Proposed License Renewal of the Prairie Island Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, 69460-69462 [2013-27730]
Download as PDF
69460
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Notices
issuance of the combined license,
NPF–91, for this facility.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
NRC Staff Determination of Completion
of ITAAC
The NRC staff has determined that the
inspections, tests, and analyses have
been successfully completed, and that
the specified acceptance criteria are met
for Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License,
ITAAC E.3.8.05.01.01. This notice
fulfills the staff’s obligations under 10
CFR 52.99(e)(1) to publish a notice in
the Federal Register of the NRC staff’s
determination of the successful
completion of inspections, tests and
analyses.
The documentation of the NRC staff’s
determination is in the ITAAC Closure
Verification Evaluation Form (VEF),
dated October 21, 2013 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13294A349). The VEF
is a form that represents the NRC staff’s
structured process for reviewing ICNs.
The ICN presents a narrative description
of how the ITAAC was completed, and
the NRC’s ICN review process involves
a determination on whether, among
other things: (1) The ICN provides
sufficient information, including a
summary of the methodology used to
perform the ITAAC, to demonstrate that
the inspections, tests, and analyses have
been successfully completed; (2) the
ICN provides sufficient information to
demonstrate that the acceptance criteria
are met; and (3) any inspections for the
ITAAC have been completed and any
ITAAC findings associated with the
ITAAC have been closed.
The NRC staff’s determination of the
successful completion of this ITAAC is
based on information available at this
time and is subject to the licensee’s
ability to maintain the condition that
the acceptance criteria are met. If new
information disputes the NRC staff’s
determination, this ITAAC will be
reopened as necessary. The NRC staff’s
determination will be used to support a
subsequent finding, pursuant to 10 CFR
52.103(g), at the end of construction that
all acceptance criteria in the combined
license are met. The ITAAC closure
process is not finalized for this ITAAC
until the NRC makes an affirmative
finding under 10 CFR 52.103(g). Any
future updates to the status of this
ITAAC will be reflected on the NRC’s
Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/
new-reactors/oversight/itaac.html.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day
of November 2013.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Nov 18, 2013
Jkt 232001
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David Jaffe,
Project Manager, Division of New Reactor
Licensing, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2013–27727 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2013–0251]
Proposed License Renewal of the
Prairie Island Independent Spent Fuel
Storage Installation
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft environmental assessment
and draft finding of no significant
impact; request for comment.
AGENCY:
On October 20, 2011,
Northern States Power Company, a
Minnesota Corporation, (NSPM) (doing
business as Xcel Energy), submitted an
application to the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC)
requesting renewal of Special Nuclear
Materials (SNM) license number SNM–
2506 for the Prairie Island Nuclear
Generating Plant (PINGP) site-specific
Independent Spent Fuel Storage
Installation (ISFSI) located in Red Wing,
Goodhue County, Minnesota, for an
additional 40 years. The NRC staff is
conducting an environmental review of
the proposed license renewal and has
prepared a draft environmental
assessment (EA) and draft finding of no
significant impact (FONSI) in
accordance with NRC regulations. The
NRC is requesting public comments on
the draft EA and the draft FONSI.
DATES: Submit comments by December
19, 2013. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical
to do so, but the NRC is able to assure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods (unless
this document describes a different
method for submitting comments on a
specific subject):
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2013–0251. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
Chief, Rules, Announcements, and
Directives Branch, Office of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Administration, Mail Stop: 3WFN–06–
44M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
For additional direction on accessing
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Accessing Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean
Trefethen, Office of Federal and State
Materials and Environmental
Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington
DC, 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
7000; email: Jean.Trefethen@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Accessing Information and
Submitting Comments
A. Accessing Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2013–
0251 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information regarding
this document. You may access
publicly-available information related to
this document by any of the following
methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2013–0251.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly
available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and
then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The draft
EA is available in ADAMS under
Accession No. ML13205A120. The draft
FONSI is included in the Draft EA.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2013–
0251 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure
that the NRC is able to make your
comment submission available to the
public in this docket.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM
19NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Notices
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment submissions into
ADAMS.
