Anchorage Regulations: Pacific Ocean at San Nicolas Island, Calif.; Restricted Anchorage Areas, 67300-67303 [2013-25642]
Download as PDF
67300
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
paragraph 311a. This airspace action is
not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated August 7, 2013, and effective
September 15, 2013 is amended as
follows:
■
Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace designated
as surface areas.
*
*
*
*
*
ANM MT E2 Cut Bank, MT [Modified]
Cut Bank Municipal Airport, MT
(Lat. 48°36′30″ N., long. 112°22′34″ W.)
Within a 4.7-mile radius of the Cut Bank
Municipal Airport, and within 3.1 miles each
side of the 150° bearing of the Cut Bank
Municipal Airport extending from the 4.7mile radius to 11 miles southeast of the
airport.
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
ANM MT E5 Cut Bank, MT [Modified]
Cut Bank Municipal Airport, MT
(Lat. 48°36′30″ N., long. 112°22′34″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7.9-mile
radius of the Cut Bank Municipal Airport,
and within 8.3 miles northeast and 4 miles
southwest of the 150° bearing of the Cut Bank
Municipal Airport extending from the 7.9mile radius to 18.4 miles southeast of the
airport, and within 2.6 miles each side of the
175° bearing of the Cut Bank Municipal
Airport extending from the 7.9-mile radius to
12.6 miles south of the airport; that airspace
extending upward from 1,200 feet above the
surface bounded by a line beginning at lat.
47°53′00″ N., long. 113°11′00″ W.; to lat.
48°52′00″ N., long. 112°42′00″ W.; to lat.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Nov 08, 2013
Jkt 232001
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on: October
30, 2013.
Clark Desing,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western
Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2013–26922 Filed 11–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0967]
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
48°57′00″ N., long. 111°46′00″ W.; to lat.
48°27′00″ N., long. 111°01′00″ W.; to lat.
48°08′00″ N., long. 111°19′00″ W.; to lat.
47°46′00″ N., long. 112°35′00″ W., thence to
the point of beginning.
RIN 1625–AA01
Anchorage Regulations: Pacific Ocean
at San Nicolas Island, Calif.; Restricted
Anchorage Areas
Coast Guard, DHS.
Direct final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
By this direct final rule, the
Coast Guard is amending the restricted
anchorage areas of San Nicolas Island,
California. At the request of the United
States Navy, the Coast Guard will
remove the west area anchorage
restriction and decrease the size of the
east area anchorage restriction (see
figure 1 located in the docket). After
these amendments are finalized, the
restricted anchorage at San Nicolas
Island will accurately reflect the needs
and operational use of the United States
Navy.
DATES: This rule is effective February
10, 2014 unless an adverse comment, or
notice of intent to submit an adverse
comment, is either submitted to our
online docket via https://
www.regulations.gov on or before
January 13, 2014 or reaches the Docket
Management Facility by that date. If an
adverse comment, or notice of intent to
submit an adverse comment, is received
by January 13, 2014, we will withdraw
this direct final rule and publish a
timely notice of withdrawal in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is (202)
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Junior Grade Blake
Morris, Waterways Management Branch,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (510) 437–
3801, email Blake.J.Morris@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2012–0967 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the
line associated with this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2; by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2012–0967 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this rulemaking. You
may also visit the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one to the docket using one of the
methods specified under ADDRESSES. In
your request, explain why you believe a
public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory Information
We are publishing this direct final
rule under 33 CFR 1.05–55 because we
do not expect an adverse comment. If no
adverse comment or notice of intent to
submit an adverse comment is received
by January 13, 2014, this rule will
become effective as stated in the DATES
section. In that case, approximately 30
days before the effective date, we will
publish a document in the Federal
Register stating that no adverse
comment was received and confirming
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 Nov 08, 2013
Jkt 232001
that this rule will become effective as
scheduled. However, if we receive an
adverse comment or notice of intent to
submit an adverse comment, we will
publish a document in the Federal
Register announcing the withdrawal of
all or part of this direct final rule. If an
adverse comment applies only to part of
this rule (e.g., to an amendment, a
paragraph, or a section) and it is
possible to remove that part without
defeating the purpose of this rule, we
may adopt, as final, those parts of this
rule on which no adverse comment was
received. We will withdraw the part of
this rule that was the subject of an
adverse comment. If we decide to
proceed with a rulemaking following
receipt of an adverse comment, we will
publish a separate notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) and provide a new
opportunity for comment.
