Airworthiness Directives; MD Helicopters, Inc., Helicopters, 65180-65183 [2013-24039]
Download as PDF
65180
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 211 / Thursday, October 31, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
helicopters identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
2013–22–01 Bell Helicopter Textron
Canada: Amendment 39–17633; Docket
No. FAA–2013–0526; Directorate
Identifier 2008–SW–14–AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Model 206L–4 and 407
helicopters, with a freewheel aft bearing cap
(cap), part number (P/N) 406–040–509–101,
with a serial number with a prefix of ‘‘A-’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 Oct 30, 2013
Jkt 232001
and Nos. 1833 through 1912, installed,
certificated in any category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as
certain caps being manufactured without a
lubrication channel to allow oil flow into the
aft bearing support assembly, which could
result in failure of the freewheel unit and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
(c) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective December 5,
2013.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
Within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS):
(1) Remove and disassemble each
freewheel assembly.
(2) Replace the sprag and retainer (item 7),
the output shaft (item 10), and the aft seal
(item 3), as depicted in Figure 2 of Bell Alert
Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 206L–04–129 for
the Model 206L–4 and ASB No. 407–04–66
for the Model 407, both Revision A, and both
dated December 1, 2004.
(3) Visually inspect the remaining
freewheel part details for a missing channel.
(4) If the channel is missing, replace or
rework the cap assembly by following the
instructions depicted in Figure 3 of ASB
206L–04–129 or ASB 407 04–66, as
applicable for your model helicopter. Using
a vibrating stylus, mark the letter ‘‘R’’ at the
end of the serial number on the cap
assembly.
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Eric Haight,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft
Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137, telephone (817)
222–5110, email: eric.haight@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(g) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) AD
No. CF–2004–17R1, dated February 11, 2005.
You may view the TCCA AD at https://
www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FAA–
2013–0526.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 6300: Main Rotor Drive System.
(i) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Bell Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No.
206L–04–129, Revision A, dated December 1,
2004.
(ii) Bell ASB No. 407–04–66, Revision A,
dated December 1, 2004.
(3) For Bell service information identified
in this AD, contact Bell Helicopter Textron,
Inc., P.O. Box 482, Fort Worth, Texas 76101,
telephone (817) 280–3391, fax (817) 280–
6466.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 1,
2013.
Kim Smith,
Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–25310 Filed 10–30–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0401; Directorate
Identifier 2012–SW–047–AD; Amendment
39–17606; AD 2013–19–24]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; MD
Helicopters, Inc., Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2003–08–
51 for MD Helicopters, Inc. (MDHI),
Model 369A, 369D, 369E, 369H, 369HE,
369HM, 369HS, 369F and 369FF
helicopters with certain MDHI or
Helicopter Technology Company (HTC)
tail rotor blades installed. AD 2003–08–
51 required reducing the retirement life
of each tail rotor blade (blade),
performing a one-time visual inspection
of each blade’s pitch horn (pitch horn)
for a crack or corrosion, and replacing
any cracked blade or any blade that has
exceeded its retirement life with an
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31OCR1.SGM
31OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 211 / Thursday, October 31, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
airworthy blade. AD 2003–08–51 also
required reporting information to the
FAA within 24 hours following the onetime inspection. Since we issued AD
2003–08–51, an accident in England
prompted an investigation that showed
corrosion on the blade’s pitch horn that
had not been detected under the paint.
This new AD retains some of the
requirements of AD 2003–08–51 and
also requires paint removal for all pitch
horn inspections, inspecting for pitting
and the shot peen surface’s condition in
addition to cracks and corrosion, and
adds certain part-numbered blades to
the applicability. These actions are
intended to prevent a pitch horn from
cracking, leading to vibration, loss of
tail rotor pitch control, and subsequent
loss of tail rotor and helicopter control.
