Request for Information: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Enhancing Retail Food Store Eligibility; Extension of Comment Period, 64468-64470 [2013-25451]
Download as PDF
64468
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2013 / Notices
certifying authority in the foreign
country that certifies that the sugar
being exported to the United States was
produced in the foreign country that has
the TRQ allocation. The Foreign
Agriculture will collect information
using form FAS–961.
Need and Use of the Information: FAS
will collect the following information:
(1) Country of origin or area of the
eligible raw cane sugar; (2) quota period;
(3) quantity of raw cane sugar to be
exported; (4) details of the shipment
(shipper, vessel, port of loading); and (5)
additional details if available at the time
of shipment (consignee, address of
consignee, expected date of departure,
expected date of arrival in the U.S.,
expected port of arrival). The
information will help determine if the
quantity to be imported is eligible to be
entered under the TRQ.
Description of Respondents: Business
or other for-profit.
Number of Respondents: 40.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
Annually.
Total Burden Hours: 204.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–25548 Filed 10–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
[FNS–2013–0033]
Request for Information: Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
Enhancing Retail Food Store
Eligibility; Extension of Comment
Period
Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice; Extension of Comment
Period.
AGENCY:
Sections 3(k), (p) and (r),
Section 7, and Section 9 of the Food and
Nutrition Act of 2008 (‘‘the Act’’), and
Title 7 Parts 271, 274, and 278 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (‘‘the
regulations’’) provide factors for
determining the eligibility of retail food
stores to participate in the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (‘‘SNAP’’). This notice requests
information from any and all interested
parties on opportunities to enhance
retailer definitions and requirements in
a manner that improves access to
healthy food choices for SNAP
participants as well as program
integrity, and ensures that only those
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:15 Oct 28, 2013
Jkt 232001
retailers that effectuate the purpose of
SNAP are authorized to accept benefits.
The Food and Nutrition Service (‘‘FNS’’)
considers access to a variety of healthy
foods at SNAP retailers to be
fundamental to the effectiveness of this
critical nutrition assistance program.
FNS is requesting information to
understand what policy changes and, as
needed, statutory changes, should be
considered for retailer authorizations.
FNS will use this information in
determining how to make positive
progress in the available healthy choices
for program participants at authorized
SNAP retail stores. The comment period
is being extended to provide additional
time for interested parties to review this
request for information.
DATES: The comment period for the
notice that was published on August 20,
2013 (78 FR 51136) has been extended
from October 21, 2013 to November 6,
2013. To be assured of consideration,
comments must be postmarked on or
before November 6, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments
electronically. Comments can also be
mailed or delivered to: Shanta Swezy,
Chief, Retailer Management and
Issuance Branch, Retailer Policy and
Management Division, Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program, Food and
Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive,
Room 426, Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
All comments submitted in response
to this notice will be included in the
record and will be made available to the
public at www.regulations.gov. Please be
advised that the substance of the
comments and the identity of the
individuals or entities commenting will
be subject to public disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shanta Swezy, Chief, Retailer
Management and Issuance Branch, Food
and Nutrition Service, (703) 305–2238.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the end
of fiscal year (FY) 2012, over 246,000
retailers were authorized to redeem
SNAP benefits. This is an increase of
almost 100,000 authorized stores since
2005. According to the most recent data
available (2012), 82 percent of all
benefits redeemed were redeemed at
supermarkets, large grocers and
superstores. Approximately 18 percent
of benefits were redeemed at smaller
stores, including convenience stores,
small grocers and farmers’ markets. Less
than one percent were redeemed by
authorized treatment programs, group
homes, homeless meal providers,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
communal dining facilities and shelters
as provided for in statute. A 2009 FNS
study on benefit use indicates that 96.3
percent of all SNAP beneficiaries
shopped at supermarkets or superstores
at least once each month.
