Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 60824-60826 [2013-24028]

Download as PDF 60824 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2013 / Notices Exclusion (CE) in accordance with 7 CFR 1940.310 or a Class I EA in accordance with 7 CFR 1940.311. Furthermore, if after Agency review of proposals the Agency has determined that the proposal could result in significant environmental impacts on the quality of the human environment, an Environmental Impact Statement may be required pursuant to 7 CFR 1940.313. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES VII. Agency Contacts For general questions about this Notice, please contact Todd Hubbell, Rural Development, Business Programs, Energy Division, Biorefinery Assistance Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Mail Stop 3225, Washington, DC, 20250–3225. Telephone: 202–690–2516. Email: Todd.Hubbell@wdc.usda.gov. Nondiscrimination Statement The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at https:// www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_ cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632–9992 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the information requested in the form. Send your completed complaint form or letter to us by mail at U.S. Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250– 9410, by fax (202) 690–7442 or email at program.intake@usda.gov. Individuals who are deaf, hard of hearing or have speech disabilities and you wish to file either an EEO or program complaint please contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339 or (800) 845– 6136 (in Spanish). Persons with disabilities, who wish to file a program complaint, please see information above on how to contact us by mail directly or by email. If you VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:48 Oct 01, 2013 Jkt 232001 require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) please contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). Dated: September 16, 2013. Lillian E. Salerno, Administrator, Rural Business—Cooperative Service. [FR Doc. 2013–24081 Filed 10–1–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). Agency: U.S. Census Bureau. Title: 2014 Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) Panel. OMB Control Number: None. Form Number(s): SIPP–105(L)2014— Director’s Letter; SIPP– 105(L)(SP)2014— Director’s Letter Spanish; SIPP/CAPI Automated Instrument. Type of Request: New collection. Burden Hours: 73,500. Number of Respondents: 73,500. Average Hours per Response: 1 hour. Needs and Uses: The Census Bureau plans to conduct the 2014 Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) Panel in four waves beginning in February 2014. The Census Bureau’s SIPP computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) will use an Event History Calendar (EHC) interviewing method and a 12-month, calendar-year reference period in place of the current SIPP questionnaire approach that uses a sliding 4-month reference period. The Census Bureau is re-engineering the SIPP to accomplish several goals including re-engineering the collection instrument and processing system, development of the EHC in the instrument, use of administrative records data where feasible, and increased stakeholder interaction. The main objective of the SIPP has been, and continues to be, to provide accurate and comprehensive information about the income and program participation of individuals and households in the United States. The survey’s mission is to provide a nationally representative sample for evaluating: (1) Annual and sub-annual income dynamics; (2) movements into PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and out of government transfer programs; (3) family and social context of individuals and households; and (4) interactions among these items. A major use of the SIPP has been to evaluate the use of and eligibility for government programs and to analyze the impacts of modifications to those programs. The reengineering of SIPP pursues these objectives in the context of several goals including cost reduction, improved accuracy, increased relevance and timeliness, reduced burden on respondents, and increased accessibility. The 2014 SIPP Panel will collect detailed information on cash and non-cash income (including participation in government transfer programs) once per year. A key component of re-engineering the SIPP is a shift from the every-fourmonth data collection schedule of historical SIPP (most recently in the 2008 Panel) to an annual data collection schedule for the re-engineered survey. To accomplish this shift with minimal impact on data quality, the Census Bureau will use an EHC based instrument to gather SIPP data. The EHC is intended to help respondents recall information in a more natural ‘‘autobiographical’’ manner by using life events as triggers to recall other economic events. For example, a residence change may often occur contemporaneously with a change in employment. The entire process of compiling the calendar focuses, by its nature, on consistency and sequential order of events, and attempts to correct for otherwise missing data. For example, unemployed respondents may undertake a lengthy job search before successfully finding employment. The EHC allows recording dates of events and spells of coverage and will provide measures of monthly transitions of program receipt and coverage, labor force transitions, health insurance transitions, and others. The EHC was previously used in the 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 SIPP–EHC field tests. Results from the 2010–2013 Field Tests and the 2008 SIPP Panel were used to inform final decisions regarding the design, content, and implementation of the 2014 SIPP Panel. The content of the 2014 SIPP Panel will match that of the 2013 SIPP–EHC very closely. The 2014 SIPP Panel design does not contain freestanding topical modules as in the prior production SIPP instruments; however, a portion of traditional SIPP topical module content is integrated into the main body of the 2014 SIPP interview. The start of the 2014 SIPP Panel was scheduled at the earliest possible start (February 2014) that would allow the E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2013 / Notices