Special Conditions: Airbus, Model A350-900 Series Airplane; Transient Engine Failure Loads, 67323-67324 [2013-26911]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2013 / Proposed Rules
gravity. Nose gear loads, as well as
airframe loads, must be determined. The
airplane must support these loads as
described in § 25.305.
In addition to the above airworthiness
standards, fatigue loads must also be
determined and applied in accordance
to § 25.571.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 1, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–26936 Filed 11–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0897; Notice No. 25–
13–29–SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus, Model
A350–900 Series Airplane; Transient
Engine Failure Loads
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
AGENCY:
This action proposes special
conditions for Airbus Model A350–900
series airplanes. These airplanes will
have a novel or unusual design feature
associated with the new generation of
high bypass engines and the potential
loads resulting from extreme engine
failure conditions.
The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this
design feature. These proposed special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send your comments on or
before December 27, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2013–0897
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Nov 08, 2013
Jkt 232001
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–
19478), as well as at https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Martin, FAA, International
Branch, ANM–115, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1178; facsimile
(425) 227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the proposed special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we
receive.
Background
On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied
for a type certificate for their new Model
A350–900 series airplane. Later, Airbus
requested and the FAA approved an
extension to the application for FAA
type certification to June 28, 2009. The
Model A350–900 series has a
conventional layout with twin wing-
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
67323
mounted Rolls-Royce Trent engines. It
features a twin aisle 9-abreast economy
class layout, and accommodates side-byside placement of LD–3 containers in
the cargo compartment. The basic
Model A350–900 series configuration
will accommodate 315 passengers in a
standard two-class arrangement. The
design cruise speed is Mach 0.85 with
a Maximum Take-Off Weight of 602,000
lbs. Airbus proposes the Model A350–
900 series to be certified for extended
operations (ETOPS) beyond 180 minutes
at entry into service for up to a 420minute maximum diversion time.
The existing regulations are
inadequate because the new, large
bypass fan engines of the Model A350–
900 series airplanes can cause more
damage in a failure event than the
previous engines. To maintain the level
of safety envisioned by Title 14, Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.61(b),
more comprehensive criteria are needed
for the new generation of high bypass
engines. The more severe events
resulting from extreme engine failure
conditions would be treated as dynamic
load conditions. The proposed special
conditions would distinguish between
the more common engine failure events
and those rare events resulting from
structural failures. The more common
events would continue to be treated as
static torque limit load conditions. The
severe events would be considered
ultimate loads, and include all transient
loads associated with the event. An
additional safety factor would be
applied to the more critical airframe
supporting structure.
Type Certification Basis
Under Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, Airbus must
show that the Model A350–900 series
meets the applicable provisions of 14
CFR part 25, as amended by
Amendments 25–1 through 25–128.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Model A350–900 series airplane
because of a novel or unusual design
feature, special conditions are
prescribed under § 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same or similar novel
or unusual design feature, the proposed
special conditions would also apply to
the other model under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and proposed
special conditions, the Model A350–900
E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM
12NOP1
67324
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Applicability
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Model A350–900 series airplane
will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: Engines with
large, bypass fans capable of producing
much higher failure loads than previous
engines. The Model A350–900 will
therefore require additional dynamic
loads analyses to assess the most severe
engine failure events. The loads
resulting from these conditions would
be considered as ultimate loads, with an
additional safety factor applied to the
airframe supporting structure.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
series must comply with the fuel vent
and exhaust emission requirements of
14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36 and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under
section 611 of Public Law 92–574, the
‘‘Noise Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, under § 11.38,
and they become part of the typecertification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on the Model
A350–900 series airplanes. It is not a
rule of general applicability.
Discussion
The size, configuration, and failure
modes of jet engines has changed
considerably from those envisioned by
Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR) 25.361(b) when the engine seizure
requirement was first adopted. Engines
have become larger and are now
designed with large bypass fans capable
of producing much higher failure loads.
Relative to the engine configurations
that existed when the rule was
developed in 1957, the present
generation of engines are sufficiently
different and novel to justify special
conditions for Model A350–900 series
airplanes. Service history has shown
that the engine failure events that tend
to cause the most severe loads are fan
blade failures and these events occur
much less frequently than the typical
‘‘limit’’ load condition.
The regulatory authorities and
industry developed a standardized
requirement in the Aviation Rulemaking
Advisory Committee (ARAC) forum.
