Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; Statutory Debarment Under the Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, 66984-66986 [2013-26774]

Download as PDF 66984 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2013 / Notices U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 736–4290. —SBA Update —Annual Meetings —Board Assignments —Member Roundtable The meeting is open to the public however advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to be a listening participant must contact Monika Cuff by fax or email. Her contact information is Monika Cuff, Program Specialist, 409 Third Street SW., Washington, DC 20416, Phone, 202– 205–7310, Fax 202–481–5624, email, monika.cuff@sba.gov Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability or require additional information, please contact Monika Cuff at the information above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Doukas, Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. 2013–26740 Filed 11–6–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 8514] tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES International Security Advisory Board (ISAB); Meeting Notice; Closed Meeting In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App § 10(a)(2), the Department of State announces a meeting of the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) to take place on December 3, 2013, at the Department of State, Washington, DC. Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App 10(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), it has been determined that this Board meeting will be closed to the public because the Board will be reviewing and discussing matters properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. The purpose of the ISAB is to provide the Department with a continuing source of independent advice on all aspects of arms control, disarmament, nonproliferation, political-military affairs, international security, and related aspects of public diplomacy. The agenda for this meeting will include classified discussions related to the Board’s studies on current U.S. policy and issues regarding arms control, international security, nuclear proliferation, cyber stability, energy security, and diplomacy. For more information, contact Richard W. Hartman II, Executive Director of the International Security Advisory Board, VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Nov 06, 2013 Jkt 232001 Dated: October 25, 2013. Richard W. Hartman, II, Executive Director, International Security Advisory Board, U.S. Department of State. [FR Doc. 2013–26724 Filed 11–6–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–24–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 8513] U.S. National Commission for UNESCO; Notice of Meeting The 2013 Annual Meeting of the U.S. National Commission for the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) will take place on Monday, December 16, 2013, at the U.S. Department of State in Washington, DC. (2201 C Street NW.) The Commission will hold a series of informational plenary sessions, subjectspecific committee and thematic breakout sessions and discuss final recommendations, which will be open to the public 10:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. and from 2:00 p.m. to approximately 4:30 p.m. Members of the public who wish to attend any of these meetings or who need reasonable accommodation should contact the U.S. National Commission for UNESCO at the email address below no later than Monday, December 9th for further information about admission, as seating is limited. Those who wish to make oral comments during the public comment section held during the afternoon session should request to be scheduled by Monday, December 9th session. Each individual will be limited to five minutes, with the total oral comment period not exceeding thirty minutes. Access to the building is strictly controlled. For pre-clearance purposes, those planning to attend will need to provide full name, address, date of birth, citizenship, driver’s license or passport number, and email address. This information will greatly facilitate entry into the building. Written comments should be submitted by Friday, December 6th to allow time for distribution to the Commission members prior to the meeting. The National Commission may be contacted via email at DCUNESCO@state.gov, or via phone at (202) 663–0026. The Web site can be accessed at: http://www.state.gov/p/io/ unesco/. Personal information regarding attendees is requested pursuant to Public Law 99–399 (Omnibus PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986), as amended; Public Law 107–56 (USA PATRIOT Act); and Executive Order 13356. The purpose of the collection is to validate the identity of individuals who enter Department facilities. The data will be entered into the Visitor Access Control System (VACS–D) database. Please see the Security Records System of Records Notice (State-36) at http:// www.state.gov/documents/organization/ 103419.pdf for additional information. Dated: October 31, 2013. Allison Wright, Executive Director, U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of State. [FR Doc. 2013–26725 Filed 11–6–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–19–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 8512] Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; Statutory Debarment Under the Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations ACTION: Notice. Notice is hereby given that the Department of State has imposed statutory debarment pursuant to § 127.7(c) of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (‘‘ITAR’’) (22 CFR parts 120 to 130) on persons convicted of violating, or conspiracy to violate, Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended, (‘‘AECA’’) (22 U.S.C. 2778). DATES: Effective Date: The effective date is the date of this notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel J. Buzby, Acting Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department of State (202) 632–2872. