Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing Company Airplanes, 64164-64167 [2013-24042]
Download as PDF
64164
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 208 / Monday, October 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
15, 2011; or Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
35–1058, dated June 15, 2011; as applicable;
are excluded from the requirements of
paragraph (g) of this AD, unless an oxygen
container with a part number listed in
paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this AD and a serial
number listed in paragraph (g)(1)(ii) of this
AD is installed.
Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: The
oxygen container assemblies listed in
paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this AD and paragraph
(g)(1)(ii) of this AD are B/E Aerospace
products with the mark ‘‘B/E AEROSPACE’’
on the identification plate.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(h) Parts Installation Limitation
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install, on any airplane, an
oxygen container with a part number listed
in paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this AD, and serial
number listed in paragraph (g)(1)(ii) of this
AD, unless the oxygen container has been
modified according to Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–35–1049, dated June 15, 2011;
Airbus Service Bulletin A320–35–1053,
dated June 15, 2011; Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–35–1054, dated June 15, 2011; Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–35–1055, dated June
15, 2011; Airbus Service Bulletin A320–35–
1056, dated June 15, 2011; Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–35–1057, dated June 15, 2011;
or Airbus Service Bulletin A320–35–1058,
dated June 15, 2011; as applicable.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1405; fax (425) 227–
1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(j) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information European
Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2012–0055, dated April 3, 2012, for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:59 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 232001
related information. You may examine the
MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0465-0002.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–35–1049,
dated June 15, 2011.
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–35–1053,
dated June 15, 2011.
(iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–35–
1054, dated June 15, 2011.
(iv) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–35–
1055, dated June 15, 2011.
(v) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–35–1056,
dated June 15, 2011.
(vi) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–35–
1057, dated June 15, 2011.
(vii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–35–
1058, dated June 15, 2011.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(4) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 17, 2013.
Ross Landes,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–23909 Filed 10–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0303; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–220–AD; Amendment
39–17620; AD 2013–20–14]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Final rule.
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
the Boeing Company Model 747–400
and –400F series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a report of cracks on
airplanes prior to line number 1308 in
the forward and aft inner chords of the
station (STA) 2598 bulkhead, and the
bulkhead upper and lower webs. This
AD requires, as applicable, repetitive
high frequency eddy current (HFEC) and
low frequency eddy current (LFEC)
inspections for cracks in the splice
fitting, support frame, forward and aft
inner chords, floor support, bulkhead
upper web on the upper left and right
side of the bulkhead, and the bulkhead
lower web on the lower left side of the
bulkhead and repair if necessary; and
repetitive post-repair inspections and
repair if necessary. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct cracks in the
splice fitting, support frame, floor
support, forward and aft inner chords,
and the bulkhead upper and lower webs
of the STA 2598 bulkhead, which could
adversely affect the structural integrity
of the airplane.
DATES:DATES: This AD is effective
December 2, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of December 2, 2013.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1;
fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PO 00000
ACTION:
Sfmt 4700
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
64165
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 208 / Monday, October 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nathan Weigand, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6428; fax:
425–917–6590; email:
Nathan.P.Weigand@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. The
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on April 12, 2013 (78 FR
21854). The NPRM proposed to require,
as applicable, repetitive HFEC and LFEC
inspections for cracks in the splice
fitting, support frame, forward and aft
inner chords, floor support, bulkhead
upper web on the upper left and right
side of the bulkhead, and the bulkhead
lower web on the lower left side of the
bulkhead and repair if necessary; and
repetitive post-repair inspections and
repair if necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comments
received on the proposal (78 FR 21854,
April 12, 2013) and the FAA’s response
to each comment.
Request To Include the Lower Web in
the Inspection of the Unrepaired
Structure
Boeing requested that we revise
paragraph (g) of the NPRM (78 FR
21854, April 12, 2013) to clarify that the
inspection of the unrepaired structure
includes the lower webs. Boeing stated
that the inspections for the unrepaired
structure include both the upper and
lower bulkhead webs, but that
paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of the NPRM (78 FR
21854, April 12, 2013) specifies only the
upper web.
We agree with Boeing’s comment. For
appropriate service information, the
NPRM (78 FR 21854, April 12, 2013)
referred to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747–53A2815, dated November 8, 2012,
which also describes procedures for
inspecting the bulkhead lower web. We
have clarified the inspection in
paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this AD by
referring to Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–53A2815, dated November
8, 2012, for specific inspection
procedures and locations.
Request To Revise the Unsafe Condition
Boeing requested that, for clarity, the
unsafe condition be revised to more
specifically identify the location of
potential cracking (i.e., the body station
2598 bulkhead).
