Interpretation Concerning Involvement of NASA Astronauts During a Licensed Launch or Reentry, 72011-72013 [2013-28405]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it establishes
controlled airspace at Magee Municipal
Airport, Magee, MS.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 311a. This airspace action is
not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (Air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for Part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated August 7, 2013, effective
September 15, 2013, is amended as
follows:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward from 700 feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
19:14 Nov 29, 2013
Jkt 232001
ASO MS E5 Magee, MS [New]
Magee Municipal Airport, MS
(Lat. 31°51′46″ N., long. 89°48′02″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.3- mile
radius of Magee Municipal Airport.
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on
November 20, 2013.
Kip B. Johns,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern
Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2013–28679 Filed 11–29–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0002; Airspace
Docket No. 12–ASO–46]
Establishment of Class E Airspace;
Umatilla, FL
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule: correction.
AGENCY:
This action corrects the
geographic coordinates in the airspace
description of a final rule, published in
the Federal Register on August 23,
2013, establishing controlled airspace at
Umatilla Municipal Airport, Umatilla,
FL.
SUMMARY:
Effective 0901 UTC, December
12, 2013. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under title 1, Code of
Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to
the annual revision of FAA Order
7400.9 and publication of conforming
amendments.
72011
instruction 2 and the geographic
coordinates listed in the airspace
designation of the Class E airspace for
Umatilla Municipal Airport, Umatilla,
FL, as published in the Federal Register
of August 23, 2013, (78 FR 52425), FR
Doc. 2013–20512, are corrected as
follows:
PART 71 [AMENDED]
1. On page 52425, column 3, revise
amendatory instruction 2 to read: The
incorporation by reference in 14 CFR
71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated August 7, 2013, and effective
September 15, 2013, is amended as
follows:
■
ASO FL E5 Umatilla, FL [Corrected]
2. On page 52425, column 3, line 59,
remove, ‘‘lat. 28°55′27″ N., long.
82°39′07″ W’’, and insert ‘‘lat. 28°55′27″
N., long. 81°39′07″ W’’.
■
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on
November 20, 2013.
Kip B. Johns,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern
Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2013–28758 Filed 11–29–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
DATES:
John
Fornito, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, P.O. Box 20636,
Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)
305–6364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
History
On August 23, 2013, the FAA
published a final rule in the Federal
Register establishing Class E airspace at
Umatilla Municipal Airport, Umatilla,
FL (78 FR 52425). After publication, the
FAA found that the geographic
coordinates of the airport were
incorrect. The longitude coordinate is
corrected from ‘‘long. 82°39′07″ W.’’ to
‘‘long. 81°39′07″ W.’’
Correction to Final Rule
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, amendatory
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14 CFR Part 460
Interpretation Concerning Involvement
of NASA Astronauts During a Licensed
Launch or Reentry
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Interpretation.
AGENCY:
This interpretation responds
to a request from the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) regarding whether the space
transportation regulations of the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) would
restrict NASA astronauts from
performing operational functions during
a commercial space launch or reentry
under license from the FAA.
DATES: Effective December 2, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical questions, contact Pam
Underwood, Deputy Manager,
Operations Integration Division;
pam.underwood@faa.gov. For legal
questions, contact Alex Zektser, Office
of the Chief Counsel, International Law,
Legislation, and Regulations Division,
Federal Aviation Administration; email
alex.zektser@faa.gov.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02DER1.SGM
02DER1
72012
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Background
On July 3, 2013, NASA asked the FAA
whether the FAA would restrict NASA
astronauts, who are U.S. Government
employees, from engaging in operational
functions during an FAA-licensed
launch or reentry. NASA noted that all
NASA astronauts undergo extensive
training and must meet rigorous medical
and training requirements. NASA will
also ensure astronauts complete training
specific to each launch and reentry
operator’s vehicle and operations.
