Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Initiation of Status Review of Arctic Grayling in the Upper Missouri River System, 70525-70527 [2013-28171]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 26, 2013 / Proposed Rules
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
standard without emissions reductions
associated with the use of gasoline with
an RVP of 7.8 psi in the four Triad Area
counties during the high ozone season—
June 1 through September 15.
In addition, due to the updated
modeling reflecting a change in the
applicable RVP standard, the North
Carolina revision also includes an
updated on-road mobile, non-road
mobile and area source emissions for
the Triad Area. EPA is also proposing
approval of this revision.
EPA has preliminarily determined
that North Carolina’s April 12, 2013, SIP
revision, including the technical
demonstration associated with the
State’s request for the removal of the
Federal RVP requirements, and the
updated on-road mobile, non-road
mobile and area source emissions are
consistent with the applicable
provisions of the CAA. Should EPA
decide to remove subject portions of the
Triad Area from those areas subject to
the 7.8 psi Federal RVP requirements,
such action will occur in a separate,
subsequent rulemaking.
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule does
not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submittal that
complies with the provisions of the Act
and applicable federal regulations. 42
U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus,
in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, October 7,
1999);
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Nov 25, 2013
Jkt 232001
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Lead, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 12, 2013.
Beverly H. Banister,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2013–28371 Filed 11–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2013–0120;
4500030113]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Initiation of Status Review
of Arctic Grayling in the Upper
Missouri River System
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of status
review.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (Act), announce
the initiation of a status review of the
Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus)
upper Missouri River system distinct
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
70525
population segment (DPS). We conduct
status reviews to determine whether the
entity meets the definition of an
endangered or threatened species under
the Act. Following this status review,
we will issue a proposed listing rule or
a not warranted finding for the Arctic
grayling upper Missouri River system
DPS. Through this document, we
encourage all interested parties to
provide us information regarding the
Arctic grayling in the upper Missouri
River basin.
DATES: To allow us adequate time to
conduct this review, we request that we
receive information no later than
December 26, 2013. Information
submitted electronically using the
Federal eRulemaking Portal (see
ADDRESSES section, below) must be
received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on
the closing date. After December 26,
2013, you must submit information
using the U.S. mail or hand-delivery
option provided in the ADDRESSES
section below. Please note that we may
not be able to address or incorporate
information that we receive after the
above requested date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit
information by one of the following
methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
enter FWS–R6–ES–2013–0120, which is
the docket number for this rulemaking.
Then, in the Search panel on the left
side of the screen, under the Document
Type heading, click on the Proposed
Rules link to locate this document. You
may submit a comment by clicking on
‘‘Comment Now!’’
(2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail
or hand-delivery to: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: FWS–R6–ES–2013–
0120; Division of Policy and Directives
Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS
2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203.
We request that you send information
only by the methods described above.
We will post all submissions on
https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us
(see the Request for Information section
below for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jodi
Bush, Field Supervisor, Montana Field
Office, 585 Shepard Way, Suite 1,
Helena, MT 59601; telephone (406) 449–
5225, extension 205. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), please call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
70526
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 26, 2013 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Background
The Arctic grayling is a fish belonging
to the family Salmonidae (salmon, trout,
charr, whitefishes), subfamily
Thymallinae (graylings), and is
represented by a single genus,
Thymallus (Scott and Crossman 1973,
pp. 301–302; Behnke 2002, pp. 327–
331). Arctic grayling have long, thin
bodies with deeply forked tails, and
adults typically average 254 to 330
millimeters (10 to 13 inches) in length.
Coloration varies from silvery or
iridescent blue and lavender, to dark
blue (Behnke 2002, pp. 327–328). Arctic
grayling have a prominent sail-like
dorsal fin, which is large and vividly
colored with rows of orange to bright
green spots, and often has an orange
border. Dark spots often appear on the
body toward the head (Behnke 2002, pp.
327–328).
Arctic grayling are native to Arctic
Ocean drainages of northwestern
Canada and Alaska; the Peace,
Saskatchewan, and Athabasca River
drainages in Alberta, eastward to
Hudson Bay and westward to the Bering
Straits; and eastern Siberia and northern
Eurasia (Scott and Crossman 1973, pp.
