Credit Union Service Organizations, 72537-72550 [2013-28479]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
• The back-to-back recessions in 1980
and 1981–82, during which the
unemployment rate increased 4.7
percentage points, from 6.1 percent in
fourth quarter 1979 to 10.8 percent in
fourth quarter 1982 (the last quarter of
the recession).
• The 2007–09 recession, during
which the unemployment rate increased
5.3 percentage points, from 4.7 percent
in third quarter 2007 to 10.0 percent in
fourth quarter 2009 (two quarters after
the recession ended).
Other variables under the adverse and
severely adverse scenarios would be
expected to follow paths consistent with
the depth and duration of previous
recessions and with models of
macroeconomic activity. The severely
adverse scenario also may reflect other
risks that are especially salient and that
might not be captured by past
recessions, including elevated levels of
systemic risk.
The scenarios distributed by the FDIC
for the stress tests will cover at least
nine quarters. In addition, the FDIC will
generally publish scenarios that cover
one year beyond the planning horizon of
the stress test, to allow for the
estimation of loan losses for the year
following the stress planning horizon;
this additional specification allows
covered banks to determine adequate
levels of loan loss reserves.
The FDIC believes that as a general
matter all covered banks should use the
same set of scenarios and planning
horizon so that the FDIC can better
compare results across covered banks.
To that end, the FDIC intends to provide
one set of scenarios for use by all
covered banks. However, the FDIC
believes there may be circumstances
that would warrant the use of different
or additional scenarios or a planning
horizon of more than nine quarters.
Thus, under the Stress Test Rule, the
FDIC reserves the authority to require a
covered bank to use different or
additional scenarios and/or planning
horizons the Corporation may deem
appropriate.10 For example, a covered
bank may conduct business activities or
have risk exposures that would
encounter stress under conditions that
differ materially from those that would
generate stress for other banks. The
FDIC expects such situations to be rare
and anticipates making every effort to
distribute the same scenarios to all
covered banks.
In addition to the minimum three
scenarios, the FDIC may require a
covered bank with significant trading
activities to include factors related to
trading and counterparty risk in its
10 Id.
at 325.201(c).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
stress test. Typically, these factors might
include additional shocks to specific
market prices, interest rates, rate
spreads, or other key market variables
consistent with historical or
hypothetical adverse market events.
IV. Development and Distribution
As one part of the process of
developing scenarios, the FDIC will
gather information from outside entities
and develop themes for the stress test
scenarios, including the identification of
potentially material vulnerabilities or
salient risks to the financial system, and
consider potential paths for individual
variables. The outside entities may
include academic experts, staffs of
international organizations, foreign
supervisors, financial institutions that
regularly provide forecasts, and other
private sector risk analysts that regularly
conduct stress tests based on U.S. and
global economic and financial scenarios.
The FDIC will use the information
gathered in this manner to inform its
consideration of potential risks and
scenarios.
The Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency (‘‘OCC’’), the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (‘‘Board’’), and the FDIC
(collectively, the ‘‘Agencies’’) expect to
consult closely to develop scenarios for
stress testing. Absent specific
supervisory concerns, the FDIC
anticipates that the annual stress test
scenarios distributed by the FDIC will
be the same as or nearly identical to the
scenarios developed by the Board for
the supervisory stress tests conducted
by the Board under Section 165(i)(1).
This would mean the same economic
and financial variables following the
same paths as used in the scenarios for
the Board’s supervisory stress tests.
Although the Agencies generally
expect to consult closely on scenario
development, they may have different
views of risks that should be reflected
in the stress test scenarios used by
covered banks for the annual stress test.
The FDIC may distribute scenarios to
covered banks that differ in certain
respects from those distributed by the
OCC and the Board if necessary to better
reflect specific FDIC concerns. The FDIC
expects such situations to be extremely
rare, however, and anticipates making
every effort to avoid differences in the
scenarios required by each agency.
The FDIC anticipates that the stress
test scenarios will be revised annually
as appropriate to ensure that each
scenario remains relevant under
prevailing economic and industry
conditions. These yearly revisions will
enable the scenarios to capture evolving
risks and vulnerabilities. The need to
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72537
ensure that scenarios do not become
outdated because of economic and
financial developments makes a lengthy
process of review and comment
concerning scenarios prior to
distribution each year impractical.
However, the process of consultation
with the Board and the OCC, as well as
the ongoing interaction of FDIC staff
with public and private sector experts to
obtain views on salient risks and to
obtain suggestions for the behavior of
key economic variables, should ensure
that the stress conditions reflected in
the scenarios are well suited to their
purpose.
The scenario development process
culminates with the distribution of the
scenarios to all covered banks no later
than November 15th of each year. The
scenario descriptions provided to
covered banks will include values for
economic and financial variables
depicting the paths those variables
follow under the scenarios. The FDIC
believes that distribution of the
scenarios no later than November 15th
aligns with similar processes at the OCC
and the Board.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 25th day of
November, 2013.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–28608 Filed 12–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Parts 712 and 741
RIN 3133–AD93
Credit Union Service Organizations
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NCUA is issuing a final rule
to amend its credit union service
organization (CUSO) regulation to
increase transparency and address
certain safety and soundness concerns.
The final rule expands the requirements
of the CUSO regulation that apply to
federally insured, state-chartered credit
unions (FISCUs) to address accounting,
financial statements, and audits. The
final rule also includes limits on the
ability of ‘‘less than adequately
capitalized’’ FISCUs to recapitalize their
CUSOs. In addition, it adds several new
requirements that apply to both federal
credit unions (FCUs) and FISCUs.
Specifically, all CUSOs are required to
annually provide basic profile
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
72538
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
information to NCUA and the
appropriate state supervisory authority
(SSA). CUSOs engaging in certain
complex or high-risk activities are
required to additionally report more
detailed information, including audited
financial statements and general
customer information. The final rule
also requires all subsidiary CUSOs to
follow applicable laws and regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective June 30,
2014. CUSOs will begin submitting
reports to NCUA under new
§ 712.3(d)(4) when the agency’s
reporting system is fully operational,
which will be by December 31, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pamela Yu, Staff Attorney, Office of
General Counsel, at 1775 Duke Street,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314–3428,
telephone (703) 518–6540, or Lisa Dolin,
Program Officer, Office of Examination
and Insurance, at 1775 Duke Street,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314–3428,
telephone (703) 518–6630.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Why is NCUA adopting this final rule?
B. What changes were released for
comment in the 2011 proposed rule?
II. Summary of Public Comments
A. What were the general comments
supporting the proposed rule?
B. What were the general comments
opposing the proposed rule?
III. Final Rule
A. What changes does this rule make?
B. How does this rule impact credit
unions?
C. What are the key provisions in the final
rule?
IV. Draft Reporting Form
V. Regulatory Procedures
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Background
A. Why is NCUA adopting this final
rule?
CUSOs provide significant value to
the credit union industry by acting as a
collaborative means to share risk,
manage costs, and deliver services to
credit union members. With their
unique collaborative business model,
CUSOs foster cooperation and shared
innovation for credit unions to achieve
economies of scale, retain expertise, and
better serve their members. Thus, the
NCUA Board (the Board) recognizes that
CUSOs benefit both credit unions and
credit union members. Nevertheless, the
Board believes the ability to accurately
inventory CUSOs and evaluate their
financial and operational condition is
imperative to mitigating risks to the
National Credit Union Share Insurance
Fund (NCUSIF). The Board is adopting
this rule to improve the quality of
information about CUSOs and the
nature of their activities, in order to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
identify risks to the credit union
industry and protect the NCUSIF.
In 2008, the Board issued a final rule,
which, among other things, made
certain provisions of the CUSO
regulation applicable to FISCUs.1
Specifically, the final rule requires
FISCUs to maintain separate corporate
identities from their CUSOs. It also
requires FISCUs to enter into
agreements with CUSOs stating that the
CUSOs would provide open access to
their books and records to NCUA and
the applicable SSA.2 Those provisions
had previously only applied to FCUs,
but the Board believed that, to protect
the NCUSIF, it was necessary to apply
those requirements to FISCUs as well.
Since the promulgation of the 2008
rule, the Board has determined that
additional protections in the CUSO rule
addressing investments, accounting,
financial statements, and audits should
similarly be extended to FISCUs in
order to protect credit unions and the
NCUSIF. Additionally, since 2008, the
agency has continued to investigate
ways to improve the quality of
information about credit unions’ use of
CUSOs and the services provided by
CUSOs. The Board does not believe that
the information NCUA currently
maintains on CUSOs is sufficient to
evaluate CUSOs and their potential
impact to the NCUSIF. For example, at
this time, NCUA cannot fully determine
which CUSOs maintain relationships
with which credit unions, the financial
condition of CUSOs, the full range of
services offered by CUSOs, or even the
total number of CUSOs that presently
exist. The current information is
incomplete, primarily because the
agency is collecting information on a
CUSO from the CUSO’s credit union
clients rather than directly from the
CUSO itself. Further, directly capturing
CUSO information reduces the
regulatory burden to FICUs in reporting
this information. The Board believes
that, in order to identify emergent risks
posed by CUSOs and to protect the
NCUSIF, it is imperative to have
complete and accurate financial and
operational information about CUSOs
and the nature of their services.
As a result, the Board is issuing this
final rule, which makes additional parts
of the CUSO rule applicable to all
federally insured credit unions (FICUs).
The final rule also requires CUSOs to
register basic information (and, in some
cases, to file more detailed reports)
directly with NCUA and the appropriate
SSA, if applicable. Additionally, it also
codifies existing agency policy
1 73
B. What changes were released for
comment in the 2011 proposed rule?
On July 21, 2011, the Board issued a
proposed rule to amend part 712 of
NCUA’s regulations to increase
transparency and address certain safety
and soundness concerns regarding
CUSOs.3 The proposed rule applied
several existing provisions in the CUSO
rule to FISCUs. First, the proposal
limited a ‘‘less than adequately
capitalized’’ FISCU’s aggregate cash
outlay to a CUSO, measured on a
cumulative basis, to the permissible
investment limit in the state in which
the FISCU is chartered. These proposed
changes are similar to the requirements
in § 712.2(d)(2) for FCUs. They were
intended to address the Board’s concern
that less than adequately capitalized
FISCUs are continuing to invest money
in failing CUSOs, thereby posing serious
risks to their members and the NCUSIF.
Second, the proposed rule applied
existing provisions related to
accounting, financial statements, and
audits to FISCUs. These particular
provisions already apply to FCUs under
§ 712.3(d).
The proposed rule also added two
new requirements to apply to all FICUs.
Specifically, the proposed rule required
FICUs to include, in their agreements
with CUSOs, a requirement that a CUSO
submit a financial report directly to
NCUA or, in the case of a CUSO
invested in by a FISCU, NCUA and the
appropriate SSA. Under the proposal,
these reports would be required to be
submitted at least annually. (Proposed
§ 712.3(d)(4)). The proposed reporting
requirement was intended to protect the
NCUSIF by improving the quality of
available information about CUSOs so
that NCUA could better evaluate and
identify emergent risks posed by
CUSOs. Additionally, the proposed rule
prohibited FICUs from investing in a
CUSO unless that CUSO’s subsidiaries
also comply with all of the requirements
of the CUSO rule and/or laws and rules
of the state in which the credit union is
chartered, as applicable. (Proposed
§ 712.11).
II. Summary of Public Comments
The public comment period for the
proposed rule ended on September 26,
2011. NCUA received 290 comments on
FR 79312 (Dec. 29, 2008).
2 Id.
PO 00000
regarding subsidiary CUSOs. Finally,
the rule makes technical changes to
reference federally insured credit
unions and define ‘‘CUSO,’’ and
conforming amendments to § 741.222 to
reflect the changes affecting FISCUs in
this final rule.
Frm 00006
3 76
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
FR 44866 (July 27, 2011).
03DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
the proposed rule: 64 from CUSOs, 54
from FCUs, 85 from state-chartered
credit unions, 1 from a corporate credit
union, 7 from trade associations (1
representing banks, 2 representing
credit unions, 1 representing CUSOs, 1
representing state credit union
regulators, 1 representing cooperatives,
and 1 assisting credit unions in
investments and insurance), 21 from
state credit union leagues, 2 from nonprofit policy or research organizations, 2
from law firms or attorneys, and 54 from
individuals.
Of the 290 comments received, 85
were duplicative in some manner, for
example, identical ‘‘form’’ letters from
different individual commenters,
identical letters from the same person
representing different organizations,
identical letters from different people
representing the same organization, or
different letters from the same person
representing the same organization.
Additionally, the majority of the
comments exhibited notable
similarities. For example, a significant
number of comments contained at least
some duplicative or ‘‘form’’ language,
presented similar arguments or talking
points, cited similar data or statistics, or
posed similar questions for clarification.
Most of the commenters expressed
opposition to, or raised concerns about,
one or more aspects of the proposed
rule. A few commenters were
supportive of the proposal overall.
A. What were the general comments
supporting the proposed rule?
The commenters who supported the
proposal were generally in favor of
subjecting CUSO activities to greater
regulatory scrutiny. Several supporters
of the rule, however, argued that the
proposal did not go far enough and that
additional oversight is necessary in
order to protect consumers and to
mitigate the potential risk to the
NCUSIF.
Additionally, a number of
commenters opposed the proposal in
general, but expressed support for
certain aspects of it. In particular,
several commenters supported the
proposed recapitalization limits for less
than adequately capitalized FISCUs,
noting that this particular provision is
consistent with safety and soundness.
Several commenters also supported
applying the same CUSO rules to
FISCUs and FCUs. Several opponents of
the rule in general also expressed
support for greater transparency
between CUSOs and credit unions.
These commenters suggested, however,
that instead of being required to report
financial information directly to NCUA,
CUSOs should improve and enhance the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
information shared with participating
credit unions.
B. What were the general comments
opposing the proposed rule?
Commenters expressing opposition to
the rule focused primarily on the
proposed financial reporting
requirement. Most commenters raised
concerns about NCUA’s authority to
impose the proposed reporting
requirement. They noted that NCUA
does not have statutory authority to
directly regulate CUSOs, and questioned
whether NCUA’s general safety and
soundness and examination authority
under the Federal Credit Union Act
(FCU Act) is sufficient to justify the
increased regulatory oversight of
CUSOs. Nearly all commenters
indicated they do not believe CUSOs
pose a true systemic risk to the NCUSIF
and argued that additional regulation by
NCUA is unnecessary. Commenters
contended that NCUA’s current
authority over CUSOs is sufficient,
noting that problems with CUSOs are
few, and that these problem cases can be
addressed by improving NCUA’s
supervisory oversight of credit unions
and strengthening due diligence
requirements. Most commenters
suggested that, if the Board adopts a
final rule, the Board should take a more
targeted regulatory approach by
tailoring the rule to identified problem
areas. They argued that the proposal is
misguided in treating all CUSOs the
same, regardless of the CUSO’s line of
business.
In addition, a substantial number of
commenters argued that the proposed
rule would unnecessarily and unfairly
increase regulatory burden and
compliance costs to both credit unions
and their affiliated CUSOs, stifling
innovation and placing them at a
competitive disadvantage to their nonCUSO competitors. Commenters also
expressed concern that certain
requirements under the proposal would
be a condition of NCUSIF coverage.
NCUA has carefully reviewed and
considered all the comment letters it
received in response to the proposal.
Recognizing the significant concerns
raised by commenters, the Board has
made substantial adjustments to the
final rule. The key provisions of the
final rule, along with an analysis of the
pertinent public comments, are
discussed in greater detail below.
III. Final Rule
A. What changes does this rule make?
Under this final rule, several
provisions of the current CUSO
regulation which previously applied
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72539
only to FCUs will now apply to FISCUs
as well. The rule also adds a new
requirement for all FICUs to require
their CUSOs to register basic
information (and, in some cases, to file
more detailed reports) directly with
NCUA and, if applicable, the
appropriate SSA. Finally, the final rule
clarifies the regulation’s applicability to
subsidiary CUSOs by codifying existing
policy in the regulatory text.
B. How does this rule impact credit
unions?
FCUs and FISCUs making loans to
and investments in CUSOs are impacted
by this final rule. The Board
emphasizes, however, that the final rule
is significantly more limited in
application than the proposed rule,
targeted mainly to CUSOs engaged in
more complex or high-risk activities,
such as credit and lending, information
technology (IT), and custody,
safekeeping, and investment
management services for credit unions.
C. What are the key provisions in the
final rule?
A detailed discussion of the final
rule’s key provisions follows.
Applicability of Certain CUSO Rule
Provisions to FISCUs
Section 120 of the FCU Act authorizes
the Board to prescribe rules and
regulations for the administration of the
FCU Act.4 Further, Title II of the FCU
Act provides that the Board may insure
members’ accounts and administer the
NCUSIF, and may prescribe regulations
for FICUs that are necessary to carry out
that purpose.5 Subpart B of Part 741
addresses NCUA regulations that
FISCUs must follow to obtain and
maintain federal share insurance from
NCUA. Currently, only two provisions
of the CUSO rule apply to FISCUs: (1)
§ 712.4, which addresses corporate
separateness, and (2) § 712.3(d)(3),
which provides NCUA and the
applicable SSA with access to CUSO
books and records. The Board believes
certain requirements should be
consistent among all FICUs to minimize
risk to the NCUSIF. The risk to the
NCUSIF from CUSO operations is the
same, regardless of the charter type of
the credit union. However, individual
state regulatory requirements for CUSO
activities may vary from NCUA’s
regulations. The FCU Act limits FCU
loans to CUSOs to a maximum of 1% of
paid-in and unimpaired capital and
4 12
5 12
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
U.S.C. 1766.