A comment is considered ‘‘adverse’’ if
the comment explains why this rule or
a part of this rule would be
inappropriate, including a challenge to
its underlying premise or approach, or
would be ineffective or unacceptable
without a change.
C. Basis and Purpose
The Coast Guard is conducting this
rulemaking under the authority of 33
U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2030,
2035, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1, and
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1. This rule will
amend 33 CFR 110.220(a) with accurate
regulatory information. The restricted
anchorage areas listed do not reflect
current enforcement practices or
operational use by the U.S. Navy.
D. Discussion of the Rule
Restricted anchorages were
established at the east and west ends of
San Nicolas Island to prevent vessels
from interrupting naval operations. The
restricted anchorages, in current
configuration, do not match operational
requirements. The east-end area was
designed to prevent vessels from
disturbing barge offloading and fuel
transfer lines in the vicinity. Under its
current configuration, the east-end area
does not prevent vessels from disturbing
the fuel-offloading lines at the mooring
buoys offshore Coast Guard Beach. It
also does not prevent vessels from
disturbing barge offloads. Regular barge
offloading now occurs exclusively at the
new pier facility, on the west edge of the
restricted anchorage at Daytona Beach.
The west-end area was designed to
keep vessels out of danger zones from
missile launch or hazard patterns.
However, restricted areas are currently
established around the island, which
restrict vessels from entering these
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67301
danger zones during operations. The
Navy can still open and close these
areas in part or in whole based on
operational needs, making a restricted
anchorage area redundant.
Both commercial and recreational
vessels take part in fishing around the
island. Commercial fishing is common
within section Alpha on the northern
side of the restricted area around the
island. Most fishing at and around the
island by both recreational boaters and
Navy personnel occurs in section Alpha,
outside of either restricted anchorage
area.
This rule will remove the western
restricted anchorage area, which
covered approximately 20 square
nautical miles (NM). The rule will
update the eastern restricted anchorage
area to reflect operational use,
decreasing its size from approximately
2.5 square NM to 1.3 square NM. The
new restricted anchorage will include a
single eastern no-anchorage zone that
encompasses both the mooring buoys
offshore Coast Guard Beach and the
explosives safety arc around the Barge
Pier at Daytona Beach (see figure 2
located in the docket). It will restrict
vessels from entering these areas in
order to prevent interferences with fuel,
cargo or explosives-offloads in these
areas.
This rule also updates and identifies
the agencies and officials responsible for
granting access to and enforcing the
restricted anchorage area. The
Commanding Officer of Naval Base
Ventura County may grant permission to
enter the area. Vessels in the restricted
anchorage area must obey the orders of
the Commanding Officer, Naval Base
Ventura County; Coast Guard Eleventh
District Commander; or Coast Guard
Captain of the Port, Los Angeles-Long
Beach, when issued to carry out the
purpose of the restricted anchorage.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
67302
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. This rule simply amends the
size and location of the restricted
anchorage areas off of San Nicolas
Island to accurately reflect the needs
and operational use of the United States
Navy.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
commercial or recreational vessels
intending to anchor in the affected area.
The impact to these entities will not
be significant since this rule will
decrease the size of the eastern
restricted anchorage area off San Nicolas
Island, and eliminate the western area
entirely. These changes will result in a
net decrease in the size of the restricted
anchorage area of approximately 21
square NM, allowing for more access to
anchorage grounds by both commercial
and recreational vessels.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Nov 08, 2013
Jkt 232001
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
adjustment of restricted anchorage areas
for Naval operations in the waters off
San Nicolas Island. This rule is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph (34)(f) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
ARCHITECTURAL AND
TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS
COMPLIANCE BOARD
Anchorage Regulations.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 110 as follows:
36 CFR Part 1191
RIN 3014–AA22
Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings
and Facilities; Architectural Barriers
Act (ABA) Accessibility Guidelines;
Correction
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through
1236, 2030, 2035, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
2. Revise § 110.220 to read as follows:
§ 110.220 Pacific Ocean at San Nicolas
Island, Calif; restricted anchorage areas.
