Notice of Intent To Prepare a Livestock Grazing Monument Management Plan Amendment and Associated Environmental Impact Statement for the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah, 66064-66065 [2013-25924]
Download as PDF
66064
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 213 / Monday, November 4, 2013 / Notices
support for the State’s Board of Game’s
change. In addition to the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game, the Kenai
Peninsula Chapter of the Safari Club
International was among those opposing
the Service action and supporting the
State’s change.
The Service considered all of the oral
and written comments. It concludes that
maintaining the closure on the take of
lynx, coyote and wolf is necessary to
meet the Refuge management plan
objectives to provide for enhanced
opportunities for wildlife viewing,
environmental education, and
interpretation in the Skilak Wildlife
Recreation Area. This decision is in
keeping with the Refuge purposes under
ANILCA and furthers the public use
objectives that have consistently been
identified for management of the area
since 1985. Designating and
administering the Skilak Wildlife
Recreation Area in support of these
purposes, while allowing for additional
non-conflicting uses in the area, is a
proper management approach which
recognizes the obligation to provide
educational and both consumptive, and
non-consumptive, wildlife-dependent
recreational opportunities for the public
on the Refuge.
Authority
This closure notice is pursuant to 50
CFR 36.42 for permanent closures or
restrictions on Alaska National Wildlife
Refuges. Authorities for this action are
found within the National Wildlife
Refuge Administration Act of 1966, as
amended by the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd–668ee); the
Refuge Recreation Act of 1962 (16
U.S.C. 460k–460k–4); and the Alaska
National Interest Lands Conservation
Act of 1980, Public Law 96–487, 94 Stat.
2371 (1980).
Geoffrey L. Haskett,
Regional Director, Alaska Region, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
[FR Doc. 2013–26021 Filed 11–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[LLUT0300–16100000–LXSS005J0000]
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Livestock
Grazing Monument Management Plan
Amendment and Associated
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Grand Staircase-Escalante National
Monument, Utah
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Nov 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
ACTION:
Notice of intent.
In compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), as amended, and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976 (FLPMA), as amended, the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Grand Staircase-Escalante National
Monument (GSENM), Kanab, Utah,
intends to prepare a Livestock Grazing
Monument Management Plan
Amendment (Plan Amendment) with an
associated Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS). This notice announces
the beginning of the scoping process to
solicit public comments and identify
issues. The Plan Amendment will make
land use-level decisions associated with
livestock grazing, thereby amending the
GSENM Management Plan.
DATES: This notice initiates the public
scoping process for the Plan
Amendment and associated EIS. Public
scoping meetings will be hosted in the
following locations: Kanab, Escalante,
and Salt Lake City, Utah. The date(s)
and specific location(s) and any other
public involvement activities will be
announced at least 15 days in advance
through local media outlets and on the
GSENM Web site at: www.ut.blm.gov/
monument. The public scoping period
runs from the issuance of this notice for
60 days or until 30 days after the last
public scoping meeting is held,
whichever is later. Comments on issues
and planning criteria may be submitted
in writing during this time. In order to
be considered in the Draft Plan
Amendment/EIS, all comments must be
received prior to the close of the scoping
period. BLM Utah will provide
additional opportunities for public
participation upon publication of the
Draft Plan Amendment/EIS.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on issues and planning criteria related
to the GSENM Plan Amendment/EIS by
any of the following methods:
• Email: BLM_UT_GS_EIS@blm.gov;
• Fax: 435–644–1250; or
• Mail: Bureau of Land Management,
Grand Staircase-Escalante National
Monument, 669 S. HWY 89–A, Kanab,
UT 84741.
Documents pertinent to this planning
effort may be examined at the GSENM
Office, 669 S. HWY 89–A, Kanab, Utah.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
Betenson, Assistant Monument
Manager, Planning and Support
Services; telephone: 435–644–1205;
address: GSENM Office, 669 S. HWY
89–A, Kanab, UT 84741; email: BLM_
UT_GS_EIS@blm.gov. Persons who use
a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 to leave a message or
question with the above individual. The
FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days
a week. Replies are provided during
normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document provides notice that the BLM
GSENM intends to prepare a Plan
Amendment with an associated EIS and
announces the beginning of the public
scoping process to request public input
on issues and planning criteria.
Cooperating agencies include the State
of Utah; Garfield County and Kane
County, Utah; the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; and the National Park Service
(NPS) Glen Canyon National Recreation
Area (GCNRA). The planning area
includes all lands within the GSENM
where BLM has livestock grazing
management and/or administrative
responsibility. This includes the BLMUtah lands within GSENM and
additional lands within portions of the
Kanab Field Office (KFO) and the
Arizona Strip Field Office (ASFO), as
well as lands managed by NPS in
GCNRA where GSENM administers
grazing.
