Safety Zone, Submarine Cable Replacement Operations, Kent Island Narrows; Queen Anne's County, MD, 67086-67090 [2013-26971]
Download as PDF
67086
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
normally remain in the closed to
navigation position.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this proposed rule would economically
affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
proposed rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Nov 07, 2013
Jkt 232001
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an
economically significant rule and would
not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this proposed rule. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 117.233(b) to read as
follows:
■
§ 117.233
Broad Creek.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The draws of the Poplar Street
Bridge, mile 8.2, and the U.S. 13A
Bridge, mile 8.25, both at Laurel, need
not open for the passage of vessels.
Dated: October 17, 2013.
Steven H. Ratti,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard,
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–26825 Filed 11–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
13. Technical Standards
Coast Guard
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2013–0908]
14. Environment
RIN 1625–AA00
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Safety Zone, Submarine Cable
Replacement Operations, Kent Island
Narrows; Queen Anne’s County, MD
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\08NOP1.SGM
08NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone
encompassing certain waters of Kent
Island Narrows in Queen Anne’s
County, MD. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of mariners and
their vessels on navigable waters during
submarine cable replacement operations
at the Kent Island Narrows (MD–18B)
Bridge. This action is intended to
restrict vessel traffic movement to
protect mariners from potential safety
hazards associated with the bridge
project. Entry into this zone would be
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Baltimore or his designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before November 25, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Ronald Houck, Sector
Baltimore Waterways Management
Division, Coast Guard; telephone 410–
576–2674, email Ronald.L.Houck@
uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
(202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Nov 07, 2013
Jkt 232001
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2013–0908] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0908) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
67087
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one, using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
This rule involves the installation of
a submarine cable within a federal
navigation channel requiring divers, a
barge, and support boats during a 13day period in December 2013. The
bridge operation regulations for Kent
Island Narrows listed in 33 CFR 117.561
do not apply to this activity.
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis and authorities for this
rule are found in 33 U.S.C. 1231, 46
U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1,
6.04–6, and 160.5; Public Law 107–295,
116 Stat. 2064; and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1, which collectively authorize the
Coast Guard to propose, establish, and
define regulatory safety zones. The
purpose of this safety zone is to protect
public boaters and their vessels from
potential safety hazards associated with
the electrical submarine cable
replacement operations at the Kent
Island Narrows (MD–18B) Bridge.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Maryland State Highway
Administration will replace a submarine
cable across the federal navigation
channel at the Kent Island Narrows
(MD–18B) Bridge over the Kent Island
Narrows in Queen Anne’s County,
Maryland, scheduled from 8 a.m. on
December 2, 2013 through 6 p.m. on
December 15, 2013.
According to the Maryland State
Highway Administration, the work in
early December 2013 in necessary
because a waterway construction
restriction does not allow this type of
work between December 15, 2013 and
March 15, 2014, and further delaying
E:\FR\FM\08NOP1.SGM
08NOP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
67088
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
the submarine cable work until March
2014 would have a larger impact to
those mariners using the federal
navigation channel. The designated
work site extends approximately 55 feet
northward from the south side of the
bridge, 55 feet southward from the south
side of the bridge, 74 feet eastward of
the federal navigation channel
centerline, and 70 feet westward of the
federal navigation channel centerline.
Although outside the federal navigation
channel, portions of Kent Island
Narrows will remain open to marine
traffic during the work and the bridge
can be operated if necessary.
Through this regulation, the Coast
Guard proposes to establish a temporary
safety zone. The zone would encompass
all waters of Kent Island Narrows,
within an area bounded by the
following points: from position latitude
38°58′14.5″ N, longitude 076°14′50.2″
W; thence easterly to position latitude
38°58′14.1″ N, longitude 076°14′48.4″
W; thence southerly to position latitude
38°58′12.3″ N, longitude 076°14′49.0″
W; thence westerly to position latitude
38°58′12.8″ N, longitude 076°14′50.8″
W; thence northerly to point of origin at
position latitude 38°58′14.5″ N,
longitude 076°14′50.2″ W. The zone
would be enforced daily from 6 a.m. to
6 p.m., from 8 a.m. on December 2, 2013
to 6 p.m. on December 15, 2013.