II. Summary of Draft Environmental
Assessment and Draft Finding of No
Significant Impact
The NRC staff has prepared a draft EA
and draft FONSI (ADAMS Accession
No. ML13205A120) under the NRC’s
regulations in part 51 of Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
‘‘Environmental Protection Regulations
for Domestic Licensing and Related
Regulatory Functions,’’ which
implement the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA)
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq), for NSPM’s
application to renew license SNM–2506
for the Prairie Island (PI) site-specific
ISFSI for up to an additional 40 years.
In 1993, the NRC issued a 20-year
license to NSPM to receive, possess,
store, and transfer spent nuclear fuel
generated at the PINGP, Units 1 and 2,
in the PI ISFSI. License SNM–2506
currently allows NSPM to store up to 48
transnuclear-40 casks (TN–40) and TN–
40 high thermal (TN–40HT) casks at the
ISFSI. The PI ISFSI is located within the
facility boundary of the PINGP, which is
located within the city limits of Red
Wing in Goodhue County, Minnesota,
approximately 45 kilometers (km) [28
miles (mi)] southeast of the
Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area.
The proposed action is whether to
renew the license for up to an additional
40 years. If approved, NSPM would
continue to possess and store the
PINGP, Units 1 and 2, spent fuel at the
PI ISFSI under the requirements in 10
CFR part 72, ‘‘Licensing Requirements
for the Independent Storage of Nuclear
Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and
Reactor-Related Greater than Class C
Waste.’’ The NRC’s regulations at 10
CFR 72.42 authorize the renewal of
ISFSI-specific licenses for a period not
to exceed 40 years. The NRC issued this
provision, allowing for renewals of up
to 40 years, in a final rule published in
the Federal Register on February 16,
2011 (76 FR 8890).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Nov 18, 2013
Jkt 232001
The NRC staff’s environmental review
of the proposed license renewal is
documented in the draft EA and draft
FONSI, which was prepared in
accordance with the NRC’s regulations
in 10 CFR part 51 and NRC staff
guidance in NUREG–1748,
‘‘Environmental Review Guidance for
Licensing Actions Associated with
NMSS programs’’ (ADAMS Accession
No. ML032450279). An EA (1) briefly
provides sufficient evidence and
analysis for determining whether to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) or a FONSI, (2)
facilitates creation of an EIS when one
is necessary, and (3) aids the NRC’s
compliance with NEPA when an EIS is
not necessary. Pursuant to 10 CFR
51.33, the NRC staff is making the draft
EA and the draft FONSI available for
public review and comment.
In October 2012, the NRC and the
Prairie Island Indian Community (PIIC)
entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) (ADAMS
Accession No. ML12284A456). The
MOU acknowledges the PIIC’s special
expertise in the areas of historic and
cultural resources, socioeconomics, land
use, and environmental justice as they
relate to license renewal for the PI
ISFSI, and establishes a cooperating
agency relationship between the NRC
and the PIIC. The MOU also defines the
roles and responsibilities of both
entities and the process they will use to
prepare an EA that incorporates and
reflects the PIIC’s views in the areas of
special expertise.
In the draft EA, the NRC staff
describes the affected environment and
evaluates the potential environmental
impacts from the proposed 40-year
renewal of license SNM–2506 on land
use; transportation; socioeconomics;
climatology, meteorology and air
quality; geology and soils; water
resources; ecology and threatened and
endangered species; visual and scenic
resources; noise; historic and cultural
resources; public and occupational
health and safety; waste management;
and environmental justice. The draft EA
also discusses the alternatives to the
proposed action. The staff also
evaluated the potential environmental
impacts from decommissioning of the PI
ISFSI, taking into consideration an
additional 40 years of operation.
Additionally, NRC staff analyzed the
cumulative impacts from past, present,
and reasonably foreseeable future
actions when combined with the
potential environmental impacts of the
proposed action.
The NRC staff evaluated potential
environmental impacts and categorized
the impacts as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69461
• SMALL—environmental effects are
not detectable or are so minor that they
will neither destabilize nor noticeably
alter any important attribute of the
resource.
• MODERATE—environmental
effects are sufficient to alter noticeably,
but not to destabilize important
attributes of the resource.
• LARGE—environmental effects are
clearly noticeable and are sufficient to
destabilize important attributes of the
resource.
The NRC staff preliminarily finds that
the impacts from the proposed action
would be SMALL and, thus, not
significant for all environmental
resource areas. In addition, the NRC
staff preliminarily concludes that there
would be no disproportionately high
and adverse impacts to minority and
low-income populations, historical and
cultural resources, and that Federallylisted threatened and endangered
species are not likely to be adversely
affected by the continued operation of
the PI ISFSI during the proposed license
renewal period.