According to Sections 3(k), (p) and (r),
and Section 9 of the Act, and Title 7,
Parts 271 and 278 of the regulations, to
be eligible to participate in SNAP, stores
must sell food for home preparation and
consumption and meet one of the
criteria below:
(A) Offer for sale, on a continuous
basis (any given day of operation), at
least three varieties of qualifying foods
in each of the following four staple food
groups, with perishable foods in at least
two of the categories:
• Meat, poultry or fish
• Bread or cereal
• Vegetables or fruits
• Dairy products
or
(B) More than one-half (50 percent) of
the total dollar amount of all things
(food, nonfood, gas and services) sold in
the store must be from the sale of
eligible staple foods.
The last major changes to the store
eligibility requirements took place in
the early 1990’s as a result of
congressional action. Today, a store that
consistently stocks as few as 12 total
food items from the required staple
foods categories could technically be
licensed to participate in SNAP. Store
authorization data collected from
retailers by USDA indicates that over
90,000 currently authorized SNAP
retailers have substantial (over 50
percent) sales that stem from ineligible
items.
In addition to providing minimal
access to healthy food, retailers that do
not provide sufficient healthful offerings
often tend to be those stores that present
the greatest integrity challenges for
USDA. The sale or exchange of SNAP
benefits for cash is referred to as
‘‘trafficking’’, an illegal activity
punishable by law. According to the
latest FNS trafficking study covering the
period 2009–2011, 99.5 percent of all
trafficking stores involve retailers other
than supermarkets, superstores and
large grocers. Further, 84.5 percent of all
benefit dollars trafficked involve
retailers other than supermarkets,
superstores and large grocers. The large
number of smaller stores—roughly
222,000 authorized store locations
nationwide—redeemed 15 percent of
SNAP recipient’s benefits and present
the greatest integrity challenge for FNS;
the trafficking rate in these store types
was 7.6 percent. The store violation rate
was 12.45 percent. A 2006 report by the
Government Accountability Office
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2013 / Notices
(GAO) suggested that the minimal
stocking requirements in SNAP
contribute to corrupt retailers entering
the program, and noted that FNS
regulations lacked clarity as to what
constitutes sufficient stocking
requirements.
FNS is concerned that there are a
large and growing number of authorized
retailers that do not provide healthful
food offerings to SNAP recipients and
that engage in fraud. These retailers
represent a management challenge for
the program that must be balanced
against the need to ensure effective
access to healthful, nutritious food for
SNAP households. FNS has an interest
in assuring that all authorized retailers
will play by the rules and further the
purpose of SNAP.
FNS’ objectives are to improve the
availability of more healthful foods
without compromising access to
nutritious food for SNAP participants,
or unnecessarily burdening the retailers
that redeem SNAP benefits, and to
improve the integrity of the program.
The Agency is seeking public input
regarding the following questions, with
particular attention to impacts of each
on program integrity, healthy food
choices, access to food and retailer
operations:
1. Is ensuring that SNAP retailers
provide SNAP clients access to healthy
food choices a reasonable priority for
establishing SNAP store eligibility
criteria?
2. Are there store types that clearly
meet all of the Program goals and,
consequently, should always be eligible
for SNAP participation?
3. Conversely, are there store types
that do not effectively improve access to
food choices (e.g. stores that sell low
amounts of food when compared to the
amounts of distilled liquor, tobacco
and/or lottery tickets sold) and,
therefore, should always be ineligible
for SNAP participation?
4. Would a different definition of the
‘‘staple foods 1’’ required in SNAP
authorized stores help to ensure that
these stores offer more healthy food
choices? If so, what kinds of changes
would be most effective? Specifically,
almost all foods can be counted towards
meeting staple food requirements,
including those high in added sugar,
sodium or solid fats. Should foods high
in these components be counted as
staple foods when determining store
authorization requirements?
5. How should prepared foods with
multiple ingredients, such as chicken
pot pie or other frozen dinners, or single
serving meat jerky packages, be treated
with regards to ‘‘staple foods’’
categories?
