30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Quality Control for Rental Assistance Subsidy Determinations, 69103-69104 [2013-27504]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 222 / Monday, November 18, 2013 / Notices
Border Protection, 1331 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington,
DC 20229, tel. 202–344–1060.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12
and 19 CFR 151.13, that Inspectorate
America Corporation, 37 Panagrossi
Circle, East Haven, CT 06512, has been
approved to gauge and accredited to test
petroleum and petroleum products,
organic chemicals and vegetable oils for
customs purposes, in accordance with
the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19
CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ
this entity to conduct laboratory
analyses and gauger services should
request and receive written assurances
from the entity that it is accredited or
approved by the U.S. Customs and
Border Protection to conduct the
specific test or gauger service requested.
Alternatively, inquiries regarding the
specific test or gauger service this entity
is accredited or approved to perform
may be directed to the U.S. Customs and
Border Protection by calling (202) 344–
1060. The inquiry may also be sent to
cbp.labhq@dhs.gov. Please reference the
Web site listed below for a complete
listing of CBP approved gaugers and
accredited laboratories. https://cbp.gov/
linkhandler/cgov/trade/basic_trade/
labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_
gaugers/gaulist.ctt/gaulist.pdf
Dated: October 30, 2013.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and
Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2013–27492 Filed 11–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5683–N–99]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Quality Control for Rental
Assistance Subsidy Determinations
Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD has submitted the
proposed information collection
requirement described below to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review, in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act. The
purpose of this notice is to allow for an
additional 30 days of public comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: December
18, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Nov 15, 2013
Jkt 232001
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
HUD Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503; fax: 202–395–5806. Email:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colette Pollard, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20410; email
Colette Pollard at Colette.Pollard@
hud.gov or telephone 202–402–3400.
Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
This is not a toll-free number. Copies of
available documents submitted to OMB
may be obtained from Ms. Pollard.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD has
submitted to OMB a request for
approval of the information collection
described in Section A. The Federal
Register notice that solicited public
comment on the information collection
for a period of 60 days was published
on September 10, 2013.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
Quality Control for Rental Assistance
Subsidy Determinations.
OMB Approval Number: 2528–0203.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved.
Form Number: None.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: The
Department is conducting under
contract a study to update its estimates
of the extent and type of errors
associated with income, rent, and
subsidy determinations for the 4.3
million households covered by the
Public Housing and Section 8 housing
subsidies. The Quality Control process
involves selecting a nationally
representative sample of assisted
households to measure the extent and
types of errors in rent and income
determinations, which in turn cause
subsidy errors. On-site tenant
interviews, file reviews, third-party
income verifications, and income
matching with other Federal data are
conducted. The data obtained are used
to identify the most serious problems
and their associated costs. HUD program
officers are then responsible for
designing and implementing corrective
actions. In addition to providing current
estimates of error, results will be
compared with those from previous
years’ studies. These comparisons will
indicate whether corrective actions
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69103
initiated since the 2000 study have been
effective and if changes in priorities are
needed. The first QC study was
completed in 1996 and found that about
one-half of the errors measured using
on-site tenant interviews and file
reviews could not be detected with the
50058/50059 from data collected by the
Department, which is why HUD and
other agencies with means-tested
programs have determined that on-site
reviews and interviews are an essential
complement to remote monitoring
measures. The 2000 study showed that
the calculation errors detectable with
50058/50059 data had decreased,
probably because this information was
increasingly subject to automated
computational checks. HUD has
initiated a program of corrective actions
and increased monitoring since 2000
and recent studies of tenant certification
and recertification actions showed
significant error reductions in income
and rent determinations. Future studies
are planned on an annual basis, as
required by legislation. Program
monitoring and income matching
policies being implemented may
eliminate the need for an independent,
statistically valid measure of program
errors provided by the current study
design, but such procedures have yet to
be fully implemented and evaluated.
The Improper Payments Act of 2002
requires that the Department report on
the error measurements annually. This
propose data collection approval request
is for studies to be conducted in 2011,
2012, 2013 and 2014 of prior year
certification and recertification actions.
Respondents (i.e. affected public):
Recipients of Public Housing and
Section 8 Housing Assistance subsidies.
