Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge, Orange County, CA; Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact, 68858-68859 [2013-27405]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
68858
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 221 / Friday, November 15, 2013 / Notices
Drug Addiction Recovery Month,
National Substance Abuse Prevention
Month, and underage drinking
prevention. The CADCA Conference
initiative directly supports SAMHSA’s
mission to reduce the impact of
substance abuse and mental illness on
America’s communities.
This is not a formal request for
applications. Assistance will be
provided only to CADCA based on the
receipt of a satisfactory application that
is approved by an independent review
group.
Funding Opportunity Title: SP–14–
001.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 93.243.
Authority: Section 516 of the Public
Health Services Act, as amended. Funds
for a portion of this initiative are also
authorized under Sections 509, 516 and
520A of the Public Health Service Act,
as amended.
Justification: Eligibility for this award
is limited to CADCA. The purpose of
this cooperative agreement is to provide
training and technical assistance for
thousands of members of community
coalitions dedicated to preventing
substance abuse through a national
leadership conference. CADCA is the
only national organization that has
special expertise and unique broad,
national-level experience in working
with community anti-drug coalitions.
For more than 18 years, coalitions and
coalition leadership have turned to
CADCA to obtain the assistance they
need to implement, operate, and sustain
effective local community anti-drug
strategies. The CADCA will take
advantage of the resources of multiple
agencies located throughout the federal,
state and local governments,
philanthropies, and universities to bring
the best available knowledge,
information, and technology to local
community anti-drug coalitions working
to prevent and reduce drug use among
the youth of America. CADCA is the
only identified organization with the
required experience and national reach
to over 5,000 identified anti-drug
coalitions across the country. CADCA
has long been recognized in
communities as well as states
throughout the nation as the national
voice for the advocacy and technical
support of anti-drug coalitions. As such,
it is uniquely qualified and positioned
to carry out the requirements of this
announcement.
Contact: Cathy Friedman, Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration, 1 Choke Cherry Road,
Room 8–1097, Rockville, MD 20857;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Nov 14, 2013
Jkt 232001
telephone: (240) 276–2316; email:
cathy.friedman@samhsa.hhs.gov.
Cathy J. Friedman,
SAMHSA Public Health Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2013–27334 Filed 11–14–13; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5681–N–44]
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities
To Assist the Homeless
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
AGENCY:
Notice.
This Notice identifies
unutilized, underutilized, excess, and
surplus Federal property reviewed by
HUD for suitability for possible use to
assist the homeless.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Juanita Perry, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC
20410; telephone (202) 402–3970; TTY
number for the hearing- and speechimpaired (202) 708–2565, (these
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or
call the toll-free Title V information line
at 800–927–7588.
In
accordance with the December 12, 1988
court order in National Coalition for the
Homeless v. Veterans Administration,
No. 88–2503–OG (D.D.C.), HUD
publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis,
identifying unutilized, underutilized,
excess and surplus Federal buildings
and real property that HUD has
reviewed for suitability for use to assist
the homeless. Today’s Notice is for the
purpose of announcing that no
additional properties have been
determined suitable or unsuitable this
week.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: November 7, 2013.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 2013–27125 Filed 11–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
PO 00000
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–R–2012–N115; 81683–1265–0000–
S3]
Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge,
Orange County, CA; Final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Finding of No Significant Impact
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
ACTION:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final Comprehensive
Conservation Plan (CCP) and finding of
no significant impact (FONSI) for the
Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge
(Refuge). In the CCP, we describe how
we will manage the Refuge for the next
15 years.
DATES: The CCP and FONSI are
available now. The FONSI was signed
on September 30, 2011. The Final CCP
was signed on May 18, 2012 and
implementation of the CCP is underway.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain
copies of the Final CCP and FONSI/EA
by any of the following methods. You
may request a hard copy or CD–ROM.
Agency Web site: Download a copy of
the document(s) at https://www.fws.gov/
refuge/Seal_Beach/what_we_do/
planning.html.
Email: Victoria_Touchstone@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Seal Beach CCP’’ in the subject
line of the message.
Fax: Attn: Victoria Touchstone, (619)
476–9150, extension 103.
Mail: Victoria Touchstone, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, San Diego NWR
Complex, P.O. Box 2358, Chula Vista,
CA 91912.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Copies
of the Final CCP and FONSI may also
be viewed at the San Diego National
Wildlife Refuge Complex, 1080
Gunpowder Point Drive, Chula Vista,
CA 91910 (call 619–476–9150,
extension 103, for directions and hours).