The effect of this safety zone would be
to restrict marine navigation in the
regulated area during daily work
activity. Vessels and persons would be
allowed to transit the waters of Kent
Island Narrows outside the safety zone.
This rule would require that, with the
exception of Maryland State Highways
Administration support vessels, entry
into or remaining in this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port
Baltimore. All vessels underway within
this safety zone at the time it is
implemented would be required to
depart the zone. To seek permission to
transit the area of the safety zone, the
Captain of the Port Baltimore can be
contacted at telephone number 410–
576–2693 or on Marine Band Radio
VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Coast
Guard vessels enforcing the safety zone
can be contacted on Marine Band Radio
VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
Federal, state, and local agencies may
assist the Coast Guard in the
enforcement of the safety zone. The
Coast Guard will issue notices to the
maritime community to further
publicize the safety zone and notify the
public of changes in the status of the
zone. Such notices will continue until
the work activity is complete.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Nov 07, 2013
Jkt 232001
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. Although this regulation would
restrict access to this area, the effect of
this proposed rule would not be
significant because: (i) the Coast Guard
would give advance notification via
maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly, (ii) the
safety zone would not be activated, and
thus subject to enforcement, daily from
6 p.m. to 6 a.m., from 8 a.m. on
December 2, 2013 to 6 p.m. on
December 15, 2013, and (iii) although
the safety zone would apply to the
entire width of the federal navigation
channel and not the entire width of
Kent Island Narrows, vessel traffic not
constrained by draft or height may be
able to transit safely around the safety
zone.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of the Kent Island
Narrows daily from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.,
from 8 a.m. on December 2, 2013 to 6
p.m. on December 15, 2013.
This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the following reasons. This safety zone
would be activated, and thus subject to
enforcement, for 12 hours during the
day. Although the safety zone would
apply to the entire width of the federal
navigation channel, vessel traffic could
pass safely around the safety zone.
Before the activation of the zone, we
would issue maritime advisories widely
available to users of the river.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
E:\FR\FM\08NOP1.SGM
08NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Jkt 232001
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves establishing a temporary
safety zone in the Kent Island Narrows
to maintain public safety during
submarine cable replacement operations
at the Kent Island Narrows (MD–18B)
Bridge. This action is necessary to
protect persons and property during the
project. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0908 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T05–0908 Safety Zone, Submarine
Cable Replacement Operations, Kent Island
Narrows; Queen Anne’s County, MD.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
15:18 Nov 07, 2013
14. Environment
■
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: all waters of Kent Island
Narrows, within an area bounded by the
following points: from position latitude
38°58′14.5″ N, longitude 076°14′50.2″
W; thence easterly to position latitude
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
67089
38°58′14.1″ N, longitude 076°14′48.4″
W; thence southerly to position latitude
38°58′12.3″ N, longitude 076°14′49.0″
W; thence westerly to position latitude
38°58′12.8″ N, longitude 076°14′50.8″
W; thence northerly to point of origin at
position latitude 38°58′14.5″ N,
longitude 076°14′50.2″ W, located in
Queen Anne’s County, Maryland. All
coordinates refer to datum NAD 1983.
(b) Regulations. The general safety
zone regulations found in 33 CFR
165.23 apply to the safety zone created
by this temporary section, § 165.T05–
0908.
(1) All persons are required to comply
with the general regulations governing
safety zones found in 33 CFR 165.23.