301–302). Arctic grayling also are native
to Pacific coast drainages of Alaska and
Canada as far south as the Stikine River
in British Columbia (Scott and
Crossman 1973, pp. 301–302; Nelson
and Paetz 1991, pp. 253–256; Behnke
2002, pp. 327–331).
Pleistocene glaciations isolated two
North American populations of Arctic
grayling outside of Canada and Alaska
(Vincent 1962, pp. 23–31). One
population occurred in streams and
rivers of the Great Lakes region of
northern Michigan, but was extirpated
in the 1930s (Hubbs and Lagler 1949, p.
44; Scott and Crossman 1973, p. 301).
The second population (Arctic grayling
of the upper Missouri River) inhabits
watersheds in the upper Missouri River
basin upstream of Great Falls, Montana.
This population is the subject of our
status review.
Previous Federal Actions
We have reviewed the status of the
Arctic grayling several times since 1982.
Most recently, on September 8, 2010, we
published a revised 12-month finding
for the Arctic grayling (75 FR 54708). In
that finding, we determined that fluvial
(stream dwelling) and adfluvial
(residing in lakes and spawning in
streams) Arctic grayling of the upper
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Nov 25, 2013
Jkt 232001
Missouri River did constitute a DPS
under the Act. Therefore, we found that
the upper Missouri River DPS was a
listable entity under the Act, and we
further found that listing the DPS was
warranted but precluded by higher
priority listing actions.
On May 10, 2011, we filed a multiyear
work plan as part of a proposed
settlement agreement with Wild Earth
Guardians and others in a consolidated
case in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Columbia. On September 9,
2011, the Court accepted our agreement
with the plaintiffs in Endangered
Species Act Section 4 Deadline Litig.,
Misc. Action No. 10–377 (EGS), MDL
Docket No. 2165 (D. DC) (known as the
‘‘MDL case’’), which requires the
Service to submit to the Federal
Register for publication either a
proposed rule or a not-warranted
finding for the Arctic grayling on or
before September 30, 2014.
For additional information on the
biology or previous Federal actions on
the Arctic grayling, including Federal
actions prior to 2010, see the September
8, 2010, revised 12-month finding
(75 FR 54708).
Request for Information
To ensure that the status review and,
if warranted, our subsequent listing
determination are based on the best
available scientific and commercial
information, and to provide an
opportunity to any interested parties to
provide information for consideration
during the status assessment, we are
requesting information concerning the
Arctic grayling in the upper Missouri
River system. We request information
from other concerned governmental
agencies, Native American tribes, the
scientific community, industry, and any
other interested party. Specifically, we
are seeking:
(1) General information concerning
the taxonomy, biology, ecology,
genetics, and status of the Arctic
grayling of the upper Missouri River
system.
(2) Specific information on the
conservation status of Arctic grayling in
the upper Missouri River system,
including information on distribution,
abundance, and population trends.
(3) Specific information on factors
that that may affect the continued
existence of the Arctic grayling in the
upper Missouri River, which may
include habitat modification or
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
destruction, overutilization, disease,
predation, the inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms, or other natural
or manmade factors.
(4) Specific information on planned
and ongoing conservation actions
designed to improve Arctic grayling
habitat or reduce threats to Arctic
grayling in the upper Missouri River
system.
(5) Habitat selection, use, and any
changes or trends in the amount and
distribution of Arctic grayling habitat.
(6) Habitat requirements for feeding,
breeding, and sheltering, including
particular physical or biological features
that are essential to the conservation of
Arctic grayling and where such physical
or biological features are found.
(7) Whether any of these features may
require special management
considerations or protection.
(8) Specific areas outside the
geographical area occupied by the DPS
that may be essential for the
conservation of the Arctic grayling in
the upper Missouri River system.
(9) The possible benefits and impacts
(including economic impacts) of a
possible critical habitat designation for
the Arctic grayling.
(10) Whether the designation of
critical habitat for the Arctic grayling
would be beneficial to the conservation
of the Arctic grayling in the upper
Missouri River system or whether the
identification of specific areas as critical
habitat may increase threats to the DPS
or its habitat.