Estimation of the total number of
hours needed to prepare the information
collection, including the number of
respondents, frequency of response, and
hours of response: For each study,
approximately 600 PHA/program
sponsor staff will need to be asked about
recertification procedures, training,
interview procedures, and problems
encountered in conducting
(re)certifications. Although more than
one staff member may need to be
contacted to obtain answers to all
questions, the questionnaire will be
administered once at each participating
project and the total interview times are
expected to be less than 40 minutes per
PHA or project. Researchers will survey
approximately 2,400 program
participants to obtain information on
household composition, expenses, and
income. The time required for these
interviews will vary, but is estimated to
require an average of about 50 minutes
per interview. The time estimates
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
69104
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 222 / Monday, November 18, 2013 / Notices
provided are based on the 2011 QC
survey. The proposed surveys will
continue to make use of Computer
Assisted Interviewing (CAI)
questionnaires and equipment, which
are being used in part because they
reduce interview times. The software
also provides for consistency check and
ensures that all needed data have been
collected, thereby reducing the need for
the follow-up contacts.
ACTION:
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapters
35.
Table of Contents
Dated: November 6, 2013.
Colette Pollard,
Department Reports Management Officer,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
I. Allocation and Related Information
II. Use of Funds
III. Timely Expenditure
IV. Grant Amendment Process
V. Authority To Grant Waivers
VI. Applicable Rules, Statutes, Waivers, and
Alternative Requirements
VII. Mitigation and Resilience Methods,
Policies, and Procedures
VIII. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
IX. Finding of No Significant Impact
Appendix A: Allocation Methodology
[FR Doc. 2013–27504 Filed 11–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5696–N–06]
Second Allocation, Waivers, and
Alternative Requirements for Grantees
Receiving Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) Disaster Recovery
Funds in Response to Hurricane Sandy
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
This Notice advises the public
of a second allocation of Community
Development Block Grant disaster
recovery (CDBG–DR) funds
appropriated by the Disaster Relief
Appropriations Act, 2013 (Pub. L. 113–
2) for the purpose of assisting recovery
in the most impacted and distressed
areas identified in major disaster
declarations due to Hurricane Sandy
and other eligible events in calendar
years 2011, 2012 and 2013. This
allocation provides $5.1 billion
primarily to assist Hurricane Sandy
recovery as well as recovery from
Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee.
The Notice also establishes
requirements governing the use of these
funds.
DATES: Effective Date: November 25,
2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stan
Gimont, Director, Office of Block Grant
Assistance, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW.,
Room 7286, Washington, DC 20410,
telephone number 202–708–3587.
Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number
via TTY by calling the Federal Relay
Service at 800–877–8339. Facsimile
inquiries may be sent to Mr. Gimont at
202–401–2044. (Except for the ‘‘800’’
number, these telephone numbers are
not toll-free.) Email inquiries may be
sent to disaster_recovery@hud.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (3) Ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond; including through the
use of appropriate automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. HUD
encourages interested parties to submit
comment in response to these questions.
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
AGENCY:
Notice.
I. Allocation and Related Information
The Disaster Relief Appropriations
Act, 2013 (Pub. L. 113–2, approved
January 29, 2013) (Appropriations Act)
made available $16 billion in
Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) funds for necessary expenses
related to disaster relief, long-term
recovery, restoration of infrastructure
and housing, and economic
revitalization in the most impacted and
distressed areas resulting from a major
disaster declared pursuant to the Robert
T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act of 1974 (42
U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) (Stafford Act), due
to Hurricane Sandy and other eligible
events in calendar years 2011, 2012, and
2013. The law provides that funds shall
be awarded directly to a State or unit of
general local government (UGLG)
(hereafter local government) at the
discretion of the Secretary. Unless noted
otherwise, the term ‘‘grantee’’ refers to
any jurisdiction receiving a direct award
from HUD under this Notice.
On March 1, 2013, the President
issued a sequestration order pursuant to
section 251A of the Balanced Budget
and Emergency Deficit Control Act, as
amended (2 U.S.C. 901a), and reduced
funding for CDBG–DR grants under the
Appropriations Act to $15.18 billion.
Through a Federal Register Notice
published March 5, 2013, the
Department allocated $5.4 billion for the
areas most impacted by Hurricane
Sandy (78 FR 14329). Subsequent
notices allocated funds for major
disasters occurring in 2011 and 2012
(excluding Hurricane Sandy) and a
future notice will address funding for
qualifying major disasters occurring in
2013.
To comply with statutory direction
that funds be used for disaster-related
expenses in the most impacted and
distressed areas, HUD computes
allocations based on the best available
data that cover all the eligible affected
areas. The initial allocation to Hurricane
Sandy grantees was based on unmet
housing and economic revitalization
needs. The data used to calculate the
allocation did not include unmet
infrastructure restoration needs as
damage estimates were preliminary at
that time. As more data regarding unmet
infrastructure needs are now available,
this Notice provides the following
Round 2 awards totaling $5.1 billion:
TABLE 1—HURRICANE SANDY ALLOCATIONS
Grantee
Second allocation
New York City ......................................................................................................
