Housing Assistance Due to Structural Damage, 66852-66857 [2013-26739]
Download as PDF
66852
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 433
State Fiscal Administration
CFR Correction
In Title 42 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Parts 430 to 481, revised as
of October 1, 2012, on page 98, in
§ 433.50, paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and
(a)(1)(ii) are removed.
■
[FR Doc. 2013–26781 Filed 11–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 206
[Docket ID FEMA–2010–0035]
RIN 1660–AA68
Housing Assistance Due to Structural
Damage
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Under the authority of section
408 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act
(Stafford Act), the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) provides
financial assistance to individuals and
households to repair or replace their
homes after a Presidentially-declared
major disaster or emergency. This rule
finalizes revisions to FEMA’s repair,
replacement, and housing construction
assistance regulations that clarify the
eligibility criteria for assistance and
implement changes to section 408 of the
Stafford Act that were made by the PostKatrina Emergency Management Reform
Act of 2006 (PKEMRA).
DATES: This rule is effective December 9,
2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Carleton, FEMA, Individual Assistance
Division, 500 C Street SW., Washington,
DC 20472–3100, (phone) 202–212–1000,
(facsimile) (202) 212–1005, or (email)
FEMA-IA-Regulations@fema.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Section 408 of the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 06, 2013
Jkt 232001
Assistance Act (Stafford Act) provides
the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) with the authority to
administer the Individuals and
Households program (IHP). See 42
U.S.C. 5174. Through the IHP, FEMA
provides financial and/or direct
assistance to help survivors recover
from Presidentially-declared
emergencies and major disasters. This
help may be in the form of housing
assistance as well as assistance to meet
‘‘other needs’’ such as medical, dental,
funeral, and personal property.
Specifically, FEMA provides the
following types of housing assistance:
Temporary Housing: Financial
assistance is available to rent a different
place to live for a limited period of time.
When rental properties are not
available, FEMA may provide direct
assistance in the form of a temporary
housing unit.
Housing Repair: Financial assistance
is available to homeowners to repair
disaster damage to their primary
residence. Assistance is only available
to repair damage that is not covered by
insurance. The goal is to make the
damaged home safe, sanitary, and
functional.
Housing Replacement: Financial
assistance is available to homeowners to
replace their primary residence if it was
destroyed in the disaster. Assistance is
only available for damage that is not
covered by insurance.
Permanent and Semi-Permanent
Housing Construction: In exceptional
circumstances, FEMA is authorized to
provide permanent and semi-permanent
housing construction. If FEMA exercises
its discretion to offer this form of
disaster assistance, FEMA may provide
financial assistance for the construction
of a home, or may construct the new
permanent or semi-permanent housing
unit for an individual or household.
This type of assistance is currently
provided only in insular areas or
locations specified by FEMA where no
other type of housing assistance is
available, feasible, or cost-effective.
Assistance is provided only for damage
that is not covered by insurance.
The regulations establishing the types of
IHP assistance available, the eligibility
requirements for assistance, and the
procedures for obtaining assistance are
in 44 CFR part 206, subparts D and F.
On September 30, 2002, FEMA
published an interim rule in the Federal
Register, which revised its regulations
implementing the IHP. See 67 FR 61446.
FEMA published a correction to the
interim rule on October 9, 2002. See 67
FR 62896. Among other things, the
interim rule established the housing
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
repair, replacement, and construction
eligibility regulations in 44 CFR
206.117. These regulations are currently
in effect, with minor amendments. See
74 FR 15328 (Apr. 3, 2009).
On July 30, 2012, FEMA published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM),
which addressed the public comments
received on the 2002 interim rule
related to housing repair and
replacement. See 77 FR 44562. In
addition, the NPRM proposed revisions
intended to clarify and improve FEMA’s
eligibility requirements for housing
repair assistance as well as implement
and codify PKEMRA legislative changes
made after the interim rule was
published.
II. Summary of the Proposed Rule
In the NPRM, FEMA proposed four
separate sets of changes. First, FEMA
proposed revisions to the interim rule to
respond to public comments received
on the 2002 interim rule. Second, FEMA
proposed changes that were intended to
restate the existing requirements more
clearly and in greater detail, without
substantively changing the underlying
requirements. Third, consistent with
statutory amendments in the PostKatrina Emergency Management Reform
Act of 2006 (PKEMRA), FEMA proposed
removing the housing repair and
replacement subcaps. Finally, also
consistent with statutory amendments
in PKEMRA, FEMA proposed adding
the term ‘‘semi-permanent’’ and
removing the term ‘‘remote’’ with
respect to the eligibility requirements
for housing construction pursuant to
PKEMRA.
This final rule codifies the above
changes as discussed in the NPRM. For
additional background information on
these proposed changes, please refer to
the NPRM.
III. Discussion of Comments Received
on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
FEMA received two written
comments in response to the NPRM.
The first commenter stated that FEMA’s
regulations should be clearer. The
commenter expressed that FEMA must
be able to make things as clear as
possible for disaster survivors.
The second commenter raised four
separate points in its comment. First,
the commenter noted that since FEMA
was no longer applying the housing
repair and replacement subcaps and
allowing applicants to have the
maximum IHP award for housing
assistance, there would be no additional
money available to award for Other
Needs Assistance (ONA). The
commenter asked whether an additional
amount, such as $3,000, can be available
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
to applicants for ONA. FEMA
understands the commenter’s concern;
however, FEMA does not have the
authority to award an additional amount
($3,000) for ONA above and beyond the
statutorily established program limit.
Second, the commenter thanked
FEMA for clarifying the IHP housing
repair assistance eligibility requirements
and stated that the proposed changes
will help to simplify the process for IHP
assistance.
Third, the commenter noted that
under proposed § 206.117(b)(3)(i)(C) and
(E), FEMA proposed that to be eligible
for housing replacement assistance, the
residence must have been destroyed,
and repair must be either infeasible,
insufficient to ensure the safety or
health of the occupant, or insufficient to
make the residence functional. The
commenter suggested that FEMA
include an exception to this rule, so that
if the cost to repair exceeds the cost to
rebuild, the applicant should be granted
replacement assistance even if FEMA
did not deem all parts of the dwelling’s
structure destroyed.
FEMA’s Individual and Households
Program records and verifies disasterrelated damages based on a FEMA home
inspection. Based on the home
inspection, FEMA makes a
determination regarding the amount of
damage that a dwelling has sustained. If
the dwelling is deemed destroyed, then
the applicant could receive replacement
assistance up to the maximum grant
amount. If the dwelling sustained
significant damage and is determined to
be repairable, then the applicant could
still receive up to the maximum grant
amount to repair the dwelling. FEMA
notes that the distinction between repair
and replacement assistance has no effect
on the maximum amount of assistance
that FEMA can award a disaster
survivor. The maximum IHP grant
amount that a disaster survivor may
receive in fiscal year 2014 is $32,400 per
declared event (78 FR 64523, Oct. 29,
2013).
In the scenario suggested by the
commenter, where the cost to repair
exceeds the cost to rebuild, an
(uninsured) applicant would most likely
be receiving a maximum award
regardless. Thus the distinction between
repair and replacement assistance
would have no effect on the cost
effectiveness. Moreover, if a disaster
survivor determines that they want to
rebuild their dwelling rather than
repair, the disaster survivor is allowed
to use their repair assistance towards
replacing their dwelling.
