Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Methods: Designation of Five New Equivalent Methods, 67360-67361 [2013-27016]
Download as PDF
67360
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2013 / Notices
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9902–59–ORD]
Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and
Equivalent Methods: Designation of
Five New Equivalent Methods
Office of Research and
Development; Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of the designation of five
new equivalent methods for monitoring
ambient air quality.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has designated, in accordance
with 40 CFR Part 53, five new
equivalent methods, one for measuring
concentrations of PM10, one for
measuring concentrations of PM10-2.5,
two for measuring PM2.5, and one for
measuring NO2 in the ambient air.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Vanderpool, Human Exposure
and Atmospheric Sciences Division
(MD–D205–03), National Exposure
Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711. Email:
Vanderpool.Robert@epa.gov.
SUMMARY:
In
accordance with regulations at 40 CFR
Part 53, the EPA evaluates various
methods for monitoring the
concentrations of those ambient air
pollutants for which EPA has
established National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQSs) as set
forth in 40 CFR Part 50. Monitoring
methods that are determined to meet
specific requirements for adequacy are
designated by the EPA as either
reference methods or equivalent
methods (as applicable), thereby
permitting their use under 40 CFR Part
58 by States and other agencies for
determining compliance with the
NAAQSs.
The EPA hereby announces the
designation of five new equivalent
methods for measuring pollutant
concentrations in the ambient air: One
for measuring concentrations of PM10-2.5,
one for measuring concentrations of
PM10, two for measuring concentrations
of PM2.5 and one for measuring
concentrations of NO2. These
designations are made under the
provisions of 40 CFR Part 53, as
amended on August 31, 2011 (76 FR
54326–54341).
Two of the new equivalent methods
for PM are automated monitoring
methods utilizing a measurement
principle based on sample collection by
filtration and analysis by an inertial
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:41 Nov 08, 2013
Jkt 232001
micro-balance that provides direct mass
measurements in near real time.
Separation of the PM10 aerosol into
PM10-2.5 and PM2.5 particle size fractions
is by a virtual impactor. The newly
designated equivalent methods are
identified as follows:
EQPM–1013–207, ‘‘Thermo Scientific
TEOM® 1405–DF Dichotomous Ambient
Particular Monitor with FDMS®,’’
configured for dual filter sampling of
fine (PM2.5) and coarse particles using
the US EPA PM10 inlet specified in 40
CFR part 50 Appendix L, Figs. L–2 thru
L–19 and a virtual impactor, with a total
flow rate of 16.67 L/min, fine sample
flow of 3 L/min, and coarse sample flow
rate of 1.67 L/min, and operating with
firmware version 1.70 and later,
operated with or without external
enclosures, and operated in accordance
with the Thermo Scientific TEOM®
1405–DF Dichotomous Ambient
Particulate Monitor Instruction Manual.
This designation applies to PM10-2.5
measurements only.
EQPM–1013–208, ‘‘Thermo Scientific
TEOM® 1405–DF Dichotomous Ambient
Particular Monitor with FDMS®,’’
configured for dual filter sampling of
fine (PM2.5) and coarse particles using
the US EPA PM10 inlet specified in 40
CFR part 50 Appendix L, Figs. L–2 thru
L–19 and a virtual impactor, with a total
flow rate of 16.67 L/min, fine sample
flow of 3 L/min, and coarse sample flow
rate of 1.67 L/min, and operating with
firmware version 1.70 and later,
operated with or without external
enclosures, and operated in accordance
with the Thermo Scientific TEOM®
1405–DF Dichotomous Ambient
Particulate Monitor Instruction Manual.
This designation applies to PM10
measurements only.
Applications for the equivalent
method determinations for these
candidate methods were received by the
EPA Office of Research and
Development on July 26, 2011 and
March 6, 2009. The monitors are
commercially available from the
applicant, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Air
Quality Instruments, Environmental
Instruments Division, 27 Forge Parkway,
Franklin, MA 02038.
Two of the new equivalent methods
are automated monitoring methods
utilizing a measurement principle based
on sample collection by filtration and
analysis by beta radiation attenuation.
