Evaluation of Established Plant Pests for Action at Ports of Entry, 68020-68021 [2013-27132]
Download as PDF
68020
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2013 / Notices
Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services
Gutter, Karis T.; Scuse, Michael;
Taylor, Alexis; Vetter, Darci.
Foreign Agricultural Service
Foster, Christian; Karsting, Philip;
Nuzum, Janet; Palmieri, Suzanne;
Quick, Bryce; Riemenschneider, Robert;
Sheikh, Patricia.
Farm Service Agency
Beyerhelm, Christopher; Dean, Telora
T.; Diephouse, Gregory; Garcia, Juan M.;
Gwinn, James; Harwood, Joy; Monahan,
James; Rucker, Mark A.; Schmidt, John
M.; Stephenson, Robert; Thompson,
Candace; Trimm, Alan; Ward, Bruce
Edward; Ware, Heidi Grace.
Risk Management Agency
Alston, Michael; Hand, Michael;
Nelson, Leiann H.; Willis, Brandon C.;
Witt, Timothy; Worth, Thomas W.
Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services
(FNCS)
Arena-DeRosa, James; Arnette,
Donald; Bailey Jr., Robin David; Barnes,
Darlene; Burr, David Glenn;
Christenson, Daniel Richa; Concannon,
Kevin; Dombroski, Patricia; English,
Timothy D.; Jackson, Yvette S.; Kane,
Deborah J.; Ludwig, William; Mande,
Jerold; Post, Robert C.; Rowe, Audrey;
Shahin, Jessica; Thornton, Jane;
Tribiano, Jeffrey.
Rural Development (RD)
Ferguson, Katherine; Kunesh, Patrice;
O’Brien, Doug.
Rural Business Service
Hadjy, Pandor; Parker, Chadwick O.
Rural Housing Service
Allen, Joyce; Banegas, Ronald; Davis,
Richard A.; Glendenning, Roger;
Hannah, Thomas; Hooper, Bryan;
Primrose, Edna; Ross, Robert H.;
Salguero, Francisco.
Rural Utilities Service
Ackerman, Kenneth; Adams, Keith;
Adelstein, Jonathan S.; Bojes, Gary;
Elgohary, Nivin; Padalino, John C.;
Ponti-Lazaruk, Jacqueline; Zufolo,
Jessica.
Natural Resources and Environment
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Blazer, Arthur; Bonnie, Robert Farrell;
Harrell, Meryl; Mills, Ann C.
Forest Service
Agpaoa, Elizabeth; Atkinson,
Kathleen; Bedwell, James; Blount,
Emilee; Brown, Thomas C.; Bryant,
Arthur; Bytnerowicz, Andrzej;
Christiansen, Victoria; Cleaves, David
A.; Cohen, Warren Bruce; Coleman,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Nov 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
Angela V.; Connaughton, Kent P.;
Cordell, Harold K.; Cullen, Daniel;
DeCoster, Timothy P.; Dixon, Antione;
Doudrick, Robert; Ferguson, Tony;
Ferrell, David L.; Foster, George S.;
Friend, Alexander L.; Grant, Gordon E.;
Guldin, Richard; Gutman, Theodore H.;
Hammel, Kenneth E.; Harbour, Thomas
C.; Hubbard, James E.; Iverson, Louis R.;
Jiron, Daniel J.; Joyner, Calvin N.;
Krueger, Faye L.; Lago, Jacquelyn L.;
Lemly, A. Dennis; Lepore, Mary Beth;
Lugo, Ariel E.; Mangold, Robert D.;
McGuire, Jennifer; Meade, Joe L.;
Meinzer, Frederick C.; Mezainis, Valdis
E.; Moore, Randy; Myers, Jr., Charles L.;
Nash, Douglas R.; Pena, James M.;
Pendleton, Beth G.; Peterson, David L.;
Phipps, John E.; Rains, Michael T.;
Raphael, Martin G.; Rasure, Nora B.;
Reaves, Jimmy L.; Richmond, Charles S.;
Ries, Paul F.; Rodriguez-Franco, Carlos;
Ross, Robert J.; Sears, George A.;
Shortle, Walter C.; Smith, Gregory C.;
Spies, Thomas A.; Stanturf, John A.;
Strong, Thelma J.; Thompson III, Frank
R.; Tidwell, Thomas; Tooke, Tony;
Vose, James M.; Wagner, Mary A.; Wear,
David; Weldon, Leslie; West, Cynthia.
