Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Guide To Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards of Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables, 69684-69686 [2013-27782]
Download as PDF
69684
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Notices
Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to: Alice-Lynn.Ryssman@
acl.hhs.gov. Submit written comments
on the collection of information to
Alice-Lynn Ryssman, U.S.
Administration for Community Living,
Washington, DC 20201.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alice-Lynn Ryssman, 202–357–3491.
Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency request
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an
existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, ACL is publishing notice
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection
of information, ACL invites comments
on: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of ACL’s functions,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
ACL’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
The OAA Title III–E National Family
Caregiver Support Program (NFCSP),
with statutory authority contained in
Title III sections 302, 372, and 373 of
the Older Americans Act (OAA) (42
U.S.C. 3032), as amended by the Older
Americans Act Amendments of 2006,
Pub. L. 109–365), funds a range of
comprehensive home- and communitybased services supports that assist
family and informal caregivers to care
for their loved ones at home for as long
Number of
respondents
Respondent type
as possible. ACL is directed under
206(a) of the OAA to conduct
evaluations of OAA programs. Thus,
this data collection will conduct an
evaluation of the NFCSP to fulfill this
requirement and understand how well
this program is meeting its goals and
mission.
The evaluation design is comprised of
two primary components:
1. A process study, which examines
the strategies, activities, and resources
of the program at each level of the Aging
Network—State Unit on Aging (SUA),
Area Agency on Aging (AAA), and Local
Service Provider (LSP); and
2. A client outcome study, which
examines the health and social effects of
the program on participants compared
to non-participants. This study
examines the health and social effects
on caregivers and also tracks the health
outcomes of the care recipients.
The process study will include all 56
SUAs, all of the AAAs (N = 618), a
sample of local service providers (N =
1,000), and a sample of program
participants (1,250) and nonparticipants (N = 1,250). The table
below provides the information ACL
used to estimate the burden of this
collection of information:
Average
burden per
response
(hrs.)
Responses
per
respondent
Total average
annual burden
(hrs.)
All SUAs ...........................................................................................................
All AAAs ...........................................................................................................
Stratified sample of LSPs ................................................................................
Family caregivers participating in NFCSP .......................................................
Family caregivers not participating in NFCSP .................................................
56
618
1,000
1,250
1,250
1
1
1
3
3
1.5
2
0.33
0.58
0.58
84
1236
330
2175
2175
Total ..........................................................................................................
4,174
........................
........................
6,000
The proposed data collection tools
may be found on the ACL Web site at
https://www.aoa.gov/AoARoot/Program_
Results/Program_survey.aspx.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Dated: November 15, 2013.
Kathy Greenlee,
Administrator and Assistant Secretary for
Aging.
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–1432]
[FR Doc. 2013–27822 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154–01–P
Food and Drug Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Guide To Minimize
Microbial Food Safety Hazards of
Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
16:04 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Submit either electronic or
written comments on the collection of
information by January 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
DATES:
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
PRA), Federal Agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice invites comments on
the information collection provisions in
the guidance document entitled
‘‘Guidance for Industry: Guide to
Minimize Microbial Food Safety
Hazards of Fresh-Cut Fruits and
Vegetables.’’
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
69685
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Notices
comments on the collection of
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FDA
PRA Staff, Office of Operations, Food
and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard
Dr., PI50–400B, Rockville, MD 20850,
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an
existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, we are publishing notice of
the proposed collection of information
set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, we invite
comments on these topics: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of our functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Guide To Minimize Microbial Food
Safety Hazards of Fresh-Cut Fruits and
Vegetables (OMB Control Number
0910–0609)—Extension
Fresh-cut fruits and vegetables are
fruits and vegetables that have been
processed by peeling, slicing, chopping,
shredding, coring, trimming, or
mashing, with or without washing or
other treatment, prior to being packaged
for consumption. The methods by
which produce is grown, harvested, and
processed may contribute to its
contamination with pathogens and,
consequently, the role of the produce in
transmitting foodborne illness. Factors
such as the high degree of handling and
mixing of the product, the release of
cellular fluids during cutting or
mashing, the high moisture content of
the product, the absence of a step lethal
to pathogens, and the potential for
temperature abuse in the processing,
storage, transport, and retail display all
increase the potential for pathogens to
survive and grow in fresh-cut produce.
