Notice of Availability of the Utah Greater Sage-Grouse Draft Land Use Plan Amendments and Environmental Impact Statement, 65700-65701 [2013-26221]
Download as PDF
65700
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Notices
any project Conditions of Approval.
Availability of the ROD will be
announced through local media and the
project mailing list, and will be posted
on the project Web site.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10)
Donald A. Simpson,
State Director, Wyoming.
[FR Doc. 2013–25923 Filed 10–31–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLUT1110000.L16100000.DS0000]
Notice of Availability of the Utah
Greater Sage-Grouse Draft Land Use
Plan Amendments and Environmental
Impact Statement
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976, as amended, the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) and U.S.
Forest Service (USFS) have prepared a
Utah Greater Sage-Grouse Draft Land
Use Plan (LUP) Amendments and
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and by this notice is announcing the
opening of the comment period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be
considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the Draft LUP
Amendments/EIS within 90 days
following the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes notice of
the Draft LUP Amendments/EIS in the
Federal Register. The BLM and USFS
will announce future meetings or
hearings and any other public
participation activities at least 15 days
in advance through public notices,
media releases, and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments related to the Utah
Greater Sage-Grouse Draft LUP
Amendments/EIS by any of the
following methods:
• Email: blm_ut_comments@blm.gov
• Fax: 801–539–4074
• Mail: BLM—Greater Sage-Grouse EIS,
440 West 200 South, Suite 500, Salt
Lake City, UT 84101–1345
Copies of the Utah Greater Sage-Grouse
Draft LUP Amendments/EIS are
available at the BLM Utah State Office
at the above address or on the Internet
at: https://www.blm.gov/ut/st/en/prog/
planning/SG_RMP_rev.html.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:40 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Quincy Bahr, Greater Sage-Grouse
Project Manager/Environmental
Coordinator, telephone 801–539–4122
or Tyler Ashcroft, Environmental
Coordinator, telephone 801–539–4068.
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to leave a
message or question for the above
individual. The FIRS is available 24
hours a day, 7 days a week. Replies are
provided during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM
prepared the Utah Greater Sage-Grouse
Draft LUP Amendments/EIS to address
a range of alternatives focused on
specific conservation measures across
the Utah range of the Greater SageGrouse. This Draft LUP Amendments/
EIS is one of 15 separate planning
efforts that are being undertaken as part
of the BLM and USFS National Greater
Sage-Grouse Planning Strategy. Since
December 2011, the BLM has invited 56
local, State, Federal, and tribal
governments to participate as
cooperating agencies (CA) in the Utah
Greater Sage-Grouse Draft LUP
Amendments/EIS. Twenty-six of the
governments have participated as CAs
including the USFS, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), National
Resource Conservation Service, State of
Utah, and the State of Wyoming.
The Draft LUP Amendments/EIS
proposes to amend the LUPs for the
Vernal, Price, Richfield, Kanab, Grand
Staircase-Escalante National
Mounument, Cedar/Beaver/Garfield/
Antimony, Pinyon, Warm Springs,
House Range, Pony Express, Box Elder,
Randolph, Park City, and Salt Lake
District Isolated Tracts resource or
planning areas. The Draft LUP
Amendments/EIS will also be used to
amend the LUPs for the Dixie, Fishlake,
Uinta-Wasatch-Cache, Ashley, and
Manti-La Sal National Forests. The
current management decisions for
resources are described in the following
LUPs:
• Vernal Resource Management Plan
(RMP) (2008)
• Price RMP (2008)
• Richfield RMP (2008)
• Kanab RMP (2008)
• Grand Staircase-Escalante National
Monument Management Plan (2000)
• Cedar/Beaver/Garfield/Antimony
RMP (1986)
• Pinyon Management Framework Plan
(MFP) (1978)
• Warm Springs RMP (1987)
• House Range RMP (1987)
• Pony Express RMP (1990)
• Box Elder RMP (1986)
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Randolph MFP (1980)
• Park City MFP (1975)
• Salt Lake District Isolated Tracts
Planning Analysis (1985)
• Dixie National Forest Land and
Resource Management Plan (LRMP)
(1986)
• Fishlake National Forest LRMP (1986)
• Uinta National Forest Revised Forest
Plan (2003)
• Wasatch-Cache National Forest
Revised Forest Plan (2003)
• Ashley National Forest LRMP (1986)
• Manti-La Sal National Forest LRMP
(1986)
The planning area includes
approximately 48 million acres of BLM,
National Park Service, USFS, Bureau of
Reclamation, State, local, and private
lands located in Utah. It consists of all
lands in the State of Utah, minus
Washington and San Juan counties and
the portions of the Sawtooth National
Forest located in Box Elder County. The
planning area also includes portions of
the Ashley and Uinta-Wasatch-Cache
National Forests that extend into
Wyoming. Within the planning area, the
BLM and USFS administer
approximately 3.3 million surface acres.
