Facility Security Clearance and Safeguarding of National Security Information and Restricted Data, 69286-69287 [2013-27140]
Download as PDF
69286
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). When OMB notifies us of its
decision, if approval is denied, we will
publish a document in the Federal
Register providing notice of what action
we plan to take.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 851–2908.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs,
Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rice,
Vegetables.
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR
part 319 as follows:
split the length of the bean pod. Split or
shredded bean pod pieces may not
exceed 8 centimeters in length and 8.5
millimeters in diameter.
(c) Commercial consignments. The
beans must be imported as commercial
consignments only.
(d) Phytosanitary certificate. Each
consignment of fresh beans must be
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by Jordan’s NPPO
attesting that the conditions of this
section have been met and that the
consignment has been inspected and
found free of the pests listed in this
section.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 0579–0405)
Done in Washington, DC, this 13th day of
November 2013.
Michael C. Gregoire,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–27689 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
7 CFR Part 1726
■
1. The authority citation for part 319
continues to read as follows:
Electric System Construction Policies
and Procedures
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
CFR Correction
In Title 7 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Parts 1600 to 1759, revised
as of January 1, 2013, on page 246, in
§ 1726.14, the second definition of
Minor modification or improvement is
removed.
2. A new § 319.56–62 is added to read
as follows:
■
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 319.56–62 Fresh beans, shelled or in
pods, from Jordan.
Fresh beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.),
shelled or in pods (French, green, snap,
and string), may be imported into the
continental United States from Jordan
only under the conditions described in
this section. These conditions are
designed to prevent the introduction of
the following quarantine pests:
Chrysodeixis chalcites, Helicoverpa
´
armıgera, Lampides boeticus Liriomyza
huidobrensis, Maconellicoccus hirsutus,
Phoma exigua var. diversispora, and
Spodoptera littoralis.
(a) Packinghouse requirements. The
beans must be packed in packing
facilities that are approved and
registered with Jordan’s national plant
protection organization (NPPO). Each
shipping box must be marked with the
identity of the packing facility.
(b) Post-harvest processing. The beans
must be washed in potable water. Each
bean pod must be either cut into
chevrons or pieces that do not exceed 2
centimeters in length, or shredded or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:31 Nov 18, 2013
Jkt 232001
[FR Doc. 2013–27735 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 95
[NRC–2011–0268]
RIN 3150–AJ07
Facility Security Clearance and
Safeguarding of National Security
Information and Restricted Data
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of
effective date.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is confirming the
effective date of October 21, 2013, for
the direct final rule that was published
in the Federal Register on August 7,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2013. This direct final rule updated the
NRC’s regulations to standardize the
frequency of required security education
training for employees of NRC licensees
possessing security clearances so that
such training will be conducted
annually consistent with the objectives
of Executive Order 13526, Classified
National Security Information. In
addition, this direct final rule allowed
licensees flexibility in determining the
means and methods for providing this
training, established uniformity in the
frequency of licensee security education
and training programs, and enhanced
the protection of classified information.
DATES: The effective date of October 21,
2013, is confirmed for this direct final
rule.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2011–0268 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may access publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2011–0268. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly
available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and
then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel W. Lenehan, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
3501; email: Daniel.Lenehan@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
7, 2013 (78 FR 48037), the NRC
published a direct final rule that
amended its regulations in § 95.33 of
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. The direct final rule
amendments required NRC licensees (or
their designees) to conduct classified
E:\FR\FM\19NOR1.SGM
19NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
information security refresher briefings
for all cleared employees at least
annually and to provide derivative
classification training for employees
authorized to apply derivative
classifications before exercising this
authority and then at least once every 2
years thereafter. This direct final rule
also gave licensees flexibility in
determining the means and methods for
providing this training. In the direct
final rule, the NRC stated that if any
significant adverse comments were
received on the companion proposed
rule by September 6, 2013 (78 FR 48076;
August 7, 2013), a notice of timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule
would be published in the Federal
Register. A significant adverse comment
is one where a commenter explains why
the rule would be inappropriate,
including challenges to its underlying
premise or approach, or would be
ineffective, or unacceptable without a
change. The NRC did not receive any
comments that warranted withdrawal of
the direct final rule. Therefore, this
direct final rule was effective as
scheduled.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day
of November 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Cindy Bladey,
Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives
Branch, Office of Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–27140 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2009–1093; Amdt. Nos.
117–1, 119–16, 121–357]
RIN 2120–AJ58
Flightcrew Member Duty and Rest
Requirements; Technical Correction
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.
AGENCY:
The FAA is correcting the
final flightcrew member duty and rest
rule published on January 4, 2012. In
that rule, the FAA amended its existing
flight, duty and rest regulations
applicable to certificate holders and
their flightcrew members operating
certain domestic, flag, and supplemental
operations. This document corrects
several issues requiring a technical
correction in the codified text of the
final flightcrew member duty and rest
rule.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:31 Nov 18, 2013
Jkt 232001
Effective January 4, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For
technical questions concerning this
action, contact Dale E. Roberts, AFS–
200, Flight Standards Service, Air
Transportation Division Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
267–5749; email dale.e.roberts@faa.gov.
For legal questions concerning this
action, contact Alex Zektser or Bonnie
Dragotto, AGC–220, Office of Chief
Counsel, Regulations Division, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
267–3073; email: alex.zektser@faa.gov
or bonnie.dragotto@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 4, 2012, the FAA
published a final rule entitled
‘‘Flightcrew Member Duty and Rest
Requirements’’ (77 FR 330). In that rule,
the FAA created a new part, part 117,
which replaced the then-existing flight,
duty, and rest regulations for part 121
passenger operations. As part of this
rulemaking, the FAA also applied the
new part 117 to certain part 91
operations, and it permitted all-cargo
operations operating under part 121 to
voluntarily opt into the part 117 flight,
duty, and rest regulations.