Sections 301 and 402 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
331 and 342) prohibits the distribution
of adulterated food in interstate
commerce. In response to the increased
consumption of fresh-cut fruits and
vegetables and the potential for
foodborne illness associated with these
products, we recognize the need for
guidance specific to the processing of
fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. The
guidance document entitled, ‘‘Guide to
Minimize Microbial Food Safety
Hazards of Fresh-cut Fruits and
Vegetables,’’ which is available at https://
www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances, provides
our recommendations to fresh-cut
produce processors about how to avoid
contamination of their product with
pathogens. The guidance is in addition
to the good manufacturing practice
(GMP) regulations found in part 110 (21
CFR part 110). The guidance is intended
to assist fresh-cut produce processors in
minimizing microbial food safety
hazards common to the processing of
most fresh-cut fruits and vegetables sold
to consumers and retail establishments
in a ready-to-eat form. Accordingly, we
encourage fresh-cut produce processors
to adopt the general recommendations
in the guidance and to tailor practices
to their individual operations.
The guidance provides information
and recommended procedures designed
to help fresh-cut produce processors
minimize microbial food safety hazards.
The recommended procedures
contained in the guidance are voluntary.
Both FDA and fresh-cut produce
processors will use and benefit from the
information collected.
Two general recommendations in the
guidance are for operators to develop
and implement both a written Standard
Operating Procedures (SOP) plan and a
Sanitary Standard Operation Procedures
(SSOP) plan. SOPs and SSOPs are
important components to properly
implement and monitor GMP, which are
required for processed food operations
under part 110. Other recommended
programs that require documentation
and recordkeeping are recall and
traceback programs. In the event of a
food safety concern, processors who
adopt these recommended programs
will be prepared to recall products from
the marketplace or be able to traceback
fresh produce to its source. Fresh-cut
produce processors are also asked to
consider the application of Hazards
Analysis and Critical Control Point
(HACCP) principles or comparable
preventive control programs to the
processing of fruits and vegetables. An
HACCP system allows managers to
assess the inherent risks and identify
hazards attributable to a product or a
process, and then determine the
necessary steps to control the hazards.
FDA, along with other Federal and State
food Agencies and industry and food
establishments, have found such
preventive control programs, when
properly designed and maintained by
the establishment’s personnel, to be
valuable in managing the safety of food
products.
We estimate the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
No. of
recordkeepers
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Activity
SOP and SSOP: Maintenance ............................................
Traceback development .......................................................
Traceback maintenance .......................................................
Preventive control program comparable to an HACCP system: System development ................................................
Preventive control program comparable to an HACCP system: System implementation ............................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
No. of
records per
recordkeeper
Total annual
records
Average
burden per
recordkeeping
Total hours
122
10
290
404,430
10
290
0.067
20
40
27,097
200
11,600
10
1
10
100
1,000
145
Fmt 4703
3,315
1
1
510
73,950
0.067
4,955
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
69686
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1—Continued
Activity
No. of
recordkeepers
No. of
records per
recordkeeper
Total annual
records
Average
burden per
recordkeeping
Preventive control program comparable to an HACCP system: Implementation review .............................................
Annual burden hours ....................................................
145
........................
4
........................
580
........................
4
........................
1 There
2,320
47,172
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
A. Industry Profile
Estimates of the paperwork burden to
the fresh-cut industry are based on
information received from a fresh-cut
processor who has developed and
maintained these programs and
information from a fresh-cut produce
industry trade association. We estimate
that there are 280 fresh-cut plants in
operation and that approximately 10
new firms will enter the fresh cut
industry over the next 3 years.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Total hours
B. SOPs and SSOPs
We consider the guidance’s
recommendation to develop SOPs and
SSOPs to be ‘‘usual and customary’’ for
manufacturers and processors in the
fresh-cut industry (see 5 CFR
1320.3(b)(2)). Therefore, we do not
calculate this burden.
We recommend that facilities not only
develop but also maintain SOPs and
SSOPs. Of the 280 fresh-cut processors,
we estimate that over half have SOP and
SSOP maintenance programs in place.
Therefore, for purposes of estimating the
annual recordkeeping burden for SOP
and SSOP maintenance programs, we
assume that 40 percent of the existing
processors, or 112 firms, and the 10 new
firms do not have SOP and SSOP
maintenance programs in place. We
estimate the recordkeeping burden for
SOP and SSOP maintenance programs
by assuming that these 122 firms will
choose to implement such a
maintenance strategy as a result of the
recommendations in the guidance.
