Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 60824-60826 [2013-24028]
Download as PDF
60824
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2013 / Notices
Exclusion (CE) in accordance with 7
CFR 1940.310 or a Class I EA in
accordance with 7 CFR 1940.311.
Furthermore, if after Agency review of
proposals the Agency has determined
that the proposal could result in
significant environmental impacts on
the quality of the human environment,
an Environmental Impact Statement
may be required pursuant to 7 CFR
1940.313.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VII. Agency Contacts
For general questions about this
Notice, please contact Todd Hubbell,
Rural Development, Business Programs,
Energy Division, Biorefinery Assistance
Program, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Mail Stop 3225, Washington, DC,
20250–3225. Telephone: 202–690–2516.
Email: Todd.Hubbell@wdc.usda.gov.
Nondiscrimination Statement
The U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) prohibits discrimination against
its customers, employees, and
applicants for employment on the bases
of race, color, national origin, age,
disability, sex, gender identity, religion,
reprisal, and where applicable, political
beliefs, marital status, familial or
parental status, sexual orientation, or all
or part of an individual’s income is
derived from any public assistance
program, or protected genetic
information in employment or in any
program or activity conducted or funded
by the Department. (Not all prohibited
bases will apply to all programs and/or
employment activities.)
If you wish to file a Civil Rights
program complaint of discrimination,
complete the USDA Program
Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF),
found online at https://
www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_
cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call
(866) 632–9992 to request the form. You
may also write a letter containing all of
the information requested in the form.
Send your completed complaint form or
letter to us by mail at U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Director, Office of
Adjudication, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250–
9410, by fax (202) 690–7442 or email at
program.intake@usda.gov.
Individuals who are deaf, hard of
hearing or have speech disabilities and
you wish to file either an EEO or
program complaint please contact
USDA through the Federal Relay
Service at (800) 877–8339 or (800) 845–
6136 (in Spanish).
Persons with disabilities, who wish to
file a program complaint, please see
information above on how to contact us
by mail directly or by email. If you
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Oct 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
require alternative means of
communication for program information
(e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.)
please contact USDA’s TARGET Center
at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD).
Dated: September 16, 2013.
Lillian E. Salerno,
Administrator, Rural Business—Cooperative
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–24081 Filed 10–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
Title: 2014 Survey of Income and
Program Participation (SIPP) Panel.
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number(s): SIPP–105(L)2014—
Director’s Letter; SIPP–
105(L)(SP)2014— Director’s Letter
Spanish; SIPP/CAPI Automated
Instrument.
Type of Request: New collection.
Burden Hours: 73,500.
Number of Respondents: 73,500.
Average Hours per Response: 1 hour.
Needs and Uses: The Census Bureau
plans to conduct the 2014 Survey of
Income and Program Participation
(SIPP) Panel in four waves beginning in
February 2014. The Census Bureau’s
SIPP computer-assisted personal
interviewing (CAPI) will use an Event
History Calendar (EHC) interviewing
method and a 12-month, calendar-year
reference period in place of the current
SIPP questionnaire approach that uses a
sliding 4-month reference period. The
Census Bureau is re-engineering the
SIPP to accomplish several goals
including re-engineering the collection
instrument and processing system,
development of the EHC in the
instrument, use of administrative
records data where feasible, and
increased stakeholder interaction.
The main objective of the SIPP has
been, and continues to be, to provide
accurate and comprehensive
information about the income and
program participation of individuals
and households in the United States.
The survey’s mission is to provide a
nationally representative sample for
evaluating: (1) Annual and sub-annual
income dynamics; (2) movements into
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and out of government transfer
programs; (3) family and social context
of individuals and households; and (4)
interactions among these items. A major
use of the SIPP has been to evaluate the
use of and eligibility for government
programs and to analyze the impacts of
modifications to those programs. The reengineering of SIPP pursues these
objectives in the context of several goals
including cost reduction, improved
accuracy, increased relevance and
timeliness, reduced burden on
respondents, and increased
accessibility. The 2014 SIPP Panel will
collect detailed information on cash and
non-cash income (including
participation in government transfer
programs) once per year.
