Habitat Conservation Plan for South Sacramento County, California, 66058-66061 [2013-26366]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
66058
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 213 / Monday, November 4, 2013 / Notices
benefit rare habitats on the refuge. We
would continue shrubland habitat
management at the Sandy Stream Unit
and would expand grassland
management at the Benton Unit if
feasible. Management of Carlton Pond
WPA would remain unchanged,
focusing on providing habitat for
breeding black terns and waterfowl. We
would work to enhance public use
activities, such as providing additional
parking areas and improving
maintenance of some existing public
trails. Our environmental education and
interpretation program would be
improved by providing Service-led
environmental education programs, in
addition to programming conducted by
partners and the Friends of Sunkhaze
Meadows.
Alternative C (Increased Shrubland
Young Forest Habitat and Increased
Public Use)
Under alternative C, we would
continue to focus on the preservation of
the peatland-wetland complex at the
Sunkhaze Meadows Unit. However, in
contrast to alternatives A and B, this
alternative includes shifting
management of some mature forest and
grasslands to shrubland and young
forest habitat within the Sunkhaze
Meadow Unit and Benton Unit to
benefit species that rely on these
habitats. Management of the Sandy
Stream Unit and Carlton Pond WPA
would be similar to alternative B. Under
alternative C, we would also work
closely with partners to increase and
enhance authorized public uses, such as
expanding the trails at the Benton Unit
and providing more environmental
education and interpretation
programming.
Comments
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
We solicited comments on the draft
CCP and EA for Sunkhaze Meadows
NWR and Carlton Pond WPA from April
23 to May 31, 2013 (78 FR 23949).
During the comment period, we
received 17 sets of responses including
comments from public meetings, faxes,
email, and letters. We evaluated all of
the substantive comments we received
and include a summary of those
comments, and our responses to them,
as appendix G in the final CCP.
Selected Alternative
We have selected alternative B for
implementation, with the following
modifications:
• Under objective 4.1, we agreed to
maintain the Spur Trail off of the
Johnson Brook Trail in the Sunkhaze
Meadows Unit.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Nov 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
• We clarified that we will provide
wood duck nesting boxes from existing
supplies upon request, as long as
volunteers continue to clean, maintain,
and monitor use of the boxes. After the
existing supply of boxes is depleted, we
will phase out artificial wood duck
nesting boxes as they deteriorate, or will
remove the boxes if volunteers are no
longer able to maintain them (see
strategies under objective 2.1).
• We added a strategy under objective
6.1 that we will explore the feasibility
of, and interest in, including the Benton
Unit in a regional trail system upon
request.
• We modified a strategy under
objective 7.2 to include specific
reference to working with universities,
as well as other partners, to identify
research and monitoring projects and
needs at each refuge unit to foster
partnerships.
• We modified language in the
boating compatibility determination for
Carlton Pond WPA to include
monitoring for potential conflicts with
other authorized public uses on the
WPA (e.g., hunting), and will modify
this and other compatibility
determinations if warranted.
We have selected alternative B to
implement for Sunkhaze Meadows
NWR and Carlton Pond WPA, with
these minor changes, for several
reasons. Alternative B incorporates a
combination of actions that, in our
professional judgment, work best
towards achieving the refuge’s and
WPA’s purposes, vision, and goals;
Service policies; and the goals of other
State and regional conservation plans.
We also believe that alternative B most
effectively addresses key issues raised
during the planning process. The basis
of our decision is detailed in the FONSI
(appendix H in the final CCP).
Public Availability of Documents
In addition to any methods in
you can view or obtain
documents at the following location:
• Public Libraries: The Old Town
Public Library, located at 46 Middle
Street, Old Town, ME 04468, and the
Dorothy Webb Quimby Library, located
at Unity College, 90 Quaker Hill Road,
Unity, ME 04988 during regular library
hours.
ADDRESSES,
Dated: September 27, 2013.
Wendi Weber,
Regional Director, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2013–26365 Filed 11–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–ES–2013–N209]; [FF08E00000–
FXES11120800000F2–123–F2]
Habitat Conservation Plan for South
Sacramento County, California
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent, request for
comments, and notice of public scoping
meetings.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), intend to
gather additional information and to
prepare, in coordination with the
County of Sacramento, California, a
joint environmental impact statement
and environmental impact report (EIS/
EIR) under the National Environmental
Policy Act and the California
Environmental Quality Act for the
proposed South Sacramento Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP). The draft EIS/
EIR will evaluate the impacts of several
alternatives related to the proposed
issuance of Endangered Species Act
permits to eight permit applicants in
south Sacramento County, California.
The permit applicants intend to apply
for either a 30-year or a 50-year permit
from the Service that would authorize
the incidental take resulting from
implementation or approval of covered
activities, including various kinds of
development projects. We also
announce public scoping meetings and
the opening of a public comment
period. We request data, comments, new
information, or suggestions from other
concerned governmental agencies, the
scientific community, Tribes, industry,
or any other interested party.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by
December 19, 2013. We will hold two
public scoping meetings at different
locations in the plan area (see Public
Meetings under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for dates, times, and
locations). In addition to this notice, we
will also announce the public scoping
meetings in local news media and on
the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/
sacramento.
