Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Actions (Formerly Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) Actions), 68422-68424 [2013-27215]
Download as PDF
68422
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2013 / Notices
Therefore, the USPTO estimates that
the total postage cost for this collection
is 15,124 per year.
There is also annual nonhour cost
burden in the way of filing fees
associated with this collection. The
petitions to cancel and the notices of
registration; therefore the total filing
fees can vary depending on the number
of classes. The total filing fees of
2,438,100.00 shown here are the
minimum fees associated with this
information collection.
opposition and appeal have filing fees.
There are no filing fees for the
remaining items in the collection. The
filing fees for the petitions to cancel,
notices of opposition, and notices of
appeal are per class of goods and
services in the subject application or
Responses
Filing fee ($)
Total non-hour
cost burden
(a)
Item
(b)
(a × b) (c)
Petition to Cancel ..................................................................................................................
Electronic Petition to Cancel .................................................................................................
Notice of Opposition ..............................................................................................................
Electronic Notice of Opposition .............................................................................................
Extension of Time to File an Opposition ...............................................................................
Electronic Request for Extension of Time to File an Opposition ..........................................
Papers in Inter Partes Cases ................................................................................................
• Answers
• Amendments to Pleadings
• Amendment of Application or Registration During Proceeding
• Motions (such as consent motions, motions to extend, motions to suspend, etc.)
• Evidence
• Briefs
• Surrender of Registration
• Abandonment of Application
• Documents Related to Concurrent Use Applications
• Notice of Intent to Appeal a TTAB decision
Electronic Papers in Inter Partes Cases ...............................................................................
• Answers
• Amendments to Pleadings
• Amendment of Application or Registration During Proceeding
• Motions (such as consent motions, motions to extend, motions to suspend, etc.)
• Evidence
• Briefs
• Surrender of Registration
• Abandonment of Application
• Documents Related to Concurrent Use Applications
• Notice of Intent to Appeal a TTAB Decision
Notice of Appeal (Ex parte) ...................................................................................................
Electronic Notice of Appeal (Ex parte) ..................................................................................
Miscellaneous Ex Parte Papers ............................................................................................
Electronic Miscellaneous Ex Parte Papers ...........................................................................
77
1,500
140
5,500
70
17,000
3,100
$300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$23,100.00
450,000.00
42,000.00
1,650,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
37,000
0.00
0.00
130
2,600
2,400
6,500
100.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
13,000.00
260,000.00
0.00
0.00
Totals .......................................................................................................................
76,017
..........................
2,438,100.00
The USPTO estimates that the total
(non-hour) respondent cost burden for
this collection, in the form of postage
costs and filing fees, is 2,453,224 per
year.
TKELleY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Request for Comments
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval. All comments will become a
matter of public record.
The USPTO is soliciting public
comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:20 Nov 13, 2013
Jkt 232001
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) Minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Dated: November 8, 2013.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2013–27214 Filed 11–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Patent and Trademark Office
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
Actions (Formerly Board of Patent
Appeals and Interferences (BPAI)
Actions)
ACTION:
Proposed collection; comment
request.
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing efforts to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on this revision of a
continuing information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2013 / Notices
Written comments must be
submitted on or before January 13, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email: InformationCollection@
uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0063
comment’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to the attention of
Linda Horner, Acting Vice Chief Judge,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board, United
States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–
1450; by telephone at 571–272–9797; or
by email to linda.horner@uspto.gov.
Additional information about this
collection is also available at https://
www.reginfo.gov under ‘‘Information
Collection Review.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board
(PTAB or Board) is established by
statute under 35 U.S.C. 6. This statute
directs that PTAB ‘‘shall on written
appeal of an applicant, review adverse
decisions of examiners upon
applications for patent and shall
determine priority and patentability of
invention in interferences.’’ PTAB has
the authority, under pre-AIA sections of
the Patent Act, i.e., 35 U.S.C. 134, 135,
306, and 315, to decide ex parte and
inter partes appeals and interferences.
In addition, 35 U.S.C. 6 establishes the
membership of PTAB as the Director,
the Deputy Director, the Commissioner
for Patents, the Commissioner for
Trademarks, and the Administrative
Patent Judges. Each appeal and
interference is decided by a merits panel
of at least three members of the Board.