The last point by the second
commenter suggested that FEMA add a
requirement in the final rule to do a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 06, 2013
Jkt 232001
cost-benefit analysis to determine the
type of housing that would be the most
cost effective and mindful of taxpayer
dollars; for example, if the costs of
building a community site for temporary
housing units (THUs) exceeds the costs
of semi-permanent housing
construction, then semi-permanent
housing should be utilized. FEMA is
statutorily required under Section
408(b)(2)(A) of the Stafford Act to
determine the appropriate types of
housing assistance ‘‘based on
considerations of cost effectiveness,
convenience to the individuals and
households, and such other factors
. . .’’; a requirement in the final rule is
therefore not necessary. See 42 U.S.C.
5174. FEMA currently has a process for
evaluating the appropriate type of
housing based on a number of factors,
one of which is the cost effectiveness of
the housing option. In addition, FEMA
weighs housing options based on the
geographical area affected by the
disaster, the delivery speed of housing
options, the availability of housing
resources in the affected area, and
various other considerations.
IV. Records Management
The Regulation Identifier Number
(RIN) listed in the September 30, 2002
interim rule and the correction to the
interim rule was 3067–AD25. When
FEMA became a component of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) in 2003, FEMA’s RINs were
renumbered, and 3067–AD25 became
1660–AA18.
The Docket ID for 1660–AA18 is
FEMA–2008–0005. All of 1660–AA18’s
public submissions, supporting and
related documents, and rules are posted
to Docket ID FEMA–2008–0005. The
public comments that addressed
housing repair assistance, the subject of
this rulemaking, have also been posted
to Docket ID FEMA–2010–0035.
V. Regulatory Analysis
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
FEMA has prepared and reviewed this
rule consistent with Executive Order
12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
(58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993) as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review (76 FR 3821, Jan. 18,
2011). This final rule is not a significant
regulatory action, and therefore has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This final rule provides clarification
with respect to the eligibility for
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66853
housing repair assistance, without
adding new requirements, as well as
implements changes to section 408 of
the Stafford Act made by PKEMRA. See
42 U.S.C. 5174. This rule does not
impose any additional burden on the
public or change the total amount of
assistance available to individuals and
households since this rule merely
codifies FEMA practice since 2006.
The changes resulting from PKEMRA
(a) revise the regulations to align with
PKEMRA’s removal of the housing
repair and replacement subcaps; (b)
remove the limitation that housing
construction assistance be provided
only in a ‘‘remote’’ area, if the location
is not otherwise insular (outside the
continental United States); and (c)
incorporate FEMA’s new authority to
provide assistance for the construction
of ‘‘semi-permanent’’ housing.
When the current regulations were
written, the Disaster Mitigation Act of
2000 prohibited FEMA from providing
more than $5,000 (adjusted annually to
reflect changes in the Consumer Price
Index (CPI)) for repair assistance, and
more than $10,000 (adjusted annually to
reflect changes in the CPI) for
replacement assistance. These subcaps
prevented applicants from spending
other available IHP assistance (in fiscal
year 2014, the overall cap on financial
assistance is $32,400 per declared event
(78 FR 64523, Oct. 29, 2013)) on
housing repair or replacement. The
change in PKEMRA was selfimplementing and immediately went
into effect. FEMA is no longer required
to apply subcaps and has not applied
them since PKEMRA became law in
2006. This rule change is intended to
revise the regulations to conform to the
statutory change and FEMA’s current
practice. It does not change the
eligibility criteria and does not reduce
the total amount of assistance available
to individuals and households. This
rule does not have an economic impact
because it merely codifies FEMA
current practice.
This rule also removes the term
‘‘remote’’ from 44 CFR 206.117(b)(3) to
implement new authority to provide
housing construction assistance in areas
within the continental United States
where alternative housing resources are
not available, infeasible, or not cost
effective. The 2002 interim rule limited
this type of assistance to only locations
that are insular or remote. This rule
change implements PKEMRA by
providing housing construction
assistance to disaster survivors in areas
where alternative housing resources are
not feasible. This rule change provides
more flexibility for FEMA to meet the
housing needs for disaster survivors,
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
66854
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
although it is expected that FEMA will
only rarely exercise this authority. This
is because alternative housing resources,
such as rental units, manufactured
housing, recreational vehicles, other
readily fabricated dwellings, or FEMAprovided temporary housing units,
typically are available within the
continental United States. This change
is not expected to have a significant
economic impact or to negatively affect
the eligibility criteria for assistance. Any
economic impact from this rule change
would be an increase in Federal
financial assistance provided to
individuals and households to provide
housing in those extremely rare cases
where alternative housing resources are
unavailable, infeasible, or not cost
effective. There would be no increased
burden imposed on the public from this
proposed change. There is no economic
impact to this change because this rule
merely codifies FEMA current practice
since 2006.
This rule also adds ‘‘semi-permanent’’
to the types of housing that could be
constructed. This type of housing would
have a life expectancy of more than 5
years, but less than 25 years. While
FEMA already provides temporary and
permanent housing, by implementing
this new authority, FEMA would have
greater flexibility to meet the needs of
a particular community, where the
construction of a type of housing other
than a long-term permanent structure
may be more appropriate. Although this
rule change is likely to provide more
flexibility for FEMA to meet the housing
needs for disaster survivors, it is not
expected that FEMA will regularly
exercise this authority. This proposed
rule change would implement PKEMRA
by giving FEMA more options in
providing housing assistance to disaster
survivors. It would not reduce the
number of individuals or households
eligible for housing assistance and
would not affect eligibility
requirements. There is no economic
impact to this proposed change because
this proposed rule merely codifies
current FEMA practice.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FEMA determined that this proposed
rule will not create a new collection of
information or create a revision to an
existing collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. All
information submitted by applicants
seeking IHP housing assistance,
including information submitted on
appeal, is included in Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approved collections.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 06, 2013
Jkt 232001
The following collections related to
IHP have been approved by OMB under
the following titles and control
numbers: ‘‘Disaster Assistance
Registration,’’ OMB control number
1660–0002, expiration date July 31,
2015 and ‘‘Federal Assistance to
Individuals and Households Program
(IHP),’’ OMB control number 1660–
0061, expiration date October 31, 2014.
There would be no additional
paperwork burden as a result of the
changes proposed in this rule.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended
by the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub.
L. 104–121, 110 Stat. 857), FEMA must
consider the impact of this proposed
regulation on small entities. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
This final rule clarifies the eligibility
criteria for housing repair, replacement,
and construction assistance to
individuals and households. It will not
have an economic impact on small
entities because it merely codifies
FEMA current practice since PKEMRA
became law in 2006. FEMA certifies that
this rulemaking will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
D. Privacy Act
The Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C.