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:15 Oct 28, 2013
Jkt 232001
6. Do twelve items (the minimum
amount necessary to meet SNAP
authorization criterion A, by virtue of
needing three varieties in the four
different staple food categories) provide
adequate variety for a retailer to further
the Program’s purpose? If not, what
would be a more appropriate
requirement?
7. Currently, retailers who are
authorized under criterion A are
required to stock perishable items (e.g.,
fresh, frozen or refrigerated fruits and
vegetables; dairy; meats, poultry and
fish; bread or cereal) in two categories.
Should perishable items be required in
more than two categories?
8. Are 50 percent of sales in staple
foods, as currently required for criterion
B, sufficient to ensure that a SNAP
authorized store furthers the program’s
purpose, given the current definition of
‘‘staple foods’’? Would this percentage
be sufficient if the definition of ‘‘staple
foods’’ is changed to exclude items high
in added sugar, sodium or solid fats?
9. Should stores whose primary
business (as evidenced by marketing,
inventory or sales) is not the sale of
food, be eligible to participate in SNAP?
10. Restaurants are generally
prohibited from being SNAP retailers,
and hot foods cannot be purchased with
SNAP benefits. However, there are
authorized retailers who primarily sell
food for immediate consumption, often
on premises, but also sell their products
cold and heat them for SNAP recipients
immediately after purchase for a
nominal fee. These stores qualify today
based on the array of raw ingredients,
such as unbaked pizza or raw fish.
Should such stores be eligible for
participation in SNAP?
11. Should all retailers who meet
SNAP eligibility criteria be authorized,
even when sufficient store access for
recipients is not a concern?
12. If store access were a concern in
an area where no store meets basic
eligibility criteria for SNAP
authorization, how should FNS select
the stores to authorize that best serve
the needs of the client population?
Should FNS employ an evaluation and
scoring system? If so, what criteria
should make up such a system?
13. How should integrity and
management priorities be balanced
against healthy food choice criteria in
the SNAP authorization process? What
elements could be used to assess
integrity risks, and how should they be
applied?
14. Are there any other ways in which
the criteria for retailer eligibility should
be changed? If so, how?
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64469
Dated: October 23, 2013.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
1 Statutory, Regulatory and Policy
Definitions of ‘‘Food’’, ‘‘Staple Food’’ and
‘‘Accessory Food’’:
Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 7 U.S.C.
2012 Section 3 Definitions:
(k) ‘‘Food’’ means (1) any food or food
product for home consumption except
alcoholic beverages, tobacco, and hot foods
or hot food products ready for immediate
consumption other than those authorized
pursuant to clauses (3), (4), (5), (7), (8), and
(9) of this subsection, (2) seeds and plants for
use in gardens to produce food for the
personal consumption of the eligible
household, (3) in the case of those persons
who are sixty years of age or over or who
receive supplemental security income
benefits or disability or blindness payments
under title I, II, X, XIV, or XVI of the Social
Security Act [(42 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.)], and
their spouses, meals prepared by and served
in senior citizens’ centers, apartment
buildings occupied primarily by such
persons, public or private nonprofit
establishments (eating or otherwise) that feed
such persons, private establishments that
contract with the appropriate agency of the
State to offer meals for such persons at
concessional prices, and meals prepared for
and served to residents of federally
subsidized housing for the elderly, (4) in the
case of persons sixty years of age or over and
persons who are physically or mentally
handicapped or otherwise so disabled that
they are unable adequately to prepare all of
their meals, meals prepared for and delivered
to them (and their spouses) at their home by
a public or private nonprofit organization or
by a private establishment that contracts with
the appropriate State agency to perform such
services at concessional prices, (5) in the case
of narcotics addicts or alcoholics, and their
children, served by drug addiction or
alcoholic treatment and rehabilitation
programs, meals prepared and served under
such programs, (6) in the case of certain
eligible households living in Alaska,
equipment for procuring food by hunting and
fishing, such as nets, hooks, rods, harpoons,
and knives (but not equipment for purposes
of transportation, clothing, or shelter, and not
firearms, ammunition, and explosives) if the
Secretary determines that such households