DATES: This AD is effective December 5,
2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain documents listed in this AD
as of December 5, 2013.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact MD
Helicopters, Inc., Attn: Customer
Support Division, 4555 E. McDowell
Rd., Mail Stop M615, Mesa, AZ 85215–
9734; telephone 1–800–388–3378; fax
480–346–6813; email
serviceengineering@mdhelicopters.com;
Web site https://www.mdhelicopters.com
or contact Helicopter Technology
Company, 12923 South Spring Street,
Los Angeles, CA 90061; telephone 310–
523–2750; email gburdorf@
helicoptertech.com; Web site
www.helicoptertech.com.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
Docket Operations Office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, any
incorporated-by-reference service
information, the economic evaluation,
any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations Office (phone: 800–
647–5527) is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations
Office, M–30, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
Guerin, Aviation Safety Engineer, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood,
California 90712; telephone (562) 627–
5232; email fred.guerin@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 Oct 30, 2013
Jkt 232001
Discussion
On May 13, 2013, at 78 FR 27867, the
Federal Register published our notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM), which
proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 by
removing AD No. 2003–08–51 (68 FR
39449, July 2, 2003; corrected 68 FR
47447, August 11, 2003) and by adding
an AD that would apply to MDHI Model
369A, 369D, 369E, 369H, 369HE,
369HM, 369HS, 369F and 369FF
helicopters with a tail rotor blade
(blade) part number (P/N) 369D21640–
501, 369D21640–503, 369D21641–501,
369D21641–503, 369D21642–501,
369D21642–503, 369D21643–501, or
369D21643–503 installed, or with an
HTC blade P/N 500P3100–101,
500P3100–301, 500P3300–501, or
500P3500–701 installed. AD No. 2003–
08–51 required reducing the retirement
life of the blade, performing a one-time
visual inspection of each pitch horn for
a crack or corrosion, and replacing any
cracked blade or any blade that has
exceeded its retirement life. AD No.
2003–08–51 was prompted by two
reports of cracked pitch horns that
failed during flight. The cracks
developed before the blades reached
their retirement lives.
Actions Since AD 2003–08–51 Was
Issued
Since we published AD No. 2003–08–
51, investigation of an accident in
England found corrosion on the pitch
horn that was not detected under the
paint. The corrosion compromised the
shot peen surface, which caused
premature fatigue failure.
As a result, the NPRM (78 FR 27867,
May 13, 2013) proposed to require
establishing a retirement life for new
applicable blades of 400 hours time-inservice (TIS), replacing within 10 hours
TIS any installed blades with 390 to 700
hours TIS, and replacing before further
flight any blades with more than 700
hours TIS. Within 60 days and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed one
year, the NPRM proposed to inspect all
other blades with a 10X or higher power
magnifying glass for a crack, pitting,
corrosion, and the condition of the
dimpled shot peen surface. If there is a
crack, pitting, corrosion, or a
nonconforming shot peen surface, the
NPRM proposed to require replacement
of the blade with an airworthy blade.
The proposed requirements were
intended to prevent a pitch horn from
cracking and separating from the blade,
leading to an unbalanced condition,
vibration, loss of tail rotor pitch control,
and loss of directional control of the
helicopter.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65181
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD, but
we did not receive any comments on the
NPRM (78 FR 27867, May 13, 2013).
FAA’s Determination
We have reviewed the relevant
information and determined that an
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other products of
these same type designs and that air
safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD requirements as
proposed.
Related Service Information
We reviewed MDHI Service Bulletins
SB369D–210, SB369E–105, SB369F–
091, and SB369H–252, all dated
November 21, 2011, and HTC
Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 3100–5,
dated August 25, 2011 (service
bulletins). The service bulletins specify
removing the paint from the pitch horn,
performing an inspection of the blade
using a 10x magnifying glass and a
bright light, repainting the pitch horn
area, and repeating the inspection
annually. The service bulletins state that
no corrosion, pitting, or cracking is
acceptable. The MDHI service bulletins
adds that a lack, removal, or blending of
the shot peen surface is unacceptable.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
827 helicopters of U.S. Registry and that
labor costs will average $85 a workhour. Based on these estimates, we
expect the following costs:
• The inspection will require 4.5
work hours, and parts will cost $20 for
a total cost of about $403 per helicopter
and $333,281 for the U.S. fleet.