(a) The restricted area. All waters
within one-quarter nautical mile from
the shoreline or manmade structures
including mooring buoys, piers and
jetties on the easterly end of San Nicolas
Island between a point on the northeast
shore at latitude 33°14′32″ N, longitude
119°26′41″ W and a point on the
southeast shore at latitude 33°13′08″ N,
longitude 119°27′06″ W.
(b) The regulations. (1) Except in an
emergency, no vessel shall enter into or
anchor in this restricted area without
permission from the Commanding
Officer, Naval Base Ventura County.
Cargo and supply vessels or barges
destined for San Nicolas Island may
anchor in the area for unloading or
loading. (2) Each person in a restricted
anchorage shall obey the order or
direction of the Commanding Officer,
Naval Base Ventura County, Coast
Guard Eleventh District Commander, or
Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Los
Angeles-Long Beach, when issued to
carry out this section.
(c) Enforcement.The Coast Guard may
be assisted in enforcing this rule by
other Federal, state, or local agencies.
Dated: September 10, 2013.
K.L. Schultz,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–25642 Filed 11–8–13; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Nov 08, 2013
Jkt 232001
the International Building Code (2000
edition and 2001 Supplement) or
section 1007 of the International
Building Code (2003 edition)
(incorporated by reference, see
‘‘Referenced Standards’’ in Chapter 1).’’
■ 2. On page 59500, in the third column,
and continuing on page 59501, in the
first column, Table 208.2—PARKING
SPACES is corrected to read as follows:
TABLE 208.2—PARKING SPACES
Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board (Access Board) is correcting a
document that appeared in the Federal
Register of September 26, 2013 (78 FR
59476). The document issued a final
rule that amended the Architectural
Barriers Act Accessibility Guidelines by
adding scoping and technical
requirements for camping facilities,
picnic facilities, viewing areas, trails,
and beach access routes constructed or
altered by or on behalf of federal
agencies. The document set out the
Architectural Barriers Act Accessibility
Guidelines in their entirety, as amended
by the final rule, and also set out the
Americans with Disabilities Act
Accessibility Guidelines in their
entirety as word searchable text since
both sets of guidelines were previously
issued as ‘‘camera ready’’ images that
could not be amended.
DATES: Effective November 25, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Raggio, Access Board, 1331 F
Street NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC
20004–1111. Telephone: (202) 272–0040
(voice) or (202) 272–0062 (TTY). Email
address: raggio@access-board.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc.
2013–22876 appearing on page 59476 in
the Federal Register of Thursday,
September 26, 2013 (78 FR 59476), the
following corrections are made:
SUMMARY:
Appendix B to Part 1191—Americans
With Disabilities Act: Scoping
[Corrected]
1. On page 59500, in the third column,
in 207.1 General, ‘‘Means of egress shall
comply with section 1003.2.13 of the
International Building Code (2000
edition and 2001 Supplement) or
section 1007 of the International
Building Code (2003 edition)
(incorporated by reference, see
Referenced Standards’’ in Chapter 1).’’
is corrected to read ‘‘Means of egress
shall comply with section 1003.2.13 of
■
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67303
Total number of
parking spaces
provided in
parking facility
Minimum number of
required accessible
parking spaces
1 to 25 .......................
26 to 50 .....................
51 to 75 .....................
76 to 100 ...................
101 to 150 .................
151 to 200 .................
201 to 300 .................
301 to 400 .................
401 to 500 .................
501 to 1000 ...............
1001 and over ...........
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
2 percent of total.
20, plus 1 for each
100, or fraction
thereof, over 1000.
