Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Raccoon Creek, Bridgeport, NJ, 64189-64191 [2013-25288]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 208 / Monday, October 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This proposed rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 117.729 paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
■
§ 117.729
Mantua Creek.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The draw of the S.R. 44 Bridge,
mile 1.7, at Paulsboro, shall open on
signal from May 1 through October 31
from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m., and shall open
on signal at all other times upon four
hours notice.
Dated: September 19, 2013.
Steven H. Ratti,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard,
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–25290 Filed 10–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0711]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Raccoon Creek, Bridgeport, NJ
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:00 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 232001
ACTION:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Coast Guard proposes to
modify the operating schedule that
governs the U.S. Route 130 lift Bridge
over Raccoon Creek at mile marker 1.8
in Bridgeport, NJ. Bridge tender logs
from 2007–2013 indicates that the
majority of the marine traffic transits
Raccoon Creek during the summer
months. To better align the operating
schedule to meet the needs of both land
and marine traffic, the proposed change
would reduce the number of months the
bridge is required to open on signal
during the early spring and fall of each
year.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
December 27, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2013–0711 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments. To avoid duplication, please
use only one of these four methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mrs. Jessica Shea,
Fifth Coast Guard District Bridge
Administration Division, Coast Guard;
telephone 757–398–6422, email
jessica.c.shea2@uscg.mil If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NJDOT New Jersey Department of
Transportation
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this proposed rulemaking by submitting
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64189
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
proposed rulemaking (USCG–2013–
0711), indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (https://
www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2013–0711 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the
line associated with this rulemaking. If
you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2013–0711 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this rulemaking. You
may also visit the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
E:\FR\FM\28OCP1.SGM
28OCP1
64190
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 208 / Monday, October 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why one would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The current operating schedule for the
bridge is set out in 33 CFR 117.741(a),
effective May 20, 2003. The current
regulation states: (a) The draw of the
Route 130 highway bridge, mile 1.8, at
Bridgeport, shall open on signal:
(1) March 1 through November 30,
from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m.
(2) At all other times, if at least four
hours notice is given.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Basis and Purpose
The bridge owner, New Jersey
Department of Transportation (NJDOT),
requested a change in the operation
regulation for the U.S. Route 130
highway bridge, at mile 1.8, across
Raccoon Creek in Bridgeport, NJ. NJDOT
provided the Coast Guard with the
bridge tender logs dating back to 2007
to illustrate the marine traffic patterns
on Raccoon Creek. Based on the
information provided by the bridge
tenders, there have been very few
requests requiring openings between
March 1 and November 30 during the 7
a.m. to 11 p.m. time period.
The vertical clearance of the verticallift bridge is 5 feet above mean high
water in the closed position and 64
above mean high water in the open
position. In order to align the operating
schedule with the observed marine
traffic since 2007, this proposed rule
would change the open on demand
requirement for March 1 through April
30 and November 1 through November
30 to require a 4 hour advance notice.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The majority of vessels that use this
waterway are recreational boats that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:00 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 232001
travel during the summer and fall
months of May through October. The
current operating schedule requires
openings on signal from 7 a.m. to 11
p.m. between the months of March and
November. If vessels require an opening
during any time of the year outside the
summer and fall season or between the
hours of 11 p.m. and 7 a.m., the bridge
will open with a 4 hour advanced
notice. The impact to vessels of the
proposed change to the regulation is
that vessels which require openings
during March, April, or November will
need to provide 4 hours advanced
notice. Based on the average logged
openings between 2007–2013 during the
months of March, April, and November,
the bridge tender logs indicate that
fewer than 5 vessels annually will be
required to provide 4 hours notice
under the proposed change.
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. This proposed rule
amends the months of the year when the
draw must open on signal when it is
documented that vessel traffic is low.
Additionally, vessels may still request
an opening with 4 hours advanced
notice during the months of March,
April, and November.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive
orders.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
proposed rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require
an assessment of potential costs and
benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order
12866 or under section 1 of Executive
Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
those Orders. The impact to vessels of
this regulation is that vessels which
require openings during March, April,
or November will need to provide 4
hours advanced notice. Based on the
average logged openings during 2007–
2013 during the months of March, April,
and November, the bridge tender logs
indicate that fewer than 30 vessels
annually require openings in those
months. This proposed regulatory
change should not have an adverse
effect on their transit because the bridge
is able to open if the mariner provides
at least 4 hours of advance notice.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3. Assistance for Small Entities
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
E:\FR\FM\28OCP1.SGM
28OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 208 / Monday, October 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an
economically significant rule and would
not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:00 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 232001
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This proposed rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this proposed rule. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 117.741 paragraph(a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 117.741
Raccoon Creek
(a) The draw of the Route 130
highway bridge, mile 1.8, at Bridgeport,
shall open on signal:
(1) May 1 through October 31 from 7
a.m. to 11 p.m.
(2) At all other times, if at least four
hours notice is given.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 19, 2013.
Steven H. Ratti,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard,
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
64191
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1 and 27
[WT Docket No. 12–357; Report No. 2991]
Petition for Reconsideration of Action
in Rulemaking Proceeding
Federal Communications
Commission.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Petition for reconsideration.