are located in an area of the State where it
is extremely difficult to reach stores selling
food and that such households depend to a
substantial extent upon hunting and fishing
for subsistence, (7) in the case of disabled or
blind recipients of benefits under title I, II,
X, XIV, or XVI of the Social Security Act, or
are 3–2 individuals described in paragraphs
(2) through (7) of subsection (j), who are
residents in a public or private nonprofit
group living arrangement that serves no more
than sixteen residents and is certified by the
appropriate State agency or agencies under
regulations issued under section 1616(e) of
the Social Security Act or under standards
determined by the Secretary to be
comparable to standards implemented by
appropriate State agencies under such
section [(42 U.S.C. 1382e(e))], meals prepared
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
64470
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
and served under such arrangement, (8) in
the case of women and children temporarily
residing in public or private nonprofit
shelters for battered women and children,
meals prepared and served, by such shelters,
and (9) in the case of households that do not
reside in permanent dwellings and
households that have no fixed mailing
addresses, meals prepared for and served by
a public or private nonprofit establishment
(approved by an appropriate State or local
agency) that feeds such individuals and by
private establishments that contract with the
appropriate agency of the State to offer meals
for such individuals at concessional prices.
(r)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2),
‘‘staple foods’’ means foods in the following
categories:
(A) Meat, poultry, or fish.
(B) Bread or cereals.
(C) Vegetables or fruits.
(D) Dairy products.
(2) ‘‘Staple foods’’ do not include accessory
food items, such as coffee, tea, cocoa,
carbonated and un-carbonated drinks, candy,
condiments, and spices.
7 CFR Part 271 General Information and
Definitions: Staple food means those food
items intended for home preparation and
consumption in each of the following food
categories: Meat, poultry, or fish; bread or
cereals; vegetables or fruits; and dairy
products. Commercially processed foods and
prepared mixtures with multiple ingredients
shall only be counted in one staple food
category. For example, foods such as cold
pizza, macaroni and cheese, multi-ingredient
soup, or frozen dinners, shall only be
counted as one staple food item and will
normally be included in the staple food
category of the main ingredient as
determined by FNS. Hot foods are not
eligible for purchase with food stamps and,
therefore, do not qualify as staple foods for
the purpose of determining eligibility under
§ 278.1(b)(1) of this chapter. Accessory food
items including, but not limited to, coffee,
tea, cocoa, carbonated and un-carbonated
drinks, candy, condiments, and spices shall
not be considered staple foods for the
purpose of determining eligibility of any
firm. However, accessory foods that are
offered for sale in authorized retail food
stores are eligible food items which may be
purchased with food stamp benefits.
USDA FNS Policy: ‘‘Accessory food items
include coffee, tea, cocoa, carbonated and uncarbonated drinks, candy, condiments and
spices. All foods not identified as accessory
in the Act and regulations must be
considered staple foods’’.
[FR Doc. 2013–25451 Filed 10–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:15 Oct 28, 2013
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
[Docket No. FSIS–2013–0003]
Availability of FSIS Compliance Guide
for a Systematic Approach to the
Humane Handling of Livestock
Food Safety and Inspection
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
opportunity for comments.
AGENCY:
The Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS) is announcing
the availability of a compliance guide to
assist livestock slaughter establishments
in complying with the regulatory
requirements for humane handling and
slaughter of livestock. FSIS encourages
operators of livestock slaughter
establishments to follow this guidance.
DATES: The Agency must receive
comments by December 30, 2013.
ADDRESSES: A downloadable version of
the compliance guide is available to
view and print at https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/
topics/regulatory-compliance. No hard
copies of the compliance guide have
been published.
FSIS invites interested persons to
submit comments on this notice.
Comments may be submitted by either
of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: This
Web site provides the ability to type
short comments directly into the
comment field on this Web page or
attach a file for lengthier comments. Go
to https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow
the on-line instructions at that site for
submitting comments.