• Replacing a tail rotor blade, if
needed, would require 1 work hour.
Parts would cost $15,951, for a total cost
of $16,036 per helicopter.
• The cost is negligible to revise the
Airworthiness Limitations section of the
maintenance manual to reflect a blade’s
new retirement life.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
E:\FR\FM\31OCR1.SGM
31OCR1
65182
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 211 / Thursday, October 31, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2003–08–51, Amendment 39–13215 (68
FR 39449, August 11, 2003; correction
68 FR 47447, August 11, 2003), and
adding the following new (AD):
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
2013–19–24 MD Helicopters, Inc.:
Amendment 39–17606; Docket No.
FAA–2013–0401; Directorate Identifier
2012–SW–047–AD.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 Oct 30, 2013
Jkt 232001
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to MD Helicopters, Inc.
(MDHI), Model 369A, 369D, 369E, 369H,
369HE, 369HM, 369HS, 369F and 369FF
helicopters with a tail rotor blade (blade) part
number (P/N) 369D21640–501, 369D21640–
503, 369D21641–501, 369D21641–503,
369D21642–501, 369D21642–503,
369D21643–501, or 369D21643–503
installed, or with a Helicopter Technology
Company blade P/N 500P3100–101,
500P3100–301, 500P3300–501, or 500P3500–
701 installed, certificated in any category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as
the tail rotor blade pitch horn (pitch horn)
separating from the tail rotor blade, leading
to an unbalanced condition, vibration, loss of
tail rotor pitch control and loss of directional
control of the helicopter.
(c) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD No. 2003–08–51,
Amendment 39–13215 (68 FR 39449, July 2,
2003; correction 68 FR 47447, August 11,
2003).
(d) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective December 5,
2013.
(e) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(f) Required Actions
(1) Before further flight, for each applicable
blade, revise the Airworthiness Limitations
section of the maintenance manual to reflect
that the blade has a retirement life of 400
hours time-in-service (TIS).
(2) For helicopters with an applicable
blade installed that has 390 through 700
hours TIS, within 10 hours TIS, replace the
blade with an airworthy blade.
(3) For all other applicable helicopters,
within 60 days, and thereafter at intervals not
to exceed one year, remove the paint from the
blade pitch control arm in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions, Section
2.A.(1) through 2.A.(3), of MDHI Service
Bulletins SB369D–210, SB369E–105,
SB369F–091, and SB369H–252, all dated
November 21, 2011, as applicable to your
model helicopter.
(i) Using a 10X or higher power magnifying
glass, inspect all four sides and the pocket of
the blade pitch control arm for a crack,
pitting, or corrosion and for the condition of
the dimpled shot peen surface by referring to
Figure 1 of MDHI Service Bulletins SB369D–
210, SB369E–105, SB369F–091, and
SB369H–252, as applicable to your model
helicopter, and by reviewing the rotorcraft
maintenance records to determine whether
rework was done in this area.
(ii) If there is pitting, corrosion, a crack,
blending or removal of any of the dimpled
shot peen surface, or any indication that the
shot peen has not been done, replace the
blade with an airworthy blade.
(iii) If there is no pitting, corrosion, cracks,
or blending or removal of any of the dimpled
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
shot peen surface, refinish the stripped pitch
control arm in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, Section
2.A.(6) through 2.A.(7), of MDHI Service
Bulletins SB369D–210, SB369E–105,
SB369F–091, and SB369H–252, as applicable
to your model helicopter.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, may approve
AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to:
Fred Guerin, Aviation Safety Engineer, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 3960
Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California
90712; telephone (562) 627–5232; email
fred.guerin@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(3) AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD No. 2003–08–51 (68 FR
39449, July 2, 2003; correction 68 FR 47447,
August 11, 2003) are approved as AMOCs for
the corresponding requirements in this AD.