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C. 2778(g)(4), prohibits the Department of State from issuing licenses or other approvals for the export of defense articles or defense services where the applicant, or any party to the export, has been convicted of violating certain statutes, including the AECA. The statute permits limited exceptions to be made on a case-by-case basis. In implementing this provision, Section 127.7 of the ITAR provides for ‘‘statutory debarment’’ of any person who has been convicted of violating or conspiring to violate the AECA. Persons subject to statutory debarment are prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in the export of defense SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM 07NON1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2013 / Notices articles, including technical data, or in the furnishing of defense services for which a license or other approval is required. Statutory debarment is based solely upon conviction in a criminal proceeding, conducted by a United States Court, and as such the administrative debarment procedures outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR are not applicable. The period for debarment will be determined by the Assistant Secretary for Political-Military Affairs based on the underlying nature of the violations, but will generally be for three years from the date of conviction. Export privileges may be reinstated only at the request of the debarred person followed by the necessary interagency consultations, after a thorough review of the circumstances surrounding the conviction, and a finding that appropriate steps have been taken to mitigate any law enforcement concerns, as required by Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA. Unless export privileges are reinstated, however, the person remains debarred. Department of State policy permits debarred persons to apply to the Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, for reinstatement beginning one year after the date of the debarment. Any decision to grant reinstatement can be made only after the statutory requirements of Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA have been satisfied. Exceptions, also known as transaction exceptions, may be made to this debarment determination on a case-bycase basis at the discretion of the Assistant Secretary of State for PoliticalMilitary Affairs, after consulting with the appropriate U.S. agencies. However, such an exception would be granted only after a full review of all circumstances, paying particular attention to the following factors: Whether an exception is warranted by overriding U.S. foreign policy or national security interests; whether an exception would further law enforcement concerns that are consistent with the foreign policy or national security interests of the United States; or whether other compelling circumstances exist that are consistent with the foreign policy or national security interests of the United States, and that do not conflict with law enforcement concerns. Even if exceptions are granted, the debarment continues until subsequent reinstatement. Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA and Section 127.7(c) of the ITAR, the following persons are statutorily VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Nov 06, 2013 Jkt 232001 debarred as of the date of this notice (Name; Date of Conviction; District; Case No.; Month/Year of Birth): (1) Gabriel Justin Aguirre; October 16, 2012; U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR 11–01715–004– PHX–NVW; February 1987. (2) Rene Alexandre; March 16, 2013; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR00626–S2–001; January 1983. (3) Jaime Ariel Amaya-Garcia; March 16, 2013; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR00626–002; April 1959. (4) Jonathan Arellano; January 14, 2013; U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR 11–01715–008– PHX–NVW; October 1991. (5) Everardo Eleazar AvendanoCamacho; March 25, 2013; U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR 12–00812–001–PHX–DGC; December 1980. (6) Michael Bartch, Sr.; April 22, 2013; U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas; Case No. W–12–CR– 018(01); November 1949. (7) Aliaksandr Belski, (aka Alex Belski); July 18, 2013; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Case No. 2:11CR000449–002; December 1980. (8) Brian Keith Bishop; May 7, 2013; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia; Case No. 1:12CR00395–001; November 1973. (9) Ivon Castaneda; December 20, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; Case No. 1:12– 20383–CR–LENARD–4; March 1967. (10) Martyn Caulfield, (aka Martin Caulfield, Martin Butt); October 29, 2012; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida; Case No. 3:12cr47– 001LAC; December 1956. (11) Ernest Chornoletskyy, (aka Erik Chornoletskyy); August 21, 2013; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Case No. 2:11CR000449– 006; September 1984. (12) Guadalupe Santos Cisneros; December 4, 2012; U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR 11– 01715–010–PHX–NVW; March 1991. (13) Demetrio Cortez-Salgado, (aka Demetrio