A typical fresh-cut processing plant
operates about 255 days per year. For an
8-hour shift, assuming the ingredients
are received twice during that time,
under the recommendations in the
guidance, there would be about 13
records kept (2 for inspecting incoming
ingredients; 2 for inspecting the facility
and production areas once every 4
hours; 3 records for equipment
(maintenance, sanitation, and visual
inspections for defects); 1 for calibrating
equipment; 2 temperature recording
audits (1 time for each of the 2
processing runs); and 3 microbiological
audits (ingredients, food contact
surfaces, and equipment)). Therefore,
the annual frequency of recordkeeping
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
for SOPs and SSOPs is calculated to be
3,315 times (255 × 13) per year per firm;
122 firms will be performing these
activities to generate a total 404,430
records (3,315 × 22) annually.
The total time to record observations
for SOP and SSOP maintenance is
estimated to take 4 minutes or 0.067
hours per record, and the number of
records maintained is 404,430.
Therefore, the total annual burden in
hours for 122 processors to maintain
their SOP and SSOP records is
approximately 27,097 hours (404,430 ×
0.067). The maintenance burden for
these 122 firms is estimated in row 1 of
Table 1.
C. Recall and Traceback
The burden to develop a traceback
program is a one-time activity estimated
to take approximately 20 hours.
Accordingly, we only need to estimate
the burden of this one-time activity on
the 10 new businesses expected to enter
the industry in the next 3 years. We
estimate that the 10 new firms will
spend 20 hours each preparing a
traceback program, for a total of 200
hours (10 × 20). The burden estimate of
developing a traceback program is
shown in row 2 of Table 1.
Firms may test their traceback
programs yearly to see if adjustments
are needed to maintain traceback
capabilities. Evaluating and updating
traceback programs is estimated to take
40 hours to complete. The annual
burden of maintaining a traceback
program is estimated for the 280
existing firms in the industry plus the
10 firms new to the industry. Assuming
that each firm completes this exercise
once a year, the total maintenance
burden of traceback programs is 11,600
hours yearly (290 x 40). This burden
estimate is shown in row 3 of Table 1.
The guidance refers to previously
approved collections of information
found in our regulations. The
recommendations regarding establishing
and maintaining a recall plan, as
provided in 21 CFR 7.59, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0249. Therefore, we are not
calculating a paperwork burden for
recall plans.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
D. Preventative Control Program
Developing an HACCP plan is a onetime activity during the first year that is
estimated to take 100 hours based on a
trained HACCP team working on the
plan full time. Accordingly, we only
need to estimate the burden on the 10
new businesses expected to enter the
industry in the next 3 years. We
estimate that the 10 new firms will
spend 100 hours each to develop their
individual HACCP plans, for a total of
1,000 hours (10 x 100). This burden
estimate is shown in row 4 of Table 1.
After the HACCP plan is developed,
the frequency for recordkeeping for
implementing or maintaining daily
records is estimated to be 510 records
per year. The total time to record
observations is estimated to take 4
minutes or 0.067 hours per record. Of
the 280 existing firms, we estimate that
approximately 135 firms have not
implemented HACCP plans. We assume
that these fresh-cut processors (135
existing firms plus 10 new firms) would
voluntarily implement an HACCP plan.
Therefore, the total annual records kept
by 145 firms is 73,950 (510 × 145), and
the total hours required are 4,955
(73,950 records × 0.067 hours per record
= 4,954.65, rounded to 4,955). This
annual burden is shown in row 5 of
Table 1.
Fresh-cut processors are presumed to
review their HACCP plans four times
per year (once per quarter). Estimating
that it takes each of the 145 firms 4
hours per review each quarter, the total
burden of this activity is 2,320 (145 × 4
× 4) hours per year. This annual burden
is shown in row 6 of Table 1.
Dated: November 14, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–27782 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69684-69686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27782]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-1432]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Guide To Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards of
Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice invites comments on the information collection
provisions in the guidance document entitled ``Guidance for Industry:
Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards of Fresh-Cut Fruits and
Vegetables.''