The newly designated equivalent
methods are identified as follows:
EQPM–1013–209, ‘‘Met One
Instruments, Inc. BAM–1022 Beta
Attenuation Mass Monitor—Outdoor
PM2.5 FEM Configuration,’’ configured
for 24 1-hour average measurements of
PM2.5 by beta attenuation, using a glass
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
fiber filter tape roll (460130) and a
sample flow rate of 16.67 liters/min and
with the standard (BX–802) EPA PM10
inlet (meeting 40 CFR part 50 Appendix
L specifications) and with a BGI VSCC®
Very Sharp Cut Cyclone (BX–808)
particle size separator, and equipped
with external enclosure BX–922 and
BX–592 ambient temperature sensor or
BX–596 ambient temperature/
barometric combination sensor or BX–
597 ambient temperature/barometric
pressure/relative humidity combination
sensor. Instrument must be operated in
accordance with the BAM 1022
Particulate Monitor operation manual,
revision 3 or later. This designation
applies to PM2.5 measurements only.
The application for the equivalent
method determination for this candidate
method was received by the EPA Office
of Research and Development on
January 16, 2013. The monitor is
commercially available from the
applicant, Met One Instruments, Inc.,
1600 Washington Blvd., Grants Pass, Or
97526.
EQPM–1013–211, ‘‘Environnement
S.A. Model MP101M PM2.5 Beta
Attenuation Monitor’’ using a glass fiber
filter tape roll, operated at a sample flow
rate of 16.67 liters/min for 24-hour
average measurements of PM2.5,
configured with the standard EPA PM10
inlet (meeting 40 CFR part 50 Appendix
L specifications) associated with a BGI
VSCC® Very Sharp Cut Cyclone particle
size separator and using a temperature
regulated sampling tube with ambient
meteorological sensor. With or without
optional ESTEL analog inputs/outputs,
serial link: 1 RS–232/422; USB port;
Ethernet port (TCP/IP). Instrument must
be operated in accordance with the
Ambient Air Continuous Particulate
Monitor Model MP101M operation
manual. This designation applies to
PM2.5 measurements only.
The application for the equivalent
method determination for this candidate
method was received by the EPA Office
of Research and Development on June
11, 2013. The monitor is commercially
available from the applicant,
Environment S.A., 111 bd Robespierre,
78300 POISSY, France.
The new equivalent method for NO2
is an automated method (analyzer)
utilizing the principle of Cavity
Attenuated Phase Shift spectroscopy
and the calibration procedure specified
in the operation manual. The newly
designated equivalent method is
identified as follows:
EQNA–1013–210, ‘‘Environnement
S.A. Model AS32M cavity attenuated
phase shift spectroscopy Nitrogen
Dioxide Analyzer’’, operated on any full
scale range between 0–500 ppb and 0–
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2013 / Notices
1000 ppb, at any ambient temperature in
the range of 20°C to 30°C, with
automatic response time ON, set to 11,
in accordance with the associated
instrument manual; with sample
particulate filter; zero gas inlet and zero
check enabled; sample permeation
dryer. Serial link: 2 RS–232; USB port;
Ethernet port (TCP/IP); onboard html
web server and, with or without any of
the following options: Internal
permeation bench; ESTEL analog
inputs/outputs.
The application for equivalent
method determination for the NO2
method was received by the Office of
Research and Development on
November 29, 2012. This analyzer
model is commercially available from
the applicant, Environment S.A., 111 bd
Robespierre, 78300 POISSY, France.
Test monitors representative of these
methods have been tested in accordance
with the applicable test procedures
specified in 40 CFR Part 53, as amended
on August 31, 2011. After reviewing the
results of those tests and other
information submitted in the
applications, EPA has determined, in
accordance with Part 53, that these
methods should be designated as
equivalent methods.
As designated equivalent methods,
these methods are acceptable for use by
states and other air monitoring agencies
under the requirements of 40 CFR Part
58, Ambient Air Quality Surveillance.
For such purposes, the methods must be
used in strict accordance with the
operation or instruction manuals
associated with the methods and subject
to any specifications and limitations
(e.g., configuration or operational
settings) specified in the applicable
designated descriptions (see the
identification of the methods above).
Use of the methods also should be in
general accordance with the guidance
and recommendations of applicable
sections of the ‘‘Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume I,’’ EPA/
600/R–94/038a and ‘‘Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume II,
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Program’’ EPA–454/B–08–003,
December, 2008. Provisions concerning
modification of such methods by users
are specified under Section 2.8
(Modifications of Methods by Users) of
Appendix C to 40 CFR Part 58.
