Safety Zones; Pacific Northwest Grain Handlers Association Facilities; Columbia and Willamette Rivers, 70858-70863 [2013-28362]
Download as PDF
70858
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 27, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Small Business Administration for
comment on its impact on small
business, and no comments were
received.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Janet Engel Kidd, Office of
the Associate Chief Counsel, Procedure
and Administration.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 is amended by adding an entry
in numerical order to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.6050H–3 is also issued under 26
U.S.C. 6050H(h). * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.6050H–3 is added to
read as follows:
■
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 1.6050H–3 Information reporting of
mortgage insurance premiums.
(a) Information reporting
requirements. Any person who, in the
course of a trade or business, receives
premiums, including prepaid
premiums, for mortgage insurance (as
described in paragraph (b) of this
section) from any individual aggregating
$600 or more for any calendar year,
must make an information return setting
forth the total amount received from
that individual during the calendar year.
(b) Scope. Paragraph (a) of this section
applies to mortgage insurance provided
by the Federal Housing Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, or the
Rural Housing Service (or their
successor organizations), or to private
mortgage insurance (as defined by
section 2 of the Homeowners Protection
Act of 1998 (12 U.S.C. 4901) as in effect
on December 20, 2006). The rule stated
in paragraph (a) of this section applies
to the receipt of all payments of
mortgage insurance premiums, by cash
or financing, without regard to source.
(c) Aggregation. Whether a person
receives $600 or more of mortgage
insurance premiums is determined on a
mortgage-by-mortgage basis. A recipient
need not aggregate mortgage insurance
premiums received on all of the
mortgages of an individual to determine
whether the $600 threshold is met.
Therefore, a recipient need not report
mortgage insurance premiums of less
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Nov 26, 2013
Jkt 232001
than $600 received on a mortgage, even
though it receives a total of $600 or
more of mortgage insurance premiums
on all of the mortgages for an individual
for a calendar year.
(d) Time, form, and manner of
reporting. Mortgage insurance
premiums required to be reported under
paragraph (a) of this section must be
reported on the Form 1098 or successor
form that is filed pursuant to § 1.6050H–
2(a) with respect to the mortgage of the
individual who paid the mortgage
insurance premiums. For the
requirements for furnishing statements
with respect to Forms 1098 filed with
the Internal Revenue Service, see
§ 1.6050H–2(b).
(e) Cross reference. For rules
concerning the allocation of certain
prepaid qualified mortgage insurance
premiums, see § 1.163–11 of this
chapter.
(f) Limitation on the reporting of
mortgage insurance premiums. This
section applies to mortgage insurance
premiums described in paragraph (b) of
this section that are paid or accrued on
or after January 1, 2013, and during
periods to which section 163(h)(3)(E)
applies. This section does not apply to
any amounts of mortgage insurance
premiums that are allocable to any
periods to which section 163(h)(3)(E)
does not apply.
(g) Effective/applicability date. This
section applies to mortgage insurance
premiums received on or after January
1, 2013. For regulations applicable
before May 5, 2012, see § 1.6050H–3T as
contained in 26 CFR part 1 (revised as
of April 1, 2012).
§ 1.6050H–3T
[Removed]
Par. 3. Section 1.6050H–3T is
removed.
■
John M. Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: October 1, 2013.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2013–28381 Filed 11–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2013–0011]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Pacific Northwest Grain
Handlers Association Facilities;
Columbia and Willamette Rivers
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing temporary safety zones
around the following Pacific Northwest
Grain Handlers Association facilities:
The Columbia Grain facility on the
Willamette River in Portland, OR, the
United Grain Corporation facility on the
Columbia River in Vancouver, WA, the
Temco Irving facility on the Willamette
River in Portland, OR, the Temco
Kalama facility on the Columbia River
in Kalama, WA, and the Louis Dreyfus
Commodities facility on the Willamette
River in Portland, OR. These safety
zones extend approximately between
the navigable channel and the shoreline
of the facility described. These safety
zones have been established to ensure
that on-water protest activities near
these facilities do not create hazardous
navigation conditions for vessels
protesting, transiting in the navigable
channel, or attempting to moor at the
facilities and that any on-water
activities do not create hazardous
conditions while grain-shipment vessels
are moored at the facilities.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from November 27, 2013
until November 27, 2015. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from the date the rule was
signed, October 31, 2013, until
November 27, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2013–0011]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Open Docket
Folder’’ on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 27, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LTJG Ian P. McPhillips,
Waterways Management Division,
Marine Safety Unit Portland, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone (503) 240–9319, email
msupdxwwm@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
A. Regulatory History and Information
On August 6, 2013, the Coast Guard
published a temporary interim rule and
request for comments titled, ‘‘Safety
Zones; Pacific Northwest Grain
Handlers Association Facilities;
Columbia and Willamette Rivers’’ in the
Federal Register (78 FR 47567). In that
temporary interim rule, the Coast Guard
established temporary safety zones near
five Pacific Northwest Grain Handlers
Association facilities. Although the
Coast Guard had good cause to issue
that temporary interim rule without first
publishing a proposed rule, the Coast
Guard invited the submission of postpromulgation comments and related
material regarding that rule through
September 5, 2013. No request for a
public meeting was received. The Coast
Guard received one submission to the
docket that raised several objections.
B. Basis and Purpose
Coast Guard Captains of the Port are
granted authority to establish safety and
security zones in 33 CFR 1.05–1(f) for
safety and environmental purposes as
described in 33 CFR Part 165.
These safety zones are being
implemented to ensure the safe
navigation of maritime traffic on the
Columbia and Willamette Rivers and
their tributaries while grain-shipment
and grain-shipment assist vessels transit
to and from these Pacific Northwest
Grain Handlers Association facilities
and to ensure that vessels remain safely
moored at these Coast Guard regulated
facilities. These safety zones are
intended to ensure that members of the
maritime public, in particular, those
engaged in commerce and protest
activities on the water, are not injured.