use of a 2010 Census based sample. The 2014 SIPP Panel wave 1 will interview respondents using the previous calendar year 2013 as the reference period and will proceed with annual interviewing going forward. The 2014 SIPP Panel will use a revised interviewing method structure that will follow persons aged 15 years and older who move from the prior wave household. Consequently, future waves will incorporate dependent data, which is information collected from the prior wave interview brought forward to the current interview. The Census Bureau plans to use Computer Assisted Recorded Interview (CARI) technology during the 2014 SIPP Panel. CARI is a data collection method that captures audio along with response data during computer-assisted personal and telephone interviews (CAPI & CATI). With the respondent’s consent, a portion of each interview is recorded unobtrusively and both the sound file and screen images are returned with the response data to a central location for coding. By reviewing the recorded portions of the interview, quality assurance analysts can evaluate the likelihood that the exchange between the field representative and respondent is authentic and follows critical survey protocol as defined by the sponsor and based on best practices. Additionally, the recordings will be reviewed to develop standards for coaching interviewers and develop options to use them as supplements to both in-person observation and reinterview. The 2014 SIPP Panel instrument will utilize the CARI Interactive Data Access System (CARI System), an innovative, integrated, multifaceted monitoring system that features a configurable webbased interface for behavior coding, quality assurance, and coaching. This system assists in coding interviews for measuring question and interviewer performance and the interaction between interviewers and respondents. The 2014 SIPP Panel Wave 1 instrument will be evaluated in several domains including field implementation ` issues and data comparability vis-a-vis the 2008 SIPP Panel and administrative records. Distributional characteristics such as the percent of persons receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Food Stamps, Medicare, who are working, who are enrolled in school, or who have health insurance coverage reported in the EHC will be compared to the same distributions from the 2008 SIPP Panel. The primary focus will be to examine the quality of data that the new instrument yields for low-income programs relative to the current SIPP VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:48 Oct 01, 2013 Jkt 232001 and other administrative sources. The 2014 SIPP Panel sample is nationally representative, with an oversample of low-income areas in order to increase the ability to measure participation in government programs. In general, there are two ways we will evaluate data quality: First, we will compare monthly estimates from the 2014 SIPP Panel to estimates from the 2008 SIPP Panel for characteristics such as participation in Food Stamps, TANF, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), and Medicaid. We plan to conduct a rigorous statistical analysis using the model established for the 2010–2013 SIPP–EHC evaluations, where data from the 2008 Panel and 2010–2013 SIPP– EHC for the previous calendar years were mapped to a common analysis standard. The tests of significance conducted for the differences in monthly participation levels, identification of patterns of significance, and the likelihood of transition will again be applied to the 2013 calendar year comparison mapped data. Additional content will be included in the mapped data to expand the comparisons beyond the focus of the EHC section of the instrument comparisons made with the SIPP–EHC field tests. As with the 2010–2013 SIPP– EHC field tests, we will also compare paradata related to interview performance (interview length and nonresponse) by region, interviewer and household characteristics, and training performance as measured by the certification test. Second, for a small subset of characteristics, and for a subset of sample areas, we will have access to administrative record data, which should allow for a more objective data quality assessment of the validity of the survey estimates for respondents matched to administrative data. The acquisition of administrative data from national sources and especially from states is difficult and time consuming. We continue to work with Texas, Maryland, Illinois, and Wisconsin to acquire state-level data (primarily focused on Food Stamps or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and TANF), and additional state discussions are in progress. From national-level administrative records, we are working to acquire additional data from the Internal Revenue Service, the detailed and summary earnings records, OldAge, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI), SSI, Medicare, and Medicaid (from Centers for Medicare and PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 60825 Medicaid services (CMS)). To the extent that data can be obtained in a timely way for calendar year 2013 we will include validation evaluations of the responses given both in the 2008 Panel and the 2014 SIPP Panel Wave 1 data. These administrative data can tell us the rate of both false positive and false negative reporting, as well as some indication of the accuracy of the timing of reports. The ability to make effective comparisons with administrative data is dependent on the match rate of administrative data to SIPP and reengineered SIPP data, the timing of the receipt of the data, and the accuracy and quality of the administrative records. This project will continue to show the importance of developing systems that can integrate administrative reports with survey data. This OMB clearance request is for the full 2014 SIPP Panel (Waves 1, 2, 3, and 4). Wave 1 of the SIPP 2014 Panel will be conducted from February to May of 2014. Wave 2 is scheduled to be conducted from January to April of 2015. Wave 3 is scheduled to be conducted from January to April of 2016. Wave 4 is scheduled to be conducted from January to April of 2017. Approximately 52,000 households will be sampled to be interviewed for the 2014 Panel. From these sampled households, we expect approximately 35,000 interviewed households. We estimate that each household contains 2.1 people aged 15 and above, yielding approximately 73,500 person-level interviews per wave in this panel. Interviews take approximately 60 minutes per adult on average, consequently the total annual burden for 2014 SIPP–EHC interviews will be 73,500 hours per year in FY 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017. Affected Public: Individuals or households. Frequency: Annually. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C., Section 182. OMB Desk Officer: Brian HarrisKojetin, (202) 395–7314. Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained by calling or writing Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at jjessup@ doc.gov). Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to Brian Harris-Kojetin, OMB E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1 60826 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2013 / Notices Desk Officer either by fax (202–395– 7245) or email (bharrisk@omb.eop.gov). Dated: September 27, 2013. Glenna Mickelson, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2013–24028 Filed 10–1–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Title: Building Construction Technology Extension Pilot (BCTEP) Client Impact Survey. OMB Control Number: None. Form Number(s): NA. Type of Request: Regular submission (new information collection). Number of Respondents: 50. Average Hours per Response: 15 minutes. Burden Hours: 13. Needs and Uses: The Building Construction Technology Extension Pilot (BCTEP) sponsored by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) and the Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy/Building Technologies Office (EERE/BTO), is focused on training building operators in the principles and practices of building energy systems re-tuning. Retuning is a systematic semi-automated process of identifying operational problems in commercial and industrial buildings. The information collected under this request will be used to monitor and evaluate the Competitive Award Recipients’ participation in the project as well as providing Congress with quantitate information required for government-supported programs. The reporting criterion is: Project accountability; project evaluation; award recipient evaluation; analysis and research; reports to stakeholders; continuous improvement; knowledge sharing; and identification of distinctive practices. Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; Not for-profit institutions. Frequency: Annually. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:48 Oct 01, 2013 Jkt 232001 Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained by calling or writing Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at JJessup@ doc.gov). Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to Jasmeet Seehra, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395–5167 or via the Internet at Jasmeet_K._Seehra@ omb.eop.gov. Dated: September 26, 2013. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2013–24023 Filed 10–1–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–13–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Title: California Recreational Groundfish Survey. OMB Control Number: None. Form Number(s): NA. Type of Request: Regular submission (request for a new information collection). Number of Respondents: 1,500. Average Hours per Response: 25 minutes. Burden Hours: 208. Needs and Uses: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) plans to collect data to increase the agency’s understanding of California saltwater angler preferences relative to Pacific groundfish. Pacific groundfish caught in California’s recreational fishery include about 17 species of rockfish, as well as lingcod, cabezon, and California scorpionfish. The number and diversity of species caught in this fishery poses a regulatory challenge for State and Federal fisheries managers. Information to be collected pertains to anglers’ recreational saltwater fishing activities in California (including groundfish); their attitudes and preferences regarding particular groundfish species and groundfish regulations; and angler PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 demographics. The data collected will provide NMFS, as well as state agency partners such as the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), with information useful for understanding current groundfish fishing behavior and possible responses to potential regulatory changes. Affected Public: Individuals or households. Frequency: One time. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. OMB Desk Officer: OIRA_ Submission@omb.eop.gov. Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained by calling or writing Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at JJessup@ doc.gov). Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to OIRA_Submission@ omb.eop.gov. Dated: September 26, 2013. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2013–24022 Filed 10–1–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board Foreign-Trade Zone 155—Calhoun/ Victoria Counties, Texas; Authorization of Production Activity; Caterpillar, Inc. (Excavator and Frame Assembly Production); Victoria, Texas On May 29, 2013, The CalhounVictoria Foreign Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 155, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board on behalf of Caterpillar, Inc., within FTZ 155-Site 5, in Victoria, Texas. The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400) including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (78 FR 35604, 06/13/ 2013). The FTZ Board has determined that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification is authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.14. E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60824-60826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24028]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
    Title: 2014 Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) 
Panel.
    OMB Control Number: None.
    Form Number(s): SIPP-105(L)2014--Director's Letter; SIPP-
105(L)(SP)2014-- Director's Letter Spanish; SIPP/CAPI Automated 
Instrument.
    Type of Request: New collection.
