Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Herring Fishery; Adjustments to 2014 Sub-Annual Catch Limits, 70009-70011 [2013-28107]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No.: 130919816–3953–01]
RIN 0648–BD70
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Herring Fishery;
Adjustments to 2014 Sub-Annual
Catch Limits
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This action proposes to adjust
2014 sub-annual catch limits (ACLs) for
the Atlantic herring (herring) fishery to
account for catch overages and
underharvest in 2012. Three of the four
sub-ACLs are being decreased and one
sub-ACL is being increased. This would
result in an increase to the overall catch
available to the herring fleet.
DATES: Public comments must be
received no later than 5 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time, on December 9, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting
documents, 2013–2015 Specifications/
Framework 2 and Amendment 4 to the
Herring Fishery Management Plan
(FMP), are available from: Thomas A.
Nies, Executive Director, New England
Fishery Management Council, 50 Water
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950,
telephone (978) 465–0492. These
documents are also accessible via the
Internet at https://www.nero.nmfs.gov.
You may submit comments, identified
by NOAA–NMFS–2013–0153, by any
one of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20130153, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: NMFS, Northeast Regional
Office, 55 Great Republic Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside
of the envelope ‘‘Comments on
Adjustment to 2014 Herring Catch
Limits.’’
• Fax: (978) 281–9135, Attn: Travis
Ford.
Instructions: Comments must be
submitted by one of the above methods
to ensure that the comments are
received, documented, and considered
by NMFS. Comments sent by any other
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:00 Nov 21, 2013
Jkt 232001
method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are
a part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing
on www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address) submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Travis Ford, Fishery Policy Analyst,
978–281–9233, fax 978–281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Atlantic herring harvest in the
United States is managed under the
Herring FMP developed by the New
England Fishery Management Council
(Council), and was approved and
implemented by NMFS in 2000. The
Herring FMP divides the stock-wide
herring ACL among three management
areas, one of which has two sub-areas.
It divides Area 1 (located in the Gulf of
Maine (GOM)) into an inshore section
(Area 1A) and an offshore section (Area
1B). Area 2 is located in the coastal
waters between Massachusetts and
North Carolina, and Area 3 is on
Georges Bank (GB). The Herring FMP
considers the herring stock complex to
be a single stock, but there are inshore
(GOM) and offshore (GB) stock
components. The GOM and GB stock
components segregate during spawning
and mix during feeding and migration.
Each management area has its own subACL to allow greater control of the
fishing mortality on each stock
component.
We, NMFS, determined the amount of
herring landings in 2012 based on
dealer reports (Federal and state) of
herring purchases, supplemented with
vessel trip reports (VTRs) (Federal and
State of Maine) of herring landings. We
compared dealer reports to VTRs for all
trips that landed herring in 2012.
Because VTRs are generally a hail
weight or estimate of landings, with an
assumed 10-percent margin of error,
dealer reports are a more accurate
source of landings data. However, if the
amount of herring reported via VTR
exceeded the amount of herring
reported by the dealer by 10 percent or
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
70009
more, we assumed that the dealer report
for that trip was in error. To improve the
likelihood of not exceeding ACLs, in
those instances we used the higher
amount of herring reported via VTR to
determine the amount of herring landed
on that trip. We checked the herring
landings in the VTR database for
accuracy against the scanned image of
the paper VTRs submitted by the owner/
operator of the vessel. NMFS also
verified VTR landings by comparing
reported landings to harvesting
potential and applicable possession
limits for each vessel.
We assigned herring landings
reported on the VTRs to herring
management areas using latitude and
longitude coordinates. We manually
corrected VTRs with missing or invalid
latitude/longitude coordinates using the
statistical area reported on the VTR. If
the fisherman did not report statistical
area on the VTR, then we used a
combination of recent fishing activity
and a review of the scanned images of
the original VTR to assign landings to
herring management areas. We prorated
dealer reports without corresponding
VTRs to herring management area using
the proportion of total herring landings
stratified by week, gear type, and
management area.
As we were reviewing the 2012
herring data and comparing individual
VTRs with individual dealer reports, we
solved data errors resulting from
misreporting. Common dealer reporting
issues were: Missing dealer reports,
incorrect or missing VTR serial
numbers, incorrect or missing vessel
permit numbers, and incorrect dates.
VTRs had similar errors. Common VTR
reporting issues were: Missing VTRs,
missing or incorrect dealer information,
incorrect amounts of landed herring,
incorrect dates, and missing or incorrect
statistical area. The quality of herring
landings data is affected by unresolved
data errors; therefore, we strongly
encourage vessel owner/operators and
dealers to double-check reports for
accuracy and to ensure that reports are
submitted on a timely basis.