Cortez-Ordaz); September 11, 2013; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California; Case No. 1:11–CR– 00376–003; December 1966. (14) Erasmo Gallegos-Gutierrez; October 16, 2012; U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR 11– 01715–005–PHX–NVW; February 1972. (15) Manuel Homero Garces; February 6, 2013; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR01228–001; October 1990. (16) Elvin Garrido; June 4, 2013; U.S. District Court, Southern District of PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 66985 Florida; Case No. 13–20070–CRMartinez; June 1977. (17) Ramiro Garza-Gonzalez; May 17, 2013; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR01579–001; January 1976. (18) James Charles Gidaro; January 8, 2013; U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR 11–01715–013– PHX–NVW; April 1971. (19) Marco Antonio HernandezVallejo; May 27, 2013; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR02010–001; September 1992. (20) Sixing Liu, (aka Steve Liu); March 26, 2013; U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey; Case No. 2:11CR208(SRC)(1); May 1963. (21) Jesus Humberto Lopez-Estrada; February 5, 2013; U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR 11– 01715–001–PHX–NVW; December 1978. (22) Kevin Robert Mejia; October 26, 2012; U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR 11–01715–007– PHX–NVW; October 1986. (23) Javier Molina; August 21, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi; Case No. 1:11CR103–1; October 1962. (24) Joshua Isaac Ortega; January 8, 2013; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR01135–001; September 1991. (25) Mario Obdulio Padilla; December 18, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; Case No. 1:12– 20383–CR–LENARD–3; August 1947. (26) Esther Rizo; January 11, 2013; U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; Case No. 12CR0806–H; December 1985. (27) Carlos Rubio-Tovias; November 28, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR01135–002; November 1987. (28) Jose Luis Santos-Garcia; August 22, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi; Case No. 1:11CR103–2; September 1968. (29) Michael Barry Shor; April 6, 2012; U.S. District Court, Northern District of California; Case No. CR–10– 00434–001; October 1951. (30) Floyd Dean Stilwell; May 14, 2013; U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR 10–01463–001– PHX–PGR; September 1926. (31) Joel Robert Stone; January 25, 2013; U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas; Case No. W–12–CR– 017(01); December 1965. (32) Christopher Harold Tappin; January 9, 2013; U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas; Case No. EP– 07–CR–249–DB(1); November 1946. (33) Anthony J. Torresi; July 18, 2013; U.S. District Court, District of Maryland; Case No. ELH–1–11–CR–0513–001; August 1978. E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM 07NON1 66986 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2013 / Notices tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES (34) Vitali Tsishuk; February 14, 2013; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Case No. 2:11CR000449– 005; November 1982. (35) Juan Luis Vargas-Yanez; May 14, 2013; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR01580–001; October 1983. (36) Ming Xie, (aka Michael Xie); May 22, 2013; U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey; Case No. CR. 1:11–00608– 001(RMB); May 1957. (37) Kevin Zhang, (aka Zhao Wei Zhang); April 17, 2013; U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; Case No. 11CR0212–MMA; January 1971. As noted above, at the end of the three-year period following the date of this notice, the above named persons/ entities remain debarred unless export privileges are reinstated. Debarred persons are generally ineligible to participate in activity regulated under the ITAR (see e.g., sections 120.1(c) and (d), and 127.11(a)). Also, under Section 127.1(d) of the ITAR, any person who has knowledge that another person is subject to debarment or is otherwise ineligible may not, without disclosure to and written approval from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, participate, directly or indirectly, in any ITARcontrolled export in which such ineligible person may benefit there from or have a direct or indirect interest therein. This notice is provided for purposes of making the public aware that the persons listed above are prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in activities regulated by the ITAR, including any brokering activities and in any export from or temporary import into the United States of defense articles, related technical data, or defense services in all situations covered by the ITAR. Specific case information may be obtained from the Office of the Clerk for the U.S. District Courts mentioned above and by citing the court case number where provided. Dated: October 28, 2013. Tom Kelly, Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. 2013–26774 Filed 11–6–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–25–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Nov 06, 2013 Jkt 232001 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration [Summary Notice No. PE–2013–51] Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received. AGENCY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief from specified requirements of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The purpose of this notice is to improve the public’s awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of the FAA’s regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition. DATE: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket number involved and must be received on or before November 27, 2013. ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by docket number FAA– 2011–0883 using any of the following methods: • Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments digitally. • Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590. • Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at 202–493–2251. • Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the Docket Management Facility in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Privacy: We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. Using the search function of our docket Web site, anyone can find and read the comments received into any of our dockets, including the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78). Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to the Docket Management Facility in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Forseth, ANM–113, (425) 227– 2796, Federal Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356, or Andrea Copeland, ARM–208, Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; email andrea.copeland@faa.gov; (202) 267– 8081. This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85. Issued in Washington, DC, on November 4, 2013. Brenda Courtney, Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking. Petition for Exemption Docket No.: FAA–2011–0883. Petitioner: The Boeing Company. Section of 14 CFR Affected: § 25.809(a). Description of Relief Sought: Petitioner seeks an amendment to Exemption No. 10376, which permits relief from the requirements that passenger emergency exits have a means to view outside conditions under all lighting situations for certain Boeing Model 747–8 series airplanes for upperdeck passenger exits, and the main-deck exits located at doors 1, 2, 4 and 5. The amendment would extend the relief to all Boeing 747–8 airplanes manufactured before production line 1499, regardless of the actual airplane delivery date. [FR Doc. 2013–26715 Filed 11–6–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property Release at Barnwell County Airport, Barnwell, South Carolina Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. 47151(d), notice is being given that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a request from the County of Barnwell to waive the requirement that a 4.0 acre SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM 07NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 216 (Thursday, November 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66984-66986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26774]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8512]


Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; Statutory Debarment Under 
the Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms 
Regulations

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Department of State has 
imposed statutory debarment pursuant to Sec.  127.7(c) of the 
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (``ITAR'') (22 CFR parts 120 
to 130) on persons convicted of violating, or conspiracy to violate, 
Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended, (``AECA'') (22 
U.S.C. 2778).

DATES: Effective Date: The effective date is the date of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel J. Buzby, Acting Director, 
Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, Bureau of Political-
Military Affairs, Department of State (202) 632-2872.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C. 
2778(g)(4), prohibits the Department of State from issuing licenses or 
other approvals for the export of defense articles or defense services 
where the applicant, or any party to the export, has been convicted of 
violating certain statutes, including the AECA. The statute permits 
limited exceptions to be made on a case-by-case basis. In implementing 
this provision, Section 127.7 of the ITAR provides for ``statutory 
debarment'' of any person who has been convicted of violating or 
conspiring to violate the AECA. Persons subject to statutory debarment 
are prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in the export 
of defense

[[Page 66985]]

articles, including technical data, or in the furnishing of defense 
services for which a license or other approval is required.
    Statutory debarment is based solely upon conviction in a criminal 
proceeding, conducted by a United States Court, and as such the 
administrative debarment procedures outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR 
are not applicable.
    The period for debarment will be determined by the Assistant 
Secretary for Political-Military Affairs based on the underlying nature 
of the violations, but will generally be for three years from the date 
of conviction. Export privileges may be reinstated only at the request 
of the debarred person followed by the necessary interagency 
consultations, after a thorough review of the circumstances surrounding 
the conviction, and a finding that appropriate steps have been taken to 
mitigate any law enforcement concerns, as required by Section 38(g)(4) 
of the AECA. Unless export privileges are reinstated, however, the 
person remains debarred.
    Department of State policy permits debarred persons to apply to the 
Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, for 
reinstatement beginning one year after the date of the debarment. Any 
decision to grant reinstatement can be made only after the statutory 
requirements of Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA have been satisfied.