Specifically, NASA asked whether,
under the FAA’s statute and regulations,
a NASA astronaut flying as a space
flight participant could engage in ‘‘all
nominal and off-nominal operational
functions,’’ including ‘‘the conduct of
aborts, emergency response, and
monitoring and operating
environmental controls and life support
systems.’’ NASA also asked the FAA
whether NASA’s astronauts could
‘‘perform operational activities up to
and including flight.’’ In response to
NASA’s question, the FAA examined
the launch and reentry scenarios
currently envisioned, and concludes
that NASA astronauts may perform
these functions in FAA-licensed
launches and reentries.
Scenarios
The FAA understands that the
following scenarios are likely, but not
definite. It is the FAA’s understanding
that a NASA astronaut’s interaction
with the controls of a launch or reentry
vehicle may vary depending on a launch
or reentry operator’s designs and
operational procedures, which are
currently under development. During a
nominal launch, a launch operator
under an FAA license would most likely
conduct the ascent using a flight
computer as the primary means of
controlling the flight path of the vehicle.
Any persons on board would not likely
affect the flight path of the launch
vehicle. If an emergency situation arose,
a NASA astronaut could override the
launch operator’s flight computer to
initiate an abort from the launch vehicle
and take manual control of the
spacecraft atop the launch vehicle.
NASA astronaut emergency operations
could include manually initiating an
abort, using thrusters to orient a capsule
to support chute deployment, and
subsequent deployment of any
parachutes. Emergency operations could
also include the NASA astronaut
manually piloting a vehicle to a water
or runway landing.
For a reentry, a licensed operator’s
flight computer could serve as the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:14 Nov 29, 2013
Jkt 232001
primary means of controlling the flight
path of the vehicle during a nominal
reentry. A NASA astronaut might
manually initiate the reentry burn, and
the flight computer could conduct the
reentry of the vehicle during nominal
operations. The NASA astronaut could
also have the capability to take manual
control over the reentry vehicle in an
off-nominal or emergency situation.
During an off-nominal or emergency
situation, the NASA astronaut would,
much of the time, be using procedures
or training prepared by the reentry
operator.
Discussion
A. Space Flight Participants Who are
NASA Astronauts
Based on the above scenarios, we
conclude that, under 51 U.S.C. ch. 509
(Chapter 509), the FAA’s space
regulations at 14 CFR ch. III, and
consistent with the FAA’s discussion of
its human space flight requirements,1 a
NASA astronaut may engage in
operational functions, up to and
including piloting the vehicle, the
conduct of aborts, emergency response,
and monitoring and operating
environmental controls and life support
systems, and the launch or reentry
would remain under FAA jurisdiction.
Chapter 509 addresses crew and space
flight participants, and, according to
Chapter 509’s definition, NASA
astronauts are space flight participants.
Chapter 509 defines ‘‘crew’’ as ‘‘any
employee of a licensee or transferee, or
of a contractor or subcontractor of a
licensee or transferee, who performs
activities in the course of that
employment directly relating to the
launch, reentry, or other operation of or
in a launch vehicle or reentry vehicle
that carries human beings.’’ 51 U.S.C.
50902(2). Conversely, a ‘‘space flight
participant’’ is ‘‘an individual, who is
not crew, carried within a launch
vehicle or reentry vehicle.’’ Id.
§ 50902(17). Because a NASA astronaut
is not an employee of a licensee or
transferee, or of a contractor or
subcontractor of a licensee or transferee,
a NASA astronaut is not crew.
Consequently, a NASA astronaut who is
being carried within a launch or reentry
vehicle is a space flight participant.
