Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE Arca Equities Schedule of Fees and Charges for Exchange Services Regarding Calculation of the Mid-Point Passive Liquidity Order Tier, 60939-60941 [2013-24011]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2013 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
reopening auction if the security is
going to close shortly thereafter. This
may cause price dislocations,
uncertainty of executions, and added
confusion during an already volatile
period.26 Based on the Participants’
statements, the Commission believes the
proposal to amend Section VII(C)(1) of
the Plan is consistent with with Section
11A of the Act.
Second, the Participants propose to
amend Section I of Appendix A of the
Plan to revise the definition of which
ETPs are eligible to be included in the
list of Tier 1 NMS Stocks under the Plan
by deleting the following language: ‘‘To
ensure that ETPs that track similar
benchmarks but that do not meet this
volume criterion do not become subject
to pricing volatility when a component
security is the subject of a Trading
Pause, non-leveraged ETPs that have
traded below this volume criterion, but
that track the same benchmark as an
ETP that does meet the volume
criterion, will be deemed eligible to be
included as a Tier 1 NMS Stock.’’ The
Participants note that based on
experience thus far with the Plan,
certain thinly traded ETPs with wide
quotes that are included as Tier 1 NMS
Stocks because they track an index of an
ETP that meets the volume criterion are
triggering Trading Pauses.27 These
Trading Pauses are triggered because of
bids or offers that cross the Price Band
rather than because of an execution of
a trade in the underlying security. This
results in certain ETPs that have not
traded during the day triggering Trading
Pauses and requiring a reopening
auction process, despite the lack of
trading in that security.28 The
amendment to Section I of Appendix A
will reduce the potential for certain
thinly-traded NMS Stock in Tier 1 that
have not experienced any trading
volatility to be halted and then have to
go through a reopening auction process.
Based on the Participants’ statements,
the Commission believes that the
proposal to amend Section I of
26 The Participants noted that Primary Listing
Exchanges will be filing proposed rule changes with
the Commission to update their respective closing
procedures to address the ability to permit
additional interest to be entered for the purpose of
a closing auction if there is a Trading Pause
declared near the end of Regular Trading Hours. See
Notice, supra note 4.
27 The Participants noted that since the initial
date of Plan operations through to July 8, 2013,
there have been 32 Trading Pauses in NYSE Arcalisted securities triggered pursuant to the Plan.
These Trading Pauses have been in only ten NMS
Stocks, some more than once a day, and all are
ETPs with less than $2,000,000 notional ADV. The
symbols are BXDB, BDG, GIY, VIOO, BOS, SAGG,
IELG, IESM, HUSE, and GMTB. See id.
28 See id.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Oct 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
Appendix A of the Plan is consistent
with Section 11A of the Act.
The Commission reiterates its
expectation that the Participants will
continue to monitor the scope and
operation of the Plan and study the data
produced during that time with respect
to such issues, and will propose any
modifications to the Plan that may be
necessary or appropriate.29 Similarly,
the Commission expects that the
Participants will propose any
modifications to the Plan that may be
necessary or appropriate in response to
the data being gathered by the
Participants during the pilot period,
including any proposed changes to
thinly-traded NMS Stocks in Tier 2 that
have not experienced any trading
volatility.
Therefore, the Commission finds that
the Fifth Amendment to the Plan is
consistent with Section 11A of the
Act 30 and Rule 608 thereunder.31
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 11A of the Act 32 and Rule 608
thereunder, 33 that the Fifth Amendment
to the Plan (File No. 4–631) be, and it
hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.34
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–24019 Filed 10–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–70520; File No. SR–
NYSEARCA–2013–94]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the NYSE Arca
Equities Schedule of Fees and
Charges for Exchange Services
Regarding Calculation of the Mid-Point
Passive Liquidity Order Tier
September 26, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on
29 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091
(May 31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012).
30 15 U.S.C. 78k–1.
31 17 CFR 242.608.
32 15 U.S.C. 78k–1.
33 17 CFR 242.608.
34 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(29).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60939
September 17, 2013, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to proposes to
amend the NYSE Arca Equities
Schedule of Fees and Charges for
Exchange Services (the ‘‘Fee Schedule’’)
regarding calculation of the Mid-Point
Passive Liquidity (‘‘MPL’’) Order Tier.