A key component of re-engineering
the SIPP is a shift from the every-fourmonth data collection schedule of
historical SIPP (most recently in the
2008 Panel) to an annual data collection
schedule for the re-engineered survey.
To accomplish this shift with minimal
impact on data quality, the Census
Bureau will use an EHC based
instrument to gather SIPP data. The EHC
is intended to help respondents recall
information in a more natural
‘‘autobiographical’’ manner by using life
events as triggers to recall other
economic events. For example, a
residence change may often occur
contemporaneously with a change in
employment. The entire process of
compiling the calendar focuses, by its
nature, on consistency and sequential
order of events, and attempts to correct
for otherwise missing data. For example,
unemployed respondents may
undertake a lengthy job search before
successfully finding employment. The
EHC allows recording dates of events
and spells of coverage and will provide
measures of monthly transitions of
program receipt and coverage, labor
force transitions, health insurance
transitions, and others. The EHC was
previously used in the 2010, 2011, 2012,
and 2013 SIPP–EHC field tests. Results
from the 2010–2013 Field Tests and the
2008 SIPP Panel were used to inform
final decisions regarding the design,
content, and implementation of the
2014 SIPP Panel. The content of the
2014 SIPP Panel will match that of the
2013 SIPP–EHC very closely. The 2014
SIPP Panel design does not contain
freestanding topical modules as in the
prior production SIPP instruments;
however, a portion of traditional SIPP
topical module content is integrated
into the main body of the 2014 SIPP
interview.
The start of the 2014 SIPP Panel was
scheduled at the earliest possible start
(February 2014) that would allow the
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2013 / Notices
use of a 2010 Census based sample. The
2014 SIPP Panel wave 1 will interview
respondents using the previous calendar
year 2013 as the reference period and
will proceed with annual interviewing
going forward. The 2014 SIPP Panel will
use a revised interviewing method
structure that will follow persons aged
15 years and older who move from the
prior wave household. Consequently,
future waves will incorporate
dependent data, which is information
collected from the prior wave interview
brought forward to the current
interview.
The Census Bureau plans to use
Computer Assisted Recorded Interview
(CARI) technology during the 2014 SIPP
Panel. CARI is a data collection method
that captures audio along with response
data during computer-assisted personal
and telephone interviews (CAPI &
CATI). With the respondent’s consent, a
portion of each interview is recorded
unobtrusively and both the sound file
and screen images are returned with the
response data to a central location for
coding. By reviewing the recorded
portions of the interview, quality
assurance analysts can evaluate the
likelihood that the exchange between
the field representative and respondent
is authentic and follows critical survey
protocol as defined by the sponsor and
based on best practices. Additionally,
the recordings will be reviewed to
develop standards for coaching
interviewers and develop options to use
them as supplements to both in-person
observation and reinterview. The 2014
SIPP Panel instrument will utilize the
CARI Interactive Data Access System
(CARI System), an innovative,
integrated, multifaceted monitoring
system that features a configurable webbased interface for behavior coding,
quality assurance, and coaching. This
system assists in coding interviews for
measuring question and interviewer
performance and the interaction
between interviewers and respondents.
The 2014 SIPP Panel Wave 1
instrument will be evaluated in several
domains including field implementation
`
issues and data comparability vis-a-vis
the 2008 SIPP Panel and administrative
records. Distributional characteristics
such as the percent of persons receiving
Temporary Assistance for Needy
Families (TANF), Food Stamps,
Medicare, who are working, who are
enrolled in school, or who have health
insurance coverage reported in the EHC
will be compared to the same
distributions from the 2008 SIPP Panel.
