Privacy Act; Implementation, 69552-69553 [2013-27460]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
69552
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
ACTION:
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 319 continues to read as follows:
SUMMARY:
■
It has been determined that this rule
is not a significant rule. This rule does
not (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in these Executive orders.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
This rule will not have significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because it is
concerned only with the administration
of Privacy Act systems of records within
the Department of Defense. A
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not
required.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This rule does not contain any
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
These amendments do not involve a
Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
and that such rulemaking will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Direct final rule with request for
comments.
PART 319—DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM
Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896
(5 U.S.C. 552a).
2. Section 319.13 is amended by
adding paragraph (m) to read as follows:
■
§ 319.13
Specific exemptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) System identifier and name: LDIA
10–0004 Occupational, Safety, Health,
and Environmental Management
Records.
(1) Exemptions: Any portion of this
record system which falls within the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2)(k)(4)
and (k)(5) may be exempt from the
following subsections of 5 U.S.C. 552a:
(c)(3); (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), (d)(5);
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); (f)(1),
(f)(2), (f)(2), (f)(3), (f)(4), (f)(5).
(2) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) and
(k)(5).
(3) The reasons for asserting these
exemptions are to ensure the integrity of
an investigative or administrative
process and to protect statistical
records. The execution requires that
information be provided in a free and
open manner without fear of retribution
or harassment in order to facilitate a
just, thorough, and timely resolution
during an investigation or
administrative action. Disclosures from
this system can enable individuals to
conceal their wrongdoing or mislead the
course of the investigation by
concealing, destroying, or fabricating
evidence or documents. In addition,
disclosures can subject sources and
witnesses to harassment or intimidation
which may cause individuals to not to
seek redress for concerns about
occupational safety, health,
environmental issues and accident
reporting. Information is used to comply
regulatory reporting requirements.
Dated: November 13, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
These amendments do not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, no
Federalism assessment is required.
[FR Doc. 2013–27518 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am]
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 319
Privacy Act; Implementation
The rule will be effective on
January 29, 2014 unless adverse
comment is received by January 21,
2014. If adverse comment is received,
Department of the Navy will publish a
timely withdrawal of the rule in the
Federal Register.
DATES:
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
* Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
* Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive;
East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09,
Alexandria, VA 22350–3100.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this Federal Register
document. The general policy for
comments and other submissions from
members of the public is to make these
submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
ADDRESSES:
[Docket ID: USN–2013–0039]
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 319 is
amended as follows:
Department of the Navy is
updating the Navy Privacy Act Program
by adding the (k)(5) exemption to
accurately describe the basis for
exempting the records in the system of
records notice NM03800–1, Naval
Global Maritime, Foreign,
Counterterrorism and Counter
Intelligence Operation Records. This
direct final rule makes non-substantive
changes to the Department of the Navy’s
Program rules. These changes will allow
the Department to add exemption rules
to the Department of the Navy Privacy
Program rules that will exempt
applicable Department records and/or
material from certain portions of the
Privacy Act. This will improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of DoD’s
program by ensuring the integrity of the
security and investigative material
complied for law enforcement purposes
by the Department of the Navy and the
Department of Defense.
This rule is being published as a
direct final rule as the Department of
Defense does not expect to receive any
adverse comments, and so a proposed
rule is unnecessary.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:56 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 701
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Robin Patterson at 202–685–6546.
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
Ms.
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
It has been determined that this rule
is not a significant rule. This rule does
not (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in these Executive orders.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Direct Final Rule and Significant
Adverse Comments
DoD has determined this rulemaking
meets the criteria for a direct final rule
because it involves nonsubstantive
changes dealing with DoD’s
management of its Privacy Programs.
DoD expects no opposition to the
changes and no significant adverse
comments. However, if DoD receives a
significant adverse comment, the
Department will withdraw this direct
final rule by publishing a notice in the
Federal Register. A significant adverse
comment is one that explains: (1) Why
the direct final rule is inappropriate,
including challenges to the rule’s
underlying premise or approach; or (2)
why the direct final rule will be
ineffective or unacceptable without a
change. In determining whether a
comment necessitates withdrawal of
this direct final rule, DoD will consider
whether it warrants a substantive
response in a notice and comment
process.
PART 701—AVAILABILITY OF
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
RECORDS AND PUBLICATION OF
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
DOCUMENTS AFFECTING THE
PUBLIC
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
This rule will not have significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because it is
concerned only with the administration
of Privacy Act systems of records within
the Department of Defense. A
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not
required.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This rule does not contain any
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:56 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
These amendments do not involve a
Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
and that such rulemaking will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
These amendments do not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, no
Federalism assessment is required.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 701
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 701 is
amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 701 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552.
2. In § 701.128, add paragraph (y) to
read as follows:
■
§ 701.128 Exemptions for specific Navy
record systems.
*
*
*
*
*
(y) System identifier and name:
NM03800–1, Naval Global Maritime,
Foreign, Counterterrorism and Counter
Intelligence Operation Records.