The NRC staff is also performing a
detailed safety analysis of the NSPM’s
license renewal application to assess
compliance with 10 CFR part 20,
‘‘Standards for Protection Against
Radiation,’’ and 10 CFR part 72,
‘‘Licensing Requirements for the
Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear
Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and
Reactor-Related Greater Than Class C
Waste.’’ The NRC staff’s analysis will be
documented in a separate safety
evaluation report (SER). The NRC staff’s
decision whether to renew the NSPM’s
PI ISFSI license as proposed will be
based on the results of the NRC staff’s
review as documented in the final EA,
the final FONSI, and in the SER.
On June 8, 2012, the United States
Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit [New York v. NRC,
681 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir. 2012)], in
response to a legal challenge to the
NRC’s Waste Confidence (WC) Decision
and Rule Update, vacated the NRC’s WC
Decision and Rule Update (75 FR 81032
and 75 FR 81037). The Court held that
the WC Decision and Rule Update is a
major Federal action necessitating either
an EIS or a FONSI, and the
Commission’s evaluation of the risks
associated with the storage of spent
nuclear fuel for at least 60 years beyond
the licensed life of a reactor is deficient.
In response to the Court’s ruling, the
Commission, in CLI–12–16 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML12220A100),
determined that it would not issue
licenses dependent upon the WC
Decision and Rule until the issues
identified in the Court’s decision are
E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM
19NON1
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
69462
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Notices
appropriately addressed. In CLI–12–16,
the Commission also noted that this
determination extends only to final
license issuance; all current licensing
reviews and proceedings should
continue to move forward. The
Commission directed the NRC staff to
proceed with a rulemaking that includes
the development of an EIS to support an
updated WC Decision and Rule within
24 months (by September 2014).
The updated rule and supporting
Generic EIS (GEIS) will provide the
necessary NEPA analyses of wasteconfidence-related environmental
issues. As directed by the Commission,
the NRC will not issue a renewed
license for the PI ISFSI before wasteconfidence-related issues are resolved.
This will ensure the NRC’s
consideration of any resource
commitments or potential harm to the
environment before WC impacts have
been addressed. If the results of the WC
GEIS identify information that requires
a supplement to this draft EA and draft
FONSI, the NRC staff will perform any
appropriate additional NEPA review for
those issues before the NRC makes a
final licensing decision.
Based on its review of the proposed
action in the draft EA relative to the
requirements set forth in 10 CFR part
51, the NRC staff has preliminarily
determined that renewal of NRC license
SNM–2506, which would authorize
continued operation of the PI ISFSI in
Goodhue County, Minnesota, for a
period of up to 40 years, will not
significantly affect the quality of the
human environment. No significant
changes in NSPM’s authorized
operations for the PI ISFSI were
requested as part of the license renewal
application. Approval of the proposed
action would not result in any new
construction or expansion of the
existing ISFSI footprint beyond that
previously approved. The ISFSI is a
passive facility that produces no liquid
or gaseous effluents. No significant
radiological or nonradiological impacts
are expected from continued normal
operations. Occupational dose estimates
from routine monitoring activities and
transfer of spent fuel for disposal are
expected to be at as low as reasonably
achievable (ALARA) levels and are
expected to be within the limits of 10
CFR 20.1201. The estimated annual
dose to the nearest potential member of
the public from ISFSI activities is 0.02
millisieverts/year (mSv/yr) [2.20
millirem/year (mrem/yr)], which is
below the 0.25 mSv/yr [25 mrem/yr]
limit specified in 10 CFR 72.104(a) and
the 1 mSv/yr (100 mrem/yr) limit in 10
CFR 20.1301(a)(1). Therefore, based on
this preliminary assessment, the NRC
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Nov 18, 2013
Jkt 232001
staff has preliminarily determined that
an EIS is not warranted and, pursuant
to 10 CFR 51.31, a FONSI is appropriate.
