Home Improvements and Structural Alterations (HISA) Benefits Program, 69614-69625 [2013-27672]
Download as PDF
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
69614
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
consider their results in deciding
whether additional rule changes are
needed in the future to address student
fraud.
The Department continues to review
the valuable testimony offered at the
public hearings and the comments
submitted through the public comment
process regarding other proposed
rulemaking topics, and may form
additional committees to consider other
topics.
Constituencies: We have identified
the following constituencies as having
interests that are significantly affected
by the topics proposed for negotiations.
The Department plans to seat as
negotiators individuals from
organizations or groups representing
these constituencies:
• Students.
• Legal assistance organizations that
represent students.
• Consumer advocacy organizations.
• State higher education executive
officers.
• State attorneys general and other
appropriate State officials.
• Business and industry.
• Institutions of higher education
eligible to receive Federal assistance
under title III, Parts A, B, and F, and
title V of the HEA, which include
Historically Black Colleges and
Universities, Hispanic-Serving
Institutions, American Indian Tribally
Controlled Colleges and Universities,
Alaska Native and Native HawaiianServing Institutions, Predominantly
Black Institutions, and other institutions
with a substantial enrollment of needy
students as defined in title III of the
HEA.
• Two-year public institutions of
higher education.
• Four-year public institutions of
higher education.
• Private, non-profit institutions of
higher education.
• Private, for-profit institutions of
higher education.
• Regional accrediting agencies.
• National accrediting agencies.
• Specialized accrediting agencies.
• Financial aid administrators at
postsecondary institutions.
• Business officers and bursars at
postsecondary institutions.
• Admissions officers at
postsecondary institutions.
• Institutional third-party servicers
who perform functions related to the
title IV Federal Student Aid programs
(including collection agencies).
• State approval agencies.
• Lenders, community banks, and
credit unions.
The goal of the committee is to
develop proposed regulations that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
reflect a final consensus of the
committee. Consensus means that there
is no dissent by any member of the
negotiating committee, including the
committee member representing the
Department. An individual selected as a
negotiator will be expected to represent
the interests of his or her organization
or group and participate in the
negotiations in a manner consistent
with the goal of developing proposed
regulations on which the committee will
reach consensus. If consensus is
reached, all members of the organization
or group represented by a negotiator are
bound by the consensus and are
prohibited from commenting negatively
on the resulting proposed regulations.
The Department will not consider any
such negative comments on the
proposed regulations that are submitted
by members of such an organization or
group.
Nominations: Nominations should
include:
• The committee for which the
nominee is nominated (Program
Integrity and Improvement).
• The name of the nominee, the
organization or group the nominee
represents, and a description of the
interests that the nominee represents.
• Evidence of the nominee’s expertise
or experience in the subjects to be
negotiated.
• Evidence of support from
individuals or groups within the
constituency that the nominee will
represent.
• The nominee’s commitment that he
or she will actively participate in good
faith in the development of the
proposed regulations.
• The nominee’s contact information,
including address, phone number, fax
number, and email address.
For a better understanding of the
negotiated rulemaking process,
nominees should review The Negotiated
Rulemaking Process for Title IV
Regulations, Frequently Asked
Questions at https://www.ed.gov/policy/
highered/reg/hearulemaking/hea08/negreg-faq.html prior to committing to
serve as a negotiator.
Nominees will be notified whether or
not they have been selected as
negotiators as soon as the Department’s
review process is completed.
Schedule for Negotiations: The
Program Integrity and Improvement
Committee will meet for three sessions
on the following dates:
Session 1: February 19–21, 2014
Session 2: March 26–28, 2014
Session 3: April 23–25, 2014
Sessions will run from 9 a.m. to 5
p.m.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The committee meetings will be held
at the U.S. Department of Education at:
1990 K Street NW., Eighth Floor
Conference Center, Washington, DC
20006.
The meetings are open to the public.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of the Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site. You may also
access documents of the Department
published in the Federal Register by
using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically,
through the advanced search feature at
this site, you can limit your search to
documents published by the
Department.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1098a.
Dated: November 15, 2013.
Lynn B. Mahaffie,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy,
Planning, and Innovation, delegated the
authority to perform the functions and duties
of the Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary
Education.
[FR Doc. 2013–27850 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AO17
Home Improvements and Structural
Alterations (HISA) Benefits Program
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to establish
regulations for the Home Improvements
and Structural Alterations (HISA)
benefits program. Through the HISA
benefits program, VA has provided
monetary benefits to disabled veterans
for necessary home improvements and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
alterations. An increase in the HISA
benefits limit was authorized by the
Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus
Health Services Act of 2010. The
proposed rule would codify regulations
to govern the HISA benefits program
and incorporate the increase in HISA
benefits authorized by the 2010 Act.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be received by VA on or before
January 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to the Director, Regulation
Policy and Management (02REG),
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue NW., Room 1068,
Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to
(202) 273–9026.
Comments should indicate that they
are submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AO17, Home Improvements and
Structural Alterations (HISA) Benefits
Program.’’ Copies of comments received
will be available for public inspection in
the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1068, between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday (except
holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902
(this is not a toll-free number) for an
appointment. In addition, during the
comment period, comments may be
viewed online through the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shayla Mitchell, Program Analyst,
Rehabilitation and Prosthetic Services
(10P4R), Veterans Health
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–0366
(this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
1717(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code
(U.S.C.), authorizes the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs (Secretary) to furnish
home health services as part of medical
services provided to veterans. As a part
of home health services, 38 U.S.C.
1717(a)(2) authorizes VA to furnish
improvements and structural alterations
to the homes of disabled veterans ‘‘only
as necessary to assure the continuation
of treatment for the veteran’s disability
or to provide access to the home or to
essential lavatory and sanitary
facilities.’’ Section 1717(d) extends
these same benefits to certain
servicemembers. The HISA benefits
program is distinct from VA’s authority
under 38 U.S.C. 2101 through 2107 to
provide specially adapted housing for
disabled veterans, and HISA benefits
may be received in addition to specially
adapted housing benefits.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
The HISA benefit is a fixed-amount
monetary benefit subject to lifetime
limits based on the nature of the
beneficiary’s disability; however, the
beneficiary need not use the entire HISA
benefit amount on a single improvement
or structural alteration. In May 2010,
section 516 of the Caregivers and
Veterans Omnibus Health Services Act
of 2010 (the 2010 Act), Public Law 111–
163, amended 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2) to
increase the maximum amount of the
lifetime benefit.
This proposed rule would establish
regulations to govern the HISA benefits
program that articulate a clear national
policy and encompass the increase in
the HISA benefit limits authorized by
the 2010 Act. We note that this
rulemaking proposes new practices and
policies related to the HISA benefits
program and, therefore, this proposed
rule would make changes in the
administration of HISA benefits. These
changes are intended to streamline the
application process; simplify, reduce, or
eliminate administrative burdens on
both VA and HISA beneficiaries; and
generally improve the administration of
the program, all without increasing the
costs of the program.
For example, the current program
requests that applicants for HISA
benefits provide multiple bids for
construction projects. In practice, it is
not uncommon for bids to come in at or
above the maximum amount of the
HISA benefit because, even under the
increased benefit amount authorized by
the 2010 Act, HISA benefits cannot
exceed $6,800. After receiving the bids
and other information submitted in an
application, VA currently is required to
review and assess all the information
and take further administrative actions
before approving the application and
awarding the benefit. A similar process
is followed after the improvement or
structural alteration is completed and
the beneficiary requests final payment.
The regulatory framework proposed in
this rulemaking will greatly simplify the
process of filing and approving HISA
claims. We expect that veterans and
servicemembers eligible for HISA
benefits and VA staff will find the new
process much easier to work with, so
that claims will be processed more
quickly. We do not believe that the
simplified process will have a negative
impact on the integrity of the program
because we have incorporated
inspection and review processes to
ensure that HISA benefits are awarded
and spent in accordance with statutory
intent.
Because we intend to establish a new
regulatory framework, with new
procedures and policies that in many
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
69615
ways represent a significant departure
from the manner in which HISA is
currently administered, we do not
further address current practice in this
rulemaking.
17.3100 Purpose and Scope
Proposed § 17.3100 would set forth
the purpose of the HISA program and
the scope of §§ 17.3100 through
17.3130. Consistent with 38 U.S.C.
1717(a)(2), proposed § 17.3100(a) would
state that the purpose of the HISA
benefits program is to provide monetary
benefits for improvements and
structural alterations to the homes of
eligible veterans or servicemembers that
are necessary for the continuation of the
provision of home health treatment of
the beneficiary’s disability or that
provide access to the beneficiary’s home
or to essential lavatory and sanitary
facilities in the home.
Although 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2)
authorizes VA to ‘‘furnish[ ]’’
improvements and structural
alterations, we believe that Congress
intended that VA pay for the cost of
improvements or structural alterations,
rather than that VA actually make the
improvements or structural alterations.
Our interpretation of the word ‘‘furnish’’
would permit VA to provide
reimbursement to veterans who obtain
such improvements or structural
alterations, rather than actually
identifying contractors and negotiating
for the completion of particular projects.
Our interpretation of the statute would
ensure the most efficient and
administratively convenient distribution
of the limited funds authorized by
section 1717(a)(2), and would represent
a user-friendly way to administer the
program to veterans and
servicemembers.
We also note that improvements or
structural alterations made with HISA
benefits are distinct from other benefits
available under the Veterans Health
Administration’s (VHA) Prosthetic and
Sensory Aids Service under 38 U.S.C.
8123. The Prosthetic and Sensory Aids
Service provides prosthetic equipment
and devices that may require
modifications to a beneficiary’s home to
ensure their proper function within the
home, but these modifications would be
paid for with Prosthetic and Sensory
Aid Service funds, rather than HISA
benefits.
HISA benefits are also distinct from
the Specially Adapted Housing for
Disabled Veterans benefit, authorized
under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 21, which is
administered by the Veterans Benefits
Administration, provides a significantly
greater benefit amount, and is designed
to assist certain eligible veterans who
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
69616
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
are entitled to compensation for
permanent and total service-connected
disability ‘‘in acquiring a suitable
housing unit’’ or adaptations to housing
necessary to accommodate the veteran’s
disabilities. 38 U.S.C. 2101(a). Under
the Specially Adapted Housing
program, VA also provides ‘‘model
plans and specifications of suitable
housing units’’ and develops, maintains,
and provides to veterans a ‘‘handbook
containing appropriate designs for
specially adapted housing.’’ 38 U.S.C.
2103. A veteran may obtain HISA
benefits in addition to these other
benefits.
Proposed paragraph § 17.3100(b)
would clarify that these proposed
regulations apply only to the HISA
benefits program, unless at some future
date another section in the CFR
specifically provides otherwise.
17.3101 Definitions
Proposed § 17.3101 contains
definitions applicable to the HISA
benefits program.
‘‘Access to the home’’ would mean
the ability of the beneficiary to enter
and exit the home and to maneuver
within the home to at least one bedroom
and essential lavatory and sanitary
facilities. Although 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2)
authorizes HISA benefits for ‘‘access to
the home,’’ we broadly interpret this
phrase to include movement of the
beneficiary within the spaces necessary
for daily living. Additionally, we
interpret it as allowing beneficiaries
with one means of entering or exiting
the home to use their benefits to
construct a second one.
In addition to access to the home
itself, we would define ‘‘[a]ccess to
essential lavatory and sanitary
facilities’’ as having normal use of these
facilities and their structural
components. Beyond merely having the
ability to move about in such spaces, a
beneficiary may require that the
structures within these spaces be altered
to allow or enhance their normal use by
the beneficiary. For example, within a
kitchen or bathroom, counter heights
may need to be lowered or existing
plumbing fixtures may need to be
replaced with accessible models.
We propose to define ‘‘[b]eneficiary’’
as ‘‘a veteran or servicemember who is
awarded or who is eligible to receive
HISA benefits.’’ Use of this term will
make it easier to refer to these
individuals in the regulations.
‘‘Essential lavatory and sanitary
facilities’’ would be defined as one
bathroom equipped with a toilet and a
shower or bath, one kitchen, and one
laundry facility. Although many homes
today are equipped with multiple
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
bathrooms and sometimes more than
one kitchen, we interpret the statutory
reference to ‘‘essential lavatory and
sanitary facilities’’ to be a limiting
phrase. 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2). We believe
that access to a single bathroom and a
single kitchen facility is a reasonable
interpretation of ‘‘essential’’ lavatory
and sanitary facilities. A laundry facility
would be included in the definition
because clean clothing can reasonably
be considered as important to sanitary
living.
‘‘HISA benefits’’ would be defined as
a monetary benefit paid under the
provisions of this program. As indicated
above, under these regulations the HISA
benefits program would not provide the
actual construction of improvements or
structural alterations, but rather would
provide monetary benefits to assist a
beneficiary in paying for such
construction.
‘‘Home’’ would be defined as the
primary place where the beneficiary
resides. Our definition is based on the
common understanding of the word
‘‘home’’ and our belief that Congress
intended that HISA benefits be used to
adapt the place where the beneficiary
resides the majority of the time so that
the beneficiary will derive the greatest
benefit of the program. This definition
would include medical foster homes.
We note that 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(3)
precludes VA from furnishing
improvements or structural alterations
in ‘‘a setting other than the veteran’s
home.’’ We interpret this as permitting
alterations to an eligible
servicemember’s home, which we
would define as the place where the
servicemember intends to reside after
discharge from service.
We would define an ‘‘[i]mprovement
or structural alteration’’ as a
modification to a home or to an existing
feature or fixture of a home, including
repairs to, or replacement of, previously
improved or altered features or fixtures.
HISA benefits need not have been used
to create or previously modify a feature
or fixture that is in need of repair, but
may be used to repair or replace
previously improved or altered features
or fixtures only if the beneficiary meets
the requirements set forth in this rule.
For instance, if a beneficiary moves into
a home that already has an access ramp
to the entrance that is in need of repair,
HISA benefits may be used to repair or
replace that ramp, provided that the
beneficiary has a documented medical
justification for the ramp.
For purposes of determining a
servicemember’s eligibility for HISA
benefits, as discussed in more detail
below, we would give ‘‘undergoing
medical discharge’’ the same meaning as
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the term is defined in VA’s interim final
rule governing VA’s program providing
caregiver benefits to veterans and
servicemembers. See 76 FR 26148,
26173, May 5, 2011 (38 CFR 71.15).
17.3102 Eligibility
Proposed § 17.3102 would concern
eligibility for HISA benefits.
Consistent with 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2),
proposed § 17.3102(a) would state that
veterans who are eligible for medical
services under 38 U.S.C. 1710(a) are
eligible for HISA benefits.
In addition to HISA benefits for
eligible veterans, 38 U.S.C. 1717(d)(1)
authorizes VA to furnish HISA benefits
to a member of the Armed Forces ‘‘who,
as determined by the Secretary [of VA],
has a disability permanent in nature
incurred or aggravated in the line of
duty in the active [military service] . . .
if . . . such member is likely to be
discharged or released from the Armed
Forces for such disability.’’ In most
cases, title 38, U.S.C., does not authorize
VA to provide medical benefits to
servicemembers. However, we recently
were authorized under 38 U.S.C.