We determined discards of herring in
2012 by extrapolating Northeast
Fisheries Observer Program (observer)
data to the entire herring fishery. We
divided the amount of observed herring
discards (‘‘Atlantic herring’’ and
‘‘herring unidentified’’) by the amount
of observed fish landed. Then we
multiplied that discard ratio by the
amount of all fish landed for each trip
to calculate total amount of herring
discards in 2012. We determined the
amount of discards for each
management area and gear type, and
calculated the total herring catch for
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
70010
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
2012 by adding the amount of herring
landings to the amount of herring
discarded. The Council’s Herring Plan
Development Team reviewed and
approved this methodology used by
NMFS to calculate the amount of landed
herring and the amount of discarded
herring.
Amendment 4 to the Herring FMP
final rule (76 FR 11373, March 2, 2011)
revised the Herring FMP to address ACL
and accountability measure (AM)
requirements. As a way to account for
ACL overages in the herring fishery,
Amendment 4 established an AM that
provided for overage deductions in the
year immediately following the catch
overage determination. If the catch of
herring exceeds any ACL or sub-ACL,
NMFS will subsequently deduct the
overage from the corresponding ACL/
sub-ACL in the year following the catch
overage determination. Amendment 4
also specified that NMFS will announce
overage deductions in the Federal
Register prior to the start of the fishing
year, if possible.
We published a final rule for
Framework 2 and the 2013–15
specifications on October 4, 2013 (78 FR
61828). Among other measures,
Framework 2 allows for the carryover of
unharvested catch in the year
immediately following the catch
determination. Up to 10 percent of each
sub-ACL may be carried over, provided
the stock-wide catch did not exceed the
stock-wide ACL. The carryover
provision allows a sub-ACL increase for
a management area, but it does not
allow a corresponding increase to the
stock-wide ACL. The management area
sub-ACLs established for 2014 are:
31,200 mt for Area 1A, 4,600 mt for
Area 1B, 30,000 mt for Area 2, and
42,000 mt for Area 3 (Table 1).
We completed the 2012 catch
determination in August 2013, so we
would apply the adjustments for any
overharvests or carryover in 2012 to the
2014 sub-ACLs. In 2012, the herring
fleet underharvested the stockwide ACL
of 90,683 mt by 122 mt. However, the
fleet overharvested the sub-ACLs in
herring management Areas 1B (overage
of 1,584 mt); 2 (overage of 336 mt); and
3 (overage of 1,325 mt). After deducting
each 2012 overage, in 2014, the sub-ACL
for Area 1B would be 3,016 mt (4,600
mt reduced by 1,584 mt); the sub-ACL
for Area 2 would be 29,664 mt (30,000
mt reduced by 336); and the sub-ACL
for Area 3 would be 40,675 mt (42,000
mt reduced by 1,325 mt) (Table 1).
The herring fleet underharvested the
sub-ACL from Area 1A by 3,366 mt
(approximately 12 percent of the 2012
Area 1A sub-ACL of 27,668 mt). Since
the fleet did not exceed the stock-wide
ACL in 2012, the fleet would carryover
up to 10 percent of the 2012 Area 1A
sub-ACL to the 2014 Area 1A sub-ACL.
After adding the carryover from the
2012 sub-ACL, 2014 Area 1A sub-ACL
would be 33,967 mt (increased by 2,767
mt, equal to 10 percent of the 2012 Area
1A sub-ACL of 27,668 mt) (Table 1).
TABLE 1—HERRING MANAGEMENT AREA 2014 HERRING QUOTAS
[mt]
Area
Area
Area
Area
Area
1A ....................................................................................................................................................................
1B ....................................................................................................................................................................
2 ......................................................................................................................................................................
3 ......................................................................................................................................................................
Classification
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
2014
Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) of
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA), the NMFS Assistant
Administrator has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with the
Atlantic Herring FMP, other provisions
of the MSA, and other applicable law,
subject to further consideration after
public comment.
The National Environmental Policy
Act analyses to support this action were
completed in Amendment 4 (76 FR
11373, March 2, 2011) and 2013–2015
Specifications/Framework 2 (78 FR
46897, August 2, 2013).
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule does not contain a
collection-of-information requirement
for purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Council for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
that this proposed rule, if adopted,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:00 Nov 21, 2013
Jkt 232001
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The rationale for that
certification is as follows:
Amendment 4 analyzed the effects of
deducting ACL/sub-ACL overages from
the subsequent corresponding ACL/subACL. During a year when the fleet
exceeds the ACL/sub-ACL, fishery
participants may benefit economically
from higher catch. In the subsequent
year, when NMFS deducts the amount
of the overage from that ACL/sub-ACL
and the amount of harvest is lower,
fishery participants may experience
negative economic impacts. Deductions
are the same magnitude as the overages.