The Exchange proposes to implement
the fee change on October 1, 2013. The
text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fee Schedule regarding calculation of
the MPL Order Tier.4 The Exchange
proposes to implement the fee change
on October 1, 2013.
Under the MPL Order Tier, MPL
Orders that provide liquidity to the
Exchange receive a credit of $0.0020 per
share for Tape A, B and C Securities. As
specified in the Fee Schedule, the MPL
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69926
(July 3, 2013), 78 FR 41154 (July 9, 2013) (SR–
NYSEArca–2013–67). A Passive Liquidity (‘‘PL’’)
Order is an order to buy or sell a stated amount of
a security at a specified, undisplayed price. See
Rule 7.31(h)(4). An MPL Order is a PL Order
executable only at the midpoint of the Protected
Best Bid and Offer. See Rule 7.31(h)(5).
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
60940
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2013 / Notices
Order Tier currently applies to ETP
Holders, including Market Makers, that
execute an average daily volume
(‘‘ADV’’) of MPL Orders during the
month that is 0.0775% or more of U.S.
consolidated ADV (‘‘CADV’’).5 For all
other fees and credits, Tiered or Basic
Rates apply based on a firm’s qualifying
levels.6
The Exchange proposes to specify that
the 0.0775% threshold includes only
MPL Orders that provide liquidity,
whereas the Fee Schedule currently
specifies that it includes executed MPL
Orders, which could also include MPL
Orders that remove liquidity. For
example, if U.S. CADV during a month
is 6.5 billion shares across Tapes A, B
and C, an ETP Holder would need to
execute an ADV of at least 5,037,500
shares of providing MPL Orders during
the month in order to qualify for the
applicable MPL Order Tier credit of
$0.0020 per share, in which case the
ETP Holder’s executions of MPL Orders
that provided liquidity would receive a
credit of $0.0020 per share for Tape A,
B and C Securities. Under this example,
an ETP Holder that executed an ADV of
less than 5,037,500 shares of providing
MPL Orders during the month would
not qualify for the MPL Order Tier and,
therefore, the ETP Holder’s executions
of MPL Orders that provided liquidity
would receive a credit of $0.0015 per
share for Tape A, B and C Securities.
The proposed change is not otherwise
intended to address any other issues,
and the Exchange is not aware of any
problems that ETP Holders would have
in complying with the proposed change.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,7 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,8 in
particular, because it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its
members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly
discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change is reasonable because
the proposed specification would result
5 U.S. CADV means United States Consolidated
Average Daily Volume for transactions reported to
the Consolidated Tape and excludes volume on
days when the market closes early.
6 For ETP Holders that do not satisfy the MPL
Order Tier threshold, an MPL Order that provides
liquidity receives a credit of $0.0015 per share for
Tape A, B and C Securities. A $0.0030 fee applies
to MPL Orders in Tape A, B and C Securities that
remove liquidity.
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Oct 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
in the MPL Order Tier threshold relating
only to volume that provides liquidity,
which would be identical to the type of
volume to which the corresponding
credit would apply. The Exchange also
believes that the proposed change is
reasonable because the MPL Order Tier
and corresponding credit of $0.0020 per
share would continue to incentivize
ETP Holders to submit additional MPL
Orders that provide liquidity on the
Exchange. This would continue to
increase the liquidity available on the
Exchange and, therefore, potential price
improvement to incoming marketable
orders submitted to the Exchange. In
this regard, MPL Orders allow for
additional opportunities for passive
interaction with trading interest on the
Exchange and are designed to offer
potential price improvement to
incoming marketable orders submitted
to the Exchange.9 The Exchange also
believes that the proposed change is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the MPL Order
Tier would continue to be available to
all ETP Holders to qualify for and would
apply equally to providing MPL Orders
from all ETP Holders in all Tape A, B
and C Securities traded on the
Exchange.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it
is subject to significant competitive
forces, as described below in the
Exchange’s statement regarding the
burden on competition.