SUMMARY:
Please address written
comments to Nina Bicknese, Senior Fish
and Wildlife Biologist, Sacramento Fish
and Wildlife Office, 2800 Cottage Way,
W–2605, Sacramento, CA 95825.
Alternatively, you may send comments
by facsimile to (916) 414–6713.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Thomas, Chief, Conservation
Planning Division, or Eric Tattersall,
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 213 / Monday, November 4, 2013 / Notices
Deputy Assistant Field Supervisor, at
the address shown above (see
ADDRESSES) or at (916) 414–6600
(telephone). If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf,
please call the Federal Information
Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We intend
to gather additional information and to
prepare, in coordination with the
County of Sacramento, California, a
joint environmental impact statement
and environmental impact report (EIS/
EIR) under the National Environmental
Policy Act and the California
Environmental Quality Act for the
proposed South Sacramento Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP). This notice
revises information on the proposed
HCP previously published on June 10,
2008 (73 FR 32729). The draft EIS/ EIR
will evaluate the impacts of several
alternatives related to the proposed
issuance of Endangered Species Act
permits to eight permit applicants (the
County of Sacramento, City of Elk
Grove, City of Rancho Cordova, City of
Galt, the Capital Southeast Connector
Joint Powers Authority, the Sacramento
Regional County Sanitation District, the
Sacramento County Water Agency, and
a South Sacramento Habitat
Conservation Plan Joint Powers
Authority) for activities they would
conduct or approve within a proposed
374,000-acre plan area located in south
Sacramento County, California.
The permit applicants intend to apply
for either a 30-year or a 50-year permit
from the Service that would authorize
the incidental take of 22 animal species.
Incidental take would result from
implementation or approval of covered
activities, including private
development projects, transportation
facilities, surface and groundwater
delivery facilities, water treatment
facilities, solid waste sanitation
facilities, public facilities, recreation
facilities, energy utility facilities,
aggregate mining activities, and future
preserve land-management activities.
We also announce public scoping
meetings and the opening of a public
comment period. We request data,
comments, new information, or
suggestions from other concerned
governmental agencies, the scientific
community, Tribes, industry, or any
other interested party.
We publish this notice in accordance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq.; NEPA), and its implementing
regulations in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at 40 CFR 1500–1508,
as well as in compliance with section
10(c) of the Endangered Species Act (16
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Nov 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.; Act), and in
compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). We
intend to prepare a joint draft EIS/ EIR
to evaluate the impacts of several
alternatives related to the potential
issuance of an incidental take permit
(ITP) to the permit applicants, as well as
impacts of the implementation of the
supporting proposed habitat
conservation plan (HCP).
The permit applicants propose to
prepare the South Sacramento Habitat
Conservation Plan as part of their
application for an ITP under section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. The proposed
HCP will include measures necessary to
minimize and mitigate the impacts, to
the maximum extent practicable, of
potential proposed taking of federally
listed species to be covered by the ITP,
and the habitats upon which they
depend. The covered activities and
projects proposed by the HCP would
disturb a maximum total of 42,243 acres
within the plan area and would include
the construction of residential and
commercial development projects,
improvements to existing transportation
facilities, new transportation facilities
(including the proposed Capital
Southeast Connector highway), new
surface water and groundwater delivery
facilities, water treatment facilities,
solid waste sanitation facilities, public
facilities (including fire stations, police
stations, hospitals, schools, community
centers, cemeteries, and administration
centers), indoor and outdoor recreation
facilities, energy utility facilities,
aggregate mining activities, and future
habitat-management activities.
The plan area, the area in which all
impacts would be evaluated and all
conservation actions will be
implemented, is approximately 374,000
acres within unincorporated south
Sacramento County and within the
cities of Rancho Cordova, Elk Grove,
and Galt. The approximate geographical
boundary of the plan area would be the
area bound by U.S. Highway 50 in the
north, the San Joaquin County line to
the south, the Sacramento River levee
and County Road J11 to the west, and
the Sacramento County line with El
Dorado and Amador counties to the
east. The 374,000-acre plan area would
include a 123,000-acre urban
development area (UDA) where most
ground-disturbing development,
infrastructure activities, and projects
would occur. The UDA corresponds to
land within the County’s urban services
boundary (USB); and to land within the
city limits of Rancho Cordova, Elk
Grove, and Galt; land within Elk Grove’s
proposed sphere of influence; and land
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66059
within Galt’s adopted sphere of
influence.