Management decisions for lands in
the planning area, but outside the
GSENM boundary, will be consistent
with the goals and objectives of the
KFO, ASFO, and the GCNRA enabling
legislation and management plans, as
appropriate. NPS will also be making a
decision for the GCNRA lands
consistent with that area’s enabling
legislation (Pub. L. 92–593). The
planning area encompasses
approximately 2.2 million acres of
Federal lands in Garfield County and
Kane County, Utah, and Coconino
County, Arizona. Approximately 68
percent of the planning area is in Kane
County, approximately 32 percent is in
Garfield County, and less than 1 percent
is in Coconino County. The purpose of
the public scoping process is to
determine relevant issues related to
livestock grazing that will influence the
scope of the environmental analysis,
including alternatives, and to guide the
planning process.
Preliminary issues related to livestock
grazing that are likely to be addressed in
the Plan Amendment and EIS include
the following:
• Effects on GSENM proclamationidentified scientific and historic objects
and values;
• Lands available for livestock
grazing within the planning area;
• Effects on the resources and values
for which GCNRA was established;
• Forage currently available on an
area-wide basis for livestock grazing and
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 213 / Monday, November 4, 2013 / Notices
available for future anticipated
demands;
• Guidelines and criteria for future
allotment-specific adjustments, such as
rotational grazing plans which affect the
livestock use;
• Impacts on local custom and
culture as well as the area’s economy;
and
• Management of existing rangeland
improvement seedings.
Additional issues will likely be added
through the public scoping process.
Planning criteria are the standards,
rules, and other factors developed by
managers and interdisciplinary teams
for their use in forming judgments about
decision making, analysis, and data
collection during planning. Planning
criteria streamline and simplify the
resource management planning actions.
The following preliminary criteria will
be considered in the Plan Amendment
and EIS process:
• The Plan Amendment will be
limited to making land use planning
decisions specific to livestock grazing.
• Lands addressed in the Plan
Amendment will be public lands
managed by the BLM and the NPS.
• Grazing within the GCNRA will be
administered in a portion of GCNRA in
a manner that protects GCNRA values
and purposes pursuant to Public Law
92–593 and in accordance with the 1916
NPS Organic Act.
• The process must utilize The Utah
Standards for Rangeland Health and
Guidelines for Livestock Grazing
Management. The BLM will apply
existing applicable Land Health
Standards to all alternatives.
• The approved GSENM Plan
Amendment will comply with FLPMA,
NEPA, National Historic Preservation
Act, and Council on Environmental
Quality regulations at 40 CFR parts
1500–1508 and Department of the
Interior regulations at 43 CFR part 46
and 43 CFR part 1600; the BLM H–
1601–1 Land Use Planning Handbook;
the 2008 BLM H–1790–1 NEPA
Handbook, and all other applicable
BLM policies and guidance.
• Land use planning decisions must
be consistent with the purpose and
objectives outlined in the presidential
proclamation for the GSENM and the
enabling legislation for GCNRA, as
applicable.
• Socio-economic analysis will use an
accepted input-output quantitative
model such as IMPLAN or RIMSII, and/
or JEDI for analysis.
• The BLM and NPS will review and
use as appropriate current scientific
information, research, technologies, and
results of inventory, monitoring, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:07 Nov 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
coordination to determine appropriate
management strategies.
• The BLM and NPS will coordinate
and communicate with State, local, and
tribal governments to ensure that the
BLM and NPS consider provisions of
pertinent plans, seek to resolve
inconsistencies between State, local,
and Tribal plans, and provide ample
opportunities for State, local, and Tribal
governments to comment on the
development of amendments.
• The Plan Amendment will be based
on the principles of Adaptive
Management.
You may submit comments on issues
and planning criteria in writing to the
BLM at any public scoping meeting, or
you may submit them to the BLM using
one of the methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section above. To be most
helpful, you should submit comments
before the close of the public scoping
period. Before including your address,
phone number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can request we withhold
your personal identifying information
from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
The minutes and list of attendees for
each public scoping meeting will be
available to the public and open for 30
days after the meeting to any participant
who wishes to clarify the views he or
she expressed. The BLM will evaluate
identified issues to be addressed in the
plan amendment, and will place them
into one of three categories:
1. Issues to be resolved in the plan
amendment;
2. Issues to be resolved through policy
or administrative action; or
3. Issues beyond the scope of this plan
amendment.
The BLM will provide an explanation
in the Draft Plan Amendment/EIS as to
why an issue was placed in category
two or three. The public is also
encouraged to help identify any
management questions and concerns
that should be addressed in the plan.
The BLM will work collaboratively with
interested parties to identify the
management decisions that are best
suited to local, regional, and national
needs and concerns.