1720G(a)(2)(A) to provide caregiver
support to a ‘‘member of the Armed
Forces undergoing medical discharge
from the Armed Forces’’ who has a
serious injury incurred or aggravated
during his or her service. Although the
statutory language differs, the intent of
Congress in both the HISA and 38
U.S.C. 1720G is to authorize VA to
provide benefits to servicemembers who
will soon be, but who are not yet,
veterans. Therefore, in § 17.3102(b), we
propose to provide HISA benefits only
to a servicemember ‘‘who is undergoing
medical discharge from the Armed
Forces for a permanent disability that
was incurred or aggravated in the line
of duty in the active military, naval, or
air service.’’ This language is similar to
the eligibility language in 38 CFR
71.20(a)(2) of the interim final rule
governing VA’s program providing
caregiver benefits to veterans and
servicemembers. See 76 FR 26148,
26173, May 5, 2011. We see no reason
that a servicemember eligible for a
caregiver should be denied access to his
or her lifetime HISA benefit prior to
discharge from service.
We also note that VA is limited in its
ability to determine precisely whether a
servicemember is ‘‘likely to be
discharged or released from the Armed
Forces for’’ a disability because this
determination is made by the
Department of Defense (DoD), not VA.
Identifying servicemembers who are
undergoing medical discharge will
provide an objective, determinable point
to determine eligibility for HISA
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
benefits. We note that VA can easily
identify these individuals through the
new joint VA-DoD Integrated Disability
Evaluation System (IDES), which
integrates disability determination
processing under each Department’s
respective programs. The IDES program
identifies all servicemembers who are in
need of medical discharge, and
facilitates the process. Using IDES to
identify servicemembers eligible for
HISA benefits will not only facilitate the
administration of the HISA program for
VA by providing a clear eligibility
criterion, it will help us identify
individuals who are in need of HISA
benefits, so that we can ensure that they
are aware of them.
17.3105 HISA Benefit Lifetime Limits
In proposed § 17.3105(a), we would
establish that the HISA benefit limits, as
set forth in 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2), are
limits established for the beneficiary’s
lifetime. We would explain that a
beneficiary is authorized to use HISA
benefits for more than one improvement
or structural alteration as long as the
beneficiary has not exhausted his or her
lifetime benefit limit. We also would
explain that, if the beneficiary does not
have to use the entire approved amount
for construction of a particular
improvement or structural alteration,
the unused amount will be added back
into the beneficiary’s remaining lifetime
balance, and will be available for future
use. This is also reflected in the HISA
benefit payment procedures set forth in
proposed § 17.3130(c)(4).
The HISA benefit lifetime limits,
established in 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2), are
based on the nature and severity of the
beneficiary’s disability and the date on
which the beneficiary first applies for
HISA benefits. Specifically, the law
provides that a greater benefit amount
may be awarded if a beneficiary has a
service-connected disability rated at 50
percent or greater, or if the beneficiary
seeks HISA benefits to address a serviceconnected disability or a compensable
disability treated ‘‘as if’’ it were service
connected under 38 U.S.C. 1151, e.g., a
disability caused by VA treatment or
vocational rehabilitation (see 38 U.S.C.
1710(a)(2)(C)). A lesser benefit amount
may be awarded when HISA benefits are
intended for use in addressing
nonservice-connected conditions for
certain veterans or when the beneficiary
has a service-connected disability rated
less than 50 percent.
In addition to the nature or severity of
the disability, the statute clearly
predicates eligibility for the increased
HISA benefit amount or prior HISA
benefit amount on whether the
beneficiary ‘‘first applies for benefits
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
. . . before May 5, 2010,’’ 38 U.S.C.
1717(a)(2)(A)(i), (B)(i), or ‘‘on or after
May 5, 2010,’’ 38 U.S.C.
1717(a)(2)(A)(ii), (B)(ii). We interpret
‘‘first applies’’ to mean submitting an
application to VA, according to the VA
process in place at the time, for HISA
benefits. Thus, those beneficiaries who
first applied for HISA benefits before the
effective date of the change would be
subject to the limits that were in effect
when they first applied. In proposed
paragraphs (b), (c) and (d), we would
establish eligibility for the increased
HISA benefit amount or prior HISA
benefit amount using substantively
identical language based on the date of
the first application for HISA benefits.
Consistent with 38 U.S.C.
1717(a)(2)(A), proposed § 17.3105(b)
would identify the greater lifetime HISA
benefit amount limits to address a need
due to a service-connected disability
under 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(1)(A), to
address a need due to a compensable
disability treated ‘‘as if’’ it were service
connected under section 1710(a)(2)(C),
or to address any need for a veteran
with a service-connected disability rated
50 percent or more under section
1710(a)(1)(B).
Consistent with 38 U.S.C.
1717(a)(2)(B), proposed § 17.3105(c)
would identify the lesser lifetime HISA
benefit limits to address a need of a
beneficiary who is eligible for HISA
benefits under proposed § 17.3102(a),
but does not qualify for the greater
lifetime HISA benefit amount under
proposed § 17.3105(b).
In proposed § 17.3105(d), we would
set forth the lifetime HISA benefits for
servicemembers eligible under proposed
§ 17.3102(b). The provisions of 38
U.S.C. 1717(d)(1) require that VA
provide HISA benefits to eligible
servicemembers for a ‘‘disability
permanent in nature incurred or
aggravated in the line of duty in the
active military, naval, or air service’’ for
which the servicemember is ‘‘likely to
be discharged or released from the
Armed Forces for such disability.’’
Further provisions in the law imply that
the limits on HISA benefits based on the
nature and severity of a disability, as
described above, should also be applied,
but the law is not entirely clear on what
level of lifetime benefit should be made
available to servicemembers. We believe
that any ‘‘disability permanent in nature
incurred or aggravated in the line of
duty’’ may be reasonably expected to
result in a disability award based on
service connection, and therefore the
beneficiary would be eligible for VA
medical services under 38 U.S.C.
1710(a)(1)(A) for such disability once
the beneficiary becomes a veteran. For
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
69617
this reason, we would make the greater
lifetime HISA benefit amount available
for all servicemembers who qualify
under proposed § 17.3102(b) and 38
U.S.C. 1717(d)(1). The benefits must be
used for the specific permanent
disability or disabilities for which the
beneficiary is undergoing medical
discharge from the Armed Forces. We
recognize that it is possible to interpret
the law differently. However, Congress
clearly intended for VA to make these
benefits available to servicemembers at
the earliest opportunity. We believe it
will better serve the interests of our
seriously wounded servicemembers and
is a better use of VA’s limited HISA
resources to avoid making resourceintensive hypothetical determinations
about these servicemembers’ future
ratings of service-connected disabilities.
We expect that very few, if any, such
determinations would result in smaller
awards of benefits. Moreover, because
Congress was silent as to the applicable
benefit amount for servicemembers, we
believe that our interpretation is a
reasonable exercise of the discretion
granted to VA by Congress to implement
the statute.
In proposed § 17.3105(e)(1), we
address the impact of a new award or an
increased rating for a service-connected
disability on the HISA benefit lifetime
limit. A veteran may receive a new
award of compensation for a serviceconnected disability or for a disability
treated ‘‘as if’’ it were service connected,
or the veteran may receive an increased
service-connected disability rating after
an initial application for HISA benefits.
Thus, the issue presented involves the
appropriate benefit amount for a veteran
who meets the service-connecteddisability requirements for the greater
HISA benefit after the veteran has
already first applied for the lesser HISA
benefit.
In section 516(b) of the 2010 Act that
amended 38 U.S.C. 1717 to authorize
increased lifetime limits, Congress
required VA to construe the amendment
as follows: ‘‘A veteran who exhausts
such veteran’s eligibility for benefits
under [38 U.S.C.] 1717(a)(2) . . . before
the date of the enactment of th[e 2010]
Act, is not entitled to additional benefits
under such section by reason of the
amendments made [to increase the
lifetime amount limitations].’’ We
interpret this to be a statement of
Congress’ intent to raise the HISA
benefits amount available to
beneficiaries who initially seek to make
improvements or structural alterations
after May 5, 2010, and not to provide
additional HISA benefits to those who
received this assistance previously. This
is a reasonable interpretation of the law
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
69618
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
because it reflects the reality that those
beneficiaries seeking to make
improvements or structural alterations
today are faced with costs that are
significantly higher than they were in
1992, when the lifetime amount
limitations were last increased.
However, we do not believe that
Congress, in section 516 of the 2010 Act,
intended to prohibit beneficiaries from
obtaining HISA benefits for which they
had not been previously eligible. We
believe that when a beneficiary, who
previously was eligible for and obtained
lesser HISA benefits only under the
statutory equivalent of proposed
§ 17.3105(c), is later awarded
compensation for a service-connected
disability, compensation for a disability
‘‘as if’’ it were service connected under
38 U.S.C. 1151, or an increased rating of
50 percent or more for a serviceconnected disability that results in
eligibility for the greater HISA benefit
under proposed § 17.3105(b), such
beneficiary should be allowed to receive
the new greater benefit based on that
new or increased award. We do not
believe this interpretation violates the
restriction of section 516 of the 2010 Act
because eligibility for the greater benefit
based on the new or increased award
did not exist when the beneficiary first
applied. In other words, such a
beneficiary would not have ‘‘first
applie[d]’’ for the greater HISA benefit
available at that time; rather, that
beneficiary would have ‘‘first applie[d]’’
for the lesser HISA benefit available at
that time. In short, individuals who
prior to May 5, 2010, sought the greater
HISA benefit for a service-connected
disability, for a disability treated ‘‘as if’’
it were service connected, or based on
having a disability rating of 50 percent
or more for a service-connected
disability who then seek the new greater
HISA benefit after such date would not
be eligible for the increased greater
HISA benefit amount. However, our
proposed interpretation of the law
would authorize the increased greater
HISA lifetime benefit amount for
individuals who prior to May 5, 2010,
sought the lesser HISA benefit for a
nonservice-connected disability and
who then seek the greater HISA benefit
on or after that date for a serviceconnected disability, for a disability
treated ‘‘as if’’ it were service connected,
or based on having a disability rating of
50 percent or more for a serviceconnected disability.
VA has consistently interpreted
section 1717 to allow veterans to apply
for the greater HISA benefit if they were
not previously eligible. Additionally, we
have searched the legislative history and
have not found an indication that our
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
interpretation is contrary to Congress’
intent. H.R. Conf. Rep. 102–871, which
discusses the increase of HISA benefit
amounts to $4,100 and $1,200, explains
that ‘‘a veteran who, prior to January 1,
1990, received the maximum amount of
reimbursement authorized under the
current limits of section 1717 is not
entitled to additional monetary benefits
by reason of amendments.’’ Based on
this explanation it is safe to assume that
a veteran who did not receive the
maximum amount—that is, veterans
who had previously received benefits
only under the lower statutory
threshold—may be entitled to the
greater benefit by reason of
amendments. Therefore, our
interpretation allowing beneficiaries
who previously applied for the lesser
benefit to apply for the greater benefit
under proposed § 17.3105 is reasonable,
particularly in the absence of any
indication otherwise when Congress has
expressly stated other limitations. This
interpretation is also consistent with
VA’s efforts to provide the maximum
assistance to beneficiaries, who would
otherwise be unable to receive
additional HISA funds that Congress has
made available to address veterans’
increased disability statuses and
growing costs of construction.
We would not authorize the full
increased HISA lifetime benefit amount
for beneficiaries who applied for HISA
benefits under section 1717(a)(2)(B), and
then later apply and are eligible for the
greater HISA benefits under section
1717(a)(2)(A); rather, proposed
§ 17.3105(e) would authorize an award
up to the amount of HISA benefits that
the beneficiary would be eligible for
under proposed § 17.3105(c) minus the
amount of HISA benefits previously
used by the beneficiary. This will
ensure that these beneficiaries do not
receive more than the authorized
lifetime HISA benefit amount.
Additionally, in no instance will any
beneficiary be approved for more than
the highest amount specified in the
statute and regulation.
The following example provides an
illustration of the effect of proposed
§ 17.3105(e). A beneficiary has a serviceconnected disability that is originally
determined to be less than 50 percent
and for which the beneficiary does not
require HISA benefits (e.g., visual
impairment) and has a nonserviceconnected disability for which HISA
benefits would provide relief (e.g.,
beneficiary walks with a cane and
cannot climb stairs). Such beneficiary
may exhaust the HISA benefit available
under § 17.3105(c) for the nonserviceconnected disability to provide a ramp
to assist in entering and exiting the
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
beneficiary’s home. Later, if that
beneficiary’s disability rating for his
visual impairment is increased to 50
percent, the beneficiary would become
eligible for an award up to the greater
HISA benefit amount, which could be
used to address either a serviceconnected or nonservice-connected
disability. The new amount of HISA
benefits available, however, would be
limited to the difference between the
greater HISA benefit amount and the
amount of HISA benefits previously
awarded.
In § 17.3105(e)(2), we would explain
that a beneficiary who received HISA
benefits as a servicemember may not
receive additional HISA benefits simply
because of a change in status from
‘‘servicemember’’ to ‘‘veteran.’’ We
believe that Congress intended for VA to
provide HISA benefits at the earliest
point in time to servicemembers dealing
with disabilities resulting from their
service, not to provide them with a
benefit that could later be duplicated as
part of the array of benefits available to
them based on their status as a veteran.
17.3120 Application for HISA Benefits
In proposed § 17.3120, we would state
that, to apply for HISA benefits, the
beneficiary must submit a complete
application to VA, and we would
identify all of the requirements for a
complete HISA benefits application.
In proposed § 17.3120(a)(1), we would
require submission of a prescription
written or approved by a VA physician
that identifies the specific improvement
or structural alteration recommended
and includes the diagnosis and medical
justification for the improvement or
structural alteration. VA relies on
medical determinations to identify
whether a beneficiary has a disability,
and what treatments are appropriate for
that disability. For approval of HISA
benefits, we would require that the
prescription be written or approved by
a VA physician because VA physicians
are highly qualified to determine what
improvements or structural alterations
would best serve those with disabilities
common to veterans and
servicemembers. Moreover, all veterans
seeking HISA benefits must be eligible
for care under section 1710(a) and
therefore they are eligible for a
determination by a VA physician.
Servicemembers will be examined by a
VA physician as part of the IDES
process and may obtain the required
prescription or approval of a
prescription at that time. The
requirement for a prescription is an
appropriate, cost effective way to
determine the necessity of the
improvement or alteration as required
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
by 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2). VA typically
delivers this prescription directly to the
HISA program office on the
beneficiary’s behalf.
Proposed § 17.3120(a)(2) would
require that a completed VA Form 10–
0103, Veterans Application for
Assistance in Acquiring Home
Improvement and Structural
Alterations, be included with the HISA
benefits application. VA Form 10–0103
is the approved form for requesting
HISA benefits and, when completed,
provides VA with sufficient information
to accurately identify the beneficiary
and determine the beneficiary’s
eligibility for HISA benefits. That form
is currently being modified to reflect the
new requirements of this proposed rule,
and we further address this information
collection later in this rulemaking.
