Medical Device Development Tools; Draft Guidance for Industry, Tool Developers, and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Availability, 68459-68460 [2013-27233]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2013 / Notices
Act, or in the alternative section
306(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I) and (b)(2)(B)(iii) and
under authority delegated to him, finds
that Dr. Diamond is subject to
debarment. The Chief Scientist has
considered the relevant factors listed in
section 306(c)(3) of the FD&C Act and
determined that debarment for 10 years
is appropriate.
As a result of the foregoing findings,
Dr. Diamond is debarred for 10 years
from providing services in any capacity
to a person with an approved or
pending drug product application under
section 505, 512, or 802 of the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 355, 360b, or 382), or under
section 351 of the Public Health Service
Act (42 U.S.C. 262), effective (see DATES)
(21 U.S.C. 335a(c)(1)(B) and (c)(2)(A)(iii)
and 21 U.S.C. 321(dd)). Any person
with an approved or pending drug
product application who knowingly
uses the services of Dr. Diamond, in any
capacity during his period of
debarment, will be subject to civil
money penalties. If Dr. Diamond, during
his period of debarment, provides
services in any capacity to a person with
an approved or pending drug product
application, he will be subject to civil
money penalties. In addition, FDA will
not accept or review any abbreviated
new drug applications submitted by or
with the assistance of Dr. Diamond
during his period of debarment.
Any application by Dr. Diamond for
termination of debarment under section
306(d) of the FD&C Act should be
identified with Docket No. FDA–2000–
N–0110 and sent to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES).
All such submissions are to be filed in
four copies. The public availability of
information in these submissions is
governed by 21 CFR 10.20(j).
Publicly available submissions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday. Persons with
access to the Internet may obtain
documents in the Docket at https://
www.regulations.gov/.
Dated: November 4, 2013.
Jesse L. Goodman,
Chief Scientist.
TKELleY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2013–27186 Filed 11–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:20 Nov 13, 2013
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–D–1279]
Medical Device Development Tools;
Draft Guidance for Industry, Tool
Developers, and Food and Drug
Administration Staff; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of the draft guidance
entitled ‘‘Medical Device Development
Tools.’’ This document provides
guidance to FDA staff, industry,
healthcare providers, researchers, and
patient and consumer groups on a new
voluntary process within the Center for
Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH)
for qualification of medical device
development tools (MDDT) for use in
device development and evaluation
programs. This draft guidance is not
final nor is it in effect at this time.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency
considers your comment on this draft
guidance before it begins work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
either electronic or written comments
on the draft guidance by February 12,
2014.
SUMMARY:
Submit written requests for
single copies of the draft guidance
document entitled ‘‘Medical Device
Development Tools’’ to the Division of
Small Manufacturers, International and
Consumer Assistance, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4613,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist that office in processing your
request, or fax your request to 301–847–
8149. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for information on
electronic access to the guidance.
Submit electronic comments on the
draft guidance to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Identify
comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathryn O’Callaghan, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68459
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3614, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6349.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The draft guidance describes the
framework and process for the voluntary
CDRH qualification of MDDT, including
definitions of applicable terms, criteria
for evaluating an MDDT for a specific
context of use, the threshold for
qualification, and the contents of a
qualification submission. The intent of
this voluntary qualification policy is to:
(1) Enable faster, more efficient
development of important life-saving
and health-promoting medical devices;
(2) promote the development of tools to
facilitate more timely device evaluation;
(3) provide a mechanism to better
leverage advances in regulatory science;
and (4) more quickly and more clearly
communicate with CDRH stakeholders
about important advances in regulatory
science that may be leveraged to speed
device development and regulatory
evaluation. CDRH expects the
qualification process to expedite
development of publicly available tools
which could potentially be used widely
in multiple device development
programs. Once an MDDT is qualified
for a specific context of use, it can be
used by any medical device developer
for that context of use.
At some point in the future, FDA may
initiate a pilot program for MDDT
qualification submissions, which would
help inform final guidance on this topic.
FDA would publicly announce such a
program prior to initiation.
This guidance does not discuss the
review of MDDTs submitted as part of
a specific medical device regulatory
submission, nor does it address the
specific evidentiary standards or
performance requirements needed for
purposes of qualification of a specific
MDDT.
II. Significance of Guidance
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent the Agency’s current thinking
on the qualification of MDDTs. It does
not create or confer any rights for or on
any person and does not operate to bind
FDA or the public. An alternative
approach may be used if such approach
satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statute and regulations.
III. Electronic Access
Persons interested in obtaining a copy
of the draft guidance may do so by using
the Internet. A search capability for all
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
68460
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2013 / Notices
CDRH guidance documents is available
at https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
DeviceRegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/default.htm.
Guidance documents are also available
at https://www.regulations.gov. To
receive ‘‘Medical Device Development
Tools,’’ you may either send an email
request to dsmica@fda.hhs.gov to
receive an electronic copy of the
document or send a fax request to 301–
847–8149 to receive a hard copy. Please
use the document number 1882 to
identify the guidance you are
requesting.
This draft guidance contains
information collection that is subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information in
21 CFR part 812 have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0078;
the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 814 have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0231; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 807 subpart E have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0120;
and the collections of information in 21
CFR part 809 have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0485.
V. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
[FR Doc. 2013–27233 Filed 11–13–13; 8:45 am]
TKELleY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–D–0880]
Draft Guidance for Industry on
Frequently Asked Questions About
Medical Foods; Second Edition;
Reopening of the Comment Period
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice; reopening of the
comment period.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
reopening the comment period for the
draft guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Frequently Asked Questions About
Medical Foods; Second Edition.’’ We are
reopening the comment period in
response to requests for an extension to
allow interested persons additional time
to submit comments.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments by December 16,
2013.
SUMMARY:
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Dated: November 4, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Submit electronic
comments on the draft guidance to
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shawne Suggs-Anderson, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
(HFS–850), Food and Drug
Administration, 5100 Paint Branch
Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 240–
402–1783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of August 13,
2013 (78 FR 49271), we published a
notice announcing the availability of an
updated draft guidance for industry
entitled ‘‘Frequently Asked Questions
About Medical Foods; Second Edition.’’
(We had published earlier versions of
the guidance in May 1997 and May
2007.) The draft guidance, when
finalized, will update some responses to
questions that appeared in earlier
versions of the guidance and add new
questions and responses regarding the
definition, labeling, and availability of
medical foods. We invited comment on
the draft guidance by October 15, 2013.
explained that they needed more time to
review the guidance, develop
comments, and assemble data.
If all of the guidance in the August 13,
2013, version were new, a reopening of
the comment period for 60 additional
days might be warranted. However,
much of the draft guidance remains
unchanged from our last revision in
2007. The additional content focuses on
FDA’s thinking relating to use of
medical foods under supervision by a
physician, whether medical foods
should be sold by prescription only, and
types of diseases and conditions that a
medical food could be used to manage.
We are, therefore, reopening the
comment period for the draft guidance
for an additional 30 days, until
December 16, 2013. We believe that this
reopening allows adequate time for
interested persons to submit comments
without significantly delaying further
FDA action on this draft guidance. (We
initially intended to extend the
comment period, but, due to the lapse
in appropriations and resulting
cessation of many government
operations from October 1 through
October 16, 2013, we were unable to
issue a notice extending the comment
period before October 15, 2013;
consequently, we are reopening the
comment period for an additional 30
days.)
III. How To Submit Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding the draft
guidance to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
may be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: November 7, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–27213 Filed 11–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
II. Request for Comments
Following publication of the August
13, 2013, notice of availability, we
received requests for a 60-day extension
of the comment period. The requesters
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:20 Nov 13, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68459-68460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27233]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-D-1279]
Medical Device Development Tools; Draft Guidance for Industry,
Tool Developers, and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of the draft guidance entitled ``Medical Device
Development Tools.'' This document provides guidance to FDA staff,
industry, healthcare providers, researchers, and patient and consumer
groups on a new voluntary process within the Center for Devices and
Radiological Health (CDRH) for qualification of medical device
development tools (MDDT) for use in device development and evaluation
programs. This draft guidance is not final nor is it in effect at this
time.
DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by February 12, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance document entitled ``Medical Device Development Tools'' to the
Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance,
Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4613, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist
that office in processing your request, or fax your request to 301-847-
8149. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for information on
electronic access to the guidance.
Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn O'Callaghan, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3614, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
301-796-6349.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The draft guidance describes the framework and process for the
voluntary CDRH qualification of MDDT, including definitions of
applicable terms, criteria for evaluating an MDDT for a specific
context of use, the threshold for qualification, and the contents of a
qualification submission. The intent of this voluntary qualification
policy is to: (1) Enable faster, more efficient development of
important life-saving and health-promoting medical devices; (2) promote
the development of tools to facilitate more timely device evaluation;
(3) provide a mechanism to better leverage advances in regulatory
science; and (4) more quickly and more clearly communicate with CDRH
stakeholders about important advances in regulatory science that may be
leveraged to speed device development and regulatory evaluation. CDRH
expects the qualification process to expedite development of publicly
available tools which could potentially be used widely in multiple
device development programs. Once an MDDT is qualified for a specific
context of use, it can be used by any medical device developer for that
context of use.
At some point in the future, FDA may initiate a pilot program for
MDDT qualification submissions, which would help inform final guidance
on this topic. FDA would publicly announce such a program prior to
initiation.
This guidance does not discuss the review of MDDTs submitted as
part of a specific medical device regulatory submission, nor does it
address the specific evidentiary standards or performance requirements
needed for purposes of qualification of a specific MDDT.
II. Significance of Guidance
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the Agency's current thinking on the
qualification of MDDTs. It does not create or confer any rights for or
on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An
alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statute and regulations.
III. Electronic Access
Persons interested in obtaining a copy of the draft guidance may do
so by using the Internet. A search capability for all
[[Page 68460]]
CDRH guidance documents is available at https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm. Guidance documents are also available at https://www.regulations.gov. To receive ``Medical Device Development Tools,''
you may either send an email request to dsmica@fda.hhs.gov to receive
an electronic copy of the document or send a fax request to 301-847-
8149 to receive a hard copy. Please use the document number 1882 to
identify the guidance you are requesting.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This draft guidance contains information collection that is subject
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections
of information in 21 CFR part 812 have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0078; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 814
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0231; the collections
of information in 21 CFR part 807 subpart E have been approved under
OMB control number 0910-0120; and the collections of information in 21
CFR part 809 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0485.
V. Comments
Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to https://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: November 4, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-27233 Filed 11-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P