Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 72558-72561 [2013-28752]
Download as PDF
72558
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Gulfstream P/N 1159SCP500–5 on any
airplane.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (m) of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(m) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Darby Mirocha, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion and Services Branch, ACE–118A,
FAA, Atlanta ACO, 1701 Columbia Avenue,
College Park, GA 30337; phone: (404) 474–
5573; fax: (404) 474–5606; email:
darby.mirocha@faa.gov.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Gulfstream V Customer Bulletin 197,
dated April 11, 2012.
(ii) Gulfstream G550 Customer Bulletin
122, dated April 11, 2012.
(iii) Triumph Service Bulletin SB–TAGV/
GVSP–28–JG0162, dated August 30, 2011.
(iv) General Electric Service Bulletin
31760–28–100, dated February 15, 2011.
(v) Gulfstream Document GV–GER–0003,
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness,
Fuel Boost Pump with Leak Check Port,
dated November 24, 2010.
(3) For Gulfstream, Triumph
Aerostructures, and General Electric Aviation
service information identified in this AD,
contact Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation,
Technical Publications Dept., P.O. Box 2206,
Savannah, GA 31402–2206; telephone 800–
810–4853; fax 912–965–3520; email pubs@
gulfstream.com; Internet
https://www.gulfstream.com/product_
support/technical_pubs/pubs/index.htm.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
25, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–28860 Filed 12–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Examining the AD Docket
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–1317; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–194–AD; Amendment
39–17687; AD 2013–24–13]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 737–100,
–200, –200C, –300, –400, –500, –600,
–700, –700C, –800, and –900 series
airplanes. This AD was prompted by a
report that the seat track attachment of
body station 520 flexible joint is
structurally deficient in resisting a 9g
forward emergency load condition in
certain seating configurations. This AD
requires replacing the pivot link
assembly on certain seats, modifying the
existing seat track link assembly
fastener on certain seats, or replacing
the seat track link assemblies on certain
seats. Also, for certain airplanes, this
AD requires installing a new seat track
link assembly or modifying the seat
track link assembly. For certain other
airplanes, this AD requires inspecting,
changing, or repairing the seat track link
assembly. We are issuing this AD to
prevent seat detachment in an
emergency landing, which could cause
injury to occupants of the passenger
compartment and affect emergency
egress.
SUMMARY:
This AD is effective January 7,
2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of January 7, 2014.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1;
fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
Sfmt 4700
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Piccola, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6483; fax:
425–917–6590; email: sarah.piccola@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to the specified products. The
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on January 16, 2013 (78 FR
3365). The NPRM proposed to require
replacing the pivot link assembly on
certain seats, and modifying or
replacing the seat track link assemblies
on certain seats. Also, for certain
airplanes, the NPRM proposed to
require installing a new seat track link
assembly.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comments
received on the proposal (78 FR 3365,
January 16, 2013) and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Request To Incorporate Revised Service
Information
Boeing concurred with the content of
the NPRM (78 FR 3365, January 16,
2013), but requested that we incorporate
Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision 1, dated
May 23, 2013, in the AD. Boeing stated
that due to manufacturing differences,
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
some operators were unable to modify
or replace the seat track link assembly
using Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737–53–1260, dated May 7,
2007. Boeing also requested that we
allow credit for actions done in
accordance with Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–
1260, dated May 7, 2007.
We agree to incorporate Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–
53–1260, Revision 1, dated May 23,
2013, in this final rule, which gives an
option for operators to modify the seat
track link assembly. References have
been revised in paragraphs (c)(1), (g)(2),
(g)(3), and (i) of this final rule
accordingly. (Paragraph (i) of this final
rule was referred to as paragraph (h) in
the NPRM (78 FR 3365, January 16,
2013).) A new paragraph (h) has been
added to this final rule to include the
optional modification. We also have
added paragraph (j)(2) to this final rule
to provide credit for certain actions
performed before the effective date of
this final rule using Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–
1260, dated May 7, 2007.
In addition, Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision
1, dated May 23, 2013, includes new
Group 6 (i.e., certain airplanes
previously in Group 1 and Group 5, as
identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, dated
May 7, 2007). For airplanes in Group 6,
we added paragraph (g)(3) to this final
rule to provide instructions to contact
the FAA for inspection, change, and
repair of the seat track link assembly
because we have determined that there
are unique aspects of these airplanes
that require specific instructions for
correcting the unsafe condition. Also,
paragraph (g)(2) of this final rule has
been revised to clarify the applicable
groups. New paragraph (g)(4) has been
added to this final rule to clarify the
requirements for airplanes in Group 5.