(h) Additional Information
MD Helicopters, Inc., maintenance
manuals CSP–HMI2, TR12–001, CHP–H–4,
and TR12–001, which are not incorporated
by reference, contain additional information
about the subject of this AD. For service
information identified in this AD, contact
MD Helicopters, Inc., Attn: Customer
Support Division, 4555 E. McDowell Rd.,
Mail Stop M615, Mesa, AZ 85215–9734;
telephone 1–800–388–3378; fax 480–346–
6813; email serviceengineering@
mdhelicopters.com; Web site https://
www.mdhelicopters.com or contact
Helicopter Technology Company, 12923
South Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90061;
telephone 310–523–2750; email gburdorf@
helicoptertech.com; Web site
www.helicoptertech.com. You may review a
copy of this information at the FAA, Office
of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth,
Texas 76137.
(i) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 6410, Tail Rotor Blades.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) MD Helicopters Service Bulletin
SB369D–210, dated November 21, 2011.
(ii) MD Helicopters Service Bulletin
SB369E–105, dated November 21, 2011.
(iii) MD Helicopters Service Bulletin
SB369F–091, dated November 21, 2011.
E:\FR\FM\31OCR1.SGM
31OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 211 / Thursday, October 31, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(iv) MD Helicopters Service Bulletin
SB369H–252, dated November 21, 2011.
Note 1 to paragraph (j)(2): MD Helicopters
Service Bulletins SB369D–210, SB369E–105,
SB369F–091, and SB369H–252, all dated
November 21, 2011, are co-published as one
document.
(3) For MD Helicopters service information
identified in this AD, contact MD
Helicopters, Inc., Attn: Customer Support
Division, 4555 E. McDowell Rd., Mail Stop
M615, Mesa, AZ 85215–9734; telephone 1–
800–388–3378; fax 480–346–6813; email
serviceengineering@mdhelicopters.com; Web
site https://www.mdhelicopters.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
(5) You may also view this service
information that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on September
18, 2013.
Kim Smith,
Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–24039 Filed 10–30–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0624; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–071–AD; Amendment
39–17632; AD 2013–21–08]
Discussion
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; ATR—GIE
´
Avions de Transport Regional
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
ATR—GIE Avions de Transport
´
Regional Model ATR72–101, –201,
–102, –202, –211, –212, and –212A
airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports of airplane incidents and
accidents that have occurred because of
low-level fuel tank situations and fuel
starvation that resulted in engine
flameouts. This AD requires installing a
fuel quantity indicator (FQI) equipped
with a locking adaptor on the electrical
connector. We are issuing this AD to
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 Oct 30, 2013
Jkt 232001
prevent an engine flame-out, which
could result in reduced controllability
of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
December 5, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of December 5, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-0624 or in
person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact ATR—GIE Avions de
´
´
Transport Regional, 1, Allee Pierre
Nadot, 31712 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 (0) 5 62 21 62 21; fax +33
(0) 5 62 21 67 18; email
continued.airworthiness@atr.fr; Internet
https://www.aerochain.com. You may
review this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1137;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to the specified products. The
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on July 18, 2013 (78 FR 42898).
The NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products.
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013–0047,
dated March 4, 2013 (referred to after
this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
Large aeroplane incidents and accidents
have occurred because of fuel tank low level
situations, or because of fuel starvation,
resulting in one or several engine(s) flameout. The results of the investigation into an
ATR 72 accident in August 2005 have shown
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65183
that overruling standard operational
procedures and maintenance practices have
led to this kind of occurrence.
Consequently, additional actions to help
avoid maintenance errors, like installation of
a wrong gauge or wrong indicator, need to be
taken.