Almost all ground disturbance and
incidental take of federally listed
endangered and threatened species
would occur on approximately 40,000
acres within the UDA. A limited amount
of infrastructure development, such as
planned road widening projects and
recycled water conveyance pipelines,
would disturb or remove approximately
2,443 acres of native and naturalized
landcovers outside the UDA. In
addition, the HCP would include an
aquatic resource program that would
avoid, minimize, or fully mitigate
potential covered activity impacts to
existing aquatic resources within the
plan area, and would facilitate the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers’ development
of a process for permit applicant
compliance with the Clean Water Act
(33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). The permit
applicants also propose to permanently
preserve or restore approximately 8,950
acres of the UDA and preserve
approximately 40,980 acres outside the
UDA, following criteria that would
expand the size of existing preserves
and create linkages and corridors
between existing preserves. In total, the
HCP proposes to permanently preserve
or restore 49,930 acres of native and
naturalized landcovers within the plan
area boundary. When combined with
the existing preserve lands, the HCP
would result in a large and
interconnected 113,623-acre habitat
reserve system within the 374,000-acre
plan area.
Background Information
Section 9 of the Act and Federal
regulations prohibit the taking of fish
and wildlife species listed as
endangered or threatened under section
4 of the Act. Take of federally listed fish
or wildlife is defined under the Act as
to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect
listed species, or attempt to engage in
such conduct. The term ‘‘harass’’ is
defined in the regulations as to carry out
actions that create the likelihood of
injury to listed species to such an extent
as to significantly disrupt normal
behavioral patterns, which include, but
are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (50 CFR 17.3). The term
‘‘harm’’ is defined in the regulations as
significant habitat modification or
degradation that results in death or
injury of listed species by significantly
impairing essential behavioral patterns,
including breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (50 CFR 17.3).
However, under specified
circumstances, the Service may issue
permits that allow the take of federally
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
66060
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 213 / Monday, November 4, 2013 / Notices
listed species, provided that the take is
incidental to, but not the purpose of, an
otherwise lawful activity. Regulations
governing permits for endangered and
threatened species can be found at 50
CFR 17.22 and 17.32, respectively.
Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act contains
provisions for issuing such incidental
take permits to non-Federal entities for
the take of endangered and threatened
species, provided the following criteria
are met:
1. The taking will be incidental;
2. The applicants will, to the
maximum extent practicable, minimize
and mitigate the impact of such taking;
3. The applicants will develop a
proposed HCP and ensure that adequate
funding for the HCP will be provided;
4. The taking will not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of the survival
and recovery of the species in the wild;
and
5. The applicants will carry out any
other measures that the Service may
require as being necessary or
appropriate for the purposes of the HCP.
Thus, the purpose of issuing ITPs is
to allow the permit applicants, under
their respective authorities, to authorize
new development and infrastructure,
while conserving covered species and
their habitats. Implementation of a
regional habitat conservation plan,
rather than a species-by-species or
project-by-project approach, would
enhance benefits of conservation
measures for covered species and would
eliminate expensive and timeconsuming efforts associated with
processing individual ITPs for each
project within the applicants’ proposed
plan area. The Service expects that the
permit applicants will request ITP
coverage for a period of 30 to 50 years.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Alternatives in the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement
The proposed action alternative
presented in the draft EIS/EIR will be
compared to a no-action alternative. The
no-action alternative represents
estimated future conditions to which
the proposed action’s estimated
conditions can be compared. Other
action alternatives considered,
including their potential impacts, will
also be addressed in the draft EIS/ EIR
and compared to a no-action condition.
No-Action Alternative
Because the proposed covered
activities would provide needed
regional infrastructure and economic
development, these types of activities
would occur within the plan area
regardless of whether a 10(a)(1)(B) ITP
is requested or issued. Although future
activities would be similar to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Nov 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
covered activities proposed by the HCP,
not all activities would necessitate an
incidental take permit or consultation
with the Service. Under the no action
alternative, the permit applicants could
implement a covered activity that fully
avoids impacts to protected species and
their habitats. Where potential impacts
to federally protected species could not
be avoided, the permit applicants could
minimize and mitigate their impacts
through individual formal or informal
consultations with the Service. When
applicable, the permit applicants would
potentially seek individual section
10(a)(1)(B) ITPs on a project-by-project
basis. Under the no-action alternative,
the permit applicants may also satisfy
the requirement of the Clean Water
Act’s sections 404 and 401, the
California Fish and Game code section
1600, and the Porter-Cologne Act, and
other applicable law, on a project-byproject basis. Thus, under the no-action
alternative, various permit applicants
would likely need to develop and file
numerous separate permit applications
over the 30-to-50-year project period.
This activity-by-activity approach could
be more time consuming and less
efficient and could result in smaller and
fragmented mitigation areas.
Proposed Action Alternative
The proposed action alternative is the
issuance of an ITP for the take of
covered species, caused by covered
activities within the proposed plan area,
for a period of 30 to 50 years. The
proposed action HCP, developed and
implemented by the permit applicants,
must meet the requirements of section
10(a)(2)(A) of the Act by providing
measures to minimize and mitigate the
effects of the potential incidental take of
covered species to the maximum extent
practicable. The proposed HCP allows
for a comprehensive mitigation
approach for unavoidable impacts, and
reduces permit processing times and
efforts for the permit applicants and the
Service.
