Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program, and William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program, 65767-65842 [2013-25331]
Download as PDF
Vol. 78
Friday,
No. 212
November 1, 2013
Part II
Department of Education
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
34 CFR Parts 668, 674, 682, and 685
Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program,
Federal Family Education Loan Program, and William D. Ford Federal
Direct Loan Program; Final Rule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65768
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Parts 668, 674, 682, and 685
RIN 1840–AD12
[Docket ID ED–2013–OPE–0063]
Student Assistance General
Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan
Program, Federal Family Education
Loan Program, and William D. Ford
Federal Direct Loan Program
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Final regulations.
AGENCY:
The Secretary amends the
Student Assistance General Provisions,
Federal Perkins Loan (Perkins Loan)
Program, Federal Family Education
Loan (FFEL) Program, and William D.
Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct Loan)
Program regulations. These final
regulations will: Amend the FFEL and
Direct Loan program regulations to
reflect changes made to the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended
(HEA), by the SAFRA Act included in
the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010; incorporate
statutory changes to interest rates and
other recent statutory changes in the
Direct Loan Program regulations;
update, strengthen, and clarify various
areas of the Student Assistance General
Provisions, Perkins Loan, FFEL, and
Direct Loan program regulations; and
provide for greater consistency in the
regulations governing the title IV, HEA
student loan programs. These final
regulations will ensure that the title IV,
HEA Federal student aid programs
operate as efficiently as possible.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations
are effective July 1, 2014.
Implementation dates: For
implementation dates, see the
Implementation Date of These
Regulations section of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information related to loan
rehabilitation reasonable and affordable
payments, contact Brian Smith or
Pamela Moran at (202)–502–7551 or
(202)–502–7732 or by email at:
Brian.Smith@ed.gov or Pamela.Moran@
ed.gov. For further information related
to administrative wage garnishment,
contact Nathan Arnold or Pamela Moran
at (202)–219–7134 or (202)–502–7732 or
by email at: Nathan.Arnold@ed.gov or
Pamela.Moran@ed.gov. For further
information related to Federal Perkins
Loan program changes, contact Gail
McLarnon or Brian Smith at (202)–219–
7048 or (202)–502–7551 or by email at:
Gail.McLarnon@ed.gov or Brian.Smith@
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
ed.gov. For further information related
to Direct Loan program changes, contact
Gail McLarnon, Jon Utz, or Pamela
Moran at (202)–219–7048, (202)–377–
4040, or (202)–502–7732 or by email at:
Gail.McLarnon@ed.gov, Jon.Utz@ed.gov,
or Pamela.Moran@ed.gov. For further
information on FFEL program changes,
contact Pamela Moran or Nathan Arnold
at (202)–502–7732 or 202–219–7134 or
by email at: Pamela.Moran@ed.gov or
Nathan.Arnold@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary:
Purpose of This Regulatory Action:
These final regulations address issues
arising from the changes made to the
HEA by the SAFRA Act, included in the
Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111–
152). The SAFRA Act ended the
origination of new loans under the FFEL
Program after June 30, 2010. With this
change, all new Stafford, PLUS, and
Consolidation loans with a first
disbursement on or after July 1, 2010,
are now made under the Direct Loan
Program. Because all new loans are
being made under the Direct Loan
Program, these final regulations amend
the FFEL Program regulations in 34 CFR
part 682 by removing provisions related
to the making of new loans. The final
regulations also reflect changes made to
interest rates in the Direct Loan program
by the Bipartisan Student Loan
Certainty Act of 2013 (Pub. L. 113–28).
In addition, the regulations amend the
Direct Loan Program regulations in 34
CFR part 685 by adding detailed
regulations in areas where the Direct
Loan Program regulations crossreference the FFEL Program regulations.
The regulations also strengthen and
clarify provisions of the Perkins Loan,
FFEL, and Direct Loan program
regulations including, but not limited
to, regulations governing: deferments,
forbearances, loan cancellation,
rehabilitation of defaulted loans,
administrative wage garnishment, and
satisfactory repayment arrangements.
The regulations also make the rules
governing the various title IV, HEA loan
programs more consistent.
Summary of the Major Provisions of
This Regulatory Action: The final
regulations—
• Raise the participation rate index
ceiling applicable to institutions that
have a single three-year cohort default
rate of over 40 percent for purposes of
challenges to, and appeals from,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
sanctions based on that default rate. (34
CFR 668.204(c) and 668.214(a) and (d))
• Clarify the Perkins Loan, FFEL, and
Direct Loan program regulations to
provide that a borrower who makes six
payments in the course of rehabilitating
a defaulted loan, but who does not seek
additional title IV aid, will not be
considered to have used the one-timeonly opportunity to regain title IV
eligibility by making satisfactory
repayment arrangements. The
regulations also define the term
‘‘satisfactory repayment arrangement’’
more consistently across the title IV,
HEA loan programs. (34 CFR 674.2(b),
674.9(k), 682.200(b), 685.102(b), and
685.200(d))
• Amend the closed school discharge
provisions in the Perkins Loan, FFEL,
and Direct Loan program regulations to
specify that a borrower may qualify for
a loan discharge if the borrower
withdrew from school not more than
120 days before the school closed,
instead of the current 90-day standard.
The regulations also add examples of
the types of exceptional circumstances
under which the Department may
extend the 120-day window. (34 CFR
674.33(g), 682.402(d), and 685.214)
• Update the FFEL and Direct Loan
program enrollment status reporting
requirements for institutions to reflect
current processes and eliminate obsolete
terms and procedures. The regulations
also add comparable enrollment status
reporting provisions to the Perkins Loan
Program regulations. (34 CFR 674.19(f),
682.605, 682.610(c), and 685.309(b))
• Revise the terms under which a
guaranty agency in the FFEL Program
may authorize a lender to grant
forbearance to permit a borrower or
endorser to resume honoring the
agreement to repay a debt after default
but prior to claim payment to require
either a signed written agreement to
repay or an oral affirmation of the
borrower’s or endorser’s obligation to
repay the debt. The regulations provide
that if a forbearance is granted based on
the borrower’s or endorser’s oral request
and affirmation of the obligation, the
forbearance is limited to 120 days and
cannot be granted for consecutive
periods. In addition, the lender must
orally review with the borrower the
terms and conditions of the forbearance
and send a notice to the borrower or
endorser that confirms the terms of the
forbearance. The regulations also define
the term ‘‘affirmation.’’ Finally, the
regulations also add comparable
provisions to the Direct Loan Program
regulations. (34 CFR 682.211(d) and
685.205(a)(8))
• Require that lenders grant
forbearance to FFEL borrowers who are
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
performing service that qualifies them
for loan repayment under the
Department of Defense student loan
repayment programs in addition to the
program authorized by 10 U.S.C. 2171
(which is currently referenced in the
regulations). A comparable forbearance
provision is added to the Direct Loan
Program regulations. (34 CFR 682.211(h)
and 685.205(a)(9))
• Authorize a lender to grant an
administrative forbearance to a FFEL
borrower who is delinquent at the
beginning of an authorized period of
forbearance and add a corresponding
provision to the Direct Loan Program
regulations. (34 CFR 682.211(f) and
685.205(b)(2))
• Provide that the Secretary, in both
the FFEL and Direct Loan programs, and
the guaranty agency, in the FFEL
Program, once the rehabilitation
discussion has begun, initially considers
a borrower’s reasonable and affordable
loan rehabilitation payment amount to
equal 15 percent of the amount by
which the borrower’s Adjusted Gross
Income (AGI) exceeds 150 percent of the
poverty guideline amount applicable to
the borrower’s family size and State,
divided by 12. If the amount determined
using this calculation is less than $5, the
borrower’s monthly rehabilitation
payment is $5. (34 CFR 682.405(b) and
685.211(f))
• Specify in the FFEL and Direct
Loan program regulations that a
reasonable and affordable loan
rehabilitation payment amount must not
be a required minimum payment
(except that a payment amount
calculated as described in the
immediately preceding paragraph may
not be less than $5), a percentage of the
borrower’s total loan balance, or an
amount based on other criteria
unrelated to the borrower’s total
financial circumstances. (Note that these
changes to the loan rehabilitation
reasonable and affordable payment
amount calculation do not prohibit the
Secretary, his designee, or a guaranty
agency from discussing other payment
arrangements with the borrower,
including payment of the full defaulted
loan balance or payment of the
defaulted loan through consolidation,
outside of the context of the loan
rehabilitation program and its
associated requirements.) (34 CFR
682.405(b) and 685.211(f))
• Require that the Secretary, in the
FFEL and Direct Loan programs, or the
guaranty agency, in the FFEL Program,
provide the borrower with a written
rehabilitation agreement within 15
business days of the determination of
the borrower’s reasonable and affordable
payment amount along with a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
comprehensive description of the
borrower’s rights, the terms and
conditions of the payments, the effects
of loan rehabilitation, and, for a FFEL
borrower, the treatment of unpaid
collection costs. (34 CFR 682.405(b) and
685.211(f))
• Provide that, if the borrower objects
to the initial payment amount
determined by the Secretary or the
guaranty agency, the Secretary or the
guaranty agency will recalculate the
amount of the borrower’s rehabilitation
payment based on the borrower’s and, if
applicable, the borrower’s spouse’s
current disposable income, family size,
and reasonable and necessary expenses.
The information about income and
expenses needed to determine the
alternative reasonable and affordable
payment amount will be provided by
the borrower to the Secretary or the
guaranty agency on a form approved by
the Secretary and, if requested, with
supporting documentation from the
borrower or other sources. (34 CFR
682.405(b) and 685.211(f))
• Provide that, while the borrower is
making payments under a rehabilitation
agreement, the Secretary and the
guaranty agency will limit contact with
the borrower to collection activities
required by law or regulation and
communications that support the
rehabilitation. (34 CFR 682.405(b) and
685.211(f))
• Amend the Direct Loan and FFEL
program regulations to provide that,
when a loan is being collected by
administrative wage garnishment
(AWG), the Secretary or the guaranty
agency, respectively, will suspend AWG
after the borrower makes five qualifying
monthly payments under a loan
rehabilitation agreement, unless the
borrower requests that AWG continue.
(34 CFR 682.405(a) and 685.211(f))
• Incorporate into the Perkins Loan
Program the same eligibility criteria
used in the Direct Loan and FFEL
programs to define an ‘‘eligible graduate
fellowship program’’ and to establish
the eligibility of a Perkins Loan
borrower for a graduate fellowship
deferment. (34 CFR 674.34(f))
• Eliminate the debt-to-income
economic hardship deferment category
in the Perkins Loan Program. (34 CFR
674.34(e))
• Modify the rehabilitation provisions
in the Perkins Loan Program regulations
to define the term ‘‘on-time’’ as it relates
to the series of payments required to
successfully rehabilitate a defaulted
loan. (34 CFR 674.39(a)(2))
• Allow assignment of a Perkins Loan
to the Secretary without the borrower’s
Social Security Number if the loan was
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65769
made before September 13, 1982. (34
CFR 674.50(e)(1))
• Permit a Perkins Loan borrower
who is unable to complete the second
half of an academic year of teaching due
to a condition covered under the Family
and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) to still
count that year as eligible teaching
service for loan cancellation purposes, if
the borrower’s employer considers the
borrower to have fulfilled the teacher
contract requirements for that academic
year. (34 CFR 674.52(c)(1))
• Permit a Perkins Loan borrower
who is unable to complete a full year of
eligible public service due to a
condition that is covered under the
FMLA to count that year as a full year
of public service for loan cancellation
purposes if the borrower completes at
least six months of consecutive eligible
service. (34 CFR 674.52(c)(2))
• Specify that, if a Perkins Loan
borrower who is performing service that
qualifies the borrower for loan
cancellation at a cancellation rate
progression of 15 percent for the first
and second years of qualifying service,
20 percent for the third and fourth years
of qualifying service, and 30 percent for
the fifth year of qualifying service, takes
a job in a different field that qualifies
the borrower under a different
cancellation category that provides loan
cancellation at the same cancellation
rate progression as the prior category,
the borrower’s cancellation rate under
the new cancellation category will
continue from the last year the borrower
received a cancellation under the former
cancellation category, rather than
starting over at the first-year
cancellation rate. (34 CFR 674.52(g))
• Change the timeframe for FFEL
lenders to send the required repayment
disclosure for borrowers who are 60
days delinquent from five calendar days
to five business days after the date the
borrower becomes 60 days delinquent.
(34 CFR 682.205(a)(5))
• Amend the FFEL Program
regulations to provide that a lender does
not have to send a repayment disclosure
to a borrower who is having difficulty
making payments if the borrower’s
difficulty has been resolved through
contact resulting from an earlier
disclosure or from other contact
between the lender and the borrower.
(34 CFR 682.205(a)(4))
• Amend the regulations governing
AWG to reflect the borrower’s right to
request a hearing on the enforceability
of the debt and to allow the borrower to
object to the amount or rate of AWG
withholding if such withholding would
cause financial hardship to the
borrower. (34 CFR 682.410(b)(9))
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65770
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
• Revise the regulations governing
AWG to conform the requirements for
borrowers whose defaulted loans are
held by a guaranty agency to the rules
and procedures used by the Secretary.
(34 CFR 682.410(b)(9))
• Amend the regulations governing
AWG to incorporate existing policy
guidance related to third-party servicers
or collection contractors retained by
guaranty agencies. (34 CFR
682.410(b)(9))
• Amend the regulations governing
AWG to more clearly describe the
process, from the initial garnishment
notice to withholding. (34 CFR
682.410(b)(9))
• Amend the regulations governing
AWG to better reflect due process
requirements and to specify the
functions, delegations of authority,
recordkeeping requirements, and
permissible activities of guaranty
agencies and third-party servicers or
collection contractors. (34 CFR
682.410(b)(9))
• Clarify the limitations on the
amount that may be subject to AWG if
a guaranty agency is garnishing pay
from a borrower who is not already
subject to a withholding order or from
a borrower who is already subject to one
or more withholding orders. The
regulations will also permit a greater
amount or percentage to be withheld
with the borrower’s consent. (34 CFR
682.410(b)(9))
• Require that for a borrower to
receive a hearing before AWG begins,
the borrower’s written request for a
hearing must be received on or before
the 30th day following the date the
garnishment notice was sent, and
remove a rule providing that a borrower
is considered to have received a
garnishment notice five days following
the date of the notice. (34 CFR
682.410(b)(9))
• Provide that if a borrower’s written
request for a hearing is received by the
guaranty agency after the 30th day
following the date of the garnishment
notice, the agency must provide the
borrower a hearing and issue a decision
within 60 days following receipt of the
request. If a decision is not rendered
within 60 days, the guaranty agency
must suspend the order beginning on
the 61st day after the hearing request
was received until a hearing is provided
and a decision is rendered. (34 CFR
682.410(b)(9))
• Amend the FFEL Program
regulations to: specify the contents of an
AWG notice; describe how an AWG
hearing is administered, including
provisions for the submission of
additional evidence and the granting of
continuances; provide for the
withholding order to end by either
rescission or full recovery of amounts
owed by the borrower; and clarify that
a borrower who wishes to object that he
or she is not subject to garnishment
because of involuntary separation bears
the burden of raising and proving that
claim. (34 CFR 682.410(b)(9))
• Eliminate provisions in the FFEL
Program regulations governing loan
origination and disbursement and
related requirements and activities
except for certain school-based
requirements and related activities. (34
CFR Part 682)
• Eliminate obsolete provisions that
do not reflect the current procedures in
the FFEL Program. (34 CFR Part 682)
• Make necessary conforming
changes in various FFEL Program
provisions to update the regulations. (34
CFR Part 682)
• In the Direct Loan Program
regulations, modify the exception to the
minimum loan period requirement for
clock-hour and certain non-standard
term programs that allows a school, in
certain transfer student situations, to
originate a loan for a period shorter than
the lesser of the academic year or
program length only if the school
accepts credit or clock hours from the
school that the student was previously
attending. The regulations remove the
provision that limits this exception to
situations in which the school into
which the student transfers accepts
credit or clock hours from the prior
school. (34 CFR 685.301(a)(10))
• Add detailed regulations to 34 CFR
part 685 in areas where the Direct Loan
Program regulations cross-reference the
FFEL Program regulations. (34 CFR Part
685)
• Remove obsolete provisions that do
not reflect current procedures used in
administering the Direct Loan Program.
(34 CFR Part 685)
• Revise the Direct Loan Program
regulations to reflect the impact of the
SAFRA Act, the Bipartisan Student
Loan Certainty Act of 2013, and other
recent statutory changes. (34 CFR Part
685)
Chart 1 summarizes the final
regulations and related benefits, costs,
and transfers that are discussed in more
detail in the Regulatory Impact Analysis
section of this preamble. Significant
benefits of these final regulations
include a clearer process for
determining a reasonable and affordable
payment for loan rehabilitation that
should result in more consistent
treatment of borrowers, the elimination
of FFEL Program regulations that are no
longer needed, the expansion of the
period during which a borrower who
withdraws from a school prior to its
closure may qualify for a closed school
discharge, and additional changes to
promote transparency and efficiency in
the administration of the Federal
student loan programs. The estimated
net budget impact of the regulations is
$2.8 to $3.4 million over ten years from
2013–2022, driven by the expansion of
the time period for eligibility for a
closed school discharge. As shown in
the Accounting Statement within the
Regulatory Impact Analysis of these
final regulations, the annualized
estimated transfer from the Federal
government to borrowers associated
with the statutory changes to Direct
Loan interest rates is $1.2 billion at a 7
percent discount rate and $467 million
at a 3 percent discount rate. For some
future cohorts, depending on the cost of
funds of the Federal government, the
transfer may be reversed and the
students would have higher interest
rates than if the PB2014 baseline
assumed rates of 6.8 percent for Direct
Subsidized Loans and Direct
Unsubsidized Loans and 7.9 percent for
Direct PLUS Loans had continued in
effect.
CHART 1—SUMMARY OF THE FINAL REGULATIONS
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Issue and key features
Benefits
Three-Year Cohort Default Rate Participation
Rate Index Challenges and Appeals (34 CFR
668.204 and 668.214).
Raises the Participation Rate Index ceiling for
purposes of challenges to and appeals from
sanctions based on one three-year cohort default rate of over 40 percent from 0.06015 to
0.0832.
More schools with low Title IV participation
but high default rates (above 40%) will be
able to appeal their loss of Title IV eligibility. This is important as the change from
a 2-year to a 3-year cohort default rate is
predicted to leave many schools ineligible
to appeal their sanctions under the previous
regulations.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Cost/transfers
No significant costs projected.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
65771
CHART 1—SUMMARY OF THE FINAL REGULATIONS—Continued
Issue and key features
Benefits
Perkins Loan, FFEL, and Direct Loan Programs: Satisfactory Repayment Arrangements
(34
CFR
674.2(b),
674.9(k),
682.200(b), 685.102(b), and 685.200).
Makes the definitions of ‘‘satisfactory repayment arrangement’’ more consistent across
the three title IV student loan programs.
Closed School Discharge (34 CFR 674.33(g),
682.402(d), and 685.214).
Extends the current 90-day window for students
who leave before a school closes to 120
days and adds examples of the types of exceptional circumstances under which the Department may extend the 120-day window.
Creates a consistent standard across the
three loan programs and adds clarity to the
regulations regarding defaulted loan rehabilitation.
No significant costs projected.
Expanding the window an extra 30 days will
provide discharges to students who failed to
meet the 90-day criteria but withdrew from
a program as it was preparing to close. Citing clear examples of exceptional circumstances adds clarity to the loan regulations and gives borrowers a basis on which
to make educated decisions.
Improves the Department’s information collection process and supports a more efficient
loan servicing process.
We estimate these changes to have a cost of
approximately $3.1 million over 10 years as
the pool of borrowers eligible for discharge
will increase.
Creates a consistent standard across the loan
programs and ensures that borrowers are
fully informed of the details of their forbearance agreement. Borrowers will have to affirm their commitment to repay and acknowledge their debt, which may improve
the probability of full repayment.
No significant costs projected.
Creates consistency across loan programs ....
No significant costs projected.
Borrowers who opt to use forbearance will not
have to worry about having a delinquent repayment status upon exiting forbearance.
No significant costs projected.
Reduces the burden on defaulted borrowers
who are attempting to rehabilitate their
loans and adds transparency to the process. This will possibly increase the percentage of defaulted borrowers that complete
the rehabilitation process and fully repay
their loans.
Provides financial relief to borrowers whose
loans are being collected through AWG but
who are taking positive steps to repay their
loans.
No significant costs projected.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
School Enrollment Status Reporting Requirements (34 CFR 674.19, 682.605, 682.610,
and 685.309).
Revises the regulations to reflect the current
processes by which schools receive and report student enrollment status information
and provides the Secretary with greater flexibility to modify enrollment reporting procedures in the future.
Forbearance for Borrowers Who are 270 or
More Days Delinquent Prior to Guaranty
Agency Default Claim Payment or Transfer
by the Department to Collection Status (34
CFR 682.211(d) and 685.205).
Requires lenders to send a notice within 30
days of a forbearance agreement to the borrower if the agreement is based on an oral
request or agreement.
Forbearance Provisions for Borrowers Receiving Department of Defense Student Loan Repayment Benefits (34 CFR 682.211(h) and
685.205).
Requires that lenders grant forbearance to borrowers who are performing service that qualifies them for loan repayment under the Department of Defense student loan repayment
programs authorized by 10 U.S.C. 2171,
2173, or 2174, or under any other student
loan repayment program administered by the
Department of Defense.
Borrowers Who Are Delinquent When an Authorized Forbearance Is Granted (34 CFR
682.211(f) and 685.205).
Authorizes lenders to grant an administrative
forbearance to a borrower who is delinquent
at the beginning of an authorized period of
forbearance.
Loan Rehabilitation Agreement: Reasonable
and Affordable Payment Standard (34 CFR
682.405(b) and 685.211(f)).
Establishes standards for determining a ‘‘reasonable and affordable’’ loan repayment for
rehabilitation purposes.
Loan Rehabilitation Agreement: Treatment of
Borrowers Subject to Administrative Wage
Garnishment (34 CFR 682.405(a) and
685.211(f)).
Suspends AWG after a borrower has made five
qualifying payments under a loan rehabilitation agreement.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Cost/transfers
No significant costs projected.
No significant costs projected.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65772
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
CHART 1—SUMMARY OF THE FINAL REGULATIONS—Continued
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Issue and key features
Benefits
Federal Perkins Loan Graduate Fellowship
Deferment Eligibility (34 CFR 674.34(b)(1)
and (f)).
Requires schools that participate in the Perkins
Loan Program to use the same eligibility criteria that are used in the FFEL Program
(under § 682.210(d)) to define an eligible
graduate fellowship program and to establish
the eligibility of a Perkins Loan borrower for a
graduate fellowship deferment.
Federal Perkins Loan Economic Hardship
Deferment Debt-to-Income Ratio Provision
(34 CFR 674.34(e)(4)).
Eliminates an inconsistency between the economic hardship deferment eligibility criteria in
the Perkins Loan program and the eligibility
criteria in the Direct Loan and FFEL programs.
Federal Perkins Loan Standard for On-time
Loan Rehabilitation Payment (34 CFR
674.39(a)(2)).
Identifies what is considered an ‘‘on-time’’ loan
payment for rehabilitation purposes within the
Perkins Loan program.
Social Security Number Requirement (SSN) for
Assignment of Defaulted Federal Perkins
Loans to the United States (34 CFR
674.50(e)(1)).
Allows assignment of a Perkins Loan without
the borrower’s SSN if the loan was made before September 13, 1982.
Federal Perkins Loan Break in Cancellation
Service Due to a Condition Covered under
the Family and Medical Leave Act (34 CFR
674.52(c)(1)).
Allows a Perkins Loan borrower who is unable
to complete a second half of an academic
year of teaching or a full year of public service due to a condition covered under the
Family Medical and Leave Act to still count
that year as a full year of service if the borrower’s employer considers the borrower to
have fulfilled the requirements for that year.
Federal Perkins Loan Cancellation Rate Progression (34 CFR 674.52(g), 674.53(d),
674.56(h), 674.57(c)(2), and 674.59(c)(2)).
Allows borrowers to continue their progression
toward full loan cancellation when they
change jobs to a position with the same cancellation eligibility requirements.
FFEL Lender Repayment Disclosures for Borrowers Who Are 60 Days Delinquent (34
CFR 682.205(a)(5)).
Changes the requirement that FFEL Lenders
have to provide a repayment disclosure to a
borrower from five calendar days after the
date the borrower becomes 60 days delinquent to five business days after that date.
FFEL Lender Repayment Disclosures to Borrowers Who Are Having Difficulty Making
Payments (34 CFR 682.205(a)(4)).
Removes requirement that a FFEL lender provide a borrower with a disclosure upon notification from the borrower that he or she is
having trouble making payments, if the borrower’s difficulty has been previously resolved.
Creates consistency across loan programs ....
No significant costs projected.
Creates consistency across loan programs ....
No significant costs projected.
Creates consistency across loan programs ....
No significant costs projected.
Makes the administration of Perkins Loans
less burdensome by bringing the regulations more in line with past practices.
No significant costs projected.
Adds consistency across the loan programs. It
also provides leniency for eligible borrowers
who are unable to complete their service
requirements because of injury or illness.
No significant costs projected.
Borrowers who are progressing toward loan
cancellation based on employment in a particular field who switch jobs will no longer
lose credit for their time served as along as
the new job has the same loan cancellation
eligibility.
No significant costs projected.
Reduces the burden on FFEL lenders by accounting for holidays and weekends.
No significant costs projected.
Reduces the paperwork burden on FFEL
lenders.
No significant costs projected.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Cost/transfers
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
65773
CHART 1—SUMMARY OF THE FINAL REGULATIONS—Continued
Issue and key features
Benefits
Administrative Wage Garnishment of the Disposable Pay of Defaulted FFEL Program Borrowers (34 CFR 682.410(b)).
Borrower Hearing Opportunities on the Enforceability of the Debt and a Borrower’s Claim of
Financial Hardship (34 CFR 682.410(b)(9)(i)).
Changes the regulations regarding Administrative Wage Garnishments (AWG) for FFEL
borrowers to align with the rules governing
AWG for Department-held loans.
Use of Third-Party Contractors in AWG Hearings (34 CFR 682.410(b)(9)).
Adds language to clarify that an AWG hearing
official may not be under the supervision or
control of the guaranty agency or of a thirdparty servicer or contractor employed by the
agency.
Amount or Rate of Wage Withholding (34 CFR
682.410(b)(9)).
Adds language to clarify the maximum amount
that may be withheld during AWG.
Borrower
Hearing
Requests
(34
CFR
682.410(b)(9)).
Changes the notification timelines regarding
AWG hearing requests.
Modification of the FFEL Program Regulations
(34 CFR part 682).
Modifies the FFEL Program regulations to remove provisions that are obsolete because of
the implementation of the SAFRA Act.
Minimum Loan Period for Transfer Students in
Non-Term and Certain Non-Standard Term
Programs (34 CFR 685.301).
Allows students who transfer into non-term and
certain non-standard term programs during
the middle of an academic year, to be eligible
for a Direct Loan to cover the remainder of
the academic year (within annual loan limits)
regardless of whether the new academic program accepts credits from the prior program.
Modification of the Direct Loan Program Regulations (34 CFR part 685).
Modifies the Direct Loan Program regulations to
remove provisions that are obsolete because
of the implementation of the SAFRA Act and
to add necessary language to replace crossreferences and reflect program requirements.
Ensures that borrowers who object to the proposed AWG have an appropriate opportunity to challenge the existence or amount
of the debt or to demonstrate that the withholding would cause financial hardship.
No significant costs projected.
Ensures borrowers receive impartial hearings
No significant costs projected.
Provides clarity to loan program ......................
No significant costs projected.
Provides borrowers with more time to request
hearings.
No significant costs projected.
Provides clarity to lenders, guaranty agencies,
financial aid administrators and borrowers.
No significant costs projected.
Borrowers will no longer have to worry about
the ramifications of transferring to a school
that does not accept credit or clock hours
from the previous school.
No significant costs projected.
Adding consistency to regulations and removing inapplicable regulations dealing with Direct Loans will provide clarity to program
participants.
No significant costs projected.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
On July 29, 2013 the Secretary
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for these
regulations in the Federal Register (78
FR 45618). The final regulations contain
several changes from the NPRM. We
fully explain the changes in the
Analysis of Comments and Changes
section of the preamble that follows.
Implementation Date of These
Regulations
Section 482(c) of the HEA requires
that regulations affecting programs
under title IV of the HEA be published
in final form by November 1, prior to
the start of the award year (July 1) to
which they apply. However, that section
also permits the Secretary to designate
any regulation as one that an entity
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
Cost/transfers
subject to the regulations may choose to
implement earlier and the conditions for
early implementation.
Consistent with the Department’s
objective to improve servicing processes
for title IV borrowers, the Secretary is
exercising his authority under section
482(c) to designate the following new
and amended regulations included in
this document for early implementation
beginning on November 1, 2013, at the
discretion of each loan holder, guaranty
agency, or institution, as applicable:
(1) Section 674.2(b).
(2) Section 674.9(k).
(3) Section 674.39(a)(2).
(4) Section 674.52(c) and (g).
(5) Section 682.205(a)(4).
(6) Section 682.205(a)(5).
(7) Section 682.211(d).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(8) Section 682.211(f).
(9) Section 682.211(h).
(10) Section 682.410(b)(9).
(11) Section 685.301(a)(10).
The Secretary also intends to
implement early provisions in 34 CFR
685.205 comparable to the provisions in
34 CFR 682.205(a)(4) and (5).
Analysis of Comments and Changes
In response to the Secretary’s
invitation in the NPRM, 25 parties
submitted comments on the proposed
regulations. An analysis of the
comments and of the changes in the
regulations since publication of the
NPRM follows.
We group major issues according to
subject, with appropriate sections of the
regulations referenced in parentheses.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65774
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
We discuss other substantive issues
under the sections of the proposed
regulations to which they pertain.
Generally, we do not address technical
or other minor changes.
We received recommendations from
some commenters to make numerous
technical changes, including changes
that would provide for greater
consistency in the regulations of the
Perkins Loan, FFEL, and Direct Loan
programs. We will consider these
changes for inclusion in future technical
corrections.
Finally, we note that although the
amendatory language in the NPRM
included a series of individual revisions
to certain parts of 34 CFR 685.220 and
34 CFR 685.301 as part of the overall
modification of the Direct Loan Program
regulations, these final regulations
restate §§ 685.220 and 685.301 in their
entirety for greater clarity. However, we
have made no changes to these sections
other than those that were proposed in
the NPRM.
Student Assistance General Provisions
Issue
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Three-Year Cohort Default Rate
Participation Rate Index Challenges and
Appeals (34 CFR 668.204 and 668.214)
Comments: Several commenters
agreed with the proposed change to
raise the participation rate index (PRI)
ceiling applicable to institutions that
have a single three-year cohort default
rate (CDR) of over 40 percent. One
commenter stated that continuity and
consistency among and between various
portions of the regulations, as evidenced
by this change, were important and also
commended the Department for
clarifying that all types of institutions
were eligible to challenge and appeal
their respective rates using the criteria.
Another commenter requested that
the Department change the PRI appeal
requirements to allow a PRI appeal to be
made annually for each published rate.
The commenter believed this would
dissuade community colleges from
discontinuing participation in the Direct
Loan program for the purpose of
preventing the loss of eligibility for the
Pell Grant Program based on high CDRs.
Discussion: We appreciate the
commenters’ support of this change.
However, we do not agree with the
proposal that we allow institutions to
file a PRI appeal annually, whether or
not the institution would be subject to
a sanction. This proposal would impose
an unmanageable workload on the
Department and is not necessary to
protect institutions. Evaluating a PRI
appeal is a time-consuming, laborintensive process. The recommended
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
change would require the Department to
consider a significantly higher number
of PRI appeals than under the current
process, which would delay decisions
for institutions that are potentially
subject to sanctions. Moreover, the
Department believes institutions have
ample opportunity to demonstrate in a
timely manner that they qualify for
relief from sanctions based on their PRI.
Current regulations permit institutions
to bring a PRI appeal not only when an
official rate leading to sanctions is
published, but also seven months
earlier, at the draft rate stage, when the
loss of eligibility is not imminent. At the
draft rate stage, just as at the official rate
stage, the institution may challenge the
draft CDR and file a PRI challenge with
respect to any or all of the official rates
that would support a loss of eligibility.
A successful PRI challenge to an
official rate at the draft rate stage has the
same impact as a successful challenge
later in the process. Thus, institutions
already have sufficient opportunity to
file a meaningful appeal.
Changes: None.
Perkins Loan, FFEL, and Direct Loan
Program Issues
Satisfactory Repayment Arrangements
(34 CFR 674.2(b), 674.9(k), 682.200(b),
685.102(b) and 685.200(d))
Comments: Two commenters
expressed support for the effort to make
the ‘‘satisfactory repayment
arrangements’’ definitions more
consistent across the Perkins Loan,
FFEL, and Direct Loan programs. These
commenters believed that a consistent
definition of an ‘‘on-time’’ payment as a
payment made within 20 days of the
due date would be helpful to borrowers.
However, these commenters also
expressed a concern with the
requirement that the payments be ‘‘full’’
payments. These commenters believe
that the term ‘‘full’’ is too vague and
open to interpretation. These
commenters recommended replacing
the term ‘‘full’’ with the term
‘‘approved’’ in the ‘‘satisfactory
repayment arrangement’’ definitions.
These commenters also suggested
aligning the number of payments
needed to regain title IV eligibility
under satisfactory repayment
arrangements with the number of
payments needed to rehabilitate a loan.
These commenters felt that allowing a
borrower to obtain new title IV loans
after six qualifying payments made
under satisfactory repayment
arrangements is not in the borrower’s
best interests.
Discussion: We thank the commenters
for their support of the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
changes to the Perkins Loan, FFEL, and
Direct Loan program definitions of
‘‘satisfactory repayment arrangements.’’
However, we do not agree with their
recommendation to require that
payments made under satisfactory
repayment arrangements be ‘‘approved’’
payments rather than ‘‘full’’ payments.
We believe that the term ‘‘full’’ is selfexplanatory when referring to a
payment made on a loan. In addition,
replacing the long-standing term ‘‘full’’
with the term ‘‘approved’’ might be
interpreted as a change in the
requirement, rather than just a change in
terminology.
The number of payments required
under satisfactory repayment
arrangements and the number of
payments required under a
rehabilitation agreement are established
by statute. Section 428F(a)(1)(A) of the
HEA requires nine payments under a
rehabilitation agreement. Section
428F(b) requires six payments to meet
the requirements for satisfactory
repayment arrangements. The
Department does not have the authority
to change these requirements.
Changes: None.
Closed School Discharge (34 CFR
674.33(g), 682.402(d), and 685.214)
Comments: One commenter
commended the Department for
proposing changes to the closed school
discharge provisions. The commenter
noted that extending the 90-day window
for students who cease enrollment
before a school closes to 120 days will
help students avoid hardships, such as
repaying loans received for programs
they are unable to complete through no
fault of their own. This same commenter
also expressed support and thanked the
Department for adding examples of
exceptional circumstances under which
the Department may extend the 120-day
window for affected borrowers.
However, this commenter also
recommended that the Department
provide the benefit of a closed school
discharge to borrowers enrolled in a
program that is discontinued at a school
that continues to operate, especially in
the case of a school that offers many of
its programs online or through distance
education.
Lastly, another commenter
commended the Department for
proposing changes to the closed school
discharge provisions and supported the
Department’s position to limit the
discharge to closed schools only and not
to discontinued programs.
Discussion: The Department
appreciates the commenters’ support for
its proposed changes to the closed
school discharge provisions. In response
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
to the request that the Department
provide the benefit of a closed school
discharge to borrowers enrolled in a
discontinued program at a school that
continues to operate, we note that
sections 437(c)(1) and 464(g) of the HEA
require that the school must close in
order for a borrower to be eligible for the
discharge. The statute does not provide
for a loan discharge when only a
program, either traditional or distance,
is discontinued. We also note that the
Department does not consider a distance
education program to be a separate
location of a school for title IV eligibility
purposes. A location is a physical site
where a student can receive instruction
in 50 percent or more of an eligible
program. If a school offers online
programs, the online programs are
considered to be associated with the
main campus of the school. Thus, a
borrower enrolled in an online course
would be eligible for a closed school
discharge if the main campus of the
school closes.
Changes: None.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
FFEL and Direct Loan Program Issues
Forbearance for Borrowers Who Are 270
or More Days Delinquent Prior to
Guaranty Agency Default Claim
Payment or Transfer by the Department
to Collections Status (34 CFR 682.211(d)
and 685.205(a)(8))
Comments: Several commenters
supported the proposed requirement
that a lender that grants a forbearance
based on an oral request and affirmation
by a borrower who is 270 or more days
delinquent must review with the
borrower the terms and conditions and
consequences of the forbearance and
must provide the borrower with written
confirmation of the terms of the
forbearance agreement within 30 days of
the agreement. However, the
commenters expressed concern about
limiting the forbearance for such
borrowers to one 120-day period. The
commenters believed that the current
economy and pending healthcare reform
could leave many borrowers
underemployed or with other temporary
situations that cannot be resolved
within 120 days. The commenters
recommended that the forbearance
period be extended from 120 to 180
days.
One commenter urged the Department
to revise these proposed regulations to
prohibit a borrower from receiving
additional forbearances unless the
borrower can demonstrate a reasonable
prospect of increased income in the
foreseeable future. The commenter also
recommended that the written notice
sent to the borrower to confirm the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
terms of the 120-day forbearance
agreement include information on other
repayment options and on how the
borrower can exit forbearance.
Discussion: The Department disagrees
with the commenters’ recommendation
that the 120-day, non-serial forbearance
that may be granted based on a
defaulted borrower’s oral request and
affirmation be expanded to 180 days.
We believe that the 120-day forbearance
period provides sufficient time for the
borrower to avoid the negative
consequences of default by submitting a
written forbearance request and
affirmation that would result in a
forbearance period of up to 12 months,
documenting deferment eligibility, or
changing to a different repayment plan,
so the borrower can successfully
manage and repay the loan.
The Department recognizes that
schools are required to conduct entrance
and exit counseling with their
borrowers, and through that process, to
educate their borrowers on the terms
and conditions of the loans and the
program benefits available to assist them
in repaying their loans. We are aware
that many schools are working to
enhance and expand loan-based
counseling with their students over the
period of their enrollment at the school
and support those efforts. The
Department has also seen evidence,
however, both during and following the
negotiated rulemaking sessions, that
some institutions are aggressively
pursuing their former students to
compel them to request forbearance on
their loans, primarily during the cohort
period when the institution is
accountable for student loan defaults.
As stated in the preamble to the NPRM,
the limits on the 120-day forbearance
based on an oral request for a borrower
who is 270 days or more delinquent are
intended to address potential abuse in
this area and to prevent the use of serial
forbearances based on oral requests.
We disagree with the commenter who
suggested that a borrower receiving the
120-day, non-serial forbearance should
be denied access to subsequent
discretionary or mandatory forbearances
unless the borrower can demonstrate
increased income in the foreseeable
future. Section 428(c)(3) of the HEA,
which contains the eligibility criteria for
discretionary and mandatory
forbearances in the Direct Loan and
FFEL programs, does not support the
use of the borrower’s demonstrated
future earnings as a basis for granting
forbearance. However, we agree with the
commenter that the other repayment
options orally reviewed with the
borrower at the time the forbearance is
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65775
granted should be included in the
confirming notice sent to the borrower.
Changes: Sections 682.211(d)(2)(iii)
and 685.205(a)(8)(ii)(B) of the FFEL and
Direct Loan program regulations,
respectively, have been revised to
require that information on all other
repayment options be included in the
notice sent to the borrower to confirm
the terms of the forbearance.
Forbearance Provisions for Borrowers
Receiving Department of Defense
Student Loan Repayment Benefits (34
CFR 682.211(h) and 685.205(a)(9))
Comments: Commenters supported
the proposed change to ensure that
lenders grant appropriate forbearances
to borrowers who are performing
eligible service to qualify for student
loan repayment under authorized
Department of Defense loan repayment
programs.
Discussion: We appreciate the
commenters’ support for this regulatory
change.
Changes: None.
Borrowers Who Are Delinquent When an
Authorized Forbearance Is Granted (34
CFR 682.211(f) and 682.205(b)(2))
Comments: Several commenters
supported the proposed change to the
regulations to authorize FFEL lenders to
grant administrative forbearance to a
borrower who is delinquent at the
beginning of an authorized period of
forbearance and the corresponding
change to the Direct Loan regulations.
The commenters expressed concern,
however, that this authority would
provide the Department’s loan servicers
an opportunity to use forbearances to
increase the percentage of Federal loans
that they service. The commenters urged
the Department to ensure that all
delinquent borrowers are treated
similarly by requiring the servicer to
discuss the terms and conditions and
consequences of the forbearance with
the borrower and subsequently provide
written confirmation of the terms and
other pertinent information, as was
proposed in the NPRM for borrowers
who are 270 or more days delinquent.
Discussion: The additional authority
for FFEL lenders and the Department in
the Direct Loan Program to grant
administrative forbearance to eliminate
a period of delinquency that pre-dates
the start of an authorized forbearance
period is used only in conjunction with
an authorized period of forbearance for
which the borrower qualifies. The use of
forbearance in this circumstance
prevents a borrower from reentering
repayment up to 12 months later in a
delinquent status, at the end of the
authorized forbearance period.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65776
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Borrowers granted authorized
forbearances are provided with
pertinent disclosures that also apply to
the period of administrative
forbearance. Therefore, we do not agree
with the commenters’ suggestion that
we specifically require additional
disclosures.
Changes: None.
Loan Rehabilitation Agreement:
Reasonable and Affordable Payment
Standard (34 CFR 682.405(b) and
685.211(f))
Comments: Several commenters
expressed support for the proposed
regulations in §§ 682.405(b)(1) and
685.211(f)(1) that would require a
guaranty agency and the Department to
determine a FFEL or Direct Loan
program borrower’s rehabilitation
payment amount based on the
borrower’s, and if applicable the
borrower’s spouse’s, current disposable
income, family size, and reasonable and
necessary expenses.
As discussed below, several
commenters raised a number of
objections to the process that a guaranty
agency and the Department would
follow to determine a borrower’s
reasonable and affordable rehabilitation
payment.
Several commenters were critical of
the proposed regulations. These
commenters believed that the
requirements in the proposed
regulations would delay and hinder the
rehabilitation process. These
commenters expressed concern that
requesting financial documents and
information from borrowers would
burden the process, create confusion,
and invade the privacy of the borrower.
They stated that often borrowers default
because they do not complete
paperwork and meet deadlines. In the
view of these commenters, the proposed
regulatory requirements would impede
the ability of collection agencies to get
borrowers to participate in the loan
rehabilitation program. One of these
commenters recommended that the
proposed regulations not be
implemented at all due to the amount of
paperwork a borrower would be
required to complete to enter into a loan
rehabilitation agreement.
Several commenters stated that the
determination of a ‘‘reasonable and
affordable’’ payment amount can often
be accomplished in a telephone
conversation in which a borrower’s
overall financial circumstances are
evaluated to establish an acceptable
payment amount. In these discussions,
the commenters asserted, the borrower’s
own assessment of his or her total
financial circumstances and ability to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
pay the requested amount serves as the
basis for the guaranty agency or
Department’s determination that the
payment amount is reasonable and
affordable. These commenters believed
that this would be a fair conclusion,
since the borrower understands his or
her financial resources and constraints
better than others. According to the
commenters, guaranty agencies find that
nearly half of borrowers seeking
rehabilitation are able to obtain what the
guaranty agencies term reasonable and
affordable payment amounts in this
manner.
Another commenter, however, argued
that, since debt collectors are paid based
on a share of revenue collected, Federal
student loan servicers have little
incentive to offer reasonable and
affordable rehabilitation payments that
are based on an objective analysis of the
borrower’s financial circumstances.
Instead, the incentive is to push
borrowers to make as large a payment as
possible, regardless of whether the
payment is either reasonable or
affordable. Another commenter
reiterated this point, stating that private
collection agencies—including the
Department’s own collection
contractors—use a balance-sensitive
repayment approach for making an
initial determination of a borrower’s
rehabilitation payment amount. Under a
balance-sensitive repayment approach,
the payment amount offered to the
borrower is based on the outstanding
balance of the loan, and does not take
into consideration the borrower’s
financial circumstances. In such cases,
the commenter asserted, the borrower
may feel pressured to agree to a loan
rehabilitation payment amount that is
unaffordable, and the rehabilitation will
ultimately be unsuccessful.
Several commenters raised concerns
with regard to use of the Department’s
proposed Financial Disclosure for
Reasonable and Affordable
Rehabilitation Payments form for
collecting financial and other
information from borrowers seeking to
rehabilitate their loans. These concerns
can be summarized as follows:
• The commenters asserted that use
of the form in all cases would be
inconsistent with the Department’s goal
of providing an improved and more
consistent loan rehabilitation process
for FFEL and Direct Loan borrowers.
The commenters believed that the
Department can achieve the same goal
by emphasizing to its own staff and
collection agencies, as well as to
guaranty agencies and their collection
agencies, the importance of complying
with all applicable statutory and
regulatory requirements. In the view of
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
these commenters, requiring the use of
the form only in the absence of an
agreement between the borrower and
the loan holder on a reasonable and
affordable repayment amount would
provide targeted help to such borrowers.
The commenters stated that collecting
personal and financial information from
every borrower who requests loan
rehabilitation would be unreasonable
and unwarranted.
• The commenters believed that the
use of the form would work against the
Department’s goal of increasing
borrower participation in the loan
rehabilitation program. The commenters
stated that many borrowers would not
complete the form, and that the
proposed regulations would actually
decrease the percentage of borrowers
attempting to rehabilitate their loans.
• The commenters expressed
concerns that use of the form would
infringe on the privacy of the borrowers,
requiring them to provide highly
sensitive information either to a
guaranty agency or to the Department,
even if the borrower has already agreed
to a repayment amount.
• The commenters believed that the
requirements in the proposed
regulations would impose an additional
impediment to borrowers seeking to
regain Title IV eligibility while
rehabilitating defaulted loans.
• The commenters were also
concerned that use of the form would
impose an enormous administrative
burden on all parties.
Several commenters stated that they
believed that the regulatory
requirements that were negotiated and
agreed to during the negotiated
rulemaking session should only be
triggered if the borrower objected to the
repayment amount offered by the
collection agency or the guaranty
agency. They stated that this type of
borrower feedback has always been a
trigger event for collecting additional
financial information to determine
reasonable and affordable payments,
and asserted that no change to this
trigger event was discussed during
negotiations. These commenters
claimed that the process for determining
reasonable and affordable rehabilitation
payment amounts provided for in the
consensus regulatory language and
described in the NPRM was not
consistent with their understanding of
what was agreed to during the
negotiated rulemaking sessions.
Another commenter had a different
understanding of the proposed rules
that had been agreed to by the
negotiated rulemaking committee. This
commenter stated that the consensus
regulatory language would require loan
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
servicers, loan holders, and debt
collectors to use the form collecting
financial disclosure information from
the borrower for every borrower who
seeks to rehabilitate a loan. This
commenter pointed out that the
proposed regulatory language agreed to
by the negotiating committee states that
a borrower’s reasonable and affordable
repayment amount must be based
‘‘solely’’ on information provided on the
form and, if requested, supporting
documentation. The proposed
regulations describe a process in which
a borrower who objects to the payment
amount determined through use of the
form is then offered a rehabilitation
payment amount that is calculated using
the same formula used for determining
payments under IBR. This commenter
stated that during the rulemaking
negotiations, the commenter supported
the consensus regulatory language
because the proposed regulations would
provide a standardized process to
ensure that rehabilitation amounts are
determined solely by looking at a
borrower’s financial circumstances. This
commenter recommended that the
Department issue guidance to clarify
that an offer of a rehabilitation payment
amount must be based solely on
information provided by the borrower.
This commenter also noted that some
negotiators had proposed during the
negotiations that the initial
rehabilitation payment amount offered
should be determined using the IBR
formula. This commenter recommended
that, if the borrower is unable to
complete the form, the loan holder
should continue the rehabilitation
process by determining the payment
amount using this approach.
Another commenter expressed
concerns about the complexity of the
proposed form, and suggested that if the
payment calculated using the IBR
formula was the initial offer to a
borrower, the form would only be
needed for borrowers who object to that
initial payment amount. The commenter
stated that a payment amount calculated
using this approach would be
acceptable to most borrowers, and
would therefore significantly reduce the
number of borrowers who would need
to use the financial disclosure form.
Discussion: In response to the
numerous comments we received
expressing concerns about the amount
of personal financial information a
borrower requesting loan rehabilitation
would have to provide under the
proposed regulations, we have modified
the final regulations to provide that as
the first step in the loan rehabilitation
process, the lender, loan servicer or the
Department will calculate a loan
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
rehabilitation payment amount by using
the IBR payment formula that provides
for a monthly payment equal to 15
percent of the amount by which the
borrower’s AGI exceeds 150 percent of
the poverty guideline amount applicable
to the borrower’s State and family size,
divided by 12. Throughout the
remainder of this preamble, we refer to
this as the ‘‘15 percent formula.’’ To
ensure consistent treatment of all
defaulted borrowers, the initial loan
rehabilitation payment amount will be
calculated in all cases using the 15
percent formula, as described earlier.
For new borrowers on or after July 1,
2014, who are repaying non-defaulted
Direct Loans under the IBR plan, the
IBR plan payment amount is equal to 10
percent of the amount by which the
borrower’s AGI exceeds 150 percent of
the poverty guideline amount applicable
to the borrower’s State and family size.
However, this 10 percent IBR formula
will not be used in the initial
determination of a reasonable and
affordable loan rehabilitation payment
amount on a defaulted loan.
It is important to note that loan
rehabilitation payments calculated by
using the 15 percent formula are not
payments that are made under the IBR
plan. This means, for example, that such
payments do not count toward IBR plan
loan forgiveness, nor do they count as
qualifying payments for purposes of
public service loan forgiveness in the
Direct Loan Program.
Under these final regulations, a loan
rehabilitation payment amount based on
the information collected on the
Financial Disclosure for Reasonable and
Affordable Payments form will only be
calculated if the borrower objects to the
payment amount based on the 15
percent formula. If the borrower does
object to the payment amount calculated
based on this formula and requests that
a rehabilitation payment amount be
calculated based on information on the
form, the borrower can choose which
payment amount to accept. We expect
that the payment amount based on the
15 percent formula will in most cases be
less than the payment amount under a
standard 10-year repayment plan, and
will be acceptable to most borrowers.
Therefore, this approach should
significantly reduce the number of
borrowers who will be required to
complete the financial disclosure form.
We believe that this change will address
concerns raised by consumer advocates,
student groups, guaranty agencies, and
collection agencies alike that the
financial disclosure information
required under the proposed regulations
would be overly burdensome for
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65777
borrowers requesting loan
rehabilitation.
Specifically, with regard to
commenters’ concerns that the proposed
regulations would create confusion, add
burden to the process, or invade the
privacy of the borrower, we believe the
revised process in the final regulations
is clear and understandable. The revised
process significantly reduces burden by
limiting the use of the form, and
appropriately balances the borrower’s
privacy with the need to verify
information. The final regulations assist
with privacy concerns by limiting the
information borrowers are required to
provide—only requiring the use of the
Financial Disclosure for Reasonable and
Affordable Payments for those
borrowers who object to the monthly
payment amount determined based on
the 15 percent formula.
Commenters were concerned that the
paperwork burden associated with the
use of the financial disclosure form
would impede the ability of collection
agencies to get borrowers to participate
in the loan rehabilitation program. Our
revisions to the proposed regulations
significantly reduce the paperwork
burden on borrowers because, again,
they will only need to provide the
Financial Disclosure for Reasonable and
Affordable Payments form if they object
to the payment amount based on the 15
percent formula.
Some commenters stated that reliance
on the oral statements of the borrower
should be sufficient to determine the
‘‘reasonable and affordable’’ payment
amount, and that there should be no
need for further documentation or
verification. Other commenters had the
opposite opinion, sharing concern that
loan servicers may push borrowers to
agree to payments that are not
reasonable and affordable. We believe
our approach balances applicable
equities, burden, verification that
payment is reasonable and affordable,
and privacy concerns.
With regard to the comments about
the agreements reached at the negotiated
rulemaking sessions, we believe the
NPRM was consistent with the
consensus reached through negotiated
rulemaking. Commenters did seem to
have different understandings of what
the NPRM language meant; we believe
our revised regulations provide a clear,
understandable process.
With regard to comments about a
‘‘trigger event,’’ we believe that it would
defeat the purpose of the proposed
regulations if the regulations only
applied in cases when a borrower and
loan holder are unable to agree to a loan
rehabilitation payment amount. The
intent of the regulations is to
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
65778
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
standardize the process for determining
rehabilitation payment amounts. The
commenter states that loan holders and
borrowers are able to agree to loan
rehabilitation payment amounts 50
percent of the time. If this figure is
accurate, and the trigger for the
rehabilitation payment amount
regulations was the failure of the
borrower and loan holder to come to an
agreement, the loan rehabilitation
regulations would only apply to half of
the borrowers who apply for
rehabilitation.
We note that nothing in these
regulations precludes a defaulted
borrower from resolving the default by
repaying the loan in full. A qualified
defaulted borrower may also, under
certain conditions, repay a defaulted
loan through a new Direct Consolidation
Loan. Some defaulted borrowers may
also qualify for a loan discharge. The
regulations do not prohibit the
Secretary, his designee, or a guaranty
agency from discussing these other
payment arrangements with the
borrower outside of the context of the
loan rehabilitation program and its
associated requirements.
Changes: We have revised
§§ 682.405(b)(1)(iii) and 685.211(f)(1)(i)
to specify that the initial loan
rehabilitation payment amount
determined by a guaranty agency or the
Secretary equals 15 percent of the
amount by which the borrower’s
Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) exceeds
150 percent of the poverty guideline
amount applicable to the borrower’s
family size and State, divided by 12,
except that if this amount is less than
$5, the borrower’s monthly
rehabilitation payment is $5.
We have revised §§ 682.405(b)(1)(vii)
and 685.211(f)(3) to specify that if the
borrower objects to the initial payment
amount, a second loan rehabilitation
payment amount is determined by
recalculating the payment amount based
solely on the information provided on
the Financial Disclosure for Reasonable
and Affordable Payments form and, if
requested, supporting documentation
from the borrower and other sources.
Comments: In the NPRM, the
Department identified several categories
of expenses in proposed
§§ 682.405(b)(1)(i)(C) and
685.211(f)(1)(i)(C) that the guaranty
agencies and the Department would use
to evaluate a borrower’s monthly
‘‘reasonable and necessary expenses.’’
Although the proposed regulations did
not stipulate standardized amounts that
a borrower might claim in each of these
categories, the Secretary invited
comment on whether the regulations
should specify standardized amounts,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
such as those used in the IRS National
Standards. Commenters representing
both guaranty agencies and consumer
groups opposed this idea.
Several commenters noted that the
topic of standardization was discussed
at length during the negotiations, and
noted that an overly rigid framework for
making these determinations would
likely eliminate the rehabilitation
opportunity for those whose financial
circumstances do not exactly fit within
the framework. They pointed out that,
as the Secretary noted in the preamble
to the NPRM, preserving appropriate
flexibility in the methodology is
important to enable guaranty agencies
and the Department to ensure that a
reasonable and affordable payment is
available to all borrowers. These
commenters contended that allowing
flexibility in this regard strengthens the
effectiveness of the regulations in
determining reasonable and affordable
payment amounts. These commenters
stated that the negotiated rulemaking
committee decided not to propose a
standardized methodology. These
commenters reiterated that position in
response to the Secretary’s invitation to
comment.
In a separate comment, another
commenter recommended that the
Department not use standardized
national standards for expense amounts.
This commenter stated that, to the
extent that the consensus regulatory
language reflected an agreement that a
combination of standardized and
tailored payment options would best
meet the needs of borrowers,
standardizing the more tailored
approach would be a step in the wrong
direction.
Discussion: We thank the commenters
for responding to the invitation to
comment on this proposal in the NPRM.
We agree with their view that the final
regulations should preserve the
flexibility to determine reasonable and
affordable rehabilitation payment
amounts based on the borrower’s
financial information, which the
proposed regulations provided.
Changes: None.
Comments: One commenter expressed
concern about proposed
§ 682.405(b)(1)(v) and
§ 685.211(f)(1)(iii), which would
provide borrowers with an opportunity
to object to an offer of a reasonable and
affordable payment amount that is
presented to the borrower in a written
rehabilitation agreement. The
commenter stated that many borrowers
will be offered payment amounts orally,
and believed that these borrowers
should be able to object to the offered
payment amount at that point. This
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
commenter noted that requiring
borrowers to wait until they receive a
written offer will only delay or deter the
borrowers from rehabilitating their
loans.
Discussion: We agree that a loan
servicer may make a first offer of the
rehabilitation payment amount based on
the 15 percent IBR formula to a
borrower orally. If the borrower agrees
to the payment amount, the borrower
would have to follow up on the
conversation by providing the loan
holder with the documentation required
to calculate a payment amount under
that formula. Consistent with
§§ 682.405(b)(1)(iii) and 685.211(f)(3),
the borrower may object to the initial
offer at the time it is made.
Changes: We have revised
§ 682.405(b)(1)(iv) and § 685.211(f)(1)(ii)
to specify that a guaranty agency or the
Department may calculate a payment
amount based on information provided
orally by the borrower, and may provide
the borrower with a rehabilitation
agreement using that amount. We have
also specified in revised
§§ 682.405(b)(1)(iv) and 685.211(f)(1)(ii)
that if the borrower does not provide the
guaranty agency or the Department with
the documentation required to calculate
the payment amount using the 15
percent formula or to confirm the
information provided orally on which
the Secretary or the guaranty agency
calculated the payment amount, the
rehabilitation agreement entered into for
that amount is null and void.
Comments: We received several
comments on §§ 682.405(b)(1)(v) and
685.211(f)(1)(iii). Section
682.405(b)(1)(v) of the proposed
regulations stated that a guaranty agency
‘‘may not impose any other conditions
unrelated to the amount or timing of the
rehabilitation payments’’ in a
rehabilitation agreement. Section
685.211(f)(1)(iii) of the proposed
regulations provided that the Secretary
would not impose such conditions in
rehabilitation agreements for Direct
Loans. Several commenters stated that
some guaranty agencies currently
require a borrower’s written
acknowledgement of the borrower’s
understanding of the terms and
conditions of rehabilitation, which these
commenters stated is a prudent practice
when establishing a new repayment
agreement with a borrower. In such
cases, the borrower may be required to
sign and return the agreement or
provide a separate, signed authorization
statement acknowledging, at a
minimum, that collection costs will be
added to the loan balance at the time the
rehabilitated loan is purchased by an
eligible lender. These commenters
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
believed that this requirement for the
borrower to review and acknowledge
the information provided in the
rehabilitation agreement underscores
the importance of rehabilitation as a
one-time opportunity to remove loans
from default status. It also reduces the
possibility of misunderstandings about
the terms of the loan rehabilitation and
related risks for guaranty agencies in the
event of a dispute concerning the
applicable repayment terms and
conditions, costs, and benefits of loan
rehabilitation.
Commenters noted that guaranty
agencies may also currently require a
borrower to provide updated references
and contact information to facilitate the
loan rehabilitation process. The
commenters stated that this provides a
purchasing lender with important
default prevention information, if
needed, since the borrower’s contact
information may be incomplete or
outdated and the references provided in
the promissory note may no longer be
valid. This enhances a guaranty
agency’s ability to sell the borrower’s
rehabilitation-eligible loans. These
commenters requested confirmation
from the Department that the proposed
regulations would not preclude
guaranty agencies from continuing these
practices.
Discussion: The limitation in the
proposed rule that would preclude a
guaranty agency from imposing any
additional conditions on loan
rehabilitation unrelated to the amount
or timing of rehabilitation payments was
not intended to prohibit the agency from
requiring borrowers to acknowledge the
terms and conditions of the
rehabilitation in writing, or from
requiring borrowers to provide updated
contact information when the loan
rehabilitation agreement is signed.
Requiring the borrower to acknowledge
such disclosure information, or to
provide such contact information,
would be helpful to the borrower. It
would help to ensure that the borrower
understands the rehabilitation
agreement, and, where necessary,
facilitate the sale of the loan to a FFEL
loan holder.
Changes: None.
Comments: There were several
comments on proposed
§§ 682.405(b)(1)(vi) and 685.211(f)(3) in
the proposed regulations. These
commenters stated that the terms ‘‘IBR
formula’’ or ‘‘IBR calculation’’ should
not be used in connection with
describing the method used to
determine a reasonable and affordable
rehabilitation payment amount. These
commenters believed that using these
terms would cause significant confusion
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
for borrowers, since payments made
towards loan rehabilitation do not count
as IBR payments. These commenters
recommended using the term
‘‘alternative payment amount’’ or
‘‘APA’’ to refer to this formula.
These commenters also noted that
proposed §§ 682.405(b)(1)(vi) and
685.211(f)(5) include a cross-reference
to the IBR regulations at § 682.215(b)(1),
§ 685.221(b)(1), and § 685.221(b)(2).
Those regulations include other
requirements in addition to the IBR
payment amount formula. These
commenters believed that using the
broad cross reference could be
interpreted as incorporating these other
provisions not specifically related to the
formula as applying to the rehabilitation
requirements as well.
These commenters recommended that
the Department include the ‘‘alternative
payment amount’’ formula directly in
the loan rehabilitation regulations,
rather than cross-referencing the IBR
regulations.
Discussion: As discussed earlier in
this preamble, in the final regulations
we have switched the order in which
the rehabilitation payment amounts are
determined and offered to borrowers.
Under the final regulations, the payment
amount based on the 15 percent formula
will be the first offer to the borrower,
and the payment amount based on
information provided on the financial
disclosure form will be the second offer.
The borrower may choose which
payment amount to accept. Since the 15
percent formula payment will be the
first payment amount offered during
rehabilitation discussions, it would not
be accurate to refer to it as the
‘‘alternative payment amount.’’
We agree with the commenters that
we do not intend the extensive and
detailed requirements in
§§ 682.215(b)(1), 685.221(b)(1), and
685.221(b)(2) of the IBR regulations to
apply to determining a loan
rehabilitation payment amount.
Replacing the cross-references with the
15 percent formula will make the loan
rehabilitation regulations simpler and
clearer. In addition, eliminating the
cross-references may reduce the
potential for borrowers to confuse
rehabilitation payments based on the 15
percent formula with payments made by
a non-defaulted borrower under the IBR
plan. Eliminating the cross-references
also clarifies that the initial
rehabilitation payment amount for a
‘‘new borrower’’ as defined in
§ 685.221(a)(4) of the IBR plan
regulations would not be calculated
using the 10 percent IBR formula as
described in § 685.221(b)(1) of the IBR
plan regulations. Regardless of how a
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65779
loan rehabilitation payment amount is
determined, a rehabilitation payment
does not qualify as an IBR plan payment
and does not count toward IBR plan
loan forgiveness or for any other
purposes for which a qualifying
payment made under the IBR plan on a
non-defaulted loan might count, such as
for public service loan forgiveness in the
Direct Loan Program.
Changes: We have replaced the crossreferences in §§ 682.405(b)(1)(iii) and
685.211(f)(1)(i) with the 15 percent
formula.
Comments: In the NPRM, the
Secretary invited comment on proposed
§§ 682.405(b)(1)(vii) and 685.211(f)(5),
which would provide that a loan
rehabilitation does not go forward if the
borrower fails to provide the
documentation required for the payment
amount to be calculated. The Secretary
asked if it would be appropriate to make
a change in the final regulations to
require a borrower to submit
information needed to recalculate the
borrower’s reasonable and affordable
rehabilitation payment amount only if
new information is required beyond
what the borrower provided when he or
she initially requested loan
rehabilitation. Several commenters
responded to this invitation for
comment, and all supported making this
change in the final regulations. One
commenter requested that the
Department’s final regulations be
flexible enough to cover the following
scenarios:
• Some information or
documentation originally submitted by
the borrower is illegible or difficult to
understand, and needs to be requested
again or explained.
• Significant time passes between the
borrower’s initial request for
rehabilitation and the borrower’s
subsequent request for a recalculated
payment amount, so a verification of
critical information may be needed to
determine an appropriate payment
amount.
• The borrower realizes after
submitting the original information/
documentation that the submission was
incomplete or inaccurate, and that
additional information or
documentation is needed by the loan
holder to determine an appropriate
payment amount.
Discussion: As discussed earlier in
this preamble, we have switched the
order in which rehabilitation payment
amounts are offered to borrowers. Under
the final regulations, a payment amount
calculated using the 15 percent formula
will be the basis for the first offer. If the
borrower objects to that amount, the
guaranty agency or the Department will
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65780
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
calculate a payment amount based on
detailed financial information provided
by the borrower, and the borrower may
then choose between the two payment
amounts. Except when the loan is being
collected by AWG, it is extremely
unlikely that the loan holder will
already have the detailed financial
information requested on the form.
Therefore, there is no need to make the
requested change.
Changes: None.
Comments: One commenter expressed
support for the provision in proposed
§ 682.405(b)(1)(x) that would limit
guaranty agency contact with a borrower
during the rehabilitation period to
collection activities required by law and
communications with the borrower that
support the rehabilitation.
Discussion: We appreciate the
commenter’s support. We also note that
this provision, in §§ 682.405(b)(1)(xi)
and § 685.211(f)(7), does not prohibit
guaranty agencies or the Secretary from
contacting borrowers to remind them
when the next payment is due or, in
appropriate circumstances, to inquire
about any missed payments. The intent
of such calls is to ensure that the
borrower maintains the consecutive
monthly payment stream required to
successfully rehabilitate a loan. Contacts
of this type between a guaranty agency
or the Secretary and a borrower are
‘‘communications that support the
rehabilitation.’’
Changes: None.
Loan Rehabilitation Agreement:
Treatment of Borrowers Subject to
Administrative Wage Garnishment (34
CFR 682.405(a) and 685.211(f))
Comments: Three commenters
expressed support for the proposed
regulations in §§ 682.405(a)(3) and
685.211(f)(12)(i) that would suspend
payments made through administrative
wage garnishment (AWG) for borrowers
who make five qualifying payments
under a loan rehabilitation agreement.
These commenters felt that this step
would be a reward and an incentive for
borrowers and would encourage
defaulted borrowers to rehabilitate their
loans.
Several commenters stated that
proposed § 682.405(a)(3) appears to
assume that a guaranty agency would
not be required to suspend the
borrower’s current garnishment order
for another reason prior to receipt of the
borrower’s fifth loan rehabilitation
payment. However, these commenters
noted that this may not always be the
case under the current and proposed
AWG regulations in § 682.410(b)(9). For
instance, if a borrower does not request
a hearing prior to the initiation of AWG,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
but does so shortly after AWG
commences, the AWG hearing process
would occur during the period of the
borrower’s first five payments under a
loan rehabilitation agreement and could
result in a required suspension of the
garnishment order during that time.
These commenters recommended that
§ 682.405(a)(3) be modified to include a
reference to § 682.410(b)(9) to clarify
that a guaranty agency may suspend a
garnishment order for a borrower
pursuing loan rehabilitation prior to
receipt of the borrower’s fifth
rehabilitation payment, if required to do
so for another reason in accordance with
§ 682.410(b)(9).
Discussion: We agree with the
commenters. The proposed regulations
governing suspension of AWG payments
after a borrower makes five qualifying
rehabilitation payments were not
intended to preclude guaranty agencies
or the Department from suspending
AWG collection for reasons unrelated to
the loan rehabilitation before the
borrower makes a fifth qualifying loan
rehabilitation payment. As the
commenters noted, a guaranty agency
may receive a notice to suspend AWG
due to other reasons, as specified in
§ 682.410(b)(9) of the AWG regulations.
Changes: We have revised
§ 682.405(a)(3)(i) to specify that the
requirement that a guaranty agency
continue collecting a loan by AWG until
the borrower makes five qualifying
monthly rehabilitation payments does
not apply if the guaranty agency is
precluded from collecting through AWG
under § 682.410(b)(9)(i), and have made
a comparable change in
§ 685.211(f)(11)(i) of the Direct Loan
regulations.
Modification of the FFEL Program and
Direct Loan Program Regulations:
Counseling Borrowers (34 CFR
682.604(a) and 685.304(b))
Comments: One commenter expressed
support for the proposed changes to the
exit counseling regulations that would
allow a school to send written
counseling materials to a student
borrower by email when the student has
withdrawn without notice to the school
or failed to complete required exit
counseling. However, the commenter
believed that the wording of proposed
§§ 682.604(a)(1) and 685.304(b)(3) could
be misinterpreted, as it could be read to
mean either that a student must provide
an email address to the school within 30
days after the school learns that the
student has withdrawn, or that the
school must provide the written
counseling materials to the student by
email within 30 days after learning of
the student’s withdrawal. The
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
commenter assumed that the second
interpretation is what was intended, and
recommended that the regulatory
language be revised to make this clear.
The same commenter also noted that
in the preamble to the NPRM, the
Department indicated that the proposed
changes in §§ 682.604(a)(1) and
685.304(b)(3) allowing schools to send
written counseling materials to an email
address provided by the student
borrower in certain cases reflected
existing guidance included in the
Department’s Federal Student Aid
Handbook. The commenter pointed out
that the guidance in the Federal Student
Loan Handbook clarifies that if a school
sends exit counseling materials to a
student by email, the school must use
the student’s ‘‘home (not school) email
address,’’ if the school has that address.
The commenter recommended that the
Department include in the regulations
this prohibition on sending the
counseling materials to the student
borrower’s school email address, but
stated that there should be no reason to
limit schools to sending exit counseling
materials only to a student’s ‘‘home’’
email address. The commenter stated
that as long as the school does not send
the counseling materials to an email
address associated with its own
institution, it should be able to send the
materials to the student’s home or work
email address, or even to an email
address for the student at another
institution where the student is in
attendance.
Discussion: The Department
appreciates the commenter’s support of
the changes to the exit counseling
regulations. With regard to the intent of
the wording of proposed
§§ 682.604(a)(1) and 685.304(b)(3), the
commenter’s understanding is correct.
The school must send the counseling
materials within 30 days after learning
that the student borrower has
withdrawn or failed to complete the
required exit counseling.
The Department agrees with the
recommendation to incorporate into the
regulations the statement in the Federal
Student Aid Handbook clarifying that
written counseling materials may not be
sent to a student borrower’s email
address at the same school that is
sending the materials. We also agree
that schools should not be limited to
sending the counseling materials to the
student’s ‘‘home’’ email address.
However, we note that the proposed
regulations did not include this
limitation. The proposed regulations
stated that the written counseling
materials could be sent to ‘‘an email
address provided by the borrower.’’
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Changes: We have revised
§§ 682.604(a)(1) and 685.304(b)(3) to
clarify that the school must send the
counseling materials within 30 days
after learning that the student borrower
has withdrawn or failed to complete the
required exit counseling, and that the
counseling materials may not be sent to
a student’s email address at the same
school that is sending the materials.
FFEL Program Issues
FFEL Lender Repayment Disclosures to
Borrowers Who Are 60 Days Delinquent
or Who Are Having Difficulty Making
Payments (34 CFR 682.205(a)(4))
Comments: One commenter agreed
with the proposed change to provide
lenders with five business days rather
than the five calendar days specified in
current regulations to send the required
disclosure to a borrower who is 60 days
delinquent. The commenter also
supported the proposed change to
provide that a lender does not have to
send the required disclosure when a
borrower is having difficulty making
payments if the borrower’s difficulty
had already been resolved based on an
earlier communication between the
lender and the borrower. The
commenter agreed that multiple
disclosures would confuse the borrower.
Discussion: The Secretary appreciates
the commenter’s support.
Changes: None.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Administrative Wage Garnishment of
the Disposable Pay of Defaulted FFEL
Program Borrowers (34 CFR 682.410(b))
Borrower Hearing Opportunities on the
Enforceability of the Debt and a
Borrower’s Claim of Financial Hardship
(34 CFR 682.410(b)(9)(i))
Comments: One commenter noted
support for the changes made to the
FFEL administrative wage garnishment
regulations in the NPRM.
Discussion: The Department
appreciates the commenter’s support for
the revised regulatory language.
Changes: None.
Comments: Under proposed
§ 682.410(b)(9)(i)(F)(2)(iv), if a hearing
official upholds a borrower’s objection
to the amount or rate of withholding, a
guaranty agency ‘‘may’’ order a lesser
rate or amount that would allow the
borrower to meet basic living expenses.
On pages 45641 and 45642 of the
NPRM, we pointed out that this
provision differs from the rules
governing AWG for Department-held
loans at 34 CFR part 34, and that, in the
latter regulations, the word ‘‘must’’ is
used instead. We invited comments on
whether it was preferable to use ‘‘must’’
rather than ‘‘may’’. One commenter
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
supported the consensus language in the
NPRM without further explanation.
Another commenter agreed with the
Department’s suggestion that ‘‘must’’
was a preferable term because a hearing
official’s financial hardship
determination and decision regarding
the amount or rate of withholding
should be binding on the guaranty
agency issuing a withholding order, and
because the regulatory language for
guaranty agencies and the Department
should be consistent.
Discussion: We agree with the
commenter who expressed support for
changing the term ‘‘may’’ to ‘‘must.’’ Not
only is it important to ensure that
substantive provisions of the FFEL
Program AWG regulations are
consistent, to the extent practicable,
with the rules governing AWG for
Department-held loans, use of the term
‘‘must’’ would provide more equitable
treatment for borrowers who are subject
to AWG. Furthermore, use of the term
‘‘must’’ would ensure that borrowers
who receive an opportunity for an
independent determination of a
financial hardship objection will have
that determination followed by the
guaranty agency issuing a withholding
order. The decision of the hearing
official binds the guaranty agency or the
Secretary as to the maximum amount
that may be ordered withheld from the
borrower’s wages and neither has
discretion to order that a greater amount
be withheld.
Changes: We have changed ‘‘may’’ to
‘‘must’’ in § 682.410(b)(9)(i)(F)(2)(iv).
Comments: On page 45641 of the
NPRM, when discussing the
determination of whether a withholding
amount would cause a financial
hardship to a borrower, we invited
comments on whether the term
‘‘National Standards’’ used in the
proposed rules should be changed to
‘‘Collection Financial Standards’’ in the
final rules to conform to the term used
by the IRS to refer to such standards.
One commenter expressed support for
making this change in the final rule,
stating that the term ‘‘Collection
Financial Standards’’ more accurately
reflects all living expense category
standards used in determining whether
a withholding amount would cause a
financial hardship for the borrower.
Discussion: We agree with the
commenter’s reasons for changing the
term to ‘‘Collection Financial
Standards.’’ The IRS, which
promulgates the standards, uses the
term to include both what the IRS calls
the ‘‘National Standards’’ (food, etc.) as
well as the regionalized Housing and
Utilities Standards and Transportation
Standards. The latter include average
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65781
amounts spent for housing, utilities, and
transportation, which represent a
significant portion of borrowers’ living
expenses. The term ‘‘Collection
Financial Standards’’ is the correct title
of the IRS Standards that hearing
officials must use when determining the
financial hardship for borrowers.
Changes: We have changed the three
uses of the term ‘‘National Standards’’ to
‘‘Collection Financial Standards’’ in
§ 682.410(b)(9)(i)(F)(2)(ii) and (iii).
Comments: A commenter noted that
proposed § 682.410(b)(9)(i) does not
address a situation in which a guaranty
agency may be required to suspend a
withholding order. Under proposed
§ 682.405(a)(3), a borrower who makes
five qualifying payments under a
rehabilitation agreement can request
that the agency suspend a withholding
order. The commenter suggested
including a cross-reference in the AWG
regulations to § 682.405(a)(3) and a brief
description of a borrower’s right to
request suspension under that
provision.
Discussion: We agree with the
commenter’s suggestion and believe that
including such a reference in
§ 682.410(b)(9)(i) would be beneficial.
All AWG regulatory provisions are
located or referenced in § 682.410(b)(9)
to minimize confusion.
Changes: We have added a new
§ 682.410(b)(9)(i)(V) to include a crossreference to § 682.405(a)(3) and describe
the possible suspension of the
withholding order.
Comments: A commenter noted that
in proposed § 682.410(b)(9)(ii)(G), the
Department defines a withholding order
as the order a guaranty agency sends to
an employer directing the employer to
withhold the pay of the employed
borrower. However, the commenter also
noted that the Department states that
such an order may also be referred to as
a ‘‘wage garnishment order’’ or
‘‘garnishment order.’’ The commenter
suggested that only one of these terms
be used to avoid confusion with other
communications sent by the agency.
Discussion: In the proposed
regulations, the Department
distinguished between an ‘‘order,’’
which is the term for the mandate
issued to the employer requiring the
employer to withhold from the
borrower’s wages, and a ‘‘notice,’’ which
refers to the warning sent to the
borrower to alert the borrower that the
agency is preparing to enforce the loan
by garnishment of the borrower’s wages.
Because these two communications are
readily distinguished by the use of the
term ‘‘order’’ to refer to the legallybinding mandate and ‘‘notice’’ to refer
to correspondence sent to the borrower,
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
65782
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
we do not believe that alternative use of
the term ‘‘garnishment’’ or
‘‘withholding’’ prior to ‘‘order’’ will
cause any confusion.
Changes: None.
Comments: A commenter stated that
the proposed rule would allow
borrowers two new bases on which they
may object to AWG in the FFEL
program: Enforceability of the debt and
financial hardship. The commenter
further asserted that the HEA does not
specifically name these as permissible
objections, but acknowledges that
borrowers have been permitted to use
these objections. The commenter further
expressed concern that AWG hearing
officials are unqualified to make legal
determinations of loan enforceability.
The commenter therefore requested a
standardized appeal process if a hearing
official makes an enforceability
determination that the guaranty agency
believes is erroneous.
Discussion: First, we note that the
commenter is incorrect in asserting that
section 488A of the HEA does not
provide borrowers with the right to
object to AWG on the basis of claims
that the debt is not enforceable or on the
basis of financial hardship. We address
these issues in turn.
Second, Section 488A(a)(5) provides
borrowers the opportunity for a hearing
concerning ‘‘the existence or the amount
of the debt.’’ 20 U.S.C. 1095a(a)(5). It is
not clear which objections the
commenter considers the HEA to permit
the borrower to raise in the hearing, but
the statute is clear that if the borrower
objects to the existence or amount of the
debt claimed by the loan holder, the
hearing official must determine whether
the debt in question is enforceable, and
if so, what amount is enforceable. In the
context of section 488A of the HEA,
determining whether a debt ‘‘exists’’
entails more than a bookkeeping test of
assuring that all amounts disbursed and
payments received have been correctly
totaled. To reduce the hearing process to
a bookkeeping exercise is to suggest that
section 488A of the HEA empowers a
guarantor to issue a legally-binding
order that an individual’s wages be
withheld to collect a claim that
applicable law would bar the guarantor
from enforcing in any other proceeding,
such as a suit on the debt. Section 488A
of the HEA authorizes collection by
non-judicial wage garnishment
‘‘notwithstanding any provision of State
law.’’ 20 U.S.C. 1095a. That provision
does no more than preempt those State
laws that would require a creditor to
obtain a judicial writ in order to garnish
wages. Nothing in the language of
section 488A of the HEA suggests that
the statute preempts other applicable,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
non-preempted State law (e.g., forgery
or prior compromise) or Federal law
(e.g., discharge in bankruptcy) that
would bar enforcement of the claim
against the individual.
For this reason, it is the responsibility
of guaranty agencies to ensure that AWG
hearing officials are qualified to make
reasoned determinations regarding the
enforceability of Federal student loan
debts. Furthermore, prior to an AWG
hearing, a guaranty agency should have
already made a determination on the
enforceability of the debt. Section
682.406(a) requires an agency to
carefully evaluate that all due diligence
requirements were met and that the debt
is legally enforceable before requesting
a reinsurance payment on a loan.
In addition, promptly after paying the
default claim, the guarantor must give
the borrower notice of its intent to
collect the loan and report the default to
credit bureaus, and to provide ‘‘an
opportunity for an administrative
review of the legal enforceability or
past-due status of the loan.’’ 34 CFR
682.410(b)(5)(ii)(D) and (b)(5)(vi)(I).
Prior to an AWG hearing, the agency
should have therefore made its own
reasoned determination of the
enforceability of the debt and have
sufficient evidence supporting that
determination. The new language added
to the wage garnishment provisions is
not a new consideration not already
existing explicitly in these provisions
and implicitly in the mandate to
provide a hearing on the ‘‘existence’’ of
the debt.
Third, section 488A(a)(5) of the HEA
provides borrowers with an opportunity
for a hearing ‘‘on the terms of the
repayment schedule’’ if that schedule is
set by order and not by an agreement
with the borrower, as provided in
section 488A(a)(4) of the HEA. The only
interpretation of this provision that
implements the objective of the statute
is that the basis for such objection must
be a claim that withholding the full 15
percent would cause financial hardship.
The Department has consistently
interpreted that phrase, and the
identical language in 5 U.S.C. 5514,
which authorizes Federal Salary Offset
and from which this provision appears
to have originated, to so provide. See,
e.g., 68 FR 8142, 8151 (Feb. 19, 2003)
and 67 FR 18072, 18073 (April 12,
2002). In establishing the terms of the
repayment schedule, a determination
must be made as to whether the
proposed withholding order would be
excessive in light of the borrower’s
reasonable and necessary living
expenses.
Finally, with regard to the comment
that the Department should establish an
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
administrative appeal procedure to be
available for review of hearing official
decisions that the guarantor believes to
be erroneous, the Department notes first
that in some instances, State law
applicable to the administrative
proceedings of State agencies may
provide such an appellate review
procedure, and those laws may provide
an opportunity for borrowers or
guarantors to challenge decisions of
hearing officials. Those guarantors that
are not State agencies subject to this
kind of administrative appeal regime are
in no different posture than the
Department itself, which has no
opportunity to appeal adverse rulings by
independent hearing officials with
regard to proposed salary offsets to
collect from Federal employees under 5
U.S.C. 5415. Federal employees who
dispute the hearing official’s ruling may
sue the Department under the Federal
Administrative Procedure Act to
challenge that ruling. See, e.g., Sibley v.
U.S. Department of Education, 913 F.
Supp. 1181 (N.D. Ill. 1995), aff’d, 111
F.3d 133 (7th Cir. 1997). Applicable law
gives the Department no corresponding
right to challenge and obtain a judicial
review of an adverse ruling by a hearing
official. The Department has not
established any administrative appeal
procedure for challenges to AWG
hearing decisions made by Department
staff, and has no resources sufficient to
establish a Federal review process for
AWG hearing decisions for loans held
by guarantors. Moreover, regardless of
the party that might decide such an
appeal, fundamental fairness dictates
that any administrative appeal process
be available for borrowers as well as
guarantors.
Therefore, the proposed regulations at
§ 682.410(b)(9) do not create new
borrower objections; instead, the
proposed changes would make the FFEL
Program regulations consistent with
existing Departmental regulations.
Changes: None.
Comments: A commenter noted that
proposed § 682.410(b)(9)(i)(I) includes
rules governing ex parte
communications (communications
where one or more parties to the hearing
are not present) in AWG hearings and
that the provision precludes ex parte
communications on non-procedural
matters. The commenter expressed
concern that, as drafted, the proposed
rule would unnecessarily impede the
administration of the hearing process.
The commenter also requested
clarification that substantive ex parte
communications during a hearing are
permissible if the absent party has been
given proper notice of the hearing.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Discussion: We agree with the
commenter’s suggestions. The intention
of the proposed provision was to ensure
that both parties to the hearing are
present and able to participate.
However, we recognize that borrowers
would not be disadvantaged by allowing
certain administrative matters to be
handled ex parte in addition to matters
involving the time, place, and manner of
the hearing as would be permitted
under the proposed rule.
We also agree that the hearing process
should not be unnecessarily delayed
due to the unexcused absence of one of
the parties when proper notice of the
hearing has been given to the absent
party. Under the proposed rules, a
guaranty agency is required to suspend
a withholding order on the 61st day
after a hearing request was received.
Therefore, without allowing an ex parte
hearing to proceed in such contexts, it
would be possible for a party to
effectively enforce the suspension of an
AWG order by failing to appear for
properly scheduled and noticed
hearings, because such hearings could
not proceed in the absence of one of the
parties.
Changes: We have revised
§ 682.410(b)(9)(i)(I) to more generally
convey the intent that communications
on administrative matters not related to
the substance of the AWG hearings may
be conducted on an ex parte basis. We
have also revised this section to allow
an ex parte hearing to proceed if the
parties have agreed on the time, place,
and manner of the hearing and the
borrower has been given proper notice
of the same but does not appear for the
hearing.
Comments: A commenter stated that
proposed § 682.410(b)(9)(i)(F)(1)(ii) and
(b)(9)(i)(J) permit a borrower to raise
new objections and provide additional
evidence before the hearing is
completed. The commenter further
noted that while the hearing official
may grant an extension of the 60-day
decision deadline so the borrower may
present additional evidence, the
regulations do not allow extension of
the deadline to raise objections. The
commenter requested a clarification on
whether the 60 day decision deadline
could be extended for the latter purpose.
Discussion: We agree with the
commenter’s suggestion. If a borrower
has not raised an objection to the AWG
order but wishes to do so, the hearing
official may grant an extension of the
60-day deadline at his or her discretion.
Changes: We have revised
§ 682.410(b)(9)(i)(J)(1) to state that the
borrower may request an extension of
the 60-day deadline for purposes of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
raising an objection not previously
raised.
Comments: A commenter noted that
proposed § 682.410(b)(9)(i)(J) permits a
hearing official to grant extensions of
the 60-day deadline for a decision to be
rendered. The commenter further noted
that while this deadline may be
extended by the hearing official, there is
no associated extension of the
requirement under proposed
§ 682.410(b)(9)(i)(H) that suspension of
the withholding order occur if a
decision is not rendered by the 61st day.
The commenter requested that the
regulations be modified to require that
the suspension of the withholding order
be delayed past the 61st day for a period
equal to the number of days that the
hearing deadline is delayed.
Discussion: The purpose of
suspending the withholding order
beginning on the 61st day is to create an
incentive for ensuring that the AWG
hearing is completed and a decision
issued on a timely basis. While the
commenter is correct that
§ 682.410(b)(9)(i)(J)(1) permits the
hearing official to grant extensions of
the 60-day deadline at the request of the
borrower, § 682.410(b)(9)(i)(J)(2)
requires the hearing official to grant an
extension made at the request of a
guaranty agency. Changing the
regulations to be consistent with the
commenter’s suggestion would create a
scenario where a guaranty agency could
request extensions that a hearing official
would be compelled to grant, resulting
in failure to suspend a withholding
order long past the 61-day deadline
required under the proposed
regulations. Such a regulatory
framework would eliminate the
guaranty agency’s incentive to ensure a
timely hearing.
Changes: None.
Comments: A commenter requested
that the AWG regulations be modified to
allow a borrower to request that AWG
continue during the hearing process.
The commenter noted that the proposed
regulations governing loan
rehabilitation provide for suspension of
a garnishment order for a borrower
pursuing loan rehabilitation, but allow
the borrower to affirmatively request to
remain in AWG while completing the
loan rehabilitation process. The
commenter stated that these two
situations are comparable and that
rather than automatically suspending a
withholding order on the 61st day after
the borrower’s hearing request, a
borrower should be able to request that
the order not be suspended.
Discussion: We believe there are
significant distinctions between the two
situations the commenter describes. In
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65783
many cases, the borrower seeking loan
rehabilitation intends to pay the balance
of his or her loan, and continuation of
AWG in that context is one plausible
mechanism by which a borrower would
seek a reduced principal balance upon
successful rehabilitation of the loan.
However, a borrower objecting to the
amount or existence of the debt or the
rate of withholding would not, by
definition, be interested in the
continuation of AWG at the existing
rate. In addition, we are concerned that
providing the borrower the option to
continue AWG may make the borrower
feel pressured to accept the offer, or
cause the borrower to fail to understand
he or she has the option to decline it.
Changes: None.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, the
Secretary must determine whether this
regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and,
therefore, subject to the requirements of
the Executive order and subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as an action likely to
result in a rule that may—
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, or
adversely affect a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities in a material way (also
referred to as an ‘‘economically
significant’’ rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
stated in the Executive order.
This regulatory action will have an
annual effect on the economy of more
than $100 million. It is estimated to
reduce annual paperwork burden on
entities participating in the Federal
student loan programs by approximately
$109 million. Therefore, this final
regulatory action is economically
significant and subject to review by
OMB under section 3(f)(1) of Executive
Order 12866.
We have also reviewed these
regulations pursuant to Executive Order
13563, which supplements and
explicitly reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
65784
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866. To the extent
permitted by law, Executive Order
13563 requires that an agency—
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only
upon a reasoned determination that
their benefits justify their costs
(recognizing that some benefits and
costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the
least burden on society, consistent with
attaining regulatory objectives, taking
into account, among other things, and to
the extent practicable, the costs of
cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative
regulatory approaches, select those
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify
performance objectives, rather than
specifying the behavior or manner of
compliance that regulated entities must
adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available
alternatives to direct regulation,
including providing economic
incentives to encourage the desired
behavior, such as user fees or
marketable permits, or providing
information upon which choices can be
made by the public.
Executive Order 13563 requires
agencies ‘‘to use the best available
techniques to quantify anticipated
present and future benefits and costs as
accurately as possible.’’ The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
within OMB emphasized that these
techniques may include ‘‘identifying
changing future compliance costs that
might result from technological
innovation or anticipated behavioral
changes.’’
We are issuing these final regulations
only upon a reasoned determination
that their benefits justify their costs. In
choosing among alternative regulatory
approaches, we selected those
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Based on the analysis below, the
Department believes that these final
regulations are consistent with the
principles in Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this
regulatory action will not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
In this regulatory impact analysis we
discuss the need for regulatory action,
the potential costs and benefits, net
budget impacts, assumptions,
limitations, and data sources, as well as
regulatory alternatives we considered.
Elsewhere in this section under
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we
identify and explain burdens
specifically associated with information
collection requirements.
The Need for Regulatory Action
As detailed in the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) published July 29,
2013, the Department is issuing these
final regulations to clarify a number of
issues related to the administration of
the Federal student loan programs, to
make the Direct Loan regulations
comprehensive, to eliminate regulations
in the FFEL Program that are no longer
needed because origination of new FFEL
loans ceased with the passage of the
SAFRA Act, to reflect changes made to
interest rates in the Direct Loan Program
by the Bipartisan Student Loan
Certainty Act of 2013, and to clarify the
loan rehabilitation process for borrowers
with defaulted student loans.
The Secretary is revising the Direct
Loan regulations to incorporate
provisions from the FFEL regulations
that were only cross-referenced. By
incorporating the substantive provisions
in the Direct Loan regulations instead of
simply cross-referencing to the FFEL
regulations, the Direct Loan regulations
will be comprehensive. This is
appropriate since the Direct Loan
Program is now the primary Federal
student loan program. The elimination
of new loan originations in the FFEL
Program means that many of the current
FFEL Program regulations are no longer
necessary. In addition, the final
regulations improve consistency across
the FFEL, Direct Loan and Perkins Loan
programs. Previously, the different title
IV loan programs were regulated and
administered differently in areas where
they could be consistent. The final
regulations eliminate these differences
where appropriate.
The final regulations provide clarity
and transparency to the administration
of the loans programs. Over the years
there have been consistent concerns that
borrowers are unable to properly
manage their Federal student loans
because of confusion over their rights
and options. This is particularly true for
borrowers who are delinquent on their
loans and borrowers who experience
personal hardship. The final regulations
clarify the rules for borrowers and help
them gain a better understanding of
their rights and responsibilities. Also,
the final regulations provide better
guidance to lenders and guaranty
agencies about their roles and
responsibilities in servicing Federal
student loans.
One area in which concerns have
been raised about the consistent and
appropriate treatment of borrowers is in
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the rehabilitation of defaulted loans.
The Department wants to ensure that
borrowers who wish to rehabilitate their
defaulted loans are properly informed
about their rights to ‘‘reasonable and
affordable’’ payments and how a
reasonable and affordable payment is
determined.
Prior regulations allowed a borrower
with defaulted student loans to
rehabilitate those loans by making nine
full, on-time payments (within 20 days
of the due date) over a 10-month period
in an amount agreed to by the borrower
and the loan holder (the Department for
a defaulted Direct Loan, a guaranty
agency or the Department for a
defaulted FFEL Program loan). These
regulations provided that the payment
amount required by the guaranty agency
or the Secretary must be reasonable and
affordable. However, as described in the
NPRM published July 29, 2013, there
have been complaints that guaranty
agencies, the Department, and the debt
collection agencies that collect Federal
student loans require payments that
exceed this standard.
The Secretary believes that providing
borrowers with an improved process to
rehabilitate a defaulted loan is in the
best interests of the taxpayers and the
borrower. Defaulted borrowers continue
to accrue interest on the debt and are
charged collection costs. In addition, the
default harms their credit scores, and
the borrowers may have trouble
purchasing homes or obtaining auto
loans or other types of consumer credit.
By improving the opportunities for
defaulted borrowers to rehabilitate their
student loans, the Department will not
only improve the chances for collection
of the full amount of the debt but also
help some defaulted borrowers return to
full economic participation.
Some defaulted borrowers who may
be interested in rehabilitating their
defaulted loans are also subject to
administrative wage garnishment
(AWG). Those borrowers may be
discouraged from trying to fully
rehabilitate their loans because they fear
that they will not be able to make loan
payments in addition to the amount
garnished. Through these final
regulations, the Department aims to add
clarity to the AWG process so that
affected borrowers will understand what
is required for AWG to be suspended.
Discussion of Costs, Benefits, and
Transfers
Adding clarity to the loan
rehabilitation process offers many
benefits. The Department believes that
rehabilitation offers benefits for
students, the Department, and the
Nation. Defaulted borrowers may be
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
more willing to complete the
rehabilitation process. Defaulted
borrowers may see significant
improvements in their credit scores and
purchasing power. As these borrowers
become bigger participants in the
economy, an improved loan
rehabilitation process should support
positive growth.
Improved loan rehabilitation rates
will also allow the Department and
collection agencies to concentrate their
collection efforts on non-paying
borrowers. In general, the more student
loan accounts that are active and
current, the better for the programs. The
Department believes these regulatory
changes will help ensure that the
Federal student loan programs remain
strong and support maximum access to
higher education for American students.
As detailed in the NPRM, loan
rehabilitations have steadily increased
over the past decade, from just over
$223 million in defaulted Federal
student loan debt in FY 2001 to $5
billion in FY 2011. Loan rehabilitations
as a share of collections rose from
approximately 4.4 percent in FY 2001 to
43.0 percent in FY 2011. Part of the
increase in loan rehabilitation can be
linked to growing enrollment, rising
tuition, and two economic slowdowns,
all of which led to more student loan
borrowing. However, the higher
percentage of total collections that
comes from loan rehabilitation shows
that the Department and guaranty
agencies are working with borrowers to
help them take advantage of the
opportunity for loan rehabilitation.
Even though these final regulations
could possibly result in lower payment
amounts for borrowers while they are
rehabilitating their defaulted loans, the
borrowers would still be responsible for
paying their entire debt. Furthermore,
even if loan rehabilitation payments are
lowered on average across the board, the
Department believes that the overall
benefits of having more borrowers
current in their debt payments will
outweigh any short-term cost of reduced
payments.
Overall, the true monetary effect of
these final regulations will depend
heavily on various factors. The
Department has implemented changes
to its income-driven repayment options
and expects these changes to help slow
a rising default rate by offering
improved payment management options
to borrowers. Also, as the economy
continues to improve, the default rate
may drop as more borrowers find
employment.
Outside of loan rehabilitation, the
regulations would provide many
additional benefits to borrowers and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
promote a more efficient and
transparent Federal student loan
program.
By expanding from 90 to 120 days the
window during which a borrower may
qualify for a closed school loan
discharge after withdrawing from a
school that eventually closes, the
number of borrowers who qualify for the
discharge may increase. However,
school closures are a relatively rare
occurrence. In 2007, 43 schools
participating in the title IV programs
closed. This number dropped to 30 in
2008 and to 18 in 2011. While the
extended window may mean that more
borrowers qualify for a closed school
discharge, we do not believe the
extension will result in a significant
increased cost. In 2011, 214 borrowers
received closed school loan discharges
for loans valued at approximately
$870,000. This was an increase from the
2010 numbers of 50 borrowers with a
loan value of $467,000, but still
represents a very small portion of
outstanding federal student loans.
The expansion of circumstances in
which lenders may grant administrative
forbearance gives the Department and
FFEL lenders more flexibility in dealing
with defaulted borrowers. These
revisions also clarify the eligibility
criteria for forbearances and promote a
more transparent loan program.
Borrowers will see other benefits
under these final regulations as well.
The changes to the AWG hearing
process will help borrowers gain a better
understanding of their rights and
responsibilities in that process and
ensure that borrowers are treated
consistently by guaranty agencies and
the Department. Additionally, the
revisions to § 685.301 will allow
students who transfer from one school
into non-term or certain standard nonterm programs at a different school
during the middle of an academic year
to initially be eligible for a Direct Loan
to cover the remainder of the academic
year that began at the prior school (up
to their remaining eligibility under the
annual loan limits), regardless of
whether the new school accepts credits
from the prior school.
The final regulations also reflect
changes made to interest rates in the
Direct Loan Program by the Bipartisan
Student Loan Certainty Act of 2013
(Pub. L. 113–28). As detailed in
§ 685.202, under this Act interest rates
will be determined each June for new
loans being made for the upcoming
award year, which runs from July 1 to
the following June 30. Each loan will
have a fixed interest rate for the life of
the loan based on rates for specific
Treasury bills or bonds, an add-on
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65785
determined by a combination of loan
type and undergraduate or graduate
student status, and an interest rate cap.
For example, the interest rate for Direct
Subsidized and Unsubsidized Loans
made to undergraduates with a first
disbursement date on or after July 1,
2013, and before July 1, 2014, is 3.86
percent, based on the bond equivalent
rate of 91-day Treasury bills auctioned
at the final auction held prior to that
June 1 plus 2.05 percentage points. The
interest rate for Direct Subsidized Loans
and Direct Unsubsidized Loans made to
undergraduate students is capped at
8.25 percent. Under this policy,
borrowers can benefit from lower
interest rates while having the certainty
of a fixed rate and a cap on the
maximum interest rate as Federal
borrowing costs vary in the future. If
Federal borrowing costs rise in the
future, borrowers with loans in later
cohorts may have interest rates greater
than would have been the case if the
interest rates prior to the enactment of
the Bipartisan Student Loan Certainty
Act of 2013, had remained in effect, so
the inclusion of the caps for various
loan types limits future borrowers’
exposure to interest rate increases.
Overall, these final regulations
strengthen the Federal student loan
programs and help support the
American postsecondary education
system. As more and more students now
depend on student loans to pay for their
college education, it is essential that
borrowers fully understand the rights
and responsibilities that are a part of
their student loan obligations. It is also
essential that the student loan programs
operate as efficiently as possible. These
revisions are part of the Department’s
commitment to running efficient loan
programs that support more than ten
million students per year. This number
will grow as the country pursues the
President’s 2020 goal of leading the
world in college degree attainment.
Keeping a strong higher education
system will be essential to America
maintaining its economic advantage in
the world.
Regulatory Alternatives Considered and
Analysis of Significant Comments
We discussed the regulatory
alternatives we considered in the NPRM
(78 FR 45668). Further, as discussed in
the Analysis of Comments and Changes
section of this preamble, 25 comments
were received in the comment period
following publication of the NPRM that
ended August 28, 2013. These
comments covered a range of issues,
including suggestions for technical
changes to the FFEL and Direct Loan
regulations. The process for determining
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65786
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
a reasonable and affordable payment
amount in loan rehabilitation received
the most comment.