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
Barry, Gayle N.; Boozer, Astor F.;
Christensen, Thomas; Coleman, RayDeleon J.; Erickson, Terrell; Gelburd,
Diane; Golden, Micheal; Herbert, Noller;
Honeycutt, C. Wayne; Jordan, Leonard;
Kramer, Anthony; Kunze, Stephen;
Laur, Michele; Perry, Janet; Reed, Lesia;
Salinas, Salvador; Sims, Richard; Smith,
David W.; Suarez Oliva, Carlos; Weller,
Jason; Wilkes, Homer L.
Research, Education and Economics
Abebe, Yeshimebet; Bartuska, Ann;
Onwulata, Charles; Ramaswamy, Gita;
Woteki, Catherine.
Agricultural Research Service
Ahuja, Lajpat R.; Allen, Lindsay;
Arnold, Jeffrey G.; Baldus, Lisa;
Brennan, Deborah; Brenner, Richard;
Bretting, Peter K.; Chandler, Laurence;
Cleveland, Thomas; Cregan, Perry B.;
Erhan, Sevin; Fayer, Ronald; Gay, Cyril
G.; Gibson, Paul; Gottwald, Timothy R.;
Hackett, Kevin J.; Hammond, Andrew;
Harris, Ellen; Hatfield, Jerry L.;
Hefferan, Colien; Huber, Steven C.;
Hunt, Patrick G.; Jackson, Thomas J.;
Jacobs-Young, Chavonda; Jenkins,
Johnie Norton; Kappes, Steven; King, Jr.,
Edgar; Klesius, Phillip Harry; Kochian,
Leon V.; Kunickis, Sheryl; Lillehoj,
Hyun S.; Lindsay, James A.; Liu, Simon;
Loper, Joyce E.; Magill, Robert;
Marshall, David; Matteri, Robert;
Mattoo, Autar K.; McGuire, Michael;
McMurtry, John; Nackman, Ronald J.;
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Ort, Donald R.; Pollak, Emil; Rango,
Albert; Rexroad, Jr., Caird; Riley, Ronald
T.; Sebesta, Paul; Shafer, Steven;
Simmons, Mary W.; Smith, Timothy P.;
Spence, Joseph; Suarez, David Lee;
Swietlik, Dariusz; Teal, Peter;
Upchurch, Dan; Vogel, Kenneth P.;
Whalen, Maureen; Willett, Julious L.;
Yates, Allison; Zhang, Howard.
Economic Research Service
Bianchi, Ronald; Bohman, Mary;
Munisamy, Gopinath; Pompelli, Gregory
K.; Variyam, Jayachandran N.;
Weinberg, Marca J.
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Barnes, Kevin L.; Bass, Robert;
Bennett, Norman; Clark, Cynthia;
Hamer, Jr., Hubert; Harris, James Mark;
Parsons, Joseph L.; Picanso, Robin;
Prusacki, Joseph; Reilly, Joseph;
Valivullah, Michael.
National Institute of Food and
Agriculture
Broussard, Meryl; Desbois, Michel;
Holland, Robert E.; Montgomery,
Cynthia R.; Otto, Ralph; Qureshi,
Muquarrab A.; Ramaswamy, Sony;
Sheely, Deborah.
DATES: Effective October 24, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Milton, Director, Office of
Human Resources Management,
telephone: (202) 690–2139, email:
william.milton@dm.usda.gov.or Patricia
Moore, Director, Executive Resources
Management Division, telephone: (202)
720–8629, email: patty.moore@
dm.usda.gov.
Dated: November 1, 2013.
Thomas J. Vilsack,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–27124 Filed 11–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–96–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2013–0048]
Evaluation of Established Plant Pests
for Action at Ports of Entry
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public
that we have been and are assessing
certain plant pests that are present in
the United States to determine whether
we should take action to mitigate the
risk posed by those pests when they are
found in consignments of imported
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2013 / Notices
goods at ports of entry into the United
States. We have determined that it is no
longer appropriate or necessary to take
such action on some plant pests on
which we had been taking action at
ports of entry because we are not taking
any regulatory action on those same
pests when we find them in interstate
movement, due to our scientific
determination that we do not need to
mitigate their pest risk. This process
relieves restrictions that are no longer
needed and ensures that actions taken
on plant pests found in imported goods
are consistent with the actions we take
on those same pests when they appear
in interstate commerce.
Mr.
David B. Lamb, Regulatory Policy
Specialist, RPM, PPQ, APHIS, 4700
River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD
20737–1231; (301) 851–2018; or Ms.