The BLM will use an interdisciplinary
approach to develop the plan
amendment in order to consider the
variety of issues and concerns
identified. Specialists with expertise in
the following disciplines will be
involved in the planning process:
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66065
rangeland management, botany,
environmental planning and
compliance, ecology, outdoor recreation
and wilderness management, visual
resources, archaeology, paleontology,
wildlife and fisheries, hydrology, soils,
sociology and economics, and public
affairs.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 43 CFR
1610.2.
Jenna Whitlock,
Acting State Director.
[FR Doc. 2013–25924 Filed 11–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCOF00000–L19900000–XZ0000]
Notice of Meeting, Front Range
Resource Advisory Council
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972, the U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) Front Range
Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will
meet as indicated below.
DATES: The meeting will be held from
9:15 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. on November 20
and 21, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Salida Ranger District
Office, 5575 Cleora Road, Salida, CO
81201.
SUMMARY:
Kyle
Sullivan, Front Range RAC Coordinator,
BLM Front Range District Office, 3028
˜
E. Main St., Canon City, CO 81212.
Phone: (719) 269–8553. Email:
ksullivan@blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15member council advises the Secretary of
the Interior, through the BLM, on a
variety of planning and management
issues associated with public land
management in the BLM Front Range
District, which includes the Royal Gorge
Field Office and the San Luis Valley
Field Office. Planned topics of
discussion items include: Introductions
of new RAC members and BLM staff,
recognition of service for outgoing RAC
members, an update from field
managers, and a tour of sage-grouse
habitat on Poncha Pass. The public is
encouraged to make oral comments to
the RAC at 9:45 a.m. on November 20,
or written statements may be submitted
for the council’s consideration.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 213 (Monday, November 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66064-66065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25924]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLUT0300-16100000-LXSS005J0000]
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Livestock Grazing Monument
Management Plan Amendment and Associated Environmental Impact Statement
for the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), as amended, and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act
of 1976 (FLPMA), as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Grand
Staircase-Escalante National Monument (GSENM), Kanab, Utah, intends to
prepare a Livestock Grazing Monument Management Plan Amendment (Plan
Amendment) with an associated Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
This notice announces the beginning of the scoping process to solicit
public comments and identify issues. The Plan Amendment will make land
use-level decisions associated with livestock grazing, thereby amending
the GSENM Management Plan.
DATES: This notice initiates the public scoping process for the Plan
Amendment and associated EIS. Public scoping meetings will be hosted in
the following locations: Kanab, Escalante, and Salt Lake City, Utah.
The date(s) and specific location(s) and any other public involvement
activities will be announced at least 15 days in advance through local
media outlets and on the GSENM Web site at: www.ut.blm.gov/monument.
The public scoping period runs from the issuance of this notice for 60
days or until 30 days after the last public scoping meeting is held,
whichever is later. Comments on issues and planning criteria may be
submitted in writing during this time. In order to be considered in the
Draft Plan Amendment/EIS, all comments must be received prior to the
close of the scoping period. BLM Utah will provide additional
opportunities for public participation upon publication of the Draft
Plan Amendment/EIS.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on issues and planning criteria
related to the GSENM Plan Amendment/EIS by any of the following
methods:
Email: BLM_UT_GS_EIS@blm.gov;
Fax: 435-644-1250; or
Mail: Bureau of Land Management, Grand Staircase-Escalante
National Monument, 669 S. HWY 89-A, Kanab, UT 84741.
Documents pertinent to this planning effort may be examined at the
GSENM Office, 669 S. HWY 89-A, Kanab, Utah.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Betenson, Assistant Monument
Manager, Planning and Support Services; telephone: 435-644-1205;
address: GSENM Office, 669 S. HWY 89-A, Kanab, UT 84741; email: BLM_UT_GS_EIS@blm.gov. Persons who use a telecommunications device for
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
1-800-877-8339 to leave a message or question with the above
individual. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Replies are provided during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document provides notice that the BLM
GSENM intends to prepare a Plan Amendment with an associated EIS and
announces the beginning of the public scoping process to request public
input on issues and planning criteria. Cooperating agencies include the
State of Utah; Garfield County and Kane County, Utah; the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; and the National Park Service (NPS) Glen Canyon
National Recreation Area (GCNRA). The planning area includes all lands
within the GSENM where BLM has livestock grazing management and/or
administrative responsibility. This includes the BLM-Utah lands within
GSENM and additional lands within portions of the Kanab Field Office
(KFO) and the Arizona Strip Field Office (ASFO), as well as lands
managed by NPS in GCNRA where GSENM administers grazing.