(2) With the exception of Maryland
State Highways Administration support
vessels, entry into or remaining in this
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port
Baltimore. All vessels underway within
this safety zone at the time it is
implemented are to depart the zone.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the area
of the safety zone must first obtain
authorization from the Captain of the
Port Baltimore or his designated
representative. To seek permission to
transit the area, the Captain of the Port
Baltimore and his designated
representatives can be contacted at
telephone number 410–576–2693 or on
Marine Band Radio VHF–FM channel
16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard
vessels enforcing this section can be
contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF–
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon
being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel, or other Federal, State, or local
agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing
light, or other means, the operator of a
vessel shall proceed as directed. If
permission is granted, all persons and
vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port
Baltimore or his designated
representative and proceed as directed
while within the zone.
(4) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone by Federal,
State, and local agencies.
(c) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Captain of the Port Baltimore means
the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Maryland.
Designated representative means any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer who has been authorized
by the Captain of the Port Baltimore to
assist in enforcing the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
Maryland State Highways
Administration Support Vessels means
E:\FR\FM\08NOP1.SGM
08NOP1
67090
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
all vessels engaged in submarine cable
replacement operations under the
auspices of the Maryland State
Highways Administration’s
authorization for repairs at the MD–18B
Bridge across Kent Island Narrows in
Queen Anne’s County, Maryland.
(d) Enforcement periods. This section
will be enforced daily from 6 a.m. to 6
p.m., from 8 a.m. on December 2, 2013
to 6 p.m. on December 15, 2013.
Dated: October 24, 2013.
Kevin C. Kiefer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2013–26971 Filed 11–6–13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0564; FRL–9902–56Region 4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Florida: Noninterference Demonstration for
Removal of Federal Low-Reid Vapor
Pressure Requirement
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
the State of Florida’s August 15, 2013,
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision to the State’s approved
maintenance plans addressing the 1997
8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS).
Specifically, Florida’s revision,
including updated modeling, shows that
the Southeast Florida, Tampa Bay and
Jacksonville areas would continue to
maintain the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard if the currently applicable
Federal Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP)
standard for gasoline of 7.8 pounds per
square inch (psi) was modified to a less
stringent standard of 9.0 psi for
Broward, Dade, Duval, Hillsborough,
Palm Beach and Pinellas Counties
(hereafter also referred to as
‘‘Maintenance Plan Areas’’) during the
high-ozone season. Also, based on a
request by the State on November 29,
2012, EPA is proposing to remove the
existing SIP references related to the
previously-implemented inspection and
maintenance programs in the
Maintenance Plan Areas. The State has
included a technical demonstration
with the August 15, 2013, SIP revision
which demonstrate that the lessstringent RVP standard and the absence
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Nov 07, 2013
Jkt 232001
of an inspection and maintenance
program in these areas would not
interfere with continued maintenance of
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS or any
other applicable standard. Approval of
this SIP revision is a prerequisite for
EPA’s consideration of an amendment
to the regulations to remove the
Maintenance Plan Areas from the list of
areas that are currently subject to the
Federal 7.8 psi RVP requirements. The
specific elements of the maintenance
plan modeling that EPA is proposing
update for the Maintenance Plan Areas
are the ozone maintenance plan
attainment inventories, emissions
projections and air quality monitoring
data. The revised modeling utilizes
updated models to calculate the mobile
source emissions. EPA has preliminarily
determined that Florida’s August 15,
2013, SIP revision with respect to the
changes to the modeling and associated
technical demonstration associated with
the State’s request for the removal of the
Federal RVP requirements, and with
respect to the use of updated models, is
consistent with the applicable
provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA or
Act). Should EPA decide to remove the
subject portions of the Maintenance
Plan Areas from those areas subject to
the 7.8 psi Federal RVP requirements,
such action will occur in a subsequent
rulemaking. EPA has also preliminarily
determined that removal of the
regulatory provisions associated with
the previously-implemented inspection
and maintenance programs from the
Maintenance Plan Areas is consistent
with the applicable provisions of the
CAA.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before December 9, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R04–OAR–2013–0564 by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: R4-RDS@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0564,
Regulatory Development Section, Air
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Ms.
Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2013–
0564. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through
www.regulations.gov or email,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
E:\FR\FM\08NOP1.SGM
08NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 67086-67090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26971]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2013-0908]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone, Submarine Cable Replacement Operations, Kent Island
Narrows; Queen Anne's County, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 67087]]
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
encompassing certain waters of Kent Island Narrows in Queen Anne's
County, MD. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of
mariners and their vessels on navigable waters during submarine cable
replacement operations at the Kent Island Narrows (MD-18B) Bridge. This
action is intended to restrict vessel traffic movement to protect
mariners from potential safety hazards associated with the bridge
project. Entry into this zone would be prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port Baltimore or his designated
representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before November 25, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, Sector Baltimore Waterways Management
Division, Coast Guard; telephone 410-576-2674, email
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online,
it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov, type the docket number [USCG-2013-
0908] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a
Comment'' on the line associated with this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov, type the docket number (USCG-2013-
0908) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also visit
the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of
the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
This rule involves the installation of a submarine cable within a
federal navigation channel requiring divers, a barge, and support boats
during a 13-day period in December 2013. The bridge operation
regulations for Kent Island Narrows listed in 33 CFR 117.561 do not
apply to this activity.
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis and authorities for this rule are found in 33
U.S.C. 1231, 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat.
2064; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to propose, establish, and
define regulatory safety zones. The purpose of this safety zone is to
protect public boaters and their vessels from potential safety hazards
associated with the electrical submarine cable replacement operations
at the Kent Island Narrows (MD-18B) Bridge.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Maryland State Highway Administration will replace a submarine
cable across the federal navigation channel at the Kent Island Narrows
(MD-18B) Bridge over the Kent Island Narrows in Queen Anne's County,
Maryland, scheduled from 8 a.m. on December 2, 2013 through 6 p.m. on
December 15, 2013.
According to the Maryland State Highway Administration, the work in
early December 2013 in necessary because a waterway construction
restriction does not allow this type of work between December 15, 2013
and March 15, 2014, and further delaying
[[Page 67088]]
the submarine cable work until March 2014 would have a larger impact to
those mariners using the federal navigation channel. The designated
work site extends approximately 55 feet northward from the south side
of the bridge, 55 feet southward from the south side of the bridge, 74
feet eastward of the federal navigation channel centerline, and 70 feet
westward of the federal navigation channel centerline. Although outside
the federal navigation channel, portions of Kent Island Narrows will
remain open to marine traffic during the work and the bridge can be
operated if necessary.
Through this regulation, the Coast Guard proposes to establish a
temporary safety zone. The zone would encompass all waters of Kent
Island Narrows, within an area bounded by the following points: from
position latitude 38[deg]58'14.5'' N, longitude 076[deg]14'50.2'' W;
thence easterly to position latitude 38[deg]58'14.1'' N, longitude
076[deg]14'48.4'' W; thence southerly to position latitude
38[deg]58'12.3'' N, longitude 076[deg]14'49.0'' W; thence westerly to
position latitude 38[deg]58'12.8'' N, longitude 076[deg]14'50.8'' W;
thence northerly to point of origin at position latitude
38[deg]58'14.5'' N, longitude 076[deg]14'50.2'' W. The zone would be
enforced daily from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., from 8 a.m. on December 2, 2013
to 6 p.m. on December 15, 2013.
The effect of this safety zone would be to restrict marine
navigation in the regulated area during daily work activity. Vessels
and persons would be allowed to transit the waters of Kent Island
Narrows outside the safety zone.