The primary focus will be to examine
the quality of data that the new
instrument yields for low-income
programs relative to the current SIPP
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Oct 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
and other administrative sources. The
2014 SIPP Panel sample is nationally
representative, with an oversample of
low-income areas in order to increase
the ability to measure participation in
government programs. In general, there
are two ways we will evaluate data
quality:
First, we will compare monthly
estimates from the 2014 SIPP Panel to
estimates from the 2008 SIPP Panel for
characteristics such as participation in
Food Stamps, TANF, Supplemental
Security Income (SSI), the Special
Supplemental Nutrition Program for
Women, Infants, and Children (WIC),
and Medicaid. We plan to conduct a
rigorous statistical analysis using the
model established for the 2010–2013
SIPP–EHC evaluations, where data from
the 2008 Panel and 2010–2013 SIPP–
EHC for the previous calendar years
were mapped to a common analysis
standard. The tests of significance
conducted for the differences in
monthly participation levels,
identification of patterns of significance,
and the likelihood of transition will
again be applied to the 2013 calendar
year comparison mapped data.
Additional content will be included in
the mapped data to expand the
comparisons beyond the focus of the
EHC section of the instrument
comparisons made with the SIPP–EHC
field tests. As with the 2010–2013 SIPP–
EHC field tests, we will also compare
paradata related to interview
performance (interview length and nonresponse) by region, interviewer and
household characteristics, and training
performance as measured by the
certification test.
Second, for a small subset of
characteristics, and for a subset of
sample areas, we will have access to
administrative record data, which
should allow for a more objective data
quality assessment of the validity of the
survey estimates for respondents
matched to administrative data. The
acquisition of administrative data from
national sources and especially from
states is difficult and time consuming.
We continue to work with Texas,
Maryland, Illinois, and Wisconsin to
acquire state-level data (primarily
focused on Food Stamps or the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) and TANF), and
additional state discussions are in
progress. From national-level
administrative records, we are working
to acquire additional data from the
Internal Revenue Service, the detailed
and summary earnings records, OldAge, Survivors, and Disability Insurance
(OASDI), SSI, Medicare, and Medicaid
(from Centers for Medicare and
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60825
Medicaid services (CMS)). To the extent
that data can be obtained in a timely
way for calendar year 2013 we will
include validation evaluations of the
responses given both in the 2008 Panel
and the 2014 SIPP Panel Wave 1 data.
These administrative data can tell us the
rate of both false positive and false
negative reporting, as well as some
indication of the accuracy of the timing
of reports. The ability to make effective
comparisons with administrative data is
dependent on the match rate of
administrative data to SIPP and reengineered SIPP data, the timing of the
receipt of the data, and the accuracy and
quality of the administrative records.
This project will continue to show the
importance of developing systems that
can integrate administrative reports
with survey data.
This OMB clearance request is for the
full 2014 SIPP Panel (Waves 1, 2, 3, and
4). Wave 1 of the SIPP 2014 Panel will
be conducted from February to May of
2014. Wave 2 is scheduled to be
conducted from January to April of
2015. Wave 3 is scheduled to be
conducted from January to April of
2016. Wave 4 is scheduled to be
conducted from January to April of
2017. Approximately 52,000 households
will be sampled to be interviewed for
the 2014 Panel. From these sampled
households, we expect approximately
35,000 interviewed households. We
estimate that each household contains
2.1 people aged 15 and above, yielding
approximately 73,500 person-level
interviews per wave in this panel.
Interviews take approximately 60
minutes per adult on average,
consequently the total annual burden
for 2014 SIPP–EHC interviews will be
73,500 hours per year in FY 2014, 2015,
2016, and 2017.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C.,
Section 182.
OMB Desk Officer: Brian HarrisKojetin, (202) 395–7314.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Jennifer Jessup,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of
Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at jjessup@
doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to Brian Harris-Kojetin, OMB
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
60826
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2013 / Notices
Desk Officer either by fax (202–395–
7245) or email (bharrisk@omb.eop.gov).
Dated: September 27, 2013.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–24028 Filed 10–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST).
Title: Building Construction
Technology Extension Pilot (BCTEP)
Client Impact Survey.
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number(s): NA.
Type of Request: Regular submission
(new information collection).
Number of Respondents: 50.
Average Hours per Response: 15
minutes.
Burden Hours: 13.