U.S.C. 1781(b)(9), 1789(11).
03DER1
72540
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
surplus.6 The FCU Act also restricts
FCU investments in CUSOs to the same
amount.7 Under certain state laws,
however, FISCUs are permitted to invest
or loan to CUSOs in significantly higher
amounts. For example, some state limits
are as high as 25% or they are
unspecified.8 Accordingly, for
uniformity among all FICUs and to
minimize risk to the NCUSIF, this final
rule amends § 741.222 to specify that
current § 712.2(d)(2), which imposes
certain recapitalization restrictions, and
§ 712.3(d), which addresses CUSO
accounting, audits, and financial
statements, also apply to FISCUs.
Limits on Recapitalization of Insolvent
CUSOs—Applicability of § 712.2(d)(2)
to FISCUs
In 2008, the Board amended the
CUSO regulation to require less than
adequately capitalized FCUs to obtain
written approval from the appropriate
regional director before making an
investment in a CUSO that would result
in an aggregate cash outlay, measured
on a cumulative basis, in an amount in
excess of 1% of the credit union’s paidin and unimpaired capital and surplus.9
The Board promulgated the amendment
because, as it noted in the 2008
proposed rule, it was aware of credit
unions that had experienced losses
because they chose to recapitalize
insolvent CUSOs.10 The 2008
amendment was intended to prevent an
FCU from investing, on an aggregate
basis, more than 1% of its capital in a
CUSO that has essentially become
unsustainable.
This final rule adds a similar
requirement for FISCUs except where
state law specifies a higher investment
limit in CUSOs. The provision will
apply in circumstances where a FISCU
is already less than adequately
capitalized or where the recapitalization
of a CUSO will render the FISCU less
than adequately capitalized for Prompt
Corrective Action (PCA) purposes.11
Under the rule, if a FISCU is less than
adequately capitalized or the investment
will result in the FISCU being less than
adequately capitalized, the FISCU must
6 12
U.S.C. 1757(5)(D).
U.S.C. 1757(7)(I).
8 See, e.g., N.D. Admin. Code 13–03–23–06 (10%
of equity); Ind. Code § 28–7–1–9 (10% of capital,
surplus, and unimpaired shares, or higher with
prior written approval); Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 9–
B, § 864 (10% of share capital and surplus); Idaho
Code Ann. § 26–2146 (10% of paid-in shares and
deposits); Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 490.401 (12%
of assets with prior approval); N.C. Gen. Stat. § 54–
109.82 (25% of allocations to the reserve fund);
Mont. Code Ann. § 32–3–701 (no limit specified).
9 73 FR 79312 (Dec. 29, 2008).
10 73 FR 23982, 23984 (May 1, 2008).
11 12 CFR part 702.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
7 12
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
obtain written approval from the
appropriate SSA before making an
investment in a CUSO that will result in
an aggregate cash outlay, measured on a
cumulative basis, that exceeds the
investment limit in the state in which
the FISCU is chartered. If the applicable
state does not regulate the investment
limit for FISCUs, however, the FISCU
must obtain regulatory approval from
the appropriate SSA before making an
investment in a CUSO that will result in
an aggregate cash outlay, measured on a
cumulative basis, in excess of 1% of the
FISCU’s paid-in and unimpaired capital
and surplus.
In addition to submitting a request to
the appropriate SSA, a less than
adequately capitalized FISCU, or a
FISCU that would be rendered less than
adequately capitalized by the
recapitalization of a CUSO, must also
submit its request to the appropriate
NCUA regional office. While the SSA
will decide such requests, the Board
believes it is important that NCUA’s
regional offices also be made aware of
these requests so NCUA can provide
appropriate input to the SSAs. The
Board notes that this amendment does
not require a less than adequately
capitalized FISCU, or a FISCU that
would be rendered less than adequately
capitalized by the recapitalization of a
CUSO, to divest of a CUSO. Rather, it
may maintain its existing investment,
but it cannot make additional
investments in any CUSO without prior
written approval from the appropriate
SSA.
Several commenters generally
supported applying the same CUSO
rules to FISCUs and FCUs. A number of
commenters also expressed specific
support for this provision, noting that
imposing investment limits for less than
adequately capitalized FISCUs is
consistent with safety and soundness.
Some commenters, however, disagreed
with the cumulative calculation for the
aggregate cash outlay or expressed
confusion regarding its application. In
particular, several commenters asked for
clarification regarding how far back in
time the cumulative calculation must
go. The Board adopts this provision
substantially as proposed, but, for
clarity, the final rule limits the
cumulative calculation to the last 7
years. This time period corresponds
with various other accounting time
limits, such as the length of time
bankruptcies are reported, and record
retention timeframes for audit and tax
purposes. Parallel amendments are
made in the final rule to limit the
cumulative calculation to 7 years for
both FCUs and FISCUs.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
CUSO Accounting, Audits, and
Financial Statements—§ 712.3(d)
Under the final rule, provisions in the
current CUSO rule addressing CUSO
accounting, audits, and financial
statements which currently only apply
to FCUs also now apply to all FICUs. As
discussed above, in 2008, the Board
amended § 712.3(d) to require FISCUs to
comply with the subsections addressing
access to a CUSO’s books and records.12
This final rule applies all of the
subsections of § 712.3(d) to FISCUs.
Under these additional subsections, a
credit union’s agreement with a CUSO
must require the CUSO to account for
all of its transactions according to
Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP), prepare quarterly
financial statements, and obtain an
annual audit of its financial statements
by a licensed certified public
accountant.
As noted above, a number of
commenters supported applying the
same rules to FISCUs and FCUs. A few
commenters, however, expressed
concern that the proposal to apply the
financial statement and audit provision,
§ 712.3(d)(2), to FISCUs would result in
higher compliance costs to the credit
union and CUSO where a CUSO is
wholly owned and the CUSO’s
financials are consolidated into the
investing credit union’s financial
statements. The Board notes that under
this final rule, as well as under the
existing rule for FCUs, a wholly owned
CUSO would not be required to obtain
a separate annual financial statement
audit if the CUSO is included in the
annual consolidated financial statement
audit of its investing credit union. As
such, the Board does not anticipate that
the extension of § 712.3(d)(2) to FISCUs
will impose an unreasonable
compliance cost where a CUSO is
wholly owned. The Board continues to
believe it is necessary to extend these
requirements to FISCUs to ensure
NCUA will be able to fully review the
financial condition of CUSOs and
evaluate the risks posed to FISCUs and
ultimately to the NCUSIF. Accordingly,
the section is adopted as proposed.
Reporting Requirement—§ 712.3(d)(4)
The proposed rule added a new
provision to require a FICU’s agreement
with a CUSO to require it to file
financial reports with NCUA and, as
applicable, the appropriate SSA
(proposed § 712.3(d)(4)). The proposal
was intended to allow NCUA to collect
uniform information directly from all
CUSOs, in order for the agency to
12 73
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
FR 79312 (Dec. 29, 2008).
03DER1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
adequately evaluate the relationships
between CUSOs and credit unions, as
well as the risk posed by those
relationships. As discussed in the
preamble to the proposed rule, the
Board believes that the information
NCUA currently compiles on CUSOs is
incomplete because the agency is
indirectly gathering pertinent
information from customer credit
unions rather than directly from the
CUSOs. Without additional reporting
directly from CUSOs, it is impossible for
NCUA to determine which CUSOs
maintain relationships with which
credit unions, the financial condition of
CUSOs, and the full range of services
offered by CUSOs. This lack of
information restricts NCUA’s ability to
conduct offsite monitoring and evaluate
the risks posed by CUSOs. As proposed,
the information required in the reports
would have to be submitted at least
annually and would address five broad
categories: (1) General information; (2)
board and management; (3) services; (4)
credit union customer listing; and (5)
balance sheet and income statement. In
addition, the Board proposed to require
a newly formed CUSO to file the report
within 30 days after its formation.
As discussed above, this requirement
was troubling to most commenters.
Commenters expressed opposition to
the reporting provision and asked the
agency to substantially revise or
withdraw the proposal. Commenters
also expressed concerns about NCUA’s
authority to impose the proposed
requirements. They noted that NCUA
does not have statutory authority to
directly regulate CUSOs and, as such,
the reporting requirement is
overreaching. Further, commenters
argued that the provision is unjustified,
contending there is insufficient data to
demonstrate that CUSO investments
present a material risk. Moreover, they
argued NCUA’s current authority over
CUSOs is sufficient to stem any
potentially serious risk issues.
The Board disagrees. While the Board
acknowledges that NCUA does not have
direct statutory and regulatory authority
over the operations of CUSOs, NCUA
does have the authority to regulate
FCUs’ lending and investment in
CUSOs.13 NCUA has regulated this
lending and investment authority in the
CUSO rule since 1979, when this
statutory provision was implemented
through the promulgation of the first
CUSO regulation.14 The Board believes
the proposed reporting requirement is
both historically and legally consistent
with NCUA’s statutory authority to
13 12
14 44
U.S.C. 1757(7)(I), 1757(5)(D).
FR 12401 (Mar. 7, 1979).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
regulate this lending and investment
authority.
Moreover, Title II of the FCU Act
provides the Board with the broad
authority to insure members’ accounts
and administer the NCUSIF, and to
prescribe regulations for FICUs that are
necessary to carry out that purpose.15
All FICUs, through their application for
insurance, have agreed to comply with
those regulations. The current lack of
information on CUSOs limits NCUA’s
ability to conduct offsite monitoring and
assess any emergent risks to the NCUSIF
posed by CUSO operations. The Board
continues to believe that, to protect the
NCUSIF from any such risk, it is
necessary and within its authority to
implement regulations that require
credit unions to enter into agreements
with CUSOs requiring CUSOs to submit
reports directly to NCUA and the
appropriate SSAs, if applicable.
Furthermore, the Board continues to
believe that CUSOs present material
risks to the credit union industry. Past
experience has demonstrated that a
single CUSO has caused losses and
operational problems at multiple credit
unions. Such losses have contributed to
a number of credit unions’ insolvency,
conservatorship, or liquidation. The
following are specific examples in
which CUSO activity caused significant
financial and/or operational problems
for credit unions.16
Case #1—Activities involving
multiple CUSOs contributed to a $1.5
billion FICU’s failure. Since 2008, the
FICU sustained losses totaling
approximately $224 million as a direct
result of its CUSO activity.
Case #2—A CUSO managed four loan
pools primarily comprised of
commercial loans. In addition to having
loan participation agreements with 25
FICUs, the CUSO obtained warehouse
lines of credit from several banks and
one corporate credit union. In 2008, the
CUSO’s access to third party investors
declined with the economic turndown.
To stay in compliance with its written
agreements with FICUs, the CUSO
shifted mortgages from one mortgage
pool to another. Investor FICUs were
15 12
U.S.C. 1781(b)(9), 1789(11).
agency does not have a formal mechanism
to track information about losses attributable to
CUSOs. Further, there are different types of losses
that can be realized by credit unions, including
losses in terms of the investment in or loan to the
CUSO and losses incurred from the product or
service offered by the CUSO (for example, loan
losses). Credit union failures can rarely be
attributed to one factor alone. Failures typically
arise out of a compounding of poor decisions on the
part of credit union management. There are
examples, however, of losses in credit unions as a
direct result of CUSO activity. In some cases, these
losses led to the failure of the institutions involved.
16 The
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72541
provided monthly reports on the loan
pools, but the information was poorly
presented. As a result, it was difficult
for investor FICUs to determine the
individual mortgages transferred among
the pools. The CUSO eventually
defaulted on its warehouse lines of
credit. It was put into bankruptcy in
2009. In total, aggregate losses to the
FICUs involved with this CUSO
exceeded $47 million. Of the 25 FICUs
affected, 10 were assumed by other
FICUs. The aggregate cost to the
NCUSIF for these actions was over $5
million.
Case #3—Nineteen FICUs incurred
losses totaling over $5 million in the last
5 years from a CUSO involved in
member business loan participations.
An additional $6 million in losses are
projected from one commercial
borrower. FICUs have already reserved
between 25% and 100% of their
participated balances for these
additional anticipated losses.
Case #4—A student lending CUSO
sold participations of purchased student
loans to six FICUs. Related loan losses
at these FICUs are much higher than
anticipated. One FICU has booked over
$4 million in loan losses and projects an
additional $4.5 million in losses on the
portfolio.
Case #5—A CUSO underwrites and
services member business loans for
several FICUs. The CUSO’s past
performance was substandard and a
large portion of the serviced loan
portfolio was owned by one FCU. The
FCU could not recover from the impact
of the CUSO’s poor lending practices,
and the associated loan losses played a
role in the FCU’s need to merge with a
healthier credit union.
Ensign FCU
Involvement in a business loan CUSO
was a contributing factor to the failure
of Ensign FCU, which has cost the
NCUSIF approximately $38 million to
date. The CUSO failed to service a
member business loan portfolio
according to its agreement with the
credit union. In November 2010, NCUA
filed a suit against the CUSO claiming
the CUSO continued to collect
payments on 18 commercial loans
allegedly owned by Ensign FCU after
the credit union was shut down in
November 2009. In addition to Ensign
FCU, the CUSO worked with three other
credit unions. The CUSO has since
dissolved.
Eastern New York FCU
Relationships with a complex
network of CUSOs, a lack of board of
directors’ oversight of related business
ventures, and improper accounting
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
72542
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
contributed to the failure of Eastern
New York FCU. Several CUSOs were
created to generate income, but most of
the CUSOs had very few customers.
NCUA’s Office of the Inspector General
determined that the FCU’s board of
directors did not perform the necessary
due diligence to ensure each CUSO was
complying with all regulations. NCUA
estimates the purchase and assumption
of this $50 million credit union will cost
the NCUSIF approximately $3.3 million.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Community One FCU
The failure of Community One FCU
was due in part to losses stemming from
a CUSO involved in indirect auto
lending. The credit union’s management
engaged in an extremely large indirect
lending program without adequate
policies and collection procedures in
place. NCUA estimates the purchase
and assumption of this $159 million
credit union will cost the NCUSIF
approximately $6.8 million.
Kern Central Credit Union
Kern Central CU’s failure was due in
part to an indirect auto loan program
CUSO. The credit union’s losses from a
concentration of indirect auto loans
with high loan-to-value ratios, as well as
poor management of the program,
contributed to its demise. NCUA
estimates the purchase and assumption
of this $34 million credit union will cost
the NCUSIF approximately $5.6 million.
The above examples clearly
demonstrate the material risks that
CUSO operations pose to the credit
union industry. Moreover, the Board
feels a proactive—rather than reactive—
approach is necessary to prevent higher
potential losses to the NCUSIF in the
future. NCUA’s methods of managing
risk to the NCUSIF must keep pace as
credit union and CUSO operations
expand and present more risk to the
NCUSIF.
As noted above, in 2008, the Board
amended the CUSO rule to, among other
things, require all FICUs to enter into
agreements with CUSOs stating that the
CUSOs would provide NCUA and the
applicable SSA with ‘‘complete access
to any books and records of the CUSO
and the ability to review CUSO internal
controls.’’ 17 In general, this access may
involve an onsite CUSO review to
determine the degree of risk the CUSO
poses to credit unions and the NCUSIF.
During such review, an examiner
assesses the financial condition of the
CUSO and the adequacy of controls;
verifies the accuracy of the financial
statements; determines the viability of
17 74 FR 79312 (Dec. 29, 2008); 12 CFR
712.3(d)(3)(i).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
operations and service to member credit
unions; and confirms compliance with
applicable laws and regulations. NCUA
may request a CUSO review if there are
safety and soundness concerns to credit
unions or if the CUSO poses an undue
risk to the NCUSIF. For example, the
agency may request a review if a credit
union examination raises concerns that
the CUSO’s operation is adversely
affecting the financial condition and
operation of the credit union, or if the
CUSO has a significant effect on the
operations of a credit union or group of
credit unions that depend on its
services.
While NCUA currently has the
authority to access CUSO books and
records and to review CUSO internal
controls, the agency does not routinely
engage in onsite monitoring of CUSOs.
The Board believes it is more efficient
and more cost-effective for the agency
and the credit union system to require
CUSOs to submit information about
their financial condition directly to
NCUA, than for the agency to collect
this information indirectly through
credit unions or through more
widespread onsite CUSO reviews. As
noted above, NCUA’s current practice is
to conduct an onsite CUSO review only
if safety and soundness concerns to
credit unions exist or if the CUSO poses
an undue risk to the NCUSIF. The Board
believes the final rule will improve the
agency’s ability to conduct offsite
monitoring of CUSOs and identify
emerging areas of concern.
Nevertheless, the Board recognizes
that the rule could be more narrowly
focused and still achieve the agency’s
objective of obtaining more complete
and accurate information about CUSOs,
the services they offer, and their
financial condition. Accordingly, the
Board is significantly revising the
reporting requirement in the final rule.
The majority of commenters suggested
NCUA should take a more targeted
regulatory approach by tailoring the
final rule to identified problem areas.
Further, they argued that the proposal’s
one-size-fits-all approach was
misguided. Numerous commenters
contended that the rule should be
exclusively targeted at CUSOs engaging
in riskier activities, such as business
lending. CUSOs involved in activities
with less risk, such as marketing or
licensing CUSOs, should not be subject
to increased oversight. Commenters
recommended that, at a minimum,
certain types of lower-risk CUSOs
should be exempted from the rule.
In light of the comments received on
the proposed rule, the Board has
determined to significantly reduce the
scope and application of the reporting
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
requirement in the final rule.