552a, establishes a code of fair
information practices that governs the
collection, maintenance, use, and
dissemination of personally identifiable
information about individuals that is
maintained in systems of records by
Federal agencies. A system of records is
a group of records under the control of
an agency from which information is
retrieved by the name of the individual
or by some identifier assigned to the
individual. FEMA, in partnership with
other Federal agencies, hosts a single
application and resource center at
https://www.disasterassistance.gov that
allows the public to apply for disaster
assistance, benefits, and other services
within FEMA and other Federal
agencies. This application and resource
center contains personally identifiable
information about IHP applicants
seeking housing repair, replacement, or
construction assistance. The application
resource center is included in a Privacy
Act System of Records entitled ‘‘Disaster
Recovery Assistance Files’’ number
‘‘DHS/FEMA–008’’ which published on
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
April 30, 2013 in the Federal Register
at 78 FR 25282. This proposed rule
would not change the application
materials received or result in a new
collection of personally identifiable
information about individuals.
E. National Environmental Policy Act
Under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq., an agency must prepare an
environmental assessment and
environmental impact statement for any
rulemaking that significantly affects the
quality of the human environment.
FEMA has determined that this
rulemaking does not significantly affect
the quality of the human environment
and consequently has not prepared an
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement. Most
activities under section 408 and prior to
section 411 of the Stafford Act
pertaining to temporary housing and
financial assistance are categorically
excluded from NEPA review under 44
CFR 10.8(d)(2)(xix)(D) and (F). Before
undertaking other activities that are not
categorically excluded (e.g., placement
of manufactured temporary housing
units on FEMA-constructed group sites;
permanent or semi-permanent housing
construction), FEMA follows the
procedures set forth in 44 CFR part 10
to assure NEPA compliance.
F. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132, Federalism,
sets forth principles and criteria that
agencies must adhere to in formulating
and implementing policies that have
federalism implications, that is,
regulations that have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. See
Executive Order 13132, 64 FR 43255,
Aug. 10, 1999. Federal agencies must
closely examine the statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the
States, and to the extent practicable,
must consult with State and local
officials before implementing any such
action. The disaster assistance
addressed by this proposed rule is
provided to individuals and
households, and would not have
federalism implications.
G. Executive Orders 11988 and 11990,
Floodplain Management and Protection
of Wetlands
Under Executive Order 11988,
Floodplain Management, as amended,
Federal agencies are required to
‘‘provide leadership to reduce the risk of
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
flood loss, to minimize the impact of
floods on human safety, health and
welfare, and to restore and preserve the
natural and beneficial values served by
floodplains.’’ See Executive Order
11988, as amended, 42 FR 26951, May
25, 1977, 44 FR 43239, July 20, 1979.
Under Executive Order 11990,
Protection of Wetlands, Federal agencies
are required to ‘‘provide leadership and
. . . take action to minimize the
destruction, loss or degradation of
wetlands, and to preserve and enhance
the natural and beneficial values of
wetlands in carrying out the agency’s
responsibilities.’’ See Executive Order
11990, as amended, 42 FR 26961, May
25, 1977, 52 FR 34617, Sept. 14, 1987.
The requirements of these Executive
Orders apply in the context of the
provision of Federal financial assistance
relating to, among other things,
construction and property improvement
activities, as well as conducting Federal
programs affecting land use. The
changes proposed in this rule would not
have an effect on land use, floodplain
management or wetlands. When FEMA
undertakes specific actions that may
have such effects (e.g., placement of
manufactured temporary housing units
on FEMA-constructed group sites;
permanent or semi-permanent housing
construction), FEMA follows the
procedures set forth in 44 CFR part 9 to
assure compliance with these Executive
Orders.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
H. Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risk and Safety Risks
FEMA has analyzed this final rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks, 62 FR 19883, Apr. 23, 1997. This
rule is not an economically significant
rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or safety
that might disproportionately affect
children.
I. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.,
pertains to any proposed rulemaking
which implements any rule that
includes a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more (adjusted annually
for inflation) in any one year. The Act
also applies to any regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
FEMA has determined that this
proposed rule would not result in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 06, 2013
Jkt 232001
expenditure by State, local and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, nor by
the private sector, of $100,000,000 or
more in any one year as a result of a
Federal mandate, nor would it
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
J. Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Under Executive Order 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, FEMA may
not issue a regulation that is not
required by statute, that significantly or
uniquely affects the communities of
Indian Tribal governments, and that
imposes substantial direct compliance
costs on those communities, unless the
Federal Government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by the Tribal government,
or FEMA consults with those
governments. See Executive Order
13175, 65 FR 67249, Nov. 9, 2000. This
final rule would not significantly or
uniquely affect the communities of
Indian Tribal governments, nor would
this proposed rulemaking impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
those communities.
K. Executive Order 12898,
Environmental Justice
Under Executive Order 12898,
Environmental Justice, each Federal
agency must conduct its programs,
policies, and activities that substantially
affect human health or the environment
in a manner that ensures that those
programs, policies, and activities do not
have the effect of excluding persons
from participation in, denying persons
the benefit of, or subjecting persons to
discrimination because of their race,
color, or national origin. See Executive
Order 12898, 59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994.
FEMA has incorporated environmental
justice into its policies and programs.
The housing repair, replacement and
construction assistance regulations
intentionally contain provisions that
ensure they would not have a
disproportionately high and adverse
human health effect on any segment of
the population. This rulemaking
clarifies the eligibility requirements for
assistance, and in doing so, maintains
focus on the functionality of the
component being repaired or replaced,
and does not consider income or home
value. Section 408 of the Stafford Act
requires that such assistance be granted
only for damage caused by a disaster
event. Non-disaster related damage is
not eligible for assistance under the
Stafford Act. To ensure that this
limitation will not be improperly
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66855
exclusive, this final rule clarifies that
components being repaired or
residences being replaced need not be in
full working order before the event to
qualify for assistance. Components or
residences that were fully or partially
functional immediately before the
declared event, despite their need for
maintenance, may be eligible for repair
assistance if they ceased to function as
a result of the disaster.
FEMA received a comment on the
2002 interim rule, identified by
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
1660–AA18, that stated the interim rule
did not overtly discriminate against
disaster survivors based on race, color,
or national origin, but that it did
discriminate covertly against those who
are financially challenged, and, to the
extent that the financially challenged
consist disproportionately of minority
groups, one might conclude that an
element of the IHP program lacks
environmental justice. The commenter
stated that the housing repair cap of
$5,000 has a gross negative impact on
low-income disaster survivors, and
results in more low-income disaster
survivors returning to unsafe,
unsanitary, and/or non-functional
homes. The commenter recommended
the liberal use of replacement assistance
to provide additional help for the
financially challenged.
FEMA addressed this comment in the
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
that published in the Federal Register,
on July 30, 2012. See 77 FR 44562. The
$5,000 subcap is no longer in effect, and
individuals and households may use up
to the full amount of IHP funds ($32,400
for fiscal year 2014) for eligible repair
and replacement assistance. See 78 FR
64523 (Oct. 29, 2013). This figure is
adjusted annually to reflect changes in
the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
No action that FEMA can anticipate
under this final rule would have a
disproportionately high and adverse
human health effect on any segment of
the population. In addition, the
rulemaking would not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
those communities.
L. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden. See
Executive Order 12988, 61 FR 4729,
Feb. 7, 1996.