Proposed § 17.3120(a)(2) would
indicate that a HISA application
requires a completed and signed VA
Form 10–0103, Veterans Application for
Assistance in Acquiring Home
Improvement and Structural
Alterations. Additionally, this form is
where the beneficiary may request
payment in advance of construction of
the improvement or structural
alteration. This advance payment would
provide the beneficiary with funds for
up-front costs associated with the
improvement or structural alteration.
Specific details on advance payment are
outlined in proposed § 17.3130.
In proposed § 17.3120(a)(3), we would
require all applicants to submit a
homeowner’s statement indicating that
the homeowner agrees to allow
construction of the improvement or
structural alteration on the
homeowner’s property. We would
require that the statement be notarized
if the beneficiary is not the owner of the
property.
In general terms, the homeowner’s
statement provides verification that the
improvement or structural alteration
will be completed in a dwelling that the
beneficiary is legally authorized to use
as his or her home, as required by 38
U.S.C. 1717(a)(3). In cases where the
beneficiary does not own the property,
we believe that the notarized statement
from the property owner may help
protect the beneficiary against any
future claims of unauthorized structural
changes to the home. It will also help
ensure that structural improvements or
alterations are not provided for an
unauthorized use under 38 U.S.C. 1717.
In proposed § 17.3120(a)(4), we would
require veterans and servicemembers
applying for HISA benefits to provide a
written and itemized estimate of costs
for the improvement or structural
alteration. The itemized estimate will be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
evaluated to ensure that the items listed
on it match with the beneficiary’s
prescription. This will allow VA to
protect the integrity of the program and
HISA benefit funds from potential
abuse. VA would also use the itemized
estimate of costs to determine the
appropriate amount of an advance
payment to the beneficiary made upon
request under proposed § 17.3130,
which is explained in greater detail
below.
In proposed § 17.3120(a)(5), we would
require that the beneficiary provide a
color photograph of the unimproved site
for the improvement or structural
alteration. Together with the pre-award
inspection conducted under proposed
§ 17.3120(b), this photograph will help
ensure that the proposed improvement
or structural alteration is appropriate to
the site and will assist VA in preventing
fraud. We would compare the
photograph submitted with the
application to the one included with the
final payment request, as required in
§ 17.3130(b), to verify that the
improvement or structural alteration
was completed as indicated in the
application.
Proposed § 17.3120(b) would require
the beneficiary to consent to VA’s
inspection of the site of the proposed
improvement or structural alteration.
An in-home evaluation before
construction begins would allow VA to
make an administrative determination
that the proposed improvement or
structural alteration is reasonably
designed to meet the needs created by
the beneficiary’s disability. We also
intend to use the pre-approval
inspection to verify that the proposed
improvement or structural alteration has
not been previously constructed and
does not duplicate resources that are
already in the beneficiary’s home.
Because HISA benefits are provided to
allow beneficiaries to make necessary
improvements or structural alterations,
we believe it would be inappropriate to
provide the HISA benefits if such
improvements or structural alterations
already exist. The statute authorizes the
Secretary to ‘‘furnish’’ improvements
and alterations, which we interpret to
include the authority to cause them to
be constructed via authorization of
HISA payments, but to the extent the
modifications already exist before a
claim is made for the benefit, the
improvements and alterations have
already been furnished, and VA lacks
authority to reimburse a beneficiary for
them. Finally, the pre-approval
inspection would allow VA to
determine that the beneficiary’s home
can reasonably accommodate the
improvement or structural alteration.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
69619
VA may determine that the submitted
documentation is sufficient to make all
such determinations and that the inhome inspection would not be required.
VA may also conduct an inspection
after the construction is finished as part
of the final payment process under
§ 17.3130.
VA’s inspections should not be
confused with or interpreted as code
enforcement or structural integrity
inspections. As indicated above, the
HISA benefit is not a construction
benefit and VA does not have expertise
in such matters. Issues of structural
integrity and code compliance are
integral to the agreement that the
veteran, like any other homeowner,
enters into with a contractor. HISA
benefits may be used to pay for the
expenses of inspections designed to
ensure compliance with those matters,
but VA’s inspection is for
administrative, not safety or
enforcement, purposes.
Proposed § 17.3120(c) would state
that VA will review only complete HISA
benefits applications for approval and
will notify the beneficiary if any
required documentation is missing from
the application. If the beneficiary does
not provide the missing documentation
to VA within 30 days, VA will notify the
beneficiary that the application has been
closed. VA will inform the applicant
that the closed application may be reopened by providing the previously
missing information, thus minimizing
any adverse impact on the applicant.
However, because several key elements
of the application, such as costs
associated with the improvement or
structural alteration, may change over
time, we would require the applicant to
provide updated information after any
lengthy period of time. We believe that
this process will encourage applicants
to keep moving forward with their
applications and increase the efficiency
of program operations by eliminating
repeated follow-up correspondence
requesting information.
17.3125 Approving HISA Benefits
Applications
Proposed § 17.3125(a) would establish
the criteria that VA will use to approve
a HISA benefits application.
Proposed § 17.3125(a)(1) would state
that the beneficiary’s application must
meet the requirements of the regulations
applicable to the HISA benefits
program.
Proposed § 17.3125(a)(2) would
require VA to determine that the
proposed improvement or structural
alteration is reasonably designed to
address the needs of the beneficiary and
is appropriate for the beneficiary’s
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
69620
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
home. This determination may be based
on documentation provided by the
beneficiary or through an in-home
inspection, as authorized by
§ 17.3120(b).
Proposed § 17.3125(b) would describe
the written notification that VA will
provide to the beneficiary when a HISA
benefits application is approved. The
notification will include the total
amount of the award of HISA benefits.
VA will only authorize charges that VA
considers to be reasonably designed to
address the needs of the beneficiary and
in keeping with the purpose of the HISA
benefit. The notification will also
indicate whether an advance payment is
approved and will reiterate the
beneficiary’s obligation to use the
advance payment only for the
improvement or structural alteration
defined in the application. Recipients
will be reminded of their obligation to
submit a request for final payment upon
completion of the construction.
Notification of approval of HISA
benefits will also include a notice of the
right to appeal and information about
how to pursue an appeal. We believe it
necessary to provide this information
even when approving an application to
allow the beneficiary to appeal any part
of VA’s determination.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
17.3126 Disapproving HISA Benefits
Applications
In proposed § 17.3126, we would state
that VA will disapprove any HISA
benefits application that does not meet
all of the criteria outlined in
§ 17.3125(a), which means that the
application was either inconsistent with
the regulations governing the HISA
benefits program or that the proposed
improvement or structural alteration is
not found to be reasonably designed to
address the needs of the beneficiary
and/or is not appropriate for the
beneficiary’s home. VA will notify the
beneficiary in writing of the decision,
detailing the basis for the disapproval,
and will provide notice to the
beneficiary of his/her right to appeal the
decision.
17.3130 HISA Benefits Payment
Procedures
Under the HISA benefits program, two
types of payments are authorized:
advance and final. As previously
discussed, the purpose of the advance
payment is to provide the beneficiary
with funds for up-front costs authorized
under the HISA benefits program.
Proposed § 17.3130(a) would state
that, upon request of the beneficiary, VA
may make an advance payment equal to
50 percent of the total amount of HISA
benefits VA has approved for the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
improvement or structural alteration.
We believe that an advance payment of
50 percent is appropriate based on
standard business practices and our
experience with administering the HISA
benefits program.
A beneficiary may request the
advance payment by completing the
appropriate space on VA Form 10–0103,
as indicated in proposed § 17.3120(a)(2).
Absent a request, VA will not make an
advance payment of HISA benefits. VA
will make the advance payment within
30 days of the application approval.
Only one advance payment will be
authorized per approved application.
Because providing funds before the
beneficiary has made any improvements
or structural alterations may put HISA
benefits at risk of misuse, VA Form 10–
0103 includes a statement that the
beneficiary requesting the advance
payment must commit to use the funds
as described in the application and to
submit the request for final payment.
VA reserves the right to seek
reimbursement of the advanced HISA
benefit amount if the beneficiary does
not comply.
Proposed § 17.3130(b) states that the
beneficiary must submit a complete
final payment request to VA within 60
days after the application for HISA
benefits is approved or, if an advance
payment was provided, within 60 days
after the advance payment is made by
VA. Final payment would not be
authorized until all elements of the
complete final payment request are
received by VA. To be complete, the
final payment request must include a
statement that the construction
indicated in the application has been
completed, a color photograph of the
completed work, and documentation of
the itemized actual costs for
construction of the improvement or
structural alteration.
VA would compare the color
photograph of the completed
improvement or structural alteration to
the color photograph included with the
HISA benefits application to
substantiate that the improvement or
structural alteration was completed.
Documentation of the itemized actual
costs of the construction will be used to
determine the correct amount of the
final payment.
Proposed § 17.3130(c) would describe
the process that VA will follow after a
complete final payment request is
received. Proposed § 17.3130(c)(1)
would state that VA may conduct an onsite inspection to determine that the
improvement or structural alteration
was actually completed and would
indicate that no payment will be made
unless construction has been completed.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
In proposed § 17.3130(c)(2), we would
explain the method of calculating the
final payment. The final payment will
equal the full approved HISA benefit
amount or the total actual cost of the
improvement or structural alteration,
whichever is less. In all cases, the
amount of any advance payment will be
subtracted from the amount to be paid.
In proposed § 17.3130(c)(3), we would
indicate that the beneficiary would be
obligated to reimburse VA if the total
actual cost of construction is less than
the amount of any advance payment.
In proposed § 17.3130(c)(4), we would
state that final payment on a HISA
benefits application would preclude VA
from furnishing additional HISA
benefits under that application. Any
unused approved HISA benefit amount
on an application would be credited
back to the beneficiary’s lifetime HISA
benefit balance and would be available
for use under future applications. A
beneficiary who has not exhausted the
lifetime HISA benefit may submit a new
application for remaining HISA benefits
by once again following the process set
forth in this regulation.
In proposed § 17.3130(d), we would
address the consequences of the failure
of the beneficiary to submit a final
payment request. As indicated
previously, when a beneficiary requests
an advance payment on VA Form 10–
0103, the beneficiary commits to use the
funds according to the plans articulated
in the application and to submit a final
payment request. We believe that this
commitment is necessary to ensure
appropriate use of the HISA benefit and
to protect the HISA benefit program
from abuse. If a beneficiary who
received an advance payment does not
submit a final payment request, VA will
send a notice as a reminder of the
commitment to complete the process.
We acknowledge that home
improvement projects are often lengthy.
We will allow for the beneficiary to
explain any delays in the construction
that may have led to the delay in
submitting the final payment request.
VA has every intention of allowing the
beneficiary a reasonable amount of time
in which to finalize construction of the
improvement or structural alteration. If
a final payment request is not received
or if suitable explanations for delay are
not provided, VA reserves the right to
attempt collection of any HISA benefits
funds paid in advance.
If a final payment request is not
received from a beneficiary who did not
request an advance payment, VA will
close the application and will not pay
HISA benefits on that application.
Before closing the application, VA will
send a notice to alert the beneficiary of
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
the impending action. If the beneficiary
does not respond to the notice,
providing adequate information to
justify the delay, VA will proceed with
closing the file and send a notice of
closure to the beneficiary. The notice
will provide the reason for closure and
include information regarding the right
to appeal the decision.
Proposed § 17.3130(e) would state
that, if a VA-conducted inspection of
the site of construction of the
improvement or structural alteration
reveals that the construction has not
been completed as purported in a final
payment request, VA may seek
reimbursement of any advance payment
amount made to the beneficiary.
However, if the beneficiary shows that
the failure to complete the project was
the fault of the contractor, such as
misconduct on the part of the contractor
(including absconding with the funds)
or bankruptcy of the contractor, VA will
not seek to recover those funds from the
beneficiary. Nor will VA credit the
amount of the lost funds to the
beneficiary’s lifetime HISA benefits
limit because they were paid out in
accordance with the HISA program set
forth in this regulation. The loss arose
from the agreement for the construction
of the improvement or structural
alteration between the beneficiary and
the contractor, and any attempt to
recover the funds from the contractor
must be made by the beneficiary.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, as
proposed to be revised by this proposed
rulemaking, would represent the
exclusive legal authority on this subject.
No contrary rules or procedures would
be authorized. All VA guidance,
including VHA Handbook 1173.14,
would be read to conform with this
proposed rulemaking if possible or, if
not possible, such guidance would be
superseded by this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule includes
collections of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521) that require approval
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Accordingly, under 44
U.S.C. 3507(d), VA has submitted a
copy of this rulemaking and the related
form to OMB for review.
OMB assigns a control number for
each collection of information it
approves. VA may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. VA Form 10–0103,
Veterans Application for Assistance in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
Acquiring Home Improvement and
Structural Alterations, was previously
approved by OMB under OMB control
number 2900–0188. This approval
allows a collection of information
requested in proposed § 17.3120.
Proposed §§ 17.3120 and 17.3130
contain new collections of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, which are reflected in an updated
version of VA Form 10–0103 that has
been submitted to OMB for review. If
OMB does not approve the collections
of information as requested, VA will
immediately remove the provisions
containing a collection of information or
take such other action as is directed by
OMB.
Comments on the collections of
information contained in this proposed
rule should be submitted to the Office
of Management and Budget, Attention:
Desk Officer for the Department of
Veterans Affairs, Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC
20503, with copies sent: by mail or hand
delivery to the Director, Office of
Regulation Policy and Management
(02REG), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW., Room
1068, Washington, DC 20420; by fax to
(202) 273–9026; or through
www.Regulations.gov. Comments
should indicate that they are submitted
in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AO17—Home
Improvements and Structural
Alterations (HISA) Benefits Program.’’
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the collections of
information contained in this proposed
rule between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, a comment
to OMB is best assured of having its full
effect if OMB receives it within 30 days
of publication. This does not affect the
deadline for the public to comment on
the proposed rule.
VA considers comments by the public
on proposed collections of information
in—
• Evaluating whether the proposed
collections of information are necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of VA, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
• Evaluating the accuracy of VA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collections of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
• Enhancing the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimizing the burden of the
collections of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
69621
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
The proposed amendments to 38 CFR
17.3120 and 17.3130 contain collections
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 for which we are
requesting approval by OMB. These
collections of information are described
immediately following this paragraph,
under their respective titles.
Title: Application for HISA Benefits.
Summary of collections of
information: The proposed rule at
§ 17.3120 would require the beneficiary
to submit VA Form 10–0103, a medical
prescription, a statement from the
homeowner (notarized, if the
homeowner is not the beneficiary), an
estimate of the costs for the
improvement or structural alteration,
and a color photograph of the
unimproved site. VA Form 10–0103 is
currently approved under OMB No.
2900–0188.