Recreational boating, fishing, and
protest activity afloat in these safety
zones is particularly hazardous because
of the effects of strong river currents, the
maneuvering characteristics of grainshipment vessels, and the safety-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Nov 26, 2013
Jkt 232001
sensitive mid-stream personnel transfers
conducted by grain-shipment assist
vessels with which recreational boaters
and protesters may be unfamiliar. These
safety zones apply equally to all
waterway users and are intended to
allow maximum use of the waterway
consistent with safe navigation. The
impact of the safety zones on maritime
activity in the area is minimal because
the safety zones are of a limited size and
do not encroach on the navigation
channel. Grain-shipment vessel means
any vessel bound for or departing or
having previously loaded cargo at any of
the following waterfront facilities:
Columbia Grain in Portland, OR; United
Grain Corporation in Vancouver, WA;
Temco Irving in Portland, OR; Temco
Kalama in Kalama, WA; or Louis
Dreyfus Commodities in Portland, OR.
This includes any vessel leaving anchor
in the Columbia and Willamette Rivers
that is bound for or had previously
departed from the aforementioned
waterfront facilities. Grain-shipment
assist vessel means any vessel bound for
or departing from a grain-shipment
vessel to assist it in navigation during
the movement of the grain-shipment
vessel in the Columbia and Willamette
Rivers and their tributaries. This
includes but is not limited to tugs, pilot
boats, and launches.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
This temporary final rule is
unchanged from the temporary interim
rule that was published on August 6,
2013 (78 FR 47567) as no substantive
changes have been deemed necessary.
One commenter submitted a letter to the
docket containing several objections.
The commenter addressed the inclusion
of the safety zone around the Louis
Dreyfus facility, which was not
included in the previous rule published
on February 4, 2013. The Louis Dreyfus
facility was not previously included
because it was undergoing repairs and
was not operational. The Coast Guard
has included the Louis Dreyfus facility
in this rule based on the facility’s plans
to begin fulltime operations within the
enforcement period of this rule.
The commenter asserted that the
safety zones were unnecessary and
overbroad. Specifically, the commenter
questioned the necessity of the size of
these zones. The sizes of these zones are
based on the average size of the grainshipment vessels operating on the river
and the average speed of the vessels
during their approach. The commenter
asserted that deep-draft vessels on the
Columbia and Willamette Rivers
typically approach at 1 to 2 knots when
entering the final 250 yards before the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70859
terminal, and therefore, a narrower
safety zone of 50–70 yards would still
provide a two-minute pre-collision
period. The Coast Guard disagrees that
a safety zone of 50–70 yards would
provide a sufficient buffer to prevent
collisions. As vessels are mooring, their
speed and direction are frequently
changing. Based on these dynamic
conditions, we believe the width and
size of these safety zones are necessary
to significantly reduce the risk posed by
limited ship-to-boat communications or
propulsion failure by vessels or
watercraft operating in the vicinity of
grain-shipment vessels.
The commenter also asserts that the
Coast Guard has failed to state why the
safety zones are necessary and that it
appears the safety zones were enacted as
the result of union animus. Coast Guard
Captains of the Port are delegated
authority to establish safety and security
zones in 33 CFR 1.05–1(f) for safety and
environmental purposes as described in
33 CFR Part 165. The Coast Guard has
previously stated that the purpose of
this rule is to ensure the safe navigation
of maritime traffic on the Columbia and
Willamette Rivers and their tributaries
while grain-shipment and grainshipment assist vessels transit to and
from these Pacific Northwest Grain
Handlers Association facilities. These
safety zones are intended to mitigate the
hazardous conditions created by small
recreational vessels operating in close
proximity to large and lessmaneuverable, commercial deep-draft
vessels and tug and barge
configurations, which are typically
between 300 and 800 feet in length. In
addition to mitigating the navigational
dangers associated with operating a
small vessel in close proximity to lessmaneuverable deep-draft grainshipment vessels, the Coast Guard
believes these safety zones are necessary
to protect the safety-sensitive midstream personnel transfers conducted by
grain-shipment assist vessels with
which recreational boaters and
protesters may be unfamiliar.
The Coast Guard also disagrees with
the commenter’s assertion that the
safety zones were enacted out of union
animus. The Coast Guard respects the
First Amendment rights of protesters.
These safety zones do not single out
protesters, but apply equally to all
waterway users and are intended to
allow maximum use of the waterway
consistent with safe navigation. The
safety zones created by this rule do not
prohibit members of the public from
assembling on the water to express their
points of view. The Captain of the Port
has, in coordination with protesters,
recommended areas on the water in the
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
70860
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 27, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
vicinity of these safety zones where
those desiring to do so can assemble and
express their views to the intended
audience without compromising
navigational safety.
The commenter asserted that the
proposed rule would prevent protesters
from engaging in peaceful protest
activities. The Coast Guard disagrees.
The safety zones created by this rule do
not prohibit protest activities on the
Columbia and Willamette Rivers.
Instead, these safety zones are intended
to mitigate the hazardous conditions
created by small recreational vessels
operating in close proximity to large and
less-maneuverable commercial deepdraft vessels and tug and barge
configurations, which are typically
between 300 and 800 feet in length. The
safety zones apply to all vessels not
otherwise exempted and are intended to
ensure the safe navigation of maritime
traffic and to protect the safety of life
and property on the Columbia and
Willamette rivers and all adjoining
tributaries.
The commenter also asserted that this
rule is inconsistent with the National
Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. 151 et
seq., because it prohibits picketing
activity. However, the safety zones in
this rule do not prohibit picketing, or
other concerted activities by employees.
Vessel operators, including those
engaged in picketing activity, may
operate in any part of the river outside
of the zones so long as they do so in
accordance with the navigational rules.