Consistent or repeated noncompliance
should be reported to: Director, Human
Exposure and Atmospheric Sciences
Division (MD–E205–01), National
Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:41 Nov 08, 2013
Jkt 232001
67361
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711.
Designation of these new equivalent
methods is intended to assist the States
in establishing and operating their air
quality surveillance systems under 40
CFR Part 58. Questions concerning the
commercial availability or technical
aspects of the methods should be
directed to the applicant.
the requesting person’s interest in the
Regional Administrator’s determination
and a brief statement of the information
that the requesting person intends to
submit at such hearing; and the
signature of the individual making the
request or, if the request is made on
behalf of an organization or other entity,
the signature of a responsible official of
the organization or other entity.
Desmond Mayes,
Acting Director, National Exposure Research
Laboratory.
ADDRESSES:
[FR Doc. 2013–27016 Filed 11–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R04–OW–2013–0470] [FRL–9902–76–
Region 4]
Public Water System Supervision
Program Revision for the
Commonwealth of Kentucky
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of tentative approval.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the Commonwealth of Kentucky is
revising its approved Public Water
System Supervision Program. Kentucky
has adopted the following rules:
Consumer Confidence Report, Ground
Water and Long Term 1 Enhanced
Surface Water Treatment. The EPA has
determined that Kentucky’s rules are no
less stringent than the corresponding
federal regulations. Therefore, the EPA
is tentatively approving this revision to
the Commonwealth of Kentucky’s
Public Water System Supervision
Program.
DATES: Any interested person may
request a public hearing. A request for
a public hearing must be submitted by
December 12, 2013, to the Regional
Administrator at the EPA Region 4
address shown below. The Regional
Administrator may deny frivolous or
insubstantial requests for a hearing.
However, if a substantial request for a
public hearing is made by December 12,
2013, a public hearing will be held. If
the EPA Region 4 does not receive a
timely and appropriate request for a
hearing and the Regional Administrator
does not elect to hold a hearing on his
own motion, this tentative approval
shall become final and effective on
December 12, 2013. Any request for a
public hearing shall include the
following information: The name,
address and telephone number of the
individual, organization or other entity
requesting a hearing; a brief statement of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
All documents relating to
this determination are available for
inspection between the hours of 8:30
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, at the following offices:
Kentucky Department for
Environmental Protection, Division of
Water, 200 Fair Oaks Lane, Fourth
Floor, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601; and
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region 4, Safe Drinking Water
Branch, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta,
Georgia 30303.
Mr.
Brian Thames, the EPA Region 4, Safe
Drinking Water Branch, at the address
given above, by telephone at (404) 562–
9454, or at thames.brian@epa.gov.
EPA Analysis: On November 19, 2009,
the Commonwealth of Kentucky
submitted requests that the Region
approve revisions to the
Commonwealth’s Safe Drinking Water
Act Public Water System Supervision
Program to include the authority to
implement and enforce the Consumer
Confidence Report Rule and the Long
Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule. On October 14, 2010,
the Commonwealth of Kentucky also
submitted a request that the Region
approve revisions to the
Commonwealth’s Safe Drinking Water
Act Public Water System Supervision
Program to include the authority to
implement and enforce the Ground
Water rule. For the revisions to be
approved, the EPA must find the State
Rules, 401 KAR 8:075, Section 1(1); 401
KAR 8:150, Section 8; and 401 KAR
8:150, Section 10 to be no less stringent
than the Federal Rules codified at 40
CFR part 141, Subpart O—Consumer
Confidence Reports; 40 CFR part 141,
Subpart T—Enhanced Filtration and
Disinfection—Systems Serving Fewer
Than 10,000 People; and 40 CFR part
141, Subpart S—Ground Water Rule.
