Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Tennessee; Revisions to the Knox County Portion of the Tennessee State Implementation Plan, 71502-71504 [2013-28377]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
71502
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Final rule.
The Copyright Royalty Judges
announce a cost of living adjustment
(COLA) of 1% in the royalty rates
satellite carriers pay for a compulsory
license under the Copyright Act. The
COLA is based on the change in the
Consumer Price Index from October
2012 to October 2013.
DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2014.
Applicability Dates: These rates are
applicable to the period January 1, 2014,
through December 31, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LaKeshia Keys, Program Specialist.
Telephone: (202) 707–7658. Email: crb@
loc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
satellite carrier compulsory license
establishes a statutory copyright
licensing scheme for the retransmission
of distant television programming by
satellite carriers. 17 U.S.C. 119.
Congress created the license in 1988 and
has reauthorized the license for
additional five-year periods, most
recently with the Satellite Television
Extension and Localism Act of 2010
(STELA), Public Law 111–175.
On August 31, 2010, the Copyright
Royalty Judges (Judges) adopted rates
for the section 119 compulsory license
for the 2010–2014 term. See 75 FR
53198. The rates adopted by the Judges
were proposed by Copyright Owners
and Satellite Carriers 1 and were
unopposed. Id. Section 119(c)(2) of the
Copyright Act requires the Judges to
adjust the adopted rates annually ‘‘to
reflect any changes occurring in the cost
of living adjustment as determined by
the most recent Consumer Price Index
(for all consumers and for all items)
[CPI–U] published . . . before December
1 of the preceding year.’’ Section 119
also requires that ‘‘[n]otification of the
adjusted fees shall be published in the
Federal Register at least 25 days before
January 1.’’ 17 U.S.C. 119(c)(2). Today’s
notice fulfills this obligation.
The change in the cost of living as
determined by the CPI–U during the
period from the most recent index
published before December 1, 2012, to
the most recent index published before
December 1, 2013, is 1%.2 Application
of the 1% COLA to the current rate for
the secondary transmission of broadcast
stations by satellite carriers for private
home viewing—27 cents per subscriber
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
1 Program Suppliers and Joint Sports Claimants
comprised the Copyright Owners while DIRECTV,
Inc.; DISH Network, LLC and National
Programming Service, LLC, comprised the Satellite
Carriers.
2 On November 20, 2013, the Bureau of Labor
Statistics announced that the CPI–U increased 1.0%
over the last 12 months.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:31 Nov 27, 2013
Jkt 232001
per month—results in the same rate of
27 cents per subscriber per month
(rounded to the nearest cent). See 37
CFR 386.2(b)(1). Application of the 1%
COLA to the current rate for viewing in
commercial establishments—54 cents
per subscriber per month—results in an
adjusted rate of 55 cents per subscriber
per month (rounded to the nearest cent).
See 37 CFR 386.2(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 386
Copyright, Satellite, Television.
Final Regulations
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Judges amend part 386 of title 37 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 386—ADJUSTMENT OF
ROYALTY FEES FOR SECONDARY
TRANSMISSIONS BY SATELLITE
CARRIERS
1. The authority citation for part 386
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 119(c), 801(b)(1).
2. Section 386.2 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b)(1)(v) and
(b)(2)(v) as follows:
■
§ 386.2 Royalty fee for secondary
transmission by satellite carriers.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) 2014: 27 cents per subscriber per
month.
(2) * * *
(v) 2014: 55 cents per subscriber per
month.
Dated: November 21, 2013.
Suzanne M. Barnett,
Chief Copyright Royalty Judge.
[FR Doc. 2013–28632 Filed 11–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–72–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0455; FRL–9903–17–
Region 4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Tennessee;
Revisions to the Knox County Portion
of the Tennessee State Implementation
Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Tennessee,
through the Tennessee Department of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Environment and Conservation (TDEC)
on December 13, 2012. EPA proposed
action on this revision on August 16,
2013, and received no adverse
comments. The SIP submittal revises the
definition of ‘‘Modification’’ in Knox
County Air Quality Management
Regulation Section 13 Definitions. TDEC
considers Knox County’s SIP revision to
be as or more stringent than the
Tennessee SIP requirements. EPA is
approving the Knox County SIP revision
because the State has demonstrated that
it is consistent with the Clean Air Act
(CAA or Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective
December 30, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2013–0455. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
Web site. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30
excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean Lakeman, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562–9043.
Mr. Lakeman can be reached via
electronic mail at
lakeman.sean@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. This Action
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. This Action
On December 13, 2012, TDEC
submitted a SIP revision to EPA for
approval into the Knox County portion
of the Tennessee SIP. Specifically, the
E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM
29NOR1
71503
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
December 13, 2012, SIP revises the
definition of ‘‘Modification’’ in Knox
County Regulation, section 13.0—
Definitions. The additions of
subparagraphs E and F to the definition
of ‘‘Modification’’ allows the local
permit program authority to provide
adequate, streamlined, and reasonable
procedures for expeditiously processing
permit changes by excluding certain
modifications from construction
permitting. The addition of
subparagraph E provides that certain
modifications (physical/method of
operation) at major sources that are not
considered Title I modifications do not
require construction permits. The
addition at subparagraph F establishes
criteria for which a physical change or
change in the method of operation for a
minor source does not need a
construction permit.