    Exceptions, also known as transaction exceptions, may be made to 
this debarment determination on a case-by-case basis at the discretion 
of the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs, 
after consulting with the appropriate U.S. agencies. However, such an 
exception would be granted only after a full review of all 
circumstances, paying particular attention to the following factors: 
Whether an exception is warranted by overriding U.S. foreign policy or 
national security interests; whether an exception would further law 
enforcement concerns that are consistent with the foreign policy or 
national security interests of the United States; or whether other 
compelling circumstances exist that are consistent with the foreign 
policy or national security interests of the United States, and that do 
not conflict with law enforcement concerns. Even if exceptions are 
granted, the debarment continues until subsequent reinstatement.
    Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA and Section 127.7(c) of 
the ITAR, the following persons are statutorily debarred as of the date 
of this notice (Name; Date of Conviction; District; Case No.; Month/
Year of Birth):
    (1) Gabriel Justin Aguirre; October 16, 2012; U.S. District Court, 
District of Arizona; Case No. CR 11-01715-004-PHX-NVW; February 1987.
    (2) Rene Alexandre; March 16, 2013; U.S. District Court, Southern 
District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR00626-S2-001; January 1983.
    (3) Jaime Ariel Amaya-Garcia; March 16, 2013; U.S. District Court, 
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR00626-002; April 1959.
    (4) Jonathan Arellano; January 14, 2013; U.S. District Court, 
District of Arizona; Case No. CR 11-01715-008-PHX-NVW; October 1991.
    (5) Everardo Eleazar Avendano-Camacho; March 25, 2013; U.S. 
District Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR 12-00812-001-PHX-DGC; 
December 1980.
    (6) Michael Bartch, Sr.; April 22, 2013; U.S. District Court, 
Western District of Texas; Case No. W-12-CR-018(01); November 1949.
    (7) Aliaksandr Belski, (aka Alex Belski); July 18, 2013; U.S. 
District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Case No. 
2:11CR000449-002; December 1980.
    (8) Brian Keith Bishop; May 7, 2013; U.S. District Court, Eastern 
District of Virginia; Case No. 1:12CR00395-001; November 1973.
    (9) Ivon Castaneda; December 20, 2012; U.S. District Court, 
Southern District of Florida; Case No. 1:12-20383-CR-LENARD-4; March 
1967.
    (10) Martyn Caulfield, (aka Martin Caulfield, Martin Butt); October 
29, 2012; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida; Case No. 
3:12cr47-001LAC; December 1956.
    (11) Ernest Chornoletskyy, (aka Erik Chornoletskyy); August 21, 
2013; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Case No. 
2:11CR000449-006; September 1984.
    (12) Guadalupe Santos Cisneros; December 4, 2012; U.S. District 
Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR 11-01715-010-PHX-NVW; March 
1991.
    (13) Demetrio Cortez-Salgado, (aka Demetrio Cortez-Ordaz); 
September 11, 2013; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of 
California; Case No. 1:11-CR-00376-003; December 1966.
    (14) Erasmo Gallegos-Gutierrez; October 16, 2012; U.S. District 
Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR 11-01715-005-PHX-NVW; February 
1972.
    (15) Manuel Homero Garces; February 6, 2013; U.S. District Court, 
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR01228-001; October 1990.
    (16) Elvin Garrido; June 4, 2013; U.S. District Court, Southern 
District of Florida; Case No. 13-20070-CR-Martinez; June 1977.
    (17) Ramiro Garza-Gonzalez; May 17, 2013; U.S. District Court, 
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR01579-001; January 1976.
    (18) James Charles Gidaro; January 8, 2013; U.S. District Court, 
District of Arizona; Case No. CR 11-01715-013-PHX-NVW; April 1971.
    (19) Marco Antonio Hernandez-Vallejo; May 27, 2013; U.S. District 
Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR02010-001; September 
1992.
