New Postal Product, 70968-70969 [2013-28388]
Download as PDF
70968
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 27, 2013 / Notices
products subsidizing competitive
products as a result of this contract. Id.
Related contract. The Postal Service
included a redacted version of the
related contract with the Request. Id.
Attachment B. The contract is
scheduled to become effective within
one business day after the Postal Service
receives final regulatory approval from
the Commission. Id. at 3. The contract
will expire three years from the effective
date. Id. The contract also allows two
90-day extensions of the agreement if
the preparation of a successor agreement
is active and the Commission is notified
at least 7 days prior to the contract’s
expiration date. Id. The Postal Service
represents that the contract is consistent
with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a). Id. Attachment
E.
The Postal Service filed much of the
supporting materials, including the
related contract, under seal. Id.
Attachment F. It maintains that the
redacted portions of the Governors’
Decision, contract, customer-identifying
information, and related financial
information should remain confidential.
Id. at 3. This information includes the
price structure, underlying costs and
assumptions, pricing formulas,
information relevant to the customer’s
mailing profile, and cost coverage
projections. Id. The Postal Service asks
the Commission to protect customeridentifying information from public
disclosure indefinitely. Id. at 7.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Notice of Filings
The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2014–8 and CP2014–9 to
consider the Request pertaining to the
proposed Priority Mail Contract 70
product and the related contract,
respectively.
Interested persons may submit
comments on whether the Postal
Service’s filings in the captioned
dockets are consistent with the policies
of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR
3015.5, and 39 CFR part 3020, subpart
B. Comments are due no later than
November 29, 2013. The public portions
of these filings can be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Curtis E.
Kidd to serve as Public Representative
in these dockets.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2014–8 and CP2014–9 to
consider the matters raised in each
docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Curtis E.
Kidd is appointed to serve as an officer
of the Commission (Public
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:02 Nov 26, 2013
Jkt 232001
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in these
proceedings.
3. Comments by interested persons in
these proceedings are due no later than
November 29, 2013.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–28389 Filed 11–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2014–7 and CP2014–8;
Order No. 1888]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing
recent Postal Service filings requesting
the addition of Priority Mail Contract 69
to the competitive product list. This
notice informs the public of the filings,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: November
29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
at 202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filings
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642
and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal
Service filed a request and associated
supporting information to add Priority
Mail Contract 69 to the competitive
product list.1 The Postal Service asserts
that Priority Mail Contract 69 is a
competitive product ‘‘not of general
applicability’’ within the meaning of 39
1 Request of the United States Postal Service to
Add Priority Mail Contract 69 to Competitive
Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of
Unredacted Governors’ Decision, Contract, and
Supporting Data, November 19, 2013 (Request).
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Id. at 1. The Request
has been assigned Docket No. MC2014–
7.
The Postal Service
contemporaneously filed a redacted
contract related to the proposed new
product. Id. Attachment B. The instant
contract has been assigned Docket No.
CP2014–8.
Request. To support its Request, the
Postal Service filed six attachments as
follows:
• Attachment A—a redacted copy of
Governors’ Decision No. 11–6,
authorizing the new product;
• Attachment B—a redacted copy of
the contract;
• Attachment C—proposed changes
to the Mail Classification Schedule
competitive product list with the
addition underlined;
• Attachment D—a Statement of
Supporting Justification as required by
39 CFR 3020.32;
• Attachment E—a certification of
compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and
• Attachment F—an application for
non-public treatment of materials to
maintain redacted portions of the
contract and related financial
information under seal.
In the Statement of Supporting
Justification, Dennis R. Nicoski,
Manager, Field Sales Strategy and
Contracts, asserts that the contract will
cover its attributable costs and increase
contribution toward the requisite 5.5
percent of the Postal Service’s total
institutional costs. Id. Attachment D at
1. Mr. Nicoski contends that there will
be no issue of market dominant
products subsidizing competitive
products as a result of this contract. Id.
Related contract. The Postal Service
included a redacted version of the
related contract with the Request. Id.
Attachment B. The contract is
scheduled to become effective one
business day after the Commission
issues all necessary regulatory approval.
Id. at 2. The contract will expire one
year from the effective date unless,
among other things, either party
terminates the agreement upon 30 days’
written notice to the other party. Id. The
contract also allows two 90-day
extensions of the agreement if the
preparation of a successor agreement is
active and the Commission is notified
within 7 days of the contract’s
expiration.2 The Postal Service
2 Id. at 3. Previously, the Postal Service clarified
that identical language in Priority Mail Contract 60
‘‘contemplates the Postal Service filing any notices
of extension with the Commission at least one week
prior to the 3-year expiration date or the extended
expiration date.’’ See Docket Nos. MC2013–54 and
CP2013–70, Order No. 1773, Order Adding Priority
Mail Contract 60 to the Competitive Product List,
E:\FR\FM\27NON1.SGM
27NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 27, 2013 / Notices
represents that the contract is consistent
with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a).3
The Postal Service filed much of the
supporting materials, including the
related contract, under seal. Id.