The technical aspects of this
requirement have been agreed and have
been accepted by the ARAC Loads and
Dynamics Harmonization Working
Group. The proposed special condition
reflects the ARAC recommendation and
is essentially harmonized with the
corresponding EASA Certification
Specifications (CS) 25. In addition, the
ARAC recommendation includes
corresponding advisory material that is
incorporated in CS–25. This advisory
material is considered an acceptable
means of compliance to the proposed
special conditions.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Nov 08, 2013
Jkt 232001
As discussed above, these proposed
special conditions apply to the Airbus
Model A350–900 series airplanes.
Should Airbus apply later for a change
to the type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, the proposed
special conditions would apply to that
model as well.
Conclusion
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
proposed special conditions is as
follows:
structural failure that results in higher
loads.
4. The ultimate loads developed from
the conditions specified in paragraphs
3.a. and 3.b. are to be multiplied by a
factor of 1.0 when applied to engine
mounts and pylons and multiplied by a
factor of 1.25 when applied to adjacent
supporting airframe structure.
5. The airplane must be capable of
continued safe flight considering the
aerodynamic effects on controllability
due to any permanent deformation that
results from the conditions specified in
3.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
22, 2013.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–26911 Filed 11–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
The Proposed Special Conditions
Federal Aviation Administration
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of
the type certification basis for Airbus
Model A350–900 series airplanes.
In lieu of § 25.361(b) the following
special condition is proposed:
1. For turbine engine installations, the
engine mounts, pylons, and adjacent
supporting airframe structure must be
designed to withstand 1g level flight
loads acting simultaneously with the
maximum limit torque loads imposed
by each of the following:
a. sudden engine deceleration due to
a malfunction that could result in a
temporary loss of power or thrust,
b. the maximum acceleration of the
engine.
2. For auxiliary power unit
installations, the power unit mounts
and adjacent supporting airframe
structure must be designed to withstand
1g level flight loads acting
simultaneously with the maximum limit
torque loads imposed by each of the
following:
a. sudden auxiliary power unit
deceleration due to malfunction or
structural failure; and
b. the maximum acceleration of the
power unit.
3. For engine supporting structure, an
ultimate loading condition must be
considered that combines 1g flight loads
with the transient dynamic loads
resulting from:
a. the loss of any fan, compressor, or
turbine blade; and separately
b. where applicable to a specific
engine design, any other engine
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0174; Airspace
Docket No. 13–AGL–10]
Proposed Amendment of Class E
Airspace; Lapeer, MI
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
amend Class E airspace at Lapeer, MI.
Additional controlled airspace is
necessary to accommodate amended
Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures (SIAP) at Dupont—Lapeer
Airport. The FAA is taking this action
to enhance the safety and management
of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR)
operations for SIAPs at the airport.
Geographic coordinates would also be
updated.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before December 27, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. You must
identify the docket number FAA–2013–
0174/Airspace Docket No. 13–AGL–10,
at the beginning of your comments. You
may also submit comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM
12NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 12, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 67323-67324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26911]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0897; Notice No. 25-13-29-SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus, Model A350-900 Series Airplane;
Transient Engine Failure Loads
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for Airbus Model A350-
900 series airplanes. These airplanes will have a novel or unusual
design feature associated with the new generation of high bypass
engines and the potential loads resulting from extreme engine failure
conditions.
The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These proposed
special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send your comments on or before December 27, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2013-0897
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477- 19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Martin, FAA, International
Branch, ANM-115, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-1178; facsimile (425) 227-1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the proposed special conditions,
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting
data.
We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We may change these special conditions based on the
comments we receive.
Background
On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied for a type certificate for their
new Model A350-900 series airplane. Later, Airbus requested and the FAA
approved an extension to the application for FAA type certification to
June 28, 2009. The Model A350-900 series has a conventional layout with
twin wing-mounted Rolls-Royce Trent engines. It features a twin aisle
9-abreast economy class layout, and accommodates side-by-side placement
of LD-3 containers in the cargo compartment. The basic Model A350-900
series configuration will accommodate 315 passengers in a standard two-
class arrangement. The design cruise speed is Mach 0.85 with a Maximum
Take-Off Weight of 602,000 lbs. Airbus proposes the Model A350-900
series to be certified for extended operations (ETOPS) beyond 180
minutes at entry into service for up to a 420-minute maximum diversion
time.