The draft EA and the draft FONSI for
the proposed PI ISFSI license renewal
will also be available at the following
public library: Red Wing Public Library,
225 East Avenue, Red Wing, MN 55066.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.33, the NRC
staff is making this draft EA and this
draft FONSI available for public review
and comment. In doing so, the NRC staff
determined that preparation of the draft
EA and the draft FONSI furthers the
purposes of NEPA. Based on the
comments received, the NRC staff may
determine that a final FONSI is
appropriate or instead find that
preparation of an EIS is warranted
should significant impacts resulting
from the proposed action be identified.
The NRC staff’s final determination will
be noticed in the Federal Register.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day
of November 2013.
For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
Aby Mohseni,
Deputy Director, Environmental Protection
and Performance Assessment Directorate,
Division of Waste Management and
Environmental Protection, Office of Federal
and State Materials and Environmental
Management Programs.
[FR Doc. 2013–27730 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2013–0001]
Sunshine Act Meeting Notice
Weeks of November 18, 25,
December 2, 9, 16, 23, 2013.
PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and Closed.
DATE:
Week of December 16, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of December 16, 2013.
Week of December 23, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of December 23, 2013.
*
*
*
*
*
Additional Information
The Briefing on Spent Fuel Pool
Safety and Consideration of Expedited
Transfer to Dry Casks scheduled on
November 21, 2013, was postponed.
*
*
*
*
*
The schedule for Commission
meetings is subject to change on short
notice. To verify the status of meetings,
call (recording)—301–415–1292.
Contact person for more information:
Rochelle Bavol, 301–415–1651.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the Internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
public-meetings/schedule.html.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.
braille, large print), please notify
Kimberly Meyer, NRC Disability
Program Manager, at 301–287–0727, or
by email at Kimberly.Meyer-Chambers@
nrc.gov. Determinations on requests for
reasonable accommodation will be
made on a case-by-case basis.
*
*
*
*
*
Members of the public may request to
receive this information electronically.
If you would like to be added to the
distribution, please contact the Office of
the Secretary, Washington, DC 20555
(301–415–1969), or send an email to
Darlene.Wright@nrc.gov.
Dated: November 14, 2013.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
Week of November 18, 2013
Thursday, November 21, 2013
4:00 p.m. Discussion of Management
and Personnel Issues (Closed—Ex. 2
and 6)
Week of November 25, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of November 25, 2013.
[FR Doc. 2013–27812 Filed 11–15–13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY OFFICE
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of December 2, 2013.
National Nanotechnology Initiative
Strategic Plan; National Science and
Technology Council; National
Nanotechnology Coordination Office
Week of December 9, 2013—Tentative
AGENCY:
Week of December 2, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of December 9, 2013.
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Executive Office of the
President, Office of Science and
Technology Policy.
E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM
19NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69460-69462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27730]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2013-0251]
Proposed License Renewal of the Prairie Island Independent Spent
Fuel Storage Installation
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Draft environmental assessment and draft finding of no
significant impact; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On October 20, 2011, Northern States Power Company, a
Minnesota Corporation, (NSPM) (doing business as Xcel Energy),
submitted an application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) requesting renewal of Special Nuclear Materials (SNM) license
number SNM-2506 for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP)
site-specific Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)
located in Red Wing, Goodhue County, Minnesota, for an additional 40
years. The NRC staff is conducting an environmental review of the
proposed license renewal and has prepared a draft environmental
assessment (EA) and draft finding of no significant impact (FONSI) in
accordance with NRC regulations. The NRC is requesting public comments
on the draft EA and the draft FONSI.
DATES: Submit comments by December 19, 2013. Comments received after
this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC
is able to assure consideration only for comments received on or before
this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods
(unless this document describes a different method for submitting
comments on a specific subject):
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2013-0251. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
of this document.
Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules,
Announcements, and Directives Branch, Office of Administration, Mail
Stop: 3WFN-06-44M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001.
For additional direction on accessing information and submitting
comments, see ``Accessing Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Trefethen, Office of Federal and
State Materials and Environmental Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-
7000; email: Jean.Trefethen@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Accessing Information and Submitting Comments
A. Accessing Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2013-0251 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information regarding this document. You may
access publicly-available information related to this document by any
of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2013-0251.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the
search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-
based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's
Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-
4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The draft EA is available in
ADAMS under Accession No. ML13205A120. The draft FONSI is included in
the Draft EA.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2013-0251 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make
your comment submission available to the public in this docket.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
[[Page 69461]]
comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS.