B. Limitations
Chapter 509 does not specify any
limitations on a space flight
participant’s conduct or operations
during a launch or reentry. Similarly,
FAA regulations implementing Chapter
1 Human Space Flight Requirements for Crew and
Space Flight Participants, Final Rule, 71 FR 75616
(Dec. 15, 2006) (‘‘Human Space Flight Rule’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
509 for space flight participants,
codified at 14 CFR part 460, also do not
specify any limitations on a space flight
participant’s conduct or operations
during a launch or reentry. See 14 CFR
460.41, et. seq.2 The only place where
the FAA limits space-flight-participant
conduct or operations is in the preamble
to the Human Space Flight rule that
created part 460. There the FAA states
that:
For public safety reasons, the FAA will not
allow space flight participants to pilot launch
or reentry vehicles at this time. A space flight
participant who wants to pilot a launch or
reentry vehicle would have to become an
employee or independent contractor of the
operator to acquire vehicle and missionspecific training. The operator will be in a
better position to evaluate the skills of an
employee or independent contractor than of
a space flight participant, particularly as
those skills relate to the requirements of the
operator’s particular vehicle. The FAA
acknowledges that this restriction may create
a dilemma for someone who wishes to
acquire training in order to become
employed, but, while the technology is so
new, it is important for public safety that
pilots be highly skilled at the outset.3
As can be seen, the FAA’s concern
with space flight participants interacting
with a launch or reentry vehicle was
based on the possibility that space flight
participants would not have the proper
vehicle and mission-specific training.
However, as NASA notes, NASA
astronauts must meet rigorous medical
and training requirements, which
include training specific to each
mission, launch vehicle, and reentry
vehicle. Because NASA astronauts are
not the untrained space-flight
participants originally contemplated by
the FAA, the considerations underlying
the policy have, at best, a limited
applicability to NASA astronauts. Thus,
for the scenarios currently envisioned,
NASA astronauts may engage in
operational activities during a licensed
launch or reentry to ensure safety and
mission success
C. Jurisdiction
We note that Chapter 509 does not
apply to launches or reentries the U.S.
Government carries out for itself. 51
U.S.C. 50919(g). Accordingly, NASA is
not carrying out the launches or
reentries that are subject to Chapter 509.
In the event, not contemplated in this
interpretation, that a NASA astronaut
2 The pertinent FAA regulations simply require
that space flight participants: (1) be informed of
risk; (2) execute a waiver of claims against the U.S.
Government; (3) receive training on how to respond
to emergency situations; and (4) not carry any
weapons onboard. See 14 CFR §§ 460.45–460.53.
3 Human Space Flight Requirements Final Rule,
71 FR at 75618.
E:\FR\FM\02DER1.SGM
02DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
exercised sufficient operational control
to carry out the launch or reentry,
§ 50919(g) would serve as a bar to FAA
licensing the activity.
In the scenarios described above, as
currently under development by launch
and reentry operators, the NASA
astronaut would likely not affect the
flight path of the vehicle during a
nominal launch. During a launch, the
astronaut would likely only manipulate
the flight path of the vehicle if an
emergency arose. Accordingly, section
50919(g) would not limit a NASA
astronaut’s ability to engage in
operational functions during launch.
Most of the conduct or operations
would simply constitute the execution
of emergency training required of space
flight participants by § 460.51.
The analysis for a reentry is similar to
that of a launch, with some additional
consideration for the possible manual
operation of the reentry vehicle by a
NASA astronaut. Specifically, a NASA
astronaut could initiate reentry
manually, but because the scenarios
have the reentry operator’s flight
computer directing the reentry, the
NASA astronaut’s interaction would not
be sufficient to constitute NASA
carrying out the reentry. Additionally,
the NASA astronaut’s exercise of
manual control over the vehicle in an
off-nominal situation would also not
rise to NASA carrying out the reentry
because, as discussed above, in an offnominal situation, the astronaut would
largely be implementing procedures
created by a commercial launch or
reentry operator for purposes of safety
or mission success.
In conclusion, Chapter 509 and the
FAA’s regulations impose no
operational constraints on NASA
astronauts for the scenarios envisioned
here.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
21, 2013.
Mark W. Bury,
Assistant Chief Counsel for International Law,
Legislation and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2013–28405 Filed 11–29–13; 8:45 am]
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:14 Nov 29, 2013
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–374]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Placement of Perampanel into
Schedule III
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
With the issuance of this final
rule, the Deputy Administrator of the
Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) places the substance perampanel
[2-(2-oxo-1-phenyl-5-pyridin-2-yl-1,2dihydropyridin-3-yl) benzonitrile],
including its salts, isomers, and salts of
isomers, into schedule III of the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA). This
scheduling action is pursuant to the
CSA which requires that such actions be
made on the record after opportunity for
a hearing through formal rulemaking.