Local Library: The full document is
also available at the Seal Beach/Mary
Wilson Library, 707 Electric Avenue,
Seal Beach, CA 90740.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Victoria Touchstone, Refuge Planner, at
619–476–9150, extension 103 (see
ADDRESSES), or Kirk Gilligan, Refuge
Manager, at 562–598–1024.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
Legislation authorizing the
establishment of the Seal Beach
National Wildlife Refuge was signed by
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 221 / Friday, November 15, 2013 / Notices
President Richard M. Nixon on August
29, 1972. The Refuge boundaries, which
are located entirely within Naval
Weapons Station Seal Beach, were
determined by the Secretary of the
Interior with the advice and consent of
the Secretary of the Navy. In accordance
with the authorizing legislation, the
Refuge is to be managed pursuant to the
National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as
amended, and pursuant to plans that are
mutually acceptable to the Secretary of
the Interior and the Secretary of the
Navy. The 956-acre Refuge was
officially established on July 11, 1974,
following approval of a general
management plan for the Refuge by the
Service and the Navy. Refuge purposes
include preservation and management
of habitat for endangered species (i.e.,
light-footed clapper rail, California least
tern) and preservation of habitat to
support migratory waterfowl,
shorebirds, and other water birds.
We announce our decision and the
availability of the FONSI for the final
CCP for the Seal Beach NWR in
accordance with National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40
CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements. We
completed a thorough analysis of
impacts on the human environment,
which we included in the
environmental assessment (EA) that
accompanied the draft CCP.
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Administration Act), as
amended by the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, requires us to develop a CCP for
each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
environmental education and
interpretation. We intend to review and
update the CCP at least every 15 years
in accordance with the Administration
Act.
Our draft CCP and EA were available
for a 45-day public review and comment
period, which we announced via several
methods, including press releases,
updates to constituents, and a Federal
Register notice (76 FR 16634; March 24,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Nov 14, 2013
Jkt 232001
2011). The draft CCP/EA identified and
evaluated three alternatives for
managing the Refuge for the next 15
years.
Under Alternative A (No Action),
management would continue
unchanged. Under Alternative B, the
Service would expand current
management to include evaluation of
current Refuge baseline data for fish,
wildlife, and plants; identification of
data gaps; implementation of species
surveys to address data gaps; restoration
of intertidal and native upland habitat;
implementation of an integrated
approach to pest management; and
support for new research projects that
would benefit Refuge resources and
Refuge management. Alternative C,
which was identified as the preferred
alternative, would implement the
majority of the management activities
proposed in Alternative B and expand
opportunities for wildlife observation
on the Refuge. The primary differences
in habitat management between
Alternatives B and C relate to the extent
of intertidal restoration proposed in
Alternative B versus the extent of
upland and wetland/upland transitional
habitat restoration proposed in
Alternative C.
We received five letters on the draft
CCP and EA during the review and
comment period. Comments focused on
constituents of concern related to past
activities on Naval Weapons Station
Seal Beach, mosquito management, and
habitat management and restoration. We
incorporated comments we received
into the CCP when appropriate, and we
responded to the comments in an
appendix to the CCP. In the FONSI, we
selected Alternative C for
implementation. The FONSI documents
our decision and is based on
information and analysis contained in
the EA.
Under the selected alternative, the
Service will expand both natural
resource management and opportunities
of wildlife observation on the Refuge.
Wildlife and habitat management
actions will be implemented to support
listed species, coastal habitats, and
migratory birds; native upland and
wetland/upland transitional habitat will
be restored to provide refugia for rails
and shorebirds during high tide; and
existing visitor serving facilities will be
improved.
The selected alternative most
effectively achieves Refuge’s purposes,
goals, and objectives, particularly those
related to the recovery and protection of
federally listed species and the
enhancement of public appreciation,
understanding, and enjoyment of Refuge
resources; contributes to the Refuge
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68859
System mission; and is consistent with
principles of sound fish and wildlife
management. Based on the associated
environmental assessment, this
alternative is not expected to result in
significant environmental impacts and
therefore does not require the
preparation of an environmental impact
statement.
Alexandra Pitts,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Southwest
Region.
[FR Doc. 2013–27405 Filed 11–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[AAK6006201 134A2100DD
AOR3B3030.999900]
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for the Proposed Fee-to-Trust Transfer
of Property and Subsequent
Development of a Resort/Hotel and
Ancillary Facilities in the City of
Taunton, Massachusetts and Tribal
Government Facilities in the Town of
Mashpee, Massachusetts by the
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
This notice advises the public
that the Bureau of Indian Affairs as lead
agency, with the Mashpee Wampanoag
Tribe, serving as a cooperating agency,
intends to file a draft environmental
impact statement (DEIS) with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
regarding the Tribe’s application for the
conveyance into trust of title to lands
located in Mashpee and Taunton,
Massachusetts, for the benefit of the
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe. This notice
also announces that the DEIS is now
available for public review and that
public hearings will be held to receive
comments on the DEIS.
DATES: The date of the public hearing
will be announced at least 15 days in
advance through notices in the
following newspapers: Taunton Daily
Gazette and the Cape Cod Times, and on
the following Web site:
www.mwteis.com. Written comments on
the DEIS must arrive within 45 days
after the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes its Notice of
Availability in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may mail or handdeliver written comments to Mr.