We agree with Boeing’s request. We
have revised the unsafe condition in the
SUMMARY and paragraph (e) of this final
rule to clarify the location of the
bulkhead.
Request To Clarify the Discussion
Section
Boeing requested clarification of the
Discussion section in the NPRM (78 FR
21854, April 12, 2013). Boeing stated
that the Discussion does not mention
cracks found in the splice fitting and
incorrectly refers to the ‘‘cutout for the
horizontal stabilizer rear spar.’’
We agree that the commenter’s
proposed clarification provides a more
accurate description of the report of
cracks. However, the Discussion section
is not carried over into the final rule;
therefore, no change to this final rule is
necessary in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (78 FR
21854, April 12, 2013) for correcting the
unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 21854,
April 12, 2013).
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 11
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per product
Cost on U.S. operators
Inspections .............................
28 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $2,380 per inspection
cycle.
$0
$2,380 per inspection cycle ...
$26,180 per inspection cycle.
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary repairs and post-repair
inspections that would be required
based on the results of the inspection.
We have no way of determining the
number of aircraft that might need this
repair:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Repair ...........................................................................
Post-repair Inspection ...................................................
13 work-hours × $85 per hour = $1,105 ......................
12 work-hours × $85 per hour = $1,020 ......................
Cost per
product
$0
0
For any repairs that would be necessary
based on the results of the post-repair
inspection, we have not received
definitive data that would enable us to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:52 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 232001
provide cost estimates for that oncondition action.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$1,105
1,020
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
64166
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 208 / Monday, October 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2013–20–14 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–17620; Docket No.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:59 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 232001
FAA–2013–0303; Directorate Identifier
2012–NM–220–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective December 2, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 747–400 and –400F series airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2815,
dated November 8, 2012.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of
cracks on airplanes prior to line number 1308
in the forward and aft inner chords of the
station (STA) 2598 bulkhead, and the
bulkhead upper and lower webs. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct cracks
in the splice fitting, support frame, floor
support, forward and aft inner chords, and
the bulkhead upper and lower webs of the
STA 2598 bulkhead, which could adversely
affect the structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) High Frequency Eddy Current (HFEC)
and Low Frequency Eddy Current (LFEC)
Inspections
At the compliance time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2815, dated
November 8, 2012; except as provided by
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD: Do HFEC and
LFEC inspections, as applicable, for cracks in
the splice fitting, support frame, floor
support, forward and aft inner chords, the
bulkhead upper web on the upper left and
right side of the bulkhead, and the bulkhead
lower web on the lower left side of the
bulkhead, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–53A2815, dated
November 8, 2012.
(1) If no cracking is found, repeat the
applicable inspections specified in paragraph
(g) of this AD, thereafter, at the applicable
time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–53A2815, dated November 8,
2012.
(2) If any cracking is found, do the actions
specified in paragraphs (g)(2)(i) and (g)(2)(ii)
of this AD.
(i) Before further flight, do the applicable
repair, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–53A2815, dated
November 8, 2012; except as provided by
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.
(ii) At the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2815, dated
November 8, 2012, do HFEC and LFEC
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
inspections for cracks in the unrepaired
structure, and do an HFEC inspection for
cracks in the repaired structure; as specified
in and in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–53A2815, dated
November 8, 2012.
(A) If no cracking is found, repeat the
applicable HFEC and LFEC inspections
specified in paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this AD,
thereafter, at the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2815, dated
November 8, 2012.
(B) If any cracking is found, before further
flight, repair using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
(h) Exceptions to the Service Information
(1) If any crack is found during any
inspection required by this AD, and Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2815, dated
November 8, 2012, specifies to contact
Boeing for appropriate action: Before further
flight, repair the crack using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747–53A2815, dated November 8, 2012,
specifies a compliance time ‘‘after the
original issue date of this service bulletin,’’
this AD requires compliance within the
specified compliance time after the effective
date of this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Nathan Weigand, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S,
FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–
3356; phone: 425–917–6428; fax: 425–917–
6590; email: Nathan.P.Weigand@faa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 208 / Monday, October 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
53A2815, dated November 8, 2012.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For Boeing service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data &
Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC
2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 19, 2013.
Ross Landes,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–24042 Filed 10–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 97
[Docket No. 30923; Amdt. No. 3558]
Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures;
Miscellaneous Amendments
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:59 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 232001
This rule is effective October 28,
2013. The compliance date for each
SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums,
and ODP is specified in the amendatory
provisions.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of October 28,
2013.