Covered activities under the proposed
HCP are otherwise lawful activities that
applicants carry out consistent with all
HCP requirements, including, but not
limited to:
1. Construction of private
development projects within the UDA
(e.g., single- and multi-family homes,
residential subdivisions, commercial or
industrial projects, offices, and park
infrastructure);
2. Installation and/or maintenance of
utility infrastructure within the UDA
(e.g., transmission or distribution lines
and facilities related to electric,
telecommunication, natural gas, and
other types of energy utilities);
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3. Installation and/or maintenance of
surface and groundwater delivery
facilities within the UDA;
4. Construction, maintenance, and/or
improvement of water treatment
facilities within the UDA;
5. Construction, maintenance, and/or
improvement of solid waste sanitation
facilities within the UDA;
6. Construction, use, and maintenance
of public facilities (e.g., fire stations,
police stations, schools, hospitals,
community centers, cemeteries, and
administration centers) within the UDA;
7. Construction, use, or maintenance
of other public infrastructure, including
indoor and outdoor recreation facilities,
within the UDA;
8. Excavation, use, maintenance, and/
or expansion of quarries, gravel mining,
or other aggregate mining activities
within the UDA;
9. Construction, maintenance, and/or
improvement of new roads, bridges, and
other transportation infrastructure
facilities outside the UDA and within
the UDA, including the proposed
Southeast Connector highway;
10. Construction, maintenance, and/or
improvement of recycled water
conveyance pipelines and outside the
UDA and within the UDA; and
11. Maintenance and land
management activities on conservation
lands outside the UDA and within the
UDA.
We anticipate that the following 30
species of plants and animals, including
seven federally listed threatened (T) or
endangered (E) species, will be included
as covered species in the permit
applicants’ proposed HCP:
Mid-valley fairy shrimp (Branchinecta
mesovallensis)
Ricksecker’s water scavenger beetle
(Hydrochara rickseckeri)
Valley elderberry longhorn beetle
(Desmocerus californicus dimorphus) (T)
Vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta
lynchi) (E)
Vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus
packardi) (E)
California tiger salamander, central California
distinct population segment (Ambystoma
californiense) (T)
Western spadefoot toad (Scaphiopus
hammondii)
Giant garter snake (Thamnophis gigas) (T)
Western pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata
marmorata and A. m. pallida) (two
subspecies)
American badger (Taxidea taxus)
Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus)
Western red bat (Lasiurus blossevillii)
Yuma myotis bat (Myotis yumanensis)
White-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus)
Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperii)
Ferruginous hawk (Buteo regalis)
Greater sandhill crane (Grus canadensis
tabida)
Loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus)
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 213 / Monday, November 4, 2013 / Notices
Northern harrier (Circus cyaneus)
Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni)
Tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor)
Western burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia
hypugaea)
Ahart’s dwarf rush (Juncus leiospermus var.
ahartii)
Boggs Lake hedge hyssop (Gratiola
heterosepala)
Dwarf downingia (Downingia pusilla)
Legenere (Legenere limosa)
Pincushion navarretia (Navarretia myersii)
Sacramento Orcutt grass (Orcuttia viscida)
(T)
Slender Orcutt grass (Orcuttia tenuis) (T)
Sanford’s arrowhead (Sagittaria sanfordii)
The permit applicants seek incidental
take authorization for all applicable
covered species. Candidate and
federally listed species that are not
likely to be taken by the covered
activities, and therefore not covered by
the proposed ITP, may also be
addressed in the proposed HCP, to
explain why the permit applicants
believe these species will not be taken.
Environmental Review and Next Steps
The Service will conduct an
environmental review to analyze the
proposed action, along with other
alternatives evaluated, and the
associated impacts of each. The draft
EIS/EIR will be the basis for the impact
evaluation for each covered species. The
draft EIS/EIR is expected to provide
biological descriptions of the affected
species and habitats, as well as the
effects of the proposed action and other
alternatives on other resources, such as
soils, geology, water quality, agriculture,
vegetation, wetlands, wildlife, cultural
resources, transportation, air quality,
land use, recreation, water use, local
economy, and environmental justice.
Following completion of the
environmental review, the Service will
publish a notice of availability and a
request for comment on the draft EIS/
EIR and on the permit applications,
which will include the proposed HCP.
We anticipate that the draft EIS/EIR and
proposed HCP will be completed and
available to the public in March or April
2014.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Public Comments
We request data, comments, new
information, or suggestions from other
concerned governmental agencies, the
scientific community, Tribes, industry,
or any other interested party on this
notice. We will consider these
comments in developing an EIS/EIR and
in the development of a South
Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan
and incidental take permit. We
particularly seek comments on the
following:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Nov 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
1. Biological information concerning
the proposed covered species;
2. Relevant data concerning the
proposed covered species;
3. Additional information concerning
the range, distribution, population size,
and population trends of the proposed
covered species;
4. Current or planned activities in the
subject area and their possible impacts
on the proposed covered species;
5. The presence of archeological sites,
buildings and structures, historic
events, sacred and traditional areas, and
other historic preservation concerns that
are required to be considered in project
planning by the National Historic
Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.);
and
6. Identification of any other
environmental issues that should be
considered with regard to the proposed
development and the permit action.