The BLM also administers
approximately 4 million acres of Federal
subsurface mineral estate underlying
occupied Greater Sage-Grouse habitat.
Surface management decisions made as
a result of this Draft LUP Amendment/
EIS will apply only to the BLMadministered and National Forest
System lands in the planning area.
Through this land use planning process,
the BLM and USFS will identify Greater
Sage-Grouse preliminary priority
management areas (PPMA) and
preliminary general management areas
(PGMA).
PPMAs are BLM-administered public
lands or National Forest System lands
identified as having the highest value to
maintaining sustainable Greater SageGrouse populations. PGMAs are BLMadministered public lands or National
Forest System lands that are not as
biologically important as PPMAs. In
addition to considering which lands
will be managed as PPMAs and PGMAs,
each alternative considers a unique set
of objectives and management actions.
The formal public scoping process for
the Draft LUP Amendments/EIS began
on December 9, 2011, with the
publication of a Notice of Intent in the
Federal Register (76 FR 77008), and
ended on March 23, 2012. The BLM
held eight scoping open houses in
January and February 2012. The BLM
used comments received during public
scoping to help identify planning issues
that would direct the formulation of
alternatives and frame the scope of
E:\FR\FM\01NON1.SGM
01NON1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Notices
analysis for the Draft LUP Amendments/
EIS. The public scoping process was
also used to introduce the public to
preliminary planning criteria, which set
limits on the scope of the Draft LUP
Amendment/EIS. Major issues
considered in the Draft LUP
Amendments/EIS include Greater SageGrouse, energy and mineral
development, lands and realty
(including rights-of-way), wildfire,
vegetation management (including
invasive species and conifer
encroachment), livestock grazing,
recreation and travel management, and
socioeconomics.
The Draft LUP Amendments/EIS
evaluates five alternatives in detail,
including a No Action Alternative
(Alternative A) and four action
alternatives (Alternatives B, C, D, and
E). Alternative A would retain the
management goals, objectives, and
direction specified in the current LUPs
for each resource or planning area.
Alternative B includes conservation
measures from the Sage-Grouse National
Technical Team Report. Alternative C
includes conservation measures that
various conservation groups submitted
to the BLM during the public scoping
process and includes proposed Areas of
Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC).
Alternative D includes conservation
measures developed by the BLM Utah in
coordination with the local USFWS and
the USFS Intermountain Region (Region
4). Alternative E is based on the State of
Utah’s Conservation Plan for Greater
Sage-Grouse in Utah and the State of
Wyoming’s Governor’s Executive Order
2011–05 and 2013–3.
The BLM and USFS have identified
Alternative D as the preferred
alternative. Identification of this
alternative does not represent the final
agency decision. The Proposed LUP
Amendments/Final EIS may include
objectives and actions contained in any
of the alternatives analyzed in the Draft
LUP Amendment/EIS.
Pursuant to 43 CFR 1610.7–2(b), this
notice announces a concurrent public
comment period on proposed Areas of
Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC).
As part of this planning process, fifteen
ACECs are proposed in Alternative C.