ADDRESSES: Availability of matters
incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
For Examination—
1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA
Headquarters Building, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591;
2. The FAA Regional Office of the
region in which the affected airport is
located;
3. The National Flight Procedures
Office, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd.,
Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
4. The National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Availability—All SIAPs and Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs are available
online free of charge. Visit https://
www.nfdc.faa.gov to register.
Additionally, individual SIAP and
Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may
be obtained from:
1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA–
200), FAA Headquarters Building, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; or
2. The FAA Regional Office of the
region in which the affected airport is
located.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
This rule establishes, amends,
suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures
(SIAPs) and associated Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle Departure
Procedures for operations at certain
airports. These regulatory actions are
needed because of the adoption of new
or revised criteria, or because of changes
occurring in the National Airspace
System, such as the commissioning of
new navigational facilities, adding new
obstacles, or changing air traffic
SUMMARY:
requirements. These changes are
designed to provide safe and efficient
use of the navigable airspace and to
promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected
airports.
Richard A. Dunham III, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS–420), Flight
Technologies and Programs Divisions,
Flight Standards Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500
South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City,
OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box
25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
Telephone: (405) 954–4164.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
amends Title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by
establishing, amending, suspending, or
revoking SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64167
and/or ODPS. The complete regulators
description of each SIAP and its
associated Takeoff Minimums or ODP
for an identified airport is listed on FAA
form documents which are incorporated
by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14
CFR 97.20. The applicable FAA Forms
are FAA Forms 8260–3, 8260–4, 8260–
5, 8260–15A, and 8260–15B when
required by an entry on 8260–15A.
The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, in addition to
their complex nature and the need for
a special format make publication in the
Federal Register expensive and
impractical. Furthermore, airmen do not
use the regulatory text of the SIAPs,
Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead
refer to their depiction on charts printed
by publishers of aeronautical materials.
The advantages of incorporation by
reference are realized and publication of
the complete description of each SIAP,
Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on
FAA forms is unnecessary. This
amendment provides the affected CFR
sections and specifies the types of SIAPs
and the effective dates of the, associated
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs. This
amendment also identifies the airport
and its location, the procedure, and the
amendment number.
The Rule
This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is
effective upon publication of each
separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and
ODP as contained in the transmittal.
Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and
textual ODP amendments may have
been issued previously by the FAA in a
Flight Data Center (FDC) Notice to
Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating
directly to published aeronautical
charts. The circumstances which
created the need for some SIAP and
Takeoff Minimums and ODP
amendments may require making them
effective in less than 30 days. For the
remaining SIAPS and Takeoff
Minimums and ODPS, an effective date
at least 30 days after publication is
provided.
Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff
Minimums and ODPS contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria
contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures
(TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the
TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the
affected airports. Because of the close
and immediate relationship between
these SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find
that notice and public procedures before
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 208 (Monday, October 28, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64164-64167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24042]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0303; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-220-AD;
Amendment 39-17620; AD 2013-20-14]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
the Boeing Company Model 747-400 and -400F series airplanes. This AD
was prompted by a report of cracks on airplanes prior to line number
1308 in the forward and aft inner chords of the station (STA) 2598
bulkhead, and the bulkhead upper and lower webs. This AD requires, as
applicable, repetitive high frequency eddy current (HFEC) and low
frequency eddy current (LFEC) inspections for cracks in the splice
fitting, support frame, forward and aft inner chords, floor support,
bulkhead upper web on the upper left and right side of the bulkhead,
and the bulkhead lower web on the lower left side of the bulkhead and
repair if necessary; and repetitive post-repair inspections and repair
if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracks in
the splice fitting, support frame, floor support, forward and aft inner
chords, and the bulkhead upper and lower webs of the STA 2598 bulkhead,
which could adversely affect the structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES:DATES: This AD is effective December 2, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of December 2,
2013.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
[[Page 64165]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathan Weigand, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6428; fax:
425-917-6590; email: Nathan.P.Weigand@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
The NPRM published in the Federal Register on April 12, 2013 (78 FR
21854). The NPRM proposed to require, as applicable, repetitive HFEC
and LFEC inspections for cracks in the splice fitting, support frame,
forward and aft inner chords, floor support, bulkhead upper web on the
upper left and right side of the bulkhead, and the bulkhead lower web
on the lower left side of the bulkhead and repair if necessary; and
repetitive post-repair inspections and repair if necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
(78 FR 21854, April 12, 2013) and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Include the Lower Web in the Inspection of the Unrepaired
Structure
Boeing requested that we revise paragraph (g) of the NPRM (78 FR
21854, April 12, 2013) to clarify that the inspection of the unrepaired
structure includes the lower webs. Boeing stated that the inspections
for the unrepaired structure include both the upper and lower bulkhead
webs, but that paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of the NPRM (78 FR 21854, April 12,
2013) specifies only the upper web.