This action imposes the regulatory
controls and administrative, civil, and
criminal sanctions applicable to
schedule III controlled substances on
persons who handle (manufacture,
distribute, dispense, import, export,
engage in research, conduct
instructional activities with, or possess)
or propose to handle perampanel.
DATES: Effective Date: January 2, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ruth A. Carter, Chief, Policy Evaluation
and Analysis Section, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152; Telephone: (202) 598–6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Legal Authority
The DEA implements and enforces
titles II and III of the Comprehensive
Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act
of 1970, as amended. Titles II and III are
referred to as the ‘‘Controlled
Substances Act’’ and the ‘‘Controlled
Substances Import and Export Act,’’
respectively, but they are collectively
referred to as the ‘‘Controlled
Substances Act’’ or the ‘‘CSA’’ for the
purposes of this action. 21 U.S.C. 801–
971. The DEA publishes the
implementing regulations for these
statutes in title 21 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 1300 to 1321.
The CSA and its implementing
regulations are designed to prevent,
detect, and eliminate the diversion of
controlled substances and listed
chemicals into the illicit market while
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72013
providing for the legitimate medical,
scientific, research, and industrial needs
of the United States. Controlled
substances have the potential for abuse
and dependence and are controlled to
protect the public health and safety.
Under the CSA, controlled substances
are classified in one of five schedules
based upon their potential for abuse,
their currently accepted medical use,
and the degree of dependence the
substance may cause. 21 U.S.C. 812. The
initial schedules of controlled
substances established by Congress are
found at 21 U.S.C. 812(c) and the
current list of scheduled substances is
published at 21 CFR part 1308.
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1), the
Attorney General may, by rule, ‘‘add to
such a schedule or transfer between
such schedules any drug or other
substance if he (A) finds that such drug
or other substance has a potential for
abuse, and (B) makes with respect to
such drug or other substance the
findings prescribed by [21 U.S.C. 812(b)]
for the schedule in which such drug is
to be placed. . . .’’ Pursuant to 28 CFR
0.100(b), the Attorney General has
delegated this scheduling authority to
the Administrator of the DEA, who has
further delegated this authority to the
Deputy Administrator of the DEA. 28
CFR 0.104.
The CSA provides that scheduling of
any drug or other substance may be
initiated by the Attorney General (1) on
his own motion; (2) at the request of the
Secretary of the Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS),1 or (3) on
the petition of any interested party. 21
U.S.C. 811(a). This action is based on a
recommendation from the Assistant
Secretary of the HHS and on an
evaluation of all other relevant data by
the DEA. This action imposes the
regulatory controls and administrative,
civil, and criminal sanctions applicable
to schedule III controlled substances on
persons who handle or propose to
handle perampanel.
Background
Perampanel [2-(2-oxo-1-phenyl-5pyridin-2-yl-1,2-dihydropyridin-3-yl)
benzonitrile] is a new chemical entity
with central nervous system (CNS)
1 As set forth in a memorandum of understanding
entered into by the HHS, the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), and the National Institute on
Drug Abuse (NIDA), the FDA acts as the lead agency
within the HHS in carrying out the Secretary’s
scheduling responsibilities under the CSA, with the
concurrence of NIDA. 50 FR 9518, Mar. 8, 1995. In
addition, because the Secretary of the HHS has
delegated to the Assistant Secretary for Health of
the HHS the authority to make domestic drug
scheduling recommendations, for purposes of this
document, all subsequent references to ‘‘Secretary’’
have been replaced with ‘‘Assistant Secretary.’’
E:\FR\FM\02DER1.SGM
02DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 231 (Monday, December 2, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72011-72013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28405]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 460
Interpretation Concerning Involvement of NASA Astronauts During a
Licensed Launch or Reentry
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Interpretation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This interpretation responds to a request from the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) regarding whether the space
transportation regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
would restrict NASA astronauts from performing operational functions
during a commercial space launch or reentry under license from the FAA.
