methods—
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: to a-and-r-docket@epa.gov;
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–
0684.
• Fax: (202) 566–1741.
• Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail Code: 6102T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Attn: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–
2013–0684. The Agency’s policy is that
all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means the EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to the EPA without
going through www.regulations.gov,
your email address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, the EPA recommends that
you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If the EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
the Agency may not be able to consider
your comment. Electronic files should
avoid the use of special characters or
any form of encryption and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional
information about the EPA’s public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\03DEP1.SGM
03DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 3, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72611-72612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28964]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA-R05-OAR-2013-0678; FRL-9903-34-Region 5]
Proposal for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator
Negative Declaration for Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Michigan
and Wisconsin
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is notifying the public that we have received from
Michigan and Wisconsin negative declarations for Hospital/Medical/
Infectious Waste Incinerators (HMIWI). The Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality submitted on August 9, 2013 a negative
declaration certifying that there are no HMIWI units currently
operating in the
[[Page 72612]]
state of Michigan. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
submitted on July 15, 2013 a negative declaration certifying that there
are no HMIWI units currently operating in the state of Wisconsin.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 2, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2013-0678, by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. Email: nash.carlton@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692-2543.
4. Mail: Carlton T. Nash, Chief, Toxics and Global Atmosphere
Section, Air Toxics and Assessment Branch (AT-18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Carlton T. Nash, Chief, Toxics and Global
Atmosphere Section, Air Toxics and Assessment Branch (AT-18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional
Office normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be
made for deliveries of boxed information. The Regional Office official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
excluding Federal holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section
of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to submit
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Sieffert, Environmental
Engineer, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard (AT-18J), Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-1151,
sieffert.margaret@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is amending 40 CFR part 62 to reflect the States'
submittals of the negative declarations as a direct final rule without
prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial
action and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for
the action is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse
comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is
contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, we will withdraw the
direct final rule and will address all public comments in a subsequent
final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second
comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on any part of this rule, and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For
additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in
the Rules section of this Federal Register.
Dated: November 8, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2013-28964 Filed 12-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P