For these reasons, the Exchange
believes that the proposal is consistent
with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,10 the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Instead, the Exchange believes that the
proposed change would continue to
encourage competition, including by
attracting additional liquidity to the
Exchange, which would continue to
make the Exchange a more competitive
venue for, among other things, order
execution and price discovery. All ETP
Holders have the ability to submit MPL
Orders, and ETP Holders could readily
choose to submit additional liquidityproviding MPL Orders in order to
qualify for the MPL Order Tier. The
Exchange does not believe that the
proposed change will impair the ability
9 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
54511 (September 26, 2006), 71 FR 58460, 58461
(October 3, 2006) (SR–PCX–2005–53).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of ETP Holders or competing order
execution venues to maintain their
competitive standing in the financial
markets.
Finally, the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily favor competing venues if they
deem fee levels at a particular venue to
be excessive. In such an environment,
the Exchange must continually review,
and consider adjusting, its fees and
credits to remain competitive with other
exchanges. For the reasons described
above, the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change reflects this
competitive environment.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 11 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 12
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 13 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
12 17
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2013 / Notices
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2013–94 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEARCA–2013–94. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2013–94 and should be
submitted on or before October 23,
2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2013–24011 Filed 10–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
[Release No. 34–70511; File No. SR–EDGX–
2013–35]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change to Amend EDGX Rule
11.13, Clearly Erroneous Executions
September 26, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 25, 2013, EDGX Exchange,
Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the
Commission a proposal to extend a pilot
program related to Rule 11.13, entitled
‘‘Clearly Erroneous Executions.’’ The
Exchange also proposes to remove
certain references to individual stock
trading pauses contained in Rule
11.13(c)(4). The Exchange has
designated this proposal as noncontroversial and provided the
Commission with the notice required by
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act.3 All
of the changes described herein are
applicable to EDGX Members. The text
of the proposed rule change is available
on the Exchange’s Internet Web site at
www.directedge.com, at the Exchange’s
principal office, and at the Public
Reference Room of the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
2 17
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Oct 01, 2013
Jkt 232001
60941
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to extend
the effectiveness of the Exchange’s
current rule applicable to Clearly
Erroneous Executions and to remove
references to individual stock trading
pauses described in Rule 11.13(c)(4).
Portions of Rule 11.13, explained in
further detail below, are currently
operating as a pilot program set to
expire on September 30, 2013.4 The
Exchange proposes to extend the pilot
program to April 8, 2014.
On September 10, 2010, the
Commission approved, on a pilot basis,
changes to Exchange Rule 11.13 to
provide for uniform treatment: (1) of
clearly erroneous execution reviews in
multi-stock events involving twenty or
more securities; and (2) in the event
transactions occur that result in the
issuance of an individual stock trading
pause by the primary listing market and
subsequent transactions that occur
before the trading pause is in effect on
the Exchange.5 The Exchange also
adopted additional changes to Rule
11.13 that reduced the ability of the
Exchange to deviate from the objective
standards set forth in Rule 11.13,6 and
in 2013, adopted a provision designed
to address the operation of the Plan to
Address Extraordinary Market Volatility
Pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS
under the Act (the ‘‘Limit Up-Limit
Down Plan’’ or the ‘‘Plan’’).7 The
Exchange believes the benefits to market
participants from the more objective
clearly erroneous executions rule
should continue on a pilot basis through
April 8, 2014, which is one year
following the commencement of
operations of the Plan. The Exchange
believes that continuing the pilot during
this time will protect against any
unanticipated consequences. Thus, the
Exchange believes that the protections
of the Clearly Erroneous Rule should
continue while the industry gains
4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68814
(February 1, 2013), 78 FR 9086 (February 7, 2013)
(SR–EDGX–2013–06).
5 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62886
(September 10, 2010), 75 FR 56613 (September 16,
2010) (SR–EDGX–2010–03).
6 Id.
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091
(May 31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (the
‘‘Limit Up-Limit Down Release’’); see also Exchange
Rule 11.13(i).