Description of the need for
information and proposed use of
information: This information is needed
to ensure that the applicant meets the
requirements provided in proposed
§§ 17.3100 through 17.3130 and 38
U.S.C. 1717(a) and (d). Specifically, the
medical prescription is needed to
confirm the disability, and to help VA
determine if the requested improvement
or structural alteration is necessary for
the treatment of the beneficiary’s
disability or necessary to provide access
to and within the home. In those cases
where the beneficiary is not the
homeowner, the notarized statement
will protect the beneficiary against any
claims of unauthorized improvement or
alteration made to the homeowner’s
property and provide verification that
the improvement or structural alteration
will be completed in a dwelling that the
beneficiary is legally authorized to use
as his/her home. When the beneficiary
is the homeowner the statement
validates that the improvement or
structural alteration is being completed
in the beneficiary’s home. A cost
estimate is needed for VA to determine
if the proposed improvement or
structural alteration is reasonably
designed to address the needs of the
beneficiary. A photograph of the
unimproved site is needed to ensure
that the proposed improvement or
structural alteration is appropriate and
help VA in preventing fraud.
Description of likely respondents:
Veterans and servicemembers applying
for HISA benefits.
Estimated number of respondents per
year: 7,000.
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
69622
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Estimated frequency of responses per
year: 1.
Estimated average burden per
response: 5 minutes.
Estimated total annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden:583 hours.
Title: HISA Benefits Payment
Procedures.
Summary of collections of
information: The proposed rule at
§ 17.3130 would require beneficiaries to
submit a final payment packet to VA
that consists of a statement by the
beneficiary that the improvement or
structural alteration was completed, a
color photograph of the completed
work, and documented evidence of total
itemized actual costs.
Description of the need for
information and proposed use of
information: The information required
under this collection will be used as
verification that the improvement or
structural alteration has been completed
and will serve as record of the
associated costs. VA will make payment
of HISA benefits awards based on the
documents required under this
collection.
Description of likely respondents:
Veterans and servicemembers.
Estimated number of respondents per
year: Applications: 7,000.
Estimated frequency of responses per
year: Applications: 1.
Estimated average burden per
response: 5 minutes.
Estimated total annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden: 583 hours.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This
proposed rule would not cause a
significant economic impact on
construction companies and their
suppliers since only a small portion of
the business of such entities concerns
VA beneficiaries. Therefore, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rulemaking is
exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) unless OMB waives such review,
as ‘‘any regulatory action that is likely
to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive
Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action
have been examined, and it has been
determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. VA’s impact analysis can be
found as a supporting document at
https://www.regulations.gov, usually
within 48 hours after the rulemaking
document is published. Additionally, a
copy of the rulemaking and its impact
analysis are available on VA’s Web site
at https://www1.va.gov/orpm/, by
following the link for ‘‘VA Regulations
Published.’’
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
given year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on State, local, and
tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance program numbers and titles
for this rule are as follows: 64.005,
Grants to States for Construction of State
Home Facilities; 64.007, Blind
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Rehabilitation Centers; 64.008, Veterans
Domiciliary Care; 64.009, Veterans
Medical Care Benefits; 64.010, Veterans
Nursing Home Care; 64.014, Veterans
State Domiciliary Care; 64.015, Veterans
State Nursing Home Care; 64.018,
Sharing Specialized Medical Resources;
64.019, Veterans Rehabilitation Alcohol
and Drug Dependence; 64.022, Veterans
Home Based Primary Care; and 64.024,
VA Homeless Providers Grant and per
Diem Program.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jose
D. Riojas, Chief of Staff, Department of
Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on October 18, 2013, for
publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and
procedure; Alcohol abuse; Alcoholism;
Claims; Day care; Dental health; Drug
abuse; Foreign relations; Government
contracts; Grant programs-health; Grant
programs-veterans; Health care; Health
facilities; Health professions; Health
records; Homeless; Medical and dental
schools; Medical devices; Medical
research; Mental health programs;
Nursing homes; Philippines; Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements;
Scholarships and fellowships; Travel
and transportation expenses; Veterans.
Dated: November 14, 2013.
William F. Russo,
Deputy Director, Regulation Policy and
Management, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, we propose to amend 38 CFR
Part 17 as follows:
PART 17—MEDICAL
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in
specific sections.
2. Add an undesignated center
heading and §§ 17.3100 through 17.3130
following the authority citation at the
end of § 17.1008 to read as follows:
■
Home Improvements and Structural
Alterations (HISA) Program
Sec.
17.3100 Purpose and scope.
17.3101 Definitions.
17.3102 Eligibility.
17.3103–17.3104 [Reserved]
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
17.3105 HISA benefit lifetime limits.
17.3106–17.3119 [Reserved]
17.3120 Application for HISA benefits.
17.3121–17.3124 [Reserved]
17.3125 Approving HISA benefits
applications.
17.3126 Disapproving HISA benefits
applications.
17.3127–17.3129 [Reserved]
17.3130 HISA benefits payment procedures.
Home Improvements and Structural
Alterations (HISA) Program
§ 17.3100
Purpose and scope.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717)
(a) Purpose. The purpose of
§§ 17.3100 through 17.3130 is to
implement the Home Improvements and
Structural Alterations (HISA) program.
The purpose of the HISA benefits
program is to provide eligible
beneficiaries monetary benefits for
improvements and structural alterations
to their homes when such
improvements and structural
alterations:
(1) Are necessary for the continuation
of the provision of home health
treatment of the beneficiary’s disability;
or
(2) Provide the beneficiary with
access to the home or to essential
lavatory and sanitary facilities.
(b) Scope. 38 CFR 17.3100 through
17.3130 apply only to the
administration of the HISA benefits
program, unless specifically provided
otherwise.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717(a)(2))
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 17.3101
Definitions.
For the purposes of the HISA benefits
program (§§ 17.3100 through 17.3130):
Access to essential lavatory and
sanitary facilities means having normal
use of the standard structural
components of those facilities.
Access to the home means the ability
of the beneficiary to enter and exit the
home and to maneuver within the home
to at least one bedroom and essential
lavatory and sanitary facilities.
Beneficiary means a veteran or
servicemember who is awarded or who
is eligible to receive HISA benefits.
Essential lavatory and sanitary
facilities means one bathroom equipped
with a toilet and a shower or bath, one
kitchen, and one laundry facility.
HISA benefits means a monetary
payment by VA to be used for
improvements and structural alterations
to the home of a beneficiary in
accordance with §§ 17.3100 through
17.3130.
Home means the primary place where
the beneficiary resides or, in the case of
a servicemember, where the beneficiary
intends to reside after discharge from
service.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
Improvement or structural alteration
means a modification to a home or to an
existing feature or fixture of a home,
including repairs to or replacement of
previously improved or altered features
or fixtures.
Undergoing medical discharge means
that a servicemember has been found
unfit for duty due to a medical
condition by their Service’s Physical
Evaluation Board, and a date of medical
discharge has been issued.
§ 17.3102
Eligibility.
The following individuals are eligible
for HISA benefits:
(a) A veteran who is eligible for
medical services under 38 U.S.C.
1710(a).
(b) A servicemember who is
undergoing medical discharge from the
Armed Forces for a permanent disability
that was incurred or aggravated in the
line of duty in the active military, naval,
or air service. A servicemember would
be eligible for HISA benefits while
hospitalized or receiving outpatient
medical care, services, or treatment for
such permanent disability.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717)
§§ 17.3103–17.3104
§ 17.3105
[Reserved]
HISA benefit lifetime limits.
(a) General. Except as provided in
paragraph (e) of this section, a
beneficiary’s HISA benefit is limited to
the lifetime amount established in
paragraphs (b), (c), or (d) of this section,
as applicable. A beneficiary may use
HISA benefits to pay for more than one
home alteration, until the beneficiary
exhausts his or her lifetime benefit.
HISA benefits approved by VA for use
in a particular home alteration but
unused by the beneficiary will remain
available for future use.
(b) HISA benefits for a serviceconnected disability, a disability treated
‘‘as if’’ it were service connected, or for
veterans with a service-connected
disability rated 50 percent or more.
(1) If a veteran:
(i) Applies for HISA benefits to
address a service-connected disability;
(ii) Applies for HISA benefits to
address a compensable disability treated
‘‘as if’’ it is a service-connected
disability and for which the veteran is
entitled to medical services under 38
U.S.C. 1710(a)(2)(C) (e.g., a disability
acquired through treatment or
vocational rehabilitation provided by
VA); or
(iii) Applies for HISA benefits to
address a nonservice-connected
disability, if the beneficiary has a
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
69623
service-connected disability rated at
least 50 percent disabling; and
(2) The veteran first applies for HISA
benefits:
(i) Before May 5, 2010, then the
veteran’s lifetime HISA benefit limit is
$4,100.
(ii) On or after May 5, 2010, then the
veteran’s lifetime HISA benefit limit is
$6,800.
(c) HISA benefits for any other
disabilities. If a veteran who is eligible
for medical services under 38 U.S.C.
1710(a) applies for HISA benefits to
address a disability that is not covered
under paragraph (b) of this section, and
the veteran first applies for HISA
benefits:
(1) Before May 5, 2010, then the
veteran’s lifetime HISA benefit limit is
$1,200; or
(2) On or after May 5, 2010, then the
veteran’s lifetime HISA benefit limit is
$2,000.
(d) Servicemembers. If a
servicemember is eligible for HISA
benefits under § 17.3102(b), and the
servicemember first applies:
(1) Before May 5, 2010, then the
servicemember’s HISA benefit lifetime
limit is $4,100; or
(2) On or after May 5, 2010, then the
servicemember’s HISA benefit lifetime
limit is $6,800.
(e) Increases to HISA benefit lifetime
limit.
(1) A veteran who received HISA
benefits under paragraph (c) of this
section, and who subsequently qualifies
for HISA benefits under paragraph (b)(1)
of this section on or after May 5, 2010,
due to a new award of disability
compensation based on service
connection or an increased disability
rating, may apply for the increased
lifetime benefit amount under paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this section. The increased
amount that will be available is $6,800
minus the amount of HISA benefits
previously used by the beneficiary.
(2) A veteran who previously received
HISA benefits as a servicemember is not
eligible for a new lifetime HISA benefit
amount based on his or her attaining
veteran status, but the veteran may file
a HISA claim for any HISA benefit
amounts not used prior to discharge.
The veteran’s subsequent HISA award
cannot exceed the applicable award
amount under paragraphs (b), (c), or
(e)(1) of this section, as applicable,
minus the amount of HISA benefits
awarded to the veteran while the
veteran was a servicemember.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717)
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
69624
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
§§ 17.3106–17.3119
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 17.3120
requirements in this section under control
number 2900–0188.)
[Reserved]
Application for HISA benefits.
(a) Application package. To apply for
HISA benefits, the beneficiary must
submit to VA a complete HISA benefits
application package. A complete HISA
benefits application package includes
all of the following:
(1) A prescription, which VA may
obtain on the beneficiary’s behalf,
written or approved by a VA physician
that includes all of the following:
(i) The beneficiary’s name, address,
and telephone number.
(ii) Identification of the prescribed
improvement or structural alteration.
(iii) The diagnosis and medical
justification for the prescribed
improvement or structural alteration.
(2) A completed and signed VA Form
10–0103, Veterans Application for
Assistance in Acquiring Home
Improvement and Structural
Alterations, including, if desired, a
request for advance payment of HISA
benefits.
(3) A signed statement from the owner
of the property authorizing the
improvement or structural alteration to
the property. The statement must be
notarized if the beneficiary submitting
the HISA benefits application is not the
owner of the property.
(4) A written itemized estimate of
costs for labor, materials, permits, and
inspections for the home improvement
or structural alteration.
(5) A color photograph of the
unimproved area.
(b) Pre-award inspection of site. The
beneficiary must allow VA to inspect
the site of the proposed improvement or
structural alteration. VA will not
approve a HISA application unless VA
has either conducted a pre-award
inspection or has determined that no
such inspection is needed. No later than
30 days after receiving a complete HISA
benefits application, VA will conduct
the inspection or determine that no
inspection is required.
(c) Incomplete applications. If VA
receives an incomplete HISA benefits
application, VA will notify the
applicant of the missing documentation.
If the missing documentation is not
received by VA within 30 days after
such notification, VA will close the
application and notify the applicant that
the application has been closed. The
closure notice will indicate that the
application may be re-opened by
submitting the requested documentation
and updating any outdated information
from the original application.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717)
(The Office of Management and Budget has
approved the information collection
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
§§ 17.3121–17.3124
[Reserved]
§ 17.3125 Approving HISA benefits
applications.
(a) Approval of application. VA will
approve the HISA benefits application
if:
(1) The application is consistent with
§§ 17.3100 through 17.3130, and
(2) VA determines that the proposed
improvement or structural alteration is
reasonably designed to address the
needs of the beneficiary and is
appropriate for the beneficiary’s home,
based on documentation provided and/
or through a pre-award inspection of the
home.
(b) Notification of approval. No later
than 30 days after a beneficiary submits
a complete application, VA will notify
the beneficiary whether an application
is approved. The notification will:
(1) State the total benefit amount
authorized for the improvement or
structural alteration.
(2) State the amount of any advance
payment, if requested by the
beneficiary, and state that the advance
payment must be used for the
improvements or structural alterations
detailed in the application. The
notification will also remind
beneficiaries receiving advance payment
of the obligation to submit the request
for final payment upon completion of
the construction.
(3) Provide the beneficiary with the
notice of the right to appeal if they do
not agree with VA’s decision regarding
the award.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717, 7104)
§ 17.3126 Disapproving HISA benefits
applications.
VA will disapprove a HISA benefits
application if the complete HISA
benefits application does not meet all of
the criteria outlined in § 17.3125(a).
Notification of the decision provided to
the beneficiary will include the basis for
the disapproval and notice to the
beneficiary of his or her right to appeal.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 7104)
§§ 17.3127–17.3129
[Reserved]
§ 17.3130 HISA benefits payment
procedures.
(a) Advance payment. If the
beneficiary has requested advance
payment of HISA benefits in VA Form
10–0103, as provided in § 17.3120(a)(2),
VA will make an advance payment to
the beneficiary equal to 50 percent of
the total benefit authorized for the
improvement or structural alteration.
VA will make the advance payment no
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
later than 30 days after the HISA
benefits application is approved. The
beneficiary may receive only one
advance payment for each approved
HISA benefits application. A beneficiary
must use the advance payment only for
the improvement or structural alteration
described in the application and must
submit a final payment request, as
defined in paragraph (b) of this section,
to document such use after the
construction is finished.
(b) Final payment request. No later
than 60 days after the application is
approved or, if VA approved an advance
payment, no later than 60 days after the
advance payment was made, the
beneficiary must submit a complete
final payment request to VA for
payment. The complete final payment
request must include:
(1) A statement by the beneficiary that
the improvement or structural
alteration, as indicated in the
application, was completed;
(2) A color photograph of the
completed work; and
(3) Documentation of the itemized
actual costs for material, labor, permits,
and inspections.
(c) VA action on final payment
request.