The existing regulations are inadequate because the new, large
bypass fan engines of the Model A350-900 series airplanes can cause
more damage in a failure event than the previous engines. To maintain
the level of safety envisioned by Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) 25.61(b), more comprehensive criteria are needed for the new
generation of high bypass engines. The more severe events resulting
from extreme engine failure conditions would be treated as dynamic load
conditions. The proposed special conditions would distinguish between
the more common engine failure events and those rare events resulting
from structural failures. The more common events would continue to be
treated as static torque limit load conditions. The severe events would
be considered ultimate loads, and include all transient loads
associated with the event. An additional safety factor would be applied
to the more critical airframe supporting structure.
Type Certification Basis
Under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, Airbus
must show that the Model A350-900 series meets the applicable
provisions of 14 CFR part 25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-
128.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Model A350-900 series airplane
because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar
novel or unusual design feature, the proposed special conditions would
also apply to the other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and
proposed special conditions, the Model A350-900
[[Page 67324]]
series must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements
of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise certification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36 and the FAA must issue a finding of regulatory adequacy under
section 611 of Public Law 92-574, the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19,
under Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type-certification basis
under Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Model A350-900 series airplane will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design features: Engines with large, bypass fans
capable of producing much higher failure loads than previous engines.
The Model A350-900 will therefore require additional dynamic loads
analyses to assess the most severe engine failure events. The loads
resulting from these conditions would be considered as ultimate loads,
with an additional safety factor applied to the airframe supporting
structure.
Discussion
The size, configuration, and failure modes of jet engines has
changed considerably from those envisioned by Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) 25.361(b) when the engine seizure requirement was
first adopted. Engines have become larger and are now designed with
large bypass fans capable of producing much higher failure loads.
Relative to the engine configurations that existed when the rule was
developed in 1957, the present generation of engines are sufficiently
different and novel to justify special conditions for Model A350-900
series airplanes. Service history has shown that the engine failure
events that tend to cause the most severe loads are fan blade failures
and these events occur much less frequently than the typical ``limit''
load condition.
The regulatory authorities and industry developed a standardized
requirement in the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) forum.
The technical aspects of this requirement have been agreed and have
been accepted by the ARAC Loads and Dynamics Harmonization Working
Group. The proposed special condition reflects the ARAC recommendation
and is essentially harmonized with the corresponding EASA Certification
Specifications (CS) 25. In addition, the ARAC recommendation includes
corresponding advisory material that is incorporated in CS-25. This
advisory material is considered an acceptable means of compliance to
the proposed special conditions.
Applicability
As discussed above, these proposed special conditions apply to the
Airbus Model A350-900 series airplanes. Should Airbus apply later for a
change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design feature, the proposed special
conditions would apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on the Model A350-900 series airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these proposed special conditions is as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis
for Airbus Model A350-900 series airplanes.
In lieu of Sec. 25.361(b) the following special condition is
proposed:
1. For turbine engine installations, the engine mounts, pylons, and
adjacent supporting airframe structure must be designed to withstand 1g
level flight loads acting simultaneously with the maximum limit torque
loads imposed by each of the following:
a. sudden engine deceleration due to a malfunction that could
result in a temporary loss of power or thrust,
b. the maximum acceleration of the engine.
2. For auxiliary power unit installations, the power unit mounts
and adjacent supporting airframe structure must be designed to
withstand 1g level flight loads acting simultaneously with the maximum
limit torque loads imposed by each of the following:
a. sudden auxiliary power unit deceleration due to malfunction or
structural failure; and
b. the maximum acceleration of the power unit.
3. For engine supporting structure, an ultimate loading condition
must be considered that combines 1g flight loads with the transient
dynamic loads resulting from:
a. the loss of any fan, compressor, or turbine blade; and
separately
b. where applicable to a specific engine design, any other engine
structural failure that results in higher loads.
4. The ultimate loads developed from the conditions specified in
paragraphs 3.a. and 3.b. are to be multiplied by a factor of 1.0 when
applied to engine mounts and pylons and multiplied by a factor of 1.25
when applied to adjacent supporting airframe structure.
5. The airplane must be capable of continued safe flight
considering the aerodynamic effects on controllability due to any
permanent deformation that results from the conditions specified in 3.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 22, 2013.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-26911 Filed 11-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P