Accordingly, the final rule narrowly
focuses on CUSOs engaging in certain
complex or high-risk activities. The
Board notes that the types of activities
qualifying as ‘‘complex or high-risk,’’ as
well as the reporting requirements for
CUSOs engaging in such activities, may
evolve as new risks emerge. At this
time, however, the Board believes that,
for purposes of the reporting
requirement, complex or high-risk
activities include credit and lending,
information technology, and custody,
safekeeping, and investment
management services for credit unions
because these particular activities tend
to affect a large number of credit unions
and present a high degree of operational
and/or financial risk. Activities related
to these categories currently include:
• Credit and lending—
Æ Business loan origination;
Æ Consumer mortgage loan
origination;
Æ Loan support services, including
servicing;
Æ Student loan origination; and
Æ Credit card loan origination.
• Information technology—
Æ Electronic transaction services;
Æ Record retention, security, and
disaster recovery services; and
Æ Payroll processing services.
• Custody, safekeeping, and
investment management services for
credit unions.18
Credit and lending-related activities
involve credit unions’ core business
function and represent a high degree of
potential risk. CUSOs engaging in credit
and lending services have the potential
to pose multiple types of risks to FICUs
and the NCUSIF. Without proper
monitoring and controls, FICUs making
loans to, and investments in, CUSOs
engaged in credit and lending activities
may quickly be exposed to significant
levels of credit, strategic, or reputation
risks. For example, credit risk increases
with poor underwriting, which may
lead to decreased net worth and
increased strategic and reputation risks,
all of which can ultimately impact
member services. Due to the higher-risk
nature of credit and lending activities,
the Board believes it is necessary to
receive additional information about
CUSOs involved in credit and lending
activities in order to monitor for
material levels of risk to the NCUSIF.
Information technology-related
CUSOs usually engage in activities that
18 CUSOs only engaging in trust services for
individual credit union members will be required
to submit only basic profile information. These
CUSOs will not be required to submit the
additional, enhanced report.
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
involve emerging complex electronic
services. These services have been
subject to malicious attacks, which pose
transactional, reputational, and strategic
risks to credit unions, and ultimately,
the NCUSIF, if proper safeguards are not
in place. Moreover, credit union
members have been adversely impacted
by breaches in network security. The
additional data collected for CUSOs
engaging in IT services will enable
NCUA to better monitor and respond to
these increased risks.
In addition, the Board believes CUSOs
engaging in custody, safekeeping, and
investment management services for
credit unions require robust monitoring
due to the complex nature of these
services. Credit unions place a high
degree of reliance on these CUSOs
because credit unions are entrusting
their assets and their members’ assets to
CUSOs. As a result, there are increased
reputational, strategic, and compliance
risks that warrant additional monitoring
by NCUA.
Under the final rule, only CUSOs
engaging in these complex or high-risk
activities are required to report
substantive information. All other
CUSOs will register only basic profile
information. Specifically, the final rule
requires a FICU to obtain a written
agreement from a CUSO before investing
in or lending to the CUSO. This written
agreement must provide that the CUSO
will annually submit, pursuant to
NCUA guidance, a report containing
general registration information directly
to NCUA and the appropriate SSA, if
applicable. This basic registration
information will consist of general
profile information, including the
CUSO’s legal name; tax identification
number (e.g., EIN); address; telephone
number; Web site; primary point of
contact; services offered; name(s) and
charter(s) of credit union(s) investing in,
lending to, or receiving services from
the CUSO; and investor(s) and/or
subsidiary CUSO(s). The Board believes
this is the minimal amount of
information necessary to meet the
agency’s objective of obtaining a clearer
and more transparent representation of
the CUSO industry.
Only CUSOs involved in complex or
high-risk activities will be subject to an
additional, enhanced reporting
requirement. Specifically, in addition to
the basic profile information described
above, CUSOs engaged in certain
complex or high-risk activities will be
required to report more detailed
information, including audited financial
statements and more specific customer
information. The Board believes this
additional information is crucial in
order for the agency to effectively
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
analyze and monitor the risks CUSOs
present to FICUs and the NCUSIF.
Specifically, CUSOs engaging in
complex or high-risk activities will be
required to report:
• For each credit union investing in,
lending to, or receiving services from
the CUSO:
Æ Services provided to each credit
union;
Æ The investment amount, loan
amount, or level of activity of each
credit union; and
• The CUSO’s most recent year-end
audited financial statements.
In addition, CUSOs engaging in credit
and lending services will be required to
report the following activity by loan
type:
• The total dollar amount of loans
outstanding;
• The total number of loans
outstanding;
• The total dollar amount of loans
granted year-to-date; and
• The total number of loans granted
year-to-date.
CUSOs that previously were not
involved in complex or high-risk
activities that become involved in such
activities by virtue of: (1) A merger with
or acquisition of a CUSO that engages in
such activities; or (2) adding new
products or services that are complex or
high-risk activities will be subject to the
enhanced reporting requirement. For
example, if a CUSO providing real estate
brokerage services merges into a CUSO
involved in consumer mortgage loan
origination, then the continuing CUSO
will be required to submit the
additional, enhanced report in the next
reporting cycle. Moreover, if a CUSO
engaging in checking and currency
services begins to offer payroll
processing services, then it too will
become subject to the enhanced
reporting requirement.
Some commenters objected that the
actual reporting form required under the
proposal would be issued as guidance,
without the opportunity for public
comment. The Board believes it would
be advantageous for FICUs and CUSOs
to have the opportunity to review the
format and content of the draft reporting
form, so all affected parties are
adequately prepared to comply with the
new requirements once the reporting
system is fully established. Accordingly,
the draft reporting form is being
published in conjunction with this
rulemaking. The draft form illustrates
the intended reporting format for the
basic registration for all CUSOs, as well
as the expanded reporting requirement
for CUSOs involved in complex or highrisk services. The Board emphasizes that
the draft reporting form is subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72543
change as the agency works to develop
and implement the new reporting
system for CUSOs. Furthermore, future
modifications may be made to the
reporting form based on NCUA’s
assessment of current needs. NCUA
intends to submit a copy of the
reporting form to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA). Accordingly, the public will
be provided an opportunity to comment
on the form’s paperwork requirements.
The draft reporting form is found in
Section IV of this SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Many commenters raised concerns
that the proposed reporting requirement
could potentially expose CUSOs’
confidential business information and
trade secrets to public dissemination
through Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) requests, putting them at a
competitive disadvantage to their nonCUSO counterparts. The Board is
sensitive to these concerns. It notes that
the FOIA, as well as the applicable
exemptions set forth in NCUA’s
implementing FOIA regulations, applies
to any data or information submitted by
CUSOs to NCUA under § 712.3(d)(4).
The Board anticipates that CUSO
submissions will contain or consist of
‘‘trade secrets and commercial or
financial information obtained from a
person and privileged or confidential.’’
This type of information is subject to
withholding under exemption 4 of the
FOIA.19 In addition, information that is
‘‘contained in or related to examination,
operating, or condition reports prepared
by, on behalf of, or for the use of an
agency responsible for the regulation or
supervision of financial institutions’’ is
subject to withholding under exemption
8 of the FOIA.20 To the extent, however,
that CUSO submissions may contain or
consist of data or information not
subject to an applicable FOIA
exemption, for example, a CUSO’s
name, address, or other publicly
available information, that data or
information would be releasable under
the FOIA.
Several commenters noted that the
proposal required the financial report to
be submitted ‘‘at least’’ annually. These
commenters urged NCUA to clearly
define the reporting frequency as
‘‘annual.’’ The Board agrees that
reporting under the new rule should
occur on an annual basis. As such, the
final rule modifies the requirement by
establishing the reporting frequency as
‘‘annually.’’ Additionally, the final rule
19 5
U.S.C. 552(b)(4); 12 CFR 792.11(a)(4).
U.S.C. 552(b)(8); 12 CFR 792.11(a)(8)
(emphasis added).
20 5
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
72544
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
modifies the proposed requirement that
a newly formed CUSO file a report
within 30 days after its formation.
Under the final rule, all newly formed
CUSOs will be required to file a report
within 60 days of formation. For newly
formed CUSOs involved in complex or
high-risk activities, such report must
include the enhanced information; all
other newly formed CUSOs will report
only basic registration information. For
purposes of this requirement, the
definition of ‘‘newly formed CUSO’’
includes a newly established business
or an established business that becomes
subject to this regulation by virtue of a
credit union’s investment or loan to the
business. Again, NCUA will publish
guidance on the report, providing more
specific information on the correct
format, timing, and required
information.
Commenters also raised concerns that
the proposal is unclear about how the
information reported directly by CUSOs
will be used by the agency. Numerous
commenters noted that, by design,
CUSOs generally do not have a sizable
capital structure or generate significant
income. These commenters urged
NCUA not to evaluate CUSOs based
solely on their balance sheets and
income statements.
The Board is mindful of commenters’
concerns and emphasizes that the
agency appreciates the value that
CUSOs bring to the credit union
industry as collaborative tools for credit
unions to achieve economies of scale,
retain expertise, and better serve their
members. The Board recognizes that
CUSOs, in their supportive function, are
intentionally designed to operate on
thin margins in order to realize greater
benefits to credit unions. Accordingly,
the Board understands that balance
sheets and income statements alone do
not reflect the true value of CUSOs. The
Board continues to believe, however,
that the ability to accurately inventory
CUSOs and evaluate their financial and
operational condition is paramount to
mitigating risk to the credit union
system as a whole. It emphasizes that
NCUA intends to use the information
reported by CUSOs to inform the
agency’s supervisory oversight of FICUs.
For example, NCUA may use the
information to help credit unions
improve their due diligence, to raise
examiner awareness of identified risks,
and to foster collaborative problemsolving among CUSOs, credit unions,
SSAs, and NCUA. The Board feels that
the final rule achieves the balance of
exercising regulatory restraint while
ensuring the ultimate safety and
soundness of the NCUSIF.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
Subsidiary CUSOs—§ 712.11
The proposed rule added a new
section to the CUSO regulation,
applicable to both FCUs and FISCUs,
prohibiting a FICU from investing in a
CUSO unless all subsidiaries of the
CUSO also agree to follow all applicable
laws and regulations. (Proposed
§ 712.11).
A significant number of commenters
expressed concern that the proposal
would treat any entity in which a CUSO
invests as a subsidiary subject to the
CUSO regulation. They argued that noncontrolling investments should not
trigger the regulation. Several
commenters suggested that the informal
rule has been that a CUSO subsidiary is
impermissible if the subsidiary was
formed with the intent and purpose of
evading the CUSO rule, and they
recommended that the Board adopt this
standard in the final rule.
The Board disagrees and adopts the
subsidiary provision substantially as
proposed. NCUA’s policy with regard to
CUSO subsidiaries has been publicly
stated since at least 1997, although it
has never been included in regulatory
text. Specifically, under existing policy,
the CUSO rule applies to all levels or
tiers of a CUSO’s structure. Any
subsidiary entity in which a CUSO
invests will also be treated as a CUSO
and, thus, subject to the regulation.21
The Board continues to believe there is
an inherent risk that a subsidiary CUSO
could adversely affect the investing
credit union and, ultimately, the
NCUSIF. Accordingly, the final rule
clarifies the regulation’s applicability to
subsidiary CUSOs by codifying NCUA’s
existing policy in the regulatory text.
The Board believes it is appropriate to
codify this requirement in the regulation
to ensure that credit unions and CUSOs
are aware that the requirements of the
CUSO rule and applicable state rules
apply to all subsidiary entities in which
a CUSO invests, including those entities
with the appearance of being formed
with the intent and purpose of evading
the CUSO rule. This requirement will
apply to any entity in which a CUSO
has an ownership interest of any
amount, if that entity is engaged
primarily in providing products or
services to credit unions or credit union
members. The provision, however, will
not apply to third parties with whom a
CUSO contracts or otherwise does
business. Because this provision
(§ 712.11) applies to all FICUs, the
definition of a CUSO in § 741.222 is also
amended to include subsidiary entities
in which a CUSO invests any amount,
21 62
PO 00000
FR 11781 (Mar. 13, 1997).
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
if that entity is engaged primarily in
providing products or services to credit
unions or members.
Definitions and Conforming
Amendments
The Board is making several technical
and conforming amendments. The final
rule updates § 712.1 to make certain
technical changes, to reflect the
amendments in this rulemaking, and to
add a definition to provide that the term
‘‘federally insured credit union’’ or
‘‘FICU’’ means all FCUs and FISCUs. In
addition, the final rule brings the
language contained in § 741.222 that
defines the term ‘‘CUSO’’ into § 712.1 as
well. The Board believes that parallel
references to ‘‘CUSO’’ in both § 712.1
and § 742.222 will add clarity and
consistency to the regulations
addressing CUSOs. Additionally,
§ 712.1 and § 741.222 are being revised
to conform with § 701.30, which was
amended to include remittance
transfers.22 Finally, technical changes
are made in § 712.4(b) to clarify that
written legal advice is required prior to
a FICU investing in a CUSO.
State Exemptions
Section 712.10 of the current rule
allows SSAs to apply for an exemption,
on behalf of FISCUs, from § 712.3(d)(3),
the provision addressing access to books
and records with which FISCUs must
comply. Because the proposed rule
added additional requirements for
FISCUs (proposed § 712.3(d)(1) and (2)),
the proposal expanded § 712.10 to allow
SSAs to obtain an exemption, on behalf
of FISCUs, from compliance with these
additional provisions. The proposed
changes did not alter the manner in
which an SSA can obtain an exemption,
but merely made changes that take into
account that some states may already
have equivalent or more stringent rules
or requirements that govern financial
reporting, audits, and accounting
practices of FISCUs and their CUSOs.
The proposed rule, however, did not
allow for an SSA to apply for an
exemption, on behalf of FISCUs, from
the new reporting requirement in
proposed § 712.3(d)(4) because allowing
an exemption from this requirement
would result in inconsistent reporting
based on the varying laws in the
different states. Commenters were either
generally supportive of, or did not
provide comment on, these particular
changes. Accordingly, the Board adopts
the amendments to § 712.10
substantially as proposed. The final rule
clarifies, however, that NCUA may grant
22 76 FR 44761 (July 27, 2011); 76 FR 73993 (Nov.
30, 2011).
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Transition Period for Compliance
The Board recognizes that FICUs with
loans to or investments in CUSOs will
be required under this final rule to make
changes in the agreements they
currently have with their CUSOs.
Accordingly, the effective date of the
final rule is June 30, 2014. Additionally,
CUSOs will begin submitting reports to
NCUA under new § 712.3(d)(4) when
the agency’s reporting system is fully
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
operational, which will be by December
31, 2015.
IV. Draft Reporting Form
The Board is publishing a draft
reporting form to illustrate the intended
format for CUSO reports submitted
under § 712.3(d)(4) of this final rule.
The draft shows the planned reporting
format for the basic registration for all
CUSOs, as well as the expanded
reporting requirement for CUSOs
engaging in complex or high-risk
activities. The Board notes, however,
that the draft reporting form is subject
to change as the agency develops and
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
implements the new reporting system
for CUSOs. Further, once finalized, the
agency may later modify the reporting
form based on NCUA’s assessment of
changing industry needs. In accordance
with the requirements of the PRA,
NCUA will submit a copy of the
reporting form to the OMB, along with
an application for an OMB Control
Number. At that time, the public will be
provided an opportunity to comment on
the form’s paperwork requirements,
including NCUA’s estimate of the
burden of the paperwork requirements.
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
ER03DE13.008
state exemptions from any or all of
§ 712.3(d)(1), (2), and (3) only if state
law is equal to, or more stringent than,
NCUA’s requirements.
72545
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
V. Regulatory Procedures
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires NCUA to prepare an analysis to
describe any significant economic
impact a regulation may have on a
substantial number of small entities.
NCUA considers credit unions having
less than fifty million dollars in assets
to be small for purposes of RFA.23 The
changes to the CUSO rule impose
minimal compliance obligations by
requiring FISCUs to comply with certain
regulatory requirements concerning
agreements with CUSOs and certain
recapitalization limits. NCUA has
determined and certifies that the final
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small credit unions.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The PRA applies to rulemakings in
which an agency by rule creates a new
paperwork burden on regulated entities
or modifies an existing burden.24 For
purposes of the PRA, a paperwork
burden may take the form of either a
reporting or a recordkeeping
requirement, both referred to as
information collections. NCUA
recognizes that this final rule requires
23 Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement (IRPS)
87–2 as amended by IRPS 03–2, 68 FR 30950 (May
29, 2003) and IRPS 13–1, 78 FR 4032 (Jan. 18,
2013).
24 44 U.S.C. 3507(d); 5 CFR Part 1320.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
FISCUs and FCUs to comply with
certain requirements that constitute an
information collection within the
meaning of the PRA. Under this rule,
FISCUs with an investment in or loan to
a CUSO will need to revise the current
agreement they have with their CUSO to
provide that the CUSO will account for
all its transactions in accordance with
GAAP, prepare quarterly financial
statements and obtain an annual
financial statement audit of its financial
statements by a licensed certified public
accountant. The rule also requires
FISCUs, in certain circumstances, to
submit an application for regulatory
approval to recapitalize an insolvent
CUSO. Additionally, the final rule
requires FICUs to enter into agreements
with CUSOs requiring CUSOs to submit
reports directly to NCUA and the
appropriate SSA.