Although it is recognised that the fuel
(indicating) system of the ATR 42/72 type
design is compliant with the applicable
requirements, the risk of other maintenance
errors will be mitigated by making
installation of an ATR 42 Fuel Quantity
Indicator (FQI) on an ATR 72 aeroplane
mechanically impossible through a specific
design change on the ATR 72.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD requires modification of the ATR
72 FQI by installing a locking adaptor on the
electrical connector. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the
AD docket.
We are issuing this AD to prevent an
engine flame-out, which could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-06240002.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM (78
FR 42898, July 18, 2013) or on the
determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
as proposed—except for minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these
minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (78 FR
42898, July 18, 2013) for correcting the
unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 42898,
July 18, 2013).
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this AD affects 25 products
of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it
takes 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this AD. The average labor rate is $85
per work-hour. Required parts would
cost about $3,882 per product. Where
the service information lists required
parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there
will be no charge for these parts. As we
do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur
costs higher than estimated here. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of
E:\FR\FM\31OCR1.SGM
31OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65180-65183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24039]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0401; Directorate Identifier 2012-SW-047-AD;
Amendment 39-17606; AD 2013-19-24]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; MD Helicopters, Inc., Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2003-08-51 for
MD Helicopters, Inc. (MDHI), Model 369A, 369D, 369E, 369H, 369HE,
369HM, 369HS, 369F and 369FF helicopters with certain MDHI or
Helicopter Technology Company (HTC) tail rotor blades installed. AD
2003-08-51 required reducing the retirement life of each tail rotor
blade (blade), performing a one-time visual inspection of each blade's
pitch horn (pitch horn) for a crack or corrosion, and replacing any
cracked blade or any blade that has exceeded its retirement life with
an
[[Page 65181]]
airworthy blade. AD 2003-08-51 also required reporting information to
the FAA within 24 hours following the one-time inspection. Since we
issued AD 2003-08-51, an accident in England prompted an investigation
that showed corrosion on the blade's pitch horn that had not been
detected under the paint. This new AD retains some of the requirements
of AD 2003-08-51 and also requires paint removal for all pitch horn
inspections, inspecting for pitting and the shot peen surface's
condition in addition to cracks and corrosion, and adds certain part-
numbered blades to the applicability. These actions are intended to
prevent a pitch horn from cracking, leading to vibration, loss of tail
rotor pitch control, and subsequent loss of tail rotor and helicopter
control.
DATES: This AD is effective December 5, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain documents listed in this AD as of December 5,
2013.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact MD
Helicopters, Inc., Attn: Customer Support Division, 4555 E. McDowell
Rd., Mail Stop M615, Mesa, AZ 85215-9734; telephone 1-800-388-3378; fax
480-346-6813; email serviceengineering@mdhelicopters.com; Web site
https://www.mdhelicopters.com or contact Helicopter Technology Company,
12923 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90061; telephone 310-523-
2750; email gburdorf@helicoptertech.com; Web site
www.helicoptertech.com.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, any incorporated-by-reference
service information, the economic evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations
Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations Office, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Guerin, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California 90712;
telephone (562) 627-5232; email fred.guerin@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
On May 13, 2013, at 78 FR 27867, the Federal Register published our
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), which proposed to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by removing AD No. 2003-08-51 (68 FR 39449, July 2, 2003;
corrected 68 FR 47447, August 11, 2003) and by adding an AD that would
apply to MDHI Model 369A, 369D, 369E, 369H, 369HE, 369HM, 369HS, 369F
and 369FF helicopters with a tail rotor blade (blade) part number (P/N)
369D21640-501, 369D21640-503, 369D21641-501, 369D21641-503, 369D21642-
501, 369D21642-503, 369D21643-501, or 369D21643-503 installed, or with
an HTC blade P/N 500P3100-101, 500P3100-301, 500P3300-501, or 500P3500-
701 installed. AD No. 2003-08-51 required reducing the retirement life
of the blade, performing a one-time visual inspection of each pitch
horn for a crack or corrosion, and replacing any cracked blade or any
blade that has exceeded its retirement life. AD No. 2003-08-51 was
prompted by two reports of cracked pitch horns that failed during
flight. The cracks developed before the blades reached their retirement
lives.