In particular, several commenters
suggested switching the order of the two
methods for determining the reasonable
and affordable payment amount for loan
rehabilitation so that the 15 percent
formula would be used first, and only
borrowers who object to the amount
calculated under this formula would
need to provide detailed financial
information. Consumer advocates and
commenters representing collection
agencies agreed that the amount of
information required by the proposed
financial information form could deter
borrowers from pursuing loan
rehabilitation. The primary use of the 15
percent formula will allow the borrower
and the collection agency to determine
a reasonable and affordable payment
over the phone based on the borrower’s
income and family size, subject to later
confirmation once the borrower
provides required documentation. We
agreed with these comments and
adopted this approach in the final rule.
In addition to the comments
proposing using the 15 percent formula
first, we considered the suggestion that
an agency should be able to negotiate a
reasonable and affordable payment with
the borrower on the phone so that the
loan rehabilitation process could be
initiated when they have the first
discussion about rehabilitation with a
borrower. The Department agrees that it
is important to be able to offer a
borrower a reasonable and affordable
payment amount during the initial
discussion of loan rehabilitation but
believes that use of the 15 percent
formula, with documentation to follow,
as the first option allows this possibility
while ensuring consistent treatment of
borrowers seeking loan rehabilitation.
Net Budget Impacts
As detailed in the NPRM, the final
regulations are estimated to have a net
budget impact of $2.8 to $3.4 million
over ten years from 2013–2022 driven
by the expansion of the time period for
eligibility for a closed school discharge.
Consistent with the requirements of the
Credit Reform Act of 1990, budget cost
estimates for the student loan programs
reflect the estimated net present value of
all future non-administrative Federal
costs associated with a cohort of loans.
A cohort reflects all loans originated in
a given fiscal year.
In general, these estimates were
developed using the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB’s)
credit subsidy calculator. The calculator
takes projected future cash flows from
the Department’s student loan cost
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
estimation model and produces
discounted subsidy rates reflecting the
net present value of all future Federal
costs associated with awards made in a
given fiscal year. Values are calculated
using a ‘‘basket of zeros’’ methodology
under which each cash flow is
discounted using the interest rate of a
zero-coupon Treasury bond with the
same maturity as that cash flow. To
ensure comparability across programs,
this methodology is incorporated into
the calculator and used Government
wide to develop estimates of the Federal
cost of credit programs. Accordingly,
the Department believes it is the
appropriate methodology to use in
developing estimates for these
regulations. That said, in developing the
following Accounting Statement, the
Department consulted with OMB on
how to integrate our discounting
methodology with the discounting
methodology traditionally used in
developing regulatory impact analyses.
Absent evidence of the effect of these
regulations on student behavior, budget
cost estimates were based on behavior
as reflected in various Department data
sets and longitudinal surveys listed
under Assumptions, Limitations, and
Data Sources. Student loan cost
estimates are developed across five risk
categories: Students at less than fouryear for-profit institutions, students at
less than four-year public and non-profit
institutions, freshmen/sophomores at
four-year institutions, juniors/seniors at
four-year institutions, and graduate
students. Risk categories have separate
assumptions based on the historical
pattern of behavior—for example, the
likelihood of default or the likelihood to
use statutory deferment or discharge
benefits—of borrowers in each category.
Closed School Discharge
The primary budget impact of the
final regulations relates to the extension
of the time period for a closed school
discharge. The final regulations extend
the previous 90-day period for a closed
school discharge to a 120-day period
and provide examples of what qualifies
as an exceptional circumstance under
which the Secretary may provide a
further extension. We estimate these
changes to have a cost of approximately
$3.1 million over 10 years as the pool
of borrowers eligible for discharge will
increase. The costs are limited by the
small number of closed schools, the
availability of teach-outs, and the
assignment of recoveries to the
Department. In the NPRM, the
Department estimated that extending
the window to 120 days would result in
an additional 100 students receiving
closed school discharges totaling
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
approximately $400,000 annually. The
Department requested comments about
the assumptions and estimates for this
provision. We did not receive any
comments and did not make any
changes to the closed school discharge
regulations.
Loan Rehabilitation
Two areas related to loan
rehabilitation affected by the final
regulations are the determination of the
reasonable and affordable payment for
loan rehabilitation and the limitations
on the use of AWG while a borrower is
attempting to rehabilitate a defaulted
loan. While the regulatory changes in
both areas would change the period of
time and sources of payments the
Department receives, the Department
does not estimate that the regulations
would have any significant budget
impact.
The final regulations refine the
process for determining the reasonable
and affordable payment for loan
rehabilitation to improve consistency
across the title IV loan programs. The
prior regulations for the FFEL Program
require guaranty agencies to negotiate a
reasonable and affordable payment for
loan rehabilitation with the borrower
that takes into account all of the
borrower’s financial circumstances. The
Direct Loan Program did not have
similar provisions, but the program does
have a similar process for receiving
income and expense information and
negotiating a payment with the
borrower. Over the past months, the
Department developed a tool
incorporating the 15 percent formula in
determining reasonable and affordable
payments that has helped increase loan
rehabilitations. As discussed in the
Regulatory Alternatives Considered and
Analysis of Comments and Changes
sections of this preamble, the
Department has agreed to reverse the
order of the methods for determining a
reasonable and affordable payment so
that the 15 percent formula comes first.
With approximately $1.72 billion in
defaulted loan balances rehabilitated by
the Department in FY 2012, loan
rehabilitation is a valuable collections
tool that also allows borrowers to
improve their credit history and regain
eligibility for title IV, HEA Federal
student aid. The Department and
guaranty agencies have emphasized
keeping the loan rehabilitation payment
amount close to the payment the
borrower will have to make following
rehabilitation to avoid significant
increases in the required payment. The
availability of income-driven repayment
plans after rehabilitation of the loan
expands the range of payments possible
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
during rehabilitation that would be in
line with post-rehabilitation payments
(although payments made under a loan
rehabilitation agreement that are based
on the 15 percent formula do not count
toward IBR plan loan forgiveness if a
borrower who has successfully
rehabilitated a defaulted loan chooses to
repay under the IBR plan postrehabilitation). This new standard may
also help decrease the number of
borrowers who re-default, as the
required loan rehabilitation plan
payment amount should be very similar
to the payment amount they make when
they return to regular repayment. The
final regulations use the 15 percent
formula for initial determination of a
reasonable and affordable loan
rehabilitation payment, and allow
borrowers to object to that payment
through use of a standardized form that
accounts for the borrower’s income and
expenses to obtain an alternative
amount. A borrower may choose
between the two proposed payment
amounts.
For individual borrowers, the
payment offered as a rehabilitation
amount calculated using the 15 percent
formula might be less than what the
Department would determine to be
appropriate based on an assessment of
the borrower’s income and expenses or
through negotiation with the borrower
without use of a formula. If this is the
case, the Department would collect less
money during the months the borrower
attempts loan rehabilitation, but the
borrower would still owe the remaining
balance after rehabilitation. In addition,
to the extent lower payments encourage
borrowers to complete loan
rehabilitation and continue payments
they otherwise would not make, the
final regulations may increase total
payments over the life of the loan for
some borrowers. The likelihood of
borrowers paying less, the same, or
more over the life of a loan over time as
a result of the changes in defining a
reasonable and affordable payment is
uncertain, but the Department does not
expect it to have an appreciable budget
impact.
Perkins Loans Provisions
The final regulations also address a
few areas related to the Perkins Loan
Program including: Revising
cancellation progression rates;
modifying the treatment of healthrelated breaks in service for certain loan
cancellations; making the eligibility for
a graduate fellowship deferment
consistent with FFEL and Direct Loan
program criteria; making a technical
correction to eliminate the debt-toincome economic hardship deferment
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
category for borrowers working less than
full-time; defining ‘‘on-time’’ for
rehabilitation payments; and allowing
assignment to the Department of Perkins
Loans made before September 13, 1982,
without the borrower’s Social Security
Number (SSN). No changes were made
to these provisions as a result of
comments on the NPRM. The
Department does not estimate a
significant budget impact from these
provisions. No appropriations have been
made to support the Perkins Loan
Program since 2008, and institutions
make loans from payments made on
their portfolios of existing loans. The
effect on the Federal budget of increased
costs in the Perkins Loan Program is a
possible reduction of Federal Perkins
Loan assets available to be recalled in
future years.
The slight changes in timing
associated with defining the on-time
payment standard at 20 days is not
expected to change the number of
borrowers successfully rehabilitating
their Perkins loans or the ultimate
amount collected from those borrowers,
so no budget impact is expected. The
ability to assign loans to the Department
without the borrower’s SSN may
facilitate some institutions leaving the
program and, if the Department is able
to collect on those loans, result in some
small additional revenues.
These final regulations change the
Department’s longstanding policy that a
borrower who switches jobs which
qualify for loan cancellation under the
Perkins Loan Program results in the
borrower returning to the first-year
cancellation rate. Instead, the final
regulations allow borrowers who switch
between cancellation categories with the
same rate of progression to continue the
progression from the last year under the
prior category; however, the borrower
returns to the first-year cancellation rate
if the borrower switches to a category
with a different progression rate. While
some borrowers may be able to
accelerate cancellation of their loans or
achieve full cancellation, the nature of
the categories affected by the policy
change limits the likelihood of
borrowers switching between them. To
the extent a small number of borrowers
do switch and maintain their
progression rate instead of falling back
to year one, the primary effect is on the
timing of cancellation received, not the
amount.
Additionally, the final regulations
change the current Perkins Loan
treatment of a break in teaching service
for pregnancy or illness. Previously, to
receive credit for a year of teaching
service the borrower had to complete
the first half of the academic year, begin
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65787
the second half, and have the employer
agree that the teacher fulfilled that year
of the contract. In the FFEL and Direct
Loan programs, the regulations provide
that if a borrower was unable to
complete the second half of the year of
teaching for reasons covered by the
FMLA, the service could count towards
cancellation if the employer agreed the
contract has been fulfilled for the year.
The final regulations apply the
FMLA-related break-in-service
exception to all Perkins Loan
cancellation categories, not just
teachers. As Perkins loan cancellation
does not require consecutive service, the
Department expects this provision may
allow some borrowers to receive credit
for a year that would not otherwise have
counted as service and speed up the
ultimate cancellation of the loan, but it
will not significantly expand the
number of borrowers who achieve loan
cancellation as their next year of service
could qualify instead. These
cancellation provisions may affect the
timing of when borrowers achieve
cancellation, but the Department does
not estimate that they will significantly
increase the overall amount cancelled.
Additional Provisions
Many of the final regulations have no
impact on the Federal budget as they
reflect statutory changes already
incorporated into the budget baseline or
clarify existing practices. These final
regulations reflect changes made to
interest rates in the Direct Loan Program
by the Bipartisan Student Loan
Certainty Act of 2013. These final
regulations eliminate many regulations
relating to the origination and
administration of FFEL Program loans.
Those regulations became irrelevant
when new FFEL Program loan
originations ended as of July 1, 2010.
Any costs or savings resulting from the
end of FFEL Program loan originations
were attributed to the SAFRA Act, so
there is no estimated budget impact
from these provisions. The budget
impact of these changes was already
incorporated into the budget baseline.
Updates were also made to the Direct
Loan regulations to incorporate specific
provisions that previously were
included in the Direct Loan regulations
by cross-reference to the FFEL
regulations. The restructuring of the
Direct Loan regulations to remove
references to the FFEL Program
regulations or to reflect current practices
is not estimated to have a budget
impact.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65788
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Assumptions, Limitations, and Data
Sources
In developing these estimates, a wide
range of data sources was used,
including data from the National
Student Loan Data System; operational
and financial data from Department of
Education systems, including especially
the Fiscal Operations Report and
Application to Participate (FISAP); and
data from a range of surveys conducted
by the National Center for Education
Statistics, such as the 2008 National
Postsecondary Student Aid Survey and
the 2004 Beginning Postsecondary
Student Survey. Data from other
sources, such as the U.S. Census
Bureau, were also used.
Accounting Statement
As required by OMB Circular A–4
(available at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/
omb/assets/omb/circulars/a004/a4.pdf), in Table 1, we have prepared an
accounting statement showing the
classification of the expenditures
associated with the provisions of these
regulations. This table provides our best
estimate of the changes in Federal
student aid payments as a result of these
regulations. Expenditures are classified
as transfers from the Federal
Government to student loan borrowers.
The transfers with respect to the change
in interest rate policy use the
annualized outlays as estimated by the
Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and
discounted to 2013 at 7 percent and 3
percent. While the Department generally
does not use estimated outlays from
CBO in evaluating regulations, the
interest rate policy changes included in
these final regulations are statutory and
the Department determined that this
approach would be appropriate in this
instance.
TABLE 1—ACCOUNTING STATEMENT: CLASSIFICATION OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
[In millions]
Benefits
Category
7%
3%
Greater consistency between the title IV loan programs ........................................................................................
Not Quantified
Category
Costs
7%
Costs of compliance with paperwork requirements ................................................................................................
3%
¥$109.1
¥$109.8
Category
Transfers
7%
Reduced payments to Federal Government from additional borrowers receiving closed school discharges ........
Statutory changes to the Direct Loan interest rates: Difference in transfer payments from borrowers to the
Federal government against a baseline prior to the enactment of the Bipartisan Student Loan Certainty Act
of 2013 .................................................................................................................................................................
See the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 section of this document for
further information on the $109.1
million reduction in costs of compliance
with paperwork requirements.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
These regulations affect institutions
that participate in the title IV, HEA
programs, including alternative
certification programs not housed at
institutions, and individual borrowers.
The U.S. Small Business Administration
(SBA) Size Standards define for-profit
institutions as ‘‘small businesses’’ if
they are independently owned and
operated and not dominant in their field
of operation with total annual revenue
below $7,000,000. The SBA Size
Standards define nonprofit institutions
as small organizations if they are
independently owned and operated and
not dominant in their field of operation,
or as small entities if they are
institutions controlled by governmental
entities with populations below 50,000.
The revenues involved in the sector
affected by these regulations, and the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
concentration of ownership of
institutions by private owners or public
systems means that the number of title
IV, HEA eligible institutions that are
small entities would be limited but for
the fact that the nonprofit entities fit
within the definition of a small
organization regardless of revenue.
Given the definitions above, several of
the entities subject to the proposed
regulations are small, leading to the
preparation of this analysis.
Description of the Reasons That Action
by the Agency Is Being Considered
With these regulations, the
Department removes certain regulations
governing the FFEL Program that are no
longer needed and revises Direct Loan
Program regulations to ensure that they
are comprehensive and to add
consistency and clarity to all regulations
governing student loans by revising
where applicable. Through these
regulations, the Department also
provides clarity to the loan
rehabilitation process for borrowers
with defaulted student loans.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
3%
$0.40
$0.40
$1,168
$467
Succinct Statement of the Objectives of,
and Legal Basis for, the Regulations
The final regulations amend the FFEL
and Direct Loan program regulations to:
reflect changes made to the HEA by the
SAFRA Act; incorporate other statutory
changes in the Direct Loan Program
regulations; update, strengthen, and
clarify various areas of the Student
Assistance General Provisions, Perkins
Loan, FFEL, and Direct Loan program
regulations; and provide for greater
consistency in the regulations governing
title IV, HEA student loan programs.
In addition, on January 21, 2011,
President Obama issued Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’ (76 FR 3821).
The order requires all Federal agencies
to ‘‘consider how best to promote
retrospective analysis of rules that may
be outmoded, ineffective, insufficient,
or excessively burdensome, and to
modify, streamline, expand, or repeal
them in accordance with what has been
learned.’’ Accordingly, on August 22,
2011, the Department issued its Plan for
Retrospective Analysis of Existing
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Regulations. (See ed.gov/policy/gen/reg/
retrospective-analysis/).
Our plan identified a number of
regulatory initiatives for retrospective
review and analysis. One of those
initiatives was transitioning from the
FFEL Program, under which new loans
ceased on July 1, 2010, to the Direct
Loan Program. These final regulations
remove obsolete FFEL Program
regulations.
Description of and, Where Feasible, an
Estimate of the Number of Small
Entities to Which the Regulations Will
Apply
The final regulations affect several
categories of entities involved in the
administration and servicing of Federal
student loans. Many of the regulations
relate to notifications, servicing, or
collection activities done by loan
servicers or entities acting for the
Federal government. The Department
does not expect these entities to meet
the applicable definition of ‘‘small
entity.’’ The final regulations related to
Perkins Loans will affect the institutions
65789
that participate in the program, some of
which would be classified as small
entities. As discussed above, private
non-profit institutions that do not
dominate in their field are defined as
small entities and a few other
institutions that participate in the
Perkins Loan Program do not have
revenues above $7 million and are also
categorized as small entities. Table 2
summarizes AY 2010–11 Perkins loan
disbursements by institutions that
qualify as small entities. Based on the
definition of non-profit institutions as
small entities, approximately 59 percent
of institutions that disbursed Perkins
loans in AY2010–11 were small entities.
TABLE 2—AY2010–11 PERKINS LOAN DISBURSEMENT SUMMARY
AY2010–11
Public
Perkins Loan Institutions with disbursements .................................................
Small entities with Perkins disbursements ......................................................
% of small entities by control ...........................................................................
Overall Disbursements ....................................................................................
% by control .....................................................................................................
Amounts at Small Entities ...............................................................................
In the NPRM, the Secretary invited
comments from small entities as to
whether they believe the proposed
changes would have a significant
economic impact on them. We did not
receive any comments.
545
2
0.4%
387,694,908
45.26%
53,467
Description of the Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping and Other Compliance
Requirements of the Regulations,
Including an Estimate of the Classes of
Small Entities That Will Be Subject to
the Requirement and the Type of
Professional Skills Necessary for
Preparation of the Report or Record
The various provisions in the final
regulations will modify or increase the
paperwork burden on entities
participating in the FFEL, Direct Loan,
or Perkins Loan programs, as described
in the Paperwork Reduction Act section.
Much of this burden is associated with
Non-profit
874
874
100.0%
448,589,990
52.37%
448,589,990
For-profit
107
25
23.4%
20,332,961
2.37%
1,012,596
Total
1526
901
59.0%
856,617,859
100%
2,808,851
borrowers or the Department and its
agents and therefore does not affect
small entities. Table 3 summarizes the
estimated burden on small entities,
primarily institutions and guaranty
agencies, from the paperwork
requirements associated with the final
regulations. As discussed in the
Paperwork Reduction Act section of this
preamble, several of the provisions
reduce the estimated burden on
institutions, lenders, and guaranty
agencies from the elimination of
regulatory provisions or changes to
requirements and this is reflected by the
negative numbers in the table.
TABLE 3—SUMMARY OF PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL ENTITIES
OMB Control
No.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Description
FFEL forbearance ............................................................................................
Reasonable and Affordable loan rehab ...........................................................
Suspension of AWG for rehab borrowers .......................................................
School Enrollment Status Reporting ...............................................................
Deferment of repayment—Federal Perkins Loans—definition of eligible
graduate fellowship programs ......................................................................
AWG 3rd party contractors; hearing requests, and hearing administration ....
Lender disclosure ............................................................................................
Due diligence in making a loan .......................................................................
Equal credit—removal of provision ..................................................................
Eligibility for interest benefits ...........................................................................
Basic program agreement ...............................................................................
Records, reports, inspection requirements for GA programs ..........................
Prohibited use of Operating Fund when it contains Federal Fund assets—
removal of provision .....................................................................................
Funds transferred to Operating Fund by a GA—removal of provision ...........
FISL loan related—removal of provisions .......................................................
School as lender—removal of provision ..........................................................
Exit counseling .................................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Small entity
hours
Cost
($)
Cost per
small entity
1845–0020
1845–0020
1845–0020
1845–0019
264
69,161
1,257
24,342
6,497
1,702,052
30,935
599,068
650
154,732
2,812
54,461
1845–0019
1845–0020
1845–0020
1845–0020
1845–0020
1845–0020
1845–0020
1845–0020
175
57,568
(20,461)
(40,923)
(40,923)
(40,923)
(11,174)
(5,587)
4,316
1,416,748
(503,556)
(1,007,112)
(1,007,112)
(1,007,112)
(274,982)
(137,495)
22
128,795
(50,356)
(100,711)
(100,711)
(100,711)
(27,498)
(12,500)
1845–0020
1845–0020
1845–0020
1845–0020
1845–0020
(111,739)
(111,739)
(163,692)
(206,534)
(134,247)
(2,749,889)
(2,749,889)
(4,028,450)
(5,082,791)
(3,303,819)
(249,990)
(249,990)
(884.40)
(1,115.87)
(725.32)
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65790
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 3—SUMMARY OF PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL ENTITIES—Continued
OMB Control
No.
Description
Disqualification review of limitation, suspension, and termination actions
taken by GA against a school—removal of provision ..................................
Identification, to the Extent Practicable,
of All Relevant Federal Regulations
That May Duplicate, Overlap or Conflict
With the Proposed Regulation
The proposed regulations are unlikely
to conflict with or duplicate existing
Federal regulations.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Alternatives Considered
As described above, the Department
participated in negotiated rulemaking in
developing the proposed regulations,
reviewed comments received in
response to the NPRM published July
29, 2013, and considered a number of
options for some of the provisions. In
particular, the Department reversed the
order of the use of the 15 percent
formula and the standard form in
determining a reasonable and affordable
payment for loan rehabilitation, but that
is not expected to affect small entities.
No alternatives were aimed specifically
at small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Sections 674.19, 674.33, 674.34,
682.102, 682.200, 682.205, 682.206,
682.208, 682.209, 682.210, 682.211,
682.212, 682.214, 682.216, 682.301,
682.305, 682.401, 682.402, 682.404,
682.405, 682.406, 682.409, 682.410,
682.411, 682.412, 682.414, 682.417,
682.418, 682.421, 682.507, 682.508,
682.511, 682.515, 682.602, 682.603,
682.604, 682.605, 682.610, 682.711,
682.712, 682.713, 685.205, 685.211,
685.214, contain information collection
requirements. Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3507(d)), the Department of Education
has submitted a copy of these sections,
related forms, and Information
Collection Requests (ICRs) to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
its review.
The OMB Control numbers associated
with the final regulations and related
forms are 1845–0015, 1845–0019, 1845–
0020, and 1845–0119 (identified as
1845—NEW2 in the NPRM).
In the NPRM, the Department
included a draft version of the Financial
Disclosure for Reasonable and
Affordable Payments form (1845–0120,
identified as 1845—NEW1 in the
NPRM) and calculated estimated burden
for the completion and review of that
version. The Department received
extensive and detailed comments from
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
1845–0020
the public on the draft form, including
all aspects of the form and its intended
use. We will require significant time to
properly analyze these comments and, if
appropriate, rework the form to address
them. To allow the time to carefully
consider public comment and take
necessary action, we will address
comments and burden relating to the
Financial Disclosure for Reasonable and
Affordable Payments form in a separate
Federal Register notice that will be
published after these final regulations.
A Federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless OMB approves the collection
under the PRA and the corresponding
information collection instrument
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to comply with, or is subject to penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection
of information if the collection
instrument does not display a currently
valid OMB control number.
Sections 682.211 and 685.205—
Forbearance
The final regulations amend the
current FFEL Program regulations to
authorize a lender, prior to resolving a
default claim payment, to grant
forbearance to a borrower or endorser
who is in default on a loan based on the
borrower’s or endorser’s oral request.
The current regulations require
borrowers to submit a written request
for forbearance. The burden calculations
address only the added burden created
by accepting oral requests for
forbearance. These final regulations
provide that a forbearance agreement in
this situation must include a new
agreement to repay the debt signed by
the borrower or endorser (as required
under the current regulations), or a
written or oral affirmation of the
borrower’s or endorser’s obligation to
repay the debt. The final regulations
define ‘‘affirmation’’ for this purpose to
be an acknowledgment of the loan by
the borrower or endorser in a legally
binding manner that can take the form
of: (1) A new signed repayment
agreement or schedule, or another form
of signed agreement to repay the debt
(as under current regulations); (2) an
oral acknowledgment and agreement to
repay the debt that is documented by
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Small entity
hours
(111,739)
Cost
($)
(2,749,889)
Cost per
small entity
(249,990)
the lender in the borrower’s or
endorser’s file and confirmed by the
lender in a notice to the borrower; or (3)
a payment made on the loan by the
borrower or endorser. The final
regulations also specify that if a
forbearance in this situation is based on
the borrower’s or endorser’s oral request
and affirmation, the lender must orally
review with the borrower the terms and
conditions of the forbearance. The
lender must also send the borrower or
endorser a notice that confirms the
terms of the forbearance and the
borrower’s or endorser’s affirmation of
the obligation to make the first payment
under the forbearance agreement within
30 days after entering into that
agreement. The final regulations require
the lender to retain a record of the terms
and conditions of the forbearance and
affirmation in the borrower’s or
endorser’s file.
For the 2011 calendar year, the last
year for which data are available, we
estimate that 172,915 FFEL borrowers
requested forbearance after defaulting
on a loan. Of that number, 49,350
borrowers have FFEL program loans
held by lenders. Of those borrowers, we
estimate that 25 percent (12,338
borrowers) will exercise the option in
these final regulations to orally
acknowledge the debt and agree to repay
the debt. The remaining 123,565 loans
for which we estimate borrowers will
request forbearance after defaulting will
be held by the Department. We estimate
that 25 percent of those borrowers
(30,891 borrowers) who request
forbearance from the Department will
exercise the option to orally
acknowledge the debt and agree to repay
the debt, as would be authorized under
these final regulations. Because OMB
requires Federal agencies to account for
burden imposed on non-Federal entities
separately by type, i.e. public, not-forprofit, and for-profit, the following
analysis of the burden imposed on
lenders other than the Department is
broken down by the types of entities.
Note that State guaranty agencies are
covered under the ‘‘public’’ type of
entities.
Of the FFEL Program loans held by
lenders, we estimate that public holders
(State guaranty agencies) will have two
FFEL borrowers who seek to orally
acknowledge a defaulted FFEL Program
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
loan. On average, we estimate that it
will take the lender 0.17 hours (10
minutes) per oral acknowledgment to
orally review with the borrower the
terms and conditions of the forbearance
and document the conversation and
place that documentation in the
borrower’s or endorser’s file. For public
holders, we estimate that burden will
increase by 0.34 hours (two borrowers
multiplied by 0.17 hours per oral
forbearance request).
Of the FFEL Program loans, we
estimate that not-for-profit holders will
have 1,551 FFEL borrowers who seek an
oral forbearance on a defaulted FFEL
program loan. On average, we estimate
that it will take the lender 0.17 hours
(10 minutes) per oral acknowledgment
to orally review with the borrower the
terms and conditions of the forbearance
and document the conversation and
place that documentation in the
borrower’s or endorser’s file. For notfor-profit holders, we estimate that
burden will increase by 264 hours
(1,551 borrowers multiplied by 0.17
hours per oral forbearance request).
Of the FFEL Program loans, we
estimate that for-profit holders will have
10,785 FFEL borrowers who seek an oral
forbearance on a defaulted FFEL
Program loan. On average, we estimate
that it will take the lender 0.17 hours
(10 minutes) per oral acknowledgment
to orally review with the borrower the
terms and conditions of the forbearance
and document the conversation and
place that documentation in the
borrower’s or endorser’s file. We
estimate that burden will increase by
1,833 hours (10,785 borrowers
multiplied by 0.17 hours per oral
forbearance request) at for-profit
holders.
We estimate there will be an equal
amount of burden on the borrower
engaged in the oral acknowledgement
and agreement to repay the debt request
with the lender. The oral
acknowledgment process will increase
burden by 7,349 hours for all FFEL
borrowers (12,338 held by lenders and
30,891 Department-held = 43,229
borrowers multiplied by 0.17 hours per
oral forbearance request). Since there is
no FFEL general forbearance form
approved by OMB, the final regulations
will impose new burden.
Collectively, we estimate that these
final FFEL forbearance regulations will
increase burden by 9,446 hours under
OMB Control Number 1845–0020.
The final regulations will amend the
current Direct Loan Program regulations
to authorize the Secretary, prior to the
loan being transferred to the
Department’s default collections office,
to grant forbearance to a borrower or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
endorser who is in default on a loan
based on the borrower’s or endorser’s
oral request. The final regulations
provide that a forbearance agreement in
this situation must include a new
agreement to repay the debt signed by
the borrower or endorser (as required
under the current regulations), or a
written or oral affirmation of the
borrower’s or endorser’s obligation to
repay the debt. The final regulations
define ‘‘affirmation’’ for this purpose to
be an acknowledgment of the loan by
the borrower or endorser in a legally
binding manner that can take the form
of: (1) A new signed repayment
agreement or schedule, or another form
of signed agreement to repay the debt
(as under current regulations); (2) an
oral acknowledgment and agreement to
repay the debt that is documented by
the Secretary in the borrower’s or
endorser’s file and confirmed by the
Secretary in a notice to the borrower; or
(3) a payment made on the loan by the
borrower or endorser. The final
regulations also specify that if a
forbearance in this situation is based on
the borrower’s or endorser’s oral request
and affirmation, the Secretary must
orally review with the borrower the
terms and conditions of the forbearance,
and that the Secretary must send the
borrower or endorser a notice that
confirms the terms of the forbearance
and the borrower’s or endorser’s
affirmation of the obligation to make the
first payment under the agreement
within 30 days after entering into that
agreement. The final regulations require
the Secretary to retain a record of the
terms and conditions of the forbearance
and affirmation in the borrower’s or
endorser’s file.
For the 2011 calendar year, 62,905
Direct Loan borrowers requested
forbearance after defaulting on a loan.
Of that number, we estimate that 25
percent (15,726 borrowers) will have
exercised an option to orally
acknowledge the debt and agree to repay
the debt. On average, we estimate that
it would take a borrower 0.17 hours (10
minutes) per oral acknowledgment to
listen to the list of terms and conditions
of the forbearance as they are reviewed
with the borrower. The burden
associated with the completion of the
General Forbearance Request form,
OMB 1845–0031, is estimated to average
0.2 hours (12 minutes). Therefore, the
net reduction in burden to provide an
oral acknowledgement rather than
complete the form is the difference of
the two or 0.03 hours (0.20 hours minus
0.17 hours or 2 minutes) per oral
forbearance.
We estimate that burden will decrease
by 472 hours (15,726 borrowers
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65791
multiplied by 0.03 hours per oral
forbearance) under OMB Control
Number 1845–0119.
Sections 682.405(b) and 685.211(f)—
Reasonable and Affordable Loan
Rehabilitation Agreement
The final regulations will add new
§§ 682.405(b)(1)(iii) and 685.211(f)(1)(i),
requiring a guaranty agency and the
Secretary, respectively, to first offer a
reasonable and affordable loan
rehabilitation payment amount on a
defaulted loan as determined using the
15 percent formula (i.e., the amount
equal to 15 percent of the amount by
which the borrower’s Adjusted Gross
Income (AGI) exceeds 150 percent of the
poverty guideline amount applicable to
the borrower’s family size and State,
divided by 12), except that if this
amount is less than $5, the borrower’s
monthly rehabilitation payment is $5. If
the borrower does not provide the
documentation required to confirm the
calculated monthly payment under this
formula to the guaranty agency or the
Secretary, the rehabilitation agreement
would be null and void.
In calendar year 2011, there were
approximately 299,159 FFEL borrowers
(192,029 borrowers whose FFEL
program loans are held by lenders and
107,130 FFEL program borrowers whose
loans are held by the Department) who
requested and received a loan
rehabilitation agreement for their
defaulted loans. We estimate that of the
192,029 FFEL loans held by lenders,
66,283 loans are held by state guaranty
agencies and 125,746 loans are held by
not-for-profit guaranty agencies, with
the remaining 107,130 loans (299,159
minus 192,029) held by the Department.
In calendar year 2011, there were
approximately 92,870 Direct Loan
borrowers that requested and received a
loan rehabilitation agreement for their
defaulted loans.
Under these final regulations, we
estimate that the 66,283 FFEL borrowers
whose loans are held by state guaranty
agencies will request rehabilitation of
their defaulted loans using the 15
percent formula and submit the required
documentation. We estimate that on
average each borrower will take 0.33
hours (20 minutes) to gather, copy and
submit the required documentation. We
estimate that burden will increase by
21,873 hours (66,283 borrowers
submitting documentation multiplied
by 0.33 hours per loan rehabilitation
request) under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
Under these final regulations, we
estimate that the 125,746 FFEL
borrowers whose loans are held by notfor-profit guaranty agencies will request
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
65792
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
rehabilitation of their defaulted loans
using the 15 percent formula and
submitting the required documentation
to confirm the monthly repayment
amount. We estimate that on average
each borrower will take 0.33 hours (20
minutes) to gather, copy and submit the
required documentation. We estimate
that burden will increase by 41,496
hours (125,746 borrowers submitting
documentation verifying IBR calculation
multiplied by 0.33 hours per loan
rehabilitation request) under OMB
Control Number 1845–0020.
Under these final regulations, we
estimate that the 107,130 FFEL
borrowers whose loans are held by the
Department will request rehabilitation
of their defaulted loans using the 15
percent formula and submitting the
required documentation to confirm the
monthly repayment amount. We
estimate that on average each borrower
will take 0.33 hours (20 minutes) to
gather, copy and submit the required
documentation. We estimate that
burden will increase by 35,353 hours
(107,130 borrowers submitting
documentation verifying the calculation
multiplied by 0.33 hours per loan
rehabilitation request) under OMB
Control Number 1845–0020.
Under these final regulations, we
estimate that the 92,870 Direct Loan
borrowers whose loans are held by the
Department will request rehabilitation
of their defaulted loans using the 15
percent formula and submitting the
required documentation to confirm the
monthly repayment amount. We
estimate that on average each borrower
will take 0.33 hours (20 minutes) to
collect, copy and submit the required
documentation. We estimate that
burden will increase by 30,647 hours
(92,870 borrowers submitting
documentation verifying the 15 percent
formula calculation multiplied by 0.33
hours per loan rehabilitation request)
under OMB Control Number 1845–0119.
We estimate that to review the
supporting documentation submitted, it
would take the guaranty agency on
average 0.17 hours (10 minutes) to
review the supporting documentation
from the borrower. Under these final
regulations, we estimate that burden
will increase by 23,645 hours (192,029
borrowers requesting loan rehabilitation
multiplied by 0.17 hours per document
review) under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
Sections 682.405(b)(1)(vii) and
685.211(f)(3) will require a guaranty
agency and the Secretary to recalculate
the borrower’s rehabilitation payment
amount if the borrower objects to the
payment amount contained in the
written repayment agreement that the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
guaranty agency or the Secretary sent to
the borrower based on the 15 percent
formula calculation.
Of the 299,159 FFEL borrowers in
calendar year 2011 who requested
rehabilitation of their defaulted loans,
we estimate that 12 percent or 35,899
borrowers will raise an objection to the
initial determination of the reasonable
and affordable monthly payment
amount by the guaranty agency or the
Secretary. We estimate that each
objection will entail a phone
conversation or email that would span
on average 0.17 hours (10 minutes). This
will increase burden to the borrowers
for a total of 6,103 hours (35,899
borrowers objecting to the initial
determination of the reasonable and
affordable payment amount multiplied
by 0.17 hours per loan rehabilitation
request) under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
Of the 92,870 Direct Loan borrowers
in calendar year 2011 who requested
loan rehabilitation of their defaulted
loans, we estimate that 11,144 Direct
Loan borrowers will raise an objection
to the initial determination of the
reasonable and affordable monthly
payment amount. We estimate that each
objection will entail a phone
conversation or email that would span
on average 0.17 hours (10 minutes). This
would increase burden to the borrowers
for a total of 1,894 hours (11,144
borrowers objecting to the initial
determination of the reasonable and
affordable payment amount multiplied
by 0.17 hours per loan rehabilitation
request) under OMB Control Number
1845–0119.
Sections 682.405(b)(1)(vii) and
685.211(f)(5) will require a borrower
who objects to the monthly repayment
amount contained in the written
repayment agreement based on the 15
percent formula to provide the guaranty
agency or the Secretary the information
needed to calculate a monthly payment
amount by completing the reasonable
and affordable rehabilitation payment
form. If the borrower does not provide
this information to the guaranty agency
or the Secretary, no rehabilitation
agreement would exist with the
borrower, and the guaranty agency or
the Secretary will not proceed with the
rehabilitation.
Sections 682.405(b)(1)(x) and
685.211(f)(6) will require the Secretary
or the guaranty agency, upon the
borrower’s request, to adjust the
borrower’s monthly rehabilitation
payment due to a change in the
borrower’s financial circumstances. The
borrower will be required to provide
documentation supporting the request.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
We estimate that 10 percent of the
299,159 FFEL borrowers who requested
rehabilitation of their defaulted loans
(29,916 FFEL borrowers, 19,203 of
whom have FFEL program loans that are
held by lenders and 10,713 of whom
have FFEL program loans that are held
by the Department) will have a change
in their financial circumstances in the
initial year the proposed regulation is
implemented. We estimate that on
average each borrower will take 0.33
hours (20 minutes) to collect, copy, and
submit the required documentation. We
estimate that burden will increase by
9,872 hours (29,916 borrowers with
changes in financial circumstances
multiplied by 0.33 hours per loan
rehabilitation request) under OMB
Control Number 1845–0020.
Of the 19,203 borrowers with FFEL
loans held by lenders, 6,628 are held by
public guaranty agencies and 12,575 are
held by not-for-profit guaranty agencies.
Under these final regulations, we
estimate 6,628 FFEL borrowers whose
loans are held by public guaranty
agencies will have a change in their
financial circumstances in the initial
year the proposed regulation is
implemented. We estimate that for each
request submitted it will take on average
0.5 hours (30 minutes) for the guaranty
agency to review and process the
request. Under these final regulations,
we estimate that burden will increase by
3,314 hours (6,628 borrowers requesting
loan rehabilitation multiplied 0.5 hours
per loan rehabilitation request equals
3,314 hours) under OMB Control
Number 1845–0020.
Under these final regulations, we
estimate that 12,575 FFEL borrowers
whose loans are held by not-for-profit
guaranty agencies will request a change
in their reasonable and affordable
payment amount due to changed
financial circumstances in the initial
year the final regulation is
implemented. We estimate that for each
request submitted it will take on average
0.5 hours (30 minutes) for the guaranty
agency to review and process the
request for a change in the payment
amount. Under these final regulations,
we estimate that burden will increase by
6,288 hours (12,575 borrowers
requesting a change in the loan
rehabilitation payment amount
multiplied by 0.5 hours per request)
under OMB Control Number 1845–0020.
We estimate that 10 percent of Direct
Loan borrowers who are rehabilitating
their defaulted loans (9,287 Direct Loan
borrowers) will request a change in the
reasonable and affordable payment
amount due to a change in their
financial circumstances in the initial
year the final regulation is
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
implemented. We estimate that on
average each borrower will take 0.33
hours (20 minutes) to collect, copy, and
submit the required documentation. We
estimate that burden will increase by
3,065 hours (9,287 borrowers requesting
a change in the reasonable and
affordable payment amount multiplied
by 0.33 hours per payment change
request equals 3,065 hours) under OMB
Control Number 1845–0119.
Sections 682.405(a) and 685.211(f)—
Suspension of Administrative Wage
Garnishment for Borrowers
Rehabilitating Defaulted Loans
The final regulations will add new
§§ 682.405(a)(3)(i) and 685.211(f)(12)(i)
to the FFEL and Direct Loan program
regulations requiring a guaranty agency
or the Secretary, respectively, to
suspend collecting on a defaulted loan
through Administrative Wage
Garnishment (AWG) after the borrower
makes five qualifying payments under a
loan rehabilitation agreement. The
guaranty agency or the Secretary will
not be permitted to suspend AWG prior
to the fifth payment (unless otherwise
required to do so), and, after the fifth
payment, the borrower will have the
option to request that the guaranty
agency or the Secretary continue
collecting on the loan through AWG
while the borrower makes voluntary
payments under the rehabilitation
agreement.
Under § 682.405(a)(3)(ii), we estimate
that state guaranty agencies will have
663 FFEL borrowers from whom they
will be collecting payments through
AWG while the borrower is also making
voluntary repayments to rehabilitate the
loan. After the borrower has made five
qualifying voluntary loan payments (in
addition to the AWG payments) the
holder would suspend AWG. We
estimate that on average each
suspension of AWG would take one
hour (60 minutes). We estimate that
burden would increase by 663 hours
(663 borrower requests multiplied by
one hour per AWG suspension equals
663 hours) under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
Under § 682.405(a)(3)(ii), we estimate
that not-for-profit guaranty agencies will
have 1,257 FFEL borrowers from whom
they will be collecting payments using
AWG while the borrower is also making
voluntary repayments to rehabilitate the
loan. After the borrower has made five
qualifying voluntary loan payments (in
addition to the AWG payments) the
holder would suspend AWG. We
estimate that on average each
suspension of AWG would take one
hour (60 minutes). We estimate that
burden would increase by 1,257 hours
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
(1,257 borrower requests multiplied by
one hour per AWG suspension equals
1,257 hours) under OMB Control
Number 1845–0020.
Any burden under § 685.211(f)(12)(i)
is attributable to the Department and
therefore not a part of this burden
assessment of affected entities.
Collectively, the changes in
§ 682.405(a) and (b) will increase
burden by 149,864 hours in OMB
Control Number 1845–0020.
Collectively, the changes in
§ 685.211(f) will increase burden by
35,606 hours in OMB Control Number
1845–0119.
Sections 674.33(g), 682.402(d), and
685.214—Closed School Discharge
The final regulations at
§§ 674.33(a)(4)(i)(B), 682.402(d)(1), and
685.214(c)(1)(iii) will extend, for
purposes of the closed school discharge,
the current 90-day period to 120-days
for students who leave before a school
closes and add examples of the types of
exceptional circumstances under which
the Department may extend the 120-day
window.
During the 2011 calendar year, no
Perkins Loan borrowers received closed
school loan discharges. We estimate that
15 Perkins Loan borrowers submitted
applications for closed school
discharges. We estimate that the average
burden per response is 0.5 hours (30
minutes) for each loan discharge
application and that by expanding the
period from 90 days to 120 days prior
to school closure for students who had
withdrawn to apply for a closed school
loan discharge will increase the number
of applicants by 20 percent. As a result
there will be an estimated 18
applications under the final regulation
for a total increase in burden of 2 hours
(18 borrowers applying for loan
discharge multiplied by 0.5 hours per
application minus 15 borrowers
applying for loan discharge under
current regulations multiplied by 0.5
hours per application) under OMB
Control Number 1845–0015.
During the 2011 calendar year, 163
FFEL borrowers received closed school
loan discharges. We estimate that 230
FFEL borrowers submitted applications
for discharge. We estimate that the
average burden per response is 0.5
hours (30 minutes) for each loan
discharge application and that by
expanding the period from 90 days to
120 days prior to school closure for
students who had withdrawn to apply
for a closed school loan discharge will
increase the number of applicants by 20
percent. As a result there will be 276
applications under the final regulation
for a total increase in burden of 23 hours
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65793
(276 borrowers applying for loan
discharge multiplied by 0.5 hours per
application minus 230 borrowers
applying for loan discharge under
current regulations multiplied by 0.5
hours per application) under OMB
Control Number 1845–0015.
During the 2011 calendar year, 128
Direct Loan borrowers received closed
school loan discharges. We estimate that
295 Direct Loan borrowers submitted
applications for discharge. We estimate
that the average burden per response is
0.5 hours (30 minutes) for each loan
discharge application and that by
expanding the period from 90 days to
120 days prior to school closure for
students who had withdrawn to apply
for a closed school loan discharge will
increase the number of applicants by 20
percent, thus totaling 354 applications
under the final regulation for a total
increase in burden of 29 hours (354
borrowers applying for loan discharge
multiplied by 0.5 hours per application
minus 295 borrowers applying for loan
discharge under current regulations
multiplied by 0.5 hours per application)
under OMB Control Number 1845–0015.
Collectively, the total increase in
burden is 54 hours under OMB Control
Number 1845–0015. The changes
associated with the elongation of the
period prior to school closure from 90
days to 120 days for students who had
withdrawn to apply for a closed school
loan discharge is non-substantive and as
such, we will submit a Form 83–C to
OMB to make this change.
Sections 674.19, 682.610, and 685.309—
School Enrollment Status Reporting
Requirements
For the Federal Perkins Loan program,
the final regulations would add a new
§ 674.19(f) with the heading
‘‘enrollment reporting process.’’ Section
674.19(f)(1) will provide that, upon
receipt of an enrollment report from the
Secretary, an institution must update all
information included in the report and
return the report to the Secretary in the
manner and format prescribed by the
Secretary and within the timeframe
prescribed by the Secretary. Section
674.19(f)(2) will provide that, unless it
expects to submit its subsequent
updated enrollment report to the
Secretary within the next 60 days, an
institution must notify the Secretary
within 30 days after: (1) The date the
school discovers that a loan under title
IV of the HEA was made to a student
who was enrolled or accepted for
enrollment at the institution, and the
student has ceased to be enrolled on at
least a half-time basis, or has failed to
enroll on at least a half-time basis for
the period for which the loan was
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
65794
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
intended; or (2) the date the school
discovers that a student who is enrolled
at the institution and who received a
loan under title IV of the HEA has
changed his or her permanent address.
Because the Secretary already receives
enrollment information on Federal
Perkins Loan borrowers who also have
a FFEL loan or a Direct Loan, the
additional burden associated with
sending enrollment reports to
institutions for the Federal Perkins Loan
Program is only associated with those
Federal Perkins Loan borrowers whose
only loan received under title IV of the
HEA is a Federal Perkins Loan and who
are enrolled on at least a half-time basis
or who had recently changed enrollment
status.
In the 2011 calendar year, there were
2,070,514 Federal Perkins Loan
borrowers. Of the 2,070,514 Federal
Perkins Loan borrowers, 240,959
borrowers have a Federal Perkins Loan
as the only loan received under title IV
of the HEA. Of the 240,959 borrowers,
53 percent (127,708 borrowers) were
enrolled at least half-time or had
recently changed enrollment status. The
Secretary will be sending enrollment
reports to each of the institutions
approximately every 60 days or 6
reports per year. We estimate that on
average the completion and submission
of an enrollment report will take 0.05
hours (3 minutes) per borrower. Burden
will increase by 38,312 hours (127,708
borrowers multiplied by 0.05 hours per
borrower multiplied by 6 reports per
year) under OMB Control Number
1845–0019.
For the 2011 calendar year 51 percent
of the Federal Perkins loan borrowers or
65,131 affected borrowers were at public
institutions, therefore we estimate that
burden will increase for public
institutions by 19,539 hours (38,312
hours multiplied by 0.51) under OMB
1845–0019.
For the 2011 calendar year 45 percent
of the Federal Perkins loan borrowers or
57,469 affected borrowers were at
private not-for-profit institutions,
therefore we estimate that burden will
increase for private not-for-profit
institutions by 17,240 hours (38,312
hours multiplied by 0.45) under OMB
1845–0019.
For the 2011 calendar year 4 percent
of the Federal Perkins loan borrowers or
5,108 affected borrowers were at
proprietary institutions, therefore we
estimate that burden will increase for
proprietary institutions by 1,533 hours
(38,312 hours multiplied by 0.04) under
OMB 1845–0019.
Collectively, the final regulatory
changes to § 674.19 will increase burden
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
by 38,312 hours for 127,708 affected
borrowers under OMB 1845–0019.
For the FFEL Program, the final
regulations will replace the term
‘‘student status confirmation reports’’ in
§ 682.610(c) with the term ‘‘enrollment
reporting process,’’ and will revise
§ 682.610(c)(1) to provide that upon
receipt of an enrollment report from the
Secretary, a school must update all
information included in the report and
return the report to the Secretary in the
manner and format prescribed by the
Secretary and within the timeframe
specified by the Secretary. Institutions
currently participating in the FFEL or
Direct Loan programs will continue to
report enrollment to the Secretary and
the lender. Because the only change
regarding the FFEL Program reporting is
in the definition of the reporting
requirement, there is no change in
burden for institutions participating in
the FFEL and Direct Loan programs.
Section 674.34—Deferment of
Repayment—Federal Perkins Loans
The final regulations in § 674.34(f)(1)
will require schools that participate in
the Perkins Loan Program to use the
same eligibility criteria to define an
eligible graduate fellowship program
and to establish the eligibility of a
borrower for a graduate fellowship
deferment that lenders and the
Department use in the FFEL and Direct
Loan programs, respectively. The final
regulations will require that a borrower
provide the institution with a statement
from an authorized official of the
borrower’s graduate fellowship program
certifying: (1) That the borrower holds at
least a bachelor’s degree; and (2) the
borrower’s anticipated completion date
of the program. In calendar year 2011
there were 1,104 Perkins borrowers who
applied for a graduate fellowship
deferment. We estimate that on average
it will take the borrower 0.25 hours (15
minutes) to obtain the certification from
an authorized official of the graduate
fellowship program and to complete and
submit the Perkins Loan deferment form
multiplied by an estimated 1,104
deferment applications equals 276 hours
of increased burden to borrowers under
OMB Control Number 1845–0019.
For the 2011 calendar year 51 percent
of the Federal Perkins Loan borrowers
or 563 affected borrowers were at public
institutions, therefore we estimate that
burden will increase for authorizing
officials at public institutions by 141
hours (1,104 applications multiplied by
0.51 multiplied by 0.25 hours per
certification) under OMB 1845–0019.
For the 2011 calendar year 45 percent
of the Federal Perkins Loan borrowers
or 497 affected borrowers were at
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
private not-for-profit institutions,
therefore we estimate that burden will
increase authorizing officials at for
private not-for-profit institutions by 124
hours (1,104 applications multiplied by
0.45 multiplied by 0.25 hours per
certification) under OMB 1845–0019.
For the 2011 calendar year 4 percent
of the Federal Perkins Loan borrowers
or 44 affected borrowers were at
proprietary institutions, therefore we
estimate that burden will increase for
private not-for-profit institutions by 11
hours (1,104 applications multiplied by
0.04 multiplied by 0.25 hours per
certification) under OMB 1845–0019.
Collectively, the final regulatory
changes to § 674.34 will increase burden
by 552 hours under OMB 1845–0019.
Section 682.410(b)(9)(i)(T)(2)—
Administrative Wage Garnishment
(AWG)—Use of Third-Party Contractors
The final regulations will also add a
new § 682.410(b)(9)(i)(T) to the
regulations, which specifies the
functions that may be performed by a
third-party servicer or collection
contractor employed by the guaranty
agency for services needed in the AWG
process. The final regulations make
clear that the guaranty agency may not
delegate to any third party the decision
to order withholding of an individual
borrower’s wages, and must create and
retain records to demonstrate that each
order issued has been individually
authorized by an appropriate official of
the guaranty agency. The final
regulations also specify the manner by
which a withholding order may be sent
to employers and the permissible
activities that may be performed by a
third-party servicer or collection
contractor employed by the guaranty
agency with respect to withholding
orders. Only an authorized official of
the guaranty agency may determine that
an individual withholding order is to be
issued. The guarantor must record the
official’s determination for each order it
issues by either including the official’s
signature on the order, or by retaining
in the agency’s records the identity of
the approving official, the date of the
approval, the amount or rate of the
order, the name and address of the
employer to whom the order was issued,
and the debt for which the order was
issued.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate
there were 84,293 FFEL Program
borrowers whose loans were held by
state guaranty agencies and for which
the guaranty agency had initiated AWG.
We estimate that on average the
guaranty agency will take 0.25 hours (15
minutes) to meet the recordkeeping
requirements specified above. Total
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
burden hours will increase by 21,073
hours (84,293 multiplied by 0.25 hours)
under OMB 1845–0020.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate
there were 159,912 FFEL borrowers
whose loans were held by not-for-profit
guaranty agencies and for which the
guaranty agency had initiated AWG. We
estimate that on average the guaranty
agency will take 0.25 hours (15 minutes)
to meet the recordkeeping requirements
specified above. Total burden hours will
increase by 39,978 hours (159,912
multiplied by 0.25 hours) under OMB
1845–0020.
The final changes in
§ 682.410(b)(9)(i)(T)(2) will increase
burden by 61,051 hours under OMB
Control Number 1845–0020.
Section 682.410(b)(9)(i)(H)—
Administrative Wage Garnishment
(AWG)—Borrower Hearing Requests
The final regulations will also replace
§ 682.410(b)(9)(i)(L) of the FFEL
Program regulations with
§ 682.410(b)(9)(i)(H) to provide that if a
borrower’s written request for a hearing
is received by the guaranty agency after
the 30th day following the date of the
garnishment notice and a decision is not
rendered within 60 days following
receipt of the borrower’s written request
for a hearing, the guaranty agency must
suspend the order beginning on the 61st
day after the hearing request was
received until a hearing is provided and
a decision is rendered.
If a borrower does not request a
hearing within the 30-day time limit,
the guaranty agency must go forward
with the AWG. However, if a borrower
does eventually request a hearing, a
guaranty agency would still be required
to provide one in sufficient time to have
a decision issued within 60 days of the
request. The Department added a
provision specifying that if this hearing
is not provided and a decision issued
within 60 days, then the agency must
suspend the AWG order beginning on
the 61st day until a decision is issued.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate
there were 84,293 FFEL borrowers
whose loans were held by state guaranty
agencies and for which the agencies had
initiated AWG. We estimate that 10
percent of these borrowers (8,429) will
request a hearing and that in 10 percent
of those cases (843) a decision will not
be rendered until after 60 days
following the receipt of the borrower’s
request. On average, we estimate that it
will take one hour (60 minutes) to
suspend an administrative wage
garnishment order. The total increase in
burden will be 843 hours (843 FFEL
borrowers undergoing AWG who
requested a hearing where a decision
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
was not rendered until after 60 days
following the receipt of the borrower’s
request multiplied by one hour per
suspension) under OMB 1845–0020.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate
there were 159,912 FFEL borrowers
whose loans where held by not-forprofit guaranty agencies and for which
the agencies had initiated AWG. We
estimate that 10 percent of these
borrowers (15,991) will request a
hearing and that in 10 percent of those
cases (1,599) a decision will not be
rendered until after 60 days following
the receipt of the borrower’s request. On
average, we estimate that it will take one
hour (60 minutes) to suspend an
administrative wage garnishment order.
The total increase in burden will be
1,599 hours (1,599 FFEL borrowers
undergoing AWG who requested a
hearing where a decision was not
rendered until after 60 days following
the receipt of the borrower’s request
multiplied by one hour per suspension)
under OMB 1845–0020.
Collectively, the final changes in
§ 682.410(b)(9)(i)(H) will increase
burden by 2,442 hours in OMB Control
Number 1845–0020.
Section 682.410(b)(9)(i)(J)—
Administrative Wage Garnishment
(AWG)—Hearing Administration
The final regulations will add new
paragraph (b)(9)(i)(J) and will provide
for the manner by which the hearing is
administered and certain provisions
relating to bringing forth additional
evidence and continuances.
Specifically, the final regulations will
require that the hearing be conducted as
an informal proceeding, require
witnesses in an oral hearing to testify
under oath or affirmation, and require
maintenance of a summary record of the
hearing. The final regulations will also
allow the borrower to request a
continuance to submit additional
evidence.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate
there were 84,293 FFEL borrowers
whose loans where held by state
guaranty agencies and for which the
agencies had initiated AWG. We
estimate that 10 percent of these
borrowers (8,429) will request a hearing.
We estimate that on average each
summary record will take one hour (60
minutes). The total burden increase for
this recordkeeping will be 8,429 hours
(8,429 hearings multiplied by one hour
per hearing) under OMB 1845–0020.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate
there were 159,912 FFEL borrowers
whose loans where held by not-forprofit guaranty agencies and for which
the agencies had initiated AWG. We
estimate that 10 percent of these
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65795
borrowers (15,991) will request a
hearing. We estimate that on average
each summary record will take one hour
(60 minutes). The total burden increase
for this recordkeeping will be 15,991
hours (15,991 hearings multiplied by
one hour per hearing) under OMB 1845–
0020.
Collectively, the changes in
§ 682.410(b)(9)(i)(J) will increase burden
by 24,420 hours in OMB Control
Number 1845–0020.
Section 682.410(b)(9)(i)(Q)—
Administrative Wage Garnishment
(AWG)—Recent Reemployment After
Involuntary Unemployment
Section 682.410(b)(9)(i)(Q) will clarify
that a borrower who wishes to object to
AWG on the basis that he or she is not
subject to garnishment because of recent
reemployment after involuntary
separation, bears the burden of raising
and proving that claim.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate
that there were 84,293 FFEL borrowers
whose loans where held by state
guaranty agencies and for which the
agencies had initiated AWG. Of that
number, we estimate that 8 percent
(6,743) became unemployed
involuntarily. Furthermore, we estimate
that a sub-group of those who became
unemployed involuntarily, 5 percent
(337), gained subsequent reemployment.
We estimate that the average amount of
time for each borrower subject to AWG
in this sub-group to provide
documentation that supports their claim
to not be subject to AWG due to their
recent reemployment to be 0.5 hours.
The increased burden to provide
documentation that will support the
borrower’s claim that he not be subject
to AWG due to recent reemployment is
169 hours (337 borrowers whose student
loans were being collected by AWG,
who became unemployed involuntarily,
but subsequently gained reemployment
multiplied by 0.5 hours per claim)
under OMB 1845–0020.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate
that there were 159,912 FFEL borrowers
whose loans where held by not-forprofit guaranty agencies and for which
the agencies had initiated AWG. Of that
number, we estimate that 8 percent
(12,793) became unemployed
involuntarily. Furthermore, we estimate
that a sub-group of those who became
unemployed involuntarily, 5 percent
(640), gained subsequent reemployment.
We estimate that the average amount of
time for each borrower subject to AWG
in this sub-group to provide
documentation that supports their claim
to not be subject to AWG due to their
recent reemployment to be 0.5 hours.
The total amount of increased burden to
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65796
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
provide documentation that will
support the borrower’s claim that he not
be subject to AWG due to recent
reemployment is 320 hours (640
borrowers whose loans were being
collected by AWG, who became
employed involuntarily, but
subsequently gained reemployment
multiplied by 0.5 hours per claim)
under OMB 1845–0020.
The final changes in
§ 682.410(b)(9)(i)(Q) will collectively
increase burden by 489 hours in OMB
Control Number 1845–0020.
Collectively, the final changes in all
subparagraphs of § 682.410(b)(9) will
increase burden by 88,402 hours in
OMB Control Number 1845–0020.
Repeal of Unnecessary FFEL Program
Regulations
The language in these final
regulations removes provisions from 34
CFR part 682 that are no longer required
as a result of the SAFRA Act included
in the Health Care and Reconciliation
Act of 2010. One of the provisions of the
SAFRA Act was the termination, as of
July 1, 2010, of the authority for lenders
to make new loans under the FFEL
Program. These final regulations will
remove the FFEL provisions that are
now unnecessary in light of this change
and would also make technical and
conforming changes. A number of the
final technical and conforming changes
in 34 CFR Part 682 are for clarity, others
are due to the elimination of crossreferences.
Typically, the results of negotiated
rulemaking produce some regulatory
changes that correspond to reporting or
recordkeeping burden on affected
entities such as borrowers, lenders, or
guaranty agencies. The primary
information collection associated with
34 CFR Part 682 is the currently
approved OMB 1845–0020. Unlike other
newly proposed regulations where the
resultant final regulation would either
increase or decrease burden as a result
of the change in a regulation, this
expansive effort to eliminate unneeded
regulations includes more wholesale
changes being made to 34 CFR Part 682.
As a result, the entire history of burden
associated with OMB 1845–0020 was
examined. While the burden
assessments for OMB 1845–0020 stretch
back over 13 years, the necessary level
of detail does not exist to disaggregate
the amount of the currently approved
amount of burden in this collection into
its corresponding subsections of 34 CFR
Part 682.
Therefore, a new methodology to
calculate burden is required. We are
able to establish that there are 38
subsections of 34 CFR Part 682 that have
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
burden under OMB 1845–0020. We
divided the total of the currently
approved burden hours of 12,352,197
hours by the 38 affected subsections
which on average yields 325,058 hours
per affected subsection.
Each of the subsections listed below
will use this number of burden hours as
a starting point. The final changes as
provided below explain the burden
impact.
The specific number of respondents
from the affected entities is similarly
unavailable, so we have established a
percentage based on the number of
borrowers per loan type to distribute the
number of respondents across the
affected entities.
Section 682.206—Due Diligence in
Making a Loan
The final regulations will remove
§ 682.206 from the FFEL regulations.
The SAFRA Act eliminated the
authority to make new FFEL Program
loans, including FFEL Consolidation
loans. As a result, the requirements
governing the making of new FFEL
Program loans are no longer needed and
the previous burden associated with the
making of a loan by a lender will be
removed.
The final change will remove all of
the prior assessment of 325,058 hours of
burden associated under OMB Control
Number 1845–0020, and therefore
burden will decrease by 325,058 hours
for a total of 0 hours.
Section 682.102—Repaying a Loan
Section 682.208—Due Diligence in
Servicing a Loan
The final regulations will replace the
term ‘‘national credit bureau(s)’’ with
‘‘nationwide consumer reporting
agency(ies)’’ to more accurately reflect
the reporting requirements.
These final changes will not alter the
prior burden assessment of 325,058
hours under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
The final regulations will amend the
section heading, remove § 682.102(a)
through (d), which describe the
application process for Stafford, PLUS,
and Consolidation loans, and
redesignate the paragraphs in current
§ 682.102(e), which describes the loan
repayment process, as § 682.102(a)–(g).
These final changes will not alter the
prior burden assessment of 325,058
hours under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
Section 682.200—Definitions—Lender
The final regulations will remove the
provisions of current § 682.601(a)(3),
(a)(5), and (a)(7), and place these
provisions into paragraph (8) of the
definition of ‘‘Lender’’ in § 682.200(b).
These final changes will not alter the
prior burden assessment of 325,058
hours under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
Section 682.205—Disclosure
Requirements for Lenders
The final regulations will remove
§ 682.205(a) (the initial disclosure
statement), (b) (statement of borrower
rights and responsibilities), (g) (plain
language disclosure), and (i) (separate
disclosure for Consolidation loans) from
the FFEL Program regulations and
renumber the remaining provisions. The
remaining provisions include providing
repayment information, providing
required disclosures during the
repayment period, and providing
required disclosures for borrowers
having difficulty making payments.
The final changes will decrease the
required burden by 162,529 hours, and
therefore the current burden hours will
decrease from 325,058 hours to 162,529
hours under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Section 682.209—Repayment of a Loan
The final regulations will amend
§ 682.209(a)(3)(i) by adding a new
paragraph that specifies that borrowers
with fixed interest rates on their
Stafford loans enter repayment on those
loans the day after six months following
the date the borrower was no longer
enrolled on at least a half-time basis.
The final regulations will remove
current § 682.209(e) through (g) and (j)
from the regulations and re-designate
the remaining paragraphs as paragraphs
(e)-(g). Redesignated § 682.209(e)
(current paragraph (h)) will be amended
to specify that a FFEL Consolidation
loan borrower repaying under the IBR
plan may make a scheduled monthly
payment of less than the interest that
accrues on the loan.
The final changes will decrease the
burden by 65,012 hours, and therefore
the current burden assessment will
decrease from 325,058 to 260,046 hours
under OMB Control Number 1845–0020.
Section 682.210—Deferment
The final regulations will amend
§ 682.210(a)(4) of the regulations to
provide that a borrower’s representative
may request a military service
deferment on behalf of the borrower. In
§ 682.210(b), the introductory language
in paragraphs (b)(1) through (6) of
§ 682.210 was revised to identify the
cohort of borrowers to which each
paragraph applies. Throughout
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
§ 682.210(b) cross-references were
added to the eligibility criteria that are
applicable to deferments available to
these borrowers. The final regulations
also amend § 682.210(s)(2) by removing
the exception clause at the end of the
provision, and amend § 682.210(u)(5) by
replacing the words ‘‘military active’’
with ‘‘post-active’’.
These final changes will not alter the
prior burden assessment of 325,058
hours under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
Section 682.211—Forbearance
Substantive changes in this section
have been identified earlier which
added 9,446 hours of burden to OMB
Control Number 1845–0020. There were
no further changes to this section that
will alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control
Number 1845–0020.
Collectively, the final changes will
increase the burden assessment from
325,058 by 9,446 hours (as identified
earlier) for a total of 334,504 hours
under OMB Control Number 1845–0020.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Section 682.212—Prohibited
Transactions
There is no change to the current
language in this section of the
regulations, however the current burden
referenced in OMB Control Number
1845–0020 is incorrectly calculated.
This section primarily defines
‘‘prohibited transactions,’’ but does not
impose recordkeeping or reporting
requirements upon entities and thus
does not impose burden. Therefore,
these final regulations remove the
325,058 hours of burden that was
previously incorrectly attributed to this
section of the regulations. While
subsection 34 CFR 682.212(h) provides
that an institution, at its option, may
make available a list of recommended or
suggested lenders, the burden associated
with that reporting is accounted for in
§§ 601.10 and 668.14.
We removed the prior burden
assessment of 325,058 hours under
OMB Control Number 1845–0020, and
therefore burden will decrease by
325,058 hours for a total of 0 hours.
Section 682.214—Compliance With
Equal Credit Opportunity Requirements
The final regulations will remove
§ 682.214 from the FFEL regulations.
The SAFRA Act ended the making of
new FFEL loans and therefore these
requirements can be eliminated from the
FFEL regulations.
The change in the final regulation will
remove the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control
Number 1845–0020, and therefore
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
burden will decrease by 325,058 hours
for a total of 0 hours.
Section 682.216—Teacher Loan
Forgiveness Program
The final regulations provide for
minor language changes.
These changes in the final regulations
will not alter the prior burden
assessment of 325,058 hours under
OMB Control Number 1845–0020.
Section 682.301—Eligibility of
Borrowers for Interest Benefits on
Stafford and Consolidation Loans
The final regulations will remove
§ 682.301(c) from the regulations. The
SAFRA Act ended the making of new
FFEL Program loans and this provision
related to determining borrower
eligibility for the interest subsidy on
new loans would be eliminated.
The change in the final regulations
will remove the prior burden
assessment of 325,058 hours under
OMB Control Number 1845–0020, and
therefore burden would decrease by
325,058 hours for a total of 0 hours
under this section.
Section 682.305—Procedures for
Payment of Interest Benefits and Special
Allowance and Collection of Origination
and Loan Fees
Section 682.305(c)(1)(ii) specifies that,
regardless of the dollar volume of loans
originated or held, a school lender or an
eligible lender serving as trustee for a
school or school-affiliated organization
originating FFEL Program loans as a
lender must submit an independent
compliance audit to the Department
each year. The final regulations will
remove the reference to FFEL lenders
originating loans. The final regulations
will also remove the language specifying
that a school and lender serving as a
trustee for a school must submit an
independent compliance audit to the
Department each year.
The number of school lenders or
lenders serving as a trustee on behalf of
a school or a school affiliated
organization whose purpose is to
originate loans for which the final
regulations will provide relief is so
small as to not be substantive. As a
result, these final changes will not alter
the prior burden assessment of 325,058
hours under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
Section 682.401—Basic Program
Agreement
The final regulations will remove
from § 682.401 language that addresses
new loan originations, the process
supporting loan origination, and a
guaranty agency’s efforts to secure new
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65797
loan volume. These provisions can be
eliminated from the FFEL Program
regulations because no new FFEL loans
are being made. The remaining
provisions proposed for elimination
relate to school eligibility to participate
in a guaranty agency’s program and the
authority of an agency to limit, suspend,
or terminate a school from its program.
For purposes of new loans, schools now
participate only in the Direct Loan
Program. Any future actions to limit,
suspend, or terminate a school’s
participation in the student loan
programs would be undertaken by the
Department under 34 CFR part 668,
subpart G. Therefore, § 682.401(b)(6) can
also be eliminated from the FFEL
Program regulations.
The final changes will decrease the
burden related to FFEL processes by
32,506 hours, and therefore the current
burden hours will decrease from
325,058 hours by 32,506 hours to
292,552 hours under OMB Control
Number 1845–0020.
Section 682.402—Death, Disability,
Closed School, False Certification,
Unpaid Refunds, and Bankruptcy
Payments
Substantive changes in this section
have been identified earlier under OMB
1845–0015. There were no further
changes to this section that impacted
the burden under OMB 1845–0020.
As a result, the prior burden
assessment of 325,058 hours under
OMB Control Number 1845–0020 will
not be altered.
Section 682.404—Federal rEinsurance
Agreement
The final regulations will make
conforming language changes required
due to the elimination of previous crossreferences or obsolete requirements.
These final changes will not alter the
prior burden assessment of 325,058
hours under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
Section 682.405—Loan Rehabilitation
Agreement
Substantive changes in this section
have been identified earlier. There were
no further changes to this section.
The substantive changes would be in
addition to the previous burden
assessment of 325,058 hours under
OMB Control Number 1845–0020 and
the earlier assessment increases burden
by 135,359 hours in OMB 1845–0020 for
a total burden of 460,417 hours.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65798
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Section 682.406—Conditions for Claim
Payments From the Federal Fund and
for Reinsurance Coverage
Section 682.414—Records, Reports, and
Inspection Requirements for Guaranty
Agency Programs
Section 682.507—Due Diligence in
Collecting a Loan
The final regulations will make a
minor wording change due to the
elimination of previous cross-references
and add an ending date coinciding with
the implementation of the SAFRA Act,
which ended the making of new FFEL
Program loans.
These final changes will not alter the
prior burden assessment of 325,058
hours under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
The final regulations will make minor
wording changes. One of the minor
wording changes will eliminate a
reporting category from annual guaranty
agency reporting requirement. Under
§ 682.414, annually, for each State in
which it operates, a guaranty agency
report of the total guaranteed loan
volume, default volume, and default
rate does not have to be categorized by
schools for all loans guaranteed after
December 31, 1980. We estimate that
this reduction in reporting categories
will decrease the previous burden
assessment by 16,253 hours, and
therefore the current burden of 325,058
would decrease to 308,805 hours under
OMB Control Number 1845–0020.
Section 682.511—Procedures for Filing
a Claim
Section 682.409—Mandatory
Assignment by Guaranty Agencies of
Defaulted Loans to the Secretary
The final regulations will make no
changes to this section of the
regulations.
These final regulations will not alter
the prior burden assessment of 325,058
hours under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
Section 682.410—Fiscal,
Administrative, and Enforcement
Requirements
Apart from the earlier discussion of
the changes made to the administrative
wage garnishment provisions in this
section of the regulations, the final
regulations will only make minor
wording changes to correct crossreferences and delete obsolete
references.
Substantive changes in this section
have been identified earlier. There are
no further changes to this section. These
final changes will not alter the prior
burden assessment of 325,058 hours
under OMB Control Number 1845–0020
and the earlier assessment that
increased burden by 88,402 hours in
OMB 1845–0020 for a total of 413,460
hours.
Section 682.411—Lender Due Diligence
in Collecting Guaranty Agency Loans
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
The final regulations will make a
minor wording change.
These final changes will not alter the
prior burden assessment of 325,058
hours under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
Section 682.412—Consequences of the
Failure of a Borrower or Student To
Establish Eligibility
Section 682.417—Determination of
Federal Funds or Assets To Be Returned
The final regulations make no changes
to this section of the regulations. These
changes in the final regulations will not
alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control
Number 1845–0020.
Section 682.418—Prohibited Uses of the
Assets of the Operating Fund During
Periods in Which the Operating Fund
Contains Transferred Funds Owed to
the Federal Fund
The final regulations will remove
§ 682.418 from the FFEL regulations.
The final change will remove the prior
burden assessment of 325,058 hours
under OMB Control Number 1845–0020,
and therefore burden will be decreased
by 325,058 hours for a total of 0 hours
based on the elimination of the prior
FFEL requirements.
Section 682.421—Funds Transferred
From the Federal Fund to the Operating
Fund by a Guaranty Agency
The final regulations will remove
§ 682.421 from the FFEL regulations.
The final change will remove the prior
burden assessment of 325,058 hours
under OMB Control Number 1845–0020,
and therefore burden will decrease by
325,058 hours for a total of 0 hours
based on the elimination of the prior
FFEL requirements.
The final regulations will make a
minor wording change.
These final changes will not alter the
prior burden assessment of 325,058
hours under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Section 682.508—Assignment of a Loan
Section 682.515—Records, Reports, and
Inspection Requirements for Federal
GSL Program Lenders
The final regulations will remove all
of the regulations under Part 682,
subpart E (§§ 682.500 through 682.515)
and reserve the subpart. The final
regulations will also remove FISLrelated Appendix C to part 682 from the
regulations.
The change in the final regulations
will remove the prior burden
assessment of 1,300,232 hours under
OMB Control Number 1845–0020, and
therefore burden will decrease by
325,058 hours for each of these four
sections and decrease burden by
1,300,232 hours for a total of 0 hours
based on the elimination of the prior
FFEL requirements.
Section 682.602—Rules for a School or
School-Affiliated Organization That
Makes or Originates Loans Through an
Eligible Lender Trustee
The final regulations will remove
§ 682.602 from the FFEL regulations.
The final change will remove the prior
burden assessment of 325,058 hours
under OMB Control Number 1845–0020,
and therefore burden will decrease by
325,058 hours for a total of 0 hours
based on the elimination of the prior
FFEL requirements.
Section 682.603—Certification by a
School That Participated in Connection
With a Loan Application
The final regulations will make
conforming language changes required
due to the elimination of a crossreference and reorganization due to a
deletion of previous requirements.
These final changes will not alter the
prior burden assessment of 325,058
hours under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
Section 682.604—Processing the
Borrower’s Loan Proceeds and
Counseling Borrowers (Required Exit
Counseling for Borrowers)
The final regulations will change the
heading of § 682.604, remove current
paragraph (a), remove and reserve
paragraph (b), and remove paragraphs
(c) through (f) and (h). The final
regulations will also redesignate current
paragraph (g) as paragraph (a). Newly
redesignated § 682.604(a)(1) will be
amended to include another option for
providing exit counseling to a student
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
borrower who withdraws without the
school’s knowledge or fails to complete
required exit counseling. In addition to
the existing options described under
‘‘Current Regulations,’’ a school could
also send written counseling materials
to an email address provided by the
student borrower. Newly redesignated
§ 682.604(a)(2) will be amended by
replacing cross-references to current
paragraph (a), which we are removing,
with the substantive information
contained in the cross-referenced
provision that must be included in the
counseling. A new paragraph (a)(5) will
also be added to newly redesignated
§ 682.604(a) to clarify that: (1) A
school’s compliance with the Direct
Loan Program exit counseling
requirements in 34 CFR 685.304(b)
satisfies the FFEL exit counseling
requirements for student borrowers who
received both FFEL and Direct Loan
program loans for attendance at the
school if the school provides the
information required by
§ 682.604(a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii); and (2) a
student’s completion of interactive exit
counseling offered by the Secretary
meets both the FFEL exit counseling
requirements and the Direct Loan exit
counseling requirements in 34 CFR
685.304(b).
The changes in the final regulations
will decrease the previous burden
assessment of 325,058 hours by 211,288
hours, and therefore the current burden
of 325,058 hours will decrease to
113,770 hours under OMB Control
Number 1845–0020 because the burden
associated with new FFEL Program
loans will be eliminated.
Section 682.605—Determining the Date
of a Student’s Withdrawal
The final regulations will not make
any changes to this section. These final
regulations will not alter the prior
burden assessment of 325,058 hours
under OMB Control Number 1845–0020.
Section 682.610—Administrative and
Fiscal Requirements for Schools That
Participated
Apart from the earlier discussion of
the changes made to this section, the
final regulations will only make minor
wording changes.
These final changes will not alter the
prior burden assessment of 325,058
hours under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
Section 682.711—Reinstatement After
Termination
The final regulations will remove the
language regarding the loss of a school
lender’s participation upon the loss of
the school’s eligibility to participate in
the Title IV, Federal student financial
aid programs.
These final changes will not alter the
prior burden assessment of 325,058
hours under OMB Control Number
1845–0020.
Section 682.712—Disqualification
Review of Limitation, Suspension, and
Termination Actions Taken by
Guarantee Agencies Against Lenders
The final regulations will remove a
cross-reference to a section proposed for
65799
deletion. These final changes will not
alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control
Number 1845–0020.
Section 682.713—Disqualification
Review of Limitation, Suspension, and
Termination Actions Taken by Guaranty
Agencies Against a School
The final regulations will remove
§ 682.713 from the FFEL Program
regulations. The change in the final
regulations will remove the prior
burden assessment of 325,058 hours
under OMB Control Number 1845–0020,
therefore burden will decrease by
325,058 hours for a total of 0 hours
based upon the elimination of the prior
FFEL requirements.
Consistent with the discussion above,
the following chart describes the
sections of the final regulations
involving information collections, the
information being collected, and the
collections that the Department will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget for approval and public
comment under the Paperwork
Reduction Act, and the estimated costs
associated with the information
collections. The monetized net savings
from of the reduced burden on lender/
guaranty agencies, institutions, and
borrowers using wage data developed
using BLS data, available at https://
www.bls.gov/ncs/ect/sp/ecsuphst.pdf, is
¥$108,767,761 as shown in the chart
below. This cost was based on an hourly
rate of $24.61.
COLLECTION OF INFORMATION
Information collection
OMB Control No. and estimated change
in burden
These final regulations amend the current FFEL regulations to authorize a
lender to grant forbearance to a borrower who is in default on a loan, but
prior to a default claim payment based
on the borrower’s oral request. The
lender must orally review with the borrower the terms and conditions of the
forbearance and send a notice confirming the terms within 30 days of the
oral agreement.
These final regulations amend the current Direct Loan regulations to authorize the Secretary to grant forbearance
to a borrower who is in default on a
loan, but prior to a default claim payment based on the borrower’s oral request. The Secretary must orally review with the borrower the terms and
conditions of the forbearance and send
a notice confirming the terms within 30
days of the oral agreement.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will increase by 9,446 hours.
$232,466.
OMB 1845–0119 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease by 472 hours.
¥$11,616.
Regulatory section
Forbearance ..........................
§ 685.205
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
§ 682.211
Forbearance ..........................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Estimated
costs
65800
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
COLLECTION OF INFORMATION—Continued
Information collection
OMB Control No. and estimated change
in burden
Estimated
costs
The final regulations require the guaranty
agency to base determinations of reasonable and affordable rehabilitation
payment amounts of defaulted loans
on information provided on an OMBapproved form, and if requested, supporting documentation.
The final regulations require the Secretary to base determinations of reasonable and affordable rehabilitation
payment amounts of defaulted loans
on information provided on an OMBapproved form, and if requested, supporting documentation.
The final regulations extend the current
90-day window to 120-days for students who leave before a school
closes may apply for a discharge of a
title IV, HEA loan.
The final regulations add a new section
requiring institutions that participate in
the Federal Perkins Loan program to,
upon receipt of an enrollment report
from the Secretary, update all information included in the report, and return it
to the Secretary in the manner and format and within the timeframe prescribed by the Secretary.
The final regulations require schools that
participate in the Perkins Loan Program to use the same eligibility criteria
that FFEL lenders and the Department
use to define an eligible graduate fellowship program and to establish the
eligibility of a Perkins Loan borrower
for a graduate fellowship deferment.
The final regulations:
• Add a new section to specify the
functions that may be performed
by a third-party servicer or collection contractor employed by a
guaranty agency (GA) for administrative wage garnishment (AWG)
purposes;
• Replace a section of the regulations with a new section to provide
that if a borrower’s written request
for a hearing is received by the
GA after the 30th day following
the date of the garnishment notice
and a decision is not rendered
within 60 days following receipt of
a borrower’s written request the
GA must suspend the AWG order
beginning on the 61st day after
the request was received until the
hearing is provided and a decision
rendered;
• Provide for the manner by which
the hearing is administered and
certain provisions relating to bringing forth additional evidence and
continuances; and
• Clarify that a borrower who wishes to object that they are not subject to garnishment because of recent reemployment after involuntary separation bears the burden
of raising and proving the claim.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will increase by 149,864 hours.
$3,688,153.
OMB 1845–0119 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will increase by 35,606 hours.
$876,264.
OMB 1845–0015 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will increase by 54 hours.
$1,329.
OMB 1845–0019 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will increase by 38,312 hours.
$942,858.
OMB 1845–0019 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will increase by 276 hours.
$13,585.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will increase by 88,402 hours.
$2,175,573.
Regulatory section
§ 682.405(b)
ment.
Loan rehabilitation agree-
§ 685.211(f)
ment.
Loan rehabilitation agree-
§ 674.33, § 682.402, § 685.214
school discharge form.
Closed
§ 674.19 School enrollment status reporting.
§ 674.34 Deferment of
Federal Perkins Loans.
repayment—
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
§ 682.410 Fiscal, administrative and enforcement requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
65801
COLLECTION OF INFORMATION—Continued
Information collection
OMB Control No. and estimated change
in burden
Estimated
costs
The final regulations:
• Amend the section heading;
• Remove the section of the regulations that describes the application
process for FFEL loans; and
• Re-designates the paragraphs describing the loan repayment process.
The final regulations make a conforming
change to the definition of ‘‘Lender’’
due to the elimination of § 682.601.
The final regulations remove regulations
governing required lender disclosures
to borrowers that are provided when
new loans are made.
The remaining provisions include providing repayment information, providing required disclosures during the
repayment period, and providing required disclosures for borrowers having difficulty making payments.
The final regulations remove § 682.206
from the FFEL regulations. The
SAFRA Act eliminated the authority to
make new FFEL Program loans, including FFEL consolidation loans.
The final regulations replace the term
‘‘national credit bureau(s)’’ with ‘‘nationwide consumer reporting agency(ies)’’ to more accurately reflect the
appropriate legal terms.
The
final
regulations
amend
§ 682.209(a)(3)(i) by adding a new
paragraph which specifies that borrowers with fixed interest rates on their
Stafford loans enter repayment on
those loans the day after six months
following the date the borrower was no
longer enrolled on at least a half-time
basis.
The final regulations remove current
§§ 682.209(e)–(g) and (j) from the regulations and re-designate the remaining paragraphs as paragraphs (e)–(g).
Re-designated
§ 682.209(e)
(current
paragraph (h)) is amended to specify
that a FFEL Consolidation loan borrower repaying under the incomebased repayment plan may make a
scheduled monthly payment of less
than the interest that accrues on the
loan.
The final regulations amend the
deferment regulations to provide that a
borrower’s representative may request
a military service deferment on behalf
of the borrower.
In § 682.210(b), the introductory language is revised to identify the cohort
of borrowers to which each paragraph
applies.
Throughout
§ 682.210(b)
cross-references are added to the eligibility criteria that are applicable to deferments
available to these borrowers. The final
regulations remove the exception
clause at the end of the provision, and
replace the words ‘‘military active’’ with
the word ‘‘post-active’’.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
No Change.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease by 162,529 hours to
162,529 hours.
No change.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease by 325,058 hours to
0 hours of burden.
¥$7,999,677.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
No change.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease from 325,058 by
65,012 hours to 260,046 hours.
¥$1,599,945.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
No change.
Regulatory section
§ 682.102
loan.
Obtaining and repaying a
§ 682.200
Definitions—Lender ...............
§ 682.205 Disclosure Requirements for
Lenders.
Due Diligence in making a
§ 682.208
loan.
Due diligence in servicing a
§ 682.209
Repayment of a loan ............
§ 682.210
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
§ 682.206
loan.
Deferment .............................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
¥$3,999,839.
65802
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
COLLECTION OF INFORMATION—Continued
Information collection
OMB Control No. and estimated change
in burden
Estimated
costs
Substantive changes in this section have
been identified earlier.
The additional amendments to the regulations allow a lender to grant forbearance to a borrower who is delinquent
at the beginning of a period of nonmandatory authorized forbearance.
There is no change to the current language in this section of the regulations. However the current burden referenced in OMB Control Number
1845–0020 is incorrect.
The final regulations remove § 682.214
from the FFEL regulations. The
SAFRA Act ended the making of new
FFEL loans and therefore these requirements can be eliminated from the
FFEL regulations.
The final regulations provide for minor
language changes.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
(NOTE: Other earlier changes increased
burden by 9,446 hours for a total of
334,504 hours.)
No change.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease by 325,058 hours to
0 hours of burden.
¥7,999,677.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease by 325,058 hours to
0 hours of burden.
¥7,999,677.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease by 325,058 hours to
0 hours of burden.
No change.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
No change.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden of 325,058 hours will decrease by
32,506 to 292,552 hours.
¥799,973.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
No change.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
No change.
Regulatory section
§ 682.211
Forbearance ..........................
§ 682.212
Prohibited transactions .........
§ 682.214 Compliance with equal credit
opportunity requirements.
§ 682.216 Teacher
program.
loan
forgiveness
§ 682.301 Eligibility of borrowers for interest benefits on Stafford and Consolidation Loans.
§ 682.305 Procedures for payment of
interest benefits and special allowance
and collection of origination and loan
fees.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
§ 682.401
Basic Program Agreement ....
§ 682.402 Death,
disability,
closed
school, false certification, unpaid refunds, and bankruptcy payments.
§ 682.404 Federal reinsurance agreement.
§ 682.405
ment.
Loan
VerDate Mar<15>2010
rehabilitation
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
agree-
Jkt 232001
The
final
regulations
remove
§ 682.301(c) from the regulations. The
SAFRA Act ended the making of new
FFEL loans and this provision related
to determining borrower eligibility for
the interest subsidy on new loans will
be eliminated.
Section 682.305(c)(1)(ii) specifies that,
regardless of the dollar volume of
loans originated or held, a school lender or an eligible lender serving as
trustee for a school or school-affiliated
organization originating FFEL loans as
a lender must submit an independent
compliance audit to the Department
each year. The final regulations will remove the reference to FFEL lenders
originating loans.
The final regulations remove from
§ 682.401 language addressing new
loan originations, the process for loan
origination, and a guaranty agency’s
efforts to secure new loan volume.
These provisions can be eliminated
from the FFEL regulations because no
new FFEL loans are being made.
The remaining provisions that are eliminated relate to school eligibility to participate in a guaranty agency’s program and the authority of an agency to
limit, suspend, or terminate a school
from its program. For purposes of new
loans, schools now participate only in
the Direct Loan Program. Any future
actions to limit, suspend, or terminate
a school’s participation in the student
loan programs will be undertaken by
the Department under 34 CFR part
668, subpart G.
Substantive changes in this section have
been identified earlier. There are no
further changes to this section.
The final regulations make conforming
language changes required due to the
elimination of previous cross references or obsolete requirements.
Substantive changes in this section have
been identified earlier. There were no
further changes to this section.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
¥7,999,677.
No change.
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
65803
COLLECTION OF INFORMATION—Continued
Regulatory section
Information collection
OMB Control No. and estimated change
in burden
Estimated
costs
§ 682.406 Conditions for claim payments from the Federal Fund and for
reinsurance coverage.
The final regulations make a minor wording change due to the elimination of
previous cross-references and add an
ending date coinciding with the implementation of the SAFRA Act, which
ended the making of new FFEL loans.
The final regulations make no changes
to this section of the regulations.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
No change.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
(NOTE: Other earlier changes to the Administrative Wage Garnishment regulations increase burden by 88,402 hours
for a total of 413,460 hours.)
No change.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease from 325,058 hours
by 16,253 hours for a total of 308,805
hours.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease by 325,058 hours to
0 hours of burden..
No change.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease by 325,058 hours to
0 hours of burden.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease by 325,058 hours to
0 hours of burden.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease by 325,058 hours to
0 hours of burden.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease by 325,058 hours to
0 hours of burden.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease by 325,058 hours to
0 hours of burden.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease by 325,058 hours to
0 hours of burden.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
¥7,999,677.
§ 682.409 Mandatory assignment by
guaranty agencies of defaulted loans
to the Secretary.
§ 682.410 Fiscal, administrative, and
enforcement requirements.
§ 682.411 Lender due diligence in collecting guaranty agency loans.
Apart from the earlier discussion of the
changes made to the administrative
wage garnishment provisions of this
section of the regulations, the final regulations would only make minor wording changes to conform to cross reference changes and delete obsolete
references.
The final regulations make a minor wording change.
§ 682.412 Consequences of the failure
of a borrower or student to establish
eligibility.
§ 682.414 Records, reports, and inspection requirements for guaranty agency
programs.
The final regulations make a minor wording change.
§ 682.417 Determination of Federal
funds or assets to be returned.
The final regulations make a minor wording change.
§ 682.418 Prohibited uses of the assets
of the Operating Fund during periods
in which the Operating Fund contains
transferred funds owed to the Federal
Fund.
§ 682.421 Funds transferred from the
Federal Fund to the Operating Fund by
a guaranty agency.
The final regulations remove § 682.418
from the FFEL regulations.
§ 682.507
loan.
Due diligence in collecting a
§ 682.508
Assignment of a loan ............
§ 682.511
Procedures for filing a claim
The final regulations remove all of the
regulations
under
subpart
E
(§§ 682.500 through 682.515) and reserve the subpart.
The final regulations remove all of the
regulations
under
subpart
E
(§§ 682.500 through 682.515) and reserve the subpart.
The final regulations remove all of the
regulations
under
subpart
E
(§§ 682.500 through 682.515) and reserve the subpart.
The final regulations remove all of the
regulations
under
subpart
E
(§§ 682.500 through 682.515) and reserve the subpart.
The final regulations remove § 682.602
from the FFEL regulations.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
§ 682.515 Records, reports, and inspection requirements for Federal GSL program lenders.
§ 682.602 Rules for a school or schoolaffiliated organization that makes or
originates loans through an eligible
lender trustee.
§ 682.603 Certification by a school that
participated in connection with a loan
application.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
The final regulations make a minor wording change.
The final regulations remove § 682.421
from the FFEL regulations.
The final regulations make conforming
language changes required due to the
elimination of a cross reference and
reorganization due to a deletion of previous requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
No change.
No change.
¥$399,986.
No change.
¥$7,999,677.
¥7,999,677.
¥7,999,677.
¥7,999,677.
¥7,999,677.
¥7,999,677.
No change.
65804
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
COLLECTION OF INFORMATION—Continued
Regulatory section
Information collection
OMB Control No. and estimated change
in burden
Estimated
costs
§ 682.604 Processing the borrower’s
loan proceeds and counseling borrowers (Required exit counseling for
borrowers).
The final regulations remove, reserve,
and redesignate paragraphs to illustrate the counseling requirements, specifically the exit counseling requirements.
¥$5,199,798.
§ 682.605 Determining the date of a
student’s withdrawal.
The Secretary is not changing the language in this section.
§ 682.610 Administrative and fiscal requirements for schools that participated.
§ 682.711 Reinstatement after termination.
The final regulations only make minor
wording changes.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
OMB 1845–0020
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease from 325,058 by
211,288 hours for a total of 113,770
hours.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will remain 325,058 hours.
No change.
OMB 1845–0020 ......................................
The Department estimates that the burden will decrease by 325,058 hours to
0 hours of burden.
¥7,999,677.
§ 682.712 Disqualification review of limitation, suspension, and termination actions taken by guaranty agencies
against lenders.
§ 682.713 Disqualification review of limitation, suspension, and termination actions taken by guaranty agencies
against a school.
The final regulations remove the language regarding the loss of a school
lender’s participation upon the loss of
the school’s eligibility to participate in
the Title IV, Federal student financial
assistance programs.
The final regulations remove a cross-reference to a section proposed for deletion.
The final regulations remove § 682.713
from the FFEL regulations.
The total burden hours and change in
burden hours associated with each OMB
Control number affected by these final
regulations follows:
Total
burden
hours
Change in
burden
hours
........
........
........
........
14,828
6,247,152
8,211,632
35,606
+54
+38,864
¥4,169,582
+36,078
Total ...........
14,509,690
¥4,094,586
Control No.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
1845–0015
1845–0019
1845–0020
1845–0119
Assessment of Educational Impact
In the NPRM we requested comments
on whether the proposed regulations
would require transmission of
information that any other agency or
authority of the United States gathers or
makes available.
Based on the response to the NPRM
and our review, we have determined
that these final regulations do not
require transmission of information that
any other agency or authority of the
United States gathers or makes
available.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at this site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department. (Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance Numbers: 84.032
Federal Family Education Loan
Program; 84.038 Federal Perkins Loan
Program; 84.268 William D. Ford
Federal Direct Loan Program)
List of Subjects in 34 CFR Parts 668,
674, 682, and 685
Administrative practice and
procedure, Colleges and universities,
Education, Loan programs—education,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Student aid, Vocational
education.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
No change.
No change.
No change.
Dated: October 23, 2013.
Arne Duncan,
Secretary of Education.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Secretary amends parts
668, 674, 682, and 685 of title 34 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 668—STUDENT ASSISTANCE
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 668
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1001, 1002, 1003,
1070, 1085, 1088, 1091, 1092, 1094, 1099c,
and 1099c–1, unless otherwise noted.
§ 668.204
[Amended]
2. Section 668.204(c)(1)(i) is amended
by removing the figure ‘‘0.06015’’ and
adding, in its place, the figure ‘‘0.0832’’.
■
§ 668.214
[Amended]
3. Section 668.214 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (a)(1), removing the
figure ‘‘0.06015’’ and adding, in its
place, the figure ‘‘0.0832’’.
■ B. In paragraph (d)(2), removing the
words ‘‘0.06015 or 0.0625’’ and adding,
in their place, the words ‘‘0.0832 or
0.0625, as applicable’’.
■
■
PART 674—FEDERAL PERKINS LOAN
PROGRAM
4. The authority citation for part 674
continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070g, 1087aa–
1087hh, unless otherwise noted.
5. Section 674.2(b) is amended by
revising the definition of ‘‘Satisfactory
repayment arrangement’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 674.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
Satisfactory repayment arrangement:
(1) For purposes of regaining eligibility
for grant, loan, or work assistance under
title IV of the HEA, to the extent that the
borrower is otherwise eligible, the
making of six on-time, consecutive,
voluntary, full monthly payments on a
defaulted loan. ‘‘On-time’’ means a
payment made within 20 days of the
scheduled due date. A borrower may
obtain the benefit of this paragraph with
respect to renewed eligibility once.
(2) Voluntary payments are payments
made directly by the borrower, and do
not include payments obtained by
income tax offset, garnishment, or
income or asset execution.
(3) A borrower has not used the one
opportunity to renew eligibility for title
IV assistance if the borrower makes six
consecutive, on-time, voluntary, full
monthly payments under an agreement
to rehabilitate a defaulted loan, but does
not receive additional title IV assistance
prior to defaulting on that loan again.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Section 674.9 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (j)(1), removing the
word ‘‘those’’.
■ B. Redesignating paragraph (k) as
paragraph (l).
■ C. Adding a new paragraph (k).
The addition reads as follows:
§ 674.9
Student eligibility.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) In the case of a borrower who is
in default on an FFEL Program or a
Direct Loan Program loan, makes
satisfactory repayment arrangements as
defined in 34 CFR 682.200(b) or
685.102(b) on the defaulted loan, as
determined by the loan holder; and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Section 674.19 is amended by
adding a new paragraph (f) to read as
follows:
§ 674.19
Fiscal procedures and records.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Enrollment reporting process. (1)
Upon receipt of an enrollment report
from the Secretary, an institution must
update all information included in the
report and return the report to the
Secretary—
(i) In the manner and format
prescribed by the Secretary; and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
(ii) Within the timeframe specified by
the Secretary.
(2) Unless it expects to submit its next
updated enrollment report to the
Secretary within the next 60 days, an
institution must notify the Secretary
within 30 days after the date the school
discovers that—
(i) A loan under title IV of the HEA
was made to a student who was enrolled
or accepted for enrollment at the
institution, and the student has ceased
to be enrolled on at least a half-time
basis or failed to enroll on at least a halftime basis for the period for which the
loan was intended; or
(ii) A student who is enrolled at the
institution and who received a loan
under title IV of the HEA has changed
his or her permanent address.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Section 674.33 is amended by:
■ A. Revising paragraph (g)(4)(i)(B).
■ B. In paragraph (g)(8)(i), removing the
figure ‘‘90’’ and adding, in its place, the
figure ‘‘120’’.
The revision reads as follows:
§ 674.33
Repayment.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) Did not complete the program of
study at that school because the school
closed while the student was enrolled,
or the student withdrew from the school
not more than 120 days before the
school closed. The Secretary may
extend the 120-day period if the
Secretary determines that exceptional
circumstances related to the school’s
closing justify an extension. Exceptional
circumstances for this purpose may
include, but are not limited to: the
school’s loss of accreditation; The
school’s discontinuation of the majority
of its academic programs; action by the
State to revoke the school’s license to
operate or award academic credentials
in the State; or a finding by a State or
Federal government agency that the
school violated State or Federal law;
and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Section 674.34 is amended by:
■ A. In the introductory text of
paragraph (e), removing the reference
‘‘(e)(5)’’ and adding, in its place, the
reference ‘‘(e)(4)’’, each time it appears.
■ B. Removing paragraph (e)(4).
■ C. Redesignating paragraph (e)(5) as
paragraph (e)(4).
■ D. Removing paragraph (e)(6).
■ E. Redesignating paragraphs (e)(7) and
(e)(8) as paragraphs (e)(5) and (e)(6),
respectively.
■ F. In newly redesignated paragraph
(e)(5), removing the words ‘‘paragraphs
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65805
(e)(3) and (e)(4)’’ and adding, in their
place, the words ‘‘paragraph (e)(3)’’.
■ G. Removing paragraph (e)(9).
■ H. Revising paragraph (f) to read as
follows:
§ 674.34 Deferment of repayment—Federal
Perkins loans, NDSLs and Defense loans.
*
*
*
*
*
(f)(1) To qualify for a deferment for
study as part of a graduate fellowship
program pursuant to paragraph (b)(1)(ii)
of this section, a borrower must provide
the institution with a statement from an
authorized official of the borrower’s
graduate fellowship program
certifying—
(i) That the borrower holds at least a
baccalaureate degree conferred by an
institution of higher education;
(ii) That the borrower has been
accepted or recommended by an
institution of higher education for
acceptance on a full-time basis into an
eligible graduate fellowship program;
and
(iii) The borrower’s anticipated
completion date in the program.
(2) For purposes of paragraph (b)(1)(ii)
of this section, an eligible graduate
fellowship program is a fellowship
program that—
(i) Provides sufficient financial
support to graduate fellows to allow for
full-time study for at least six months;
(ii) Requires a written statement from
each applicant explaining the
applicant’s objectives before the award
of that financial support;
(iii) Requires a graduate fellow to
submit periodic reports, projects, or
evidence of the fellow’s progress; and
(iv) In the case of a course of study at
a foreign university, accepts the course
of study for completion of the
fellowship program.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. Section 674.39 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 674.39
Loan rehabilitation.
(a) * * *
(2) A loan is rehabilitated if the
borrower—
(i) Requests rehabilitation; and
(ii) Makes a full monthly payment—
as determined by the institution—
within 20 days of the due date, each
month for 9 consecutive months.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 674.50
[Amended]
11. Section 674.50(e)(1) is amended
by removing the words ‘‘is submitted for
assignment under 674.8(d)(3)’’ and
adding, in their place, the words ‘‘was
made before September 13, 1982’’.
■ 12. Section 674.52 is amended by:
■
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65806
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
A. Removing paragraph (b)(2).
B. Redesignating paragraph (b)(1)(i) as
paragraph (b)(1).
■ C. Redesignating paragraph (b)(1)(ii)
as paragraph (b)(2).
■ D. Redesignating paragraphs (c), (d),
and (e) as paragraphs (d), (e), and (f),
respectively.
■ E. Adding a new paragraph (c).
■ F. Adding a new paragraph (g).
The additions read as follows:
■
■
§ 674.52
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
(c) Break in service. (1) If the borrower
is unable to complete an academic year
of eligible teaching service due to a
condition that is covered under the
Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
(FMLA) (29 U.S.C. 2601, et seq.), the
borrower still qualifies for the
cancellation if—
(i) The borrower completes one half of
the academic year; and
(ii) The borrower’s employer
considers the borrower to have fulfilled
his or her contract requirements for the
academic year for purposes of salary
increases, tenure, and retirement.
(2) If the borrower is unable to
complete a year of eligible service under
§§ 674.56, 674.57, 674.59, or 674.60 due
to a condition that is covered under the
FMLA, the borrower still qualifies for
the cancellation if the borrower
completes at least six consecutive
months of eligible service.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Switching cancellation categories.