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
66856
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
M. Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference
With Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights
FEMA has reviewed this rule under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights, as supplemented by Executive
Order 13406, Protecting the Property
Rights of the American People. See
Executive Order 12630, 53 FR 8859,
Mar. 18, 1988 and Executive Order
13406, 71 FR 36973, June 28, 2006. This
rule will not effect a taking of private
property or otherwise have taking
implications under Executive Order
12630.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 206
Administrative practice and
procedure, Coastal zone, Community
facilities, Disaster assistance, Fire
prevention, Grant programs—housing
and community development, Housing,
Insurance, Intergovernmental relations,
Loan programs—housing and
community development, Natural
resources, Penalties, and Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency amends 44 CFR
part 206 as follows:
PART 206—FEDERAL DISASTER
ASSISTANCE
1. The authority citation for part 206
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42
U.S.C. 5121 through 5207; Homeland
Security Act of 2002, 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
9001.1; sec. 1105, Pub. L. 113–2, 127 Stat. 43
(42 U.S.C. 5189a note).
2. Amend § 206.117 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (b)(2) through (4) and
removing paragraph (c).
The revisions read as follows:
■
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 206.117
Housing assistance.
(a) Definitions. The definitions in this
paragraph apply to this section only.
‘‘Caused by the disaster’’ means as a
direct result of a peril identified in the
Federal Register Notice of a
Presidentially-declared major disaster or
emergency, the component is no longer
functional.
‘‘Real Property Component’’ or
‘‘Component’’ means each individual
part of a dwelling that makes it
habitable, as enumerated in paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this section.
‘‘Semi-Permanent Housing’’ means
housing designed and constructed with
finishes, material, and systems selected
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 06, 2013
Jkt 232001
for moderate (or better) energy
efficiency, maintenance, and life cycle
cost, and with a life expectancy of more
than 5 years but less than 25 years.
(b) * * *
(2) Repairs. (i) FEMA may provide
financial assistance for the repair of real
property components in an owner’s
primary residence if:
(A) The eligibility criteria in § 206.113
are met;
(B) The component was functional
immediately before the declared event;
(C) The component was damaged, and
the damage was caused by the disaster;
(D) The damage to the component is
not covered by insurance; and
(E) Repair of the component is
necessary to ensure the safety or health
of the occupant or to make the residence
functional.
(ii) FEMA may provide financial
assistance for the repair of:
(A) Structural components of the
residence. This includes real property
components, such as the foundation,
exterior walls, and roof.
(B) Windows and doors.
(C) The Heating, Ventilation and Air
Conditioning system.
(D) Utility systems. This includes
electrical, gas, water and sewage
systems.
(E) Interior components. This
includes, but is not limited to, the
structure’s floors, walls, ceilings, and
cabinetry.
(F) The structure’s access and egress,
including privately owned access roads
and privately owned bridges.
(G) Blocking, leveling, and anchoring
of a mobile home, and reconnecting or
resetting mobile home sewer, water,
electrical and fuel lines and tanks.
(H) Items or services determined to be
eligible hazard mitigation measures that
reduce the likelihood of future damage
to the residence, utilities, or
infrastructure.
(iii) The components that may be
deemed eligible for repair assistance,
and the type of repairs authorized, will
vary depending upon the nature of the
disaster. Repairs are limited to
restoration of the dwelling to a safe and
sanitary living or functioning condition.
Repair assistance will only be provided
to the extent that the work makes the
component functional. FEMA may
provide for the replacement of
components if repair is not feasible. The
repairs of components must be of
average quality, size, and capacity,
taking into consideration the needs of
the occupant.
(iv) Components that were functional
immediately before the declared event
may be eligible for repair assistance if
the damage to the component was
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
caused by the disaster and the
component is no longer functional.
(v) Eligible individuals or households
may receive up to the maximum amount
of assistance (See § 206.110(b) of this
part) to repair damages to their primary
residence irrespective of other financial
resources, except insurance proceeds.
(vi) The individual or household is
responsible for obtaining all local
permits or inspections that applicable
State or local building codes may
require.
(vii) If the applicant disputes a
determination made by FEMA regarding
eligibility for repair assistance, the
applicant may appeal that
determination pursuant to the
procedures in § 206.115 of this part. In
addition to the requirements in
§ 206.115, the applicant must provide
proof that the component meets the
requirements of paragraph (b)(2)(i) of
this section, including that the
component was functional before the
declared event and proof that the
declared event caused the component to
stop functioning. If the applicant
disputes the amount of repair assistance
awarded, the applicant must also
provide justification for the amount
sought.
(3) Housing replacement. (i) FEMA
may provide financial assistance for the
replacement of an owner’s primary
residence if:
(A) The eligibility criteria in § 206.113
of this part are met;
(B) The residence was functional
immediately before the disaster;
(C) The residence was destroyed, and
the damage was caused by, the disaster;
(D) The damage to the residence is not
covered by insurance;
(E) Repair is not feasible, will not
ensure the safety or health of the
occupant, or will not make the
residence functional; and
(F) Replacement is necessary to
ensure the safety or health of the
occupant.
(ii) All replacement assistance awards
must be approved by the Regional
Administrator or his/her designee. If
replacement assistance is granted, the
applicant may either use the maximum
amount of assistance (See § 206.110(b)
of this part) to replace the dwelling in
its entirety, or may use the assistance
toward the cost of acquiring a new
permanent residence.
(iii) Housing replacement assistance
will be based on the verified disasterrelated level of damage to the dwelling,
or the statutory maximum (See
§ 206.110(b) of this part), whichever is
less.
(iv) If the applicant disputes a
determination made by FEMA regarding
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
eligibility for replacement assistance,
the applicant may appeal that
determination pursuant to the
procedures in § 206.115 of this part. In
addition to the requirements in
§ 206.115, the applicant must provide
proof that repair is not feasible, or will
not ensure the safety or health of the
occupant or make the residence
functional. If the applicant disputes the
amount of replacement assistance
awarded, the applicant must also
provide justification for the amount
sought.
(4) Permanent and semi-permanent
housing construction. (i) FEMA may
provide financial or direct assistance to
applicants for the purpose of
constructing permanent and semipermanent housing if:
(A) The eligibility criteria in § 206.113
of this part are met;
(B) The residence was functional
immediately before the declared event;
(C) The residence was damaged by the
event;
(D) The damage to the residence is not
covered by insurance;
(E) The residence was an owneroccupied primary residence; and
(F) The residence is located in an
insular area outside the continental
United States or in another location
where alternative housing resources are
not available and the types of financial
or direct temporary housing assistance
described in paragraphs (b)(1), (2), and
(3) of this section are unavailable,
infeasible, or not cost-effective.
(ii) Permanent and semi-permanent
housing construction, in general, must
be consistent with current minimal local
building codes and standards where
they exist, or minimal acceptable
construction industry standards in the
area, including reasonable hazard
mitigation measures, and Federal
environmental laws and regulations.
Dwellings will be of average quality,
size and capacity, taking into
consideration the needs of the occupant.
(iii) If the applicant disputes a
determination made by FEMA regarding
eligibility for construction assistance,
the applicant may appeal that
determination pursuant to the
procedures in § 206.115 of this part. In
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 06, 2013
Jkt 232001
addition to the requirements in
§ 206.115, the applicant must provide
proof that the property is either located
in an insular area outside the
continental United States, or in a
location where alternative housing
resources are not available. The
applicant must also provide proof that
the types of financial or direct
temporary housing assistance described
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section are
unavailable, infeasible, or not cost
effective. If the applicant disputes the
amount of construction assistance
awarded, the applicant must also
provide justification for the amount
sought.