Attachment F. It maintains that the
redacted portions of the Governors’
Decision, contract, customer-identifying
information, and related financial
information should remain confidential.
Id. at 3. This information includes the
price structure, underlying costs and
assumptions, pricing formulas,
information relevant to the customer’s
mailing profile, and cost coverage
projections. Id. The Postal Service asks
the Commission to protect customeridentifying information from public
disclosure indefinitely. Id. at 7.
II. Notice of Filings
The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2014–7 and CP2014–8 to
consider the Request pertaining to the
proposed Priority Mail Contract 69
product and the related contract,
respectively.
Interested persons may submit
comments on whether the Postal
Service’s filings in the captioned
dockets are consistent with the policies
of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR
3015.5, and 39 CFR part 3020, subpart
B. Comments are due no later than
November 29, 2013. The public portions
of these filings can be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Pamela A.
Thompson to serve as Public
Representative in these dockets.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2014–7 and CP2014–8 to
consider the matters raised in each
docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Pamela
A. Thompson is appointed to serve as
an officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in these
proceedings.
3. Comments by interested persons in
these proceedings are due no later than
November 29, 2013.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
July 8, 2013, at 3; see also Docket Nos. MC2013–
54 and CP2013–70, Response of the United States
Postal Service to Chairman’s Information Request
No. 1, July 1, 2013, question 2.
3 Although the Request appears to state that the
certification only pertains to paragraphs (1) and (3)
of 39 U.S.C. 3633(a), the certification itself contains
an assertion that the prices are in compliance with
39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(1), (2), and (3). See Request at 2;
Attachment E.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:02 Nov 26, 2013
Jkt 232001
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–28388 Filed 11–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2014–5 and CP2014–6;
Order No. 1886]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing
recent Postal Service filings requesting
the addition of Priority Mail Contract 67
to the competitive product list. This
notice informs the public of the filings,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: November
29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
at 202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filings
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642
and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal
Service filed a request and associated
supporting information to add Priority
Mail Contract 67 to the competitive
product list.1 The Postal Service asserts
that Priority Mail Contract 67 is a
competitive product ‘‘not of general
applicability’’ within the meaning of 39
U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Id. at 1. The Request
has been assigned Docket No. MC2014–
5.
The Postal Service
contemporaneously filed a redacted
contract related to the proposed new
product. Id. Attachment B. The instant
contract has been assigned Docket No.
CP2014–6.
1 Request
of the United States Postal Service to
Add Priority Mail Contract 67 to Competitive
Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of
Unredacted Governors’ Decision, Contract, and
Supporting Data, November 19, 2013 (Request).
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70969
Request. To support its Request, the
Postal Service filed six attachments as
follows:
• Attachment A—a redacted copy of
Governors’ Decision No. 11–6,
authorizing the new product;
• Attachment B—a redacted copy of
the contract;
• Attachment C—proposed changes
to the Mail Classification Schedule
competitive product list with the
addition underlined;
• Attachment D—a Statement of
Supporting Justification as required by
39 CFR 3020.32;
• Attachment E—a certification of
compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and
• Attachment F—an application for
non-public treatment of materials to
maintain redacted portions of the
contract and related financial
information under seal.
In the Statement of Supporting
Justification, Dennis R. Nicoski,
Manager, Field Sales Strategy and
Contracts, asserts that the contract will
cover its attributable costs and increase
contribution toward the requisite 5.5
percent of the Postal Service’s total
institutional costs. Id. Attachment D at
1. Mr. Nicoski contends that there will
be no issue of market dominant
products subsidizing competitive
products as a result of this contract. Id.
Related contract. The Postal Service
included a redacted version of the
related contract with the Request. Id.
Attachment B. The contract is
scheduled to become effective one
business day after the Commission
issues all necessary regulatory approval.
Id. at 2. The contract will expire three
years from the effective date unless,
among other things, either party
terminates the agreement upon 30 days’
written notice to the other party or
renewed by mutual agreement. Id. at 3.
The contract also allows two 90-day
extensions of the agreement if the
preparation of a successor agreement is
active and the Commission is notified at
least 7 days prior to the contract’s
expiration date. Id. The Postal Service
represents that the contract is consistent
with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a).2
The Postal Service filed much of the
supporting materials, including the
related contract, under seal. Id.
Attachment F. It maintains that the
redacted portions of the Governors’
Decision, contract, customer-identifying
information, and related financial
information should remain confidential.