A borrower who qualifies for a
cancellation under one of the
cancellation categories in §§ 674.53,
674.56, 674.57, or 674.59 receives
cancellation of 15 percent of the original
principal for the first and second years
of qualifying service, 20 percent of the
original principal for the third and
fourth years of qualifying service, and
30 percent of the original principal for
the fifth year of qualifying service. If,
after the first, second, third, or fourth
complete year of qualifying service—
(1) The borrower switches to a
position that qualifies the borrower for
cancellation under a different
cancellation category under §§ 674.53,
674.56, 674.57, or 674.59, the borrower’s
cancellation rate progression continues
from the last year the borrower received
a cancellation under the former
cancellation category; or
(2) The borrower switches to a
position that qualifies the borrower for
cancellation under a different
cancellation category under §§ 674.58 or
674.60, the borrower’s cancellation rate
progression under the new cancellation
category begins at the year one
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
PART 682—FEDERAL FAMILY
EDUCATION LOAN (FFEL) PROGRAM
13. The authority citation for part 682
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1071 to 1087–2,
unless otherwise noted.
14. Section 682.100 is amended by:
A. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (a).
■ B. In paragraph (a)(1), removing the
word ‘‘encourages’’ and adding, in its
place, the word ‘‘encouraged’’.
■ C. In the first sentence of paragraph
(a)(3), removing the word ‘‘encourages’’
and adding, in its place, the word
‘‘encouraged’’.
■ D. Revising the last sentence of
paragraph (a)(3).
■ E. In paragraph (a)(4), removing the
word ‘‘encourages’’ and adding, in its
place, the word ‘‘encouraged’’.
■ F. In paragraph (a)(4), adding the
words ‘‘and prior to July 1, 2010’’ in the
last sentence between the date
‘‘November 13, 1997’’ and the
punctuation ‘‘.’’.
■ G. Revising paragraph (b)(2)(iii).
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
Cancellation procedures.
*
cancellation rates specified in
§§ 674.58(b) or 674.60(b), respectively.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 682.100 The Federal Family Education
Loan programs.
(a) This part governs the following
four programs collectively referred to in
these regulations as ‘‘the Federal Family
Education Loan (FFEL) programs,’’ in
which lenders used their own funds
prior to July 1, 2010, to make loans to
enable a student or his or her parents to
pay the costs of the student’s attendance
at postsecondary schools.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * * The PLUS Program also
provided for making loans to graduate
and professional students on or after
July 1, 2006 and prior to July 1, 2010.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) The Federal GSL programs were
authorized to operate in States not
served by a guaranty agency program. In
addition, the FISL and Federal SLS (as
in effect for periods of enrollment that
began prior to July 1, 1994) programs
were authorized, under limited
circumstances, to operate in States in
which a guaranty agency program did
not serve all eligible students.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 15. Section 682.101 is amended by:
■ A. Adding introductory text to this
section.
■ B. In paragraph (a), removing the
words ‘‘may make loans.’’ and adding,
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
in their place, the words ‘‘made loans
prior to July 1, 2010.’’
■ C. In paragraph (b), removing the
words ‘‘may participate’’ and adding, in
their place, the word ‘‘participated’’.
■ D. Revising paragraph (c).
The addition and revision read as
follows:
§ 682.101 Participation in the FFEL
programs.
The following entities and persons
participate in the FFEL programs:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Students who met certain
requirements, including enrollment at a
participating school, borrowed under
the Stafford Loan Program prior to July
1, 2010 and, for periods of enrollment
that began prior to July 1, 1994, the SLS
program. Parents of eligible dependent
undergraduate students borrowed under
the PLUS Program prior to July 1, 2010.
Borrowers with outstanding Stafford,
SLS, FISL, Perkins, HPSL, HEAL, ALAS,
PLUS, or Nursing Student Loan Program
loans borrowed under the Consolidation
Loan Program prior to July 1, 2010. The
PLUS Program also provided for making
loans to graduate and professional
students on or after July 1, 2006 and
prior to July 1, 2010.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. Section 682.102 is amended by:
■ A. Revising the section heading.
■ B. Removing paragraphs (a), (c), and
(d).
■ C. In the introductory text of
paragraph (e), removing the paragraph
heading.
■ D. Redesignating paragraphs (e)(1)
through (e)(7) as paragraphs (a) through
(g), respectively.
■ E. In newly redesignated paragraph
(a), revising the last sentence.
■ F. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b), removing the words ‘‘on a Stafford
Loan’’.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 682.102
Repaying a loan.
(a) * * * The obligation to repay all
or a portion of a loan may be forgiven
for Stafford Loan borrowers who enter
certain areas of the teaching profession.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 682.103
[Amended]
17. Section 682.103(c) is amended by
removing the letter and the punctuation
‘‘E,’’.
■ 18. Section 682.200 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (a)(1) introductory
text, removing the words ‘‘subpart A
of’’.
■ B. In paragraph (a)(1), removing from
the list, the terms Academic
Competitiveness Grant (ACG) Program,
■
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Graduate and professional student,
Leveraging Educational Assistance
Partnership (LEAP) Program, National
Science and Mathematics Access to
Retain Talent Grant (National SMART
Grant) Program, Supplemental
Educational Opportunity Grant (SEOG)
Program, and Supplemental Loans for
Students (SLS) Program.
■ C. In paragraph (a)(1), adding to the
list, in alphabetical order, the terms
Federal Supplemental Educational
Opportunity Grant (SEOG) Program,
Federal Supplemental Loans for
Students (SLS) Program, and Graduate
or professional student.
■ D. In paragraph (b), in the definition
of Authority, removing the words
‘‘making or purchasing’’ and adding, in
their place, the word ‘‘purchase’’.
■ E. In paragraph (b), in the definition
of Borrower, removing the word ‘‘is’’
and adding, in its place, the word
‘‘was’’.
■ F. In paragraph (b), in the definition
of Estimated financial assistance, in
paragraph (1)(vi), removing the words
‘‘Academic Competitiveness Grant,
National SMART Grant,’’.
■ G. In paragraph (b), in the definition
of Lender, revising paragraph
(5)(i)(A)(10).
■ H. In paragraph (b), in the definition
of Lender, revising paragraph (8).
■ I. In paragraph (b), revising the
definition of Nationwide consumer
reporting agency.
■ J. In paragraph (b), revising the
definition of Satisfactory repayment
arrangement.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 682.200
Definitions.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
Lender
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(10) Performance of, or payment to
another third party to perform, any
school function required under title IV,
except that the lender may perform
entrance counseling and, as provided in
§ 682.604(a), exit counseling, and may
provide services to participating foreign
schools at the direction of the Secretary,
as a third-party servicer; and
*
*
*
*
*
(8) As of January 1, 2007, and for
loans first disbursed on or after that date
under a trustee arrangement, an eligible
lender operating as a trustee under a
contract entered into on or before
September 30, 2006, and which
continues in effect with a school or a
school-affiliated organization—
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
(i) Must not—
(A) Make a loan to any undergraduate
student;
(B) Make a loan other than a Federal
Stafford loan to a graduate or
professional student; or
(C) Make a loan to a borrower who is
not enrolled at that school;
(ii) Must offer loans that carry an
origination fee or an interest rate, or
both, that are less than the fee or rate
authorized under the provisions of the
Act; and
(iii) Must, for any fiscal year
beginning on or after July 1, 2006 in
which the school engages in activities as
an eligible lender, submit an annual
compliance audit that satisfies the
following requirements:
(A) With regard to a school that is a
governmental entity or a nonprofit
organization, the audit must be
conducted in accordance with
§ 682.305(c)(2)(v) and chapter 75 of title
31, United States Code, and in addition,
during years when the student financial
aid cluster (as defined in Office of
Management and Budget Circular A–
133, Appendix B, Compliance
Supplement) is not audited as a ‘‘major
program’’ (as defined under 31 U.S.C.
7501) must, without regard to the
amount of loans made, include in such
audit the school’s lending activities as a
major program.
(B) With regard to a school that is not
a governmental entity or a nonprofit
organization, the audit must be
conducted annually in accordance with
§ 682.305(c)(2)(i) through (iii).
(C) With regard to any school, the
audit must include a determination
that—
(1) The school used all payments and
proceeds (i.e., special allowance and
interest payments from borrowers,
interest subsidy payments, proceeds
from the sale or other disposition of
loans) from the loans for need-based
grant programs;
(2) Those need-based grants
supplemented, rather than supplanted,
the institution’s use of non-Federal
funds for such grants; and
(3) The school used no more than a
reasonable portion of payments and
proceeds from the loans for direct
administrative expenses.
*
*
*
*
*
Nationwide consumer reporting
agency. A consumer reporting agency
that compiles and maintains files on
consumers on a nationwide basis and as
defined in 15 U.S.C. 1681a(p).
*
*
*
*
*
Satisfactory repayment arrangement.
(1) For purposes of regaining eligibility
under the title IV student financial
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65807
assistance programs, the making of six
consecutive, on-time, voluntary full
monthly payments on a defaulted loan.
A borrower may only obtain the benefit
of this paragraph with respect to
renewed eligibility once.
(2) The required full monthly
payment amount may not be more than
is reasonable and affordable based on
the borrower’s total financial
circumstances. Voluntary payments are
payments made directly by the
borrower, and do not include payments
obtained by income tax off-set,
garnishment, or income or asset
execution. ‘‘On-time’’ means a payment
received by the Secretary or a guaranty
agency or its agent within 20 days of the
scheduled due date.
(3) A borrower has not used the one
opportunity to renew eligibility for title
IV assistance if the borrower makes six
consecutive, on-time, voluntary, full
monthly payments under an agreement
to rehabilitate a defaulted loan but does
not receive additional title IV assistance
prior to defaulting on that loan again.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 682.201
[Amended]
19. Section 682.201 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (a) introductory text,
removing the words ‘‘made under
§ 682.209(e) or (f)’’.
■ B. In paragraph (a)(4)(ii) introductory
text, adding the words ‘‘paragraph (a)(4)
of’’ between the words ‘‘of’’ and ‘‘this’’.
■ C. In paragraph (a)(6) introductory
text, removing the word ‘‘student’’ and
adding, in its place, the word
‘‘borrower’’.
■ D. In paragraph (c)(2)(i), removing the
words ‘‘credit bureau’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘consumer
reporting agency’’.
■ 20. Section 682.202 is amended by:
■ A. Revising paragraphs (a)(1)(i),
(a)(1)(ii) introductory text, (a)(1)(iii),
(a)(1)(iv), (a)(1)(v), and (a)(1)(vi)
introductory text.
■ B. In paragraph (a)(1)(vii) introductory
text, removing the first occurrence of the
word ‘‘is’’ and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘was’’.
■ C. In paragraph (a)(1)(viii)
introductory text, removing the first
occurrence of the word ‘‘is’’ and adding,
in its place, the word ‘‘was’’.
■ D. In paragraph (a)(1)(ix), removing
the first occurrence of the word ‘‘is’’ and
adding, in its place, the word ‘‘was’’.
■ E. In paragraph (a)(1)(x) introductory
text, removing the word ‘‘is’’ and
adding, in its place, the word ‘‘was’’.
■ F. Removing paragraphs (a)(1)(x)(D)
and (a)(1)(x)(E).
■ G. In paragraph (a)(2)(ii) introductory
text, removing the words ‘‘loan made
■
■
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65808
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
under § 682.209(e) or (f)’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘refinanced PLUS
loan’’.
■ H. In paragraph (a)(2)(iv) introductory
text, removing the first occurrence of the
word ‘‘is’’ and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘was’’.
■ I. In paragraph (a)(2)(v) introductory
text, removing the first occurrence of the
word ‘‘is’’ and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘was’’.
■ J. In paragraph (a)(3)(ii) introductory
text, removing the words ‘‘loan made
under § 682.209(e) or (f)’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘refinanced SLS
loan’’.
■ K. In paragraph (a)(4)(iv) introductory
text, adding the words ‘‘and prior to July
1, 2010’’ after the date ‘‘1998’’ and
before the punctuation ‘‘,’’.
■ L. In paragraph (a)(4)(v), adding the
words ‘‘and prior to July 1, 2010’’ after
the date ‘‘1997’’ and before the
punctuation ‘‘,’’.
■ M. In paragraph (a)(7)(iii)(A),
removing the citation ‘‘(a)(6)(ii)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘(a)(7)(i)’’.
■ N. In paragraph (b)(1), adding the
words ‘‘or Federal default fees’’ between
the words ‘‘premiums’’ and ‘‘to’’.
■ O. Removing paragraph (c)(1)(vi).
■ P. Redesignating paragraph (c)(1)(vii)
as paragraph (c)(1)(vi).
■ Q. In paragraphs (c)(5), (c)(6), and the
introductory text of paragraph (c)(7),
removing the word ‘‘Shall’’ and adding,
in its place, the words ‘‘A lender must’’.
■ R. In paragraph (c)(7)(iv), removing
the words ‘‘in accordance with
§ 682.207(b)(1)(ii)(B) and (C)’’.
■ S. In paragraph (d)(2), removing the
words ‘‘, other than an SLS or PLUS
loan refinanced under § 682.209(e) or
(f)’’ and adding, in their place, the
words ‘‘and prior to July 1, 2010’’.
■ T. Removing paragraph (e).
■ U. Redesignating paragraphs (f)
through (h) as paragraphs (e) through
(g), respectively.
■ V. In newly redesignated paragraph
(e)(1), removing the citation ‘‘(f)(2)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation ‘‘(e)(2)’’.
■ W. In newly redesignated paragraph
(f)(1)(i), removing ‘‘Attorney’s’’ and
adding, in its place, ‘‘Attorney’’.
■ X. In newly redesignated paragraph
(f)(2), removing the citation ‘‘(g)(1)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation ‘‘(f)(1)’’.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 682.202 Permissible charges by lenders
to borrowers.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) For loans made prior to July 1,
1994, if the borrower, on the date the
promissory note evidencing the loan
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
was signed, had an outstanding balance
of principal or interest on a previous
Stafford loan, the interest rate is the
applicable interest rate on that previous
Stafford loan.
(ii) If the borrower, on the date the
promissory note evidencing the loan
was signed, had no outstanding balance
on any FFEL Program loan, and the first
disbursement was made—
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) For a Stafford loan for which the
first disbursement was made before
October 1, 1992—
(A) If the borrower, on the date the
promissory note was signed, had no
outstanding balance on a Stafford loan
but had an outstanding balance of
principal or interest on a PLUS or SLS
loan made for a period of enrollment
beginning before July 1, 1988, or on a
Consolidation loan that repaid a loan
made for a period of enrollment
beginning before July 1, 1988, the
interest rate is 8 percent; or
(B) If the borrower, on the date the
promissory note evidencing the loan
was signed, had an outstanding balance
of principal or interest on a PLUS or
SLS loan made for a period of
enrollment beginning on or after July 1,
1988, or on a Consolidation loan that
repaid a loan made for a period of
enrollment beginning on or after July 1,
1988, the interest rate is 8 percent until
48 months elapse after the repayment
period begins, and 10 percent thereafter.
(iv) For a Stafford loan for which the
first disbursement was made on or after
October 1, 1992, but before December
20, 1993, if the borrower, on the date the
promissory note evidencing the loan
was signed, had no outstanding balance
on a Stafford loan but had an
outstanding balance of principal or
interest on a PLUS, SLS, or
Consolidation loan, the interest rate is 8
percent.
(v) For a Stafford loan for which the
first disbursement was made on or after
December 20, 1993 and prior to July 1,
1994, if the borrower, on the date the
promissory note was signed, had no
outstanding balance on a Stafford loan
but had an outstanding balance of
principal or interest on a PLUS, SLS, or
Consolidation loan, the interest rate is
the rate provided in paragraph
(a)(1)(ii)(B) of this section.
(vi) For a Stafford loan for which the
first disbursement was made on or after
July 1, 1994 and prior to July 1, 1995,
for a period of enrollment that included
or began on or after July 1, 1994, the
interest rate is a variable rate, applicable
to each July 1–June 30 period, that
equals the lesser of—
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
21. Section 682.204 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (a) introductory text,
removing the words ‘‘Federal Direct
Stafford/Ford’’ and adding, in their
place, the words ‘‘Direct Subsidized’’.
■ B. In paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii),
removing the words ‘‘$2,625, or, for a
loan disbursed on or after July 1, 2007,
$3,500,’’ and adding, in their place, the
figure ‘‘$3,500’’.
■ C. Revising paragraph (a)(1)(iii).
■ D. In paragraph (a)(2) introductory
text, removing the words ‘‘Federal
Direct Stafford/Ford’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘Direct
Subsidized’’.
■ E. In paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii),
removing the words ‘‘$3,500, or, for a
loan disbursed on or after July 1, 2007,
$4,500,’’ and adding, in their place, the
figure ‘‘$4,500’’.
■ F. In paragraph (a)(3) introductory
text, removing the words ‘‘Federal
Direct Stafford/Ford’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘Direct
Subsidized’’.
■ G. Revising paragraph (a)(5).
■ H. In paragraph (a)(6) introductory
text and paragraph (a)(7), removing the
words ‘‘Federal Direct Stafford/Ford’’
and adding, in their place, the words
‘‘Direct Subsidized’’.
■ I. In paragraph (b) introductory text,
removing the words ‘‘Federal Direct
Stafford/Ford’’, and adding, in their
place, the words ‘‘Direct Subsidized’’.
■ J. Revising paragraph (c)(1).
■ K. Revising paragraph (c)(2).
■ L. In paragraph (d) introductory text,
removing the word ‘‘additional’’ that
appears after the word ‘‘borrow’’.
■ M. In paragraph (d) introductory text,
removing the words ‘‘Federal Direct
Unsubsidized Stafford/Ford’’ and
adding, in their place, the words ‘‘Direct
Unsubsidized’’.
■ N. In paragraphs (d)(1)(i), (d)(1)(ii),
(d)(2)(i), and (d)(2)(ii), removing the
words ‘‘$4,000, or, for a loan first
disbursed on or after July 1, 2008,
$6,000,’’ and adding, in their place, the
figure ‘‘$6,000’’.
■ O. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(iii).
■ P. In paragraphs (d)(3)(i) and (d)(3)(ii),
removing the words ‘‘$5,000, or, for a
loan first disbursed on or after July 1,
2008, $7,000,’’ and adding, in their
place, the figure ‘‘$7,000’’.
■ Q. In paragraph (d)(5), removing the
words ‘‘$10,000, or, for a loan disbursed
on or after July 1, 2007,’’.
■ R. In paragraph (d)(6)(i), removing the
words ‘‘$4,000, or, for a loan first
disbursed on or after July 1, 2008,
$6,000,’’ and adding, in their place, the
figure ‘‘$6,000’’.
■ S. In paragraph (d)(6)(ii), removing the
words ‘‘$5,000, or, for a loan disbursed
on or after July 1, 2007, $7,000,’’ and
■
■
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
65809
■
W. Redesignating paragraphs (g)
through (m) as paragraphs (f) through
(l), respectively.
■ X. In newly redesignated paragraph
(l), removing the citation ‘‘(d), (e), and
(f)’’ and adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘(d), and (e)’’.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 682.204
*
*
*
*
*
(5) In the case of a graduate or
professional student, the total amount
the student may borrow for loans made
prior to July 1, 2010 for any academic
year of study under the Stafford Loan
Program, in combination with any
amount borrowed under the Direct
Subsidized Loan Program, may not
exceed $8,500.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Except for a dependent
undergraduate student who qualifies for
additional Unsubsidized Stafford Loan
funds because the student’s parents are
unable to borrow under the PLUS Loan
Program, as described in paragraph (d)
of this section, the total amount the
dependent undergraduate student may
borrow for any academic year under the
Unsubsidized Stafford Loan Program in
combination with the Direct
Unsubsidized Loan Program is the same
amount determined under paragraph (a)
of this section, less any amount received
under the Stafford Loan Program or the
Direct Subsidized Loan program, plus—
(i) $2,000, for a program of study of
at least a full academic year in length.
(ii) For a program of study that is at
least one academic year or more in
length with less than a full academic
year remaining, the amount that is the
same ratio to $2,000 as the—
(iii) For a program of study that is less
than a full academic year in length, the
Maximum loan amounts.
amount that is the same ratio to $2,000
as the lesser of the—
ER01NO13.001
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) For a program of study that is less
than a full academic year in length, the
amount that is the same ratio to $3,500
as the lesser of the—
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
ER01NO13.000
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
adding, in their place, the figure
‘‘$7,000’’.
■ T. In paragraph (d)(6)(iii), removing
the words ‘‘$5,000, or, for a loan
disbursed on or after July 1, 2007,’’.
■ U. Revising paragraph (e).
■ V. Removing paragraph (f).
65810
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Stafford Loan and Direct Unsubsidized
Loan programs may not exceed the
amounts determined under paragraph
(a) of this section less any amount
received under the Federal Stafford
Loan Program or the Direct Subsidized
Loan Program, in combination with the
amounts determined under paragraph
(d) of this section.
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) For a program of study that is less
than a full academic year in length, an
amount that is the same ratio to $6,000
as the lesser of—
*
(3) $138,500 for a graduate or
professional student.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 22. Section 682.205 is amended by:
■ A. Removing paragraphs (a), (b), (g),
and (i).
■ B. Redesignating paragraphs (c), (d),
(e), (f), (h), and (j) as paragraphs (a), (b),
(c), (d), (e), and (f), respectively.
■ C. In newly redesignated paragraph
(a)(1), removing the citation ‘‘(c)(2)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation ‘‘(a)(2)’’.
■ D. In newly redesignated paragraph
(a)(3) introductory text, removing the
citation ‘‘(c)(1)’’ and adding, in its place,
the citation ‘‘(a)(1)’’.
■ E. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (a)(4).
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
F. In newly redesignated paragraph
(a)(5)(ii), adding the word ‘‘business’’
after the word ‘‘five’’.
■ G. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b), removing the citation ‘‘(c)(2)(viii)’’
and adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘(a)(2)(viii)’’.
■ H. In newly redesignated paragraph
(e)(2), removing the citation ‘‘(h)(1)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation ‘‘(e)(1)’’.
The revision reads as follows:
§ 682.205
lenders.
Disclosure requirements for
(a) * * *
(4) Required disclosures for borrowers
having difficulty making payments. (i)
Except as provided in paragraph
(a)(4)(ii) of this section, the lender must
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
ER01NO13.003
*
*
*
*
(e) Combined Federal Stafford, SLS
and Federal Unsubsidized Stafford Loan
Program aggregate limits. The aggregate
unpaid principal amount of Stafford
Loans, Direct Subsidized Loans,
Unsubsidized Stafford Loans, Direct
Unsubsidized Loans and SLS Loans, but
excluding the amount of capitalized
interest, may not exceed the following:
(1) $31,000 for a dependent
undergraduate student.
(2) $57,500 for an independent
undergraduate student or a dependent
undergraduate student under the
conditions specified in § 682.201(a)(3).
ER01NO13.002
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
(2) In the case of an independent
undergraduate student, a graduate or
professional student, or certain
dependent undergraduate students
under the conditions specified in
§ 682.201(a)(3), the total amount the
student may borrow for any period of
enrollment under the Unsubsidized
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
provide a borrower who has notified the
lender that he or she is having difficulty
making payments with—
(A) A description of the repayment
plans available to the borrower, and
how the borrower may request a change
in repayment plan;
(B) A description of the requirements
for obtaining forbearance on the loan
and any costs associated with
forbearance; and
(C) A description of the options
available to the borrower to avoid
default and any fees or costs associated
with those options.
(ii) A disclosure under paragraph
(a)(4)(i) of this section is not required if
the borrower’s difficulty has been
resolved through contact with the
borrower resulting from an earlier
disclosure or other communication
between the lender and the borrower.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 682.206
[Removed and Reserved]
23. Section 682.206 is removed and
reserved.
■
§ 682.207
[Removed and Reserved]
24. Section 682.207 is removed and
reserved.
■
§ 682.208
[Amended]
25. Section 682.208 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (a), removing the
words ‘‘national credit bureaus’’ and
adding, in their place, the words
‘‘nationwide consumer reporting
agencies’’.
■ B. In paragraph (b)(1) introductory
text, removing the words ‘‘at least one
national credit bureau’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘each nationwide
consumer reporting agency’’.
■ C. In paragraph (b)(2), removing the
words ‘‘at least one national credit
bureau’’ and adding, in their place, the
words ‘‘each nationwide consumer
reporting agency’’.
■ D. In paragraph (b)(3) introductory
text, removing both occurrences of the
words ‘‘credit bureau’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘consumer
reporting agency’’.
■ E. In paragraph (b)(3)(i)(A), removing
the words ‘‘credit bureau’’ and adding,
in their place, the words ‘‘consumer
reporting agency’’.
■ F. In paragraph (e)(3), removing the
citation ‘‘§ 682.401(b)(17)(ii)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘§ 682.401(b)(8)(ii)’’.
■ G. In paragraph (g), removing the
citation ‘‘§ 682.411(g)’’ and adding, in
its place, the citation ‘‘§ 682.411(h)’’.
■ 26. Section 682.209 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (a)(3)(i)(B), removing
the word ‘‘and’’.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
■
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
B. In paragraph (a)(3)(i)(C), removing
the punctuation ‘‘.’’ and adding, in its
place, the punctuation and the word ‘‘;
and’’.
■ C. Adding a new paragraph
(a)(3)(i)(D).
■ D. In paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(E), removing
the citation ‘‘§ 682.205(c)(1)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘§ 682.205(a)(1)’’.
■ E. In paragraph (b)(2)(ii), revising the
last sentence.
■ F. Removing paragraphs (e), (f), (g),
and (j).
■ G. Redesignating paragraphs (h), (i),
and (k) as paragraphs (e), (f), and (g),
respectively.
■ H. In newly redesignated paragraph
(e)(3) introductory text, removing the
citation ‘‘(h)(2)’’ and adding, in its
place, the citation ‘‘(e)(2)’’.
■ I. In newly redesignated paragraph
(e)(4)(ii), removing the word ‘‘Must’’
and adding, in its place, the words
‘‘Except in the case of an income-based
repayment schedule, must’’.
■ J. In newly redesignated paragraph
(e)(5), removing the citation ‘‘(h)(2)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation ‘‘(e)(2)’’.
■ K. In newly redesignated paragraph
(f)(2)(i), removing the words ‘‘under
§ 682.209(f)’’.
■ L. In newly redesignated paragraph
(f)(2)(ii), removing the citation ‘‘(i)(2)(i)’’
and adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘(f)(2)(i)’’.
The addition and revision read as
follows:
■
§ 682.209
Repayment of a loan.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) For a borrower with a loan for
which the applicable interest rate is
fixed at 6.0 percent per year, 5.6 percent
per year, or 6.8 percent per year, the day
after 6 months following the date on
which the borrower is no longer
enrolled on at least a half-time basis at
an institution of higher education.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * * Information related to next
scheduled payment due date need not
be provided to borrowers making such
prepayments while in an in-school,
grace, deferment, or forbearance period
when payments are not due.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 27. Section 682.210 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (a)(4), adding the
words and punctuation ‘‘, or the
borrower’s representative for purposes
of paragraphs (i) and (t) of this section,’’
between the words ‘‘borrower’’ and
‘‘must’’.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65811
B. Revising paragraph (b).
C. In paragraph (n)(1) introductory
text, removing the words and citations
‘‘paragraphs (b)(2)(v) or (b)(5)(iii)’’ and
adding, in their place, the word and
citation ‘‘paragraph (b)(3)(iv)’’.
■ D. In paragraph (n)(2), removing the
citation ‘‘(b)(2)(v)’’ and adding, in its
place, the citation ‘‘(b)(3)(iv)’’.
■ E. In paragraph (o)(1) introductory
text, removing the citation ‘‘(b)(3)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘(b)(3)(i)’’.
■ F. In paragraph (q)(1) introductory
text, removing the citation ‘‘(b)(5)(ii)’’
and adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘(b)(3)(iii)’’.
■ G. In paragraph (r)(1) introductory
text, removing the citation ‘‘(b)(5)(iv)’’
and adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘(b)(3)(v)’’.
■ H. In paragraph (s)(2), removing the
punctuation and the words ‘‘, except
that the borrower is not required to
obtain a Stafford or SLS loan for the
period of enrollment covered by the
deferment’’.
■ I. In paragraph (s)(6) introductory text,
removing both occurrences of the
citation ‘‘(s)(6)(vi)’’ and adding, in their
place, the citation ‘‘(s)(6)(iv)’’.
■ J. In paragraph (u)(5), removing both
occurrences of the words ‘‘military
active’’ and adding, in their place, the
words ‘‘post-active’’.
The revision reads as follows:
■
■
§ 682.210
Deferment.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Authorized deferments for
borrowers prior to July 1, 1993—(1) For
all borrowers who are not new borrowers
on or after July 1, 1993. Deferment is
authorized for a FFEL borrower during
any period when the borrower is—
(i) Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(4) of this section, engaged in fulltime study at a school in accordance
with paragraph (c) of this section;
(ii) Engaged in a course of study
under an eligible graduate fellowship
program in accordance with paragraph
(d) of this section;
(iii) Engaged in a rehabilitation
training program for disabled
individuals in accordance with
paragraph (e) of this section;
(iv) Temporarily totally disabled in
accordance with paragraph (f) of this
section, or unable to secure employment
because the borrower is caring for a
spouse or other dependent who is
disabled and requires continuous
nursing or similar services for up to
three years in accordance with
paragraph (g) of this section; or
(v) Conscientiously seeking, but
unable to find, full-time employment in
the United States, for up to two years,
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
65812
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
in accordance with paragraph (h) of this
section.
(2) For all Stafford and SLS borrowers
who are not new borrowers on or after
July 1, 1993, and for parent PLUS loans
made before August 15, 1983.
Deferment is authorized during any
period when the borrower is—
(i) On active duty status in the United
States Armed Forces in accordance with
paragraph (i) of this section, or an
officer in the Commissioned Corps of
the United States Public Health Service
in accordance with paragraph (j) of this
section, for up to three years (including
any period during which the borrower
received a deferment authorized under
paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section);
(ii) A full-time volunteer under the
Peace Corps Act, for up to three years,
in accordance with paragraph (k) of this
section;
(iii) A full-time volunteer under title
I of the Domestic Volunteer Service Act
of 1973 (ACTION programs), for up to
three years, in accordance with
paragraph (l) of this section;
(iv) A full-time volunteer for a taxexempt organization, for up to three
years, in accordance with paragraph (m)
of this section; or
(v) Engaged in an internship or
residency program, in accordance with
paragraph (n) of this section, for up to
two years (including any period during
which the borrower received a
deferment authorized under paragraph
(b)(3)(iv) of this section).
(3) For new Stafford or SLS borrowers
on or after July 1, 1987 but before July
1, 1993. Deferment is authorized—
(i) In accordance with paragraph (o) of
this section, if the borrower has been
enrolled on at least a half-time basis at
an institution of higher education
during the six months preceding the
beginning of the deferment, for a period
of up to six months during which the
borrower is—
(A)(1) Pregnant;
(2) Caring for his or her newborn
child; or
(3) Caring for a child immediately
following the placement of the child
with the borrower before or immediately
following adoption; and
(B) Not attending a school or gainfully
employed;
(ii) During a period when the
borrower is on active duty status in the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration Corps, for up to three
years, in accordance with paragraph (p)
of this section, (including any period
during which the borrower received a
deferment authorized under paragraph
(b)(2)(i) of this section);
(iii) During a period of up to three
years when the borrower is serving as a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
full-time teacher in a public or nonprofit private elementary or secondary
school in a teacher shortage area
designated by the Secretary under
paragraph (q) of this section;
(iv) During a period when the
borrower is engaged in an internship or
residency program, for up to two years,
in accordance with paragraph (n) of this
section, (including any period during
which the borrower received a
deferment authorized under paragraph
(b)(2)(v) of this section); or
(v) When a mother who has
preschool-age children (i.e., children
who have not enrolled in first grade)
and who is earning not more than $1 per
hour above the Federal minimum wage,
for up to 12 months of employment, and
who began that full-time employment
within one year of entering or reentering the work force, in accordance
with paragraph (r) of this section. Fulltime employment involves at least 30
hours of work a week and it is expected
to last at least 3 months.
(4) For new Stafford or SLS borrowers
on or after July 1, 1987. Deferment is
authorized during periods when the
borrower is engaged in at least half-time
study at a school in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section.
(5) For new parent PLUS borrowers on
or after July 1, 1987 and before July 1,
1993. Deferment is authorized during
any period when a student on whose
behalf the parent borrower received the
loan—
(i) Is not independent as defined in
section 480(d) of the Act; and
(ii) Meets the conditions and provides
the required documentation, for any of
the deferments described in paragraphs
(b)(1)(i) through (iii) and (b)(4) of this
section.
(6) Definition of a new borrower. For
purposes of paragraphs (b)(3), (b)(4), and
(b)(5) of this section, a ‘‘new borrower’’
with respect to a loan is a borrower
who, on the date he or she signs the
promissory note, has no outstanding
balance on—
(i) A Stafford, SLS, or PLUS loan
made prior to July 1, 1987 for a period
of enrollment beginning prior to July 1,
1987; or
(ii) A Consolidation loan that repaid
a loan made prior to July 1, 1987 and
for a period of enrollment beginning
prior to July 1, 1987.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 28. Section 682.211 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (a)(4), removing the
citation ‘‘(f)(10)’’ and adding, in its
place, the citation ‘‘(f)(11)’’.
■ B. Revising paragraphs (c) and (d).
■ C. In paragraph (f)(2), removing the
words ‘‘or an administrative forbearance
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
period as specified under paragraph
(f)(11) or (i)(2) of this section;’’ and
adding, in their place, the words ‘‘or an
authorized period of forbearance;’’.
■ D. In paragraph (f)(6), removing the
words ‘‘credit bureau’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘consumer
reporting agency’’.
■ E. In paragraph (h)(2)(ii)(B), removing
the words ‘‘10 U.S.C. 2171; or’’ and
adding, in their place, the words ‘‘10
U.S.C. 2171, 2173, 2174 or any other
student loan repayment programs
administered by the Department of
Defense; or’’.
■ F. In paragraph (h)(2)(ii)(C), removing
the citation ‘‘§ 682.215’’ and adding, in
its place, the citation ‘‘§ 682.216’’.
■ G. In paragraph (h)(4)(iii)(A),
removing the citation ‘‘§ 682.215(c)’’
and adding, in its place the citation
‘‘§ 682.216(c)’’.
■ H. In paragraph (h)(4)(iii)(B),
removing the citation ‘‘§ 682.215(c)’’
and adding, in its place the citation
‘‘§ 682.216(c)’’.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 682.211
Forbearance.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Except as provided in paragraph
(d)(2) of this section, a lender may grant
forbearance for a period of up to one
year at a time if both the borrower or
endorser and an authorized official of
the lender agree to the terms of the
forbearance. If the borrower or endorser
requests the forbearance orally and the
lender and the borrower or endorser
agree to the terms of the forbearance
orally, the lender must notify the
borrower or endorser of the terms
within 30 days of that agreement.
(d)(1) A guaranty agency may
authorize a lender to grant forbearance
to permit a borrower or endorser to
resume honoring the agreement to repay
the debt after default but prior to claim
payment. The forbearance agreement in
this situation must include a new
agreement to repay the debt signed by
the borrower or endorser or a written or
oral affirmation of the borrower’s or
endorser’s obligation to repay the debt.
(2) If the forbearance is based on the
borrower’s or endorser’s oral request
and affirmation of the obligation to
repay the debt—
(i) The forbearance period is limited
to a period of 120 days;
(ii) Such a forbearance cannot be
granted consecutively;
(iii) The lender must orally review
with the borrower the terms and
conditions of the forbearance, including
the consequences of interest
capitalization, and all other repayment
options available to the borrower; and
(iv) The lender must—
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(A) Send a notice to the borrower or
endorser, as provided in paragraph (c) of
this section, that confirms the terms of
the forbearance and the borrower’s or
endorser’s affirmation of the obligation
to repay the debt, and includes
information on all other repayment
options available to the borrower, and
(B) Retain a record of the terms of the
forbearance and affirmation in the
borrower’s or endorser’s file.
(3) For purposes of this section, an
‘‘affirmation’’ means an
acknowledgement of the loan by the
borrower or endorser in a legally
binding manner. The form of the
affirmation may include, but is not
limited to, the borrower’s or
endorser’s—
(i) New signed repayment agreement
or schedule, or another form of signed
agreement to repay the debt;
(ii) Oral acknowledgment and
agreement to repay the debt
documented by the lender in the
borrower’s or endorser’s file and
confirmed by the lender in a notice to
the borrower; or
(iii) A payment made on the loan by
the borrower or endorser.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 682.214
[Removed and Reserved]
29. Section 682.214 is removed and
reserved.
■ 30. Section 682.216 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (a)(2)(iii), removing
the first occurrence of the word ‘‘at’’ and
adding, in its place, the word ‘‘for’’.
■ B. In paragraph (a)(4)(i), removing the
second occurrence of the word ‘‘at’’ and
adding, in its place, the word ‘‘for’’.
■ C. In paragraph (c)(1) introductory
text, removing the words ‘‘at an
educational’’ and adding, in their place,
the words ‘‘for an educational’’.
■ D. In paragraph (c)(1)(iii), removing
the final sentence.
■ E. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(2)
through (c)(11) as paragraphs (c)(3)
through (c)(12), respectively.
■ F. Adding a new paragraph (c)(2).
■ G. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(4)(ii)(A), removing the words ‘‘at an
eligible educational’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘for an eligible
educational’’.
■ H. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(4)(ii)(B), adding the words ‘‘for an’’
immediately before the words
‘‘educational service agency’’.
■ I. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(4)(iii), removing the first occurrence
of the word ‘‘at’’ and adding, in its
place, the word ‘‘for’’.
■ J. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(5)(i), adding the words ‘‘for an’’
immediately before the words
‘‘educational service’’.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
K. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(5)(ii)(A), removing the words
‘‘students at an eligible’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘students for an
eligible’’.
■ L. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(5)(ii)(B), adding the words ‘‘for an’’
immediately before the words
‘‘educational service’’.
■ M. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(5)(iii), removing the first occurrence
of the word ‘‘at’’ and adding, in its place
the word ‘‘for’’.
■ N. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(10), removing the second occurrence
of the word ‘‘at’’ and adding, in its
place, the word ‘‘for’’.
■ O. In paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2),
removing the words and citations
‘‘paragraphs (c)(3)(ii) or (c)(4)(ii)’’ and
adding, in their place, the words and
citations ‘‘paragraph (c)(4)(ii) or
(c)(5)(ii)’’.
■ P. In the heading of paragraph (e),
removing the word ‘‘discharge’’ and
adding in its place, the word
‘‘forgiveness’’.
■ Q. In paragraph (e)(1)(i), removing the
citation ‘‘(h)(3)(iii)’’ and adding, in its
place, the citation ‘‘(h)(4)(iii)’’.
■ R. In paragraph (e)(1)(iii), removing
the word ‘‘discharge’’ and adding, in its
place, the word ‘‘forgiveness’’.
■ S. Revising paragraphs (f)(2)(i) and
(f)(2)(ii).
■ T. In paragraph (f)(2)(iii), removing
both occurrences of the word
‘‘discharged’’ and adding, in their place,
the words ‘‘loan forgiveness’’.
■ U. In paragraph (f)(3)(ii), removing
both occurrences of the word
‘‘discharge’’ and adding, in their place,
the words ‘‘loan forgiveness’’.
■ V. In paragraph (f)(4), removing both
occurrences of the word ‘‘discharge’’
and adding, in their place, the words
‘‘loan forgiveness’’.
■ W. In paragraph (f)(5), removing the
word ‘‘discharge’’.
■ X. Revising paragraph (g).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
§ 682.216
program.
Teacher loan forgiveness
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) The Secretary considers all
elementary and secondary schools
operated by the Bureau of Indian
Education (BIE) or operated on Indian
reservations by Indian tribal groups
under contract with the BIE to qualify
as schools serving low-income students.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The holder must file a request for
payment with the guaranty agency on a
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65813
teacher loan forgiveness amount no later
than 60 days after the receipt, from the
borrower, of a completed teacher loan
forgiveness application.
(ii) When filing a request for payment
on a teacher loan forgiveness, the holder
must provide the guaranty agency with
the completed loan forgiveness
application submitted by the borrower
and any required supporting
documentation.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Claims for reimbursement from the
Secretary on loans held by guaranty
agencies. In the case of a teacher loan
forgiveness applied to a defaulted loan
held by the guaranty agency, the
Secretary pays the guaranty agency a
percentage of the amount forgiven that
is equal to the complement of the
reinsurance percentage paid on the loan.
The payment of up to $5,000, or up to
$17,500, may also include interest that
accrues on the forgiveness amount
during the period from the date on
which the guaranty agency received
payment from the Secretary on a default
claim to the date on which the guaranty
agency determines that the borrower is
eligible for the teacher loan forgiveness.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 682.300
[Amended]
31. Section 682.300 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (b)(2)(ii) introductory
text, removing the words ‘‘, except as
provided in paragraph (c)(4) of this
section’’.
■ B. In paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(B), removing
the words ‘‘in accordance with
§ 682.207(b)(1)(ii)(B) and (C)’’.
■ C. In paragraph (c)(1), adding the
word ‘‘or’’ after the punctuation ‘‘;’’.
■ D. In paragraph (c)(2), removing the
punctuation ‘‘;’’ and adding, in its place,
the punctuation ‘‘.’’.
■ E. Removing paragraphs (c)(3) and
(c)(4).
■
■
§ 682.301
[Amended]
32. Section 682.301 is amended by
removing paragraph (c).
■ 33. Section 682.302 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (b)(3) introductory
text, adding the words ‘‘and prior to July
1, 2010’’ after the date ‘‘1992’’ and
before the punctuation ‘‘,’’.
■ B. In paragraph (d)(1)(vi)(B), removing
the words ‘‘the loan proceeds disbursed
by electronic funds transfer or master
check in accordance with
§ 682.207(b)(1)(ii)(B) and (C)’’ and
adding, in their place, the words ‘‘The
loan proceeds disbursed by electronic
funds transfer or master check’’.
■ C. In paragraph (d)(2) introductory
text, adding the words ‘‘and prior to July
1, 2010’’ after the date ‘‘1992’’ and
before the punctuation ‘‘,’’.
■
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65814
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
D. In paragraph (e)(1)(i), removing the
citation ‘‘§ 682.800’’ and adding, in its
place, the words ‘‘section 438(e) of the
Act’’.
■ E. Revising paragraph (f)(3)(viii)(B).
■ F. In paragraph (f)(3)(x)(B)(3),
removing the citation ‘‘503(c)(3)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘501(c)(3)’’.
The revision reads as follows:
■
§ 682.302 Payment of special allowance on
FFEL loans.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(3) * * *
(viii) * * *
(B) Fees are reasonable and customary
for purposes of paragraph (f)(3)(viii) of
this section, if they do not exceed the
amounts received by the trustee for
similar services with regard to similar
portfolios of loans of that State or nonprofit entity or its related special
purpose entity that are not eligible to
receive special allowance at the rate
established under paragraph (f)(2) of
this section, or if they do not exceed an
amount as determined by such other
method requested by the State or nonprofit entity that the Secretary considers
reliable.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 682.305
[Amended]
34. Section 682.305 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(B), by adding
the words ‘‘and prior to July 1, 2010’’
after the date ‘‘2007’’ and before the
punctuation ‘‘,’’.
■ B. In paragraph (c)(1)(i), removing the
words ‘‘originating or’’.
■ C. Removing paragraph (c)(1)(ii).
■ D. Redesignating paragraph (c)(1)(iii)
as paragraph (c)(1)(ii).
■ E. In paragraph (c)(2)(iv), adding the
word ‘‘and’’ as the last word in the
paragraph, immediately following the
punctuation ‘‘;’’.
■ F. In paragraph (c)(2)(v), removing the
final punctuation ‘‘;’’ and adding, in its
place, the punctuation ‘‘.’’.
■ G. Removing paragraphs (c)(2)(vi) and
(c)(2)(vii).
■ 35. Section 682.400 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(1)(i) to read as
follows:
■
■
§ 682.400 Agreements between a guaranty
agency and the Secretary.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Borrowers whose Stafford or
Consolidation loans are guaranteed by
the agency may qualify for interest
benefits that are paid to the lender on
the borrower’s behalf under § 682.301;
and
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
36. Section 682.401 is amended by:
A. Removing paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2),
and (b)(3).
■ B. Redesignating paragraph (b)(4) as
paragraph (b)(1).
■ C. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(1) introductory text, removing the
citation ‘‘(b)(4)’’ and adding, in its place,
the citation ‘‘(b)(1)’’.
■ D. Removing paragraphs (b)(5) and
(b)(6).
■ E. Redesignating paragraph (b)(7) as
paragraph (b)(2).
■ F. Removing paragraphs (b)(8) and
(b)(9).
■ G. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(10)
and (b)(11) as paragraphs (b)(3) and
(b)(4), respectively.
■ H. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(3)(i) introductory text, removing the
words ‘‘SLS or PLUS loans refinanced
under § 682.209(e) or (f)’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘refinanced SLS
or PLUS loans’’.
■ I. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(3)(iv)(C), adding the words ‘‘and
prior to July 1, 2010’’ between the date
‘‘2006’’ and the punctuation ‘‘.’’.
■ J. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(3)(vi)(B)(4), removing the words ‘‘in
accordance with § 682.207(b)(1)(ii)(B)
and (C)’’.
■ K. Removing paragraphs (b)(12) and
(b)(13).
■ L. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(14)
through (b)(29) as paragraphs (b)(5)
through (b)(20), respectively.
■ M. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(6), adding the words ‘‘and N’’
between the letter ‘‘M’’ and the word
‘‘of’’.
■ N. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(8)(i) introductory text, removing the
citation ‘‘(b)(17)(iii)’’ and adding, in its
place, the citation ‘‘(b)(8)(iii)’’.
■ O. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(8)(iii), removing the citation
‘‘(b)(17)(i)’’ and adding, in its place, the
citation ‘‘(b)(8)(i)’’.
■ P. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(10)(i)(B), removing the words
‘‘School and lender’’ and adding, in
their place, the word ‘‘Lender’’.
■ Q. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(10)(i)(C), removing the words
‘‘school and’’.
■ R. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(10)(i)(D), removing the words
‘‘school or’’.
■ S. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(11) introductory text, adding the
word ‘‘of’’ between the words ‘‘days’’
and ‘‘any’’.
■ T. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(14)(ii), removing the citation
‘‘(b)(23)(i)’’ and adding, in its place, the
citation ‘‘(b)(14)(i)’’.
■ U. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(18)(i), removing the word ‘‘Federal’’
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
and adding, in its place, the word
‘‘Direct’’.
■ V. Removing newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(18)(ii).
■ W. Further redesignating newly
redesignated paragraphs (b)(18)(iii)
through (v) as paragraphs (b)(18)(ii)
through (iv), respectively.
■ X. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(18)(iii).
■ Y. Removing paragraph (c).
■ Z. Redesignating paragraph (d) as
paragraph (c).
■ AA. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(2), removing the citation ‘‘(d)(1)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation ‘‘(c)(1)’’.
■ BB. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(3), adding a final sentence to the end
of the paragraph.
■ CC. Removing newly redesignated
paragraph (c)(4).
■ DD. Further redesignating newly
redesignated paragraphs (c)(5) and (c)(6)
as paragraphs (c)(4) and (c)(5),
respectively.
■ EE. Removing paragraph (e).
■ FF. Redesignating paragraphs (f) and
(g) as paragraphs (d) and (e),
respectively.
■ GG. In newly redesignated paragraph
(d)(2), removing the word ‘‘HEA’’ and
adding, in its place, the word ‘‘Act’’.
■ HH. In newly redesignated paragraph
(e)(1), removing the word ‘‘participate’’
and adding, in its place, the word
‘‘participated’’.
■ II. In newly redesignated paragraph
(e)(2), removing the citation ‘‘(g)(1)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation ‘‘(e)(1)’’.
■ JJ. In newly redesignated paragraph
(e)(4), removing the citation ‘‘(g)(1)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation ‘‘(e)(1)’’.
The revision and addition read as
follows:
§ 682.401
Basic program agreement.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(18) * * *
(iii) On or after October 1, 2009, when
returning proceeds to the Secretary from
the consolidation of a defaulted loan
that is paid off with excess
consolidation proceeds as defined in
paragraph (b)(18)(iv) of this section, a
guaranty agency must remit the entire
amount of collection costs repaid
through the consolidation loan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * * Each loan made under an
MPN is enforceable in accordance with
the terms of the MPN and is eligible for
claim payment based on a true and
exact copy of such MPN.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 37. Section 682.402 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (a)(5)(ii), removing
the words ‘‘credit bureau’’ and adding,
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
in their place, the words ‘‘consumer
reporting agency’’.
■ B. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(i).
■ C. In paragraph (d)(3)(ii)(B), by
removing the figure ‘‘90’’ and adding, in
its place, the figure ‘‘120’’.
■ D. In paragraphs (d)(6)(i)(C),
(d)(6)(i)(D) introductory text,
(d)(6)(i)(D)(2), (d)(6)(i)(H)(3), (d)(6)(ii)(B)
introductory text, (d)(6)(ii)(B)(2), and
(d)(6)(ii)(F)(3), by removing the figure
‘‘90’’ each time it appears and adding,
in its place, the figure ‘‘120’’.
■ E. In paragraph (d)(7)(iv), removing
the words ‘‘credit bureaus’’ and adding,
in their place, the words ‘‘consumer
reporting agencies’’.
■ F. In paragraph (d)(8)(i), removing the
citation ‘‘34 CFR 685.213’’ and adding,
in its place, the citation ‘‘34 CFR
685.214’’.
■ G. In paragraph (e)(3) introductory
text, removing the citation ‘‘(e)(14)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘(e)(15)’’.
■ H. In paragraph (e)(3)(v)(C), removing
the word ‘‘identify’’ and adding, in its
place, the word ‘‘identity’’.
■ I. In paragraph (e)(12)(v) introductory
text, removing the words ‘‘credit
bureaus’’ and adding, in their place, the
words ‘‘consumer reporting agencies’’.
■ J. In paragraphs (l)(1), (l)(2)(ii), and
(l)(3)(i), adding the words ‘‘or Federal
default fees’’ between the word
‘‘premiums’’ and the punctuation ’’)’’.
■ K. In paragraph (n)(2), adding the
words ‘‘or Federal default fees’’ between
the word ‘‘premiums’’ and the
punctuation ’’)’’.
The revision reads as follows:
§ 682.402 Death, disability, closed school,
false certification, unpaid refunds, and
bankruptcy payments.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) The Secretary reimburses the
holder of a loan received by a borrower
on or after January 1, 1986, and
discharges the borrower’s obligation
with respect to the loan in accordance
with the provisions of paragraph (d) of
this section, if the borrower (or the
student for whom a parent received a
PLUS loan) could not complete the
program of study for which the loan was
intended because the school at which
the borrower (or student) was enrolled
closed, or the borrower (or student)
withdrew from the school not more than
120 days prior to the date the school
closed. The Secretary may extend the
120-day period if the Secretary
determines that exceptional
circumstances related to a school’s
closing justify an extension. Exceptional
circumstances for this purpose may
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
include, but are not limited to: the
school’s loss of accreditation; the
school’s discontinuation of the majority
of its academic programs; action by the
State to revoke the school’s license to
operate or award academic credentials
in the State; or a finding by a State or
Federal government agency that the
school violated State or Federal law.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 682.403
[Removed and Reserved]
38. Section 682.403 is removed and
reserved.
■ 39. Section 682.404 is amended by:
■ A. Revising paragraph (b)(3)(ii).
■ B. In paragraph (b)(3)(iii), adding the
word ‘‘or’’ after the punctuation ‘‘;’’.
■ C. In paragraph (b)(4)(ii)(G)(2),
removing the words ‘‘is consistent with
§ 682.509(a)(1)’’ and adding, in their
place, the words ‘‘addresses the
condition identified in paragraph
(b)(3)(ii) of this section’’.
■ D. In paragraph (d)(1) introductory
text, removing the words ‘‘made under
§ 682.209(e), (f) and (h),’’ and adding, in
their place the words ‘‘that were
refinanced pursuant to section
428B(e)(2) and (3) of the Act,’’.
■ E. Removing paragraph (h).
■ F. Redesignating paragraphs (i)
through (l) as paragraphs (h) through (k),
respectively.
■ G. In newly redesignated paragraph
(j)(3)(i), removing the parenthetical
‘‘(k)(2)(i)’’ and adding, in its place, the
parenthetical ‘‘(j)(2)(i)’’.
■ H. In newly redesignated paragraph
(j)(3)(ii), removing the citation
‘‘(k)(2)(ii)’’ and adding, in its place, the
citation ‘‘(j)(2)(ii)’’.
The revision reads as follows:
■
§ 682.404
Federal reinsurance agreement.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Under a policy established by the
agency that addresses instances in
which, for a non-school originated loan,
a lender learns that the school
terminated its teaching activities while
a student was enrolled during the
academic period covered by the loan;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 40. Section 682.405 is amended by:
■ A. In the introductory text of
paragraph (a)(2)(i), adding the word
‘‘qualifying’’ between the words ‘‘ten’’
and ‘‘payments’’.
■ B. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (a)(2)(i)(A).
■ C. Redesignating paragraph (a)(3) as
paragraph (a)(4).
■ D. Adding a new paragraph (a)(3).
■ E. Revising paragraph (b)(1).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
§ 682.405
65815
Loan rehabilitation agreement.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) A qualifying payment is—
*
*
*
*
*
(3)(i) If a borrower’s loan is being
collected by administrative wage
garnishment while the borrower is also
making monthly payments on the same
loan under a loan rehabilitation
agreement, the guaranty agency must
continue collecting the loan by
administrative wage garnishment until
the borrower makes five qualifying
monthly payments under the
rehabilitation agreement, unless the
guaranty agency is otherwise precluded
from doing so under § 682.410(b)(9).
(ii) After the borrower makes the fifth
qualifying monthly payment, the
guaranty agency must, unless otherwise
directed by the borrower, suspend the
garnishment order issued to the
borrower’s employer.
(iii) A borrower may only obtain the
benefit of a suspension of administrative
wage garnishment while also attempting
to rehabilitate a defaulted loan once.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) A borrower may request
rehabilitation of the borrower’s
defaulted loan held by the guaranty
agency. In order to be eligible for
rehabilitation of the loan, the borrower
must voluntarily make at least 9 of the
10 payments required under a monthly
repayment agreement.
(i) Each payment must be—
(A) Made voluntarily;
(B) For the full amount required;
(C) Received within 20 days of the
due date for the payment; and
(D) Reasonable and affordable.
(ii) All 9 payments must be received
within a 10-month period that begins
with the month in which the first
required due date falls and ends with
the ninth consecutive calendar month
following that month.
(iii) The guaranty agency initially
considers the borrower’s reasonable and
affordable payment amount to be an
amount equal to 15 percent of the
amount by which the borrower’s
Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) exceeds
150 percent of the poverty guideline
amount applicable to the borrower’s
family size and State, divided by 12,
except that if this amount is less than
$5, the borrower’s monthly
rehabilitation payment is $5.
(iv) The guaranty agency or its agents
may calculate the payment amount
based on information provided orally by
the borrower or the borrower’s
representative and provide the borrower
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
65816
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
with a rehabilitation agreement using
that amount. The guaranty agency must
request documentation from the
borrower to confirm the borrower’s AGI
and family size. If the borrower does not
provide the guaranty agency or its
agents with any documentation
requested by the guaranty agency to
calculate or confirm the reasonable and
affordable payment amount, within a
reasonable time deadline set by the
guaranty agency or its agent, the
rehabilitation agreement provided is
null and void.
(v) The reasonable and affordable
payment amount calculated under this
section must not be—
(A) A required minimum loan
payment amount (e.g., $50) if the agency
determines that a smaller amount is
reasonable and affordable;
(B) A percentage of the borrower’s
total loan balance; or
(C) Based on other criteria unrelated
to the borrower’s total financial
circumstances.
(vi) Within 15 business days of its
determination of the borrower’s loan
rehabilitation payment amount, the
guaranty agency must provide the
borrower with a written rehabilitation
agreement which includes the
borrower’s payment amount calculated
under paragraph (b)(1)(iii), a prominent
statement that the borrower may object
orally or in writing to the payment
amount, with the method and timeframe
for raising such an objection, and an
explanation of any other terms and
conditions applicable to the required
series of payments that must be made
before the borrower’s account can be
considered for repurchase by an eligible
lender (i.e., rehabilitated). To accept the
agreement, the borrower must sign and
return the agreement or accept the
agreement electronically under a
process provided by the agency. The
agency may not impose any other
conditions unrelated to the amount or
timing of the rehabilitation payments in
the rehabilitation agreement. The
written rehabilitation agreement must
inform the borrower—
(A) Of the effects of having the loans
rehabilitated (e.g., removal of the record
of default from the borrower’s credit
history and return to normal
repayment);
(B) Of the amount of any collection
costs to be added to the unpaid
principal of the loan when the loan is
sold to an eligible lender, which may
not exceed 18.5 percent of the unpaid
principal and accrued interest on the
loan at the time of the sale; and
(C) That the rehabilitation agreement
is null and void if the borrower fails to
provide the documentation required to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:03 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
confirm the monthly payment
calculated under paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of
this section.
(vii) If the borrower objects to the
monthly payment amount determined
under paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this
section, the guaranty agency or its
agents must recalculate the payment
amount based solely on information
provided on a form approved by the
Secretary and, if requested, supporting
documentation from the borrower and
other sources, and must consider—
(A) The borrower’s, and if applicable,
the spouse’s current disposable income,
including public assistance payments,
and other income received by the
borrower and the spouse, such as
welfare benefits, Social Security
benefits, Supplemental Security Income,
and workers’ compensation. Spousal
income is not considered if the spouse
does not contribute to the borrower’s
household income;
(B) Family size as defined in
§ 682.215(a)(3); and
(C) Reasonable and necessary
expenses, which include—
(1) Food;
(2) Housing;
(3) Utilities;
(4) Basic communication expenses;
(5) Necessary medical and dental
costs;
(6) Necessary insurance costs;
(7) Transportation costs;
(8) Dependent care and other workrelated expenses;
(9) Legally required child and spousal
support;
(10) Other title IV and non-title IV
student loan payments; and
(11) Other expenses approved by the
Secretary.
(viii) The guaranty agency must
provide the borrower with a new
written rehabilitation agreement
confirming the borrower’s recalculated
reasonable and affordable payment
amount within the timeframe specified
in paragraph (b)(1)(vii) of this section.
To accept the agreement, the borrower
must sign and return the agreement or
accept the agreement electronically
under a process provided by the agency.
(ix) The agency must include any
payment made under § 682.401(b)(1) in
determining whether the 9 out of 10
payments required under paragraph
(b)(1) of this section have been made.
(x) A borrower may request that the
monthly payment amount be adjusted
due to a change in the borrower’s total
financial circumstances only upon
providing the documentation specified
in paragraph (b)(1)(vii) of this section.
(xi) During the rehabilitation period,
the guaranty agency must limit contact
with the borrower on the loan being
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
rehabilitated to collection activities that
are required by law or regulation and to
communications that support the
rehabilitation.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 682.406
[Amended]
41. Section 682.406 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (a)(2)(ii), removing
the words ‘‘in accordance with
§ 682.207(b)(1)(ii)(B) and (C)’’.
■ B. In paragraph (a)(12)(iv), adding the
words ‘‘and prior to July 1, 2010’’ after
the date ‘‘1999’’ and before the
punctuation ‘‘,’’.
■
■
§ 682.407
[Amended]
42. Section 682.407(e)(1)(ii) is
amended by removing the figure ‘‘24’’
the first time it appears and adding, in
its place, the figure ‘‘72’’.
■
§ 682.408
[Removed and Reserved]
43. Section 682.408 is removed and
reserved.
■
§ 682.409
[Amended]
44. Section 682.409 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (a)(2)(i), removing the
citation ‘‘§ 682.401(b)(4)’’ and adding, in
its place, the citation ‘‘§ 682.401(b)(1)’’.
■ B. In paragraph (a)(3)(i)(B), removing
the citation ‘‘§ 682.401(b)(4)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘§ 682.401(b)(1)’’.
■ 45. Section 682.410 is amended by:
■ A. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (a)(2).
■ B. In paragraph (a)(2)(ii) introductory
text, removing the word ‘‘preclaims’’
and adding, in its place, the words
‘‘default aversion’’.
■ C. In paragraph (b)(2) introductory
text, removing the citation
‘‘§§ 682.401(b)(27) and
682.405(b)(1)(iv)’’ and adding, in its
place, the citation ‘‘§§ 682.401(b)(18)(i)
and 682.405(b)(1)(iv)(B)’’.
■ D. In paragraph (b)(5)(i) introductory
text, removing the citation ‘‘(b)(6)(v)’’
and adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘(b)(6)(ii)’’.
■ E. In paragraph (b)(7)(i), removing the
words ‘‘conditions described in
§ 682.509(a)(1)’’ and adding, in their
place, the words ‘‘condition described
in § 682.404(b)(3)(ii)’’.
■ F. In paragraph (b)(7)(ii)(A), removing
the words ‘‘credit bureau’’ and adding,
in their place, the words ‘‘consumer
reporting agency’’.
■ G. Revising paragraph (b)(9).
■ H. In paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A)
introductory text, removing the words
‘‘made or’’.
■ I. In paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A)(1),
removing the words ‘‘in that year’’.
■ J. In paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A)(2),
removing the words ‘‘in that year’’.
■
■
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
K. Revising paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C).
L. In paragraph (c)(1)(ii), removing the
citation ‘‘(c)(1)(A)–(C)’’ and adding, in
its place, the citation ‘‘(c)(1)(i)(A)–(C)’’.
■ M. Removing paragraph (c)(4).
■ N. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(5)
through (c)(11) as paragraphs (c)(4)
through (c)(10), respectively.
■ O. In newly redesignated paragraphs
(c)(8)(i) and (c)(8)(ii), adding the words
‘‘title IV eligibility of a’’ between the
words ‘‘or’’ and ‘‘school’’.
■ P. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (c)(10) introductory text.
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
§ 682.410 Fiscal, administrative, and
enforcement requirements.
(a) * * *
(2) Uses of reserve fund assets. A
guaranty agency may use the assets of
the reserve fund established under
paragraph (a)(1) of this section to pay
only—
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(9) Administrative garnishment. (i) If
a guaranty agency decides to garnish the
disposable pay of a borrower who is not
making payments on a loan held by the
agency, on which the Secretary has paid
a reinsurance claim, it must do so in
accordance with the following
procedures:
(A) At least 30 days before the
initiation of garnishment proceedings,
the guaranty agency must mail to the
borrower’s last known address, a written
notice described in paragraph
(b)(9)(i)(B) of this section.
(B) The notice must describe—
(1) The nature and amount of the
debt;
(2) The intention of the agency to
collect the debt through deductions
from disposable pay;
(3) An explanation of the borrower’s
rights;
(4) The deadlines by which a
borrower must exercise those rights; and
(5) The consequences of failure to
exercise those rights in a timely manner.
(C) The guaranty agency must offer
the borrower an opportunity to inspect
and copy agency records related to the
debt.
(D) The guaranty agency must offer
the borrower an opportunity to enter
into a written repayment agreement
with the agency under terms agreeable
to the agency.
(E)(1) The guaranty agency must offer
the borrower an opportunity for a
hearing in accordance with paragraphs
(b)(9)(i)(F) through (J) of this section and
other guidance provided by the
Secretary, for any objection regarding
the existence, amount, or enforceability
of the debt, and any objection that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
withholding from the borrower’s
disposable pay in the amount or at the
rate proposed in the notice would cause
financial hardship to the borrower.
(2) The borrower must request a
hearing in writing. At the borrower’s
option, the hearing may be oral or
written. The time and location of the
hearing is established by the guaranty
agency. An oral hearing may, at the
borrower’s option, be conducted either
in-person or by telephone conference.
The agency notifies the borrower of the
process for arranging the time and
location of an oral hearing. All
telephonic charges are the responsibility
of the agency. All travel expenses
incurred by the borrower in connection
with an in-person oral hearing are the
responsibility of the borrower.
(F)(1) If the borrower submits a
written request for a hearing on the
existence, amount, or enforceability of
the debt—
(i) The guaranty agency must provide
evidence of the existence of the debt. If
the agency provides evidence of the
existence of the debt, the borrower must
prove by the preponderance of the
evidence that no debt exists, the debt is
not enforceable under applicable law,
the amount the guaranty agency claims
the borrower owes is incorrect,
including that any amount of collection
costs assessed to the borrower exceeds
the limits established under
§ 682.410(b)(2), or the debt is not
delinquent; and
(ii) The borrower may raise any of the
objections described in paragraph
(b)(9)(i)(F)(1)(i) of this section not raised
in the written request, but must do so
before a hearing is completed. For
purposes of this paragraph, a hearing is
completed when the record is closed
and the hearing official notifies the
parties that no additional evidence or
objections will be accepted.
(2) If the borrower submits a written
request for a hearing on an objection
that withholding in the amount or at the
rate that the agency proposed in its
notice would cause financial hardship
to the borrower and the borrower’s
spouse and dependents—
(i) The borrower bears the burden of
proving the claim of financial hardship
by a preponderance of the credible
evidence by providing credible
documentation that the amount of
wages proposed in the notice would
leave the borrower unable to meet basic
living expenses of the borrower, the
borrower’s spouse, and the borrower’s
dependents. The documentation must
show the amount of the costs incurred
for basic living expenses and the income
available from any source to meet those
expenses;
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65817
(ii) The borrower’s claim of financial
hardship must be evaluated by
comparing the amounts that the
borrower proves are being incurred for
basic living expenses against the
amounts spent for basic living expenses
by families of the same size as the
borrower’s. For the purposes of this
section, the standards published by the
Internal Revenue Service under 26
U.S.C. 7122(d)(2) (the ’’Collection
Financial Standards’’) establish the
average amounts spent for basic living
expenses for families of the same size as
the borrower’s family;
(iii) The amount that the borrower
proves is incurred for a type of basic
living expense is considered to be
reasonable to the extent that the amount
does not exceed the amount spent for
that expense by families of the same size
according to the Collection Financial
Standards. If the borrower claims an
amount for any basic living expense that
exceeds the amount in the Collection
Financial Standards, the borrower must
prove that the amount claimed is
reasonable and necessary;
(iv) If the borrower’s objection to the
rate or amount proposed in the notice is
upheld in part, the garnishment must be
ordered at a lesser rate or amount, that
is determined will allow the borrower to
meet basic living expenses proven to be
reasonable and necessary. If this
financial hardship determination is
made after a garnishment order is
already in effect, the guaranty agency
must notify the borrower’s employer of
any change required by the
determination in the amount to be
withheld or the rate of withholding
under that order; and
(v) A determination by a hearing
official that financial hardship would
result from garnishment is effective for
a period not longer than six months
after the date of the finding. After this
period, the guaranty agency may require
the borrower to submit current
information regarding the borrower’s
family income and living expenses. If
the borrower fails to submit current
information within 30 days of this
request, or the guaranty agency
concludes from a review of the available
evidence that garnishment should now
begin or the rate or the amount of an
outstanding withholding should be
increased, the guaranty agency must
notify the borrower and provide the
borrower with an opportunity to contest
the determination and obtain a hearing
on the objection under the procedures
in paragraph (b)(9)(i) of this section.
(G) If the borrower’s written request
for a hearing is received by the guaranty
agency on or before the 30th day
following the date of the notice
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
65818
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
described in paragraph (b)(9)(i)(B) of
this section, the guaranty agency may
not issue a withholding order until the
borrower has been provided the
requested hearing and a decision has
been rendered. The guaranty agency
must provide a hearing to the borrower
in sufficient time to permit a decision,
in accordance with the procedures that
the agency may prescribe, to be
rendered within 60 days.
(H) If the borrower’s written request
for a hearing is received by the guaranty
agency after the 30th day following the
date of the notice described in
paragraph (b)(9)(i)(B) of this section, the
guaranty agency must provide a hearing
to the borrower in sufficient time that a
decision, in accordance with the
procedures that the agency may
prescribe, may be rendered within 60
days, but may not delay issuance of a
withholding order unless the agency
determines that the delay in filing the
request was caused by factors over
which the borrower had no control, or
the agency receives information that the
agency believes justifies a delay or
cancellation of the withholding order. If
a decision is not rendered within 60
days following receipt of a borrower’s
written request for a hearing, the
guaranty agency must suspend the order
beginning on the 61st day after the
hearing request was received until a
hearing is provided and a decision is
rendered.
(I) The hearing official appointed by
the agency to conduct the hearing may
be any qualified individual, including
an administrative law judge. Under no
circumstance may the hearing official be
under the supervision or control of the
head of the guaranty agency or of a
third-party servicer or collection
contractor employed by the agency.
Payment of compensation by the
guaranty agency, third-party servicer, or
collection contractor employed by the
agency to the hearing official for service
as a hearing official does not constitute
impermissible supervision or control
under this paragraph. The guaranty
agency must ensure that, except as
needed to arrange for administrative
matters pertaining to the hearing,
including the type of hearing requested
by the borrower, the time, place, and
manner of conducting an oral hearing,
and post-hearing matters such as
issuance of a hearing decision, all oral
communications between the hearing
official and any representative of the
guaranty agency or with the borrower
are made within the hearing of the other
party, and that copies of any written
communication with either party are
promptly provided to the other party.
This paragraph does not preclude a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
hearing in the absence of one of the
parties if the borrower is given proper
notice of the hearing, both parties have
agreed on the time, place, and manner
of the hearing, and one of the parties
fails to attend.
(J) The hearing official must conduct
any hearing as an informal proceeding,
require witnesses in an oral hearing to
testify under oath or affirmation, and
maintain a summary record of any
hearing. The hearing official must issue
a final written decision at the earliest
practicable date, but not later than 60
days after the guaranty agency’s receipt
of the borrower’s hearing request.
However—
(1) The borrower may request an
extension of that deadline for a
reasonable period, as determined by the
hearing official, for the purpose of
submitting additional evidence or
raising a new objection described in
paragraph (b)(9)(i)(F)(1)(ii) of this
section; and
(2) The agency may request, and the
hearing official must grant, a reasonable
extension of time sufficient to enable
the guaranty agency to evaluate and
respond to any such additional evidence
or any objections raised pursuant to
paragraph (b)(9)(i)(F)(1)(ii) of this
section.
(K) An employer served with a
garnishment order from the guaranty
agency with respect to a borrower
whose wages are not then subject to a
withholding order of any kind must
deduct and pay to the agency from a
borrower’s disposable pay an amount
that does not exceed the smallest of—
(1) The amount specified in the
guaranty agency order;
(2) The amount permitted by section
488A(a)(1) of the Act, which is 15
percent of the borrower’s disposable
pay; or
(3) The amount permitted by 15
U.S.C. 1673(a)(2), which is the amount
by which the borrower’s disposable pay
exceeds 30 times the minimum wage.
(L) If a borrower’s pay is subject to
more than one garnishment order—
(1) Unless other Federal law requires
a different priority, the employer must
pay the agency the amount calculated
under paragraph (b)(9)(i)(K) of this
section before the employer complies
with any later garnishment orders,
except a family support withholding
order;
(2) If an employer is withholding from
a borrower’s pay based on a
garnishment order served on the
employer before the guaranty agency’s
order, or if a withholding order for
family support is served on an employer
at any time, the employer must comply
with the agency’s garnishment order by
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
withholding an amount that is the lesser
of—
(i) The amount specified in the
guaranty agency order; or
(ii) The amount calculated under
paragraph (b)(9)(i)(L)(3) of this section
less the amount or amounts withheld
under the garnishment order or orders
that have priority over the agency’s
order; and
(3) The cumulative withholding for all
garnishment orders issued by guaranty
agencies may not exceed, for an
individual borrower, the amount
permitted by 15 U.S.C. 1673, which is
the lesser of 25 percent of the borrower’s
disposable pay or the amount by which
the borrower’s disposable pay exceeds
30 times the minimum wage. If a
borrower owes debts to one or more
guaranty agencies, each agency may
issue a garnishment order to enforce
each of those debts, but no single agency
may order a total amount exceeding 15
percent of the disposable pay of a
borrower to be withheld. The employer
must honor these orders as provided in
paragraphs (b)(9)(i)(L)(1) and (2) of this
section.
(M) Notwithstanding paragraphs
(b)(9)(i)(K) and (L) of this section, an
employer may withhold and pay a
greater amount than required under the
order if the borrower gives the employer
written consent.
(N) A borrower may, at any time, raise
an objection to the amount or the rate
of withholding specified in the guaranty
agency’s order to the borrower’s
employer on the ground of financial
hardship. However, the guaranty agency
is not required to consider such an
objection and provide the borrower with
a hearing until at least six months after
the agency issued the most recent
garnishment order, either one for which
the borrower did not request a hearing
or one that was issued after a hardshiprelated hearing determination. The
agency may provide a hearing in
extraordinary circumstances earlier than
six months if the borrower’s request for
review shows that the borrower’s
financial circumstances have
substantially changed after the
garnishment notice because of an event
such as injury, divorce, or catastrophic
illness.
(O) A garnishment order is effective
until the guaranty agency rescinds the
order or the agency has fully recovered
the amounts owed by the borrower,
including interest, late fees, and
collections costs. If an employer is
unable to honor a garnishment order
because the amount available for
garnishment is insufficient to pay any
portion of the amount stated in the
order, the employer must notify the
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
agency and comply with the order when
sufficient disposable pay is available.
Upon full recovery of the debt, the
agency must send the borrower’s
employer notification to stop wage
withholding.
(P) The guaranty agency must sue any
employer for any amount that the
employer, after receipt of the
withholding order provided by the
agency under paragraph (b)(9)(i)(R) of
this section, fails to withhold from
wages owed and payable to an employee
under the employer’s normal pay and
disbursement cycle.
(Q) The guaranty agency may not
garnish the wages of a borrower whom
it knows has been involuntarily
separated from employment until the
borrower has been reemployed
continuously for at least 12 months. The
borrower has the burden of informing
the guaranty agency of the
circumstances surrounding the
borrower’s involuntary separation from
employment.
(R) Unless the guaranty agency
receives information that the agency
believes justifies a delay or cancellation
of the withholding order, it must send
a withholding order to the employer
within 20 days after the borrower fails
to make a timely request for a hearing,
or, if a timely request for a hearing is
made by the borrower, within 20 days
after a final decision is made by the
agency to proceed with garnishment.
(S) The notice given to the employer
under paragraph (b)(9)(i)(R) of this
section must contain only the
information as may be necessary for the
employer to comply with the
withholding order and to ensure proper
credit for payments received. At a
minimum, the notice given to the
employer includes the borrower’s name,
address, and Social Security Number, as
well as instructions for withholding and
information as to where the employer
must send payments.
(T)(1) A guaranty agency may use a
third-party servicer or collection
contractor to perform administrative
activities associated with administrative
wage garnishment, but may not allow
such a party to conduct required
hearings or to determine that a
withholding order is to be issued.
Subject to the limitations of paragraphs
(b)(9)(i)(T)(2) and (3) of this section,
administrative activities associated with
administrative wage garnishment may
include but are not limited to—
(i) Identifying to the agency suitable
candidates for wage garnishment
pursuant to agency standards;
(ii) Obtaining employment
information for the purposes of
garnishment;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
(iii) Sending candidates selected for
garnishment by the agency notices
prescribed by the agency;
(iv) Negotiating alternative repayment
arrangements with borrowers;
(v) Responding to inquiries from
notified borrowers;
(vi) Receiving garnishment payments
on behalf of the agency;
(vii) Arranging for the retention of
hearing officials and for the conduct of
hearings on behalf of the agency;
(viii) Providing information to
borrowers or hearing officials on the
process or conduct of hearings; and
(ix) Sending garnishment orders and
other communications to employers on
behalf of the agency.
(2) Only an authorized official of the
agency may determine that an
individual withholding order is to be
issued. The guarantor must record the
official’s determination for each order it
issues, including any order which it
causes to be prepared or mailed by a
third-party servicer or collection
contractor. The guarantor must evidence
the official’s approval, either by
including the official’s signature on the
order or, if the agency uses a form of
withholding order that does not provide
for execution by signature, by retaining
in the agency’s records the identity of
the approving official, the date of the
approval, the amount or rate of the
order, the name and address of the
employer to whom the order was issued,
and the debt for which the order was
issued.
(3) The withholding order must
identify the guaranty agency as the
holder of the debt, as the issuer of the
order, and as the sole party legally
authorized to issue the withholding
order. If a guaranty agency uses a thirdparty servicer or collection contractor to
prepare and mail a withholding order
that includes the name of the servicer or
contractor that prepared or mailed the
order, the guaranty agency must also
ensure that the order contains no
captions or representations that the
servicer or contractor is the party that
issued, or was empowered by Federal
law or by the agency to issue, the
withholding order.
(U) As specified in section 488A(a)(8)
of the Act, the borrower may seek
judicial relief, including punitive
damages, if the employer discharges,
refuses to employ, or takes disciplinary
action against the borrower due to the
issuance of a withholding order.
(V) A guaranty agency is required to
suspend a garnishment order when the
agency receives a borrower’s fifth
qualifying payment under a loan
rehabilitation agreement with the
agency, unless otherwise directed by the
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65819
borrower, in accordance with
§ 682.405(a)(3).
(ii) For purposes of paragraph (b)(9) of
this section—
(A) ‘‘Borrower’’ includes all endorsers
on a loan;
(B) ‘‘Day’’ means calendar day;
(C) ‘‘Disposable pay’’ means that part
of a borrower’s compensation for
personal services, whether or not
denominated as wages from an
employer, that remains after the
deduction of health insurance
premiums and any amounts required by
law to be withheld, and includes, but is
not limited to, salary, bonuses,
commissions, or vacation pay.
‘‘Amounts required by law to be
withheld’’ include amounts for
deductions such as Social Security taxes
and withholding taxes, but do not
include any amount withheld under a
court order or other withholding order.
All references to an amount of
disposable pay refer to disposable pay
calculated for a single week;
(D) ‘‘Employer’’ means a person or
entity that employs the services of
another and that pays the latter’s wages
or salary and includes, but is not limited
to, State and local governments, but
does not include an agency of the
Federal Government;
(E) ‘‘Financial hardship’’ means an
inability to meet basic living expenses
for goods and services necessary for the
survival of the borrower and the
borrower’s spouse and dependents;
(F) ‘‘Garnishment’’ means the process
of withholding amounts from an
employee’s disposable pay and paying
those amounts to a creditor in
satisfaction of a withholding order; and
(G) ‘‘Withholding order’’ means any
order for withholding or garnishment of
pay issued by the guaranty agency and
may also be referred to as ‘‘wage
garnishment order’’ or ‘‘garnishment
order.’’
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) Each school that participated in
the guaranty agency’s program, located
in a State for which the guaranty agency
is the principal guaranty agency, that
has a cohort default rate, as described in
subpart M of 34 CFR part 668, that
includes FFEL Program loans, for either
of the 2 immediately preceding fiscal
years, as defined in 34 CFR 668.182,
that exceeds 20 percent, unless the
school is under a mandate from the
Secretary under subpart M of 34 CFR
part 668 to take specific default
reduction measures or if the total dollar
amount of loans entering repayment in
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65820
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
each fiscal year on which the cohort
default rate of over 20 percent is based
does not exceed $100,000; or
*
*
*
*
*
(10) Taking prompt action to protect
the rights of borrowers and the Federal
fiscal interest respecting loans that the
agency has guaranteed when the agency
learns that a school that participated in
the FFEL Program or a holder of loans
participating in the program is
experiencing problems that threaten the
solvency of the school or holder,
including—
*
*
*
*
*
§ 682.411
[Amended]
46. Section 682.411 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (d)(2), removing the
words ‘‘all national credit bureaus’’ and
adding, in their place, the words ‘‘each
nationwide consumer reporting
agency’’.
■ B. In paragraph (f), removing the
words ‘‘a national credit bureau’’ and
adding, in their place, the words ‘‘each
nationwide consumer reporting
agency’’.
■ C. In paragraph (n)(2), removing the
words ‘‘a national credit bureau’’ and
adding, in their place, the words ‘‘each
nationwide consumer reporting
agency’’.
■ D. In paragraph (o)(2), removing the
words ‘‘credit bureau’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘consumer
reporting agency’’.
■
■
§ 682.412
[Amended]
47. Section 682.412(a)(2) is amended
by removing the words ‘‘as provided
under § 682.301’’.
■ 48. Section 682.413 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (c)(1)(vi), removing
the words ‘‘certification required under
§ 682.206(f)(1)’’ and adding, in their
place the words ‘‘required lender
verification certification’’.
■ B. Revising the first sentence of
paragraph (h).
The revision reads as follows:
Remedial actions.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
(h) In any action to require repayment
of funds or to withhold funds from a
guaranty agency, or to limit, suspend, or
terminate a guaranty agency based on a
violation of section 428(b)(3) of the Act,
if the Secretary finds that the guaranty
agency provided or offered the
prohibited payments or activities, the
Secretary applies a rebuttable
presumption that the payments or
activities were offered or provided to
secure applications for FFEL loans or to
secure FFEL loan volume. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
[Amended]
49. Section 682.414 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(D), removing
the words ‘‘credit bureau’’ and adding,
in their place, the words ‘‘consumer
reporting agency’’.
■ B. In paragraph (a)(4)(ii)(J), removing
the words ‘‘credit bureau’’ and adding,
in their place, the words ‘‘consumer
reporting agency’’.
■ C. In paragraph (a)(6)(ii)(D), removing
the word ‘‘is’’ and adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘it’’.
■ D. Removing paragraph (b)(2)(i).
■ E. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(2)(ii)
through (b)(2)(iv), as (b)(2)(i) through
(b)(2)(iii), respectively.
■ F. In paragraph (b)(3)(i), removing the
words ‘‘schools and’’.
■ G. In paragraph (b)(3)(ii), removing
the words ‘‘schools and’’.
■ H. In paragraph (b)(3)(iii), removing
the words ‘‘school or’’.
■ I. In paragraph (c)(2), removing the
citation ‘‘§ 682.401(b)(21) and (22)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘§ 682.401(b)(12) and (13)’’.
■
■
Jkt 232001
Subpart F—Requirements, Standards,
and Payments for Schools That
Participated in the FFEL Program
58. Revise the heading to subpart F of
part 682 to read as set forth above.
■
§ 682.601
[Removed and Reserved]
59. Section 682.601 is removed and
reserved.
■
§ 682.602
[Removed and Reserved]
■
60. Section 682.602 is removed and
reserved.
■ 61. Section 682.603 is amended by:
■ A. Revising the section heading.
■ B. In paragraph (b)(3), removing the
citation ‘‘§ 682.604(c)’’ and adding, in
its place, the citation ‘‘section 428G of
the Act’’.
■ C. Revising paragraphs (g), (h), and (i).
■ D. Revising the first of the two
paragraphs that are both designated as
paragraph (j).
■ E. Removing the second of the two
paragraphs that are both designated as
paragraph (j).
■ F. Adding paragraphs (k) and (l).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 682.418
§ 682.603 Certification by a school that
participated in the FFEL Program in
connection with a loan application.
§ 682.416
[Amended]
50. Section 682.416(d)(2) is amended
by removing the word ‘‘Title’’ and
adding, in its place, the word ‘‘title’’.
[Removed and Reserved]
51. Section 682.418 is removed and
reserved.
■
§ 682.419
[Amended]
52. Section 682.419 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (b)(8), removing the
words ‘‘, in accordance with § 682.420’’.
■ B. In paragraph (c)(6), removing the
citation ‘‘§ 682.421’’ and adding, in its
place, the citation ‘‘section 422A(f) of
the Act’’.
■
■
■
§ 682.413
§ 682.414
§ 682.420
[Removed and Reserved]
53. Section 682.420 is removed and
reserved.
■
§ 682.421
[Removed and Reserved]
54. Section 682.421 is removed and
reserved.
■
§ 682.422
[Removed and Reserved]
55. Section 682.422 is removed and
reserved.
■
§ 682.423
[Amended]
56. Section 682.423 is amended by:
A. In the second sentence of
paragraph (a), adding the word ‘‘may’’
between the words ‘‘that’’ and ‘‘have’’.
■ B. In paragraph (a), removing the last
sentence.
■
■
Subpart E—[Removed and Reserved]
57. Remove and reserve subpart E of
part 682.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
■
*
*
*
*
*
(g) The maximum period for which a
school may certify a loan application
is—
(1) Generally an academic year, as
defined by 34 CFR 668.3, except that a
guaranty agency may allow a school to
use a longer period of time,
corresponding to the period to which
the agency applies the annual loan
limits; or
(2) For a defaulted borrower who has
regained eligibility under
§ 682.401(b)(1), the academic year in
which the borrower regained eligibility.
(h) In certifying a Stafford or
Unsubsidized Stafford loan amount in
accordance with § 682.204—
(1) A program of study must be
considered at least one full academic
year if—
(i) The number of weeks of
instructional time is at least 30 weeks;
and
(ii) The number of clock hours is a
least 900, the number of semester or
trimester hours is at least 24, or the
number of quarter hours is at least 36;
(2) A program of study must be
considered two-thirds (2/3) of an
academic year if—
(i) The number of weeks of
instructional time is at least 20 weeks;
and
(ii) The number of clock hours is at
least 600, the number of semester or
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
trimester hours is at least 16, or the
number of quarter hours is at least 24;
(3) A program of study must be
considered one-third (1⁄3) of an
academic year if—
(i) The number of weeks of
instructional time is at least 10 weeks;
and
(ii) The number of clock hours is at
least 300, the number of semester or
trimester hours is at least 8, or the
number of quarter hours is at least 12;
and
(4) In prorating a loan amount for a
student enrolled in a program of study
with less than a full academic year
remaining, the school need not
recalculate the amount of the loan if the
number of hours for which an eligible
student is enrolled changes after the
school certifies the loan.
(i)(1) If a school measures academic
progress in an educational program in
credit hours and uses either standard
terms (semesters, trimesters, or quarters)
or nonstandard terms that are
substantially equal in length, and each
term is at least nine weeks of
instructional time in length, a student is
considered to have completed an
academic year and progresses to the
next annual loan limit when the
academic year calendar period has
elapsed.
(2) If a school measures academic
progress in an educational program in
credit hours and uses nonstandard
terms that are not substantially equal in
length or each term is not at least nine
weeks of instructional time in length, or
measures academic progress in credit
hours and does not have academic
terms, a student is considered to have
completed an academic year and
progresses to the next annual loan limit
at the later of—
(i) The student’s completion of the
weeks of instructional time in the
student’s academic year; or
(ii) The date, as determined by the
school, that the student has successfully
completed the academic coursework in
the student’s academic year.
(3) If a school measures academic
progress in an educational program in
clock hours, a student is considered to
have completed an academic year and
progresses to the next annual loan limit
at the later of—
(i) The student’s completion of the
weeks of instructional time in the
student’s academic year; or
(ii) The date, as determined by the
school, that the student has successfully
completed the clock hours in the
student’s academic year.
(4) For purposes of this section, terms
in a loan period are substantially equal
in length if no term in the loan period
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
is more than two weeks of instructional
time longer than any other term in that
loan period.
(j)(1) A school must cease certifying
loans based on the exceptions in section
428G(a)(3) of the Act no later than—
(i) 30 days after the date the school
receives notification from the Secretary
of an FFEL cohort default rate,
calculated under subpart M of 34 CFR
part 668, that causes the school to no
longer meet the qualifications outlined
in those paragraphs; or
(ii) October 1, 2002.
(2) A school must cease certifying
loans based on the exceptions in section
428G(a)(3) of the Act no later than 30
days after the date the school receives
notification from the Secretary of an
FFEL cohort default rate, calculated
under subpart M of 34 CFR part 668,
that causes the school to no longer meet
the qualifications outlined in those
paragraphs.
(k) A school may not assess the
borrower, or the student in the case of
a parent PLUS loan, a fee for the
completion or certification of any FFEL
Program form or information or for
providing any information necessary for
a student or parent to receive a loan
under part B of the Act or any benefits
associated with such a loan.
(l) Pursuant to paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, a school may not request the
disbursement by the lender for loan
proceeds earlier than the period
specified in 34 CFR 668.167.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 62. Section 682.604 is amended by:
■ A. Revising the section heading.
■ B. Removing paragraphs (a), (c), (d),
(e), (f), (h), and (i).
■ C. Redesignating paragraph (g) as
paragraph (a).
■ D. Removing and reserving paragraph
(b).
■ E. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (a)(1).
■ F. Removing newly redesignated
paragraph (a)(2)(vi).
■ G. Further redesignating newly
redesignated paragraphs (a)(2)(vii)
through (a)(2)(xii) as paragraphs
(a)(2)(ix) through (a)(2)(xiv),
respectively.
■ H. Adding new paragraphs (a)(2)(vi)
through (a)(2)(viii).
■ I. Adding new paragraph (a)(5).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 682.604 Required exit counseling for
borrowers.
(a) * * *
(1) A school must ensure that exit
counseling is conducted with each
Stafford Loan borrower and graduate or
professional student PLUS Loan
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65821
borrower either in person, by
audiovisual presentation, or by
interactive electronic means. In each
case, the school must ensure that this
counseling is conducted shortly before
the student borrower ceases at least halftime study at the school, and that an
individual with expertise in the title IV
programs is reasonably available shortly
after the counseling to answer the
student borrower’s questions. As an
alternative, in the case of a student
borrower enrolled in a correspondence
program or a study-abroad program that
the home institution approves for credit,
written counseling materials may be
provided by mail within 30 days after
the student borrower completes the
program. If a student borrower
withdraws from school without the
school’s prior knowledge or fails to
complete an exit counseling session as
required, the school must, within 30
days after learning that the student
borrower has withdrawn from school or
failed to complete the exit counseling as
required, ensure that exit counseling is
provided through interactive electronic
means, by mailing written counseling
materials to the student borrower at the
student borrower’s last known address,
or by sending written counseling
materials to an email address provided
by the student borrower that is not an
email address associated with the
school sending the counseling materials.
(2) * * *
(vi) Explain to the borrower the use of
a Master Promissory Note;
(vii) Emphasize to the student
borrower the seriousness and
importance of the repayment obligation
the borrower has assumed;
(viii) Emphasize to the student
borrower that the full amount of the
loan (other than a loan made or
originated by the school) must be repaid
in full even if the student borrower does
not complete the program, does not
complete the program within the regular
time for program completion, is unable
to obtain employment upon completion,
or is otherwise dissatisfied with or does
not receive the educational or other
services that the student borrower
purchased from the school;
*
*
*
*
*
(5)(i) For students who have received
both FFEL Program and Direct Loan
Program loans for attendance at a
school, the school’s compliance with
the exit counseling requirements in 34
CFR 685.304(b) satisfies the
requirements of this section if the
school ensures that the exit counseling
also provides the borrower with the
information described in paragraphs
(a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii) of this section.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65822
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) A student’s completion of
electronic interactive exit counseling
offered by the Secretary satisfies the
requirements of this section, and for
students who have also received Direct
Loan Program loans for attendance at
the school, the requirements of 34 CFR
685.304(b).
*
*
*
*
*
§ 682.605
[Amended]
63. Section 682.605 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (b), adding the words
‘‘and the Secretary’’ between the words
‘‘lender’’ and ‘‘the date’’.
■ B. In paragraph (c), adding the words
‘‘and the Secretary’’ between the word
‘‘lender’’ and the punctuation ‘‘,’’.
■
■
title IV of the Act has changed his or her
permanent address.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart G—Limitation, Suspension, or
Termination of Lender or Third-Party
Servicer Eligibility and Disqualification
of Lenders
66. The heading of subpart G of part
682 is revised to read as set forth above.
■
§ 682.700
[Amended]
■
67. Section 682.700 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (a), removing the
words ‘‘or school’’ and the word and
citation ‘‘and (h)(3)’’ in the final
sentence.
■ B. In paragraph (b)(1)(ii), adding the
word ‘‘or’’ after the punctuation ‘‘;’’.
■ C. Removing paragraph (b)(2).
■ D. Redesignating paragraph (b)(3) as
paragraph (b)(2).
■ E. In paragraph (c), removing the
words ‘‘or schools’’.
■ 68. Section 682.701 is amended by
revising the definition of
‘‘Disqualification’’ to read as follows:
§ 682.610 Administrative and fiscal
requirements for schools that participated
in the FFEL Program.
§ 682.701
subpart.
*
*
§ 682.608
[Removed and Reserved]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
64. Section 682.608 is removed and
reserved.
■ 65. Section 682.610 is amended by:
■ A. Revising the section heading.
■ B. Revising paragraph (b)(5).
■ C. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) For loans delivered by electronic
funds transfer or master check, a copy
of the borrower’s required written
authorization, if it was not provided in
the loan application or MPN, to deliver
the initial and subsequent
disbursements of each FFEL Program
loan; and
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Enrollment reporting process. (1)
Upon receipt of an enrollment report
from the Secretary, a school must
update all information included in the
report and return the report to the
Secretary—
(i) In the manner and format
prescribed by the Secretary; and
(ii) Within the timeframe specified by
the Secretary.
(2) Unless it expects to submit its next
updated enrollment report to the
Secretary within the next 60 days, a
school must notify the Secretary within
30 days after the date that the school
discovers that—
(i) A loan under title IV of the Act was
made to or on behalf of a student who
was enrolled or accepted for enrollment
at the school, and the student has
ceased to be enrolled on at least a halftime basis or failed to enroll on at least
a half-time basis for the period for
which the loan was intended; or
(ii) A student who is enrolled at the
school and who received a loan under
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
■
■
Definitions of terms used in this
*
*
*
*
Disqualification. The removal of a
lender’s eligibility for an indefinite
period of time by the Secretary on
review of limitation, suspension, or
termination action taken against the
lender by a guaranty agency.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 69. Section 682.702 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (a), removing the
words ‘‘in paragraph (d) of this section
and’’.
■ B. Revising paragraph (b)(1).
■ C. Removing paragraph (b)(2).
■ D. Redesignating paragraph (b)(3) as
paragraph (b)(2).
■ E. Removing paragraph (d).
The revision reads as follows:
§ 682.702
Effect on participation.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) A limit on the number or total
amount of loans that a lender may
purchase or hold under the FFEL
Program; or
*
*
*
*
*
§ 682.704
[Amended]
70. Section 682.704(a) introductory
text is amended, by removing the words
‘‘stop the issuance of guarantee
commitments by the Secretary and
guarantee agencies and to’’.
■
§ 682.705
■
PO 00000
[Amended]
Fmt 4701
§ 682.706
[Amended]
72. Section 682.706 is amended by
removing paragraph (d).
■ 73. Section 682.709 is amended by
adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 682.709
offsets.
Reimbursements, refunds, and
*
*
*
*
*
(d) In any action under this part based
on a violation of the prohibitions in
section 435(d)(5) of the Act, if the
Secretary, the designated Department
official, or the hearing official finds that
the lender provided or offered the
payments or activities described in
paragraph (5)(i) of the definition of
‘‘lender’’ in § 682.200(b), the Secretary
or the official applies a rebuttable
presumption that the payments or
activities were offered or provided to
secure applications for FFEL loans. To
reverse the presumption, the lender
must present evidence that the activities
or payments were provided for a reason
unrelated to securing applications for
FFEL loans or securing FFEL loan
volume.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 682.711
[Amended]
74. Section 682.711 is amended by:
A. Removing paragraph (c).
B. Redesignating paragraphs (d) and
(e) as paragraphs (c) and (d),
respectively.
■ C. In newly redesignated paragraph
(d)(2), removing the citation ‘‘(d)(3)’’
and adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘(c)(3)’’.
■ D. In newly redesignated paragraph
(d)(2), removing the citation ‘‘(e)(1)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘(d)(1)’’.
■
■
■
§ 682.712
[Amended]
75. Section 682.712 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (g)(2), removing the
parenthetical ‘‘(j)’’ and adding, in its
place, the parenthetical ‘‘(i)’’.
■ B. In paragraph (h)(2) and in
paragraph (h)(3) introductory text,
removing the parenthetical ‘‘(j)’’ and
adding, in its place, the parenthetical
‘‘(i)’’.
■ C. Removing paragraph (i).
■ D. Redesignating paragraph (j) as
paragraph (i).
■
■
§ 682.713
[Removed and Reserved]
76. Section 682.713 is removed and
reserved.
■
71. Section 682.705 is amended by:
Frm 00056
A. In paragraph (a)(1) introductory
text, removing the words ‘‘new loan
made by the lender or’’.
■ B. In paragraph (b)(2)(v), removing the
words ‘‘, except as provided in
paragraph (c)(9) of this section,’’.
■ C. Removing paragraph (c).
■
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart H of Part 682 [Removed and
Reserved]
77. Remove and reserve subpart H of
part 682.
■
Appendix C to Part 682 [Removed and
Reserved]
78. Appendix C to part 682 is removed
and reserved.
■
Appendix D to Part 682 [Amended]
79. In appendix D to part 682,
paragraph (3) of the introduction is
amended by removing the final citation
‘‘34 CFR 682.401(d)’’ and adding, in its
place, the citation ‘‘34 CFR 682.401(c)’’.
■
PART 685—WILLIAM D. FORD
FEDERAL DIRECT LOAN PROGRAM
80. The authority citation for part 685
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070g, 1087a, et seq.,
unless otherwise noted.
81. Section 685.100 is amended by:
A. Revising paragraph (a).
B. In paragraph (b), removing the
words ‘‘has been selected by the
Secretary to participate’’ and adding, in
their place, the word ‘‘participates’’.
■ C. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
■
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
§ 685.100 The William D. Ford Federal
Direct Loan Program.
(a) Under the William D. Ford Federal
Direct Loan (Direct Loan) Program
(formerly known as the Federal Direct
Student Loan Program), the Secretary
makes loans to enable a student or
parent to pay the costs of the student’s
attendance at a postsecondary school.
This part governs the Federal Direct
Stafford/Ford Loan Program, the Federal
Direct Unsubsidized Stafford/Ford Loan
Program, the Federal Direct PLUS
Program, and the Federal Direct
Consolidation Loan Program. The
Secretary makes loans under the
following program components:
(1)(i) Federal Direct Stafford/Ford
Loan Program (Direct Subsidized Loan
Program), which provides loans to
undergraduate, graduate, and
professional students. Loans made
under this program are referred to as
Direct Subsidized Loans. Except as
provided in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this
section, the Secretary subsidizes the
interest while the borrower is in an inschool, grace, or deferment period.
Graduate and professional students are
not eligible to receive Direct Subsidized
Loans for any period of enrollment
beginning on or after July 1, 2012.
(ii) The Secretary does not subsidize
the interest that accrues during the grace
period on any Direct Subsidized Loan
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
for which the first disbursement is made
on or after July 1, 2012 and before July
1, 2014.
(2) Federal Direct Unsubsidized
Stafford/Ford Loan Program (Direct
Unsubsidized Loan Program), which
provides loans to undergraduate,
graduate and professional students.
Loans made under this program are
referred to as Direct Unsubsidized
Loans. The borrower is responsible for
the interest that accrues during any
period.
(3) Federal Direct PLUS Program
(Direct PLUS Loan Program), which
provides loans to parents of dependent
students and to graduate or professional
students. Loans made under this
program are referred to as Direct PLUS
Loans. The borrower is responsible for
the interest that accrues during any
period.
(4) Federal Direct Consolidation Loan
Program (Direct Consolidation Loan
Program), which provides loans to
borrowers to consolidate certain Federal
educational loans. Loans made under
this program are referred to as Direct
Consolidation Loans.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The Secretary makes a Direct
Consolidation Loan only to a borrower
who is consolidating at least one loan
made under the Direct Loan Program or
the Federal Family Education Loan
(FFEL) Program.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 82. Section 685.101 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 685.101 Participation in the Direct Loan
Program.
(a) Colleges, universities, graduate
and professional schools, vocational
schools, and proprietary schools may
participate in the Direct Loan Program.
Participation in the Direct Loan Program
enables an eligible student or parent to
obtain a loan to pay for the student’s
cost of attendance at the school.
(b)(1) An eligible undergraduate
student who is enrolled at a school
participating in the Direct Loan Program
may borrow under the Direct Subsidized
Loan and Direct Unsubsidized Loan
programs.