In this document, a Petition
for Reconsideration (Petition) has been
filed in the Commission’s Rulemaking
proceeding by Caressa D. Bennet on
behalf of Rural Wireless Association,
Inc.
SUMMARY:
Oppositions to the Petition must
be filed on or before November 12, 2013.
Replies to an opposition must be filed
on or before November 22, 2013.
DATES:
Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Pearl, Wireless,
Telecommunications Bureau, phone:
(202) 418–2607, or (202) 418–7233.
This is a
summary of Commission’s document,
Report No. 2991, released September 20,
2013. The full text of Report No. 2991
is available for viewing and copying in
Room CY–B402, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC or may be purchased
from the Commission’s copy contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1–
800–378–3160). The Commission will
not send a copy of this Notice pursuant
to the Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because this Notice
does not have an impact on any rules of
particular applicability.
Subject: Service Rules for Advanced
Wireless Services H Block
Implementing Section 6401 of the
Middle Class Tax Relief and Job
Creation Act of 2012 Related to the
1915–1920 MHz and 1995–2000 MHz
Bands, published at 78 FR 50213,
August 16, 2013, and published
pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also
§ 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission’s rules.
Number of Petitions Filed: 1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2013–25288 Filed 10–25–13; 8:45 am]
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of
Managing Director.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
[FR Doc. 2013–25345 Filed 10–25–13; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\28OCP1.SGM
28OCP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 208 (Monday, October 28, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64189-64191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25288]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0711]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Raccoon Creek, Bridgeport, NJ
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to modify the operating schedule that
governs the U.S. Route 130 lift Bridge over Raccoon Creek at mile
marker 1.8 in Bridgeport, NJ. Bridge tender logs from 2007-2013
indicates that the majority of the marine traffic transits Raccoon
Creek during the summer months. To better align the operating schedule
to meet the needs of both land and marine traffic, the proposed change
would reduce the number of months the bridge is required to open on
signal during the early spring and fall of each year.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before December 27, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2013-0711 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these
four methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mrs. Jessica Shea, Fifth Coast Guard District
Bridge Administration Division, Coast Guard; telephone 757-398-6422,
email jessica.c.shea2@uscg.mil If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NJDOT New Jersey Department of Transportation
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this proposed rulemaking by
submitting comments and related materials. All comments received will
be posted, without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will
include any personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
proposed rulemaking (USCG-2013-0711), indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and
material online (https://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2013-0711 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail
and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2013-0711 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
[[Page 64190]]
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and
place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The current operating schedule for the bridge is set out in 33 CFR
117.741(a), effective May 20, 2003. The current regulation states: (a)
The draw of the Route 130 highway bridge, mile 1.8, at Bridgeport,
shall open on signal:
(1) March 1 through November 30, from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m.
(2) At all other times, if at least four hours notice is given.
C. Basis and Purpose
The bridge owner, New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT),
requested a change in the operation regulation for the U.S. Route 130
highway bridge, at mile 1.8, across Raccoon Creek in Bridgeport, NJ.
NJDOT provided the Coast Guard with the bridge tender logs dating back
to 2007 to illustrate the marine traffic patterns on Raccoon Creek.
Based on the information provided by the bridge tenders, there have
been very few requests requiring openings between March 1 and November
30 during the 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. time period.
The vertical clearance of the vertical-lift bridge is 5 feet above
mean high water in the closed position and 64 above mean high water in
the open position. In order to align the operating schedule with the
observed marine traffic since 2007, this proposed rule would change the
open on demand requirement for March 1 through April 30 and November 1
through November 30 to require a 4 hour advance notice.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The majority of vessels that use this waterway are recreational
boats that travel during the summer and fall months of May through
October. The current operating schedule requires openings on signal
from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. between the months of March and November. If
vessels require an opening during any time of the year outside the
summer and fall season or between the hours of 11 p.m. and 7 a.m., the
bridge will open with a 4 hour advanced notice. The impact to vessels
of the proposed change to the regulation is that vessels which require
openings during March, April, or November will need to provide 4 hours
advanced notice. Based on the average logged openings between 2007-2013
during the months of March, April, and November, the bridge tender logs
indicate that fewer than 5 vessels annually will be required to provide
4 hours notice under the proposed change.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under those Orders. The impact to vessels of this
regulation is that vessels which require openings during March, April,
or November will need to provide 4 hours advanced notice. Based on the
average logged openings during 2007-2013 during the months of March,
April, and November, the bridge tender logs indicate that fewer than 30
vessels annually require openings in those months. This proposed
regulatory change should not have an adverse effect on their transit
because the bridge is able to open if the mariner provides at least 4
hours of advance notice.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This proposed action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the
following reasons. This proposed rule amends the months of the year
when the draw must open on signal when it is documented that vessel
traffic is low. Additionally, vessels may still request an opening with
4 hours advanced notice during the months of March, April, and
November.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this proposed
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
[[Page 64191]]
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
This proposed rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this proposed rule. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 117.741 paragraph(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.741 Raccoon Creek
(a) The draw of the Route 130 highway bridge, mile 1.8, at
Bridgeport, shall open on signal:
(1) May 1 through October 31 from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m.
(2) At all other times, if at least four hours notice is given.
* * * * *
Dated: September 19, 2013.
Steven H. Ratti,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2013-25288 Filed 10-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