Management decisions for lands in the planning area, but outside
the GSENM boundary, will be consistent with the goals and objectives of
the KFO, ASFO, and the GCNRA enabling legislation and management plans,
as appropriate. NPS will also be making a decision for the GCNRA lands
consistent with that area's enabling legislation (Pub. L. 92-593). The
planning area encompasses approximately 2.2 million acres of Federal
lands in Garfield County and Kane County, Utah, and Coconino County,
Arizona. Approximately 68 percent of the planning area is in Kane
County, approximately 32 percent is in Garfield County, and less than 1
percent is in Coconino County. The purpose of the public scoping
process is to determine relevant issues related to livestock grazing
that will influence the scope of the environmental analysis, including
alternatives, and to guide the planning process.
Preliminary issues related to livestock grazing that are likely to
be addressed in the Plan Amendment and EIS include the following:
Effects on GSENM proclamation-identified scientific and
historic objects and values;
Lands available for livestock grazing within the planning
area;
Effects on the resources and values for which GCNRA was
established;
Forage currently available on an area-wide basis for
livestock grazing and
[[Page 66065]]
available for future anticipated demands;
Guidelines and criteria for future allotment-specific
adjustments, such as rotational grazing plans which affect the
livestock use;
Impacts on local custom and culture as well as the area's
economy; and
Management of existing rangeland improvement seedings.
Additional issues will likely be added through the public scoping
process. Planning criteria are the standards, rules, and other factors
developed by managers and interdisciplinary teams for their use in
forming judgments about decision making, analysis, and data collection
during planning. Planning criteria streamline and simplify the resource
management planning actions. The following preliminary criteria will be
considered in the Plan Amendment and EIS process:
The Plan Amendment will be limited to making land use
planning decisions specific to livestock grazing.
Lands addressed in the Plan Amendment will be public lands
managed by the BLM and the NPS.
Grazing within the GCNRA will be administered in a portion
of GCNRA in a manner that protects GCNRA values and purposes pursuant
to Public Law 92-593 and in accordance with the 1916 NPS Organic Act.
The process must utilize The Utah Standards for Rangeland
Health and Guidelines for Livestock Grazing Management. The BLM will
apply existing applicable Land Health Standards to all alternatives.
The approved GSENM Plan Amendment will comply with FLPMA,
NEPA, National Historic Preservation Act, and Council on Environmental
Quality regulations at 40 CFR parts 1500-1508 and Department of the
Interior regulations at 43 CFR part 46 and 43 CFR part 1600; the BLM H-
1601-1 Land Use Planning Handbook; the 2008 BLM H-1790-1 NEPA Handbook,
and all other applicable BLM policies and guidance.
Land use planning decisions must be consistent with the
purpose and objectives outlined in the presidential proclamation for
the GSENM and the enabling legislation for GCNRA, as applicable.
Socio-economic analysis will use an accepted input-output
quantitative model such as IMPLAN or RIMSII, and/or JEDI for analysis.
The BLM and NPS will review and use as appropriate current
scientific information, research, technologies, and results of
inventory, monitoring, and coordination to determine appropriate
management strategies.
The BLM and NPS will coordinate and communicate with
State, local, and tribal governments to ensure that the BLM and NPS
consider provisions of pertinent plans, seek to resolve inconsistencies
between State, local, and Tribal plans, and provide ample opportunities
for State, local, and Tribal governments to comment on the development
of amendments.
The Plan Amendment will be based on the principles of
Adaptive Management.
You may submit comments on issues and planning criteria in writing to
the BLM at any public scoping meeting, or you may submit them to the
BLM using one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section above. To
be most helpful, you should submit comments before the close of the
public scoping period. Before including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including your
personal identifying information--may be made publicly available at any
time. While you can request we withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so. The minutes and list of attendees for each public
scoping meeting will be available to the public and open for 30 days
after the meeting to any participant who wishes to clarify the views he
or she expressed. The BLM will evaluate identified issues to be
addressed in the plan amendment, and will place them into one of three
categories:
1. Issues to be resolved in the plan amendment;
2. Issues to be resolved through policy or administrative action;
or
3. Issues beyond the scope of this plan amendment.
The BLM will provide an explanation in the Draft Plan Amendment/EIS
as to why an issue was placed in category two or three. The public is
also encouraged to help identify any management questions and concerns
that should be addressed in the plan. The BLM will work collaboratively
with interested parties to identify the management decisions that are
best suited to local, regional, and national needs and concerns.
The BLM will use an interdisciplinary approach to develop the plan
amendment in order to consider the variety of issues and concerns
identified. Specialists with expertise in the following disciplines
will be involved in the planning process: rangeland management, botany,
environmental planning and compliance, ecology, outdoor recreation and
wilderness management, visual resources, archaeology, paleontology,
wildlife and fisheries, hydrology, soils, sociology and economics, and
public affairs.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 43 CFR 1610.2.
Jenna Whitlock,
Acting State Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-25924 Filed 11-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-P