Dated: October 30, 2013.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2013–26739 Filed 11–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 121009528–2729–02]
RIN 0648–XC932
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Summer Flounder Fishery;
Quota Transfer
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; quota transfer.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces that the
State of Maine is transferring a portion
of its 2013 commercial summer flounder
quota to the State of Connecticut. NMFS
is adjusting the quotas and announcing
the revised commercial quota for each
state involved.
DATES: Effective November 6, 2013,
through December 31, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carly Bari, Fishery Management
Specialist, 978–281–9224.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
66857
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations governing the summer
flounder fishery are in 50 CFR part 648,
and require annual specification of a
commercial quota that is apportioned
among the coastal states from North
Carolina through Maine. The process to
set the annual commercial quota and the
percent allocated to each state are
described in § 648.100.
The final rule implementing
Amendment 5 to the Summer Flounder,
Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery
Management Plan, which was published
on December 17, 1993 (58 FR 65936),
provided a mechanism for summer
flounder quota to be transferred from
one state to another. Two or more states,
under mutual agreement and with the
concurrence of the Administrator,
Northeast Region, NMFS (Regional
Administrator), can transfer or combine
summer flounder commercial quota
under § 648.102(c)(2). The Regional
Administrator is required to consider
the criteria in § 648.102(c)(2)(i) to
evaluate requests for quota transfers or
combinations.
Maine has agreed to transfer 5,400 lb
(2,449 kg) of its 2013 commercial quota
to Connecticut. This transfer was
prompted by the diligent efforts of state
officials in Connecticut not to exceed
the commercial summer flounder quota.
The Regional Administrator has
determined that the criteria set forth in
§ 648.102(c)(2)(i) have been met. The
revised summer flounder commercial
quotas for calendar year 2013 are:
Maine, 41 lb (19 kg); and Connecticut,
263,605 lb (119,569 kg).
Classification
This action is taken under 50 CFR
part 648 and is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 1, 2013.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–26769 Filed 11–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 216 (Thursday, November 7, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66852-66857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26739]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management Agency
44 CFR Part 206
[Docket ID FEMA-2010-0035]
RIN 1660-AA68
Housing Assistance Due to Structural Damage
AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the authority of section 408 of the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) provides financial
assistance to individuals and households to repair or replace their
homes after a Presidentially-declared major disaster or emergency. This
rule finalizes revisions to FEMA's repair, replacement, and housing
construction assistance regulations that clarify the eligibility
criteria for assistance and implement changes to section 408 of the
Stafford Act that were made by the Post-Katrina Emergency Management
Reform Act of 2006 (PKEMRA).
DATES: This rule is effective December 9, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Carleton, FEMA, Individual
Assistance Division, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472-3100,
(phone) 202-212-1000, (facsimile) (202) 212-1005, or (email) FEMA-IA-Regulations@fema.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 408 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act (Stafford Act) provides the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) with the authority to administer the Individuals and
Households program (IHP). See 42 U.S.C. 5174. Through the IHP, FEMA
provides financial and/or direct assistance to help survivors recover
from Presidentially-declared emergencies and major disasters. This help
may be in the form of housing assistance as well as assistance to meet
``other needs'' such as medical, dental, funeral, and personal
property.
Specifically, FEMA provides the following types of housing
assistance:
Temporary Housing: Financial assistance is available to rent a
different place to live for a limited period of time. When rental
properties are not available, FEMA may provide direct assistance in the
form of a temporary housing unit.
Housing Repair: Financial assistance is available to homeowners to
repair disaster damage to their primary residence. Assistance is only
available to repair damage that is not covered by insurance. The goal
is to make the damaged home safe, sanitary, and functional.
Housing Replacement: Financial assistance is available to
homeowners to replace their primary residence if it was destroyed in
the disaster. Assistance is only available for damage that is not
covered by insurance.
Permanent and Semi-Permanent Housing Construction: In exceptional
circumstances, FEMA is authorized to provide permanent and semi-
permanent housing construction. If FEMA exercises its discretion to
offer this form of disaster assistance, FEMA may provide financial
assistance for the construction of a home, or may construct the new
permanent or semi-permanent housing unit for an individual or
household. This type of assistance is currently provided only in
insular areas or locations specified by FEMA where no other type of
housing assistance is available, feasible, or cost-effective.
Assistance is provided only for damage that is not covered by
insurance.
The regulations establishing the types of IHP assistance available, the
eligibility requirements for assistance, and the procedures for
obtaining assistance are in 44 CFR part 206, subparts D and F.
On September 30, 2002, FEMA published an interim rule in the
Federal Register, which revised its regulations implementing the IHP.
See 67 FR 61446. FEMA published a correction to the interim rule on
October 9, 2002. See 67 FR 62896. Among other things, the interim rule
established the housing repair, replacement, and construction
eligibility regulations in 44 CFR 206.117. These regulations are
currently in effect, with minor amendments. See 74 FR 15328 (Apr. 3,
2009).
On July 30, 2012, FEMA published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM), which addressed the public comments received on the 2002
interim rule related to housing repair and replacement. See 77 FR
44562. In addition, the NPRM proposed revisions intended to clarify and
improve FEMA's eligibility requirements for housing repair assistance
as well as implement and codify PKEMRA legislative changes made after
the interim rule was published.
II. Summary of the Proposed Rule
In the NPRM, FEMA proposed four separate sets of changes. First,
FEMA proposed revisions to the interim rule to respond to public
comments received on the 2002 interim rule. Second, FEMA proposed
changes that were intended to restate the existing requirements more
clearly and in greater detail, without substantively changing the
underlying requirements. Third, consistent with statutory amendments in
the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 (PKEMRA), FEMA
proposed removing the housing repair and replacement subcaps. Finally,
also consistent with statutory amendments in PKEMRA, FEMA proposed
adding the term ``semi-permanent'' and removing the term ``remote''
with respect to the eligibility requirements for housing construction
pursuant to PKEMRA.
This final rule codifies the above changes as discussed in the
NPRM. For additional background information on these proposed changes,
please refer to the NPRM.
III. Discussion of Comments Received on the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
FEMA received two written comments in response to the NPRM. The
first commenter stated that FEMA's regulations should be clearer. The
commenter expressed that FEMA must be able to make things as clear as
possible for disaster survivors.
The second commenter raised four separate points in its comment.
First, the commenter noted that since FEMA was no longer applying the
housing repair and replacement subcaps and allowing applicants to have
the maximum IHP award for housing assistance, there would be no
additional money available to award for Other Needs Assistance (ONA).
The commenter asked whether an additional amount, such as $3,000, can
be available
[[Page 66853]]
to applicants for ONA. FEMA understands the commenter's concern;
however, FEMA does not have the authority to award an additional amount
($3,000) for ONA above and beyond the statutorily established program
limit.
Second, the commenter thanked FEMA for clarifying the IHP housing
repair assistance eligibility requirements and stated that the proposed
changes will help to simplify the process for IHP assistance.
Third, the commenter noted that under proposed Sec.