Therefore, if participants are active in
the fishery during the overage year and
the deduction year, the total economic
impact on participants are expected to
be neutral.
NMFS has now identified 70 entities
that held at least one limited access
herring permit (category A, B, or C) in
2012. Many of these entities were active
in both finfish fishing and shellfish
fishing industries. In order to make a
determination of size, fishing entities
are first classified as participants in
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31,200
4,600
30,000
42,000
2014
Adjustment
33,967
3,016
29,664
40,675
either the Finfish Fishing or Shellfish
Fishing industry. If an entity derives
more than 50 percent of its gross
revenues from shellfish fishing, the $5.0
million standard for total revenues is
applied. If an entity derives more than
50 percent of its gross revenues from
finfish fishing, the $19.0 million
standard for total revenues is applied.
Based on the revised criteria, there are
7 large shellfish fishing entities to
which the final rule would apply and 63
small entities to which the final rule
would apply.
Of the 63 small entities, 39 reported
no revenue from herring during 2012.
For the 24 small entities that were active
in the herring fishery, median gross
revenues were approximately $872,000
and median revenues from the herring
fishery were approximately $219,000.
There is large variation in the
importance of herring fishing for these
small entities. Eight of these 24 active
small entities derive less than 5 percent
of their total fishing revenue from
herring. Seven of these 24 active small
entities derive more than 95 percent of
their total fishing revenue from herring.
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
After considering the new
information, and the new SBA size
standards and due to the limited nature
of this action and the overall increase in
herring availability in 2014, there would
be no disproportionate economic
impacts on small entities.
Total herring revenue in 2012 was
approximately $29 million. Because
most vessels that harvest herring
participate in other fisheries, revenue
generated by herring catch is only a
portion of their income. While this
action reduces the amount of fish
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:00 Nov 21, 2013
Jkt 232001
available for harvest in three areas, it
increases the overall amount of
available harvest in the fishery,
resulting in an overall economic benefit
for the fishery. The reduced sub-ACLs
in Areas 1B, 2, and 3 are estimated to
equal $1 million in lost revenue in 2012.
However, the increased sub-ACL in
Area 1A is estimated to equal $1.1
million in gained revenue in 2012.
Therefore, this action would increase
revenues as a whole by approximately
$100,000.
PO 00000
For all the reasons described above,
an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
is not required and none has been
prepared.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 19, 2013.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, performing the
functions and duties of the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–28107 Filed 11–21–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
70011
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 226 (Friday, November 22, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70009-70011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28107]
[[Page 70009]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No.: 130919816-3953-01]
RIN 0648-BD70
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Herring
Fishery; Adjustments to 2014 Sub-Annual Catch Limits
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes to adjust 2014 sub-annual catch limits
(ACLs) for the Atlantic herring (herring) fishery to account for catch
overages and underharvest in 2012. Three of the four sub-ACLs are being
decreased and one sub-ACL is being increased. This would result in an
increase to the overall catch available to the herring fleet.
DATES: Public comments must be received no later than 5 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time, on December 9, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting documents, 2013-2015 Specifications/
Framework 2 and Amendment 4 to the Herring Fishery Management Plan
(FMP), are available from: Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, New
England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Mill 2,
Newburyport, MA 01950, telephone (978) 465-0492. These documents are
also accessible via the Internet at https://www.nero.nmfs.gov.
You may submit comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2013-0153, by any
one of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2013-0153, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: NMFS, Northeast Regional Office, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the envelope
``Comments on Adjustment to 2014 Herring Catch Limits.''
Fax: (978) 281-9135, Attn: Travis Ford.
Instructions: Comments must be submitted by one of the above
methods to ensure that the comments are received, documented, and
considered by NMFS. Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered. All comments received are a part of the public
record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address) submitted voluntarily by the sender
will be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you
wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be
accepted in Microsoft Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF formats
only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Travis Ford, Fishery Policy Analyst,
978-281-9233, fax 978-281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Atlantic herring harvest in the United States is managed under
the Herring FMP developed by the New England Fishery Management Council
(Council), and was approved and implemented by NMFS in 2000. The
Herring FMP divides the stock-wide herring ACL among three management
areas, one of which has two sub-areas. It divides Area 1 (located in
the Gulf of Maine (GOM)) into an inshore section (Area 1A) and an
offshore section (Area 1B). Area 2 is located in the coastal waters
between Massachusetts and North Carolina, and Area 3 is on Georges Bank
(GB). The Herring FMP considers the herring stock complex to be a
single stock, but there are inshore (GOM) and offshore (GB) stock
components. The GOM and GB stock components segregate during spawning
and mix during feeding and migration. Each management area has its own
sub-ACL to allow greater control of the fishing mortality on each stock
component.