3. On page 59507, in the first column,
in 233.2 Residential Dwelling Units
Provided by Entities Subject to HUD
Section 504 Regulations, ‘‘Where
facilities with residential dwelling units
are provided by entities subject to
regulations issued by the Department of
Housing and Urban Development
(residential dwelling units with
mobility features complying with 809.2
through 809.4 in a number required by
the applicable HUD regulations.’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘Where facilities with
residential dwelling units are provided
by entities subject to regulations issued
by the Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) under
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended, such entities shall
provide residential dwelling units with
mobility features complying with 809.2
through 809.4 in a number required by
the applicable HUD regulations.’’
■
Appendix C to Part 1191—
Architectural Barriers Act Act: Scoping
[Corrected]
■ 4. On page 59509, in the second
column, remove F104.3 Figures.
■ 5. On page 59515, in the third column,
in F207.1 General, ‘‘Means of egress
shall comply with section 1003.2.13 of
the International Building Code (2000
edition and 2001 Supplement) or
section 1007 of the International
Building Code (2003 edition)
(incorporated by reference, see
Referenced Standards’’ in Chapter 1).’’
is corrected to read ‘‘Means of egress
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 12, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67300-67303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25642]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0967]
RIN 1625-AA01
Anchorage Regulations: Pacific Ocean at San Nicolas Island,
Calif.; Restricted Anchorage Areas
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: By this direct final rule, the Coast Guard is amending the
restricted anchorage areas of San Nicolas Island, California. At the
request of the United States Navy, the Coast Guard will remove the west
area anchorage restriction and decrease the size of the east area
anchorage restriction (see figure 1 located in the docket). After these
amendments are finalized, the restricted anchorage at San Nicolas
Island will accurately reflect the needs and operational use of the
United States Navy.
DATES: This rule is effective February 10, 2014 unless an adverse
comment, or notice of intent to submit an adverse comment, is either
submitted to our online docket via https://www.regulations.gov on or
before January 13, 2014 or reaches the Docket Management Facility by
that date. If an adverse comment, or notice of intent to submit an
adverse comment, is received by January 13, 2014, we will withdraw this
direct final rule and publish a timely notice of withdrawal in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is (202) 366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade Blake Morris, Waterways
Management Branch, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (510) 437-3801, email
Blake.J.Morris@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2012-0967 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.''
[[Page 67301]]
Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with this
rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\; by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2012-0967 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one to the docket using one of the methods specified under
ADDRESSES. In your request, explain why you believe a public meeting
would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory Information
We are publishing this direct final rule under 33 CFR 1.05-55
because we do not expect an adverse comment. If no adverse comment or
notice of intent to submit an adverse comment is received by January
13, 2014, this rule will become effective as stated in the DATES
section. In that case, approximately 30 days before the effective date,
we will publish a document in the Federal Register stating that no
adverse comment was received and confirming that this rule will become
effective as scheduled. However, if we receive an adverse comment or
notice of intent to submit an adverse comment, we will publish a
document in the Federal Register announcing the withdrawal of all or
part of this direct final rule. If an adverse comment applies only to
part of this rule (e.g., to an amendment, a paragraph, or a section)
and it is possible to remove that part without defeating the purpose of
this rule, we may adopt, as final, those parts of this rule on which no
adverse comment was received. We will withdraw the part of this rule
that was the subject of an adverse comment. If we decide to proceed
with a rulemaking following receipt of an adverse comment, we will
publish a separate notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) and provide a
new opportunity for comment.
A comment is considered ``adverse'' if the comment explains why
this rule or a part of this rule would be inappropriate, including a
challenge to its underlying premise or approach, or would be
ineffective or unacceptable without a change.
C. Basis and Purpose
The Coast Guard is conducting this rulemaking under the authority
of 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2030, 2035, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05-1,
and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. This rule
will amend 33 CFR 110.220(a) with accurate regulatory information. The
restricted anchorage areas listed do not reflect current enforcement
practices or operational use by the U.S. Navy.