Franklin Keel, Eastern Regional
Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Eastern Region, 545 Marriott Drive,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68858-68859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27405]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-R-2012-N115; 81683-1265-0000-S3]
Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge, Orange County, CA; Final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) and
finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for the Seal Beach National
Wildlife Refuge (Refuge). In the CCP, we describe how we will manage
the Refuge for the next 15 years.
DATES: The CCP and FONSI are available now. The FONSI was signed on
September 30, 2011. The Final CCP was signed on May 18, 2012 and
implementation of the CCP is underway.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of the Final CCP and FONSI/EA
by any of the following methods. You may request a hard copy or CD-ROM.
Agency Web site: Download a copy of the document(s) at https://www.fws.gov/refuge/Seal_Beach/what_we_do/planning.html.
Email: Victoria_Touchstone@fws.gov. Include ``Seal Beach CCP'' in
the subject line of the message.
Fax: Attn: Victoria Touchstone, (619) 476-9150, extension 103.
Mail: Victoria Touchstone, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, San
Diego NWR Complex, P.O. Box 2358, Chula Vista, CA 91912.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Copies of the Final CCP and FONSI may
also be viewed at the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 1080
Gunpowder Point Drive, Chula Vista, CA 91910 (call 619-476-9150,
extension 103, for directions and hours).
Local Library: The full document is also available at the Seal
Beach/Mary Wilson Library, 707 Electric Avenue, Seal Beach, CA 90740.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria Touchstone, Refuge Planner,
at 619-476-9150, extension 103 (see ADDRESSES), or Kirk Gilligan,
Refuge Manager, at 562-598-1024.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Legislation authorizing the establishment of the Seal Beach
National Wildlife Refuge was signed by
[[Page 68859]]
President Richard M. Nixon on August 29, 1972. The Refuge boundaries,
which are located entirely within Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach,
were determined by the Secretary of the Interior with the advice and
consent of the Secretary of the Navy. In accordance with the
authorizing legislation, the Refuge is to be managed pursuant to the
National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as amended,
and pursuant to plans that are mutually acceptable to the Secretary of
the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy. The 956-acre Refuge was
officially established on July 11, 1974, following approval of a
general management plan for the Refuge by the Service and the Navy.
Refuge purposes include preservation and management of habitat for
endangered species (i.e., light-footed clapper rail, California least
tern) and preservation of habitat to support migratory waterfowl,
shorebirds, and other water birds.
We announce our decision and the availability of the FONSI for the
final CCP for the Seal Beach NWR in accordance with National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40 CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements. We
completed a thorough analysis of impacts on the human environment,
which we included in the environmental assessment (EA) that accompanied
the draft CCP.
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Administration Act), as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to develop
a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for developing a
CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for achieving
refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National
Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and
wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife
and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, environmental
education and interpretation. We intend to review and update the CCP at
least every 15 years in accordance with the Administration Act.
Our draft CCP and EA were available for a 45-day public review and
comment period, which we announced via several methods, including press
releases, updates to constituents, and a Federal Register notice (76 FR
16634; March 24, 2011). The draft CCP/EA identified and evaluated three
alternatives for managing the Refuge for the next 15 years.
Under Alternative A (No Action), management would continue
unchanged. Under Alternative B, the Service would expand current
management to include evaluation of current Refuge baseline data for
fish, wildlife, and plants; identification of data gaps; implementation
of species surveys to address data gaps; restoration of intertidal and
native upland habitat; implementation of an integrated approach to pest
management; and support for new research projects that would benefit
Refuge resources and Refuge management. Alternative C, which was
identified as the preferred alternative, would implement the majority
of the management activities proposed in Alternative B and expand
opportunities for wildlife observation on the Refuge. The primary
differences in habitat management between Alternatives B and C relate
to the extent of intertidal restoration proposed in Alternative B
versus the extent of upland and wetland/upland transitional habitat
restoration proposed in Alternative C.
We received five letters on the draft CCP and EA during the review
and comment period. Comments focused on constituents of concern related
to past activities on Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, mosquito
management, and habitat management and restoration. We incorporated
comments we received into the CCP when appropriate, and we responded to
the comments in an appendix to the CCP. In the FONSI, we selected
Alternative C for implementation. The FONSI documents our decision and
is based on information and analysis contained in the EA.
Under the selected alternative, the Service will expand both
natural resource management and opportunities of wildlife observation
on the Refuge. Wildlife and habitat management actions will be
implemented to support listed species, coastal habitats, and migratory
birds; native upland and wetland/upland transitional habitat will be
restored to provide refugia for rails and shorebirds during high tide;
and existing visitor serving facilities will be improved.
The selected alternative most effectively achieves Refuge's
purposes, goals, and objectives, particularly those related to the
recovery and protection of federally listed species and the enhancement
of public appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of Refuge
resources; contributes to the Refuge System mission; and is consistent
with principles of sound fish and wildlife management. Based on the
associated environmental assessment, this alternative is not expected
to result in significant environmental impacts and therefore does not
require the preparation of an environmental impact statement.
Alexandra Pitts,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2013-27405 Filed 11-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P