Needs and Uses: The Building
Construction Technology Extension
Pilot (BCTEP) sponsored by the National
Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST), the Manufacturing Extension
Partnership (MEP) and the Department
of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy/Building
Technologies Office (EERE/BTO), is
focused on training building operators
in the principles and practices of
building energy systems re-tuning. Retuning is a systematic semi-automated
process of identifying operational
problems in commercial and industrial
buildings. The information collected
under this request will be used to
monitor and evaluate the Competitive
Award Recipients’ participation in the
project as well as providing Congress
with quantitate information required for
government-supported programs. The
reporting criterion is: Project
accountability; project evaluation;
award recipient evaluation; analysis and
research; reports to stakeholders;
continuous improvement; knowledge
sharing; and identification of distinctive
practices.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; Not for-profit
institutions.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Oct 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Jennifer Jessup,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of
Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at JJessup@
doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to Jasmeet Seehra, OMB Desk
Officer, FAX number (202) 395–5167 or
via the Internet at Jasmeet_K._Seehra@
omb.eop.gov.
Dated: September 26, 2013.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–24023 Filed 10–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: California Recreational
Groundfish Survey.
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number(s): NA.
Type of Request: Regular submission
(request for a new information
collection).
Number of Respondents: 1,500.
Average Hours per Response: 25
minutes.
Burden Hours: 208.
Needs and Uses: The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) plans to
collect data to increase the agency’s
understanding of California saltwater
angler preferences relative to Pacific
groundfish. Pacific groundfish caught in
California’s recreational fishery include
about 17 species of rockfish, as well as
lingcod, cabezon, and California
scorpionfish. The number and diversity
of species caught in this fishery poses a
regulatory challenge for State and
Federal fisheries managers. Information
to be collected pertains to anglers’
recreational saltwater fishing activities
in California (including groundfish);
their attitudes and preferences regarding
particular groundfish species and
groundfish regulations; and angler
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
demographics. The data collected will
provide NMFS, as well as state agency
partners such as the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife
(CDFW), with information useful for
understanding current groundfish
fishing behavior and possible responses
to potential regulatory changes.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Frequency: One time.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
OMB Desk Officer: OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Jennifer Jessup,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of
Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at JJessup@
doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov.
Dated: September 26, 2013.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–24022 Filed 10–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
Foreign-Trade Zone 155—Calhoun/
Victoria Counties, Texas; Authorization
of Production Activity; Caterpillar, Inc.
(Excavator and Frame Assembly
Production); Victoria, Texas
On May 29, 2013, The CalhounVictoria Foreign Trade Zone, Inc.,
grantee of FTZ 155, submitted a
notification of proposed production
activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones
(FTZ) Board on behalf of Caterpillar,
Inc., within FTZ 155-Site 5, in Victoria,
Texas.
The notification was processed in
accordance with the regulations of the
FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400) including
notice in the Federal Register inviting
public comment (78 FR 35604, 06/13/
2013). The FTZ Board has determined
that no further review of the activity is
warranted at this time. The production
activity described in the notification is
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.14.
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60824-60826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24028]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 35).
Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
Title: 2014 Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP)
Panel.
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number(s): SIPP-105(L)2014--Director's Letter; SIPP-
105(L)(SP)2014-- Director's Letter Spanish; SIPP/CAPI Automated
Instrument.
Type of Request: New collection.
Burden Hours: 73,500.
Number of Respondents: 73,500.
Average Hours per Response: 1 hour.
Needs and Uses: The Census Bureau plans to conduct the 2014 Survey
of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) Panel in four waves
beginning in February 2014. The Census Bureau's SIPP computer-assisted
personal interviewing (CAPI) will use an Event History Calendar (EHC)
interviewing method and a 12-month, calendar-year reference period in
place of the current SIPP questionnaire approach that uses a sliding 4-
month reference period. The Census Bureau is re-engineering the SIPP to
accomplish several goals including re-engineering the collection
instrument and processing system, development of the EHC in the
instrument, use of administrative records data where feasible, and
increased stakeholder interaction.