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60939-60941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24011]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-70520; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2013-94]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE
Arca Equities Schedule of Fees and Charges for Exchange Services
Regarding Calculation of the Mid-Point Passive Liquidity Order Tier
September 26, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on September 17, 2013, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Equities
Schedule of Fees and Charges for Exchange Services (the ``Fee
Schedule'') regarding calculation of the Mid-Point Passive Liquidity
(``MPL'') Order Tier. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee change
on October 1, 2013. The text of the proposed rule change is available
on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule regarding
calculation of the MPL Order Tier.\4\ The Exchange proposes to
implement the fee change on October 1, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69926 (July 3,
2013), 78 FR 41154 (July 9, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2013-67). A Passive
Liquidity (``PL'') Order is an order to buy or sell a stated amount
of a security at a specified, undisplayed price. See Rule
7.31(h)(4). An MPL Order is a PL Order executable only at the
midpoint of the Protected Best Bid and Offer. See Rule 7.31(h)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the MPL Order Tier, MPL Orders that provide liquidity to the
Exchange receive a credit of $0.0020 per share for Tape A, B and C
Securities. As specified in the Fee Schedule, the MPL
[[Page 60940]]
Order Tier currently applies to ETP Holders, including Market Makers,
that execute an average daily volume (``ADV'') of MPL Orders during the
month that is 0.0775% or more of U.S. consolidated ADV (``CADV'').\5\
For all other fees and credits, Tiered or Basic Rates apply based on a
firm's qualifying levels.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ U.S. CADV means United States Consolidated Average Daily
Volume for transactions reported to the Consolidated Tape and
excludes volume on days when the market closes early.
\6\ For ETP Holders that do not satisfy the MPL Order Tier
threshold, an MPL Order that provides liquidity receives a credit of
$0.0015 per share for Tape A, B and C Securities. A $0.0030 fee
applies to MPL Orders in Tape A, B and C Securities that remove
liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to specify that the 0.0775% threshold
includes only MPL Orders that provide liquidity, whereas the Fee
Schedule currently specifies that it includes executed MPL Orders,
which could also include MPL Orders that remove liquidity. For example,
if U.S. CADV during a month is 6.5 billion shares across Tapes A, B and
C, an ETP Holder would need to execute an ADV of at least 5,037,500
shares of providing MPL Orders during the month in order to qualify for
the applicable MPL Order Tier credit of $0.0020 per share, in which
case the ETP Holder's executions of MPL Orders that provided liquidity
would receive a credit of $0.0020 per share for Tape A, B and C
Securities. Under this example, an ETP Holder that executed an ADV of
less than 5,037,500 shares of providing MPL Orders during the month
would not qualify for the MPL Order Tier and, therefore, the ETP
Holder's executions of MPL Orders that provided liquidity would receive
a credit of $0.0015 per share for Tape A, B and C Securities.
The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other
issues, and the Exchange is not aware of any problems that ETP Holders
would have in complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in
particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and
other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed change is reasonable
because the proposed specification would result in the MPL Order Tier
threshold relating only to volume that provides liquidity, which would
be identical to the type of volume to which the corresponding credit
would apply. The Exchange also believes that the proposed change is
reasonable because the MPL Order Tier and corresponding credit of
$0.0020 per share would continue to incentivize ETP Holders to submit
additional MPL Orders that provide liquidity on the Exchange. This
would continue to increase the liquidity available on the Exchange and,
therefore, potential price improvement to incoming marketable orders
submitted to the Exchange. In this regard, MPL Orders allow for
additional opportunities for passive interaction with trading interest
on the Exchange and are designed to offer potential price improvement
to incoming marketable orders submitted to the Exchange.\9\ The
Exchange also believes that the proposed change is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because the MPL Order Tier would continue to be
available to all ETP Holders to qualify for and would apply equally to
providing MPL Orders from all ETP Holders in all Tape A, B and C
Securities traded on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54511
(September 26, 2006), 71 FR 58460, 58461 (October 3, 2006) (SR-PCX-
2005-53).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement
regarding the burden on competition.
For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\10\ the Exchange
does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden
on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. Instead, the Exchange believes that the
proposed change would continue to encourage competition, including by
attracting additional liquidity to the Exchange, which would continue
to make the Exchange a more competitive venue for, among other things,
order execution and price discovery. All ETP Holders have the ability
to submit MPL Orders, and ETP Holders could readily choose to submit
additional liquidity-providing MPL Orders in order to qualify for the
MPL Order Tier. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed change
will impair the ability of ETP Holders or competing order execution
venues to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually
review, and consider adjusting, its fees and credits to remain
competitive with other exchanges. For the reasons described above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this
competitive environment.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \11\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \12\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \13\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
[[Page 60941]]
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please
include File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2013-94 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2013-94. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2013-94 and should
be submitted on or before October 23, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-24011 Filed 10-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P