We, NMFS, determined the amount of herring landings in 2012 based
on dealer reports (Federal and state) of herring purchases,
supplemented with vessel trip reports (VTRs) (Federal and State of
Maine) of herring landings. We compared dealer reports to VTRs for all
trips that landed herring in 2012. Because VTRs are generally a hail
weight or estimate of landings, with an assumed 10-percent margin of
error, dealer reports are a more accurate source of landings data.
However, if the amount of herring reported via VTR exceeded the amount
of herring reported by the dealer by 10 percent or more, we assumed
that the dealer report for that trip was in error. To improve the
likelihood of not exceeding ACLs, in those instances we used the higher
amount of herring reported via VTR to determine the amount of herring
landed on that trip. We checked the herring landings in the VTR
database for accuracy against the scanned image of the paper VTRs
submitted by the owner/operator of the vessel. NMFS also verified VTR
landings by comparing reported landings to harvesting potential and
applicable possession limits for each vessel.
We assigned herring landings reported on the VTRs to herring
management areas using latitude and longitude coordinates. We manually
corrected VTRs with missing or invalid latitude/longitude coordinates
using the statistical area reported on the VTR. If the fisherman did
not report statistical area on the VTR, then we used a combination of
recent fishing activity and a review of the scanned images of the
original VTR to assign landings to herring management areas. We
prorated dealer reports without corresponding VTRs to herring
management area using the proportion of total herring landings
stratified by week, gear type, and management area.
As we were reviewing the 2012 herring data and comparing individual
VTRs with individual dealer reports, we solved data errors resulting
from misreporting. Common dealer reporting issues were: Missing dealer
reports, incorrect or missing VTR serial numbers, incorrect or missing
vessel permit numbers, and incorrect dates. VTRs had similar errors.
Common VTR reporting issues were: Missing VTRs, missing or incorrect
dealer information, incorrect amounts of landed herring, incorrect
dates, and missing or incorrect statistical area. The quality of
herring landings data is affected by unresolved data errors; therefore,
we strongly encourage vessel owner/operators and dealers to double-
check reports for accuracy and to ensure that reports are submitted on
a timely basis.
We determined discards of herring in 2012 by extrapolating
Northeast Fisheries Observer Program (observer) data to the entire
herring fishery. We divided the amount of observed herring discards
(``Atlantic herring'' and ``herring unidentified'') by the amount of
observed fish landed. Then we multiplied that discard ratio by the
amount of all fish landed for each trip to calculate total amount of
herring discards in 2012. We determined the amount of discards for each
management area and gear type, and calculated the total herring catch
for
[[Page 70010]]
2012 by adding the amount of herring landings to the amount of herring
discarded. The Council's Herring Plan Development Team reviewed and
approved this methodology used by NMFS to calculate the amount of
landed herring and the amount of discarded herring.
Amendment 4 to the Herring FMP final rule (76 FR 11373, March 2,
2011) revised the Herring FMP to address ACL and accountability measure
(AM) requirements. As a way to account for ACL overages in the herring
fishery, Amendment 4 established an AM that provided for overage
deductions in the year immediately following the catch overage
determination. If the catch of herring exceeds any ACL or sub-ACL, NMFS
will subsequently deduct the overage from the corresponding ACL/sub-ACL
in the year following the catch overage determination. Amendment 4 also
specified that NMFS will announce overage deductions in the Federal
Register prior to the start of the fishing year, if possible.
We published a final rule for Framework 2 and the 2013-15
specifications on October 4, 2013 (78 FR 61828). Among other measures,
Framework 2 allows for the carryover of unharvested catch in the year
immediately following the catch determination. Up to 10 percent of each
sub-ACL may be carried over, provided the stock-wide catch did not
exceed the stock-wide ACL. The carryover provision allows a sub-ACL
increase for a management area, but it does not allow a corresponding
increase to the stock-wide ACL. The management area sub-ACLs
established for 2014 are: 31,200 mt for Area 1A, 4,600 mt for Area 1B,
30,000 mt for Area 2, and 42,000 mt for Area 3 (Table 1).