(1) Prior to approving and remitting
the final payment, VA may inspect
(within 30 days after receiving the final
payment request) the beneficiary’s home
to determine that the improvement or
structural alteration was completed as
indicated in the application. No
payment will be made if the
improvement or structural alteration has
not been completed.
(2) No later than 30 days after receipt
of a complete final payment request, or,
if VA conducts an inspection of the
home under paragraph (c)(1) of this
section, no later than 30 days after the
inspection, VA will make a
determination on the final payment
request. If approved, VA will remit a
final payment to the beneficiary equal to
the lesser of:
(i) The approved HISA benefit
amount, less the amount of any advance
payment, or
(ii) The total actual cost of the
improvement or structural alteration,
less the amount of any advance
payment.
(3) If the total actual cost of the
improvement or structural alteration is
less than the amount paid to the
beneficiary as an advance payment, the
beneficiary will reimburse VA for the
difference between the advance
payment and the total actual costs.
(4) After final payment is made on a
HISA benefits application, the
application file will be closed and no
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
future HISA benefits will be furnished
to the beneficiary for that application. If
the total actual cost of the improvement
or structural alteration is less than the
approved HISA benefit, the balance of
the approved amount will be credited to
the beneficiary’s remaining HISA
benefits lifetime balance.
(d) Failure to submit a final payment
request.
(1) If an advance payment was made
to the beneficiary, but the beneficiary
fails to submit a final payment request
in accordance with paragraph (b) of this
section within 60 days of the date of the
advance payment, VA will send a notice
to remind the beneficiary of the
obligation to submit the final payment
request. If the beneficiary fails to submit
the final payment request or to provide
a suitable update and explanation of
delay within 30 days of this notice, VA
may take appropriate action to collect
the amount of the advance payment
from the beneficiary.
(2) If an advance payment was not
made to the beneficiary and the
beneficiary does not submit a final
payment request in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section within 60
days of the date the application was
approved, the application will be closed
and no future HISA benefits will be
furnished to the beneficiary for that
application. Before closing the
application, VA will send a notice to the
beneficiary of the intent to close the file.
If the beneficiary does not respond with
a suitable update and explanation for
the delay within 30 days, VA will close
the file and provide a final notice of
closure. The notice will include
information about the right to appeal the
decision.
(e) Failure to make approved
improvements or structural alterations.
If an inspection conducted pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1) of this section reveals
that the improvement or structural
alteration has not been completed as
indicated in the final payment request,
VA may take appropriate action to
collect the amount of the advance
payment from the beneficiary. VA will
not seek to collect the amount of the
advance payment from the beneficiary if
the beneficiary provides documentation
indicating that the project was not
completed due to the fault of the
contractor, including bankruptcy or
misconduct of the contractor.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717)
(The Office of Management and Budget has
approved the information collection
requirements in this section under control
number 2900–0188.)
[FR Doc. 2013–27672 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R02–OAR–2013–0734, FRL–9903–06–
Region 2]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; New York State
Ozone Implementation Plan Revision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
revision to the New York State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone
concerning the control of volatile
organic compounds. The SIP revision
consists of amendments to the New
York Codes. The intended effect of this
action is to approve control techniques,
required by the Clean Air Act, which
will result in emission reductions that
will help attain and maintain the
national ambient air quality standards
for ozone.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket Number EPA–R02–
OAR–2013–0734, by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: Ruvo.Richard@epa.gov.
• Fax: 212–637–3901.
• Mail: Mr. Richard Ruvo, Chief, Air
Programs Branch, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290
Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New
York 10007–1866.
• Hand Delivery: Mr. Richard Ruvo,
Chief, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007–
1866. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office’s normal
hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4
p.m., excluding federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket No. EPA–R02–OAR–2013–0734.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
69625
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters or any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch,
290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
New York 10007–1866. EPA requests, if
at all possible, that you contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view
the hard copy of the docket. You may
view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4
p.m., excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk
J. Wieber (wieber.kirk@epa.gov), Air
Programs Branch, Environmental
Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007–
1866, (212) 637–3381.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. What is required by the Clean Air Act
(CAA) and how does it apply to New
York?
A. Background
B. What are the moderate area
requirements?
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 69614-69625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27672]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900-AO17
Home Improvements and Structural Alterations (HISA) Benefits
Program
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to establish
regulations for the Home Improvements and Structural Alterations (HISA)
benefits program. Through the HISA benefits program, VA has provided
monetary benefits to disabled veterans for necessary home improvements
and
[[Page 69615]]
alterations. An increase in the HISA benefits limit was authorized by
the Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus Health Services Act of 2010. The
proposed rule would codify regulations to govern the HISA benefits
program and incorporate the increase in HISA benefits authorized by the
2010 Act.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received by VA on or
before January 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through https://www.regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to the Director,
Regulation Policy and Management (02REG), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by
fax to (202) 273-9026.
Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response to
``RIN 2900-AO17, Home Improvements and Structural Alterations (HISA)
Benefits Program.'' Copies of comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management,
Room 1068, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 (this is not a
toll-free number) for an appointment. In addition, during the comment
period, comments may be viewed online through the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shayla Mitchell, Program Analyst,
Rehabilitation and Prosthetic Services (10P4R), Veterans Health
Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-0366 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 1717(a)(1) of title 38, United
States Code (U.S.C.), authorizes the Secretary of Veterans Affairs
(Secretary) to furnish home health services as part of medical services
provided to veterans. As a part of home health services, 38 U.S.C.
1717(a)(2) authorizes VA to furnish improvements and structural
alterations to the homes of disabled veterans ``only as necessary to
assure the continuation of treatment for the veteran's disability or to
provide access to the home or to essential lavatory and sanitary
facilities.'' Section 1717(d) extends these same benefits to certain
servicemembers. The HISA benefits program is distinct from VA's
authority under 38 U.S.C. 2101 through 2107 to provide specially
adapted housing for disabled veterans, and HISA benefits may be
received in addition to specially adapted housing benefits.
The HISA benefit is a fixed-amount monetary benefit subject to
lifetime limits based on the nature of the beneficiary's disability;
however, the beneficiary need not use the entire HISA benefit amount on
a single improvement or structural alteration. In May 2010, section 516
of the Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus Health Services Act of 2010 (the
2010 Act), Public Law 111-163, amended 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2) to increase
the maximum amount of the lifetime benefit.
This proposed rule would establish regulations to govern the HISA
benefits program that articulate a clear national policy and encompass
the increase in the HISA benefit limits authorized by the 2010 Act. We
note that this rulemaking proposes new practices and policies related
to the HISA benefits program and, therefore, this proposed rule would
make changes in the administration of HISA benefits. These changes are
intended to streamline the application process; simplify, reduce, or
eliminate administrative burdens on both VA and HISA beneficiaries; and
generally improve the administration of the program, all without
increasing the costs of the program.
For example, the current program requests that applicants for HISA
benefits provide multiple bids for construction projects. In practice,
it is not uncommon for bids to come in at or above the maximum amount
of the HISA benefit because, even under the increased benefit amount
authorized by the 2010 Act, HISA benefits cannot exceed $6,800. After
receiving the bids and other information submitted in an application,
VA currently is required to review and assess all the information and
take further administrative actions before approving the application
and awarding the benefit. A similar process is followed after the
improvement or structural alteration is completed and the beneficiary
requests final payment. The regulatory framework proposed in this
rulemaking will greatly simplify the process of filing and approving
HISA claims. We expect that veterans and servicemembers eligible for
HISA benefits and VA staff will find the new process much easier to
work with, so that claims will be processed more quickly. We do not
believe that the simplified process will have a negative impact on the
integrity of the program because we have incorporated inspection and
review processes to ensure that HISA benefits are awarded and spent in
accordance with statutory intent.
Because we intend to establish a new regulatory framework, with new
procedures and policies that in many ways represent a significant
departure from the manner in which HISA is currently administered, we
do not further address current practice in this rulemaking.
17.3100 Purpose and Scope
Proposed Sec. 17.3100 would set forth the purpose of the HISA
program and the scope of Sec. Sec. 17.3100 through 17.3130. Consistent
with 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2), proposed Sec. 17.3100(a) would state that
the purpose of the HISA benefits program is to provide monetary
benefits for improvements and structural alterations to the homes of
eligible veterans or servicemembers that are necessary for the
continuation of the provision of home health treatment of the
beneficiary's disability or that provide access to the beneficiary's
home or to essential lavatory and sanitary facilities in the home.
Although 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2) authorizes VA to ``furnish[ ]''
improvements and structural alterations, we believe that Congress
intended that VA pay for the cost of improvements or structural
alterations, rather than that VA actually make the improvements or
structural alterations. Our interpretation of the word ``furnish''
would permit VA to provide reimbursement to veterans who obtain such
improvements or structural alterations, rather than actually
identifying contractors and negotiating for the completion of
particular projects. Our interpretation of the statute would ensure the
most efficient and administratively convenient distribution of the
limited funds authorized by section 1717(a)(2), and would represent a
user-friendly way to administer the program to veterans and
servicemembers.
We also note that improvements or structural alterations made with
HISA benefits are distinct from other benefits available under the
Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) Prosthetic and Sensory Aids
Service under 38 U.S.C. 8123. The Prosthetic and Sensory Aids Service
provides prosthetic equipment and devices that may require
modifications to a beneficiary's home to ensure their proper function
within the home, but these modifications would be paid for with
Prosthetic and Sensory Aid Service funds, rather than HISA benefits.
HISA benefits are also distinct from the Specially Adapted Housing
for Disabled Veterans benefit, authorized under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 21,
which is administered by the Veterans Benefits Administration, provides
a significantly greater benefit amount, and is designed to assist
certain eligible veterans who
[[Page 69616]]
are entitled to compensation for permanent and total service-connected
disability ``in acquiring a suitable housing unit'' or adaptations to
housing necessary to accommodate the veteran's disabilities. 38 U.S.C.
2101(a). Under the Specially Adapted Housing program, VA also provides
``model plans and specifications of suitable housing units'' and
develops, maintains, and provides to veterans a ``handbook containing
appropriate designs for specially adapted housing.'' 38 U.S.C. 2103. A
veteran may obtain HISA benefits in addition to these other benefits.
Proposed paragraph Sec. 17.3100(b) would clarify that these
proposed regulations apply only to the HISA benefits program, unless at
some future date another section in the CFR specifically provides
otherwise.
17.3101 Definitions
Proposed Sec. 17.3101 contains definitions applicable to the HISA
benefits program.
``Access to the home'' would mean the ability of the beneficiary to
enter and exit the home and to maneuver within the home to at least one
bedroom and essential lavatory and sanitary facilities. Although 38
U.S.C. 1717(a)(2) authorizes HISA benefits for ``access to the home,''
we broadly interpret this phrase to include movement of the beneficiary
within the spaces necessary for daily living. Additionally, we
interpret it as allowing beneficiaries with one means of entering or
exiting the home to use their benefits to construct a second one.
In addition to access to the home itself, we would define
``[a]ccess to essential lavatory and sanitary facilities'' as having
normal use of these facilities and their structural components. Beyond
merely having the ability to move about in such spaces, a beneficiary
may require that the structures within these spaces be altered to allow
or enhance their normal use by the beneficiary. For example, within a
kitchen or bathroom, counter heights may need to be lowered or existing
plumbing fixtures may need to be replaced with accessible models.
We propose to define ``[b]eneficiary'' as ``a veteran or
servicemember who is awarded or who is eligible to receive HISA
benefits.'' Use of this term will make it easier to refer to these
individuals in the regulations.
``Essential lavatory and sanitary facilities'' would be defined as
one bathroom equipped with a toilet and a shower or bath, one kitchen,
and one laundry facility. Although many homes today are equipped with
multiple bathrooms and sometimes more than one kitchen, we interpret
the statutory reference to ``essential lavatory and sanitary
facilities'' to be a limiting phrase. 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2). We believe
that access to a single bathroom and a single kitchen facility is a
reasonable interpretation of ``essential'' lavatory and sanitary
facilities. A laundry facility would be included in the definition
because clean clothing can reasonably be considered as important to
sanitary living.
``HISA benefits'' would be defined as a monetary benefit paid under
the provisions of this program. As indicated above, under these
regulations the HISA benefits program would not provide the actual
construction of improvements or structural alterations, but rather
would provide monetary benefits to assist a beneficiary in paying for
such construction.
``Home'' would be defined as the primary place where the
beneficiary resides. Our definition is based on the common
understanding of the word ``home'' and our belief that Congress
intended that HISA benefits be used to adapt the place where the
beneficiary resides the majority of the time so that the beneficiary
will derive the greatest benefit of the program. This definition would
include medical foster homes. We note that 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(3)
precludes VA from furnishing improvements or structural alterations in
``a setting other than the veteran's home.'' We interpret this as
permitting alterations to an eligible servicemember's home, which we
would define as the place where the servicemember intends to reside
after discharge from service.
We would define an ``[i]mprovement or structural alteration'' as a
modification to a home or to an existing feature or fixture of a home,
including repairs to, or replacement of, previously improved or altered
features or fixtures. HISA benefits need not have been used to create
or previously modify a feature or fixture that is in need of repair,
but may be used to repair or replace previously improved or altered
features or fixtures only if the beneficiary meets the requirements set
forth in this rule. For instance, if a beneficiary moves into a home
that already has an access ramp to the entrance that is in need of
repair, HISA benefits may be used to repair or replace that ramp,
provided that the beneficiary has a documented medical justification
for the ramp.
For purposes of determining a servicemember's eligibility for HISA
benefits, as discussed in more detail below, we would give ``undergoing
medical discharge'' the same meaning as the term is defined in VA's
interim final rule governing VA's program providing caregiver benefits
to veterans and servicemembers. See 76 FR 26148, 26173, May 5, 2011 (38
CFR 71.15).
17.3102 Eligibility
Proposed Sec. 17.3102 would concern eligibility for HISA benefits.
Consistent with 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2), proposed Sec. 17.3102(a)
would state that veterans who are eligible for medical services under
38 U.S.C. 1710(a) are eligible for HISA benefits.
In addition to HISA benefits for eligible veterans, 38 U.S.C.
1717(d)(1) authorizes VA to furnish HISA benefits to a member of the
Armed Forces ``who, as determined by the Secretary [of VA], has a
disability permanent in nature incurred or aggravated in the line of
duty in the active [military service] . . . if . . . such member is
likely to be discharged or released from the Armed Forces for such
disability.'' In most cases, title 38, U.S.C., does not authorize VA to
provide medical benefits to servicemembers. However, we recently were
authorized under 38 U.S.C. 1720G(a)(2)(A) to provide caregiver support
to a ``member of the Armed Forces undergoing medical discharge from the
Armed Forces'' who has a serious injury incurred or aggravated during
his or her service. Although the statutory language differs, the intent
of Congress in both the HISA and 38 U.S.C. 1720G is to authorize VA to
provide benefits to servicemembers who will soon be, but who are not
yet, veterans. Therefore, in Sec. 17.3102(b), we propose to provide
HISA benefits only to a servicemember ``who is undergoing medical
discharge from the Armed Forces for a permanent disability that was
incurred or aggravated in the line of duty in the active military,
naval, or air service.'' This language is similar to the eligibility
language in 38 CFR 71.20(a)(2) of the interim final rule governing VA's
program providing caregiver benefits to veterans and servicemembers.