Two of the Board’s responsibilities
under the statute include the review of
ex parte appeals from adverse decisions
of examiners in those situations where
a written appeal is taken by a
dissatisfied applicant, and the
administration of interferences to
‘‘determine priority’’ (or decide who is
the first inventor) whenever an
applicant claims the same patentable
invention that is already claimed by
another applicant or patentee. In inter
partes reexamination appeals, PTAB
reviews examiner’s decisions adverse to
a patent owner or a third-party
requestor.
PTAB’s opinions and decisions for
publicly available files are published on
the USPTO Web site.
There are no forms associated with
these items. However, they are governed
by rules in Part 41. Failure to comply
with the appropriate rule may result in
dismissal of the appeal or denial of
entry of the paper.
The USPTO is adding an existing
information requirement, the Petitions
to the Chief Administrative Patent
Judge, into this information collection.
This requirement is currently covered
under information collection 0651–0072
America Invents Act Section 10 Patent
Fee Adjustments. At the time of the
publication of the USPTO rulemaking,
‘‘Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees’’
(RIN 0651–AC54), the petitions to the
Chief Administrative Patent Judge were
not covered by any existing information
collection request, so it was included in
the 0651–0072 submission because the
fee associated with this petition was
affected by the rulemaking. As part of
this renewal, the USPTO is moving this
information requirement into this
collection because it is associated with
the activities covered by this collection.
However, only the information
requirement and the non-fee burden for
the petitions will be moved into 0651–
0063. The fee will remain in 0651–0072.
II. Method of Collection
By mail, hand delivery, or facsimile
when an applicant files a brief, petition,
TKELleY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Amendment ...................................................................................................................
Electronic Amendment ..................................................................................................
Appeal Brief ...................................................................................................................
Electronic Appeal Brief ..................................................................................................
Reply Brief .....................................................................................................................
Electronic Reply Brief ....................................................................................................
Request for Rehearing Before the PTAB .....................................................................
Electronic Request for Rehearing Before the PTAB ....................................................
Petitions to the Chief Administrative Patent Judge Under 37 CFR 41.3 .....................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:20 Nov 13, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
amendment, or request. These papers
can also be filed as attachments through
EFS-Web.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0063.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households, businesses or other for
profits, non-profit institutions, and the
Federal Government.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
34,537 responses per year. The USPTO
estimates that approximately 25%
(8,634) of these responses will be from
small entities. The USPTO also
estimates that approximately 93%
(32,119) of the briefs, requests, petitions,
and amendments will be filed
electronically.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it takes the public
approximately 2 to 32 hours to complete
this information, depending on the
complexity of the request. This includes
the time to gather the necessary
information, prepare the brief, petition,
and other papers, and submit the
completed request to the USPTO. The
USPTO calculates that, on balance, it
takes the same amount of time to gather
the necessary information, prepare the
brief, petition, and other papers, and
submit it to the USPTO, whether the
applicant submits it in paper form or
electronically.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 858,683 hours per year.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Cost Burden: $334,027,687 per year. The
USPTO expects that all of the
information in this collection will be
prepared by an attorney. Using the
professional hourly rate of $389 for
attorneys in private firms, the USPTO
estimates that the total respondent cost
burden for this collection is
$334,027,687 per year.
Estimated
time for
response
(hours)
Item
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68423
Estimated
annual
responses
2
2
32
32
5
5
5
5
4
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
19
248
1,781
23,662
578
7,672
29
386
11
14NON1
Estimated
annual
burden
hours
38
496
56,992
757,184
2,890
38,360
145
1,930
44
68424
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2013 / Notices
Estimated
time for
response
(hours)
Item
Electronic Petitions to the Chief Administrative Patent Judge Under 37 CFR 41.3 ....
Total .......................................................................................................................
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour
Respondent Cost Burden: $48,239 per
year. There are no maintenance,
operation, capital start-up, or
recordkeeping costs associated with this
information collection. However, this
collection does have annual (non-hour)
costs in the form of postage costs. There
are also filing fees for the appeal briefs
and the petitions to the chief
administrative patent judge, but these
fees are not included in the annual
Estimated
annual
responses
4
151
604
34,537
......................................
(non-hour) cost burden for this
collection. These fees are covered
instead under 0651–0072 America
Invents Act Section 10 Patent Fee
Adjustments.