After the final rule was published, the
FAA discovered several issues requiring
a technical correction in the regulatory
text of the rule. These issues, and the
corresponding technical corrections, are
as follows.
Technical Corrections
14 CFR Parts 117 and 121
SUMMARY:
DATES:
1. Certain Domestic All-Cargo
Operations (§ 121.470(b))
Under the existing rules, 14 CFR
121.470(b) states that ‘‘[c]ertificate
holders conducting scheduled
operations entirely within the States of
Alaska or Hawaii with airplanes having
a passenger seat configuration of more
than 30 seats, excluding each
crewmember seat, or a payload capacity
of more than 7,500 pounds’’ may elect
to comply with the flag flight, duty, and
rest rules of part 121.
The final rule that created 14 CFR part
117 provides that all-cargo operations
that do not choose to operate under part
117 will be able to operate under the
same flight, duty, and rest rules that
they operated under prior to the
creation of part 117.1 However, the final
rule inadvertently changed the
1 See Flightcrew Member Duty and Rest
Requirements Final Rule, 77 FR 330, 336–337 (Jan.
4, 2012).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69287
regulatory text of § 121.470(b) to apply
to airplanes with a passenger seat
configuration of ‘‘30 seats or fewer . . .
and a payload capacity of 7,500 pounds
or less.’’ 2 Because this was not the
intent of the final rule, § 121.470(b) has
been corrected so that all-cargo
operations that previously operated
pursuant to § 121.470(b) can continue to
do so after the final rule becomes
effective.3
2. Conflict Between the Definitions in
§ 117.3 and Other Definitions
The regulatory text in § 117.3 has
been corrected to clarify that if there is
a conflict in definitions, the definitions
in § 117.3 control only for purposes of
the flight and duty limitations and rest
requirements of part 117.
3. Reporting Requirements of § 117.11(c)
Section 117.11(b) permits a flightcrew
member to exceed the flight-time limits
of § 117.11(a) and § 117.23(b) in certain
circumstances. To ensure that the FAA
is notified in all instances in which the
§ 117.11(b) extension is utilized,
§ 117.11(c) has been corrected to clarify
that reporting is required if the
extension in § 117.11(b) is used to
exceed either the limits of § 117.11 or
§ 117.23(b).
4. Reporting Requirements of
§ 117.19(b)(4)
Similar to § 117.11(b), § 117.19(b)
permits a flightcrew member to exceed
the flight-duty-period limits specified in
Tables B and C and in § 117.23(c). To
ensure that the FAA is notified in all
instances in which the § 117.19(b)
extension is utilized, § 117.19(b)(4) has
been corrected to clarify that reporting
is required if the extension in
§ 117.19(b) is used to exceed either the
limits of Tables B/C or § 117.23. We
note that while reporting is not required
if the limits of Table B or C are exceeded
by 30 minutes or less, the corrected
§ 117.19(b) requires certificate holder
reporting if the limits of § 117.23 are
exceeded by any amount of time.
5. Cumulative Limitations in § 117.23(b)
The cumulative flight-time limitations
in § 117.23(c) have been corrected to
clarify that a flightcrew member cannot
accept an assignment that would cause
that crewmember’s total flight duty
period to exceed either 60 hours in any
2 Id.
at 403 (emphasis added).
FAA acknowledges that § 121.470(b)
governs scheduled operations and § 110.2 defines a
scheduled operation as a ‘‘passenger-carrying
operation.’’ Consequently, an all-cargo operation
may not be able to operate under § 121.470(b) as
currently written. The FAA is examining this issue
and may address it in a future regulatory action.
3 The
E:\FR\FM\19NOR1.SGM
19NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 19, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69286-69287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27140]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 95
[NRC-2011-0268]
RIN 3150-AJ07
Facility Security Clearance and Safeguarding of National Security
Information and Restricted Data
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is confirming the
effective date of October 21, 2013, for the direct final rule that was
published in the Federal Register on August 7, 2013. This direct final
rule updated the NRC's regulations to standardize the frequency of
required security education training for employees of NRC licensees
possessing security clearances so that such training will be conducted
annually consistent with the objectives of Executive Order 13526,
Classified National Security Information. In addition, this direct
final rule allowed licensees flexibility in determining the means and
methods for providing this training, established uniformity in the
frequency of licensee security education and training programs, and
enhanced the protection of classified information.
DATES: The effective date of October 21, 2013, is confirmed for this
direct final rule.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2011-0268 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may access publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2011-0268. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the
search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-
based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's
Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-
4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel W. Lenehan, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-3501; email: Daniel.Lenehan@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 7, 2013 (78 FR 48037), the NRC
published a direct final rule that amended its regulations in Sec.
95.33 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The direct final
rule amendments required NRC licensees (or their designees) to conduct
classified
[[Page 69287]]
information security refresher briefings for all cleared employees at
least annually and to provide derivative classification training for
employees authorized to apply derivative classifications before
exercising this authority and then at least once every 2 years
thereafter. This direct final rule also gave licensees flexibility in
determining the means and methods for providing this training. In the
direct final rule, the NRC stated that if any significant adverse
comments were received on the companion proposed rule by September 6,
2013 (78 FR 48076; August 7, 2013), a notice of timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule would be published in the Federal Register. A
significant adverse comment is one where a commenter explains why the
rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to its underlying
premise or approach, or would be ineffective, or unacceptable without a
change. The NRC did not receive any comments that warranted withdrawal
of the direct final rule. Therefore, this direct final rule was
effective as scheduled.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of November 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Cindy Bladey,
Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch, Office of
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-27140 Filed 11-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P