Diane L. Schuble, National Coordinator
for Official Control, Pest Detection and
Emergency Programs, PPQ, APHIS, 4700
River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD
20737–1237; (301) 851–2334.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Under the
Plant Protection Act, as amended (PPA,
7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), the Secretary of
Agriculture is authorized to take such
actions as may be necessary to prevent
the introduction and spread of plant
pests within the United States. The
Secretary has delegated this
responsibility to the Administrator of
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS).
Pursuant to the PPA, when the
Secretary considers it necessary to
prevent the dissemination of a plant
pest that is new to or not known to be
widely prevalent or distributed within
and throughout the United States, the
Secretary may hold, seize, quarantine,
treat, apply other remedial measures to,
destroy, or otherwise dispose of any
plant, plant pest, noxious weed,
biological control organism, plant
product, article, or means of conveyance
that, among other things, is moving into
the United States and that the Secretary
has reason to believe is infested with a
plant pest at the time of the movement.
Under this PPA authority, consignments
of imported articles are inspected at the
port of entry to determine whether plant
pests are associated with them and, if
so, prescribe remedial measures as
described in the Act. APHIS typically
refers to prescribing measures to address
the pest risk as ‘‘taking action’’ at the
port of entry to prevent a plant pest
from being introduced into or further
disseminated within the United States.
Pests that are subject to such actions are
referred to as ‘‘actionable pests.’’
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Nov 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
APHIS determines whether a pest is
actionable based on its novelty and
known prevalence or distribution
within and throughout the United
States, its potential harm to U.S.
agricultural, environmental, or other
resources, and the need to mitigate its
pest risk, if any. However, after APHIS
determines that a pest is actionable,
circumstances may change, and it may
no longer be necessary or be an effective
use of resources to take action on the
pest at ports of entry. For example, a
bacterium could cause disease in a
plant, but also could have become
widespread in the United States, making
any future control efforts ineffective and
a waste of limited resources. We may
lack effective control methods for an
insect pest that is present in the United
States, which would result in taking
action that will likely not prevent the
pest from causing damage but will
continue to expend limited resources.
Or, for example, a mealybug could
damage certain plants, but additional
experience with the pest may reveal that
the damage is not of sufficient plant pest
risk or economic importance to merit
action at the port of entry. These
circumstances often mean that no
restrictions are placed on the interstate
movement of articles infested with these
pests when the articles are moved
interstate. It is important to make the
actions we take at the port of entry
consistent with the actions taken in
interstate movement, to maintain a
uniform and consistent pest risk
safeguarding and trade policy.
To ensure that we are taking action at
the ports of entry only when such action
is warranted, APHIS has started to
assess currently actionable plant pests
that are present in the United States to
determine which specific pests we
should continue to take action on at the
port of entry. The assessment is based
on a number of factors, including:
• The extent of the pest’s distribution
in the United States;
• The pest’s impacts on the economy
(including its potential impacts on
export markets), agricultural
production, and the environment;
• The scientific knowledge we have
about the pest and the risk it poses; and
• The availability and effectiveness of
control or eradication tools for the pest.
After we have completed our
assessment, we share the information
with the National Plant Board, a group
of State plant health agencies. The
States conduct their own reviews and
provide additional information to help
inform APHIS’ decisionmaking. For
example, States may have additional
information on the presence or
distribution of a pest in their States, on
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68021
the damage that pest causes, or potential
control tools.
After reviewing the information
provided by the States, APHIS makes a
decision on whether to continue taking
action at ports of entry to mitigate the
risk associated with a specific plant
pest. Data leading to the decisions are
documented in letters that are available
on the Web at https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/
plant_pest_info/frsmp/non-regpests.shtml. As of September 2013,
APHIS has determined that 71 pests on
which we had been taking action at
ports of entry to address their risk no
longer qualify under the PPA as
requiring such action.
Done in Washington, DC, this 6th day of
November 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–27132 Filed 11–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2013–0007]
Notice of Affirmation of Addition of a
Treatment Schedule for Methyl
Bromide Fumigation of Blueberries
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are affirming our earlier
determination that it was necessary to
immediately add to the Plant Protection
and Quarantine Treatment Manual a
treatment schedule for methyl bromide
fumigation of blueberries for
Mediterranean fruit fly and South
American fruit fly. In a previous notice,
we made available to the public for
review and comment a treatment
evaluation document that described the
new treatment schedule and explained
why we have determined that it is
effective at neutralizing these fruit flies.