You may submit your comments and
materials by one of the methods listed
in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments and materials we receive
on this notice will be available for
public inspection by appointment,
during normal business hours, at our
office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
Public Availability of Comments
Written comments we receive become
part of the public record associated with
this action. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comments, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Public Scoping Meetings
The purpose of scoping meetings is to
provide the public with a general
understanding on the background of the
proposed HCP and activities it would
cover, alternative proposals under
consideration for the draft EIS/EIR, the
Service’s role, and steps to be taken to
develop the draft EIS/EIR for the
proposed HCP. Two public scoping
meetings will be held:
1. Wednesday, November 20, from
6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., at the Anthony
Pescetti Community Room, Galt Police
Facility, 455 Industrial Drive, Galt, CA
95632.
2. Thursday November 21, from 2:00
p.m. to 4:00 p.m., at the Governor’s
Office of Planning and Research, Large
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66061
Conference Room 202, 2nd Floor, 1400
Tenth Street, Sacramento, California,
95814.
The meeting will include a 1-hour
open house prior to the formal scoping
meeting. The open house will provide
an opportunity to learn about the
proposed action, permit area, and
species covered. The open house will be
followed by a presentation of the
proposed action, a summary of the
NEPA process, and comments from the
public. The primary purpose of these
meetings and public comment period is
to solicit suggestions and information
on the scope of issues and scope of
alternatives for the Service to consider
when drafting the EIS/EIR. Written
comments will be accepted at the
meetings. Comments can also be
submitted by methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Once the draft EIS/
EIR and proposed HCP are complete and
made available for review, there will be
additional opportunity for public
comment on the content of these
documents during a 90-day draft EIS/
EIR public comment period.
Meeting Location Accommodations
Please note that the meeting locations
are accessible to wheelchair users. If
you require additional accommodations,
please notify us at least 1 week in
advance of the meeting (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Authority
We provide this notice under section
10 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
and by NEPA regulations (40 CFR
1501.7, 1506.6, and 1508.22).
Dated: October 29, 2013.
Alexandra Pitts,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest
Region, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2013–26366 Filed 11–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R7–R–2013–N156; FF07RKNA00
FXRS12610700000 134]
Notice of Hunting and Trapping
Restrictions Within the Skilak Wildlife
Recreation Area (Skilak Loop
Management Area) of Kenai National
Wildlife Refuge, Alaska
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Department of Interior.
ACTION: Notice of permanent closure and
restrictions.
AGENCY:
This notice advises the public
that the Fish and Wildlife Service—
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 213 (Monday, November 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66058-66061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26366]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-ES-2013-N209]; [FF08E00000-FXES11120800000F2-123-F2]
Habitat Conservation Plan for South Sacramento County, California
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent, request for comments, and notice of public
scoping meetings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), intend to
gather additional information and to prepare, in coordination with the
County of Sacramento, California, a joint environmental impact
statement and environmental impact report (EIS/ EIR) under the National
Environmental Policy Act and the California Environmental Quality Act
for the proposed South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). The
draft EIS/ EIR will evaluate the impacts of several alternatives
related to the proposed issuance of Endangered Species Act permits to
eight permit applicants in south Sacramento County, California. The
permit applicants intend to apply for either a 30-year or a 50-year
permit from the Service that would authorize the incidental take
resulting from implementation or approval of covered activities,
including various kinds of development projects. We also announce
public scoping meetings and the opening of a public comment period. We
request data, comments, new information, or suggestions from other
concerned governmental agencies, the scientific community, Tribes,
industry, or any other interested party.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
December 19, 2013. We will hold two public scoping meetings at
different locations in the plan area (see Public Meetings under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for dates, times, and locations). In addition
to this notice, we will also announce the public scoping meetings in
local news media and on the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/sacramento.
ADDRESSES: Please address written comments to Nina Bicknese, Senior
Fish and Wildlife Biologist, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, 2800
Cottage Way, W-2605, Sacramento, CA 95825. Alternatively, you may send
comments by facsimile to (916) 414-6713.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Thomas, Chief, Conservation
Planning Division, or Eric Tattersall,
[[Page 66059]]
Deputy Assistant Field Supervisor, at the address shown above (see
ADDRESSES) or at (916) 414-6600 (telephone). If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf, please call the Federal
Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We intend to gather additional information
and to prepare, in coordination with the County of Sacramento,
California, a joint environmental impact statement and environmental
impact report (EIS/ EIR) under the National Environmental Policy Act
and the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed South
Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). This notice revises
information on the proposed HCP previously published on June 10, 2008
(73 FR 32729). The draft EIS/ EIR will evaluate the impacts of several
alternatives related to the proposed issuance of Endangered Species Act
permits to eight permit applicants (the County of Sacramento, City of
Elk Grove, City of Rancho Cordova, City of Galt, the Capital Southeast
Connector Joint Powers Authority, the Sacramento Regional County
Sanitation District, the Sacramento County Water Agency, and a South
Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan Joint Powers Authority) for
activities they would conduct or approve within a proposed 374,000-acre
plan area located in south Sacramento County, California.