Currently, NCUA cannot fully
determine the total number of CUSOs
that presently exist, which CUSOs
maintain relationships with which
credit unions, the financial condition of
CUSOs, or the full range of services
offered by CUSOs. The current
information is incomplete, primarily
because the agency is collecting
information from the CUSOs’ credit
union clients rather than directly from
each CUSO itself. Nevertheless,
according to NCUA records, of the 2,492
FISCUs that filed a Form 5300 Call
Report with NCUA as of June 30, 2013,
1,161 reported an interest in at least one
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
CUSO, and a total of 2,836 CUSO
interests was reported. For purposes of
this analysis, NCUA estimates that this
requirement will affect all FISCUs
reporting an interest in a CUSO. Using
these estimates, information collection
obligations imposed by this aspect of
the rule, on an annual basis, are
analyzed below:
Changing the written agreement
relating to certain accounting and
reporting requirements.
FISCUs with a reported interest in a
CUSO as of 6/30/2013: 1,161.
Frequency of response: one-time 25
Initial hour burden: 4.
4 hour × 1,161 = 4,644
In addition to the requirement for
FISCUs to revise their agreements with
CUSOs, this rule also requires FCUs
with an investment in or loan to a CUSO
to revise the current agreement they
have with their CUSO to provide that
the CUSO submit a financial report
directly to NCUA. According to NCUA
records, of the 4,189 FCUs that filed a
form 5300 call report with NCUA as of
June 30, 2013, 1,413 reported at least
one interest in a CUSO; a total of 3,275
CUSO interests was reported. For
purposes of this analysis, NCUA
estimates that this requirement will
affect all FCUs with a reported interest
25 One-time estimates account for, on average,
approximately two CUSOs per credit union. The
actual frequency will vary based on the credit
union’s actual number of reported interests in a
CUSO.
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
ER03DE13.009
72546
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
in a CUSO. Using these estimates,
information collection obligations
imposed by this aspect of the rule, on
an annual basis, are analyzed below:
Changing the written agreement
relating to reports to NCUA.
FCUs with a reported interest in a
CUSO as of 6/30/2013: 1,413.
Frequency of response: one-time.
Initial hour burden: 4.
4 hour × 1,413 = 5,652
Initial CUSO reporting to NCUA—
basic information.
Reported CUSOs as of 6/30/2013 26:
1,197.
Frequency of response: one-time.
Initial hour burden: 0.5.
0.5 × 1,197 = 598.5
Initial CUSO reporting to NCUA—
expanded information.
Reported CUSOs providing credit and
lending, IT, or custody, safekeeping, and
investment management services for
credit unions as of 6/30/2013: 27 600.
Frequency of response: one-time.
Initial hour burden: 3.
3 hours × 600 = 1,800
Annual CUSO reporting to NCUA—
expanded information.
Reported CUSOs providing credit and
lending, IT, or custody, safekeeping, and
investment management services for
credit unions services as of 6/30/2013:
600.
Frequency of response: Annual.
Initial hour burden: 3.
3 hour × 600 = 1,800
Direct reporting by CUSOs, however,
will lessen the existing burden to FICUs
for reporting their CUSO interests to
NCUA. According to NCUA records, of
the 6,681 FICUs that filed a form 5300
call report with NCUA as of June 30,
2013, 2,574 reported at least one interest
in a CUSO.
For purposes of this analysis, NCUA
estimates that this requirement will
affect all FICUs with a reported interest
in a CUSO. Using these estimates, the
reduced burden to FICUs by this aspect
of the rule, on an annual basis, is
analyzed below:
Completing the CUSO section of 5300
call report.
FICUs with a reported interest in a
CUSO as of 6/30/2013: 2,574.
Frequency of response: Quarterly.
Reduced hour burden: 0.4.
0.4 hours × 2,574 × 4 = 4,118.4
26 Numbers reported may be over or understated
based on the problems with gathering CUSO data
from credit unions rather than from CUSOs directly.
27 Estimates are likely overstated as credit unions
currently report only broad categories of services as
defined in the regulation. The expanded reporting
requirements under this rule are more narrowly
defined and will result in fewer CUSOs affected.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
Completing the CUSO section of CU
Online profile.
FICUs with a reported interest in a
CUSO as of 6/30/2013: 2,574.
Frequency of response: Semiannually.
Reduced hour burden: 0.2.
0.2 hours × 2,574 × 2 = 1,029.6
Another aspect of this final rule that
involves PRA consideration is the
requirement pertaining to recapitalizing
CUSOs that have become insolvent. The
final rule will require certain FISCUs to
seek and obtain prior approval from
their SSA before making an investment
to recapitalize an insolvent CUSO.
According to NCUA’s records, as of June
30, 2013, there were only 17 FISCUs
that were less than adequately
capitalized (i.e., net worth of under 6%).
Of these FISCUs, 9 currently have an
interest in a CUSO. NCUA estimates it
would take a FISCU approximately two
hours to complete a request for the
SSA’s prior approval for an investment
to recapitalize an insolvent CUSO.
Obtaining regulatory approval:
Total less than adequately capitalized
FISCUs with an interest in a CUSO as
of 6/30/2013: 9.
Frequency of response: one-time.
Initial hour burden: 2.
2 hours × 9 = 18
In accordance with the requirements
of the PRA, NCUA intends to obtain a
modification of its OMB Control
Number, 3133–0149, to support these
changes. Simultaneously with its
publication of this final rule, NCUA is
submitting a copy of the final rule to
OMB, along with an application for a
modification of the OMB Control
Number.
The PRA and OMB regulations
require that the public be provided an
opportunity to comment on the
paperwork requirements, including an
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
paperwork requirements. The Board
invites comment on: (1) Whether the
paperwork requirements are necessary;
(2) the accuracy of NCUA’s estimates on
the burden of the paperwork
requirements; (3) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
paperwork requirements; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the
paperwork requirements.
Comments should be sent to the
NCUA Contact and the OMB Reviewer
listed below:
NCUA Contact: Tracy Crews, National
Credit Union Administration, 1775
Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia
22314–3428, Fax No. 703–837–2861,
Email: OCIOPRA@ncua.gov
OMB Contact: Office of Management
and Budget, ATTN: Desk Officer for
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72547
the National Credit Union
Administration, Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Washington,
DC 20503
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages
independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on
state and local interests. In adherence to
fundamental federalism principles,
NCUA, an independent regulatory
agency,28 voluntarily complies with the
Executive Order.
The major aspects of the rule make
certain aspects applicable to FISCUs. By
law, these institutions are already
subject to numerous provisions of
NCUA’s rules, based on the agency’s
role as the insurer of member share
accounts and the significant interest
NCUA has in the safety and soundness
of their operations. In developing the
rule, NCUA worked with
representatives of the state credit union
regulatory community. This rule
incorporates a mechanism by which
states may request an exemption from
coverage of part of the rule for
institutions in that state, provided
certain criteria are met. In any event, the
final rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this final rule does not
constitute a policy that has federalism
implications for purposes of the
executive order.
Assessment of Federal Regulations and
Policies on Families
NCUA has determined that this final
rule will not affect family well-being
within the meaning of Section 654 of
the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999.29
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 30
(SBREFA) provides generally for
congressional review of agency rules. A
reporting requirement is triggered in
instances where NCUA issues a final
rule as defined by Section 551 of the
Administrative Procedure Act.31 NCUA
does not believe this final rule is a
‘‘major rule’’ within the meaning of the
relevant sections of SBREFA. NCUA has
28 44
U.S.C. 3502(5).
Law 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998).
30 Public Law 104–121, 110 Stat. 857 (1996).
31 5 U.S.C. 551.
29 Public
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
72548
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
submitted the rule to OMB for its
determination in that regard.
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 712
Administrative practices and
procedure, credit, credit unions,
insurance, investments, reporting, and
record keeping requirements.
12 CFR Part 741
Credit, Credit unions, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Share
insurance.
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on November 21, 2013.
Gerard Poliquin,
Secretary of the Board.
Accordingly, NCUA amends 12 CFR
Parts 712 and 741 as follows:
PART 712—CREDIT UNION SERVICE
ORGANIZATIONS (CUSOS)
1. The authority citation for part 712
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1756, 1757(5)(D), and
(7)(I), 1766, 1781(b)(9), 1782, 1784, 1785,
1786 and 1789(11).
■
2. Revise § 712.1 to read as follows:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 712.1
What does this part cover?
(a) This part establishes when a
federal credit union (FCU) can invest in
and make loans to credit union service
organizations (CUSOs). CUSOs are
subject to review by NCUA. This part
does not apply to corporate credit
unions that have CUSOs subject to
§ 704.11 of this chapter.
(b) All sections of this part apply to
FCUs. Sections 712.2(d)(2)(ii), 712.3(d),
712.4 and 712.11(b) and (c) of this part
apply to federally insured, statechartered credit unions (FISCUs), as
provided in § 741.222 of this chapter.
FISCUs must follow the law in the state
in which they are chartered with respect
to the sections in this part that only
apply to FCUs.
(c) As used in this part, federally
insured credit union (FICU) means an
FCU or FISCU.
(d) As used in this part, CUSO means
any entity in which a FICU has an
ownership interest or to which a FICU
has extended a loan, and that entity is
engaged primarily in providing products
or services to credit unions or credit
union members, or, in the case of
checking and currency services,
including cashing checks and money
orders for a fee, and selling negotiable
checks, including travelers checks,
money orders, and other similar money
transfer instruments (including
international and domestic electronic
fund transfers and remittance transfers,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
as defined in section 919 of the
Electronic Fund Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C.
1693o–1), to persons eligible for
membership in any credit union having
a loan, investment or contract with the
entity. A CUSO also includes any entity
in which a CUSO has an ownership
interest of any amount, if that entity is
engaged primarily in providing products
or services to credit unions or credit
union members.
3. Revise § 712.2(d)(2) to read as
follows:
■
§ 712.2 How much can an FCU invest in or
loan to CUSOs, and what parties may
participate?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) Special rule in the case of less
than adequately capitalized FICUs. This
rule applies in the case of a FICU that
is currently less than adequately
capitalized, as determined under part
702 of this chapter, or where the making
of an investment in a CUSO would
render the FICU less than adequately
capitalized under part 702 of this
chapter. Before making an investment in
a CUSO:
(i) A less than adequately capitalized
FCU, or an FCU that would be rendered
less than adequately capitalized by the
recapitalization of a CUSO, must obtain
prior written approval from the
appropriate NCUA regional office if the
making of the investment would result
in an aggregate cash outlay, measured
on a cumulative basis (regardless of how
the investment is valued for accounting
purposes, but limited to the
immediately preceding seven (7) years)
in an amount that is in excess of 1% of
its paid-in and unimpaired capital and
surplus; or
(ii) A less than adequately capitalized
FISCU, or a FISCU that would be
rendered less than adequately
capitalized by the recapitalization of a
CUSO, must obtain prior written
approval from the appropriate state
supervisory authority if the making of
the investment would result in an
aggregate cash outlay, measured on a
cumulative basis (regardless of how the
investment is valued for accounting
purposes, but limited to the
immediately preceding seven (7) years)
in an amount that is in excess of the
investment limit in the state in which it
is chartered. A FISCU must also
contemporaneously submit a copy of
this request to the appropriate NCUA
regional office. If there is no state limit
in the state in which a FISCU is
chartered, the requirements in
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section will
apply to that FISCU.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Revise § 712.3(d) to read as follows:
712.3 What are the characteristics of and
what requirements apply to CUSOs?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) CUSO accounting; audits and
financial statements; NCUA access to
information. A FICU must obtain a
written agreement from a CUSO before
investing in or lending to the CUSO that
the CUSO will:
(1) Account for all of its transactions
in accordance with GAAP;
(2) Prepare quarterly financial
statements and obtain an annual
financial statement audit of its financial
statements by a licensed certified public
accountant in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards. A wholly
owned CUSO is not required to obtain
a separate annual financial statement
audit if that wholly owned CUSO is
included in the annual consolidated
financial statement audit of the
investing FICU;
(3) Provide NCUA, its representatives,
and the state supervisory authority
having jurisdiction over any FISCU with
an outstanding loan to, investment in or
contractual agreement for products or
services with the CUSO with complete
access to any books and records of the
CUSO and the ability to review the
CUSO’s internal controls, as deemed
necessary by NCUA or the state
supervisory authority in carrying out
their respective responsibilities under
the Act and the relevant state credit
union statute;
(4) Annually submit, pursuant to
NCUA guidance, a report directly to
NCUA and the appropriate state
supervisory authority, if applicable. A
newly formed CUSO (including a preexisting business which becomes
subject to this regulation by virtue of a
credit union investment or loan) must
file a report within 60 days of its
formation. The report must contain
basic registration information, including
the CUSO’s legal name; tax
identification number; address;
telephone number; Web site; primary
point of contact; services offered; the
name(s) and charter(s) of credit union(s)
investing in, lending to, or receiving
services from the CUSO; and investor
and/or subsidiary CUSO(s). In addition,
for any CUSO engaged in complex or
high-risk activities, the report must
contain:
(i) For each credit union investing in,
lending to, or receiving services from
the CUSO:
(A) A list of services provided to each
credit union;
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(B) The investment amount, loan
amount, or level of activity of each
credit union;
(ii) The CUSO’s most recent year-end
audited financial statements; and
(iii) (A) For CUSOs engaged in credit
and lending services:
(1) The total dollar amount of loans
outstanding;
(2) The total number of loans
outstanding;
(3) The total dollar amount of loans
granted year-to-date; and
(4) The total number of loans granted
year-to-date.
(B) Such information must be
provided by loan type for each type of
loan originated or serviced by the
CUSO.
(5) For purposes of paragraph (d)(4) of
this section, complex or high-risk
activities include preapproved CUSO
activities and services related to credit
and lending, information technology,
and custody, safekeeping, and
investment management services for
credit unions. Specific activities related
to these categories include:
(i) Credit and lending:
(A) Business loan origination;
(B) Consumer mortgage loan
origination;
(C) Loan support services, including
servicing;
(D) Student loan origination; and
(E) Credit card loan origination.
(ii) Information technology:
(A) Electronic transaction services;
(B) Record retention, security, and
disaster recovery services; and
(C) Payroll processing services.
(iii) Custody, safekeeping, and
investment management services for
credit unions.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Revise § 712.4 to read as follows:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 712.4 What must a FICU and a CUSO do
to maintain separate corporate identities?
(a) Corporate separateness. A FICU
and a CUSO must be operated in a
manner that demonstrates to the public
the separate corporate existence of the
FICU and the CUSO. Good business
practices dictate that each must operate
so that:
(1) Its respective business
transactions, accounts, and records are
not intermingled;
(2) Each observes the formalities of its
separate corporate procedures;
(3) Each is adequately financed as a
separate unit in the light of normal
obligations reasonably foreseeable in a
business of its size and character;
(4) Each is held out to the public as
a separate enterprise;
(5) The FICU does not dominate the
CUSO to the extent that the CUSO is
treated as a department of the FICU; and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
(6) Unless the FICU has guaranteed a
loan obtained by the CUSO, all
borrowings by the CUSO indicate that
the FICU is not liable.
(b) Written legal advice. Prior to a
FICU investing in a CUSO, the FICU
must obtain written legal advice as to
whether the CUSO is established in a
manner that will limit potential
exposure of the FICU to no more than
the loss of funds invested in, or loaned
to, the CUSO. In addition, if a FICU
invests in, or makes a loan to, a CUSO,
and that CUSO plans to change its
structure under § 712.3(a), the FICU
must also obtain prior written legal
advice that the CUSO will remain
established in a manner that will limit
potential exposure of the FICU to no
more than the loss of funds invested in,
or loaned to, the CUSO. The written
legal advice must address factors that
have led courts to ‘‘pierce the corporate
veil,’’ such as inadequate capitalization,
lack of separate corporate identity,
common boards of directors and
employees, control of one entity over
another, and lack of separate books and
records. The written legal advice must
be provided by independent legal
counsel of the investing FICU or the
CUSO.
§ 712.9
■
■
[Removed and Reserved]
6. Remove and reserve § 712.9.
7. Revise § 712.10 to read as follows:
§ 712.10 How can a state supervisory
authority obtain an exemption for FISCUs
from compliance with § 712.3(d)(1), (2), and
(3)?
(a) The NCUA Board may exempt
FISCUs in a given state from compliance
with any or all of § 712.3(d)(1), (2), and
(3) if the NCUA Board determines the
laws in that state are equal to, or more
stringent than, § 712.3(d)(1), (2), and (3),
and the laws and procedures available
to the supervisory authority in that state
are sufficient to provide NCUA with the
degree of access and information it
believes is necessary to evaluate the
safety and soundness of FICUs having
business relationships with CUSOs
owned by FISCUs in that state.
(b) To obtain an exemption, the state
supervisory authority must submit a
copy of the legal authority pursuant to
which it secures the information
required in § 712.3(d)(1), (2), and (3) of
this part to NCUA’s regional office
having responsibility for that state,
along with all procedural and
operational documentation supporting
and describing the actual practices by
which it implements and exercises the
authority.
(c) The state supervisory authority
must provide the regional director with
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72549
an assurance that NCUA examiners will
be provided with co-extensive authority
and will be allowed direct access to
CUSO books and records at such times
as NCUA, in its sole discretion, may
determine necessary or appropriate. For
purposes of this section, access includes
the right to make and retain copies of
any CUSO record, as to which NCUA
will accord the same level of control
and confidentiality that it uses with
respect to all other examination-related
materials it obtains in the course of its
duties.
(d) The state supervisory authority
must also provide the regional director
with an assurance that NCUA, upon
request, will have access to copies of
any financial statements or reports
which a CUSO has provided to the state
supervisory authority.
(e) The regional director will review
the applicable authority, procedures and
assurances and forward the exemption
request, along with the regional
director’s recommendation, to the
NCUA Board for a final determination.
(f) For purposes of this section,
whether an entity is a CUSO shall be
determined in accordance with the
definition set out in § 741.222 of this
chapter.