(2) An eligible graduate or
professional student enrolled at a school
participating in the Direct Loan Program
may borrow under the Direct Subsidized
Loan, Direct Unsubsidized Loan, and
Direct PLUS Loan programs, except that
a graduate or professional student may
not borrow under the Direct Subsidized
Loan Program for any period of
enrollment beginning on or after July 1,
2012.
(3) An eligible parent of an eligible
dependent student enrolled at a school
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65823
participating in the Direct Loan Program
may borrow under the Direct PLUS
Loan Program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.)
83. Section 685.102 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (a)(1) introductory
text, removing the words ‘‘subpart A
of’’.
■ B. In paragraph (a)(1), removing the
terms ‘‘Academic Competitiveness
Grant (ACG) Program’’, ‘‘Disburse’’,
‘‘Federal Direct Student Loan Program
(Direct Loan Program)’’, ‘‘Leveraging
Educational Assistance Partnership
Program’’, ‘‘National Science and
Mathematics Access to Retain Talent
Grant (National SMART Grant)
Program’’, and ‘‘State’’.
■ C. In paragraph (a)(1), adding the
terms ‘‘Disbursement’’ and ‘‘William D.
Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct Loan)
Program’’ in alphabetical order.
■ D. In paragraph (a)(2), adding the
terms ‘‘Correspondence course’’ and
‘‘State’’ in alphabetical order.
■ E. In paragraph (a)(2), removing the
term ‘‘Program of study by
correspondence’’.
■ F. Removing paragraph (a)(3).
■ G. In paragraph (b), adding the
definitions of ‘‘Act’’, ‘‘Endorser’’,
‘‘Federal Insured Student Loan
Program’’, ‘‘Federal Stafford Loan
Program’’, ‘‘Guaranty agency’’,
‘‘Holder’’, ‘‘Lender’’, ‘‘Nationwide
consumer reporting agency’’,
‘‘Substantial gainful activity’’, and
‘‘Totally and permanently disabled’’, in
alphabetical order.
■ H. In paragraph (b), removing the
definitions of ‘‘Alternative originator’’,
‘‘Consortium’’, ‘‘School origination
option 1’’, ‘‘School origination option
2’’, ‘‘Servicer’’, and ‘‘Standard
origination’’.
■ I. In paragraph (b), in the definition of
‘‘Estimated financial assistance’’,
revising paragraphs (1)(vi) and (2)(i).
■ J. In paragraph (b), in the heading of
the definition of ‘‘Federal Direct
Consolidation Loan Program:’’, adding
the words ‘‘(Direct Consolidation Loan
Program)’’ immediately before the
punctuation ‘‘:’’.
■ K. In paragraph (b), in paragraph (4)
of the definition of ‘‘Federal Direct
Consolidation Loan Program’’, removing
the words ‘‘The term’’ in the first
sentence and adding, in their place, the
words ‘‘In the case of a Direct
Consolidation Loan that entered
repayment prior to July 1, 2006, the
term’’.
■ L. In paragraph (b), in the heading of
the definition of ‘‘Federal Direct PLUS
Program:’’, adding the words ‘‘(Direct
PLUS Loan Program)’’ immediately
before the punctuation ‘‘:’’.
■
■
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65824
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
M. In paragraph (b), revising the
definition of ‘‘Federal Direct Stafford/
Ford Loan Program’’.
■ N. In paragraph (b), in the heading of
the definition of ‘‘Federal Direct
Unsubsidized Stafford/Ford Loan
Program:’’, adding the words ‘‘(Direct
Unsubsidized Loan Program)’’
immediately before the punctuation ‘‘:’’.
■ O. In paragraph (b), revising the
definition of ‘‘Grace period’’.
■ P. In paragraph (b), in the definition
of ‘‘Master Promissory Note (MPN)’’,
adding a new paragraph (4).
■ Q. In paragraph (b), revising the
definition of ‘‘Satisfactory repayment
arrangement’’.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
§ 685.102
*
Definitions.
*
*
(b) * * *
*
*
Act: The Higher Education Act of 1965, as
amended, 20 U.S.C. 1071 et seq.
*
*
*
*
*
Endorser: An individual who signs a
promissory note and agrees to repay the loan
in the event that the borrower does not.
Estimated financial assistance:
(1) * * *
(vi) The estimated amount of other Federal
student financial aid, including but not
limited to a Federal Pell Grant, campus-based
aid, and the gross amount (including fees) of
subsidized and unsubsidized Federal
Stafford Loans, Direct Subsidized and
Unsubsidized Loans, and Federal PLUS or
Direct PLUS Loans.
(2) * * *
(i) Those amounts used to replace the
expected family contribution (EFC),
including the amounts of any TEACH Grants,
unsubsidized Federal Stafford Loans or
Direct Unsubsidized Loans, Federal PLUS or
Direct PLUS Loans, and non-federal nonneed-based loans, including private, statesponsored, and institutional loans. However,
if the sum of the amounts received that are
being used to replace the student’s EFC
exceed the EFC, the excess amount must be
treated as estimated financial assistance;
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loan Program
(Direct Subsidized Loan Program): A loan
program authorized by title IV, part D of the
Act that provides loans to undergraduate,
graduate, and professional students attending
Direct Loan Program schools, and one of the
components of the Direct Loan Program. The
Secretary subsidizes the interest while the
borrower is in an in-school, grace, or
deferment period, except that the Secretary
does not subsidize the interest that accrues
during the grace period on a loan for which
the first disbursement is made on or after July
1, 2012 and before July 1, 2014. Loans made
under this program are referred to as Direct
Subsidized Loans. Graduate and professional
students are not eligible to receive Direct
Subsidized Loans for any period of
enrollment beginning on or after July 1, 2012.
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
Federal Insured Student Loan Program:
The loan program authorized by title IV, part
B of the Act under which the Secretary
directly insures lenders against losses.
Federal Stafford Loan Program: The loan
program authorized by title IV, part B of the
Act which encouraged the making of
subsidized and unsubsidized loans to
undergraduate, graduate, and professional
students and is one of the Federal Family
Education Loan programs.
Grace period: A six-month period that
begins on the day after a Direct Subsidized
Loan borrower, a Direct Unsubsidized Loan
borrower, or, in some cases, a Direct
Consolidation Loan borrower whose
consolidation application was received
before July 1, 2006, ceases to be enrolled as
at least a half-time student at an eligible
institution and ends on the day before the
repayment period begins.
Guaranty agency: A State or private
nonprofit organization that has an agreement
with the Secretary under which it will
administer a loan guarantee program under
the Act.
Holder: The entity that owns a loan. For a
FFEL Program loan, the term ‘‘holder’’ refers
to an eligible lender owning a FFEL Program
loan, including a Federal or State agency or
an organization or corporation acting on
behalf of such an agency and acting as a
conservator, liquidator, or receiver of an
eligible lender.
*
*
*
*
*
Lender: As used in this part, the term
‘‘lender’’ has the meaning specified in
section 435(d) of the Act for purposes of the
FFEL Program.
*
*
*
*
*
Master Promissory Note (MPN):
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Unless the Secretary determines
otherwise, a school may use a single MPN as
the basis for all loans borrowed by a student
or parent borrower for attendance at that
school. If a school is not authorized by the
Secretary for multi-year use of the MPN, a
student or parent borrower must sign a new
MPN for each academic year.
Nationwide consumer reporting agency: A
consumer reporting agency as defined in 15
U.S.C. 1681a(p).
*
*
*
*
*
Satisfactory repayment arrangement: (1)
For the purpose of regaining eligibility under
section 428F(b) of the HEA, the making of six
consecutive, voluntary, on-time, full monthly
payments on a defaulted loan. A borrower
may only obtain the benefit of this paragraph
with respect to renewed eligibility once.
(2) For the purpose of consolidating a
defaulted loan under
§ 685.220(d)(1)(ii)(A)(3)—
(i) The making of three consecutive,
voluntary, on-time, full monthly payments
on a defaulted loan prior to consolidation; or
(ii) Agreeing to repay the Direct
Consolidation Loan under one of the incomecontingent repayment plans described in
§ 685.209 or the income-based repayment
plan described in § 685.221.
(3) For the purpose of paragraph (2)(i) of
this definition, the required monthly
payment amount may not be more than is
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
reasonable and affordable based on the
borrower’s total financial circumstances.
‘‘On-time’’ means a payment made within 20
days of the scheduled due date, and
voluntary payments are payments made
directly by the borrower and do not include
payments obtained by Federal offset,
garnishment, or income or asset execution.
(4) A borrower has not used the one
opportunity to renew eligibility for title IV
assistance if the borrower makes six
consecutive, on-time, voluntary, full monthly
payments under an agreement to rehabilitate
a defaulted loan, but does not receive
additional title IV assistance prior to
defaulting on that loan again.
Substantial gainful activity: A level of
work performed for pay or profit that
involves doing significant physical or mental
activities, or a combination of both.
Totally and permanently disabled: The
condition of an individual who—
(1) Is unable to engage in any substantial
gainful activity by reason of any medically
determinable physical or mental impairment
that—
(i) Can be expected to result in death;
(ii) Has lasted for a continuous period of
not less than 60 months; or
(iii) Can be expected to last for a
continuous period of not less than 60
months; or
(2) Has been determined by the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs to be unemployable due
to a service-connected disability.
*
*
*
*
*
84. Section 685.200 is amended by:
A. Revising paragraph (a)(1)(iv).
B. Revising paragraph (a)(1)(v).
C. Revising paragraph (b)(4).
D. In paragraph (c)(1)(vii)(C), adding
the word ‘‘paragraph’’ immediately
before the citation ‘‘(c)(1)(vii)(A)’’.
■ E. Adding a new paragraph
(c)(1)(vii)(D).
■ F. Revising paragraph (d).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
■
■
■
§ 685.200
Borrower eligibility.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) In the case of a borrower whose
previous loan or TEACH Grant service
obligation was discharged due to total
and permanent disability, the student—
(A) In the case of a borrower whose
prior loan under title IV of the Act or
TEACH Grant service obligation was
discharged after a final determination of
total and permanent disability, the
borrower—
(1) Obtains a certification from a
physician that the borrower is able to
engage in substantial gainful activity;
and
(2) Signs a statement acknowledging
that neither the new Direct Loan the
borrower receives nor any previously
discharged loan on which the borrower
is required to resume payment in
accordance with paragraph (a)(1)(iv)(B)
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
of this section can be discharged in the
future on the basis of any impairment
present when the new loan is made,
unless that impairment substantially
deteriorates;
(B) In the case of a borrower who
receives a new Direct Loan, other than
a Direct Consolidation Loan, within
three years of the date that any previous
title IV loan or TEACH Grant service
obligation was discharged due to a total
and permanent disability in accordance
with § 685.213(b)(4)(iii), 34 CFR
674.61(b)(3)(v), 34 CFR
682.402(c)(3)(iv), or 34 CFR 686.42(b)
based on a discharge request received
on or after July 1, 2010, the borrower
resumes repayment on the previously
discharged loan in accordance with
§ 685.213(b)(7), 34 CFR 674.61(b)(6), or
34 CFR 682.402(c)(6), or acknowledges
that he or she is once again subject to
the terms of the TEACH Grant
agreement to serve before receiving the
new loan; and
(C) In the case of a borrower whose
prior loan under title IV of the Act was
conditionally discharged after an initial
determination that the borrower was
totally and permanently disabled based
on a discharge request received prior to
July 1, 2010—
(1) The suspension of collection
activity on the prior loan has been
lifted;
(2) The borrower complies with the
requirement in paragraph (a)(1)(iv)(A)(1)
of this section;
(3) The borrower signs a statement
acknowledging that neither the new
Direct Loan the borrower receives nor
the loan that has been conditionally
discharged prior to a final determination
of total and permanent disability can be
discharged in the future on the basis of
any impairment present when the
borrower applied for a total and
permanent disability discharge or when
the new loan is made, unless that
impairment substantially deteriorates;
and
(4) The borrower signs a statement
acknowledging that the suspension of
collection activity on the prior loan will
be lifted.
(v) In the case of a student who was
enrolled in a program of study prior to
July 1, 2012 and who seeks a loan but
does not have a certificate of graduation
from a school providing secondary
education or the recognized equivalent
of such a certificate, the student meets
the requirements under 34 CFR
668.32(e)(2), (3), (4), or (5).
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) The student has received a
determination of his or her annual loan
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
maximum eligibility under the Direct
Unsubsidized Loan Program and, for
periods of enrollment beginning before
July 1, 2012, the Direct Subsidized Loan
Program; and
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(vii) * * *
(D) For the purposes of paragraph
(c)(1)(vii)(A)(3) of this section, the
Secretary may determine that
extenuating circumstances exist based
on documentation that includes, but is
not limited to, an updated credit report,
a statement from the creditor that the
borrower has made satisfactory
arrangements to repay the debt, or a
satisfactory statement from the borrower
explaining any delinquencies with
outstanding balances of less than $500.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Defaulted Perkins, FFEL, and
Direct Loan program borrowers. Except
as noted in § 685.220(d)(1)(ii)(A)(3), in
the case of a student or parent borrower
who is currently in default on a Perkins,
FFEL, or Direct Loan program loan, the
borrower must make satisfactory
repayment arrangements, as described
in paragraph (1) of the definition of that
term under § 685.102(b), on the
defaulted loan.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 85. Section 685.201 is amended by:
■ A. Revising paragraph (a)(2).
■ B. Revising paragraph (b).
■ C. Revising paragraph (c)(1).
■ D. In paragraph (c)(2), removing the
word ‘‘Servicer’’ and adding, in its
place, the word ‘‘Secretary’’.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 685.201
Obtaining a loan.
(a) * * *
(2) If the student is eligible for a
Direct Subsidized Loan or a Direct
Unsubsidized Loan, the school in which
the student is enrolled must perform the
following functions:
(i) Create a loan origination record
and transmit the record to the Secretary.
(ii) Ensure that the loan is supported
by a completed Master Promissory Note
(MPN) and, if applicable, transmit the
MPN to the Secretary.
(iii) In accordance with 34 CFR
668.162, draw down funds or receive
funds from the Secretary, and disburse
the funds to the student.
(b) Application for a Direct PLUS
Loan. (1) For a parent to obtain a Direct
PLUS Loan, the parent must complete
the Direct PLUS Loan MPN and the
dependent student on whose behalf the
parent is borrowing must complete a
Free Application for Federal Student
Aid and submit it in accordance with
instructions in the application.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65825
(2) For a graduate or professional
student to apply for a Direct PLUS Loan,
the student must complete a Free
Application for Federal Student Aid and
submit it in accordance with
instructions in the application. The
graduate or professional student must
also complete the Direct PLUS Loan
MPN.
(3) For either a parent or student
PLUS borrower, as applicable, the
school must complete its portion of the
Direct PLUS Loan MPN and, if
applicable, submit it to the Secretary.
The Secretary makes a determination as
to whether the parent or graduate or
professional student has an adverse
credit history. The school performs the
functions described in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section.
(c) * * *
(1) To obtain a Direct Consolidation
Loan, the applicant must complete the
application and promissory note and
submit it to the Secretary. The
application and promissory note sets
forth the terms and conditions of the
Direct Consolidation Loan and informs
the applicant how to contact the
Secretary. The Secretary answers
questions regarding the process of
applying for a Direct Consolidation
Loan and provides information about
the terms and conditions of both Direct
Consolidation Loans and the types of
loans that may be consolidated.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 86. Section 685.202 is amended by:
■ A. Revising paragraph (a).
■ B. Revising paragraph (b)(2).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 685.202 Charges for which Direct Loan
Program borrowers are responsible.
(a) Interest—(1) Interest rate for Direct
Subsidized Loans and Direct
Unsubsidized Loans first disbursed
before July 1, 1995. During all periods,
the interest rate during any twelvemonth period beginning on July 1 and
ending on June 30 is determined on the
June 1 immediately preceding that
period. The interest rate is equal to the
bond equivalent rate of 91-day Treasury
bills auctioned at the final auction held
prior to that June 1 plus 3.1 percentage
points, but does not exceed 8.25
percent.
(2) Interest rate for Direct Subsidized
Loans and Direct Unsubsidized Loans
first disbursed on or after July 1, 1995,
and before July 1, 1998. (i) During the
in-school, grace, and deferment periods.
The interest rate during any twelvemonth period beginning on July 1 and
ending on June 30 is determined on the
June 1 immediately preceding that
period. The interest rate is equal to the
bond equivalent rate of 91-day Treasury
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
65826
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
bills auctioned at the final auction held
prior to that June 1 plus 2.5 percentage
points, but does not exceed 8.25
percent.
(ii) During all other periods. The
interest rate during any twelve-month
period beginning on July 1 and ending
on June 30 is determined on the June 1
immediately preceding that period. The
interest rate is equal to the bond
equivalent rate of 91-day Treasury bills
auctioned at the final auction held prior
to that June 1 plus 3.1 percentage
points, but does not exceed 8.25
percent.
(3) Interest Rate for Direct Subsidized
Loans and Direct Subsidized Loans first
disbursed on or after July 1, 1998, and
before July 1, 2006. (i) During the inschool, grace, and deferment periods.
The interest rate during any twelvemonth period beginning on July 1 and
ending on June 30 is determined on the
June 1 immediately preceding that
period. The interest rate is equal to the
bond equivalent rate of 91-day Treasury
bills auctioned at the final auction held
prior to that June 1 plus 1.7 percentage
points, but does not exceed 8.25
percent.
(ii) During all other periods. The
interest rate during any twelve-month
period beginning on July 1 and ending
on June 30 is determined on the June 1
immediately preceding that period. The
interest rate is equal to the bond
equivalent rate of 91-day Treasury bills
auctioned at the final auction held prior
to that June 1 plus 2.3 percentage
points, but does not exceed 8.25
percent.
(4) Interest rate for Direct Subsidized
Loans made to undergraduate students
for which the first disbursement is made
on or after July 1, 2006, and before July
1, 2013. For a loan for which the first
disbursement is made:
(i) On or after July 1, 2006, and before
July 1, 2008, the interest rate is 6.8
percent on the unpaid principal balance
of the loan.
(ii) On or after July 1, 2008, and before
July 1, 2009, the interest rate is 6
percent on the unpaid principal balance
of the loan.
(iii) On or after July 1, 2009, and
before July 1, 2010, the interest rate is
5.6 percent on the unpaid principal
balance of the loan.
(iv) On or after July 1, 2010, and
before July 1, 2011, the interest rate is
4.5 percent on the unpaid principal
balance of the loan.
(v) On or after July 1, 2011, and before
July 1, 2013, the interest rate is 3.4
percent on the unpaid balance of the
loan.
(5) Interest rate for Direct Subsidized
Loans made to graduate or professional
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
students for which the first
disbursement is made on or after July 1,
2006, and before July 1, 2012. The
interest rate is 6.8 percent.
(6) Interest rate for Direct
Unsubsidized Loans first disbursed on
or after July 1, 2006, and before July 1,
2013. The interest rate is 6.8 percent.
(7) Interest rate for Direct Subsidized
Loans and Direct Unsubsidized Loans
made to undergraduate students for
which the first disbursement is made on
or after July 1, 2013. The interest rate for
loans first disbursed during any 12month period beginning on July 1 and
ending on June 30 is determined on the
June 1 preceding that period and is a
fixed rate for the life of the loan. The
interest rate is the lesser of—
(i) A rate equal to the high yield of the
10-year Treasury note auctioned at the
final auction held prior to the June 1
preceding the 12-month period, plus
2.05 percentage points, or
(ii) 8.25 percent.
(8) Interest rate for Direct
Unsubsidized Loans made to graduate
or professional students for which the
first disbursement is made on or after
July 1, 2013. The interest rate for loans
first disbursed during any 12-month
period beginning on July 1 and ending
on June 30 is determined on the June 1
preceding that period and is a fixed rate
for the life of the loan. The interest rate
is the lesser of—
(i) A rate equal to the high yield of the
10-year Treasury note auctioned at the
final auction held prior to the June 1
preceding the 12-month period, plus 3.6
percentage points, or
(ii) 9.5 percent.
(9) Interest rate for Direct PLUS
Loans. (i) Direct PLUS Loans first
disbursed before July 1, 1998. (A)
Interest rates for periods ending before
July 1, 2001. During all periods, the
interest rate during any twelve-month
period beginning on July 1 and ending
on June 30 is determined on the June 1
preceding that period. The interest rate
is equal to the bond equivalent rate of
52-week Treasury bills auctioned at the
final auction held prior to that June 1
plus 3.1 percentage points, but does not
exceed 9 percent.
(B) Interest rates for periods beginning
on or after July 1, 2001. During all
periods, the interest rate during any
twelve-month period beginning on July
1 and ending on June 30 is determined
on the June 26 preceding that period.
The interest rate is equal to the weekly
average 1-year constant maturity
Treasury yield, as published by the
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, for the last calendar
week ending on or before that June 26
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
plus 3.1 percentage points, but does not
exceed 9 percent.
(ii) Direct PLUS Loans first disbursed
on or after July 1, 1998, and before July
1, 2006. During all periods, the interest
rate during any twelve-month period
beginning on July 1 and ending on June
30 is determined on the June 1
preceding that period. The interest rate
is equal to the bond equivalent rate of
91-day Treasury bills auctioned at the
final auction held prior to that June 1
plus 3.1 percentage points, but does not
exceed 9 percent.
(iii) Direct PLUS Loans first disbursed
on or after July 1, 2006, and before July
1, 2013. The interest rate is 7.9 percent.
(iv) Direct PLUS Loans first disbursed
on or after July 1, 2013. The interest rate
for loans first disbursed during any 12month period beginning on July 1 and
ending on June 30 is determined on the
June 1 preceding that period and is a
fixed rate for the life of the loan. The
interest rate is the lesser of—
(A) A rate equal to the high yield of
the 10-year Treasury note auctioned at
the final auction held prior to the June
1 preceding the 12-month period, plus
4.6 percentage points, or
(B) 10.5 percent.
(10) Interest rate for Direct
Consolidation Loans—(i) Interest rate
for Direct Subsidized Consolidation
Loans and Direct Unsubsidized
Consolidation Loans. (A) Loans first
disbursed before July 1, 1995. The
interest rate is the rate established for
Direct Subsidized Loans and Direct
Unsubsidized Loans in paragraph (a)(1)
of this section.
(B) Loans first disbursed on or after
July 1, 1995, and before July 1, 1998.
The interest rate is the rate established
for Direct Subsidized Loans and Direct
Unsubsidized Loans in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section.
(C) Loans for which the first
disbursement is made on or after July 1,
1998, and prior to October 1, 1998, and
loans for which the disbursement is
made on or after October 1, 1998, for
which the consolidation application was
received by the Secretary before October
1, 1998. The interest rate is the rate
established for Direct Subsidized Loans
and Direct Unsubsidized Loans in
paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
(D) Loans for which the consolidation
application is received by the Secretary
on or after October 1, 1998, and before
February 1, 1999. During all periods, the
interest rate during any twelve-month
period beginning on July 1 and ending
on June 30 is determined on the June 1
immediately preceding that period. The
interest rate is equal to the bond
equivalent rate of 91-day Treasury bills
auctioned at the final auction held prior
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
to that June 1 plus 2.3 percentage
points, but does not exceed 8.25
percent.
(E) Loans for which the consolidation
application is received by the Secretary
on or after February 1, 1999, and before
July 1, 2013. During all periods, the
interest rate is based on the weighted
average of the interest rates on the loans
being consolidated, rounded to the
nearest higher one-eighth of one
percent, but does not exceed 8.25
percent.
(F) Loans for which the consolidation
application is received by the Secretary
on or after July 1, 2013. During all
periods, the interest rate is based on the
weighted average of the interest rates on
the loans being consolidated, rounded
to the nearest higher one-eighth of one
percent.
(ii) Interest rate for Direct PLUS
Consolidation Loans. (A) Loans first
disbursed before July 1, 1998. The
interest rate is the rate established for
Direct PLUS Loans in paragraph (a)(9)(i)
of this section.
(B) Loans for which the first
disbursement is made on or after July 1,
1998, and prior to October 1, 1998, and
loans for which the disbursement is
made on or after October 1, 1998, for
which the consolidation application was
received by the Secretary before October
1, 1998. The interest rate is the rate
established for Direct PLUS Loans in
paragraph (a)(9)(ii) of this section.
(C) Loans for which the consolidation
application is received by the Secretary
on or after October 1, 1998, and before
February 1, 1999. During all periods, the
interest rate during any twelve-month
period beginning on July 1 and ending
on June 30 is determined on the June 1
immediately preceding that period. The
interest rate is equal to the bond
equivalent rate of 91-day Treasury bills
auctioned at the final auction held prior
to that June 1 plus 2.3 percentage
points, but does not exceed 8.25
percent.
(D) Loans for which the consolidation
application is received by the Secretary
on or after February 1, 1999, and before
July 1, 2006. During all periods, the
interest rate is based on the weighted
average of the interest rates on the loans
being consolidated, rounded to the
nearest higher one-eighth of one
percent, but does not exceed 8.25
percent.
(11) Applicability of the
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50
U.S.C. 527, App. sec. 207).
Notwithstanding paragraphs (a)(1)
through (10) of this section, effective
August 14, 2008, upon the Secretary’s
receipt of a borrower’s written request
and a copy of the borrower’s military
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
orders, the maximum interest rate, as
defined in 50 U.S.C. 527, App. section
207(d), on Direct Loan Program loans
made prior to the borrower entering
active duty status is 6 percent while the
borrower is on active duty military
service.
(b) * * *
(2) For a Direct Unsubsidized Loan, a
Direct Unsubsidized Consolidation Loan
that qualifies for a grace period under
the regulations that were in effect for
consolidation applications received
before July 1, 2006, a Direct PLUS Loan,
or for a Direct Subsidized Loan for
which the first disbursement is made on
or after July 1, 2012, and before July 1,
2014, the Secretary may capitalize the
unpaid interest that accrues on the loan
when the borrower enters repayment.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 87. Section 685.203 is amended by:
■ A. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (a)(1).
■ B. In paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (a)(1)(ii), and
(a)(1)(iii), removing the words ‘‘$2,625,
or, for a loan disbursed on or after July
1, 2007, $3,500,’’ and adding, in their
place, the figure ‘‘$3,500’’.
■ C. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (a)(2).
■ D. In paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii),
removing the words ‘‘$3,500, or, for a
loan disbursed on or after July 1, 2007,
$4,500,’’ and adding, in their place, the
figure ‘‘$4,500’’.
■ E. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (a)(3).
■ F. Revising paragraph (a)(5).
■ G. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (a)(6).
■ H. Revising paragraph (a)(7).
■ I. Revising paragraph (b).
■ J. In paragraph (c)(1)(i), removing the
words ‘‘Federal Direct Unsubsidized
Loan Program’’ and adding, in their
place, the words ‘‘Direct Unsubsidized
Loan Program’’.
■ K. Revising paragraph (c)(1)(ii).
■ L. In paragraph (c)(1)(iii), in the last
sentence, removing the words ‘‘Federal
PLUS Loan or’’.
■ M. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (c)(2).
■ N. In paragraphs (c)(2)(i)(A),
(c)(2)(i)(B), (c)(2)(i)(C), (c)(2)(ii)(A), and
(c)(2)(ii)(B), removing the words
‘‘$4,000, or, for a loan first disbursed on
or after July 1, 2008, $6,000,’’ and
adding, in their place, the figure
‘‘$6,000’’.
■ O. In paragraphs (c)(2)(iii)(A) and
(c)(2)(iii)(B), removing the words
‘‘$5,000, or, for a loan first disbursed on
or after July 1, 2008, $7,000,’’ and
adding, in their place, the figure
‘‘$7,000’’.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65827
P. In paragraph (c)(2)(v), removing the
words ‘‘$10,000, or, for a loan disbursed
on or after July 1, 2007,’’.
■ Q. In paragraph (c)(2)(vi)(A), removing
the words ‘‘$4,000, or, for a loan first
disbursed on or after July 1, 2008,
$6,000,’’ and adding, in their place, the
figure ‘‘$6,000’’.
■ R. In paragraph (c)(2)(vi)(B), removing
the words ‘‘$5,000, or, for a loan
disbursed on or after July 1, 2007,
$7,000,’’ and adding, in their place, the
figure ‘‘$7,000’’.
■ S. In paragraph (c)(2)(vii), removing
the words ‘‘$5,000, or, for a loan
disbursed on or after July 1, 2007,’’.
■ T. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (d).
■ U. Revising paragraph (e).
■ V. In paragraph (i)(1), adding the word
‘‘Subsidized’’ immediately before the
words ‘‘Federal Stafford Loans’’.
■ W. In paragraph (i)(2), removing the
words ‘‘Federal Unsubsidized Stafford
Loans’’ and adding, in their place, the
words ‘‘Unsubsidized Federal Stafford
Loans’’.
The revisions read as follows:
■
§ 685.203
Loan limits.
(a) * * *
(1) In the case of an undergraduate
student who has not successfully
completed the first year of a program of
undergraduate education, the total
amount the student may borrow for any
academic year of study under the Direct
Subsidized Loan Program may not
exceed the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(2) In the case of an undergraduate
student who has successfully completed
the first year of an undergraduate
program but has not successfully
completed the second year of an
undergraduate program, the total
amount the student may borrow for any
academic year of study under the Direct
Subsidized Loan Program may not
exceed the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(3) In the case of an undergraduate
student who has successfully completed
the first and second years of a program
of study of undergraduate education but
has not successfully completed the
remainder of the program, the total
amount the student may borrow for any
academic year of study under the Direct
Subsidized Loan Program may not
exceed the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(5) In the case of a graduate or
professional student for periods of
enrollment beginning before July 1,
2012, the total amount the student may
borrow for any academic year of study
under the Direct Subsidized Loan
Program may not exceed $8,500.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65828
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) In the case of a graduate or
professional student for a period of
enrollment beginning before July 1,
2012, the total amount the student may
borrow for any academic year of study
under the Direct Unsubsidized Loan
Program may not exceed the amount
determined under paragraph (a)(5) of
this section, less any amount received
under the Direct Subsidized Loan
Program.
(iii) In the case of a graduate or
professional student for a period of
enrollment beginning on or after July 1,
2012, the total amount the student may
borrow for any academic year of study
under the Direct Unsubsidized Loan
Program may not exceed $8,500.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) In order for a dependent
undergraduate student to receive this
additional loan amount, the financial
aid administrator must determine that
the student’s parent likely will be
precluded by exceptional circumstances
from borrowing under the Direct PLUS
Loan Program and the student’s family
is otherwise unable to provide the
student’s expected family contribution.
The financial aid administrator must
base the determination on a review of
the family financial information
provided by the student and
consideration of the student’s debt
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
ER01NO13.005
amount that is the same ratio to $2,000
as the lesser of the—
(2)(i) In the case of an independent
undergraduate student or certain
dependent undergraduate students
under the conditions specified in
paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section,
except as provided in paragraph (c)(3) of
this section, the total amount the
student may borrow for any period of
enrollment under the Direct
Unsubsidized Loan Program may not
exceed the amounts determined under
paragraph (a) of this section less any
amount received under the Direct
Subsidized Loan Program in
combination with the amounts
determined under paragraph (c) of this
section.
academic year of study under the Direct
Unsubsidized Loan Program is the same
as the amount determined under
paragraph (a) of this section, less any
amount received under the Direct
Subsidized Loan Program, plus—
(i) $2,000 for a program of study of at
least a full academic year in length.
(ii) For a program of study that is one
academic year or more in length with
less than a full academic year
remaining, the amount that is the same
ratio to $2,000 as the—
ER01NO13.004
credential or certification from a State
that is required for employment as a
teacher in an elementary or secondary
school in that State, the total amount the
student may borrow for any academic
year of study under the Direct
Subsidized Loan Program may not
exceed $5,500.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Direct Unsubsidized Loans. (1) In
the case of a dependent undergraduate
student, except as provided in
paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the total
amount a student may borrow for any
(iii) For a program of study that is less
than a full academic year in length, the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
(6) In the case of a student enrolled
for no longer than one consecutive 12month period in a course of study
necessary for enrollment in a program
leading to a degree or a certificate, the
total amount the student may borrow for
any academic year of study under the
Direct Subsidized Loan Program may
not exceed the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(7) In the case of a student who has
obtained a baccalaureate degree and is
enrolled or accepted for enrollment in
coursework necessary for a professional
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
burden and must document the
determination in the school’s file.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) The additional amount that a
student described in paragraph (c)(1)(i)
of this section may borrow under the
Direct Unsubsidized Loan Program for
any academic year of study may not
exceed the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Aggregate limits for subsidized
loans. The aggregate unpaid principal
amount of all Direct Subsidized Loans
and Subsidized Federal Stafford Loans
made to a student but excluding the
amount of capitalized interest may not
exceed the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Aggregate limits for unsubsidized
loans. The total amount of Direct
Unsubsidized Loans, Unsubsidized
Federal Stafford Loans, and Federal SLS
Loans, excluding the amount of
capitalized interest, may not exceed the
following:
(1) For a dependent undergraduate
student, $31,000 minus any Direct
Subsidized Loan and Subsidized
Federal Stafford Loan amounts, unless
the student qualifies under paragraph
(c) of this section for additional
eligibility or qualified for that additional
eligibility under the Federal SLS
Program.
(2) For an independent undergraduate
or a dependent undergraduate who
qualifies for additional eligibility under
paragraph (c) of this section or qualified
for this additional eligibility under the
Federal SLS Program, $57,500 minus
any Direct Subsidized Loan and
Subsidized Federal Stafford Loan
amounts.
(3) For a graduate or professional
student, $138,500, including any loans
for undergraduate study, minus any
Direct Subsidized Loan, Subsidized
Federal Stafford Loan, and Federal SLS
Program loan amounts.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 88. Section 685.204 is revised to read
as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
§ 685.204
Deferment.
(a) General. (1) A Direct Subsidized
Loan or Direct Subsidized Consolidation
Loan borrower who meets the
requirements described in paragraphs
(b), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), or (j) of this
section is eligible for a deferment during
which periodic installments of principal
and interest need not be paid.
(2) A Direct Unsubsidized Loan,
Direct Unsubsidized Consolidation
Loan, Direct PLUS Loan, or Direct PLUS
Consolidation Loan borrower who meets
the requirements described in
paragraphs (b) through (j) of this section
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
is eligible for a deferment during which
periodic installments of principal need
not be paid but interest does accrue and
is capitalized or paid by the borrower.
At or before the time a deferment is
granted, the Secretary provides
information, including an example, to
assist the borrower in understanding the
impact of capitalization of accrued,
unpaid interest on the borrower’s loan
principal and on the total amount of
interest to be paid over the life of the
loan.
(3) A borrower whose loan is in
default is not eligible for a deferment,
unless the borrower has made payment
arrangements satisfactory to the
Secretary.
(4)(i) To receive a deferment, except
as provided for in-school deferments
under paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) through (iv)
of this section, the borrower must
request the deferment and, except as
provided in paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this
section, provide the Secretary with all
information and documents required to
establish eligibility for the deferment.
(ii) In the case of a military service
deferment under paragraph (h) of this
section, a borrower’s representative may
request the deferment and provide the
required information and documents on
behalf of the borrower. If the Secretary
grants a military service deferment
based on a request from a borrower’s
representative, the Secretary notifies the
borrower that the deferment has been
granted and that the borrower has the
option to cancel the deferment and
continue to make payments on the loan.
The Secretary may also notify the
borrower’s representative of the
outcome of the deferment request.
(5)(i) After receiving a borrower’s
written or verbal request for a
deferment, the Secretary may grant a
graduate fellowship deferment under
paragraph (d), a rehabilitation training
deferment under paragraph (e), an
unemployment deferment under
paragraph (f), an economic hardship
deferment under paragraph (g), a
military service deferment under
paragraph (h), or a post-active duty
student deferment under paragraph (i)
of this section if the Secretary confirms
that the borrower has received a
deferment on a FFEL Program loan for
the same reason and during the same
time period.
(ii) The Secretary will grant a
deferment based on the information
obtained under paragraph (a)(5)(i) of
this section when determining a
borrower’s eligibility for a deferment,
unless the Secretary, as of the date of
the determination, has information
indicating that the borrower does not
qualify for the deferment. The Secretary
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65829
will resolve any discrepant information
before granting a deferment under
paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this section.
(iii) If the Secretary grants a deferment
under paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this section,
the Secretary notifies the borrower that
the deferment has been granted and that
the borrower has the option to cancel
the deferment and continue to make
payments on the loan.
(b) In-school deferment. (1) A Direct
Loan borrower is eligible for a
deferment during any period during
which—
(i) The borrower is carrying at least
one-half the normal full-time work load
for the course of study that the borrower
is pursuing, as determined by the
eligible school the borrower is
attending; and
(ii) The borrower is not serving in a
medical internship or residency
program, except for a residency program
in dentistry.
(2) For the purpose of paragraph (b)(1)
of this section, the Secretary processes
a deferment when—
(i) The borrower submits a request to
the Secretary along with documentation
verifying the borrower’s eligibility;
(ii) The Secretary receives information
from the borrower’s school indicating
that the borrower is eligible to receive
a new loan;
(iii) The Secretary receives student
status information from the borrower’s
school, either directly or indirectly,
indicating that the borrower is enrolled
on at least a half-time basis; or
(iv) The Secretary confirms a
borrower’s half-time enrollment status
through the use of the National Student
Loan Data System if requested to do so
by the school the borrower is attending.
(3)(i) Upon notification by the
Secretary that a deferment has been
granted based on paragraph (b)(2)(ii),
(iii), or (iv) of this section, the borrower
has the option to cancel the deferment
and continue to make payments on the
loan.
(ii) If the borrower elects to cancel the
deferment and continue to make
payments on the loan, the borrower has
the option to make the principal and
interest payments that were deferred. If
the borrower does not make the
payments, the Secretary applies a
deferment for the period in which
payments were not made and capitalizes
the interest.
(c) In-school deferments for Direct
PLUS Loan borrowers with loans first
disbursed on or after July 1, 2008. (1)(i)
A student Direct PLUS Loan borrower is
eligible for a deferment on a Direct
PLUS Loan first disbursed on or after
July 1, 2008 during the six-month
period that begins on the day after the
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
65830
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
student ceases to be enrolled on at least
a half-time basis at an eligible
institution.
(ii) If the Secretary grants an in-school
deferment to a student Direct PLUS
Loan borrower in accordance with
§ 685.204(b)(2)(ii), (iii), or (iv), the
deferment period for a Direct PLUS
Loan first disbursed on or after July 1,
2008 includes the six-month postenrollment period described in
paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section.
(2) A parent Direct PLUS Loan
borrower is eligible for a deferment on
a Direct PLUS Loan first disbursed on or
after July 1, 2008—
(i) Upon the request of the borrower,
during the period when the student on
whose behalf the loan was obtained is
enrolled at an eligible institution on at
least a half-time basis; and
(ii) Upon the request of the borrower,
during the six-month period that begins
on the later of the day after the student
on whose behalf the loan was obtained
ceases to be enrolled on at least a halftime basis or, if the parent borrower is
also a student, the day after the parent
borrower ceases to be enrolled on at
least a half-time basis.
(d) Graduate fellowship deferment. (1)
A Direct Loan borrower is eligible for a
deferment during any period in which
an authorized official of the borrower’s
graduate fellowship program certifies
that the borrower is pursuing a course
of study pursuant to an eligible graduate
fellowship program in accordance with
paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
(2)(i) To qualify for a deferment under
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, a
borrower must—
(A) Hold at least a baccalaureate
degree conferred by an institution of
higher education;
(B) Have been accepted or
recommended by an institution of
higher education for acceptance on a
full-time basis into an eligible graduate
fellowship program, as defined in
paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section; and
(C) Not be serving in a medical
internship or residency program, except
for a residency program in dentistry.
(ii) An eligible graduate fellowship
program is a fellowship program that—
(A) Provides sufficient financial
support to graduate fellows to allow for
full-time study for at least six months;
(B) Requires a written statement from
each applicant explaining the
applicant’s objectives before the award
of that financial support;
(C) Requires a graduate fellow to
submit periodic reports, projects, or
evidence of the fellow’s progress; and
(D) In the case of a course of study at
a foreign university, accepts the course
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
of study for completion of the
fellowship program.
(e) Rehabilitation training program
deferment. (1) A Direct Loan borrower is
eligible for a deferment during any
period in which an authorized official of
the borrower’s rehabilitation training
program certifies that the borrower is
pursuing an eligible rehabilitation
training program for individuals with
disabilities in accordance with
paragraph (e)(2) of this section.
(2) For purposes of paragraph (e)(1) of
this section, an eligible rehabilitation
training program for disabled
individuals is a program that—
(i) Is licensed, approved, certified, or
otherwise recognized as providing
rehabilitation training to disabled
individuals by—
(A) A State agency with responsibility
for vocational rehabilitation programs;
(B) A State agency with responsibility
for drug abuse treatment programs;
(C) A State agency with responsibility
for mental health services programs;
(D) A State agency with responsibility
for alcohol abuse treatment programs; or
(E) The Department of Veterans
Affairs; and
(ii) Provides or will provide the
borrower with rehabilitation services
under a written plan that—
(A) Is individualized to meet the
borrower’s needs;
(B) Specifies the date on which the
services to the borrower are expected to
end; and
(C) Is structured in a way that requires
a substantial commitment by the
borrower to his or her rehabilitation.
The Secretary considers a substantial
commitment by the borrower to be a
commitment of time and effort that
normally would prevent an individual
from engaging in full-time employment,
either because of the number of hours
that must be devoted to rehabilitation or
because of the nature of the
rehabilitation. For the purpose of this
paragraph, full-time employment
involves at least 30 hours of work per
week and is expected to last at least
three months.
(f) Unemployment deferment. (1) A
Direct Loan borrower is eligible for a
deferment during periods that,
collectively, do not exceed three years
in which the borrower is seeking and
unable to find full-time employment.
(2) A borrower qualifies for an
unemployment deferment by—
(i) Providing evidence of eligibility for
unemployment benefits to the Secretary;
or
(ii) Providing to the Secretary a
written certification, or an equivalent as
approved by the Secretary, that—
(A) The borrower has registered with
a public or private employment agency,
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
if one is available to the borrower
within a 50-mile radius of the
borrower’s current address; and
(B) For all requests beyond the initial
request, the borrower has made at least
six diligent attempts during the
preceding six-month period to secure
full-time employment.
(3) For purposes of obtaining an
unemployment deferment under
paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section, the
following rules apply:
(i) A borrower may qualify for an
unemployment deferment whether or
not the borrower has been previously
employed.
(ii) An unemployment deferment is
not justified if the borrower refuses to
seek or accept employment in kinds of
positions or at salary and responsibility
levels for which the borrower feels
overqualified by virtue of education or
previous experience.
(iii) Full-time employment involves at
least 30 hours of work a week and is
expected to last at least three months.
(iv) The initial period of
unemployment deferment may be
granted for a period of unemployment
beginning up to six months before the
date the Secretary receives the
borrower’s request, and may be granted
for up to six months after that date.
(4) The Secretary does not grant an
unemployment deferment beyond the
date that is six months after the date the
borrower provides evidence of the
borrower’s eligibility for unemployment
insurance benefits under paragraph
(f)(2)(i) of this section or the date the
borrower provides the written
certification, or an approved equivalent,
under paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section.
(g) Economic hardship deferment.
(1)(i) A Direct Loan borrower is eligible
for a deferment during periods that,
collectively, do not exceed three years
in which the borrower has experienced
or will experience an economic
hardship in accordance with paragraph
(g)(2) of this section.
(ii) An economic hardship deferment
is granted for periods of up to one year
at a time, except that a borrower who
receives a deferment under paragraph
(g)(2)(iv) of this section may receive an
economic hardship deferment for the
lesser of the borrower’s full term of
service in the Peace Corps or the
borrower’s remaining period of
economic hardship deferment eligibility
under the 3-year maximum.
(2) A borrower qualifies for an
economic hardship deferment if the
borrower—
(i) Has been granted an economic
hardship deferment under either the
FFEL or the Federal Perkins Loan
programs for the period of time for
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
which the borrower has requested an
economic hardship deferment for his or
her Direct Loan;
(ii) Is receiving payment under a
Federal or State public assistance
program, such as Aid to Families with
Dependent Children, Supplemental
Security Income, Food Stamps, or State
general public assistance;
(iii) Is working full-time (as defined in
paragraph (g)(3)(iii) of this section) and
has a monthly income (as defined in
paragraph (g)(3)(iv) of this section) that
does not exceed the greater of (as
calculated on a monthly basis)—
(A) The minimum wage rate described
in section 6 of the Fair Labor Standards
Act of 1938; or
(B) An amount equal to 150 percent
of the poverty guideline applicable to
the borrower’s family size (as defined in
paragraph (g)(3)(v) of this section) as
published annually by the Department
of Health and Human Services pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. 9902(2). If a borrower is not
a resident of a State identified in the
poverty guidelines, the poverty
guideline to be used for the borrower is
the poverty guideline (for the relevant
family size) used for the 48 contiguous
States; or
(iv) Is serving as a volunteer in the
Peace Corps.
(3) The following rules apply to a
deferment granted under paragraph
(g)(2)(iii) of this section:
(i) For an initial period of deferment,
the Secretary requires the borrower to
submit evidence showing the amount of
the borrower’s monthly income.
(ii) To qualify for a subsequent period
of deferment that begins less than one
year after the end of a period of
deferment under paragraph (g)(2)(iii) of
this section, the Secretary requires the
borrower to submit evidence showing
the amount of the borrower’s monthly
income or a copy of the borrower’s most
recently filed Federal income tax return.
(iii) A borrower is considered to be
working full-time if the borrower is
expected to be employed for at least
three consecutive months at 30 hours
per week.
(iv) A borrower’s monthly income is
the gross amount of income received by
the borrower from employment and
from other sources, or one-twelfth of the
borrower’s adjusted gross income, as
recorded on the borrower’s most
recently filed Federal income tax return.
(v) Family size means the number that
is determined by counting the borrower,
the borrower’s spouse, and the
borrower’s children, including unborn
children who will be born during the
period covered by the deferment, if the
children receive more than half their
support from the borrower. A borrower’s
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
family size includes other individuals if,
at the time the borrower requests the
economic hardship deferment, the other
individuals—
(A) Live with the borrower; and
(B) Receive more than half their
support from the borrower and will
continue to receive this support from
the borrower for the year the borrower
certifies family size. Support includes
money, gifts, loans, housing, food,
clothes, car, medical and dental care,
and payment of college costs.
(h) Military service deferment. (1) A
Direct Loan borrower is eligible for a
deferment during any period in which
the borrower is—
(i) Serving on active duty during a
war or other military operation or
national emergency, as defined in
paragraph (h)(5) of this section; or
(ii) Performing qualifying National
Guard duty during a war or other
military operation or national
emergency, as defined in paragraph
(h)(5) of this section.
(2) For a borrower whose active duty
service includes October 1, 2007, or
begins on or after that date, the
deferment period ends 180 days after
the demobilization date for each period
of the service described in paragraphs
(h)(1)(i) and (h)(1)(ii) of this section.
(3) Without supporting
documentation, the military service
deferment will be granted to an
otherwise eligible borrower for a period
not to exceed the initial 12 months from
the date the qualifying eligible service
began based on a request from the
borrower or the borrower’s
representative.
(4) The provisions of paragraph (h) of
this section do not authorize the
refunding of any payments made by or
on behalf of a borrower during a period
for which the borrower qualified for a
military service deferment.
(5) As used in paragraph (h) of this
section—
(i) Serving on active duty during a war
or other military operation or national
emergency means service by an
individual who is—
(A) A Reserve of an Armed Force
ordered to active duty under 10 U.S.C.
12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, or
12306;
(B) A retired member of an Armed
Force ordered to active duty under 10
U.S.C. 688 for service in connection
with a war or other military operation
or national emergency, regardless of the
location at which such active duty
service is performed; or
(C) Any other member of an Armed
Force on active duty in connection with
such emergency or subsequent actions
or conditions who has been assigned to
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65831
a duty station at a location other than
the location at which the member is
normally assigned;
(ii) Qualifying National Guard duty
during a war or other operation or
national emergency means service as a
member of the National Guard on fulltime National Guard duty, as defined in
10 U.S.C. 101(d)(5) under a call to active
service authorized by the President or
the Secretary of Defense for a period of
more than 30 consecutive days under 32
U.S.C. 502(f) in connection with a war,
other military operation, or national
emergency declared by the President
and supported by Federal funds;
(iii) Active duty means active duty as
defined in 10 U.S.C. 101(d)(1) except
that it does not include active duty for
training or attendance at a service
school;
(iv) Military operation means a
contingency operation as defined in 10
U.S.C. 101(a)(13); and
(v) National emergency means the
national emergency by reason of certain
terrorist attacks declared by the
President on September 14, 2001, or
subsequent national emergencies
declared by the President by reason of
terrorist attacks.
(i) Post-active duty student deferment.
(1) A Direct Loan borrower is eligible for
a deferment for 13 months following the
conclusion of the borrower’s active duty
military service and any applicable
grace period if—
(i) The borrower is a member of the
National Guard or other reserve
component of the Armed Forces of the
United States or a member of such
forces in retired status; and
(ii) The borrower was enrolled on at
least a half-time basis in a program of
instruction at an eligible institution at
the time, or within six months prior to
the time, the borrower was called to
active duty.
(2) As used in paragraph (i)(1) of this
section, ‘‘active duty’’ means active duty
as defined in 10 U.S.C. 101(d)(1) for at
least a 30-day period, except that—
(i) Active duty includes active State
duty for members of the National Guard
under which a Governor activates
National Guard personnel based on
State statute or policy and the activities
of the National Guard are paid for with
State funds;
(ii) Active duty includes full-time
National Guard duty under which a
Governor is authorized, with the
approval of the President or the U.S.
Secretary of Defense, to order a member
to State active duty and the activities of
the National Guard are paid for with
Federal funds;
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65832
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
(iii) Active duty does not include
active duty for training or attendance at
a service school; and
(iv) Active duty does not include
employment in a full-time, permanent
position in the National Guard unless
the borrower employed in such a
position is reassigned to active duty
under paragraph (i)(2)(i) of this section
or full-time National Guard duty under
paragraph (i)(2)(ii) of this section.
(3) If the borrower returns to enrolled
student status on at least a half-time
basis during the grace period or the 13month deferment period, the deferment
expires at the time the borrower returns
to enrolled student status on at least a
half-time basis.
(4) If a borrower qualifies for both a
military service deferment and a postactive duty student deferment, the 180day post-demobilization military service
deferment period and the 13-month
post-active duty student deferment
period apply concurrently.
(j) Additional deferments for Direct
Loan borrowers with FFEL Program
loans made before July 1, 1993. If, at the
time of application for a borrower’s first
Direct Loan, a borrower has an
outstanding balance of principal or
interest owing on any FFEL Program
loan that was made, insured, or
guaranteed prior to July 1, 1993, the
borrower is eligible for a deferment
during—
(1) The periods described in
paragraphs (b) through (i) of this
section; and
(2) The periods described in 34 CFR
682.210(b), including those periods that
apply to a ‘‘new borrower’’ as that term
is defined in 34 CFR 682.210(b)(7).
(Approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under control
number 1845–0021)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.)
■ 89. Section 685.205 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (a)(4), removing the
word ‘‘or’’ that appears after the
punctuation ‘‘;’’.
■ B. Revising paragraph (a)(5).
■ C. Adding new paragraphs (a)(8) and
(a)(9).
■ D. In paragraph (b)(2), removing the
words ‘‘authorized deferment period’’
and adding, in their place, the words
‘‘authorized deferment or forbearance
period’’.
The additions read as follows:
§ 685.205
Forbearance.
(a) * * *
(5)(i) The borrower is performing the
type of service that would qualify the
borrower for loan forgiveness under the
requirements of the teacher loan
forgiveness program in § 685.217.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
(ii) Before a forbearance is granted
under § 685.205(a)(5)(i), the borrower
must—
(A) Submit documentation for the
period of the annual forbearance request
showing the beginning and ending dates
that the borrower is expected to
perform, for that year, the type of
service described in § 685.217(c); and
(B) Certify the borrower’s intent to
satisfy the requirements of § 685.217(c).
(iii) The Secretary grants forbearance
under paragraph (a)(5) of this section
only if the Secretary believes, at the
time of the borrower’s annual request,
that the expected forgiveness amount
under § 685.217(d) will satisfy the
anticipated remaining outstanding
balance on the borrower’s loan at the
time of the expected forgiveness;
*
*
*
*
*
(8)(i) The Secretary may grant a
forbearance to permit a borrower or
endorser to resume honoring the
agreement to repay the debt after
default. The terms of the forbearance
agreement in this situation must include
a new agreement to repay the debt
signed by the borrower or endorser or a
written or oral affirmation of the
borrower’s or endorser’s obligation to
repay the debt.
(ii) If the forbearance is based on the
borrower’s or endorser’s oral affirmation
of the obligation to repay the debt, the
forbearance period is limited to 120
days, such a forbearance is not granted
consecutively, and the Secretary will—
(A) Orally review with the borrower
the terms and conditions of the
forbearance, including the consequences
of interest capitalization, and all other
repayment options available to the
borrower;
(B) Send a notice to the borrower or
endorser that confirms the terms of the
forbearance and the borrower’s or
endorser’s affirmation of the obligation
to repay the debt and that includes
information on all other repayment
options available to the borrower; and
(C) Retain a record of the terms of the
forbearance and affirmation in the
borrower’s or endorser’s file.
(iii) For purposes of this section, an
‘‘affirmation’’ means an
acknowledgement of the loan by the
borrower or endorser in a legally
binding manner. The form of the
affirmation may include, but is not
limited to, the borrower’s or
endorser’s—
(A) New signed repayment agreement
or schedule, or another form of signed
agreement to repay the debt;
(B) Oral acknowledgement and
agreement to repay the debt
documented by the Secretary in the
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
borrower’s or endorser’s file and
confirmed by the Secretary in a notice
to the borrower; or
(C) A payment made on the loan by
the borrower or endorser.
(9)(i) The borrower is performing the
type of service that would qualify the
borrower for a partial repayment of his
or her loan under the Student Loan
Repayment Programs administered by
the Department of Defense under 10
U.S.C. 2171, 2173, 2174, or any other
student loan repayment programs
administered by the Department of
Defense.
(ii) To receive a forbearance under
this paragraph, the borrower must
submit documentation showing the time
period during which the Department of
Defense considers the borrower to be
eligible for a partial repayment of his or
her loan under a student loan
repayment program.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 685.206
[Amended]
90. Section 685.206 is amended by:
A. In the introductory text of
paragraph (a), removing the word
‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘must’’.
■ B. In paragraph (b)(1), removing the
word ‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘must’’.
■ C. In paragraph (b)(2), removing the
word ‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘must’’.
■ D. In paragraph (c)(1)(iv), removing
the words ‘‘Credit bureau’’ and adding,
in their place, the words ‘‘Consumer
reporting agency’’.
■ E. In paragraph (c)(2)(iii), removing
the words ‘‘credit bureaus’’ and adding,
in their place, the words ‘‘consumer
reporting agencies’’.
■ 91. Section 685.207 is amended by:
■ A. Revising paragraph (a)(2).
■ B. Adding a new paragraph (a)(3).
■ C. In paragraph (b)(1)(ii), removing the
citation ‘‘§ 685.204’’ and adding, in its
place, the citation ’’§ 685.204(b)’’.
■ D. Revising paragraph (b)(3).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
§ 685.207
Obligation to repay.
(a) * * *
(2) The borrower’s repayment of a
Direct Loan may also be subject to the
deferment provisions in § 685.204, the
forbearance provisions in § 685.205, the
discharge provisions in § 685.212, and
the loan forgiveness provisions in
§§ 685.217 and 685.219.
(3) A borrower’s first payment on a
Direct Loan is due within 60 days of the
beginning date of the repayment period
as determined in accordance with
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
paragraph (b), (c), (d), or (e) of this
section.
(b) * * *
(3)(i) A borrower is not obligated to
pay interest on a Direct Subsidized Loan
during periods when the borrower is
enrolled at an eligible school on at least
a half-time basis unless the borrower is
required to make payments on the loan
during those periods under paragraph
(b)(1) of this section.
(ii) Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(3)(iii) of this section, a borrower is
not obligated to pay interest on a Direct
Subsidized Loan during grace periods.
(iii) In the case of a Direct Subsidized
Loan for which the first disbursement is
made on or after July 1, 2012 and before
July 1, 2014, a borrower is responsible
for the interest that accrues during the
grace period.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 685.220(d)(1)(ii)(A)(3) may not change
to another repayment plan unless—
(i) The borrower was required to and
did make a payment under the incomecontingent repayment plan or incomebased repayment plan in each of the
prior three months; or
*
*
*
*
*
■ 94. Section 685.211 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (d)(3)(i), removing the
words ‘‘national credit bureaus’’ and
adding, in their place, the words
‘‘nationwide consumer reporting
agencies’’.
■ B. In paragraph (d)(3)(ii), removing
the words ‘‘income contingent’’ and
adding, in their place, the words
‘‘income-contingent’’.
■ C. Revising paragraph (f).
The revision reads as follows:
§ 685.208
*
[Amended]
92. Section 685.208 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (a)(5), removing the
words ‘‘income contingent’’ and adding,
in their place, the words ‘‘incomecontingent’’.
■ B. In paragraph (j)(1), removing the
word ‘‘then’’ and adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘than’’.
■ C. In paragraph (m)(1), adding the
words ‘‘or, for a new borrower as of July
1, 2014, as defined in § 685.221(a)(4), 10
percent’’ immediately after the words
‘‘15 percent’’.
■ 93. Section 685.210 is amended by:
■ A. Revising paragraph (a)(2).
■ B. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (b)(1).
■ C. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(i).
■ D. In paragraph (b)(2)(i), removing the
words ‘‘income contingent’’ and adding,
in their place, the words ‘‘incomecontingent’’.
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
§ 685.210
Choice of repayment plan.
(a) * * *
(2) If a borrower does not select a
repayment plan, the Secretary
designates the standard repayment plan
described in § 685.208(b) or (c) for the
borrower, as applicable.
(b) * * *
(1) A borrower may change repayment
plans at any time after the loan has
entered repayment by notifying the
Secretary. However, a borrower who is
repaying a defaulted loan under an
income-contingent repayment plan or
the income-based repayment plan in
accordance with § 685.211(d)(3)(ii), or
who is repaying a Direct Consolidation
Loan under the income-contingent
repayment plan or the income-based
repayment plan in accordance with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
§ 685.211 Miscellaneous repayment
provisions.
*
*
*
*
(f) Rehabilitation of defaulted loans.
(1) A defaulted Direct Loan, except for
a loan on which a judgment has been
obtained, is rehabilitated if the borrower
makes 9 voluntary, reasonable and
affordable monthly payments within 20
days of the due date during 10
consecutive months. The Secretary
determines the amount of a borrower’s
reasonable and affordable payment on
the basis of a borrower’s total financial
circumstances.
(i) The Secretary initially considers
the borrower’s reasonable and affordable
payment amount to be an amount equal
to 15 percent of the amount by which
the borrower’s AGI exceeds 150 percent
of the poverty guideline amount
applicable to the borrower’s family size
and State, divided by 12, except that if
this amount is less than $5, the
borrower’s monthly rehabilitation
payment is $5.
(ii) The Secretary may calculate the
payment amount based on information
provided orally by the borrower or the
borrower’s representative and provide
the borrower with a rehabilitation
agreement using that amount. The
Secretary requires the borrower to
provide documentation to confirm the
borrower’s AGI and family size. If the
borrower does not provide the Secretary
with any documentation requested by
the Secretary to calculate or confirm the
reasonable and affordable payment
amount within a reasonable time
deadline set by the Secretary, the
rehabilitation agreement provided is
null and void.
(iii) A reasonable and affordable
payment amount is not—
(A) A required minimum loan
payment amount (e.g., $50) if the
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65833
Secretary determines that a smaller
amount is reasonable and affordable;
(B) A percentage of the borrower’s
total loan balance; or
(C) Based on other criteria unrelated
to the borrower’s total financial
circumstances.
(iv) Within 15 business days of the
Secretary’s determination of the
borrower’s loan rehabilitation payment
amount, the Secretary provides the
borrower with a written rehabilitation
agreement which includes the
borrower’s reasonable and affordable
payment amount, a prominent statement
that the borrower may object orally or in
writing to the reasonable and affordable
payment amount with the method and
timeframe for raising such an objection,
a statement that the rehabilitation is
null and void if the borrower does not
provide the documentation required to
calculate the reasonable and affordable
payment amount, and an explanation of
any other terms and conditions
applicable to the required series of
payments that must be made. To accept
the agreement, the borrower must sign
and return the agreement or accept the
agreement electronically under a
process provided by the Secretary. The
Secretary does not impose any other
conditions unrelated to the amount or
timing of the rehabilitation payments in
the rehabilitation agreement. The
written rehabilitation agreement informs
the borrower of the effects of having the
loans rehabilitated (e.g., removal of the
record of default from the borrower’s
credit history and return to normal
repayment).
(2) The Secretary provides the
borrower with a written statement
confirming the borrower’s reasonable
and affordable payment amount, as
determined by the Secretary, and
explaining any other terms and
conditions applicable to the required
series of payments that must be made
before the borrower’s account can be
rehabilitated. The statement informs the
borrower that the borrower may object
to the terms and conditions of the
rehabilitation agreement, and explains
the method and timeframe for objecting
to the terms and conditions of the
rehabilitation agreement.
(3) If the borrower objects to the
monthly payment amount determined
under paragraph (f)(1) of this section,
the Secretary recalculates the payment
based solely on information provided on
a form approved by the Secretary and,
if requested, supporting documentation
from the borrower and other sources,
and considers—
(i) The borrower’s, and if applicable,
the spouse’s current disposable income,
including public assistance payments,
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
65834
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
and other income received by the
borrower and the spouse, such as
welfare benefits, Social Security
benefits, Supplemental Security Income,
and workers’ compensation. Spousal
income is not considered if the spouse
does not contribute to the borrower’s
household income;
(ii) Family size as defined in
§ 685.221(a)(3); and
(iii) Reasonable and necessary
expenses, which include—
(A) Food;
(B) Housing;
(C) Utilities;
(D) Basic communication expenses;
(E) Necessary medical and dental
costs;
(F) Necessary insurance costs;
(G) Transportation costs;
(H) Dependent care and other workrelated expenses;
(I) Legally required child and spousal
support;
(J) Other title IV and non-title IV
student loan payments; and
(K) Other expenses approved by the
Secretary.
(4) The Secretary provides the
borrower with a new written
rehabilitation agreement confirming the
borrower’s recalculated reasonable and
affordable payment amount. To accept
the agreement, the borrower must sign
and return the agreement or accept the
agreement electronically under a
process provided by the Secretary.
(5) The Secretary includes any
payment made under paragraph (1) of
the definition of ‘‘satisfactory repayment
arrangement’’ in § 685.102(b) in
determining whether the 9 out of 10
payments required under paragraph
(f)(1) of this section have been made.
(6) A borrower may request that the
monthly payment amount be adjusted
due to a change in the borrower’s total
financial circumstances only upon
providing the documentation specified
in paragraph (f)(3) of this section.
(7) During the rehabilitation period,
the Secretary limits contact with the
borrower on the loan being rehabilitated
to collection activities that are required
by law or regulation and to
communications that support the
rehabilitation.
(8) If a defaulted loan is rehabilitated,
the Secretary instructs any consumer
reporting agency to which the default
was reported to remove the default from
the borrower’s credit history.
(9) A defaulted Direct Loan on which
a judgment has been obtained may not
be rehabilitated.
(10) A Direct Loan obtained by fraud
for which the borrower has been
convicted of, or has pled nolo
contendere or guilty to, a crime
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
involving fraud in obtaining title IV,
HEA program assistance may not be
rehabilitated.
(11)(i) If a borrower’s loan is being
collected by administrative wage
garnishment while the borrower is also
making monthly payments on the same
loan under a loan rehabilitation
agreement, the Secretary continues
collecting the loan by administrative
wage garnishment until the borrower
makes five qualifying monthly
payments under the rehabilitation
agreement, unless the Secretary is
otherwise precluded from doing so.
(ii) After the borrower makes the fifth
qualifying monthly payment, the
Secretary, unless otherwise directed by
the borrower, suspends the garnishment
order issued to the borrower’s employer.
(iii) A borrower may only obtain the
benefit of a suspension of administrative
wage garnishment while also attempting
to rehabilitate a defaulted loan once.
(12) Effective for any defaulted Direct
Loan that is rehabilitated on or after
August 14, 2008, the borrower cannot
rehabilitate the loan again if the loan
returns to default status following the
rehabilitation.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 685.212
[Amended]
95. Section 685.212 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (a)(3), removing the
words ‘‘Direct PLUS Consolidation
Loan’’ and adding, in their place, the
words ‘‘Direct Consolidation Loan’’.
■ B. In paragraph (b), removing the
citation ‘‘§ 685.213(c)’’ and adding, in
its place, the citation ‘‘§ 685.213’’.
■ 96. Section 685.214 is amended by:
■ A. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(ii).
■ B. Revising paragraph (b)(4).
■ C. Revising paragraph (c).
■ D. In paragraph (d)(1), removing the
word ‘‘shall’’ each time it appears and
adding, in its place, the word ‘‘must’’.
■ E. In paragraph (f)(1), removing the
number and words ‘‘90 days’’ and
adding, in their place, the number and
words ‘‘120 days’’.
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
§ 685.214
Closed school discharge.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) ‘‘School’’ means a school’s main
campus or any location or branch of the
main campus, regardless of whether the
school or its location or branch is
considered eligible.
(b) * * *
(4) The Secretary reports the
discharge of a loan under this section to
all consumer reporting agencies to
which the Secretary previously reported
the status of the loan, so as to delete all
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
adverse credit history assigned to the
loan.
(c) Borrower qualification for
discharge. (1) In order to qualify for
discharge of a loan under this section,
a borrower must submit to the Secretary
a written request and sworn statement,
and the factual assertions in the
statement must be true. The statement
need not be notarized but must be made
by the borrower under penalty of
perjury. In the statement, the borrower
must—
(i) State that the borrower (or the
student on whose behalf a parent
borrowed)—
(A) Received the proceeds of a loan,
in whole or in part, on or after January
1, 1986 to attend a school;
(B) Did not complete the program of
study at that school because the school
closed while the student was enrolled,
or the student withdrew from the school
not more than 120 days before the
school closed. The Secretary may
extend the 120-day period if the
Secretary determines that exceptional
circumstances related to a school’s
closing justify an extension. Exceptional
circumstances for this purpose may
include, but are not limited to: the
school’s loss of accreditation; the
school’s discontinuation of the majority
of its academic programs; action by the
State to revoke the school’s license to
operate or award academic credentials
in the State; or a finding by a State or
Federal government agency that the
school violated State or Federal law;
and
(C) Did not complete the program of
study through a teach-out at another
school or by transferring academic
credits or hours earned at the closed
school to another school;
(ii) State whether the borrower (or
student) has made a claim with respect
to the school’s closing with any third
party, such as the holder of a
performance bond or a tuition recovery
program, and, if so, the amount of any
payment received by the borrower (or
student) or credited to the borrower’s
loan obligation; and
(iii) State that the borrower (or
student)—
(A) Agrees to provide to the Secretary
upon request other documentation
reasonably available to the borrower
that demonstrates that the borrower
meets the qualifications for discharge
under this section; and
(B) Agrees to cooperate with the
Secretary in enforcement actions in
accordance with paragraph (d) of this
section and to transfer any right to
recovery against a third party to the
Secretary in accordance with paragraph
(e) of this section.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(2) The Secretary may discharge a
loan under this section without an
application from the borrower if the
Secretary determines, based on
information in the Secretary’s
possession, that the borrower qualifies
for the discharge.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 97. Section 685.215 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (a)(1)(iv), removing
the citation ‘‘§ 682.402(e)(14)’’ and
adding, in its place, the words
‘‘paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of this section’’.
■ B. Revising paragraph (b)(5).
■ C. In the introductory text of
paragraph (c), removing the word
‘‘shall’’ each time it appears and adding,
in its place, the word ‘‘must’’.
■ D. In the introductory text of
paragraph (c)(1), removing the word
‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘must’’.
■ E. In the introductory text of
paragraph (c)(2), removing the word
‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘must’’.
■ F. In the introductory text of
paragraph (c)(3), removing the word
‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘must’’.
■ G. Revising paragraph (c)(4).
■ H. In paragraph (c)(5), removing the
word ‘‘shall’’ and adding, it its place,
the word ‘‘must’’.
■ I. In the introductory text of paragraph
(c)(6), removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and
adding, in its place, the word ‘‘must’’.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 685.215 Discharge for false certification
of student eligibility or unauthorized
payment.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) The Secretary reports the
discharge under this section to all
consumer reporting agencies to which
the Secretary previously reported the
status of the loan, so as to delete all
adverse credit history assigned to the
loan.
(c) * * *
(4) Identity theft. (i) In the case of an
individual whose eligibility to borrow
was falsely certified because he or she
was a victim of the crime of identity
theft and is requesting a discharge, the
individual must—
(A) Certify that the individual did not
sign the promissory note, or that any
other means of identification used to
obtain the loan was used without the
authorization of the individual claiming
relief;
(B) Certify that the individual did not
receive or benefit from the proceeds of
the loan with knowledge that the loan
had been made without the
authorization of the individual;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
(C) Provide a copy of a local, State, or
Federal court verdict or judgment that
conclusively determines that the
individual who is named as the
borrower of the loan was the victim of
a crime of identity theft; and
(D) If the judicial determination of the
crime does not expressly state that the
loan was obtained as a result of the
crime of identity theft, provide—
(1) Authentic specimens of the
signature of the individual, as provided
in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section, or
of other means of identification of the
individual, as applicable, corresponding
to the means of identification falsely
used to obtain the loan; and
(2) A statement of facts that
demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the
Secretary, that eligibility for the loan in
question was falsely certified as a result
of the crime of identity theft committed
against that individual.
(ii)(A) For purposes of this section,
identity theft is defined as the
unauthorized use of the identifying
information of another individual that is
punishable under 18 U.S.C. 1028,
1028A, 1029, or 1030, or substantially
comparable State or local law.
(B) Identifying information includes,
but is not limited to—
(1) Name, Social Security number,
date of birth, official State or
government issued driver’s license or
identification number, alien registration
number, government passport number,
and employer or taxpayer identification
number;
(2) Unique biometric data, such as
fingerprints, voiceprint, retina or iris
image, or unique physical
representation;
(3) Unique electronic identification
number, address, or routing code; or
(4) Telecommunication identifying
information or access device (as defined
in 18 U.S.C. 1029(e)).
*
*
*
*
*
§ 685.216
[Amended]
98. Section 685.216(b)(2) is amended
by removing the word ‘‘credit’’ and
adding, in its place, the word
‘‘consumer’’.
■ 99. Section 685.217 is amended by:
■ A. Revising paragraph (a)(1).
■ B. In the last sentence of paragraph
(a)(2)(i), adding the word ‘‘for’’
immediately before the words ‘‘an
eligible educational service agency’’.
■ C. In paragraph (a)(2)(iii), removing
the word ‘‘at’’ each time it appears and
adding, in its place, the word ‘‘for’’.
■ D. In paragraph (a)(3), removing the
words ‘‘FFEL and Direct Loan’’ and
adding, in their place, the words ‘‘Direct
Loan and FFEL’’.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65835
E. In the introductory text of
paragraph (a)(4), removing the words
‘‘FFEL and Direct Loan’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘Direct Loan and
FFEL’’.
■ F. In paragraph (a)(4)(i), removing the
word ‘‘at’’ the second time it appears
and adding, in its place, the word ‘‘by’’.
■ G. In paragraph (a)(4)(ii), adding the
words ‘‘by an eligible’’ immediately
before the words ‘‘educational service
agency’’.
■ H. In the introductory text of
paragraph (c)(1), adding the word ‘‘by’’
immediately before the words ‘‘an
educational service agency’’.
■ I. In paragraph (c)(1)(iii), removing the
last sentence.
■ J. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(2)
through (c)(11) as paragraphs (c)(3)
through (c)(12), respectively.
■ K. Adding a new paragraph (c)(2).
■ L. In redesignated paragraph
(c)(4)(ii)(A), removing the word ‘‘at’’ the
second time it appears and adding, in its
place, the word ‘‘for’’.
■ M. In redesignated paragraph
(c)(4)(ii)(B), adding the words ‘‘for an
eligible’’ immediately before the words
‘‘educational service agency’’.
■ N. In redesignated paragraph
(c)(4)(iii), removing the word ‘‘at’’ each
time it appears and adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘for’’.
■ O. In redesignated paragraph (c)(5)(i),
adding the words ‘‘for an eligible’’
immediately before the words
‘‘educational service agency’’.
■ P. In redesignated paragraph
(c)(5)(ii)(A), removing the word ‘‘at’’ the
second time it appears and adding, in its
place, the word ‘‘for’’.
■ Q. In redesignated paragraph
(c)(5)(ii)(B), adding the words ‘‘for an
eligible’’ immediately before the words
‘‘educational service agency’’.
■ R. In redesignated paragraph
(c)(5)(iii), removing the word ‘‘at’’ each
time it appears and adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘for’’.
■ S. Revising the introductory text of
redesignated paragraph (c)(7).
■ T. Revising redesignated paragraph
(c)(9).
■ U. Revising redesignated paragraph
(c)(10).
■ V. Adding a new paragraph (c)(13).
■ W. Revising paragraph (d)(1).
■ X. In paragraph (d)(2), removing the
words ‘‘paragraphs (c)(3)(ii) or (c)(4)(ii)’’
and adding, in their place, the words
‘‘paragraph (c)(4)(ii) or (c)(5)(ii)’’.
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
§ 685.217
program.
Teacher loan forgiveness
(a) * * *
(1) The teacher loan forgiveness
program is intended to encourage
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
65836
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
individuals to enter and continue in the
teaching profession. For new borrowers,
the Secretary repays the amount
specified in this paragraph (a) on the
borrower’s Direct Subsidized Loans,
Direct Unsubsidized Loans, Subsidized
and Unsubsidized Federal Stafford
Loans, and in certain cases, Direct
Consolidation Loans or Federal
Consolidation Loans. The forgiveness
program is only available to a borrower
who has no outstanding loan balance
under the Direct Loan Program or the
FFEL Program on October 1, 1998, or
who has no outstanding loan balance on
the date he or she obtains a loan after
October 1, 1998.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) The Secretary considers all
elementary and secondary schools
operated by the Bureau of Indian
Education (BIE) or operated on Indian
reservations by Indian tribal groups
under contract with the BIE to qualify
as schools serving low-income students.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) For teacher loan forgiveness
applications received by the Secretary
on or after July 1, 2006, a teacher in a
private, non-profit elementary or
secondary school who is exempt from
State certification requirements (unless
otherwise applicable under State law)
may qualify for loan forgiveness under
paragraphs (c)(4)(ii) or (c)(5) of this
section if—
*
*
*
*
*
(9) A borrower’s period of
postsecondary education, qualifying
FMLA condition, or military active duty
as described in paragraph (c)(8) of this
section, including the time necessary for
the borrower to resume qualifying
teaching no later than the beginning of
the next regularly scheduled academic
year, does not constitute a break in the
required five consecutive years of
qualifying teaching service.
(10) A borrower who was employed as
a teacher at more than one qualifying
school, for more than one qualifying
educational service agency, or a
combination of both during an academic
year and demonstrates that the
combined teaching was the equivalent
of full-time, as supported by the
certification of one or more of the chief
administrative officers of the schools or
educational service agencies involved,
is considered to have completed one
academic year of qualifying teaching.
*
*
*
*
*
(13) A borrower may request
forbearance during each of the five years
of qualifying teaching service in
accordance with § 685.205(a)(5).
(d) * * *
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
(1) A qualified borrower is eligible for
forgiveness of up to $5,000, or up to
$17,500 if the borrower meets the
requirements of paragraph (c)(4)(ii) or
(c)(5)(ii) of this section. The forgiveness
amount is deducted from the aggregate
amount of the borrower’s Direct
Subsidized Loan or Direct Unsubsidized
Loan or Direct Consolidation Loan
obligation that is outstanding after the
borrower completes his or her fifth
consecutive complete academic year of
teaching as described in paragraph (c) of
this section. Only the outstanding
portion of the Direct Consolidation Loan
that was used to repay an eligible Direct
Subsidized Loan, an eligible Direct
Unsubsidized Loan, or an eligible
Subsidized or Unsubsidized Federal
Stafford Loan qualifies for loan
forgiveness under this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 100. Section 685.218 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (b)(4), removing the
words ‘‘FFEL or Direct’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘Direct or FFEL’’.
■ B. Revising paragraph (d)(3).
■ C. In paragraph (d)(6), removing the
words ‘‘a Perkins Loan, a FFEL Program
loan, or another Direct Loan’’ and
adding, in their place, the words
‘‘another Direct Loan, a FFEL Program
Loan, or a Perkins Loan’’.
■ D. In paragraph (d)(7), removing the
words ‘‘a FFEL Program Loan or another
Direct Loan’’ and adding, in their place,
‘‘another Direct Loan or a FFEL Program
Loan’’.
■ E. In paragraph (e)(1)(ii), removing the
number and word ‘‘24 hours’’ each time
they appear and adding, in their place,
the number and word ‘‘72 hours’’.
■ F. Revising paragraph (f)(4)(iii).
■ G. In paragraph (g)(2)(i), removing the
words ‘‘Direct Loans’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘Direct Loan’’.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 685.218 Discharge of student loan
indebtedness for survivors of victims of the
September 11, 2001, attacks.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) If the individual owed a Direct
Loan, a FFEL Program Loan, or a
Perkins Loan at the time of the terrorist
attacks on September 11, 2001,
documentation that the individual’s
loans were discharged by the Secretary,
the lender, or the institution due to
death may be substituted for the original
or certified copy of a death certificate.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(4) * * *
(iii) Copies of approved joint Direct
Loan or FFEL Consolidation Loan
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
applications or an approved Direct or
FFEL PLUS Loan application.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 101. Section 685.220 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 685.220
Consolidation.
(a) Direct Consolidation Loans. A
borrower may consolidate education
loans made under certain Federal
programs into a Direct Consolidation
Loan. Loans consolidated into a Direct
Consolidation Loan are discharged
when the Direct Consolidation Loan is
originated.
(b) Loans eligible for consolidation.
The following loans may be
consolidated into a Direct Consolidation
Loan:
(1) Subsidized Federal Stafford Loans.
(2) Guaranteed Student Loans.
(3) Federal Insured Student Loans
(FISL).
(4) Direct Subsidized Loans.
(5) Direct Subsidized Consolidation
Loans.
(6) Federal Perkins Loans.
(7) National Direct Student Loans
(NDSL).
(8) National Defense Student Loans
(NDSL).
(9) Federal PLUS Loans.
(10) Parent Loans for Undergraduate
Students (PLUS).
(11) Direct PLUS Loans.
(12) Direct PLUS Consolidation
Loans.
(13) Federal Consolidation Loans.
(14) Unsubsidized Federal Stafford
Loans.
(15) Federal Supplemental Loans for
Students (SLS).
(16) Direct Unsubsidized Loans.
(17) Direct Unsubsidized
Consolidation Loans.
(18) Auxiliary Loans to Assist
Students (ALAS).
(19) Health Professions Student Loans
(HPSL) and Loans for Disadvantaged
Students (LDS) made under subpart II of
part A of title VII of the Public Health
Service Act.
(20) Health Education Assistance
Loans (HEAL).
(21) Nursing loans made under
subpart II of part B of title VIII of the
Public Health Service Act.
(c) Components of Direct
Consolidation Loans. (1) Subsidized
component of Direct Consolidation
Loans. The term ‘‘Direct Subsidized
Consolidation Loan’’ refers to the
portion of a Direct Consolidation Loan
attributable to—
(i) The loans identified in paragraphs
(b)(1) through (b)(5) of this section; and
(ii) The portion of a Federal
Consolidation Loan under paragraph
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(b)(13) of this section that is eligible for
interest benefits during a deferment
period under section 428C(b)(4)(C) of
the Act.
(2) Unsubsidized component of Direct
Consolidation Loans. Except as
provided in paragraph (c)(3) of this
section, the term ‘‘Direct Unsubsidized
Consolidation Loan’’ refers to the
portion of a Direct Consolidation Loan
attributable to—
(i) The loans identified in paragraphs
(b)(6) through (b)(12) of this section;
(ii) The portion of a Federal
Consolidation Loan under paragraph
(b)(13) of this section that is not eligible
for interest benefits during a deferment
period under section 428C(b)(4)(C) of
the Act; and
(iii) The loans identified in
paragraphs (b)(14) through (b)(21) of this
section.
(3) PLUS component of Direct
Consolidation Loans. In the case of a
Direct Consolidation Loan made before
July 1, 2006, the term ‘‘Direct PLUS
Consolidation Loan’’ refers to the
portion of a Direct Consolidation Loan
attributable to the loans identified in
paragraphs (b)(9) through (b)(12) of this
section.
(d) Eligibility for a Direct
Consolidation Loan. (1) A borrower may
obtain a Direct Consolidation Loan if the
borrower meets the following
requirements:
(i) The borrower consolidates at least
one Direct Loan Program or FFEL
Program loan.
(ii) On the loans being consolidated,
the borrower is—
(A) At the time the borrower applies
for the Direct Consolidation Loan—
(1) In the grace period;
(2) In a repayment period but not in
default; or
(3) In default but has made
satisfactory repayment arrangements in
accordance with paragraph (2) of the
definition of that term in § 685.102(b);
(B) Not subject to a judgment secured
through litigation, unless the judgment
has been vacated; or
(C) Not subject to an order for wage
garnishment under section 488A of the
Act, unless the order has been lifted.
(iii) The borrower agrees to notify the
Secretary of any change in address.
(2) A borrower may not consolidate a
Direct Consolidation Loan or a Federal
Consolidation Loan into a new
consolidation loan under this section
unless at least one additional eligible
loan is included in the consolidation,
except that a borrower may consolidate
a Federal Consolidation Loan into a new
consolidation loan under this section
without including any additional loans
if—
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
(i) The borrower has a Federal
Consolidation Loan that is in default or
has been submitted to the guaranty
agency by the lender for default
aversion, and the borrower wants to
consolidate the Federal Consolidation
Loan into the Direct Loan Program for
the purpose of obtaining an incomecontingent repayment plan or an
income-based repayment plan; or
(ii) The borrower has a Federal
Consolidation Loan and the borrower
wants to consolidate that loan into the
Direct Loan Program for the purpose of
using the Public Service Loan
Forgiveness Program or the no accrual
of interest benefit for active duty
service.
(3) Eligible loans received before or
after the date a Direct Consolidation
Loan is made may be added to a
subsequent Direct Consolidation Loan.
(e) Application for a Direct
Consolidation Loan. To obtain a Direct
Consolidation Loan, a borrower must
submit a completed application to the
Secretary. A borrower may add eligible
loans to a Direct Consolidation Loan by
submitting a request to the Secretary
within 180 days after the date on which
the Direct Consolidation Loan is
originated.
(f) Origination of a consolidation
loan. (1)(i) The holder of a loan that a
borrower wishes to consolidate into a
Direct Loan must complete and return
the Secretary’s request for certification
of the amount owed within 10 business
days of receipt or, if it is unable to
provide the certification, provide to the
Secretary a written explanation of the
reasons for its inability to provide the
certification.
(ii) If the Secretary approves an
application for a consolidation loan, the
Secretary pays to each holder of a loan
selected for consolidation the amount
necessary to discharge the loan.
(iii) For a Direct Loan Program or
FFEL Program loan that is in default, the
Secretary limits collection costs that
may be charged to the borrower to a
maximum of 18.5 percent of the
outstanding principal and interest
amount of the defaulted loan. For any
other defaulted Federal education loan,
all collection costs that are owed may be
charged to the borrower.
(2) Upon receipt of the proceeds of a
Direct Consolidation Loan, the holder of
a consolidated loan must promptly
apply the proceeds to fully discharge
the borrower’s obligation on the
consolidated loan. The holder of a
consolidated loan must notify the
borrower that the loan has been paid in
full.
(3) The principal balance of a Direct
Consolidation Loan is equal to the sum
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65837
of the amounts paid to the holders of the
consolidated loans.
(4) If the amount paid by the Secretary
to the holder of a consolidated loan
exceeds the amount needed to discharge
that loan, the holder of the consolidated
loan must promptly refund the excess
amount to the Secretary to be credited
against the outstanding balance of the
Direct Consolidation Loan.
(5) If the amount paid by the Secretary
to the holder of the consolidated loan is
insufficient to discharge that loan, the
holder must notify the Secretary in
writing of the remaining amount due on
the loan. The Secretary promptly pays
the remaining amount due.
(g) Interest rate. The interest rate on
a Direct Subsidized Consolidation Loan
or a Direct Unsubsidized Consolidation
Loan is the rate established in
§ 685.202(a)(10)(i). The interest rate on a
Direct PLUS Consolidation Loan is the
rate established in § 685.202(a)(10)(ii).
(h) Repayment plans. A borrower may
choose a repayment plan for a Direct
Consolidation Loan in accordance with
§ 685.208, and may change repayment
plans in accordance with § 685.210(b).
(i) Repayment period. (1) Except as
noted in paragraph (i)(4) of this section,
the repayment period for a Direct
Consolidation Loan begins on the day
the loan is disbursed.
(2)(i) Borrowers who entered
repayment before July 1, 2006. The
Secretary determines the repayment
period under § 685.208(i) on the basis of
the outstanding balances on all of the
borrower’s loans that are eligible for
consolidation and the balances on other
education loans except as provided in
paragraphs (i)(3)(i), (ii), and (iii) of this
section.
(ii) Borrowers entering repayment on
or after July 1, 2006. The Secretary
determines the repayment period under
§ 685.208(j) on the basis of the
outstanding balances on all of the
borrower’s loans that are eligible for
consolidation and the balances on other
education loans except as provided in
paragraphs (i)(3)(i) through (iii) of this
section.
(3)(i) The total amount of outstanding
balances on the other education loans
used to determine the repayment period
under §§ 685.208(i) and (j) may not
exceed the amount of the Direct
Consolidation Loan.
(ii) The borrower may not be in
default on the other education loan
unless the borrower has made
satisfactory repayment arrangements
with the holder of the loan.
(iii) The lender of the other
educational loan may not be an
individual.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
65838
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(4) A Direct Consolidation Loan that
was made based on an application
received before July 1, 2006 receives a
grace period if it includes a Direct Loan
Program or FFEL Program loan for
which the borrower was in an in-school
period at the time of consolidation. The
repayment period begins the day after
the grace period ends.
(j) Repayment schedule. (1) The
Secretary provides a borrower of a
Direct Consolidation Loan a repayment
schedule before the borrower’s first
payment is due. The repayment
schedule identifies the borrower’s
monthly repayment amount under the
repayment plan selected.
(2) If a borrower adds an eligible loan
to the consolidation loan under
paragraph (e) of this section, the
Secretary makes appropriate
adjustments to the borrower’s monthly
repayment amount and repayment
period.
(k) Refunds and returns of title IV,
HEA program funds received from
schools. If a lender receives a refund or
return of title IV, HEA program funds
from a school on a loan that has been
consolidated into a Direct Consolidation
Loan, the lender must transmit the
refund or return and an explanation of
the source of the refund or return to the
Secretary within 30 days of receipt.
(l) Special provisions for joint
consolidation loans. The provisions of
paragraphs (l)(1) through (3) of this
section apply to a Direct Consolidation
Loan obtained by two married
borrowers in accordance with the
regulations that were in effect for
consolidation applications received
prior to July 1, 2006.
(1) Deferment. To obtain a deferment
on a joint Direct Consolidation Loan
under § 685.204, both borrowers must
meet the requirements of that section.
(2) Forbearance. To obtain
forbearance on a joint Direct
Consolidation Loan under § 685.205,
both borrowers must meet the
requirements of that section.
(3) Discharge. (i) If a borrower dies
and the Secretary receives the
documentation described in
§ 685.212(a), the Secretary discharges an
amount equal to the portion of the
outstanding balance of the consolidation
loan, as of the date of the borrower’s
death, attributable to any of that
borrower’s loans that were repaid by the
consolidation loan.
(ii) If a borrower meets the
requirements for total and permanent
disability discharge under § 685.212(b),
the Secretary discharges an amount
equal to the portion of the outstanding
balance of the consolidation loan, as of
the date the borrower became totally
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
and permanently disabled, attributable
to any of that borrower’s loans that were
repaid by the consolidation loan.
(iii) If a borrower meets the
requirements for discharge under
§ 685.212(d), (e), or (f) on a loan that
was consolidated into a joint Direct
Consolidation Loan, the Secretary
discharges the portion of the
consolidation loan equal to the amount
of the loan that would be eligible for
discharge under the provisions of
§ 685.212(d), (e), or (f) as applicable, and
that was repaid by the consolidation
loan.
(iv) If a borrower meets the
requirements for loan forgiveness under
§ 685.212(h) on a loan that was
consolidated into a joint Direct
Consolidation Loan, the Secretary
repays the portion of the outstanding
balance of the consolidation loan
attributable to the loan that would be
eligible for forgiveness under the
provisions of § 685.212(h), and that was
repaid by the consolidation loan.
(Approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under control
number 1845–0021)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1078–8, 1087a et seq.)
102. Section 685.300 is amended by:
A. Revising paragraph (a).
B. In the introductory text of
paragraph (b), removing the word
‘‘shall’’ each time it appears and adding,
in its place, the word ‘‘must’’.
■ C. Removing paragraph (b)(8).
■ D. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(5),
(6), and (7) as paragraphs (b)(6), (7), and
(8), respectively.
■ E. Adding a new paragraph (b)(5).
■ F. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 685.300 Agreements between an eligible
school and the Secretary for participation in
the Direct Loan Program
(a) General. Participation of a school
in the Direct Loan Program means that
eligible students at the school may
receive Direct Loans. To participate in
the Direct Loan Program, a school
must—
(1) Demonstrate to the satisfaction of
the Secretary that the school meets the
requirements for eligibility under the
Act and applicable regulations; and
(2) Enter into a written program
participation agreement with the
Secretary.
(b) * * *
(5) On a monthly basis, reconcile
institutional records with Direct Loan
funds received from the Secretary and
Direct Loan disbursement records
submitted to and accepted by the
Secretary;
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(c) Origination. A school that
originates loans in the Direct Loan
Program must originate loans to eligible
students and parents in accordance with
part D of the Act. The note or evidence
of the borrower’s obligation on the loan
originated by the school is the property
of the Secretary.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 103. Section 685.301 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 685.301 Origination of a loan by a Direct
Loan Program school.
(a) Determining eligibility and loan
amount. (1) A school participating in
the Direct Loan Program must ensure
that any information it provides to the
Secretary in connection with loan
origination is complete and accurate. A
school must originate a Direct Loan
while the student meets the borrower
eligibility requirements of § 685.200.
Except as provided in 34 CFR part 668,
subpart E, a school may rely in good
faith upon statements made by the
borrower and, in the case of a parent
Direct PLUS Loan borrower, the student
and the parent borrower.
(2) A school must provide to the
Secretary borrower information that
includes but is not limited to—
(i) The borrower’s eligibility for a
loan, as determined in accordance with
§ 685.200 and § 685.203;
(ii) The student’s loan amount; and
(iii) The anticipated and actual
disbursement date or dates and
disbursement amounts of the loan
proceeds, as determined in accordance
with § 685.303(d).
(3) Before originating a Direct PLUS
Loan for a graduate or professional
student borrower, the school must
determine the borrower’s eligibility for
a Direct Subsidized and a Direct
Unsubsidized Loan. If the borrower is
eligible for a Direct Subsidized or Direct
Unsubsidized Loan, but has not
requested the maximum Direct
Subsidized or Direct Unsubsidized Loan
amount for which the borrower is
eligible, the school must—
(i) Notify the graduate or professional
student borrower of the maximum
Direct Subsidized or Direct
Unsubsidized Loan amount that he or
she is eligible to receive and provide the
borrower with a comparison of—
(A) The maximum interest rate for a
Direct Subsidized Loan and a Direct
Unsubsidized Loan and the maximum
interest rate for a Direct PLUS Loan;
(B) Periods when interest accrues on
a Direct Subsidized Loan and a Direct
Unsubsidized Loan, and periods when
interest accrues on a Direct PLUS Loan;
and
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(C) The point at which a Direct
Subsidized Loan and a Direct
Unsubsidized Loan enters repayment,
and the point at which a Direct PLUS
Loan enters repayment; and
(ii) Give the graduate or professional
student borrower the opportunity to
request the maximum Direct Subsidized
or Direct Unsubsidized Loan amount for
which the borrower is eligible.
(4) A school may not originate a
Direct Subsidized, Direct Unsubsidized,
or Direct PLUS Loan, or a combination
of loans, for an amount that—
(i) The school has reason to know
would result in the borrower exceeding
the annual or maximum loan amounts
in § 685.203; or
(ii) Exceeds the student’s estimated
cost of attendance less—
(A) The student’s estimated financial
assistance for that period; and
(B) In the case of a Direct Subsidized
Loan, the borrower’s expected family
contribution for that period.
(5)(i) A school determines a Direct
Subsidized or Direct Unsubsidized Loan
amount in accordance with § 685.203.
(ii) When prorating a loan amount for
a student enrolled in a program of study
with less than a full academic year
remaining, the school need not
recalculate the amount of the loan if the
number of hours for which an eligible
student is enrolled changes after the
school originates the loan.
(6) The date of loan origination is the
date a school creates the electronic loan
origination record.
(7) If a student has received a
determination of need for a Direct
Subsidized Loan that is $200 or less, a
school may choose not to originate a
Direct Subsidized Loan for that student
and to include the amount as part of a
Direct Unsubsidized Loan.
(8) A school may refuse to originate a
Direct Subsidized, Direct Unsubsidized,
or Direct PLUS Loan or may reduce the
borrower’s determination of need for the
loan if the reason for that action is
documented and provided to the
borrower in writing, and if—
(i) The determination is made on a
case-by-case basis;
(ii) The documentation supporting the
determination is retained in the
student’s file; and
(iii) The school does not engage in
any pattern or practice that results in a
denial of a borrower’s access to Direct
Loans because of the borrower’s race,
gender, color, religion, national origin,
age, disability status, or income.
(9) A school may not assess a fee for
the completion or certification of any
Direct Loan Program forms or
information or for the origination of a
Direct Loan.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
(10)(i) The minimum period of
enrollment for which a school may
originate a Direct Loan is—
(A) At a school that measures
academic progress in credit hours and
uses a semester, trimester, or quarter
system, or that has terms that are
substantially equal in length with no
term less than nine weeks in length, a
single academic term (e.g., a semester or
quarter); or
(B) Except as provided in paragraph
(a)(10)(ii) or (iii) of this section, at a
school that measures academic progress
in clock hours, or measures academic
progress in credit hours but does not use
a semester, trimester, or quarter system
and does not have terms that are
substantially equal in length with no
term less than nine weeks in length, the
lesser of—
(1) The length of the student’s
program (or the remaining portion of
that program if the student has less than
the full program remaining) at the
school; or
(2) The academic year as defined by
the school in accordance with 34 CFR
668.3.
(ii) For a student who transfers into a
school from another school and the
prior school originated a loan for a
period of enrollment that overlaps the
period of enrollment at the new school,
the new school may originate a loan for
the remaining portion of the program or
academic year. In this case the school
may originate a loan for an amount that
does not exceed the remaining balance
of the student’s annual loan limit.
(iii) For a student who completes a
program at a school, where the student’s
last loan to complete that program had
been for less than an academic year, and
the student then begins a new program
at the same school, the school may
originate a loan for the remainder of the
academic year. In this case the school
may originate a loan for an amount that
does not exceed the remaining balance
of the student’s annual loan limit at the
loan level associated with the new
program.
(iv) The maximum period for which a
school may originate a Direct Loan is—
(A) Generally an academic year, as
defined by the school in accordance
with 34 CFR 668.3, except that the
school may use a longer period of time
corresponding to the period to which
the school applies the annual loan
limits under § 685.203; or
(B) For a defaulted borrower who has
regained eligibility, the academic year
in which the borrower regained
eligibility.
(b) Promissory note handling. (1) The
Secretary provides promissory notes for
use in the Direct Loan Program. A
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65839
school may not modify, or make any
additions to, the promissory note
without the Secretary’s prior written
approval.
(2) A school that originates a loan
must ensure that the loan is supported
by a completed promissory note as proof
of the borrower’s indebtedness.
(c) Reporting to the Secretary. The
Secretary accepts a student’s Payment
Data that is submitted in accordance
with procedures established through
publication in the Federal Register, and
that contains information the Secretary
considers to be accurate in light of other
available information including that
previously provided by the student and
the institution. (Approved by the Office
of Management and Budget under
control number 1845–0021)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.)
104. Section 685.303 is amended by:
A. In paragraph (a), removing the
word ‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘must’’.
■ B. Revising paragraph (b)(1).
■ C. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(2)
through (b)(4) as paragraphs (b)(3)
through (b)(5), respectively.
■ D. Adding a new paragraph (b)(2).
■ E. Revising redesignated paragraph
(b)(3)(i).
■ F. Revising redesignated paragraph
(b)(3)(ii).
■ G. Revising redesignated paragraph
(b)(5)(i) introductory text.
■ H. In redesignated paragraph
(b)(5)(i)(A)(1), removing the citation
‘‘(b)(4)(i)(A)(2)’’ and adding, in its place,
the citation ‘‘(b)(5)(i)(A)(2)’’.
■ I. Revising redesignated paragraph
(b)(5)(ii).
■ J. In redesignated paragraph (b)(5)(iii),
removing the citation ‘‘(b)(4)(i)(B)’’ and
adding, in its place, the citation
‘‘(b)(5)(i)(B)’’.
■ K. In paragraph (c), removing the
word ‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘must’’.
■ L. Redesignating paragraphs (d) and
(e) as paragraphs (f) and (g),
respectively.
■ M. Adding a new paragraph (d).
■ N. Adding a new paragraph (e).
■ O. Revising redesignated paragraph
(g).
■ P. Adding an authority citation after
the OMB control number parenthetical
at the end of the section.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 685.303
Processing loan proceeds.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) A school may not disburse loan
proceeds to a borrower unless the
borrower has executed a legally
enforceable promissory note.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
65840
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(2) The Secretary provides Direct
Loan funds to a school in accordance
with 34 CFR 668.162.
(3)(i) Except in the case of a late
disbursement under paragraph (f) of this
section, or as provided in paragraph
(b)(3)(iii) of this section, a school may
disburse loan proceeds only to a
student, or a parent in the case of a
Direct PLUS Loan obtained by a parent
borrower, if the school determines the
student has continuously maintained
eligibility in accordance with the
provisions of § 685.200 from the
beginning of the loan period for which
the loan was intended.
(ii) If a student delays attending
school for a period of time, the school
may consider that student to have
maintained eligibility for the loan from
the first day of the period of enrollment.
However, the school must comply with
the requirements under paragraph (b)(4)
of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(5)(i) If a student is enrolled in the
first year of an undergraduate program
of study and has not previously received
a Direct Subsidized Loan, a Direct
Unsubsidized Loan, a Subsidized or
Unsubsidized Federal Stafford Loan, or
a Federal Supplemental Loan for
Students, a school may not disburse the
proceeds of a Direct Subsidized or
Direct Unsubsidized Loan until 30 days
after the first day of the student’s
program of study unless—
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Paragraphs (b)(5)(i)(A) and (B) of
this section do not apply to any loans
originated by the school beginning 30
days after the date the school receives
notification from the Secretary of a
cohort default rate, calculated under
subpart M or subpart N of 34 CFR part
668, that causes the school to no longer
meet the qualifications outlined in
paragraph (b)(5)(i)(A) or (B) of this
section, as applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Determining disbursement dates
and amounts. (1) Before disbursing a
loan, a school must determine that all
information required by the promissory
note has been provided by the borrower
and, if applicable, the student.
(2) An institution must disburse the
loan proceeds on a payment period
basis in accordance with 34 CFR
668.164(b).