If you submit information, we request
you support it with documentation such
as data, maps, bibliographic references,
methods used to gather and analyze the
data, or copies of any pertinent
publications, reports, or letters by
knowledgeable sources. Section
4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs that
determinations as to whether any
species is an endangered or threatened
species must be made ‘‘solely on the
basis of the best scientific and
commercial data available.’’
You may submit your information
concerning this status review by one of
the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. If you submit information that
includes personal identifying
information, you may request at the top
of your document that we withhold this
personal identifying information from
public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 26, 2013 / Proposed Rules
References Cited
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
A complete list of all the references
cited in this document is available on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov and upon request
from the Field Supervisor, Montana
Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Nov 25, 2013
Jkt 232001
Authors
The primary authors of this document
are staff members of the Montana Field
Office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
Dated: November 12, 2013.
Stephen Guertin,
Acting Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–28171 Filed 11–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
Authority
The authority for this action is the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
70527
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 26, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70525-70527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28171]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2013-0120; 4500030113]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Initiation of
Status Review of Arctic Grayling in the Upper Missouri River System
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of status review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act),
announce the initiation of a status review of the Arctic grayling
(Thymallus arcticus) upper Missouri River system distinct population
segment (DPS). We conduct status reviews to determine whether the
entity meets the definition of an endangered or threatened species
under the Act. Following this status review, we will issue a proposed
listing rule or a not warranted finding for the Arctic grayling upper
Missouri River system DPS. Through this document, we encourage all
interested parties to provide us information regarding the Arctic
grayling in the upper Missouri River basin.
DATES: To allow us adequate time to conduct this review, we request
that we receive information no later than December 26, 2013.
Information submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking
Portal (see ADDRESSES section, below) must be received by 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on the closing date. After December 26, 2013, you must
submit information using the U.S. mail or hand-delivery option provided
in the ADDRESSES section below. Please note that we may not be able to
address or incorporate information that we receive after the above
requested date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit information by one of the following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, enter FWS-R6-ES-2013-0120,
which is the docket number for this rulemaking. Then, in the Search
panel on the left side of the screen, under the Document Type heading,
click on the Proposed Rules link to locate this document. You may
submit a comment by clicking on ``Comment Now!''
(2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-R6-ES-2013-0120; Division of Policy and
Directives Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax
Drive, MS 2042-PDM; Arlington, VA 22203.
We request that you send information only by the methods described
above. We will post all submissions on https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that we will post any personal information you provide
us (see the Request for Information section below for more
information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jodi Bush, Field Supervisor, Montana
Field Office, 585 Shepard Way, Suite 1, Helena, MT 59601; telephone
(406) 449-5225, extension 205. If you use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD), please call the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 70526]]
Background
The Arctic grayling is a fish belonging to the family Salmonidae
(salmon, trout, charr, whitefishes), subfamily Thymallinae (graylings),
and is represented by a single genus, Thymallus (Scott and Crossman
1973, pp. 301-302; Behnke 2002, pp. 327-331). Arctic grayling have
long, thin bodies with deeply forked tails, and adults typically
average 254 to 330 millimeters (10 to 13 inches) in length. Coloration
varies from silvery or iridescent blue and lavender, to dark blue
(Behnke 2002, pp. 327-328). Arctic grayling have a prominent sail-like
dorsal fin, which is large and vividly colored with rows of orange to
bright green spots, and often has an orange border. Dark spots often
appear on the body toward the head (Behnke 2002, pp. 327-328).
Arctic grayling are native to Arctic Ocean drainages of
northwestern Canada and Alaska; the Peace, Saskatchewan, and Athabasca
River drainages in Alberta, eastward to Hudson Bay and westward to the
Bering Straits; and eastern Siberia and northern Eurasia (Scott and
Crossman 1973, pp. 301-302). Arctic grayling also are native to Pacific
coast drainages of Alaska and Canada as far south as the Stikine River
in British Columbia (Scott and Crossman 1973, pp. 301-302; Nelson and
Paetz 1991, pp. 253-256; Behnke 2002, pp. 327-331).
Pleistocene glaciations isolated two North American populations of
Arctic grayling outside of Canada and Alaska (Vincent 1962, pp. 23-31).