    (20) Sixing Liu, (aka Steve Liu); March 26, 2013; U.S. District 
Court, District of New Jersey; Case No. 2:11CR208(SRC)(1); May 1963.
    (21) Jesus Humberto Lopez-Estrada; February 5, 2013; U.S. District 
Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR 11-01715-001-PHX-NVW; December 
1978.
    (22) Kevin Robert Mejia; October 26, 2012; U.S. District Court, 
District of Arizona; Case No. CR 11-01715-007-PHX-NVW; October 1986.
    (23) Javier Molina; August 21, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern 
District of Mississippi; Case No. 1:11CR103-1; October 1962.
    (24) Joshua Isaac Ortega; January 8, 2013; U.S. District Court, 
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR01135-001; September 1991.
    (25) Mario Obdulio Padilla; December 18, 2012; U.S. District Court, 
Southern District of Florida; Case No. 1:12-20383-CR-LENARD-3; August 
1947.
    (26) Esther Rizo; January 11, 2013; U.S. District Court, Southern 
District of California; Case No. 12CR0806-H; December 1985.
    (27) Carlos Rubio-Tovias; November 28, 2012; U.S. District Court, 
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR01135-002; November 1987.
    (28) Jose Luis Santos-Garcia; August 22, 2012; U.S. District Court, 
Southern District of Mississippi; Case No. 1:11CR103-2; September 1968.
    (29) Michael Barry Shor; April 6, 2012; U.S. District Court, 
Northern District of California; Case No. CR-10-00434-001; October 
1951.
    (30) Floyd Dean Stilwell; May 14, 2013; U.S. District Court, 
District of Arizona; Case No. CR 10-01463-001-PHX-PGR; September 1926.
    (31) Joel Robert Stone; January 25, 2013; U.S. District Court, 
Western District of Texas; Case No. W-12-CR-017(01); December 1965.
    (32) Christopher Harold Tappin; January 9, 2013; U.S. District 
Court, Western District of Texas; Case No. EP-07-CR-249-DB(1); November 
1946.
    (33) Anthony J. Torresi; July 18, 2013; U.S. District Court, 
District of Maryland; Case No. ELH-1-11-CR-0513-001; August 1978.

[[Page 66986]]

    (34) Vitali Tsishuk; February 14, 2013; U.S. District Court, 
Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Case No. 2:11CR000449-005; November 
1982.
    (35) Juan Luis Vargas-Yanez; May 14, 2013; U.S. District Court, 
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:12CR01580-001; October 1983.
    (36) Ming Xie, (aka Michael Xie); May 22, 2013; U.S. District 
Court, District of New Jersey; Case No. CR. 1:11-00608-001(RMB); May 
1957.
    (37) Kevin Zhang, (aka Zhao Wei Zhang); April 17, 2013; U.S. 
District Court, Southern District of California; Case No. 11CR0212-MMA; 
January 1971.
    As noted above, at the end of the three-year period following the 
date of this notice, the above named persons/entities remain debarred 
unless export privileges are reinstated.
    Debarred persons are generally ineligible to participate in 
activity regulated under the ITAR (see e.g., sections 120.1(c) and (d), 
and 127.11(a)). Also, under Section 127.1(d) of the ITAR, any person 
who has knowledge that another person is subject to debarment or is 
otherwise ineligible may not, without disclosure to and written 
approval from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, participate, 
directly or indirectly, in any ITAR-controlled export in which such 
ineligible person may benefit there from or have a direct or indirect 
interest therein.
    This notice is provided for purposes of making the public aware 
that the persons listed above are prohibited from participating 
directly or indirectly in activities regulated by the ITAR, including 
any brokering activities and in any export from or temporary import 
into the United States of defense articles, related technical data, or 
defense services in all situations covered by the ITAR. Specific case 
information may be obtained from the Office of the Clerk for the U.S. 
District Courts mentioned above and by citing the court case number 
where provided.

    Dated: October 28, 2013.
Tom Kelly,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-26774 Filed 11-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P