(3) Unless paragraph (d)(4) or (d)(6) of
this section applies—
(i) If a loan period is more than one
payment period, the school must
disburse loan proceeds at least once in
each payment period; and
(ii) If a loan period is one payment
period, the school must make at least
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
two disbursements during that payment
period.
(A) For a loan originated under
§ 685.301(a)(10)(i)(A), the school may
not make the second disbursement until
the calendar midpoint between the first
and last scheduled days of class of the
loan period.
(B) For a loan originated under
§ 685.301(a)(10)(i)(B), the school may
not make the second disbursement until
the student successfully completes half
of the number of credit hours or clock
hours and half of the number of weeks
of instructional time in the payment
period.
(4)(i) If one or more payment periods
have elapsed before a school makes a
disbursement, the school may include
in the disbursement loan proceeds for
completed payment periods.
(ii) If the loan period is equal to one
payment period and more than one-half
of it has elapsed, the school may
include in the disbursement loan
proceeds for the entire payment period.
(5) The school must disburse loan
proceeds in substantially equal
installments, and no installment may
exceed one-half of the loan.
(6)(i) A school is not required to make
more than one disbursement if—
(A)(1) The loan period is not more
than one semester, one trimester, one
quarter, or, for non term-based schools
or schools with non-standard terms, 4
months; and
(2)(i) Except as provided in paragraph
(d)(6)(i)(A)(2)(ii) of this section, the
school has a cohort default rate,
calculated under subpart M of 34 CFR
part 668 of less than 10 percent for each
of the three most recent fiscal years for
which data are available; or
(ii) For loan disbursements made on
or after October 1, 2011, the school in
which the student is enrolled has a
cohort default rate, calculated under
either subpart M or subpart N of 34 CFR
part 668, of less than 15 percent for each
of the three most recent fiscal years for
which data are available; or
(B) The school is an eligible home
institution originating a loan to cover
the cost of attendance in a study abroad
program and has a cohort default rate,
calculated under subpart M or subpart
N of 34 CFR part 668, of less than five
percent for the single most recent fiscal
year for which data are available.
(ii) Paragraphs (d)(6)(i)(A) and (B) of
this section do not apply to any loans
originated by the school beginning 30
days after the date the school receives
notification from the Secretary of a
cohort default rate, calculated under
subpart M or subpart N of 34 CFR part
668, that causes the school to no longer
meet the qualifications outlined in
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
paragraph (d)(6)(i)(A) or (B) of this
section, as applicable.
(iii) Paragraph (d)(6)(i)(B) of this
section does not apply to any loans
originated by the school beginning 30
days after the date the school receives
notification from the Secretary of a
cohort default rate, calculated under
subpart M or subpart N of 34 CFR part
668, that causes the school to no longer
meet the qualifications outlined in that
paragraph.
(e) Annual loan limit progression
based on completion of an academic
year. (1) If a school measures academic
progress in an educational program in
credit hours and uses either standard
terms (semesters, trimesters, or quarters)
or nonstandard terms that are
substantially equal in length, and each
term is at least nine weeks of
instructional time in length, a student is
considered to have completed an
academic year and progresses to the
next annual loan limit when the
academic year calendar period has
elapsed.
(2) If a school measures academic
progress in an educational program in
credit hours and uses nonstandard
terms that are not substantially equal in
length or each term is not at least nine
weeks of instructional time in length, or
measures academic progress in credit
hours and does not have academic
terms, a student is considered to have
completed an academic year and
progresses to the next annual loan limit
at the later of—
(i) The student’s completion of the
weeks of instructional time in the
student’s academic year; or
(ii) The date, as determined by the
school, that the student has successfully
completed the academic coursework in
the student’s academic year.
(3) If a school measures academic
progress in an educational program in
clock hours, a student is considered to
have completed an academic year and
progresses to the next annual loan limit
at the later of—
(i) The student’s completion of the
weeks of instructional time in the
student’s academic year; or
(ii) The date, as determined by the
school, that the student has successfully
completed the clock hours in the
student’s academic year.
(4) For purposes of this section, terms
in a loan period are substantially equal
in length if no term in the loan period
is more than two weeks of instructional
time longer than any other term in that
loan period.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Treatment of excess loan proceeds.
Before the disbursement of any Direct
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Subsidized Loan, Direct Unsubsidized
Loan, or Direct PLUS Loan proceeds, if
a school learns that the borrower will
receive or has received financial aid for
the period of enrollment for which the
loan was intended that exceeds the
amount of assistance for which the
student is eligible (except for Federal
Work-Study Program funds up to $300),
the school must reduce or eliminate the
overaward by either—
(1) Using the student’s Direct
Unsubsidized Loan, Direct PLUS Loan,
or State-sponsored or another nonFederal loan to cover the expected
family contribution, if not already done;
or
(2) Reducing one or more subsequent
disbursements to eliminate the
overaward.
*
*
*
*
*
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.)
105. Section 685.304 is amended by:
A. Revising paragraph (a)(1).
B. In paragraph (a)(2), removing the
words ‘‘prior Direct PLUS Loan or
Federal PLUS Loan’’ and adding, in
their place, the words ‘‘prior student
Direct PLUS Loan or student Federal
PLUS Loan’’.
■ C. In paragraph (a)(7)(i)(A), removing
the word ‘‘or’’ the first time it appears
and adding, in its place, the word ‘‘of’’.
■ D. Revising paragraph (a)(7)(iii).
■ E. Revising paragraph (a)(7)(iv).
■ F. Revising paragraph (b)(3).
■ G. In paragraph (b)(4)(ii), removing
the words ‘‘income contingent
repayment plans’’ and adding, in their
place, the words ‘‘income-contingent
repayment’’.
■ H. Adding a new paragraph (b)(8).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
■
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
§ 685.304
Counseling borrowers.
(a) * * *
(1) Except as provided in paragraph
(a)(8) of this section, a school must
ensure that entrance counseling is
conducted with each Direct Subsidized
Loan or Direct Unsubsidized Loan
student borrower prior to making the
first disbursement of the proceeds of a
loan to a student borrower unless the
student borrower has received a prior
Direct Subsidized Loan, Direct
Unsubsidized Loan, Subsidized or
Unsubsidized Federal Stafford Loan, or
Federal SLS Loan.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) * * *
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
(iii) For a graduate or professional
student Direct PLUS Loan borrower who
has received a prior Direct Subsidized
Loan, Direct Unsubsidized Loan,
Subsidized Federal Stafford Loan, or
Unsubsidized Federal Stafford Loan,
provide the information specified in
§ 685.301(a)(3)(i)(A) through (a)(3)(i)(C);
and
(iv) For a graduate or professional
student Direct PLUS Loan borrower who
has not received a prior Direct
Subsidized Loan, Direct Unsubsidized
Loan, Subsidized Federal Stafford Loan,
or Unsubsidized Federal Stafford Loan,
provide the information specified in
paragraph (a)(6)(i) through paragraph
(a)(6)(xii) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) If a student borrower withdraws
from school without the school’s prior
knowledge or fails to complete the exit
counseling as required, exit counseling
must, within 30 days after the school
learns that the student borrower has
withdrawn from school or failed to
complete the exit counseling as
required, be provided either through
interactive electronic means, by mailing
written counseling materials to the
student borrower at the student
borrower’s last known address, or by
sending written counseling materials to
an email address provided by the
student borrower that is not an email
address associated with the school
sending the counseling materials.
*
*
*
*
*
(8)(i) For students who have received
loans under both the FFEL Program and
the Direct Loan Program for attendance
at a school, the school’s compliance
with the exit counseling requirements in
paragraph (b) of this section satisfies the
exit counseling requirements in 34 CFR
682.604(a) if the school ensures that the
exit counseling also provides the
borrower with the information
described in 34 CFR 682.604(a)(2)(i) and
(ii).
(ii) A student’s completion of
electronic interactive exit counseling
offered by the Secretary satisfies the
requirements of paragraph (b) of this
section and, for students who have also
received FFEL Program loans for
attendance at the school, 34 CFR
682.604(a).
*
*
*
*
*
§ 685.305
■
PO 00000
[Amended]
106. Section 685.305 is amended by:
Frm 00075
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
65841
A. In paragraph (a), removing the
word ‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘must’’.
■ B. In paragraph (b), removing the
word ‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘must’’.
■ C. In paragraph (c), removing the word
‘‘shall’’ and adding, it its place, the
word ‘‘must’’.
■
§ 685.306
[Amended]
107. Section 685.306 is amended by:
■ A. In paragraph (a)(1), removing the
word ‘‘Shall’’ and adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘Must’’.
■ B. In paragraph (a)(2), removing the
word ‘‘Shall’’ and adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘Must’’.
■ C. In paragraph (b), removing the
word ‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘must’’.
■
§ 685.307
[Amended]
108. Section 685.307(b) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding,
in its place, the word ‘‘must’’.
■ 109. Section 685.309 is amended by:
■ A. In the introductory text of
paragraph (a), removing the word
‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘must’’.
■ B. Revising paragraph (b).
■ C. In paragraph (c), removing the word
‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘must’’.
■ D. In paragraph (d), removing the
word ‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place,
the word ‘‘must’’.
■ E. In paragraph (e), removing the word
‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘must’’.
■ F. In paragraph (f), removing the word
‘‘shall’’ and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘must’’.
■ G. In paragraph (g), removing the
words ‘‘Except for funds paid to a
school under section 452(b)(1) of the
Act, funds’’ and adding, in their place,
the word ‘‘Funds’’.
The revision reads as follows:
■
§ 685.309 Administrative and fiscal control
and fund accounting requirements for
schools participating in the Direct Loan
Program.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Enrollment reporting process. (1)
Upon receipt of an enrollment report
from the Secretary, a school must
update all information included in the
report and return the report to the
Secretary—
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
65842
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
(i) In the manner and format
prescribed by the Secretary; and
(ii) Within the timeframe prescribed
by the Secretary.
(2) Unless it expects to submit its next
updated enrollment report to the
Secretary within the next 60 days, a
school must notify the Secretary within
30 days after the date the school
discovers that—
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Oct 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
(i) A loan under title IV of the Act was
made to or on behalf of a student who
was enrolled or accepted for enrollment
at the school, and the student has
ceased to be enrolled on at least a halftime basis or failed to enroll on at least
a half-time basis for the period for
which the loan was intended; or
(ii) A student who is enrolled at the
school and who received a loan under
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
title IV of the Act has changed his or her
permanent address.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart D [Removed and Reserved]
110. Subpart D of part 685 is removed
and reserved.
■
[FR Doc. 2013–25331 Filed 10–31–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
E:\FR\FM\01NOR2.SGM
01NOR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 212 (Friday, November 1, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65767-65842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25331]
[[Page 65767]]
Vol. 78
Friday,
No. 212
November 1, 2013
Part II
Department of Education
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
34 CFR Parts 668, 674, 682, and 685
Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program,
Federal Family Education Loan Program, and William D. Ford Federal
Direct Loan Program; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 78 , No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2013 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 65768]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Parts 668, 674, 682, and 685
RIN 1840-AD12
[Docket ID ED-2013-OPE-0063]
Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan
Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program, and William D. Ford
Federal Direct Loan Program
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Secretary amends the Student Assistance General
Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan (Perkins Loan) Program, Federal Family
Education Loan (FFEL) Program, and William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan
(Direct Loan) Program regulations. These final regulations will: Amend
the FFEL and Direct Loan program regulations to reflect changes made to
the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), by the SAFRA Act
included in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010;
incorporate statutory changes to interest rates and other recent
statutory changes in the Direct Loan Program regulations; update,
strengthen, and clarify various areas of the Student Assistance General
Provisions, Perkins Loan, FFEL, and Direct Loan program regulations;
and provide for greater consistency in the regulations governing the
title IV, HEA student loan programs. These final regulations will
ensure that the title IV, HEA Federal student aid programs operate as
efficiently as possible.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations are effective July 1, 2014.
Implementation dates: For implementation dates, see the
Implementation Date of These Regulations section of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information related to
loan rehabilitation reasonable and affordable payments, contact Brian
Smith or Pamela Moran at (202)-502-7551 or (202)-502-7732 or by email
at: Brian.Smith@ed.gov or Pamela.Moran@ed.gov. For further information
related to administrative wage garnishment, contact Nathan Arnold or
Pamela Moran at (202)-219-7134 or (202)-502-7732 or by email at:
Nathan.Arnold@ed.gov or Pamela.Moran@ed.gov. For further information
related to Federal Perkins Loan program changes, contact Gail McLarnon
or Brian Smith at (202)-219-7048 or (202)-502-7551 or by email at:
Gail.McLarnon@ed.gov or Brian.Smith@ed.gov. For further information
related to Direct Loan program changes, contact Gail McLarnon, Jon Utz,
or Pamela Moran at (202)-219-7048, (202)-377-4040, or (202)-502-7732 or
by email at: Gail.McLarnon@ed.gov, Jon.Utz@ed.gov, or
Pamela.Moran@ed.gov. For further information on FFEL program changes,
contact Pamela Moran or Nathan Arnold at (202)-502-7732 or 202-219-7134
or by email at: Pamela.Moran@ed.gov or Nathan.Arnold@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary:
Purpose of This Regulatory Action: These final regulations address
issues arising from the changes made to the HEA by the SAFRA Act,
included in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010
(Pub. L. 111-152). The SAFRA Act ended the origination of new loans
under the FFEL Program after June 30, 2010. With this change, all new
Stafford, PLUS, and Consolidation loans with a first disbursement on or
after July 1, 2010, are now made under the Direct Loan Program. Because
all new loans are being made under the Direct Loan Program, these final
regulations amend the FFEL Program regulations in 34 CFR part 682 by
removing provisions related to the making of new loans. The final
regulations also reflect changes made to interest rates in the Direct
Loan program by the Bipartisan Student Loan Certainty Act of 2013 (Pub.
L. 113-28). In addition, the regulations amend the Direct Loan Program
regulations in 34 CFR part 685 by adding detailed regulations in areas
where the Direct Loan Program regulations cross-reference the FFEL
Program regulations.
The regulations also strengthen and clarify provisions of the
Perkins Loan, FFEL, and Direct Loan program regulations including, but
not limited to, regulations governing: deferments, forbearances, loan
cancellation, rehabilitation of defaulted loans, administrative wage
garnishment, and satisfactory repayment arrangements. The regulations
also make the rules governing the various title IV, HEA loan programs
more consistent.
Summary of the Major Provisions of This Regulatory Action: The
final regulations--
Raise the participation rate index ceiling applicable to
institutions that have a single three-year cohort default rate of over
40 percent for purposes of challenges to, and appeals from, sanctions
based on that default rate. (34 CFR 668.204(c) and 668.214(a) and (d))
Clarify the Perkins Loan, FFEL, and Direct Loan program
regulations to provide that a borrower who makes six payments in the
course of rehabilitating a defaulted loan, but who does not seek
additional title IV aid, will not be considered to have used the one-
time-only opportunity to regain title IV eligibility by making
satisfactory repayment arrangements. The regulations also define the
term ``satisfactory repayment arrangement'' more consistently across
the title IV, HEA loan programs. (34 CFR 674.2(b), 674.9(k),
682.200(b), 685.102(b), and 685.200(d))
Amend the closed school discharge provisions in the
Perkins Loan, FFEL, and Direct Loan program regulations to specify that
a borrower may qualify for a loan discharge if the borrower withdrew
from school not more than 120 days before the school closed, instead of
the current 90-day standard. The regulations also add examples of the
types of exceptional circumstances under which the Department may
extend the 120-day window. (34 CFR 674.33(g), 682.402(d), and 685.214)
Update the FFEL and Direct Loan program enrollment status
reporting requirements for institutions to reflect current processes
and eliminate obsolete terms and procedures. The regulations also add
comparable enrollment status reporting provisions to the Perkins Loan
Program regulations. (34 CFR 674.19(f), 682.605, 682.610(c), and
685.309(b))
Revise the terms under which a guaranty agency in the FFEL
Program may authorize a lender to grant forbearance to permit a
borrower or endorser to resume honoring the agreement to repay a debt
after default but prior to claim payment to require either a signed
written agreement to repay or an oral affirmation of the borrower's or
endorser's obligation to repay the debt. The regulations provide that
if a forbearance is granted based on the borrower's or endorser's oral
request and affirmation of the obligation, the forbearance is limited
to 120 days and cannot be granted for consecutive periods. In addition,
the lender must orally review with the borrower the terms and
conditions of the forbearance and send a notice to the borrower or
endorser that confirms the terms of the forbearance. The regulations
also define the term ``affirmation.'' Finally, the regulations also add
comparable provisions to the Direct Loan Program regulations. (34 CFR
682.211(d) and 685.205(a)(8))
Require that lenders grant forbearance to FFEL borrowers
who are
[[Page 65769]]
performing service that qualifies them for loan repayment under the
Department of Defense student loan repayment programs in addition to
the program authorized by 10 U.S.C. 2171 (which is currently referenced
in the regulations). A comparable forbearance provision is added to the
Direct Loan Program regulations. (34 CFR 682.211(h) and 685.205(a)(9))
Authorize a lender to grant an administrative forbearance
to a FFEL borrower who is delinquent at the beginning of an authorized
period of forbearance and add a corresponding provision to the Direct
Loan Program regulations. (34 CFR 682.211(f) and 685.205(b)(2))
Provide that the Secretary, in both the FFEL and Direct
Loan programs, and the guaranty agency, in the FFEL Program, once the
rehabilitation discussion has begun, initially considers a borrower's
reasonable and affordable loan rehabilitation payment amount to equal
15 percent of the amount by which the borrower's Adjusted Gross Income
(AGI) exceeds 150 percent of the poverty guideline amount applicable to
the borrower's family size and State, divided by 12. If the amount
determined using this calculation is less than $5, the borrower's
monthly rehabilitation payment is $5. (34 CFR 682.405(b) and
685.211(f))
Specify in the FFEL and Direct Loan program regulations
that a reasonable and affordable loan rehabilitation payment amount
must not be a required minimum payment (except that a payment amount
calculated as described in the immediately preceding paragraph may not
be less than $5), a percentage of the borrower's total loan balance, or
an amount based on other criteria unrelated to the borrower's total
financial circumstances. (Note that these changes to the loan
rehabilitation reasonable and affordable payment amount calculation do
not prohibit the Secretary, his designee, or a guaranty agency from
discussing other payment arrangements with the borrower, including
payment of the full defaulted loan balance or payment of the defaulted
loan through consolidation, outside of the context of the loan
rehabilitation program and its associated requirements.) (34 CFR
682.405(b) and 685.211(f))
Require that the Secretary, in the FFEL and Direct Loan
programs, or the guaranty agency, in the FFEL Program, provide the
borrower with a written rehabilitation agreement within 15 business
days of the determination of the borrower's reasonable and affordable
payment amount along with a comprehensive description of the borrower's
rights, the terms and conditions of the payments, the effects of loan
rehabilitation, and, for a FFEL borrower, the treatment of unpaid
collection costs. (34 CFR 682.405(b) and 685.211(f))
Provide that, if the borrower objects to the initial
payment amount determined by the Secretary or the guaranty agency, the
Secretary or the guaranty agency will recalculate the amount of the
borrower's rehabilitation payment based on the borrower's and, if
applicable, the borrower's spouse's current disposable income, family
size, and reasonable and necessary expenses. The information about
income and expenses needed to determine the alternative reasonable and
affordable payment amount will be provided by the borrower to the
Secretary or the guaranty agency on a form approved by the Secretary
and, if requested, with supporting documentation from the borrower or
other sources. (34 CFR 682.405(b) and 685.211(f))
Provide that, while the borrower is making payments under
a rehabilitation agreement, the Secretary and the guaranty agency will
limit contact with the borrower to collection activities required by
law or regulation and communications that support the rehabilitation.
(34 CFR 682.405(b) and 685.211(f))
Amend the Direct Loan and FFEL program regulations to
provide that, when a loan is being collected by administrative wage
garnishment (AWG), the Secretary or the guaranty agency, respectively,
will suspend AWG after the borrower makes five qualifying monthly
payments under a loan rehabilitation agreement, unless the borrower
requests that AWG continue. (34 CFR 682.405(a) and 685.211(f))
Incorporate into the Perkins Loan Program the same
eligibility criteria used in the Direct Loan and FFEL programs to
define an ``eligible graduate fellowship program'' and to establish the
eligibility of a Perkins Loan borrower for a graduate fellowship
deferment. (34 CFR 674.34(f))
Eliminate the debt-to-income economic hardship deferment
category in the Perkins Loan Program. (34 CFR 674.34(e))
Modify the rehabilitation provisions in the Perkins Loan
Program regulations to define the term ``on-time'' as it relates to the
series of payments required to successfully rehabilitate a defaulted
loan. (34 CFR 674.39(a)(2))
Allow assignment of a Perkins Loan to the Secretary
without the borrower's Social Security Number if the loan was made
before September 13, 1982. (34 CFR 674.50(e)(1))
Permit a Perkins Loan borrower who is unable to complete
the second half of an academic year of teaching due to a condition
covered under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) to still count
that year as eligible teaching service for loan cancellation purposes,
if the borrower's employer considers the borrower to have fulfilled the
teacher contract requirements for that academic year. (34 CFR
674.52(c)(1))
Permit a Perkins Loan borrower who is unable to complete a
full year of eligible public service due to a condition that is covered
under the FMLA to count that year as a full year of public service for
loan cancellation purposes if the borrower completes at least six
months of consecutive eligible service. (34 CFR 674.52(c)(2))
Specify that, if a Perkins Loan borrower who is performing
service that qualifies the borrower for loan cancellation at a
cancellation rate progression of 15 percent for the first and second
years of qualifying service, 20 percent for the third and fourth years
of qualifying service, and 30 percent for the fifth year of qualifying
service, takes a job in a different field that qualifies the borrower
under a different cancellation category that provides loan cancellation
at the same cancellation rate progression as the prior category, the
borrower's cancellation rate under the new cancellation category will
continue from the last year the borrower received a cancellation under
the former cancellation category, rather than starting over at the
first-year cancellation rate. (34 CFR 674.52(g))
Change the timeframe for FFEL lenders to send the required
repayment disclosure for borrowers who are 60 days delinquent from five
calendar days to five business days after the date the borrower becomes
60 days delinquent. (34 CFR 682.205(a)(5))
Amend the FFEL Program regulations to provide that a
lender does not have to send a repayment disclosure to a borrower who
is having difficulty making payments if the borrower's difficulty has
been resolved through contact resulting from an earlier disclosure or
from other contact between the lender and the borrower. (34 CFR
682.205(a)(4))
Amend the regulations governing AWG to reflect the
borrower's right to request a hearing on the enforceability of the debt
and to allow the borrower to object to the amount or rate of AWG
withholding if such withholding would cause financial hardship to the
borrower. (34 CFR 682.410(b)(9))
[[Page 65770]]
Revise the regulations governing AWG to conform the
requirements for borrowers whose defaulted loans are held by a guaranty
agency to the rules and procedures used by the Secretary. (34 CFR
682.410(b)(9))
Amend the regulations governing AWG to incorporate
existing policy guidance related to third-party servicers or collection
contractors retained by guaranty agencies. (34 CFR 682.410(b)(9))
Amend the regulations governing AWG to more clearly
describe the process, from the initial garnishment notice to
withholding. (34 CFR 682.410(b)(9))
Amend the regulations governing AWG to better reflect due
process requirements and to specify the functions, delegations of
authority, recordkeeping requirements, and permissible activities of
guaranty agencies and third-party servicers or collection contractors.
(34 CFR 682.410(b)(9))
Clarify the limitations on the amount that may be subject
to AWG if a guaranty agency is garnishing pay from a borrower who is
not already subject to a withholding order or from a borrower who is
already subject to one or more withholding orders. The regulations will
also permit a greater amount or percentage to be withheld with the
borrower's consent. (34 CFR 682.410(b)(9))
Require that for a borrower to receive a hearing before
AWG begins, the borrower's written request for a hearing must be
received on or before the 30th day following the date the garnishment
notice was sent, and remove a rule providing that a borrower is
considered to have received a garnishment notice five days following
the date of the notice. (34 CFR 682.410(b)(9))
Provide that if a borrower's written request for a hearing
is received by the guaranty agency after the 30th day following the
date of the garnishment notice, the agency must provide the borrower a
hearing and issue a decision within 60 days following receipt of the
request. If a decision is not rendered within 60 days, the guaranty
agency must suspend the order beginning on the 61st day after the
hearing request was received until a hearing is provided and a decision
is rendered. (34 CFR 682.410(b)(9))
Amend the FFEL Program regulations to: specify the
contents of an AWG notice; describe how an AWG hearing is administered,
including provisions for the submission of additional evidence and the
granting of continuances; provide for the withholding order to end by
either rescission or full recovery of amounts owed by the borrower; and
clarify that a borrower who wishes to object that he or she is not
subject to garnishment because of involuntary separation bears the
burden of raising and proving that claim. (34 CFR 682.410(b)(9))
Eliminate provisions in the FFEL Program regulations
governing loan origination and disbursement and related requirements
and activities except for certain school-based requirements and related
activities. (34 CFR Part 682)
Eliminate obsolete provisions that do not reflect the
current procedures in the FFEL Program. (34 CFR Part 682)
Make necessary conforming changes in various FFEL Program
provisions to update the regulations. (34 CFR Part 682)
In the Direct Loan Program regulations, modify the
exception to the minimum loan period requirement for clock-hour and
certain non-standard term programs that allows a school, in certain
transfer student situations, to originate a loan for a period shorter
than the lesser of the academic year or program length only if the
school accepts credit or clock hours from the school that the student
was previously attending. The regulations remove the provision that
limits this exception to situations in which the school into which the
student transfers accepts credit or clock hours from the prior school.
(34 CFR 685.301(a)(10))
Add detailed regulations to 34 CFR part 685 in areas where
the Direct Loan Program regulations cross-reference the FFEL Program
regulations. (34 CFR Part 685)
Remove obsolete provisions that do not reflect current
procedures used in administering the Direct Loan Program. (34 CFR Part
685)
Revise the Direct Loan Program regulations to reflect the
impact of the SAFRA Act, the Bipartisan Student Loan Certainty Act of
2013, and other recent statutory changes. (34 CFR Part 685)
Chart 1 summarizes the final regulations and related benefits,
costs, and transfers that are discussed in more detail in the
Regulatory Impact Analysis section of this preamble. Significant
benefits of these final regulations include a clearer process for
determining a reasonable and affordable payment for loan rehabilitation
that should result in more consistent treatment of borrowers, the
elimination of FFEL Program regulations that are no longer needed, the
expansion of the period during which a borrower who withdraws from a
school prior to its closure may qualify for a closed school discharge,
and additional changes to promote transparency and efficiency in the
administration of the Federal student loan programs. The estimated net
budget impact of the regulations is $2.8 to $3.4 million over ten years
from 2013-2022, driven by the expansion of the time period for
eligibility for a closed school discharge. As shown in the Accounting
Statement within the Regulatory Impact Analysis of these final
regulations, the annualized estimated transfer from the Federal
government to borrowers associated with the statutory changes to Direct
Loan interest rates is $1.2 billion at a 7 percent discount rate and
$467 million at a 3 percent discount rate. For some future cohorts,
depending on the cost of funds of the Federal government, the transfer
may be reversed and the students would have higher interest rates than
if the PB2014 baseline assumed rates of 6.8 percent for Direct
Subsidized Loans and Direct Unsubsidized Loans and 7.9 percent for
Direct PLUS Loans had continued in effect.
Chart 1--Summary of the Final Regulations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue and key features Benefits Cost/transfers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Three-Year Cohort Default More schools with No significant costs
Rate Participation Rate low Title IV projected.
Index Challenges and participation but
Appeals (34 CFR 668.204 and high default rates
668.214). (above 40%) will be
Raises the Participation able to appeal
Rate Index ceiling for their loss of Title
purposes of challenges to IV eligibility.
and appeals from sanctions This is important
based on one three-year as the change from
cohort default rate of over a 2-year to a 3-
40 percent from 0.06015 to year cohort default
0.0832.. rate is predicted
to leave many
schools ineligible
to appeal their
sanctions under the
previous
regulations.
[[Page 65771]]
Perkins Loan, FFEL, and Creates a consistent No significant costs
Direct Loan Programs: standard across the projected.
Satisfactory Repayment three loan programs
Arrangements (34 CFR and adds clarity to
674.2(b), 674.9(k), the regulations
682.200(b), 685.102(b), and regarding defaulted
685.200). loan rehabilitation.
Makes the definitions of
``satisfactory repayment
arrangement'' more
consistent across the three
title IV student loan
programs..
Closed School Discharge (34 Expanding the window We estimate these
CFR 674.33(g), 682.402(d), an extra 30 days changes to have a
and 685.214). will provide cost of
Extends the current 90-day discharges to approximately $3.1
window for students who students who failed million over 10
leave before a school to meet the 90-day years as the pool
closes to 120 days and adds criteria but of borrowers
examples of the types of withdrew from a eligible for
exceptional circumstances program as it was discharge will
under which the Department preparing to close. increase.
may extend the 120-day Citing clear
window.. examples of
exceptional
circumstances adds
clarity to the loan
regulations and
gives borrowers a
basis on which to
make educated
decisions.
School Enrollment Status Improves the No significant costs
Reporting Requirements (34 Department's projected.
CFR 674.19, 682.605, information
682.610, and 685.309). collection process
Revises the regulations to and supports a more
reflect the current efficient loan
processes by which schools servicing process.
receive and report student
enrollment status
information and provides
the Secretary with greater
flexibility to modify
enrollment reporting
procedures in the future..
Forbearance for Borrowers Creates a consistent No significant costs
Who are 270 or More Days standard across the projected.
Delinquent Prior to loan programs and
Guaranty Agency Default ensures that
Claim Payment or Transfer borrowers are fully
by the Department to informed of the
Collection Status (34 CFR details of their
682.211(d) and 685.205). forbearance
Requires lenders to send a agreement.
notice within 30 days of a Borrowers will have
forbearance agreement to to affirm their
the borrower if the commitment to repay
agreement is based on an and acknowledge
oral request or agreement.. their debt, which
may improve the
probability of full
repayment.
Forbearance Provisions for Creates consistency No significant costs
Borrowers Receiving across loan projected.
Department of Defense programs.
Student Loan Repayment
Benefits (34 CFR 682.211(h)
and 685.205).
Requires that lenders grant
forbearance to borrowers
who are performing service
that qualifies them for
loan repayment under the
Department of Defense
student loan repayment
programs authorized by 10
U.S.C. 2171, 2173, or 2174,
or under any other student
loan repayment program
administered by the
Department of Defense..
Borrowers Who Are Delinquent Borrowers who opt to No significant costs
When an Authorized use forbearance projected.
Forbearance Is Granted (34 will not have to
CFR 682.211(f) and 685.205). worry about having
Authorizes lenders to grant a delinquent
an administrative repayment status
forbearance to a borrower upon exiting
who is delinquent at the forbearance.
beginning of an authorized
period of forbearance..
Loan Rehabilitation Reduces the burden No significant costs
Agreement: Reasonable and on defaulted projected.
Affordable Payment Standard borrowers who are
(34 CFR 682.405(b) and attempting to
685.211(f)). rehabilitate their
Establishes standards for loans and adds
determining a ``reasonable transparency to the
and affordable'' loan process. This will
repayment for possibly increase
rehabilitation purposes.. the percentage of
defaulted borrowers
that complete the
rehabilitation
process and fully
repay their loans.
Loan Rehabilitation Provides financial No significant costs
Agreement: Treatment of relief to borrowers projected.
Borrowers Subject to whose loans are
Administrative Wage being collected
Garnishment (34 CFR through AWG but who
682.405(a) and 685.211(f)). are taking positive
Suspends AWG after a steps to repay
borrower has made five their loans.
qualifying payments under a
loan rehabilitation
agreement..
[[Page 65772]]
Federal Perkins Loan Creates consistency No significant costs
Graduate Fellowship across loan projected.
Deferment Eligibility (34 programs.
CFR 674.34(b)(1) and (f)).
Requires schools that
participate in the Perkins
Loan Program to use the
same eligibility criteria
that are used in the FFEL
Program (under Sec.
682.210(d)) to define an
eligible graduate
fellowship program and to
establish the eligibility
of a Perkins Loan borrower
for a graduate fellowship
deferment..
Federal Perkins Loan Creates consistency No significant costs
Economic Hardship Deferment across loan projected.
Debt-to-Income Ratio programs.
Provision (34 CFR
674.34(e)(4)).
Eliminates an inconsistency
between the economic
hardship deferment
eligibility criteria in the
Perkins Loan program and
the eligibility criteria in
the Direct Loan and FFEL
programs..
Federal Perkins Loan Creates consistency No significant costs
Standard for On-time Loan across loan projected.
Rehabilitation Payment (34 programs.
CFR 674.39(a)(2)).
Identifies what is
considered an ``on-time''
loan payment for
rehabilitation purposes
within the Perkins Loan
program..
Social Security Number Makes the No significant costs
Requirement (SSN) for administration of projected.
Assignment of Defaulted Perkins Loans less
Federal Perkins Loans to burdensome by
the United States (34 CFR bringing the
674.50(e)(1)). regulations more in
Allows assignment of a line with past
Perkins Loan without the practices.
borrower's SSN if the loan
was made before September
13, 1982..
Federal Perkins Loan Break Adds consistency No significant costs
in Cancellation Service Due across the loan projected.
to a Condition Covered programs. It also
under the Family and provides leniency
Medical Leave Act (34 CFR for eligible
674.52(c)(1)). borrowers who are
Allows a Perkins Loan unable to complete
borrower who is unable to their service
complete a second half of requirements
an academic year of because of injury
teaching or a full year of or illness.
public service due to a
condition covered under the
Family Medical and Leave
Act to still count that
year as a full year of
service if the borrower's
employer considers the
borrower to have fulfilled
the requirements for that
year..
Federal Perkins Loan Borrowers who are No significant costs
Cancellation Rate progressing toward projected.
Progression (34 CFR loan cancellation
674.52(g), 674.53(d), based on employment
674.56(h), 674.57(c)(2), in a particular
and 674.59(c)(2)). field who switch
Allows borrowers to continue jobs will no longer
their progression toward lose credit for
full loan cancellation when their time served
they change jobs to a as along as the new
position with the same job has the same
cancellation eligibility loan cancellation
requirements.. eligibility.
FFEL Lender Repayment Reduces the burden No significant costs
Disclosures for Borrowers on FFEL lenders by projected.
Who Are 60 Days Delinquent accounting for
(34 CFR 682.205(a)(5)). holidays and
Changes the requirement that weekends.
FFEL Lenders have to
provide a repayment
disclosure to a borrower
from five calendar days
after the date the borrower
becomes 60 days delinquent
to five business days after
that date..
FFEL Lender Repayment Reduces the No significant costs
Disclosures to Borrowers paperwork burden on projected.
Who Are Having Difficulty FFEL lenders.
Making Payments (34 CFR
682.205(a)(4)).
Removes requirement that a
FFEL lender provide a
borrower with a disclosure
upon notification from the
borrower that he or she is
having trouble making
payments, if the borrower's
difficulty has been
previously resolved..
[[Page 65773]]
Administrative Wage Ensures that No significant costs
Garnishment of the borrowers who projected.
Disposable Pay of Defaulted object to the
FFEL Program Borrowers (34 proposed AWG have
CFR 682.410(b)). an appropriate
Borrower Hearing opportunity to
Opportunities on the challenge the
Enforceability of the Debt existence or amount
and a Borrower's Claim of of the debt or to
Financial Hardship (34 CFR demonstrate that
682.410(b)(9)(i)).. the withholding
Changes the regulations would cause
regarding Administrative financial hardship.
Wage Garnishments (AWG) for
FFEL borrowers to align
with the rules governing
AWG for Department-held
loans..
Use of Third-Party Ensures borrowers No significant costs
Contractors in AWG Hearings receive impartial projected.
(34 CFR 682.410(b)(9)). hearings.
Adds language to clarify
that an AWG hearing
official may not be under
the supervision or control
of the guaranty agency or
of a third-party servicer
or contractor employed by
the agency.
Amount or Rate of Wage Provides clarity to No significant costs
Withholding (34 CFR loan program. projected.
682.410(b)(9)).
Adds language to clarify the
maximum amount that may be
withheld during AWG.
Borrower Hearing Requests Provides borrowers No significant costs
(34 CFR 682.410(b)(9)). with more time to projected.
Changes the notification request hearings.
timelines regarding AWG
hearing requests..
Modification of the FFEL Provides clarity to No significant costs
Program Regulations (34 CFR lenders, guaranty projected.
part 682). agencies, financial
Modifies the FFEL Program aid administrators
regulations to remove and borrowers.
provisions that are
obsolete because of the
implementation of the SAFRA
Act..
Minimum Loan Period for Borrowers will no No significant costs
Transfer Students in Non- longer have to projected.
Term and Certain Non- worry about the
Standard Term Programs (34 ramifications of
CFR 685.301). transferring to a
Allows students who transfer school that does
into non-term and certain not accept credit
non-standard term programs or clock hours from
during the middle of an the previous school.
academic year, to be
eligible for a Direct Loan
to cover the remainder of
the academic year (within
annual loan limits)
regardless of whether the
new academic program
accepts credits from the
prior program..
Modification of the Direct Adding consistency No significant costs
Loan Program Regulations to regulations and projected.
(34 CFR part 685). removing
Modifies the Direct Loan inapplicable
Program regulations to regulations dealing
remove provisions that are with Direct Loans
obsolete because of the will provide
implementation of the SAFRA clarity to program
Act and to add necessary participants.
language to replace cross-
references and reflect
program requirements..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 29, 2013 the Secretary published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for these regulations in the Federal Register (78 FR
45618). The final regulations contain several changes from the NPRM. We
fully explain the changes in the Analysis of Comments and Changes
section of the preamble that follows.
Implementation Date of These Regulations
Section 482(c) of the HEA requires that regulations affecting
programs under title IV of the HEA be published in final form by
November 1, prior to the start of the award year (July 1) to which they
apply. However, that section also permits the Secretary to designate
any regulation as one that an entity subject to the regulations may
choose to implement earlier and the conditions for early
implementation.
Consistent with the Department's objective to improve servicing
processes for title IV borrowers, the Secretary is exercising his
authority under section 482(c) to designate the following new and
amended regulations included in this document for early implementation
beginning on November 1, 2013, at the discretion of each loan holder,
guaranty agency, or institution, as applicable:
(1) Section 674.2(b).
(2) Section 674.9(k).
(3) Section 674.39(a)(2).
(4) Section 674.52(c) and (g).
(5) Section 682.205(a)(4).
(6) Section 682.205(a)(5).
(7) Section 682.211(d).
(8) Section 682.211(f).
(9) Section 682.211(h).
(10) Section 682.410(b)(9).
(11) Section 685.301(a)(10).
The Secretary also intends to implement early provisions in 34 CFR
685.205 comparable to the provisions in 34 CFR 682.205(a)(4) and (5).
Analysis of Comments and Changes
In response to the Secretary's invitation in the NPRM, 25 parties
submitted comments on the proposed regulations. An analysis of the
comments and of the changes in the regulations since publication of the
NPRM follows.
We group major issues according to subject, with appropriate
sections of the regulations referenced in parentheses.
[[Page 65774]]
We discuss other substantive issues under the sections of the proposed
regulations to which they pertain. Generally, we do not address
technical or other minor changes.
We received recommendations from some commenters to make numerous
technical changes, including changes that would provide for greater
consistency in the regulations of the Perkins Loan, FFEL, and Direct
Loan programs. We will consider these changes for inclusion in future
technical corrections.
Finally, we note that although the amendatory language in the NPRM
included a series of individual revisions to certain parts of 34 CFR
685.220 and 34 CFR 685.301 as part of the overall modification of the
Direct Loan Program regulations, these final regulations restate
Sec. Sec. 685.220 and 685.301 in their entirety for greater clarity.
However, we have made no changes to these sections other than those
that were proposed in the NPRM.
Student Assistance General Provisions Issue
Three-Year Cohort Default Rate Participation Rate Index Challenges and
Appeals (34 CFR 668.204 and 668.214)
Comments: Several commenters agreed with the proposed change to
raise the participation rate index (PRI) ceiling applicable to
institutions that have a single three-year cohort default rate (CDR) of
over 40 percent. One commenter stated that continuity and consistency
among and between various portions of the regulations, as evidenced by
this change, were important and also commended the Department for
clarifying that all types of institutions were eligible to challenge
and appeal their respective rates using the criteria.
Another commenter requested that the Department change the PRI
appeal requirements to allow a PRI appeal to be made annually for each
published rate. The commenter believed this would dissuade community
colleges from discontinuing participation in the Direct Loan program
for the purpose of preventing the loss of eligibility for the Pell
Grant Program based on high CDRs.
Discussion: We appreciate the commenters' support of this change.
However, we do not agree with the proposal that we allow institutions
to file a PRI appeal annually, whether or not the institution would be
subject to a sanction. This proposal would impose an unmanageable
workload on the Department and is not necessary to protect
institutions. Evaluating a PRI appeal is a time-consuming, labor-
intensive process. The recommended change would require the Department
to consider a significantly higher number of PRI appeals than under the
current process, which would delay decisions for institutions that are
potentially subject to sanctions. Moreover, the Department believes
institutions have ample opportunity to demonstrate in a timely manner
that they qualify for relief from sanctions based on their PRI. Current
regulations permit institutions to bring a PRI appeal not only when an
official rate leading to sanctions is published, but also seven months
earlier, at the draft rate stage, when the loss of eligibility is not
imminent. At the draft rate stage, just as at the official rate stage,
the institution may challenge the draft CDR and file a PRI challenge
with respect to any or all of the official rates that would support a
loss of eligibility.
A successful PRI challenge to an official rate at the draft rate
stage has the same impact as a successful challenge later in the
process. Thus, institutions already have sufficient opportunity to file
a meaningful appeal.
Changes: None.
Perkins Loan, FFEL, and Direct Loan Program Issues
Satisfactory Repayment Arrangements (34 CFR 674.2(b), 674.9(k),
682.200(b), 685.102(b) and 685.200(d))
Comments: Two commenters expressed support for the effort to make
the ``satisfactory repayment arrangements'' definitions more consistent
across the Perkins Loan, FFEL, and Direct Loan programs. These
commenters believed that a consistent definition of an ``on-time''
payment as a payment made within 20 days of the due date would be
helpful to borrowers. However, these commenters also expressed a
concern with the requirement that the payments be ``full'' payments.
These commenters believe that the term ``full'' is too vague and open
to interpretation. These commenters recommended replacing the term
``full'' with the term ``approved'' in the ``satisfactory repayment
arrangement'' definitions. These commenters also suggested aligning the
number of payments needed to regain title IV eligibility under
satisfactory repayment arrangements with the number of payments needed
to rehabilitate a loan. These commenters felt that allowing a borrower
to obtain new title IV loans after six qualifying payments made under
satisfactory repayment arrangements is not in the borrower's best
interests.
Discussion: We thank the commenters for their support of the
proposed changes to the Perkins Loan, FFEL, and Direct Loan program
definitions of ``satisfactory repayment arrangements.'' However, we do
not agree with their recommendation to require that payments made under
satisfactory repayment arrangements be ``approved'' payments rather
than ``full'' payments. We believe that the term ``full'' is self-
explanatory when referring to a payment made on a loan. In addition,
replacing the long-standing term ``full'' with the term ``approved''
might be interpreted as a change in the requirement, rather than just a
change in terminology.
The number of payments required under satisfactory repayment
arrangements and the number of payments required under a rehabilitation
agreement are established by statute. Section 428F(a)(1)(A) of the HEA
requires nine payments under a rehabilitation agreement. Section
428F(b) requires six payments to meet the requirements for satisfactory
repayment arrangements. The Department does not have the authority to
change these requirements.
Changes: None.
Closed School Discharge (34 CFR 674.33(g), 682.402(d), and 685.214)
Comments: One commenter commended the Department for proposing
changes to the closed school discharge provisions. The commenter noted
that extending the 90-day window for students who cease enrollment
before a school closes to 120 days will help students avoid hardships,
such as repaying loans received for programs they are unable to
complete through no fault of their own. This same commenter also
expressed support and thanked the Department for adding examples of
exceptional circumstances under which the Department may extend the
120-day window for affected borrowers. However, this commenter also
recommended that the Department provide the benefit of a closed school
discharge to borrowers enrolled in a program that is discontinued at a
school that continues to operate, especially in the case of a school
that offers many of its programs online or through distance education.
Lastly, another commenter commended the Department for proposing
changes to the closed school discharge provisions and supported the
Department's position to limit the discharge to closed schools only and
not to discontinued programs.
Discussion: The Department appreciates the commenters' support for
its proposed changes to the closed school discharge provisions. In
response
[[Page 65775]]
to the request that the Department provide the benefit of a closed
school discharge to borrowers enrolled in a discontinued program at a
school that continues to operate, we note that sections 437(c)(1) and
464(g) of the HEA require that the school must close in order for a
borrower to be eligible for the discharge. The statute does not provide
for a loan discharge when only a program, either traditional or
distance, is discontinued. We also note that the Department does not
consider a distance education program to be a separate location of a
school for title IV eligibility purposes. A location is a physical site
where a student can receive instruction in 50 percent or more of an
eligible program. If a school offers online programs, the online
programs are considered to be associated with the main campus of the
school. Thus, a borrower enrolled in an online course would be eligible
for a closed school discharge if the main campus of the school closes.
Changes: None.
FFEL and Direct Loan Program Issues
Forbearance for Borrowers Who Are 270 or More Days Delinquent Prior to
Guaranty Agency Default Claim Payment or Transfer by the Department to
Collections Status (34 CFR 682.211(d) and 685.205(a)(8))
Comments: Several commenters supported the proposed requirement
that a lender that grants a forbearance based on an oral request and
affirmation by a borrower who is 270 or more days delinquent must
review with the borrower the terms and conditions and consequences of
the forbearance and must provide the borrower with written confirmation
of the terms of the forbearance agreement within 30 days of the
agreement. However, the commenters expressed concern about limiting the
forbearance for such borrowers to one 120-day period. The commenters
believed that the current economy and pending healthcare reform could
leave many borrowers underemployed or with other temporary situations
that cannot be resolved within 120 days. The commenters recommended
that the forbearance period be extended from 120 to 180 days.
One commenter urged the Department to revise these proposed
regulations to prohibit a borrower from receiving additional
forbearances unless the borrower can demonstrate a reasonable prospect
of increased income in the foreseeable future. The commenter also
recommended that the written notice sent to the borrower to confirm the
terms of the 120-day forbearance agreement include information on other
repayment options and on how the borrower can exit forbearance.
Discussion: The Department disagrees with the commenters'
recommendation that the 120-day, non-serial forbearance that may be
granted based on a defaulted borrower's oral request and affirmation be
expanded to 180 days. We believe that the 120-day forbearance period
provides sufficient time for the borrower to avoid the negative
consequences of default by submitting a written forbearance request and
affirmation that would result in a forbearance period of up to 12
months, documenting deferment eligibility, or changing to a different
repayment plan, so the borrower can successfully manage and repay the
loan.
The Department recognizes that schools are required to conduct
entrance and exit counseling with their borrowers, and through that
process, to educate their borrowers on the terms and conditions of the
loans and the program benefits available to assist them in repaying
their loans. We are aware that many schools are working to enhance and
expand loan-based counseling with their students over the period of
their enrollment at the school and support those efforts. The
Department has also seen evidence, however, both during and following
the negotiated rulemaking sessions, that some institutions are
aggressively pursuing their former students to compel them to request
forbearance on their loans, primarily during the cohort period when the
institution is accountable for student loan defaults. As stated in the
preamble to the NPRM, the limits on the 120-day forbearance based on an
oral request for a borrower who is 270 days or more delinquent are
intended to address potential abuse in this area and to prevent the use
of serial forbearances based on oral requests.
We disagree with the commenter who suggested that a borrower
receiving the 120-day, non-serial forbearance should be denied access
to subsequent discretionary or mandatory forbearances unless the
borrower can demonstrate increased income in the foreseeable future.
Section 428(c)(3) of the HEA, which contains the eligibility criteria
for discretionary and mandatory forbearances in the Direct Loan and
FFEL programs, does not support the use of the borrower's demonstrated
future earnings as a basis for granting forbearance. However, we agree
with the commenter that the other repayment options orally reviewed
with the borrower at the time the forbearance is granted should be
included in the confirming notice sent to the borrower.
Changes: Sections 682.211(d)(2)(iii) and 685.205(a)(8)(ii)(B) of
the FFEL and Direct Loan program regulations, respectively, have been
revised to require that information on all other repayment options be
included in the notice sent to the borrower to confirm the terms of the
forbearance.
Forbearance Provisions for Borrowers Receiving Department of Defense
Student Loan Repayment Benefits (34 CFR 682.211(h) and 685.205(a)(9))
Comments: Commenters supported the proposed change to ensure that
lenders grant appropriate forbearances to borrowers who are performing
eligible service to qualify for student loan repayment under authorized
Department of Defense loan repayment programs.
Discussion: We appreciate the commenters' support for this
regulatory change.
Changes: None.
Borrowers Who Are Delinquent When an Authorized Forbearance Is Granted
(34 CFR 682.211(f) and 682.205(b)(2))
Comments: Several commenters supported the proposed change to the
regulations to authorize FFEL lenders to grant administrative
forbearance to a borrower who is delinquent at the beginning of an
authorized period of forbearance and the corresponding change to the
Direct Loan regulations. The commenters expressed concern, however,
that this authority would provide the Department's loan servicers an
opportunity to use forbearances to increase the percentage of Federal
loans that they service. The commenters urged the Department to ensure
that all delinquent borrowers are treated similarly by requiring the
servicer to discuss the terms and conditions and consequences of the
forbearance with the borrower and subsequently provide written
confirmation of the terms and other pertinent information, as was
proposed in the NPRM for borrowers who are 270 or more days delinquent.
Discussion: The additional authority for FFEL lenders and the
Department in the Direct Loan Program to grant administrative
forbearance to eliminate a period of delinquency that pre-dates the
start of an authorized forbearance period is used only in conjunction
with an authorized period of forbearance for which the borrower
qualifies. The use of forbearance in this circumstance prevents a
borrower from reentering repayment up to 12 months later in a
delinquent status, at the end of the authorized forbearance period.
[[Page 65776]]
Borrowers granted authorized forbearances are provided with pertinent
disclosures that also apply to the period of administrative
forbearance. Therefore, we do not agree with the commenters' suggestion
that we specifically require additional disclosures.
Changes: None.
Loan Rehabilitation Agreement: Reasonable and Affordable Payment
Standard (34 CFR 682.405(b) and 685.211(f))
Comments: Several commenters expressed support for the proposed
regulations in Sec. Sec. 682.405(b)(1) and 685.211(f)(1) that would
require a guaranty agency and the Department to determine a FFEL or
Direct Loan program borrower's rehabilitation payment amount based on
the borrower's, and if applicable the borrower's spouse's, current
disposable income, family size, and reasonable and necessary expenses.
As discussed below, several commenters raised a number of
objections to the process that a guaranty agency and the Department
would follow to determine a borrower's reasonable and affordable
rehabilitation payment.
Several commenters were critical of the proposed regulations. These
commenters believed that the requirements in the proposed regulations
would delay and hinder the rehabilitation process. These commenters
expressed concern that requesting financial documents and information
from borrowers would burden the process, create confusion, and invade
the privacy of the borrower. They stated that often borrowers default
because they do not complete paperwork and meet deadlines. In the view
of these commenters, the proposed regulatory requirements would impede
the ability of collection agencies to get borrowers to participate in
the loan rehabilitation program. One of these commenters recommended
that the proposed regulations not be implemented at all due to the
amount of paperwork a borrower would be required to complete to enter
into a loan rehabilitation agreement.
Several commenters stated that the determination of a ``reasonable
and affordable'' payment amount can often be accomplished in a
telephone conversation in which a borrower's overall financial
circumstances are evaluated to establish an acceptable payment amount.
In these discussions, the commenters asserted, the borrower's own
assessment of his or her total financial circumstances and ability to
pay the requested amount serves as the basis for the guaranty agency or
Department's determination that the payment amount is reasonable and
affordable. These commenters believed that this would be a fair
conclusion, since the borrower understands his or her financial
resources and constraints better than others. According to the
commenters, guaranty agencies find that nearly half of borrowers
seeking rehabilitation are able to obtain what the guaranty agencies
term reasonable and affordable payment amounts in this manner.
Another commenter, however, argued that, since debt collectors are
paid based on a share of revenue collected, Federal student loan
servicers have little incentive to offer reasonable and affordable
rehabilitation payments that are based on an objective analysis of the
borrower's financial circumstances. Instead, the incentive is to push
borrowers to make as large a payment as possible, regardless of whether
the payment is either reasonable or affordable. Another commenter
reiterated this point, stating that private collection agencies--
including the Department's own collection contractors--use a balance-
sensitive repayment approach for making an initial determination of a
borrower's rehabilitation payment amount. Under a balance-sensitive
repayment approach, the payment amount offered to the borrower is based
on the outstanding balance of the loan, and does not take into
consideration the borrower's financial circumstances. In such cases,
the commenter asserted, the borrower may feel pressured to agree to a
loan rehabilitation payment amount that is unaffordable, and the
rehabilitation will ultimately be unsuccessful.
Several commenters raised concerns with regard to use of the
Department's proposed Financial Disclosure for Reasonable and
Affordable Rehabilitation Payments form for collecting financial and
other information from borrowers seeking to rehabilitate their loans.
These concerns can be summarized as follows:
The commenters asserted that use of the form in all cases
would be inconsistent with the Department's goal of providing an
improved and more consistent loan rehabilitation process for FFEL and
Direct Loan borrowers. The commenters believed that the Department can
achieve the same goal by emphasizing to its own staff and collection
agencies, as well as to guaranty agencies and their collection
agencies, the importance of complying with all applicable statutory and
regulatory requirements. In the view of these commenters, requiring the
use of the form only in the absence of an agreement between the
borrower and the loan holder on a reasonable and affordable repayment
amount would provide targeted help to such borrowers. The commenters
stated that collecting personal and financial information from every
borrower who requests loan rehabilitation would be unreasonable and
unwarranted.
The commenters believed that the use of the form would
work against the Department's goal of increasing borrower participation
in the loan rehabilitation program. The commenters stated that many
borrowers would not complete the form, and that the proposed
regulations would actually decrease the percentage of borrowers
attempting to rehabilitate their loans.
The commenters expressed concerns that use of the form
would infringe on the privacy of the borrowers, requiring them to
provide highly sensitive information either to a guaranty agency or to
the Department, even if the borrower has already agreed to a repayment
amount.
The commenters believed that the requirements in the
proposed regulations would impose an additional impediment to borrowers
seeking to regain Title IV eligibility while rehabilitating defaulted
loans.
The commenters were also concerned that use of the form
would impose an enormous administrative burden on all parties.
Several commenters stated that they believed that the regulatory
requirements that were negotiated and agreed to during the negotiated
rulemaking session should only be triggered if the borrower objected to
the repayment amount offered by the collection agency or the guaranty
agency. They stated that this type of borrower feedback has always been
a trigger event for collecting additional financial information to
determine reasonable and affordable payments, and asserted that no
change to this trigger event was discussed during negotiations. These
commenters claimed that the process for determining reasonable and
affordable rehabilitation payment amounts provided for in the consensus
regulatory language and described in the NPRM was not consistent with
their understanding of what was agreed to during the negotiated
rulemaking sessions.
Another commenter had a different understanding of the proposed
rules that had been agreed to by the negotiated rulemaking committee.
This commenter stated that the consensus regulatory language would
require loan
[[Page 65777]]
servicers, loan holders, and debt collectors to use the form collecting
financial disclosure information from the borrower for every borrower
who seeks to rehabilitate a loan. This commenter pointed out that the
proposed regulatory language agreed to by the negotiating committee
states that a borrower's reasonable and affordable repayment amount
must be based ``solely'' on information provided on the form and, if
requested, supporting documentation. The proposed regulations describe
a process in which a borrower who objects to the payment amount
determined through use of the form is then offered a rehabilitation
payment amount that is calculated using the same formula used for
determining payments under IBR. This commenter stated that during the
rulemaking negotiations, the commenter supported the consensus
regulatory language because the proposed regulations would provide a
standardized process to ensure that rehabilitation amounts are
determined solely by looking at a borrower's financial circumstances.
This commenter recommended that the Department issue guidance to
clarify that an offer of a rehabilitation payment amount must be based
solely on information provided by the borrower. This commenter also
noted that some negotiators had proposed during the negotiations that
the initial rehabilitation payment amount offered should be determined
using the IBR formula. This commenter recommended that, if the borrower
is unable to complete the form, the loan holder should continue the
rehabilitation process by determining the payment amount using this
approach.
Another commenter expressed concerns about the complexity of the
proposed form, and suggested that if the payment calculated using the
IBR formula was the initial offer to a borrower, the form would only be
needed for borrowers who object to that initial payment amount. The
commenter stated that a payment amount calculated using this approach
would be acceptable to most borrowers, and would therefore
significantly reduce the number of borrowers who would need to use the
financial disclosure form.
Discussion: In response to the numerous comments we received
expressing concerns about the amount of personal financial information
a borrower requesting loan rehabilitation would have to provide under
the proposed regulations, we have modified the final regulations to
provide that as the first step in the loan rehabilitation process, the
lender, loan servicer or the Department will calculate a loan
rehabilitation payment amount by using the IBR payment formula that
provides for a monthly payment equal to 15 percent of the amount by
which the borrower's AGI exceeds 150 percent of the poverty guideline
amount applicable to the borrower's State and family size, divided by
12. Throughout the remainder of this preamble, we refer to this as the
``15 percent formula.'' To ensure consistent treatment of all defaulted
borrowers, the initial loan rehabilitation payment amount will be
calculated in all cases using the 15 percent formula, as described
earlier. For new borrowers on or after July 1, 2014, who are repaying
non-defaulted Direct Loans under the IBR plan, the IBR plan payment
amount is equal to 10 percent of the amount by which the borrower's AGI
exceeds 150 percent of the poverty guideline amount applicable to the
borrower's State and family size. However, this 10 percent IBR formula
will not be used in the initial determination of a reasonable and
affordable loan rehabilitation payment amount on a defaulted loan.
It is important to note that loan rehabilitation payments
calculated by using the 15 percent formula are not payments that are
made under the IBR plan. This means, for example, that such payments do
not count toward IBR plan loan forgiveness, nor do they count as
qualifying payments for purposes of public service loan forgiveness in
the Direct Loan Program.
Under these final regulations, a loan rehabilitation payment amount
based on the information collected on the Financial Disclosure for
Reasonable and Affordable Payments form will only be calculated if the
borrower objects to the payment amount based on the 15 percent formula.
If the borrower does object to the payment amount calculated based on
this formula and requests that a rehabilitation payment amount be
calculated based on information on the form, the borrower can choose
which payment amount to accept. We expect that the payment amount based
on the 15 percent formula will in most cases be less than the payment
amount under a standard 10-year repayment plan, and will be acceptable
to most borrowers. Therefore, this approach should significantly reduce
the number of borrowers who will be required to complete the financial
disclosure form. We believe that this change will address concerns
raised by consumer advocates, student groups, guaranty agencies, and
collection agencies alike that the financial disclosure information
required under the proposed regulations would be overly burdensome for
borrowers requesting loan rehabilitation.
Specifically, with regard to commenters' concerns that the proposed
regulations would create confusion, add burden to the process, or
invade the privacy of the borrower, we believe the revised process in
the final regulations is clear and understandable. The revised process
significantly reduces burden by limiting the use of the form, and
appropriately balances the borrower's privacy with the need to verify
information. The final regulations assist with privacy concerns by
limiting the information borrowers are required to provide--only
requiring the use of the Financial Disclosure for Reasonable and
Affordable Payments for those borrowers who object to the monthly
payment amount determined based on the 15 percent formula.
Commenters were concerned that the paperwork burden associated with
the use of the financial disclosure form would impede the ability of
collection agencies to get borrowers to participate in the loan
rehabilitation program. Our revisions to the proposed regulations
significantly reduce the paperwork burden on borrowers because, again,
they will only need to provide the Financial Disclosure for Reasonable
and Affordable Payments form if they object to the payment amount based
on the 15 percent formula.
Some commenters stated that reliance on the oral statements of the
borrower should be sufficient to determine the ``reasonable and
affordable'' payment amount, and that there should be no need for
further documentation or verification. Other commenters had the
opposite opinion, sharing concern that loan servicers may push
borrowers to agree to payments that are not reasonable and affordable.
We believe our approach balances applicable equities, burden,
verification that payment is reasonable and affordable, and privacy
concerns.
With regard to the comments about the agreements reached at the
negotiated rulemaking sessions, we believe the NPRM was consistent with
the consensus reached through negotiated rulemaking. Commenters did
seem to have different understandings of what the NPRM language meant;
we believe our revised regulations provide a clear, understandable
process.
With regard to comments about a ``trigger event,'' we believe that
it would defeat the purpose of the proposed regulations if the
regulations only applied in cases when a borrower and loan holder are
unable to agree to a loan rehabilitation payment amount. The intent of
the regulations is to
[[Page 65778]]
standardize the process for determining rehabilitation payment amounts.
The commenter states that loan holders and borrowers are able to agree
to loan rehabilitation payment amounts 50 percent of the time. If this
figure is accurate, and the trigger for the rehabilitation payment
amount regulations was the failure of the borrower and loan holder to
come to an agreement, the loan rehabilitation regulations would only
apply to half of the borrowers who apply for rehabilitation.
We note that nothing in these regulations precludes a defaulted
borrower from resolving the default by repaying the loan in full. A
qualified defaulted borrower may also, under certain conditions, repay
a defaulted loan through a new Direct Consolidation Loan. Some
defaulted borrowers may also qualify for a loan discharge. The
regulations do not prohibit the Secretary, his designee, or a guaranty
agency from discussing these other payment arrangements with the
borrower outside of the context of the loan rehabilitation program and
its associated requirements.
Changes: We have revised Sec. Sec. 682.405(b)(1)(iii) and
685.211(f)(1)(i) to specify that the initial loan rehabilitation
payment amount determined by a guaranty agency or the Secretary equals
15 percent of the amount by which the borrower's Adjusted Gross Income
(AGI) exceeds 150 percent of the poverty guideline amount applicable to
the borrower's family size and State, divided by 12, except that if
this amount is less than $5, the borrower's monthly rehabilitation
payment is $5.
We have revised Sec. Sec. 682.405(b)(1)(vii) and 685.211(f)(3) to
specify that if the borrower objects to the initial payment amount, a
second loan rehabilitation payment amount is determined by
recalculating the payment amount based solely on the information
provided on the Financial Disclosure for Reasonable and Affordable
Payments form and, if requested, supporting documentation from the
borrower and other sources.
Comments: In the NPRM, the Department identified several categories
of expenses in proposed Sec. Sec. 682.405(b)(1)(i)(C) and
685.211(f)(1)(i)(C) that the guaranty agencies and the Department would
use to evaluate a borrower's monthly ``reasonable and necessary
expenses.'' Although the proposed regulations did not stipulate
standardized amounts that a borrower might claim in each of these
categories, the Secretary invited comment on whether the regulations
should specify standardized amounts, such as those used in the IRS
National Standards. Commenters representing both guaranty agencies and
consumer groups opposed this idea.
Several commenters noted that the topic of standardization was
discussed at length during the negotiations, and noted that an overly
rigid framework for making these determinations would likely eliminate
the rehabilitation opportunity for those whose financial circumstances
do not exactly fit within the framework. They pointed out that, as the
Secretary noted in the preamble to the NPRM, preserving appropriate
flexibility in the methodology is important to enable guaranty agencies
and the Department to ensure that a reasonable and affordable payment
is available to all borrowers. These commenters contended that allowing
flexibility in this regard strengthens the effectiveness of the
regulations in determining reasonable and affordable payment amounts.
These commenters stated that the negotiated rulemaking committee
decided not to propose a standardized methodology. These commenters
reiterated that position in response to the Secretary's invitation to
comment.
In a separate comment, another commenter recommended that the
Department not use standardized national standards for expense amounts.
This commenter stated that, to the extent that the consensus regulatory
language reflected an agreement that a combination of standardized and
tailored payment options would best meet the needs of borrowers,
standardizing the more tailored approach would be a step in the wrong
direction.
Discussion: We thank the commenters for responding to the
invitation to comment on this proposal in the NPRM. We agree with their
view that the final regulations should preserve the flexibility to
determine reasonable and affordable rehabilitation payment amounts
based on the borrower's financial information, which the proposed
regulations provided.
Changes: None.
Comments: One commenter expressed concern about proposed Sec.
682.405(b)(1)(v) and Sec. 685.211(f)(1)(iii), which would provide
borrowers with an opportunity to object to an offer of a reasonable and
affordable payment amount that is presented to the borrower in a
written rehabilitation agreement. The commenter stated that many
borrowers will be offered payment amounts orally, and believed that
these borrowers should be able to object to the offered payment amount
at that point. This commenter noted that requiring borrowers to wait
until they receive a written offer will only delay or deter the
borrowers from rehabilitating their loans.
Discussion: We agree that a loan servicer may make a first offer of
the rehabilitation payment amount based on the 15 percent IBR formula
to a borrower orally. If the borrower agrees to the payment amount, the
borrower would have to follow up on the conversation by providing the
loan holder with the documentation required to calculate a payment
amount under that formula. Consistent with Sec. Sec.
682.405(b)(1)(iii) and 685.211(f)(3), the borrower may object to the
initial offer at the time it is made.
Changes: We have revised Sec. 682.405(b)(1)(iv) and Sec.
685.211(f)(1)(ii) to specify that a guaranty agency or the Department
may calculate a payment amount based on information provided orally by
the borrower, and may provide the borrower with a rehabilitation
agreement using that amount. We have also specified in revised
Sec. Sec. 682.405(b)(1)(iv) and 685.211(f)(1)(ii) that if the borrower
does not provide the guaranty agency or the Department with the
documentation required to calculate the payment amount using the 15
percent formula or to confirm the information provided orally on which
the Secretary or the guaranty agency calculated the payment amount, the
rehabilitation agreement entered into for that amount is null and void.
Comments: We received several comments on Sec. Sec.
682.405(b)(1)(v) and 685.211(f)(1)(iii). Section 682.405(b)(1)(v) of
the proposed regulations stated that a guaranty agency ``may not impose
any other conditions unrelated to the amount or timing of the
rehabilitation payments'' in a rehabilitation agreement. Section
685.211(f)(1)(iii) of the proposed regulations provided that the
Secretary would not impose such conditions in rehabilitation agreements
for Direct Loans. Several commenters stated that some guaranty agencies
currently require a borrower's written acknowledgement of the
borrower's understanding of the terms and conditions of rehabilitation,
which these commenters stated is a prudent practice when establishing a
new repayment agreement with a borrower. In such cases, the borrower
may be required to sign and return the agreement or provide a separate,
signed authorization statement acknowledging, at a minimum, that
collection costs will be added to the loan balance at the time the
rehabilitated loan is purchased by an eligible lender. These commenters
[[Page 65779]]
believed that this requirement for the borrower to review and
acknowledge the information provided in the rehabilitation agreement
underscores the importance of rehabilitation as a one-time opportunity
to remove loans from default status. It also reduces the possibility of
misunderstandings about the terms of the loan rehabilitation and
related risks for guaranty agencies in the event of a dispute
concerning the applicable repayment terms and conditions, costs, and
benefits of loan rehabilitation.
Commenters noted that guaranty agencies may also currently require
a borrower to provide updated references and contact information to
facilitate the loan rehabilitation process. The commenters stated that
this provides a purchasing lender with important default prevention
information, if needed, since the borrower's contact information may be
incomplete or outdated and the references provided in the promissory
note may no longer be valid. This enhances a guaranty agency's ability
to sell the borrower's rehabilitation-eligible loans. These commenters
requested confirmation from the Department that the proposed
regulations would not preclude guaranty agencies from continuing these
practices.
Discussion: The limitation in the proposed rule that would preclude
a guaranty agency from imposing any additional conditions on loan
rehabilitation unrelated to the amount or timing of rehabilitation
payments was not intended to prohibit the agency from requiring
borrowers to acknowledge the terms and conditions of the rehabilitation
in writing, or from requiring borrowers to provide updated contact
information when the loan rehabilitation agreement is signed. Requiring
the borrower to acknowledge such disclosure information, or to provide
such contact information, would be helpful to the borrower. It would
help to ensure that the borrower understands the rehabilitation
agreement, and, where necessary, facilitate the sale of the loan to a
FFEL loan holder.
Changes: None.
Comments: There were several comments on proposed Sec. Sec.
682.405(b)(1)(vi) and 685.211(f)(3) in the proposed regulations. These
commenters stated that the terms ``IBR formula'' or ``IBR calculation''
should not be used in connection with describing the method used to
determine a reasonable and affordable rehabilitation payment amount.
These commenters believed that using these terms would cause
significant confusion for borrowers, since payments made towards loan
rehabilitation do not count as IBR payments. These commenters
recommended using the term ``alternative payment amount'' or ``APA'' to
refer to this formula.
These commenters also noted that proposed Sec. Sec.
682.405(b)(1)(vi) and 685.211(f)(5) include a cross-reference to the
IBR regulations at Sec. 682.215(b)(1), Sec. 685.221(b)(1), and Sec.
685.221(b)(2). Those regulations include other requirements in addition
to the IBR payment amount formula. These commenters believed that using
the broad cross reference could be interpreted as incorporating these
other provisions not specifically related to the formula as applying to
the rehabilitation requirements as well.
These commenters recommended that the Department include the
``alternative payment amount'' formula directly in the loan
rehabilitation regulations, rather than cross-referencing the IBR
regulations.
Discussion: As discussed earlier in this preamble, in the final
regulations we have switched the order in which the rehabilitation
payment amounts are determined and offered to borrowers. Under the
final regulations, the payment amount based on the 15 percent formula
will be the first offer to the borrower, and the payment amount based
on information provided on the financial disclosure form will be the
second offer. The borrower may choose which payment amount to accept.
Since the 15 percent formula payment will be the first payment amount
offered during rehabilitation discussions, it would not be accurate to
refer to it as the ``alternative payment amount.''
We agree with the commenters that we do not intend the extensive
and detailed requirements in Sec. Sec. 682.215(b)(1), 685.221(b)(1),
and 685.221(b)(2) of the IBR regulations to apply to determining a loan
rehabilitation payment amount. Replacing the cross-references with the
15 percent formula will make the loan rehabilitation regulations
simpler and clearer. In addition, eliminating the cross-references may
reduce the potential for borrowers to confuse rehabilitation payments
based on the 15 percent formula with payments made by a non-defaulted
borrower under the IBR plan. Eliminating the cross-references also
clarifies that the initial rehabilitation payment amount for a ``new
borrower'' as defined in Sec. 685.221(a)(4) of the IBR plan
regulations would not be calculated using the 10 percent IBR formula as
described in Sec. 685.221(b)(1) of the IBR plan regulations.
Regardless of how a loan rehabilitation payment amount is determined, a
rehabilitation payment does not qualify as an IBR plan payment and does
not count toward IBR plan loan forgiveness or for any other purposes
for which a qualifying payment made under the IBR plan on a non-
defaulted loan might count, such as for public service loan forgiveness
in the Direct Loan Program.
Changes: We have replaced the cross-references in Sec. Sec.
682.405(b)(1)(iii) and 685.211(f)(1)(i) with the 15 percent formula.
Comments: In the NPRM, the Secretary invited comment on proposed
Sec. Sec. 682.405(b)(1)(vii) and 685.211(f)(5), which would provide
that a loan rehabilitation does not go forward if the borrower fails to
provide the documentation required for the payment amount to be
calculated. The Secretary asked if it would be appropriate to make a
change in the final regulations to require a borrower to submit
information needed to recalculate the borrower's reasonable and
affordable rehabilitation payment amount only if new information is
required beyond what the borrower provided when he or she initially
requested loan rehabilitation. Several commenters responded to this
invitation for comment, and all supported making this change in the
final regulations. One commenter requested that the Department's final
regulations be flexible enough to cover the following scenarios:
Some information or documentation originally submitted by
the borrower is illegible or difficult to understand, and needs to be
requested again or explained.
Significant time passes between the borrower's initial
request for rehabilitation and the borrower's subsequent request for a
recalculated payment amount, so a verification of critical information
may be needed to determine an appropriate payment amount.
The borrower realizes after submitting the original
information/documentation that the submission was incomplete or
inaccurate, and that additional information or documentation is needed
by the loan holder to determine an appropriate payment amount.
Discussion: As discussed earlier in this preamble, we have switched
the order in which rehabilitation payment amounts are offered to
borrowers. Under the final regulations, a payment amount calculated
using the 15 percent formula will be the basis for the first offer. If
the borrower objects to that amount, the guaranty agency or the
Department will
[[Page 65780]]
calculate a payment amount based on detailed financial information
provided by the borrower, and the borrower may then choose between the
two payment amounts. Except when the loan is being collected by AWG, it
is extremely unlikely that the loan holder will already have the
detailed financial information requested on the form. Therefore, there
is no need to make the requested change.
Changes: None.
Comments: One commenter expressed support for the provision in
proposed Sec. 682.405(b)(1)(x) that would limit guaranty agency
contact with a borrower during the rehabilitation period to collection
activities required by law and communications with the borrower that
support the rehabilitation.
Discussion: We appreciate the commenter's support. We also note
that this provision, in Sec. Sec. 682.405(b)(1)(xi) and Sec.
685.211(f)(7), does not prohibit guaranty agencies or the Secretary
from contacting borrowers to remind them when the next payment is due
or, in appropriate circumstances, to inquire about any missed payments.
The intent of such calls is to ensure that the borrower maintains the
consecutive monthly payment stream required to successfully
rehabilitate a loan. Contacts of this type between a guaranty agency or
the Secretary and a borrower are ``communications that support the
rehabilitation.''
Changes: None.
Loan Rehabilitation Agreement: Treatment of Borrowers Subject to
Administrative Wage Garnishment (34 CFR 682.405(a) and 685.211(f))
Comments: Three commenters expressed support for the proposed
regulations in Sec. Sec. 682.405(a)(3) and 685.211(f)(12)(i) that
would suspend payments made through administrative wage garnishment
(AWG) for borrowers who make five qualifying payments under a loan
rehabilitation agreement. These commenters felt that this step would be
a reward and an incentive for borrowers and would encourage defaulted
borrowers to rehabilitate their loans.
Several commenters stated that proposed Sec. 682.405(a)(3) appears
to assume that a guaranty agency would not be required to suspend the
borrower's current garnishment order for another reason prior to
receipt of the borrower's fifth loan rehabilitation payment. However,
these commenters noted that this may not always be the case under the
current and proposed AWG regulations in Sec. 682.410(b)(9). For
instance, if a borrower does not request a hearing prior to the
initiation of AWG, but does so shortly after AWG commences, the AWG
hearing process would occur during the period of the borrower's first
five payments under a loan rehabilitation agreement and could result in
a required suspension of the garnishment order during that time. These
commenters recommended that Sec. 682.405(a)(3) be modified to include
a reference to Sec. 682.410(b)(9) to clarify that a guaranty agency
may suspend a garnishment order for a borrower pursuing loan
rehabilitation prior to receipt of the borrower's fifth rehabilitation
payment, if required to do so for another reason in accordance with
Sec. 682.410(b)(9).
Discussion: We agree with the commenters. The proposed regulations
governing suspension of AWG payments after a borrower makes five
qualifying rehabilitation payments were not intended to preclude
guaranty agencies or the Department from suspending AWG collection for
reasons unrelated to the loan rehabilitation before the borrower makes
a fifth qualifying loan rehabilitation payment. As the commenters
noted, a guaranty agency may receive a notice to suspend AWG due to
other reasons, as specified in Sec. 682.410(b)(9) of the AWG
regulations.
Changes: We have revised Sec. 682.405(a)(3)(i) to specify that the
requirement that a guaranty agency continue collecting a loan by AWG
until the borrower makes five qualifying monthly rehabilitation
payments does not apply if the guaranty agency is precluded from
collecting through AWG under Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i), and have made a
comparable change in Sec. 685.211(f)(11)(i) of the Direct Loan
regulations.
Modification of the FFEL Program and Direct Loan Program Regulations:
Counseling Borrowers (34 CFR 682.604(a) and 685.304(b))
Comments: One commenter expressed support for the proposed changes
to the exit counseling regulations that would allow a school to send
written counseling materials to a student borrower by email when the
student has withdrawn without notice to the school or failed to
complete required exit counseling. However, the commenter believed that
the wording of proposed Sec. Sec. 682.604(a)(1) and 685.304(b)(3)
could be misinterpreted, as it could be read to mean either that a
student must provide an email address to the school within 30 days
after the school learns that the student has withdrawn, or that the
school must provide the written counseling materials to the student by
email within 30 days after learning of the student's withdrawal. The
commenter assumed that the second interpretation is what was intended,
and recommended that the regulatory language be revised to make this
clear.
The same commenter also noted that in the preamble to the NPRM, the
Department indicated that the proposed changes in Sec. Sec.
682.604(a)(1) and 685.304(b)(3) allowing schools to send written
counseling materials to an email address provided by the student
borrower in certain cases reflected existing guidance included in the
Department's Federal Student Aid Handbook. The commenter pointed out
that the guidance in the Federal Student Loan Handbook clarifies that
if a school sends exit counseling materials to a student by email, the
school must use the student's ``home (not school) email address,'' if
the school has that address. The commenter recommended that the
Department include in the regulations this prohibition on sending the
counseling materials to the student borrower's school email address,
but stated that there should be no reason to limit schools to sending
exit counseling materials only to a student's ``home'' email address.
The commenter stated that as long as the school does not send the
counseling materials to an email address associated with its own
institution, it should be able to send the materials to the student's
home or work email address, or even to an email address for the student
at another institution where the student is in attendance.
Discussion: The Department appreciates the commenter's support of
the changes to the exit counseling regulations. With regard to the
intent of the wording of proposed Sec. Sec. 682.604(a)(1) and
685.304(b)(3), the commenter's understanding is correct. The school
must send the counseling materials within 30 days after learning that
the student borrower has withdrawn or failed to complete the required
exit counseling.
The Department agrees with the recommendation to incorporate into
the regulations the statement in the Federal Student Aid Handbook
clarifying that written counseling materials may not be sent to a
student borrower's email address at the same school that is sending the
materials. We also agree that schools should not be limited to sending
the counseling materials to the student's ``home'' email address.
However, we note that the proposed regulations did not include this
limitation. The proposed regulations stated that the written counseling
materials could be sent to ``an email address provided by the
borrower.''
[[Page 65781]]
Changes: We have revised Sec. Sec. 682.604(a)(1) and 685.304(b)(3)
to clarify that the school must send the counseling materials within 30
days after learning that the student borrower has withdrawn or failed
to complete the required exit counseling, and that the counseling
materials may not be sent to a student's email address at the same
school that is sending the materials.
FFEL Program Issues
FFEL Lender Repayment Disclosures to Borrowers Who Are 60 Days
Delinquent or Who Are Having Difficulty Making Payments (34 CFR
682.205(a)(4))
Comments: One commenter agreed with the proposed change to provide
lenders with five business days rather than the five calendar days
specified in current regulations to send the required disclosure to a
borrower who is 60 days delinquent. The commenter also supported the
proposed change to provide that a lender does not have to send the
required disclosure when a borrower is having difficulty making
payments if the borrower's difficulty had already been resolved based
on an earlier communication between the lender and the borrower. The
commenter agreed that multiple disclosures would confuse the borrower.
Discussion: The Secretary appreciates the commenter's support.
Changes: None.
Administrative Wage Garnishment of the Disposable Pay of Defaulted FFEL
Program Borrowers (34 CFR 682.410(b)) Borrower Hearing Opportunities on
the Enforceability of the Debt and a Borrower's Claim of Financial
Hardship (34 CFR 682.410(b)(9)(i))
Comments: One commenter noted support for the changes made to the
FFEL administrative wage garnishment regulations in the NPRM.
Discussion: The Department appreciates the commenter's support for
the revised regulatory language.
Changes: None.
Comments: Under proposed Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(F)(2)(iv), if a
hearing official upholds a borrower's objection to the amount or rate
of withholding, a guaranty agency ``may'' order a lesser rate or amount
that would allow the borrower to meet basic living expenses. On pages
45641 and 45642 of the NPRM, we pointed out that this provision differs
from the rules governing AWG for Department-held loans at 34 CFR part
34, and that, in the latter regulations, the word ``must'' is used
instead. We invited comments on whether it was preferable to use
``must'' rather than ``may''. One commenter supported the consensus
language in the NPRM without further explanation. Another commenter
agreed with the Department's suggestion that ``must'' was a preferable
term because a hearing official's financial hardship determination and
decision regarding the amount or rate of withholding should be binding
on the guaranty agency issuing a withholding order, and because the
regulatory language for guaranty agencies and the Department should be
consistent.
Discussion: We agree with the commenter who expressed support for
changing the term ``may'' to ``must.'' Not only is it important to
ensure that substantive provisions of the FFEL Program AWG regulations
are consistent, to the extent practicable, with the rules governing AWG
for Department-held loans, use of the term ``must'' would provide more
equitable treatment for borrowers who are subject to AWG. Furthermore,
use of the term ``must'' would ensure that borrowers who receive an
opportunity for an independent determination of a financial hardship
objection will have that determination followed by the guaranty agency
issuing a withholding order. The decision of the hearing official binds
the guaranty agency or the Secretary as to the maximum amount that may
be ordered withheld from the borrower's wages and neither has
discretion to order that a greater amount be withheld.
Changes: We have changed ``may'' to ``must'' in Sec.
682.410(b)(9)(i)(F)(2)(iv).
Comments: On page 45641 of the NPRM, when discussing the
determination of whether a withholding amount would cause a financial
hardship to a borrower, we invited comments on whether the term
``National Standards'' used in the proposed rules should be changed to
``Collection Financial Standards'' in the final rules to conform to the
term used by the IRS to refer to such standards. One commenter
expressed support for making this change in the final rule, stating
that the term ``Collection Financial Standards'' more accurately
reflects all living expense category standards used in determining
whether a withholding amount would cause a financial hardship for the
borrower.
Discussion: We agree with the commenter's reasons for changing the
term to ``Collection Financial Standards.'' The IRS, which promulgates
the standards, uses the term to include both what the IRS calls the
``National Standards'' (food, etc.) as well as the regionalized Housing
and Utilities Standards and Transportation Standards. The latter
include average amounts spent for housing, utilities, and
transportation, which represent a significant portion of borrowers'
living expenses. The term ``Collection Financial Standards'' is the
correct title of the IRS Standards that hearing officials must use when
determining the financial hardship for borrowers.
Changes: We have changed the three uses of the term ``National
Standards'' to ``Collection Financial Standards'' in Sec.
682.410(b)(9)(i)(F)(2)(ii) and (iii).
Comments: A commenter noted that proposed Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)
does not address a situation in which a guaranty agency may be required
to suspend a withholding order. Under proposed Sec. 682.405(a)(3), a
borrower who makes five qualifying payments under a rehabilitation
agreement can request that the agency suspend a withholding order. The
commenter suggested including a cross-reference in the AWG regulations
to Sec. 682.405(a)(3) and a brief description of a borrower's right to
request suspension under that provision.
Discussion: We agree with the commenter's suggestion and believe
that including such a reference in Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i) would be
beneficial. All AWG regulatory provisions are located or referenced in
Sec. 682.410(b)(9) to minimize confusion.
Changes: We have added a new Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(V) to include a
cross-reference to Sec. 682.405(a)(3) and describe the possible
suspension of the withholding order.
Comments: A commenter noted that in proposed Sec.
682.410(b)(9)(ii)(G), the Department defines a withholding order as the
order a guaranty agency sends to an employer directing the employer to
withhold the pay of the employed borrower. However, the commenter also
noted that the Department states that such an order may also be
referred to as a ``wage garnishment order'' or ``garnishment order.''
The commenter suggested that only one of these terms be used to avoid
confusion with other communications sent by the agency.
Discussion: In the proposed regulations, the Department
distinguished between an ``order,'' which is the term for the mandate
issued to the employer requiring the employer to withhold from the
borrower's wages, and a ``notice,'' which refers to the warning sent to
the borrower to alert the borrower that the agency is preparing to
enforce the loan by garnishment of the borrower's wages. Because these
two communications are readily distinguished by the use of the term
``order'' to refer to the legally-binding mandate and ``notice'' to
refer to correspondence sent to the borrower,
[[Page 65782]]
we do not believe that alternative use of the term ``garnishment'' or
``withholding'' prior to ``order'' will cause any confusion.
Changes: None.
Comments: A commenter stated that the proposed rule would allow
borrowers two new bases on which they may object to AWG in the FFEL
program: Enforceability of the debt and financial hardship. The
commenter further asserted that the HEA does not specifically name
these as permissible objections, but acknowledges that borrowers have
been permitted to use these objections. The commenter further expressed
concern that AWG hearing officials are unqualified to make legal
determinations of loan enforceability. The commenter therefore
requested a standardized appeal process if a hearing official makes an
enforceability determination that the guaranty agency believes is
erroneous.
Discussion: First, we note that the commenter is incorrect in
asserting that section 488A of the HEA does not provide borrowers with
the right to object to AWG on the basis of claims that the debt is not
enforceable or on the basis of financial hardship. We address these
issues in turn.
Second, Section 488A(a)(5) provides borrowers the opportunity for a
hearing concerning ``the existence or the amount of the debt.'' 20
U.S.C. 1095a(a)(5). It is not clear which objections the commenter
considers the HEA to permit the borrower to raise in the hearing, but
the statute is clear that if the borrower objects to the existence or
amount of the debt claimed by the loan holder, the hearing official
must determine whether the debt in question is enforceable, and if so,
what amount is enforceable. In the context of section 488A of the HEA,
determining whether a debt ``exists'' entails more than a bookkeeping
test of assuring that all amounts disbursed and payments received have
been correctly totaled. To reduce the hearing process to a bookkeeping
exercise is to suggest that section 488A of the HEA empowers a
guarantor to issue a legally-binding order that an individual's wages
be withheld to collect a claim that applicable law would bar the
guarantor from enforcing in any other proceeding, such as a suit on the
debt. Section 488A of the HEA authorizes collection by non-judicial
wage garnishment ``notwithstanding any provision of State law.'' 20
U.S.C. 1095a. That provision does no more than preempt those State laws
that would require a creditor to obtain a judicial writ in order to
garnish wages. Nothing in the language of section 488A of the HEA
suggests that the statute preempts other applicable, non-preempted
State law (e.g., forgery or prior compromise) or Federal law (e.g.,
discharge in bankruptcy) that would bar enforcement of the claim
against the individual.
For this reason, it is the responsibility of guaranty agencies to
ensure that AWG hearing officials are qualified to make reasoned
determinations regarding the enforceability of Federal student loan
debts. Furthermore, prior to an AWG hearing, a guaranty agency should
have already made a determination on the enforceability of the debt.
Section 682.406(a) requires an agency to carefully evaluate that all
due diligence requirements were met and that the debt is legally
enforceable before requesting a reinsurance payment on a loan.
In addition, promptly after paying the default claim, the guarantor
must give the borrower notice of its intent to collect the loan and
report the default to credit bureaus, and to provide ``an opportunity
for an administrative review of the legal enforceability or past-due
status of the loan.'' 34 CFR 682.410(b)(5)(ii)(D) and (b)(5)(vi)(I).
Prior to an AWG hearing, the agency should have therefore made its own
reasoned determination of the enforceability of the debt and have
sufficient evidence supporting that determination. The new language
added to the wage garnishment provisions is not a new consideration not
already existing explicitly in these provisions and implicitly in the
mandate to provide a hearing on the ``existence'' of the debt.
Third, section 488A(a)(5) of the HEA provides borrowers with an
opportunity for a hearing ``on the terms of the repayment schedule'' if
that schedule is set by order and not by an agreement with the
borrower, as provided in section 488A(a)(4) of the HEA. The only
interpretation of this provision that implements the objective of the
statute is that the basis for such objection must be a claim that
withholding the full 15 percent would cause financial hardship. The
Department has consistently interpreted that phrase, and the identical
language in 5 U.S.C. 5514, which authorizes Federal Salary Offset and
from which this provision appears to have originated, to so provide.
See, e.g., 68 FR 8142, 8151 (Feb. 19, 2003) and 67 FR 18072, 18073
(April 12, 2002). In establishing the terms of the repayment schedule,
a determination must be made as to whether the proposed withholding
order would be excessive in light of the borrower's reasonable and
necessary living expenses.
Finally, with regard to the comment that the Department should
establish an administrative appeal procedure to be available for review
of hearing official decisions that the guarantor believes to be
erroneous, the Department notes first that in some instances, State law
applicable to the administrative proceedings of State agencies may
provide such an appellate review procedure, and those laws may provide
an opportunity for borrowers or guarantors to challenge decisions of
hearing officials. Those guarantors that are not State agencies subject
to this kind of administrative appeal regime are in no different
posture than the Department itself, which has no opportunity to appeal
adverse rulings by independent hearing officials with regard to
proposed salary offsets to collect from Federal employees under 5
U.S.C. 5415. Federal employees who dispute the hearing official's
ruling may sue the Department under the Federal Administrative
Procedure Act to challenge that ruling. See, e.g., Sibley v. U.S.
Department of Education, 913 F. Supp. 1181 (N.D. Ill. 1995), aff'd, 111
F.3d 133 (7th Cir. 1997). Applicable law gives the Department no
corresponding right to challenge and obtain a judicial review of an
adverse ruling by a hearing official. The Department has not
established any administrative appeal procedure for challenges to AWG
hearing decisions made by Department staff, and has no resources
sufficient to establish a Federal review process for AWG hearing
decisions for loans held by guarantors. Moreover, regardless of the
party that might decide such an appeal, fundamental fairness dictates
that any administrative appeal process be available for borrowers as
well as guarantors.
Therefore, the proposed regulations at Sec. 682.410(b)(9) do not
create new borrower objections; instead, the proposed changes would
make the FFEL Program regulations consistent with existing Departmental
regulations.
Changes: None.
Comments: A commenter noted that proposed Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(I)
includes rules governing ex parte communications (communications where
one or more parties to the hearing are not present) in AWG hearings and
that the provision precludes ex parte communications on non-procedural
matters. The commenter expressed concern that, as drafted, the proposed
rule would unnecessarily impede the administration of the hearing
process. The commenter also requested clarification that substantive ex
parte communications during a hearing are permissible if the absent
party has been given proper notice of the hearing.
[[Page 65783]]
Discussion: We agree with the commenter's suggestions. The
intention of the proposed provision was to ensure that both parties to
the hearing are present and able to participate. However, we recognize
that borrowers would not be disadvantaged by allowing certain
administrative matters to be handled ex parte in addition to matters
involving the time, place, and manner of the hearing as would be
permitted under the proposed rule.
We also agree that the hearing process should not be unnecessarily
delayed due to the unexcused absence of one of the parties when proper
notice of the hearing has been given to the absent party. Under the
proposed rules, a guaranty agency is required to suspend a withholding
order on the 61st day after a hearing request was received. Therefore,
without allowing an ex parte hearing to proceed in such contexts, it
would be possible for a party to effectively enforce the suspension of
an AWG order by failing to appear for properly scheduled and noticed
hearings, because such hearings could not proceed in the absence of one
of the parties.
Changes: We have revised Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(I) to more
generally convey the intent that communications on administrative
matters not related to the substance of the AWG hearings may be
conducted on an ex parte basis. We have also revised this section to
allow an ex parte hearing to proceed if the parties have agreed on the
time, place, and manner of the hearing and the borrower has been given
proper notice of the same but does not appear for the hearing.
Comments: A commenter stated that proposed Sec.
682.410(b)(9)(i)(F)(1)(ii) and (b)(9)(i)(J) permit a borrower to raise
new objections and provide additional evidence before the hearing is
completed. The commenter further noted that while the hearing official
may grant an extension of the 60-day decision deadline so the borrower
may present additional evidence, the regulations do not allow extension
of the deadline to raise objections. The commenter requested a
clarification on whether the 60 day decision deadline could be extended
for the latter purpose.
Discussion: We agree with the commenter's suggestion. If a borrower
has not raised an objection to the AWG order but wishes to do so, the
hearing official may grant an extension of the 60-day deadline at his
or her discretion.
Changes: We have revised Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(J)(1) to state that
the borrower may request an extension of the 60-day deadline for
purposes of raising an objection not previously raised.
Comments: A commenter noted that proposed Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(J)
permits a hearing official to grant extensions of the 60-day deadline
for a decision to be rendered. The commenter further noted that while
this deadline may be extended by the hearing official, there is no
associated extension of the requirement under proposed Sec.
682.410(b)(9)(i)(H) that suspension of the withholding order occur if a
decision is not rendered by the 61st day. The commenter requested that
the regulations be modified to require that the suspension of the
withholding order be delayed past the 61st day for a period equal to
the number of days that the hearing deadline is delayed.
Discussion: The purpose of suspending the withholding order
beginning on the 61st day is to create an incentive for ensuring that
the AWG hearing is completed and a decision issued on a timely basis.
While the commenter is correct that Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(J)(1)
permits the hearing official to grant extensions of the 60-day deadline
at the request of the borrower, Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(J)(2) requires
the hearing official to grant an extension made at the request of a
guaranty agency. Changing the regulations to be consistent with the
commenter's suggestion would create a scenario where a guaranty agency
could request extensions that a hearing official would be compelled to
grant, resulting in failure to suspend a withholding order long past
the 61-day deadline required under the proposed regulations. Such a
regulatory framework would eliminate the guaranty agency's incentive to
ensure a timely hearing.
Changes: None.
Comments: A commenter requested that the AWG regulations be
modified to allow a borrower to request that AWG continue during the
hearing process. The commenter noted that the proposed regulations
governing loan rehabilitation provide for suspension of a garnishment
order for a borrower pursuing loan rehabilitation, but allow the
borrower to affirmatively request to remain in AWG while completing the
loan rehabilitation process. The commenter stated that these two
situations are comparable and that rather than automatically suspending
a withholding order on the 61st day after the borrower's hearing
request, a borrower should be able to request that the order not be
suspended.
Discussion: We believe there are significant distinctions between
the two situations the commenter describes. In many cases, the borrower
seeking loan rehabilitation intends to pay the balance of his or her
loan, and continuation of AWG in that context is one plausible
mechanism by which a borrower would seek a reduced principal balance
upon successful rehabilitation of the loan. However, a borrower
objecting to the amount or existence of the debt or the rate of
withholding would not, by definition, be interested in the continuation
of AWG at the existing rate. In addition, we are concerned that
providing the borrower the option to continue AWG may make the borrower
feel pressured to accept the offer, or cause the borrower to fail to
understand he or she has the option to decline it.
Changes: None.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, the Secretary must determine whether
this regulatory action is ``significant'' and, therefore, subject to
the requirements of the Executive order and subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action likely
to result in a rule that may--
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more,
or adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or
tribal governments or communities in a material way (also referred to
as an ``economically significant'' rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles stated in the
Executive order.
This regulatory action will have an annual effect on the economy of
more than $100 million. It is estimated to reduce annual paperwork
burden on entities participating in the Federal student loan programs
by approximately $109 million. Therefore, this final regulatory action
is economically significant and subject to review by OMB under section
3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866.
We have also reviewed these regulations pursuant to Executive Order
13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing
[[Page 65784]]
regulatory review established in Executive Order 12866. To the extent
permitted by law, Executive Order 13563 requires that an agency--
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only upon a reasoned determination
that their benefits justify their costs (recognizing that some benefits
and costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society,
consistent with attaining regulatory objectives, taking into account,
among other things, and to the extent practicable, the costs of
cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select
those approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather
than specifying the behavior or manner of compliance that regulated
entities must adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available alternatives to direct
regulation, including providing economic incentives to encourage the
desired behavior, such as user fees or marketable permits, or providing
information upon which choices can be made by the public.
Executive Order 13563 requires agencies ``to use the best available
techniques to quantify anticipated present and future benefits and
costs as accurately as possible.'' The Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs within OMB emphasized that these techniques may
include ``identifying changing future compliance costs that might
result from technological innovation or anticipated behavioral
changes.''
We are issuing these final regulations only upon a reasoned
determination that their benefits justify their costs. In choosing
among alternative regulatory approaches, we selected those approaches
that maximize net benefits. Based on the analysis below, the Department
believes that these final regulations are consistent with the
principles in Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this regulatory action will not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
In this regulatory impact analysis we discuss the need for
regulatory action, the potential costs and benefits, net budget
impacts, assumptions, limitations, and data sources, as well as
regulatory alternatives we considered. Elsewhere in this section under
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we identify and explain burdens
specifically associated with information collection requirements.
The Need for Regulatory Action
As detailed in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published
July 29, 2013, the Department is issuing these final regulations to
clarify a number of issues related to the administration of the Federal
student loan programs, to make the Direct Loan regulations
comprehensive, to eliminate regulations in the FFEL Program that are no
longer needed because origination of new FFEL loans ceased with the
passage of the SAFRA Act, to reflect changes made to interest rates in
the Direct Loan Program by the Bipartisan Student Loan Certainty Act of
2013, and to clarify the loan rehabilitation process for borrowers with
defaulted student loans.
The Secretary is revising the Direct Loan regulations to
incorporate provisions from the FFEL regulations that were only cross-
referenced. By incorporating the substantive provisions in the Direct
Loan regulations instead of simply cross-referencing to the FFEL
regulations, the Direct Loan regulations will be comprehensive. This is
appropriate since the Direct Loan Program is now the primary Federal
student loan program. The elimination of new loan originations in the
FFEL Program means that many of the current FFEL Program regulations
are no longer necessary. In addition, the final regulations improve
consistency across the FFEL, Direct Loan and Perkins Loan programs.
Previously, the different title IV loan programs were regulated and
administered differently in areas where they could be consistent. The
final regulations eliminate these differences where appropriate.
The final regulations provide clarity and transparency to the
administration of the loans programs. Over the years there have been
consistent concerns that borrowers are unable to properly manage their
Federal student loans because of confusion over their rights and
options. This is particularly true for borrowers who are delinquent on
their loans and borrowers who experience personal hardship. The final
regulations clarify the rules for borrowers and help them gain a better
understanding of their rights and responsibilities. Also, the final
regulations provide better guidance to lenders and guaranty agencies
about their roles and responsibilities in servicing Federal student
loans.
One area in which concerns have been raised about the consistent
and appropriate treatment of borrowers is in the rehabilitation of
defaulted loans. The Department wants to ensure that borrowers who wish
to rehabilitate their defaulted loans are properly informed about their
rights to ``reasonable and affordable'' payments and how a reasonable
and affordable payment is determined.
Prior regulations allowed a borrower with defaulted student loans
to rehabilitate those loans by making nine full, on-time payments
(within 20 days of the due date) over a 10-month period in an amount
agreed to by the borrower and the loan holder (the Department for a
defaulted Direct Loan, a guaranty agency or the Department for a
defaulted FFEL Program loan). These regulations provided that the
payment amount required by the guaranty agency or the Secretary must be
reasonable and affordable. However, as described in the NPRM published
July 29, 2013, there have been complaints that guaranty agencies, the
Department, and the debt collection agencies that collect Federal
student loans require payments that exceed this standard.
The Secretary believes that providing borrowers with an improved
process to rehabilitate a defaulted loan is in the best interests of
the taxpayers and the borrower. Defaulted borrowers continue to accrue
interest on the debt and are charged collection costs. In addition, the
default harms their credit scores, and the borrowers may have trouble
purchasing homes or obtaining auto loans or other types of consumer
credit. By improving the opportunities for defaulted borrowers to
rehabilitate their student loans, the Department will not only improve
the chances for collection of the full amount of the debt but also help
some defaulted borrowers return to full economic participation.
Some defaulted borrowers who may be interested in rehabilitating
their defaulted loans are also subject to administrative wage
garnishment (AWG). Those borrowers may be discouraged from trying to
fully rehabilitate their loans because they fear that they will not be
able to make loan payments in addition to the amount garnished. Through
these final regulations, the Department aims to add clarity to the AWG
process so that affected borrowers will understand what is required for
AWG to be suspended.