II. Summary of Draft Environmental Assessment and Draft Finding of No
Significant Impact
The NRC staff has prepared a draft EA and draft FONSI (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13205A120) under the NRC's regulations in part 51 of
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ``Environmental
Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory
Functions,'' which implement the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq), for NSPM's application
to renew license SNM-2506 for the Prairie Island (PI) site-specific
ISFSI for up to an additional 40 years. In 1993, the NRC issued a 20-
year license to NSPM to receive, possess, store, and transfer spent
nuclear fuel generated at the PINGP, Units 1 and 2, in the PI ISFSI.
License SNM-2506 currently allows NSPM to store up to 48 transnuclear-
40 casks (TN-40) and TN-40 high thermal (TN-40HT) casks at the ISFSI.
The PI ISFSI is located within the facility boundary of the PINGP,
which is located within the city limits of Red Wing in Goodhue County,
Minnesota, approximately 45 kilometers (km) [28 miles (mi)] southeast
of the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area.
The proposed action is whether to renew the license for up to an
additional 40 years. If approved, NSPM would continue to possess and
store the PINGP, Units 1 and 2, spent fuel at the PI ISFSI under the
requirements in 10 CFR part 72, ``Licensing Requirements for the
Independent Storage of Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and
Reactor-Related Greater than Class C Waste.'' The NRC's regulations at
10 CFR 72.42 authorize the renewal of ISFSI-specific licenses for a
period not to exceed 40 years. The NRC issued this provision, allowing
for renewals of up to 40 years, in a final rule published in the
Federal Register on February 16, 2011 (76 FR 8890).
The NRC staff's environmental review of the proposed license
renewal is documented in the draft EA and draft FONSI, which was
prepared in accordance with the NRC's regulations in 10 CFR part 51 and
NRC staff guidance in NUREG-1748, ``Environmental Review Guidance for
Licensing Actions Associated with NMSS programs'' (ADAMS Accession No.
ML032450279). An EA (1) briefly provides sufficient evidence and
analysis for determining whether to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) or a FONSI, (2) facilitates creation of an EIS when one
is necessary, and (3) aids the NRC's compliance with NEPA when an EIS
is not necessary. Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.33, the NRC staff is making the
draft EA and the draft FONSI available for public review and comment.
In October 2012, the NRC and the Prairie Island Indian Community
(PIIC) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) (ADAMS
Accession No. ML12284A456). The MOU acknowledges the PIIC's special
expertise in the areas of historic and cultural resources,
socioeconomics, land use, and environmental justice as they relate to
license renewal for the PI ISFSI, and establishes a cooperating agency
relationship between the NRC and the PIIC. The MOU also defines the
roles and responsibilities of both entities and the process they will
use to prepare an EA that incorporates and reflects the PIIC's views in
the areas of special expertise.
In the draft EA, the NRC staff describes the affected environment
and evaluates the potential environmental impacts from the proposed 40-
year renewal of license SNM-2506 on land use; transportation;
socioeconomics; climatology, meteorology and air quality; geology and
soils; water resources; ecology and threatened and endangered species;
visual and scenic resources; noise; historic and cultural resources;
public and occupational health and safety; waste management; and
environmental justice. The draft EA also discusses the alternatives to
the proposed action. The staff also evaluated the potential
environmental impacts from decommissioning of the PI ISFSI, taking into
consideration an additional 40 years of operation. Additionally, NRC
staff analyzed the cumulative impacts from past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future actions when combined with the potential
environmental impacts of the proposed action.
The NRC staff evaluated potential environmental impacts and
categorized the impacts as follows:
SMALL--environmental effects are not detectable or are so
minor that they will neither destabilize nor noticeably alter any
important attribute of the resource.
MODERATE--environmental effects are sufficient to alter
noticeably, but not to destabilize important attributes of the
resource.
LARGE--environmental effects are clearly noticeable and
are sufficient to destabilize important attributes of the resource.
The NRC staff preliminarily finds that the impacts from the
proposed action would be SMALL and, thus, not significant for all
environmental resource areas. In addition, the NRC staff preliminarily
concludes that there would be no disproportionately high and adverse
impacts to minority and low-income populations, historical and cultural
resources, and that Federally-listed threatened and endangered species
are not likely to be adversely affected by the continued operation of
the PI ISFSI during the proposed license renewal period.