The commenter disagreed with the
Coast Guard’s suggested use of on-water
assembly areas. Prior to promulgation of
the initial safety zone, outreach
meetings were held between the local
Captain of the Port, Columbia River
Pilots, and union members. Based on
input from these meetings, the Coast
Guard designated on-water assembly
areas where protesters could safely
exercise their First Amendment rights.
However, protestors are not required to
restrict their protest activities to these
assembly areas and may operate in any
part of the river outside of the zones so
long as they do so in accordance with
the navigational rules.
The commenter expressed the
importance of ‘‘on-water picketing’’ in
publicizing the ongoing labor dispute
and stated that the safety zones
unnecessarily burden the ability of
protesters to convey their message to
their intended audience of ‘‘incoming
vessels.’’ The Coast Guard disagrees.
Nothing in this rule prevents union
members from protesting on the water.
The safety zones created by the rule
apply to all vessels not otherwise
exempted and are intended to ensure
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Nov 26, 2013
Jkt 232001
the safe navigation of maritime traffic
and protect the safety of life and
property on the Columbia and
Willamette rivers and all adjoining
tributaries. The zones address the
hazardous conditions for vessels
operating in the area due to the
maneuvering characteristics of grainshipment vessels and the safety
sensitive mid-stream personnel transfers
conducted by grain-shipment assist
vessels with which recreational boaters
and protesters may be unfamiliar. Vessel
operators, including protestors, may
operate in any part of the river outside
of the zones so long as they do so in
accordance with the navigational rules.
Additionally, the safety zones are not so
large as to prevent vessels from coming
within sight or sound of inbound grainshipment and grain-shipment assist
vessels. The recommended on-water
assembly areas were proposed
specifically to identify locations outside
of the safety zones that allow protestors
to safely communicate with their
intended audience.
Finally, the commenter asserts that
the enforcement of these safety zones for
a limited amount of time underscores
the singling out of labor unions for
differential treatment. The Coast Guard
disagrees. The safety zones address
safety hazards created by the navigation
of recreational vessels in close
proximity to the facilities to which large
and less-maneuverable grain-shipment
vessels are transiting. The enforcement
of the safety zones for limited time
periods is not for the purpose of singling
out labor unions but is for the purpose
of minimizing the impact on marine
operators. The Coast Guard will enforce
the safety zones for the minimal amount
of time necessary to help ensure the safe
navigation for all vessels in the vicinity.
The safety zones created by this rule
apply to all vessels not otherwise
exempted, regardless of whether they
are engaged in union activities.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. Although this rule will restrict
access to the regulated areas, the effect
of this rule will not be significant
because: (i) The safety zones are limited
in size; (ii) the official on-scene patrol
may authorize access to the safety
zones; (iii) the safety zones will effect
limited geographical locations for a
limited time; and (iv) the Coast Guard
will make notifications via maritime
advisories so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received 0 comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule may affect the
following entities some of which may be
small entities: The owners and operators
of vessels intending to operate in the
area covered by the safety zones created
in this rule.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons: (i) The safety zones
are limited in size; (ii) the official onscene patrol may authorize access to the
safety zones; (iii) the safety zones will
effect limited geographical locations for
a limited time; and (iv) the Coast Guard
will make notifications via maritime
advisories so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If this rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 27, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters. In
preparing this temporary final rule, the
Coast Guard carefully considered the
rights of lawful protestors. The safety
zones created by this rule do not
prohibit members of the public from
assembling on shore or expressing their
points of view from locations on shore.
In addition, the Captain of the Port has,
in coordination with protesters,
recommended water areas in the
vicinity of these safety zones where
those desiring to do so can assemble and
express their views without
compromising navigational safety.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Nov 26, 2013
Jkt 232001
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70861
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of temporary safety zones
around the Columbia Grain facility on
the Willamette River in Portland, OR,
the United Grain Corporation facility on
the Columbia River in Vancouver, WA,
the Temco Irving facility on the
Willamette River in Portland, OR, the
Temco Kalama facility on the Columbia
River in Kalama, WA, and the Louis
Dreyfus Commodities facility on the
Willamette River in Portland, OR. This
rule is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–240 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–240 Safety Zones; Pacific
Northwest Grain Handlers Association
Facilities; Columbia and Willamette Rivers.
(a) Definitions. As used in this
section:
(1) Federal Law Enforcement Officer
means any employee or agent of the
United States government who has the
authority to carry firearms and make
warrantless arrests and whose duties
involve the enforcement of criminal
laws of the United States.
(2) Navigable waters of the United
States means those waters defined as
such in 33 CFR part 2.
(3) Navigation Rules means the
International Regulations for Preventing
Collisions at Sea, 1972 (commonly
called 72 COLREGS) and the Inland
Navigation Rules published in 33 CFR
Part 83.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
70862
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 27, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(4) Official Patrol means those
persons designated by the Captain of the
Port to monitor a vessel safety zone,
permit entry into the zone, give legally
enforceable orders to persons or vessels
within the zone and take other actions
authorized by the Captain of the Port.
Federal Law Enforcement Officers
authorized to enforce this section are
designated as the Official Patrol.
(5) Public vessel means vessels
owned, chartered, or operated by the
United States, or by a State or political
subdivision thereof.
(6) Grain-shipment vessel means any
vessel bound for, departing from, or
having previously loaded cargo at any of
the following waterfront facilities:
Columbia Grain in Portland, OR, United
Grain Corporation in Vancouver, WA,
Temco Irving in Portland, OR, Temco
Kalama in Kalama, WA, or Louis
Dreyfus Commodities in Portland, OR.
This includes any vessel leaving anchor
in the Columbia and Willamette Rivers
that is bound for or had previously
departed from the aforementioned
waterfront facilities.