Subsequent paragraph identifiers have
been revised accordingly.
Request for Credit for Certain Actions
Delta, Alaska Airlines, WestJet, and
Saudi Aramco requested that we
provide credit for actions performed
prior to the effective date of the AD
using Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–
1244, dated April 17, 2003; Revision 1,
dated May 29, 2003; Revision 2, dated
March 15, 2007; and Revision 3, dated
December 4, 2008. The commenters
stated that Boeing Service Bulletin 737–
53–1244, Revision 5, dated July 27,
2011, specifies that no more work is
necessary on airplanes changed in
accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin
737–53–1244, dated April 17, 2003;
Revision 1, dated May 29, 2003;
Revision 2, dated March 15, 2007; and
Revision 3, dated December 4, 2008.
We agree to provide credit for actions
performed prior to the effective date of
the final rule using Boeing Service
Bulletin 737–53–1244, dated April 17,
2003; Revision 1, dated May 29, 2003;
Revision 2, dated March 15, 2007; and
Revision 3, dated December 4, 2008. We
have added a new paragraph (j)(1) to
this final rule accordingly. Subsequent
paragraph identifiers have been revised
accordingly.
Request To Correct Compliance Table 1
of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1244,
Revision 5, Dated July 27, 2011
Alaska Airlines requested that we
correct Table 1 of paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737–53–1244, Revision 5, dated
July 27, 2011, which refers to Boeing
Service Bulletin 737–53–1244, dated
April 17, 2003; and Revision 4, dated
April 6, 2011 (which was withdrawn by
Boeing).
We partially agree with the request.
We agree that the ‘‘Optional Actions’’
column of Table 1 of paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737–53–1244, Revision 5, dated
July 27, 2011, refers to Boeing Service
Bulletin 737–53–1244, dated April 17,
2003; and Revision 4, dated April 6,
2011. However, this final rule does not
require that action. This final rule
requires, among other actions,
installation of the new, improved pivot
link within 60 months after the effective
date of this AD, which is identified in
the ‘‘Follow On Actions’’ column of
Table 1 of paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737–53–1244, Revision 5, dated
July 27, 2011. No change has been made
to this final rule in this regard.
72559
Request for Clarification of Damage
Tolerance Inspections Statement
Alaska Airlines requested that we
clarify the NPRM (78 FR 3365, January
16, 2013) by adding a statement
regarding the damage tolerance
inspections. Alaska Airlines stated that
Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1244,
Revision 5, dated July 27, 2012,
includes a damage tolerance inspection
statement; however, Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–
1260, dated May 7, 2007, does not
include the statement. The commenter
requested that we add a statement to the
NPRM indicating that no damage
tolerance inspections are required as a
result of rework using either service
bulletin.
We agree that the damage tolerance
inspection statement was not included
in Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737–53–1260, dated May 7,
2007; however, the statement is
included in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision
1, dated May 23, 2013, which is cited
in this final rule. No change has been
made to this final rule in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 3365,
January 16, 2013) for correcting the
unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 3365,
January 16, 2013).
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 1,281
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this AD:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Replacement or modification
Concurrent installation or
modification (Groups 1, 2,
4, and 5 airplanes).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Labor cost
Up to
per
Up to
per
41 work-hours × $85
hour = $3,485.
60 work-hours × $85
hour = $5,100.
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
U.S.
Airplanes
Parts cost
Frm 00027
Cost per product
Up to $15,478 ........
Up to $18,963 ........
1,281
Up to $18,089 ........
Up to $23,189 ........
214
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Cost on U.S.
operators
Up to $24,291,603.
Up to $4,962,446.
72560
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide a cost
estimate for the actions required for
airplanes in Group 6 identified in
Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision 1, dated
May 23, 2013.
Authority for this Rulemaking
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Adoption of the Amendment
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
2013–24–13 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–17687; Docket No.
FAA–2012–1317; Directorate Identifier
2011–NM–194–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective January 7, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the airplanes identified
in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD,
certificated in any category.
(1) The Boeing Company Model 737–100,
–200, –200C, –300, –400, and –500 series
airplanes, as identified in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–1260,
Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013.
(2) The Boeing Company Model 737–600,
–700, –700C, –800, and –900 series airplanes,
as identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737–
53–1244, Revision 5, dated July 27, 2011.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report that a
Boeing study found that the seat track
attachment of body station 520 flexible joint
is structurally deficient in resisting a 9g
forward emergency load condition in certain
seating configurations. We are issuing this
AD to prevent seat detachment in an
emergency landing, which could cause injury
to occupants of the passenger compartment
and affect emergency egress.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Repair or Replacement of Seat Track
Link Assembly or Seat Track Link Assembly
Fastener
Within 60 months after the effective date
of this AD, do the actions specified in
paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), or (g)(4) of this
AD, as applicable.