Mail, including CD–ROMs, etc.: Send
to Docket Room Manager, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Food Safety
and Inspection Service, Patriots Plaza 3,
1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Mailstop 3782, Room 8–163B,
Washington, DC 20250–3700.
Hand- or courier-delivered submittals:
Deliver to Patriots Plaza 3, 355 E. Street
SW., Room 8–163B, Washington, DC
20250–3700.
Instructions: All items submitted by
mail or electronic mail must include the
Agency name and docket number FSIS–
2013–0003. Comments received in
response to this docket will be made
available for public inspection and
posted without change, including any
personal information, to https://
www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to background
documents or to comments received, go
to the FSIS Docket Room at Patriots
Plaza 3, 355 E. Street SW., Room 8–164,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Washington, DC 20250–3700 between
8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel Edelstein, Assistant
Administrator, Office of Policy and
Program Development; Telephone: (202)
205–0495, or by Fax: (202) 720–2025.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Humane Methods of Slaughter Act
(HMSA) of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.)
requires the use of humane methods for
handling and slaughtering livestock.
The HMSA states that ‘‘the use of
humane methods in the slaughter of
livestock prevents needless suffering;
results in safer and better working
conditions for persons engaged in the
slaughtering industry; brings about
improvement of products and
economies in slaughtering operations;
and produces other benefits for
producers, processors, and consumers
which tend to expedite an orderly flow
of livestock and livestock products in
interstate and foreign commerce.’’
The HMSA is referenced in the
Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) (21
U.S.C. 603) and is implemented by FSIS
humane handling and slaughter
regulations found at 9 CFR part 313.
Establishments are required to meet the
humane handling and slaughter
requirements in the regulations the
entire time they hold livestock in
connection with slaughter.
On September 9, 2004, FSIS
announced that livestock slaughter
establishments should implement and
maintain a systematic approach to
humane handling and slaughter to best
ensure compliance with the HMSA,
FMIA, and the implementing
regulations (69 FR 54625). A systematic
approach is a comprehensive way of
evaluating how livestock enter and
move through an establishment. The
2004 notice outlined four steps
establishments should take to develop
and maintain a systematic approach.
The guidance summarizes these four
steps and states that under a systematic
approach, establishments should:
(1) Assess the ability of their livestock
handling and slaughter practices to
minimize distress and injury to
livestock;
(2) Design facilities and implement
handling practices that minimize
distress and injury to livestock;
(3) Periodically evaluate facilities and
handling methods to ensure that they
continue to minimize distress and
injury to livestock; and
(4) When necessary, modify facilities
and handling methods to ensure that
they continue to minimize distress and
injury to livestock.
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64468-64470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25451]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
[FNS-2013-0033]
Request for Information: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) Enhancing Retail Food Store Eligibility; Extension of
Comment Period
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice; Extension of Comment Period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Sections 3(k), (p) and (r), Section 7, and Section 9 of the
Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (``the Act''), and Title 7 Parts 271,
274, and 278 of the Code of Federal Regulations (``the regulations'')
provide factors for determining the eligibility of retail food stores
to participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
(``SNAP''). This notice requests information from any and all
interested parties on opportunities to enhance retailer definitions and
requirements in a manner that improves access to healthy food choices
for SNAP participants as well as program integrity, and ensures that
only those retailers that effectuate the purpose of SNAP are authorized
to accept benefits. The Food and Nutrition Service (``FNS'') considers
access to a variety of healthy foods at SNAP retailers to be
fundamental to the effectiveness of this critical nutrition assistance
program. FNS is requesting information to understand what policy
changes and, as needed, statutory changes, should be considered for
retailer authorizations. FNS will use this information in determining
how to make positive progress in the available healthy choices for
program participants at authorized SNAP retail stores. The comment
period is being extended to provide additional time for interested
parties to review this request for information.