206.117(b)(3)(i)(C) and (E), FEMA proposed that to be eligible for
housing replacement assistance, the residence must have been destroyed,
and repair must be either infeasible, insufficient to ensure the safety
or health of the occupant, or insufficient to make the residence
functional. The commenter suggested that FEMA include an exception to
this rule, so that if the cost to repair exceeds the cost to rebuild,
the applicant should be granted replacement assistance even if FEMA did
not deem all parts of the dwelling's structure destroyed.
FEMA's Individual and Households Program records and verifies
disaster-related damages based on a FEMA home inspection. Based on the
home inspection, FEMA makes a determination regarding the amount of
damage that a dwelling has sustained. If the dwelling is deemed
destroyed, then the applicant could receive replacement assistance up
to the maximum grant amount. If the dwelling sustained significant
damage and is determined to be repairable, then the applicant could
still receive up to the maximum grant amount to repair the dwelling.
FEMA notes that the distinction between repair and replacement
assistance has no effect on the maximum amount of assistance that FEMA
can award a disaster survivor. The maximum IHP grant amount that a
disaster survivor may receive in fiscal year 2014 is $32,400 per
declared event (78 FR 64523, Oct. 29, 2013).
In the scenario suggested by the commenter, where the cost to
repair exceeds the cost to rebuild, an (uninsured) applicant would most
likely be receiving a maximum award regardless. Thus the distinction
between repair and replacement assistance would have no effect on the
cost effectiveness. Moreover, if a disaster survivor determines that
they want to rebuild their dwelling rather than repair, the disaster
survivor is allowed to use their repair assistance towards replacing
their dwelling.
The last point by the second commenter suggested that FEMA add a
requirement in the final rule to do a cost-benefit analysis to
determine the type of housing that would be the most cost effective and
mindful of taxpayer dollars; for example, if the costs of building a
community site for temporary housing units (THUs) exceeds the costs of
semi-permanent housing construction, then semi-permanent housing should
be utilized. FEMA is statutorily required under Section 408(b)(2)(A) of
the Stafford Act to determine the appropriate types of housing
assistance ``based on considerations of cost effectiveness, convenience
to the individuals and households, and such other factors . . .''; a
requirement in the final rule is therefore not necessary. See 42 U.S.C.
5174. FEMA currently has a process for evaluating the appropriate type
of housing based on a number of factors, one of which is the cost
effectiveness of the housing option. In addition, FEMA weighs housing
options based on the geographical area affected by the disaster, the
delivery speed of housing options, the availability of housing
resources in the affected area, and various other considerations.
IV. Records Management
The Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) listed in the September 30,
2002 interim rule and the correction to the interim rule was 3067-AD25.
When FEMA became a component of the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) in 2003, FEMA's RINs were renumbered, and 3067-AD25 became 1660-
AA18.
The Docket ID for 1660-AA18 is FEMA-2008-0005. All of 1660-AA18's
public submissions, supporting and related documents, and rules are
posted to Docket ID FEMA-2008-0005. The public comments that addressed
housing repair assistance, the subject of this rulemaking, have also
been posted to Docket ID FEMA-2010-0035.
V. Regulatory Analysis
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
FEMA has prepared and reviewed this rule consistent with Executive
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993)
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review (76 FR 3821, Jan. 18, 2011). This final rule is not a
significant regulatory action, and therefore has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This final rule provides clarification with respect to the
eligibility for housing repair assistance, without adding new
requirements, as well as implements changes to section 408 of the
Stafford Act made by PKEMRA. See 42 U.S.C. 5174. This rule does not
impose any additional burden on the public or change the total amount
of assistance available to individuals and households since this rule
merely codifies FEMA practice since 2006.
The changes resulting from PKEMRA (a) revise the regulations to
align with PKEMRA's removal of the housing repair and replacement
subcaps; (b) remove the limitation that housing construction assistance
be provided only in a ``remote'' area, if the location is not otherwise
insular (outside the continental United States); and (c) incorporate
FEMA's new authority to provide assistance for the construction of
``semi-permanent'' housing.
When the current regulations were written, the Disaster Mitigation
Act of 2000 prohibited FEMA from providing more than $5,000 (adjusted
annually to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI)) for
repair assistance, and more than $10,000 (adjusted annually to reflect
changes in the CPI) for replacement assistance. These subcaps prevented
applicants from spending other available IHP assistance (in fiscal year
2014, the overall cap on financial assistance is $32,400 per declared
event (78 FR 64523, Oct. 29, 2013)) on housing repair or replacement.
The change in PKEMRA was self-implementing and immediately went into
effect. FEMA is no longer required to apply subcaps and has not applied
them since PKEMRA became law in 2006. This rule change is intended to
revise the regulations to conform to the statutory change and FEMA's
current practice. It does not change the eligibility criteria and does
not reduce the total amount of assistance available to individuals and
households. This rule does not have an economic impact because it
merely codifies FEMA current practice.
This rule also removes the term ``remote'' from 44 CFR
206.117(b)(3) to implement new authority to provide housing
construction assistance in areas within the continental United States
where alternative housing resources are not available, infeasible, or
not cost effective. The 2002 interim rule limited this type of
assistance to only locations that are insular or remote. This rule
change implements PKEMRA by providing housing construction assistance
to disaster survivors in areas where alternative housing resources are
not feasible. This rule change provides more flexibility for FEMA to
meet the housing needs for disaster survivors,
[[Page 66854]]
although it is expected that FEMA will only rarely exercise this
authority. This is because alternative housing resources, such as
rental units, manufactured housing, recreational vehicles, other
readily fabricated dwellings, or FEMA-provided temporary housing units,
typically are available within the continental United States. This
change is not expected to have a significant economic impact or to
negatively affect the eligibility criteria for assistance. Any economic
impact from this rule change would be an increase in Federal financial
assistance provided to individuals and households to provide housing in
those extremely rare cases where alternative housing resources are
unavailable, infeasible, or not cost effective. There would be no
increased burden imposed on the public from this proposed change. There
is no economic impact to this change because this rule merely codifies
FEMA current practice since 2006.
This rule also adds ``semi-permanent'' to the types of housing that
could be constructed. This type of housing would have a life expectancy
of more than 5 years, but less than 25 years. While FEMA already
provides temporary and permanent housing, by implementing this new
authority, FEMA would have greater flexibility to meet the needs of a
particular community, where the construction of a type of housing other
than a long-term permanent structure may be more appropriate. Although
this rule change is likely to provide more flexibility for FEMA to meet
the housing needs for disaster survivors, it is not expected that FEMA
will regularly exercise this authority. This proposed rule change would
implement PKEMRA by giving FEMA more options in providing housing
assistance to disaster survivors. It would not reduce the number of
individuals or households eligible for housing assistance and would not
affect eligibility requirements. There is no economic impact to this
proposed change because this proposed rule merely codifies current FEMA
practice.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FEMA determined that this proposed rule will not create a new
collection of information or create a revision to an existing
collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. All information submitted by applicants
seeking IHP housing assistance, including information submitted on
appeal, is included in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved
collections.
The following collections related to IHP have been approved by OMB
under the following titles and control numbers: ``Disaster Assistance
Registration,'' OMB control number 1660-0002, expiration date July 31,
2015 and ``Federal Assistance to Individuals and Households Program
(IHP),'' OMB control number 1660-0061, expiration date October 31,
2014. There would be no additional paperwork burden as a result of the
changes proposed in this rule.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (Pub. L. 104-121, 110 Stat. 857), FEMA must consider the impact of
this proposed regulation on small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
This final rule clarifies the eligibility criteria for housing repair,
replacement, and construction assistance to individuals and households.