See 76 FR 26148, 26173, May 5, 2011. We see no reason that a
servicemember eligible for a caregiver should be denied access to his
or her lifetime HISA benefit prior to discharge from service.
We also note that VA is limited in its ability to determine
precisely whether a servicemember is ``likely to be discharged or
released from the Armed Forces for'' a disability because this
determination is made by the Department of Defense (DoD), not VA.
Identifying servicemembers who are undergoing medical discharge will
provide an objective, determinable point to determine eligibility for
HISA
[[Page 69617]]
benefits. We note that VA can easily identify these individuals through
the new joint VA-DoD Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES),
which integrates disability determination processing under each
Department's respective programs. The IDES program identifies all
servicemembers who are in need of medical discharge, and facilitates
the process. Using IDES to identify servicemembers eligible for HISA
benefits will not only facilitate the administration of the HISA
program for VA by providing a clear eligibility criterion, it will help
us identify individuals who are in need of HISA benefits, so that we
can ensure that they are aware of them.
17.3105 HISA Benefit Lifetime Limits
In proposed Sec. 17.3105(a), we would establish that the HISA
benefit limits, as set forth in 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2), are limits
established for the beneficiary's lifetime. We would explain that a
beneficiary is authorized to use HISA benefits for more than one
improvement or structural alteration as long as the beneficiary has not
exhausted his or her lifetime benefit limit. We also would explain
that, if the beneficiary does not have to use the entire approved
amount for construction of a particular improvement or structural
alteration, the unused amount will be added back into the beneficiary's
remaining lifetime balance, and will be available for future use. This
is also reflected in the HISA benefit payment procedures set forth in
proposed Sec. 17.3130(c)(4).
The HISA benefit lifetime limits, established in 38 U.S.C.
1717(a)(2), are based on the nature and severity of the beneficiary's
disability and the date on which the beneficiary first applies for HISA
benefits. Specifically, the law provides that a greater benefit amount
may be awarded if a beneficiary has a service-connected disability
rated at 50 percent or greater, or if the beneficiary seeks HISA
benefits to address a service-connected disability or a compensable
disability treated ``as if'' it were service connected under 38 U.S.C.
1151, e.g., a disability caused by VA treatment or vocational
rehabilitation (see 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(2)(C)). A lesser benefit amount
may be awarded when HISA benefits are intended for use in addressing
nonservice-connected conditions for certain veterans or when the
beneficiary has a service-connected disability rated less than 50
percent.
In addition to the nature or severity of the disability, the
statute clearly predicates eligibility for the increased HISA benefit
amount or prior HISA benefit amount on whether the beneficiary ``first
applies for benefits . . . before May 5, 2010,'' 38 U.S.C.
1717(a)(2)(A)(i), (B)(i), or ``on or after May 5, 2010,'' 38 U.S.C.
1717(a)(2)(A)(ii), (B)(ii). We interpret ``first applies'' to mean
submitting an application to VA, according to the VA process in place
at the time, for HISA benefits. Thus, those beneficiaries who first
applied for HISA benefits before the effective date of the change would
be subject to the limits that were in effect when they first applied.
In proposed paragraphs (b), (c) and (d), we would establish eligibility
for the increased HISA benefit amount or prior HISA benefit amount
using substantively identical language based on the date of the first
application for HISA benefits.
Consistent with 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2)(A), proposed Sec. 17.3105(b)
would identify the greater lifetime HISA benefit amount limits to
address a need due to a service-connected disability under 38 U.S.C.
1710(a)(1)(A), to address a need due to a compensable disability
treated ``as if'' it were service connected under section
1710(a)(2)(C), or to address any need for a veteran with a service-
connected disability rated 50 percent or more under section
1710(a)(1)(B).
Consistent with 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2)(B), proposed Sec. 17.3105(c)
would identify the lesser lifetime HISA benefit limits to address a
need of a beneficiary who is eligible for HISA benefits under proposed
Sec. 17.3102(a), but does not qualify for the greater lifetime HISA
benefit amount under proposed Sec. 17.3105(b).
In proposed Sec. 17.3105(d), we would set forth the lifetime HISA
benefits for servicemembers eligible under proposed Sec. 17.3102(b).
The provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1717(d)(1) require that VA provide HISA
benefits to eligible servicemembers for a ``disability permanent in
nature incurred or aggravated in the line of duty in the active
military, naval, or air service'' for which the servicemember is
``likely to be discharged or released from the Armed Forces for such
disability.'' Further provisions in the law imply that the limits on
HISA benefits based on the nature and severity of a disability, as
described above, should also be applied, but the law is not entirely
clear on what level of lifetime benefit should be made available to
servicemembers. We believe that any ``disability permanent in nature
incurred or aggravated in the line of duty'' may be reasonably expected
to result in a disability award based on service connection, and
therefore the beneficiary would be eligible for VA medical services
under 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(1)(A) for such disability once the beneficiary
becomes a veteran. For this reason, we would make the greater lifetime
HISA benefit amount available for all servicemembers who qualify under
proposed Sec. 17.3102(b) and 38 U.S.C. 1717(d)(1). The benefits must
be used for the specific permanent disability or disabilities for which
the beneficiary is undergoing medical discharge from the Armed Forces.
We recognize that it is possible to interpret the law differently.
However, Congress clearly intended for VA to make these benefits
available to servicemembers at the earliest opportunity. We believe it
will better serve the interests of our seriously wounded servicemembers
and is a better use of VA's limited HISA resources to avoid making
resource-intensive hypothetical determinations about these
servicemembers' future ratings of service-connected disabilities. We
expect that very few, if any, such determinations would result in
smaller awards of benefits. Moreover, because Congress was silent as to
the applicable benefit amount for servicemembers, we believe that our
interpretation is a reasonable exercise of the discretion granted to VA
by Congress to implement the statute.
In proposed Sec. 17.3105(e)(1), we address the impact of a new
award or an increased rating for a service-connected disability on the
HISA benefit lifetime limit. A veteran may receive a new award of
compensation for a service-connected disability or for a disability
treated ``as if'' it were service connected, or the veteran may receive
an increased service-connected disability rating after an initial
application for HISA benefits. Thus, the issue presented involves the
appropriate benefit amount for a veteran who meets the service-
connected-disability requirements for the greater HISA benefit after
the veteran has already first applied for the lesser HISA benefit.
In section 516(b) of the 2010 Act that amended 38 U.S.C. 1717 to
authorize increased lifetime limits, Congress required VA to construe
the amendment as follows: ``A veteran who exhausts such veteran's
eligibility for benefits under [38 U.S.C.] 1717(a)(2) . . . before the
date of the enactment of th[e 2010] Act, is not entitled to additional
benefits under such section by reason of the amendments made [to
increase the lifetime amount limitations].'' We interpret this to be a
statement of Congress' intent to raise the HISA benefits amount
available to beneficiaries who initially seek to make improvements or
structural alterations after May 5, 2010, and not to provide additional
HISA benefits to those who received this assistance previously. This is
a reasonable interpretation of the law
[[Page 69618]]
because it reflects the reality that those beneficiaries seeking to
make improvements or structural alterations today are faced with costs
that are significantly higher than they were in 1992, when the lifetime
amount limitations were last increased.
However, we do not believe that Congress, in section 516 of the
2010 Act, intended to prohibit beneficiaries from obtaining HISA
benefits for which they had not been previously eligible. We believe
that when a beneficiary, who previously was eligible for and obtained
lesser HISA benefits only under the statutory equivalent of proposed
Sec. 17.3105(c), is later awarded compensation for a service-connected
disability, compensation for a disability ``as if'' it were service
connected under 38 U.S.C. 1151, or an increased rating of 50 percent or
more for a service-connected disability that results in eligibility for
the greater HISA benefit under proposed Sec. 17.3105(b), such
beneficiary should be allowed to receive the new greater benefit based
on that new or increased award. We do not believe this interpretation
violates the restriction of section 516 of the 2010 Act because
eligibility for the greater benefit based on the new or increased award
did not exist when the beneficiary first applied. In other words, such
a beneficiary would not have ``first applie[d]'' for the greater HISA
benefit available at that time; rather, that beneficiary would have
``first applie[d]'' for the lesser HISA benefit available at that time.
In short, individuals who prior to May 5, 2010, sought the greater HISA
benefit for a service-connected disability, for a disability treated
``as if'' it were service connected, or based on having a disability
rating of 50 percent or more for a service-connected disability who
then seek the new greater HISA benefit after such date would not be
eligible for the increased greater HISA benefit amount. However, our
proposed interpretation of the law would authorize the increased
greater HISA lifetime benefit amount for individuals who prior to May
5, 2010, sought the lesser HISA benefit for a nonservice-connected
disability and who then seek the greater HISA benefit on or after that
date for a service-connected disability, for a disability treated ``as
if'' it were service connected, or based on having a disability rating
of 50 percent or more for a service-connected disability.
VA has consistently interpreted section 1717 to allow veterans to
apply for the greater HISA benefit if they were not previously
eligible. Additionally, we have searched the legislative history and
have not found an indication that our interpretation is contrary to
Congress' intent. H.R. Conf. Rep. 102-871, which discusses the increase
of HISA benefit amounts to $4,100 and $1,200, explains that ``a veteran
who, prior to January 1, 1990, received the maximum amount of
reimbursement authorized under the current limits of section 1717 is
not entitled to additional monetary benefits by reason of amendments.''
Based on this explanation it is safe to assume that a veteran who did
not receive the maximum amount--that is, veterans who had previously
received benefits only under the lower statutory threshold--may be
entitled to the greater benefit by reason of amendments. Therefore, our
interpretation allowing beneficiaries who previously applied for the
lesser benefit to apply for the greater benefit under proposed Sec.
17.3105 is reasonable, particularly in the absence of any indication
otherwise when Congress has expressly stated other limitations. This
interpretation is also consistent with VA's efforts to provide the
maximum assistance to beneficiaries, who would otherwise be unable to
receive additional HISA funds that Congress has made available to
address veterans' increased disability statuses and growing costs of
construction.
We would not authorize the full increased HISA lifetime benefit
amount for beneficiaries who applied for HISA benefits under section
1717(a)(2)(B), and then later apply and are eligible for the greater
HISA benefits under section 1717(a)(2)(A); rather, proposed Sec.
17.3105(e) would authorize an award up to the amount of HISA benefits
that the beneficiary would be eligible for under proposed Sec.
17.3105(c) minus the amount of HISA benefits previously used by the
beneficiary. This will ensure that these beneficiaries do not receive
more than the authorized lifetime HISA benefit amount. Additionally, in
no instance will any beneficiary be approved for more than the highest
amount specified in the statute and regulation.
The following example provides an illustration of the effect of
proposed Sec. 17.3105(e). A beneficiary has a service-connected
disability that is originally determined to be less than 50 percent and
for which the beneficiary does not require HISA benefits (e.g., visual
impairment) and has a nonservice-connected disability for which HISA
benefits would provide relief (e.g., beneficiary walks with a cane and
cannot climb stairs). Such beneficiary may exhaust the HISA benefit
available under Sec. 17.3105(c) for the nonservice-connected
disability to provide a ramp to assist in entering and exiting the
beneficiary's home. Later, if that beneficiary's disability rating for
his visual impairment is increased to 50 percent, the beneficiary would
become eligible for an award up to the greater HISA benefit amount,
which could be used to address either a service-connected or
nonservice-connected disability. The new amount of HISA benefits
available, however, would be limited to the difference between the
greater HISA benefit amount and the amount of HISA benefits previously
awarded.
In Sec. 17.3105(e)(2), we would explain that a beneficiary who
received HISA benefits as a servicemember may not receive additional
HISA benefits simply because of a change in status from
``servicemember'' to ``veteran.'' We believe that Congress intended for
VA to provide HISA benefits at the earliest point in time to
servicemembers dealing with disabilities resulting from their service,
not to provide them with a benefit that could later be duplicated as
part of the array of benefits available to them based on their status
as a veteran.
17.3120 Application for HISA Benefits
In proposed Sec. 17.3120, we would state that, to apply for HISA
benefits, the beneficiary must submit a complete application to VA, and
we would identify all of the requirements for a complete HISA benefits
application.
In proposed Sec. 17.3120(a)(1), we would require submission of a
prescription written or approved by a VA physician that identifies the
specific improvement or structural alteration recommended and includes
the diagnosis and medical justification for the improvement or
structural alteration. VA relies on medical determinations to identify
whether a beneficiary has a disability, and what treatments are
appropriate for that disability. For approval of HISA benefits, we
would require that the prescription be written or approved by a VA
physician because VA physicians are highly qualified to determine what
improvements or structural alterations would best serve those with
disabilities common to veterans and servicemembers. Moreover, all
veterans seeking HISA benefits must be eligible for care under section
1710(a) and therefore they are eligible for a determination by a VA
physician. Servicemembers will be examined by a VA physician as part of
the IDES process and may obtain the required prescription or approval
of a prescription at that time. The requirement for a prescription is
an appropriate, cost effective way to determine the necessity of the
improvement or alteration as required
[[Page 69619]]
by 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(2). VA typically delivers this prescription
directly to the HISA program office on the beneficiary's behalf.
Proposed Sec. 17.3120(a)(2) would require that a completed VA Form
10-0103, Veterans Application for Assistance in Acquiring Home
Improvement and Structural Alterations, be included with the HISA
benefits application. VA Form 10-0103 is the approved form for
requesting HISA benefits and, when completed, provides VA with
sufficient information to accurately identify the beneficiary and
determine the beneficiary's eligibility for HISA benefits. That form is
currently being modified to reflect the new requirements of this
proposed rule, and we further address this information collection later
in this rulemaking.
Proposed Sec. 17.3120(a)(2) would indicate that a HISA application
requires a completed and signed VA Form 10-0103, Veterans Application
for Assistance in Acquiring Home Improvement and Structural
Alterations. Additionally, this form is where the beneficiary may
request payment in advance of construction of the improvement or
structural alteration. This advance payment would provide the
beneficiary with funds for up-front costs associated with the
improvement or structural alteration. Specific details on advance
payment are outlined in proposed Sec. 17.3130.
In proposed Sec. 17.3120(a)(3), we would require all applicants to
submit a homeowner's statement indicating that the homeowner agrees to
allow construction of the improvement or structural alteration on the
homeowner's property. We would require that the statement be notarized
if the beneficiary is not the owner of the property.
In general terms, the homeowner's statement provides verification
that the improvement or structural alteration will be completed in a
dwelling that the beneficiary is legally authorized to use as his or
her home, as required by 38 U.S.C. 1717(a)(3). In cases where the
beneficiary does not own the property, we believe that the notarized
statement from the property owner may help protect the beneficiary
against any future claims of unauthorized structural changes to the
home. It will also help ensure that structural improvements or
alterations are not provided for an unauthorized use under 38 U.S.C.
1717.