The permit applicants intend to apply for either a 30-year or a 50-
year permit from the Service that would authorize the incidental take
of 22 animal species. Incidental take would result from implementation
or approval of covered activities, including private development
projects, transportation facilities, surface and groundwater delivery
facilities, water treatment facilities, solid waste sanitation
facilities, public facilities, recreation facilities, energy utility
facilities, aggregate mining activities, and future preserve land-
management activities. We also announce public scoping meetings and the
opening of a public comment period. We request data, comments, new
information, or suggestions from other concerned governmental agencies,
the scientific community, Tribes, industry, or any other interested
party.
We publish this notice in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.;
NEPA), and its implementing regulations in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at 40 CFR 1500-1508, as well as in compliance with
section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.;
Act), and in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). We intend to prepare a joint draft EIS/ EIR to evaluate the
impacts of several alternatives related to the potential issuance of an
incidental take permit (ITP) to the permit applicants, as well as
impacts of the implementation of the supporting proposed habitat
conservation plan (HCP).
The permit applicants propose to prepare the South Sacramento
Habitat Conservation Plan as part of their application for an ITP under
section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. The proposed HCP will include measures
necessary to minimize and mitigate the impacts, to the maximum extent
practicable, of potential proposed taking of federally listed species
to be covered by the ITP, and the habitats upon which they depend. The
covered activities and projects proposed by the HCP would disturb a
maximum total of 42,243 acres within the plan area and would include
the construction of residential and commercial development projects,
improvements to existing transportation facilities, new transportation
facilities (including the proposed Capital Southeast Connector
highway), new surface water and groundwater delivery facilities, water
treatment facilities, solid waste sanitation facilities, public
facilities (including fire stations, police stations, hospitals,
schools, community centers, cemeteries, and administration centers),
indoor and outdoor recreation facilities, energy utility facilities,
aggregate mining activities, and future habitat-management activities.
The plan area, the area in which all impacts would be evaluated and
all conservation actions will be implemented, is approximately 374,000
acres within unincorporated south Sacramento County and within the
cities of Rancho Cordova, Elk Grove, and Galt. The approximate
geographical boundary of the plan area would be the area bound by U.S.
Highway 50 in the north, the San Joaquin County line to the south, the
Sacramento River levee and County Road J11 to the west, and the
Sacramento County line with El Dorado and Amador counties to the east.
The 374,000-acre plan area would include a 123,000-acre urban
development area (UDA) where most ground-disturbing development,
infrastructure activities, and projects would occur. The UDA
corresponds to land within the County's urban services boundary (USB);
and to land within the city limits of Rancho Cordova, Elk Grove, and
Galt; land within Elk Grove's proposed sphere of influence; and land
within Galt's adopted sphere of influence.
Almost all ground disturbance and incidental take of federally
listed endangered and threatened species would occur on approximately
40,000 acres within the UDA. A limited amount of infrastructure
development, such as planned road widening projects and recycled water
conveyance pipelines, would disturb or remove approximately 2,443 acres
of native and naturalized landcovers outside the UDA. In addition, the
HCP would include an aquatic resource program that would avoid,
minimize, or fully mitigate potential covered activity impacts to
existing aquatic resources within the plan area, and would facilitate
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' development of a process for permit
applicant compliance with the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.).
The permit applicants also propose to permanently preserve or restore
approximately 8,950 acres of the UDA and preserve approximately 40,980
acres outside the UDA, following criteria that would expand the size of
existing preserves and create linkages and corridors between existing
preserves. In total, the HCP proposes to permanently preserve or
restore 49,930 acres of native and naturalized landcovers within the
plan area boundary. When combined with the existing preserve lands, the
HCP would result in a large and interconnected 113,623-acre habitat
reserve system within the 374,000-acre plan area.
Background Information
Section 9 of the Act and Federal regulations prohibit the taking of
fish and wildlife species listed as endangered or threatened under
section 4 of the Act. Take of federally listed fish or wildlife is
defined under the Act as to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound,
kill, trap, capture, or collect listed species, or attempt to engage in
such conduct. The term ``harass'' is defined in the regulations as to
carry out actions that create the likelihood of injury to listed
species to such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavioral
patterns, which include, but are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (50 CFR 17.3). The term ``harm'' is defined in the
regulations as significant habitat modification or degradation that
results in death or injury of listed species by significantly impairing
essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (50 CFR 17.3).
However, under specified circumstances, the Service may issue
permits that allow the take of federally
[[Page 66060]]
listed species, provided that the take is incidental to, but not the
purpose of, an otherwise lawful activity. Regulations governing permits
for endangered and threatened species can be found at 50 CFR 17.22 and
17.32, respectively. Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act contains provisions
for issuing such incidental take permits to non-Federal entities for
the take of endangered and threatened species, provided the following
criteria are met:
1. The taking will be incidental;
2. The applicants will, to the maximum extent practicable, minimize
and mitigate the impact of such taking;
3. The applicants will develop a proposed HCP and ensure that
adequate funding for the HCP will be provided;
4. The taking will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of the
survival and recovery of the species in the wild; and
5. The applicants will carry out any other measures that the
Service may require as being necessary or appropriate for the purposes
of the HCP.