The proposed Greater-Sage-Grouse
ACECs include:
• Three Corners/Browns Park—50,100
acres
• Diamond Mountain—110,300 acres
• Little Mountain/Halfway Hollow—
60,700 acres
• Blue Mountain—18,900 acres
• Parker Mountain—201,800 acres
• Southern Mountain Valleys—105,300
acres
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:40 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
•
•
•
•
Buckskin Valley—34,900 acres
Black Mountains—256,800 acres
Southern Great Basin—101,000 acres
Sheep Creek Mountains—316,700
acres
• Ibapah—47,000 acres
• Box Elder/Grouse Creek—364,100
acres
• Rich County—166,600 acres
Under Alternative C, the following
management prescriptions would apply
to all Greater Sage-Grouse habitat,
within the proposed ACECs: Closed to
new mineral leasing; unsuitable for new
surface coal mining; closed to new
mineral material disposal;
recommended for withdrawal from
mineral entry; designated as a right-ofway (ROW) exclusion area; and,
unavailable for livestock grazing.
Additionally, within the proposed
ACECs, the following management
would apply:
• Prioritize withdrawal from mineral
location and make existing claims
within the proposed ACECs subject to
validity patent examinations;
• Require Plans of Operations for any
Notice-level locatable mineral
development per 43 CFR 3809
regulations; and
• Prioritize the removal of un-needed
infrastructure, including mining or
ROW equipment, roads, range
developments and fencing.
Please note that public comments and
information submitted including names,
street addresses and email addresses of
persons who submit comments will be
available for public review and
disclosure at the above address during
regular business hours (7:45 a.m.–4:30
p.m.), Monday through Friday, except
holidays.
Before including an address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in any
comments, be aware that the entire
comment—including personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. Requests
to withhold personal identifying
information from public review, may be
submitted, but the BLM cannot
guarantee that it will be able to do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10,
43 CFR 1610.2.
Jenna Whitlock,
Associate State Director.
[FR Doc. 2013–26221 Filed 10–31–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65701
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLNV930000. L11100000.DS0000.
LXSISGST0000.13X; 13–08807; MO#
4500055596]
Notice of Availability of the Nevada
and Northeastern California Greater
Sage-Grouse Draft Land Use Plan
Amendments and Draft Environmental
Impact Statement
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976, as amended, the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) and U.S.
Forest Service (USFS) have prepared a
Nevada and Northeastern California
Sub-region Greater Sage-Grouse Draft
Land Use Plan (LUP) Amendments and
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) and by this notice is announcing
the opening of the comment period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be
considered, the BLM and USFS must
receive written comments on the Draft
LUP Amendments/Draft EIS within 90
days following the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes its notice of the Draft LUP
Amendments/Draft EIS in the Federal
Register. The BLM and USFS will
announce future workshops and any
other public participation activities at
least 15 days in advance through public
notices, media releases, and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments related to the Nevada and
Northeastern California Sub-region
Greater Sage-Grouse Draft LUP
Amendments/Draft EIS by any of the
following methods:
• Web site: https://on.doi.gov/
14ZD3Rb.
• Email: blm_nv_ca_sagegrouse_eis_
comments@blm.gov.
• Mail: BLM—Greater Sage Grouse
EIS, Attn: Joe Tague, 1340 Financial
Blvd. Reno, NV 89502.
Copies of the Nevada and
Northeastern California Sub-region
Greater Sage-Grouse Draft LUP
Amendments/Draft EIS are available on
the Web at: https://www.blm.gov/nv/st/
en/prog/wildlife/greater_sagegrouse.html. Copies are also available at
BLM and USFS offices throughout the
subregion. For a list of these offices,
please see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Tague, Project Manager, telephone 775–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01NON1.SGM
01NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 212 (Friday, November 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65700-65701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26221]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLUT1110000.L16100000.DS0000]
Notice of Availability of the Utah Greater Sage-Grouse Draft Land
Use Plan Amendments and Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act
of 1976, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and U.S.