D. Discussion of the Rule
Restricted anchorages were established at the east and west ends of
San Nicolas Island to prevent vessels from interrupting naval
operations. The restricted anchorages, in current configuration, do not
match operational requirements. The east-end area was designed to
prevent vessels from disturbing barge offloading and fuel transfer
lines in the vicinity. Under its current configuration, the east-end
area does not prevent vessels from disturbing the fuel-offloading lines
at the mooring buoys offshore Coast Guard Beach. It also does not
prevent vessels from disturbing barge offloads. Regular barge
offloading now occurs exclusively at the new pier facility, on the west
edge of the restricted anchorage at Daytona Beach.
The west-end area was designed to keep vessels out of danger zones
from missile launch or hazard patterns. However, restricted areas are
currently established around the island, which restrict vessels from
entering these danger zones during operations. The Navy can still open
and close these areas in part or in whole based on operational needs,
making a restricted anchorage area redundant.
Both commercial and recreational vessels take part in fishing
around the island. Commercial fishing is common within section Alpha on
the northern side of the restricted area around the island. Most
fishing at and around the island by both recreational boaters and Navy
personnel occurs in section Alpha, outside of either restricted
anchorage area.
This rule will remove the western restricted anchorage area, which
covered approximately 20 square nautical miles (NM). The rule will
update the eastern restricted anchorage area to reflect operational
use, decreasing its size from approximately 2.5 square NM to 1.3 square
NM. The new restricted anchorage will include a single eastern no-
anchorage zone that encompasses both the mooring buoys offshore Coast
Guard Beach and the explosives safety arc around the Barge Pier at
Daytona Beach (see figure 2 located in the docket). It will restrict
vessels from entering these areas in order to prevent interferences
with fuel, cargo or explosives-offloads in these areas.
This rule also updates and identifies the agencies and officials
responsible for granting access to and enforcing the restricted
anchorage area. The Commanding Officer of Naval Base Ventura County may
grant permission to enter the area. Vessels in the restricted anchorage
area must obey the orders of the Commanding Officer, Naval Base Ventura
County; Coast Guard Eleventh District Commander; or Coast Guard Captain
of the Port, Los Angeles-Long Beach, when issued to carry out the
purpose of the restricted anchorage.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
[[Page 67302]]
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This rule simply amends
the size and location of the restricted anchorage areas off of San
Nicolas Island to accurately reflect the needs and operational use of
the United States Navy.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This rule may affect the following entities, some of which might be
small entities: The owners or operators of commercial or recreational
vessels intending to anchor in the affected area.
The impact to these entities will not be significant since this
rule will decrease the size of the eastern restricted anchorage area
off San Nicolas Island, and eliminate the western area entirely. These
changes will result in a net decrease in the size of the restricted
anchorage area of approximately 21 square NM, allowing for more access
to anchorage grounds by both commercial and recreational vessels.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the adjustment of restricted anchorage
areas for Naval operations in the waters off San Nicolas Island. This
rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
(34)(f) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical
Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
[[Page 67303]]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage Regulations.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2030, 2035, 2071;
33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 110.220 to read as follows:
Sec. 110.220 Pacific Ocean at San Nicolas Island, Calif; restricted
anchorage areas.
(a) The restricted area. All waters within one-quarter nautical
mile from the shoreline or manmade structures including mooring buoys,
piers and jetties on the easterly end of San Nicolas Island between a
point on the northeast shore at latitude 33[deg]14'32'' N, longitude
119[deg]26'41'' W and a point on the southeast shore at latitude
33[deg]13'08'' N, longitude 119[deg]27'06'' W.
(b) The regulations. (1) Except in an emergency, no vessel shall
enter into or anchor in this restricted area without permission from
the Commanding Officer, Naval Base Ventura County. Cargo and supply
vessels or barges destined for San Nicolas Island may anchor in the
area for unloading or loading. (2) Each person in a restricted
anchorage shall obey the order or direction of the Commanding Officer,
Naval Base Ventura County, Coast Guard Eleventh District Commander, or
Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Los Angeles-Long Beach, when issued to
carry out this section.
(c) Enforcement.The Coast Guard may be assisted in enforcing this
rule by other Federal, state, or local agencies.
Dated: September 10, 2013.
K.L. Schultz,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2013-25642 Filed 11-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P