(7) Grain-shipment assist vessel
means any vessel bound for or departing
from a grain-shipment vessel to assist it
in navigation during the movement of
the grain-shipment vessel in the
Columbia and Willamette Rivers and
their tributaries. This includes but is not
limited to tugs, pilot boats, and
launches.
(8) Oregon Law Enforcement Officer
means any Oregon Peace Officer as
defined in Oregon Revised Statutes
section 161.015.
(9) Washington Law Enforcement
Officer means any General Authority
Washington Peace Officer, Limited
Authority Washington Peace Officer, or
Specially Commissioned Washington
Peace Officer as defined in Revised
Code of Washington section 10.93.020
(b) Locations. The following areas are
safety zones:
(1) Columbia Grain. All navigable
waters of the United States within the
Sector Columbia River Captain of the
Port Zone enclosed by three lines and
the shoreline: line one starting on the
shoreline at 45–38′34″ N/122–46′11″ W
then heading 150 yards offshore to 45–
38′37″ N/122–46′16″ W then heading up
river 380 yards to 45–38′30″ N/122–
46′28″ W then heading 150 yards to the
shoreline ending at 45–38′27″ N/122–
46′24″ W.
(2) United Grain Corporation. All
navigable waters of the United States
within the Sector Columbia River
Captain of the Port Zone enclosed by
three lines and the shoreline: line one
starting on the shoreline at 45–37′52″ N/
122–41′46″ W then heading 150 yards
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Nov 26, 2013
Jkt 232001
offshore to 45–37′48″ N/122–41′50″ W
then heading up river 470 yards to 45–
37′40″ N/122–41′34″ W then heading
175 yards to the shoreline ending at 45–
37′44″ N/122–41′29″ W.
(3) Temco Portland. All navigable
waters of the United States within the
Sector Columbia River Captain of the
Port Zone enclosed by three lines and
the shoreline: line one starting on the
shoreline at 45–32′10″ N/122–40′34″ W
then heading 150 yards offshore to 45–
32′09″ N/122–40′39″ W then heading up
river 275 yards to 45–32′01″ N/122–
40′33″ W then heading 150 yards to the
shoreline ending at 45–32′04″ N/122–
40′28″ W.
(4) Temco Kalama. All navigable
waters of the United States within the
Sector Columbia River Captain of the
Port Zone enclosed by three lines and
the shoreline: line one starting on the
shoreline at 45–59′10″ N/122–50′09″ W
then heading 150 yards offshore to 45–
59′09″ N/122–50′14″ W then heading up
river 385 yards to 45–58′58″ N/122–
50′07″ W then heading 150 yards to the
shoreline ending at 45–59′00″ N/122–
50′01″ W.
(5) Louis Dreyfus Commodities. All
navigable waters of the United States
within the Sector Columbia River
Captain of the Port Zone enclosed by
three lines and the shoreline: line one
starting on the shoreline at 45–31′49″ N/
122–40′15″ W then heading 70 yards
offshore to 45–31′48″ N/122–40′17″ W
then heading up river 300 yards to 45–
31′41″ N/122–40′09″ W then heading
100 yards to the shoreline ending at 45–
31′43″ N/122–40′06″ W.
(c) Effective Period. This section is
effective without actual notice from
November 27, 2013 until November 27,
2015 and will be activated for
enforcement as described in paragraph
(d) of this section. Actual notice will be
used from the date the rule was signed,
October 31, 2013, until November 27,
2013.
(d) Enforcement Periods. The Sector
Columbia River Captain of the Port will
cause notice of the enforcement of the
grain facilities safety zones to be made
by all appropriate means to effect the
widest publicity among the affected
segments of the public as practicable, in
accordance with 33 CFR 165.7. Such
means of notification may include, but
are not limited to, Broadcast Notices to
Mariners or Local Notices to Mariners.
The Sector Columbia River Captain of
the Port will issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners notifying the public when
enforcement of the safety zone is
suspended.
Upon notice of enforcement by the
Sector Columbia River Captain of the
Port, the Coast Guard will enforce the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
safety zone in accordance with the rules
set out in this section. Upon notice of
suspension of enforcement by the Sector
Columbia River Captain of the Port, all
persons and vessels are authorized to
enter, transit, and exit the safety zone,
consistent with the Navigation Rules.
(e) Regulation. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into or movement
within these zones is prohibited unless
authorized by the Sector Columbia River
Captain of the Port, the official patrol,
or other designated representatives of
the Captain of the Port.
(2) To request authorization to enter
or operate within the safety zone contact
the on-scene official patrol on VHF–FM
channel 16 or 13, or the Sector
Columbia River Command Center at
phone number (503) 861–6211.
Authorization will be granted based on
the necessity of access and consistent
with safe navigation.
(3) Vessels authorized to enter or
operate within the safety zone shall
operate at the minimum speed
necessary to maintain a safe course and
shall proceed as directed by the onscene official patrol. The Navigation
Rules shall apply at all times within the
safety zone.
(4) When conditions permit, the onscene official patrol, or a designated
representative of the Captain of the Port
at the Sector Columbia River Command
Center, should:
(i) Permit vessels constrained by their
navigational draft or restricted in their
ability to maneuver to enter or operate
within the safety zone in order to ensure
a safe passage in accordance with the
Navigation Rules; and
(ii) Permit commercial vessels
anchored in a designated anchorage area
to remain at anchor within the safety
zone; and
(iii) Permit vessels that must transit
via a navigable channel or waterway to
enter or operate within the safety zone
in order to do so.
(f) Exemption. Public vessels as
defined in paragraph (a) of this section
are exempt from complying with
paragraph (e) of this section.