EPA proposed approval of
Tennessee’s December 13, 2012,
submission on August 16, 2013 (78 FR
49990), and received no adverse
comments on its proposed action.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving the aforementioned
change to the Knox County portion of
the Tennessee SIP, because it is
consistent with EPA policy and the
CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian
country, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by January 28, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section
307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements and Sulfur oxides.
Dated: November 12, 2013.
Beverly H. Banister,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart RR—Tennessee
2. Section 52.2220(c) is amended by
revising the entry in Table 3 for
‘‘Section 13.0’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.2220
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
TABLE 3—EPA APPROVED KNOX COUNTY, REGULATIONS
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
State
section
State effective
date
Title/subject
*
13.0 ..........
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
Definitions ........................................
20:31 Nov 27, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
EPA approval date
*
10/17/2012
Frm 00069
Explanation
*
*
11/29/2013 [Insert first page of publication].
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM
29NOR1
*
71504
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 3—EPA APPROVED KNOX COUNTY, REGULATIONS—Continued
State
section
*
*
State effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–28377 Filed 11–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2012–0113; A–1–FRL–
9903–21–Region 1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; New
Hampshire; Transportation Conformity
and Conformity of General Federal
Actions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of New
Hampshire. This revision establishes
transportation conformity criteria and
procedures related to interagency
consultation and enforceability of
certain transportation-related control
measures and mitigation measures. In
addition, the revision relies on the
Federal rule for General Conformity.
The intended effect of this action is to
approve State criteria and procedures to
govern conformity determinations. This
action is being taken in accordance with
the Clean Air Act.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective
January 28, 2014, unless EPA receives
adverse comments by December 30,
2013. If adverse comments are received,
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R01–OAR–2012–0113 by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: arnold.anne@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (617) 918–0047.
4. Mail: ‘‘Docket Identification
Number EPA–R01–OAR–2012–0113,’’
Anne Arnold, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, Air Quality Planning Unit, 5
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:31 Nov 27, 2013
Jkt 232001
EPA approval date
*
*
Post Office Square—Suite 100, (Mail
code OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109–
3912.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to: Anne Arnold,
Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit,
Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, Office of
Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality
Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square—
Suite 100, (Mail code OEP05–2), Boston,
MA 02109–3912. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional
Office’s normal hours of operation. The
Regional Office’s official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding legal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R01–OAR–2012–
0113. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through
www.regulations.gov, or email,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov your email address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4700
Explanation
Sfmt 4700
*
*
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square—
Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests
that if at all possible, you contact the
contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding legal holidays.
In addition, copies of the state
submittal are also available for public
inspection during normal business
hours, by appointment at the State Air
Agency: Air Resources Division,
Department of Environmental Services,
6 Hazen Drive, P.O. Box 95, Concord,
NH 03302–0095.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald O. Cooke, Air Quality Unit, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, 5 Post
Office Square—Suite 100, (Mail code
OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109–3912,
telephone number (617) 918–1668, fax
number (617) 918–0668, email
cooke.donald@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Organization of this document. The
following outline is provided to aid in
locating information in this preamble.
I. Background and Purpose
A. What is Transportation Conformity?
B. What is General Conformity?
C. Call to States for Conformity SIP
Revisions
D. Transportation Conformity Provisions of
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU)
E. General Conformity Affected by
SAFETEA–LU
E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM
29NOR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71502-71504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28377]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2013-0455; FRL-9903-17-Region 4]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Tennessee;
Revisions to the Knox County Portion of the Tennessee State
Implementation Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Tennessee, through the Tennessee Department
of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) on December 13, 2012. EPA
proposed action on this revision on August 16, 2013, and received no
adverse comments. The SIP submittal revises the definition of
``Modification'' in Knox County Air Quality Management Regulation
Section 13 Definitions. TDEC considers Knox County's SIP revision to be
as or more stringent than the Tennessee SIP requirements. EPA is
approving the Knox County SIP revision because the State has
demonstrated that it is consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective December 30, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2013-0455. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential
Business Information or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30 excluding federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Lakeman, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404)
562-9043. Mr. Lakeman can be reached via electronic mail at
lakeman.sean@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. This Action
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. This Action
On December 13, 2012, TDEC submitted a SIP revision to EPA for
approval into the Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP.
Specifically, the
[[Page 71503]]
December 13, 2012, SIP revises the definition of ``Modification'' in
Knox County Regulation, section 13.0--Definitions. The additions of
subparagraphs E and F to the definition of ``Modification'' allows the
local permit program authority to provide adequate, streamlined, and
reasonable procedures for expeditiously processing permit changes by
excluding certain modifications from construction permitting. The
addition of subparagraph E provides that certain modifications
(physical/method of operation) at major sources that are not considered
Title I modifications do not require construction permits. The addition
at subparagraph F establishes criteria for which a physical change or
change in the method of operation for a minor source does not need a
construction permit.
EPA proposed approval of Tennessee's December 13, 2012, submission
on August 16, 2013 (78 FR 49990), and received no adverse comments on
its proposed action.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving the aforementioned change to the Knox County
portion of the Tennessee SIP, because it is consistent with EPA policy
and the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country, and EPA notes that it
will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by January 28, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements and Sulfur oxides.
Dated: November 12, 2013.
Beverly H. Banister,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart RR--Tennessee
0
2. Section 52.2220(c) is amended by revising the entry in Table 3 for
``Section 13.0'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Table 3--EPA Approved Knox County, Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State section Title/subject effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13.0................. Definitions............ 10/17/2012 11/29/2013 [Insert
first page of
publication].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 71504]]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-28377 Filed 11-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
