Imazapyr; Pesticide Tolerances, 66651-66653 [2013-26364]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
any unfunded mandate as described
under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VI. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
*
Persimmon ..............................
*
2.5
*
*
*
*
Spanish lime ...........................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
13
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–26643 Filed 11–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0583; FRL–9401–9]
Imazapyr; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of imazapyr in or
on lentil at 0.2 parts per million (ppm);
and rapeseed subgroup 20A and
Dated: October 25, 2013.
sunflower subgroup 20B at 0.05 ppm.
Lois Rossi,
BASF Corporation requested these
Director, Registration Division, Office of
tolerances under the Federal Food,
Pesticide Programs.
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
DATES: This regulation is effective
amended as follows:
November 6, 2013. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
PART 180—[AMENDED]
on or before January 6, 2014, and must
■ 1. The authority citation for part 180
be filed in accordance with the
continues to read as follows:
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
■ 2. In § 180.641, in the table in
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
paragraph (a)(1):
identified by docket identification (ID)
■ a. Add alphabetically ‘‘corn, sweet,
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0583, is
kernel plus cob with husks removed’’
available at https://www.regulations.gov
and ‘‘persimmon’’; and
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
■ b. Revise the entries for ‘‘feijoa,’’
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
‘‘papaya,’’ and ‘‘Spanish lime’’.
in the Environmental Protection Agency
The additions and revisions read as
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West
follows:
Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
§ 180.641 Spirotetramat; tolerances for
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The
residues.
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
(a) * * *
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
(1) * * *
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public
Parts per
Commodity
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
million
the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
*
*
*
*
*
the visitor instructions and additional
Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob
information about the docket available
with husks removed ............
1.5
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois
*
*
*
*
*
Rossi, Registration Division (7505P),
Feijoa ......................................
2.5
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
*
*
*
*
*
Papaya ....................................
0.40 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66651
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2012–0583 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before January 6, 2014. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM
06NOR1
66652
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2012–0583, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center
(EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
II. Summary of Petitioned-for Tolerance
In the Federal Register of August 22,
2012 (77 FR 163) (FRL–9358–9), EPA
issued a document pursuant to FFDCA
section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3),
announcing the filing of a pesticide
petition (PP 2E8045) by BASF
Corporation, 26 Davis Drive, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27709. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.500 be
amended by establishing tolerances for
residues of the herbicide, imazapyr [2[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3pyridinecarboxylic acid], in or on lentil
at 0.2 ppm; and rapeseed subgroup 20A
and sunflower subgroup 20B at 0.05
ppm. That document referenced a
summary of the petition prepared by
BASF Corporation, the registrant, which
is available in the docket, https://
www.regulations.gov. There were no
comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
EPA has revised the tolerance
expression to clarify the chemical
moieties that are covered by the
tolerances and specify how compliance
with the tolerance is to be measured.
The reason for this change is explained
in Unit IV.C.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for imazapyr
including exposure resulting from the
tolerances established by this action.
EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks
associated with imazapyr follows.
In 2003, EPA quantitatively assessed
the risk of imazapyr tolerances in
connection with the final rule published
in the Federal Register of September 26,
2003 (68 FR 55475) (FRL–7321–4)
establishing tolerances for imazapyr in
or on grass, forage; grass, hay; fish;
shellfish; fats of cattle, sheep, goats, and
horses; kidney of cattle, sheep, goats,
and horses; meat byproducts (except
kidney) of cattle, sheep, goats, and
horses; meat of cattle, sheep, goats, and
horses; and milk. At that time, EPA
determined that the aggregate risks from
exposure to imazapyr were minimal. In
reviewing the current tolerance petition,
EPA determined that the toxicity
database for imazapyr is complete and
no additional studies are needed. EPA
also determined that the toxicity data
identified no hazard from imazapyr
regardless of the route of exposure or
the species tested. In the absence of
evidence of neurotoxicity,
immunotoxicity, genotoxicity,
carcinogenicity, or other acute or
chronic toxicity in conjunction with no
adverse developmental or reproductive
effects, the Agency concluded that a
quantitative risk assessment for
imazapyr was no longer needed and that
EPA could determine based on a
qualitative assessment of the imazapyr
database that the proposed import
tolerances are safe. This conclusion is
supported by the findings in the last risk
assessment, which were based on
conservative (protective) toxicity
endpoints showing only negligible
aggregate exposures and risks identified
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
from dietary, residential, and swimming
and occupational routes. As previously
indicated, EPA has determined that this
prior quantitative assessment overstated
risk because the current toxicology
database shows no evidence of adverse
effects from exposure to imazapyr.