(1) Exemptions: Investigatory material
compiled solely for the purpose of
determining suitability, eligibility, or
qualifications for federal civilian
employment, military service, federal
contracts, or access to classified
information may be exempt pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5) but only to the
extent that such material would reveal
the identity of a confidential source. An
exemption rule for this system has been
promulgated in accordance with the
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(1), (2)
and (3)(c) and (e) and is published at 32
CFR part 701.
(2) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5).
(3) The reason for asserting this
exemption is ensure the integrity of the
security and investigative material
complied for law enforcement purposes
by the Department of the Navy and the
Department of Defense.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69553
Dated: November 12, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013–27460 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
Domestic Competitive Products
Pricing and Mailing Standards
Changes
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Postal Service is
amending its Mailing Standards of the
United States Postal Service, Domestic
Mail Manual (DMM®), to reflect changes
to prices and mailing standards for
certain competitive products.
DATES: Effective: January 26, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Margaret Choiniere (202) 268–7231 or
Garry Rodriguez (202) 268–7281.
SUMMARY:
This final
rule describes new prices and product
features for competitive products, by
class of mail, established by the
Governors of the United States Postal
Service®. New prices are available
under Docket Number CP2014–5 on the
Postal Regulatory Commission’s (PRC)
Web site at https://www.prc.gov, and also
located on the Postal Explorer® Web site
at https://pe.usps.com.
The Postal Service will revise Mailing
Standards of the United States Postal
Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM®), to reflect changes to prices and
mailing standards for the following
competitive products:
• Priority Mail ExpressTM.
• Priority Mail®.
• First-Class Package ServiceTM.
• Parcel Select®.
• Standard PostTM.
• Extra Services.
• Return Services.
• Mailer Services.
• Recipient Services.
Competitive product prices and
changes are identified by product as
follows:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Priority Mail Express
Prices
Overall, Priority Mail Express prices
will increase 3.0 percent. Priority Mail
Express will continue to offer zoned
Retail, Commercial BaseTM, and
Commercial PlusTM pricing tiers.
Retail prices will increase an average
of 3.1 percent. The price for the Retail
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69552-69553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27460]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 701
[Docket ID: USN-2013-0039]
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Direct final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Department of the Navy is updating the Navy Privacy Act
Program by adding the (k)(5) exemption to accurately describe the basis
for exempting the records in the system of records notice NM03800-1,
Naval Global Maritime, Foreign, Counterterrorism and Counter
Intelligence Operation Records. This direct final rule makes non-
substantive changes to the Department of the Navy's Program rules.
These changes will allow the Department to add exemption rules to the
Department of the Navy Privacy Program rules that will exempt
applicable Department records and/or material from certain portions of
the Privacy Act. This will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of
DoD's program by ensuring the integrity of the security and
investigative material complied for law enforcement purposes by the
Department of the Navy and the Department of Defense.
This rule is being published as a direct final rule as the
Department of Defense does not expect to receive any adverse comments,
and so a proposed rule is unnecessary.
DATES: The rule will be effective on January 29, 2014 unless adverse
comment is received by January 21, 2014. If adverse comment is
received, Department of the Navy will publish a timely withdrawal of
the rule in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods:
* Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
* Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark Center
Drive; East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change,
including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Robin Patterson at 202-685-6546.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 69553]]
Direct Final Rule and Significant Adverse Comments
DoD has determined this rulemaking meets the criteria for a direct
final rule because it involves nonsubstantive changes dealing with
DoD's management of its Privacy Programs. DoD expects no opposition to
the changes and no significant adverse comments. However, if DoD
receives a significant adverse comment, the Department will withdraw
this direct final rule by publishing a notice in the Federal Register.
A significant adverse comment is one that explains: (1) Why the direct
final rule is inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's
underlying premise or approach; or (2) why the direct final rule will
be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. In determining whether
a comment necessitates withdrawal of this direct final rule, DoD will
consider whether it warrants a substantive response in a notice and
comment process.
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
It has been determined that this rule is not a significant rule.
This rule does not (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a
sector of the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another Agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
these Executive orders.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
This rule will not have significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because it is concerned only with
the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the
Department of Defense. A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not
required.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This rule does not contain any information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
These amendments do not involve a Federal mandate that may result
in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and that
such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
These amendments do not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, no Federalism assessment is
required.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 701
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 701 is amended as follows:
PART 701--AVAILABILITY OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY RECORDS AND
PUBLICATION OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DOCUMENTS AFFECTING THE
PUBLIC
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 701 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552.
0
2. In Sec. 701.128, add paragraph (y) to read as follows:
Sec. 701.128 Exemptions for specific Navy record systems.
* * * * *
(y) System identifier and name: NM03800-1, Naval Global Maritime,
Foreign, Counterterrorism and Counter Intelligence Operation Records.
(1) Exemptions: Investigatory material compiled solely for the
purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for
federal civilian employment, military service, federal contracts, or
access to classified information may be exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(5) but only to the extent that such material would reveal the
identity of a confidential source. An exemption rule for this system
has been promulgated in accordance with the requirements of 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(1), (2) and (3)(c) and (e) and is published at 32 CFR part 701.
(2) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5).
(3) The reason for asserting this exemption is ensure the integrity
of the security and investigative material complied for law enforcement
purposes by the Department of the Navy and the Department of Defense.
Dated: November 12, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013-27460 Filed 11-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