(g) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
may enforce the rules in this section. In
the navigable waters of the United
States to which this section applies,
when immediate action is required and
representatives of the Coast Guard are
not present or are not present in
sufficient force to provide effective
enforcement of this section, any Federal
Law Enforcement Officer, Oregon Law
Enforcement Officer, or Washington
Law Enforcement Officer may enforce
the rules contained in this section
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 27, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 70118. In
addition, the Captain of the Port may be
assisted by other federal, state, or local
agencies in enforcing this section.
(h) Waiver. The Captain of the Port
Columbia River may waive any of the
requirements of this section for any
vessel or class of vessels upon finding
that operational conditions or other
circumstances are such that application
of this section is unnecessary or
impractical for the purpose of port
safety or environmental safety.
Dated: October 31, 2013.
B.C. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2013–28362 Filed 11–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AO59
Copayment for Extended Care
Services
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This document promulgates
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
final regulations amending the
definition of ‘‘spousal resource
protection amount’’ to reference the
Maximum Community Spouse Resource
Standard, which is adjusted and
published each year by the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
This change has the immediate effect of
increasing the spousal resource
protection amount from $89,280 to
$115,920, and ensures that the spousal
resource protection amount will stay
consistent with the comparable
protection for the spouses of Medicaid
recipients.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective December 27, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin J. Cunningham, Director
Business Policy, Chief Business Office,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20420; (202) 461–1599. (This is not a
toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
22, 2013, VA published in the Federal
Register (78 FR 23702) a proposal to
amend the definition of ‘‘spousal
resource protection amount’’ found at
38 CFR 17.111(d)(2)(vi). The spousal
resource protection amount is the
amount of liquid assets of a veteran and
community (i.e., not institutionalized)
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Nov 26, 2013
Jkt 232001
spouse that is considered unavailable
when calculating the veteran’s
maximum monthly copayment
obligation for extended care services
longer than 180 days. We proposed to
define the ‘‘spousal resource protection
amount’’ by reference to the Maximum
Community Spouse Resource Standard,
which is published each year by the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) and is adjusted annually
based on the Consumer Price Index.
Previously, the spousal resource
protection amount used by VA was set
at $89,280 and did not adjust annually.
Under the proposed change, this
amount would immediately increase to
the current CMS standard of $115,920,
and would automatically adjust on an
annual basis consistent with the
comparable protection for the spouses of
Medicaid recipients.
In addition, we proposed to remove
§ 17.111(g), which consists entirely of a
copy of VA Form 10–10EC, Application
for Extended Care Services.
Interested persons were invited to
submit comments to the proposed rule
on or before June 21, 2013. We received
one comment advocating for increased
funding for medical services provided to
military spouses, which is beyond the
scope of this rulemaking. We received
no substantive comments addressing the
substance of the proposed rule or
suggesting any changes. Therefore,
based on the rationale set forth in the
proposed rule, VA is adopting the
provisions of the proposed rule as a
final rule with no changes.
Effect of Rulemaking
Title 38 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, as revised by this final
rulemaking, represents VA’s
implementation of its legal authority on
this subject. Other than future
amendments to this regulation or
governing statutes, no contrary guidance
or procedures are authorized. All
existing or subsequent VA guidance
must be read to conform with this
rulemaking if possible or, if not
possible, such guidance is superseded
by this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This final rule
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70863
will directly affect only individuals and
will not directly affect small entities.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
this rulemaking is exempt from the
initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603
and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), unless OMB waives such
review, as ‘‘any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1)
Have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency; (3)
Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive
Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule have been
examined, and it has been determined
not to be a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866. VA’s
impact analysis can be found as a
supporting document at https://
www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is
published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its impact analysis are
available on VA’s Web site at https://
www1.va.gov/orpm/, by following the
link for ‘‘VA Regulations Published.’’
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 27, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70858-70863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28362]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2013-0011]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones; Pacific Northwest Grain Handlers Association
Facilities; Columbia and Willamette Rivers
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing temporary safety zones around
the following Pacific Northwest Grain Handlers Association facilities:
The Columbia Grain facility on the Willamette River in Portland, OR,
the United Grain Corporation facility on the Columbia River in
Vancouver, WA, the Temco Irving facility on the Willamette River in
Portland, OR, the Temco Kalama facility on the Columbia River in
Kalama, WA, and the Louis Dreyfus Commodities facility on the
Willamette River in Portland, OR. These safety zones extend
approximately between the navigable channel and the shoreline of the
facility described. These safety zones have been established to ensure
that on-water protest activities near these facilities do not create
hazardous navigation conditions for vessels protesting, transiting in
the navigable channel, or attempting to moor at the facilities and that
any on-water activities do not create hazardous conditions while grain-
shipment vessels are moored at the facilities.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from November 27,
2013 until November 27, 2015. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from the date the rule was signed, October 31,
2013, until November 27, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2013-0011]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on
``Open Docket Folder'' on the line associated with this rulemaking. You
may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the
ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
[[Page 70859]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LTJG Ian P. McPhillips, Waterways Management Division,
Marine Safety Unit Portland, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (503) 240-
9319, email msupdxwwm@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
A. Regulatory History and Information
On August 6, 2013, the Coast Guard published a temporary interim
rule and request for comments titled, ``Safety Zones; Pacific Northwest
Grain Handlers Association Facilities; Columbia and Willamette Rivers''
in the Federal Register (78 FR 47567). In that temporary interim rule,
the Coast Guard established temporary safety zones near five Pacific
Northwest Grain Handlers Association facilities. Although the Coast
Guard had good cause to issue that temporary interim rule without first
publishing a proposed rule, the Coast Guard invited the submission of
post-promulgation comments and related material regarding that rule
through September 5, 2013. No request for a public meeting was
received. The Coast Guard received one submission to the docket that
raised several objections.
B. Basis and Purpose
Coast Guard Captains of the Port are granted authority to establish
safety and security zones in 33 CFR 1.05-1(f) for safety and
environmental purposes as described in 33 CFR Part 165.