Actions Since AD 2003-08-51 Was Issued
Since we published AD No. 2003-08-51, investigation of an accident
in England found corrosion on the pitch horn that was not detected
under the paint. The corrosion compromised the shot peen surface, which
caused premature fatigue failure.
As a result, the NPRM (78 FR 27867, May 13, 2013) proposed to
require establishing a retirement life for new applicable blades of 400
hours time-in-service (TIS), replacing within 10 hours TIS any
installed blades with 390 to 700 hours TIS, and replacing before
further flight any blades with more than 700 hours TIS. Within 60 days
and thereafter at intervals not to exceed one year, the NPRM proposed
to inspect all other blades with a 10X or higher power magnifying glass
for a crack, pitting, corrosion, and the condition of the dimpled shot
peen surface. If there is a crack, pitting, corrosion, or a
nonconforming shot peen surface, the NPRM proposed to require
replacement of the blade with an airworthy blade. The proposed
requirements were intended to prevent a pitch horn from cracking and
separating from the blade, leading to an unbalanced condition,
vibration, loss of tail rotor pitch control, and loss of directional
control of the helicopter.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD, but we did not receive any comments on the NPRM (78 FR 27867,
May 13, 2013).
FAA's Determination
We have reviewed the relevant information and determined that an
unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of these same type designs and that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD requirements as proposed.
Related Service Information
We reviewed MDHI Service Bulletins SB369D-210, SB369E-105, SB369F-
091, and SB369H-252, all dated November 21, 2011, and HTC Mandatory
Service Bulletin No. 3100-5, dated August 25, 2011 (service bulletins).
The service bulletins specify removing the paint from the pitch horn,
performing an inspection of the blade using a 10x magnifying glass and
a bright light, repainting the pitch horn area, and repeating the
inspection annually. The service bulletins state that no corrosion,
pitting, or cracking is acceptable. The MDHI service bulletins adds
that a lack, removal, or blending of the shot peen surface is
unacceptable.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 827 helicopters of U.S.
Registry and that labor costs will average $85 a work-hour. Based on
these estimates, we expect the following costs:
The inspection will require 4.5 work hours, and parts will
cost $20 for a total cost of about $403 per helicopter and $333,281 for
the U.S. fleet.
Replacing a tail rotor blade, if needed, would require 1
work hour. Parts would cost $15,951, for a total cost of $16,036 per
helicopter.
The cost is negligible to revise the Airworthiness
Limitations section of the maintenance manual to reflect a blade's new
retirement life.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
[[Page 65182]]
air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air
commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because
it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2003-08-51, Amendment 39-13215 (68 FR 39449, August 11, 2003;
correction 68 FR 47447, August 11, 2003), and adding the following new
(AD):
2013-19-24 MD Helicopters, Inc.: Amendment 39-17606; Docket No. FAA-
2013-0401; Directorate Identifier 2012-SW-047-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to MD Helicopters, Inc. (MDHI), Model 369A,
369D, 369E, 369H, 369HE, 369HM, 369HS, 369F and 369FF helicopters
with a tail rotor blade (blade) part number (P/N) 369D21640-501,
369D21640-503, 369D21641-501, 369D21641-503, 369D21642-501,
369D21642-503, 369D21643-501, or 369D21643-503 installed, or with a
Helicopter Technology Company blade P/N 500P3100-101, 500P3100-301,
500P3300-501, or 500P3500-701 installed, certificated in any
category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as the tail rotor blade
pitch horn (pitch horn) separating from the tail rotor blade,
leading to an unbalanced condition, vibration, loss of tail rotor
pitch control and loss of directional control of the helicopter.
(c) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD No. 2003-08-51, Amendment 39-13215 (68 FR
39449, July 2, 2003; correction 68 FR 47447, August 11, 2003).