Discussion of Costs, Benefits, and Transfers
Adding clarity to the loan rehabilitation process offers many
benefits. The Department believes that rehabilitation offers benefits
for students, the Department, and the Nation. Defaulted borrowers may
be
[[Page 65785]]
more willing to complete the rehabilitation process. Defaulted
borrowers may see significant improvements in their credit scores and
purchasing power. As these borrowers become bigger participants in the
economy, an improved loan rehabilitation process should support
positive growth.
Improved loan rehabilitation rates will also allow the Department
and collection agencies to concentrate their collection efforts on non-
paying borrowers. In general, the more student loan accounts that are
active and current, the better for the programs. The Department
believes these regulatory changes will help ensure that the Federal
student loan programs remain strong and support maximum access to
higher education for American students.
As detailed in the NPRM, loan rehabilitations have steadily
increased over the past decade, from just over $223 million in
defaulted Federal student loan debt in FY 2001 to $5 billion in FY
2011. Loan rehabilitations as a share of collections rose from
approximately 4.4 percent in FY 2001 to 43.0 percent in FY 2011. Part
of the increase in loan rehabilitation can be linked to growing
enrollment, rising tuition, and two economic slowdowns, all of which
led to more student loan borrowing. However, the higher percentage of
total collections that comes from loan rehabilitation shows that the
Department and guaranty agencies are working with borrowers to help
them take advantage of the opportunity for loan rehabilitation.
Even though these final regulations could possibly result in lower
payment amounts for borrowers while they are rehabilitating their
defaulted loans, the borrowers would still be responsible for paying
their entire debt. Furthermore, even if loan rehabilitation payments
are lowered on average across the board, the Department believes that
the overall benefits of having more borrowers current in their debt
payments will outweigh any short-term cost of reduced payments.
Overall, the true monetary effect of these final regulations will
depend heavily on various factors. The Department has implemented
changes to its income-driven repayment options and expects these
changes to help slow a rising default rate by offering improved payment
management options to borrowers. Also, as the economy continues to
improve, the default rate may drop as more borrowers find employment.
Outside of loan rehabilitation, the regulations would provide many
additional benefits to borrowers and promote a more efficient and
transparent Federal student loan program.
By expanding from 90 to 120 days the window during which a borrower
may qualify for a closed school loan discharge after withdrawing from a
school that eventually closes, the number of borrowers who qualify for
the discharge may increase. However, school closures are a relatively
rare occurrence. In 2007, 43 schools participating in the title IV
programs closed. This number dropped to 30 in 2008 and to 18 in 2011.
While the extended window may mean that more borrowers qualify for a
closed school discharge, we do not believe the extension will result in
a significant increased cost. In 2011, 214 borrowers received closed
school loan discharges for loans valued at approximately $870,000. This
was an increase from the 2010 numbers of 50 borrowers with a loan value
of $467,000, but still represents a very small portion of outstanding
federal student loans.
The expansion of circumstances in which lenders may grant
administrative forbearance gives the Department and FFEL lenders more
flexibility in dealing with defaulted borrowers. These revisions also
clarify the eligibility criteria for forbearances and promote a more
transparent loan program.
Borrowers will see other benefits under these final regulations as
well. The changes to the AWG hearing process will help borrowers gain a
better understanding of their rights and responsibilities in that
process and ensure that borrowers are treated consistently by guaranty
agencies and the Department. Additionally, the revisions to Sec.
685.301 will allow students who transfer from one school into non-term
or certain standard non-term programs at a different school during the
middle of an academic year to initially be eligible for a Direct Loan
to cover the remainder of the academic year that began at the prior
school (up to their remaining eligibility under the annual loan
limits), regardless of whether the new school accepts credits from the
prior school.
The final regulations also reflect changes made to interest rates
in the Direct Loan Program by the Bipartisan Student Loan Certainty Act
of 2013 (Pub. L. 113-28). As detailed in Sec. 685.202, under this Act
interest rates will be determined each June for new loans being made
for the upcoming award year, which runs from July 1 to the following
June 30. Each loan will have a fixed interest rate for the life of the
loan based on rates for specific Treasury bills or bonds, an add-on
determined by a combination of loan type and undergraduate or graduate
student status, and an interest rate cap. For example, the interest
rate for Direct Subsidized and Unsubsidized Loans made to
undergraduates with a first disbursement date on or after July 1, 2013,
and before July 1, 2014, is 3.86 percent, based on the bond equivalent
rate of 91-day Treasury bills auctioned at the final auction held prior
to that June 1 plus 2.05 percentage points. The interest rate for
Direct Subsidized Loans and Direct Unsubsidized Loans made to
undergraduate students is capped at 8.25 percent. Under this policy,
borrowers can benefit from lower interest rates while having the
certainty of a fixed rate and a cap on the maximum interest rate as
Federal borrowing costs vary in the future. If Federal borrowing costs
rise in the future, borrowers with loans in later cohorts may have
interest rates greater than would have been the case if the interest
rates prior to the enactment of the Bipartisan Student Loan Certainty
Act of 2013, had remained in effect, so the inclusion of the caps for
various loan types limits future borrowers' exposure to interest rate
increases.
Overall, these final regulations strengthen the Federal student
loan programs and help support the American postsecondary education
system. As more and more students now depend on student loans to pay
for their college education, it is essential that borrowers fully
understand the rights and responsibilities that are a part of their
student loan obligations. It is also essential that the student loan
programs operate as efficiently as possible. These revisions are part
of the Department's commitment to running efficient loan programs that
support more than ten million students per year. This number will grow
as the country pursues the President's 2020 goal of leading the world
in college degree attainment. Keeping a strong higher education system
will be essential to America maintaining its economic advantage in the
world.
Regulatory Alternatives Considered and Analysis of Significant Comments
We discussed the regulatory alternatives we considered in the NPRM
(78 FR 45668). Further, as discussed in the Analysis of Comments and
Changes section of this preamble, 25 comments were received in the
comment period following publication of the NPRM that ended August 28,
2013. These comments covered a range of issues, including suggestions
for technical changes to the FFEL and Direct Loan regulations. The
process for determining
[[Page 65786]]
a reasonable and affordable payment amount in loan rehabilitation
received the most comment.
In particular, several commenters suggested switching the order of
the two methods for determining the reasonable and affordable payment
amount for loan rehabilitation so that the 15 percent formula would be
used first, and only borrowers who object to the amount calculated
under this formula would need to provide detailed financial
information. Consumer advocates and commenters representing collection
agencies agreed that the amount of information required by the proposed
financial information form could deter borrowers from pursuing loan
rehabilitation. The primary use of the 15 percent formula will allow
the borrower and the collection agency to determine a reasonable and
affordable payment over the phone based on the borrower's income and
family size, subject to later confirmation once the borrower provides
required documentation. We agreed with these comments and adopted this
approach in the final rule.
In addition to the comments proposing using the 15 percent formula
first, we considered the suggestion that an agency should be able to
negotiate a reasonable and affordable payment with the borrower on the
phone so that the loan rehabilitation process could be initiated when
they have the first discussion about rehabilitation with a borrower.
The Department agrees that it is important to be able to offer a
borrower a reasonable and affordable payment amount during the initial
discussion of loan rehabilitation but believes that use of the 15
percent formula, with documentation to follow, as the first option
allows this possibility while ensuring consistent treatment of
borrowers seeking loan rehabilitation.
Net Budget Impacts
As detailed in the NPRM, the final regulations are estimated to
have a net budget impact of $2.8 to $3.4 million over ten years from
2013-2022 driven by the expansion of the time period for eligibility
for a closed school discharge. Consistent with the requirements of the
Credit Reform Act of 1990, budget cost estimates for the student loan
programs reflect the estimated net present value of all future non-
administrative Federal costs associated with a cohort of loans. A
cohort reflects all loans originated in a given fiscal year.
In general, these estimates were developed using the Office of
Management and Budget's (OMB's) credit subsidy calculator. The
calculator takes projected future cash flows from the Department's
student loan cost estimation model and produces discounted subsidy
rates reflecting the net present value of all future Federal costs
associated with awards made in a given fiscal year. Values are
calculated using a ``basket of zeros'' methodology under which each
cash flow is discounted using the interest rate of a zero-coupon
Treasury bond with the same maturity as that cash flow. To ensure
comparability across programs, this methodology is incorporated into
the calculator and used Government wide to develop estimates of the
Federal cost of credit programs. Accordingly, the Department believes
it is the appropriate methodology to use in developing estimates for
these regulations. That said, in developing the following Accounting
Statement, the Department consulted with OMB on how to integrate our
discounting methodology with the discounting methodology traditionally
used in developing regulatory impact analyses.
Absent evidence of the effect of these regulations on student
behavior, budget cost estimates were based on behavior as reflected in
various Department data sets and longitudinal surveys listed under
Assumptions, Limitations, and Data Sources. Student loan cost estimates
are developed across five risk categories: Students at less than four-
year for-profit institutions, students at less than four-year public
and non-profit institutions, freshmen/sophomores at four-year
institutions, juniors/seniors at four-year institutions, and graduate
students. Risk categories have separate assumptions based on the
historical pattern of behavior--for example, the likelihood of default
or the likelihood to use statutory deferment or discharge benefits--of
borrowers in each category.
Closed School Discharge
The primary budget impact of the final regulations relates to the
extension of the time period for a closed school discharge. The final
regulations extend the previous 90-day period for a closed school
discharge to a 120-day period and provide examples of what qualifies as
an exceptional circumstance under which the Secretary may provide a
further extension. We estimate these changes to have a cost of
approximately $3.1 million over 10 years as the pool of borrowers
eligible for discharge will increase. The costs are limited by the
small number of closed schools, the availability of teach-outs, and the
assignment of recoveries to the Department. In the NPRM, the Department
estimated that extending the window to 120 days would result in an
additional 100 students receiving closed school discharges totaling
approximately $400,000 annually. The Department requested comments
about the assumptions and estimates for this provision. We did not
receive any comments and did not make any changes to the closed school
discharge regulations.
Loan Rehabilitation
Two areas related to loan rehabilitation affected by the final
regulations are the determination of the reasonable and affordable
payment for loan rehabilitation and the limitations on the use of AWG
while a borrower is attempting to rehabilitate a defaulted loan. While
the regulatory changes in both areas would change the period of time
and sources of payments the Department receives, the Department does
not estimate that the regulations would have any significant budget
impact.
The final regulations refine the process for determining the
reasonable and affordable payment for loan rehabilitation to improve
consistency across the title IV loan programs. The prior regulations
for the FFEL Program require guaranty agencies to negotiate a
reasonable and affordable payment for loan rehabilitation with the
borrower that takes into account all of the borrower's financial
circumstances. The Direct Loan Program did not have similar provisions,
but the program does have a similar process for receiving income and
expense information and negotiating a payment with the borrower. Over
the past months, the Department developed a tool incorporating the 15
percent formula in determining reasonable and affordable payments that
has helped increase loan rehabilitations. As discussed in the
Regulatory Alternatives Considered and Analysis of Comments and Changes
sections of this preamble, the Department has agreed to reverse the
order of the methods for determining a reasonable and affordable
payment so that the 15 percent formula comes first.
With approximately $1.72 billion in defaulted loan balances
rehabilitated by the Department in FY 2012, loan rehabilitation is a
valuable collections tool that also allows borrowers to improve their
credit history and regain eligibility for title IV, HEA Federal student
aid. The Department and guaranty agencies have emphasized keeping the
loan rehabilitation payment amount close to the payment the borrower
will have to make following rehabilitation to avoid significant
increases in the required payment. The availability of income-driven
repayment plans after rehabilitation of the loan expands the range of
payments possible
[[Page 65787]]
during rehabilitation that would be in line with post-rehabilitation
payments (although payments made under a loan rehabilitation agreement
that are based on the 15 percent formula do not count toward IBR plan
loan forgiveness if a borrower who has successfully rehabilitated a
defaulted loan chooses to repay under the IBR plan post-
rehabilitation). This new standard may also help decrease the number of
borrowers who re-default, as the required loan rehabilitation plan
payment amount should be very similar to the payment amount they make
when they return to regular repayment. The final regulations use the 15
percent formula for initial determination of a reasonable and
affordable loan rehabilitation payment, and allow borrowers to object
to that payment through use of a standardized form that accounts for
the borrower's income and expenses to obtain an alternative amount. A
borrower may choose between the two proposed payment amounts.
For individual borrowers, the payment offered as a rehabilitation
amount calculated using the 15 percent formula might be less than what
the Department would determine to be appropriate based on an assessment
of the borrower's income and expenses or through negotiation with the
borrower without use of a formula. If this is the case, the Department
would collect less money during the months the borrower attempts loan
rehabilitation, but the borrower would still owe the remaining balance
after rehabilitation. In addition, to the extent lower payments
encourage borrowers to complete loan rehabilitation and continue
payments they otherwise would not make, the final regulations may
increase total payments over the life of the loan for some borrowers.
The likelihood of borrowers paying less, the same, or more over the
life of a loan over time as a result of the changes in defining a
reasonable and affordable payment is uncertain, but the Department does
not expect it to have an appreciable budget impact.
Perkins Loans Provisions
The final regulations also address a few areas related to the
Perkins Loan Program including: Revising cancellation progression
rates; modifying the treatment of health-related breaks in service for
certain loan cancellations; making the eligibility for a graduate
fellowship deferment consistent with FFEL and Direct Loan program
criteria; making a technical correction to eliminate the debt-to-income
economic hardship deferment category for borrowers working less than
full-time; defining ``on-time'' for rehabilitation payments; and
allowing assignment to the Department of Perkins Loans made before
September 13, 1982, without the borrower's Social Security Number
(SSN). No changes were made to these provisions as a result of comments
on the NPRM. The Department does not estimate a significant budget
impact from these provisions. No appropriations have been made to
support the Perkins Loan Program since 2008, and institutions make
loans from payments made on their portfolios of existing loans. The
effect on the Federal budget of increased costs in the Perkins Loan
Program is a possible reduction of Federal Perkins Loan assets
available to be recalled in future years.
The slight changes in timing associated with defining the on-time
payment standard at 20 days is not expected to change the number of
borrowers successfully rehabilitating their Perkins loans or the
ultimate amount collected from those borrowers, so no budget impact is
expected. The ability to assign loans to the Department without the
borrower's SSN may facilitate some institutions leaving the program
and, if the Department is able to collect on those loans, result in
some small additional revenues.
These final regulations change the Department's longstanding policy
that a borrower who switches jobs which qualify for loan cancellation
under the Perkins Loan Program results in the borrower returning to the
first-year cancellation rate. Instead, the final regulations allow
borrowers who switch between cancellation categories with the same rate
of progression to continue the progression from the last year under the
prior category; however, the borrower returns to the first-year
cancellation rate if the borrower switches to a category with a
different progression rate. While some borrowers may be able to
accelerate cancellation of their loans or achieve full cancellation,
the nature of the categories affected by the policy change limits the
likelihood of borrowers switching between them. To the extent a small
number of borrowers do switch and maintain their progression rate
instead of falling back to year one, the primary effect is on the
timing of cancellation received, not the amount.
Additionally, the final regulations change the current Perkins Loan
treatment of a break in teaching service for pregnancy or illness.
Previously, to receive credit for a year of teaching service the
borrower had to complete the first half of the academic year, begin the
second half, and have the employer agree that the teacher fulfilled
that year of the contract. In the FFEL and Direct Loan programs, the
regulations provide that if a borrower was unable to complete the
second half of the year of teaching for reasons covered by the FMLA,
the service could count towards cancellation if the employer agreed the
contract has been fulfilled for the year.
The final regulations apply the FMLA-related break-in-service
exception to all Perkins Loan cancellation categories, not just
teachers. As Perkins loan cancellation does not require consecutive
service, the Department expects this provision may allow some borrowers
to receive credit for a year that would not otherwise have counted as
service and speed up the ultimate cancellation of the loan, but it will
not significantly expand the number of borrowers who achieve loan
cancellation as their next year of service could qualify instead. These
cancellation provisions may affect the timing of when borrowers achieve
cancellation, but the Department does not estimate that they will
significantly increase the overall amount cancelled.
Additional Provisions
Many of the final regulations have no impact on the Federal budget
as they reflect statutory changes already incorporated into the budget
baseline or clarify existing practices. These final regulations reflect
changes made to interest rates in the Direct Loan Program by the
Bipartisan Student Loan Certainty Act of 2013. These final regulations
eliminate many regulations relating to the origination and
administration of FFEL Program loans. Those regulations became
irrelevant when new FFEL Program loan originations ended as of July 1,
2010. Any costs or savings resulting from the end of FFEL Program loan
originations were attributed to the SAFRA Act, so there is no estimated
budget impact from these provisions. The budget impact of these changes
was already incorporated into the budget baseline.
Updates were also made to the Direct Loan regulations to
incorporate specific provisions that previously were included in the
Direct Loan regulations by cross-reference to the FFEL regulations. The
restructuring of the Direct Loan regulations to remove references to
the FFEL Program regulations or to reflect current practices is not
estimated to have a budget impact.
[[Page 65788]]
Assumptions, Limitations, and Data Sources
In developing these estimates, a wide range of data sources was
used, including data from the National Student Loan Data System;
operational and financial data from Department of Education systems,
including especially the Fiscal Operations Report and Application to
Participate (FISAP); and data from a range of surveys conducted by the
National Center for Education Statistics, such as the 2008 National
Postsecondary Student Aid Survey and the 2004 Beginning Postsecondary
Student Survey. Data from other sources, such as the U.S. Census
Bureau, were also used.
Accounting Statement
As required by OMB Circular A-4 (available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/omb/circulars/a004/a-4.pdf), in Table 1, we have prepared an accounting statement showing
the classification of the expenditures associated with the provisions
of these regulations. This table provides our best estimate of the
changes in Federal student aid payments as a result of these
regulations. Expenditures are classified as transfers from the Federal
Government to student loan borrowers. The transfers with respect to the
change in interest rate policy use the annualized outlays as estimated
by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and discounted to 2013 at 7
percent and 3 percent. While the Department generally does not use
estimated outlays from CBO in evaluating regulations, the interest rate
policy changes included in these final regulations are statutory and
the Department determined that this approach would be appropriate in
this instance.
Table 1--Accounting Statement: Classification of Estimated Expenditures
[In millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefits
Category -------------------------------
7% 3%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greater consistency between the title IV
loan programs.......................... Not Quantified
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Costs
-------------------------------
7% 3%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs of compliance with paperwork -$109.1 -$109.8
requirements...........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Transfers
-------------------------------
7% 3%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reduced payments to Federal Government $0.40 $0.40
from additional borrowers receiving
closed school discharges...............
Statutory changes to the Direct Loan $1,168 $467
interest rates: Difference in transfer
payments from borrowers to the Federal
government against a baseline prior to
the enactment of the Bipartisan Student
Loan Certainty Act of 2013.............
------------------------------------------------------------------------
See the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 section of this document
for further information on the $109.1 million reduction in costs of
compliance with paperwork requirements.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
These regulations affect institutions that participate in the title
IV, HEA programs, including alternative certification programs not
housed at institutions, and individual borrowers. The U.S. Small
Business Administration (SBA) Size Standards define for-profit
institutions as ``small businesses'' if they are independently owned
and operated and not dominant in their field of operation with total
annual revenue below $7,000,000. The SBA Size Standards define
nonprofit institutions as small organizations if they are independently
owned and operated and not dominant in their field of operation, or as
small entities if they are institutions controlled by governmental
entities with populations below 50,000. The revenues involved in the
sector affected by these regulations, and the concentration of
ownership of institutions by private owners or public systems means
that the number of title IV, HEA eligible institutions that are small
entities would be limited but for the fact that the nonprofit entities
fit within the definition of a small organization regardless of
revenue. Given the definitions above, several of the entities subject
to the proposed regulations are small, leading to the preparation of
this analysis.
Description of the Reasons That Action by the Agency Is Being
Considered
With these regulations, the Department removes certain regulations
governing the FFEL Program that are no longer needed and revises Direct
Loan Program regulations to ensure that they are comprehensive and to
add consistency and clarity to all regulations governing student loans
by revising where applicable. Through these regulations, the Department
also provides clarity to the loan rehabilitation process for borrowers
with defaulted student loans.
Succinct Statement of the Objectives of, and Legal Basis for, the
Regulations
The final regulations amend the FFEL and Direct Loan program
regulations to: reflect changes made to the HEA by the SAFRA Act;
incorporate other statutory changes in the Direct Loan Program
regulations; update, strengthen, and clarify various areas of the
Student Assistance General Provisions, Perkins Loan, FFEL, and Direct
Loan program regulations; and provide for greater consistency in the
regulations governing title IV, HEA student loan programs.
In addition, on January 21, 2011, President Obama issued Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'' (76 FR
3821). The order requires all Federal agencies to ``consider how best
to promote retrospective analysis of rules that may be outmoded,
ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify,
streamline, expand, or repeal them in accordance with what has been
learned.'' Accordingly, on August 22, 2011, the Department issued its
Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing
[[Page 65789]]
Regulations. (See ed.gov/policy/gen/reg/retrospective-analysis/).
Our plan identified a number of regulatory initiatives for
retrospective review and analysis. One of those initiatives was
transitioning from the FFEL Program, under which new loans ceased on
July 1, 2010, to the Direct Loan Program. These final regulations
remove obsolete FFEL Program regulations.
Description of and, Where Feasible, an Estimate of the Number of Small
Entities to Which the Regulations Will Apply
The final regulations affect several categories of entities
involved in the administration and servicing of Federal student loans.
Many of the regulations relate to notifications, servicing, or
collection activities done by loan servicers or entities acting for the
Federal government. The Department does not expect these entities to
meet the applicable definition of ``small entity.'' The final
regulations related to Perkins Loans will affect the institutions that
participate in the program, some of which would be classified as small
entities. As discussed above, private non-profit institutions that do
not dominate in their field are defined as small entities and a few
other institutions that participate in the Perkins Loan Program do not
have revenues above $7 million and are also categorized as small
entities. Table 2 summarizes AY 2010-11 Perkins loan disbursements by
institutions that qualify as small entities. Based on the definition of
non-profit institutions as small entities, approximately 59 percent of
institutions that disbursed Perkins loans in AY2010-11 were small
entities.
Table 2--AY2010-11 Perkins Loan Disbursement Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AY2010-11 Public Non-profit For-profit Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Perkins Loan Institutions with disbursements.... 545 874 107 1526
Small entities with Perkins disbursements....... 2 874 25 901
% of small entities by control.................. 0.4% 100.0% 23.4% 59.0%
Overall Disbursements........................... 387,694,908 448,589,990 20,332,961 856,617,859
% by control.................................... 45.26% 52.37% 2.37% 100%
Amounts at Small Entities....................... 53,467 448,589,990 1,012,596 2,808,851
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the NPRM, the Secretary invited comments from small entities as
to whether they believe the proposed changes would have a significant
economic impact on them. We did not receive any comments.
Description of the Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping and Other
Compliance Requirements of the Regulations, Including an Estimate of
the Classes of Small Entities That Will Be Subject to the Requirement
and the Type of Professional Skills Necessary for Preparation of the
Report or Record
The various provisions in the final regulations will modify or
increase the paperwork burden on entities participating in the FFEL,
Direct Loan, or Perkins Loan programs, as described in the Paperwork
Reduction Act section. Much of this burden is associated with borrowers
or the Department and its agents and therefore does not affect small
entities. Table 3 summarizes the estimated burden on small entities,
primarily institutions and guaranty agencies, from the paperwork
requirements associated with the final regulations. As discussed in the
Paperwork Reduction Act section of this preamble, several of the
provisions reduce the estimated burden on institutions, lenders, and
guaranty agencies from the elimination of regulatory provisions or
changes to requirements and this is reflected by the negative numbers
in the table.
Table 3--Summary of Paperwork Requirements for Small Entities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMB Control Small entity Cost per small
Description No. hours Cost ($) entity
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FFEL forbearance................................ 1845-0020 264 6,497 650
Reasonable and Affordable loan rehab............ 1845-0020 69,161 1,702,052 154,732
Suspension of AWG for rehab borrowers........... 1845-0020 1,257 30,935 2,812
School Enrollment Status Reporting.............. 1845-0019 24,342 599,068 54,461
Deferment of repayment--Federal Perkins Loans-- 1845-0019 175 4,316 22
definition of eligible graduate fellowship
programs.......................................
AWG 3rd party contractors; hearing requests, and 1845-0020 57,568 1,416,748 128,795
hearing administration.........................
Lender disclosure............................... 1845-0020 (20,461) (503,556) (50,356)
Due diligence in making a loan.................. 1845-0020 (40,923) (1,007,112) (100,711)
Equal credit--removal of provision.............. 1845-0020 (40,923) (1,007,112) (100,711)
Eligibility for interest benefits............... 1845-0020 (40,923) (1,007,112) (100,711)
Basic program agreement......................... 1845-0020 (11,174) (274,982) (27,498)
Records, reports, inspection requirements for GA 1845-0020 (5,587) (137,495) (12,500)
programs.......................................
Prohibited use of Operating Fund when it 1845-0020 (111,739) (2,749,889) (249,990)
contains Federal Fund assets--removal of
provision......................................
Funds transferred to Operating Fund by a GA-- 1845-0020 (111,739) (2,749,889) (249,990)
removal of provision...........................
FISL loan related--removal of provisions........ 1845-0020 (163,692) (4,028,450) (884.40)
School as lender--removal of provision.......... 1845-0020 (206,534) (5,082,791) (1,115.87)
Exit counseling................................. 1845-0020 (134,247) (3,303,819) (725.32)
[[Page 65790]]
Disqualification review of limitation, 1845-0020 (111,739) (2,749,889) (249,990)
suspension, and termination actions taken by GA
against a school--removal of provision.........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identification, to the Extent Practicable, of All Relevant Federal
Regulations That May Duplicate, Overlap or Conflict With the Proposed
Regulation
The proposed regulations are unlikely to conflict with or duplicate
existing Federal regulations.
Alternatives Considered
As described above, the Department participated in negotiated
rulemaking in developing the proposed regulations, reviewed comments
received in response to the NPRM published July 29, 2013, and
considered a number of options for some of the provisions. In
particular, the Department reversed the order of the use of the 15
percent formula and the standard form in determining a reasonable and
affordable payment for loan rehabilitation, but that is not expected to
affect small entities. No alternatives were aimed specifically at small
entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Sections 674.19, 674.33, 674.34, 682.102, 682.200, 682.205,
682.206, 682.208, 682.209, 682.210, 682.211, 682.212, 682.214, 682.216,
682.301, 682.305, 682.401, 682.402, 682.404, 682.405, 682.406, 682.409,
682.410, 682.411, 682.412, 682.414, 682.417, 682.418, 682.421, 682.507,
682.508, 682.511, 682.515, 682.602, 682.603, 682.604, 682.605, 682.610,
682.711, 682.712, 682.713, 685.205, 685.211, 685.214, contain
information collection requirements. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)), the Department of Education has
submitted a copy of these sections, related forms, and Information
Collection Requests (ICRs) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for its review.
The OMB Control numbers associated with the final regulations and
related forms are 1845-0015, 1845-0019, 1845-0020, and 1845-0119
(identified as 1845--NEW2 in the NPRM).
In the NPRM, the Department included a draft version of the
Financial Disclosure for Reasonable and Affordable Payments form (1845-
0120, identified as 1845--NEW1 in the NPRM) and calculated estimated
burden for the completion and review of that version. The Department
received extensive and detailed comments from the public on the draft
form, including all aspects of the form and its intended use. We will
require significant time to properly analyze these comments and, if
appropriate, rework the form to address them. To allow the time to
carefully consider public comment and take necessary action, we will
address comments and burden relating to the Financial Disclosure for
Reasonable and Affordable Payments form in a separate Federal Register
notice that will be published after these final regulations.
A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless OMB approves the collection under the PRA and the
corresponding information collection instrument displays a currently
valid OMB control number. Notwithstanding any other provision of law,
no person is required to comply with, or is subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information if the collection
instrument does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
Sections 682.211 and 685.205--Forbearance
The final regulations amend the current FFEL Program regulations to
authorize a lender, prior to resolving a default claim payment, to
grant forbearance to a borrower or endorser who is in default on a loan
based on the borrower's or endorser's oral request. The current
regulations require borrowers to submit a written request for
forbearance. The burden calculations address only the added burden
created by accepting oral requests for forbearance. These final
regulations provide that a forbearance agreement in this situation must
include a new agreement to repay the debt signed by the borrower or
endorser (as required under the current regulations), or a written or
oral affirmation of the borrower's or endorser's obligation to repay
the debt. The final regulations define ``affirmation'' for this purpose
to be an acknowledgment of the loan by the borrower or endorser in a
legally binding manner that can take the form of: (1) A new signed
repayment agreement or schedule, or another form of signed agreement to
repay the debt (as under current regulations); (2) an oral
acknowledgment and agreement to repay the debt that is documented by
the lender in the borrower's or endorser's file and confirmed by the
lender in a notice to the borrower; or (3) a payment made on the loan
by the borrower or endorser. The final regulations also specify that if
a forbearance in this situation is based on the borrower's or
endorser's oral request and affirmation, the lender must orally review
with the borrower the terms and conditions of the forbearance. The
lender must also send the borrower or endorser a notice that confirms
the terms of the forbearance and the borrower's or endorser's
affirmation of the obligation to make the first payment under the
forbearance agreement within 30 days after entering into that
agreement. The final regulations require the lender to retain a record
of the terms and conditions of the forbearance and affirmation in the
borrower's or endorser's file.
For the 2011 calendar year, the last year for which data are
available, we estimate that 172,915 FFEL borrowers requested
forbearance after defaulting on a loan. Of that number, 49,350
borrowers have FFEL program loans held by lenders. Of those borrowers,
we estimate that 25 percent (12,338 borrowers) will exercise the option
in these final regulations to orally acknowledge the debt and agree to
repay the debt. The remaining 123,565 loans for which we estimate
borrowers will request forbearance after defaulting will be held by the
Department. We estimate that 25 percent of those borrowers (30,891
borrowers) who request forbearance from the Department will exercise
the option to orally acknowledge the debt and agree to repay the debt,
as would be authorized under these final regulations. Because OMB
requires Federal agencies to account for burden imposed on non-Federal
entities separately by type, i.e. public, not-for-profit, and for-
profit, the following analysis of the burden imposed on lenders other
than the Department is broken down by the types of entities. Note that
State guaranty agencies are covered under the ``public'' type of
entities.
Of the FFEL Program loans held by lenders, we estimate that public
holders (State guaranty agencies) will have two FFEL borrowers who seek
to orally acknowledge a defaulted FFEL Program
[[Page 65791]]
loan. On average, we estimate that it will take the lender 0.17 hours
(10 minutes) per oral acknowledgment to orally review with the borrower
the terms and conditions of the forbearance and document the
conversation and place that documentation in the borrower's or
endorser's file. For public holders, we estimate that burden will
increase by 0.34 hours (two borrowers multiplied by 0.17 hours per oral
forbearance request).
Of the FFEL Program loans, we estimate that not-for-profit holders
will have 1,551 FFEL borrowers who seek an oral forbearance on a
defaulted FFEL program loan. On average, we estimate that it will take
the lender 0.17 hours (10 minutes) per oral acknowledgment to orally
review with the borrower the terms and conditions of the forbearance
and document the conversation and place that documentation in the
borrower's or endorser's file. For not-for-profit holders, we estimate
that burden will increase by 264 hours (1,551 borrowers multiplied by
0.17 hours per oral forbearance request).
Of the FFEL Program loans, we estimate that for-profit holders will
have 10,785 FFEL borrowers who seek an oral forbearance on a defaulted
FFEL Program loan. On average, we estimate that it will take the lender
0.17 hours (10 minutes) per oral acknowledgment to orally review with
the borrower the terms and conditions of the forbearance and document
the conversation and place that documentation in the borrower's or
endorser's file. We estimate that burden will increase by 1,833 hours
(10,785 borrowers multiplied by 0.17 hours per oral forbearance
request) at for-profit holders.
We estimate there will be an equal amount of burden on the borrower
engaged in the oral acknowledgement and agreement to repay the debt
request with the lender. The oral acknowledgment process will increase
burden by 7,349 hours for all FFEL borrowers (12,338 held by lenders
and 30,891 Department-held = 43,229 borrowers multiplied by 0.17 hours
per oral forbearance request). Since there is no FFEL general
forbearance form approved by OMB, the final regulations will impose new
burden.
Collectively, we estimate that these final FFEL forbearance
regulations will increase burden by 9,446 hours under OMB Control
Number 1845-0020.
The final regulations will amend the current Direct Loan Program
regulations to authorize the Secretary, prior to the loan being
transferred to the Department's default collections office, to grant
forbearance to a borrower or endorser who is in default on a loan based
on the borrower's or endorser's oral request. The final regulations
provide that a forbearance agreement in this situation must include a
new agreement to repay the debt signed by the borrower or endorser (as
required under the current regulations), or a written or oral
affirmation of the borrower's or endorser's obligation to repay the
debt. The final regulations define ``affirmation'' for this purpose to
be an acknowledgment of the loan by the borrower or endorser in a
legally binding manner that can take the form of: (1) A new signed
repayment agreement or schedule, or another form of signed agreement to
repay the debt (as under current regulations); (2) an oral
acknowledgment and agreement to repay the debt that is documented by
the Secretary in the borrower's or endorser's file and confirmed by the
Secretary in a notice to the borrower; or (3) a payment made on the
loan by the borrower or endorser. The final regulations also specify
that if a forbearance in this situation is based on the borrower's or
endorser's oral request and affirmation, the Secretary must orally
review with the borrower the terms and conditions of the forbearance,
and that the Secretary must send the borrower or endorser a notice that
confirms the terms of the forbearance and the borrower's or endorser's
affirmation of the obligation to make the first payment under the
agreement within 30 days after entering into that agreement. The final
regulations require the Secretary to retain a record of the terms and
conditions of the forbearance and affirmation in the borrower's or
endorser's file.
For the 2011 calendar year, 62,905 Direct Loan borrowers requested
forbearance after defaulting on a loan. Of that number, we estimate
that 25 percent (15,726 borrowers) will have exercised an option to
orally acknowledge the debt and agree to repay the debt. On average, we
estimate that it would take a borrower 0.17 hours (10 minutes) per oral
acknowledgment to listen to the list of terms and conditions of the
forbearance as they are reviewed with the borrower. The burden
associated with the completion of the General Forbearance Request form,
OMB 1845-0031, is estimated to average 0.2 hours (12 minutes).
Therefore, the net reduction in burden to provide an oral
acknowledgement rather than complete the form is the difference of the
two or 0.03 hours (0.20 hours minus 0.17 hours or 2 minutes) per oral
forbearance.
We estimate that burden will decrease by 472 hours (15,726
borrowers multiplied by 0.03 hours per oral forbearance) under OMB
Control Number 1845-0119.
Sections 682.405(b) and 685.211(f)--Reasonable and Affordable Loan
Rehabilitation Agreement
The final regulations will add new Sec. Sec. 682.405(b)(1)(iii)
and 685.211(f)(1)(i), requiring a guaranty agency and the Secretary,
respectively, to first offer a reasonable and affordable loan
rehabilitation payment amount on a defaulted loan as determined using
the 15 percent formula (i.e., the amount equal to 15 percent of the
amount by which the borrower's Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) exceeds 150
percent of the poverty guideline amount applicable to the borrower's
family size and State, divided by 12), except that if this amount is
less than $5, the borrower's monthly rehabilitation payment is $5. If
the borrower does not provide the documentation required to confirm the
calculated monthly payment under this formula to the guaranty agency or
the Secretary, the rehabilitation agreement would be null and void.
In calendar year 2011, there were approximately 299,159 FFEL
borrowers (192,029 borrowers whose FFEL program loans are held by
lenders and 107,130 FFEL program borrowers whose loans are held by the
Department) who requested and received a loan rehabilitation agreement
for their defaulted loans. We estimate that of the 192,029 FFEL loans
held by lenders, 66,283 loans are held by state guaranty agencies and
125,746 loans are held by not-for-profit guaranty agencies, with the
remaining 107,130 loans (299,159 minus 192,029) held by the Department.
In calendar year 2011, there were approximately 92,870 Direct Loan
borrowers that requested and received a loan rehabilitation agreement
for their defaulted loans.
Under these final regulations, we estimate that the 66,283 FFEL
borrowers whose loans are held by state guaranty agencies will request
rehabilitation of their defaulted loans using the 15 percent formula
and submit the required documentation. We estimate that on average each
borrower will take 0.33 hours (20 minutes) to gather, copy and submit
the required documentation. We estimate that burden will increase by
21,873 hours (66,283 borrowers submitting documentation multiplied by
0.33 hours per loan rehabilitation request) under OMB Control Number
1845-0020.
Under these final regulations, we estimate that the 125,746 FFEL
borrowers whose loans are held by not-for-profit guaranty agencies will
request
[[Page 65792]]
rehabilitation of their defaulted loans using the 15 percent formula
and submitting the required documentation to confirm the monthly
repayment amount. We estimate that on average each borrower will take
0.33 hours (20 minutes) to gather, copy and submit the required
documentation. We estimate that burden will increase by 41,496 hours
(125,746 borrowers submitting documentation verifying IBR calculation
multiplied by 0.33 hours per loan rehabilitation request) under OMB
Control Number 1845-0020.
Under these final regulations, we estimate that the 107,130 FFEL
borrowers whose loans are held by the Department will request
rehabilitation of their defaulted loans using the 15 percent formula
and submitting the required documentation to confirm the monthly
repayment amount. We estimate that on average each borrower will take
0.33 hours (20 minutes) to gather, copy and submit the required
documentation. We estimate that burden will increase by 35,353 hours
(107,130 borrowers submitting documentation verifying the calculation
multiplied by 0.33 hours per loan rehabilitation request) under OMB
Control Number 1845-0020.
Under these final regulations, we estimate that the 92,870 Direct
Loan borrowers whose loans are held by the Department will request
rehabilitation of their defaulted loans using the 15 percent formula
and submitting the required documentation to confirm the monthly
repayment amount. We estimate that on average each borrower will take
0.33 hours (20 minutes) to collect, copy and submit the required
documentation. We estimate that burden will increase by 30,647 hours
(92,870 borrowers submitting documentation verifying the 15 percent
formula calculation multiplied by 0.33 hours per loan rehabilitation
request) under OMB Control Number 1845-0119.
We estimate that to review the supporting documentation submitted,
it would take the guaranty agency on average 0.17 hours (10 minutes) to
review the supporting documentation from the borrower. Under these
final regulations, we estimate that burden will increase by 23,645
hours (192,029 borrowers requesting loan rehabilitation multiplied by
0.17 hours per document review) under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Sections 682.405(b)(1)(vii) and 685.211(f)(3) will require a
guaranty agency and the Secretary to recalculate the borrower's
rehabilitation payment amount if the borrower objects to the payment
amount contained in the written repayment agreement that the guaranty
agency or the Secretary sent to the borrower based on the 15 percent
formula calculation.
Of the 299,159 FFEL borrowers in calendar year 2011 who requested
rehabilitation of their defaulted loans, we estimate that 12 percent or
35,899 borrowers will raise an objection to the initial determination
of the reasonable and affordable monthly payment amount by the guaranty
agency or the Secretary. We estimate that each objection will entail a
phone conversation or email that would span on average 0.17 hours (10
minutes). This will increase burden to the borrowers for a total of
6,103 hours (35,899 borrowers objecting to the initial determination of
the reasonable and affordable payment amount multiplied by 0.17 hours
per loan rehabilitation request) under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Of the 92,870 Direct Loan borrowers in calendar year 2011 who
requested loan rehabilitation of their defaulted loans, we estimate
that 11,144 Direct Loan borrowers will raise an objection to the
initial determination of the reasonable and affordable monthly payment
amount. We estimate that each objection will entail a phone
conversation or email that would span on average 0.17 hours (10
minutes). This would increase burden to the borrowers for a total of
1,894 hours (11,144 borrowers objecting to the initial determination of
the reasonable and affordable payment amount multiplied by 0.17 hours
per loan rehabilitation request) under OMB Control Number 1845-0119.
Sections 682.405(b)(1)(vii) and 685.211(f)(5) will require a
borrower who objects to the monthly repayment amount contained in the
written repayment agreement based on the 15 percent formula to provide
the guaranty agency or the Secretary the information needed to
calculate a monthly payment amount by completing the reasonable and
affordable rehabilitation payment form. If the borrower does not
provide this information to the guaranty agency or the Secretary, no
rehabilitation agreement would exist with the borrower, and the
guaranty agency or the Secretary will not proceed with the
rehabilitation.
Sections 682.405(b)(1)(x) and 685.211(f)(6) will require the
Secretary or the guaranty agency, upon the borrower's request, to
adjust the borrower's monthly rehabilitation payment due to a change in
the borrower's financial circumstances. The borrower will be required
to provide documentation supporting the request.
We estimate that 10 percent of the 299,159 FFEL borrowers who
requested rehabilitation of their defaulted loans (29,916 FFEL
borrowers, 19,203 of whom have FFEL program loans that are held by
lenders and 10,713 of whom have FFEL program loans that are held by the
Department) will have a change in their financial circumstances in the
initial year the proposed regulation is implemented. We estimate that
on average each borrower will take 0.33 hours (20 minutes) to collect,
copy, and submit the required documentation. We estimate that burden
will increase by 9,872 hours (29,916 borrowers with changes in
financial circumstances multiplied by 0.33 hours per loan
rehabilitation request) under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Of the 19,203 borrowers with FFEL loans held by lenders, 6,628 are
held by public guaranty agencies and 12,575 are held by not-for-profit
guaranty agencies. Under these final regulations, we estimate 6,628
FFEL borrowers whose loans are held by public guaranty agencies will
have a change in their financial circumstances in the initial year the
proposed regulation is implemented. We estimate that for each request
submitted it will take on average 0.5 hours (30 minutes) for the
guaranty agency to review and process the request. Under these final
regulations, we estimate that burden will increase by 3,314 hours
(6,628 borrowers requesting loan rehabilitation multiplied 0.5 hours
per loan rehabilitation request equals 3,314 hours) under OMB Control
Number 1845-0020.
Under these final regulations, we estimate that 12,575 FFEL
borrowers whose loans are held by not-for-profit guaranty agencies will
request a change in their reasonable and affordable payment amount due
to changed financial circumstances in the initial year the final
regulation is implemented. We estimate that for each request submitted
it will take on average 0.5 hours (30 minutes) for the guaranty agency
to review and process the request for a change in the payment amount.
Under these final regulations, we estimate that burden will increase by
6,288 hours (12,575 borrowers requesting a change in the loan
rehabilitation payment amount multiplied by 0.5 hours per request)
under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
We estimate that 10 percent of Direct Loan borrowers who are
rehabilitating their defaulted loans (9,287 Direct Loan borrowers) will
request a change in the reasonable and affordable payment amount due to
a change in their financial circumstances in the initial year the final
regulation is
[[Page 65793]]
implemented. We estimate that on average each borrower will take 0.33
hours (20 minutes) to collect, copy, and submit the required
documentation. We estimate that burden will increase by 3,065 hours
(9,287 borrowers requesting a change in the reasonable and affordable
payment amount multiplied by 0.33 hours per payment change request
equals 3,065 hours) under OMB Control Number 1845-0119.
Sections 682.405(a) and 685.211(f)--Suspension of Administrative Wage
Garnishment for Borrowers Rehabilitating Defaulted Loans
The final regulations will add new Sec. Sec. 682.405(a)(3)(i) and
685.211(f)(12)(i) to the FFEL and Direct Loan program regulations
requiring a guaranty agency or the Secretary, respectively, to suspend
collecting on a defaulted loan through Administrative Wage Garnishment
(AWG) after the borrower makes five qualifying payments under a loan
rehabilitation agreement. The guaranty agency or the Secretary will not
be permitted to suspend AWG prior to the fifth payment (unless
otherwise required to do so), and, after the fifth payment, the
borrower will have the option to request that the guaranty agency or
the Secretary continue collecting on the loan through AWG while the
borrower makes voluntary payments under the rehabilitation agreement.
Under Sec. 682.405(a)(3)(ii), we estimate that state guaranty
agencies will have 663 FFEL borrowers from whom they will be collecting
payments through AWG while the borrower is also making voluntary
repayments to rehabilitate the loan. After the borrower has made five
qualifying voluntary loan payments (in addition to the AWG payments)
the holder would suspend AWG. We estimate that on average each
suspension of AWG would take one hour (60 minutes). We estimate that
burden would increase by 663 hours (663 borrower requests multiplied by
one hour per AWG suspension equals 663 hours) under OMB Control Number
1845-0020.
Under Sec. 682.405(a)(3)(ii), we estimate that not-for-profit
guaranty agencies will have 1,257 FFEL borrowers from whom they will be
collecting payments using AWG while the borrower is also making
voluntary repayments to rehabilitate the loan. After the borrower has
made five qualifying voluntary loan payments (in addition to the AWG
payments) the holder would suspend AWG. We estimate that on average
each suspension of AWG would take one hour (60 minutes). We estimate
that burden would increase by 1,257 hours (1,257 borrower requests
multiplied by one hour per AWG suspension equals 1,257 hours) under OMB
Control Number 1845-0020.
Any burden under Sec. 685.211(f)(12)(i) is attributable to the
Department and therefore not a part of this burden assessment of
affected entities.
Collectively, the changes in Sec. 682.405(a) and (b) will increase
burden by 149,864 hours in OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Collectively, the changes in Sec. 685.211(f) will increase burden
by 35,606 hours in OMB Control Number 1845-0119.
Sections 674.33(g), 682.402(d), and 685.214--Closed School Discharge
The final regulations at Sec. Sec. 674.33(a)(4)(i)(B),
682.402(d)(1), and 685.214(c)(1)(iii) will extend, for purposes of the
closed school discharge, the current 90-day period to 120-days for
students who leave before a school closes and add examples of the types
of exceptional circumstances under which the Department may extend the
120-day window.
During the 2011 calendar year, no Perkins Loan borrowers received
closed school loan discharges. We estimate that 15 Perkins Loan
borrowers submitted applications for closed school discharges. We
estimate that the average burden per response is 0.5 hours (30 minutes)
for each loan discharge application and that by expanding the period
from 90 days to 120 days prior to school closure for students who had
withdrawn to apply for a closed school loan discharge will increase the
number of applicants by 20 percent. As a result there will be an
estimated 18 applications under the final regulation for a total
increase in burden of 2 hours (18 borrowers applying for loan discharge
multiplied by 0.5 hours per application minus 15 borrowers applying for
loan discharge under current regulations multiplied by 0.5 hours per
application) under OMB Control Number 1845-0015.
During the 2011 calendar year, 163 FFEL borrowers received closed
school loan discharges. We estimate that 230 FFEL borrowers submitted
applications for discharge. We estimate that the average burden per
response is 0.5 hours (30 minutes) for each loan discharge application
and that by expanding the period from 90 days to 120 days prior to
school closure for students who had withdrawn to apply for a closed
school loan discharge will increase the number of applicants by 20
percent. As a result there will be 276 applications under the final
regulation for a total increase in burden of 23 hours (276 borrowers
applying for loan discharge multiplied by 0.5 hours per application
minus 230 borrowers applying for loan discharge under current
regulations multiplied by 0.5 hours per application) under OMB Control
Number 1845-0015.
During the 2011 calendar year, 128 Direct Loan borrowers received
closed school loan discharges. We estimate that 295 Direct Loan
borrowers submitted applications for discharge. We estimate that the
average burden per response is 0.5 hours (30 minutes) for each loan
discharge application and that by expanding the period from 90 days to
120 days prior to school closure for students who had withdrawn to
apply for a closed school loan discharge will increase the number of
applicants by 20 percent, thus totaling 354 applications under the
final regulation for a total increase in burden of 29 hours (354
borrowers applying for loan discharge multiplied by 0.5 hours per
application minus 295 borrowers applying for loan discharge under
current regulations multiplied by 0.5 hours per application) under OMB
Control Number 1845-0015.
Collectively, the total increase in burden is 54 hours under OMB
Control Number 1845-0015. The changes associated with the elongation of
the period prior to school closure from 90 days to 120 days for
students who had withdrawn to apply for a closed school loan discharge
is non-substantive and as such, we will submit a Form 83-C to OMB to
make this change.
Sections 674.19, 682.610, and 685.309--School Enrollment Status
Reporting Requirements
For the Federal Perkins Loan program, the final regulations would
add a new Sec. 674.19(f) with the heading ``enrollment reporting
process.'' Section 674.19(f)(1) will provide that, upon receipt of an
enrollment report from the Secretary, an institution must update all
information included in the report and return the report to the
Secretary in the manner and format prescribed by the Secretary and
within the timeframe prescribed by the Secretary. Section 674.19(f)(2)
will provide that, unless it expects to submit its subsequent updated
enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, an
institution must notify the Secretary within 30 days after: (1) The
date the school discovers that a loan under title IV of the HEA was
made to a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the
institution, and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a
half-time basis, or has failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis
for the period for which the loan was
[[Page 65794]]
intended; or (2) the date the school discovers that a student who is
enrolled at the institution and who received a loan under title IV of
the HEA has changed his or her permanent address. Because the Secretary
already receives enrollment information on Federal Perkins Loan
borrowers who also have a FFEL loan or a Direct Loan, the additional
burden associated with sending enrollment reports to institutions for
the Federal Perkins Loan Program is only associated with those Federal
Perkins Loan borrowers whose only loan received under title IV of the
HEA is a Federal Perkins Loan and who are enrolled on at least a half-
time basis or who had recently changed enrollment status.
In the 2011 calendar year, there were 2,070,514 Federal Perkins
Loan borrowers. Of the 2,070,514 Federal Perkins Loan borrowers,
240,959 borrowers have a Federal Perkins Loan as the only loan received
under title IV of the HEA. Of the 240,959 borrowers, 53 percent
(127,708 borrowers) were enrolled at least half-time or had recently
changed enrollment status. The Secretary will be sending enrollment
reports to each of the institutions approximately every 60 days or 6
reports per year. We estimate that on average the completion and
submission of an enrollment report will take 0.05 hours (3 minutes) per
borrower. Burden will increase by 38,312 hours (127,708 borrowers
multiplied by 0.05 hours per borrower multiplied by 6 reports per year)
under OMB Control Number 1845-0019.
For the 2011 calendar year 51 percent of the Federal Perkins loan
borrowers or 65,131 affected borrowers were at public institutions,
therefore we estimate that burden will increase for public institutions
by 19,539 hours (38,312 hours multiplied by 0.51) under OMB 1845-0019.
For the 2011 calendar year 45 percent of the Federal Perkins loan
borrowers or 57,469 affected borrowers were at private not-for-profit
institutions, therefore we estimate that burden will increase for
private not-for-profit institutions by 17,240 hours (38,312 hours
multiplied by 0.45) under OMB 1845-0019.
For the 2011 calendar year 4 percent of the Federal Perkins loan
borrowers or 5,108 affected borrowers were at proprietary institutions,
therefore we estimate that burden will increase for proprietary
institutions by 1,533 hours (38,312 hours multiplied by 0.04) under OMB
1845-0019.
Collectively, the final regulatory changes to Sec. 674.19 will
increase burden by 38,312 hours for 127,708 affected borrowers under
OMB 1845-0019.
For the FFEL Program, the final regulations will replace the term
``student status confirmation reports'' in Sec. 682.610(c) with the
term ``enrollment reporting process,'' and will revise Sec.
682.610(c)(1) to provide that upon receipt of an enrollment report from
the Secretary, a school must update all information included in the
report and return the report to the Secretary in the manner and format
prescribed by the Secretary and within the timeframe specified by the
Secretary. Institutions currently participating in the FFEL or Direct
Loan programs will continue to report enrollment to the Secretary and
the lender. Because the only change regarding the FFEL Program
reporting is in the definition of the reporting requirement, there is
no change in burden for institutions participating in the FFEL and
Direct Loan programs.
Section 674.34--Deferment of Repayment--Federal Perkins Loans
The final regulations in Sec. 674.34(f)(1) will require schools
that participate in the Perkins Loan Program to use the same
eligibility criteria to define an eligible graduate fellowship program
and to establish the eligibility of a borrower for a graduate
fellowship deferment that lenders and the Department use in the FFEL
and Direct Loan programs, respectively. The final regulations will
require that a borrower provide the institution with a statement from
an authorized official of the borrower's graduate fellowship program
certifying: (1) That the borrower holds at least a bachelor's degree;
and (2) the borrower's anticipated completion date of the program. In
calendar year 2011 there were 1,104 Perkins borrowers who applied for a
graduate fellowship deferment. We estimate that on average it will take
the borrower 0.25 hours (15 minutes) to obtain the certification from
an authorized official of the graduate fellowship program and to
complete and submit the Perkins Loan deferment form multiplied by an
estimated 1,104 deferment applications equals 276 hours of increased
burden to borrowers under OMB Control Number 1845-0019.
For the 2011 calendar year 51 percent of the Federal Perkins Loan
borrowers or 563 affected borrowers were at public institutions,
therefore we estimate that burden will increase for authorizing
officials at public institutions by 141 hours (1,104 applications
multiplied by 0.51 multiplied by 0.25 hours per certification) under
OMB 1845-0019.
For the 2011 calendar year 45 percent of the Federal Perkins Loan
borrowers or 497 affected borrowers were at private not-for-profit
institutions, therefore we estimate that burden will increase
authorizing officials at for private not-for-profit institutions by 124
hours (1,104 applications multiplied by 0.45 multiplied by 0.25 hours
per certification) under OMB 1845-0019.
For the 2011 calendar year 4 percent of the Federal Perkins Loan
borrowers or 44 affected borrowers were at proprietary institutions,
therefore we estimate that burden will increase for private not-for-
profit institutions by 11 hours (1,104 applications multiplied by 0.04
multiplied by 0.25 hours per certification) under OMB 1845-0019.
Collectively, the final regulatory changes to Sec. 674.34 will
increase burden by 552 hours under OMB 1845-0019.
Section 682.410(b)(9)(i)(T)(2)--Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG)--
Use of Third-Party Contractors
The final regulations will also add a new Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(T)
to the regulations, which specifies the functions that may be performed
by a third-party servicer or collection contractor employed by the
guaranty agency for services needed in the AWG process. The final
regulations make clear that the guaranty agency may not delegate to any
third party the decision to order withholding of an individual
borrower's wages, and must create and retain records to demonstrate
that each order issued has been individually authorized by an
appropriate official of the guaranty agency. The final regulations also
specify the manner by which a withholding order may be sent to
employers and the permissible activities that may be performed by a
third-party servicer or collection contractor employed by the guaranty
agency with respect to withholding orders. Only an authorized official
of the guaranty agency may determine that an individual withholding
order is to be issued. The guarantor must record the official's
determination for each order it issues by either including the
official's signature on the order, or by retaining in the agency's
records the identity of the approving official, the date of the
approval, the amount or rate of the order, the name and address of the
employer to whom the order was issued, and the debt for which the order
was issued.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate there were 84,293 FFEL Program
borrowers whose loans were held by state guaranty agencies and for
which the guaranty agency had initiated AWG. We estimate that on
average the guaranty agency will take 0.25 hours (15 minutes) to meet
the recordkeeping requirements specified above. Total
[[Page 65795]]
burden hours will increase by 21,073 hours (84,293 multiplied by 0.25
hours) under OMB 1845-0020.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate there were 159,912 FFEL
borrowers whose loans were held by not-for-profit guaranty agencies and
for which the guaranty agency had initiated AWG. We estimate that on
average the guaranty agency will take 0.25 hours (15 minutes) to meet
the recordkeeping requirements specified above. Total burden hours will
increase by 39,978 hours (159,912 multiplied by 0.25 hours) under OMB
1845-0020.
The final changes in Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(T)(2) will increase
burden by 61,051 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.410(b)(9)(i)(H)--Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG)--
Borrower Hearing Requests
The final regulations will also replace Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(L)
of the FFEL Program regulations with Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(H) to
provide that if a borrower's written request for a hearing is received
by the guaranty agency after the 30th day following the date of the
garnishment notice and a decision is not rendered within 60 days
following receipt of the borrower's written request for a hearing, the
guaranty agency must suspend the order beginning on the 61st day after
the hearing request was received until a hearing is provided and a
decision is rendered.
If a borrower does not request a hearing within the 30-day time
limit, the guaranty agency must go forward with the AWG. However, if a
borrower does eventually request a hearing, a guaranty agency would
still be required to provide one in sufficient time to have a decision
issued within 60 days of the request. The Department added a provision
specifying that if this hearing is not provided and a decision issued
within 60 days, then the agency must suspend the AWG order beginning on
the 61st day until a decision is issued.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate there were 84,293 FFEL borrowers
whose loans were held by state guaranty agencies and for which the
agencies had initiated AWG. We estimate that 10 percent of these
borrowers (8,429) will request a hearing and that in 10 percent of
those cases (843) a decision will not be rendered until after 60 days
following the receipt of the borrower's request. On average, we
estimate that it will take one hour (60 minutes) to suspend an
administrative wage garnishment order. The total increase in burden
will be 843 hours (843 FFEL borrowers undergoing AWG who requested a
hearing where a decision was not rendered until after 60 days following
the receipt of the borrower's request multiplied by one hour per
suspension) under OMB 1845-0020.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate there were 159,912 FFEL
borrowers whose loans where held by not-for-profit guaranty agencies
and for which the agencies had initiated AWG. We estimate that 10
percent of these borrowers (15,991) will request a hearing and that in
10 percent of those cases (1,599) a decision will not be rendered until
after 60 days following the receipt of the borrower's request. On
average, we estimate that it will take one hour (60 minutes) to suspend
an administrative wage garnishment order. The total increase in burden
will be 1,599 hours (1,599 FFEL borrowers undergoing AWG who requested
a hearing where a decision was not rendered until after 60 days
following the receipt of the borrower's request multiplied by one hour
per suspension) under OMB 1845-0020.
Collectively, the final changes in Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(H) will
increase burden by 2,442 hours in OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.410(b)(9)(i)(J)--Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG)--
Hearing Administration
The final regulations will add new paragraph (b)(9)(i)(J) and will
provide for the manner by which the hearing is administered and certain
provisions relating to bringing forth additional evidence and
continuances. Specifically, the final regulations will require that the
hearing be conducted as an informal proceeding, require witnesses in an
oral hearing to testify under oath or affirmation, and require
maintenance of a summary record of the hearing. The final regulations
will also allow the borrower to request a continuance to submit
additional evidence.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate there were 84,293 FFEL borrowers
whose loans where held by state guaranty agencies and for which the
agencies had initiated AWG. We estimate that 10 percent of these
borrowers (8,429) will request a hearing. We estimate that on average
each summary record will take one hour (60 minutes). The total burden
increase for this recordkeeping will be 8,429 hours (8,429 hearings
multiplied by one hour per hearing) under OMB 1845-0020.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate there were 159,912 FFEL
borrowers whose loans where held by not-for-profit guaranty agencies
and for which the agencies had initiated AWG. We estimate that 10
percent of these borrowers (15,991) will request a hearing. We estimate
that on average each summary record will take one hour (60 minutes).
The total burden increase for this recordkeeping will be 15,991 hours
(15,991 hearings multiplied by one hour per hearing) under OMB 1845-
0020.
Collectively, the changes in Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(J) will
increase burden by 24,420 hours in OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.410(b)(9)(i)(Q)--Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG)--
Recent Reemployment After Involuntary Unemployment
Section 682.410(b)(9)(i)(Q) will clarify that a borrower who wishes
to object to AWG on the basis that he or she is not subject to
garnishment because of recent reemployment after involuntary
separation, bears the burden of raising and proving that claim.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate that there were 84,293 FFEL
borrowers whose loans where held by state guaranty agencies and for
which the agencies had initiated AWG. Of that number, we estimate that
8 percent (6,743) became unemployed involuntarily. Furthermore, we
estimate that a sub-group of those who became unemployed involuntarily,
5 percent (337), gained subsequent reemployment. We estimate that the
average amount of time for each borrower subject to AWG in this sub-
group to provide documentation that supports their claim to not be
subject to AWG due to their recent reemployment to be 0.5 hours. The
increased burden to provide documentation that will support the
borrower's claim that he not be subject to AWG due to recent
reemployment is 169 hours (337 borrowers whose student loans were being
collected by AWG, who became unemployed involuntarily, but subsequently
gained reemployment multiplied by 0.5 hours per claim) under OMB 1845-
0020.
In calendar year 2011, we estimate that there were 159,912 FFEL
borrowers whose loans where held by not-for-profit guaranty agencies
and for which the agencies had initiated AWG. Of that number, we
estimate that 8 percent (12,793) became unemployed involuntarily.
Furthermore, we estimate that a sub-group of those who became
unemployed involuntarily, 5 percent (640), gained subsequent
reemployment. We estimate that the average amount of time for each
borrower subject to AWG in this sub-group to provide documentation that
supports their claim to not be subject to AWG due to their recent
reemployment to be 0.5 hours. The total amount of increased burden to
[[Page 65796]]
provide documentation that will support the borrower's claim that he
not be subject to AWG due to recent reemployment is 320 hours (640
borrowers whose loans were being collected by AWG, who became employed
involuntarily, but subsequently gained reemployment multiplied by 0.5
hours per claim) under OMB 1845-0020.
The final changes in Sec. 682.410(b)(9)(i)(Q) will collectively
increase burden by 489 hours in OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Collectively, the final changes in all subparagraphs of Sec.
682.410(b)(9) will increase burden by 88,402 hours in OMB Control
Number 1845-0020.
Repeal of Unnecessary FFEL Program Regulations
The language in these final regulations removes provisions from 34
CFR part 682 that are no longer required as a result of the SAFRA Act
included in the Health Care and Reconciliation Act of 2010. One of the
provisions of the SAFRA Act was the termination, as of July 1, 2010, of
the authority for lenders to make new loans under the FFEL Program.
These final regulations will remove the FFEL provisions that are now
unnecessary in light of this change and would also make technical and
conforming changes. A number of the final technical and conforming
changes in 34 CFR Part 682 are for clarity, others are due to the
elimination of cross-references.
Typically, the results of negotiated rulemaking produce some
regulatory changes that correspond to reporting or recordkeeping burden
on affected entities such as borrowers, lenders, or guaranty agencies.
The primary information collection associated with 34 CFR Part 682 is
the currently approved OMB 1845-0020. Unlike other newly proposed
regulations where the resultant final regulation would either increase
or decrease burden as a result of the change in a regulation, this
expansive effort to eliminate unneeded regulations includes more
wholesale changes being made to 34 CFR Part 682. As a result, the
entire history of burden associated with OMB 1845-0020 was examined.
While the burden assessments for OMB 1845-0020 stretch back over 13
years, the necessary level of detail does not exist to disaggregate the
amount of the currently approved amount of burden in this collection
into its corresponding subsections of 34 CFR Part 682.
Therefore, a new methodology to calculate burden is required. We
are able to establish that there are 38 subsections of 34 CFR Part 682
that have burden under OMB 1845-0020. We divided the total of the
currently approved burden hours of 12,352,197 hours by the 38 affected
subsections which on average yields 325,058 hours per affected
subsection.
Each of the subsections listed below will use this number of burden
hours as a starting point. The final changes as provided below explain
the burden impact.
The specific number of respondents from the affected entities is
similarly unavailable, so we have established a percentage based on the
number of borrowers per loan type to distribute the number of
respondents across the affected entities.
Section 682.102--Repaying a Loan
The final regulations will amend the section heading, remove Sec.
682.102(a) through (d), which describe the application process for
Stafford, PLUS, and Consolidation loans, and redesignate the paragraphs
in current Sec. 682.102(e), which describes the loan repayment
process, as Sec. 682.102(a)-(g).
These final changes will not alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.200--Definitions--Lender
The final regulations will remove the provisions of current Sec.
682.601(a)(3), (a)(5), and (a)(7), and place these provisions into
paragraph (8) of the definition of ``Lender'' in Sec. 682.200(b).
These final changes will not alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.205--Disclosure Requirements for Lenders
The final regulations will remove Sec. 682.205(a) (the initial
disclosure statement), (b) (statement of borrower rights and
responsibilities), (g) (plain language disclosure), and (i) (separate
disclosure for Consolidation loans) from the FFEL Program regulations
and renumber the remaining provisions. The remaining provisions include
providing repayment information, providing required disclosures during
the repayment period, and providing required disclosures for borrowers
having difficulty making payments.
The final changes will decrease the required burden by 162,529
hours, and therefore the current burden hours will decrease from
325,058 hours to 162,529 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.206--Due Diligence in Making a Loan
The final regulations will remove Sec. 682.206 from the FFEL
regulations. The SAFRA Act eliminated the authority to make new FFEL
Program loans, including FFEL Consolidation loans. As a result, the
requirements governing the making of new FFEL Program loans are no
longer needed and the previous burden associated with the making of a
loan by a lender will be removed.
The final change will remove all of the prior assessment of 325,058
hours of burden associated under OMB Control Number 1845-0020, and
therefore burden will decrease by 325,058 hours for a total of 0 hours.
Section 682.208--Due Diligence in Servicing a Loan
The final regulations will replace the term ``national credit
bureau(s)'' with ``nationwide consumer reporting agency(ies)'' to more
accurately reflect the reporting requirements.
These final changes will not alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.209--Repayment of a Loan
The final regulations will amend Sec. 682.209(a)(3)(i) by adding a
new paragraph that specifies that borrowers with fixed interest rates
on their Stafford loans enter repayment on those loans the day after
six months following the date the borrower was no longer enrolled on at
least a half-time basis. The final regulations will remove current
Sec. 682.209(e) through (g) and (j) from the regulations and re-
designate the remaining paragraphs as paragraphs (e)-(g). Redesignated
Sec. 682.209(e) (current paragraph (h)) will be amended to specify
that a FFEL Consolidation loan borrower repaying under the IBR plan may
make a scheduled monthly payment of less than the interest that accrues
on the loan.
The final changes will decrease the burden by 65,012 hours, and
therefore the current burden assessment will decrease from 325,058 to
260,046 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.210--Deferment
The final regulations will amend Sec. 682.210(a)(4) of the
regulations to provide that a borrower's representative may request a
military service deferment on behalf of the borrower. In Sec.
682.210(b), the introductory language in paragraphs (b)(1) through (6)
of Sec. 682.210 was revised to identify the cohort of borrowers to
which each paragraph applies. Throughout
[[Page 65797]]
Sec. 682.210(b) cross-references were added to the eligibility
criteria that are applicable to deferments available to these
borrowers. The final regulations also amend Sec. 682.210(s)(2) by
removing the exception clause at the end of the provision, and amend
Sec. 682.210(u)(5) by replacing the words ``military active'' with
``post-active''.
These final changes will not alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.211--Forbearance
Substantive changes in this section have been identified earlier
which added 9,446 hours of burden to OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
There were no further changes to this section that will alter the prior
burden assessment of 325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Collectively, the final changes will increase the burden assessment
from 325,058 by 9,446 hours (as identified earlier) for a total of
334,504 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.212--Prohibited Transactions
There is no change to the current language in this section of the
regulations, however the current burden referenced in OMB Control
Number 1845-0020 is incorrectly calculated.
This section primarily defines ``prohibited transactions,'' but
does not impose recordkeeping or reporting requirements upon entities
and thus does not impose burden. Therefore, these final regulations
remove the 325,058 hours of burden that was previously incorrectly
attributed to this section of the regulations. While subsection 34 CFR
682.212(h) provides that an institution, at its option, may make
available a list of recommended or suggested lenders, the burden
associated with that reporting is accounted for in Sec. Sec. 601.10
and 668.14.
We removed the prior burden assessment of 325,058 hours under OMB
Control Number 1845-0020, and therefore burden will decrease by 325,058
hours for a total of 0 hours.
Section 682.214--Compliance With Equal Credit Opportunity Requirements
The final regulations will remove Sec. 682.214 from the FFEL
regulations. The SAFRA Act ended the making of new FFEL loans and
therefore these requirements can be eliminated from the FFEL
regulations.
The change in the final regulation will remove the prior burden
assessment of 325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020, and
therefore burden will decrease by 325,058 hours for a total of 0 hours.
Section 682.216--Teacher Loan Forgiveness Program
The final regulations provide for minor language changes.
These changes in the final regulations will not alter the prior
burden assessment of 325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.301--Eligibility of Borrowers for Interest Benefits on
Stafford and Consolidation Loans
The final regulations will remove Sec. 682.301(c) from the
regulations. The SAFRA Act ended the making of new FFEL Program loans
and this provision related to determining borrower eligibility for the
interest subsidy on new loans would be eliminated.
The change in the final regulations will remove the prior burden
assessment of 325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020, and
therefore burden would decrease by 325,058 hours for a total of 0 hours
under this section.
Section 682.305--Procedures for Payment of Interest Benefits and
Special Allowance and Collection of Origination and Loan Fees
Section 682.305(c)(1)(ii) specifies that, regardless of the dollar
volume of loans originated or held, a school lender or an eligible
lender serving as trustee for a school or school-affiliated
organization originating FFEL Program loans as a lender must submit an
independent compliance audit to the Department each year. The final
regulations will remove the reference to FFEL lenders originating
loans. The final regulations will also remove the language specifying
that a school and lender serving as a trustee for a school must submit
an independent compliance audit to the Department each year.
The number of school lenders or lenders serving as a trustee on
behalf of a school or a school affiliated organization whose purpose is
to originate loans for which the final regulations will provide relief
is so small as to not be substantive. As a result, these final changes
will not alter the prior burden assessment of 325,058 hours under OMB
Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.401--Basic Program Agreement
The final regulations will remove from Sec. 682.401 language that
addresses new loan originations, the process supporting loan
origination, and a guaranty agency's efforts to secure new loan volume.
These provisions can be eliminated from the FFEL Program regulations
because no new FFEL loans are being made. The remaining provisions
proposed for elimination relate to school eligibility to participate in
a guaranty agency's program and the authority of an agency to limit,
suspend, or terminate a school from its program. For purposes of new
loans, schools now participate only in the Direct Loan Program. Any
future actions to limit, suspend, or terminate a school's participation
in the student loan programs would be undertaken by the Department
under 34 CFR part 668, subpart G. Therefore, Sec. 682.401(b)(6) can
also be eliminated from the FFEL Program regulations.
The final changes will decrease the burden related to FFEL
processes by 32,506 hours, and therefore the current burden hours will
decrease from 325,058 hours by 32,506 hours to 292,552 hours under OMB
Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.402--Death, Disability, Closed School, False Certification,
Unpaid Refunds, and Bankruptcy Payments
Substantive changes in this section have been identified earlier
under OMB 1845-0015. There were no further changes to this section that
impacted the burden under OMB 1845-0020.
As a result, the prior burden assessment of 325,058 hours under OMB
Control Number 1845-0020 will not be altered.
Section 682.404--Federal rEinsurance Agreement
The final regulations will make conforming language changes
required due to the elimination of previous cross-references or
obsolete requirements.
These final changes will not alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.405--Loan Rehabilitation Agreement
Substantive changes in this section have been identified earlier.
There were no further changes to this section.
The substantive changes would be in addition to the previous burden
assessment of 325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020 and the
earlier assessment increases burden by 135,359 hours in OMB 1845-0020
for a total burden of 460,417 hours.
[[Page 65798]]
Section 682.406--Conditions for Claim Payments From the Federal Fund
and for Reinsurance Coverage
The final regulations will make a minor wording change due to the
elimination of previous cross-references and add an ending date
coinciding with the implementation of the SAFRA Act, which ended the
making of new FFEL Program loans.
These final changes will not alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.409--Mandatory Assignment by Guaranty Agencies of Defaulted
Loans to the Secretary
The final regulations will make no changes to this section of the
regulations.
These final regulations will not alter the prior burden assessment
of 325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.410--Fiscal, Administrative, and Enforcement Requirements
Apart from the earlier discussion of the changes made to the
administrative wage garnishment provisions in this section of the
regulations, the final regulations will only make minor wording changes
to correct cross-references and delete obsolete references.
Substantive changes in this section have been identified earlier.
There are no further changes to this section. These final changes will
not alter the prior burden assessment of 325,058 hours under OMB
Control Number 1845-0020 and the earlier assessment that increased
burden by 88,402 hours in OMB 1845-0020 for a total of 413,460 hours.
Section 682.411--Lender Due Diligence in Collecting Guaranty Agency
Loans
The final regulations will make a minor wording change.
These final changes will not alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.412--Consequences of the Failure of a Borrower or Student
To Establish Eligibility
The final regulations will make a minor wording change.
These final changes will not alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.414--Records, Reports, and Inspection Requirements for
Guaranty Agency Programs
The final regulations will make minor wording changes. One of the
minor wording changes will eliminate a reporting category from annual
guaranty agency reporting requirement. Under Sec. 682.414, annually,
for each State in which it operates, a guaranty agency report of the
total guaranteed loan volume, default volume, and default rate does not
have to be categorized by schools for all loans guaranteed after
December 31, 1980. We estimate that this reduction in reporting
categories will decrease the previous burden assessment by 16,253
hours, and therefore the current burden of 325,058 would decrease to
308,805 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.417--Determination of Federal Funds or Assets To Be
Returned
The final regulations make no changes to this section of the
regulations. These changes in the final regulations will not alter the
prior burden assessment of 325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-
0020.
Section 682.418--Prohibited Uses of the Assets of the Operating Fund
During Periods in Which the Operating Fund Contains Transferred Funds
Owed to the Federal Fund
The final regulations will remove Sec. 682.418 from the FFEL
regulations. The final change will remove the prior burden assessment
of 325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020, and therefore
burden will be decreased by 325,058 hours for a total of 0 hours based
on the elimination of the prior FFEL requirements.
Section 682.421--Funds Transferred From the Federal Fund to the
Operating Fund by a Guaranty Agency
The final regulations will remove Sec. 682.421 from the FFEL
regulations. The final change will remove the prior burden assessment
of 325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020, and therefore
burden will decrease by 325,058 hours for a total of 0 hours based on
the elimination of the prior FFEL requirements.
Section 682.507--Due Diligence in Collecting a Loan
Section 682.508--Assignment of a Loan
Section 682.511--Procedures for Filing a Claim
Section 682.515--Records, Reports, and Inspection Requirements for
Federal GSL Program Lenders
The final regulations will remove all of the regulations under Part
682, subpart E (Sec. Sec. 682.500 through 682.515) and reserve the
subpart. The final regulations will also remove FISL-related Appendix C
to part 682 from the regulations.
The change in the final regulations will remove the prior burden
assessment of 1,300,232 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020, and
therefore burden will decrease by 325,058 hours for each of these four
sections and decrease burden by 1,300,232 hours for a total of 0 hours
based on the elimination of the prior FFEL requirements.
Section 682.602--Rules for a School or School-Affiliated Organization
That Makes or Originates Loans Through an Eligible Lender Trustee
The final regulations will remove Sec. 682.602 from the FFEL
regulations. The final change will remove the prior burden assessment
of 325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020, and therefore
burden will decrease by 325,058 hours for a total of 0 hours based on
the elimination of the prior FFEL requirements.
Section 682.603--Certification by a School That Participated in
Connection With a Loan Application
The final regulations will make conforming language changes
required due to the elimination of a cross-reference and reorganization
due to a deletion of previous requirements.
These final changes will not alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.604--Processing the Borrower's Loan Proceeds and Counseling
Borrowers (Required Exit Counseling for Borrowers)
The final regulations will change the heading of Sec. 682.604,
remove current paragraph (a), remove and reserve paragraph (b), and
remove paragraphs (c) through (f) and (h). The final regulations will
also redesignate current paragraph (g) as paragraph (a). Newly
redesignated Sec. 682.604(a)(1) will be amended to include another
option for providing exit counseling to a student
[[Page 65799]]
borrower who withdraws without the school's knowledge or fails to
complete required exit counseling. In addition to the existing options
described under ``Current Regulations,'' a school could also send
written counseling materials to an email address provided by the
student borrower. Newly redesignated Sec. 682.604(a)(2) will be
amended by replacing cross-references to current paragraph (a), which
we are removing, with the substantive information contained in the
cross-referenced provision that must be included in the counseling. A
new paragraph (a)(5) will also be added to newly redesignated Sec.
682.604(a) to clarify that: (1) A school's compliance with the Direct
Loan Program exit counseling requirements in 34 CFR 685.304(b)
satisfies the FFEL exit counseling requirements for student borrowers
who received both FFEL and Direct Loan program loans for attendance at
the school if the school provides the information required by Sec.
682.604(a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii); and (2) a student's completion of
interactive exit counseling offered by the Secretary meets both the
FFEL exit counseling requirements and the Direct Loan exit counseling
requirements in 34 CFR 685.304(b).
The changes in the final regulations will decrease the previous
burden assessment of 325,058 hours by 211,288 hours, and therefore the
current burden of 325,058 hours will decrease to 113,770 hours under
OMB Control Number 1845-0020 because the burden associated with new
FFEL Program loans will be eliminated.
Section 682.605--Determining the Date of a Student's Withdrawal
The final regulations will not make any changes to this section.
These final regulations will not alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.610--Administrative and Fiscal Requirements for Schools
That Participated
Apart from the earlier discussion of the changes made to this
section, the final regulations will only make minor wording changes.
These final changes will not alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.711--Reinstatement After Termination
The final regulations will remove the language regarding the loss
of a school lender's participation upon the loss of the school's
eligibility to participate in the Title IV, Federal student financial
aid programs.
These final changes will not alter the prior burden assessment of
325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.712--Disqualification Review of Limitation, Suspension, and
Termination Actions Taken by Guarantee Agencies Against Lenders
The final regulations will remove a cross-reference to a section
proposed for deletion. These final changes will not alter the prior
burden assessment of 325,058 hours under OMB Control Number 1845-0020.
Section 682.713--Disqualification Review of Limitation, Suspension, and
Termination Actions Taken by Guaranty Agencies Against a School
The final regulations will remove Sec. 682.713 from the FFEL
Program regulations. The change in the final regulations will remove
the prior burden assessment of 325,058 hours under OMB Control Number
1845-0020, therefore burden will decrease by 325,058 hours for a total
of 0 hours based upon the elimination of the prior FFEL requirements.
Consistent with the discussion above, the following chart describes
the sections of the final regulations involving information
collections, the information being collected, and the collections that
the Department will submit to the Office of Management and Budget for
approval and public comment under the Paperwork Reduction Act, and the
estimated costs associated with the information collections. The
monetized net savings from of the reduced burden on lender/guaranty
agencies, institutions, and borrowers using wage data developed using
BLS data, available at https://www.bls.gov/ncs/ect/sp/ecsuphst.pdf, is -
$108,767,761 as shown in the chart below. This cost was based on an
hourly rate of $24.61.
Collection of Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMB Control No. and
Regulatory section Information collection estimated change in Estimated costs
burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 682.211 Forbearance.......... These final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... $232,466.
amend the current FFEL The Department
regulations to estimates that the
authorize a lender to burden will increase
grant forbearance to a by 9,446 hours..
borrower who is in
default on a loan, but
prior to a default
claim payment based on
the borrower's oral
request. The lender
must orally review
with the borrower the
terms and conditions
of the forbearance and
send a notice
confirming the terms
within 30 days of the
oral agreement.
Sec. 685.205 Forbearance.......... These final regulations OMB 1845-0119.......... -$11,616.
amend the current The Department
Direct Loan estimates that the
regulations to burden will decrease
authorize the by 472 hours..
Secretary to grant
forbearance to a
borrower who is in
default on a loan, but
prior to a default
claim payment based on
the borrower's oral
request. The Secretary
must orally review
with the borrower the
terms and conditions
of the forbearance and
send a notice
confirming the terms
within 30 days of the
oral agreement.
[[Page 65800]]
Sec. 682.405(b) Loan The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... $3,688,153.
rehabilitation agreement. require the guaranty The Department
agency to base estimates that the
determinations of burden will increase
reasonable and by 149,864 hours..
affordable
rehabilitation payment
amounts of defaulted
loans on information
provided on an OMB-
approved form, and if
requested, supporting
documentation.
Sec. 685.211(f) Loan The final regulations OMB 1845-0119.......... $876,264.
rehabilitation agreement. require the Secretary The Department
to base determinations estimates that the
of reasonable and burden will increase
affordable by 35,606 hours..
rehabilitation payment
amounts of defaulted
loans on information
provided on an OMB-
approved form, and if
requested, supporting
documentation.
Sec. 674.33, Sec. 682.402, Sec. The final regulations OMB 1845-0015.......... $1,329.
685.214 Closed school discharge extend the current 90- The Department
form. day window to 120-days estimates that the
for students who leave burden will increase
before a school closes by 54 hours..
may apply for a
discharge of a title
IV, HEA loan.
Sec. 674.19 School enrollment The final regulations OMB 1845-0019.......... $942,858.
status reporting. add a new section The Department
requiring institutions estimates that the
that participate in burden will increase
the Federal Perkins by 38,312 hours..
Loan program to, upon
receipt of an
enrollment report from
the Secretary, update
all information
included in the
report, and return it
to the Secretary in
the manner and format
and within the
timeframe prescribed
by the Secretary.
Sec. 674.34 Deferment of The final regulations OMB 1845-0019.......... $13,585.
repayment--Federal Perkins Loans. require schools that The Department
participate in the estimates that the
Perkins Loan Program burden will increase
to use the same by 276 hours..
eligibility criteria
that FFEL lenders and
the Department use to
define an eligible
graduate fellowship
program and to
establish the
eligibility of a
Perkins Loan borrower
for a graduate
fellowship deferment.
Sec. 682.410 Fiscal, The final regulations: OMB 1845-0020.......... $2,175,573.
administrative and enforcement Add a new The Department
requirements. section to specify the estimates that the
functions that may be burden will increase
performed by a third- by 88,402 hours..
party servicer or
collection contractor
employed by a guaranty
agency (GA) for
administrative wage
garnishment (AWG)
purposes;.
Replace a
section of the
regulations with a new
section to provide
that if a borrower's
written request for a
hearing is received by
the GA after the 30th
day following the date
of the garnishment
notice and a decision
is not rendered within
60 days following
receipt of a
borrower's written
request the GA must
suspend the AWG order
beginning on the 61st
day after the request
was received until the
hearing is provided
and a decision
rendered;
Provide for
the manner by which
the hearing is
administered and
certain provisions
relating to bringing
forth additional
evidence and
continuances; and
Clarify that a
borrower who wishes to
object that they are
not subject to
garnishment because of
recent reemployment
after involuntary
separation bears the
burden of raising and
proving the claim.
[[Page 65801]]
Sec. 682.102 Obtaining and The final regulations: OMB 1845-0020.......... No Change.
repaying a loan. Amend the The Department
section heading;. estimates that the
Remove the burden will remain
section of the 325,058 hours..
regulations that
describes the
application process
for FFEL loans; and.
Re-designates
the paragraphs
describing the loan
repayment process.
Sec. 682.200 Definitions--Lender.. The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
make a conforming The Department
change to the estimates that the
definition of burden will remain
``Lender'' due to the 325,058 hours..
elimination of Sec.
682.601.
Sec. 682.205 Disclosure The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -$3,999,839.
Requirements for Lenders. remove regulations The Department
governing required estimates that the
lender disclosures to burden will decrease
borrowers that are by 162,529 hours to
provided when new 162,529 hours..
loans are made.
The remaining
provisions include
providing repayment
information, providing
required disclosures
during the repayment
period, and providing
required disclosures
for borrowers having
difficulty making
payments..
Sec. 682.206 Due Diligence in The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -$7,999,677.
making a loan. remove Sec. 682.206 The Department
from the FFEL estimates that the
regulations. The SAFRA burden will decrease
Act eliminated the by 325,058 hours to 0
authority to make new hours of burden..
FFEL Program loans,
including FFEL
consolidation loans.
Sec. 682.208 Due diligence in The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
servicing a loan. replace the term The Department
``national credit estimates that the
bureau(s)'' with burden will remain
``nationwide consumer 325,058 hours..
reporting
agency(ies)'' to more
accurately reflect the
appropriate legal
terms.
Sec. 682.209 Repayment of a loan.. The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -$1,599,945.
amend Sec. The Department
682.209(a)(3)(i) by estimates that the
adding a new paragraph burden will decrease
which specifies that from 325,058 by 65,012
borrowers with fixed hours to 260,046
interest rates on hours..
their Stafford loans
enter repayment on
those loans the day
after six months
following the date the
borrower was no longer
enrolled on at least a
half-time basis.
The final regulations
remove current Sec.
Sec. 682.209(e)-(g)
and (j) from the
regulations and re-
designate the
remaining paragraphs
as paragraphs (e)-(g).
Re-designated Sec.
682.209(e) (current
paragraph (h)) is
amended to specify
that a FFEL
Consolidation loan
borrower repaying
under the income-based
repayment plan may
make a scheduled
monthly payment of
less than the interest
that accrues on the
loan.
Sec. 682.210 Deferment............ The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
amend the deferment The Department
regulations to provide estimates that the
that a borrower's burden will remain
representative may 325,058 hours..
request a military
service deferment on
behalf of the borrower.
In Sec. 682.210(b),
the introductory
language is revised to
identify the cohort of
borrowers to which
each paragraph
applies.
Throughout Sec.
682.210(b) cross-
references are added
to the eligibility
criteria that are
applicable to
deferments available
to these borrowers.
The final regulations
remove the exception
clause at the end of
the provision, and
replace the words
``military active''
with the word ``post-
active''.
[[Page 65802]]
Sec. 682.211 Forbearance.......... Substantive changes in OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
this section have been The Department
identified earlier. estimates that the
The additional burden will remain
amendments to the 325,058 hours..
regulations allow a (NOTE: Other earlier
lender to grant changes increased
forbearance to a burden by 9,446 hours
borrower who is for a total of 334,504
delinquent at the hours.).
beginning of a period
of non-mandatory
authorized
forbearance..
Sec. 682.212 Prohibited There is no change to OMB 1845-0020.......... -7,999,677.
transactions. the current language The Department
in this section of the estimates that the
regulations. However burden will decrease
the current burden by 325,058 hours to 0
referenced in OMB hours of burden..
Control Number 1845-
0020 is incorrect.
Sec. 682.214 Compliance with equal The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -7,999,677.
credit opportunity requirements. remove Sec. 682.214 The Department
from the FFEL estimates that the
regulations. The SAFRA burden will decrease
Act ended the making by 325,058 hours to 0
of new FFEL loans and hours of burden..
therefore these
requirements can be
eliminated from the
FFEL regulations.
Sec. 682.216 Teacher loan The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
forgiveness program. provide for minor The Department
language changes. estimates that the
burden will remain
325,058 hours..
Sec. 682.301 Eligibility of The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -7,999,677.
borrowers for interest benefits on remove Sec. The Department
Stafford and Consolidation Loans. 682.301(c) from the estimates that the
regulations. The SAFRA burden will decrease
Act ended the making by 325,058 hours to 0
of new FFEL loans and hours of burden..
this provision related
to determining
borrower eligibility
for the interest
subsidy on new loans
will be eliminated.
Sec. 682.305 Procedures for Section OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
payment of interest benefits and 682.305(c)(1)(ii) The Department
special allowance and collection of specifies that, estimates that the
origination and loan fees. regardless of the burden will remain
dollar volume of loans 325,058 hours..
originated or held, a
school lender or an
eligible lender
serving as trustee for
a school or school-
affiliated
organization
originating FFEL loans
as a lender must
submit an independent
compliance audit to
the Department each
year. The final
regulations will
remove the reference
to FFEL lenders
originating loans.
Sec. 682.401 Basic Program The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -799,973.
Agreement. remove from Sec. The Department
682.401 language estimates that the
addressing new loan burden of 325,058
originations, the hours will decrease by
process for loan 32,506 to 292,552
origination, and a hours..
guaranty agency's
efforts to secure new
loan volume. These
provisions can be
eliminated from the
FFEL regulations
because no new FFEL
loans are being made.
The remaining
provisions that are
eliminated relate to
school eligibility to
participate in a
guaranty agency's
program and the
authority of an agency
to limit, suspend, or
terminate a school
from its program. For
purposes of new loans,
schools now
participate only in
the Direct Loan
Program. Any future
actions to limit,
suspend, or terminate
a school's
participation in the
student loan programs
will be undertaken by
the Department under
34 CFR part 668,
subpart G.
Sec. 682.402 Death, disability, Substantive changes in OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
closed school, false certification, this section have been The Department
unpaid refunds, and bankruptcy identified earlier. estimates that the
payments. There are no further burden will remain
changes to this 325,058 hours..
section.
Sec. 682.404 Federal reinsurance The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
agreement. make conforming The Department
language changes estimates that the
required due to the burden will remain
elimination of 325,058 hours..
previous cross
references or obsolete
requirements.
Sec. 682.405 Loan rehabilitation Substantive changes in OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
agreement. this section have been The Department
identified earlier. estimates that the
There were no further burden will remain
changes to this 325,058 hours..
section.
[[Page 65803]]
Sec. 682.406 Conditions for claim The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
payments from the Federal Fund and make a minor wording The Department
for reinsurance coverage. change due to the estimates that the
elimination of burden will remain
previous cross- 325,058 hours..
references and add an
ending date coinciding
with the
implementation of the
SAFRA Act, which ended
the making of new FFEL
loans.
Sec. 682.409 Mandatory assignment The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
by guaranty agencies of defaulted make no changes to The Department
loans to the Secretary. this section of the estimates that the
regulations. burden will remain
325,058 hours..
Sec. 682.410 Fiscal, Apart from the earlier OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
administrative, and enforcement discussion of the The Department
requirements. changes made to the estimates that the
administrative wage burden will remain
garnishment provisions 325,058 hours..
of this section of the (NOTE: Other earlier
regulations, the final changes to the
regulations would only Administrative Wage
make minor wording Garnishment
changes to conform to regulations increase
cross reference burden by 88,402 hours
changes and delete for a total of 413,460
obsolete references. hours.).
Sec. 682.411 Lender due diligence The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
in collecting guaranty agency loans. make a minor wording The Department
change. estimates that the
burden will remain
325,058 hours..
Sec. 682.412 Consequences of the The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
failure of a borrower or student to make a minor wording The Department
establish eligibility. change. estimates that the
burden will remain
325,058 hours..
Sec. 682.414 Records, reports, and The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -$399,986.
inspection requirements for make a minor wording The Department
guaranty agency programs. change. estimates that the
burden will decrease
from 325,058 hours by
16,253 hours for a
total of 308,805
hours..
Sec. 682.417 Determination of The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
Federal funds or assets to be make a minor wording The Department
returned. change. estimates that the
burden will remain
325,058 hours..
Sec. 682.418 Prohibited uses of The final regulations The Department -$7,999,677.
the assets of the Operating Fund remove Sec. 682.418 estimates that the
during periods in which the from the FFEL burden will decrease
Operating Fund contains transferred regulations. by 325,058 hours to 0
funds owed to the Federal Fund. hours of burden..
Sec. 682.421 Funds transferred The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -7,999,677.
from the Federal Fund to the remove Sec. 682.421 The Department
Operating Fund by a guaranty agency. from the FFEL estimates that the
regulations. burden will decrease
by 325,058 hours to 0
hours of burden..
Sec. 682.507 Due diligence in The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -7,999,677.
collecting a loan. remove all of the The Department
regulations under estimates that the
subpart E (Sec. Sec. burden will decrease
682.500 through by 325,058 hours to 0
682.515) and reserve hours of burden..
the subpart.
Sec. 682.508 Assignment of a loan. The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -7,999,677.
remove all of the The Department
regulations under estimates that the
subpart E (Sec. Sec. burden will decrease
682.500 through by 325,058 hours to 0
682.515) and reserve hours of burden..
the subpart.
Sec. 682.511 Procedures for filing The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -7,999,677.
a claim. remove all of the The Department
regulations under estimates that the
subpart E (Sec. Sec. burden will decrease
682.500 through by 325,058 hours to 0
682.515) and reserve hours of burden..
the subpart.
Sec. 682.515 Records, reports, and The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -7,999,677.
inspection requirements for Federal remove all of the The Department
GSL program lenders. regulations under estimates that the
subpart E (Sec. Sec. burden will decrease
682.500 through by 325,058 hours to 0
682.515) and reserve hours of burden..
the subpart.
Sec. 682.602 Rules for a school or The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -7,999,677.
school-affiliated organization that remove Sec. 682.602 The Department
makes or originates loans through from the FFEL estimates that the
an eligible lender trustee. regulations. burden will decrease
by 325,058 hours to 0
hours of burden..
Sec. 682.603 Certification by a The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
school that participated in make conforming The Department
connection with a loan application. language changes estimates that the
required due to the burden will remain
elimination of a cross 325,058 hours..
reference and
reorganization due to
a deletion of previous
requirements.
[[Page 65804]]
Sec. 682.604 Processing the The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -$5,199,798.
borrower's loan proceeds and remove, reserve, and OMB 1845-0020..........
counseling borrowers (Required exit redesignate paragraphs The Department
counseling for borrowers). to illustrate the estimates that the
counseling burden will decrease
requirements, from 325,058 by
specifically the exit 211,288 hours for a
counseling total of 113,770
requirements. hours..
Sec. 682.605 Determining the date The Secretary is not OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
of a student's withdrawal. changing the language The Department
in this section. estimates that the
burden will remain
325,058 hours..
Sec. 682.610 Administrative and The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
fiscal requirements for schools only make minor The Department
that participated. wording changes. estimates that the
burden will remain
325,058 hours..
Sec. 682.711 Reinstatement after The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
termination. remove the language The Department
regarding the loss of estimates that the
a school lender's burden will remain
participation upon the 325,058 hours..
loss of the school's
eligibility to
participate in the
Title IV, Federal
student financial
assistance programs.
Sec. 682.712 Disqualification The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... No change.
review of limitation, suspension, remove a cross- The Department
and termination actions taken by reference to a section estimates that the
guaranty agencies against lenders. proposed for deletion. burden will remain
325,058 hours..
Sec. 682.713 Disqualification The final regulations OMB 1845-0020.......... -7,999,677.
review of limitation, suspension, remove Sec. 682.713 The Department
and termination actions taken by from the FFEL estimates that the
guaranty agencies against a school. regulations. burden will decrease
by 325,058 hours to 0
hours of burden..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The total burden hours and change in burden hours associated with
each OMB Control number affected by these final regulations follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Change in
Control No. burden burden
hours hours
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1845-0015..................................... 14,828 +54
1845-0019..................................... 6,247,152 +38,864
1845-0020..................................... 8,211,632 -4,169,582
1845-0119..................................... 35,606 +36,078
-------------------------
Total..................................... 14,509,690 -4,094,586
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment of Educational Impact
In the NPRM we requested comments on whether the proposed
regulations would require transmission of information that any other
agency or authority of the United States gathers or makes available.
Based on the response to the NPRM and our review, we have
determined that these final regulations do not require transmission of
information that any other agency or authority of the United States
gathers or makes available.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this
site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers:
84.032 Federal Family Education Loan Program; 84.038 Federal Perkins
Loan Program; 84.268 William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program)
List of Subjects in 34 CFR Parts 668, 674, 682, and 685
Administrative practice and procedure, Colleges and universities,
Education, Loan programs--education, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Student aid, Vocational education.
Dated: October 23, 2013.
Arne Duncan,
Secretary of Education.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Secretary amends
parts 668, 674, 682, and 685 of title 34 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 668--STUDENT ASSISTANCE GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 668 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1001, 1002, 1003, 1070, 1085, 1088, 1091,
1092, 1094, 1099c, and 1099c-1, unless otherwise noted.
Sec. 668.204 [Amended]
0
2. Section 668.204(c)(1)(i) is amended by removing the figure
``0.06015'' and adding, in its place, the figure ``0.0832''.
Sec. 668.214 [Amended]
0
3. Section 668.214 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(1), removing the figure ``0.06015'' and adding, in
its place, the figure ``0.0832''.
0
B. In paragraph (d)(2), removing the words ``0.06015 or 0.0625'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``0.0832 or 0.0625, as applicable''.
PART 674--FEDERAL PERKINS LOAN PROGRAM
0
4. The authority citation for part 674 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 65805]]
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070g, 1087aa-1087hh, unless otherwise
noted.
0
5. Section 674.2(b) is amended by revising the definition of
``Satisfactory repayment arrangement'' to read as follows:
Sec. 674.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
Satisfactory repayment arrangement: (1) For purposes of regaining
eligibility for grant, loan, or work assistance under title IV of the
HEA, to the extent that the borrower is otherwise eligible, the making
of six on-time, consecutive, voluntary, full monthly payments on a
defaulted loan. ``On-time'' means a payment made within 20 days of the
scheduled due date. A borrower may obtain the benefit of this paragraph
with respect to renewed eligibility once.
(2) Voluntary payments are payments made directly by the borrower,
and do not include payments obtained by income tax offset, garnishment,
or income or asset execution.
(3) A borrower has not used the one opportunity to renew
eligibility for title IV assistance if the borrower makes six
consecutive, on-time, voluntary, full monthly payments under an
agreement to rehabilitate a defaulted loan, but does not receive
additional title IV assistance prior to defaulting on that loan again.
* * * * *
0
6. Section 674.9 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (j)(1), removing the word ``those''.
0
B. Redesignating paragraph (k) as paragraph (l).
0
C. Adding a new paragraph (k).
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 674.9 Student eligibility.
* * * * *
(k) In the case of a borrower who is in default on an FFEL Program
or a Direct Loan Program loan, makes satisfactory repayment
arrangements as defined in 34 CFR 682.200(b) or 685.102(b) on the
defaulted loan, as determined by the loan holder; and
* * * * *
0
7. Section 674.19 is amended by adding a new paragraph (f) to read as
follows:
Sec. 674.19 Fiscal procedures and records.
* * * * *
(f) Enrollment reporting process. (1) Upon receipt of an enrollment
report from the Secretary, an institution must update all information
included in the report and return the report to the Secretary--
(i) In the manner and format prescribed by the Secretary; and
(ii) Within the timeframe specified by the Secretary.
(2) Unless it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report
to the Secretary within the next 60 days, an institution must notify
the Secretary within 30 days after the date the school discovers that--
(i) A loan under title IV of the HEA was made to a student who was
enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the institution, and the student
has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or failed to
enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan
was intended; or
(ii) A student who is enrolled at the institution and who received
a loan under title IV of the HEA has changed his or her permanent
address.
* * * * *
0
8. Section 674.33 is amended by:
0
A. Revising paragraph (g)(4)(i)(B).
0
B. In paragraph (g)(8)(i), removing the figure ``90'' and adding, in
its place, the figure ``120''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 674.33 Repayment.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) Did not complete the program of study at that school because
the school closed while the student was enrolled, or the student
withdrew from the school not more than 120 days before the school
closed. The Secretary may extend the 120-day period if the Secretary
determines that exceptional circumstances related to the school's
closing justify an extension. Exceptional circumstances for this
purpose may include, but are not limited to: the school's loss of
accreditation; The school's discontinuation of the majority of its
academic programs; action by the State to revoke the school's license
to operate or award academic credentials in the State; or a finding by
a State or Federal government agency that the school violated State or
Federal law; and
* * * * *
0
9. Section 674.34 is amended by:
0
A. In the introductory text of paragraph (e), removing the reference
``(e)(5)'' and adding, in its place, the reference ``(e)(4)'', each
time it appears.
0
B. Removing paragraph (e)(4).
0
C. Redesignating paragraph (e)(5) as paragraph (e)(4).
0
D. Removing paragraph (e)(6).
0
E. Redesignating paragraphs (e)(7) and (e)(8) as paragraphs (e)(5) and
(e)(6), respectively.
0
F. In newly redesignated paragraph (e)(5), removing the words
``paragraphs (e)(3) and (e)(4)'' and adding, in their place, the words
``paragraph (e)(3)''.
0
G. Removing paragraph (e)(9).
0
H. Revising paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 674.34 Deferment of repayment--Federal Perkins loans, NDSLs and
Defense loans.
* * * * *
(f)(1) To qualify for a deferment for study as part of a graduate
fellowship program pursuant to paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, a
borrower must provide the institution with a statement from an
authorized official of the borrower's graduate fellowship program
certifying--
(i) That the borrower holds at least a baccalaureate degree
conferred by an institution of higher education;
(ii) That the borrower has been accepted or recommended by an
institution of higher education for acceptance on a full-time basis
into an eligible graduate fellowship program; and
(iii) The borrower's anticipated completion date in the program.
(2) For purposes of paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, an
eligible graduate fellowship program is a fellowship program that--
(i) Provides sufficient financial support to graduate fellows to
allow for full-time study for at least six months;
(ii) Requires a written statement from each applicant explaining
the applicant's objectives before the award of that financial support;
(iii) Requires a graduate fellow to submit periodic reports,
projects, or evidence of the fellow's progress; and
(iv) In the case of a course of study at a foreign university,
accepts the course of study for completion of the fellowship program.