The NRC staff is also performing a detailed safety analysis of the
NSPM's license renewal application to assess compliance with 10 CFR
part 20, ``Standards for Protection Against Radiation,'' and 10 CFR
part 72, ``Licensing Requirements for the Independent Storage of Spent
Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and Reactor-Related Greater
Than Class C Waste.'' The NRC staff's analysis will be documented in a
separate safety evaluation report (SER). The NRC staff's decision
whether to renew the NSPM's PI ISFSI license as proposed will be based
on the results of the NRC staff's review as documented in the final EA,
the final FONSI, and in the SER.
On June 8, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit [New York v. NRC, 681 F.3d 471 (D.C. Cir.
2012)], in response to a legal challenge to the NRC's Waste Confidence
(WC) Decision and Rule Update, vacated the NRC's WC Decision and Rule
Update (75 FR 81032 and 75 FR 81037). The Court held that the WC
Decision and Rule Update is a major Federal action necessitating either
an EIS or a FONSI, and the Commission's evaluation of the risks
associated with the storage of spent nuclear fuel for at least 60 years
beyond the licensed life of a reactor is deficient. In response to the
Court's ruling, the Commission, in CLI-12-16 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML12220A100), determined that it would not issue licenses dependent
upon the WC Decision and Rule until the issues identified in the
Court's decision are
[[Page 69462]]
appropriately addressed. In CLI-12-16, the Commission also noted that
this determination extends only to final license issuance; all current
licensing reviews and proceedings should continue to move forward. The
Commission directed the NRC staff to proceed with a rulemaking that
includes the development of an EIS to support an updated WC Decision
and Rule within 24 months (by September 2014).
The updated rule and supporting Generic EIS (GEIS) will provide the
necessary NEPA analyses of waste-confidence-related environmental
issues. As directed by the Commission, the NRC will not issue a renewed
license for the PI ISFSI before waste-confidence-related issues are
resolved. This will ensure the NRC's consideration of any resource
commitments or potential harm to the environment before WC impacts have
been addressed. If the results of the WC GEIS identify information that
requires a supplement to this draft EA and draft FONSI, the NRC staff
will perform any appropriate additional NEPA review for those issues
before the NRC makes a final licensing decision.
Based on its review of the proposed action in the draft EA relative
to the requirements set forth in 10 CFR part 51, the NRC staff has
preliminarily determined that renewal of NRC license SNM-2506, which
would authorize continued operation of the PI ISFSI in Goodhue County,
Minnesota, for a period of up to 40 years, will not significantly
affect the quality of the human environment. No significant changes in
NSPM's authorized operations for the PI ISFSI were requested as part of
the license renewal application. Approval of the proposed action would
not result in any new construction or expansion of the existing ISFSI
footprint beyond that previously approved. The ISFSI is a passive
facility that produces no liquid or gaseous effluents. No significant
radiological or nonradiological impacts are expected from continued
normal operations. Occupational dose estimates from routine monitoring
activities and transfer of spent fuel for disposal are expected to be
at as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) levels and are expected to
be within the limits of 10 CFR 20.1201. The estimated annual dose to
the nearest potential member of the public from ISFSI activities is
0.02 millisieverts/year (mSv/yr) [2.20 millirem/year (mrem/yr)], which
is below the 0.25 mSv/yr [25 mrem/yr] limit specified in 10 CFR
72.104(a) and the 1 mSv/yr (100 mrem/yr) limit in 10 CFR 20.1301(a)(1).
Therefore, based on this preliminary assessment, the NRC staff has
preliminarily determined that an EIS is not warranted and, pursuant to
10 CFR 51.31, a FONSI is appropriate.
The draft EA and the draft FONSI for the proposed PI ISFSI license
renewal will also be available at the following public library: Red
Wing Public Library, 225 East Avenue, Red Wing, MN 55066.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.33, the NRC staff is making this draft EA and
this draft FONSI available for public review and comment. In doing so,
the NRC staff determined that preparation of the draft EA and the draft
FONSI furthers the purposes of NEPA. Based on the comments received,
the NRC staff may determine that a final FONSI is appropriate or
instead find that preparation of an EIS is warranted should significant
impacts resulting from the proposed action be identified. The NRC
staff's final determination will be noticed in the Federal Register.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of November 2013.
For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Aby Mohseni,
Deputy Director, Environmental Protection and Performance Assessment
Directorate, Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection,
Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2013-27730 Filed 11-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P