■ 8. Add new § 712.11 to read as
follows:
§ 712.11 What requirements apply to
subsidiary CUSOs?
(a) FCUs investing in a CUSO with a
subsidiary CUSO. FCUs may only invest
in or loan to a CUSO, which has a
subsidiary CUSO, if the subsidiary
CUSO satisfies all of the requirements of
this part. The requirements of this part
apply to all tiers or levels of a CUSO’s
structure.
(b) FISCUs investing in a CUSO with
a subsidiary CUSO. FISCUs may only
invest in or loan to a CUSO which has
a subsidiary CUSO, if the subsidiary
CUSO complies with the following:
(1) All applicable state laws and rules
regarding CUSOs; and
(2) All of the requirements of this part
that apply to FISCUs, which are listed
in § 712.1. The requirements of this part
that apply to FISCUs apply to all tiers
or levels of a CUSO’s structure.
(c) For purposes of this section, a
subsidiary CUSO is any entity in which
a CUSO has an ownership interest of
any amount, if that entity is engaged
primarily in providing products or
services to credit unions or credit union
members.
PART 741—REQUIREMENTS FOR
INSURANCE
9. The authority citation for part 741
continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
72550
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1757, 1766, 1781–
1790, and 1790d.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Examining the AD Docket
10. Revise § 741.222 to read as
follows:
Federal Aviation Administration
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Lucier, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6438; fax:
425–917–6590; email: suzanne.lucier@
faa.gov.
■
14 CFR Part 39
§ 741.222 Credit union service
organizations.
(a) Any credit union that is insured
pursuant to Title II of the Act must
adhere to the requirements in
§§ 712.2(d)(2)(ii), 712.3(d), 712.4 and
712.11(b) and (c) of this chapter
concerning permissible investment
limits for less than adequately
capitalized credit unions, agreements
between credit unions and their credit
union service organizations (CUSOs),
the requirement to maintain separate
corporate identities, and investments
and loans to CUSOs investing in other
CUSOs. For purposes of this section, a
CUSO is any entity in which a credit
union has an ownership interest or to
which a credit union has extended a
loan, and that entity is engaged
primarily in providing products or
services to credit unions or credit union
members, or, in the case of checking and
currency services, including cashing
checks and money orders for a fee, and
selling negotiable checks, including
travelers checks, money orders, and
other similar money transfer
instruments (including international
and domestic electronic fund transfers
and remittance transfers, as defined in
section 919 of the Electronic Fund
Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. 1693o-1), to
persons eligible for membership in any
credit union having a loan, investment
or contract with the entity. A CUSO also
includes any entity in which a CUSO
has an ownership interest of any
amount, if that entity is engaged
primarily in providing products or
services to credit unions or credit union
members.
(b) This section shall have no
preemptive effect with respect to the
laws or rules of any state providing for
access to CUSO books and records or
CUSO examination by credit union
regulatory authorities.
[FR Doc. 2013–28479 Filed 12–2–13; 8:45 am]
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:06 Dec 02, 2013
Jkt 232001
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0673; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–057–AD; Amendment
39–17681; AD 2013–24–07]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 707
airplanes; and Model 720 and 720B
series airplanes. This AD was prompted
by reports indicating that a standard
access door was located where an
impact-resistant access door was
required, and stencils were missing
from some impact-resistant access
doors. This AD requires an inspection of
the left- and right-hand wing fuel tank
access doors to determine that impactresistant access doors are installed in
the correct locations, and to replace any
door with an impact-resistant access
door if necessary. This AD also requires
an inspection for stencils and index
markers on impact-resistant access
doors, and application of new stencils
or index markers if necessary. This AD
also requires revising the maintenance
program to incorporate changes to the
airworthiness limitations section. We
are issuing this AD to prevent foreign
object penetration of the fuel tank,
which could cause a fuel leak near an
ignition source (e.g., hot brakes or
engine exhaust nozzle), consequently
leading to a fuel-fed fire.
DATES: This AD is effective January 7,
2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of January 7, 2014.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1;
fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to the specified products. The
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on August 13, 2013 (78 FR
49237). The NPRM proposed to require
an inspection of the left- and right-hand
wing fuel tank access doors to
determine that impact-resistant access
doors are installed in the correct
locations, and to replace any door with
an impact-resistant access door if
necessary. The NPRM also proposed to
require an inspection for stencils and
index markers on impact-resistant
access doors, and application of new
stencils or index markers if necessary.
The NPRM also proposed to require
revising the maintenance program to
incorporate changes to the airworthiness
limitations section.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
have considered the comment received.
The Boeing Company stated that it
supports the NPRM (78 FR 49237,
August 13, 2013).
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed except for minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these
minor changes:
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 3, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72537-72550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28479]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Parts 712 and 741
RIN 3133-AD93
Credit Union Service Organizations
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NCUA is issuing a final rule to amend its credit union service
organization (CUSO) regulation to increase transparency and address
certain safety and soundness concerns. The final rule expands the
requirements of the CUSO regulation that apply to federally insured,
state-chartered credit unions (FISCUs) to address accounting, financial
statements, and audits. The final rule also includes limits on the
ability of ``less than adequately capitalized'' FISCUs to recapitalize
their CUSOs. In addition, it adds several new requirements that apply
to both federal credit unions (FCUs) and FISCUs. Specifically, all
CUSOs are required to annually provide basic profile
[[Page 72538]]
information to NCUA and the appropriate state supervisory authority
(SSA). CUSOs engaging in certain complex or high-risk activities are
required to additionally report more detailed information, including
audited financial statements and general customer information. The
final rule also requires all subsidiary CUSOs to follow applicable laws
and regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective June 30, 2014. CUSOs will begin
submitting reports to NCUA under new Sec. 712.3(d)(4) when the
agency's reporting system is fully operational, which will be by
December 31, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Yu, Staff Attorney, Office of
General Counsel, at 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428,
telephone (703) 518-6540, or Lisa Dolin, Program Officer, Office of
Examination and Insurance, at 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia
22314-3428, telephone (703) 518-6630.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Why is NCUA adopting this final rule?
B. What changes were released for comment in the 2011 proposed
rule?
II. Summary of Public Comments
A. What were the general comments supporting the proposed rule?
B. What were the general comments opposing the proposed rule?
III. Final Rule
A. What changes does this rule make?
B. How does this rule impact credit unions?
C. What are the key provisions in the final rule?
IV. Draft Reporting Form
V. Regulatory Procedures
I. Background
A. Why is NCUA adopting this final rule?
CUSOs provide significant value to the credit union industry by
acting as a collaborative means to share risk, manage costs, and
deliver services to credit union members. With their unique
collaborative business model, CUSOs foster cooperation and shared
innovation for credit unions to achieve economies of scale, retain
expertise, and better serve their members. Thus, the NCUA Board (the
Board) recognizes that CUSOs benefit both credit unions and credit
union members. Nevertheless, the Board believes the ability to
accurately inventory CUSOs and evaluate their financial and operational
condition is imperative to mitigating risks to the National Credit
Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF). The Board is adopting this rule to
improve the quality of information about CUSOs and the nature of their
activities, in order to identify risks to the credit union industry and
protect the NCUSIF.
In 2008, the Board issued a final rule, which, among other things,
made certain provisions of the CUSO regulation applicable to FISCUs.\1\
Specifically, the final rule requires FISCUs to maintain separate
corporate identities from their CUSOs. It also requires FISCUs to enter
into agreements with CUSOs stating that the CUSOs would provide open
access to their books and records to NCUA and the applicable SSA.\2\
Those provisions had previously only applied to FCUs, but the Board
believed that, to protect the NCUSIF, it was necessary to apply those
requirements to FISCUs as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 73 FR 79312 (Dec. 29, 2008).
\2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since the promulgation of the 2008 rule, the Board has determined
that additional protections in the CUSO rule addressing investments,
accounting, financial statements, and audits should similarly be
extended to FISCUs in order to protect credit unions and the NCUSIF.
Additionally, since 2008, the agency has continued to investigate ways
to improve the quality of information about credit unions' use of CUSOs
and the services provided by CUSOs. The Board does not believe that the
information NCUA currently maintains on CUSOs is sufficient to evaluate
CUSOs and their potential impact to the NCUSIF. For example, at this
time, NCUA cannot fully determine which CUSOs maintain relationships
with which credit unions, the financial condition of CUSOs, the full
range of services offered by CUSOs, or even the total number of CUSOs
that presently exist. The current information is incomplete, primarily
because the agency is collecting information on a CUSO from the CUSO's
credit union clients rather than directly from the CUSO itself.
Further, directly capturing CUSO information reduces the regulatory
burden to FICUs in reporting this information. The Board believes that,
in order to identify emergent risks posed by CUSOs and to protect the
NCUSIF, it is imperative to have complete and accurate financial and
operational information about CUSOs and the nature of their services.
As a result, the Board is issuing this final rule, which makes
additional parts of the CUSO rule applicable to all federally insured
credit unions (FICUs). The final rule also requires CUSOs to register
basic information (and, in some cases, to file more detailed reports)
directly with NCUA and the appropriate SSA, if applicable.
Additionally, it also codifies existing agency policy regarding
subsidiary CUSOs. Finally, the rule makes technical changes to
reference federally insured credit unions and define ``CUSO,'' and
conforming amendments to Sec. 741.222 to reflect the changes affecting
FISCUs in this final rule.
B. What changes were released for comment in the 2011 proposed rule?
On July 21, 2011, the Board issued a proposed rule to amend part
712 of NCUA's regulations to increase transparency and address certain
safety and soundness concerns regarding CUSOs.\3\ The proposed rule
applied several existing provisions in the CUSO rule to FISCUs. First,
the proposal limited a ``less than adequately capitalized'' FISCU's
aggregate cash outlay to a CUSO, measured on a cumulative basis, to the
permissible investment limit in the state in which the FISCU is
chartered. These proposed changes are similar to the requirements in
Sec. 712.2(d)(2) for FCUs. They were intended to address the Board's
concern that less than adequately capitalized FISCUs are continuing to
invest money in failing CUSOs, thereby posing serious risks to their
members and the NCUSIF. Second, the proposed rule applied existing
provisions related to accounting, financial statements, and audits to
FISCUs. These particular provisions already apply to FCUs under Sec.
712.3(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 76 FR 44866 (July 27, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule also added two new requirements to apply to all
FICUs. Specifically, the proposed rule required FICUs to include, in
their agreements with CUSOs, a requirement that a CUSO submit a
financial report directly to NCUA or, in the case of a CUSO invested in
by a FISCU, NCUA and the appropriate SSA. Under the proposal, these
reports would be required to be submitted at least annually. (Proposed
Sec. 712.3(d)(4)). The proposed reporting requirement was intended to
protect the NCUSIF by improving the quality of available information
about CUSOs so that NCUA could better evaluate and identify emergent
risks posed by CUSOs. Additionally, the proposed rule prohibited FICUs
from investing in a CUSO unless that CUSO's subsidiaries also comply
with all of the requirements of the CUSO rule and/or laws and rules of
the state in which the credit union is chartered, as applicable.
(Proposed Sec. 712.11).
II. Summary of Public Comments
The public comment period for the proposed rule ended on September
26, 2011. NCUA received 290 comments on
[[Page 72539]]
the proposed rule: 64 from CUSOs, 54 from FCUs, 85 from state-chartered
credit unions, 1 from a corporate credit union, 7 from trade
associations (1 representing banks, 2 representing credit unions, 1
representing CUSOs, 1 representing state credit union regulators, 1
representing cooperatives, and 1 assisting credit unions in investments
and insurance), 21 from state credit union leagues, 2 from non-profit
policy or research organizations, 2 from law firms or attorneys, and 54
from individuals.
Of the 290 comments received, 85 were duplicative in some manner,
for example, identical ``form'' letters from different individual
commenters, identical letters from the same person representing
different organizations, identical letters from different people
representing the same organization, or different letters from the same
person representing the same organization. Additionally, the majority
of the comments exhibited notable similarities. For example, a
significant number of comments contained at least some duplicative or
``form'' language, presented similar arguments or talking points, cited
similar data or statistics, or posed similar questions for
clarification.
Most of the commenters expressed opposition to, or raised concerns
about, one or more aspects of the proposed rule. A few commenters were
supportive of the proposal overall.
A. What were the general comments supporting the proposed rule?
The commenters who supported the proposal were generally in favor
of subjecting CUSO activities to greater regulatory scrutiny. Several
supporters of the rule, however, argued that the proposal did not go
far enough and that additional oversight is necessary in order to
protect consumers and to mitigate the potential risk to the NCUSIF.
Additionally, a number of commenters opposed the proposal in
general, but expressed support for certain aspects of it. In
particular, several commenters supported the proposed recapitalization
limits for less than adequately capitalized FISCUs, noting that this
particular provision is consistent with safety and soundness. Several
commenters also supported applying the same CUSO rules to FISCUs and
FCUs. Several opponents of the rule in general also expressed support
for greater transparency between CUSOs and credit unions. These
commenters suggested, however, that instead of being required to report
financial information directly to NCUA, CUSOs should improve and
enhance the information shared with participating credit unions.
B. What were the general comments opposing the proposed rule?
Commenters expressing opposition to the rule focused primarily on
the proposed financial reporting requirement. Most commenters raised
concerns about NCUA's authority to impose the proposed reporting
requirement. They noted that NCUA does not have statutory authority to
directly regulate CUSOs, and questioned whether NCUA's general safety
and soundness and examination authority under the Federal Credit Union
Act (FCU Act) is sufficient to justify the increased regulatory
oversight of CUSOs. Nearly all commenters indicated they do not believe
CUSOs pose a true systemic risk to the NCUSIF and argued that
additional regulation by NCUA is unnecessary. Commenters contended that
NCUA's current authority over CUSOs is sufficient, noting that problems
with CUSOs are few, and that these problem cases can be addressed by
improving NCUA's supervisory oversight of credit unions and
strengthening due diligence requirements. Most commenters suggested
that, if the Board adopts a final rule, the Board should take a more
targeted regulatory approach by tailoring the rule to identified
problem areas. They argued that the proposal is misguided in treating
all CUSOs the same, regardless of the CUSO's line of business.
In addition, a substantial number of commenters argued that the
proposed rule would unnecessarily and unfairly increase regulatory
burden and compliance costs to both credit unions and their affiliated
CUSOs, stifling innovation and placing them at a competitive
disadvantage to their non-CUSO competitors. Commenters also expressed
concern that certain requirements under the proposal would be a
condition of NCUSIF coverage.
NCUA has carefully reviewed and considered all the comment letters
it received in response to the proposal. Recognizing the significant
concerns raised by commenters, the Board has made substantial
adjustments to the final rule. The key provisions of the final rule,
along with an analysis of the pertinent public comments, are discussed
in greater detail below.
III. Final Rule
A. What changes does this rule make?
Under this final rule, several provisions of the current CUSO
regulation which previously applied only to FCUs will now apply to
FISCUs as well. The rule also adds a new requirement for all FICUs to
require their CUSOs to register basic information (and, in some cases,
to file more detailed reports) directly with NCUA and, if applicable,
the appropriate SSA. Finally, the final rule clarifies the regulation's
applicability to subsidiary CUSOs by codifying existing policy in the
regulatory text.
B. How does this rule impact credit unions?
FCUs and FISCUs making loans to and investments in CUSOs are
impacted by this final rule. The Board emphasizes, however, that the
final rule is significantly more limited in application than the
proposed rule, targeted mainly to CUSOs engaged in more complex or
high-risk activities, such as credit and lending, information
technology (IT), and custody, safekeeping, and investment management
services for credit unions.
C. What are the key provisions in the final rule?
A detailed discussion of the final rule's key provisions follows.
Applicability of Certain CUSO Rule Provisions to FISCUs
Section 120 of the FCU Act authorizes the Board to prescribe rules
and regulations for the administration of the FCU Act.\4\ Further,
Title II of the FCU Act provides that the Board may insure members'
accounts and administer the NCUSIF, and may prescribe regulations for
FICUs that are necessary to carry out that purpose.\5\ Subpart B of
Part 741 addresses NCUA regulations that FISCUs must follow to obtain
and maintain federal share insurance from NCUA. Currently, only two
provisions of the CUSO rule apply to FISCUs: (1) Sec. 712.4, which
addresses corporate separateness, and (2) Sec. 712.3(d)(3), which
provides NCUA and the applicable SSA with access to CUSO books and
records. The Board believes certain requirements should be consistent
among all FICUs to minimize risk to the NCUSIF. The risk to the NCUSIF
from CUSO operations is the same, regardless of the charter type of the
credit union. However, individual state regulatory requirements for
CUSO activities may vary from NCUA's regulations. The FCU Act limits
FCU loans to CUSOs to a maximum of 1% of paid-in and unimpaired capital
and
[[Page 72540]]
surplus.\6\ The FCU Act also restricts FCU investments in CUSOs to the
same amount.\7\ Under certain state laws, however, FISCUs are permitted
to invest or loan to CUSOs in significantly higher amounts. For
example, some state limits are as high as 25% or they are
unspecified.\8\ Accordingly, for uniformity among all FICUs and to
minimize risk to the NCUSIF, this final rule amends Sec. 741.222 to
specify that current Sec. 712.2(d)(2), which imposes certain
recapitalization restrictions, and Sec. 712.3(d), which addresses CUSO
accounting, audits, and financial statements, also apply to FISCUs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 12 U.S.C. 1766.
\5\ 12 U.S.C. 1781(b)(9), 1789(11).
\6\ 12 U.S.C. 1757(5)(D).
\7\ 12 U.S.C. 1757(7)(I).