The briefs, petitions, and other papers
may be submitted by mail through the
United States Postal Service. The
USPTO expects the items in this
collection to be mailed by Express Mail
using the flat rate envelope, which can
accommodate both the varying
Estimated
annual
burden
hours
858,683
submission weights of these
submissions and the various postal
zones. Using the Express Mail flat rate
cost for mailing envelopes, the USPTO
estimates that the average cost for
sending these submissions by Express
Mail will be $19.95 and that
approximately 2,418 may be mailed to
the USPTO.
The USPTO estimates that the total
postage cost for this collection will be
$48,239 per year.
Item
Postage
cost
Responses
Total
postage
cost
Express Mailing Costs
Amendment ..............................................................................................................................................
Appeal Brief .............................................................................................................................................
Reply Brief ...............................................................................................................................................
Request for Rehearing Before the PTAB ................................................................................................
Petitions to the Chief Administrative Patent Judge Under 37 CFR 41.3 ................................................
19
1,781
578
29
11
$19.95
19.95
19.95
19.95
19.95
$379.00
35,531.00
11,531.00
579.00
219.00
Total Postage Costs .........................................................................................................................
2,418
....................
48,239.00
TKELleY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Request for Comments
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval. All comments will become a
matter of public record.
The USPTO is soliciting public
comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) Minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:20 Nov 13, 2013
Jkt 232001
Dated: November 8, 2013.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–27215 Filed 11–13–13; 8:45 am]
CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson,
Office
of the Secretary, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301)
504–7923.
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
Dated: November 12, 2013.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[FR Doc. 2013–27389 Filed 11–12–13; 4:15 pm]
Sunshine Act Meetings
FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS
ANNOUNCEMENT: Vol. 78, No. 217,
Friday, November 8, 2013, page 67130.
ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF OPEN
MEETING: 10 a.m.–12 p.m., Wednesday,
November 13, 2013.
CHANGES TO OPEN MEETING AGENDA:.
Matter To Be Considered: Decisional
Matter—Voluntary Recall Notice NPR.
Item Removed From the Agenda:
Decisional Matters: FY 2014 Operating
Plan.
For a recorded message containing the
latest agenda information, call (301)
504–7948.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
Wednesday, November
20, 2013, 10:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m.
TIME AND DATE:
Hearing Room 420, Bethesda
Towers, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland.
PLACE:
Commission Meeting—Open to
the Public.
STATUS:
Matter To Be Considered
Decisional Matter: FY 2014 Operating
Plan.
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68422-68424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27215]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Actions (Formerly Board of
Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) Actions)
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part
of its continuing efforts to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on this revision of a continuing information
collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public
Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
[[Page 68423]]
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before January 13,
2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Email: InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-
0063 comment'' in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to the attention of Linda Horner, Acting Vice Chief
Judge, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; by
telephone at 571-272-9797; or by email to linda.horner@uspto.gov.
Additional information about this collection is also available at
https://www.reginfo.gov under ``Information Collection Review.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) is established by
statute under 35 U.S.C. 6. This statute directs that PTAB ``shall on
written appeal of an applicant, review adverse decisions of examiners
upon applications for patent and shall determine priority and
patentability of invention in interferences.'' PTAB has the authority,
under pre-AIA sections of the Patent Act, i.e., 35 U.S.C. 134, 135,
306, and 315, to decide ex parte and inter partes appeals and
interferences. In addition, 35 U.S.C. 6 establishes the membership of
PTAB as the Director, the Deputy Director, the Commissioner for
Patents, the Commissioner for Trademarks, and the Administrative Patent
Judges. Each appeal and interference is decided by a merits panel of at
least three members of the Board.
Two of the Board's responsibilities under the statute include the
review of ex parte appeals from adverse decisions of examiners in those
situations where a written appeal is taken by a dissatisfied applicant,
and the administration of interferences to ``determine priority'' (or
decide who is the first inventor) whenever an applicant claims the same
patentable invention that is already claimed by another applicant or
patentee. In inter partes reexamination appeals, PTAB reviews
examiner's decisions adverse to a patent owner or a third-party
requestor.
PTAB's opinions and decisions for publicly available files are
published on the USPTO Web site.
There are no forms associated with these items. However, they are
governed by rules in Part 41. Failure to comply with the appropriate
rule may result in dismissal of the appeal or denial of entry of the
paper.