(1) For Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800,
and –900 series airplanes: Install new,
improved pivot link assemblies, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–
53–1244, Revision 5, dated July 27, 2011.
(2) For airplanes in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4,
as identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision 1,
dated May 23, 2013: Replace the seat track
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
link assembly, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–
1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013.
(3) For airplanes in Group 6, as identified
in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737–53–1260, Revision 1, dated May 23,
2013: Inspect, change, or repair the seat track
link assembly, as applicable, using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(4) For airplanes in Group 5, as identified
in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737–53–1260, Revision 1, dated May 23,
2013: Modify the existing seat track link
assembly fastener, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–
1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013.
(h) Optional Modification of Seat Track Link
Assembly
In lieu of the replacement specified in
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, doing the
optional modification of the seat track link
assembly, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–53–
1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013, is
acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (g)(2) of this AD,
provided the modification is done within the
compliance time specified in the
introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD.
(i) Concurrent Actions
For airplanes in Groups 1, 2, 4, and 5, as
identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision 1,
dated May 23, 2013: Before or concurrently
with the accomplishment of the actions
specified in paragraph (g)(2) or (g)(3) of this
AD, install a new seat track link assembly or
modify the seat track link assembly, as
applicable, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Service Bulletin 737–53–1120, Revision 1,
dated May 13, 1993.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
(1) This paragraph provides credit for the
actions required by paragraph (g)(1) of this
AD, if those actions were performed before
the effective date of the AD using Boeing
Service Bulletin 737–53–1244, dated April
17, 2003; Revision 1, dated May 29, 2003;
Revision 2, dated March 15, 2007; or
Revision 3, dated December 4, 2008; which
are not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(2) This paragraph provides credit for the
actions required by paragraphs (g)(2) and
(g)(4) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD
using Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737–53–1260, dated May 7, 2007,
which is not incorporated by reference in this
AD.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (l) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by The
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane and 14
CFR 25.571, Amendment 45, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Sarah Piccola, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems
Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–
6483; fax: 425–917–6590; email:
sarah.piccola@faa.gov.
(2) Service information that is referenced
in this AD but is not incorporated by
reference may be obtained at the addresses
identified in paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of
this AD.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1120,
Revision 1, dated May 13, 1993.
(ii) Boeing Service Bulletin 737–53–1244,
Revision 5, dated July 27, 2011.
(iii) Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737–53–1260, Revision 1, dated May
23, 2013.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–
544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 19, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–28752 Filed 12–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0420; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–241–AD; Amendment
39–17685; AD 2013–24–11]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 747–100,
747–100B, 747–100B SUD, 747–200B,
747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–
400, 747–400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and
747SP series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a report of a disbonded
doubler and a skin crack in section 41
of the fuselage, and multiple reports of
cracked or missing fastener heads. This
AD requires repetitive inspections for
cracking of the fuselage skin, discrepant
fasteners, and for disbonds at the
doublers; and related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary. For
certain airplanes, this AD also requires
a terminating repair for repair doublers.
We are issuing this AD to prevent rapid
decompression and loss of structural
integrity of the airplane due to such
disbonding and subsequent cracking of
the skin panels.
DATES: This AD is effective January 7,
2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of January 7, 2014.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1;
fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72561
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nathan Weigand, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6428;
fax: 425–917–6590; email:
Nathan.P.Weigand@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to the specified products. The
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on May 16, 2013 (78 FR 28767).
The NPRM proposed to require
repetitive inspections for cracking of the
fuselage skin, discrepant fasteners, and
for disbonds at the doublers; and related
investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. For certain airplanes, the
NPRM also proposed to require a
terminating repair for repair doublers.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comments
received on the proposal (78 FR 28767,
May 16, 2013) and the FAA’s response
to each comment.
Request To Add Terminating Action for
Other AD Actions
Boeing requested that we include the
requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2006–24–05, Amendment 39–14834 (76
FR 68434, November 27, 2006), in
paragraph (k)(3) of the NPRM (78 FR
28767, May 16, 2013), which specifies
that accomplishing the required actions
proposed by the NPRM terminates
certain requirements of AD 2006–24–05.