We agree with Boeing's comment. For appropriate service
information, the NPRM (78 FR 21854, April 12, 2013) referred to Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2815, dated November 8, 2012, which also
describes procedures for inspecting the bulkhead lower web. We have
clarified the inspection in paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this AD by
referring to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2815, dated November
8, 2012, for specific inspection procedures and locations.
Request To Revise the Unsafe Condition
Boeing requested that, for clarity, the unsafe condition be revised
to more specifically identify the location of potential cracking (i.e.,
the body station 2598 bulkhead).
We agree with Boeing's request. We have revised the unsafe
condition in the SUMMARY and paragraph (e) of this final rule to
clarify the location of the bulkhead.
Request To Clarify the Discussion Section
Boeing requested clarification of the Discussion section in the
NPRM (78 FR 21854, April 12, 2013). Boeing stated that the Discussion
does not mention cracks found in the splice fitting and incorrectly
refers to the ``cutout for the horizontal stabilizer rear spar.''
We agree that the commenter's proposed clarification provides a
more accurate description of the report of cracks. However, the
Discussion section is not carried over into the final rule; therefore,
no change to this final rule is necessary in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (78 FR 21854, April 12, 2013) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 21854, April 12, 2013).
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 11 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections..................... 28 work-hours x $85 $0 $2,380 per $26,180 per
per hour = $2,380 inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
per inspection
cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs and
post-repair inspections that would be required based on the results of
the inspection. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft
that might need this repair:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair....................................... 13 work-hours x $85 per hour = $0 $1,105
$1,105.
Post-repair Inspection....................... 12 work-hours x $85 per hour = 0 1,020
$1,020.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For any repairs that would be necessary based on the results of the
post-repair inspection, we have not received definitive data that would
enable us to provide cost estimates for that on-condition action.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
[[Page 64166]]
section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle
VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the
Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2013-20-14 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17620; Docket No. FAA-
2013-0303; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-220-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective December 2, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-400 and -400F
series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2815, dated November 8, 2012.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of cracks on airplanes prior to
line number 1308 in the forward and aft inner chords of the station
(STA) 2598 bulkhead, and the bulkhead upper and lower webs. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct cracks in the splice fitting,
support frame, floor support, forward and aft inner chords, and the
bulkhead upper and lower webs of the STA 2598 bulkhead, which could
adversely affect the structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) High Frequency Eddy Current (HFEC) and Low Frequency Eddy Current
(LFEC) Inspections
At the compliance time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2815, dated
November 8, 2012; except as provided by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD:
Do HFEC and LFEC inspections, as applicable, for cracks in the
splice fitting, support frame, floor support, forward and aft inner
chords, the bulkhead upper web on the upper left and right side of
the bulkhead, and the bulkhead lower web on the lower left side of
the bulkhead, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2815, dated November 8, 2012.
(1) If no cracking is found, repeat the applicable inspections
specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, thereafter, at the applicable
time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2815, dated November 8, 2012.
(2) If any cracking is found, do the actions specified in
paragraphs (g)(2)(i) and (g)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before further flight, do the applicable repair, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-53A2815, dated November 8, 2012; except as
provided by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.
(ii) At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2815, dated
November 8, 2012, do HFEC and LFEC inspections for cracks in the
unrepaired structure, and do an HFEC inspection for cracks in the
repaired structure; as specified in and in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2815, dated November 8, 2012.
(A) If no cracking is found, repeat the applicable HFEC and LFEC
inspections specified in paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this AD,
thereafter, at the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2815, dated
November 8, 2012.
(B) If any cracking is found, before further flight, repair
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (i) of this AD.
(h) Exceptions to the Service Information
(1) If any crack is found during any inspection required by this
AD, and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2815, dated November 8,
2012, specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate action: Before
further flight, repair the crack using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD.
(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2815, dated
November 8, 2012, specifies a compliance time ``after the original
issue date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance
within the specified compliance time after the effective date of
this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Nathan Weigand,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356;
phone: 425-917-6428; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
Nathan.P.Weigand@faa.gov.
[[Page 64167]]
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2815, dated November 8,
2012.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207;
telephone 206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may review copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 19, 2013.
Ross Landes,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-24042 Filed 10-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P