\8\ See, e.g., N.D. Admin. Code 13-03-23-06 (10% of equity);
Ind. Code Sec. 28-7-1-9 (10% of capital, surplus, and unimpaired
shares, or higher with prior written approval); Me. Rev. Stat. Ann.
tit. 9-B, Sec. 864 (10% of share capital and surplus); Idaho Code
Ann. Sec. 26-2146 (10% of paid-in shares and deposits); Mich. Comp.
Laws Ann. Sec. 490.401 (12% of assets with prior approval); N.C.
Gen. Stat. Sec. 54-109.82 (25% of allocations to the reserve fund);
Mont. Code Ann. Sec. 32-3-701 (no limit specified).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limits on Recapitalization of Insolvent CUSOs--Applicability of Sec.
712.2(d)(2) to FISCUs
In 2008, the Board amended the CUSO regulation to require less than
adequately capitalized FCUs to obtain written approval from the
appropriate regional director before making an investment in a CUSO
that would result in an aggregate cash outlay, measured on a cumulative
basis, in an amount in excess of 1% of the credit union's paid-in and
unimpaired capital and surplus.\9\ The Board promulgated the amendment
because, as it noted in the 2008 proposed rule, it was aware of credit
unions that had experienced losses because they chose to recapitalize
insolvent CUSOs.\10\ The 2008 amendment was intended to prevent an FCU
from investing, on an aggregate basis, more than 1% of its capital in a
CUSO that has essentially become unsustainable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 73 FR 79312 (Dec. 29, 2008).
\10\ 73 FR 23982, 23984 (May 1, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This final rule adds a similar requirement for FISCUs except where
state law specifies a higher investment limit in CUSOs. The provision
will apply in circumstances where a FISCU is already less than
adequately capitalized or where the recapitalization of a CUSO will
render the FISCU less than adequately capitalized for Prompt Corrective
Action (PCA) purposes.\11\ Under the rule, if a FISCU is less than
adequately capitalized or the investment will result in the FISCU being
less than adequately capitalized, the FISCU must obtain written
approval from the appropriate SSA before making an investment in a CUSO
that will result in an aggregate cash outlay, measured on a cumulative
basis, that exceeds the investment limit in the state in which the
FISCU is chartered. If the applicable state does not regulate the
investment limit for FISCUs, however, the FISCU must obtain regulatory
approval from the appropriate SSA before making an investment in a CUSO
that will result in an aggregate cash outlay, measured on a cumulative
basis, in excess of 1% of the FISCU's paid-in and unimpaired capital
and surplus.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 12 CFR part 702.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to submitting a request to the appropriate SSA, a less
than adequately capitalized FISCU, or a FISCU that would be rendered
less than adequately capitalized by the recapitalization of a CUSO,
must also submit its request to the appropriate NCUA regional office.
While the SSA will decide such requests, the Board believes it is
important that NCUA's regional offices also be made aware of these
requests so NCUA can provide appropriate input to the SSAs. The Board
notes that this amendment does not require a less than adequately
capitalized FISCU, or a FISCU that would be rendered less than
adequately capitalized by the recapitalization of a CUSO, to divest of
a CUSO. Rather, it may maintain its existing investment, but it cannot
make additional investments in any CUSO without prior written approval
from the appropriate SSA.
Several commenters generally supported applying the same CUSO rules
to FISCUs and FCUs. A number of commenters also expressed specific
support for this provision, noting that imposing investment limits for
less than adequately capitalized FISCUs is consistent with safety and
soundness. Some commenters, however, disagreed with the cumulative
calculation for the aggregate cash outlay or expressed confusion
regarding its application. In particular, several commenters asked for
clarification regarding how far back in time the cumulative calculation
must go. The Board adopts this provision substantially as proposed,
but, for clarity, the final rule limits the cumulative calculation to
the last 7 years. This time period corresponds with various other
accounting time limits, such as the length of time bankruptcies are
reported, and record retention timeframes for audit and tax purposes.
Parallel amendments are made in the final rule to limit the cumulative
calculation to 7 years for both FCUs and FISCUs.
CUSO Accounting, Audits, and Financial Statements--Sec. 712.3(d)
Under the final rule, provisions in the current CUSO rule
addressing CUSO accounting, audits, and financial statements which
currently only apply to FCUs also now apply to all FICUs. As discussed
above, in 2008, the Board amended Sec. 712.3(d) to require FISCUs to
comply with the subsections addressing access to a CUSO's books and
records.\12\ This final rule applies all of the subsections of Sec.
712.3(d) to FISCUs. Under these additional subsections, a credit
union's agreement with a CUSO must require the CUSO to account for all
of its transactions according to Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP), prepare quarterly financial statements, and obtain
an annual audit of its financial statements by a licensed certified
public accountant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 73 FR 79312 (Dec. 29, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted above, a number of commenters supported applying the same
rules to FISCUs and FCUs. A few commenters, however, expressed concern
that the proposal to apply the financial statement and audit provision,
Sec. 712.3(d)(2), to FISCUs would result in higher compliance costs to
the credit union and CUSO where a CUSO is wholly owned and the CUSO's
financials are consolidated into the investing credit union's financial
statements. The Board notes that under this final rule, as well as
under the existing rule for FCUs, a wholly owned CUSO would not be
required to obtain a separate annual financial statement audit if the
CUSO is included in the annual consolidated financial statement audit
of its investing credit union. As such, the Board does not anticipate
that the extension of Sec. 712.3(d)(2) to FISCUs will impose an
unreasonable compliance cost where a CUSO is wholly owned. The Board
continues to believe it is necessary to extend these requirements to
FISCUs to ensure NCUA will be able to fully review the financial
condition of CUSOs and evaluate the risks posed to FISCUs and
ultimately to the NCUSIF. Accordingly, the section is adopted as
proposed.
Reporting Requirement--Sec. 712.3(d)(4)
The proposed rule added a new provision to require a FICU's
agreement with a CUSO to require it to file financial reports with NCUA
and, as applicable, the appropriate SSA (proposed Sec. 712.3(d)(4)).
The proposal was intended to allow NCUA to collect uniform information
directly from all CUSOs, in order for the agency to
[[Page 72541]]
adequately evaluate the relationships between CUSOs and credit unions,
as well as the risk posed by those relationships. As discussed in the
preamble to the proposed rule, the Board believes that the information
NCUA currently compiles on CUSOs is incomplete because the agency is
indirectly gathering pertinent information from customer credit unions
rather than directly from the CUSOs. Without additional reporting
directly from CUSOs, it is impossible for NCUA to determine which CUSOs
maintain relationships with which credit unions, the financial
condition of CUSOs, and the full range of services offered by CUSOs.
This lack of information restricts NCUA's ability to conduct offsite
monitoring and evaluate the risks posed by CUSOs. As proposed, the
information required in the reports would have to be submitted at least
annually and would address five broad categories: (1) General
information; (2) board and management; (3) services; (4) credit union
customer listing; and (5) balance sheet and income statement. In
addition, the Board proposed to require a newly formed CUSO to file the
report within 30 days after its formation.
As discussed above, this requirement was troubling to most
commenters. Commenters expressed opposition to the reporting provision
and asked the agency to substantially revise or withdraw the proposal.
Commenters also expressed concerns about NCUA's authority to impose the
proposed requirements. They noted that NCUA does not have statutory
authority to directly regulate CUSOs and, as such, the reporting
requirement is overreaching. Further, commenters argued that the
provision is unjustified, contending there is insufficient data to
demonstrate that CUSO investments present a material risk. Moreover,
they argued NCUA's current authority over CUSOs is sufficient to stem
any potentially serious risk issues.
The Board disagrees. While the Board acknowledges that NCUA does
not have direct statutory and regulatory authority over the operations
of CUSOs, NCUA does have the authority to regulate FCUs' lending and
investment in CUSOs.\13\ NCUA has regulated this lending and investment
authority in the CUSO rule since 1979, when this statutory provision
was implemented through the promulgation of the first CUSO
regulation.\14\ The Board believes the proposed reporting requirement
is both historically and legally consistent with NCUA's statutory
authority to regulate this lending and investment authority.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 12 U.S.C. 1757(7)(I), 1757(5)(D).
\14\ 44 FR 12401 (Mar. 7, 1979).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover, Title II of the FCU Act provides the Board with the broad
authority to insure members' accounts and administer the NCUSIF, and to
prescribe regulations for FICUs that are necessary to carry out that
purpose.\15\ All FICUs, through their application for insurance, have
agreed to comply with those regulations. The current lack of
information on CUSOs limits NCUA's ability to conduct offsite
monitoring and assess any emergent risks to the NCUSIF posed by CUSO
operations. The Board continues to believe that, to protect the NCUSIF
from any such risk, it is necessary and within its authority to
implement regulations that require credit unions to enter into
agreements with CUSOs requiring CUSOs to submit reports directly to
NCUA and the appropriate SSAs, if applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 12 U.S.C. 1781(b)(9), 1789(11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Furthermore, the Board continues to believe that CUSOs present
material risks to the credit union industry. Past experience has
demonstrated that a single CUSO has caused losses and operational
problems at multiple credit unions. Such losses have contributed to a
number of credit unions' insolvency, conservatorship, or liquidation.
The following are specific examples in which CUSO activity caused
significant financial and/or operational problems for credit
unions.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The agency does not have a formal mechanism to track
information about losses attributable to CUSOs. Further, there are
different types of losses that can be realized by credit unions,
including losses in terms of the investment in or loan to the CUSO
and losses incurred from the product or service offered by the CUSO
(for example, loan losses). Credit union failures can rarely be
attributed to one factor alone. Failures typically arise out of a
compounding of poor decisions on the part of credit union
management. There are examples, however, of losses in credit unions
as a direct result of CUSO activity. In some cases, these losses led
to the failure of the institutions involved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1--Activities involving multiple CUSOs contributed to
a $1.5 billion FICU's failure. Since 2008, the FICU sustained losses
totaling approximately $224 million as a direct result of its CUSO
activity.
Case 2--A CUSO managed four loan pools primarily comprised
of commercial loans. In addition to having loan participation
agreements with 25 FICUs, the CUSO obtained warehouse lines of credit
from several banks and one corporate credit union. In 2008, the CUSO's
access to third party investors declined with the economic turndown. To
stay in compliance with its written agreements with FICUs, the CUSO
shifted mortgages from one mortgage pool to another. Investor FICUs
were provided monthly reports on the loan pools, but the information
was poorly presented. As a result, it was difficult for investor FICUs
to determine the individual mortgages transferred among the pools. The
CUSO eventually defaulted on its warehouse lines of credit. It was put
into bankruptcy in 2009. In total, aggregate losses to the FICUs
involved with this CUSO exceeded $47 million. Of the 25 FICUs affected,
10 were assumed by other FICUs. The aggregate cost to the NCUSIF for
these actions was over $5 million.
Case 3--Nineteen FICUs incurred losses totaling over $5
million in the last 5 years from a CUSO involved in member business
loan participations. An additional $6 million in losses are projected
from one commercial borrower. FICUs have already reserved between 25%
and 100% of their participated balances for these additional
anticipated losses.
Case 4--A student lending CUSO sold participations of
purchased student loans to six FICUs. Related loan losses at these
FICUs are much higher than anticipated. One FICU has booked over $4
million in loan losses and projects an additional $4.5 million in
losses on the portfolio.
Case 5--A CUSO underwrites and services member business
loans for several FICUs. The CUSO's past performance was substandard
and a large portion of the serviced loan portfolio was owned by one
FCU. The FCU could not recover from the impact of the CUSO's poor
lending practices, and the associated loan losses played a role in the
FCU's need to merge with a healthier credit union.
Ensign FCU
Involvement in a business loan CUSO was a contributing factor to
the failure of Ensign FCU, which has cost the NCUSIF approximately $38
million to date. The CUSO failed to service a member business loan
portfolio according to its agreement with the credit union. In November
2010, NCUA filed a suit against the CUSO claiming the CUSO continued to
collect payments on 18 commercial loans allegedly owned by Ensign FCU
after the credit union was shut down in November 2009. In addition to
Ensign FCU, the CUSO worked with three other credit unions. The CUSO
has since dissolved.
Eastern New York FCU
Relationships with a complex network of CUSOs, a lack of board of
directors' oversight of related business ventures, and improper
accounting
[[Page 72542]]
contributed to the failure of Eastern New York FCU. Several CUSOs were
created to generate income, but most of the CUSOs had very few
customers. NCUA's Office of the Inspector General determined that the
FCU's board of directors did not perform the necessary due diligence to
ensure each CUSO was complying with all regulations. NCUA estimates the
purchase and assumption of this $50 million credit union will cost the
NCUSIF approximately $3.3 million.
Community One FCU
The failure of Community One FCU was due in part to losses stemming
from a CUSO involved in indirect auto lending. The credit union's
management engaged in an extremely large indirect lending program
without adequate policies and collection procedures in place. NCUA
estimates the purchase and assumption of this $159 million credit union
will cost the NCUSIF approximately $6.8 million.
Kern Central Credit Union
Kern Central CU's failure was due in part to an indirect auto loan
program CUSO. The credit union's losses from a concentration of
indirect auto loans with high loan-to-value ratios, as well as poor
management of the program, contributed to its demise. NCUA estimates
the purchase and assumption of this $34 million credit union will cost
the NCUSIF approximately $5.6 million.
The above examples clearly demonstrate the material risks that CUSO
operations pose to the credit union industry. Moreover, the Board feels
a proactive--rather than reactive--approach is necessary to prevent
higher potential losses to the NCUSIF in the future. NCUA's methods of
managing risk to the NCUSIF must keep pace as credit union and CUSO
operations expand and present more risk to the NCUSIF.
As noted above, in 2008, the Board amended the CUSO rule to, among
other things, require all FICUs to enter into agreements with CUSOs
stating that the CUSOs would provide NCUA and the applicable SSA with
``complete access to any books and records of the CUSO and the ability
to review CUSO internal controls.'' \17\ In general, this access may
involve an onsite CUSO review to determine the degree of risk the CUSO
poses to credit unions and the NCUSIF. During such review, an examiner
assesses the financial condition of the CUSO and the adequacy of
controls; verifies the accuracy of the financial statements; determines
the viability of operations and service to member credit unions; and
confirms compliance with applicable laws and regulations. NCUA may
request a CUSO review if there are safety and soundness concerns to
credit unions or if the CUSO poses an undue risk to the NCUSIF. For
example, the agency may request a review if a credit union examination
raises concerns that the CUSO's operation is adversely affecting the
financial condition and operation of the credit union, or if the CUSO
has a significant effect on the operations of a credit union or group
of credit unions that depend on its services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 74 FR 79312 (Dec. 29, 2008); 12 CFR 712.3(d)(3)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While NCUA currently has the authority to access CUSO books and
records and to review CUSO internal controls, the agency does not
routinely engage in onsite monitoring of CUSOs. The Board believes it
is more efficient and more cost-effective for the agency and the credit
union system to require CUSOs to submit information about their
financial condition directly to NCUA, than for the agency to collect
this information indirectly through credit unions or through more
widespread onsite CUSO reviews. As noted above, NCUA's current practice
is to conduct an onsite CUSO review only if safety and soundness
concerns to credit unions exist or if the CUSO poses an undue risk to
the NCUSIF. The Board believes the final rule will improve the agency's
ability to conduct offsite monitoring of CUSOs and identify emerging
areas of concern.
Nevertheless, the Board recognizes that the rule could be more
narrowly focused and still achieve the agency's objective of obtaining
more complete and accurate information about CUSOs, the services they
offer, and their financial condition. Accordingly, the Board is
significantly revising the reporting requirement in the final rule.
The majority of commenters suggested NCUA should take a more
targeted regulatory approach by tailoring the final rule to identified
problem areas. Further, they argued that the proposal's one-size-fits-
all approach was misguided. Numerous commenters contended that the rule
should be exclusively targeted at CUSOs engaging in riskier activities,
such as business lending. CUSOs involved in activities with less risk,
such as marketing or licensing CUSOs, should not be subject to
increased oversight. Commenters recommended that, at a minimum, certain
types of lower-risk CUSOs should be exempted from the rule.
In light of the comments received on the proposed rule, the Board
has determined to significantly reduce the scope and application of the
reporting requirement in the final rule. Accordingly, the final rule
narrowly focuses on CUSOs engaging in certain complex or high-risk
activities. The Board notes that the types of activities qualifying as
``complex or high-risk,'' as well as the reporting requirements for
CUSOs engaging in such activities, may evolve as new risks emerge. At
this time, however, the Board believes that, for purposes of the
reporting requirement, complex or high-risk activities include credit
and lending, information technology, and custody, safekeeping, and
investment management services for credit unions because these
particular activities tend to affect a large number of credit unions
and present a high degree of operational and/or financial risk.
Activities related to these categories currently include:
Credit and lending--
[cir] Business loan origination;
[cir] Consumer mortgage loan origination;
[cir] Loan support services, including servicing;
[cir] Student loan origination; and
[cir] Credit card loan origination.
Information technology--
[cir] Electronic transaction services;
[cir] Record retention, security, and disaster recovery services;
and
[cir] Payroll processing services.
Custody, safekeeping, and investment management services
for credit unions.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ CUSOs only engaging in trust services for individual credit
union members will be required to submit only basic profile
information. These CUSOs will not be required to submit the
additional, enhanced report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Credit and lending-related activities involve credit unions' core
business function and represent a high degree of potential risk. CUSOs
engaging in credit and lending services have the potential to pose
multiple types of risks to FICUs and the NCUSIF. Without proper
monitoring and controls, FICUs making loans to, and investments in,
CUSOs engaged in credit and lending activities may quickly be exposed
to significant levels of credit, strategic, or reputation risks. For
example, credit risk increases with poor underwriting, which may lead
to decreased net worth and increased strategic and reputation risks,
all of which can ultimately impact member services. Due to the higher-
risk nature of credit and lending activities, the Board believes it is
necessary to receive additional information about CUSOs involved in
credit and lending activities in order to monitor for material levels
of risk to the NCUSIF.