The EPA reviewed the applications
using the Federal statutory provisions
(Section 1413 of the Safe Drinking
Water Act), Federal regulations (at 40
CFR part 142), State regulations, rule
crosswalks, and EPA regulatory
guidance to determine whether the
request for revisions is approvable. The
EPA determined that the Kentucky
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67360-67361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27016]
[[Page 67360]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9902-59-ORD]
Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Methods:
Designation of Five New Equivalent Methods
AGENCY: Office of Research and Development; Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of the designation of five new equivalent methods for
monitoring ambient air quality.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has designated, in accordance with 40 CFR Part 53, five
new equivalent methods, one for measuring concentrations of
PM10, one for measuring concentrations of
PM10-2.5, two for measuring PM2.5, and one for
measuring NO2 in the ambient air.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Vanderpool, Human Exposure and
Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD-D205-03), National Exposure Research
Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
Email: Vanderpool.Robert@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with regulations at 40 CFR
Part 53, the EPA evaluates various methods for monitoring the
concentrations of those ambient air pollutants for which EPA has
established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQSs) as set
forth in 40 CFR Part 50. Monitoring methods that are determined to meet
specific requirements for adequacy are designated by the EPA as either
reference methods or equivalent methods (as applicable), thereby
permitting their use under 40 CFR Part 58 by States and other agencies
for determining compliance with the NAAQSs.
The EPA hereby announces the designation of five new equivalent
methods for measuring pollutant concentrations in the ambient air: One
for measuring concentrations of PM10-2.5, one for measuring
concentrations of PM10, two for measuring concentrations of
PM2.5 and one for measuring concentrations of
NO2. These designations are made under the provisions of 40
CFR Part 53, as amended on August 31, 2011 (76 FR 54326-54341).
Two of the new equivalent methods for PM are automated monitoring
methods utilizing a measurement principle based on sample collection by
filtration and analysis by an inertial micro-balance that provides
direct mass measurements in near real time. Separation of the
PM10 aerosol into PM10-2.5 and PM2.5
particle size fractions is by a virtual impactor. The newly designated
equivalent methods are identified as follows:
EQPM-1013-207, ``Thermo Scientific TEOM[supreg] 1405-DF Dichotomous
Ambient Particular Monitor with FDMS[supreg],'' configured for dual
filter sampling of fine (PM2.5) and coarse particles using
the US EPA PM10 inlet specified in 40 CFR part 50 Appendix
L, Figs. L-2 thru L-19 and a virtual impactor, with a total flow rate
of 16.67 L/min, fine sample flow of 3 L/min, and coarse sample flow
rate of 1.67 L/min, and operating with firmware version 1.70 and later,
operated with or without external enclosures, and operated in
accordance with the Thermo Scientific TEOM[supreg] 1405-DF Dichotomous
Ambient Particulate Monitor Instruction Manual. This designation
applies to PM10-2.5 measurements only.
EQPM-1013-208, ``Thermo Scientific TEOM[supreg] 1405-DF Dichotomous
Ambient Particular Monitor with FDMS[supreg],'' configured for dual
filter sampling of fine (PM2.5) and coarse particles using
the US EPA PM10 inlet specified in 40 CFR part 50 Appendix
L, Figs. L-2 thru L-19 and a virtual impactor, with a total flow rate
of 16.67 L/min, fine sample flow of 3 L/min, and coarse sample flow
rate of 1.67 L/min, and operating with firmware version 1.70 and later,
operated with or without external enclosures, and operated in
accordance with the Thermo Scientific TEOM[supreg] 1405-DF Dichotomous
Ambient Particulate Monitor Instruction Manual. This designation
applies to PM10 measurements only.
Applications for the equivalent method determinations for these
candidate methods were received by the EPA Office of Research and
Development on July 26, 2011 and March 6, 2009. The monitors are
commercially available from the applicant, Thermo Fisher Scientific,
Air Quality Instruments, Environmental Instruments Division, 27 Forge
Parkway, Franklin, MA 02038.
Two of the new equivalent methods are automated monitoring methods
utilizing a measurement principle based on sample collection by
filtration and analysis by beta radiation attenuation. The newly
designated equivalent methods are identified as follows:
EQPM-1013-209, ``Met One Instruments, Inc. BAM-1022 Beta
Attenuation Mass Monitor--Outdoor PM2.5 FEM Configuration,''
configured for 24 1-hour average measurements of PM2.5 by
beta attenuation, using a glass fiber filter tape roll (460130) and a
sample flow rate of 16.67 liters/min and with the standard (BX-802) EPA
PM10 inlet (meeting 40 CFR part 50 Appendix L
specifications) and with a BGI VSCC[supreg] Very Sharp Cut Cyclone (BX-
808) particle size separator, and equipped with external enclosure BX-
922 and BX-592 ambient temperature sensor or BX-596 ambient
temperature/barometric combination sensor or BX-597 ambient
temperature/barometric pressure/relative humidity combination sensor.