These safety zones are being implemented to ensure the safe
navigation of maritime traffic on the Columbia and Willamette Rivers
and their tributaries while grain-shipment and grain-shipment assist
vessels transit to and from these Pacific Northwest Grain Handlers
Association facilities and to ensure that vessels remain safely moored
at these Coast Guard regulated facilities. These safety zones are
intended to ensure that members of the maritime public, in particular,
those engaged in commerce and protest activities on the water, are not
injured. Recreational boating, fishing, and protest activity afloat in
these safety zones is particularly hazardous because of the effects of
strong river currents, the maneuvering characteristics of grain-
shipment vessels, and the safety-sensitive mid-stream personnel
transfers conducted by grain-shipment assist vessels with which
recreational boaters and protesters may be unfamiliar. These safety
zones apply equally to all waterway users and are intended to allow
maximum use of the waterway consistent with safe navigation. The impact
of the safety zones on maritime activity in the area is minimal because
the safety zones are of a limited size and do not encroach on the
navigation channel. Grain-shipment vessel means any vessel bound for or
departing or having previously loaded cargo at any of the following
waterfront facilities: Columbia Grain in Portland, OR; United Grain
Corporation in Vancouver, WA; Temco Irving in Portland, OR; Temco
Kalama in Kalama, WA; or Louis Dreyfus Commodities in Portland, OR.
This includes any vessel leaving anchor in the Columbia and Willamette
Rivers that is bound for or had previously departed from the
aforementioned waterfront facilities. Grain-shipment assist vessel
means any vessel bound for or departing from a grain-shipment vessel to
assist it in navigation during the movement of the grain-shipment
vessel in the Columbia and Willamette Rivers and their tributaries.
This includes but is not limited to tugs, pilot boats, and launches.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule
This temporary final rule is unchanged from the temporary interim
rule that was published on August 6, 2013 (78 FR 47567) as no
substantive changes have been deemed necessary. One commenter submitted
a letter to the docket containing several objections. The commenter
addressed the inclusion of the safety zone around the Louis Dreyfus
facility, which was not included in the previous rule published on
February 4, 2013. The Louis Dreyfus facility was not previously
included because it was undergoing repairs and was not operational. The
Coast Guard has included the Louis Dreyfus facility in this rule based
on the facility's plans to begin fulltime operations within the
enforcement period of this rule.
The commenter asserted that the safety zones were unnecessary and
overbroad. Specifically, the commenter questioned the necessity of the
size of these zones. The sizes of these zones are based on the average
size of the grain-shipment vessels operating on the river and the
average speed of the vessels during their approach. The commenter
asserted that deep-draft vessels on the Columbia and Willamette Rivers
typically approach at 1 to 2 knots when entering the final 250 yards
before the terminal, and therefore, a narrower safety zone of 50-70
yards would still provide a two-minute pre-collision period. The Coast
Guard disagrees that a safety zone of 50-70 yards would provide a
sufficient buffer to prevent collisions. As vessels are mooring, their
speed and direction are frequently changing. Based on these dynamic
conditions, we believe the width and size of these safety zones are
necessary to significantly reduce the risk posed by limited ship-to-
boat communications or propulsion failure by vessels or watercraft
operating in the vicinity of grain-shipment vessels.
The commenter also asserts that the Coast Guard has failed to state
why the safety zones are necessary and that it appears the safety zones
were enacted as the result of union animus. Coast Guard Captains of the
Port are delegated authority to establish safety and security zones in
33 CFR 1.05-1(f) for safety and environmental purposes as described in
33 CFR Part 165. The Coast Guard has previously stated that the purpose
of this rule is to ensure the safe navigation of maritime traffic on
the Columbia and Willamette Rivers and their tributaries while grain-
shipment and grain-shipment assist vessels transit to and from these
Pacific Northwest Grain Handlers Association facilities. These safety
zones are intended to mitigate the hazardous conditions created by
small recreational vessels operating in close proximity to large and
less-maneuverable, commercial deep-draft vessels and tug and barge
configurations, which are typically between 300 and 800 feet in length.
In addition to mitigating the navigational dangers associated with
operating a small vessel in close proximity to less-maneuverable deep-
draft grain-shipment vessels, the Coast Guard believes these safety
zones are necessary to protect the safety-sensitive mid-stream
personnel transfers conducted by grain-shipment assist vessels with
which recreational boaters and protesters may be unfamiliar.
The Coast Guard also disagrees with the commenter's assertion that
the safety zones were enacted out of union animus. The Coast Guard
respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. These safety zones
do not single out protesters, but apply equally to all waterway users
and are intended to allow maximum use of the waterway consistent with
safe navigation. The safety zones created by this rule do not prohibit
members of the public from assembling on the water to express their
points of view. The Captain of the Port has, in coordination with
protesters, recommended areas on the water in the
[[Page 70860]]
vicinity of these safety zones where those desiring to do so can
assemble and express their views to the intended audience without
compromising navigational safety.
The commenter asserted that the proposed rule would prevent
protesters from engaging in peaceful protest activities. The Coast
Guard disagrees. The safety zones created by this rule do not prohibit
protest activities on the Columbia and Willamette Rivers. Instead,
these safety zones are intended to mitigate the hazardous conditions
created by small recreational vessels operating in close proximity to
large and less-maneuverable commercial deep-draft vessels and tug and
barge configurations, which are typically between 300 and 800 feet in
length. The safety zones apply to all vessels not otherwise exempted
and are intended to ensure the safe navigation of maritime traffic and
to protect the safety of life and property on the Columbia and
Willamette rivers and all adjoining tributaries.
The commenter also asserted that this rule is inconsistent with the
National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. 151 et seq., because it
prohibits picketing activity. However, the safety zones in this rule do
not prohibit picketing, or other concerted activities by employees.