Thus, the purpose of issuing ITPs is to allow the permit
applicants, under their respective authorities, to authorize new
development and infrastructure, while conserving covered species and
their habitats. Implementation of a regional habitat conservation plan,
rather than a species-by-species or project-by-project approach, would
enhance benefits of conservation measures for covered species and would
eliminate expensive and time-consuming efforts associated with
processing individual ITPs for each project within the applicants'
proposed plan area. The Service expects that the permit applicants will
request ITP coverage for a period of 30 to 50 years.
Alternatives in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement
The proposed action alternative presented in the draft EIS/EIR will
be compared to a no-action alternative. The no-action alternative
represents estimated future conditions to which the proposed action's
estimated conditions can be compared. Other action alternatives
considered, including their potential impacts, will also be addressed
in the draft EIS/ EIR and compared to a no-action condition.
No-Action Alternative
Because the proposed covered activities would provide needed
regional infrastructure and economic development, these types of
activities would occur within the plan area regardless of whether a
10(a)(1)(B) ITP is requested or issued. Although future activities
would be similar to the covered activities proposed by the HCP, not all
activities would necessitate an incidental take permit or consultation
with the Service. Under the no action alternative, the permit
applicants could implement a covered activity that fully avoids impacts
to protected species and their habitats. Where potential impacts to
federally protected species could not be avoided, the permit applicants
could minimize and mitigate their impacts through individual formal or
informal consultations with the Service. When applicable, the permit
applicants would potentially seek individual section 10(a)(1)(B) ITPs
on a project-by-project basis. Under the no-action alternative, the
permit applicants may also satisfy the requirement of the Clean Water
Act's sections 404 and 401, the California Fish and Game code section
1600, and the Porter-Cologne Act, and other applicable law, on a
project-by-project basis. Thus, under the no-action alternative,
various permit applicants would likely need to develop and file
numerous separate permit applications over the 30-to-50-year project
period. This activity-by-activity approach could be more time consuming
and less efficient and could result in smaller and fragmented
mitigation areas.
Proposed Action Alternative
The proposed action alternative is the issuance of an ITP for the
take of covered species, caused by covered activities within the
proposed plan area, for a period of 30 to 50 years. The proposed action
HCP, developed and implemented by the permit applicants, must meet the
requirements of section 10(a)(2)(A) of the Act by providing measures to
minimize and mitigate the effects of the potential incidental take of
covered species to the maximum extent practicable. The proposed HCP
allows for a comprehensive mitigation approach for unavoidable impacts,
and reduces permit processing times and efforts for the permit
applicants and the Service.
Covered activities under the proposed HCP are otherwise lawful
activities that applicants carry out consistent with all HCP
requirements, including, but not limited to:
1. Construction of private development projects within the UDA
(e.g., single- and multi-family homes, residential subdivisions,
commercial or industrial projects, offices, and park infrastructure);
2. Installation and/or maintenance of utility infrastructure within
the UDA (e.g., transmission or distribution lines and facilities
related to electric, telecommunication, natural gas, and other types of
energy utilities);
3. Installation and/or maintenance of surface and groundwater
delivery facilities within the UDA;
4. Construction, maintenance, and/or improvement of water treatment
facilities within the UDA;
5. Construction, maintenance, and/or improvement of solid waste
sanitation facilities within the UDA;
6. Construction, use, and maintenance of public facilities (e.g.,
fire stations, police stations, schools, hospitals, community centers,
cemeteries, and administration centers) within the UDA;
7. Construction, use, or maintenance of other public
infrastructure, including indoor and outdoor recreation facilities,
within the UDA;
8. Excavation, use, maintenance, and/or expansion of quarries,
gravel mining, or other aggregate mining activities within the UDA;
9. Construction, maintenance, and/or improvement of new roads,
bridges, and other transportation infrastructure facilities outside the
UDA and within the UDA, including the proposed Southeast Connector
highway;
10. Construction, maintenance, and/or improvement of recycled water
conveyance pipelines and outside the UDA and within the UDA; and
11. Maintenance and land management activities on conservation
lands outside the UDA and within the UDA.