Boeing stated that including the
requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2006–24–05 in paragraph (k) of the
NPRM would then be consistent with
paragraph (k)(2) of the NPRM that
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 3, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72558-72561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28752]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-1317; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-194-AD;
Amendment 39-17687; AD 2013-24-13]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, -500, -600,
-700, -700C, -800, and -900 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a
report that the seat track attachment of body station 520 flexible
joint is structurally deficient in resisting a 9g forward emergency
load condition in certain seating configurations. This AD requires
replacing the pivot link assembly on certain seats, modifying the
existing seat track link assembly fastener on certain seats, or
replacing the seat track link assemblies on certain seats. Also, for
certain airplanes, this AD requires installing a new seat track link
assembly or modifying the seat track link assembly. For certain other
airplanes, this AD requires inspecting, changing, or repairing the seat
track link assembly. We are issuing this AD to prevent seat detachment
in an emergency landing, which could cause injury to occupants of the
passenger compartment and affect emergency egress.
DATES: This AD is effective January 7, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of January 7,
2014.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Piccola, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone: 425-917-6483; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
sarah.piccola@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to the specified products. The
NPRM published in the Federal Register on January 16, 2013 (78 FR
3365). The NPRM proposed to require replacing the pivot link assembly
on certain seats, and modifying or replacing the seat track link
assemblies on certain seats. Also, for certain airplanes, the NPRM
proposed to require installing a new seat track link assembly.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
(78 FR 3365, January 16, 2013) and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Incorporate Revised Service Information
Boeing concurred with the content of the NPRM (78 FR 3365, January
16, 2013), but requested that we incorporate Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013, in the
AD. Boeing stated that due to manufacturing differences,
[[Page 72559]]
some operators were unable to modify or replace the seat track link
assembly using Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260,
dated May 7, 2007. Boeing also requested that we allow credit for
actions done in accordance with Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-53-1260, dated May 7, 2007.
We agree to incorporate Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013, in this final rule, which
gives an option for operators to modify the seat track link assembly.
References have been revised in paragraphs (c)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), and
(i) of this final rule accordingly. (Paragraph (i) of this final rule
was referred to as paragraph (h) in the NPRM (78 FR 3365, January 16,
2013).) A new paragraph (h) has been added to this final rule to
include the optional modification. We also have added paragraph (j)(2)
to this final rule to provide credit for certain actions performed
before the effective date of this final rule using Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, dated May 7, 2007.
In addition, Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260,
Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013, includes new Group 6 (i.e., certain
airplanes previously in Group 1 and Group 5, as identified in Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, dated May 7, 2007). For
airplanes in Group 6, we added paragraph (g)(3) to this final rule to
provide instructions to contact the FAA for inspection, change, and
repair of the seat track link assembly because we have determined that
there are unique aspects of these airplanes that require specific
instructions for correcting the unsafe condition. Also, paragraph
(g)(2) of this final rule has been revised to clarify the applicable
groups. New paragraph (g)(4) has been added to this final rule to
clarify the requirements for airplanes in Group 5. Subsequent paragraph
identifiers have been revised accordingly.
Request for Credit for Certain Actions
Delta, Alaska Airlines, WestJet, and Saudi Aramco requested that we
provide credit for actions performed prior to the effective date of the
AD using Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1244, dated April 17, 2003;
Revision 1, dated May 29, 2003; Revision 2, dated March 15, 2007; and
Revision 3, dated December 4, 2008. The commenters stated that Boeing
Service Bulletin 737-53-1244, Revision 5, dated July 27, 2011,
specifies that no more work is necessary on airplanes changed in
accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1244, dated April 17,
2003; Revision 1, dated May 29, 2003; Revision 2, dated March 15, 2007;
and Revision 3, dated December 4, 2008.
We agree to provide credit for actions performed prior to the
effective date of the final rule using Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-
1244, dated April 17, 2003; Revision 1, dated May 29, 2003; Revision 2,
dated March 15, 2007; and Revision 3, dated December 4, 2008. We have
added a new paragraph (j)(1) to this final rule accordingly. Subsequent
paragraph identifiers have been revised accordingly.
Request To Correct Compliance Table 1 of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
53-1244, Revision 5, Dated July 27, 2011
Alaska Airlines requested that we correct Table 1 of paragraph
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1244, Revision
5, dated July 27, 2011, which refers to Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-
1244, dated April 17, 2003; and Revision 4, dated April 6, 2011 (which
was withdrawn by Boeing).
We partially agree with the request. We agree that the ``Optional
Actions'' column of Table 1 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1244, Revision 5, dated July 27, 2011,
refers to Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1244, dated April 17, 2003;
and Revision 4, dated April 6, 2011. However, this final rule does not
require that action. This final rule requires, among other actions,
installation of the new, improved pivot link within 60 months after the
effective date of this AD, which is identified in the ``Follow On
Actions'' column of Table 1 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1244, Revision 5, dated July 27, 2011.