Vessel operators, including those engaged in picketing activity, may
operate in any part of the river outside of the zones so long as they
do so in accordance with the navigational rules.
The commenter disagreed with the Coast Guard's suggested use of on-
water assembly areas. Prior to promulgation of the initial safety zone,
outreach meetings were held between the local Captain of the Port,
Columbia River Pilots, and union members. Based on input from these
meetings, the Coast Guard designated on-water assembly areas where
protesters could safely exercise their First Amendment rights. However,
protestors are not required to restrict their protest activities to
these assembly areas and may operate in any part of the river outside
of the zones so long as they do so in accordance with the navigational
rules.
The commenter expressed the importance of ``on-water picketing'' in
publicizing the ongoing labor dispute and stated that the safety zones
unnecessarily burden the ability of protesters to convey their message
to their intended audience of ``incoming vessels.'' The Coast Guard
disagrees. Nothing in this rule prevents union members from protesting
on the water. The safety zones created by the rule apply to all vessels
not otherwise exempted and are intended to ensure the safe navigation
of maritime traffic and protect the safety of life and property on the
Columbia and Willamette rivers and all adjoining tributaries. The zones
address the hazardous conditions for vessels operating in the area due
to the maneuvering characteristics of grain-shipment vessels and the
safety sensitive mid-stream personnel transfers conducted by grain-
shipment assist vessels with which recreational boaters and protesters
may be unfamiliar. Vessel operators, including protestors, may operate
in any part of the river outside of the zones so long as they do so in
accordance with the navigational rules. Additionally, the safety zones
are not so large as to prevent vessels from coming within sight or
sound of inbound grain-shipment and grain-shipment assist vessels. The
recommended on-water assembly areas were proposed specifically to
identify locations outside of the safety zones that allow protestors to
safely communicate with their intended audience.
Finally, the commenter asserts that the enforcement of these safety
zones for a limited amount of time underscores the singling out of
labor unions for differential treatment. The Coast Guard disagrees. The
safety zones address safety hazards created by the navigation of
recreational vessels in close proximity to the facilities to which
large and less-maneuverable grain-shipment vessels are transiting. The
enforcement of the safety zones for limited time periods is not for the
purpose of singling out labor unions but is for the purpose of
minimizing the impact on marine operators. The Coast Guard will enforce
the safety zones for the minimal amount of time necessary to help
ensure the safe navigation for all vessels in the vicinity. The safety
zones created by this rule apply to all vessels not otherwise exempted,
regardless of whether they are engaged in union activities.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. Although this rule will
restrict access to the regulated areas, the effect of this rule will
not be significant because: (i) The safety zones are limited in size;
(ii) the official on-scene patrol may authorize access to the safety
zones; (iii) the safety zones will effect limited geographical
locations for a limited time; and (iv) the Coast Guard will make
notifications via maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received 0 comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This rule may affect the
following entities some of which may be small entities: The owners and
operators of vessels intending to operate in the area covered by the
safety zones created in this rule.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: (i) The
safety zones are limited in size; (ii) the official on-scene patrol may
authorize access to the safety zones; (iii) the safety zones will
effect limited geographical locations for a limited time; and (iv) the
Coast Guard will make notifications via maritime advisories so mariners
can adjust their plans accordingly.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If this rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine
[[Page 70861]]
compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast
Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
In preparing this temporary final rule, the Coast Guard carefully
considered the rights of lawful protestors. The safety zones created by
this rule do not prohibit members of the public from assembling on
shore or expressing their points of view from locations on shore. In
addition, the Captain of the Port has, in coordination with protesters,
recommended water areas in the vicinity of these safety zones where
those desiring to do so can assemble and express their views without
compromising navigational safety. Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received
without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or
vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of temporary safety
zones around the Columbia Grain facility on the Willamette River in
Portland, OR, the United Grain Corporation facility on the Columbia
River in Vancouver, WA, the Temco Irving facility on the Willamette
River in Portland, OR, the Temco Kalama facility on the Columbia River
in Kalama, WA, and the Louis Dreyfus Commodities facility on the
Willamette River in Portland, OR. This rule is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting
this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-240 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-240 Safety Zones; Pacific Northwest Grain Handlers
Association Facilities; Columbia and Willamette Rivers.
(a) Definitions. As used in this section:
(1) Federal Law Enforcement Officer means any employee or agent of
the United States government who has the authority to carry firearms
and make warrantless arrests and whose duties involve the enforcement
of criminal laws of the United States.
(2) Navigable waters of the United States means those waters
defined as such in 33 CFR part 2.
(3) Navigation Rules means the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (commonly called 72 COLREGS) and the
Inland Navigation Rules published in 33 CFR Part 83.
[[Page 70862]]
(4) Official Patrol means those persons designated by the Captain
of the Port to monitor a vessel safety zone, permit entry into the
zone, give legally enforceable orders to persons or vessels within the
zone and take other actions authorized by the Captain of the Port.
Federal Law Enforcement Officers authorized to enforce this section are
designated as the Official Patrol.
(5) Public vessel means vessels owned, chartered, or operated by
the United States, or by a State or political subdivision thereof.
(6) Grain-shipment vessel means any vessel bound for, departing
from, or having previously loaded cargo at any of the following
waterfront facilities: Columbia Grain in Portland, OR, United Grain
Corporation in Vancouver, WA, Temco Irving in Portland, OR, Temco
Kalama in Kalama, WA, or Louis Dreyfus Commodities in Portland, OR.
This includes any vessel leaving anchor in the Columbia and Willamette
Rivers that is bound for or had previously departed from the
aforementioned waterfront facilities.
(7) Grain-shipment assist vessel means any vessel bound for or
departing from a grain-shipment vessel to assist it in navigation
during the movement of the grain-shipment vessel in the Columbia and
Willamette Rivers and their tributaries. This includes but is not
limited to tugs, pilot boats, and launches.