One population occurred in streams and rivers of the Great Lakes region
of northern Michigan, but was extirpated in the 1930s (Hubbs and Lagler
1949, p. 44; Scott and Crossman 1973, p. 301). The second population
(Arctic grayling of the upper Missouri River) inhabits watersheds in
the upper Missouri River basin upstream of Great Falls, Montana. This
population is the subject of our status review.
Previous Federal Actions
We have reviewed the status of the Arctic grayling several times
since 1982. Most recently, on September 8, 2010, we published a revised
12-month finding for the Arctic grayling (75 FR 54708). In that
finding, we determined that fluvial (stream dwelling) and adfluvial
(residing in lakes and spawning in streams) Arctic grayling of the
upper Missouri River did constitute a DPS under the Act. Therefore, we
found that the upper Missouri River DPS was a listable entity under the
Act, and we further found that listing the DPS was warranted but
precluded by higher priority listing actions.
On May 10, 2011, we filed a multiyear work plan as part of a
proposed settlement agreement with Wild Earth Guardians and others in a
consolidated case in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia. On September 9, 2011, the Court accepted our agreement with
the plaintiffs in Endangered Species Act Section 4 Deadline Litig.,
Misc. Action No. 10-377 (EGS), MDL Docket No. 2165 (D. DC) (known as
the ``MDL case''), which requires the Service to submit to the Federal
Register for publication either a proposed rule or a not-warranted
finding for the Arctic grayling on or before September 30, 2014.
For additional information on the biology or previous Federal
actions on the Arctic grayling, including Federal actions prior to
2010, see the September 8, 2010, revised 12-month finding (75 FR
54708).
Request for Information
To ensure that the status review and, if warranted, our subsequent
listing determination are based on the best available scientific and
commercial information, and to provide an opportunity to any interested
parties to provide information for consideration during the status
assessment, we are requesting information concerning the Arctic
grayling in the upper Missouri River system. We request information
from other concerned governmental agencies, Native American tribes, the
scientific community, industry, and any other interested party.
Specifically, we are seeking:
(1) General information concerning the taxonomy, biology, ecology,
genetics, and status of the Arctic grayling of the upper Missouri River
system.
(2) Specific information on the conservation status of Arctic
grayling in the upper Missouri River system, including information on
distribution, abundance, and population trends.
(3) Specific information on factors that that may affect the
continued existence of the Arctic grayling in the upper Missouri River,
which may include habitat modification or destruction, overutilization,
disease, predation, the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms,
or other natural or manmade factors.
(4) Specific information on planned and ongoing conservation
actions designed to improve Arctic grayling habitat or reduce threats
to Arctic grayling in the upper Missouri River system.
(5) Habitat selection, use, and any changes or trends in the amount
and distribution of Arctic grayling habitat.
(6) Habitat requirements for feeding, breeding, and sheltering,
including particular physical or biological features that are essential
to the conservation of Arctic grayling and where such physical or
biological features are found.
(7) Whether any of these features may require special management
considerations or protection.
(8) Specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the
DPS that may be essential for the conservation of the Arctic grayling
in the upper Missouri River system.
(9) The possible benefits and impacts (including economic impacts)
of a possible critical habitat designation for the Arctic grayling.
(10) Whether the designation of critical habitat for the Arctic
grayling would be beneficial to the conservation of the Arctic grayling
in the upper Missouri River system or whether the identification of
specific areas as critical habitat may increase threats to the DPS or
its habitat.
If you submit information, we request you support it with
documentation such as data, maps, bibliographic references, methods
used to gather and analyze the data, or copies of any pertinent
publications, reports, or letters by knowledgeable sources. Section
4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs that determinations as to whether any
species is an endangered or threatened species must be made ``solely on
the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available.''
You may submit your information concerning this status review by
one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. If you submit
information that includes personal identifying information, you may
request at the top of your document that we withhold this personal
identifying information from public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
[[Page 70527]]
References Cited
A complete list of all the references cited in this document is
available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov and upon
request from the Field Supervisor, Montana Field Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Authors
The primary authors of this document are staff members of the
Montana Field Office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Authority
The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: November 12, 2013.
Stephen Guertin,
Acting Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-28171 Filed 11-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P