Information technology-related CUSOs usually engage in activities
that
[[Page 72543]]
involve emerging complex electronic services. These services have been
subject to malicious attacks, which pose transactional, reputational,
and strategic risks to credit unions, and ultimately, the NCUSIF, if
proper safeguards are not in place. Moreover, credit union members have
been adversely impacted by breaches in network security. The additional
data collected for CUSOs engaging in IT services will enable NCUA to
better monitor and respond to these increased risks.
In addition, the Board believes CUSOs engaging in custody,
safekeeping, and investment management services for credit unions
require robust monitoring due to the complex nature of these services.
Credit unions place a high degree of reliance on these CUSOs because
credit unions are entrusting their assets and their members' assets to
CUSOs. As a result, there are increased reputational, strategic, and
compliance risks that warrant additional monitoring by NCUA.
Under the final rule, only CUSOs engaging in these complex or high-
risk activities are required to report substantive information. All
other CUSOs will register only basic profile information. Specifically,
the final rule requires a FICU to obtain a written agreement from a
CUSO before investing in or lending to the CUSO. This written agreement
must provide that the CUSO will annually submit, pursuant to NCUA
guidance, a report containing general registration information directly
to NCUA and the appropriate SSA, if applicable. This basic registration
information will consist of general profile information, including the
CUSO's legal name; tax identification number (e.g., EIN); address;
telephone number; Web site; primary point of contact; services offered;
name(s) and charter(s) of credit union(s) investing in, lending to, or
receiving services from the CUSO; and investor(s) and/or subsidiary
CUSO(s). The Board believes this is the minimal amount of information
necessary to meet the agency's objective of obtaining a clearer and
more transparent representation of the CUSO industry.
Only CUSOs involved in complex or high-risk activities will be
subject to an additional, enhanced reporting requirement. Specifically,
in addition to the basic profile information described above, CUSOs
engaged in certain complex or high-risk activities will be required to
report more detailed information, including audited financial
statements and more specific customer information. The Board believes
this additional information is crucial in order for the agency to
effectively analyze and monitor the risks CUSOs present to FICUs and
the NCUSIF. Specifically, CUSOs engaging in complex or high-risk
activities will be required to report:
For each credit union investing in, lending to, or
receiving services from the CUSO:
[cir] Services provided to each credit union;
[cir] The investment amount, loan amount, or level of activity of
each credit union; and
The CUSO's most recent year-end audited financial
statements.
In addition, CUSOs engaging in credit and lending services will be
required to report the following activity by loan type:
The total dollar amount of loans outstanding;
The total number of loans outstanding;
The total dollar amount of loans granted year-to-date; and
The total number of loans granted year-to-date.
CUSOs that previously were not involved in complex or high-risk
activities that become involved in such activities by virtue of: (1) A
merger with or acquisition of a CUSO that engages in such activities;
or (2) adding new products or services that are complex or high-risk
activities will be subject to the enhanced reporting requirement. For
example, if a CUSO providing real estate brokerage services merges into
a CUSO involved in consumer mortgage loan origination, then the
continuing CUSO will be required to submit the additional, enhanced
report in the next reporting cycle. Moreover, if a CUSO engaging in
checking and currency services begins to offer payroll processing
services, then it too will become subject to the enhanced reporting
requirement.
Some commenters objected that the actual reporting form required
under the proposal would be issued as guidance, without the opportunity
for public comment. The Board believes it would be advantageous for
FICUs and CUSOs to have the opportunity to review the format and
content of the draft reporting form, so all affected parties are
adequately prepared to comply with the new requirements once the
reporting system is fully established. Accordingly, the draft reporting
form is being published in conjunction with this rulemaking. The draft
form illustrates the intended reporting format for the basic
registration for all CUSOs, as well as the expanded reporting
requirement for CUSOs involved in complex or high-risk services. The
Board emphasizes that the draft reporting form is subject to change as
the agency works to develop and implement the new reporting system for
CUSOs. Furthermore, future modifications may be made to the reporting
form based on NCUA's assessment of current needs. NCUA intends to
submit a copy of the reporting form to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
Accordingly, the public will be provided an opportunity to comment on
the form's paperwork requirements. The draft reporting form is found in
Section IV of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Many commenters raised concerns that the proposed reporting
requirement could potentially expose CUSOs' confidential business
information and trade secrets to public dissemination through Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) requests, putting them at a competitive
disadvantage to their non-CUSO counterparts. The Board is sensitive to
these concerns. It notes that the FOIA, as well as the applicable
exemptions set forth in NCUA's implementing FOIA regulations, applies
to any data or information submitted by CUSOs to NCUA under Sec.
712.3(d)(4). The Board anticipates that CUSO submissions will contain
or consist of ``trade secrets and commercial or financial information
obtained from a person and privileged or confidential.'' This type of
information is subject to withholding under exemption 4 of the
FOIA.\19\ In addition, information that is ``contained in or related to
examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of,
or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or
supervision of financial institutions'' is subject to withholding under
exemption 8 of the FOIA.\20\ To the extent, however, that CUSO
submissions may contain or consist of data or information not subject
to an applicable FOIA exemption, for example, a CUSO's name, address,
or other publicly available information, that data or information would
be releasable under the FOIA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4); 12 CFR 792.11(a)(4).
\20\ 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(8); 12 CFR 792.11(a)(8) (emphasis added).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several commenters noted that the proposal required the financial
report to be submitted ``at least'' annually. These commenters urged
NCUA to clearly define the reporting frequency as ``annual.'' The Board
agrees that reporting under the new rule should occur on an annual
basis. As such, the final rule modifies the requirement by establishing
the reporting frequency as ``annually.'' Additionally, the final rule
[[Page 72544]]
modifies the proposed requirement that a newly formed CUSO file a
report within 30 days after its formation. Under the final rule, all
newly formed CUSOs will be required to file a report within 60 days of
formation. For newly formed CUSOs involved in complex or high-risk
activities, such report must include the enhanced information; all
other newly formed CUSOs will report only basic registration
information. For purposes of this requirement, the definition of
``newly formed CUSO'' includes a newly established business or an
established business that becomes subject to this regulation by virtue
of a credit union's investment or loan to the business. Again, NCUA
will publish guidance on the report, providing more specific
information on the correct format, timing, and required information.
Commenters also raised concerns that the proposal is unclear about
how the information reported directly by CUSOs will be used by the
agency. Numerous commenters noted that, by design, CUSOs generally do
not have a sizable capital structure or generate significant income.
These commenters urged NCUA not to evaluate CUSOs based solely on their
balance sheets and income statements.
The Board is mindful of commenters' concerns and emphasizes that
the agency appreciates the value that CUSOs bring to the credit union
industry as collaborative tools for credit unions to achieve economies
of scale, retain expertise, and better serve their members. The Board
recognizes that CUSOs, in their supportive function, are intentionally
designed to operate on thin margins in order to realize greater
benefits to credit unions. Accordingly, the Board understands that
balance sheets and income statements alone do not reflect the true
value of CUSOs. The Board continues to believe, however, that the
ability to accurately inventory CUSOs and evaluate their financial and
operational condition is paramount to mitigating risk to the credit
union system as a whole. It emphasizes that NCUA intends to use the
information reported by CUSOs to inform the agency's supervisory
oversight of FICUs. For example, NCUA may use the information to help
credit unions improve their due diligence, to raise examiner awareness
of identified risks, and to foster collaborative problem-solving among
CUSOs, credit unions, SSAs, and NCUA. The Board feels that the final
rule achieves the balance of exercising regulatory restraint while
ensuring the ultimate safety and soundness of the NCUSIF.
Subsidiary CUSOs--Sec. 712.11
The proposed rule added a new section to the CUSO regulation,
applicable to both FCUs and FISCUs, prohibiting a FICU from investing
in a CUSO unless all subsidiaries of the CUSO also agree to follow all
applicable laws and regulations. (Proposed Sec. 712.11).
A significant number of commenters expressed concern that the
proposal would treat any entity in which a CUSO invests as a subsidiary
subject to the CUSO regulation. They argued that non-controlling
investments should not trigger the regulation. Several commenters
suggested that the informal rule has been that a CUSO subsidiary is
impermissible if the subsidiary was formed with the intent and purpose
of evading the CUSO rule, and they recommended that the Board adopt
this standard in the final rule.
The Board disagrees and adopts the subsidiary provision
substantially as proposed. NCUA's policy with regard to CUSO
subsidiaries has been publicly stated since at least 1997, although it
has never been included in regulatory text. Specifically, under
existing policy, the CUSO rule applies to all levels or tiers of a
CUSO's structure. Any subsidiary entity in which a CUSO invests will
also be treated as a CUSO and, thus, subject to the regulation.\21\ The
Board continues to believe there is an inherent risk that a subsidiary
CUSO could adversely affect the investing credit union and, ultimately,
the NCUSIF. Accordingly, the final rule clarifies the regulation's
applicability to subsidiary CUSOs by codifying NCUA's existing policy
in the regulatory text. The Board believes it is appropriate to codify
this requirement in the regulation to ensure that credit unions and
CUSOs are aware that the requirements of the CUSO rule and applicable
state rules apply to all subsidiary entities in which a CUSO invests,
including those entities with the appearance of being formed with the
intent and purpose of evading the CUSO rule. This requirement will
apply to any entity in which a CUSO has an ownership interest of any
amount, if that entity is engaged primarily in providing products or
services to credit unions or credit union members. The provision,
however, will not apply to third parties with whom a CUSO contracts or
otherwise does business. Because this provision (Sec. 712.11) applies
to all FICUs, the definition of a CUSO in Sec. 741.222 is also amended
to include subsidiary entities in which a CUSO invests any amount, if
that entity is engaged primarily in providing products or services to
credit unions or members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 62 FR 11781 (Mar. 13, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitions and Conforming Amendments
The Board is making several technical and conforming amendments.
The final rule updates Sec. 712.1 to make certain technical changes,
to reflect the amendments in this rulemaking, and to add a definition
to provide that the term ``federally insured credit union'' or ``FICU''
means all FCUs and FISCUs. In addition, the final rule brings the
language contained in Sec. 741.222 that defines the term ``CUSO'' into
Sec. 712.1 as well. The Board believes that parallel references to
``CUSO'' in both Sec. 712.1 and Sec. 742.222 will add clarity and
consistency to the regulations addressing CUSOs. Additionally, Sec.
712.1 and Sec. 741.222 are being revised to conform with Sec. 701.30,
which was amended to include remittance transfers.\22\ Finally,
technical changes are made in Sec. 712.4(b) to clarify that written
legal advice is required prior to a FICU investing in a CUSO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 76 FR 44761 (July 27, 2011); 76 FR 73993 (Nov. 30, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Exemptions
Section 712.10 of the current rule allows SSAs to apply for an
exemption, on behalf of FISCUs, from Sec. 712.3(d)(3), the provision
addressing access to books and records with which FISCUs must comply.
Because the proposed rule added additional requirements for FISCUs
(proposed Sec. 712.3(d)(1) and (2)), the proposal expanded Sec.
712.10 to allow SSAs to obtain an exemption, on behalf of FISCUs, from
compliance with these additional provisions. The proposed changes did
not alter the manner in which an SSA can obtain an exemption, but
merely made changes that take into account that some states may already
have equivalent or more stringent rules or requirements that govern
financial reporting, audits, and accounting practices of FISCUs and
their CUSOs. The proposed rule, however, did not allow for an SSA to
apply for an exemption, on behalf of FISCUs, from the new reporting
requirement in proposed Sec. 712.3(d)(4) because allowing an exemption
from this requirement would result in inconsistent reporting based on
the varying laws in the different states. Commenters were either
generally supportive of, or did not provide comment on, these
particular changes. Accordingly, the Board adopts the amendments to
Sec. 712.10 substantially as proposed. The final rule clarifies,
however, that NCUA may grant
[[Page 72545]]
state exemptions from any or all of Sec. 712.3(d)(1), (2), and (3)
only if state law is equal to, or more stringent than, NCUA's
requirements.
Transition Period for Compliance
The Board recognizes that FICUs with loans to or investments in
CUSOs will be required under this final rule to make changes in the
agreements they currently have with their CUSOs. Accordingly, the
effective date of the final rule is June 30, 2014. Additionally, CUSOs
will begin submitting reports to NCUA under new Sec. 712.3(d)(4) when
the agency's reporting system is fully operational, which will be by
December 31, 2015.
IV. Draft Reporting Form
The Board is publishing a draft reporting form to illustrate the
intended format for CUSO reports submitted under Sec. 712.3(d)(4) of
this final rule. The draft shows the planned reporting format for the
basic registration for all CUSOs, as well as the expanded reporting
requirement for CUSOs engaging in complex or high-risk activities. The
Board notes, however, that the draft reporting form is subject to
change as the agency develops and implements the new reporting system
for CUSOs. Further, once finalized, the agency may later modify the
reporting form based on NCUA's assessment of changing industry needs.
In accordance with the requirements of the PRA, NCUA will submit a copy
of the reporting form to the OMB, along with an application for an OMB
Control Number. At that time, the public will be provided an
opportunity to comment on the form's paperwork requirements, including
NCUA's estimate of the burden of the paperwork requirements.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR03DE13.008
[[Page 72546]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR03DE13.009
V. Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires NCUA to prepare an
analysis to describe any significant economic impact a regulation may
have on a substantial number of small entities. NCUA considers credit
unions having less than fifty million dollars in assets to be small for
purposes of RFA.\23\ The changes to the CUSO rule impose minimal
compliance obligations by requiring FISCUs to comply with certain
regulatory requirements concerning agreements with CUSOs and certain
recapitalization limits. NCUA has determined and certifies that the
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small credit unions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement (IRPS) 87-2 as
amended by IRPS 03-2, 68 FR 30950 (May 29, 2003) and IRPS 13-1, 78
FR 4032 (Jan. 18, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paperwork Reduction Act
The PRA applies to rulemakings in which an agency by rule creates a
new paperwork burden on regulated entities or modifies an existing
burden.\24\ For purposes of the PRA, a paperwork burden may take the
form of either a reporting or a recordkeeping requirement, both
referred to as information collections. NCUA recognizes that this final
rule requires FISCUs and FCUs to comply with certain requirements that
constitute an information collection within the meaning of the PRA.
Under this rule, FISCUs with an investment in or loan to a CUSO will
need to revise the current agreement they have with their CUSO to
provide that the CUSO will account for all its transactions in
accordance with GAAP, prepare quarterly financial statements and obtain
an annual financial statement audit of its financial statements by a
licensed certified public accountant. The rule also requires FISCUs, in
certain circumstances, to submit an application for regulatory approval
to recapitalize an insolvent CUSO. Additionally, the final rule
requires FICUs to enter into agreements with CUSOs requiring CUSOs to
submit reports directly to NCUA and the appropriate SSA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 44 U.S.C. 3507(d); 5 CFR Part 1320.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, NCUA cannot fully determine the total number of CUSOs
that presently exist, which CUSOs maintain relationships with which
credit unions, the financial condition of CUSOs, or the full range of
services offered by CUSOs. The current information is incomplete,
primarily because the agency is collecting information from the CUSOs'
credit union clients rather than directly from each CUSO itself.
Nevertheless, according to NCUA records, of the 2,492 FISCUs that filed
a Form 5300 Call Report with NCUA as of June 30, 2013, 1,161 reported
an interest in at least one CUSO, and a total of 2,836 CUSO interests
was reported. For purposes of this analysis, NCUA estimates that this
requirement will affect all FISCUs reporting an interest in a CUSO.
Using these estimates, information collection obligations imposed by
this aspect of the rule, on an annual basis, are analyzed below:
Changing the written agreement relating to certain accounting and
reporting requirements.
FISCUs with a reported interest in a CUSO as of 6/30/2013: 1,161.
Frequency of response: one-time \25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ One-time estimates account for, on average, approximately
two CUSOs per credit union. The actual frequency will vary based on
the credit union's actual number of reported interests in a CUSO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial hour burden: 4.
4 hour x 1,161 = 4,644
In addition to the requirement for FISCUs to revise their
agreements with CUSOs, this rule also requires FCUs with an investment
in or loan to a CUSO to revise the current agreement they have with
their CUSO to provide that the CUSO submit a financial report directly
to NCUA. According to NCUA records, of the 4,189 FCUs that filed a form
5300 call report with NCUA as of June 30, 2013, 1,413 reported at least
one interest in a CUSO; a total of 3,275 CUSO interests was reported.
For purposes of this analysis, NCUA estimates that this requirement
will affect all FCUs with a reported interest
[[Page 72547]]
in a CUSO. Using these estimates, information collection obligations
imposed by this aspect of the rule, on an annual basis, are analyzed
below:
Changing the written agreement relating to reports to NCUA.
FCUs with a reported interest in a CUSO as of 6/30/2013: 1,413.
Frequency of response: one-time.
Initial hour burden: 4.
4 hour x 1,413 = 5,652
Initial CUSO reporting to NCUA--basic information.
Reported CUSOs as of 6/30/2013 \26\: 1,197.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Numbers reported may be over or understated based on the
problems with gathering CUSO data from credit unions rather than
from CUSOs directly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frequency of response: one-time.
Initial hour burden: 0.5.
0.5 x 1,197 = 598.5
Initial CUSO reporting to NCUA--expanded information.