Forest Service (USFS) have prepared a Utah Greater Sage-Grouse Draft
Land Use Plan (LUP) Amendments and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and by this notice is announcing the opening of the comment period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the Draft LUP Amendments/EIS within 90 days
following the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes notice
of the Draft LUP Amendments/EIS in the Federal Register. The BLM and
USFS will announce future meetings or hearings and any other public
participation activities at least 15 days in advance through public
notices, media releases, and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments related to the Utah
Greater Sage-Grouse Draft LUP Amendments/EIS by any of the following
methods:
Email: blm_ut_comments@blm.gov
Fax: 801-539-4074
Mail: BLM--Greater Sage-Grouse EIS, 440 West 200 South, Suite
500, Salt Lake City, UT 84101-1345
Copies of the Utah Greater Sage-Grouse Draft LUP Amendments/EIS are
available at the BLM Utah State Office at the above address or on the
Internet at: https://www.blm.gov/ut/st/en/prog/planning/SG_RMP_rev.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Quincy Bahr, Greater Sage-Grouse
Project Manager/Environmental Coordinator, telephone 801-539-4122 or
Tyler Ashcroft, Environmental Coordinator, telephone 801-539-4068.
Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call
the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to leave
a message or question for the above individual. The FIRS is available
24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Replies are provided during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM prepared the Utah Greater Sage-
Grouse Draft LUP Amendments/EIS to address a range of alternatives
focused on specific conservation measures across the Utah range of the
Greater Sage-Grouse. This Draft LUP Amendments/EIS is one of 15
separate planning efforts that are being undertaken as part of the BLM
and USFS National Greater Sage-Grouse Planning Strategy. Since December
2011, the BLM has invited 56 local, State, Federal, and tribal
governments to participate as cooperating agencies (CA) in the Utah
Greater Sage-Grouse Draft LUP Amendments/EIS. Twenty-six of the
governments have participated as CAs including the USFS, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), National Resource Conservation Service, State
of Utah, and the State of Wyoming.
The Draft LUP Amendments/EIS proposes to amend the LUPs for the
Vernal, Price, Richfield, Kanab, Grand Staircase-Escalante National
Mounument, Cedar/Beaver/Garfield/Antimony, Pinyon, Warm Springs, House
Range, Pony Express, Box Elder, Randolph, Park City, and Salt Lake
District Isolated Tracts resource or planning areas. The Draft LUP
Amendments/EIS will also be used to amend the LUPs for the Dixie,
Fishlake, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache, Ashley, and Manti-La Sal National
Forests. The current management decisions for resources are described
in the following LUPs:
Vernal Resource Management Plan (RMP) (2008)
Price RMP (2008)
Richfield RMP (2008)
Kanab RMP (2008)
Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Management Plan
(2000)
Cedar/Beaver/Garfield/Antimony RMP (1986)
Pinyon Management Framework Plan (MFP) (1978)
Warm Springs RMP (1987)
House Range RMP (1987)
Pony Express RMP (1990)
Box Elder RMP (1986)
Randolph MFP (1980)
Park City MFP (1975)
Salt Lake District Isolated Tracts Planning Analysis (1985)
Dixie National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP)
(1986)
Fishlake National Forest LRMP (1986)
Uinta National Forest Revised Forest Plan (2003)
Wasatch-Cache National Forest Revised Forest Plan (2003)
Ashley National Forest LRMP (1986)
Manti-La Sal National Forest LRMP (1986)
The planning area includes approximately 48 million acres of BLM,
National Park Service, USFS, Bureau of Reclamation, State, local, and
private lands located in Utah. It consists of all lands in the State of
Utah, minus Washington and San Juan counties and the portions of the
Sawtooth National Forest located in Box Elder County. The planning area
also includes portions of the Ashley and Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National
Forests that extend into Wyoming. Within the planning area, the BLM and
USFS administer approximately 3.3 million surface acres. The BLM also
administers approximately 4 million acres of Federal subsurface mineral
estate underlying occupied Greater Sage-Grouse habitat. Surface
management decisions made as a result of this Draft LUP Amendment/EIS
will apply only to the BLM-administered and National Forest System
lands in the planning area. Through this land use planning process, the
BLM and USFS will identify Greater Sage-Grouse preliminary priority
management areas (PPMA) and preliminary general management areas
(PGMA).
PPMAs are BLM-administered public lands or National Forest System
lands identified as having the highest value to maintaining sustainable
Greater Sage-Grouse populations. PGMAs are BLM-administered public
lands or National Forest System lands that are not as biologically
important as PPMAs. In addition to considering which lands will be
managed as PPMAs and PGMAs, each alternative considers a unique set of
objectives and management actions.