Because EPA is not quantitatively
assessing the risk of imazapyr based on
a reliance on the use of safety factors,
EPA has not retained the additional
safety factor described in FFDCA
section 408(b)(2)(C) for the protection of
infants and children.
Therefore, based on EPA’s qualitative
assessment of the imazapyr risk and the
prior quantitative risk assessment
discussed in the final rule published in
the Federal Register of September 26,
2003 (68 FR 55475) (FRL–7321–4), EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the
general population, or to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to
imazapyr and its metabolites or
degradates.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology
(liquid chromatography with tandem
mass spectrometric detection (LC/MS/
MS)) is available to enforce the
tolerance expression.
The method may be requested from:
Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701
Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350;
telephone number: (410) 305–2905;
email address: residuemethods@
epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint
United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health
Organization food standards program,
and it is recognized as an international
food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to
which the United States is a party. EPA
may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level. The Codex has not
established MRLs for imazapyr on
rapeseed, sunflower, or lentils.
E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM
06NOR1
66653
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
C. Revisions to Petitioned-for Tolerances
EPA is revising the tolerance
expressions for plant and livestock
commodities to clarify the chemical
moieties that are covered by the
tolerances and specify how compliance
with the tolerances is to be measured.
The revised tolerance expression makes
clear that the tolerances cover ‘‘residues
of imazapyr, including its metabolites
and degradates,’’ as specified in FFDCA
section 408(a)(3), and that compliance
with the tolerance levels is to be
determined by measuring only the
residues of imazapyr [2-[4,5-dihydro-4methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1Himidazol-2-yl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic
acid]. EPA has determined that it is
reasonable to make this change final
without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment because public comment is
not necessary, in that the change has no
substantive effect on the tolerance, but
rather incorporates statutory
requirements and is merely intended to
clarify the existing tolerance expression.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established
for residues of imazapyr [2-[4,5-dihydro4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1Himidazol-2-yl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic
acid], in or on lentil at 0.2 ppm;
rapeseed subgroup 20A and sunflower
subgroup 20B at 0.05 ppm.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes tolerances
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this final rule
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This final rule does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this final rule. In addition, this final
rule does not impose any enforceable
duty or contain any unfunded mandate
as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
Dated: October 22, 2013.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
VII. Congressional Review Act
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.500, paragraph (a) is
amended by revising the introductory
text and alphabetically adding the
following commodities to the table to
read as follows:
■
§ 180.500 Imazapyr; tolerances for
residues.
(a) General. Tolerances are
established for residues of the herbicide,
imazapyr, including its metabolites and
degradates, in or on the commodities in
the following table. Compliance with
the tolerance levels is to be determined
by measuring only the residues of
imazapyr [2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3pyridinecarboxylic acid].
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
Lentil 1 ...................................
*
*
*
*
Rapeseed subgroup 20A 1 ....
*
*
0.05
*
*
*
Sunflower subgroup 20B 1 ....
*
*
0.05
1 There
*
*
0.2
are no U.S. Registrations.
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–26364 Filed 11–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
45 CFR Parts 153, 155, 156, 157, and
158
[CMS–9964–F3]
RIN–0938–AR51
Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act; HHS Notice of Benefit and
Payment Parameters for 2014;
Correcting Amendment
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
AGENCY:
In the March 11, 2013 issue
of the Federal Register, we published a
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM
06NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 6, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66651-66653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26364]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0583; FRL-9401-9]
Imazapyr; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of
imazapyr in or on lentil at 0.2 parts per million (ppm); and rapeseed
subgroup 20A and sunflower subgroup 20B at 0.05 ppm. BASF Corporation
requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective November 6, 2013. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before January 6, 2014,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0583, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305-
5805. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information
about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois Rossi, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 305-7090; email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0583 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
January 6, 2014. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified
[[Page 66652]]
by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0583, by one of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-for Tolerance
In the Federal Register of August 22, 2012 (77 FR 163) (FRL-9358-
9), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
2E8045) by BASF Corporation, 26 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC
27709. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.500 be amended by
establishing tolerances for residues of the herbicide, imazapyr [2-
[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-
pyridinecarboxylic acid], in or on lentil at 0.2 ppm; and rapeseed
subgroup 20A and sunflower subgroup 20B at 0.05 ppm. That document
referenced a summary of the petition prepared by BASF Corporation, the
registrant, which is available in the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
EPA has revised the tolerance expression to clarify the chemical
moieties that are covered by the tolerances and specify how compliance
with the tolerance is to be measured. The reason for this change is
explained in Unit IV.C.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for imazapyr including exposure
resulting from the tolerances established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with imazapyr follows.