DATES: The comment period for the notice that was published on August
20, 2013 (78 FR 51136) has been extended from October 21, 2013 to
November 6, 2013. To be assured of consideration, comments must be
postmarked on or before November 6, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments electronically. Comments can also be mailed or
delivered to: Shanta Swezy, Chief, Retailer Management and Issuance
Branch, Retailer Policy and Management Division, Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 426, Alexandria, Virginia
22302.
All comments submitted in response to this notice will be included
in the record and will be made available to the public at
www.regulations.gov. Please be advised that the substance of the
comments and the identity of the individuals or entities commenting
will be subject to public disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shanta Swezy, Chief, Retailer
Management and Issuance Branch, Food and Nutrition Service, (703) 305-
2238.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the end of fiscal year (FY) 2012, over
246,000 retailers were authorized to redeem SNAP benefits. This is an
increase of almost 100,000 authorized stores since 2005. According to
the most recent data available (2012), 82 percent of all benefits
redeemed were redeemed at supermarkets, large grocers and superstores.
Approximately 18 percent of benefits were redeemed at smaller stores,
including convenience stores, small grocers and farmers' markets. Less
than one percent were redeemed by authorized treatment programs, group
homes, homeless meal providers, communal dining facilities and shelters
as provided for in statute. A 2009 FNS study on benefit use indicates
that 96.3 percent of all SNAP beneficiaries shopped at supermarkets or
superstores at least once each month.
According to Sections 3(k), (p) and (r), and Section 9 of the Act,
and Title 7, Parts 271 and 278 of the regulations, to be eligible to
participate in SNAP, stores must sell food for home preparation and
consumption and meet one of the criteria below:
(A) Offer for sale, on a continuous basis (any given day of
operation), at least three varieties of qualifying foods in each of the
following four staple food groups, with perishable foods in at least
two of the categories:
Meat, poultry or fish
Bread or cereal
Vegetables or fruits
Dairy products
or
(B) More than one-half (50 percent) of the total dollar amount of
all things (food, nonfood, gas and services) sold in the store must be
from the sale of eligible staple foods.
The last major changes to the store eligibility requirements took
place in the early 1990's as a result of congressional action. Today, a
store that consistently stocks as few as 12 total food items from the
required staple foods categories could technically be licensed to
participate in SNAP. Store authorization data collected from retailers
by USDA indicates that over 90,000 currently authorized SNAP retailers
have substantial (over 50 percent) sales that stem from ineligible
items.
In addition to providing minimal access to healthy food, retailers
that do not provide sufficient healthful offerings often tend to be
those stores that present the greatest integrity challenges for USDA.
The sale or exchange of SNAP benefits for cash is referred to as
``trafficking'', an illegal activity punishable by law. According to
the latest FNS trafficking study covering the period 2009-2011, 99.5
percent of all trafficking stores involve retailers other than
supermarkets, superstores and large grocers. Further, 84.5 percent of
all benefit dollars trafficked involve retailers other than
supermarkets, superstores and large grocers. The large number of
smaller stores--roughly 222,000 authorized store locations nationwide--
redeemed 15 percent of SNAP recipient's benefits and present the
greatest integrity challenge for FNS; the trafficking rate in these
store types was 7.6 percent. The store violation rate was 12.45
percent. A 2006 report by the Government Accountability Office
[[Page 64469]]
(GAO) suggested that the minimal stocking requirements in SNAP
contribute to corrupt retailers entering the program, and noted that
FNS regulations lacked clarity as to what constitutes sufficient
stocking requirements.
FNS is concerned that there are a large and growing number of
authorized retailers that do not provide healthful food offerings to
SNAP recipients and that engage in fraud. These retailers represent a
management challenge for the program that must be balanced against the
need to ensure effective access to healthful, nutritious food for SNAP
households. FNS has an interest in assuring that all authorized
retailers will play by the rules and further the purpose of SNAP.