* * * * *
0
10. Section 674.39 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 674.39 Loan rehabilitation.
(a) * * *
(2) A loan is rehabilitated if the borrower--
(i) Requests rehabilitation; and
(ii) Makes a full monthly payment--as determined by the
institution--within 20 days of the due date, each month for 9
consecutive months.
* * * * *
Sec. 674.50 [Amended]
0
11. Section 674.50(e)(1) is amended by removing the words ``is
submitted for assignment under 674.8(d)(3)'' and adding, in their
place, the words ``was made before September 13, 1982''.
0
12. Section 674.52 is amended by:
[[Page 65806]]
0
A. Removing paragraph (b)(2).
0
B. Redesignating paragraph (b)(1)(i) as paragraph (b)(1).
0
C. Redesignating paragraph (b)(1)(ii) as paragraph (b)(2).
0
D. Redesignating paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) as paragraphs (d), (e),
and (f), respectively.
0
E. Adding a new paragraph (c).
0
F. Adding a new paragraph (g).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 674.52 Cancellation procedures.
* * * * *
(c) Break in service. (1) If the borrower is unable to complete an
academic year of eligible teaching service due to a condition that is
covered under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) (29
U.S.C. 2601, et seq.), the borrower still qualifies for the
cancellation if--
(i) The borrower completes one half of the academic year; and
(ii) The borrower's employer considers the borrower to have
fulfilled his or her contract requirements for the academic year for
purposes of salary increases, tenure, and retirement.
(2) If the borrower is unable to complete a year of eligible
service under Sec. Sec. 674.56, 674.57, 674.59, or 674.60 due to a
condition that is covered under the FMLA, the borrower still qualifies
for the cancellation if the borrower completes at least six consecutive
months of eligible service.
* * * * *
(g) Switching cancellation categories. A borrower who qualifies for
a cancellation under one of the cancellation categories in Sec. Sec.
674.53, 674.56, 674.57, or 674.59 receives cancellation of 15 percent
of the original principal for the first and second years of qualifying
service, 20 percent of the original principal for the third and fourth
years of qualifying service, and 30 percent of the original principal
for the fifth year of qualifying service. If, after the first, second,
third, or fourth complete year of qualifying service--
(1) The borrower switches to a position that qualifies the borrower
for cancellation under a different cancellation category under
Sec. Sec. 674.53, 674.56, 674.57, or 674.59, the borrower's
cancellation rate progression continues from the last year the borrower
received a cancellation under the former cancellation category; or
(2) The borrower switches to a position that qualifies the borrower
for cancellation under a different cancellation category under
Sec. Sec. 674.58 or 674.60, the borrower's cancellation rate
progression under the new cancellation category begins at the year one
cancellation rates specified in Sec. Sec. 674.58(b) or 674.60(b),
respectively.
* * * * *
PART 682--FEDERAL FAMILY EDUCATION LOAN (FFEL) PROGRAM
0
13. The authority citation for part 682 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1071 to 1087-2, unless otherwise noted.
0
14. Section 682.100 is amended by:
0
A. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (a).
0
B. In paragraph (a)(1), removing the word ``encourages'' and adding, in
its place, the word ``encouraged''.
0
C. In the first sentence of paragraph (a)(3), removing the word
``encourages'' and adding, in its place, the word ``encouraged''.
0
D. Revising the last sentence of paragraph (a)(3).
0
E. In paragraph (a)(4), removing the word ``encourages'' and adding, in
its place, the word ``encouraged''.
0
F. In paragraph (a)(4), adding the words ``and prior to July 1, 2010''
in the last sentence between the date ``November 13, 1997'' and the
punctuation ``.''.
0
G. Revising paragraph (b)(2)(iii).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 682.100 The Federal Family Education Loan programs.
(a) This part governs the following four programs collectively
referred to in these regulations as ``the Federal Family Education Loan
(FFEL) programs,'' in which lenders used their own funds prior to July
1, 2010, to make loans to enable a student or his or her parents to pay
the costs of the student's attendance at postsecondary schools.
* * * * *
(3) * * * The PLUS Program also provided for making loans to
graduate and professional students on or after July 1, 2006 and prior
to July 1, 2010.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) The Federal GSL programs were authorized to operate in States
not served by a guaranty agency program. In addition, the FISL and
Federal SLS (as in effect for periods of enrollment that began prior to
July 1, 1994) programs were authorized, under limited circumstances, to
operate in States in which a guaranty agency program did not serve all
eligible students.
* * * * *
0
15. Section 682.101 is amended by:
0
A. Adding introductory text to this section.
0
B. In paragraph (a), removing the words ``may make loans.'' and adding,
in their place, the words ``made loans prior to July 1, 2010.''
0
C. In paragraph (b), removing the words ``may participate'' and adding,
in their place, the word ``participated''.
0
D. Revising paragraph (c).
The addition and revision read as follows:
Sec. 682.101 Participation in the FFEL programs.
The following entities and persons participate in the FFEL
programs:
* * * * *
(c) Students who met certain requirements, including enrollment at
a participating school, borrowed under the Stafford Loan Program prior
to July 1, 2010 and, for periods of enrollment that began prior to July
1, 1994, the SLS program. Parents of eligible dependent undergraduate
students borrowed under the PLUS Program prior to July 1, 2010.
Borrowers with outstanding Stafford, SLS, FISL, Perkins, HPSL, HEAL,
ALAS, PLUS, or Nursing Student Loan Program loans borrowed under the
Consolidation Loan Program prior to July 1, 2010. The PLUS Program also
provided for making loans to graduate and professional students on or
after July 1, 2006 and prior to July 1, 2010.
* * * * *
0
16. Section 682.102 is amended by:
0
A. Revising the section heading.
0
B. Removing paragraphs (a), (c), and (d).
0
C. In the introductory text of paragraph (e), removing the paragraph
heading.
0
D. Redesignating paragraphs (e)(1) through (e)(7) as paragraphs (a)
through (g), respectively.
0
E. In newly redesignated paragraph (a), revising the last sentence.
0
F. In newly redesignated paragraph (b), removing the words ``on a
Stafford Loan''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 682.102 Repaying a loan.
(a) * * * The obligation to repay all or a portion of a loan may be
forgiven for Stafford Loan borrowers who enter certain areas of the
teaching profession.
* * * * *
Sec. 682.103 [Amended]
0
17. Section 682.103(c) is amended by removing the letter and the
punctuation ``E,''.
0
18. Section 682.200 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(1) introductory text, removing the words ``subpart
A of''.
0
B. In paragraph (a)(1), removing from the list, the terms Academic
Competitiveness Grant (ACG) Program,
[[Page 65807]]
Graduate and professional student, Leveraging Educational Assistance
Partnership (LEAP) Program, National Science and Mathematics Access to
Retain Talent Grant (National SMART Grant) Program, Supplemental
Educational Opportunity Grant (SEOG) Program, and Supplemental Loans
for Students (SLS) Program.
0
C. In paragraph (a)(1), adding to the list, in alphabetical order, the
terms Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (SEOG)
Program, Federal Supplemental Loans for Students (SLS) Program, and
Graduate or professional student.
0
D. In paragraph (b), in the definition of Authority, removing the words
``making or purchasing'' and adding, in their place, the word
``purchase''.
0
E. In paragraph (b), in the definition of Borrower, removing the word
``is'' and adding, in its place, the word ``was''.
0
F. In paragraph (b), in the definition of Estimated financial
assistance, in paragraph (1)(vi), removing the words ``Academic
Competitiveness Grant, National SMART Grant,''.
0
G. In paragraph (b), in the definition of Lender, revising paragraph
(5)(i)(A)(10).
0
H. In paragraph (b), in the definition of Lender, revising paragraph
(8).
0
I. In paragraph (b), revising the definition of Nationwide consumer
reporting agency.
0
J. In paragraph (b), revising the definition of Satisfactory repayment
arrangement.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 682.200 Definitions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
Lender
* * * * *
(5) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(10) Performance of, or payment to another third party to perform,
any school function required under title IV, except that the lender may
perform entrance counseling and, as provided in Sec. 682.604(a), exit
counseling, and may provide services to participating foreign schools
at the direction of the Secretary, as a third-party servicer; and
* * * * *
(8) As of January 1, 2007, and for loans first disbursed on or
after that date under a trustee arrangement, an eligible lender
operating as a trustee under a contract entered into on or before
September 30, 2006, and which continues in effect with a school or a
school-affiliated organization--
(i) Must not--
(A) Make a loan to any undergraduate student;
(B) Make a loan other than a Federal Stafford loan to a graduate or
professional student; or
(C) Make a loan to a borrower who is not enrolled at that school;
(ii) Must offer loans that carry an origination fee or an interest
rate, or both, that are less than the fee or rate authorized under the
provisions of the Act; and
(iii) Must, for any fiscal year beginning on or after July 1, 2006
in which the school engages in activities as an eligible lender, submit
an annual compliance audit that satisfies the following requirements:
(A) With regard to a school that is a governmental entity or a
nonprofit organization, the audit must be conducted in accordance with
Sec. 682.305(c)(2)(v) and chapter 75 of title 31, United States Code,
and in addition, during years when the student financial aid cluster
(as defined in Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, Appendix
B, Compliance Supplement) is not audited as a ``major program'' (as
defined under 31 U.S.C. 7501) must, without regard to the amount of
loans made, include in such audit the school's lending activities as a
major program.
(B) With regard to a school that is not a governmental entity or a
nonprofit organization, the audit must be conducted annually in
accordance with Sec. 682.305(c)(2)(i) through (iii).
(C) With regard to any school, the audit must include a
determination that--
(1) The school used all payments and proceeds (i.e., special
allowance and interest payments from borrowers, interest subsidy
payments, proceeds from the sale or other disposition of loans) from
the loans for need-based grant programs;
(2) Those need-based grants supplemented, rather than supplanted,
the institution's use of non-Federal funds for such grants; and
(3) The school used no more than a reasonable portion of payments
and proceeds from the loans for direct administrative expenses.
* * * * *
Nationwide consumer reporting agency. A consumer reporting agency
that compiles and maintains files on consumers on a nationwide basis
and as defined in 15 U.S.C. 1681a(p).
* * * * *
Satisfactory repayment arrangement. (1) For purposes of regaining
eligibility under the title IV student financial assistance programs,
the making of six consecutive, on-time, voluntary full monthly payments
on a defaulted loan. A borrower may only obtain the benefit of this
paragraph with respect to renewed eligibility once.
(2) The required full monthly payment amount may not be more than
is reasonable and affordable based on the borrower's total financial
circumstances. Voluntary payments are payments made directly by the
borrower, and do not include payments obtained by income tax off-set,
garnishment, or income or asset execution. ``On-time'' means a payment
received by the Secretary or a guaranty agency or its agent within 20
days of the scheduled due date.
(3) A borrower has not used the one opportunity to renew
eligibility for title IV assistance if the borrower makes six
consecutive, on-time, voluntary, full monthly payments under an
agreement to rehabilitate a defaulted loan but does not receive
additional title IV assistance prior to defaulting on that loan again.
* * * * *
Sec. 682.201 [Amended]
0
19. Section 682.201 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a) introductory text, removing the words ``made under
Sec. 682.209(e) or (f)''.
0
B. In paragraph (a)(4)(ii) introductory text, adding the words
``paragraph (a)(4) of'' between the words ``of'' and ``this''.
0
C. In paragraph (a)(6) introductory text, removing the word ``student''
and adding, in its place, the word ``borrower''.
0
D. In paragraph (c)(2)(i), removing the words ``credit bureau'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``consumer reporting agency''.
0
20. Section 682.202 is amended by:
0
A. Revising paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (a)(1)(ii) introductory text,
(a)(1)(iii), (a)(1)(iv), (a)(1)(v), and (a)(1)(vi) introductory text.
0
B. In paragraph (a)(1)(vii) introductory text, removing the first
occurrence of the word ``is'' and adding, in its place, the word
``was''.
0
C. In paragraph (a)(1)(viii) introductory text, removing the first
occurrence of the word ``is'' and adding, in its place, the word
``was''.
0
D. In paragraph (a)(1)(ix), removing the first occurrence of the word
``is'' and adding, in its place, the word ``was''.
0
E. In paragraph (a)(1)(x) introductory text, removing the word ``is''
and adding, in its place, the word ``was''.
0
F. Removing paragraphs (a)(1)(x)(D) and (a)(1)(x)(E).
0
G. In paragraph (a)(2)(ii) introductory text, removing the words ``loan
made
[[Page 65808]]
under Sec. 682.209(e) or (f)'' and adding, in their place, the words
``refinanced PLUS loan''.
0
H. In paragraph (a)(2)(iv) introductory text, removing the first
occurrence of the word ``is'' and adding, in its place, the word
``was''.
0
I. In paragraph (a)(2)(v) introductory text, removing the first
occurrence of the word ``is'' and adding, in its place, the word
``was''.
0
J. In paragraph (a)(3)(ii) introductory text, removing the words ``loan
made under Sec. 682.209(e) or (f)'' and adding, in their place, the
words ``refinanced SLS loan''.
0
K. In paragraph (a)(4)(iv) introductory text, adding the words ``and
prior to July 1, 2010'' after the date ``1998'' and before the
punctuation ``,''.
0
L. In paragraph (a)(4)(v), adding the words ``and prior to July 1,
2010'' after the date ``1997'' and before the punctuation ``,''.
0
M. In paragraph (a)(7)(iii)(A), removing the citation ``(a)(6)(ii)''
and adding, in its place, the citation ``(a)(7)(i)''.
0
N. In paragraph (b)(1), adding the words ``or Federal default fees''
between the words ``premiums'' and ``to''.
0
O. Removing paragraph (c)(1)(vi).
0
P. Redesignating paragraph (c)(1)(vii) as paragraph (c)(1)(vi).
0
Q. In paragraphs (c)(5), (c)(6), and the introductory text of paragraph
(c)(7), removing the word ``Shall'' and adding, in its place, the words
``A lender must''.
0
R. In paragraph (c)(7)(iv), removing the words ``in accordance with
Sec. 682.207(b)(1)(ii)(B) and (C)''.
0
S. In paragraph (d)(2), removing the words ``, other than an SLS or
PLUS loan refinanced under Sec. 682.209(e) or (f)'' and adding, in
their place, the words ``and prior to July 1, 2010''.
0
T. Removing paragraph (e).
0
U. Redesignating paragraphs (f) through (h) as paragraphs (e) through
(g), respectively.
0
V. In newly redesignated paragraph (e)(1), removing the citation
``(f)(2)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(e)(2)''.
0
W. In newly redesignated paragraph (f)(1)(i), removing ``Attorney's''
and adding, in its place, ``Attorney''.
0
X. In newly redesignated paragraph (f)(2), removing the citation
``(g)(1)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(f)(1)''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 682.202 Permissible charges by lenders to borrowers.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) For loans made prior to July 1, 1994, if the borrower, on the
date the promissory note evidencing the loan was signed, had an
outstanding balance of principal or interest on a previous Stafford
loan, the interest rate is the applicable interest rate on that
previous Stafford loan.
(ii) If the borrower, on the date the promissory note evidencing
the loan was signed, had no outstanding balance on any FFEL Program
loan, and the first disbursement was made--
* * * * *
(iii) For a Stafford loan for which the first disbursement was made
before October 1, 1992--
(A) If the borrower, on the date the promissory note was signed,
had no outstanding balance on a Stafford loan but had an outstanding
balance of principal or interest on a PLUS or SLS loan made for a
period of enrollment beginning before July 1, 1988, or on a
Consolidation loan that repaid a loan made for a period of enrollment
beginning before July 1, 1988, the interest rate is 8 percent; or
(B) If the borrower, on the date the promissory note evidencing the
loan was signed, had an outstanding balance of principal or interest on
a PLUS or SLS loan made for a period of enrollment beginning on or
after July 1, 1988, or on a Consolidation loan that repaid a loan made
for a period of enrollment beginning on or after July 1, 1988, the
interest rate is 8 percent until 48 months elapse after the repayment
period begins, and 10 percent thereafter.
(iv) For a Stafford loan for which the first disbursement was made
on or after October 1, 1992, but before December 20, 1993, if the
borrower, on the date the promissory note evidencing the loan was
signed, had no outstanding balance on a Stafford loan but had an
outstanding balance of principal or interest on a PLUS, SLS, or
Consolidation loan, the interest rate is 8 percent.
(v) For a Stafford loan for which the first disbursement was made
on or after December 20, 1993 and prior to July 1, 1994, if the
borrower, on the date the promissory note was signed, had no
outstanding balance on a Stafford loan but had an outstanding balance
of principal or interest on a PLUS, SLS, or Consolidation loan, the
interest rate is the rate provided in paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(B) of this
section.
(vi) For a Stafford loan for which the first disbursement was made
on or after July 1, 1994 and prior to July 1, 1995, for a period of
enrollment that included or began on or after July 1, 1994, the
interest rate is a variable rate, applicable to each July 1-June 30
period, that equals the lesser of--
* * * * *
0
21. Section 682.204 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a) introductory text, removing the words ``Federal
Direct Stafford/Ford'' and adding, in their place, the words ``Direct
Subsidized''.
0
B. In paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii), removing the words ``$2,625,
or, for a loan disbursed on or after July 1, 2007, $3,500,'' and
adding, in their place, the figure ``$3,500''.
0
C. Revising paragraph (a)(1)(iii).
0
D. In paragraph (a)(2) introductory text, removing the words ``Federal
Direct Stafford/Ford'' and adding, in their place, the words ``Direct
Subsidized''.
0
E. In paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii), removing the words ``$3,500,
or, for a loan disbursed on or after July 1, 2007, $4,500,'' and
adding, in their place, the figure ``$4,500''.
0
F. In paragraph (a)(3) introductory text, removing the words ``Federal
Direct Stafford/Ford'' and adding, in their place, the words ``Direct
Subsidized''.
0
G. Revising paragraph (a)(5).
0
H. In paragraph (a)(6) introductory text and paragraph (a)(7), removing
the words ``Federal Direct Stafford/Ford'' and adding, in their place,
the words ``Direct Subsidized''.
0
I. In paragraph (b) introductory text, removing the words ``Federal
Direct Stafford/Ford'', and adding, in their place, the words ``Direct
Subsidized''.
0
J. Revising paragraph (c)(1).
0
K. Revising paragraph (c)(2).
0
L. In paragraph (d) introductory text, removing the word ``additional''
that appears after the word ``borrow''.
0
M. In paragraph (d) introductory text, removing the words ``Federal
Direct Unsubsidized Stafford/Ford'' and adding, in their place, the
words ``Direct Unsubsidized''.
0
N. In paragraphs (d)(1)(i), (d)(1)(ii), (d)(2)(i), and (d)(2)(ii),
removing the words ``$4,000, or, for a loan first disbursed on or after
July 1, 2008, $6,000,'' and adding, in their place, the figure
``$6,000''.
0
O. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(iii).
0
P. In paragraphs (d)(3)(i) and (d)(3)(ii), removing the words ``$5,000,
or, for a loan first disbursed on or after July 1, 2008, $7,000,'' and
adding, in their place, the figure ``$7,000''.
0
Q. In paragraph (d)(5), removing the words ``$10,000, or, for a loan
disbursed on or after July 1, 2007,''.
0
R. In paragraph (d)(6)(i), removing the words ``$4,000, or, for a loan
first disbursed on or after July 1, 2008, $6,000,'' and adding, in
their place, the figure ``$6,000''.
0
S. In paragraph (d)(6)(ii), removing the words ``$5,000, or, for a loan
disbursed on or after July 1, 2007, $7,000,'' and
[[Page 65809]]
adding, in their place, the figure ``$7,000''.
0
T. In paragraph (d)(6)(iii), removing the words ``$5,000, or, for a
loan disbursed on or after July 1, 2007,''.
0
U. Revising paragraph (e).
0
V. Removing paragraph (f).
0
W. Redesignating paragraphs (g) through (m) as paragraphs (f) through
(l), respectively.
0
X. In newly redesignated paragraph (l), removing the citation ``(d),
(e), and (f)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(d), and (e)''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 682.204 Maximum loan amounts.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) For a program of study that is less than a full academic year
in length, the amount that is the same ratio to $3,500 as the lesser of
the--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01NO13.000
* * * * *
(5) In the case of a graduate or professional student, the total
amount the student may borrow for loans made prior to July 1, 2010 for
any academic year of study under the Stafford Loan Program, in
combination with any amount borrowed under the Direct Subsidized Loan
Program, may not exceed $8,500.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Except for a dependent undergraduate student who qualifies for
additional Unsubsidized Stafford Loan funds because the student's
parents are unable to borrow under the PLUS Loan Program, as described
in paragraph (d) of this section, the total amount the dependent
undergraduate student may borrow for any academic year under the
Unsubsidized Stafford Loan Program in combination with the Direct
Unsubsidized Loan Program is the same amount determined under paragraph
(a) of this section, less any amount received under the Stafford Loan
Program or the Direct Subsidized Loan program, plus--
(i) $2,000, for a program of study of at least a full academic year
in length.
(ii) For a program of study that is at least one academic year or
more in length with less than a full academic year remaining, the
amount that is the same ratio to $2,000 as the--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01NO13.001
(iii) For a program of study that is less than a full academic year
in length, the amount that is the same ratio to $2,000 as the lesser of
the--
[[Page 65810]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01NO13.002
(2) In the case of an independent undergraduate student, a graduate
or professional student, or certain dependent undergraduate students
under the conditions specified in Sec. 682.201(a)(3), the total amount
the student may borrow for any period of enrollment under the
Unsubsidized Stafford Loan and Direct Unsubsidized Loan programs may
not exceed the amounts determined under paragraph (a) of this section
less any amount received under the Federal Stafford Loan Program or the
Direct Subsidized Loan Program, in combination with the amounts
determined under paragraph (d) of this section.
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) For a program of study that is less than a full academic year
in length, an amount that is the same ratio to $6,000 as the lesser
of--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01NO13.003
* * * * *
(e) Combined Federal Stafford, SLS and Federal Unsubsidized
Stafford Loan Program aggregate limits. The aggregate unpaid principal
amount of Stafford Loans, Direct Subsidized Loans, Unsubsidized
Stafford Loans, Direct Unsubsidized Loans and SLS Loans, but excluding
the amount of capitalized interest, may not exceed the following:
(1) $31,000 for a dependent undergraduate student.
(2) $57,500 for an independent undergraduate student or a dependent
undergraduate student under the conditions specified in Sec.
682.201(a)(3).
(3) $138,500 for a graduate or professional student.
* * * * *
0
22. Section 682.205 is amended by:
0
A. Removing paragraphs (a), (b), (g), and (i).
0
B. Redesignating paragraphs (c), (d), (e), (f), (h), and (j) as
paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f), respectively.
0
C. In newly redesignated paragraph (a)(1), removing the citation
``(c)(2)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(a)(2)''.
0
D. In newly redesignated paragraph (a)(3) introductory text, removing
the citation ``(c)(1)'' and adding, in its place, the citation
``(a)(1)''.
0
E. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (a)(4).
0
F. In newly redesignated paragraph (a)(5)(ii), adding the word
``business'' after the word ``five''.
0
G. In newly redesignated paragraph (b), removing the citation
``(c)(2)(viii)'' and adding, in its place, the citation
``(a)(2)(viii)''.
0
H. In newly redesignated paragraph (e)(2), removing the citation
``(h)(1)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(e)(1)''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 682.205 Disclosure requirements for lenders.
(a) * * *
(4) Required disclosures for borrowers having difficulty making
payments. (i) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this
section, the lender must
[[Page 65811]]
provide a borrower who has notified the lender that he or she is having
difficulty making payments with--
(A) A description of the repayment plans available to the borrower,
and how the borrower may request a change in repayment plan;
(B) A description of the requirements for obtaining forbearance on
the loan and any costs associated with forbearance; and
(C) A description of the options available to the borrower to avoid
default and any fees or costs associated with those options.
(ii) A disclosure under paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section is not
required if the borrower's difficulty has been resolved through contact
with the borrower resulting from an earlier disclosure or other
communication between the lender and the borrower.
* * * * *
Sec. 682.206 [Removed and Reserved]
0
23. Section 682.206 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 682.207 [Removed and Reserved]
0
24. Section 682.207 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 682.208 [Amended]
0
25. Section 682.208 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a), removing the words ``national credit bureaus'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``nationwide consumer reporting
agencies''.
0
B. In paragraph (b)(1) introductory text, removing the words ``at least
one national credit bureau'' and adding, in their place, the words
``each nationwide consumer reporting agency''.
0
C. In paragraph (b)(2), removing the words ``at least one national
credit bureau'' and adding, in their place, the words ``each nationwide
consumer reporting agency''.
0
D. In paragraph (b)(3) introductory text, removing both occurrences of
the words ``credit bureau'' and adding, in their place, the words
``consumer reporting agency''.
0
E. In paragraph (b)(3)(i)(A), removing the words ``credit bureau'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``consumer reporting agency''.
0
F. In paragraph (e)(3), removing the citation ``Sec.
682.401(b)(17)(ii)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``Sec.
682.401(b)(8)(ii)''.
0
G. In paragraph (g), removing the citation ``Sec. 682.411(g)'' and
adding, in its place, the citation ``Sec. 682.411(h)''.
0
26. Section 682.209 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(3)(i)(B), removing the word ``and''.
0
B. In paragraph (a)(3)(i)(C), removing the punctuation ``.'' and
adding, in its place, the punctuation and the word ``; and''.
0
C. Adding a new paragraph (a)(3)(i)(D).
0
D. In paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(E), removing the citation ``Sec.
682.205(c)(1)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``Sec.
682.205(a)(1)''.
0
E. In paragraph (b)(2)(ii), revising the last sentence.
0
F. Removing paragraphs (e), (f), (g), and (j).
0
G. Redesignating paragraphs (h), (i), and (k) as paragraphs (e), (f),
and (g), respectively.
0
H. In newly redesignated paragraph (e)(3) introductory text, removing
the citation ``(h)(2)'' and adding, in its place, the citation
``(e)(2)''.
0
I. In newly redesignated paragraph (e)(4)(ii), removing the word
``Must'' and adding, in its place, the words ``Except in the case of an
income-based repayment schedule, must''.
0
J. In newly redesignated paragraph (e)(5), removing the citation
``(h)(2)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(e)(2)''.
0
K. In newly redesignated paragraph (f)(2)(i), removing the words
``under Sec. 682.209(f)''.
0
L. In newly redesignated paragraph (f)(2)(ii), removing the citation
``(i)(2)(i)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(f)(2)(i)''.
The addition and revision read as follows:
Sec. 682.209 Repayment of a loan.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) For a borrower with a loan for which the applicable interest
rate is fixed at 6.0 percent per year, 5.6 percent per year, or 6.8
percent per year, the day after 6 months following the date on which
the borrower is no longer enrolled on at least a half-time basis at an
institution of higher education.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * * Information related to next scheduled payment due date
need not be provided to borrowers making such prepayments while in an
in-school, grace, deferment, or forbearance period when payments are
not due.
* * * * *
0
27. Section 682.210 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(4), adding the words and punctuation ``, or the
borrower's representative for purposes of paragraphs (i) and (t) of
this section,'' between the words ``borrower'' and ``must''.
0
B. Revising paragraph (b).
0
C. In paragraph (n)(1) introductory text, removing the words and
citations ``paragraphs (b)(2)(v) or (b)(5)(iii)'' and adding, in their
place, the word and citation ``paragraph (b)(3)(iv)''.
0
D. In paragraph (n)(2), removing the citation ``(b)(2)(v)'' and adding,
in its place, the citation ``(b)(3)(iv)''.
0
E. In paragraph (o)(1) introductory text, removing the citation
``(b)(3)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(b)(3)(i)''.
0
F. In paragraph (q)(1) introductory text, removing the citation
``(b)(5)(ii)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(b)(3)(iii)''.
0
G. In paragraph (r)(1) introductory text, removing the citation
``(b)(5)(iv)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(b)(3)(v)''.
0
H. In paragraph (s)(2), removing the punctuation and the words ``,
except that the borrower is not required to obtain a Stafford or SLS
loan for the period of enrollment covered by the deferment''.
0
I. In paragraph (s)(6) introductory text, removing both occurrences of
the citation ``(s)(6)(vi)'' and adding, in their place, the citation
``(s)(6)(iv)''.
0
J. In paragraph (u)(5), removing both occurrences of the words
``military active'' and adding, in their place, the words ``post-
active''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 682.210 Deferment.
* * * * *
(b) Authorized deferments for borrowers prior to July 1, 1993--(1)
For all borrowers who are not new borrowers on or after July 1, 1993.
Deferment is authorized for a FFEL borrower during any period when the
borrower is--
(i) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(4) of this section, engaged
in full-time study at a school in accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section;
(ii) Engaged in a course of study under an eligible graduate
fellowship program in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section;
(iii) Engaged in a rehabilitation training program for disabled
individuals in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section;
(iv) Temporarily totally disabled in accordance with paragraph (f)
of this section, or unable to secure employment because the borrower is
caring for a spouse or other dependent who is disabled and requires
continuous nursing or similar services for up to three years in
accordance with paragraph (g) of this section; or
(v) Conscientiously seeking, but unable to find, full-time
employment in the United States, for up to two years,
[[Page 65812]]
in accordance with paragraph (h) of this section.
(2) For all Stafford and SLS borrowers who are not new borrowers on
or after July 1, 1993, and for parent PLUS loans made before August 15,
1983. Deferment is authorized during any period when the borrower is--
(i) On active duty status in the United States Armed Forces in
accordance with paragraph (i) of this section, or an officer in the
Commissioned Corps of the United States Public Health Service in
accordance with paragraph (j) of this section, for up to three years
(including any period during which the borrower received a deferment
authorized under paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section);
(ii) A full-time volunteer under the Peace Corps Act, for up to
three years, in accordance with paragraph (k) of this section;
(iii) A full-time volunteer under title I of the Domestic Volunteer
Service Act of 1973 (ACTION programs), for up to three years, in
accordance with paragraph (l) of this section;
(iv) A full-time volunteer for a tax-exempt organization, for up to
three years, in accordance with paragraph (m) of this section; or
(v) Engaged in an internship or residency program, in accordance
with paragraph (n) of this section, for up to two years (including any
period during which the borrower received a deferment authorized under
paragraph (b)(3)(iv) of this section).
(3) For new Stafford or SLS borrowers on or after July 1, 1987 but
before July 1, 1993. Deferment is authorized--
(i) In accordance with paragraph (o) of this section, if the
borrower has been enrolled on at least a half-time basis at an
institution of higher education during the six months preceding the
beginning of the deferment, for a period of up to six months during
which the borrower is--
(A)(1) Pregnant;
(2) Caring for his or her newborn child; or
(3) Caring for a child immediately following the placement of the
child with the borrower before or immediately following adoption; and
(B) Not attending a school or gainfully employed;
(ii) During a period when the borrower is on active duty status in
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Corps, for up to
three years, in accordance with paragraph (p) of this section,
(including any period during which the borrower received a deferment
authorized under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section);
(iii) During a period of up to three years when the borrower is
serving as a full-time teacher in a public or non-profit private
elementary or secondary school in a teacher shortage area designated by
the Secretary under paragraph (q) of this section;
(iv) During a period when the borrower is engaged in an internship
or residency program, for up to two years, in accordance with paragraph
(n) of this section, (including any period during which the borrower
received a deferment authorized under paragraph (b)(2)(v) of this
section); or
(v) When a mother who has preschool-age children (i.e., children
who have not enrolled in first grade) and who is earning not more than
$1 per hour above the Federal minimum wage, for up to 12 months of
employment, and who began that full-time employment within one year of
entering or re-entering the work force, in accordance with paragraph
(r) of this section. Full-time employment involves at least 30 hours of
work a week and it is expected to last at least 3 months.
(4) For new Stafford or SLS borrowers on or after July 1, 1987.
Deferment is authorized during periods when the borrower is engaged in
at least half-time study at a school in accordance with paragraph (b)
of this section.
(5) For new parent PLUS borrowers on or after July 1, 1987 and
before July 1, 1993. Deferment is authorized during any period when a
student on whose behalf the parent borrower received the loan--
(i) Is not independent as defined in section 480(d) of the Act; and
(ii) Meets the conditions and provides the required documentation,
for any of the deferments described in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through
(iii) and (b)(4) of this section.
(6) Definition of a new borrower. For purposes of paragraphs
(b)(3), (b)(4), and (b)(5) of this section, a ``new borrower'' with
respect to a loan is a borrower who, on the date he or she signs the
promissory note, has no outstanding balance on--
(i) A Stafford, SLS, or PLUS loan made prior to July 1, 1987 for a
period of enrollment beginning prior to July 1, 1987; or
(ii) A Consolidation loan that repaid a loan made prior to July 1,
1987 and for a period of enrollment beginning prior to July 1, 1987.
* * * * *
0
28. Section 682.211 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(4), removing the citation ``(f)(10)'' and adding,
in its place, the citation ``(f)(11)''.
0
B. Revising paragraphs (c) and (d).
0
C. In paragraph (f)(2), removing the words ``or an administrative
forbearance period as specified under paragraph (f)(11) or (i)(2) of
this section;'' and adding, in their place, the words ``or an
authorized period of forbearance;''.
0
D. In paragraph (f)(6), removing the words ``credit bureau'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``consumer reporting agency''.
0
E. In paragraph (h)(2)(ii)(B), removing the words ``10 U.S.C. 2171;
or'' and adding, in their place, the words ``10 U.S.C. 2171, 2173, 2174
or any other student loan repayment programs administered by the
Department of Defense; or''.
0
F. In paragraph (h)(2)(ii)(C), removing the citation ``Sec. 682.215''
and adding, in its place, the citation ``Sec. 682.216''.
0
G. In paragraph (h)(4)(iii)(A), removing the citation ``Sec.
682.215(c)'' and adding, in its place the citation ``Sec.
682.216(c)''.
0
H. In paragraph (h)(4)(iii)(B), removing the citation ``Sec.
682.215(c)'' and adding, in its place the citation ``Sec.
682.216(c)''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 682.211 Forbearance.
* * * * *
(c) Except as provided in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, a
lender may grant forbearance for a period of up to one year at a time
if both the borrower or endorser and an authorized official of the
lender agree to the terms of the forbearance. If the borrower or
endorser requests the forbearance orally and the lender and the
borrower or endorser agree to the terms of the forbearance orally, the
lender must notify the borrower or endorser of the terms within 30 days
of that agreement.
(d)(1) A guaranty agency may authorize a lender to grant
forbearance to permit a borrower or endorser to resume honoring the
agreement to repay the debt after default but prior to claim payment.
The forbearance agreement in this situation must include a new
agreement to repay the debt signed by the borrower or endorser or a
written or oral affirmation of the borrower's or endorser's obligation
to repay the debt.
(2) If the forbearance is based on the borrower's or endorser's
oral request and affirmation of the obligation to repay the debt--
(i) The forbearance period is limited to a period of 120 days;
(ii) Such a forbearance cannot be granted consecutively;
(iii) The lender must orally review with the borrower the terms and
conditions of the forbearance, including the consequences of interest
capitalization, and all other repayment options available to the
borrower; and
(iv) The lender must--
[[Page 65813]]
(A) Send a notice to the borrower or endorser, as provided in
paragraph (c) of this section, that confirms the terms of the
forbearance and the borrower's or endorser's affirmation of the
obligation to repay the debt, and includes information on all other
repayment options available to the borrower, and
(B) Retain a record of the terms of the forbearance and affirmation
in the borrower's or endorser's file.
(3) For purposes of this section, an ``affirmation'' means an
acknowledgement of the loan by the borrower or endorser in a legally
binding manner. The form of the affirmation may include, but is not
limited to, the borrower's or endorser's--
(i) New signed repayment agreement or schedule, or another form of
signed agreement to repay the debt;
(ii) Oral acknowledgment and agreement to repay the debt documented
by the lender in the borrower's or endorser's file and confirmed by the
lender in a notice to the borrower; or
(iii) A payment made on the loan by the borrower or endorser.
* * * * *
Sec. 682.214 [Removed and Reserved]
0
29. Section 682.214 is removed and reserved.
0
30. Section 682.216 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(2)(iii), removing the first occurrence of the word
``at'' and adding, in its place, the word ``for''.
0
B. In paragraph (a)(4)(i), removing the second occurrence of the word
``at'' and adding, in its place, the word ``for''.
0
C. In paragraph (c)(1) introductory text, removing the words ``at an
educational'' and adding, in their place, the words ``for an
educational''.
0
D. In paragraph (c)(1)(iii), removing the final sentence.
0
E. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(11) as paragraphs (c)(3)
through (c)(12), respectively.
0
F. Adding a new paragraph (c)(2).
0
G. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(4)(ii)(A), removing the words
``at an eligible educational'' and adding, in their place, the words
``for an eligible educational''.
0
H. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(4)(ii)(B), adding the words
``for an'' immediately before the words ``educational service agency''.
0
I. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(4)(iii), removing the first
occurrence of the word ``at'' and adding, in its place, the word
``for''.
0
J. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(5)(i), adding the words ``for
an'' immediately before the words ``educational service''.
0
K. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(5)(ii)(A), removing the words
``students at an eligible'' and adding, in their place, the words
``students for an eligible''.
0
L. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(5)(ii)(B), adding the words
``for an'' immediately before the words ``educational service''.
0
M. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(5)(iii), removing the first
occurrence of the word ``at'' and adding, in its place the word
``for''.
0
N. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(10), removing the second
occurrence of the word ``at'' and adding, in its place, the word
``for''.
0
O. In paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2), removing the words and citations
``paragraphs (c)(3)(ii) or (c)(4)(ii)'' and adding, in their place, the
words and citations ``paragraph (c)(4)(ii) or (c)(5)(ii)''.
0
P. In the heading of paragraph (e), removing the word ``discharge'' and
adding in its place, the word ``forgiveness''.
0
Q. In paragraph (e)(1)(i), removing the citation ``(h)(3)(iii)'' and
adding, in its place, the citation ``(h)(4)(iii)''.
0
R. In paragraph (e)(1)(iii), removing the word ``discharge'' and
adding, in its place, the word ``forgiveness''.
0
S. Revising paragraphs (f)(2)(i) and (f)(2)(ii).
0
T. In paragraph (f)(2)(iii), removing both occurrences of the word
``discharged'' and adding, in their place, the words ``loan
forgiveness''.
0
U. In paragraph (f)(3)(ii), removing both occurrences of the word
``discharge'' and adding, in their place, the words ``loan
forgiveness''.
0
V. In paragraph (f)(4), removing both occurrences of the word
``discharge'' and adding, in their place, the words ``loan
forgiveness''.
0
W. In paragraph (f)(5), removing the word ``discharge''.
0
X. Revising paragraph (g).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 682.216 Teacher loan forgiveness program.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) The Secretary considers all elementary and secondary schools
operated by the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) or operated on Indian
reservations by Indian tribal groups under contract with the BIE to
qualify as schools serving low-income students.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The holder must file a request for payment with the guaranty
agency on a teacher loan forgiveness amount no later than 60 days after
the receipt, from the borrower, of a completed teacher loan forgiveness
application.
(ii) When filing a request for payment on a teacher loan
forgiveness, the holder must provide the guaranty agency with the
completed loan forgiveness application submitted by the borrower and
any required supporting documentation.
* * * * *
(g) Claims for reimbursement from the Secretary on loans held by
guaranty agencies. In the case of a teacher loan forgiveness applied to
a defaulted loan held by the guaranty agency, the Secretary pays the
guaranty agency a percentage of the amount forgiven that is equal to
the complement of the reinsurance percentage paid on the loan. The
payment of up to $5,000, or up to $17,500, may also include interest
that accrues on the forgiveness amount during the period from the date
on which the guaranty agency received payment from the Secretary on a
default claim to the date on which the guaranty agency determines that
the borrower is eligible for the teacher loan forgiveness.
* * * * *
Sec. 682.300 [Amended]
0
31. Section 682.300 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (b)(2)(ii) introductory text, removing the words ``,
except as provided in paragraph (c)(4) of this section''.
0
B. In paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(B), removing the words ``in accordance with
Sec. 682.207(b)(1)(ii)(B) and (C)''.
0
C. In paragraph (c)(1), adding the word ``or'' after the punctuation
``;''.
0
D. In paragraph (c)(2), removing the punctuation ``;'' and adding, in
its place, the punctuation ``.''.
0
E. Removing paragraphs (c)(3) and (c)(4).
Sec. 682.301 [Amended]
0
32. Section 682.301 is amended by removing paragraph (c).
0
33. Section 682.302 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (b)(3) introductory text, adding the words ``and prior
to July 1, 2010'' after the date ``1992'' and before the punctuation
``,''.
0
B. In paragraph (d)(1)(vi)(B), removing the words ``the loan proceeds
disbursed by electronic funds transfer or master check in accordance
with Sec. 682.207(b)(1)(ii)(B) and (C)'' and adding, in their place,
the words ``The loan proceeds disbursed by electronic funds transfer or
master check''.
0
C. In paragraph (d)(2) introductory text, adding the words ``and prior
to July 1, 2010'' after the date ``1992'' and before the punctuation
``,''.
[[Page 65814]]
0
D. In paragraph (e)(1)(i), removing the citation ``Sec. 682.800'' and
adding, in its place, the words ``section 438(e) of the Act''.
0
E. Revising paragraph (f)(3)(viii)(B).
0
F. In paragraph (f)(3)(x)(B)(3), removing the citation ``503(c)(3)''
and adding, in its place, the citation ``501(c)(3)''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 682.302 Payment of special allowance on FFEL loans.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(3) * * *
(viii) * * *
(B) Fees are reasonable and customary for purposes of paragraph
(f)(3)(viii) of this section, if they do not exceed the amounts
received by the trustee for similar services with regard to similar
portfolios of loans of that State or non-profit entity or its related
special purpose entity that are not eligible to receive special
allowance at the rate established under paragraph (f)(2) of this
section, or if they do not exceed an amount as determined by such other
method requested by the State or non-profit entity that the Secretary
considers reliable.
* * * * *
Sec. 682.305 [Amended]
0
34. Section 682.305 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(B), by adding the words ``and prior to July
1, 2010'' after the date ``2007'' and before the punctuation ``,''.
0
B. In paragraph (c)(1)(i), removing the words ``originating or''.
0
C. Removing paragraph (c)(1)(ii).
0
D. Redesignating paragraph (c)(1)(iii) as paragraph (c)(1)(ii).
0
E. In paragraph (c)(2)(iv), adding the word ``and'' as the last word in
the paragraph, immediately following the punctuation ``;''.
0
F. In paragraph (c)(2)(v), removing the final punctuation ``;'' and
adding, in its place, the punctuation ``.''.
0
G. Removing paragraphs (c)(2)(vi) and (c)(2)(vii).
0
35. Section 682.400 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(1)(i) to read
as follows:
Sec. 682.400 Agreements between a guaranty agency and the Secretary.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Borrowers whose Stafford or Consolidation loans are guaranteed
by the agency may qualify for interest benefits that are paid to the
lender on the borrower's behalf under Sec. 682.301; and
* * * * *
0
36. Section 682.401 is amended by:
0
A. Removing paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(3).
0
B. Redesignating paragraph (b)(4) as paragraph (b)(1).
0
C. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(1) introductory text, removing
the citation ``(b)(4)'' and adding, in its place, the citation
``(b)(1)''.
0
D. Removing paragraphs (b)(5) and (b)(6).
0
E. Redesignating paragraph (b)(7) as paragraph (b)(2).
0
F. Removing paragraphs (b)(8) and (b)(9).
0
G. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(10) and (b)(11) as paragraphs (b)(3)
and (b)(4), respectively.
0
H. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(3)(i) introductory text,
removing the words ``SLS or PLUS loans refinanced under Sec.
682.209(e) or (f)'' and adding, in their place, the words ``refinanced
SLS or PLUS loans''.
0
I. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(3)(iv)(C), adding the words
``and prior to July 1, 2010'' between the date ``2006'' and the
punctuation ``.''.
0
J. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(3)(vi)(B)(4), removing the words
``in accordance with Sec. 682.207(b)(1)(ii)(B) and (C)''.
0
K. Removing paragraphs (b)(12) and (b)(13).
0
L. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(14) through (b)(29) as paragraphs
(b)(5) through (b)(20), respectively.
0
M. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(6), adding the words ``and N''
between the letter ``M'' and the word ``of''.
0
N. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(8)(i) introductory text,
removing the citation ``(b)(17)(iii)'' and adding, in its place, the
citation ``(b)(8)(iii)''.
0
O. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(8)(iii), removing the citation
``(b)(17)(i)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(b)(8)(i)''.
0
P. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(10)(i)(B), removing the words
``School and lender'' and adding, in their place, the word ``Lender''.
0
Q. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(10)(i)(C), removing the words
``school and''.
0
R. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(10)(i)(D), removing the words
``school or''.
0
S. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(11) introductory text, adding
the word ``of'' between the words ``days'' and ``any''.
0
T. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(14)(ii), removing the citation
``(b)(23)(i)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(b)(14)(i)''.
0
U. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(18)(i), removing the word
``Federal'' and adding, in its place, the word ``Direct''.
0
V. Removing newly redesignated paragraph (b)(18)(ii).
0
W. Further redesignating newly redesignated paragraphs (b)(18)(iii)
through (v) as paragraphs (b)(18)(ii) through (iv), respectively.
0
X. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (b)(18)(iii).
0
Y. Removing paragraph (c).
0
Z. Redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (c).
0
AA. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(2), removing the citation
``(d)(1)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(c)(1)''.
0
BB. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(3), adding a final sentence to
the end of the paragraph.
0
CC. Removing newly redesignated paragraph (c)(4).
0
DD. Further redesignating newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(5) and
(c)(6) as paragraphs (c)(4) and (c)(5), respectively.
0
EE. Removing paragraph (e).
0
FF. Redesignating paragraphs (f) and (g) as paragraphs (d) and (e),
respectively.
0
GG. In newly redesignated paragraph (d)(2), removing the word ``HEA''
and adding, in its place, the word ``Act''.
0
HH. In newly redesignated paragraph (e)(1), removing the word
``participate'' and adding, in its place, the word ``participated''.
0
II. In newly redesignated paragraph (e)(2), removing the citation
``(g)(1)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(e)(1)''.
0
JJ. In newly redesignated paragraph (e)(4), removing the citation
``(g)(1)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(e)(1)''.
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 682.401 Basic program agreement.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(18) * * *
(iii) On or after October 1, 2009, when returning proceeds to the
Secretary from the consolidation of a defaulted loan that is paid off
with excess consolidation proceeds as defined in paragraph (b)(18)(iv)
of this section, a guaranty agency must remit the entire amount of
collection costs repaid through the consolidation loan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * * Each loan made under an MPN is enforceable in accordance
with the terms of the MPN and is eligible for claim payment based on a
true and exact copy of such MPN.
* * * * *
0
37. Section 682.402 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(5)(ii), removing the words ``credit bureau'' and
adding,
[[Page 65815]]
in their place, the words ``consumer reporting agency''.
0
B. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(i).
0
C. In paragraph (d)(3)(ii)(B), by removing the figure ``90'' and
adding, in its place, the figure ``120''.
0
D. In paragraphs (d)(6)(i)(C), (d)(6)(i)(D) introductory text,
(d)(6)(i)(D)(2), (d)(6)(i)(H)(3), (d)(6)(ii)(B) introductory text,
(d)(6)(ii)(B)(2), and (d)(6)(ii)(F)(3), by removing the figure ``90''
each time it appears and adding, in its place, the figure ``120''.
0
E. In paragraph (d)(7)(iv), removing the words ``credit bureaus'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``consumer reporting agencies''.
0
F. In paragraph (d)(8)(i), removing the citation ``34 CFR 685.213'' and
adding, in its place, the citation ``34 CFR 685.214''.
0
G. In paragraph (e)(3) introductory text, removing the citation
``(e)(14)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(e)(15)''.
0
H. In paragraph (e)(3)(v)(C), removing the word ``identify'' and
adding, in its place, the word ``identity''.
0
I. In paragraph (e)(12)(v) introductory text, removing the words
``credit bureaus'' and adding, in their place, the words ``consumer
reporting agencies''.
0
J. In paragraphs (l)(1), (l)(2)(ii), and (l)(3)(i), adding the words
``or Federal default fees'' between the word ``premiums'' and the
punctuation '')''.
0
K. In paragraph (n)(2), adding the words ``or Federal default fees''
between the word ``premiums'' and the punctuation '')''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 682.402 Death, disability, closed school, false certification,
unpaid refunds, and bankruptcy payments.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) The Secretary reimburses the holder of a loan received by a
borrower on or after January 1, 1986, and discharges the borrower's
obligation with respect to the loan in accordance with the provisions
of paragraph (d) of this section, if the borrower (or the student for
whom a parent received a PLUS loan) could not complete the program of
study for which the loan was intended because the school at which the
borrower (or student) was enrolled closed, or the borrower (or student)
withdrew from the school not more than 120 days prior to the date the
school closed. The Secretary may extend the 120-day period if the
Secretary determines that exceptional circumstances related to a
school's closing justify an extension. Exceptional circumstances for
this purpose may include, but are not limited to: the school's loss of
accreditation; the school's discontinuation of the majority of its
academic programs; action by the State to revoke the school's license
to operate or award academic credentials in the State; or a finding by
a State or Federal government agency that the school violated State or
Federal law.
* * * * *
Sec. 682.403 [Removed and Reserved]
0
38. Section 682.403 is removed and reserved.
0
39. Section 682.404 is amended by:
0
A. Revising paragraph (b)(3)(ii).
0
B. In paragraph (b)(3)(iii), adding the word ``or'' after the
punctuation ``;''.
0
C. In paragraph (b)(4)(ii)(G)(2), removing the words ``is consistent
with Sec. 682.509(a)(1)'' and adding, in their place, the words
``addresses the condition identified in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this
section''.
0
D. In paragraph (d)(1) introductory text, removing the words ``made
under Sec. 682.209(e), (f) and (h),'' and adding, in their place the
words ``that were refinanced pursuant to section 428B(e)(2) and (3) of
the Act,''.
0
E. Removing paragraph (h).
0
F. Redesignating paragraphs (i) through (l) as paragraphs (h) through
(k), respectively.
0
G. In newly redesignated paragraph (j)(3)(i), removing the
parenthetical ``(k)(2)(i)'' and adding, in its place, the parenthetical
``(j)(2)(i)''.
0
H. In newly redesignated paragraph (j)(3)(ii), removing the citation
``(k)(2)(ii)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(j)(2)(ii)''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 682.404 Federal reinsurance agreement.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Under a policy established by the agency that addresses
instances in which, for a non-school originated loan, a lender learns
that the school terminated its teaching activities while a student was
enrolled during the academic period covered by the loan;
* * * * *
0
40. Section 682.405 is amended by:
0
A. In the introductory text of paragraph (a)(2)(i), adding the word
``qualifying'' between the words ``ten'' and ``payments''.
0
B. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (a)(2)(i)(A).
0
C. Redesignating paragraph (a)(3) as paragraph (a)(4).
0
D. Adding a new paragraph (a)(3).
0
E. Revising paragraph (b)(1).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 682.405 Loan rehabilitation agreement.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) A qualifying payment is--
* * * * *
(3)(i) If a borrower's loan is being collected by administrative
wage garnishment while the borrower is also making monthly payments on
the same loan under a loan rehabilitation agreement, the guaranty
agency must continue collecting the loan by administrative wage
garnishment until the borrower makes five qualifying monthly payments
under the rehabilitation agreement, unless the guaranty agency is
otherwise precluded from doing so under Sec. 682.410(b)(9).
(ii) After the borrower makes the fifth qualifying monthly payment,
the guaranty agency must, unless otherwise directed by the borrower,
suspend the garnishment order issued to the borrower's employer.
(iii) A borrower may only obtain the benefit of a suspension of
administrative wage garnishment while also attempting to rehabilitate a
defaulted loan once.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) A borrower may request rehabilitation of the borrower's
defaulted loan held by the guaranty agency. In order to be eligible for
rehabilitation of the loan, the borrower must voluntarily make at least
9 of the 10 payments required under a monthly repayment agreement.
(i) Each payment must be--
(A) Made voluntarily;
(B) For the full amount required;
(C) Received within 20 days of the due date for the payment; and
(D) Reasonable and affordable.
(ii) All 9 payments must be received within a 10-month period that
begins with the month in which the first required due date falls and
ends with the ninth consecutive calendar month following that month.
(iii) The guaranty agency initially considers the borrower's
reasonable and affordable payment amount to be an amount equal to 15
percent of the amount by which the borrower's Adjusted Gross Income
(AGI) exceeds 150 percent of the poverty guideline amount applicable to
the borrower's family size and State, divided by 12, except that if
this amount is less than $5, the borrower's monthly rehabilitation
payment is $5.
(iv) The guaranty agency or its agents may calculate the payment
amount based on information provided orally by the borrower or the
borrower's representative and provide the borrower
[[Page 65816]]
with a rehabilitation agreement using that amount. The guaranty agency
must request documentation from the borrower to confirm the borrower's
AGI and family size. If the borrower does not provide the guaranty
agency or its agents with any documentation requested by the guaranty
agency to calculate or confirm the reasonable and affordable payment
amount, within a reasonable time deadline set by the guaranty agency or
its agent, the rehabilitation agreement provided is null and void.
(v) The reasonable and affordable payment amount calculated under
this section must not be--
(A) A required minimum loan payment amount (e.g., $50) if the
agency determines that a smaller amount is reasonable and affordable;
(B) A percentage of the borrower's total loan balance; or
(C) Based on other criteria unrelated to the borrower's total
financial circumstances.
(vi) Within 15 business days of its determination of the borrower's
loan rehabilitation payment amount, the guaranty agency must provide
the borrower with a written rehabilitation agreement which includes the
borrower's payment amount calculated under paragraph (b)(1)(iii), a
prominent statement that the borrower may object orally or in writing
to the payment amount, with the method and timeframe for raising such
an objection, and an explanation of any other terms and conditions
applicable to the required series of payments that must be made before
the borrower's account can be considered for repurchase by an eligible
lender (i.e., rehabilitated). To accept the agreement, the borrower
must sign and return the agreement or accept the agreement
electronically under a process provided by the agency. The agency may
not impose any other conditions unrelated to the amount or timing of
the rehabilitation payments in the rehabilitation agreement. The
written rehabilitation agreement must inform the borrower--
(A) Of the effects of having the loans rehabilitated (e.g., removal
of the record of default from the borrower's credit history and return
to normal repayment);
(B) Of the amount of any collection costs to be added to the unpaid
principal of the loan when the loan is sold to an eligible lender,
which may not exceed 18.5 percent of the unpaid principal and accrued
interest on the loan at the time of the sale; and
(C) That the rehabilitation agreement is null and void if the
borrower fails to provide the documentation required to confirm the
monthly payment calculated under paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section.
(vii) If the borrower objects to the monthly payment amount
determined under paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section, the guaranty
agency or its agents must recalculate the payment amount based solely
on information provided on a form approved by the Secretary and, if
requested, supporting documentation from the borrower and other
sources, and must consider--
(A) The borrower's, and if applicable, the spouse's current
disposable income, including public assistance payments, and other
income received by the borrower and the spouse, such as welfare
benefits, Social Security benefits, Supplemental Security Income, and
workers' compensation. Spousal income is not considered if the spouse
does not contribute to the borrower's household income;
(B) Family size as defined in Sec. 682.215(a)(3); and
(C) Reasonable and necessary expenses, which include--
(1) Food;
(2) Housing;
(3) Utilities;
(4) Basic communication expenses;
(5) Necessary medical and dental costs;
(6) Necessary insurance costs;
(7) Transportation costs;
(8) Dependent care and other work-related expenses;
(9) Legally required child and spousal support;
(10) Other title IV and non-title IV student loan payments; and
(11) Other expenses approved by the Secretary.
(viii) The guaranty agency must provide the borrower with a new
written rehabilitation agreement confirming the borrower's recalculated
reasonable and affordable payment amount within the timeframe specified
in paragraph (b)(1)(vii) of this section. To accept the agreement, the
borrower must sign and return the agreement or accept the agreement
electronically under a process provided by the agency.
(ix) The agency must include any payment made under Sec.
682.401(b)(1) in determining whether the 9 out of 10 payments required
under paragraph (b)(1) of this section have been made.
(x) A borrower may request that the monthly payment amount be
adjusted due to a change in the borrower's total financial
circumstances only upon providing the documentation specified in
paragraph (b)(1)(vii) of this section.
(xi) During the rehabilitation period, the guaranty agency must
limit contact with the borrower on the loan being rehabilitated to
collection activities that are required by law or regulation and to
communications that support the rehabilitation.
* * * * *
Sec. 682.406 [Amended]
0
41. Section 682.406 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(2)(ii), removing the words ``in accordance with
Sec. 682.207(b)(1)(ii)(B) and (C)''.
0
B. In paragraph (a)(12)(iv), adding the words ``and prior to July 1,
2010'' after the date ``1999'' and before the punctuation ``,''.
Sec. 682.407 [Amended]
0
42. Section 682.407(e)(1)(ii) is amended by removing the figure ``24''
the first time it appears and adding, in its place, the figure ``72''.
Sec. 682.408 [Removed and Reserved]
0
43. Section 682.408 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 682.409 [Amended]
0
44. Section 682.409 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(2)(i), removing the citation ``Sec.
682.401(b)(4)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``Sec.
682.401(b)(1)''.
0
B. In paragraph (a)(3)(i)(B), removing the citation ``Sec.
682.401(b)(4)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``Sec.
682.401(b)(1)''.
0
45. Section 682.410 is amended by:
0
A. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (a)(2).
0
B. In paragraph (a)(2)(ii) introductory text, removing the word
``preclaims'' and adding, in its place, the words ``default aversion''.
0
C. In paragraph (b)(2) introductory text, removing the citation
``Sec. Sec. 682.401(b)(27) and 682.405(b)(1)(iv)'' and adding, in its
place, the citation ``Sec. Sec. 682.401(b)(18)(i) and
682.405(b)(1)(iv)(B)''.
0
D. In paragraph (b)(5)(i) introductory text, removing the citation
``(b)(6)(v)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(b)(6)(ii)''.
0
E. In paragraph (b)(7)(i), removing the words ``conditions described in
Sec. 682.509(a)(1)'' and adding, in their place, the words ``condition
described in Sec. 682.404(b)(3)(ii)''.
0
F. In paragraph (b)(7)(ii)(A), removing the words ``credit bureau'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``consumer reporting agency''.
0
G. Revising paragraph (b)(9).
0
H. In paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A) introductory text, removing the words
``made or''.
0
I. In paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A)(1), removing the words ``in that year''.
0
J. In paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A)(2), removing the words ``in that year''.
[[Page 65817]]
0
K. Revising paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C).
0
L. In paragraph (c)(1)(ii), removing the citation ``(c)(1)(A)-(C)'' and
adding, in its place, the citation ``(c)(1)(i)(A)-(C)''.
0
M. Removing paragraph (c)(4).
0
N. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(5) through (c)(11) as paragraphs (c)(4)
through (c)(10), respectively.
0
O. In newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(8)(i) and (c)(8)(ii), adding
the words ``title IV eligibility of a'' between the words ``or'' and
``school''.
0
P. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (c)(10) introductory text.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 682.410 Fiscal, administrative, and enforcement requirements.
(a) * * *
(2) Uses of reserve fund assets. A guaranty agency may use the
assets of the reserve fund established under paragraph (a)(1) of this
section to pay only--
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(9) Administrative garnishment. (i) If a guaranty agency decides to
garnish the disposable pay of a borrower who is not making payments on
a loan held by the agency, on which the Secretary has paid a
reinsurance claim, it must do so in accordance with the following
procedures:
(A) At least 30 days before the initiation of garnishment
proceedings, the guaranty agency must mail to the borrower's last known
address, a written notice described in paragraph (b)(9)(i)(B) of this
section.
(B) The notice must describe--
(1) The nature and amount of the debt;
(2) The intention of the agency to collect the debt through
deductions from disposable pay;
(3) An explanation of the borrower's rights;
(4) The deadlines by which a borrower must exercise those rights;
and
(5) The consequences of failure to exercise those rights in a
timely manner.
(C) The guaranty agency must offer the borrower an opportunity to
inspect and copy agency records related to the debt.
(D) The guaranty agency must offer the borrower an opportunity to
enter into a written repayment agreement with the agency under terms
agreeable to the agency.
(E)(1) The guaranty agency must offer the borrower an opportunity
for a hearing in accordance with paragraphs (b)(9)(i)(F) through (J) of
this section and other guidance provided by the Secretary, for any
objection regarding the existence, amount, or enforceability of the
debt, and any objection that withholding from the borrower's disposable
pay in the amount or at the rate proposed in the notice would cause
financial hardship to the borrower.
(2) The borrower must request a hearing in writing. At the
borrower's option, the hearing may be oral or written. The time and
location of the hearing is established by the guaranty agency. An oral
hearing may, at the borrower's option, be conducted either in-person or
by telephone conference. The agency notifies the borrower of the
process for arranging the time and location of an oral hearing. All
telephonic charges are the responsibility of the agency. All travel
expenses incurred by the borrower in connection with an in-person oral
hearing are the responsibility of the borrower.
(F)(1) If the borrower submits a written request for a hearing on
the existence, amount, or enforceability of the debt--
(i) The guaranty agency must provide evidence of the existence of
the debt. If the agency provides evidence of the existence of the debt,
the borrower must prove by the preponderance of the evidence that no
debt exists, the debt is not enforceable under applicable law, the
amount the guaranty agency claims the borrower owes is incorrect,
including that any amount of collection costs assessed to the borrower
exceeds the limits established under Sec. 682.410(b)(2), or the debt
is not delinquent; and
(ii) The borrower may raise any of the objections described in
paragraph (b)(9)(i)(F)(1)(i) of this section not raised in the written
request, but must do so before a hearing is completed. For purposes of
this paragraph, a hearing is completed when the record is closed and
the hearing official notifies the parties that no additional evidence
or objections will be accepted.
(2) If the borrower submits a written request for a hearing on an
objection that withholding in the amount or at the rate that the agency
proposed in its notice would cause financial hardship to the borrower
and the borrower's spouse and dependents--
(i) The borrower bears the burden of proving the claim of financial
hardship by a preponderance of the credible evidence by providing
credible documentation that the amount of wages proposed in the notice
would leave the borrower unable to meet basic living expenses of the
borrower, the borrower's spouse, and the borrower's dependents. The
documentation must show the amount of the costs incurred for basic
living expenses and the income available from any source to meet those
expenses;
(ii) The borrower's claim of financial hardship must be evaluated
by comparing the amounts that the borrower proves are being incurred
for basic living expenses against the amounts spent for basic living
expenses by families of the same size as the borrower's. For the
purposes of this section, the standards published by the Internal
Revenue Service under 26 U.S.C. 7122(d)(2) (the ''Collection Financial
Standards'') establish the average amounts spent for basic living
expenses for families of the same size as the borrower's family;
(iii) The amount that the borrower proves is incurred for a type of
basic living expense is considered to be reasonable to the extent that
the amount does not exceed the amount spent for that expense by
families of the same size according to the Collection Financial
Standards. If the borrower claims an amount for any basic living
expense that exceeds the amount in the Collection Financial Standards,
the borrower must prove that the amount claimed is reasonable and
necessary;
(iv) If the borrower's objection to the rate or amount proposed in
the notice is upheld in part, the garnishment must be ordered at a
lesser rate or amount, that is determined will allow the borrower to
meet basic living expenses proven to be reasonable and necessary. If
this financial hardship determination is made after a garnishment order
is already in effect, the guaranty agency must notify the borrower's
employer of any change required by the determination in the amount to
be withheld or the rate of withholding under that order; and
(v) A determination by a hearing official that financial hardship
would result from garnishment is effective for a period not longer than
six months after the date of the finding. After this period, the
guaranty agency may require the borrower to submit current information
regarding the borrower's family income and living expenses. If the
borrower fails to submit current information within 30 days of this
request, or the guaranty agency concludes from a review of the
available evidence that garnishment should now begin or the rate or the
amount of an outstanding withholding should be increased, the guaranty
agency must notify the borrower and provide the borrower with an
opportunity to contest the determination and obtain a hearing on the
objection under the procedures in paragraph (b)(9)(i) of this section.
(G) If the borrower's written request for a hearing is received by
the guaranty agency on or before the 30th day following the date of the
notice
[[Page 65818]]
described in paragraph (b)(9)(i)(B) of this section, the guaranty
agency may not issue a withholding order until the borrower has been
provided the requested hearing and a decision has been rendered. The
guaranty agency must provide a hearing to the borrower in sufficient
time to permit a decision, in accordance with the procedures that the
agency may prescribe, to be rendered within 60 days.
(H) If the borrower's written request for a hearing is received by
the guaranty agency after the 30th day following the date of the notice
described in paragraph (b)(9)(i)(B) of this section, the guaranty
agency must provide a hearing to the borrower in sufficient time that a
decision, in accordance with the procedures that the agency may
prescribe, may be rendered within 60 days, but may not delay issuance
of a withholding order unless the agency determines that the delay in
filing the request was caused by factors over which the borrower had no
control, or the agency receives information that the agency believes
justifies a delay or cancellation of the withholding order. If a
decision is not rendered within 60 days following receipt of a
borrower's written request for a hearing, the guaranty agency must
suspend the order beginning on the 61st day after the hearing request
was received until a hearing is provided and a decision is rendered.
(I) The hearing official appointed by the agency to conduct the
hearing may be any qualified individual, including an administrative
law judge. Under no circumstance may the hearing official be under the
supervision or control of the head of the guaranty agency or of a
third-party servicer or collection contractor employed by the agency.
Payment of compensation by the guaranty agency, third-party servicer,
or collection contractor employed by the agency to the hearing official
for service as a hearing official does not constitute impermissible
supervision or control under this paragraph. The guaranty agency must
ensure that, except as needed to arrange for administrative matters
pertaining to the hearing, including the type of hearing requested by
the borrower, the time, place, and manner of conducting an oral
hearing, and post-hearing matters such as issuance of a hearing
decision, all oral communications between the hearing official and any
representative of the guaranty agency or with the borrower are made
within the hearing of the other party, and that copies of any written
communication with either party are promptly provided to the other
party. This paragraph does not preclude a hearing in the absence of one
of the parties if the borrower is given proper notice of the hearing,
both parties have agreed on the time, place, and manner of the hearing,
and one of the parties fails to attend.
(J) The hearing official must conduct any hearing as an informal
proceeding, require witnesses in an oral hearing to testify under oath
or affirmation, and maintain a summary record of any hearing. The
hearing official must issue a final written decision at the earliest
practicable date, but not later than 60 days after the guaranty
agency's receipt of the borrower's hearing request. However--
(1) The borrower may request an extension of that deadline for a
reasonable period, as determined by the hearing official, for the
purpose of submitting additional evidence or raising a new objection
described in paragraph (b)(9)(i)(F)(1)(ii) of this section; and
(2) The agency may request, and the hearing official must grant, a
reasonable extension of time sufficient to enable the guaranty agency
to evaluate and respond to any such additional evidence or any
objections raised pursuant to paragraph (b)(9)(i)(F)(1)(ii) of this
section.
(K) An employer served with a garnishment order from the guaranty
agency with respect to a borrower whose wages are not then subject to a
withholding order of any kind must deduct and pay to the agency from a
borrower's disposable pay an amount that does not exceed the smallest
of--
(1) The amount specified in the guaranty agency order;
(2) The amount permitted by section 488A(a)(1) of the Act, which is
15 percent of the borrower's disposable pay; or
(3) The amount permitted by 15 U.S.C. 1673(a)(2), which is the
amount by which the borrower's disposable pay exceeds 30 times the
minimum wage.
(L) If a borrower's pay is subject to more than one garnishment
order--
(1) Unless other Federal law requires a different priority, the
employer must pay the agency the amount calculated under paragraph
(b)(9)(i)(K) of this section before the employer complies with any
later garnishment orders, except a family support withholding order;
(2) If an employer is withholding from a borrower's pay based on a
garnishment order served on the employer before the guaranty agency's
order, or if a withholding order for family support is served on an
employer at any time, the employer must comply with the agency's
garnishment order by withholding an amount that is the lesser of--
(i) The amount specified in the guaranty agency order; or
(ii) The amount calculated under paragraph (b)(9)(i)(L)(3) of this
section less the amount or amounts withheld under the garnishment order
or orders that have priority over the agency's order; and
(3) The cumulative withholding for all garnishment orders issued by
guaranty agencies may not exceed, for an individual borrower, the
amount permitted by 15 U.S.C. 1673, which is the lesser of 25 percent
of the borrower's disposable pay or the amount by which the borrower's
disposable pay exceeds 30 times the minimum wage. If a borrower owes
debts to one or more guaranty agencies, each agency may issue a
garnishment order to enforce each of those debts, but no single agency
may order a total amount exceeding 15 percent of the disposable pay of
a borrower to be withheld. The employer must honor these orders as
provided in paragraphs (b)(9)(i)(L)(1) and (2) of this section.
(M) Notwithstanding paragraphs (b)(9)(i)(K) and (L) of this
section, an employer may withhold and pay a greater amount than
required under the order if the borrower gives the employer written
consent.
(N) A borrower may, at any time, raise an objection to the amount
or the rate of withholding specified in the guaranty agency's order to
the borrower's employer on the ground of financial hardship. However,
the guaranty agency is not required to consider such an objection and
provide the borrower with a hearing until at least six months after the
agency issued the most recent garnishment order, either one for which
the borrower did not request a hearing or one that was issued after a
hardship-related hearing determination. The agency may provide a
hearing in extraordinary circumstances earlier than six months if the
borrower's request for review shows that the borrower's financial
circumstances have substantially changed after the garnishment notice
because of an event such as injury, divorce, or catastrophic illness.
(O) A garnishment order is effective until the guaranty agency
rescinds the order or the agency has fully recovered the amounts owed
by the borrower, including interest, late fees, and collections costs.
If an employer is unable to honor a garnishment order because the
amount available for garnishment is insufficient to pay any portion of
the amount stated in the order, the employer must notify the
[[Page 65819]]
agency and comply with the order when sufficient disposable pay is
available. Upon full recovery of the debt, the agency must send the
borrower's employer notification to stop wage withholding.
(P) The guaranty agency must sue any employer for any amount that
the employer, after receipt of the withholding order provided by the
agency under paragraph (b)(9)(i)(R) of this section, fails to withhold
from wages owed and payable to an employee under the employer's normal
pay and disbursement cycle.
(Q) The guaranty agency may not garnish the wages of a borrower
whom it knows has been involuntarily separated from employment until
the borrower has been reemployed continuously for at least 12 months.
The borrower has the burden of informing the guaranty agency of the
circumstances surrounding the borrower's involuntary separation from
employment.
(R) Unless the guaranty agency receives information that the agency
believes justifies a delay or cancellation of the withholding order, it
must send a withholding order to the employer within 20 days after the
borrower fails to make a timely request for a hearing, or, if a timely
request for a hearing is made by the borrower, within 20 days after a
final decision is made by the agency to proceed with garnishment.
(S) The notice given to the employer under paragraph (b)(9)(i)(R)
of this section must contain only the information as may be necessary
for the employer to comply with the withholding order and to ensure
proper credit for payments received. At a minimum, the notice given to
the employer includes the borrower's name, address, and Social Security
Number, as well as instructions for withholding and information as to
where the employer must send payments.
(T)(1) A guaranty agency may use a third-party servicer or
collection contractor to perform administrative activities associated
with administrative wage garnishment, but may not allow such a party to
conduct required hearings or to determine that a withholding order is
to be issued. Subject to the limitations of paragraphs (b)(9)(i)(T)(2)
and (3) of this section, administrative activities associated with
administrative wage garnishment may include but are not limited to--
(i) Identifying to the agency suitable candidates for wage
garnishment pursuant to agency standards;
(ii) Obtaining employment information for the purposes of
garnishment;
(iii) Sending candidates selected for garnishment by the agency
notices prescribed by the agency;
(iv) Negotiating alternative repayment arrangements with borrowers;
(v) Responding to inquiries from notified borrowers;
(vi) Receiving garnishment payments on behalf of the agency;
(vii) Arranging for the retention of hearing officials and for the
conduct of hearings on behalf of the agency;
(viii) Providing information to borrowers or hearing officials on
the process or conduct of hearings; and
(ix) Sending garnishment orders and other communications to
employers on behalf of the agency.
(2) Only an authorized official of the agency may determine that an
individual withholding order is to be issued. The guarantor must record
the official's determination for each order it issues, including any
order which it causes to be prepared or mailed by a third-party
servicer or collection contractor. The guarantor must evidence the
official's approval, either by including the official's signature on
the order or, if the agency uses a form of withholding order that does
not provide for execution by signature, by retaining in the agency's
records the identity of the approving official, the date of the
approval, the amount or rate of the order, the name and address of the
employer to whom the order was issued, and the debt for which the order
was issued.
(3) The withholding order must identify the guaranty agency as the
holder of the debt, as the issuer of the order, and as the sole party
legally authorized to issue the withholding order. If a guaranty agency
uses a third-party servicer or collection contractor to prepare and
mail a withholding order that includes the name of the servicer or
contractor that prepared or mailed the order, the guaranty agency must
also ensure that the order contains no captions or representations that
the servicer or contractor is the party that issued, or was empowered
by Federal law or by the agency to issue, the withholding order.
(U) As specified in section 488A(a)(8) of the Act, the borrower may
seek judicial relief, including punitive damages, if the employer
discharges, refuses to employ, or takes disciplinary action against the
borrower due to the issuance of a withholding order.
(V) A guaranty agency is required to suspend a garnishment order
when the agency receives a borrower's fifth qualifying payment under a
loan rehabilitation agreement with the agency, unless otherwise
directed by the borrower, in accordance with Sec. 682.405(a)(3).
(ii) For purposes of paragraph (b)(9) of this section--
(A) ``Borrower'' includes all endorsers on a loan;
(B) ``Day'' means calendar day;
(C) ``Disposable pay'' means that part of a borrower's compensation
for personal services, whether or not denominated as wages from an
employer, that remains after the deduction of health insurance premiums
and any amounts required by law to be withheld, and includes, but is
not limited to, salary, bonuses, commissions, or vacation pay.
``Amounts required by law to be withheld'' include amounts for
deductions such as Social Security taxes and withholding taxes, but do
not include any amount withheld under a court order or other
withholding order. All references to an amount of disposable pay refer
to disposable pay calculated for a single week;
(D) ``Employer'' means a person or entity that employs the services
of another and that pays the latter's wages or salary and includes, but
is not limited to, State and local governments, but does not include an
agency of the Federal Government;
(E) ``Financial hardship'' means an inability to meet basic living
expenses for goods and services necessary for the survival of the
borrower and the borrower's spouse and dependents;
(F) ``Garnishment'' means the process of withholding amounts from
an employee's disposable pay and paying those amounts to a creditor in
satisfaction of a withholding order; and
(G) ``Withholding order'' means any order for withholding or
garnishment of pay issued by the guaranty agency and may also be
referred to as ``wage garnishment order'' or ``garnishment order.''
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) Each school that participated in the guaranty agency's program,
located in a State for which the guaranty agency is the principal
guaranty agency, that has a cohort default rate, as described in
subpart M of 34 CFR part 668, that includes FFEL Program loans, for
either of the 2 immediately preceding fiscal years, as defined in 34
CFR 668.182, that exceeds 20 percent, unless the school is under a
mandate from the Secretary under subpart M of 34 CFR part 668 to take
specific default reduction measures or if the total dollar amount of
loans entering repayment in
[[Page 65820]]
each fiscal year on which the cohort default rate of over 20 percent is
based does not exceed $100,000; or
* * * * *
(10) Taking prompt action to protect the rights of borrowers and
the Federal fiscal interest respecting loans that the agency has
guaranteed when the agency learns that a school that participated in
the FFEL Program or a holder of loans participating in the program is
experiencing problems that threaten the solvency of the school or
holder, including--
* * * * *
Sec. 682.411 [Amended]
0
46. Section 682.411 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (d)(2), removing the words ``all national credit
bureaus'' and adding, in their place, the words ``each nationwide
consumer reporting agency''.
0
B. In paragraph (f), removing the words ``a national credit bureau''
and adding, in their place, the words ``each nationwide consumer
reporting agency''.
0
C. In paragraph (n)(2), removing the words ``a national credit bureau''
and adding, in their place, the words ``each nationwide consumer
reporting agency''.
0
D. In paragraph (o)(2), removing the words ``credit bureau'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``consumer reporting agency''.
Sec. 682.412 [Amended]
0
47. Section 682.412(a)(2) is amended by removing the words ``as
provided under Sec. 682.301''.
0
48. Section 682.413 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (c)(1)(vi), removing the words ``certification required
under Sec. 682.206(f)(1)'' and adding, in their place the words
``required lender verification certification''.
0
B. Revising the first sentence of paragraph (h).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 682.413 Remedial actions.
* * * * *
(h) In any action to require repayment of funds or to withhold
funds from a guaranty agency, or to limit, suspend, or terminate a
guaranty agency based on a violation of section 428(b)(3) of the Act,
if the Secretary finds that the guaranty agency provided or offered the
prohibited payments or activities, the Secretary applies a rebuttable
presumption that the payments or activities were offered or provided to
secure applications for FFEL loans or to secure FFEL loan volume. * * *
* * * * *
Sec. 682.414 [Amended]
0
49. Section 682.414 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(D), removing the words ``credit bureau'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``consumer reporting agency''.
0
B. In paragraph (a)(4)(ii)(J), removing the words ``credit bureau'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``consumer reporting agency''.
0
C. In paragraph (a)(6)(ii)(D), removing the word ``is'' and adding, in
its place, the word ``it''.
0
D. Removing paragraph (b)(2)(i).
0
E. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) through (b)(2)(iv), as (b)(2)(i)
through (b)(2)(iii), respectively.
0
F. In paragraph (b)(3)(i), removing the words ``schools and''.
0
G. In paragraph (b)(3)(ii), removing the words ``schools and''.
0
H. In paragraph (b)(3)(iii), removing the words ``school or''.
0
I. In paragraph (c)(2), removing the citation ``Sec. 682.401(b)(21)
and (22)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``Sec.
682.401(b)(12) and (13)''.
Sec. 682.416 [Amended]
0
50. Section 682.416(d)(2) is amended by removing the word ``Title'' and
adding, in its place, the word ``title''.
Sec. 682.418 [Removed and Reserved]
0
51. Section 682.418 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 682.419 [Amended]
0
52. Section 682.419 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (b)(8), removing the words ``, in accordance with Sec.
682.420''.
0
B. In paragraph (c)(6), removing the citation ``Sec. 682.421'' and
adding, in its place, the citation ``section 422A(f) of the Act''.
Sec. 682.420 [Removed and Reserved]
0
53. Section 682.420 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 682.421 [Removed and Reserved]
0
54. Section 682.421 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 682.422 [Removed and Reserved]
0
55. Section 682.422 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 682.423 [Amended]
0
56. Section 682.423 is amended by:
0
A. In the second sentence of paragraph (a), adding the word ``may''
between the words ``that'' and ``have''.
0
B. In paragraph (a), removing the last sentence.
Subpart E--[Removed and Reserved]
0
57. Remove and reserve subpart E of part 682.
Subpart F--Requirements, Standards, and Payments for Schools That
Participated in the FFEL Program
0
58. Revise the heading to subpart F of part 682 to read as set forth
above.
Sec. 682.601 [Removed and Reserved]
0
59. Section 682.601 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 682.602 [Removed and Reserved]
0
60. Section 682.602 is removed and reserved.
0
61. Section 682.603 is amended by:
0
A. Revising the section heading.
0
B. In paragraph (b)(3), removing the citation ``Sec. 682.604(c)'' and
adding, in its place, the citation ``section 428G of the Act''.
0
C. Revising paragraphs (g), (h), and (i).
0
D. Revising the first of the two paragraphs that are both designated as
paragraph (j).
0
E. Removing the second of the two paragraphs that are both designated
as paragraph (j).
0
F. Adding paragraphs (k) and (l).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 682.603 Certification by a school that participated in the FFEL
Program in connection with a loan application.
* * * * *
(g) The maximum period for which a school may certify a loan
application is--
(1) Generally an academic year, as defined by 34 CFR 668.3, except
that a guaranty agency may allow a school to use a longer period of
time, corresponding to the period to which the agency applies the
annual loan limits; or
(2) For a defaulted borrower who has regained eligibility under
Sec. 682.401(b)(1), the academic year in which the borrower regained
eligibility.
(h) In certifying a Stafford or Unsubsidized Stafford loan amount
in accordance with Sec. 682.204--
(1) A program of study must be considered at least one full
academic year if--
(i) The number of weeks of instructional time is at least 30 weeks;
and
(ii) The number of clock hours is a least 900, the number of
semester or trimester hours is at least 24, or the number of quarter
hours is at least 36;
(2) A program of study must be considered two-thirds (2/3) of an
academic year if--
(i) The number of weeks of instructional time is at least 20 weeks;
and
(ii) The number of clock hours is at least 600, the number of
semester or
[[Page 65821]]
trimester hours is at least 16, or the number of quarter hours is at
least 24;
(3) A program of study must be considered one-third (\1/3\) of an
academic year if--
(i) The number of weeks of instructional time is at least 10 weeks;
and
(ii) The number of clock hours is at least 300, the number of
semester or trimester hours is at least 8, or the number of quarter
hours is at least 12; and
(4) In prorating a loan amount for a student enrolled in a program
of study with less than a full academic year remaining, the school need
not recalculate the amount of the loan if the number of hours for which
an eligible student is enrolled changes after the school certifies the
loan.
(i)(1) If a school measures academic progress in an educational
program in credit hours and uses either standard terms (semesters,
trimesters, or quarters) or nonstandard terms that are substantially
equal in length, and each term is at least nine weeks of instructional
time in length, a student is considered to have completed an academic
year and progresses to the next annual loan limit when the academic
year calendar period has elapsed.
(2) If a school measures academic progress in an educational
program in credit hours and uses nonstandard terms that are not
substantially equal in length or each term is not at least nine weeks
of instructional time in length, or measures academic progress in
credit hours and does not have academic terms, a student is considered
to have completed an academic year and progresses to the next annual
loan limit at the later of--
(i) The student's completion of the weeks of instructional time in
the student's academic year; or
(ii) The date, as determined by the school, that the student has
successfully completed the academic coursework in the student's
academic year.
(3) If a school measures academic progress in an educational
program in clock hours, a student is considered to have completed an
academic year and progresses to the next annual loan limit at the later
of--
(i) The student's completion of the weeks of instructional time in
the student's academic year; or
(ii) The date, as determined by the school, that the student has
successfully completed the clock hours in the student's academic year.
(4) For purposes of this section, terms in a loan period are
substantially equal in length if no term in the loan period is more
than two weeks of instructional time longer than any other term in that
loan period.
(j)(1) A school must cease certifying loans based on the exceptions
in section 428G(a)(3) of the Act no later than--
(i) 30 days after the date the school receives notification from
the Secretary of an FFEL cohort default rate, calculated under subpart
M of 34 CFR part 668, that causes the school to no longer meet the
qualifications outlined in those paragraphs; or
(ii) October 1, 2002.
(2) A school must cease certifying loans based on the exceptions in
section 428G(a)(3) of the Act no later than 30 days after the date the
school receives notification from the Secretary of an FFEL cohort
default rate, calculated under subpart M of 34 CFR part 668, that
causes the school to no longer meet the qualifications outlined in
those paragraphs.
(k) A school may not assess the borrower, or the student in the
case of a parent PLUS loan, a fee for the completion or certification
of any FFEL Program form or information or for providing any
information necessary for a student or parent to receive a loan under
part B of the Act or any benefits associated with such a loan.
(l) Pursuant to paragraph (b)(3) of this section, a school may not
request the disbursement by the lender for loan proceeds earlier than
the period specified in 34 CFR 668.167.
* * * * *
0
62. Section 682.604 is amended by:
0
A. Revising the section heading.
0
B. Removing paragraphs (a), (c), (d), (e), (f), (h), and (i).
0
C. Redesignating paragraph (g) as paragraph (a).
0
D. Removing and reserving paragraph (b).
0
E. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (a)(1).
0
F. Removing newly redesignated paragraph (a)(2)(vi).
0
G. Further redesignating newly redesignated paragraphs (a)(2)(vii)
through (a)(2)(xii) as paragraphs (a)(2)(ix) through (a)(2)(xiv),
respectively.
0
H. Adding new paragraphs (a)(2)(vi) through (a)(2)(viii).
0
I. Adding new paragraph (a)(5).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 682.604 Required exit counseling for borrowers.
(a) * * *
(1) A school must ensure that exit counseling is conducted with
each Stafford Loan borrower and graduate or professional student PLUS
Loan borrower either in person, by audiovisual presentation, or by
interactive electronic means. In each case, the school must ensure that
this counseling is conducted shortly before the student borrower ceases
at least half-time study at the school, and that an individual with
expertise in the title IV programs is reasonably available shortly
after the counseling to answer the student borrower's questions. As an
alternative, in the case of a student borrower enrolled in a
correspondence program or a study-abroad program that the home
institution approves for credit, written counseling materials may be
provided by mail within 30 days after the student borrower completes
the program. If a student borrower withdraws from school without the
school's prior knowledge or fails to complete an exit counseling
session as required, the school must, within 30 days after learning
that the student borrower has withdrawn from school or failed to
complete the exit counseling as required, ensure that exit counseling
is provided through interactive electronic means, by mailing written
counseling materials to the student borrower at the student borrower's
last known address, or by sending written counseling materials to an
email address provided by the student borrower that is not an email
address associated with the school sending the counseling materials.
(2) * * *
(vi) Explain to the borrower the use of a Master Promissory Note;
(vii) Emphasize to the student borrower the seriousness and
importance of the repayment obligation the borrower has assumed;
(viii) Emphasize to the student borrower that the full amount of
the loan (other than a loan made or originated by the school) must be
repaid in full even if the student borrower does not complete the
program, does not complete the program within the regular time for
program completion, is unable to obtain employment upon completion, or
is otherwise dissatisfied with or does not receive the educational or
other services that the student borrower purchased from the school;
* * * * *
(5)(i) For students who have received both FFEL Program and Direct
Loan Program loans for attendance at a school, the school's compliance
with the exit counseling requirements in 34 CFR 685.304(b) satisfies
the requirements of this section if the school ensures that the exit
counseling also provides the borrower with the information described in
paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii) of this section.
[[Page 65822]]
(ii) A student's completion of electronic interactive exit
counseling offered by the Secretary satisfies the requirements of this
section, and for students who have also received Direct Loan Program
loans for attendance at the school, the requirements of 34 CFR
685.304(b).
* * * * *
Sec. 682.605 [Amended]
0
63. Section 682.605 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (b), adding the words ``and the Secretary'' between the
words ``lender'' and ``the date''.
0
B. In paragraph (c), adding the words ``and the Secretary'' between the
word ``lender'' and the punctuation ``,''.
Sec. 682.608 [Removed and Reserved]
0
64. Section 682.608 is removed and reserved.
0
65. Section 682.610 is amended by:
0
A. Revising the section heading.
0
B. Revising paragraph (b)(5).
0
C. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 682.610 Administrative and fiscal requirements for schools that
participated in the FFEL Program.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) For loans delivered by electronic funds transfer or master
check, a copy of the borrower's required written authorization, if it
was not provided in the loan application or MPN, to deliver the initial
and subsequent disbursements of each FFEL Program loan; and
* * * * *
(c) Enrollment reporting process. (1) Upon receipt of an enrollment
report from the Secretary, a school must update all information
included in the report and return the report to the Secretary--
(i) In the manner and format prescribed by the Secretary; and
(ii) Within the timeframe specified by the Secretary.
(2) Unless it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report
to the Secretary within the next 60 days, a school must notify the
Secretary within 30 days after the date that the school discovers
that--
(i) A loan under title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a
student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the school, and
the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or
failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which
the loan was intended; or
(ii) A student who is enrolled at the school and who received a
loan under title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent
address.
* * * * *
Subpart G--Limitation, Suspension, or Termination of Lender or
Third-Party Servicer Eligibility and Disqualification of Lenders
0
66. The heading of subpart G of part 682 is revised to read as set
forth above.
Sec. 682.700 [Amended]
0
67. Section 682.700 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a), removing the words ``or school'' and the word and
citation ``and (h)(3)'' in the final sentence.
0
B. In paragraph (b)(1)(ii), adding the word ``or'' after the
punctuation ``;''.
0
C. Removing paragraph (b)(2).
0
D. Redesignating paragraph (b)(3) as paragraph (b)(2).
0
E. In paragraph (c), removing the words ``or schools''.
0
68. Section 682.701 is amended by revising the definition of
``Disqualification'' to read as follows:
Sec. 682.701 Definitions of terms used in this subpart.
* * * * *
Disqualification. The removal of a lender's eligibility for an
indefinite period of time by the Secretary on review of limitation,
suspension, or termination action taken against the lender by a
guaranty agency.
* * * * *
0
69. Section 682.702 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a), removing the words ``in paragraph (d) of this
section and''.
0
B. Revising paragraph (b)(1).
0
C. Removing paragraph (b)(2).
0
D. Redesignating paragraph (b)(3) as paragraph (b)(2).
0
E. Removing paragraph (d).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 682.702 Effect on participation.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) A limit on the number or total amount of loans that a lender
may purchase or hold under the FFEL Program; or
* * * * *
Sec. 682.704 [Amended]
0
70. Section 682.704(a) introductory text is amended, by removing the
words ``stop the issuance of guarantee commitments by the Secretary and
guarantee agencies and to''.
Sec. 682.705 [Amended]
0
71. Section 682.705 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(1) introductory text, removing the words ``new loan
made by the lender or''.
0
B. In paragraph (b)(2)(v), removing the words ``, except as provided in
paragraph (c)(9) of this section,''.
0
C. Removing paragraph (c).
Sec. 682.706 [Amended]
0
72. Section 682.706 is amended by removing paragraph (d).
0
73. Section 682.709 is amended by adding paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 682.709 Reimbursements, refunds, and offsets.
* * * * *
(d) In any action under this part based on a violation of the
prohibitions in section 435(d)(5) of the Act, if the Secretary, the
designated Department official, or the hearing official finds that the
lender provided or offered the payments or activities described in
paragraph (5)(i) of the definition of ``lender'' in Sec. 682.200(b),
the Secretary or the official applies a rebuttable presumption that the
payments or activities were offered or provided to secure applications
for FFEL loans. To reverse the presumption, the lender must present
evidence that the activities or payments were provided for a reason
unrelated to securing applications for FFEL loans or securing FFEL loan
volume.
* * * * *
Sec. 682.711 [Amended]
0
74. Section 682.711 is amended by:
0
A. Removing paragraph (c).
0
B. Redesignating paragraphs (d) and (e) as paragraphs (c) and (d),
respectively.
0
C. In newly redesignated paragraph (d)(2), removing the citation
``(d)(3)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(c)(3)''.
0
D. In newly redesignated paragraph (d)(2), removing the citation
``(e)(1)'' and adding, in its place, the citation ``(d)(1)''.
Sec. 682.712 [Amended]
0
75. Section 682.712 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (g)(2), removing the parenthetical ``(j)'' and adding,
in its place, the parenthetical ``(i)''.
0
B. In paragraph (h)(2) and in paragraph (h)(3) introductory text,
removing the parenthetical ``(j)'' and adding, in its place, the
parenthetical ``(i)''.
0
C. Removing paragraph (i).
0
D. Redesignating paragraph (j) as paragraph (i).
Sec. 682.713 [Removed and Reserved]
0
76. Section 682.713 is removed and reserved.
[[Page 65823]]
Subpart H of Part 682 [Removed and Reserved]
0
77. Remove and reserve subpart H of part 682.
Appendix C to Part 682 [Removed and Reserved]
0
78. Appendix C to part 682 is removed and reserved.
Appendix D to Part 682 [Amended]
0
79. In appendix D to part 682, paragraph (3) of the introduction is
amended by removing the final citation ``34 CFR 682.401(d)'' and
adding, in its place, the citation ``34 CFR 682.401(c)''.
PART 685--WILLIAM D. FORD FEDERAL DIRECT LOAN PROGRAM
0
80. The authority citation for part 685 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070g, 1087a, et seq., unless otherwise
noted.
0
81. Section 685.100 is amended by:
0
A. Revising paragraph (a).
0
B. In paragraph (b), removing the words ``has been selected by the
Secretary to participate'' and adding, in their place, the word
``participates''.
0
C. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 685.100 The William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program.
(a) Under the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct Loan)
Program (formerly known as the Federal Direct Student Loan Program),
the Secretary makes loans to enable a student or parent to pay the
costs of the student's attendance at a postsecondary school. This part
governs the Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loan Program, the Federal
Direct Unsubsidized Stafford/Ford Loan Program, the Federal Direct PLUS
Program, and the Federal Direct Consolidation Loan Program. The
Secretary makes loans under the following program components:
(1)(i) Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loan Program (Direct Subsidized
Loan Program), which provides loans to undergraduate, graduate, and
professional students. Loans made under this program are referred to as
Direct Subsidized Loans. Except as provided in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of
this section, the Secretary subsidizes the interest while the borrower
is in an in-school, grace, or deferment period. Graduate and
professional students are not eligible to receive Direct Subsidized
Loans for any period of enrollment beginning on or after July 1, 2012.
(ii) The Secretary does not subsidize the interest that accrues
during the grace period on any Direct Subsidized Loan for which the
first disbursement is made on or after July 1, 2012 and before July 1,
2014.
(2) Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford/Ford Loan Program (Direct
Unsubsidized Loan Program), which provides loans to undergraduate,
graduate and professional students. Loans made under this program are
referred to as Direct Unsubsidized Loans. The borrower is responsible
for the interest that accrues during any period.
(3) Federal Direct PLUS Program (Direct PLUS Loan Program), which
provides loans to parents of dependent students and to graduate or
professional students. Loans made under this program are referred to as
Direct PLUS Loans. The borrower is responsible for the interest that
accrues during any period.
(4) Federal Direct Consolidation Loan Program (Direct Consolidation
Loan Program), which provides loans to borrowers to consolidate certain
Federal educational loans. Loans made under this program are referred
to as Direct Consolidation Loans.
* * * * *
(c) The Secretary makes a Direct Consolidation Loan only to a
borrower who is consolidating at least one loan made under the Direct
Loan Program or the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program.
* * * * *
0
82. Section 685.101 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 685.101 Participation in the Direct Loan Program.
(a) Colleges, universities, graduate and professional schools,
vocational schools, and proprietary schools may participate in the
Direct Loan Program. Participation in the Direct Loan Program enables
an eligible student or parent to obtain a loan to pay for the student's
cost of attendance at the school.
(b)(1) An eligible undergraduate student who is enrolled at a
school participating in the Direct Loan Program may borrow under the
Direct Subsidized Loan and Direct Unsubsidized Loan programs.
(2) An eligible graduate or professional student enrolled at a
school participating in the Direct Loan Program may borrow under the
Direct Subsidized Loan, Direct Unsubsidized Loan, and Direct PLUS Loan
programs, except that a graduate or professional student may not borrow
under the Direct Subsidized Loan Program for any period of enrollment
beginning on or after July 1, 2012.
(3) An eligible parent of an eligible dependent student enrolled at
a school participating in the Direct Loan Program may borrow under the
Direct PLUS Loan Program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.)
0
83. Section 685.102 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(1) introductory text, removing the words ``subpart
A of''.
0
B. In paragraph (a)(1), removing the terms ``Academic Competitiveness
Grant (ACG) Program'', ``Disburse'', ``Federal Direct Student Loan
Program (Direct Loan Program)'', ``Leveraging Educational Assistance
Partnership Program'', ``National Science and Mathematics Access to
Retain Talent Grant (National SMART Grant) Program'', and ``State''.
0
C. In paragraph (a)(1), adding the terms ``Disbursement'' and ``William
D. Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct Loan) Program'' in alphabetical
order.
0
D. In paragraph (a)(2), adding the terms ``Correspondence course'' and
``State'' in alphabetical order.
0
E. In paragraph (a)(2), removing the term ``Program of study by
correspondence''.
0
F. Removing paragraph (a)(3).
0
G. In paragraph (b), adding the definitions of ``Act'', ``Endorser'',
``Federal Insured Student Loan Program'', ``Federal Stafford Loan
Program'', ``Guaranty agency'', ``Holder'', ``Lender'', ``Nationwide
consumer reporting agency'', ``Substantial gainful activity'', and
``Totally and permanently disabled'', in alphabetical order.
0
H. In paragraph (b), removing the definitions of ``Alternative
originator'', ``Consortium'', ``School origination option 1'', ``School
origination option 2'', ``Servicer'', and ``Standard origination''.
0
I. In paragraph (b), in the definition of ``Estimated financial
assistance'', revising paragraphs (1)(vi) and (2)(i).
0
J. In paragraph (b), in the heading of the definition of ``Federal
Direct Consolidation Loan Program:'', adding the words ``(Direct
Consolidation Loan Program)'' immediately before the punctuation ``:''.
0
K. In paragraph (b), in paragraph (4) of the definition of ``Federal
Direct Consolidation Loan Program'', removing the words ``The term'' in
the first sentence and adding, in their place, the words ``In the case
of a Direct Consolidation Loan that entered repayment prior to July 1,
2006, the term''.
0
L. In paragraph (b), in the heading of the definition of ``Federal
Direct PLUS Program:'', adding the words ``(Direct PLUS Loan Program)''
immediately before the punctuation ``:''.
[[Page 65824]]
0
M. In paragraph (b), revising the definition of ``Federal Direct
Stafford/Ford Loan Program''.
0
N. In paragraph (b), in the heading of the definition of ``Federal
Direct Unsubsidized Stafford/Ford Loan Program:'', adding the words
``(Direct Unsubsidized Loan Program)'' immediately before the
punctuation ``:''.
0
O. In paragraph (b), revising the definition of ``Grace period''.
0
P. In paragraph (b), in the definition of ``Master Promissory Note
(MPN)'', adding a new paragraph (4).
0
Q. In paragraph (b), revising the definition of ``Satisfactory
repayment arrangement''.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 685.102 Definitions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
Act: The Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, 20 U.S.C.
1071 et seq.
* * * * *
Endorser: An individual who signs a promissory note and agrees
to repay the loan in the event that the borrower does not.
Estimated financial assistance:
(1) * * *
(vi) The estimated amount of other Federal student financial
aid, including but not limited to a Federal Pell Grant, campus-based
aid, and the gross amount (including fees) of subsidized and
unsubsidized Federal Stafford Loans, Direct Subsidized and
Unsubsidized Loans, and Federal PLUS or Direct PLUS Loans.
(2) * * *
(i) Those amounts used to replace the expected family
contribution (EFC), including the amounts of any TEACH Grants,
unsubsidized Federal Stafford Loans or Direct Unsubsidized Loans,
Federal PLUS or Direct PLUS Loans, and non-federal non-need-based
loans, including private, state-sponsored, and institutional loans.
However, if the sum of the amounts received that are being used to
replace the student's EFC exceed the EFC, the excess amount must be
treated as estimated financial assistance;
* * * * *
Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loan Program (Direct Subsidized
Loan Program): A loan program authorized by title IV, part D of the
Act that provides loans to undergraduate, graduate, and professional
students attending Direct Loan Program schools, and one of the
components of the Direct Loan Program. The Secretary subsidizes the
interest while the borrower is in an in-school, grace, or deferment
period, except that the Secretary does not subsidize the interest
that accrues during the grace period on a loan for which the first
disbursement is made on or after July 1, 2012 and before July 1,
2014. Loans made under this program are referred to as Direct
Subsidized Loans. Graduate and professional students are not
eligible to receive Direct Subsidized Loans for any period of
enrollment beginning on or after July 1, 2012.
* * * * *
Federal Insured Student Loan Program: The loan program
authorized by title IV, part B of the Act under which the Secretary
directly insures lenders against losses.
Federal Stafford Loan Program: The loan program authorized by
title IV, part B of the Act which encouraged the making of
subsidized and unsubsidized loans to undergraduate, graduate, and
professional students and is one of the Federal Family Education
Loan programs.