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by January 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written
[[Page 69685]]
comments on the collection of information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with
the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville,
MD 20850, PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, we are publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection of information, we invite
comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of our functions,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the
accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Guide To Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards of Fresh-Cut Fruits and
Vegetables (OMB Control Number 0910-0609)--Extension
Fresh-cut fruits and vegetables are fruits and vegetables that have
been processed by peeling, slicing, chopping, shredding, coring,
trimming, or mashing, with or without washing or other treatment, prior
to being packaged for consumption. The methods by which produce is
grown, harvested, and processed may contribute to its contamination
with pathogens and, consequently, the role of the produce in
transmitting foodborne illness. Factors such as the high degree of
handling and mixing of the product, the release of cellular fluids
during cutting or mashing, the high moisture content of the product,
the absence of a step lethal to pathogens, and the potential for
temperature abuse in the processing, storage, transport, and retail
display all increase the potential for pathogens to survive and grow in
fresh-cut produce.
Sections 301 and 402 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(21 U.S.C. 331 and 342) prohibits the distribution of adulterated food
in interstate commerce. In response to the increased consumption of
fresh-cut fruits and vegetables and the potential for foodborne illness
associated with these products, we recognize the need for guidance
specific to the processing of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. The
guidance document entitled, ``Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety
Hazards of Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables,'' which is available at
https://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances, provides our recommendations to
fresh-cut produce processors about how to avoid contamination of their
product with pathogens. The guidance is in addition to the good
manufacturing practice (GMP) regulations found in part 110 (21 CFR part
110). The guidance is intended to assist fresh-cut produce processors
in minimizing microbial food safety hazards common to the processing of
most fresh-cut fruits and vegetables sold to consumers and retail
establishments in a ready-to-eat form. Accordingly, we encourage fresh-
cut produce processors to adopt the general recommendations in the
guidance and to tailor practices to their individual operations.
The guidance provides information and recommended procedures
designed to help fresh-cut produce processors minimize microbial food
safety hazards. The recommended procedures contained in the guidance
are voluntary. Both FDA and fresh-cut produce processors will use and
benefit from the information collected.
Two general recommendations in the guidance are for operators to
develop and implement both a written Standard Operating Procedures
(SOP) plan and a Sanitary Standard Operation Procedures (SSOP) plan.
SOPs and SSOPs are important components to properly implement and
monitor GMP, which are required for processed food operations under
part 110. Other recommended programs that require documentation and
recordkeeping are recall and traceback programs. In the event of a food
safety concern, processors who adopt these recommended programs will be
prepared to recall products from the marketplace or be able to
traceback fresh produce to its source. Fresh-cut produce processors are
also asked to consider the application of Hazards Analysis and Critical
Control Point (HACCP) principles or comparable preventive control
programs to the processing of fruits and vegetables. An HACCP system
allows managers to assess the inherent risks and identify hazards
attributable to a product or a process, and then determine the
necessary steps to control the hazards. FDA, along with other Federal
and State food Agencies and industry and food establishments, have
found such preventive control programs, when properly designed and
maintained by the establishment's personnel, to be valuable in managing
the safety of food products.
We estimate the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of records Average burden
Activity No. of per Total annual per Total hours
recordkeepers recordkeeper records recordkeeping
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOP and SSOP: Maintenance....... 122 3,315 404,430 0.067 27,097
Traceback development........... 10 1 10 20 200
Traceback maintenance........... 290 1 290 40 11,600
Preventive control program 10 1 10 100 1,000
comparable to an HACCP system:
System development.............
Preventive control program 145 510 73,950 0.067 4,955
comparable to an HACCP system:
System implementation..........
[[Page 69686]]
Preventive control program 145 4 580 4 2,320
comparable to an HACCP system:
Implementation review..........
Annual burden hours......... .............. .............. .............. .............. 47,172
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
A. Industry Profile
Estimates of the paperwork burden to the fresh-cut industry are
based on information received from a fresh-cut processor who has
developed and maintained these programs and information from a fresh-
cut produce industry trade association. We estimate that there are 280
fresh-cut plants in operation and that approximately 10 new firms will
enter the fresh cut industry over the next 3 years.
B. SOPs and SSOPs
We consider the guidance's recommendation to develop SOPs and SSOPs
to be ``usual and customary'' for manufacturers and processors in the
fresh-cut industry (see 5 CFR 1320.3(b)(2)). Therefore, we do not
calculate this burden.