In proposed Sec. 17.3120(a)(4), we would require veterans and
servicemembers applying for HISA benefits to provide a written and
itemized estimate of costs for the improvement or structural
alteration. The itemized estimate will be evaluated to ensure that the
items listed on it match with the beneficiary's prescription. This will
allow VA to protect the integrity of the program and HISA benefit funds
from potential abuse. VA would also use the itemized estimate of costs
to determine the appropriate amount of an advance payment to the
beneficiary made upon request under proposed Sec. 17.3130, which is
explained in greater detail below.
In proposed Sec. 17.3120(a)(5), we would require that the
beneficiary provide a color photograph of the unimproved site for the
improvement or structural alteration. Together with the pre-award
inspection conducted under proposed Sec. 17.3120(b), this photograph
will help ensure that the proposed improvement or structural alteration
is appropriate to the site and will assist VA in preventing fraud. We
would compare the photograph submitted with the application to the one
included with the final payment request, as required in Sec.
17.3130(b), to verify that the improvement or structural alteration was
completed as indicated in the application.
Proposed Sec. 17.3120(b) would require the beneficiary to consent
to VA's inspection of the site of the proposed improvement or
structural alteration. An in-home evaluation before construction begins
would allow VA to make an administrative determination that the
proposed improvement or structural alteration is reasonably designed to
meet the needs created by the beneficiary's disability. We also intend
to use the pre-approval inspection to verify that the proposed
improvement or structural alteration has not been previously
constructed and does not duplicate resources that are already in the
beneficiary's home. Because HISA benefits are provided to allow
beneficiaries to make necessary improvements or structural alterations,
we believe it would be inappropriate to provide the HISA benefits if
such improvements or structural alterations already exist. The statute
authorizes the Secretary to ``furnish'' improvements and alterations,
which we interpret to include the authority to cause them to be
constructed via authorization of HISA payments, but to the extent the
modifications already exist before a claim is made for the benefit, the
improvements and alterations have already been furnished, and VA lacks
authority to reimburse a beneficiary for them. Finally, the pre-
approval inspection would allow VA to determine that the beneficiary's
home can reasonably accommodate the improvement or structural
alteration. VA may determine that the submitted documentation is
sufficient to make all such determinations and that the in-home
inspection would not be required.
VA may also conduct an inspection after the construction is
finished as part of the final payment process under Sec. 17.3130.
VA's inspections should not be confused with or interpreted as code
enforcement or structural integrity inspections. As indicated above,
the HISA benefit is not a construction benefit and VA does not have
expertise in such matters. Issues of structural integrity and code
compliance are integral to the agreement that the veteran, like any
other homeowner, enters into with a contractor. HISA benefits may be
used to pay for the expenses of inspections designed to ensure
compliance with those matters, but VA's inspection is for
administrative, not safety or enforcement, purposes.
Proposed Sec. 17.3120(c) would state that VA will review only
complete HISA benefits applications for approval and will notify the
beneficiary if any required documentation is missing from the
application. If the beneficiary does not provide the missing
documentation to VA within 30 days, VA will notify the beneficiary that
the application has been closed. VA will inform the applicant that the
closed application may be re-opened by providing the previously missing
information, thus minimizing any adverse impact on the applicant.
However, because several key elements of the application, such as costs
associated with the improvement or structural alteration, may change
over time, we would require the applicant to provide updated
information after any lengthy period of time. We believe that this
process will encourage applicants to keep moving forward with their
applications and increase the efficiency of program operations by
eliminating repeated follow-up correspondence requesting information.
17.3125 Approving HISA Benefits Applications
Proposed Sec. 17.3125(a) would establish the criteria that VA will
use to approve a HISA benefits application.
Proposed Sec. 17.3125(a)(1) would state that the beneficiary's
application must meet the requirements of the regulations applicable to
the HISA benefits program.
Proposed Sec. 17.3125(a)(2) would require VA to determine that the
proposed improvement or structural alteration is reasonably designed to
address the needs of the beneficiary and is appropriate for the
beneficiary's
[[Page 69620]]
home. This determination may be based on documentation provided by the
beneficiary or through an in-home inspection, as authorized by Sec.
17.3120(b).
Proposed Sec. 17.3125(b) would describe the written notification
that VA will provide to the beneficiary when a HISA benefits
application is approved. The notification will include the total amount
of the award of HISA benefits. VA will only authorize charges that VA
considers to be reasonably designed to address the needs of the
beneficiary and in keeping with the purpose of the HISA benefit. The
notification will also indicate whether an advance payment is approved
and will reiterate the beneficiary's obligation to use the advance
payment only for the improvement or structural alteration defined in
the application. Recipients will be reminded of their obligation to
submit a request for final payment upon completion of the construction.
Notification of approval of HISA benefits will also include a
notice of the right to appeal and information about how to pursue an
appeal. We believe it necessary to provide this information even when
approving an application to allow the beneficiary to appeal any part of
VA's determination.
17.3126 Disapproving HISA Benefits Applications
In proposed Sec. 17.3126, we would state that VA will disapprove
any HISA benefits application that does not meet all of the criteria
outlined in Sec. 17.3125(a), which means that the application was
either inconsistent with the regulations governing the HISA benefits
program or that the proposed improvement or structural alteration is
not found to be reasonably designed to address the needs of the
beneficiary and/or is not appropriate for the beneficiary's home. VA
will notify the beneficiary in writing of the decision, detailing the
basis for the disapproval, and will provide notice to the beneficiary
of his/her right to appeal the decision.
17.3130 HISA Benefits Payment Procedures
Under the HISA benefits program, two types of payments are
authorized: advance and final. As previously discussed, the purpose of
the advance payment is to provide the beneficiary with funds for up-
front costs authorized under the HISA benefits program.
Proposed Sec. 17.3130(a) would state that, upon request of the
beneficiary, VA may make an advance payment equal to 50 percent of the
total amount of HISA benefits VA has approved for the improvement or
structural alteration. We believe that an advance payment of 50 percent
is appropriate based on standard business practices and our experience
with administering the HISA benefits program.
A beneficiary may request the advance payment by completing the
appropriate space on VA Form 10-0103, as indicated in proposed Sec.
17.3120(a)(2). Absent a request, VA will not make an advance payment of
HISA benefits. VA will make the advance payment within 30 days of the
application approval. Only one advance payment will be authorized per
approved application. Because providing funds before the beneficiary
has made any improvements or structural alterations may put HISA
benefits at risk of misuse, VA Form 10-0103 includes a statement that
the beneficiary requesting the advance payment must commit to use the
funds as described in the application and to submit the request for
final payment. VA reserves the right to seek reimbursement of the
advanced HISA benefit amount if the beneficiary does not comply.
Proposed Sec. 17.3130(b) states that the beneficiary must submit a
complete final payment request to VA within 60 days after the
application for HISA benefits is approved or, if an advance payment was
provided, within 60 days after the advance payment is made by VA. Final
payment would not be authorized until all elements of the complete
final payment request are received by VA. To be complete, the final
payment request must include a statement that the construction
indicated in the application has been completed, a color photograph of
the completed work, and documentation of the itemized actual costs for
construction of the improvement or structural alteration.
VA would compare the color photograph of the completed improvement
or structural alteration to the color photograph included with the HISA
benefits application to substantiate that the improvement or structural
alteration was completed. Documentation of the itemized actual costs of
the construction will be used to determine the correct amount of the
final payment.
Proposed Sec. 17.3130(c) would describe the process that VA will
follow after a complete final payment request is received. Proposed
Sec. 17.3130(c)(1) would state that VA may conduct an on-site
inspection to determine that the improvement or structural alteration
was actually completed and would indicate that no payment will be made
unless construction has been completed.
In proposed Sec. 17.3130(c)(2), we would explain the method of
calculating the final payment. The final payment will equal the full
approved HISA benefit amount or the total actual cost of the
improvement or structural alteration, whichever is less. In all cases,
the amount of any advance payment will be subtracted from the amount to
be paid.
In proposed Sec. 17.3130(c)(3), we would indicate that the
beneficiary would be obligated to reimburse VA if the total actual cost
of construction is less than the amount of any advance payment.
In proposed Sec. 17.3130(c)(4), we would state that final payment
on a HISA benefits application would preclude VA from furnishing
additional HISA benefits under that application. Any unused approved
HISA benefit amount on an application would be credited back to the
beneficiary's lifetime HISA benefit balance and would be available for
use under future applications. A beneficiary who has not exhausted the
lifetime HISA benefit may submit a new application for remaining HISA
benefits by once again following the process set forth in this
regulation.
In proposed Sec. 17.3130(d), we would address the consequences of
the failure of the beneficiary to submit a final payment request. As
indicated previously, when a beneficiary requests an advance payment on
VA Form 10-0103, the beneficiary commits to use the funds according to
the plans articulated in the application and to submit a final payment
request. We believe that this commitment is necessary to ensure
appropriate use of the HISA benefit and to protect the HISA benefit
program from abuse. If a beneficiary who received an advance payment
does not submit a final payment request, VA will send a notice as a
reminder of the commitment to complete the process. We acknowledge that
home improvement projects are often lengthy. We will allow for the
beneficiary to explain any delays in the construction that may have led
to the delay in submitting the final payment request. VA has every
intention of allowing the beneficiary a reasonable amount of time in
which to finalize construction of the improvement or structural
alteration. If a final payment request is not received or if suitable
explanations for delay are not provided, VA reserves the right to
attempt collection of any HISA benefits funds paid in advance.
If a final payment request is not received from a beneficiary who
did not request an advance payment, VA will close the application and
will not pay HISA benefits on that application. Before closing the
application, VA will send a notice to alert the beneficiary of
[[Page 69621]]
the impending action. If the beneficiary does not respond to the
notice, providing adequate information to justify the delay, VA will
proceed with closing the file and send a notice of closure to the
beneficiary. The notice will provide the reason for closure and include
information regarding the right to appeal the decision.
Proposed Sec. 17.3130(e) would state that, if a VA-conducted
inspection of the site of construction of the improvement or structural
alteration reveals that the construction has not been completed as
purported in a final payment request, VA may seek reimbursement of any
advance payment amount made to the beneficiary. However, if the
beneficiary shows that the failure to complete the project was the
fault of the contractor, such as misconduct on the part of the
contractor (including absconding with the funds) or bankruptcy of the
contractor, VA will not seek to recover those funds from the
beneficiary. Nor will VA credit the amount of the lost funds to the
beneficiary's lifetime HISA benefits limit because they were paid out
in accordance with the HISA program set forth in this regulation. The
loss arose from the agreement for the construction of the improvement
or structural alteration between the beneficiary and the contractor,
and any attempt to recover the funds from the contractor must be made
by the beneficiary.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, as proposed to be revised by this
proposed rulemaking, would represent the exclusive legal authority on
this subject. No contrary rules or procedures would be authorized. All
VA guidance, including VHA Handbook 1173.14, would be read to conform
with this proposed rulemaking if possible or, if not possible, such
guidance would be superseded by this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule includes collections of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) that require
approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Accordingly,
under 44 U.S.C. 3507(d), VA has submitted a copy of this rulemaking and
the related form to OMB for review.
OMB assigns a control number for each collection of information it
approves. VA may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. VA Form 10-0103, Veterans
Application for Assistance in Acquiring Home Improvement and Structural
Alterations, was previously approved by OMB under OMB control number
2900-0188. This approval allows a collection of information requested
in proposed Sec. 17.3120. Proposed Sec. Sec. 17.3120 and 17.3130
contain new collections of information under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, which are reflected in an updated version of VA Form 10-
0103 that has been submitted to OMB for review. If OMB does not approve
the collections of information as requested, VA will immediately remove
the provisions containing a collection of information or take such
other action as is directed by OMB.
Comments on the collections of information contained in this
proposed rule should be submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the Department of Veterans Affairs,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503,
with copies sent: by mail or hand delivery to the Director, Office of
Regulation Policy and Management (02REG), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; by fax
to (202) 273-9026; or through www.Regulations.gov. Comments should
indicate that they are submitted in response to ``RIN 2900-AO17--Home
Improvements and Structural Alterations (HISA) Benefits Program.''
OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collections of
information contained in this proposed rule between 30 and 60 days
after publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore,
a comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB
receives it within 30 days of publication. This does not affect the
deadline for the public to comment on the proposed rule.
VA considers comments by the public on proposed collections of
information in--
Evaluating whether the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of VA,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluating the accuracy of VA's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collections of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
Enhancing the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimizing the burden of the collections of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
The proposed amendments to 38 CFR 17.3120 and 17.3130 contain
collections of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
for which we are requesting approval by OMB. These collections of
information are described immediately following this paragraph, under
their respective titles.
Title: Application for HISA Benefits.
Summary of collections of information: The proposed rule at Sec.
17.3120 would require the beneficiary to submit VA Form 10-0103, a
medical prescription, a statement from the homeowner (notarized, if the
homeowner is not the beneficiary), an estimate of the costs for the
improvement or structural alteration, and a color photograph of the
unimproved site. VA Form 10-0103 is currently approved under OMB No.
2900-0188.
Description of the need for information and proposed use of
information: This information is needed to ensure that the applicant
meets the requirements provided in proposed Sec. Sec. 17.3100 through
17.3130 and 38 U.S.C. 1717(a) and (d). Specifically, the medical
prescription is needed to confirm the disability, and to help VA
determine if the requested improvement or structural alteration is
necessary for the treatment of the beneficiary's disability or
necessary to provide access to and within the home. In those cases
where the beneficiary is not the homeowner, the notarized statement
will protect the beneficiary against any claims of unauthorized
improvement or alteration made to the homeowner's property and provide
verification that the improvement or structural alteration will be
completed in a dwelling that the beneficiary is legally authorized to
use as his/her home. When the beneficiary is the homeowner the
statement validates that the improvement or structural alteration is
being completed in the beneficiary's home. A cost estimate is needed
for VA to determine if the proposed improvement or structural
alteration is reasonably designed to address the needs of the
beneficiary. A photograph of the unimproved site is needed to ensure
that the proposed improvement or structural alteration is appropriate
and help VA in preventing fraud.
Description of likely respondents: Veterans and servicemembers
applying for HISA benefits.
Estimated number of respondents per year: 7,000.
[[Page 69622]]
Estimated frequency of responses per year: 1.
Estimated average burden per response: 5 minutes.
Estimated total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden:583
hours.
Title: HISA Benefits Payment Procedures.
Summary of collections of information: The proposed rule at Sec.
17.3130 would require beneficiaries to submit a final payment packet to
VA that consists of a statement by the beneficiary that the improvement
or structural alteration was completed, a color photograph of the
completed work, and documented evidence of total itemized actual costs.
Description of the need for information and proposed use of
information: The information required under this collection will be
used as verification that the improvement or structural alteration has
been completed and will serve as record of the associated costs. VA
will make payment of HISA benefits awards based on the documents
required under this collection.
Description of likely respondents: Veterans and servicemembers.
Estimated number of respondents per year: Applications: 7,000.
Estimated frequency of responses per year: Applications: 1.
Estimated average burden per response: 5 minutes.