The formal public scoping process for the Draft LUP Amendments/EIS
began on December 9, 2011, with the publication of a Notice of Intent
in the Federal Register (76 FR 77008), and ended on March 23, 2012. The
BLM held eight scoping open houses in January and February 2012. The
BLM used comments received during public scoping to help identify
planning issues that would direct the formulation of alternatives and
frame the scope of
[[Page 65701]]
analysis for the Draft LUP Amendments/EIS. The public scoping process
was also used to introduce the public to preliminary planning criteria,
which set limits on the scope of the Draft LUP Amendment/EIS. Major
issues considered in the Draft LUP Amendments/EIS include Greater Sage-
Grouse, energy and mineral development, lands and realty (including
rights-of-way), wildfire, vegetation management (including invasive
species and conifer encroachment), livestock grazing, recreation and
travel management, and socioeconomics.
The Draft LUP Amendments/EIS evaluates five alternatives in detail,
including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A) and four action
alternatives (Alternatives B, C, D, and E). Alternative A would retain
the management goals, objectives, and direction specified in the
current LUPs for each resource or planning area. Alternative B includes
conservation measures from the Sage-Grouse National Technical Team
Report. Alternative C includes conservation measures that various
conservation groups submitted to the BLM during the public scoping
process and includes proposed Areas of Critical Environmental Concern
(ACEC). Alternative D includes conservation measures developed by the
BLM Utah in coordination with the local USFWS and the USFS
Intermountain Region (Region 4). Alternative E is based on the State of
Utah's Conservation Plan for Greater Sage-Grouse in Utah and the State
of Wyoming's Governor's Executive Order 2011-05 and 2013-3.
The BLM and USFS have identified Alternative D as the preferred
alternative. Identification of this alternative does not represent the
final agency decision. The Proposed LUP Amendments/Final EIS may
include objectives and actions contained in any of the alternatives
analyzed in the Draft LUP Amendment/EIS.
Pursuant to 43 CFR 1610.7-2(b), this notice announces a concurrent
public comment period on proposed Areas of Critical Environmental
Concern (ACEC). As part of this planning process, fifteen ACECs are
proposed in Alternative C. The proposed Greater-Sage-Grouse ACECs
include:
Three Corners/Browns Park--50,100 acres
Diamond Mountain--110,300 acres
Little Mountain/Halfway Hollow--60,700 acres
Blue Mountain--18,900 acres
Parker Mountain--201,800 acres
Southern Mountain Valleys--105,300 acres
Buckskin Valley--34,900 acres
Black Mountains--256,800 acres
Southern Great Basin--101,000 acres
Sheep Creek Mountains--316,700 acres
Ibapah--47,000 acres
Box Elder/Grouse Creek--364,100 acres
Rich County--166,600 acres
Under Alternative C, the following management prescriptions would
apply to all Greater Sage-Grouse habitat, within the proposed ACECs:
Closed to new mineral leasing; unsuitable for new surface coal mining;
closed to new mineral material disposal; recommended for withdrawal
from mineral entry; designated as a right-of-way (ROW) exclusion area;
and, unavailable for livestock grazing. Additionally, within the
proposed ACECs, the following management would apply:
Prioritize withdrawal from mineral location and make
existing claims within the proposed ACECs subject to validity patent
examinations;
Require Plans of Operations for any Notice-level locatable
mineral development per 43 CFR 3809 regulations; and
Prioritize the removal of un-needed infrastructure,
including mining or ROW equipment, roads, range developments and
fencing.
Please note that public comments and information submitted
including names, street addresses and email addresses of persons who
submit comments will be available for public review and disclosure at
the above address during regular business hours (7:45 a.m.-4:30 p.m.),
Monday through Friday, except holidays.
Before including an address, phone number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in any comments, be aware that the
entire comment--including personal identifying information--may be made
publicly available at any time. Requests to withhold personal
identifying information from public review, may be submitted, but the
BLM cannot guarantee that it will be able to do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2.
Jenna Whitlock,
Associate State Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-26221 Filed 10-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-P