Reported CUSOs providing credit and lending, IT, or custody,
safekeeping, and investment management services for credit unions as of
6/30/2013: \27\ 600.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ Estimates are likely overstated as credit unions currently
report only broad categories of services as defined in the
regulation. The expanded reporting requirements under this rule are
more narrowly defined and will result in fewer CUSOs affected.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frequency of response: one-time.
Initial hour burden: 3.
3 hours x 600 = 1,800
Annual CUSO reporting to NCUA--expanded information.
Reported CUSOs providing credit and lending, IT, or custody,
safekeeping, and investment management services for credit unions
services as of 6/30/2013: 600.
Frequency of response: Annual.
Initial hour burden: 3.
3 hour x 600 = 1,800
Direct reporting by CUSOs, however, will lessen the existing burden
to FICUs for reporting their CUSO interests to NCUA. According to NCUA
records, of the 6,681 FICUs that filed a form 5300 call report with
NCUA as of June 30, 2013, 2,574 reported at least one interest in a
CUSO.
For purposes of this analysis, NCUA estimates that this requirement
will affect all FICUs with a reported interest in a CUSO. Using these
estimates, the reduced burden to FICUs by this aspect of the rule, on
an annual basis, is analyzed below:
Completing the CUSO section of 5300 call report.
FICUs with a reported interest in a CUSO as of 6/30/2013: 2,574.
Frequency of response: Quarterly.
Reduced hour burden: 0.4.
0.4 hours x 2,574 x 4 = 4,118.4
Completing the CUSO section of CU Online profile.
FICUs with a reported interest in a CUSO as of 6/30/2013: 2,574.
Frequency of response: Semi-annually.
Reduced hour burden: 0.2.
0.2 hours x 2,574 x 2 = 1,029.6
Another aspect of this final rule that involves PRA consideration
is the requirement pertaining to recapitalizing CUSOs that have become
insolvent. The final rule will require certain FISCUs to seek and
obtain prior approval from their SSA before making an investment to
recapitalize an insolvent CUSO. According to NCUA's records, as of June
30, 2013, there were only 17 FISCUs that were less than adequately
capitalized (i.e., net worth of under 6%). Of these FISCUs, 9 currently
have an interest in a CUSO. NCUA estimates it would take a FISCU
approximately two hours to complete a request for the SSA's prior
approval for an investment to recapitalize an insolvent CUSO.
Obtaining regulatory approval:
Total less than adequately capitalized FISCUs with an interest in a
CUSO as of 6/30/2013: 9.
Frequency of response: one-time.
Initial hour burden: 2.
2 hours x 9 = 18
In accordance with the requirements of the PRA, NCUA intends to
obtain a modification of its OMB Control Number, 3133-0149, to support
these changes. Simultaneously with its publication of this final rule,
NCUA is submitting a copy of the final rule to OMB, along with an
application for a modification of the OMB Control Number.
The PRA and OMB regulations require that the public be provided an
opportunity to comment on the paperwork requirements, including an
agency's estimate of the burden of the paperwork requirements. The
Board invites comment on: (1) Whether the paperwork requirements are
necessary; (2) the accuracy of NCUA's estimates on the burden of the
paperwork requirements; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the paperwork requirements; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the paperwork requirements.
Comments should be sent to the NCUA Contact and the OMB Reviewer
listed below:
NCUA Contact: Tracy Crews, National Credit Union Administration, 1775
Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428, Fax No. 703-837-2861,
Email: OCIOPRA@ncua.gov
OMB Contact: Office of Management and Budget, ATTN: Desk Officer for
the National Credit Union Administration, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on state and local interests. In
adherence to fundamental federalism principles, NCUA, an independent
regulatory agency,\28\ voluntarily complies with the Executive Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 44 U.S.C. 3502(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The major aspects of the rule make certain aspects applicable to
FISCUs. By law, these institutions are already subject to numerous
provisions of NCUA's rules, based on the agency's role as the insurer
of member share accounts and the significant interest NCUA has in the
safety and soundness of their operations. In developing the rule, NCUA
worked with representatives of the state credit union regulatory
community. This rule incorporates a mechanism by which states may
request an exemption from coverage of part of the rule for institutions
in that state, provided certain criteria are met. In any event, the
final rule will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on
the relationship between the national government and the states, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. NCUA has determined that this final rule does not
constitute a policy that has federalism implications for purposes of
the executive order.
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
NCUA has determined that this final rule will not affect family
well-being within the meaning of Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations Act, 1999.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ Public Law 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 \30\
(SBREFA) provides generally for congressional review of agency rules. A
reporting requirement is triggered in instances where NCUA issues a
final rule as defined by Section 551 of the Administrative Procedure
Act.\31\ NCUA does not believe this final rule is a ``major rule''
within the meaning of the relevant sections of SBREFA. NCUA has
[[Page 72548]]
submitted the rule to OMB for its determination in that regard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ Public Law 104-121, 110 Stat. 857 (1996).
\31\ 5 U.S.C. 551.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 712
Administrative practices and procedure, credit, credit unions,
insurance, investments, reporting, and record keeping requirements.
12 CFR Part 741
Credit, Credit unions, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Share insurance.
By the National Credit Union Administration Board on November
21, 2013.
Gerard Poliquin,
Secretary of the Board.
Accordingly, NCUA amends 12 CFR Parts 712 and 741 as follows:
PART 712--CREDIT UNION SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS (CUSOS)
0
1. The authority citation for part 712 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1756, 1757(5)(D), and (7)(I), 1766,
1781(b)(9), 1782, 1784, 1785, 1786 and 1789(11).
0
2. Revise Sec. 712.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 712.1 What does this part cover?
(a) This part establishes when a federal credit union (FCU) can
invest in and make loans to credit union service organizations (CUSOs).
CUSOs are subject to review by NCUA. This part does not apply to
corporate credit unions that have CUSOs subject to Sec. 704.11 of this
chapter.
(b) All sections of this part apply to FCUs. Sections
712.2(d)(2)(ii), 712.3(d), 712.4 and 712.11(b) and (c) of this part
apply to federally insured, state-chartered credit unions (FISCUs), as
provided in Sec. 741.222 of this chapter. FISCUs must follow the law
in the state in which they are chartered with respect to the sections
in this part that only apply to FCUs.
(c) As used in this part, federally insured credit union (FICU)
means an FCU or FISCU.
(d) As used in this part, CUSO means any entity in which a FICU has
an ownership interest or to which a FICU has extended a loan, and that
entity is engaged primarily in providing products or services to credit
unions or credit union members, or, in the case of checking and
currency services, including cashing checks and money orders for a fee,
and selling negotiable checks, including travelers checks, money
orders, and other similar money transfer instruments (including
international and domestic electronic fund transfers and remittance
transfers, as defined in section 919 of the Electronic Fund Transfer
Act, 15 U.S.C. 1693o-1), to persons eligible for membership in any
credit union having a loan, investment or contract with the entity. A
CUSO also includes any entity in which a CUSO has an ownership interest
of any amount, if that entity is engaged primarily in providing
products or services to credit unions or credit union members.
0
3. Revise Sec. 712.2(d)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 712.2 How much can an FCU invest in or loan to CUSOs, and what
parties may participate?
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) Special rule in the case of less than adequately capitalized
FICUs. This rule applies in the case of a FICU that is currently less
than adequately capitalized, as determined under part 702 of this
chapter, or where the making of an investment in a CUSO would render
the FICU less than adequately capitalized under part 702 of this
chapter. Before making an investment in a CUSO:
(i) A less than adequately capitalized FCU, or an FCU that would be
rendered less than adequately capitalized by the recapitalization of a
CUSO, must obtain prior written approval from the appropriate NCUA
regional office if the making of the investment would result in an
aggregate cash outlay, measured on a cumulative basis (regardless of
how the investment is valued for accounting purposes, but limited to
the immediately preceding seven (7) years) in an amount that is in
excess of 1% of its paid-in and unimpaired capital and surplus; or
(ii) A less than adequately capitalized FISCU, or a FISCU that
would be rendered less than adequately capitalized by the
recapitalization of a CUSO, must obtain prior written approval from the
appropriate state supervisory authority if the making of the investment
would result in an aggregate cash outlay, measured on a cumulative
basis (regardless of how the investment is valued for accounting
purposes, but limited to the immediately preceding seven (7) years) in
an amount that is in excess of the investment limit in the state in
which it is chartered. A FISCU must also contemporaneously submit a
copy of this request to the appropriate NCUA regional office. If there
is no state limit in the state in which a FISCU is chartered, the
requirements in paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section will apply to that
FISCU.
* * * * *
0
4. Revise Sec. 712.3(d) to read as follows:
712.3 What are the characteristics of and what requirements apply to
CUSOs?
* * * * *
(d) CUSO accounting; audits and financial statements; NCUA access
to information. A FICU must obtain a written agreement from a CUSO
before investing in or lending to the CUSO that the CUSO will:
(1) Account for all of its transactions in accordance with GAAP;
(2) Prepare quarterly financial statements and obtain an annual
financial statement audit of its financial statements by a licensed
certified public accountant in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards. A wholly owned CUSO is not required to obtain a
separate annual financial statement audit if that wholly owned CUSO is
included in the annual consolidated financial statement audit of the
investing FICU;
(3) Provide NCUA, its representatives, and the state supervisory
authority having jurisdiction over any FISCU with an outstanding loan
to, investment in or contractual agreement for products or services
with the CUSO with complete access to any books and records of the CUSO
and the ability to review the CUSO's internal controls, as deemed
necessary by NCUA or the state supervisory authority in carrying out
their respective responsibilities under the Act and the relevant state
credit union statute;
(4) Annually submit, pursuant to NCUA guidance, a report directly
to NCUA and the appropriate state supervisory authority, if applicable.
A newly formed CUSO (including a pre-existing business which becomes
subject to this regulation by virtue of a credit union investment or
loan) must file a report within 60 days of its formation. The report
must contain basic registration information, including the CUSO's legal
name; tax identification number; address; telephone number; Web site;
primary point of contact; services offered; the name(s) and charter(s)
of credit union(s) investing in, lending to, or receiving services from
the CUSO; and investor and/or subsidiary CUSO(s). In addition, for any
CUSO engaged in complex or high-risk activities, the report must
contain:
(i) For each credit union investing in, lending to, or receiving
services from the CUSO:
(A) A list of services provided to each credit union;
[[Page 72549]]
(B) The investment amount, loan amount, or level of activity of
each credit union;
(ii) The CUSO's most recent year-end audited financial statements;
and
(iii) (A) For CUSOs engaged in credit and lending services:
(1) The total dollar amount of loans outstanding;
(2) The total number of loans outstanding;
(3) The total dollar amount of loans granted year-to-date; and
(4) The total number of loans granted year-to-date.
(B) Such information must be provided by loan type for each type of
loan originated or serviced by the CUSO.
(5) For purposes of paragraph (d)(4) of this section, complex or
high-risk activities include preapproved CUSO activities and services
related to credit and lending, information technology, and custody,
safekeeping, and investment management services for credit unions.
Specific activities related to these categories include:
(i) Credit and lending:
(A) Business loan origination;
(B) Consumer mortgage loan origination;
(C) Loan support services, including servicing;
(D) Student loan origination; and
(E) Credit card loan origination.
(ii) Information technology:
(A) Electronic transaction services;
(B) Record retention, security, and disaster recovery services; and
(C) Payroll processing services.
(iii) Custody, safekeeping, and investment management services for
credit unions.
* * * * *
0
5. Revise Sec. 712.4 to read as follows:
Sec. 712.4 What must a FICU and a CUSO do to maintain separate
corporate identities?
(a) Corporate separateness. A FICU and a CUSO must be operated in a
manner that demonstrates to the public the separate corporate existence
of the FICU and the CUSO. Good business practices dictate that each
must operate so that:
(1) Its respective business transactions, accounts, and records are
not intermingled;
(2) Each observes the formalities of its separate corporate
procedures;
(3) Each is adequately financed as a separate unit in the light of
normal obligations reasonably foreseeable in a business of its size and
character;
(4) Each is held out to the public as a separate enterprise;
(5) The FICU does not dominate the CUSO to the extent that the CUSO
is treated as a department of the FICU; and
(6) Unless the FICU has guaranteed a loan obtained by the CUSO, all
borrowings by the CUSO indicate that the FICU is not liable.
(b) Written legal advice. Prior to a FICU investing in a CUSO, the
FICU must obtain written legal advice as to whether the CUSO is
established in a manner that will limit potential exposure of the FICU
to no more than the loss of funds invested in, or loaned to, the CUSO.
In addition, if a FICU invests in, or makes a loan to, a CUSO, and that
CUSO plans to change its structure under Sec. 712.3(a), the FICU must
also obtain prior written legal advice that the CUSO will remain
established in a manner that will limit potential exposure of the FICU
to no more than the loss of funds invested in, or loaned to, the CUSO.
The written legal advice must address factors that have led courts to
``pierce the corporate veil,'' such as inadequate capitalization, lack
of separate corporate identity, common boards of directors and
employees, control of one entity over another, and lack of separate
books and records. The written legal advice must be provided by
independent legal counsel of the investing FICU or the CUSO.
Sec. 712.9 [Removed and Reserved]
0
6. Remove and reserve Sec. 712.9.
0
7. Revise Sec. 712.10 to read as follows:
Sec. 712.10 How can a state supervisory authority obtain an exemption
for FISCUs from compliance with Sec. 712.3(d)(1), (2), and (3)?
(a) The NCUA Board may exempt FISCUs in a given state from
compliance with any or all of Sec. 712.3(d)(1), (2), and (3) if the
NCUA Board determines the laws in that state are equal to, or more
stringent than, Sec. 712.3(d)(1), (2), and (3), and the laws and
procedures available to the supervisory authority in that state are
sufficient to provide NCUA with the degree of access and information it
believes is necessary to evaluate the safety and soundness of FICUs
having business relationships with CUSOs owned by FISCUs in that state.
(b) To obtain an exemption, the state supervisory authority must
submit a copy of the legal authority pursuant to which it secures the
information required in Sec. 712.3(d)(1), (2), and (3) of this part to
NCUA's regional office having responsibility for that state, along with
all procedural and operational documentation supporting and describing
the actual practices by which it implements and exercises the
authority.
(c) The state supervisory authority must provide the regional
director with an assurance that NCUA examiners will be provided with
co-extensive authority and will be allowed direct access to CUSO books
and records at such times as NCUA, in its sole discretion, may
determine necessary or appropriate. For purposes of this section,
access includes the right to make and retain copies of any CUSO record,
as to which NCUA will accord the same level of control and
confidentiality that it uses with respect to all other examination-
related materials it obtains in the course of its duties.
(d) The state supervisory authority must also provide the regional
director with an assurance that NCUA, upon request, will have access to
copies of any financial statements or reports which a CUSO has provided
to the state supervisory authority.
(e) The regional director will review the applicable authority,
procedures and assurances and forward the exemption request, along with
the regional director's recommendation, to the NCUA Board for a final
determination.
(f) For purposes of this section, whether an entity is a CUSO shall
be determined in accordance with the definition set out in Sec.
741.222 of this chapter.
0
8. Add new Sec. 712.11 to read as follows:
Sec. 712.11 What requirements apply to subsidiary CUSOs?
(a) FCUs investing in a CUSO with a subsidiary CUSO. FCUs may only
invest in or loan to a CUSO, which has a subsidiary CUSO, if the
subsidiary CUSO satisfies all of the requirements of this part. The
requirements of this part apply to all tiers or levels of a CUSO's
structure.
(b) FISCUs investing in a CUSO with a subsidiary CUSO. FISCUs may
only invest in or loan to a CUSO which has a subsidiary CUSO, if the
subsidiary CUSO complies with the following:
(1) All applicable state laws and rules regarding CUSOs; and
(2) All of the requirements of this part that apply to FISCUs,
which are listed in Sec. 712.1. The requirements of this part that
apply to FISCUs apply to all tiers or levels of a CUSO's structure.
(c) For purposes of this section, a subsidiary CUSO is any entity
in which a CUSO has an ownership interest of any amount, if that entity
is engaged primarily in providing products or services to credit unions
or credit union members.
PART 741--REQUIREMENTS FOR INSURANCE
0
9. The authority citation for part 741 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 72550]]
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1757, 1766, 1781-1790, and 1790d.
0
10. Revise Sec. 741.222 to read as follows:
Sec. 741.222 Credit union service organizations.
(a) Any credit union that is insured pursuant to Title II of the
Act must adhere to the requirements in Sec. Sec. 712.2(d)(2)(ii),
712.3(d), 712.4 and 712.11(b) and (c) of this chapter concerning
permissible investment limits for less than adequately capitalized
credit unions, agreements between credit unions and their credit union
service organizations (CUSOs), the requirement to maintain separate
corporate identities, and investments and loans to CUSOs investing in
other CUSOs. For purposes of this section, a CUSO is any entity in
which a credit union has an ownership interest or to which a credit
union has extended a loan, and that entity is engaged primarily in
providing products or services to credit unions or credit union
members, or, in the case of checking and currency services, including
cashing checks and money orders for a fee, and selling negotiable
checks, including travelers checks, money orders, and other similar
money transfer instruments (including international and domestic
electronic fund transfers and remittance transfers, as defined in
section 919 of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. 1693o-1), to
persons eligible for membership in any credit union having a loan,
investment or contract with the entity. A CUSO also includes any entity
in which a CUSO has an ownership interest of any amount, if that entity
is engaged primarily in providing products or services to credit unions
or credit union members.
(b) This section shall have no preemptive effect with respect to
the laws or rules of any state providing for access to CUSO books and
records or CUSO examination by credit union regulatory authorities.
[FR Doc. 2013-28479 Filed 12-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P