2 Although the Request appears to state that the
certification only pertains to paragraphs (1) and (3)
of 39 U.S.C. 3633(a), the certification itself contains
an assertion that the prices are in compliance with
39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(1), (2), and (3). See Request at 2;
Attachment E.
E:\FR\FM\27NON1.SGM
27NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70968-70969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28388]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2014-7 and CP2014-8; Order No. 1888]
New Postal Product
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing recent Postal Service filings
requesting the addition of Priority Mail Contract 69 to the competitive
product list. This notice informs the public of the filings, invites
public comment, and takes other administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: November 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
at 202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filings
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq., the
Postal Service filed a request and associated supporting information to
add Priority Mail Contract 69 to the competitive product list.\1\ The
Postal Service asserts that Priority Mail Contract 69 is a competitive
product ``not of general applicability'' within the meaning of 39
U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Id. at 1. The Request has been assigned Docket No.
MC2014-7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority
Mail Contract 69 to Competitive Product List and Notice of Filing
(Under Seal) of Unredacted Governors' Decision, Contract, and
Supporting Data, November 19, 2013 (Request).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Postal Service contemporaneously filed a redacted contract
related to the proposed new product. Id. Attachment B. The instant
contract has been assigned Docket No. CP2014-8.
Request. To support its Request, the Postal Service filed six
attachments as follows:
Attachment A--a redacted copy of Governors' Decision No.
11-6, authorizing the new product;
Attachment B--a redacted copy of the contract;
Attachment C--proposed changes to the Mail Classification
Schedule competitive product list with the addition underlined;
Attachment D--a Statement of Supporting Justification as
required by 39 CFR 3020.32;
Attachment E--a certification of compliance with 39 U.S.C.
3633(a); and
Attachment F--an application for non-public treatment of
materials to maintain redacted portions of the contract and related
financial information under seal.
In the Statement of Supporting Justification, Dennis R. Nicoski,
Manager, Field Sales Strategy and Contracts, asserts that the contract
will cover its attributable costs and increase contribution toward the
requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal Service's total institutional
costs. Id. Attachment D at 1. Mr. Nicoski contends that there will be
no issue of market dominant products subsidizing competitive products
as a result of this contract. Id.
Related contract. The Postal Service included a redacted version of
the related contract with the Request. Id. Attachment B. The contract
is scheduled to become effective one business day after the Commission
issues all necessary regulatory approval. Id. at 2. The contract will
expire one year from the effective date unless, among other things,
either party terminates the agreement upon 30 days' written notice to
the other party. Id. The contract also allows two 90-day extensions of
the agreement if the preparation of a successor agreement is active and
the Commission is notified within 7 days of the contract's
expiration.\2\ The Postal Service
[[Page 70969]]
represents that the contract is consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Id. at 3. Previously, the Postal Service clarified that
identical language in Priority Mail Contract 60 ``contemplates the
Postal Service filing any notices of extension with the Commission
at least one week prior to the 3-year expiration date or the
extended expiration date.'' See Docket Nos. MC2013-54 and CP2013-70,
Order No. 1773, Order Adding Priority Mail Contract 60 to the
Competitive Product List, July 8, 2013, at 3; see also Docket Nos.
MC2013-54 and CP2013-70, Response of the United States Postal
Service to Chairman's Information Request No. 1, July 1, 2013,
question 2.
\3\ Although the Request appears to state that the certification
only pertains to paragraphs (1) and (3) of 39 U.S.C. 3633(a), the
certification itself contains an assertion that the prices are in
compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(1), (2), and (3). See Request at
2; Attachment E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Postal Service filed much of the supporting materials,
including the related contract, under seal. Id. Attachment F. It
maintains that the redacted portions of the Governors' Decision,
contract, customer-identifying information, and related financial
information should remain confidential. Id. at 3. This information
includes the price structure, underlying costs and assumptions, pricing
formulas, information relevant to the customer's mailing profile, and
cost coverage projections. Id. The Postal Service asks the Commission
to protect customer-identifying information from public disclosure
indefinitely. Id. at 7.
II. Notice of Filings
The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2014-7 and CP2014-8 to
consider the Request pertaining to the proposed Priority Mail Contract
69 product and the related contract, respectively.
Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal
Service's filings in the captioned dockets are consistent with the
policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR 3015.5, and 39 CFR
part 3020, subpart B. Comments are due no later than November 29, 2013.
The public portions of these filings can be accessed via the
Commission's Web site (https://www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Pamela A. Thompson to serve as Public
Representative in these dockets.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2014-7 and CP2014-8 to
consider the matters raised in each docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Pamela A. Thompson is appointed to
serve as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to
represent the interests of the general public in these proceedings.
3. Comments by interested persons in these proceedings are due no
later than November 29, 2013.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-28388 Filed 11-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P