We anticipate that the following 30 species of plants and animals,
including seven federally listed threatened (T) or endangered (E)
species, will be included as covered species in the permit applicants'
proposed HCP:
Mid-valley fairy shrimp (Branchinecta mesovallensis)
Ricksecker's water scavenger beetle (Hydrochara rickseckeri)
Valley elderberry longhorn beetle (Desmocerus californicus
dimorphus) (T)
Vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) (E)
Vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus packardi) (E)
California tiger salamander, central California distinct population
segment (Ambystoma californiense) (T)
Western spadefoot toad (Scaphiopus hammondii)
Giant garter snake (Thamnophis gigas) (T)
Western pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata marmorata and A. m.
pallida) (two subspecies)
American badger (Taxidea taxus)
Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus)
Western red bat (Lasiurus blossevillii)
Yuma myotis bat (Myotis yumanensis)
White-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus)
Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooperii)
Ferruginous hawk (Buteo regalis)
Greater sandhill crane (Grus canadensis tabida)
Loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus)
[[Page 66061]]
Northern harrier (Circus cyaneus)
Swainson's hawk (Buteo swainsoni)
Tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor)
Western burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia hypugaea)
Ahart's dwarf rush (Juncus leiospermus var. ahartii)
Boggs Lake hedge hyssop (Gratiola heterosepala)
Dwarf downingia (Downingia pusilla)
Legenere (Legenere limosa)
Pincushion navarretia (Navarretia myersii)
Sacramento Orcutt grass (Orcuttia viscida) (T)
Slender Orcutt grass (Orcuttia tenuis) (T)
Sanford's arrowhead (Sagittaria sanfordii)
The permit applicants seek incidental take authorization for all
applicable covered species. Candidate and federally listed species that
are not likely to be taken by the covered activities, and therefore not
covered by the proposed ITP, may also be addressed in the proposed HCP,
to explain why the permit applicants believe these species will not be
taken.
Environmental Review and Next Steps
The Service will conduct an environmental review to analyze the
proposed action, along with other alternatives evaluated, and the
associated impacts of each. The draft EIS/EIR will be the basis for the
impact evaluation for each covered species. The draft EIS/EIR is
expected to provide biological descriptions of the affected species and
habitats, as well as the effects of the proposed action and other
alternatives on other resources, such as soils, geology, water quality,
agriculture, vegetation, wetlands, wildlife, cultural resources,
transportation, air quality, land use, recreation, water use, local
economy, and environmental justice.
Following completion of the environmental review, the Service will
publish a notice of availability and a request for comment on the draft
EIS/EIR and on the permit applications, which will include the proposed
HCP. We anticipate that the draft EIS/EIR and proposed HCP will be
completed and available to the public in March or April 2014.
Public Comments
We request data, comments, new information, or suggestions from
other concerned governmental agencies, the scientific community,
Tribes, industry, or any other interested party on this notice. We will
consider these comments in developing an EIS/EIR and in the development
of a South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan and incidental take
permit. We particularly seek comments on the following:
1. Biological information concerning the proposed covered species;
2. Relevant data concerning the proposed covered species;
3. Additional information concerning the range, distribution,
population size, and population trends of the proposed covered species;
4. Current or planned activities in the subject area and their
possible impacts on the proposed covered species;
5. The presence of archeological sites, buildings and structures,
historic events, sacred and traditional areas, and other historic
preservation concerns that are required to be considered in project
planning by the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 et
seq.); and
6. Identification of any other environmental issues that should be
considered with regard to the proposed development and the permit
action.
You may submit your comments and materials by one of the methods
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments and materials we receive on this notice will be available
for public inspection by appointment, during normal business hours, at
our office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Public Availability of Comments
Written comments we receive become part of the public record
associated with this action. Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other personal identifying information in
your comments, you should be aware that your entire comment--including
your personal identifying information--may be made publicly available
at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your
personal identifying information from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Public Scoping Meetings
The purpose of scoping meetings is to provide the public with a
general understanding on the background of the proposed HCP and
activities it would cover, alternative proposals under consideration
for the draft EIS/EIR, the Service's role, and steps to be taken to
develop the draft EIS/EIR for the proposed HCP. Two public scoping
meetings will be held:
1. Wednesday, November 20, from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., at the
Anthony Pescetti Community Room, Galt Police Facility, 455 Industrial
Drive, Galt, CA 95632.
2. Thursday November 21, from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., at the
Governor's Office of Planning and Research, Large Conference Room 202,
2nd Floor, 1400 Tenth Street, Sacramento, California, 95814.
The meeting will include a 1-hour open house prior to the formal
scoping meeting. The open house will provide an opportunity to learn
about the proposed action, permit area, and species covered. The open
house will be followed by a presentation of the proposed action, a
summary of the NEPA process, and comments from the public. The primary
purpose of these meetings and public comment period is to solicit
suggestions and information on the scope of issues and scope of
alternatives for the Service to consider when drafting the EIS/EIR.
Written comments will be accepted at the meetings. Comments can also be
submitted by methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. Once the draft
EIS/EIR and proposed HCP are complete and made available for review,
there will be additional opportunity for public comment on the content
of these documents during a 90-day draft EIS/EIR public comment period.
Meeting Location Accommodations
Please note that the meeting locations are accessible to wheelchair
users. If you require additional accommodations, please notify us at
least 1 week in advance of the meeting (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
Authority
We provide this notice under section 10 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.) and by NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1501.7, 1506.6, and 1508.22).
Dated: October 29, 2013.
Alexandra Pitts,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 2013-26366 Filed 11-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