(8) Oregon Law Enforcement Officer means any Oregon Peace Officer
as defined in Oregon Revised Statutes section 161.015.
(9) Washington Law Enforcement Officer means any General Authority
Washington Peace Officer, Limited Authority Washington Peace Officer,
or Specially Commissioned Washington Peace Officer as defined in
Revised Code of Washington section 10.93.020
(b) Locations. The following areas are safety zones:
(1) Columbia Grain. All navigable waters of the United States
within the Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port Zone enclosed by
three lines and the shoreline: line one starting on the shoreline at
45-38'34'' N/122-46'11'' W then heading 150 yards offshore to 45-
38'37'' N/122-46'16'' W then heading up river 380 yards to 45-38'30''
N/122-46'28'' W then heading 150 yards to the shoreline ending at 45-
38'27'' N/122-46'24'' W.
(2) United Grain Corporation. All navigable waters of the United
States within the Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port Zone
enclosed by three lines and the shoreline: line one starting on the
shoreline at 45-37'52'' N/122-41'46'' W then heading 150 yards offshore
to 45-37'48'' N/122-41'50'' W then heading up river 470 yards to 45-
37'40'' N/122-41'34'' W then heading 175 yards to the shoreline ending
at 45-37'44'' N/122-41'29'' W.
(3) Temco Portland. All navigable waters of the United States
within the Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port Zone enclosed by
three lines and the shoreline: line one starting on the shoreline at
45-32'10'' N/122-40'34'' W then heading 150 yards offshore to 45-
32'09'' N/122-40'39'' W then heading up river 275 yards to 45-32'01''
N/122-40'33'' W then heading 150 yards to the shoreline ending at 45-
32'04'' N/122-40'28'' W.
(4) Temco Kalama. All navigable waters of the United States within
the Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port Zone enclosed by three
lines and the shoreline: line one starting on the shoreline at 45-
59'10'' N/122-50'09'' W then heading 150 yards offshore to 45-59'09''
N/122-50'14'' W then heading up river 385 yards to 45-58'58'' N/122-
50'07'' W then heading 150 yards to the shoreline ending at 45-59'00''
N/122-50'01'' W.
(5) Louis Dreyfus Commodities. All navigable waters of the United
States within the Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port Zone
enclosed by three lines and the shoreline: line one starting on the
shoreline at 45-31'49'' N/122-40'15'' W then heading 70 yards offshore
to 45-31'48'' N/122-40'17'' W then heading up river 300 yards to 45-
31'41'' N/122-40'09'' W then heading 100 yards to the shoreline ending
at 45-31'43'' N/122-40'06'' W.
(c) Effective Period. This section is effective without actual
notice from November 27, 2013 until November 27, 2015 and will be
activated for enforcement as described in paragraph (d) of this
section. Actual notice will be used from the date the rule was signed,
October 31, 2013, until November 27, 2013.
(d) Enforcement Periods. The Sector Columbia River Captain of the
Port will cause notice of the enforcement of the grain facilities
safety zones to be made by all appropriate means to effect the widest
publicity among the affected segments of the public as practicable, in
accordance with 33 CFR 165.7. Such means of notification may include,
but are not limited to, Broadcast Notices to Mariners or Local Notices
to Mariners. The Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port will issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners notifying the public when enforcement of
the safety zone is suspended.
Upon notice of enforcement by the Sector Columbia River Captain of
the Port, the Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone in accordance
with the rules set out in this section. Upon notice of suspension of
enforcement by the Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port, all
persons and vessels are authorized to enter, transit, and exit the
safety zone, consistent with the Navigation Rules.
(e) Regulation. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into or movement within these zones
is prohibited unless authorized by the Sector Columbia River Captain of
the Port, the official patrol, or other designated representatives of
the Captain of the Port.
(2) To request authorization to enter or operate within the safety
zone contact the on-scene official patrol on VHF-FM channel 16 or 13,
or the Sector Columbia River Command Center at phone number (503) 861-
6211. Authorization will be granted based on the necessity of access
and consistent with safe navigation.
(3) Vessels authorized to enter or operate within the safety zone
shall operate at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course
and shall proceed as directed by the on-scene official patrol. The
Navigation Rules shall apply at all times within the safety zone.
(4) When conditions permit, the on-scene official patrol, or a
designated representative of the Captain of the Port at the Sector
Columbia River Command Center, should:
(i) Permit vessels constrained by their navigational draft or
restricted in their ability to maneuver to enter or operate within the
safety zone in order to ensure a safe passage in accordance with the
Navigation Rules; and
(ii) Permit commercial vessels anchored in a designated anchorage
area to remain at anchor within the safety zone; and
(iii) Permit vessels that must transit via a navigable channel or
waterway to enter or operate within the safety zone in order to do so.
(f) Exemption. Public vessels as defined in paragraph (a) of this
section are exempt from complying with paragraph (e) of this section.
(g) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer may enforce the rules in this section. In the navigable waters
of the United States to which this section applies, when immediate
action is required and representatives of the Coast Guard are not
present or are not present in sufficient force to provide effective
enforcement of this section, any Federal Law Enforcement Officer,
Oregon Law Enforcement Officer, or Washington Law Enforcement Officer
may enforce the rules contained in this section
[[Page 70863]]
pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 70118. In addition, the Captain of the Port may
be assisted by other federal, state, or local agencies in enforcing
this section.
(h) Waiver. The Captain of the Port Columbia River may waive any of
the requirements of this section for any vessel or class of vessels
upon finding that operational conditions or other circumstances are
such that application of this section is unnecessary or impractical for
the purpose of port safety or environmental safety.
Dated: October 31, 2013.
B.C. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2013-28362 Filed 11-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P