The main objective of the SIPP has been, and continues to be, to
provide accurate and comprehensive information about the income and
program participation of individuals and households in the United
States. The survey's mission is to provide a nationally representative
sample for evaluating: (1) Annual and sub-annual income dynamics; (2)
movements into and out of government transfer programs; (3) family and
social context of individuals and households; and (4) interactions
among these items. A major use of the SIPP has been to evaluate the use
of and eligibility for government programs and to analyze the impacts
of modifications to those programs. The re-engineering of SIPP pursues
these objectives in the context of several goals including cost
reduction, improved accuracy, increased relevance and timeliness,
reduced burden on respondents, and increased accessibility. The 2014
SIPP Panel will collect detailed information on cash and non-cash
income (including participation in government transfer programs) once
per year.
A key component of re-engineering the SIPP is a shift from the
every-four-month data collection schedule of historical SIPP (most
recently in the 2008 Panel) to an annual data collection schedule for
the re-engineered survey. To accomplish this shift with minimal impact
on data quality, the Census Bureau will use an EHC based instrument to
gather SIPP data. The EHC is intended to help respondents recall
information in a more natural ``autobiographical'' manner by using life
events as triggers to recall other economic events. For example, a
residence change may often occur contemporaneously with a change in
employment. The entire process of compiling the calendar focuses, by
its nature, on consistency and sequential order of events, and attempts
to correct for otherwise missing data. For example, unemployed
respondents may undertake a lengthy job search before successfully
finding employment. The EHC allows recording dates of events and spells
of coverage and will provide measures of monthly transitions of program
receipt and coverage, labor force transitions, health insurance
transitions, and others. The EHC was previously used in the 2010, 2011,
2012, and 2013 SIPP-EHC field tests. Results from the 2010-2013 Field
Tests and the 2008 SIPP Panel were used to inform final decisions
regarding the design, content, and implementation of the 2014 SIPP
Panel. The content of the 2014 SIPP Panel will match that of the 2013
SIPP-EHC very closely. The 2014 SIPP Panel design does not contain
freestanding topical modules as in the prior production SIPP
instruments; however, a portion of traditional SIPP topical module
content is integrated into the main body of the 2014 SIPP interview.
The start of the 2014 SIPP Panel was scheduled at the earliest
possible start (February 2014) that would allow the
[[Page 60825]]
use of a 2010 Census based sample. The 2014 SIPP Panel wave 1 will
interview respondents using the previous calendar year 2013 as the
reference period and will proceed with annual interviewing going
forward. The 2014 SIPP Panel will use a revised interviewing method
structure that will follow persons aged 15 years and older who move
from the prior wave household. Consequently, future waves will
incorporate dependent data, which is information collected from the
prior wave interview brought forward to the current interview.
The Census Bureau plans to use Computer Assisted Recorded Interview
(CARI) technology during the 2014 SIPP Panel. CARI is a data collection
method that captures audio along with response data during computer-
assisted personal and telephone interviews (CAPI & CATI). With the
respondent's consent, a portion of each interview is recorded
unobtrusively and both the sound file and screen images are returned
with the response data to a central location for coding. By reviewing
the recorded portions of the interview, quality assurance analysts can
evaluate the likelihood that the exchange between the field
representative and respondent is authentic and follows critical survey
protocol as defined by the sponsor and based on best practices.
Additionally, the recordings will be reviewed to develop standards for
coaching interviewers and develop options to use them as supplements to
both in-person observation and reinterview. The 2014 SIPP Panel
instrument will utilize the CARI Interactive Data Access System (CARI
System), an innovative, integrated, multifaceted monitoring system that
features a configurable web-based interface for behavior coding,
quality assurance, and coaching. This system assists in coding
interviews for measuring question and interviewer performance and the
interaction between interviewers and respondents.
The 2014 SIPP Panel Wave 1 instrument will be evaluated in several
domains including field implementation issues and data comparability
vis-[agrave]-vis the 2008 SIPP Panel and administrative records.