    Burden Hours: 73,500.
    Number of Respondents: 73,500.
    Average Hours per Response: 1 hour.
    Needs and Uses: The Census Bureau plans to conduct the 2014 Survey 
of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) Panel in four waves 
beginning in February 2014. The Census Bureau's SIPP computer-assisted 
personal interviewing (CAPI) will use an Event History Calendar (EHC) 
interviewing method and a 12-month, calendar-year reference period in 
place of the current SIPP questionnaire approach that uses a sliding 4-
month reference period. The Census Bureau is re-engineering the SIPP to 
accomplish several goals including re-engineering the collection 
instrument and processing system, development of the EHC in the 
instrument, use of administrative records data where feasible, and 
increased stakeholder interaction.
    The main objective of the SIPP has been, and continues to be, to 
provide accurate and comprehensive information about the income and 
program participation of individuals and households in the United 
States. The survey's mission is to provide a nationally representative 
sample for evaluating: (1) Annual and sub-annual income dynamics; (2) 
movements into and out of government transfer programs; (3) family and 
social context of individuals and households; and (4) interactions 
among these items. A major use of the SIPP has been to evaluate the use 
of and eligibility for government programs and to analyze the impacts 
of modifications to those programs. The re-engineering of SIPP pursues 
these objectives in the context of several goals including cost 
reduction, improved accuracy, increased relevance and timeliness, 
reduced burden on respondents, and increased accessibility. The 2014 
SIPP Panel will collect detailed information on cash and non-cash 
income (including participation in government transfer programs) once 
per year.
    A key component of re-engineering the SIPP is a shift from the 
every-four-month data collection schedule of historical SIPP (most 
recently in the 2008 Panel) to an annual data collection schedule for 
the re-engineered survey. To accomplish this shift with minimal impact 
on data quality, the Census Bureau will use an EHC based instrument to 
gather SIPP data. The EHC is intended to help respondents recall 
information in a more natural ``autobiographical'' manner by using life 
events as triggers to recall other economic events. For example, a 
residence change may often occur contemporaneously with a change in 
employment. The entire process of compiling the calendar focuses, by 
its nature, on consistency and sequential order of events, and attempts 
to correct for otherwise missing data. For example, unemployed 
respondents may undertake a lengthy job search before successfully 
finding employment. The EHC allows recording dates of events and spells 
of coverage and will provide measures of monthly transitions of program 
receipt and coverage, labor force transitions, health insurance 
transitions, and others. The EHC was previously used in the 2010, 2011, 
2012, and 2013 SIPP-EHC field tests. Results from the 2010-2013 Field 
Tests and the 2008 SIPP Panel were used to inform final decisions 
regarding the design, content, and implementation of the 2014 SIPP 
Panel. The content of the 2014 SIPP Panel will match that of the 2013 
SIPP-EHC very closely. The 2014 SIPP Panel design does not contain 
freestanding topical modules as in the prior production SIPP 
instruments; however, a portion of traditional SIPP topical module 
content is integrated into the main body of the 2014 SIPP interview.
    The start of the 2014 SIPP Panel was scheduled at the earliest 
possible start (February 2014) that would allow the

[[Page 60825]]

use of a 2010 Census based sample. The 2014 SIPP Panel wave 1 will 
interview respondents using the previous calendar year 2013 as the 
reference period and will proceed with annual interviewing going 
forward. The 2014 SIPP Panel will use a revised interviewing method 
structure that will follow persons aged 15 years and older who move 
from the prior wave household. Consequently, future waves will 
incorporate dependent data, which is information collected from the 
prior wave interview brought forward to the current interview.
    The Census Bureau plans to use Computer Assisted Recorded Interview 
(CARI) technology during the 2014 SIPP Panel. CARI is a data collection 
method that captures audio along with response data during computer-
assisted personal and telephone interviews (CAPI & CATI). With the 
respondent's consent, a portion of each interview is recorded 
unobtrusively and both the sound file and screen images are returned 
with the response data to a central location for coding. By reviewing 
the recorded portions of the interview, quality assurance analysts can 
evaluate the likelihood that the exchange between the field 
representative and respondent is authentic and follows critical survey 
protocol as defined by the sponsor and based on best practices. 
Additionally, the recordings will be reviewed to develop standards for 
coaching interviewers and develop options to use them as supplements to 
both in-person observation and reinterview. The 2014 SIPP Panel 
instrument will utilize the CARI Interactive Data Access System (CARI 
System), an innovative, integrated, multifaceted monitoring system that 
features a configurable web-based interface for behavior coding, 
quality assurance, and coaching. This system assists in coding 
interviews for measuring question and interviewer performance and the 
interaction between interviewers and respondents.