(d) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective December 5, 2013.
(e) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.
(f) Required Actions
(1) Before further flight, for each applicable blade, revise the
Airworthiness Limitations section of the maintenance manual to
reflect that the blade has a retirement life of 400 hours time-in-
service (TIS).
(2) For helicopters with an applicable blade installed that has
390 through 700 hours TIS, within 10 hours TIS, replace the blade
with an airworthy blade.
(3) For all other applicable helicopters, within 60 days, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed one year, remove the paint
from the blade pitch control arm in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, Section 2.A.(1) through 2.A.(3), of
MDHI Service Bulletins SB369D-210, SB369E-105, SB369F-091, and
SB369H-252, all dated November 21, 2011, as applicable to your model
helicopter.
(i) Using a 10X or higher power magnifying glass, inspect all
four sides and the pocket of the blade pitch control arm for a
crack, pitting, or corrosion and for the condition of the dimpled
shot peen surface by referring to Figure 1 of MDHI Service Bulletins
SB369D-210, SB369E-105, SB369F-091, and SB369H-252, as applicable to
your model helicopter, and by reviewing the rotorcraft maintenance
records to determine whether rework was done in this area.
(ii) If there is pitting, corrosion, a crack, blending or
removal of any of the dimpled shot peen surface, or any indication
that the shot peen has not been done, replace the blade with an
airworthy blade.
(iii) If there is no pitting, corrosion, cracks, or blending or
removal of any of the dimpled shot peen surface, refinish the
stripped pitch control arm in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, Section 2.A.(6) through 2.A.(7), of MDHI Service
Bulletins SB369D-210, SB369E-105, SB369F-091, and SB369H-252, as
applicable to your model helicopter.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to: Fred Guerin,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood,
California 90712; telephone (562) 627-5232; email
fred.guerin@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(3) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD No. 2003-08-
51 (68 FR 39449, July 2, 2003; correction 68 FR 47447, August 11,
2003) are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding requirements in
this AD.
(h) Additional Information
MD Helicopters, Inc., maintenance manuals CSP-HMI2, TR12-001,
CHP-H-4, and TR12-001, which are not incorporated by reference,
contain additional information about the subject of this AD. For
service information identified in this AD, contact MD Helicopters,
Inc., Attn: Customer Support Division, 4555 E. McDowell Rd., Mail
Stop M615, Mesa, AZ 85215-9734; telephone 1-800-388-3378; fax 480-
346-6813; email serviceengineering@mdhelicopters.com; Web site
https://www.mdhelicopters.com or contact Helicopter Technology
Company, 12923 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90061; telephone
310-523-2750; email gburdorf@helicoptertech.com; Web site
www.helicoptertech.com. You may review a copy of this information at
the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
(i) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6410, Tail Rotor
Blades.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) MD Helicopters Service Bulletin SB369D-210, dated November
21, 2011.
(ii) MD Helicopters Service Bulletin SB369E-105, dated November
21, 2011.
(iii) MD Helicopters Service Bulletin SB369F-091, dated November
21, 2011.
[[Page 65183]]
(iv) MD Helicopters Service Bulletin SB369H-252, dated November
21, 2011.
Note 1 to paragraph (j)(2): MD Helicopters Service Bulletins
SB369D-210, SB369E-105, SB369F-091, and SB369H-252, all dated
November 21, 2011, are co-published as one document.
(3) For MD Helicopters service information identified in this
AD, contact MD Helicopters, Inc., Attn: Customer Support Division,
4555 E. McDowell Rd., Mail Stop M615, Mesa, AZ 85215-9734; telephone
1-800-388-3378; fax 480-346-6813; email
serviceengineering@mdhelicopters.com; Web site https://www.mdhelicopters.com.
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222-5110.
(5) You may also view this service information that is
incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on September 18, 2013.
Kim Smith,
Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-24039 Filed 10-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P