Distributional characteristics such as the percent of persons receiving
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Food Stamps, Medicare,
who are working, who are enrolled in school, or who have health
insurance coverage reported in the EHC will be compared to the same
distributions from the 2008 SIPP Panel. The primary focus will be to
examine the quality of data that the new instrument yields for low-
income programs relative to the current SIPP and other administrative
sources. The 2014 SIPP Panel sample is nationally representative, with
an oversample of low-income areas in order to increase the ability to
measure participation in government programs. In general, there are two
ways we will evaluate data quality:
First, we will compare monthly estimates from the 2014 SIPP Panel
to estimates from the 2008 SIPP Panel for characteristics such as
participation in Food Stamps, TANF, Supplemental Security Income (SSI),
the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and
Children (WIC), and Medicaid. We plan to conduct a rigorous statistical
analysis using the model established for the 2010-2013 SIPP-EHC
evaluations, where data from the 2008 Panel and 2010-2013 SIPP-EHC for
the previous calendar years were mapped to a common analysis standard.
The tests of significance conducted for the differences in monthly
participation levels, identification of patterns of significance, and
the likelihood of transition will again be applied to the 2013 calendar
year comparison mapped data. Additional content will be included in the
mapped data to expand the comparisons beyond the focus of the EHC
section of the instrument comparisons made with the SIPP-EHC field
tests. As with the 2010-2013 SIPP-EHC field tests, we will also compare
paradata related to interview performance (interview length and non-
response) by region, interviewer and household characteristics, and
training performance as measured by the certification test.
Second, for a small subset of characteristics, and for a subset of
sample areas, we will have access to administrative record data, which
should allow for a more objective data quality assessment of the
validity of the survey estimates for respondents matched to
administrative data. The acquisition of administrative data from
national sources and especially from states is difficult and time
consuming. We continue to work with Texas, Maryland, Illinois, and
Wisconsin to acquire state-level data (primarily focused on Food Stamps
or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and TANF), and
additional state discussions are in progress. From national-level
administrative records, we are working to acquire additional data from
the Internal Revenue Service, the detailed and summary earnings
records, Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI), SSI,
Medicare, and Medicaid (from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services
(CMS)). To the extent that data can be obtained in a timely way for
calendar year 2013 we will include validation evaluations of the
responses given both in the 2008 Panel and the 2014 SIPP Panel Wave 1
data. These administrative data can tell us the rate of both false
positive and false negative reporting, as well as some indication of
the accuracy of the timing of reports. The ability to make effective
comparisons with administrative data is dependent on the match rate of
administrative data to SIPP and re-engineered SIPP data, the timing of
the receipt of the data, and the accuracy and quality of the
administrative records. This project will continue to show the
importance of developing systems that can integrate administrative
reports with survey data.
This OMB clearance request is for the full 2014 SIPP Panel (Waves
1, 2, 3, and 4). Wave 1 of the SIPP 2014 Panel will be conducted from
February to May of 2014. Wave 2 is scheduled to be conducted from
January to April of 2015. Wave 3 is scheduled to be conducted from
January to April of 2016. Wave 4 is scheduled to be conducted from
January to April of 2017. Approximately 52,000 households will be
sampled to be interviewed for the 2014 Panel. From these sampled
households, we expect approximately 35,000 interviewed households. We
estimate that each household contains 2.1 people aged 15 and above,
yielding approximately 73,500 person-level interviews per wave in this
panel. Interviews take approximately 60 minutes per adult on average,
consequently the total annual burden for 2014 SIPP-EHC interviews will
be 73,500 hours per year in FY 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.
Affected Public: Individuals or households.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C., Section 182.
OMB Desk Officer: Brian Harris-Kojetin, (202) 395-7314.
Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained
by calling or writing Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482-0336, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
jjessup@doc.gov).
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice
to Brian Harris-Kojetin, OMB
[[Page 60826]]
Desk Officer either by fax (202-395-7245) or email
(bharrisk@omb.eop.gov).
Dated: September 27, 2013.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-24028 Filed 10-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P