Estimated total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden: 583
hours.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. This proposed rule would not cause a significant
economic impact on construction companies and their suppliers since
only a small portion of the business of such entities concerns VA
beneficiaries. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rulemaking
is exempt from the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) unless OMB waives such review, as ``any
regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2)
Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal
or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action have been examined, and it has
been determined not to be a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. VA's impact analysis can be found as a
supporting document at https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy
of the rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's Web
site at https://www1.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ``VA
Regulations Published.''
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any given year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and
titles for this rule are as follows: 64.005, Grants to States for
Construction of State Home Facilities; 64.007, Blind Rehabilitation
Centers; 64.008, Veterans Domiciliary Care; 64.009, Veterans Medical
Care Benefits; 64.010, Veterans Nursing Home Care; 64.014, Veterans
State Domiciliary Care; 64.015, Veterans State Nursing Home Care;
64.018, Sharing Specialized Medical Resources; 64.019, Veterans
Rehabilitation Alcohol and Drug Dependence; 64.022, Veterans Home Based
Primary Care; and 64.024, VA Homeless Providers Grant and per Diem
Program.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jose D.
Riojas, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on October 18, 2013, for publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure; Alcohol abuse; Alcoholism;
Claims; Day care; Dental health; Drug abuse; Foreign relations;
Government contracts; Grant programs-health; Grant programs-veterans;
Health care; Health facilities; Health professions; Health records;
Homeless; Medical and dental schools; Medical devices; Medical
research; Mental health programs; Nursing homes; Philippines; Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements; Scholarships and fellowships; Travel
and transportation expenses; Veterans.
Dated: November 14, 2013.
William F. Russo,
Deputy Director, Regulation Policy and Management, Office of the
General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, we propose to amend 38
CFR Part 17 as follows:
PART 17--MEDICAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in specific sections.
0
2. Add an undesignated center heading and Sec. Sec. 17.3100 through
17.3130 following the authority citation at the end of Sec. 17.1008 to
read as follows:
Home Improvements and Structural Alterations (HISA) Program
Sec.
17.3100 Purpose and scope.
17.3101 Definitions.
17.3102 Eligibility.
17.3103-17.3104 [Reserved]
[[Page 69623]]
17.3105 HISA benefit lifetime limits.
17.3106-17.3119 [Reserved]
17.3120 Application for HISA benefits.
17.3121-17.3124 [Reserved]
17.3125 Approving HISA benefits applications.
17.3126 Disapproving HISA benefits applications.
17.3127-17.3129 [Reserved]
17.3130 HISA benefits payment procedures.
Home Improvements and Structural Alterations (HISA) Program
Sec. 17.3100 Purpose and scope.
(a) Purpose. The purpose of Sec. Sec. 17.3100 through 17.3130 is
to implement the Home Improvements and Structural Alterations (HISA)
program. The purpose of the HISA benefits program is to provide
eligible beneficiaries monetary benefits for improvements and
structural alterations to their homes when such improvements and
structural alterations:
(1) Are necessary for the continuation of the provision of home
health treatment of the beneficiary's disability; or
(2) Provide the beneficiary with access to the home or to essential
lavatory and sanitary facilities.
(b) Scope. 38 CFR 17.3100 through 17.3130 apply only to the
administration of the HISA benefits program, unless specifically
provided otherwise.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717(a)(2))
Sec. 17.3101 Definitions.
For the purposes of the HISA benefits program (Sec. Sec. 17.3100
through 17.3130):
Access to essential lavatory and sanitary facilities means having
normal use of the standard structural components of those facilities.
Access to the home means the ability of the beneficiary to enter
and exit the home and to maneuver within the home to at least one
bedroom and essential lavatory and sanitary facilities.
Beneficiary means a veteran or servicemember who is awarded or who
is eligible to receive HISA benefits.
Essential lavatory and sanitary facilities means one bathroom
equipped with a toilet and a shower or bath, one kitchen, and one
laundry facility.
HISA benefits means a monetary payment by VA to be used for
improvements and structural alterations to the home of a beneficiary in
accordance with Sec. Sec. 17.3100 through 17.3130.
Home means the primary place where the beneficiary resides or, in
the case of a servicemember, where the beneficiary intends to reside
after discharge from service.
Improvement or structural alteration means a modification to a home
or to an existing feature or fixture of a home, including repairs to or
replacement of previously improved or altered features or fixtures.
Undergoing medical discharge means that a servicemember has been
found unfit for duty due to a medical condition by their Service's
Physical Evaluation Board, and a date of medical discharge has been
issued.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717)
Sec. 17.3102 Eligibility.
The following individuals are eligible for HISA benefits:
(a) A veteran who is eligible for medical services under 38 U.S.C.
1710(a).
(b) A servicemember who is undergoing medical discharge from the
Armed Forces for a permanent disability that was incurred or aggravated
in the line of duty in the active military, naval, or air service. A
servicemember would be eligible for HISA benefits while hospitalized or
receiving outpatient medical care, services, or treatment for such
permanent disability.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717)
Sec. Sec. 17.3103-17.3104 [Reserved]
Sec. 17.3105 HISA benefit lifetime limits.
(a) General. Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, a
beneficiary's HISA benefit is limited to the lifetime amount
established in paragraphs (b), (c), or (d) of this section, as
applicable. A beneficiary may use HISA benefits to pay for more than
one home alteration, until the beneficiary exhausts his or her lifetime
benefit. HISA benefits approved by VA for use in a particular home
alteration but unused by the beneficiary will remain available for
future use.
(b) HISA benefits for a service-connected disability, a disability
treated ``as if'' it were service connected, or for veterans with a
service-connected disability rated 50 percent or more.
(1) If a veteran:
(i) Applies for HISA benefits to address a service-connected
disability;
(ii) Applies for HISA benefits to address a compensable disability
treated ``as if'' it is a service-connected disability and for which
the veteran is entitled to medical services under 38 U.S.C.
1710(a)(2)(C) (e.g., a disability acquired through treatment or
vocational rehabilitation provided by VA); or
(iii) Applies for HISA benefits to address a nonservice-connected
disability, if the beneficiary has a service-connected disability rated
at least 50 percent disabling; and
(2) The veteran first applies for HISA benefits:
(i) Before May 5, 2010, then the veteran's lifetime HISA benefit
limit is $4,100.
(ii) On or after May 5, 2010, then the veteran's lifetime HISA
benefit limit is $6,800.
(c) HISA benefits for any other disabilities. If a veteran who is
eligible for medical services under 38 U.S.C. 1710(a) applies for HISA
benefits to address a disability that is not covered under paragraph
(b) of this section, and the veteran first applies for HISA benefits:
(1) Before May 5, 2010, then the veteran's lifetime HISA benefit
limit is $1,200; or
(2) On or after May 5, 2010, then the veteran's lifetime HISA
benefit limit is $2,000.
(d) Servicemembers. If a servicemember is eligible for HISA
benefits under Sec. 17.3102(b), and the servicemember first applies:
(1) Before May 5, 2010, then the servicemember's HISA benefit
lifetime limit is $4,100; or
(2) On or after May 5, 2010, then the servicemember's HISA benefit
lifetime limit is $6,800.
(e) Increases to HISA benefit lifetime limit.
(1) A veteran who received HISA benefits under paragraph (c) of
this section, and who subsequently qualifies for HISA benefits under
paragraph (b)(1) of this section on or after May 5, 2010, due to a new
award of disability compensation based on service connection or an
increased disability rating, may apply for the increased lifetime
benefit amount under paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section. The
increased amount that will be available is $6,800 minus the amount of
HISA benefits previously used by the beneficiary.
(2) A veteran who previously received HISA benefits as a
servicemember is not eligible for a new lifetime HISA benefit amount
based on his or her attaining veteran status, but the veteran may file
a HISA claim for any HISA benefit amounts not used prior to discharge.
The veteran's subsequent HISA award cannot exceed the applicable award
amount under paragraphs (b), (c), or (e)(1) of this section, as
applicable, minus the amount of HISA benefits awarded to the veteran
while the veteran was a servicemember.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717)
[[Page 69624]]
Sec. Sec. 17.3106-17.3119 [Reserved]
Sec. 17.3120 Application for HISA benefits.
(a) Application package. To apply for HISA benefits, the
beneficiary must submit to VA a complete HISA benefits application
package. A complete HISA benefits application package includes all of
the following:
(1) A prescription, which VA may obtain on the beneficiary's
behalf, written or approved by a VA physician that includes all of the
following:
(i) The beneficiary's name, address, and telephone number.
(ii) Identification of the prescribed improvement or structural
alteration.
(iii) The diagnosis and medical justification for the prescribed
improvement or structural alteration.
(2) A completed and signed VA Form 10-0103, Veterans Application
for Assistance in Acquiring Home Improvement and Structural
Alterations, including, if desired, a request for advance payment of
HISA benefits.
(3) A signed statement from the owner of the property authorizing
the improvement or structural alteration to the property. The statement
must be notarized if the beneficiary submitting the HISA benefits
application is not the owner of the property.
(4) A written itemized estimate of costs for labor, materials,
permits, and inspections for the home improvement or structural
alteration.
(5) A color photograph of the unimproved area.
(b) Pre-award inspection of site. The beneficiary must allow VA to
inspect the site of the proposed improvement or structural alteration.
VA will not approve a HISA application unless VA has either conducted a
pre-award inspection or has determined that no such inspection is
needed. No later than 30 days after receiving a complete HISA benefits
application, VA will conduct the inspection or determine that no
inspection is required.
(c) Incomplete applications. If VA receives an incomplete HISA
benefits application, VA will notify the applicant of the missing
documentation. If the missing documentation is not received by VA
within 30 days after such notification, VA will close the application
and notify the applicant that the application has been closed. The
closure notice will indicate that the application may be re-opened by
submitting the requested documentation and updating any outdated
information from the original application.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717)
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information
collection requirements in this section under control number 2900-
0188.)
Sec. Sec. 17.3121-17.3124 [Reserved]
Sec. 17.3125 Approving HISA benefits applications.
(a) Approval of application. VA will approve the HISA benefits
application if:
(1) The application is consistent with Sec. Sec. 17.3100 through
17.3130, and
(2) VA determines that the proposed improvement or structural
alteration is reasonably designed to address the needs of the
beneficiary and is appropriate for the beneficiary's home, based on
documentation provided and/or through a pre-award inspection of the
home.
(b) Notification of approval. No later than 30 days after a
beneficiary submits a complete application, VA will notify the
beneficiary whether an application is approved. The notification will:
(1) State the total benefit amount authorized for the improvement
or structural alteration.
(2) State the amount of any advance payment, if requested by the
beneficiary, and state that the advance payment must be used for the
improvements or structural alterations detailed in the application. The
notification will also remind beneficiaries receiving advance payment
of the obligation to submit the request for final payment upon
completion of the construction.
(3) Provide the beneficiary with the notice of the right to appeal
if they do not agree with VA's decision regarding the award.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717, 7104)
Sec. 17.3126 Disapproving HISA benefits applications.
VA will disapprove a HISA benefits application if the complete HISA
benefits application does not meet all of the criteria outlined in
Sec. 17.3125(a). Notification of the decision provided to the
beneficiary will include the basis for the disapproval and notice to
the beneficiary of his or her right to appeal.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 7104)
Sec. Sec. 17.3127-17.3129 [Reserved]
Sec. 17.3130 HISA benefits payment procedures.
(a) Advance payment. If the beneficiary has requested advance
payment of HISA benefits in VA Form 10-0103, as provided in Sec.
17.3120(a)(2), VA will make an advance payment to the beneficiary equal
to 50 percent of the total benefit authorized for the improvement or
structural alteration. VA will make the advance payment no later than
30 days after the HISA benefits application is approved. The
beneficiary may receive only one advance payment for each approved HISA
benefits application. A beneficiary must use the advance payment only
for the improvement or structural alteration described in the
application and must submit a final payment request, as defined in
paragraph (b) of this section, to document such use after the
construction is finished.
(b) Final payment request. No later than 60 days after the
application is approved or, if VA approved an advance payment, no later
than 60 days after the advance payment was made, the beneficiary must
submit a complete final payment request to VA for payment. The complete
final payment request must include:
(1) A statement by the beneficiary that the improvement or
structural alteration, as indicated in the application, was completed;
(2) A color photograph of the completed work; and
(3) Documentation of the itemized actual costs for material, labor,
permits, and inspections.
(c) VA action on final payment request.
(1) Prior to approving and remitting the final payment, VA may
inspect (within 30 days after receiving the final payment request) the
beneficiary's home to determine that the improvement or structural
alteration was completed as indicated in the application. No payment
will be made if the improvement or structural alteration has not been
completed.
(2) No later than 30 days after receipt of a complete final payment
request, or, if VA conducts an inspection of the home under paragraph
(c)(1) of this section, no later than 30 days after the inspection, VA
will make a determination on the final payment request. If approved, VA
will remit a final payment to the beneficiary equal to the lesser of:
(i) The approved HISA benefit amount, less the amount of any
advance payment, or
(ii) The total actual cost of the improvement or structural
alteration, less the amount of any advance payment.
(3) If the total actual cost of the improvement or structural
alteration is less than the amount paid to the beneficiary as an
advance payment, the beneficiary will reimburse VA for the difference
between the advance payment and the total actual costs.
(4) After final payment is made on a HISA benefits application, the
application file will be closed and no
[[Page 69625]]
future HISA benefits will be furnished to the beneficiary for that
application. If the total actual cost of the improvement or structural
alteration is less than the approved HISA benefit, the balance of the
approved amount will be credited to the beneficiary's remaining HISA
benefits lifetime balance.
(d) Failure to submit a final payment request.
(1) If an advance payment was made to the beneficiary, but the
beneficiary fails to submit a final payment request in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section within 60 days of the date of the advance
payment, VA will send a notice to remind the beneficiary of the
obligation to submit the final payment request. If the beneficiary
fails to submit the final payment request or to provide a suitable
update and explanation of delay within 30 days of this notice, VA may
take appropriate action to collect the amount of the advance payment
from the beneficiary.
(2) If an advance payment was not made to the beneficiary and the
beneficiary does not submit a final payment request in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section within 60 days of the date the
application was approved, the application will be closed and no future
HISA benefits will be furnished to the beneficiary for that
application. Before closing the application, VA will send a notice to
the beneficiary of the intent to close the file. If the beneficiary
does not respond with a suitable update and explanation for the delay
within 30 days, VA will close the file and provide a final notice of
closure. The notice will include information about the right to appeal
the decision.
(e) Failure to make approved improvements or structural
alterations. If an inspection conducted pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of
this section reveals that the improvement or structural alteration has
not been completed as indicated in the final payment request, VA may
take appropriate action to collect the amount of the advance payment
from the beneficiary. VA will not seek to collect the amount of the
advance payment from the beneficiary if the beneficiary provides
documentation indicating that the project was not completed due to the
fault of the contractor, including bankruptcy or misconduct of the
contractor.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1717)
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information
collection requirements in this section under control number 2900-
0188.)
[FR Doc. 2013-27672 Filed 11-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P