Instrument must be operated in accordance with the BAM 1022 Particulate
Monitor operation manual, revision 3 or later. This designation applies
to PM2.5 measurements only.
The application for the equivalent method determination for this
candidate method was received by the EPA Office of Research and
Development on January 16, 2013. The monitor is commercially available
from the applicant, Met One Instruments, Inc., 1600 Washington Blvd.,
Grants Pass, Or 97526.
EQPM-1013-211, ``Environnement S.A. Model MP101M PM2.5
Beta Attenuation Monitor'' using a glass fiber filter tape roll,
operated at a sample flow rate of 16.67 liters/min for 24-hour average
measurements of PM2.5, configured with the standard EPA
PM10 inlet (meeting 40 CFR part 50 Appendix L
specifications) associated with a BGI VSCC[supreg] Very Sharp Cut
Cyclone particle size separator and using a temperature regulated
sampling tube with ambient meteorological sensor. With or without
optional ESTEL analog inputs/outputs, serial link: 1 RS-232/422; USB
port; Ethernet port (TCP/IP). Instrument must be operated in accordance
with the Ambient Air Continuous Particulate Monitor Model MP101M
operation manual. This designation applies to PM2.5
measurements only.
The application for the equivalent method determination for this
candidate method was received by the EPA Office of Research and
Development on June 11, 2013. The monitor is commercially available
from the applicant, Environment S.A., 111 bd Robespierre, 78300 POISSY,
France.
The new equivalent method for NO2 is an automated method
(analyzer) utilizing the principle of Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift
spectroscopy and the calibration procedure specified in the operation
manual. The newly designated equivalent method is identified as
follows:
EQNA-1013-210, ``Environnement S.A. Model AS32M cavity attenuated
phase shift spectroscopy Nitrogen Dioxide Analyzer'', operated on any
full scale range between 0-500 ppb and 0-
[[Page 67361]]
1000 ppb, at any ambient temperature in the range of 20[deg]C to
30[deg]C, with automatic response time ON, set to 11, in accordance
with the associated instrument manual; with sample particulate filter;
zero gas inlet and zero check enabled; sample permeation dryer. Serial
link: 2 RS-232; USB port; Ethernet port (TCP/IP); onboard html web
server and, with or without any of the following options: Internal
permeation bench; ESTEL analog inputs/outputs.
The application for equivalent method determination for the NO2
method was received by the Office of Research and Development on
November 29, 2012. This analyzer model is commercially available from
the applicant, Environment S.A., 111 bd Robespierre, 78300 POISSY,
France.
Test monitors representative of these methods have been tested in
accordance with the applicable test procedures specified in 40 CFR Part
53, as amended on August 31, 2011. After reviewing the results of those
tests and other information submitted in the applications, EPA has
determined, in accordance with Part 53, that these methods should be
designated as equivalent methods.
As designated equivalent methods, these methods are acceptable for
use by states and other air monitoring agencies under the requirements
of 40 CFR Part 58, Ambient Air Quality Surveillance. For such purposes,
the methods must be used in strict accordance with the operation or
instruction manuals associated with the methods and subject to any
specifications and limitations (e.g., configuration or operational
settings) specified in the applicable designated descriptions (see the
identification of the methods above).
Use of the methods also should be in general accordance with the
guidance and recommendations of applicable sections of the ``Quality
Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume I,''
EPA/600/R-94/038a and ``Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume II, Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Program'' EPA-454/B-08-003, December, 2008. Provisions concerning
modification of such methods by users are specified under Section 2.8
(Modifications of Methods by Users) of Appendix C to 40 CFR Part 58.
Consistent or repeated noncompliance should be reported to:
Director, Human Exposure and Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD-E205-
01), National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
Designation of these new equivalent methods is intended to assist
the States in establishing and operating their air quality surveillance
systems under 40 CFR Part 58. Questions concerning the commercial
availability or technical aspects of the methods should be directed to
the applicant.
Desmond Mayes,
Acting Director, National Exposure Research Laboratory.
[FR Doc. 2013-27016 Filed 11-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P