It will not have an economic impact on small entities because it merely
codifies FEMA current practice since PKEMRA became law in 2006. FEMA
certifies that this rulemaking will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
D. Privacy Act
The Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, establishes a code of fair
information practices that governs the collection, maintenance, use,
and dissemination of personally identifiable information about
individuals that is maintained in systems of records by Federal
agencies. A system of records is a group of records under the control
of an agency from which information is retrieved by the name of the
individual or by some identifier assigned to the individual. FEMA, in
partnership with other Federal agencies, hosts a single application and
resource center at https://www.disasterassistance.gov that allows the
public to apply for disaster assistance, benefits, and other services
within FEMA and other Federal agencies. This application and resource
center contains personally identifiable information about IHP
applicants seeking housing repair, replacement, or construction
assistance. The application resource center is included in a Privacy
Act System of Records entitled ``Disaster Recovery Assistance Files''
number ``DHS/FEMA-008'' which published on April 30, 2013 in the
Federal Register at 78 FR 25282. This proposed rule would not change
the application materials received or result in a new collection of
personally identifiable information about individuals.
E. National Environmental Policy Act
Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq., an agency must prepare an environmental assessment
and environmental impact statement for any rulemaking that
significantly affects the quality of the human environment. FEMA has
determined that this rulemaking does not significantly affect the
quality of the human environment and consequently has not prepared an
environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. Most
activities under section 408 and prior to section 411 of the Stafford
Act pertaining to temporary housing and financial assistance are
categorically excluded from NEPA review under 44 CFR 10.8(d)(2)(xix)(D)
and (F). Before undertaking other activities that are not categorically
excluded (e.g., placement of manufactured temporary housing units on
FEMA-constructed group sites; permanent or semi-permanent housing
construction), FEMA follows the procedures set forth in 44 CFR part 10
to assure NEPA compliance.
F. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132, Federalism, sets forth principles and
criteria that agencies must adhere to in formulating and implementing
policies that have federalism implications, that is, regulations that
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
See Executive Order 13132, 64 FR 43255, Aug. 10, 1999. Federal agencies
must closely examine the statutory authority supporting any action that
would limit the policymaking discretion of the States, and to the
extent practicable, must consult with State and local officials before
implementing any such action. The disaster assistance addressed by this
proposed rule is provided to individuals and households, and would not
have federalism implications.
G. Executive Orders 11988 and 11990, Floodplain Management and
Protection of Wetlands
Under Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management, as amended,
Federal agencies are required to ``provide leadership to reduce the
risk of
[[Page 66855]]
flood loss, to minimize the impact of floods on human safety, health
and welfare, and to restore and preserve the natural and beneficial
values served by floodplains.'' See Executive Order 11988, as amended,
42 FR 26951, May 25, 1977, 44 FR 43239, July 20, 1979. Under Executive
Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands, Federal agencies are required to
``provide leadership and . . . take action to minimize the destruction,
loss or degradation of wetlands, and to preserve and enhance the
natural and beneficial values of wetlands in carrying out the agency's
responsibilities.'' See Executive Order 11990, as amended, 42 FR 26961,
May 25, 1977, 52 FR 34617, Sept. 14, 1987. The requirements of these
Executive Orders apply in the context of the provision of Federal
financial assistance relating to, among other things, construction and
property improvement activities, as well as conducting Federal programs
affecting land use. The changes proposed in this rule would not have an
effect on land use, floodplain management or wetlands. When FEMA
undertakes specific actions that may have such effects (e.g., placement
of manufactured temporary housing units on FEMA-constructed group
sites; permanent or semi-permanent housing construction), FEMA follows
the procedures set forth in 44 CFR part 9 to assure compliance with
these Executive Orders.
H. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risk and Safety Risks
FEMA has analyzed this final rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks, 62 FR 19883, Apr. 23, 1997. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an environmental risk to health
or safety that might disproportionately affect children.
I. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq., pertains to any proposed rulemaking which implements any rule
that includes a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. The Act also applies to any regulatory
requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. FEMA has determined that this proposed rule would not
result in the expenditure by State, local and Tribal governments, in
the aggregate, nor by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more in
any one year as a result of a Federal mandate, nor would it
significantly or uniquely affect small governments.
J. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
Under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, FEMA may not issue a regulation that is not
required by statute, that significantly or uniquely affects the
communities of Indian Tribal governments, and that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal
Government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by the Tribal government, or FEMA consults with those
governments. See Executive Order 13175, 65 FR 67249, Nov. 9, 2000. This
final rule would not significantly or uniquely affect the communities
of Indian Tribal governments, nor would this proposed rulemaking impose
substantial direct compliance costs on those communities.
K. Executive Order 12898, Environmental Justice
Under Executive Order 12898, Environmental Justice, each Federal
agency must conduct its programs, policies, and activities that
substantially affect human health or the environment in a manner that
ensures that those programs, policies, and activities do not have the
effect of excluding persons from participation in, denying persons the
benefit of, or subjecting persons to discrimination because of their
race, color, or national origin. See Executive Order 12898, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994. FEMA has incorporated environmental justice into its
policies and programs.
The housing repair, replacement and construction assistance
regulations intentionally contain provisions that ensure they would not
have a disproportionately high and adverse human health effect on any
segment of the population. This rulemaking clarifies the eligibility
requirements for assistance, and in doing so, maintains focus on the
functionality of the component being repaired or replaced, and does not
consider income or home value. Section 408 of the Stafford Act requires
that such assistance be granted only for damage caused by a disaster
event. Non-disaster related damage is not eligible for assistance under
the Stafford Act. To ensure that this limitation will not be improperly
exclusive, this final rule clarifies that components being repaired or
residences being replaced need not be in full working order before the
event to qualify for assistance. Components or residences that were
fully or partially functional immediately before the declared event,
despite their need for maintenance, may be eligible for repair
assistance if they ceased to function as a result of the disaster.
FEMA received a comment on the 2002 interim rule, identified by
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) 1660-AA18, that stated the interim
rule did not overtly discriminate against disaster survivors based on
race, color, or national origin, but that it did discriminate covertly
against those who are financially challenged, and, to the extent that
the financially challenged consist disproportionately of minority
groups, one might conclude that an element of the IHP program lacks
environmental justice. The commenter stated that the housing repair cap
of $5,000 has a gross negative impact on low-income disaster survivors,
and results in more low-income disaster survivors returning to unsafe,
unsanitary, and/or non-functional homes. The commenter recommended the
liberal use of replacement assistance to provide additional help for
the financially challenged.
FEMA addressed this comment in the notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) that published in the Federal Register, on July 30, 2012. See 77
FR 44562. The $5,000 subcap is no longer in effect, and individuals and
households may use up to the full amount of IHP funds ($32,400 for
fiscal year 2014) for eligible repair and replacement assistance. See
78 FR 64523 (Oct. 29, 2013). This figure is adjusted annually to
reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
No action that FEMA can anticipate under this final rule would have
a disproportionately high and adverse human health effect on any
segment of the population. In addition, the rulemaking would not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on those communities.
L. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. See Executive Order 12988, 61
FR 4729, Feb. 7, 1996.