New Jersey ..........................................................................................................
New York State ....................................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Nov 15, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
$1,447,000,000
1,463,000,000
2,097,000,000
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
First allocation
$1,772,820,000
1,829,520,000
1,713,960,000
18NON1
Total
$3,219,820,000
3,292,520,000
3,810,960,000
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 222 (Monday, November 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69103-69104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27504]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-5683-N-99]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Quality Control
for Rental Assistance Subsidy Determinations
AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: HUD has submitted the proposed information collection
requirement described below to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. The
purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days of public
comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: December 18, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC
20503; fax: 202-395-5806. Email: OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colette Pollard, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; email Colette Pollard at
Colette.Pollard@hud.gov or telephone 202-402-3400. Persons with hearing
or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by calling the
toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. This is not a toll-
free number. Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be
obtained from Ms. Pollard.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD has
submitted to OMB a request for approval of the information collection
described in Section A. The Federal Register notice that solicited
public comment on the information collection for a period of 60 days
was published on September 10, 2013.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: Quality Control for Rental
Assistance Subsidy Determinations.
OMB Approval Number: 2528-0203.
Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved.
Form Number: None.
Description of the need for the information and proposed use: The
Department is conducting under contract a study to update its estimates
of the extent and type of errors associated with income, rent, and
subsidy determinations for the 4.3 million households covered by the
Public Housing and Section 8 housing subsidies. The Quality Control
process involves selecting a nationally representative sample of
assisted households to measure the extent and types of errors in rent
and income determinations, which in turn cause subsidy errors. On-site
tenant interviews, file reviews, third-party income verifications, and
income matching with other Federal data are conducted. The data
obtained are used to identify the most serious problems and their
associated costs. HUD program officers are then responsible for
designing and implementing corrective actions. In addition to providing
current estimates of error, results will be compared with those from
previous years' studies. These comparisons will indicate whether
corrective actions initiated since the 2000 study have been effective
and if changes in priorities are needed. The first QC study was
completed in 1996 and found that about one-half of the errors measured
using on-site tenant interviews and file reviews could not be detected
with the 50058/50059 from data collected by the Department, which is
why HUD and other agencies with means-tested programs have determined
that on-site reviews and interviews are an essential complement to
remote monitoring measures. The 2000 study showed that the calculation
errors detectable with 50058/50059 data had decreased, probably because
this information was increasingly subject to automated computational
checks. HUD has initiated a program of corrective actions and increased
monitoring since 2000 and recent studies of tenant certification and
recertification actions showed significant error reductions in income
and rent determinations. Future studies are planned on an annual basis,
as required by legislation. Program monitoring and income matching
policies being implemented may eliminate the need for an independent,
statistically valid measure of program errors provided by the current
study design, but such procedures have yet to be fully implemented and
evaluated. The Improper Payments Act of 2002 requires that the
Department report on the error measurements annually. This propose data
collection approval request is for studies to be conducted in 2011,
2012, 2013 and 2014 of prior year certification and recertification
actions.
Respondents (i.e. affected public): Recipients of Public Housing
and Section 8 Housing Assistance subsidies.
Estimation of the total number of hours needed to prepare the
information collection, including the number of respondents, frequency
of response, and hours of response: For each study, approximately 600
PHA/program sponsor staff will need to be asked about recertification
procedures, training, interview procedures, and problems encountered in
conducting (re)certifications. Although more than one staff member may
need to be contacted to obtain answers to all questions, the
questionnaire will be administered once at each participating project
and the total interview times are expected to be less than 40 minutes
per PHA or project. Researchers will survey approximately 2,400 program
participants to obtain information on household composition, expenses,
and income. The time required for these interviews will vary, but is
estimated to require an average of about 50 minutes per interview. The
time estimates
[[Page 69104]]
provided are based on the 2011 QC survey. The proposed surveys will
continue to make use of Computer Assisted Interviewing (CAI)
questionnaires and equipment, which are being used in part because they
reduce interview times. The software also provides for consistency
check and ensures that all needed data have been collected, thereby
reducing the need for the follow-up contacts.
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and
affected parties concerning the collection of information described in
Section A on the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility; (2) The accuracy
of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those who are to respond; including
through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission
of responses. HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in
response to these questions.
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapters 35.
Dated: November 6, 2013.
Colette Pollard,
Department Reports Management Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-27504 Filed 11-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P