DATES: Effective December 2, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions, contact Pam
Underwood, Deputy Manager, Operations Integration Division;
pam.underwood@faa.gov. For legal questions, contact Alex Zektser,
Office of the Chief Counsel, International Law, Legislation, and
Regulations Division, Federal Aviation Administration; email
alex.zektser@faa.gov.
[[Page 72012]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 3, 2013, NASA asked the FAA whether the FAA would restrict
NASA astronauts, who are U.S. Government employees, from engaging in
operational functions during an FAA-licensed launch or reentry. NASA
noted that all NASA astronauts undergo extensive training and must meet
rigorous medical and training requirements. NASA will also ensure
astronauts complete training specific to each launch and reentry
operator's vehicle and operations.
Specifically, NASA asked whether, under the FAA's statute and
regulations, a NASA astronaut flying as a space flight participant
could engage in ``all nominal and off-nominal operational functions,''
including ``the conduct of aborts, emergency response, and monitoring
and operating environmental controls and life support systems.'' NASA
also asked the FAA whether NASA's astronauts could ``perform
operational activities up to and including flight.'' In response to
NASA's question, the FAA examined the launch and reentry scenarios
currently envisioned, and concludes that NASA astronauts may perform
these functions in FAA-licensed launches and reentries.
Scenarios
The FAA understands that the following scenarios are likely, but
not definite. It is the FAA's understanding that a NASA astronaut's
interaction with the controls of a launch or reentry vehicle may vary
depending on a launch or reentry operator's designs and operational
procedures, which are currently under development. During a nominal
launch, a launch operator under an FAA license would most likely
conduct the ascent using a flight computer as the primary means of
controlling the flight path of the vehicle. Any persons on board would
not likely affect the flight path of the launch vehicle. If an
emergency situation arose, a NASA astronaut could override the launch
operator's flight computer to initiate an abort from the launch vehicle
and take manual control of the spacecraft atop the launch vehicle. NASA
astronaut emergency operations could include manually initiating an
abort, using thrusters to orient a capsule to support chute deployment,
and subsequent deployment of any parachutes. Emergency operations could
also include the NASA astronaut manually piloting a vehicle to a water
or runway landing.
For a reentry, a licensed operator's flight computer could serve as
the primary means of controlling the flight path of the vehicle during
a nominal reentry. A NASA astronaut might manually initiate the reentry
burn, and the flight computer could conduct the reentry of the vehicle
during nominal operations. The NASA astronaut could also have the
capability to take manual control over the reentry vehicle in an off-
nominal or emergency situation. During an off-nominal or emergency
situation, the NASA astronaut would, much of the time, be using
procedures or training prepared by the reentry operator.
Discussion
A. Space Flight Participants Who are NASA Astronauts
Based on the above scenarios, we conclude that, under 51 U.S.C. ch.
509 (Chapter 509), the FAA's space regulations at 14 CFR ch. III, and
consistent with the FAA's discussion of its human space flight
requirements,\1\ a NASA astronaut may engage in operational functions,
up to and including piloting the vehicle, the conduct of aborts,
emergency response, and monitoring and operating environmental controls
and life support systems, and the launch or reentry would remain under
FAA jurisdiction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Human Space Flight Requirements for Crew and Space Flight
Participants, Final Rule, 71 FR 75616 (Dec. 15, 2006) (``Human Space
Flight Rule'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 509 addresses crew and space flight participants, and,
according to Chapter 509's definition, NASA astronauts are space flight
participants. Chapter 509 defines ``crew'' as ``any employee of a
licensee or transferee, or of a contractor or subcontractor of a
licensee or transferee, who performs activities in the course of that
employment directly relating to the launch, reentry, or other operation
of or in a launch vehicle or reentry vehicle that carries human
beings.'' 51 U.S.C. 50902(2). Conversely, a ``space flight
participant'' is ``an individual, who is not crew, carried within a
launch vehicle or reentry vehicle.'' Id. Sec. 50902(17). Because a
NASA astronaut is not an employee of a licensee or transferee, or of a
contractor or subcontractor of a licensee or transferee, a NASA
astronaut is not crew. Consequently, a NASA astronaut who is being
carried within a launch or reentry vehicle is a space flight
participant.