The USPTO is adding an existing information requirement, the
Petitions to the Chief Administrative Patent Judge, into this
information collection. This requirement is currently covered under
information collection 0651-0072 America Invents Act Section 10 Patent
Fee Adjustments. At the time of the publication of the USPTO
rulemaking, ``Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees'' (RIN 0651-AC54), the
petitions to the Chief Administrative Patent Judge were not covered by
any existing information collection request, so it was included in the
0651-0072 submission because the fee associated with this petition was
affected by the rulemaking. As part of this renewal, the USPTO is
moving this information requirement into this collection because it is
associated with the activities covered by this collection. However,
only the information requirement and the non-fee burden for the
petitions will be moved into 0651-0063. The fee will remain in 0651-
0072.
II. Method of Collection
By mail, hand delivery, or facsimile when an applicant files a
brief, petition, amendment, or request. These papers can also be filed
as attachments through EFS-Web.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651-0063.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or households, businesses or other for
profits, non-profit institutions, and the Federal Government.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 34,537 responses per year. The
USPTO estimates that approximately 25% (8,634) of these responses will
be from small entities. The USPTO also estimates that approximately 93%
(32,119) of the briefs, requests, petitions, and amendments will be
filed electronically.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it takes the
public approximately 2 to 32 hours to complete this information,
depending on the complexity of the request. This includes the time to
gather the necessary information, prepare the brief, petition, and
other papers, and submit the completed request to the USPTO. The USPTO
calculates that, on balance, it takes the same amount of time to gather
the necessary information, prepare the brief, petition, and other
papers, and submit it to the USPTO, whether the applicant submits it in
paper form or electronically.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 858,683 hours per
year.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $334,027,687 per
year. The USPTO expects that all of the information in this collection
will be prepared by an attorney. Using the professional hourly rate of
$389 for attorneys in private firms, the USPTO estimates that the total
respondent cost burden for this collection is $334,027,687 per year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Item Estimated time for response annual annual burden
(hours) responses hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amendment..................................... 2 19 38
Electronic Amendment.......................... 2 248 496
Appeal Brief.................................. 32 1,781 56,992
Electronic Appeal Brief....................... 32 23,662 757,184
Reply Brief................................... 5 578 2,890
Electronic Reply Brief........................ 5 7,672 38,360
Request for Rehearing Before the PTAB......... 5 29 145
Electronic Request for Rehearing Before the 5 386 1,930
PTAB.
Petitions to the Chief Administrative Patent 4 11 44
Judge Under 37 CFR 41.3.
[[Page 68424]]
Electronic Petitions to the Chief 4 151 604
Administrative Patent Judge Under 37 CFR 41.3.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................................... ................................ 34,537 858,683
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $48,239 per
year. There are no maintenance, operation, capital start-up, or
recordkeeping costs associated with this information collection.
However, this collection does have annual (non-hour) costs in the form
of postage costs. There are also filing fees for the appeal briefs and
the petitions to the chief administrative patent judge, but these fees
are not included in the annual (non-hour) cost burden for this
collection. These fees are covered instead under 0651-0072 America
Invents Act Section 10 Patent Fee Adjustments.
The briefs, petitions, and other papers may be submitted by mail
through the United States Postal Service. The USPTO expects the items
in this collection to be mailed by Express Mail using the flat rate
envelope, which can accommodate both the varying submission weights of
these submissions and the various postal zones. Using the Express Mail
flat rate cost for mailing envelopes, the USPTO estimates that the
average cost for sending these submissions by Express Mail will be
$19.95 and that approximately 2,418 may be mailed to the USPTO.
The USPTO estimates that the total postage cost for this collection
will be $48,239 per year.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
Item Responses Postage postage
cost cost
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Express Mailing Costs
Amendment........................ 19 $19.95 $379.00
Appeal Brief..................... 1,781 19.95 35,531.00
Reply Brief...................... 578 19.95 11,531.00
Request for Rehearing Before the 29 19.95 579.00
PTAB............................
Petitions to the Chief 11 19.95 219.00
Administrative Patent Judge
Under 37 CFR 41.3...............
--------------------------------------
Total Postage Costs.......... 2,418 ........... 48,239.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Request for Comments
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record.
The USPTO is soliciting public comments to: (a) Evaluate whether
the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the accuracy of
the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and (d) Minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses.
Dated: November 8, 2013.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-27215 Filed 11-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P