FNS' objectives are to improve the availability of more healthful
foods without compromising access to nutritious food for SNAP
participants, or unnecessarily burdening the retailers that redeem SNAP
benefits, and to improve the integrity of the program. The Agency is
seeking public input regarding the following questions, with particular
attention to impacts of each on program integrity, healthy food
choices, access to food and retailer operations:
1. Is ensuring that SNAP retailers provide SNAP clients access to
healthy food choices a reasonable priority for establishing SNAP store
eligibility criteria?
2. Are there store types that clearly meet all of the Program goals
and, consequently, should always be eligible for SNAP participation?
3. Conversely, are there store types that do not effectively
improve access to food choices (e.g. stores that sell low amounts of
food when compared to the amounts of distilled liquor, tobacco and/or
lottery tickets sold) and, therefore, should always be ineligible for
SNAP participation?
4. Would a different definition of the ``staple foods \1\''
required in SNAP authorized stores help to ensure that these stores
offer more healthy food choices? If so, what kinds of changes would be
most effective? Specifically, almost all foods can be counted towards
meeting staple food requirements, including those high in added sugar,
sodium or solid fats. Should foods high in these components be counted
as staple foods when determining store authorization requirements?
5. How should prepared foods with multiple ingredients, such as
chicken pot pie or other frozen dinners, or single serving meat jerky
packages, be treated with regards to ``staple foods'' categories?
6. Do twelve items (the minimum amount necessary to meet SNAP
authorization criterion A, by virtue of needing three varieties in the
four different staple food categories) provide adequate variety for a
retailer to further the Program's purpose? If not, what would be a more
appropriate requirement?
7. Currently, retailers who are authorized under criterion A are
required to stock perishable items (e.g., fresh, frozen or refrigerated
fruits and vegetables; dairy; meats, poultry and fish; bread or cereal)
in two categories. Should perishable items be required in more than two
categories?
8. Are 50 percent of sales in staple foods, as currently required
for criterion B, sufficient to ensure that a SNAP authorized store
furthers the program's purpose, given the current definition of
``staple foods''? Would this percentage be sufficient if the definition
of ``staple foods'' is changed to exclude items high in added sugar,
sodium or solid fats?
9. Should stores whose primary business (as evidenced by marketing,
inventory or sales) is not the sale of food, be eligible to participate
in SNAP?
10. Restaurants are generally prohibited from being SNAP retailers,
and hot foods cannot be purchased with SNAP benefits. However, there
are authorized retailers who primarily sell food for immediate
consumption, often on premises, but also sell their products cold and
heat them for SNAP recipients immediately after purchase for a nominal
fee. These stores qualify today based on the array of raw ingredients,
such as unbaked pizza or raw fish. Should such stores be eligible for
participation in SNAP?
11. Should all retailers who meet SNAP eligibility criteria be
authorized, even when sufficient store access for recipients is not a
concern?
12. If store access were a concern in an area where no store meets
basic eligibility criteria for SNAP authorization, how should FNS
select the stores to authorize that best serve the needs of the client
population? Should FNS employ an evaluation and scoring system? If so,
what criteria should make up such a system?
13. How should integrity and management priorities be balanced
against healthy food choice criteria in the SNAP authorization process?
What elements could be used to assess integrity risks, and how should
they be applied?
14. Are there any other ways in which the criteria for retailer
eligibility should be changed? If so, how?