DATES: Effective Date: Effective on
November 13, 2013, we are affirming the
addition to the Plant Protection and
Quarantine Treatment Manual of the
treatment described in the notice
published at 78 FR 36507–36508 on
June 18, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Inder P.S. Gadh, Senior Risk Manager–
Treatments, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River
Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737;
(301) 851–2018.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68020-68021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27132]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2013-0048]
Evaluation of Established Plant Pests for Action at Ports of
Entry
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public that we have been and are assessing
certain plant pests that are present in the United States to determine
whether we should take action to mitigate the risk posed by those pests
when they are found in consignments of imported
[[Page 68021]]
goods at ports of entry into the United States. We have determined that
it is no longer appropriate or necessary to take such action on some
plant pests on which we had been taking action at ports of entry
because we are not taking any regulatory action on those same pests
when we find them in interstate movement, due to our scientific
determination that we do not need to mitigate their pest risk. This
process relieves restrictions that are no longer needed and ensures
that actions taken on plant pests found in imported goods are
consistent with the actions we take on those same pests when they
appear in interstate commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David B. Lamb, Regulatory Policy
Specialist, RPM, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD
20737-1231; (301) 851-2018; or Ms. Diane L. Schuble, National
Coordinator for Official Control, Pest Detection and Emergency
Programs, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1237; (301) 851-2334.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Plant Protection Act, as amended
(PPA, 7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), the Secretary of Agriculture is
authorized to take such actions as may be necessary to prevent the
introduction and spread of plant pests within the United States. The
Secretary has delegated this responsibility to the Administrator of the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).
Pursuant to the PPA, when the Secretary considers it necessary to
prevent the dissemination of a plant pest that is new to or not known
to be widely prevalent or distributed within and throughout the United
States, the Secretary may hold, seize, quarantine, treat, apply other
remedial measures to, destroy, or otherwise dispose of any plant, plant
pest, noxious weed, biological control organism, plant product,
article, or means of conveyance that, among other things, is moving
into the United States and that the Secretary has reason to believe is
infested with a plant pest at the time of the movement. Under this PPA
authority, consignments of imported articles are inspected at the port
of entry to determine whether plant pests are associated with them and,
if so, prescribe remedial measures as described in the Act. APHIS
typically refers to prescribing measures to address the pest risk as
``taking action'' at the port of entry to prevent a plant pest from
being introduced into or further disseminated within the United States.
Pests that are subject to such actions are referred to as ``actionable
pests.''
APHIS determines whether a pest is actionable based on its novelty
and known prevalence or distribution within and throughout the United
States, its potential harm to U.S. agricultural, environmental, or
other resources, and the need to mitigate its pest risk, if any.
However, after APHIS determines that a pest is actionable,
circumstances may change, and it may no longer be necessary or be an
effective use of resources to take action on the pest at ports of
entry. For example, a bacterium could cause disease in a plant, but
also could have become widespread in the United States, making any
future control efforts ineffective and a waste of limited resources. We
may lack effective control methods for an insect pest that is present
in the United States, which would result in taking action that will
likely not prevent the pest from causing damage but will continue to
expend limited resources. Or, for example, a mealybug could damage
certain plants, but additional experience with the pest may reveal that
the damage is not of sufficient plant pest risk or economic importance
to merit action at the port of entry. These circumstances often mean
that no restrictions are placed on the interstate movement of articles
infested with these pests when the articles are moved interstate. It is
important to make the actions we take at the port of entry consistent
with the actions taken in interstate movement, to maintain a uniform
and consistent pest risk safeguarding and trade policy.
To ensure that we are taking action at the ports of entry only when
such action is warranted, APHIS has started to assess currently
actionable plant pests that are present in the United States to
determine which specific pests we should continue to take action on at
the port of entry. The assessment is based on a number of factors,
including:
The extent of the pest's distribution in the United
States;
The pest's impacts on the economy (including its potential
impacts on export markets), agricultural production, and the
environment;
The scientific knowledge we have about the pest and the
risk it poses; and
The availability and effectiveness of control or
eradication tools for the pest.
After we have completed our assessment, we share the information
with the National Plant Board, a group of State plant health agencies.
The States conduct their own reviews and provide additional information
to help inform APHIS' decisionmaking. For example, States may have
additional information on the presence or distribution of a pest in
their States, on the damage that pest causes, or potential control
tools.
After reviewing the information provided by the States, APHIS makes
a decision on whether to continue taking action at ports of entry to
mitigate the risk associated with a specific plant pest. Data leading
to the decisions are documented in letters that are available on the
Web at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/frsmp/non-reg-pests.shtml. As of September 2013, APHIS has determined that 71
pests on which we had been taking action at ports of entry to address
their risk no longer qualify under the PPA as requiring such action.
Done in Washington, DC, this 6th day of November 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-27132 Filed 11-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P