    The 2014 SIPP Panel Wave 1 instrument will be evaluated in several 
domains including field implementation issues and data comparability 
vis-[agrave]-vis the 2008 SIPP Panel and administrative records. 
Distributional characteristics such as the percent of persons receiving 
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Food Stamps, Medicare, 
who are working, who are enrolled in school, or who have health 
insurance coverage reported in the EHC will be compared to the same 
distributions from the 2008 SIPP Panel. The primary focus will be to 
examine the quality of data that the new instrument yields for low-
income programs relative to the current SIPP and other administrative 
sources. The 2014 SIPP Panel sample is nationally representative, with 
an oversample of low-income areas in order to increase the ability to 
measure participation in government programs. In general, there are two 
ways we will evaluate data quality:
    First, we will compare monthly estimates from the 2014 SIPP Panel 
to estimates from the 2008 SIPP Panel for characteristics such as 
participation in Food Stamps, TANF, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), 
the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and 
Children (WIC), and Medicaid. We plan to conduct a rigorous statistical 
analysis using the model established for the 2010-2013 SIPP-EHC 
evaluations, where data from the 2008 Panel and 2010-2013 SIPP-EHC for 
the previous calendar years were mapped to a common analysis standard. 
The tests of significance conducted for the differences in monthly 
participation levels, identification of patterns of significance, and 
the likelihood of transition will again be applied to the 2013 calendar 
year comparison mapped data. Additional content will be included in the 
mapped data to expand the comparisons beyond the focus of the EHC 
section of the instrument comparisons made with the SIPP-EHC field 
tests. As with the 2010-2013 SIPP-EHC field tests, we will also compare 
paradata related to interview performance (interview length and non-
response) by region, interviewer and household characteristics, and 
training performance as measured by the certification test.
    Second, for a small subset of characteristics, and for a subset of 
sample areas, we will have access to administrative record data, which 
should allow for a more objective data quality assessment of the 
validity of the survey estimates for respondents matched to 
administrative data. The acquisition of administrative data from 
national sources and especially from states is difficult and time 
consuming. We continue to work with Texas, Maryland, Illinois, and 
Wisconsin to acquire state-level data (primarily focused on Food Stamps 
or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and TANF), and 
additional state discussions are in progress. From national-level 
administrative records, we are working to acquire additional data from 
the Internal Revenue Service, the detailed and summary earnings 
records, Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI), SSI, 
Medicare, and Medicaid (from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services 
(CMS)). To the extent that data can be obtained in a timely way for 
calendar year 2013 we will include validation evaluations of the 
responses given both in the 2008 Panel and the 2014 SIPP Panel Wave 1 
data. These administrative data can tell us the rate of both false 
positive and false negative reporting, as well as some indication of 
the accuracy of the timing of reports. The ability to make effective 
comparisons with administrative data is dependent on the match rate of 
administrative data to SIPP and re-engineered SIPP data, the timing of 
the receipt of the data, and the accuracy and quality of the 
administrative records. This project will continue to show the 
importance of developing systems that can integrate administrative 
reports with survey data.
    This OMB clearance request is for the full 2014 SIPP Panel (Waves 
1, 2, 3, and 4). Wave 1 of the SIPP 2014 Panel will be conducted from 
February to May of 2014. Wave 2 is scheduled to be conducted from 
January to April of 2015. Wave 3 is scheduled to be conducted from 
January to April of 2016. Wave 4 is scheduled to be conducted from 
January to April of 2017. Approximately 52,000 households will be 
sampled to be interviewed for the 2014 Panel. From these sampled 
households, we expect approximately 35,000 interviewed households. We 
estimate that each household contains 2.1 people aged 15 and above, 
yielding approximately 73,500 person-level interviews per wave in this 
panel. Interviews take approximately 60 minutes per adult on average, 
consequently the total annual burden for 2014 SIPP-EHC interviews will 
be 73,500 hours per year in FY 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C., Section 182.
    OMB Desk Officer: Brian Harris-Kojetin, (202) 395-7314.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0336, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
jjessup@doc.gov).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Brian Harris-Kojetin, OMB

[[Page 60826]]

Desk Officer either by fax (202-395-7245) or email 
(bharrisk@omb.eop.gov).

    Dated: September 27, 2013.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-24028 Filed 10-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.