No change has been made to this final rule in this regard.
Request for Clarification of Damage Tolerance Inspections Statement
Alaska Airlines requested that we clarify the NPRM (78 FR 3365,
January 16, 2013) by adding a statement regarding the damage tolerance
inspections. Alaska Airlines stated that Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
53-1244, Revision 5, dated July 27, 2012, includes a damage tolerance
inspection statement; however, Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-53-1260, dated May 7, 2007, does not include the
statement. The commenter requested that we add a statement to the NPRM
indicating that no damage tolerance inspections are required as a
result of rework using either service bulletin.
We agree that the damage tolerance inspection statement was not
included in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260,
dated May 7, 2007; however, the statement is included in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013,
which is cited in this final rule. No change has been made to this
final rule in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
[Agr]re consistent with the intent that was proposed in
the NPRM (78 FR 3365, January 16, 2013) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 3365, January 16, 2013).
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 1,281 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Airplanes Cost on U.S. operators
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement or modification........ Up to 41 work-hours x Up to $15,478........ Up to $18,963........ 1,281 Up to $24,291,603.
$85 per hour = $3,485.
Concurrent installation or Up to 60 work-hours x Up to $18,089........ Up to $23,189........ 214 Up to $4,962,446.
modification (Groups 1, 2, 4, and $85 per hour = $5,100.
5 airplanes).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 72560]]
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
a cost estimate for the actions required for airplanes in Group 6
identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260,
Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013.
Authority for this Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2013-24-13 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17687; Docket No. FAA-
2012-1317; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-194-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective January 7, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1)
and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category.
(1) The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400,
and -500 series airplanes, as identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013.
(2) The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -
900 series airplanes, as identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
53-1244, Revision 5, dated July 27, 2011.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report that a Boeing study found that
the seat track attachment of body station 520 flexible joint is
structurally deficient in resisting a 9g forward emergency load
condition in certain seating configurations. We are issuing this AD
to prevent seat detachment in an emergency landing, which could
cause injury to occupants of the passenger compartment and affect
emergency egress.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Repair or Replacement of Seat Track Link Assembly or Seat Track
Link Assembly Fastener
Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions specified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), or (g)(4) of
this AD, as applicable.
(1) For Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 series
airplanes: Install new, improved pivot link assemblies, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-53-1244, Revision 5, dated July 27, 2011.
(2) For airplanes in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, as identified in
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1,
dated May 23, 2013: Replace the seat track link assembly, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated May 23,
2013.
(3) For airplanes in Group 6, as identified in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated May 23,
2013: Inspect, change, or repair the seat track link assembly, as
applicable, using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(4) For airplanes in Group 5, as identified in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated May 23,
2013: Modify the existing seat track link assembly fastener, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated May 23,
2013.
(h) Optional Modification of Seat Track Link Assembly
In lieu of the replacement specified in paragraph (g)(2) of this
AD, doing the optional modification of the seat track link assembly,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated May 23,
2013, is acceptable for compliance with the requirements of
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, provided the modification is done
within the compliance time specified in the introductory text of
paragraph (g) of this AD.
(i) Concurrent Actions
For airplanes in Groups 1, 2, 4, and 5, as identified in Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, Revision 1, dated
May 23, 2013: Before or concurrently with the accomplishment of the
actions specified in paragraph (g)(2) or (g)(3) of this AD, install
a new seat track link assembly or modify the seat track link
assembly, as applicable, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1120, Revision 1,
dated May 13, 1993.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
(1) This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, if those actions were performed before
the effective date of the AD using Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-
1244, dated April 17, 2003; Revision 1, dated May 29, 2003; Revision
2, dated March 15, 2007; or Revision 3, dated December 4, 2008;
which are not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(2) This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(4) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD using Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260, dated May 7, 2007, which is
not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
[[Page 72561]]
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph
(l) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by The
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane and 14 CFR 25.571,
Amendment 45, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Sarah Piccola,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch,
ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6483; fax: 425-
917-6590; email: sarah.piccola@faa.gov.
(2) Service information that is referenced in this AD but is not
incorporated by reference may be obtained at the addresses
identified in paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1120, Revision 1, dated May
13, 1993.
(ii) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53-1244, Revision 5, dated July
27, 2011.
(iii) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-53-1260,
Revision 1, dated May 23, 2013.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 19, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-28752 Filed 12-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P