We completed the 2012 catch determination in August 2013, so we
would apply the adjustments for any overharvests or carryover in 2012
to the 2014 sub-ACLs. In 2012, the herring fleet underharvested the
stockwide ACL of 90,683 mt by 122 mt. However, the fleet overharvested
the sub-ACLs in herring management Areas 1B (overage of 1,584 mt); 2
(overage of 336 mt); and 3 (overage of 1,325 mt). After deducting each
2012 overage, in 2014, the sub-ACL for Area 1B would be 3,016 mt (4,600
mt reduced by 1,584 mt); the sub-ACL for Area 2 would be 29,664 mt
(30,000 mt reduced by 336); and the sub-ACL for Area 3 would be 40,675
mt (42,000 mt reduced by 1,325 mt) (Table 1).
The herring fleet underharvested the sub-ACL from Area 1A by 3,366
mt (approximately 12 percent of the 2012 Area 1A sub-ACL of 27,668 mt).
Since the fleet did not exceed the stock-wide ACL in 2012, the fleet
would carryover up to 10 percent of the 2012 Area 1A sub-ACL to the
2014 Area 1A sub-ACL. After adding the carryover from the 2012 sub-ACL,
2014 Area 1A sub-ACL would be 33,967 mt (increased by 2,767 mt, equal
to 10 percent of the 2012 Area 1A sub-ACL of 27,668 mt) (Table 1).
Table 1--Herring Management Area 2014 Herring Quotas
[mt]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014
Area 2014 Adjustment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 1A................................. 31,200 33,967
Area 1B................................. 4,600 3,016
Area 2.................................. 30,000 29,664
Area 3.................................. 42,000 40,675
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Classification
Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (MSA), the NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that this proposed rule is consistent with the Atlantic
Herring FMP, other provisions of the MSA, and other applicable law,
subject to further consideration after public comment.
The National Environmental Policy Act analyses to support this
action were completed in Amendment 4 (76 FR 11373, March 2, 2011) and
2013-2015 Specifications/Framework 2 (78 FR 46897, August 2, 2013).
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866. This proposed rule does not contain
a collection-of-information requirement for purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Council for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The rationale for that certification is as follows:
Amendment 4 analyzed the effects of deducting ACL/sub-ACL overages
from the subsequent corresponding ACL/sub-ACL. During a year when the
fleet exceeds the ACL/sub-ACL, fishery participants may benefit
economically from higher catch. In the subsequent year, when NMFS
deducts the amount of the overage from that ACL/sub-ACL and the amount
of harvest is lower, fishery participants may experience negative
economic impacts. Deductions are the same magnitude as the overages.
Therefore, if participants are active in the fishery during the overage
year and the deduction year, the total economic impact on participants
are expected to be neutral.
NMFS has now identified 70 entities that held at least one limited
access herring permit (category A, B, or C) in 2012. Many of these
entities were active in both finfish fishing and shellfish fishing
industries. In order to make a determination of size, fishing entities
are first classified as participants in either the Finfish Fishing or
Shellfish Fishing industry. If an entity derives more than 50 percent
of its gross revenues from shellfish fishing, the $5.0 million standard
for total revenues is applied. If an entity derives more than 50
percent of its gross revenues from finfish fishing, the $19.0 million
standard for total revenues is applied. Based on the revised criteria,
there are 7 large shellfish fishing entities to which the final rule
would apply and 63 small entities to which the final rule would apply.
Of the 63 small entities, 39 reported no revenue from herring
during 2012. For the 24 small entities that were active in the herring
fishery, median gross revenues were approximately $872,000 and median
revenues from the herring fishery were approximately $219,000. There is
large variation in the importance of herring fishing for these small
entities. Eight of these 24 active small entities derive less than 5
percent of their total fishing revenue from herring. Seven of these 24
active small entities derive more than 95 percent of their total
fishing revenue from herring.
[[Page 70011]]
After considering the new information, and the new SBA size
standards and due to the limited nature of this action and the overall
increase in herring availability in 2014, there would be no
disproportionate economic impacts on small entities.
Total herring revenue in 2012 was approximately $29 million.
Because most vessels that harvest herring participate in other
fisheries, revenue generated by herring catch is only a portion of
their income. While this action reduces the amount of fish available
for harvest in three areas, it increases the overall amount of
available harvest in the fishery, resulting in an overall economic
benefit for the fishery. The reduced sub-ACLs in Areas 1B, 2, and 3 are
estimated to equal $1 million in lost revenue in 2012. However, the
increased sub-ACL in Area 1A is estimated to equal $1.1 million in
gained revenue in 2012. Therefore, this action would increase revenues
as a whole by approximately $100,000.
For all the reasons described above, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and none has been prepared.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 19, 2013.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, performing the
functions and duties of the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-28107 Filed 11-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P