We recommend that facilities not only develop but also maintain
SOPs and SSOPs. Of the 280 fresh-cut processors, we estimate that over
half have SOP and SSOP maintenance programs in place. Therefore, for
purposes of estimating the annual recordkeeping burden for SOP and SSOP
maintenance programs, we assume that 40 percent of the existing
processors, or 112 firms, and the 10 new firms do not have SOP and SSOP
maintenance programs in place. We estimate the recordkeeping burden for
SOP and SSOP maintenance programs by assuming that these 122 firms will
choose to implement such a maintenance strategy as a result of the
recommendations in the guidance.
A typical fresh-cut processing plant operates about 255 days per
year. For an 8-hour shift, assuming the ingredients are received twice
during that time, under the recommendations in the guidance, there
would be about 13 records kept (2 for inspecting incoming ingredients;
2 for inspecting the facility and production areas once every 4 hours;
3 records for equipment (maintenance, sanitation, and visual
inspections for defects); 1 for calibrating equipment; 2 temperature
recording audits (1 time for each of the 2 processing runs); and 3
microbiological audits (ingredients, food contact surfaces, and
equipment)). Therefore, the annual frequency of recordkeeping for SOPs
and SSOPs is calculated to be 3,315 times (255 x 13) per year per firm;
122 firms will be performing these activities to generate a total
404,430 records (3,315 x 22) annually.
The total time to record observations for SOP and SSOP maintenance
is estimated to take 4 minutes or 0.067 hours per record, and the
number of records maintained is 404,430. Therefore, the total annual
burden in hours for 122 processors to maintain their SOP and SSOP
records is approximately 27,097 hours (404,430 x 0.067). The
maintenance burden for these 122 firms is estimated in row 1 of Table
1.
C. Recall and Traceback
The burden to develop a traceback program is a one-time activity
estimated to take approximately 20 hours. Accordingly, we only need to
estimate the burden of this one-time activity on the 10 new businesses
expected to enter the industry in the next 3 years. We estimate that
the 10 new firms will spend 20 hours each preparing a traceback
program, for a total of 200 hours (10 x 20). The burden estimate of
developing a traceback program is shown in row 2 of Table 1.
Firms may test their traceback programs yearly to see if
adjustments are needed to maintain traceback capabilities. Evaluating
and updating traceback programs is estimated to take 40 hours to
complete. The annual burden of maintaining a traceback program is
estimated for the 280 existing firms in the industry plus the 10 firms
new to the industry. Assuming that each firm completes this exercise
once a year, the total maintenance burden of traceback programs is
11,600 hours yearly (290 x 40). This burden estimate is shown in row 3
of Table 1.
The guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in our regulations. The recommendations regarding
establishing and maintaining a recall plan, as provided in 21 CFR 7.59,
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0249. Therefore, we
are not calculating a paperwork burden for recall plans.
D. Preventative Control Program
Developing an HACCP plan is a one-time activity during the first
year that is estimated to take 100 hours based on a trained HACCP team
working on the plan full time. Accordingly, we only need to estimate
the burden on the 10 new businesses expected to enter the industry in
the next 3 years. We estimate that the 10 new firms will spend 100
hours each to develop their individual HACCP plans, for a total of
1,000 hours (10 x 100). This burden estimate is shown in row 4 of Table
1.
After the HACCP plan is developed, the frequency for recordkeeping
for implementing or maintaining daily records is estimated to be 510
records per year. The total time to record observations is estimated to
take 4 minutes or 0.067 hours per record. Of the 280 existing firms, we
estimate that approximately 135 firms have not implemented HACCP plans.
We assume that these fresh-cut processors (135 existing firms plus 10
new firms) would voluntarily implement an HACCP plan. Therefore, the
total annual records kept by 145 firms is 73,950 (510 x 145), and the
total hours required are 4,955 (73,950 records x 0.067 hours per record
= 4,954.65, rounded to 4,955). This annual burden is shown in row 5 of
Table 1.
Fresh-cut processors are presumed to review their HACCP plans four
times per year (once per quarter). Estimating that it takes each of the
145 firms 4 hours per review each quarter, the total burden of this
activity is 2,320 (145 x 4 x 4) hours per year. This annual burden is
shown in row 6 of Table 1.
Dated: November 14, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-27782 Filed 11-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P