This rule would require that, with the exception of Maryland State
Highways Administration support vessels, entry into or remaining in
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port Baltimore. All vessels underway within this safety
zone at the time it is implemented would be required to depart the
zone. To seek permission to transit the area of the safety zone, the
Captain of the Port Baltimore can be contacted at telephone number 410-
576-2693 or on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Coast
Guard vessels enforcing the safety zone can be contacted on Marine Band
Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Federal, state, and local agencies
may assist the Coast Guard in the enforcement of the safety zone. The
Coast Guard will issue notices to the maritime community to further
publicize the safety zone and notify the public of changes in the
status of the zone. Such notices will continue until the work activity
is complete.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. Although this regulation
would restrict access to this area, the effect of this proposed rule
would not be significant because: (i) the Coast Guard would give
advance notification via maritime advisories so mariners can adjust
their plans accordingly, (ii) the safety zone would not be activated,
and thus subject to enforcement, daily from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m., from 8
a.m. on December 2, 2013 to 6 p.m. on December 15, 2013, and (iii)
although the safety zone would apply to the entire width of the federal
navigation channel and not the entire width of Kent Island Narrows,
vessel traffic not constrained by draft or height may be able to
transit safely around the safety zone.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the Kent Island Narrows
daily from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., from 8 a.m. on December 2, 2013 to 6 p.m.
on December 15, 2013.
This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
safety zone would be activated, and thus subject to enforcement, for 12
hours during the day. Although the safety zone would apply to the
entire width of the federal navigation channel, vessel traffic could
pass safely around the safety zone. Before the activation of the zone,
we would issue maritime advisories widely available to users of the
river.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
[[Page 67089]]
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves
establishing a temporary safety zone in the Kent Island Narrows to
maintain public safety during submarine cable replacement operations at
the Kent Island Narrows (MD-18B) Bridge. This action is necessary to
protect persons and property during the project. This rule is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical
Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0908 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0908 Safety Zone, Submarine Cable Replacement
Operations, Kent Island Narrows; Queen Anne's County, MD.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: all waters of
Kent Island Narrows, within an area bounded by the following points:
from position latitude 38[deg]58'14.5'' N, longitude 076[deg]14'50.2''
W; thence easterly to position latitude 38[deg]58'14.1'' N, longitude
076[deg]14'48.4'' W; thence southerly to position latitude
38[deg]58'12.3'' N, longitude 076[deg]14'49.0'' W; thence westerly to
position latitude 38[deg]58'12.8'' N, longitude 076[deg]14'50.8'' W;
thence northerly to point of origin at position latitude
38[deg]58'14.5'' N, longitude 076[deg]14'50.2'' W, located in Queen
Anne's County, Maryland. All coordinates refer to datum NAD 1983.
(b) Regulations. The general safety zone regulations found in 33
CFR 165.23 apply to the safety zone created by this temporary section,
Sec. 165.T05-0908.
(1) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations
governing safety zones found in 33 CFR 165.23.
(2) With the exception of Maryland State Highways Administration
support vessels, entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore. All
vessels underway within this safety zone at the time it is implemented
are to depart the zone.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the area of the safety zone must
first obtain authorization from the Captain of the Port Baltimore or
his designated representative. To seek permission to transit the area,
the Captain of the Port Baltimore and his designated representatives
can be contacted at telephone number 410-576-2693 or on Marine Band
Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing
this section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz). Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel, or other
Federal, State, or local agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing
light, or other means, the operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply
with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Baltimore or his
designated representative and proceed as directed while within the
zone.
(4) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
(c) Definitions. As used in this section:
Captain of the Port Baltimore means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Maryland.
Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port Baltimore to assist in enforcing the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
Maryland State Highways Administration Support Vessels means
[[Page 67090]]
all vessels engaged in submarine cable replacement operations under the
auspices of the Maryland State Highways Administration's authorization
for repairs at the MD-18B Bridge across Kent Island Narrows in Queen
Anne's County, Maryland.
(d) Enforcement periods. This section will be enforced daily from 6
a.m. to 6 p.m., from 8 a.m. on December 2, 2013 to 6 p.m. on December
15, 2013.
Dated: October 24, 2013.
Kevin C. Kiefer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2013-26971 Filed 11-6-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P