Grace period: A six-month period that begins on the day after a
Direct Subsidized Loan borrower, a Direct Unsubsidized Loan
borrower, or, in some cases, a Direct Consolidation Loan borrower
whose consolidation application was received before July 1, 2006,
ceases to be enrolled as at least a half-time student at an eligible
institution and ends on the day before the repayment period begins.
Guaranty agency: A State or private nonprofit organization that
has an agreement with the Secretary under which it will administer a
loan guarantee program under the Act.
Holder: The entity that owns a loan. For a FFEL Program loan,
the term ``holder'' refers to an eligible lender owning a FFEL
Program loan, including a Federal or State agency or an organization
or corporation acting on behalf of such an agency and acting as a
conservator, liquidator, or receiver of an eligible lender.
* * * * *
Lender: As used in this part, the term ``lender'' has the
meaning specified in section 435(d) of the Act for purposes of the
FFEL Program.
* * * * *
Master Promissory Note (MPN):
* * * * *
(4) Unless the Secretary determines otherwise, a school may use
a single MPN as the basis for all loans borrowed by a student or
parent borrower for attendance at that school. If a school is not
authorized by the Secretary for multi-year use of the MPN, a student
or parent borrower must sign a new MPN for each academic year.
Nationwide consumer reporting agency: A consumer reporting
agency as defined in 15 U.S.C. 1681a(p).
* * * * *
Satisfactory repayment arrangement: (1) For the purpose of
regaining eligibility under section 428F(b) of the HEA, the making
of six consecutive, voluntary, on-time, full monthly payments on a
defaulted loan. A borrower may only obtain the benefit of this
paragraph with respect to renewed eligibility once.
(2) For the purpose of consolidating a defaulted loan under
Sec. 685.220(d)(1)(ii)(A)(3)--
(i) The making of three consecutive, voluntary, on-time, full
monthly payments on a defaulted loan prior to consolidation; or
(ii) Agreeing to repay the Direct Consolidation Loan under one
of the income-contingent repayment plans described in Sec. 685.209
or the income-based repayment plan described in Sec. 685.221.
(3) For the purpose of paragraph (2)(i) of this definition, the
required monthly payment amount may not be more than is reasonable
and affordable based on the borrower's total financial
circumstances. ``On-time'' means a payment made within 20 days of
the scheduled due date, and voluntary payments are payments made
directly by the borrower and do not include payments obtained by
Federal offset, garnishment, or income or asset execution.
(4) A borrower has not used the one opportunity to renew
eligibility for title IV assistance if the borrower makes six
consecutive, on-time, voluntary, full monthly payments under an
agreement to rehabilitate a defaulted loan, but does not receive
additional title IV assistance prior to defaulting on that loan
again.
Substantial gainful activity: A level of work performed for pay
or profit that involves doing significant physical or mental
activities, or a combination of both.
Totally and permanently disabled: The condition of an individual
who--
(1) Is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by
reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment
that--
(i) Can be expected to result in death;
(ii) Has lasted for a continuous period of not less than 60
months; or
(iii) Can be expected to last for a continuous period of not
less than 60 months; or
(2) Has been determined by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to
be unemployable due to a service-connected disability.
* * * * *
0
84. Section 685.200 is amended by:
0
A. Revising paragraph (a)(1)(iv).
0
B. Revising paragraph (a)(1)(v).
0
C. Revising paragraph (b)(4).
0
D. In paragraph (c)(1)(vii)(C), adding the word ``paragraph''
immediately before the citation ``(c)(1)(vii)(A)''.
0
E. Adding a new paragraph (c)(1)(vii)(D).
0
F. Revising paragraph (d).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 685.200 Borrower eligibility.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) In the case of a borrower whose previous loan or TEACH Grant
service obligation was discharged due to total and permanent
disability, the student--
(A) In the case of a borrower whose prior loan under title IV of
the Act or TEACH Grant service obligation was discharged after a final
determination of total and permanent disability, the borrower--
(1) Obtains a certification from a physician that the borrower is
able to engage in substantial gainful activity; and
(2) Signs a statement acknowledging that neither the new Direct
Loan the borrower receives nor any previously discharged loan on which
the borrower is required to resume payment in accordance with paragraph
(a)(1)(iv)(B)
[[Page 65825]]
of this section can be discharged in the future on the basis of any
impairment present when the new loan is made, unless that impairment
substantially deteriorates;
(B) In the case of a borrower who receives a new Direct Loan, other
than a Direct Consolidation Loan, within three years of the date that
any previous title IV loan or TEACH Grant service obligation was
discharged due to a total and permanent disability in accordance with
Sec. 685.213(b)(4)(iii), 34 CFR 674.61(b)(3)(v), 34 CFR
682.402(c)(3)(iv), or 34 CFR 686.42(b) based on a discharge request
received on or after July 1, 2010, the borrower resumes repayment on
the previously discharged loan in accordance with Sec. 685.213(b)(7),
34 CFR 674.61(b)(6), or 34 CFR 682.402(c)(6), or acknowledges that he
or she is once again subject to the terms of the TEACH Grant agreement
to serve before receiving the new loan; and
(C) In the case of a borrower whose prior loan under title IV of
the Act was conditionally discharged after an initial determination
that the borrower was totally and permanently disabled based on a
discharge request received prior to July 1, 2010--
(1) The suspension of collection activity on the prior loan has
been lifted;
(2) The borrower complies with the requirement in paragraph
(a)(1)(iv)(A)(1) of this section;
(3) The borrower signs a statement acknowledging that neither the
new Direct Loan the borrower receives nor the loan that has been
conditionally discharged prior to a final determination of total and
permanent disability can be discharged in the future on the basis of
any impairment present when the borrower applied for a total and
permanent disability discharge or when the new loan is made, unless
that impairment substantially deteriorates; and
(4) The borrower signs a statement acknowledging that the
suspension of collection activity on the prior loan will be lifted.
(v) In the case of a student who was enrolled in a program of study
prior to July 1, 2012 and who seeks a loan but does not have a
certificate of graduation from a school providing secondary education
or the recognized equivalent of such a certificate, the student meets
the requirements under 34 CFR 668.32(e)(2), (3), (4), or (5).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) The student has received a determination of his or her annual
loan maximum eligibility under the Direct Unsubsidized Loan Program
and, for periods of enrollment beginning before July 1, 2012, the
Direct Subsidized Loan Program; and
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(vii) * * *
(D) For the purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(vii)(A)(3) of this
section, the Secretary may determine that extenuating circumstances
exist based on documentation that includes, but is not limited to, an
updated credit report, a statement from the creditor that the borrower
has made satisfactory arrangements to repay the debt, or a satisfactory
statement from the borrower explaining any delinquencies with
outstanding balances of less than $500.
* * * * *
(d) Defaulted Perkins, FFEL, and Direct Loan program borrowers.
Except as noted in Sec. 685.220(d)(1)(ii)(A)(3), in the case of a
student or parent borrower who is currently in default on a Perkins,
FFEL, or Direct Loan program loan, the borrower must make satisfactory
repayment arrangements, as described in paragraph (1) of the definition
of that term under Sec. 685.102(b), on the defaulted loan.
* * * * *
0
85. Section 685.201 is amended by:
0
A. Revising paragraph (a)(2).
0
B. Revising paragraph (b).
0
C. Revising paragraph (c)(1).
0
D. In paragraph (c)(2), removing the word ``Servicer'' and adding, in
its place, the word ``Secretary''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 685.201 Obtaining a loan.
(a) * * *
(2) If the student is eligible for a Direct Subsidized Loan or a
Direct Unsubsidized Loan, the school in which the student is enrolled
must perform the following functions:
(i) Create a loan origination record and transmit the record to the
Secretary.
(ii) Ensure that the loan is supported by a completed Master
Promissory Note (MPN) and, if applicable, transmit the MPN to the
Secretary.
(iii) In accordance with 34 CFR 668.162, draw down funds or receive
funds from the Secretary, and disburse the funds to the student.
(b) Application for a Direct PLUS Loan. (1) For a parent to obtain
a Direct PLUS Loan, the parent must complete the Direct PLUS Loan MPN
and the dependent student on whose behalf the parent is borrowing must
complete a Free Application for Federal Student Aid and submit it in
accordance with instructions in the application.
(2) For a graduate or professional student to apply for a Direct
PLUS Loan, the student must complete a Free Application for Federal
Student Aid and submit it in accordance with instructions in the
application. The graduate or professional student must also complete
the Direct PLUS Loan MPN.
(3) For either a parent or student PLUS borrower, as applicable,
the school must complete its portion of the Direct PLUS Loan MPN and,
if applicable, submit it to the Secretary. The Secretary makes a
determination as to whether the parent or graduate or professional
student has an adverse credit history. The school performs the
functions described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(c) * * *
(1) To obtain a Direct Consolidation Loan, the applicant must
complete the application and promissory note and submit it to the
Secretary. The application and promissory note sets forth the terms and
conditions of the Direct Consolidation Loan and informs the applicant
how to contact the Secretary. The Secretary answers questions regarding
the process of applying for a Direct Consolidation Loan and provides
information about the terms and conditions of both Direct Consolidation
Loans and the types of loans that may be consolidated.
* * * * *
0
86. Section 685.202 is amended by:
0
A. Revising paragraph (a).
0
B. Revising paragraph (b)(2).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 685.202 Charges for which Direct Loan Program borrowers are
responsible.
(a) Interest--(1) Interest rate for Direct Subsidized Loans and
Direct Unsubsidized Loans first disbursed before July 1, 1995. During
all periods, the interest rate during any twelve-month period beginning
on July 1 and ending on June 30 is determined on the June 1 immediately
preceding that period. The interest rate is equal to the bond
equivalent rate of 91-day Treasury bills auctioned at the final auction
held prior to that June 1 plus 3.1 percentage points, but does not
exceed 8.25 percent.
(2) Interest rate for Direct Subsidized Loans and Direct
Unsubsidized Loans first disbursed on or after July 1, 1995, and before
July 1, 1998. (i) During the in-school, grace, and deferment periods.
The interest rate during any twelve-month period beginning on July 1
and ending on June 30 is determined on the June 1 immediately preceding
that period. The interest rate is equal to the bond equivalent rate of
91-day Treasury
[[Page 65826]]
bills auctioned at the final auction held prior to that June 1 plus 2.5
percentage points, but does not exceed 8.25 percent.
(ii) During all other periods. The interest rate during any twelve-
month period beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30 is determined on
the June 1 immediately preceding that period. The interest rate is
equal to the bond equivalent rate of 91-day Treasury bills auctioned at
the final auction held prior to that June 1 plus 3.1 percentage points,
but does not exceed 8.25 percent.
(3) Interest Rate for Direct Subsidized Loans and Direct Subsidized
Loans first disbursed on or after July 1, 1998, and before July 1,
2006. (i) During the in-school, grace, and deferment periods. The
interest rate during any twelve-month period beginning on July 1 and
ending on June 30 is determined on the June 1 immediately preceding
that period. The interest rate is equal to the bond equivalent rate of
91-day Treasury bills auctioned at the final auction held prior to that
June 1 plus 1.7 percentage points, but does not exceed 8.25 percent.
(ii) During all other periods. The interest rate during any twelve-
month period beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30 is determined on
the June 1 immediately preceding that period. The interest rate is
equal to the bond equivalent rate of 91-day Treasury bills auctioned at
the final auction held prior to that June 1 plus 2.3 percentage points,
but does not exceed 8.25 percent.
(4) Interest rate for Direct Subsidized Loans made to undergraduate
students for which the first disbursement is made on or after July 1,
2006, and before July 1, 2013. For a loan for which the first
disbursement is made:
(i) On or after July 1, 2006, and before July 1, 2008, the interest
rate is 6.8 percent on the unpaid principal balance of the loan.
(ii) On or after July 1, 2008, and before July 1, 2009, the
interest rate is 6 percent on the unpaid principal balance of the loan.
(iii) On or after July 1, 2009, and before July 1, 2010, the
interest rate is 5.6 percent on the unpaid principal balance of the
loan.
(iv) On or after July 1, 2010, and before July 1, 2011, the
interest rate is 4.5 percent on the unpaid principal balance of the
loan.
(v) On or after July 1, 2011, and before July 1, 2013, the interest
rate is 3.4 percent on the unpaid balance of the loan.
(5) Interest rate for Direct Subsidized Loans made to graduate or
professional students for which the first disbursement is made on or
after July 1, 2006, and before July 1, 2012. The interest rate is 6.8
percent.
(6) Interest rate for Direct Unsubsidized Loans first disbursed on
or after July 1, 2006, and before July 1, 2013. The interest rate is
6.8 percent.
(7) Interest rate for Direct Subsidized Loans and Direct
Unsubsidized Loans made to undergraduate students for which the first
disbursement is made on or after July 1, 2013. The interest rate for
loans first disbursed during any 12-month period beginning on July 1
and ending on June 30 is determined on the June 1 preceding that period
and is a fixed rate for the life of the loan. The interest rate is the
lesser of--
(i) A rate equal to the high yield of the 10-year Treasury note
auctioned at the final auction held prior to the June 1 preceding the
12-month period, plus 2.05 percentage points, or
(ii) 8.25 percent.
(8) Interest rate for Direct Unsubsidized Loans made to graduate or
professional students for which the first disbursement is made on or
after July 1, 2013. The interest rate for loans first disbursed during
any 12-month period beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30 is
determined on the June 1 preceding that period and is a fixed rate for
the life of the loan. The interest rate is the lesser of--
(i) A rate equal to the high yield of the 10-year Treasury note
auctioned at the final auction held prior to the June 1 preceding the
12-month period, plus 3.6 percentage points, or
(ii) 9.5 percent.
(9) Interest rate for Direct PLUS Loans. (i) Direct PLUS Loans
first disbursed before July 1, 1998. (A) Interest rates for periods
ending before July 1, 2001. During all periods, the interest rate
during any twelve-month period beginning on July 1 and ending on June
30 is determined on the June 1 preceding that period. The interest rate
is equal to the bond equivalent rate of 52-week Treasury bills
auctioned at the final auction held prior to that June 1 plus 3.1
percentage points, but does not exceed 9 percent.
(B) Interest rates for periods beginning on or after July 1, 2001.
During all periods, the interest rate during any twelve-month period
beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30 is determined on the June 26
preceding that period. The interest rate is equal to the weekly average
1-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, for the last calendar week
ending on or before that June 26 plus 3.1 percentage points, but does
not exceed 9 percent.
(ii) Direct PLUS Loans first disbursed on or after July 1, 1998,
and before July 1, 2006. During all periods, the interest rate during
any twelve-month period beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30 is
determined on the June 1 preceding that period. The interest rate is
equal to the bond equivalent rate of 91-day Treasury bills auctioned at
the final auction held prior to that June 1 plus 3.1 percentage points,
but does not exceed 9 percent.
(iii) Direct PLUS Loans first disbursed on or after July 1, 2006,
and before July 1, 2013. The interest rate is 7.9 percent.
(iv) Direct PLUS Loans first disbursed on or after July 1, 2013.
The interest rate for loans first disbursed during any 12-month period
beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30 is determined on the June 1
preceding that period and is a fixed rate for the life of the loan. The
interest rate is the lesser of--
(A) A rate equal to the high yield of the 10-year Treasury note
auctioned at the final auction held prior to the June 1 preceding the
12-month period, plus 4.6 percentage points, or
(B) 10.5 percent.
(10) Interest rate for Direct Consolidation Loans--(i) Interest
rate for Direct Subsidized Consolidation Loans and Direct Unsubsidized
Consolidation Loans. (A) Loans first disbursed before July 1, 1995. The
interest rate is the rate established for Direct Subsidized Loans and
Direct Unsubsidized Loans in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
(B) Loans first disbursed on or after July 1, 1995, and before July
1, 1998. The interest rate is the rate established for Direct
Subsidized Loans and Direct Unsubsidized Loans in paragraph (a)(2) of
this section.
(C) Loans for which the first disbursement is made on or after July
1, 1998, and prior to October 1, 1998, and loans for which the
disbursement is made on or after October 1, 1998, for which the
consolidation application was received by the Secretary before October
1, 1998. The interest rate is the rate established for Direct
Subsidized Loans and Direct Unsubsidized Loans in paragraph (a)(3) of
this section.
(D) Loans for which the consolidation application is received by
the Secretary on or after October 1, 1998, and before February 1, 1999.
During all periods, the interest rate during any twelve-month period
beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30 is determined on the June 1
immediately preceding that period. The interest rate is equal to the
bond equivalent rate of 91-day Treasury bills auctioned at the final
auction held prior
[[Page 65827]]
to that June 1 plus 2.3 percentage points, but does not exceed 8.25
percent.
(E) Loans for which the consolidation application is received by
the Secretary on or after February 1, 1999, and before July 1, 2013.
During all periods, the interest rate is based on the weighted average
of the interest rates on the loans being consolidated, rounded to the
nearest higher one-eighth of one percent, but does not exceed 8.25
percent.
(F) Loans for which the consolidation application is received by
the Secretary on or after July 1, 2013. During all periods, the
interest rate is based on the weighted average of the interest rates on
the loans being consolidated, rounded to the nearest higher one-eighth
of one percent.
(ii) Interest rate for Direct PLUS Consolidation Loans. (A) Loans
first disbursed before July 1, 1998. The interest rate is the rate
established for Direct PLUS Loans in paragraph (a)(9)(i) of this
section.
(B) Loans for which the first disbursement is made on or after July
1, 1998, and prior to October 1, 1998, and loans for which the
disbursement is made on or after October 1, 1998, for which the
consolidation application was received by the Secretary before October
1, 1998. The interest rate is the rate established for Direct PLUS
Loans in paragraph (a)(9)(ii) of this section.
(C) Loans for which the consolidation application is received by
the Secretary on or after October 1, 1998, and before February 1, 1999.
During all periods, the interest rate during any twelve-month period
beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30 is determined on the June 1
immediately preceding that period. The interest rate is equal to the
bond equivalent rate of 91-day Treasury bills auctioned at the final
auction held prior to that June 1 plus 2.3 percentage points, but does
not exceed 8.25 percent.
(D) Loans for which the consolidation application is received by
the Secretary on or after February 1, 1999, and before July 1, 2006.
During all periods, the interest rate is based on the weighted average
of the interest rates on the loans being consolidated, rounded to the
nearest higher one-eighth of one percent, but does not exceed 8.25
percent.
(11) Applicability of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50
U.S.C. 527, App. sec. 207). Notwithstanding paragraphs (a)(1) through
(10) of this section, effective August 14, 2008, upon the Secretary's
receipt of a borrower's written request and a copy of the borrower's
military orders, the maximum interest rate, as defined in 50 U.S.C.
527, App. section 207(d), on Direct Loan Program loans made prior to
the borrower entering active duty status is 6 percent while the
borrower is on active duty military service.
(b) * * *
(2) For a Direct Unsubsidized Loan, a Direct Unsubsidized
Consolidation Loan that qualifies for a grace period under the
regulations that were in effect for consolidation applications received
before July 1, 2006, a Direct PLUS Loan, or for a Direct Subsidized
Loan for which the first disbursement is made on or after July 1, 2012,
and before July 1, 2014, the Secretary may capitalize the unpaid
interest that accrues on the loan when the borrower enters repayment.
* * * * *
0
87. Section 685.203 is amended by:
0
A. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (a)(1).
0
B. In paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (a)(1)(ii), and (a)(1)(iii), removing the
words ``$2,625, or, for a loan disbursed on or after July 1, 2007,
$3,500,'' and adding, in their place, the figure ``$3,500''.
0
C. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (a)(2).
0
D. In paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii), removing the words ``$3,500,
or, for a loan disbursed on or after July 1, 2007, $4,500,'' and
adding, in their place, the figure ``$4,500''.
0
E. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (a)(3).
0
F. Revising paragraph (a)(5).
0
G. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (a)(6).
0
H. Revising paragraph (a)(7).
0
I. Revising paragraph (b).
0
J. In paragraph (c)(1)(i), removing the words ``Federal Direct
Unsubsidized Loan Program'' and adding, in their place, the words
``Direct Unsubsidized Loan Program''.
0
K. Revising paragraph (c)(1)(ii).
0
L. In paragraph (c)(1)(iii), in the last sentence, removing the words
``Federal PLUS Loan or''.
0
M. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (c)(2).
0
N. In paragraphs (c)(2)(i)(A), (c)(2)(i)(B), (c)(2)(i)(C),
(c)(2)(ii)(A), and (c)(2)(ii)(B), removing the words ``$4,000, or, for
a loan first disbursed on or after July 1, 2008, $6,000,'' and adding,
in their place, the figure ``$6,000''.
0
O. In paragraphs (c)(2)(iii)(A) and (c)(2)(iii)(B), removing the words
``$5,000, or, for a loan first disbursed on or after July 1, 2008,
$7,000,'' and adding, in their place, the figure ``$7,000''.
0
P. In paragraph (c)(2)(v), removing the words ``$10,000, or, for a loan
disbursed on or after July 1, 2007,''.
0
Q. In paragraph (c)(2)(vi)(A), removing the words ``$4,000, or, for a
loan first disbursed on or after July 1, 2008, $6,000,'' and adding, in
their place, the figure ``$6,000''.
0
R. In paragraph (c)(2)(vi)(B), removing the words ``$5,000, or, for a
loan disbursed on or after July 1, 2007, $7,000,'' and adding, in their
place, the figure ``$7,000''.
0
S. In paragraph (c)(2)(vii), removing the words ``$5,000, or, for a
loan disbursed on or after July 1, 2007,''.
0
T. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (d).
0
U. Revising paragraph (e).
0
V. In paragraph (i)(1), adding the word ``Subsidized'' immediately
before the words ``Federal Stafford Loans''.
0
W. In paragraph (i)(2), removing the words ``Federal Unsubsidized
Stafford Loans'' and adding, in their place, the words ``Unsubsidized
Federal Stafford Loans''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 685.203 Loan limits.
(a) * * *
(1) In the case of an undergraduate student who has not
successfully completed the first year of a program of undergraduate
education, the total amount the student may borrow for any academic
year of study under the Direct Subsidized Loan Program may not exceed
the following:
* * * * *
(2) In the case of an undergraduate student who has successfully
completed the first year of an undergraduate program but has not
successfully completed the second year of an undergraduate program, the
total amount the student may borrow for any academic year of study
under the Direct Subsidized Loan Program may not exceed the following:
* * * * *
(3) In the case of an undergraduate student who has successfully
completed the first and second years of a program of study of
undergraduate education but has not successfully completed the
remainder of the program, the total amount the student may borrow for
any academic year of study under the Direct Subsidized Loan Program may
not exceed the following:
* * * * *
(5) In the case of a graduate or professional student for periods
of enrollment beginning before July 1, 2012, the total amount the
student may borrow for any academic year of study under the Direct
Subsidized Loan Program may not exceed $8,500.
[[Page 65828]]
(6) In the case of a student enrolled for no longer than one
consecutive 12-month period in a course of study necessary for
enrollment in a program leading to a degree or a certificate, the total
amount the student may borrow for any academic year of study under the
Direct Subsidized Loan Program may not exceed the following:
* * * * *
(7) In the case of a student who has obtained a baccalaureate
degree and is enrolled or accepted for enrollment in coursework
necessary for a professional credential or certification from a State
that is required for employment as a teacher in an elementary or
secondary school in that State, the total amount the student may borrow
for any academic year of study under the Direct Subsidized Loan Program
may not exceed $5,500.
* * * * *
(b) Direct Unsubsidized Loans. (1) In the case of a dependent
undergraduate student, except as provided in paragraph (c)(3) of this
section, the total amount a student may borrow for any academic year of
study under the Direct Unsubsidized Loan Program is the same as the
amount determined under paragraph (a) of this section, less any amount
received under the Direct Subsidized Loan Program, plus--
(i) $2,000 for a program of study of at least a full academic year
in length.
(ii) For a program of study that is one academic year or more in
length with less than a full academic year remaining, the amount that
is the same ratio to $2,000 as the--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01NO13.004
(iii) For a program of study that is less than a full academic year
in length, the amount that is the same ratio to $2,000 as the lesser of
the--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01NO13.005
(2)(i) In the case of an independent undergraduate student or
certain dependent undergraduate students under the conditions specified
in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, except as provided in
paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the total amount the student may
borrow for any period of enrollment under the Direct Unsubsidized Loan
Program may not exceed the amounts determined under paragraph (a) of
this section less any amount received under the Direct Subsidized Loan
Program in combination with the amounts determined under paragraph (c)
of this section.
(ii) In the case of a graduate or professional student for a period
of enrollment beginning before July 1, 2012, the total amount the
student may borrow for any academic year of study under the Direct
Unsubsidized Loan Program may not exceed the amount determined under
paragraph (a)(5) of this section, less any amount received under the
Direct Subsidized Loan Program.
(iii) In the case of a graduate or professional student for a
period of enrollment beginning on or after July 1, 2012, the total
amount the student may borrow for any academic year of study under the
Direct Unsubsidized Loan Program may not exceed $8,500.
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) In order for a dependent undergraduate student to receive this
additional loan amount, the financial aid administrator must determine
that the student's parent likely will be precluded by exceptional
circumstances from borrowing under the Direct PLUS Loan Program and the
student's family is otherwise unable to provide the student's expected
family contribution. The financial aid administrator must base the
determination on a review of the family financial information provided
by the student and consideration of the student's debt
[[Page 65829]]
burden and must document the determination in the school's file.
* * * * *
(2) The additional amount that a student described in paragraph
(c)(1)(i) of this section may borrow under the Direct Unsubsidized Loan
Program for any academic year of study may not exceed the following:
* * * * *
(d) Aggregate limits for subsidized loans. The aggregate unpaid
principal amount of all Direct Subsidized Loans and Subsidized Federal
Stafford Loans made to a student but excluding the amount of
capitalized interest may not exceed the following:
* * * * *
(e) Aggregate limits for unsubsidized loans. The total amount of
Direct Unsubsidized Loans, Unsubsidized Federal Stafford Loans, and
Federal SLS Loans, excluding the amount of capitalized interest, may
not exceed the following:
(1) For a dependent undergraduate student, $31,000 minus any Direct
Subsidized Loan and Subsidized Federal Stafford Loan amounts, unless
the student qualifies under paragraph (c) of this section for
additional eligibility or qualified for that additional eligibility
under the Federal SLS Program.
(2) For an independent undergraduate or a dependent undergraduate
who qualifies for additional eligibility under paragraph (c) of this
section or qualified for this additional eligibility under the Federal
SLS Program, $57,500 minus any Direct Subsidized Loan and Subsidized
Federal Stafford Loan amounts.
(3) For a graduate or professional student, $138,500, including any
loans for undergraduate study, minus any Direct Subsidized Loan,
Subsidized Federal Stafford Loan, and Federal SLS Program loan amounts.
* * * * *
0
88. Section 685.204 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 685.204 Deferment.
(a) General. (1) A Direct Subsidized Loan or Direct Subsidized
Consolidation Loan borrower who meets the requirements described in
paragraphs (b), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), or (j) of this section is
eligible for a deferment during which periodic installments of
principal and interest need not be paid.
(2) A Direct Unsubsidized Loan, Direct Unsubsidized Consolidation
Loan, Direct PLUS Loan, or Direct PLUS Consolidation Loan borrower who
meets the requirements described in paragraphs (b) through (j) of this
section is eligible for a deferment during which periodic installments
of principal need not be paid but interest does accrue and is
capitalized or paid by the borrower. At or before the time a deferment
is granted, the Secretary provides information, including an example,
to assist the borrower in understanding the impact of capitalization of
accrued, unpaid interest on the borrower's loan principal and on the
total amount of interest to be paid over the life of the loan.
(3) A borrower whose loan is in default is not eligible for a
deferment, unless the borrower has made payment arrangements
satisfactory to the Secretary.
(4)(i) To receive a deferment, except as provided for in-school
deferments under paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) through (iv) of this section,
the borrower must request the deferment and, except as provided in
paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this section, provide the Secretary with all
information and documents required to establish eligibility for the
deferment.
(ii) In the case of a military service deferment under paragraph
(h) of this section, a borrower's representative may request the
deferment and provide the required information and documents on behalf
of the borrower. If the Secretary grants a military service deferment
based on a request from a borrower's representative, the Secretary
notifies the borrower that the deferment has been granted and that the
borrower has the option to cancel the deferment and continue to make
payments on the loan. The Secretary may also notify the borrower's
representative of the outcome of the deferment request.
(5)(i) After receiving a borrower's written or verbal request for a
deferment, the Secretary may grant a graduate fellowship deferment
under paragraph (d), a rehabilitation training deferment under
paragraph (e), an unemployment deferment under paragraph (f), an
economic hardship deferment under paragraph (g), a military service
deferment under paragraph (h), or a post-active duty student deferment
under paragraph (i) of this section if the Secretary confirms that the
borrower has received a deferment on a FFEL Program loan for the same
reason and during the same time period.
(ii) The Secretary will grant a deferment based on the information
obtained under paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this section when determining a
borrower's eligibility for a deferment, unless the Secretary, as of the
date of the determination, has information indicating that the borrower
does not qualify for the deferment. The Secretary will resolve any
discrepant information before granting a deferment under paragraph
(a)(5)(i) of this section.
(iii) If the Secretary grants a deferment under paragraph (a)(5)(i)
of this section, the Secretary notifies the borrower that the deferment
has been granted and that the borrower has the option to cancel the
deferment and continue to make payments on the loan.
(b) In-school deferment. (1) A Direct Loan borrower is eligible for
a deferment during any period during which--
(i) The borrower is carrying at least one-half the normal full-time
work load for the course of study that the borrower is pursuing, as
determined by the eligible school the borrower is attending; and
(ii) The borrower is not serving in a medical internship or
residency program, except for a residency program in dentistry.
(2) For the purpose of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the
Secretary processes a deferment when--
(i) The borrower submits a request to the Secretary along with
documentation verifying the borrower's eligibility;
(ii) The Secretary receives information from the borrower's school
indicating that the borrower is eligible to receive a new loan;
(iii) The Secretary receives student status information from the
borrower's school, either directly or indirectly, indicating that the
borrower is enrolled on at least a half-time basis; or
(iv) The Secretary confirms a borrower's half-time enrollment
status through the use of the National Student Loan Data System if
requested to do so by the school the borrower is attending.
(3)(i) Upon notification by the Secretary that a deferment has been
granted based on paragraph (b)(2)(ii), (iii), or (iv) of this section,
the borrower has the option to cancel the deferment and continue to
make payments on the loan.
(ii) If the borrower elects to cancel the deferment and continue to
make payments on the loan, the borrower has the option to make the
principal and interest payments that were deferred. If the borrower
does not make the payments, the Secretary applies a deferment for the
period in which payments were not made and capitalizes the interest.
(c) In-school deferments for Direct PLUS Loan borrowers with loans
first disbursed on or after July 1, 2008. (1)(i) A student Direct PLUS
Loan borrower is eligible for a deferment on a Direct PLUS Loan first
disbursed on or after July 1, 2008 during the six-month period that
begins on the day after the
[[Page 65830]]
student ceases to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis at an
eligible institution.
(ii) If the Secretary grants an in-school deferment to a student
Direct PLUS Loan borrower in accordance with Sec. 685.204(b)(2)(ii),
(iii), or (iv), the deferment period for a Direct PLUS Loan first
disbursed on or after July 1, 2008 includes the six-month post-
enrollment period described in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section.
(2) A parent Direct PLUS Loan borrower is eligible for a deferment
on a Direct PLUS Loan first disbursed on or after July 1, 2008--
(i) Upon the request of the borrower, during the period when the
student on whose behalf the loan was obtained is enrolled at an
eligible institution on at least a half-time basis; and
(ii) Upon the request of the borrower, during the six-month period
that begins on the later of the day after the student on whose behalf
the loan was obtained ceases to be enrolled on at least a half-time
basis or, if the parent borrower is also a student, the day after the
parent borrower ceases to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis.
(d) Graduate fellowship deferment. (1) A Direct Loan borrower is
eligible for a deferment during any period in which an authorized
official of the borrower's graduate fellowship program certifies that
the borrower is pursuing a course of study pursuant to an eligible
graduate fellowship program in accordance with paragraph (d)(2) of this
section.
(2)(i) To qualify for a deferment under paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, a borrower must--
(A) Hold at least a baccalaureate degree conferred by an
institution of higher education;
(B) Have been accepted or recommended by an institution of higher
education for acceptance on a full-time basis into an eligible graduate
fellowship program, as defined in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section;
and
(C) Not be serving in a medical internship or residency program,
except for a residency program in dentistry.
(ii) An eligible graduate fellowship program is a fellowship
program that--
(A) Provides sufficient financial support to graduate fellows to
allow for full-time study for at least six months;
(B) Requires a written statement from each applicant explaining the
applicant's objectives before the award of that financial support;
(C) Requires a graduate fellow to submit periodic reports,
projects, or evidence of the fellow's progress; and
(D) In the case of a course of study at a foreign university,
accepts the course of study for completion of the fellowship program.
(e) Rehabilitation training program deferment. (1) A Direct Loan
borrower is eligible for a deferment during any period in which an
authorized official of the borrower's rehabilitation training program
certifies that the borrower is pursuing an eligible rehabilitation
training program for individuals with disabilities in accordance with
paragraph (e)(2) of this section.
(2) For purposes of paragraph (e)(1) of this section, an eligible
rehabilitation training program for disabled individuals is a program
that--
(i) Is licensed, approved, certified, or otherwise recognized as
providing rehabilitation training to disabled individuals by--
(A) A State agency with responsibility for vocational
rehabilitation programs;
(B) A State agency with responsibility for drug abuse treatment
programs;
(C) A State agency with responsibility for mental health services
programs;
(D) A State agency with responsibility for alcohol abuse treatment
programs; or
(E) The Department of Veterans Affairs; and
(ii) Provides or will provide the borrower with rehabilitation
services under a written plan that--
(A) Is individualized to meet the borrower's needs;
(B) Specifies the date on which the services to the borrower are
expected to end; and
(C) Is structured in a way that requires a substantial commitment
by the borrower to his or her rehabilitation. The Secretary considers a
substantial commitment by the borrower to be a commitment of time and
effort that normally would prevent an individual from engaging in full-
time employment, either because of the number of hours that must be
devoted to rehabilitation or because of the nature of the
rehabilitation. For the purpose of this paragraph, full-time employment
involves at least 30 hours of work per week and is expected to last at
least three months.
(f) Unemployment deferment. (1) A Direct Loan borrower is eligible
for a deferment during periods that, collectively, do not exceed three
years in which the borrower is seeking and unable to find full-time
employment.
(2) A borrower qualifies for an unemployment deferment by--
(i) Providing evidence of eligibility for unemployment benefits to
the Secretary; or
(ii) Providing to the Secretary a written certification, or an
equivalent as approved by the Secretary, that--
(A) The borrower has registered with a public or private employment
agency, if one is available to the borrower within a 50-mile radius of
the borrower's current address; and
(B) For all requests beyond the initial request, the borrower has
made at least six diligent attempts during the preceding six-month
period to secure full-time employment.
(3) For purposes of obtaining an unemployment deferment under
paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section, the following rules apply:
(i) A borrower may qualify for an unemployment deferment whether or
not the borrower has been previously employed.
(ii) An unemployment deferment is not justified if the borrower
refuses to seek or accept employment in kinds of positions or at salary
and responsibility levels for which the borrower feels overqualified by
virtue of education or previous experience.
(iii) Full-time employment involves at least 30 hours of work a
week and is expected to last at least three months.
(iv) The initial period of unemployment deferment may be granted
for a period of unemployment beginning up to six months before the date
the Secretary receives the borrower's request, and may be granted for
up to six months after that date.
(4) The Secretary does not grant an unemployment deferment beyond
the date that is six months after the date the borrower provides
evidence of the borrower's eligibility for unemployment insurance
benefits under paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this section or the date the
borrower provides the written certification, or an approved equivalent,
under paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section.
(g) Economic hardship deferment. (1)(i) A Direct Loan borrower is
eligible for a deferment during periods that, collectively, do not
exceed three years in which the borrower has experienced or will
experience an economic hardship in accordance with paragraph (g)(2) of
this section.
(ii) An economic hardship deferment is granted for periods of up to
one year at a time, except that a borrower who receives a deferment
under paragraph (g)(2)(iv) of this section may receive an economic
hardship deferment for the lesser of the borrower's full term of
service in the Peace Corps or the borrower's remaining period of
economic hardship deferment eligibility under the 3-year maximum.
(2) A borrower qualifies for an economic hardship deferment if the
borrower--
(i) Has been granted an economic hardship deferment under either
the FFEL or the Federal Perkins Loan programs for the period of time
for
[[Page 65831]]
which the borrower has requested an economic hardship deferment for his
or her Direct Loan;
(ii) Is receiving payment under a Federal or State public
assistance program, such as Aid to Families with Dependent Children,
Supplemental Security Income, Food Stamps, or State general public
assistance;
(iii) Is working full-time (as defined in paragraph (g)(3)(iii) of
this section) and has a monthly income (as defined in paragraph
(g)(3)(iv) of this section) that does not exceed the greater of (as
calculated on a monthly basis)--
(A) The minimum wage rate described in section 6 of the Fair Labor
Standards Act of 1938; or
(B) An amount equal to 150 percent of the poverty guideline
applicable to the borrower's family size (as defined in paragraph
(g)(3)(v) of this section) as published annually by the Department of
Health and Human Services pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 9902(2). If a borrower
is not a resident of a State identified in the poverty guidelines, the
poverty guideline to be used for the borrower is the poverty guideline
(for the relevant family size) used for the 48 contiguous States; or
(iv) Is serving as a volunteer in the Peace Corps.
(3) The following rules apply to a deferment granted under
paragraph (g)(2)(iii) of this section:
(i) For an initial period of deferment, the Secretary requires the
borrower to submit evidence showing the amount of the borrower's
monthly income.
(ii) To qualify for a subsequent period of deferment that begins
less than one year after the end of a period of deferment under
paragraph (g)(2)(iii) of this section, the Secretary requires the
borrower to submit evidence showing the amount of the borrower's
monthly income or a copy of the borrower's most recently filed Federal
income tax return.
(iii) A borrower is considered to be working full-time if the
borrower is expected to be employed for at least three consecutive
months at 30 hours per week.
(iv) A borrower's monthly income is the gross amount of income
received by the borrower from employment and from other sources, or
one-twelfth of the borrower's adjusted gross income, as recorded on the
borrower's most recently filed Federal income tax return.
(v) Family size means the number that is determined by counting the
borrower, the borrower's spouse, and the borrower's children, including
unborn children who will be born during the period covered by the
deferment, if the children receive more than half their support from
the borrower. A borrower's family size includes other individuals if,
at the time the borrower requests the economic hardship deferment, the
other individuals--
(A) Live with the borrower; and
(B) Receive more than half their support from the borrower and will
continue to receive this support from the borrower for the year the
borrower certifies family size. Support includes money, gifts, loans,
housing, food, clothes, car, medical and dental care, and payment of
college costs.
(h) Military service deferment. (1) A Direct Loan borrower is
eligible for a deferment during any period in which the borrower is--
(i) Serving on active duty during a war or other military operation
or national emergency, as defined in paragraph (h)(5) of this section;
or
(ii) Performing qualifying National Guard duty during a war or
other military operation or national emergency, as defined in paragraph
(h)(5) of this section.
(2) For a borrower whose active duty service includes October 1,
2007, or begins on or after that date, the deferment period ends 180
days after the demobilization date for each period of the service
described in paragraphs (h)(1)(i) and (h)(1)(ii) of this section.
(3) Without supporting documentation, the military service
deferment will be granted to an otherwise eligible borrower for a
period not to exceed the initial 12 months from the date the qualifying
eligible service began based on a request from the borrower or the
borrower's representative.
(4) The provisions of paragraph (h) of this section do not
authorize the refunding of any payments made by or on behalf of a
borrower during a period for which the borrower qualified for a
military service deferment.
(5) As used in paragraph (h) of this section--
(i) Serving on active duty during a war or other military operation
or national emergency means service by an individual who is--
(A) A Reserve of an Armed Force ordered to active duty under 10
U.S.C. 12301(a), 12301(g), 12302, 12304, or 12306;
(B) A retired member of an Armed Force ordered to active duty under
10 U.S.C. 688 for service in connection with a war or other military
operation or national emergency, regardless of the location at which
such active duty service is performed; or
(C) Any other member of an Armed Force on active duty in connection
with such emergency or subsequent actions or conditions who has been
assigned to a duty station at a location other than the location at
which the member is normally assigned;
(ii) Qualifying National Guard duty during a war or other operation
or national emergency means service as a member of the National Guard
on full-time National Guard duty, as defined in 10 U.S.C. 101(d)(5)
under a call to active service authorized by the President or the
Secretary of Defense for a period of more than 30 consecutive days
under 32 U.S.C. 502(f) in connection with a war, other military
operation, or national emergency declared by the President and
supported by Federal funds;
(iii) Active duty means active duty as defined in 10 U.S.C.
101(d)(1) except that it does not include active duty for training or
attendance at a service school;
(iv) Military operation means a contingency operation as defined in
10 U.S.C. 101(a)(13); and
(v) National emergency means the national emergency by reason of
certain terrorist attacks declared by the President on September 14,
2001, or subsequent national emergencies declared by the President by
reason of terrorist attacks.
(i) Post-active duty student deferment. (1) A Direct Loan borrower
is eligible for a deferment for 13 months following the conclusion of
the borrower's active duty military service and any applicable grace
period if--
(i) The borrower is a member of the National Guard or other reserve
component of the Armed Forces of the United States or a member of such
forces in retired status; and
(ii) The borrower was enrolled on at least a half-time basis in a
program of instruction at an eligible institution at the time, or
within six months prior to the time, the borrower was called to active
duty.
(2) As used in paragraph (i)(1) of this section, ``active duty''
means active duty as defined in 10 U.S.C. 101(d)(1) for at least a 30-
day period, except that--
(i) Active duty includes active State duty for members of the
National Guard under which a Governor activates National Guard
personnel based on State statute or policy and the activities of the
National Guard are paid for with State funds;
(ii) Active duty includes full-time National Guard duty under which
a Governor is authorized, with the approval of the President or the
U.S. Secretary of Defense, to order a member to State active duty and
the activities of the National Guard are paid for with Federal funds;
[[Page 65832]]
(iii) Active duty does not include active duty for training or
attendance at a service school; and
(iv) Active duty does not include employment in a full-time,
permanent position in the National Guard unless the borrower employed
in such a position is reassigned to active duty under paragraph
(i)(2)(i) of this section or full-time National Guard duty under
paragraph (i)(2)(ii) of this section.
(3) If the borrower returns to enrolled student status on at least
a half-time basis during the grace period or the 13-month deferment
period, the deferment expires at the time the borrower returns to
enrolled student status on at least a half-time basis.
(4) If a borrower qualifies for both a military service deferment
and a post-active duty student deferment, the 180-day post-
demobilization military service deferment period and the 13-month post-
active duty student deferment period apply concurrently.
(j) Additional deferments for Direct Loan borrowers with FFEL
Program loans made before July 1, 1993. If, at the time of application
for a borrower's first Direct Loan, a borrower has an outstanding
balance of principal or interest owing on any FFEL Program loan that
was made, insured, or guaranteed prior to July 1, 1993, the borrower is
eligible for a deferment during--
(1) The periods described in paragraphs (b) through (i) of this
section; and
(2) The periods described in 34 CFR 682.210(b), including those
periods that apply to a ``new borrower'' as that term is defined in 34
CFR 682.210(b)(7).
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1845-0021)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.)
0
89. Section 685.205 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(4), removing the word ``or'' that appears after the
punctuation ``;''.
0
B. Revising paragraph (a)(5).
0
C. Adding new paragraphs (a)(8) and (a)(9).
0
D. In paragraph (b)(2), removing the words ``authorized deferment
period'' and adding, in their place, the words ``authorized deferment
or forbearance period''.
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 685.205 Forbearance.
(a) * * *
(5)(i) The borrower is performing the type of service that would
qualify the borrower for loan forgiveness under the requirements of the
teacher loan forgiveness program in Sec. 685.217.
(ii) Before a forbearance is granted under Sec. 685.205(a)(5)(i),
the borrower must--
(A) Submit documentation for the period of the annual forbearance
request showing the beginning and ending dates that the borrower is
expected to perform, for that year, the type of service described in
Sec. 685.217(c); and
(B) Certify the borrower's intent to satisfy the requirements of
Sec. 685.217(c).
(iii) The Secretary grants forbearance under paragraph (a)(5) of
this section only if the Secretary believes, at the time of the
borrower's annual request, that the expected forgiveness amount under
Sec. 685.217(d) will satisfy the anticipated remaining outstanding
balance on the borrower's loan at the time of the expected forgiveness;
* * * * *
(8)(i) The Secretary may grant a forbearance to permit a borrower
or endorser to resume honoring the agreement to repay the debt after
default. The terms of the forbearance agreement in this situation must
include a new agreement to repay the debt signed by the borrower or
endorser or a written or oral affirmation of the borrower's or
endorser's obligation to repay the debt.
(ii) If the forbearance is based on the borrower's or endorser's
oral affirmation of the obligation to repay the debt, the forbearance
period is limited to 120 days, such a forbearance is not granted
consecutively, and the Secretary will--
(A) Orally review with the borrower the terms and conditions of the
forbearance, including the consequences of interest capitalization, and
all other repayment options available to the borrower;
(B) Send a notice to the borrower or endorser that confirms the
terms of the forbearance and the borrower's or endorser's affirmation
of the obligation to repay the debt and that includes information on
all other repayment options available to the borrower; and
(C) Retain a record of the terms of the forbearance and affirmation
in the borrower's or endorser's file.
(iii) For purposes of this section, an ``affirmation'' means an
acknowledgement of the loan by the borrower or endorser in a legally
binding manner. The form of the affirmation may include, but is not
limited to, the borrower's or endorser's--
(A) New signed repayment agreement or schedule, or another form of
signed agreement to repay the debt;
(B) Oral acknowledgement and agreement to repay the debt documented
by the Secretary in the borrower's or endorser's file and confirmed by
the Secretary in a notice to the borrower; or
(C) A payment made on the loan by the borrower or endorser.
(9)(i) The borrower is performing the type of service that would
qualify the borrower for a partial repayment of his or her loan under
the Student Loan Repayment Programs administered by the Department of
Defense under 10 U.S.C. 2171, 2173, 2174, or any other student loan
repayment programs administered by the Department of Defense.
(ii) To receive a forbearance under this paragraph, the borrower
must submit documentation showing the time period during which the
Department of Defense considers the borrower to be eligible for a
partial repayment of his or her loan under a student loan repayment
program.
* * * * *
Sec. 685.206 [Amended]
0
90. Section 685.206 is amended by:
0
A. In the introductory text of paragraph (a), removing the word
``shall'' and adding, in its place, the word ``must''.
0
B. In paragraph (b)(1), removing the word ``shall'' and adding, in its
place, the word ``must''.
0
C. In paragraph (b)(2), removing the word ``shall'' and adding, in its
place, the word ``must''.
0
D. In paragraph (c)(1)(iv), removing the words ``Credit bureau'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``Consumer reporting agency''.
0
E. In paragraph (c)(2)(iii), removing the words ``credit bureaus'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``consumer reporting agencies''.
0
91. Section 685.207 is amended by:
0
A. Revising paragraph (a)(2).
0
B. Adding a new paragraph (a)(3).
0
C. In paragraph (b)(1)(ii), removing the citation ``Sec. 685.204'' and
adding, in its place, the citation ''Sec. 685.204(b)''.
0
D. Revising paragraph (b)(3).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 685.207 Obligation to repay.
(a) * * *
(2) The borrower's repayment of a Direct Loan may also be subject
to the deferment provisions in Sec. 685.204, the forbearance
provisions in Sec. 685.205, the discharge provisions in Sec. 685.212,
and the loan forgiveness provisions in Sec. Sec. 685.217 and 685.219.
(3) A borrower's first payment on a Direct Loan is due within 60
days of the beginning date of the repayment period as determined in
accordance with
[[Page 65833]]
paragraph (b), (c), (d), or (e) of this section.
(b) * * *
(3)(i) A borrower is not obligated to pay interest on a Direct
Subsidized Loan during periods when the borrower is enrolled at an
eligible school on at least a half-time basis unless the borrower is
required to make payments on the loan during those periods under
paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(ii) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(3)(iii) of this section, a
borrower is not obligated to pay interest on a Direct Subsidized Loan
during grace periods.
(iii) In the case of a Direct Subsidized Loan for which the first
disbursement is made on or after July 1, 2012 and before July 1, 2014,
a borrower is responsible for the interest that accrues during the
grace period.
* * * * *
Sec. 685.208 [Amended]
0
92. Section 685.208 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(5), removing the words ``income contingent'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``income-contingent''.
0
B. In paragraph (j)(1), removing the word ``then'' and adding, in its
place, the word ``than''.
0
C. In paragraph (m)(1), adding the words ``or, for a new borrower as of
July 1, 2014, as defined in Sec. 685.221(a)(4), 10 percent''
immediately after the words ``15 percent''.
0
93. Section 685.210 is amended by:
0
A. Revising paragraph (a)(2).
0
B. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (b)(1).
0
C. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(i).
0
D. In paragraph (b)(2)(i), removing the words ``income contingent'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``income-contingent''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 685.210 Choice of repayment plan.
(a) * * *
(2) If a borrower does not select a repayment plan, the Secretary
designates the standard repayment plan described in Sec. 685.208(b) or
(c) for the borrower, as applicable.
(b) * * *
(1) A borrower may change repayment plans at any time after the
loan has entered repayment by notifying the Secretary. However, a
borrower who is repaying a defaulted loan under an income-contingent
repayment plan or the income-based repayment plan in accordance with
Sec. 685.211(d)(3)(ii), or who is repaying a Direct Consolidation Loan
under the income-contingent repayment plan or the income-based
repayment plan in accordance with Sec. 685.220(d)(1)(ii)(A)(3) may not
change to another repayment plan unless--
(i) The borrower was required to and did make a payment under the
income-contingent repayment plan or income-based repayment plan in each
of the prior three months; or
* * * * *
0
94. Section 685.211 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (d)(3)(i), removing the words ``national credit
bureaus'' and adding, in their place, the words ``nationwide consumer
reporting agencies''.
0
B. In paragraph (d)(3)(ii), removing the words ``income contingent''
and adding, in their place, the words ``income-contingent''.
0
C. Revising paragraph (f).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 685.211 Miscellaneous repayment provisions.
* * * * *
(f) Rehabilitation of defaulted loans. (1) A defaulted Direct Loan,
except for a loan on which a judgment has been obtained, is
rehabilitated if the borrower makes 9 voluntary, reasonable and
affordable monthly payments within 20 days of the due date during 10
consecutive months. The Secretary determines the amount of a borrower's
reasonable and affordable payment on the basis of a borrower's total
financial circumstances.
(i) The Secretary initially considers the borrower's reasonable and
affordable payment amount to be an amount equal to 15 percent of the
amount by which the borrower's AGI exceeds 150 percent of the poverty
guideline amount applicable to the borrower's family size and State,
divided by 12, except that if this amount is less than $5, the
borrower's monthly rehabilitation payment is $5.
(ii) The Secretary may calculate the payment amount based on
information provided orally by the borrower or the borrower's
representative and provide the borrower with a rehabilitation agreement
using that amount. The Secretary requires the borrower to provide
documentation to confirm the borrower's AGI and family size. If the
borrower does not provide the Secretary with any documentation
requested by the Secretary to calculate or confirm the reasonable and
affordable payment amount within a reasonable time deadline set by the
Secretary, the rehabilitation agreement provided is null and void.
(iii) A reasonable and affordable payment amount is not--
(A) A required minimum loan payment amount (e.g., $50) if the
Secretary determines that a smaller amount is reasonable and
affordable;
(B) A percentage of the borrower's total loan balance; or
(C) Based on other criteria unrelated to the borrower's total
financial circumstances.
(iv) Within 15 business days of the Secretary's determination of
the borrower's loan rehabilitation payment amount, the Secretary
provides the borrower with a written rehabilitation agreement which
includes the borrower's reasonable and affordable payment amount, a
prominent statement that the borrower may object orally or in writing
to the reasonable and affordable payment amount with the method and
timeframe for raising such an objection, a statement that the
rehabilitation is null and void if the borrower does not provide the
documentation required to calculate the reasonable and affordable
payment amount, and an explanation of any other terms and conditions
applicable to the required series of payments that must be made. To
accept the agreement, the borrower must sign and return the agreement
or accept the agreement electronically under a process provided by the
Secretary. The Secretary does not impose any other conditions unrelated
to the amount or timing of the rehabilitation payments in the
rehabilitation agreement. The written rehabilitation agreement informs
the borrower of the effects of having the loans rehabilitated (e.g.,
removal of the record of default from the borrower's credit history and
return to normal repayment).
(2) The Secretary provides the borrower with a written statement
confirming the borrower's reasonable and affordable payment amount, as
determined by the Secretary, and explaining any other terms and
conditions applicable to the required series of payments that must be
made before the borrower's account can be rehabilitated. The statement
informs the borrower that the borrower may object to the terms and
conditions of the rehabilitation agreement, and explains the method and
timeframe for objecting to the terms and conditions of the
rehabilitation agreement.
(3) If the borrower objects to the monthly payment amount
determined under paragraph (f)(1) of this section, the Secretary
recalculates the payment based solely on information provided on a form
approved by the Secretary and, if requested, supporting documentation
from the borrower and other sources, and considers--
(i) The borrower's, and if applicable, the spouse's current
disposable income, including public assistance payments,
[[Page 65834]]
and other income received by the borrower and the spouse, such as
welfare benefits, Social Security benefits, Supplemental Security
Income, and workers' compensation. Spousal income is not considered if
the spouse does not contribute to the borrower's household income;
(ii) Family size as defined in Sec. 685.221(a)(3); and
(iii) Reasonable and necessary expenses, which include--
(A) Food;
(B) Housing;
(C) Utilities;
(D) Basic communication expenses;
(E) Necessary medical and dental costs;
(F) Necessary insurance costs;
(G) Transportation costs;
(H) Dependent care and other work-related expenses;
(I) Legally required child and spousal support;
(J) Other title IV and non-title IV student loan payments; and
(K) Other expenses approved by the Secretary.
(4) The Secretary provides the borrower with a new written
rehabilitation agreement confirming the borrower's recalculated
reasonable and affordable payment amount. To accept the agreement, the
borrower must sign and return the agreement or accept the agreement
electronically under a process provided by the Secretary.
(5) The Secretary includes any payment made under paragraph (1) of
the definition of ``satisfactory repayment arrangement'' in Sec.
685.102(b) in determining whether the 9 out of 10 payments required
under paragraph (f)(1) of this section have been made.
(6) A borrower may request that the monthly payment amount be
adjusted due to a change in the borrower's total financial
circumstances only upon providing the documentation specified in
paragraph (f)(3) of this section.
(7) During the rehabilitation period, the Secretary limits contact
with the borrower on the loan being rehabilitated to collection
activities that are required by law or regulation and to communications
that support the rehabilitation.
(8) If a defaulted loan is rehabilitated, the Secretary instructs
any consumer reporting agency to which the default was reported to
remove the default from the borrower's credit history.
(9) A defaulted Direct Loan on which a judgment has been obtained
may not be rehabilitated.
(10) A Direct Loan obtained by fraud for which the borrower has
been convicted of, or has pled nolo contendere or guilty to, a crime
involving fraud in obtaining title IV, HEA program assistance may not
be rehabilitated.
(11)(i) If a borrower's loan is being collected by administrative
wage garnishment while the borrower is also making monthly payments on
the same loan under a loan rehabilitation agreement, the Secretary
continues collecting the loan by administrative wage garnishment until
the borrower makes five qualifying monthly payments under the
rehabilitation agreement, unless the Secretary is otherwise precluded
from doing so.
(ii) After the borrower makes the fifth qualifying monthly payment,
the Secretary, unless otherwise directed by the borrower, suspends the
garnishment order issued to the borrower's employer.
(iii) A borrower may only obtain the benefit of a suspension of
administrative wage garnishment while also attempting to rehabilitate a
defaulted loan once.
(12) Effective for any defaulted Direct Loan that is rehabilitated
on or after August 14, 2008, the borrower cannot rehabilitate the loan
again if the loan returns to default status following the
rehabilitation.
* * * * *
Sec. 685.212 [Amended]
0
95. Section 685.212 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(3), removing the words ``Direct PLUS Consolidation
Loan'' and adding, in their place, the words ``Direct Consolidation
Loan''.
0
B. In paragraph (b), removing the citation ``Sec. 685.213(c)'' and
adding, in its place, the citation ``Sec. 685.213''.
0
96. Section 685.214 is amended by:
0
A. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(ii).
0
B. Revising paragraph (b)(4).
0
C. Revising paragraph (c).
0
D. In paragraph (d)(1), removing the word ``shall'' each time it
appears and adding, in its place, the word ``must''.
0
E. In paragraph (f)(1), removing the number and words ``90 days'' and
adding, in their place, the number and words ``120 days''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 685.214 Closed school discharge.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) ``School'' means a school's main campus or any location or
branch of the main campus, regardless of whether the school or its
location or branch is considered eligible.
(b) * * *
(4) The Secretary reports the discharge of a loan under this
section to all consumer reporting agencies to which the Secretary
previously reported the status of the loan, so as to delete all adverse
credit history assigned to the loan.
(c) Borrower qualification for discharge. (1) In order to qualify
for discharge of a loan under this section, a borrower must submit to
the Secretary a written request and sworn statement, and the factual
assertions in the statement must be true. The statement need not be
notarized but must be made by the borrower under penalty of perjury. In
the statement, the borrower must--
(i) State that the borrower (or the student on whose behalf a
parent borrowed)--
(A) Received the proceeds of a loan, in whole or in part, on or
after January 1, 1986 to attend a school;
(B) Did not complete the program of study at that school because
the school closed while the student was enrolled, or the student
withdrew from the school not more than 120 days before the school
closed. The Secretary may extend the 120-day period if the Secretary
determines that exceptional circumstances related to a school's closing
justify an extension. Exceptional circumstances for this purpose may
include, but are not limited to: the school's loss of accreditation;
the school's discontinuation of the majority of its academic programs;
action by the State to revoke the school's license to operate or award
academic credentials in the State; or a finding by a State or Federal
government agency that the school violated State or Federal law; and
(C) Did not complete the program of study through a teach-out at
another school or by transferring academic credits or hours earned at
the closed school to another school;
(ii) State whether the borrower (or student) has made a claim with
respect to the school's closing with any third party, such as the
holder of a performance bond or a tuition recovery program, and, if so,
the amount of any payment received by the borrower (or student) or
credited to the borrower's loan obligation; and
(iii) State that the borrower (or student)--
(A) Agrees to provide to the Secretary upon request other
documentation reasonably available to the borrower that demonstrates
that the borrower meets the qualifications for discharge under this
section; and
(B) Agrees to cooperate with the Secretary in enforcement actions
in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section and to transfer any
right to recovery against a third party to the Secretary in accordance
with paragraph (e) of this section.
[[Page 65835]]
(2) The Secretary may discharge a loan under this section without
an application from the borrower if the Secretary determines, based on
information in the Secretary's possession, that the borrower qualifies
for the discharge.
* * * * *
0
97. Section 685.215 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(1)(iv), removing the citation ``Sec.
682.402(e)(14)'' and adding, in its place, the words ``paragraph
(c)(4)(ii) of this section''.
0
B. Revising paragraph (b)(5).
0
C. In the introductory text of paragraph (c), removing the word
``shall'' each time it appears and adding, in its place, the word
``must''.
0
D. In the introductory text of paragraph (c)(1), removing the word
``shall'' and adding, in its place, the word ``must''.
0
E. In the introductory text of paragraph (c)(2), removing the word
``shall'' and adding, in its place, the word ``must''.
0
F. In the introductory text of paragraph (c)(3), removing the word
``shall'' and adding, in its place, the word ``must''.
0
G. Revising paragraph (c)(4).
0
H. In paragraph (c)(5), removing the word ``shall'' and adding, it its
place, the word ``must''.
0
I. In the introductory text of paragraph (c)(6), removing the word
``shall'' and adding, in its place, the word ``must''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 685.215 Discharge for false certification of student eligibility
or unauthorized payment.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) The Secretary reports the discharge under this section to all
consumer reporting agencies to which the Secretary previously reported
the status of the loan, so as to delete all adverse credit history
assigned to the loan.
(c) * * *
(4) Identity theft. (i) In the case of an individual whose
eligibility to borrow was falsely certified because he or she was a
victim of the crime of identity theft and is requesting a discharge,
the individual must--
(A) Certify that the individual did not sign the promissory note,
or that any other means of identification used to obtain the loan was
used without the authorization of the individual claiming relief;
(B) Certify that the individual did not receive or benefit from the
proceeds of the loan with knowledge that the loan had been made without
the authorization of the individual;
(C) Provide a copy of a local, State, or Federal court verdict or
judgment that conclusively determines that the individual who is named
as the borrower of the loan was the victim of a crime of identity
theft; and
(D) If the judicial determination of the crime does not expressly
state that the loan was obtained as a result of the crime of identity
theft, provide--
(1) Authentic specimens of the signature of the individual, as
provided in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section, or of other means of
identification of the individual, as applicable, corresponding to the
means of identification falsely used to obtain the loan; and
(2) A statement of facts that demonstrate, to the satisfaction of
the Secretary, that eligibility for the loan in question was falsely
certified as a result of the crime of identity theft committed against
that individual.
(ii)(A) For purposes of this section, identity theft is defined as
the unauthorized use of the identifying information of another
individual that is punishable under 18 U.S.C. 1028, 1028A, 1029, or
1030, or substantially comparable State or local law.
(B) Identifying information includes, but is not limited to--
(1) Name, Social Security number, date of birth, official State or
government issued driver's license or identification number, alien
registration number, government passport number, and employer or
taxpayer identification number;
(2) Unique biometric data, such as fingerprints, voiceprint, retina
or iris image, or unique physical representation;
(3) Unique electronic identification number, address, or routing
code; or
(4) Telecommunication identifying information or access device (as
defined in 18 U.S.C. 1029(e)).
* * * * *
Sec. 685.216 [Amended]
0
98. Section 685.216(b)(2) is amended by removing the word ``credit''
and adding, in its place, the word ``consumer''.
0
99. Section 685.217 is amended by:
0
A. Revising paragraph (a)(1).
0
B. In the last sentence of paragraph (a)(2)(i), adding the word ``for''
immediately before the words ``an eligible educational service
agency''.
0
C. In paragraph (a)(2)(iii), removing the word ``at'' each time it
appears and adding, in its place, the word ``for''.
0
D. In paragraph (a)(3), removing the words ``FFEL and Direct Loan'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``Direct Loan and FFEL''.
0
E. In the introductory text of paragraph (a)(4), removing the words
``FFEL and Direct Loan'' and adding, in their place, the words ``Direct
Loan and FFEL''.
0
F. In paragraph (a)(4)(i), removing the word ``at'' the second time it
appears and adding, in its place, the word ``by''.
0
G. In paragraph (a)(4)(ii), adding the words ``by an eligible''
immediately before the words ``educational service agency''.
0
H. In the introductory text of paragraph (c)(1), adding the word ``by''
immediately before the words ``an educational service agency''.
0
I. In paragraph (c)(1)(iii), removing the last sentence.
0
J. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(11) as paragraphs (c)(3)
through (c)(12), respectively.
0
K. Adding a new paragraph (c)(2).
0
L. In redesignated paragraph (c)(4)(ii)(A), removing the word ``at''
the second time it appears and adding, in its place, the word ``for''.
0
M. In redesignated paragraph (c)(4)(ii)(B), adding the words ``for an
eligible'' immediately before the words ``educational service agency''.
0
N. In redesignated paragraph (c)(4)(iii), removing the word ``at'' each
time it appears and adding, in its place, the word ``for''.
0
O. In redesignated paragraph (c)(5)(i), adding the words ``for an
eligible'' immediately before the words ``educational service agency''.
0
P. In redesignated paragraph (c)(5)(ii)(A), removing the word ``at''
the second time it appears and adding, in its place, the word ``for''.
0
Q. In redesignated paragraph (c)(5)(ii)(B), adding the words ``for an
eligible'' immediately before the words ``educational service agency''.
0
R. In redesignated paragraph (c)(5)(iii), removing the word ``at'' each
time it appears and adding, in its place, the word ``for''.
0
S. Revising the introductory text of redesignated paragraph (c)(7).
0
T. Revising redesignated paragraph (c)(9).
0
U. Revising redesignated paragraph (c)(10).
0
V. Adding a new paragraph (c)(13).
0
W. Revising paragraph (d)(1).
0
X. In paragraph (d)(2), removing the words ``paragraphs (c)(3)(ii) or
(c)(4)(ii)'' and adding, in their place, the words ``paragraph
(c)(4)(ii) or (c)(5)(ii)''.
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 685.217 Teacher loan forgiveness program.
(a) * * *
(1) The teacher loan forgiveness program is intended to encourage
[[Page 65836]]
individuals to enter and continue in the teaching profession. For new
borrowers, the Secretary repays the amount specified in this paragraph
(a) on the borrower's Direct Subsidized Loans, Direct Unsubsidized
Loans, Subsidized and Unsubsidized Federal Stafford Loans, and in
certain cases, Direct Consolidation Loans or Federal Consolidation
Loans. The forgiveness program is only available to a borrower who has
no outstanding loan balance under the Direct Loan Program or the FFEL
Program on October 1, 1998, or who has no outstanding loan balance on
the date he or she obtains a loan after October 1, 1998.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) The Secretary considers all elementary and secondary schools
operated by the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) or operated on Indian
reservations by Indian tribal groups under contract with the BIE to
qualify as schools serving low-income students.
* * * * *
(7) For teacher loan forgiveness applications received by the
Secretary on or after July 1, 2006, a teacher in a private, non-profit
elementary or secondary school who is exempt from State certification
requirements (unless otherwise applicable under State law) may qualify
for loan forgiveness under paragraphs (c)(4)(ii) or (c)(5) of this
section if--
* * * * *
(9) A borrower's period of postsecondary education, qualifying FMLA
condition, or military active duty as described in paragraph (c)(8) of
this section, including the time necessary for the borrower to resume
qualifying teaching no later than the beginning of the next regularly
scheduled academic year, does not constitute a break in the required
five consecutive years of qualifying teaching service.
(10) A borrower who was employed as a teacher at more than one
qualifying school, for more than one qualifying educational service
agency, or a combination of both during an academic year and
demonstrates that the combined teaching was the equivalent of full-
time, as supported by the certification of one or more of the chief
administrative officers of the schools or educational service agencies
involved, is considered to have completed one academic year of
qualifying teaching.
* * * * *
(13) A borrower may request forbearance during each of the five
years of qualifying teaching service in accordance with Sec.
685.205(a)(5).
(d) * * *
(1) A qualified borrower is eligible for forgiveness of up to
$5,000, or up to $17,500 if the borrower meets the requirements of
paragraph (c)(4)(ii) or (c)(5)(ii) of this section. The forgiveness
amount is deducted from the aggregate amount of the borrower's Direct
Subsidized Loan or Direct Unsubsidized Loan or Direct Consolidation
Loan obligation that is outstanding after the borrower completes his or
her fifth consecutive complete academic year of teaching as described
in paragraph (c) of this section. Only the outstanding portion of the
Direct Consolidation Loan that was used to repay an eligible Direct
Subsidized Loan, an eligible Direct Unsubsidized Loan, or an eligible
Subsidized or Unsubsidized Federal Stafford Loan qualifies for loan
forgiveness under this section.
* * * * *
0
100. Section 685.218 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (b)(4), removing the words ``FFEL or Direct'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``Direct or FFEL''.
0
B. Revising paragraph (d)(3).
0
C. In paragraph (d)(6), removing the words ``a Perkins Loan, a FFEL
Program loan, or another Direct Loan'' and adding, in their place, the
words ``another Direct Loan, a FFEL Program Loan, or a Perkins Loan''.
0
D. In paragraph (d)(7), removing the words ``a FFEL Program Loan or
another Direct Loan'' and adding, in their place, ``another Direct Loan
or a FFEL Program Loan''.
0
E. In paragraph (e)(1)(ii), removing the number and word ``24 hours''
each time they appear and adding, in their place, the number and word
``72 hours''.
0
F. Revising paragraph (f)(4)(iii).
0
G. In paragraph (g)(2)(i), removing the words ``Direct Loans'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``Direct Loan''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 685.218 Discharge of student loan indebtedness for survivors of
victims of the September 11, 2001, attacks.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) If the individual owed a Direct Loan, a FFEL Program Loan, or a
Perkins Loan at the time of the terrorist attacks on September 11,
2001, documentation that the individual's loans were discharged by the
Secretary, the lender, or the institution due to death may be
substituted for the original or certified copy of a death certificate.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(4) * * *
(iii) Copies of approved joint Direct Loan or FFEL Consolidation
Loan applications or an approved Direct or FFEL PLUS Loan application.
* * * * *
0
101. Section 685.220 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 685.220 Consolidation.
(a) Direct Consolidation Loans. A borrower may consolidate
education loans made under certain Federal programs into a Direct
Consolidation Loan. Loans consolidated into a Direct Consolidation Loan
are discharged when the Direct Consolidation Loan is originated.
(b) Loans eligible for consolidation. The following loans may be
consolidated into a Direct Consolidation Loan:
(1) Subsidized Federal Stafford Loans.
(2) Guaranteed Student Loans.
(3) Federal Insured Student Loans (FISL).
(4) Direct Subsidized Loans.
(5) Direct Subsidized Consolidation Loans.
(6) Federal Perkins Loans.
(7) National Direct Student Loans (NDSL).
(8) National Defense Student Loans (NDSL).
(9) Federal PLUS Loans.
(10) Parent Loans for Undergraduate Students (PLUS).
(11) Direct PLUS Loans.
(12) Direct PLUS Consolidation Loans.
(13) Federal Consolidation Loans.
(14) Unsubsidized Federal Stafford Loans.
(15) Federal Supplemental Loans for Students (SLS).
(16) Direct Unsubsidized Loans.
(17) Direct Unsubsidized Consolidation Loans.
(18) Auxiliary Loans to Assist Students (ALAS).
(19) Health Professions Student Loans (HPSL) and Loans for
Disadvantaged Students (LDS) made under subpart II of part A of title
VII of the Public Health Service Act.
(20) Health Education Assistance Loans (HEAL).
(21) Nursing loans made under subpart II of part B of title VIII of
the Public Health Service Act.
(c) Components of Direct Consolidation Loans. (1) Subsidized
component of Direct Consolidation Loans. The term ``Direct Subsidized
Consolidation Loan'' refers to the portion of a Direct Consolidation
Loan attributable to--
(i) The loans identified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(5) of
this section; and
(ii) The portion of a Federal Consolidation Loan under paragraph
[[Page 65837]]
(b)(13) of this section that is eligible for interest benefits during a
deferment period under section 428C(b)(4)(C) of the Act.
(2) Unsubsidized component of Direct Consolidation Loans. Except as
provided in paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the term ``Direct
Unsubsidized Consolidation Loan'' refers to the portion of a Direct
Consolidation Loan attributable to--
(i) The loans identified in paragraphs (b)(6) through (b)(12) of
this section;
(ii) The portion of a Federal Consolidation Loan under paragraph
(b)(13) of this section that is not eligible for interest benefits
during a deferment period under section 428C(b)(4)(C) of the Act; and
(iii) The loans identified in paragraphs (b)(14) through (b)(21) of
this section.
(3) PLUS component of Direct Consolidation Loans. In the case of a
Direct Consolidation Loan made before July 1, 2006, the term ``Direct
PLUS Consolidation Loan'' refers to the portion of a Direct
Consolidation Loan attributable to the loans identified in paragraphs
(b)(9) through (b)(12) of this section.
(d) Eligibility for a Direct Consolidation Loan. (1) A borrower may
obtain a Direct Consolidation Loan if the borrower meets the following
requirements:
(i) The borrower consolidates at least one Direct Loan Program or
FFEL Program loan.
(ii) On the loans being consolidated, the borrower is--
(A) At the time the borrower applies for the Direct Consolidation
Loan--
(1) In the grace period;
(2) In a repayment period but not in default; or
(3) In default but has made satisfactory repayment arrangements in
accordance with paragraph (2) of the definition of that term in Sec.
685.102(b);
(B) Not subject to a judgment secured through litigation, unless
the judgment has been vacated; or
(C) Not subject to an order for wage garnishment under section 488A
of the Act, unless the order has been lifted.
(iii) The borrower agrees to notify the Secretary of any change in
address.
(2) A borrower may not consolidate a Direct Consolidation Loan or a
Federal Consolidation Loan into a new consolidation loan under this
section unless at least one additional eligible loan is included in the
consolidation, except that a borrower may consolidate a Federal
Consolidation Loan into a new consolidation loan under this section
without including any additional loans if--
(i) The borrower has a Federal Consolidation Loan that is in
default or has been submitted to the guaranty agency by the lender for
default aversion, and the borrower wants to consolidate the Federal
Consolidation Loan into the Direct Loan Program for the purpose of
obtaining an income-contingent repayment plan or an income-based
repayment plan; or
(ii) The borrower has a Federal Consolidation Loan and the borrower
wants to consolidate that loan into the Direct Loan Program for the
purpose of using the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program or the no
accrual of interest benefit for active duty service.
(3) Eligible loans received before or after the date a Direct
Consolidation Loan is made may be added to a subsequent Direct
Consolidation Loan.
(e) Application for a Direct Consolidation Loan. To obtain a Direct
Consolidation Loan, a borrower must submit a completed application to
the Secretary. A borrower may add eligible loans to a Direct
Consolidation Loan by submitting a request to the Secretary within 180
days after the date on which the Direct Consolidation Loan is
originated.
(f) Origination of a consolidation loan. (1)(i) The holder of a
loan that a borrower wishes to consolidate into a Direct Loan must
complete and return the Secretary's request for certification of the
amount owed within 10 business days of receipt or, if it is unable to
provide the certification, provide to the Secretary a written
explanation of the reasons for its inability to provide the
certification.
(ii) If the Secretary approves an application for a consolidation
loan, the Secretary pays to each holder of a loan selected for
consolidation the amount necessary to discharge the loan.
(iii) For a Direct Loan Program or FFEL Program loan that is in
default, the Secretary limits collection costs that may be charged to
the borrower to a maximum of 18.5 percent of the outstanding principal
and interest amount of the defaulted loan. For any other defaulted
Federal education loan, all collection costs that are owed may be
charged to the borrower.
(2) Upon receipt of the proceeds of a Direct Consolidation Loan,
the holder of a consolidated loan must promptly apply the proceeds to
fully discharge the borrower's obligation on the consolidated loan. The
holder of a consolidated loan must notify the borrower that the loan
has been paid in full.
(3) The principal balance of a Direct Consolidation Loan is equal
to the sum of the amounts paid to the holders of the consolidated
loans.
(4) If the amount paid by the Secretary to the holder of a
consolidated loan exceeds the amount needed to discharge that loan, the
holder of the consolidated loan must promptly refund the excess amount
to the Secretary to be credited against the outstanding balance of the
Direct Consolidation Loan.
(5) If the amount paid by the Secretary to the holder of the
consolidated loan is insufficient to discharge that loan, the holder
must notify the Secretary in writing of the remaining amount due on the
loan. The Secretary promptly pays the remaining amount due.
(g) Interest rate. The interest rate on a Direct Subsidized
Consolidation Loan or a Direct Unsubsidized Consolidation Loan is the
rate established in Sec. 685.202(a)(10)(i). The interest rate on a
Direct PLUS Consolidation Loan is the rate established in Sec.
685.202(a)(10)(ii).
(h) Repayment plans. A borrower may choose a repayment plan for a
Direct Consolidation Loan in accordance with Sec. 685.208, and may
change repayment plans in accordance with Sec. 685.210(b).
(i) Repayment period. (1) Except as noted in paragraph (i)(4) of
this section, the repayment period for a Direct Consolidation Loan
begins on the day the loan is disbursed.
(2)(i) Borrowers who entered repayment before July 1, 2006. The
Secretary determines the repayment period under Sec. 685.208(i) on the
basis of the outstanding balances on all of the borrower's loans that
are eligible for consolidation and the balances on other education
loans except as provided in paragraphs (i)(3)(i), (ii), and (iii) of
this section.
(ii) Borrowers entering repayment on or after July 1, 2006. The
Secretary determines the repayment period under Sec. 685.208(j) on the
basis of the outstanding balances on all of the borrower's loans that
are eligible for consolidation and the balances on other education
loans except as provided in paragraphs (i)(3)(i) through (iii) of this
section.
(3)(i) The total amount of outstanding balances on the other
education loans used to determine the repayment period under Sec. Sec.
685.208(i) and (j) may not exceed the amount of the Direct
Consolidation Loan.
(ii) The borrower may not be in default on the other education loan
unless the borrower has made satisfactory repayment arrangements with
the holder of the loan.
(iii) The lender of the other educational loan may not be an
individual.
[[Page 65838]]
(4) A Direct Consolidation Loan that was made based on an
application received before July 1, 2006 receives a grace period if it
includes a Direct Loan Program or FFEL Program loan for which the
borrower was in an in-school period at the time of consolidation. The
repayment period begins the day after the grace period ends.
(j) Repayment schedule. (1) The Secretary provides a borrower of a
Direct Consolidation Loan a repayment schedule before the borrower's
first payment is due. The repayment schedule identifies the borrower's
monthly repayment amount under the repayment plan selected.
(2) If a borrower adds an eligible loan to the consolidation loan
under paragraph (e) of this section, the Secretary makes appropriate
adjustments to the borrower's monthly repayment amount and repayment
period.
(k) Refunds and returns of title IV, HEA program funds received
from schools. If a lender receives a refund or return of title IV, HEA
program funds from a school on a loan that has been consolidated into a
Direct Consolidation Loan, the lender must transmit the refund or
return and an explanation of the source of the refund or return to the
Secretary within 30 days of receipt.
(l) Special provisions for joint consolidation loans. The
provisions of paragraphs (l)(1) through (3) of this section apply to a
Direct Consolidation Loan obtained by two married borrowers in
accordance with the regulations that were in effect for consolidation
applications received prior to July 1, 2006.
(1) Deferment. To obtain a deferment on a joint Direct
Consolidation Loan under Sec. 685.204, both borrowers must meet the
requirements of that section.
(2) Forbearance. To obtain forbearance on a joint Direct
Consolidation Loan under Sec. 685.205, both borrowers must meet the
requirements of that section.
(3) Discharge. (i) If a borrower dies and the Secretary receives
the documentation described in Sec. 685.212(a), the Secretary
discharges an amount equal to the portion of the outstanding balance of
the consolidation loan, as of the date of the borrower's death,
attributable to any of that borrower's loans that were repaid by the
consolidation loan.
(ii) If a borrower meets the requirements for total and permanent
disability discharge under Sec. 685.212(b), the Secretary discharges
an amount equal to the portion of the outstanding balance of the
consolidation loan, as of the date the borrower became totally and
permanently disabled, attributable to any of that borrower's loans that
were repaid by the consolidation loan.
(iii) If a borrower meets the requirements for discharge under
Sec. 685.212(d), (e), or (f) on a loan that was consolidated into a
joint Direct Consolidation Loan, the Secretary discharges the portion
of the consolidation loan equal to the amount of the loan that would be
eligible for discharge under the provisions of Sec. 685.212(d), (e),
or (f) as applicable, and that was repaid by the consolidation loan.
(iv) If a borrower meets the requirements for loan forgiveness
under Sec. 685.212(h) on a loan that was consolidated into a joint
Direct Consolidation Loan, the Secretary repays the portion of the
outstanding balance of the consolidation loan attributable to the loan
that would be eligible for forgiveness under the provisions of Sec.
685.212(h), and that was repaid by the consolidation loan.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1845-0021)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1078-8, 1087a et seq.)
0
102. Section 685.300 is amended by:
0
A. Revising paragraph (a).
0
B. In the introductory text of paragraph (b), removing the word
``shall'' each time it appears and adding, in its place, the word
``must''.
0
C. Removing paragraph (b)(8).
0
D. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(5), (6), and (7) as paragraphs (b)(6),
(7), and (8), respectively.
0
E. Adding a new paragraph (b)(5).
0
F. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 685.300 Agreements between an eligible school and the Secretary
for participation in the Direct Loan Program
(a) General. Participation of a school in the Direct Loan Program
means that eligible students at the school may receive Direct Loans. To
participate in the Direct Loan Program, a school must--
(1) Demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the
school meets the requirements for eligibility under the Act and
applicable regulations; and
(2) Enter into a written program participation agreement with the
Secretary.
(b) * * *
(5) On a monthly basis, reconcile institutional records with Direct
Loan funds received from the Secretary and Direct Loan disbursement
records submitted to and accepted by the Secretary;
* * * * *
(c) Origination. A school that originates loans in the Direct Loan
Program must originate loans to eligible students and parents in
accordance with part D of the Act. The note or evidence of the
borrower's obligation on the loan originated by the school is the
property of the Secretary.
* * * * *
0
103. Section 685.301 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 685.301 Origination of a loan by a Direct Loan Program school.
(a) Determining eligibility and loan amount. (1) A school
participating in the Direct Loan Program must ensure that any
information it provides to the Secretary in connection with loan
origination is complete and accurate. A school must originate a Direct
Loan while the student meets the borrower eligibility requirements of
Sec. 685.200. Except as provided in 34 CFR part 668, subpart E, a
school may rely in good faith upon statements made by the borrower and,
in the case of a parent Direct PLUS Loan borrower, the student and the
parent borrower.
(2) A school must provide to the Secretary borrower information
that includes but is not limited to--
(i) The borrower's eligibility for a loan, as determined in
accordance with Sec. 685.200 and Sec. 685.203;
(ii) The student's loan amount; and
(iii) The anticipated and actual disbursement date or dates and
disbursement amounts of the loan proceeds, as determined in accordance
with Sec. 685.303(d).
(3) Before originating a Direct PLUS Loan for a graduate or
professional student borrower, the school must determine the borrower's
eligibility for a Direct Subsidized and a Direct Unsubsidized Loan. If
the borrower is eligible for a Direct Subsidized or Direct Unsubsidized
Loan, but has not requested the maximum Direct Subsidized or Direct
Unsubsidized Loan amount for which the borrower is eligible, the school
must--
(i) Notify the graduate or professional student borrower of the
maximum Direct Subsidized or Direct Unsubsidized Loan amount that he or
she is eligible to receive and provide the borrower with a comparison
of--
(A) The maximum interest rate for a Direct Subsidized Loan and a
Direct Unsubsidized Loan and the maximum interest rate for a Direct
PLUS Loan;
(B) Periods when interest accrues on a Direct Subsidized Loan and a
Direct Unsubsidized Loan, and periods when interest accrues on a Direct
PLUS Loan; and
[[Page 65839]]
(C) The point at which a Direct Subsidized Loan and a Direct
Unsubsidized Loan enters repayment, and the point at which a Direct
PLUS Loan enters repayment; and
(ii) Give the graduate or professional student borrower the
opportunity to request the maximum Direct Subsidized or Direct
Unsubsidized Loan amount for which the borrower is eligible.
(4) A school may not originate a Direct Subsidized, Direct
Unsubsidized, or Direct PLUS Loan, or a combination of loans, for an
amount that--
(i) The school has reason to know would result in the borrower
exceeding the annual or maximum loan amounts in Sec. 685.203; or
(ii) Exceeds the student's estimated cost of attendance less--
(A) The student's estimated financial assistance for that period;
and
(B) In the case of a Direct Subsidized Loan, the borrower's
expected family contribution for that period.
(5)(i) A school determines a Direct Subsidized or Direct
Unsubsidized Loan amount in accordance with Sec. 685.203.
(ii) When prorating a loan amount for a student enrolled in a
program of study with less than a full academic year remaining, the
school need not recalculate the amount of the loan if the number of
hours for which an eligible student is enrolled changes after the
school originates the loan.
(6) The date of loan origination is the date a school creates the
electronic loan origination record.
(7) If a student has received a determination of need for a Direct
Subsidized Loan that is $200 or less, a school may choose not to
originate a Direct Subsidized Loan for that student and to include the
amount as part of a Direct Unsubsidized Loan.
(8) A school may refuse to originate a Direct Subsidized, Direct
Unsubsidized, or Direct PLUS Loan or may reduce the borrower's
determination of need for the loan if the reason for that action is
documented and provided to the borrower in writing, and if--
(i) The determination is made on a case-by-case basis;
(ii) The documentation supporting the determination is retained in
the student's file; and
(iii) The school does not engage in any pattern or practice that
results in a denial of a borrower's access to Direct Loans because of
the borrower's race, gender, color, religion, national origin, age,
disability status, or income.
(9) A school may not assess a fee for the completion or
certification of any Direct Loan Program forms or information or for
the origination of a Direct Loan.
(10)(i) The minimum period of enrollment for which a school may
originate a Direct Loan is--
(A) At a school that measures academic progress in credit hours and
uses a semester, trimester, or quarter system, or that has terms that
are substantially equal in length with no term less than nine weeks in
length, a single academic term (e.g., a semester or quarter); or
(B) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(10)(ii) or (iii) of this
section, at a school that measures academic progress in clock hours, or
measures academic progress in credit hours but does not use a semester,
trimester, or quarter system and does not have terms that are
substantially equal in length with no term less than nine weeks in
length, the lesser of--
(1) The length of the student's program (or the remaining portion
of that program if the student has less than the full program
remaining) at the school; or
(2) The academic year as defined by the school in accordance with
34 CFR 668.3.
(ii) For a student who transfers into a school from another school
and the prior school originated a loan for a period of enrollment that
overlaps the period of enrollment at the new school, the new school may
originate a loan for the remaining portion of the program or academic
year. In this case the school may originate a loan for an amount that
does not exceed the remaining balance of the student's annual loan
limit.
(iii) For a student who completes a program at a school, where the
student's last loan to complete that program had been for less than an
academic year, and the student then begins a new program at the same
school, the school may originate a loan for the remainder of the
academic year. In this case the school may originate a loan for an
amount that does not exceed the remaining balance of the student's
annual loan limit at the loan level associated with the new program.
(iv) The maximum period for which a school may originate a Direct
Loan is--
(A) Generally an academic year, as defined by the school in
accordance with 34 CFR 668.3, except that the school may use a longer
period of time corresponding to the period to which the school applies
the annual loan limits under Sec. 685.203; or
(B) For a defaulted borrower who has regained eligibility, the
academic year in which the borrower regained eligibility.
(b) Promissory note handling. (1) The Secretary provides promissory
notes for use in the Direct Loan Program. A school may not modify, or
make any additions to, the promissory note without the Secretary's
prior written approval.
(2) A school that originates a loan must ensure that the loan is
supported by a completed promissory note as proof of the borrower's
indebtedness.
(c) Reporting to the Secretary. The Secretary accepts a student's
Payment Data that is submitted in accordance with procedures
established through publication in the Federal Register, and that
contains information the Secretary considers to be accurate in light of
other available information including that previously provided by the
student and the institution. (Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 1845-0021)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.)
0
104. Section 685.303 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a), removing the word ``shall'' and adding, in its
place, the word ``must''.
0
B. Revising paragraph (b)(1).
0
C. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(2) through (b)(4) as paragraphs (b)(3)
through (b)(5), respectively.
0
D. Adding a new paragraph (b)(2).
0
E. Revising redesignated paragraph (b)(3)(i).
0
F. Revising redesignated paragraph (b)(3)(ii).
0
G. Revising redesignated paragraph (b)(5)(i) introductory text.
0
H. In redesignated paragraph (b)(5)(i)(A)(1), removing the citation
``(b)(4)(i)(A)(2)'' and adding, in its place, the citation
``(b)(5)(i)(A)(2)''.
0
I. Revising redesignated paragraph (b)(5)(ii).
0
J. In redesignated paragraph (b)(5)(iii), removing the citation
``(b)(4)(i)(B)'' and adding, in its place, the citation
``(b)(5)(i)(B)''.
0
K. In paragraph (c), removing the word ``shall'' and adding, in its
place, the word ``must''.
0
L. Redesignating paragraphs (d) and (e) as paragraphs (f) and (g),
respectively.
0
M. Adding a new paragraph (d).
0
N. Adding a new paragraph (e).
0
O. Revising redesignated paragraph (g).
0
P. Adding an authority citation after the OMB control number
parenthetical at the end of the section.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 685.303 Processing loan proceeds.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) A school may not disburse loan proceeds to a borrower unless
the borrower has executed a legally enforceable promissory note.
[[Page 65840]]
(2) The Secretary provides Direct Loan funds to a school in
accordance with 34 CFR 668.162.
(3)(i) Except in the case of a late disbursement under paragraph
(f) of this section, or as provided in paragraph (b)(3)(iii) of this
section, a school may disburse loan proceeds only to a student, or a
parent in the case of a Direct PLUS Loan obtained by a parent borrower,
if the school determines the student has continuously maintained
eligibility in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 685.200 from the
beginning of the loan period for which the loan was intended.
(ii) If a student delays attending school for a period of time, the
school may consider that student to have maintained eligibility for the
loan from the first day of the period of enrollment. However, the
school must comply with the requirements under paragraph (b)(4) of this
section.
* * * * *
(5)(i) If a student is enrolled in the first year of an
undergraduate program of study and has not previously received a Direct
Subsidized Loan, a Direct Unsubsidized Loan, a Subsidized or
Unsubsidized Federal Stafford Loan, or a Federal Supplemental Loan for
Students, a school may not disburse the proceeds of a Direct Subsidized
or Direct Unsubsidized Loan until 30 days after the first day of the
student's program of study unless--
* * * * *
(ii) Paragraphs (b)(5)(i)(A) and (B) of this section do not apply
to any loans originated by the school beginning 30 days after the date
the school receives notification from the Secretary of a cohort default
rate, calculated under subpart M or subpart N of 34 CFR part 668, that
causes the school to no longer meet the qualifications outlined in
paragraph (b)(5)(i)(A) or (B) of this section, as applicable.
* * * * *
(d) Determining disbursement dates and amounts. (1) Before
disbursing a loan, a school must determine that all information
required by the promissory note has been provided by the borrower and,
if applicable, the student.
(2) An institution must disburse the loan proceeds on a payment
period basis in accordance with 34 CFR 668.164(b).
(3) Unless paragraph (d)(4) or (d)(6) of this section applies--
(i) If a loan period is more than one payment period, the school
must disburse loan proceeds at least once in each payment period; and
(ii) If a loan period is one payment period, the school must make
at least two disbursements during that payment period.
(A) For a loan originated under Sec. 685.301(a)(10)(i)(A), the
school may not make the second disbursement until the calendar midpoint
between the first and last scheduled days of class of the loan period.
(B) For a loan originated under Sec. 685.301(a)(10)(i)(B), the
school may not make the second disbursement until the student
successfully completes half of the number of credit hours or clock
hours and half of the number of weeks of instructional time in the
payment period.
(4)(i) If one or more payment periods have elapsed before a school
makes a disbursement, the school may include in the disbursement loan
proceeds for completed payment periods.
(ii) If the loan period is equal to one payment period and more
than one-half of it has elapsed, the school may include in the
disbursement loan proceeds for the entire payment period.
(5) The school must disburse loan proceeds in substantially equal
installments, and no installment may exceed one-half of the loan.
(6)(i) A school is not required to make more than one disbursement
if--
(A)(1) The loan period is not more than one semester, one
trimester, one quarter, or, for non term-based schools or schools with
non-standard terms, 4 months; and
(2)(i) Except as provided in paragraph (d)(6)(i)(A)(2)(ii) of this
section, the school has a cohort default rate, calculated under subpart
M of 34 CFR part 668 of less than 10 percent for each of the three most
recent fiscal years for which data are available; or
(ii) For loan disbursements made on or after October 1, 2011, the
school in which the student is enrolled has a cohort default rate,
calculated under either subpart M or subpart N of 34 CFR part 668, of
less than 15 percent for each of the three most recent fiscal years for
which data are available; or
(B) The school is an eligible home institution originating a loan
to cover the cost of attendance in a study abroad program and has a
cohort default rate, calculated under subpart M or subpart N of 34 CFR
part 668, of less than five percent for the single most recent fiscal
year for which data are available.
(ii) Paragraphs (d)(6)(i)(A) and (B) of this section do not apply
to any loans originated by the school beginning 30 days after the date
the school receives notification from the Secretary of a cohort default
rate, calculated under subpart M or subpart N of 34 CFR part 668, that
causes the school to no longer meet the qualifications outlined in
paragraph (d)(6)(i)(A) or (B) of this section, as applicable.
(iii) Paragraph (d)(6)(i)(B) of this section does not apply to any
loans originated by the school beginning 30 days after the date the
school receives notification from the Secretary of a cohort default
rate, calculated under subpart M or subpart N of 34 CFR part 668, that
causes the school to no longer meet the qualifications outlined in that
paragraph.
(e) Annual loan limit progression based on completion of an
academic year. (1) If a school measures academic progress in an
educational program in credit hours and uses either standard terms
(semesters, trimesters, or quarters) or nonstandard terms that are
substantially equal in length, and each term is at least nine weeks of
instructional time in length, a student is considered to have completed
an academic year and progresses to the next annual loan limit when the
academic year calendar period has elapsed.
(2) If a school measures academic progress in an educational
program in credit hours and uses nonstandard terms that are not
substantially equal in length or each term is not at least nine weeks
of instructional time in length, or measures academic progress in
credit hours and does not have academic terms, a student is considered
to have completed an academic year and progresses to the next annual
loan limit at the later of--
(i) The student's completion of the weeks of instructional time in
the student's academic year; or
(ii) The date, as determined by the school, that the student has
successfully completed the academic coursework in the student's
academic year.
(3) If a school measures academic progress in an educational
program in clock hours, a student is considered to have completed an
academic year and progresses to the next annual loan limit at the later
of--
(i) The student's completion of the weeks of instructional time in
the student's academic year; or
(ii) The date, as determined by the school, that the student has
successfully completed the clock hours in the student's academic year.
(4) For purposes of this section, terms in a loan period are
substantially equal in length if no term in the loan period is more
than two weeks of instructional time longer than any other term in that
loan period.
* * * * *
(g) Treatment of excess loan proceeds. Before the disbursement of
any Direct
[[Page 65841]]
Subsidized Loan, Direct Unsubsidized Loan, or Direct PLUS Loan
proceeds, if a school learns that the borrower will receive or has
received financial aid for the period of enrollment for which the loan
was intended that exceeds the amount of assistance for which the
student is eligible (except for Federal Work-Study Program funds up to
$300), the school must reduce or eliminate the overaward by either--
(1) Using the student's Direct Unsubsidized Loan, Direct PLUS Loan,
or State-sponsored or another non-Federal loan to cover the expected
family contribution, if not already done; or
(2) Reducing one or more subsequent disbursements to eliminate the
overaward.
* * * * *
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.)
0
105. Section 685.304 is amended by:
0
A. Revising paragraph (a)(1).
0
B. In paragraph (a)(2), removing the words ``prior Direct PLUS Loan or
Federal PLUS Loan'' and adding, in their place, the words ``prior
student Direct PLUS Loan or student Federal PLUS Loan''.
0
C. In paragraph (a)(7)(i)(A), removing the word ``or'' the first time
it appears and adding, in its place, the word ``of''.
0
D. Revising paragraph (a)(7)(iii).
0
E. Revising paragraph (a)(7)(iv).
0
F. Revising paragraph (b)(3).
0
G. In paragraph (b)(4)(ii), removing the words ``income contingent
repayment plans'' and adding, in their place, the words ``income-
contingent repayment''.
0
H. Adding a new paragraph (b)(8).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 685.304 Counseling borrowers.
(a) * * *
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(8) of this section, a
school must ensure that entrance counseling is conducted with each
Direct Subsidized Loan or Direct Unsubsidized Loan student borrower
prior to making the first disbursement of the proceeds of a loan to a
student borrower unless the student borrower has received a prior
Direct Subsidized Loan, Direct Unsubsidized Loan, Subsidized or
Unsubsidized Federal Stafford Loan, or Federal SLS Loan.
* * * * *
(7) * * *
(iii) For a graduate or professional student Direct PLUS Loan
borrower who has received a prior Direct Subsidized Loan, Direct
Unsubsidized Loan, Subsidized Federal Stafford Loan, or Unsubsidized
Federal Stafford Loan, provide the information specified in Sec.
685.301(a)(3)(i)(A) through (a)(3)(i)(C); and
(iv) For a graduate or professional student Direct PLUS Loan
borrower who has not received a prior Direct Subsidized Loan, Direct
Unsubsidized Loan, Subsidized Federal Stafford Loan, or Unsubsidized
Federal Stafford Loan, provide the information specified in paragraph
(a)(6)(i) through paragraph (a)(6)(xii) of this section.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) If a student borrower withdraws from school without the
school's prior knowledge or fails to complete the exit counseling as
required, exit counseling must, within 30 days after the school learns
that the student borrower has withdrawn from school or failed to
complete the exit counseling as required, be provided either through
interactive electronic means, by mailing written counseling materials
to the student borrower at the student borrower's last known address,
or by sending written counseling materials to an email address provided
by the student borrower that is not an email address associated with
the school sending the counseling materials.
* * * * *
(8)(i) For students who have received loans under both the FFEL
Program and the Direct Loan Program for attendance at a school, the
school's compliance with the exit counseling requirements in paragraph
(b) of this section satisfies the exit counseling requirements in 34
CFR 682.604(a) if the school ensures that the exit counseling also
provides the borrower with the information described in 34 CFR
682.604(a)(2)(i) and (ii).
(ii) A student's completion of electronic interactive exit
counseling offered by the Secretary satisfies the requirements of
paragraph (b) of this section and, for students who have also received
FFEL Program loans for attendance at the school, 34 CFR 682.604(a).
* * * * *
Sec. 685.305 [Amended]
0
106. Section 685.305 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a), removing the word ``shall'' and adding, in its
place, the word ``must''.
0
B. In paragraph (b), removing the word ``shall'' and adding, in its
place, the word ``must''.
0
C. In paragraph (c), removing the word ``shall'' and adding, it its
place, the word ``must''.
Sec. 685.306 [Amended]
0
107. Section 685.306 is amended by:
0
A. In paragraph (a)(1), removing the word ``Shall'' and adding, in its
place, the word ``Must''.
0
B. In paragraph (a)(2), removing the word ``Shall'' and adding, in its
place, the word ``Must''.
0
C. In paragraph (b), removing the word ``shall'' and adding, in its
place, the word ``must''.
Sec. 685.307 [Amended]
0
108. Section 685.307(b) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' and
adding, in its place, the word ``must''.
0
109. Section 685.309 is amended by:
0
A. In the introductory text of paragraph (a), removing the word
``shall'' and adding, in its place, the word ``must''.
0
B. Revising paragraph (b).
0
C. In paragraph (c), removing the word ``shall'' and adding, in its
place, the word ``must''.
0
D. In paragraph (d), removing the word ``shall'' and adding, in its
place, the word ``must''.
0
E. In paragraph (e), removing the word ``shall'' and adding, in its
place, the word ``must''.
0
F. In paragraph (f), removing the word ``shall'' and adding, in its
place, the word ``must''.
0
G. In paragraph (g), removing the words ``Except for funds paid to a
school under section 452(b)(1) of the Act, funds'' and adding, in their
place, the word ``Funds''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 685.309 Administrative and fiscal control and fund accounting
requirements for schools participating in the Direct Loan Program.
* * * * *
(b) Enrollment reporting process. (1) Upon receipt of an enrollment
report from the Secretary, a school must update all information
included in the report and return the report to the Secretary--
[[Page 65842]]
(i) In the manner and format prescribed by the Secretary; and
(ii) Within the timeframe prescribed by the Secretary.
(2) Unless it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report
to the Secretary within the next 60 days, a school must notify the
Secretary within 30 days after the date the school discovers that--
(i) A loan under title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a
student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the school, and
the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or
failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which
the loan was intended; or
(ii) A student who is enrolled at the school and who received a
loan under title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent
address.
* * * * *
Subpart D [Removed and Reserved]
0
110. Subpart D of part 685 is removed and reserved.
[FR Doc. 2013-25331 Filed 10-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P