Dated: October 23, 2013.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
\1\ Statutory, Regulatory and Policy Definitions of ``Food'',
``Staple Food'' and ``Accessory Food'':
Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 7 U.S.C. 2012 Section 3
Definitions:
(k) ``Food'' means (1) any food or food product for home
consumption except alcoholic beverages, tobacco, and hot foods or
hot food products ready for immediate consumption other than those
authorized pursuant to clauses (3), (4), (5), (7), (8), and (9) of
this subsection, (2) seeds and plants for use in gardens to produce
food for the personal consumption of the eligible household, (3) in
the case of those persons who are sixty years of age or over or who
receive supplemental security income benefits or disability or
blindness payments under title I, II, X, XIV, or XVI of the Social
Security Act [(42 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.)], and their spouses, meals
prepared by and served in senior citizens' centers, apartment
buildings occupied primarily by such persons, public or private
nonprofit establishments (eating or otherwise) that feed such
persons, private establishments that contract with the appropriate
agency of the State to offer meals for such persons at concessional
prices, and meals prepared for and served to residents of federally
subsidized housing for the elderly, (4) in the case of persons sixty
years of age or over and persons who are physically or mentally
handicapped or otherwise so disabled that they are unable adequately
to prepare all of their meals, meals prepared for and delivered to
them (and their spouses) at their home by a public or private
nonprofit organization or by a private establishment that contracts
with the appropriate State agency to perform such services at
concessional prices, (5) in the case of narcotics addicts or
alcoholics, and their children, served by drug addiction or
alcoholic treatment and rehabilitation programs, meals prepared and
served under such programs, (6) in the case of certain eligible
households living in Alaska, equipment for procuring food by hunting
and fishing, such as nets, hooks, rods, harpoons, and knives (but
not equipment for purposes of transportation, clothing, or shelter,
and not firearms, ammunition, and explosives) if the Secretary
determines that such households are located in an area of the State
where it is extremely difficult to reach stores selling food and
that such households depend to a substantial extent upon hunting and
fishing for subsistence, (7) in the case of disabled or blind
recipients of benefits under title I, II, X, XIV, or XVI of the
Social Security Act, or are 3-2 individuals described in paragraphs
(2) through (7) of subsection (j), who are residents in a public or
private nonprofit group living arrangement that serves no more than
sixteen residents and is certified by the appropriate State agency
or agencies under regulations issued under section 1616(e) of the
Social Security Act or under standards determined by the Secretary
to be comparable to standards implemented by appropriate State
agencies under such section [(42 U.S.C. 1382e(e))], meals prepared
[[Page 64470]]
and served under such arrangement, (8) in the case of women and
children temporarily residing in public or private nonprofit
shelters for battered women and children, meals prepared and served,
by such shelters, and (9) in the case of households that do not
reside in permanent dwellings and households that have no fixed
mailing addresses, meals prepared for and served by a public or
private nonprofit establishment (approved by an appropriate State or
local agency) that feeds such individuals and by private
establishments that contract with the appropriate agency of the
State to offer meals for such individuals at concessional prices.
(r)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), ``staple foods''
means foods in the following categories:
(A) Meat, poultry, or fish.
(B) Bread or cereals.
(C) Vegetables or fruits.
(D) Dairy products.
(2) ``Staple foods'' do not include accessory food items, such
as coffee, tea, cocoa, carbonated and un-carbonated drinks, candy,
condiments, and spices.
7 CFR Part 271 General Information and Definitions: Staple food
means those food items intended for home preparation and consumption
in each of the following food categories: Meat, poultry, or fish;
bread or cereals; vegetables or fruits; and dairy products.
Commercially processed foods and prepared mixtures with multiple
ingredients shall only be counted in one staple food category. For
example, foods such as cold pizza, macaroni and cheese, multi-
ingredient soup, or frozen dinners, shall only be counted as one
staple food item and will normally be included in the staple food
category of the main ingredient as determined by FNS. Hot foods are
not eligible for purchase with food stamps and, therefore, do not
qualify as staple foods for the purpose of determining eligibility
under Sec. 278.1(b)(1) of this chapter. Accessory food items
including, but not limited to, coffee, tea, cocoa, carbonated and
un-carbonated drinks, candy, condiments, and spices shall not be
considered staple foods for the purpose of determining eligibility
of any firm. However, accessory foods that are offered for sale in
authorized retail food stores are eligible food items which may be
purchased with food stamp benefits.
USDA FNS Policy: ``Accessory food items include coffee, tea,
cocoa, carbonated and un-carbonated drinks, candy, condiments and
spices. All foods not identified as accessory in the Act and
regulations must be considered staple foods''.
[FR Doc. 2013-25451 Filed 10-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P