[[Page 66856]]
M. Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights
FEMA has reviewed this rule under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights, as supplemented by Executive Order 13406, Protecting
the Property Rights of the American People. See Executive Order 12630,
53 FR 8859, Mar. 18, 1988 and Executive Order 13406, 71 FR 36973, June
28, 2006. This rule will not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 206
Administrative practice and procedure, Coastal zone, Community
facilities, Disaster assistance, Fire prevention, Grant programs--
housing and community development, Housing, Insurance,
Intergovernmental relations, Loan programs--housing and community
development, Natural resources, Penalties, and Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency amends 44 CFR part 206 as follows:
PART 206--FEDERAL DISASTER ASSISTANCE
0
1. The authority citation for part 206 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 through 5207; Homeland Security Act
of 2002, 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation 9001.1; sec. 1105, Pub. L. 113-2, 127 Stat. 43 (42 U.S.C.
5189a note).
0
2. Amend Sec. 206.117 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b)(2) through
(4) and removing paragraph (c).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 206.117 Housing assistance.
(a) Definitions. The definitions in this paragraph apply to this
section only.
``Caused by the disaster'' means as a direct result of a peril
identified in the Federal Register Notice of a Presidentially-declared
major disaster or emergency, the component is no longer functional.
``Real Property Component'' or ``Component'' means each individual
part of a dwelling that makes it habitable, as enumerated in paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this section.
``Semi-Permanent Housing'' means housing designed and constructed
with finishes, material, and systems selected for moderate (or better)
energy efficiency, maintenance, and life cycle cost, and with a life
expectancy of more than 5 years but less than 25 years.
(b) * * *
(2) Repairs. (i) FEMA may provide financial assistance for the
repair of real property components in an owner's primary residence if:
(A) The eligibility criteria in Sec. 206.113 are met;
(B) The component was functional immediately before the declared
event;
(C) The component was damaged, and the damage was caused by the
disaster;
(D) The damage to the component is not covered by insurance; and
(E) Repair of the component is necessary to ensure the safety or
health of the occupant or to make the residence functional.
(ii) FEMA may provide financial assistance for the repair of:
(A) Structural components of the residence. This includes real
property components, such as the foundation, exterior walls, and roof.
(B) Windows and doors.
(C) The Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning system.
(D) Utility systems. This includes electrical, gas, water and
sewage systems.
(E) Interior components. This includes, but is not limited to, the
structure's floors, walls, ceilings, and cabinetry.
(F) The structure's access and egress, including privately owned
access roads and privately owned bridges.
(G) Blocking, leveling, and anchoring of a mobile home, and
reconnecting or resetting mobile home sewer, water, electrical and fuel
lines and tanks.
(H) Items or services determined to be eligible hazard mitigation
measures that reduce the likelihood of future damage to the residence,
utilities, or infrastructure.
(iii) The components that may be deemed eligible for repair
assistance, and the type of repairs authorized, will vary depending
upon the nature of the disaster. Repairs are limited to restoration of
the dwelling to a safe and sanitary living or functioning condition.
Repair assistance will only be provided to the extent that the work
makes the component functional. FEMA may provide for the replacement of
components if repair is not feasible. The repairs of components must be
of average quality, size, and capacity, taking into consideration the
needs of the occupant.
(iv) Components that were functional immediately before the
declared event may be eligible for repair assistance if the damage to
the component was caused by the disaster and the component is no longer
functional.
(v) Eligible individuals or households may receive up to the
maximum amount of assistance (See Sec. 206.110(b) of this part) to
repair damages to their primary residence irrespective of other
financial resources, except insurance proceeds.
(vi) The individual or household is responsible for obtaining all
local permits or inspections that applicable State or local building
codes may require.
(vii) If the applicant disputes a determination made by FEMA
regarding eligibility for repair assistance, the applicant may appeal
that determination pursuant to the procedures in Sec. 206.115 of this
part. In addition to the requirements in Sec. 206.115, the applicant
must provide proof that the component meets the requirements of
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, including that the component was
functional before the declared event and proof that the declared event
caused the component to stop functioning. If the applicant disputes the
amount of repair assistance awarded, the applicant must also provide
justification for the amount sought.
(3) Housing replacement. (i) FEMA may provide financial assistance
for the replacement of an owner's primary residence if:
(A) The eligibility criteria in Sec. 206.113 of this part are met;
(B) The residence was functional immediately before the disaster;
(C) The residence was destroyed, and the damage was caused by, the
disaster;
(D) The damage to the residence is not covered by insurance;
(E) Repair is not feasible, will not ensure the safety or health of
the occupant, or will not make the residence functional; and
(F) Replacement is necessary to ensure the safety or health of the
occupant.
(ii) All replacement assistance awards must be approved by the
Regional Administrator or his/her designee. If replacement assistance
is granted, the applicant may either use the maximum amount of
assistance (See Sec. 206.110(b) of this part) to replace the dwelling
in its entirety, or may use the assistance toward the cost of acquiring
a new permanent residence.
(iii) Housing replacement assistance will be based on the verified
disaster-related level of damage to the dwelling, or the statutory
maximum (See Sec. 206.110(b) of this part), whichever is less.
(iv) If the applicant disputes a determination made by FEMA
regarding
[[Page 66857]]
eligibility for replacement assistance, the applicant may appeal that
determination pursuant to the procedures in Sec. 206.115 of this part.
In addition to the requirements in Sec. 206.115, the applicant must
provide proof that repair is not feasible, or will not ensure the
safety or health of the occupant or make the residence functional. If
the applicant disputes the amount of replacement assistance awarded,
the applicant must also provide justification for the amount sought.
(4) Permanent and semi-permanent housing construction. (i) FEMA may
provide financial or direct assistance to applicants for the purpose of
constructing permanent and semi-permanent housing if:
(A) The eligibility criteria in Sec. 206.113 of this part are met;
(B) The residence was functional immediately before the declared
event;
(C) The residence was damaged by the event;
(D) The damage to the residence is not covered by insurance;
(E) The residence was an owner-occupied primary residence; and
(F) The residence is located in an insular area outside the
continental United States or in another location where alternative
housing resources are not available and the types of financial or
direct temporary housing assistance described in paragraphs (b)(1),
(2), and (3) of this section are unavailable, infeasible, or not cost-
effective.
(ii) Permanent and semi-permanent housing construction, in general,
must be consistent with current minimal local building codes and
standards where they exist, or minimal acceptable construction industry
standards in the area, including reasonable hazard mitigation measures,
and Federal environmental laws and regulations. Dwellings will be of
average quality, size and capacity, taking into consideration the needs
of the occupant.
(iii) If the applicant disputes a determination made by FEMA
regarding eligibility for construction assistance, the applicant may
appeal that determination pursuant to the procedures in Sec. 206.115
of this part. In addition to the requirements in Sec. 206.115, the
applicant must provide proof that the property is either located in an
insular area outside the continental United States, or in a location
where alternative housing resources are not available. The applicant
must also provide proof that the types of financial or direct temporary
housing assistance described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section are
unavailable, infeasible, or not cost effective. If the applicant
disputes the amount of construction assistance awarded, the applicant
must also provide justification for the amount sought.
Dated: October 30, 2013.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2013-26739 Filed 11-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-12-P