B. Limitations
Chapter 509 does not specify any limitations on a space flight
participant's conduct or operations during a launch or reentry.
Similarly, FAA regulations implementing Chapter 509 for space flight
participants, codified at 14 CFR part 460, also do not specify any
limitations on a space flight participant's conduct or operations
during a launch or reentry. See 14 CFR 460.41, et. seq.\2\ The only
place where the FAA limits space-flight-participant conduct or
operations is in the preamble to the Human Space Flight rule that
created part 460. There the FAA states that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The pertinent FAA regulations simply require that space
flight participants: (1) be informed of risk; (2) execute a waiver
of claims against the U.S. Government; (3) receive training on how
to respond to emergency situations; and (4) not carry any weapons
onboard. See 14 CFR Sec. Sec. 460.45-460.53.
For public safety reasons, the FAA will not allow space flight
participants to pilot launch or reentry vehicles at this time. A
space flight participant who wants to pilot a launch or reentry
vehicle would have to become an employee or independent contractor
of the operator to acquire vehicle and mission-specific training.
The operator will be in a better position to evaluate the skills of
an employee or independent contractor than of a space flight
participant, particularly as those skills relate to the requirements
of the operator's particular vehicle. The FAA acknowledges that this
restriction may create a dilemma for someone who wishes to acquire
training in order to become employed, but, while the technology is
so new, it is important for public safety that pilots be highly
skilled at the outset.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Human Space Flight Requirements Final Rule, 71 FR at 75618.
As can be seen, the FAA's concern with space flight participants
interacting with a launch or reentry vehicle was based on the
possibility that space flight participants would not have the proper
vehicle and mission-specific training. However, as NASA notes, NASA
astronauts must meet rigorous medical and training requirements, which
include training specific to each mission, launch vehicle, and reentry
vehicle. Because NASA astronauts are not the untrained space-flight
participants originally contemplated by the FAA, the considerations
underlying the policy have, at best, a limited applicability to NASA
astronauts. Thus, for the scenarios currently envisioned, NASA
astronauts may engage in operational activities during a licensed
launch or reentry to ensure safety and mission success
C. Jurisdiction
We note that Chapter 509 does not apply to launches or reentries
the U.S. Government carries out for itself. 51 U.S.C. 50919(g).
Accordingly, NASA is not carrying out the launches or reentries that
are subject to Chapter 509. In the event, not contemplated in this
interpretation, that a NASA astronaut
[[Page 72013]]
exercised sufficient operational control to carry out the launch or
reentry, Sec. 50919(g) would serve as a bar to FAA licensing the
activity.
In the scenarios described above, as currently under development by
launch and reentry operators, the NASA astronaut would likely not
affect the flight path of the vehicle during a nominal launch. During a
launch, the astronaut would likely only manipulate the flight path of
the vehicle if an emergency arose. Accordingly, section 50919(g) would
not limit a NASA astronaut's ability to engage in operational functions
during launch. Most of the conduct or operations would simply
constitute the execution of emergency training required of space flight
participants by Sec. 460.51.
The analysis for a reentry is similar to that of a launch, with
some additional consideration for the possible manual operation of the
reentry vehicle by a NASA astronaut. Specifically, a NASA astronaut
could initiate reentry manually, but because the scenarios have the
reentry operator's flight computer directing the reentry, the NASA
astronaut's interaction would not be sufficient to constitute NASA
carrying out the reentry. Additionally, the NASA astronaut's exercise
of manual control over the vehicle in an off-nominal situation would
also not rise to NASA carrying out the reentry because, as discussed
above, in an off-nominal situation, the astronaut would largely be
implementing procedures created by a commercial launch or reentry
operator for purposes of safety or mission success.
In conclusion, Chapter 509 and the FAA's regulations impose no
operational constraints on NASA astronauts for the scenarios envisioned
here.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 21, 2013.
Mark W. Bury,
Assistant Chief Counsel for International Law, Legislation and
Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2013-28405 Filed 11-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P