In 2003, EPA quantitatively assessed the risk of imazapyr
tolerances in connection with the final rule published in the Federal
Register of September 26, 2003 (68 FR 55475) (FRL-7321-4) establishing
tolerances for imazapyr in or on grass, forage; grass, hay; fish;
shellfish; fats of cattle, sheep, goats, and horses; kidney of cattle,
sheep, goats, and horses; meat byproducts (except kidney) of cattle,
sheep, goats, and horses; meat of cattle, sheep, goats, and horses; and
milk. At that time, EPA determined that the aggregate risks from
exposure to imazapyr were minimal. In reviewing the current tolerance
petition, EPA determined that the toxicity database for imazapyr is
complete and no additional studies are needed. EPA also determined that
the toxicity data identified no hazard from imazapyr regardless of the
route of exposure or the species tested. In the absence of evidence of
neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, or other
acute or chronic toxicity in conjunction with no adverse developmental
or reproductive effects, the Agency concluded that a quantitative risk
assessment for imazapyr was no longer needed and that EPA could
determine based on a qualitative assessment of the imazapyr database
that the proposed import tolerances are safe. This conclusion is
supported by the findings in the last risk assessment, which were based
on conservative (protective) toxicity endpoints showing only negligible
aggregate exposures and risks identified from dietary, residential, and
swimming and occupational routes. As previously indicated, EPA has
determined that this prior quantitative assessment overstated risk
because the current toxicology database shows no evidence of adverse
effects from exposure to imazapyr. Because EPA is not quantitatively
assessing the risk of imazapyr based on a reliance on the use of safety
factors, EPA has not retained the additional safety factor described in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) for the protection of infants and children.
Therefore, based on EPA's qualitative assessment of the imazapyr
risk and the prior quantitative risk assessment discussed in the final
rule published in the Federal Register of September 26, 2003 (68 FR
55475) (FRL-7321-4), EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty
that no harm will result to the general population, or to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to imazapyr and its metabolites or
degradates.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology (liquid chromatography with tandem
mass spectrometric detection (LC/MS/MS)) is available to enforce the
tolerance expression.
The method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD
20755-5350; telephone number: (410) 305-2905; email address:
residuemethods@epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level. The Codex has not
established MRLs for imazapyr on rapeseed, sunflower, or lentils.
[[Page 66653]]
C. Revisions to Petitioned-for Tolerances
EPA is revising the tolerance expressions for plant and livestock
commodities to clarify the chemical moieties that are covered by the
tolerances and specify how compliance with the tolerances is to be
measured. The revised tolerance expression makes clear that the
tolerances cover ``residues of imazapyr, including its metabolites and
degradates,'' as specified in FFDCA section 408(a)(3), and that
compliance with the tolerance levels is to be determined by measuring
only the residues of imazapyr [2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-
methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid]. EPA
has determined that it is reasonable to make this change final without
prior proposal and opportunity for comment because public comment is
not necessary, in that the change has no substantive effect on the
tolerance, but rather incorporates statutory requirements and is merely
intended to clarify the existing tolerance expression.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of imazapyr [2-
[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-
pyridinecarboxylic acid], in or on lentil at 0.2 ppm; rapeseed subgroup
20A and sunflower subgroup 20B at 0.05 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d)
in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this final rule has
been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this final rule
is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This final rule does not contain
any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this final rule. In addition,
this final rule does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 22, 2013.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.500, paragraph (a) is amended by revising the
introductory text and alphabetically adding the following commodities
to the table to read as follows:
Sec. 180.500 Imazapyr; tolerances for residues.
(a) General. Tolerances are established for residues of the
herbicide, imazapyr, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on
the commodities in the following table. Compliance with the tolerance
levels is to be determined by measuring only the residues of imazapyr
[2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-
pyridinecarboxylic acid].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Lentil \1\.............................................. 0.2
* * * * *
Rapeseed subgroup 20A \1\............................... 0.05
* * * * *
Sunflower subgroup 20B \1\.............................. 0.05
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no U.S. Registrations.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-26364 Filed 11-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P